安徽省高等院校学科带头人评价指标体系研究
|
摘要
目的意义：高等院校学科带头人的评价是学科带头人管理的重要内容，是发现、选拔和合理使用高层次人才的前提。学科带头人评价的关键是制定科学的评价办法，制定科学评价办法的关键是根据高校学科带头人的专业工作特点，建立科学、合理的评价指标体系。目前安徽省还没有一套完整的、科学的、符合我省高校实际的学科带头人考核指标体系。本研究在我省尚属首次。
研究方法：首先通过文献调研，从高校学科带头人的岗位职责和履行岗位职责的素质、能力和绩效三个方面进行分析，建立指标体系雏形，在此基础上应用Delphi方法，经过三轮正式预测完成本研究工作。
三轮咨询有效回表率分别为96.8％、100％、100％。应邀咨询专家32名，其中，管理、教育理论专家4名，高校人事管理实践专家9名、高校教学、科研管理实践专家10名，省级以上学科带头人9名。三轮咨询均是在32位专家人数不变的情况下进行，有效保证了本次研究的完整性、可靠性。
研究结果：经过三轮Delphi方法咨询，初步建立了“安徽省高等院校学科带头人评价指标体系”，该指标体系由政治思想、学术水平、领导能力、工作业绩4项一级指标和政治表现、职业道德、人格素质、学术造诣、学术地位、外文水平、受教育程度、获取信息能力、选题能力、学术交流、组织教学能力、组织科研能力、协调沟通能力、开拓创新能力、承担课题、科研成果、专著论文、培养人才、学科建设、实验室(资料室)建设20项二级指标组成，并对各指标赋予权重。
经过三轮专家咨询，专家对二级指标的变异系数均小于0.5，各一级指标的协调系数分别为0.415、0.502、0.386、0.436，说明专家对所有二级指标评价的离散程度小，协调性较好，预测结果是可靠和可信的。
Objective and significance: The evaluation of the foregoers in their specialties is important contents in the management of higher education institution . It is also the prerequisite to find out, select and make reasonable usage of higher level talents .The importance of evaluating the foregoers in their specialties is to work out a scientific evaluation method whose key point is to set up a scientific and reasonable evaluation target system according to the characteristics of the foregoers' specialties .Up to now , Anhui province has not processed a set of entire and scientific target system to evaluate the foregoers in their specialties in higher education institution . Method: The foregoers' sense of responsibility, capability and achievements in their working posts were analyzed after studying the reference and then 4 items of first-class target and 21 items of second-class target were put forward. The research was completed with the help of Delphi method which has been done three times, receiving three-
round valid forms: 96. 8%,
100%, 100% respectively . 32 advisory specialists were invited among whom 4 are in management and education theory, 9 in personnel management in higher education institutions, 10 in college management practice of teaching and scientific research and 9 foregoers in their specialties above provincial level. The three-round advisory results were all obtained from the same 32 specialists so as to guarantee the entirety and reliability of the research.
Conclusion: After three-rounds of consultation by Delphi method, the evaluation target system of foregoers in their specialties in higher education institutions of Anhui province has been set up , which is composed of 4 items of first-class target including political awareness, academic level, leading ability and work achievements and 20 items of second-round target including political behavior, professional morals, personal quality, academic accomplishment, academic status, foreign language level, educational degree , ability to obtain information , to choose project , to conduct academic exchange, to organize teaching , to organize research, to coordinate and to innovate , undertaking projects of research , the results of research, the publication of works and papers , the training of talents , the discipline development and the laboratory development. In
addition, the importance of the above-mentioned items is various.
After three-rounds of consultation, the variation coefficients are smaller than 0. 5 and the Coordination coefficient of the four-class first targets is 0. 415, 0. 502, 0.386, 0.436 respectively. Which shows that the result of the established target system is both reliable and credible.
研究方法：首先通过文献调研，从高校学科带头人的岗位职责和履行岗位职责的素质、能力和绩效三个方面进行分析，建立指标体系雏形，在此基础上应用Delphi方法，经过三轮正式预测完成本研究工作。
三轮咨询有效回表率分别为96.8％、100％、100％。应邀咨询专家32名，其中，管理、教育理论专家4名，高校人事管理实践专家9名、高校教学、科研管理实践专家10名，省级以上学科带头人9名。三轮咨询均是在32位专家人数不变的情况下进行，有效保证了本次研究的完整性、可靠性。
研究结果：经过三轮Delphi方法咨询，初步建立了“安徽省高等院校学科带头人评价指标体系”，该指标体系由政治思想、学术水平、领导能力、工作业绩4项一级指标和政治表现、职业道德、人格素质、学术造诣、学术地位、外文水平、受教育程度、获取信息能力、选题能力、学术交流、组织教学能力、组织科研能力、协调沟通能力、开拓创新能力、承担课题、科研成果、专著论文、培养人才、学科建设、实验室(资料室)建设20项二级指标组成，并对各指标赋予权重。
经过三轮专家咨询，专家对二级指标的变异系数均小于0.5，各一级指标的协调系数分别为0.415、0.502、0.386、0.436，说明专家对所有二级指标评价的离散程度小，协调性较好，预测结果是可靠和可信的。
Objective and significance: The evaluation of the foregoers in their specialties is important contents in the management of higher education institution . It is also the prerequisite to find out, select and make reasonable usage of higher level talents .The importance of evaluating the foregoers in their specialties is to work out a scientific evaluation method whose key point is to set up a scientific and reasonable evaluation target system according to the characteristics of the foregoers' specialties .Up to now , Anhui province has not processed a set of entire and scientific target system to evaluate the foregoers in their specialties in higher education institution . Method: The foregoers' sense of responsibility, capability and achievements in their working posts were analyzed after studying the reference and then 4 items of first-class target and 21 items of second-class target were put forward. The research was completed with the help of Delphi method which has been done three times, receiving three-
round valid forms: 96. 8%,
100%, 100% respectively . 32 advisory specialists were invited among whom 4 are in management and education theory, 9 in personnel management in higher education institutions, 10 in college management practice of teaching and scientific research and 9 foregoers in their specialties above provincial level. The three-round advisory results were all obtained from the same 32 specialists so as to guarantee the entirety and reliability of the research.
Conclusion: After three-rounds of consultation by Delphi method, the evaluation target system of foregoers in their specialties in higher education institutions of Anhui province has been set up , which is composed of 4 items of first-class target including political awareness, academic level, leading ability and work achievements and 20 items of second-round target including political behavior, professional morals, personal quality, academic accomplishment, academic status, foreign language level, educational degree , ability to obtain information , to choose project , to conduct academic exchange, to organize teaching , to organize research, to coordinate and to innovate , undertaking projects of research , the results of research, the publication of works and papers , the training of talents , the discipline development and the laboratory development. In
addition, the importance of the above-mentioned items is various.
After three-rounds of consultation, the variation coefficients are smaller than 0. 5 and the Coordination coefficient of the four-class first targets is 0. 415, 0. 502, 0.386, 0.436 respectively. Which shows that the result of the established target system is both reliable and credible.
引文
1、燕红、杨潮，高校学科带头人考核中应注意的几个问题，中国高教研究，2000(3)：48
2、吴俊卿等，绩效评价理论方法——在科研机构的实践，科学技术文选出版社，1992
3、曾光，现代流行病学方法与应用，北京医科大学中国协和医科大学出版社，1994(8)：42-48
4、胡永宏、贺思辉，综合评价方法，科学出版社，2000．10
5、肖平等，论学科带头人协调能力与素质的培养，湖南医科大学学报(社会科
学版)，2000，2
6、曾超、茅林春，高校学科带头人的职责、素质与培养，高等农业教育，2001，9(总123)
7、吴康宁，充当学科带头人：意涵与要件，南京师大学报(社会科学版)，2002，2
8、张富良，关于培养学术带头人的思考，中国高教研究，2001，第9期
9、汲培文，学科带头人、学术带头人定义与含义界定，科学学研究，2000，9
10、郭耀邦、吕庆良，高校跨世纪学科带头人培养的对策，科学学研究，1993，3(第17卷第1期)
11、刘继荣，学术带头人的地位作用以及影响力探悉，http://szpx.net.cn/szpzyj/1996/1/1-02.htm
12、杨潮等，高校学科带头人队伍考核与激励机制的创新与完善，中国高教研究，2001，第8期
13、陈韶光等，跨世纪学术带头人评价指标体系与模式研究
14、华危持等，议学科带头人的学识素质和能力，中华医学科研管理杂志，2000．VOL13．NO．4
15、朱长超，特尔菲法，社会科学，1996(5)：69-70
16、王唯，特尔菲调查法，教育科学研究，1990(4)：21-24
17、杨树勤，卫生统计学，人民卫生出版社，1996．11(第3版)：16
18、萧鸣政，现代人事考评技术及其应用，中国人民大学出版社，79-122
19、蒋烽、刘顺利，应用特尔菲(Delphi)法筛选卫生事业管理指标，中国卫生统计，1988，2：23-25
20、戴均陶，现代管理评价技术，机械工业出版社，1994．9
21、许世民等，卫生防疫工作指标体系初探，中国公共卫生(管理版)，1987，3(1)：15-18
22、倪宗瓒，卫生防疫工作指标的筛选与评价，中国卫生事业管理，1989，2：23-25
23、胡善联、马鸣岗，管理流行病学，中国环境科学出版社，1992，7：347-373
24、冯之浚等，实用预测技术，科学学与科学技术管理杂志社，1983，第一章 特尔菲法
25、刘苏等，国有企业改革绩效综合评价方法研究，数量经济技术研究，2002(2)：25-29
2、吴俊卿等，绩效评价理论方法——在科研机构的实践，科学技术文选出版社，1992
3、曾光，现代流行病学方法与应用，北京医科大学中国协和医科大学出版社，1994(8)：42-48
4、胡永宏、贺思辉，综合评价方法，科学出版社，2000．10
5、肖平等，论学科带头人协调能力与素质的培养，湖南医科大学学报(社会科
学版)，2000，2
6、曾超、茅林春，高校学科带头人的职责、素质与培养，高等农业教育，2001，9(总123)
7、吴康宁，充当学科带头人：意涵与要件，南京师大学报(社会科学版)，2002，2
8、张富良，关于培养学术带头人的思考，中国高教研究，2001，第9期
9、汲培文，学科带头人、学术带头人定义与含义界定，科学学研究，2000，9
10、郭耀邦、吕庆良，高校跨世纪学科带头人培养的对策，科学学研究，1993，3(第17卷第1期)
11、刘继荣，学术带头人的地位作用以及影响力探悉，http://szpx.net.cn/szpzyj/1996/1/1-02.htm
12、杨潮等，高校学科带头人队伍考核与激励机制的创新与完善，中国高教研究，2001，第8期
13、陈韶光等，跨世纪学术带头人评价指标体系与模式研究
14、华危持等，议学科带头人的学识素质和能力，中华医学科研管理杂志，2000．VOL13．NO．4
15、朱长超，特尔菲法，社会科学，1996(5)：69-70
16、王唯，特尔菲调查法，教育科学研究，1990(4)：21-24
17、杨树勤，卫生统计学，人民卫生出版社，1996．11(第3版)：16
18、萧鸣政，现代人事考评技术及其应用，中国人民大学出版社，79-122
19、蒋烽、刘顺利，应用特尔菲(Delphi)法筛选卫生事业管理指标，中国卫生统计，1988，2：23-25
20、戴均陶，现代管理评价技术，机械工业出版社，1994．9
21、许世民等，卫生防疫工作指标体系初探，中国公共卫生(管理版)，1987，3(1)：15-18
22、倪宗瓒，卫生防疫工作指标的筛选与评价，中国卫生事业管理，1989，2：23-25
23、胡善联、马鸣岗，管理流行病学，中国环境科学出版社，1992，7：347-373
24、冯之浚等，实用预测技术，科学学与科学技术管理杂志社，1983，第一章 特尔菲法
25、刘苏等，国有企业改革绩效综合评价方法研究，数量经济技术研究，2002(2)：25-29