民航发动机机群调度优化与视情维修决策方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
由于航空公司机队运行环境和季节性等因素的影响,一段时期航空公司会出现发动机的拆换率高峰,此时各航空公司的发动机往往都不够用。另一段时期,又会出现发动机的拆换率低谷,出现大量的发动机闲置库存,造成资金积压。如果只从单机出发,由于没有照顾到全机队的备用发动机(以下简称备发)资源状况及机队拆换率的不均衡等情况,容易因缺少发动机(以下简称缺发)导致飞机停飞、拆换率不均衡及备发数量过大等问题,造成经济和信誉度的双重损失。针对单机维修决策的局限性,本文以机群为考察对象,研究机群的调度优化和视情维修决策理论与方法。主要内容如下:
     第一,研究了基于性能参数的航空发动机寿命预测方法。通过引入性能可靠性概念将可靠性和实际性能联系起来,建立了基于机群退化数据的平均寿命预测模型,得到了动态环境下机群平均寿命和性能可靠性控制方法。同时,结合两种时序分析方法,研究了基于单机退化数据的在翼剩余寿命预测方法,实例分析表明基于ARIMA模型的预测方法的精度优于基于HOLT算法的航空发动机在翼剩余寿命预测方法。
     第二,调度计划涵盖了发动机使用、送修和库存等全方位信息,因此,本文从调度计划方法研究着手,综合考虑了大修成本、排序规则、梯次技术和发动机在翼寿命、备用发动机数量、计划期长度和保障率等多种成本驱动因素,建立了机群维修保障成本评估模型。与其它机群使用维修保障评估方法相比较,该方法更全面、更系统、更能体现航空公司安全与经济两大运营目标,可以用来指导航空公司的具体发动机维修管理活动。以此为基础进一步研究了基于带约束并行机调度遗传算法的航空发动机调度优化方法、SSPT拆换率平滑方法和最优备发数量确定方法,分别实例说明了各种方法的有效性。
     第三,根据单机的功能故障时间点和风险,不能做出机队全局费用最优的下发时机决策。本章针对单台航空发动机维修决策的局限性,从工程实际需求出发,提出了基于状态的民航发动机机群维修的概念,建立了民航发动机机群维修决策的随机多目标函数模型,通过运用粗糙集理论和免疫粒子群方法优化了多台发动机在翼寿命以及时寿件的成组维修决策问题。
     第四,在借鉴国内外调度的相关方法和软件的基础上,结合上海航空公司实际工程需求,运用机群维修决策理论和方法,开发了航空发动机调度系统。
Because of the operating environment and seasonal factors, during a period of time the engine removal peak rate will be appeared in the airline when the engines of the airlines are not enough. While for another period of time there would give rise to low engine removal rate, a large number of idle inventory and a backlog of funds. If considering the single engine only, without taking into account the preparation of resources of the whole fleet, it easily make due to lack of aircraft grounded, the unbalanced rate of fleet removal, the large number of spare engines and the double loss of the economy and credibility. To address limitations of the maintenance decision-making based on the single engine, fleet maintenance decision-making theory is researched in this thesis. The main research content is as following:
     Firstly, a prediction method for the life of aero-engine based on the degradation data is researched by introducing the concept of performance reliability which linked the reliability and actual performance. The fleet performance reliability model based on Weibull distribution is established. The average expectancy life and performance reliability control method of the aero engine fleet are obtained under dynamic environment. And at the same time, a real-time reliability prediction method based on two time series analysis models is proposed applying on aero engine to predict the residual life of single aero engine on wings. The results indicate that the forecasting accuracy of the method based on. ARIMA model- is superior to the method-based on HOLT algorithm.
     Secondly, a wide range of information of the engine repair, use and stocks is covered in the scheduling scheme. Therefore, an evaluation method of the fleet maintenance cost to scheduling program is proposed, cost drivers such as the cost of the overhaul, sorting rules, echelon technology, engine life on the wings, the number of spare engines, length of plans and the protection rate. Compared with other assessment methods for aero engine fleet maintenance and support, the method proposed in this paper is more comprehensive, more systematic and better realization of the airline security and economic objectives. It can be used to guide the airline's specific engine maintenance management activities. Based on this, some researches are developed such as the genetic algorithm of aero engine fleet scheduling with constrain of parallel machine, a SSPT (shifted shortest processing time) method to smooth the removal rate of aero engine fleet, the optimization method the amount of spare engine. Examples of analysis were used to illustrate the effectiveness of these methods.
     Thirdly, according to the time and risk of functional failure based on single engine, the optimal timing of fleet maintenance decisions making under the overall cost can not be made. Therefore, to avoid the limit of single engine maintenance decision making, a random multi-objective decision making model of fleet maintenance and optimization method is studied based on conditions from practice. A concept about fleet maintenance decisions making is proposed based on contions. A decision-making method for the removal timing of aero engine and life limited parts is established by introducing the profomace condicong which resulted in a security risk and loss of machine performance and the materials cost of components. Applying the combination method based on rough set theory to estimate the cost of maintenance, the removal timing of engine and life limited parts is optimized by particle swarm method of immunization.
     Fourthly, based on the relevant methods of scheduling and software of home and abroad, combining Shanghai Airlines practical works, an aero engine scheduling system is developed by using the theory and methods of fleet maintenance decision.
引文
[1]张宝珍.预测与健康管理技术的发展及应用.测控技术, 2008, 27(2):5~7.
    [2] Andy Hess, The Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Prognostics and Health Management, NDIA 4th Annual Systems Engineering Conference, 2001.
    [3] USAF. Condition-based maintenance plus (CBM+) initiative. Air force Logististics Management Agnecy, 2003.
    [4] http://landmarc.gtri.gatech.edu/research/cbm.html
    [5] http://www.lifetime-reliability.com/condition_based_maintenance.html
    [6] Bickford R L. Health management and controls for Earth-to-orbit propulsion systems. Acta Astronautica, 1995, 35(6):411~419.
    [7] ISHEM. [EB/OL]. ti.arc.nasa.gov/projects/ishem/. 2006-6-30/2008-5-7.
    [8] Gill, J.J.; Lessons learned from rotary- and fixed-wing HUMS applications, Aerospace Conference Proceedings, IEEE, 2000,6.
    [9] Hess,A.; Calvello,G.; Dabney,T.; PHM a key enabler for the JSF autonomic logistics support concept,Aerospace Conference, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE,Volume 6.
    [10] Scheuren W J, Caldwell K A, Goodman G A, et al. Safety & The Military Aircraft Joint Strike Fighter Prognostics and Health Management. Proceeding of AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE 34th Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Cleveland, OH. AIAA, 1998:1~7.
    [11] Butcher S W. Assessment of Condition-Based Maintenance in the Department of Defense. LG903B1, McLean, Virginia, USA: Logistic Management Institute, DoD, 2000: 1~70.
    [12]曾声奎, Michael G.Pecht,吴际.故障预测与健康管理(PHM)技术的现状与发展,航空学报.2005, 26(5):626~632.
    [13] Jaw L C. ICEMS: a platform for advanced condition-based health management. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, IEEE. 2001:2909~2914.
    [14] Larder B, Azzam H, Trammel C, et al. Smith Industries HUMS: changing the M from monitoring to management. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2000 IEEE. Big Sky, MT, USA. US: IEEE, 2000:449~455.
    [15] Roemer M J. Engine Health Monitoring System for Advanced Diagnostic Monitoring for Gas Turbine Engines [R]. AFRL-PR-WPTR-1998-2120, 1998: 1~91.
    [16] Larkin J A, Moawad E G, Pieluszczak D P. Functional Aspects of, and Trade Considerations for,an "In-Space" Application-Optimized Engine Health Management System (EHMS). Proceeding of AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE 41st Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Tucson, AZ, USA. AIAA, Inc, 2005:1~8.
    [17] Nickerson B, Lally R. Development of a smart wireless networkable sensor for aircraft engine health management. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, IEEE. 2001:3255~3262.
    [18] Sandborn P, Pecht M. Introduction to special section on electronic systems prognostics and health management . Microelectronics Reliability, 2007, 47(12):1847~1848.
    [19] Sandborn P A, Wilkinson C. A maintenance planning and business case development model for the application of prognostics and health management (PHM) to electronic systems. Microelectronics Reliability, 2007, 47(12):1889~1901.
    [20] Yu L J, Cleary D J, Cuddihy P E. A novel approach to aircraft engine anomaly detection and diagnostics. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2004 IEEE. IEEE, 2004:3468~3475.
    [21] Roemer M J, Dzakowic J, Orsagh R F, et al. Validation and verification of prognostic and health management technologies. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2005 IEEE. IEEE, 2005:3941~3947.
    [22] Semega K. Embedded Sensors for Measurement of Material Properties - Needs Direction, and Technology. Proceeding of AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE 41st Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Tucson, AZ,USA. AIAA, Inc, 2005:1~12.
    [23] Kobayashi T, Simon D L. Integration of On-Line and Off-Line Diagnostic Algorithms for Aircraft Engine Health Management. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines & Power, 2007, 129(4):986~993.
    [24] Leader S, Friend R. A probabilistic, diagnostic and prognostic system for engine health and usage management. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2000 IEEE. 2000:185~192.
    [25] Fisher C E. Gas path debris monitoring-a 21st century PHM tool. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2000 IEEE. 2000:441~448.
    [26] Guralnik V, Mylaraswamy D, Voges H. On handling dependent evidence and multiple faults in knowledge fusion for engine health management. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2006 IEEE. 2006:1~9.
    [27] Figueroa F, Holland R, Schmalzel J, et al. ISHM Implementation for Constellation Systems. Proceeding of 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. AIAA, 2006:1~13.
    [28] Li C, Lei Y. Fault Diagnosis for an Aircraft Engine Based on Information Fusion. Proceeding ofMechatronics, 2006 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2006:199~202.
    [29] Curry T, Behbahani A. Propulsion directorate/control and engine health management (CEHM): real-time turbofan engine simulation. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2004 IEEE. 2004:3414~3423.
    [30] Azzam H, Beaven F, Smith A, et al. FUMS Technologies for Advanced Structural PHM. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE. 2007:1~12.
    [31] Byington C S, Kalgren P W, Donovan B P, et al. Streamlined avionics PHM utilizing portable information and reasoning. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2005 IEEE. IEEE, 2005:3547~3554.
    [32] Millar R C. A Systems Engineering Approach to PHM for Military Aircraft Propulsion Systems. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE. 2007:1~9.
    [33] Wade R A. A Need-focused Approach to Air Force Engine Health Management Research. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2005 IEEE. 2005:1~13.
    [34] Mercer C R, Simon D L, Hunter G W, et al. Fundamental Technology Development for Gas-Turbine Engine Health Management [R]. NASA-20070022364, 2007. 1~14.
    [35] Xu R, Zhang G, Zhang X, et al. Sensor Validation Using Nonlinear Minor Component Analysis [R]. AFRL-PR-WPTP-2006-275, 2006. 1~10.
    [36] Litt J S, Simon D L, Garg S, et al. A Survey of Intelligent Control and Health Management Technologies for Aircraft Propulsion Systems. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication, 2004, 1(12):543~563.
    [37] Luppold R, Brotherton T, Volponi A. Adaptive On-Wing Gas Turbine Engine Performance Estimation. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE. 2007:1~12.
    [38] Volponi A, Brotherton T. A bootstrap data methodology for sequential hybrid engine model building. Proceeding of Aerospace Conference, 2005 IEEE. 2005:3463~3471.
    [39] Litt J, Simon D L, Meyer C, et al. NASA aviation safety program Aircraft Engine Health Management Data Mining Tools roadmap. SPIE (ed), Proceeding of the 14th Annual International Symposium on Aerospace/Defense Sensing, Simulation and Controls Aerosense. Orlando, FL, USA. Bellingham, WA, USA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), 2000:292~298.
    [40]郑哲敏,赵亚溥. PHM——机械失效的预测和安全管理系统.力学进展, 1999, 29(2):268, 243.
    [41]张宝珍,曾天翔.先进的故障预测与状态管理技术.测控技术, 2003, 22(11):4~6.
    [42]张宝珍. 21世纪的保障方案——JSF的自主式后勤.航空维修与工程, 2003(1):27~29.
    [43]王克昌.液体火箭发动机的健康管理系统.上海航天, 1992(1):27~35.
    [44]木志高,胡海峰,胡茑庆.武器装备故障预测及健康管理系统设计.兵工自动化, 2006, 25(3):20~21.
    [45]张叔农,谢劲松,康锐.电子产品健康监控和故障预测技术框架.测控技术, 2007, 26(2):12~16.
    [46]徐萍,康锐.预测与状态管理系统(PHM)技术研究.测控技术, 2004, 23(12):58~60.
    [47]孙博,康锐,谢劲松.故障预测与健康管理系统研究和应用现状综述.系统工程与电子技术, 2007, 29(10):1762~1767.
    [48]孙博,康锐,谢劲松. PHM系统中的传感器应用与数据传输技术.测控技术, 2007, 26(7):12~14.
    [49]朱睿,刘槟.飞机健康管理数据挖掘方法研究.中国民航学院学报, 2004, 22(S1):150~153.
    [50]高占宝,梁旭,李行善.复杂系统综合健康管理.测控技术, 2005, 24(8):1~5.
    [51]王萍.先进传感器技术在飞机故障诊断中的应用.测控技术, 2007, 26(3):27~29.
    [52]姜永军.简论设备安全运行与维护维修智能管理系统.冶金设备, 2005(5):54~56.
    [53]潘全文,李天,李行善.预测与健康管理系统体系结构研究. Proceeding of第十七届全国测控计量仪器仪表学术年会(MCMI'2007)论文集(上册).中国福建厦门. 2007:32~37.
    [54]李爱军,章卫国,谭键.飞行器健康管理技术综述.电光与控制, 2007, 14(3):79~83.
    [55]彭云. RLV健康管理方案及关键系统监控原理.[硕士学位论文],西安:西北工业大学, 2005.
    [56]龙兵,孙振明,姜兴渭.航天器集成健康管理系统研究.航天控制, 2003(2):56~61.
    [57]黄伟斌.发动机健康管理的自适应机载实时模型.[硕士学位论文],南京:南京航空航天大学, 2007.
    [58] Jaw L C. Recent Advancements in Aircraft Engine Health Management (EHM) Technologies and Recommendations for the Next Step. Proceeding of Turbo Expo 2005: 50th ASME International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Technical Congress. Nevada. 2005:1~13.
    [59] R. E. Barlow, R. Proschan. Optimum preventive maintenance policies. Opens Res., 1960, 8: 90~100.
    [60] P. A. Scarf. On the application of mathematical models in maintenance. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 99(4): 493~506.
    [61] J. J. McCall. Maintenance policies for stochastically failing equipment: a survey. Management Science, 1965, 10(1): 85~97.
    [62] W. P. Pierskalla, J. A. Voelker. A survey of maintenance models: the control and surveillance ofdeteriorating systems. Naval Research Logistics, 1976, 23: 353~388.
    [63] Y. S. Sherf, M. L. Smith. Optimal maintenance models for systems subject to failure - a review. Naval Research Logistics, 1981, 28(1): 47~74.
    [64] C. Valdez-Flores, R. M. Feldman, A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Naval Research Logistics, 1989, 36: 419~446.
    [65] I. D. Cho, M. Parlar. A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991, 51: 1~23.
    [66] R. Dekker, R.E. Wildeman, F. Van Der Duyn schouten. A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence. Mathematical Methods of Operational Research, 1997, 45(3): 411~435.
    [67] H. Wang. A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 139(3): 469~189.
    [68]蔡景.民用飞机系统维修规划方法研究,[博士学位论文].南京:南京航空航天大学,2007.
    [69] D. Assaf, J. G. Shanthikumar. Optimal group maintenance policies with continuous and periodic inspections. Management Science, 1987, 33(11): 1140~1452.
    [70] J. G. Wilson, A. Benmerzouga. Optimal m-failure policies with random repair time. Operations Research Letters, 1990, 9: 203~209.
    [71] K. Okumoto, E. A. Elsayed. An optimum group maintenance policy. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1983, 30: 667~674.
    [72] P. Ritchken, J. G. Wilson. (m, T) group maintenance policies. Management Science, 1990, 36: 632~639.
    [73] Y. W. Archibald, R. Dekker. Modified block-replacement for multiple-component systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1996, 45 (1):75~83.
    [74] R. Dekker, R.E. Wildeman, F. Van Der Duyn schouten. A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence. Mathematical Methods of Operational Research, 1997, 45(3): 411~435.
    [75] G. Van Dijkhuizen, A. van Harten. Optimal clustering of repetitive frequency -constrained maintenance jobs with shared setups. Technical report University of Twente. The Netherlands, 1995.
    [76] S. K. Goyal, M. I. Kusy. Determining economic maintenance frequency for a family of Machines. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1985, 36: 1125~1128.
    [77]周林,王君等.军事装备管理预测与决策.北京:国防工业出版社,2007.
    [78] Vittal S, Hajela P, Joshi A. Review of Approaches to gas turbine life management. Proceeding of 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. New York. 2004:1-11.
    [79] Enright M P, Huyse L, Mcclung R C, et al. Probabilistic Methodology for Life Prediction of Aircraft Turbine Rotors. Proceeding of Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments: Earth & Space 2004. Houston, TX. 2004:453-460.
    [80] Suarez E, Hansen J, Duffy M, et al. New Approach to Tracking Engine Life. Proceeding of 33rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE. Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibition. Seattle, WA. 1997:1-6.
    [81] Jardine, A.K.S, etc.“Applications of the Weibull proportional hazards Model to Aircraft and Marine Engine Failure Data”, Quality & Reliability Engineering International, 1987,3: 77~82.
    [82] David Mark Kennet.“A Structural Model of Aircraft Engine Maintenance”, Journal of Applied Econometrics.1994, 9 (4): 351~368.
    [83] W. J. Hopp, Y. L. Kuo.“Heuristics for multicomponent joint replacement: Applications to aircraft engine maintenance”, Naval Research Logistics.1998, 45: 435~458.
    [84] Dinesh Kumar, U. Crocker, J., Knezevic. Evolutionary maintenance for aircraft engines, Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1999: 62~68.
    [85]白广忱,王延荣.航空发动机空中停车率的优化,北京航空航天大学学报,2000,26(4): 393~395.
    [86]梁剑.基于成本优化的航空发动机视情维修决策研究,[博士学位论文].南京:南京航空航天大学,2005.
    [87]宋金光,许春生.基于遗传算法和BP网络的航空发动机拆换期望值预测.航空动力学报, 2003,18 (05):676~680 .
    [88] Brothernton Tom. Prognosis of faults in gas turbine engines,2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference,Vol.6,Big Sky,Montana,USA,2001:163~171.
    [89] Zaita,Performance Deterioration modeling in aircraft gas turbine engines,Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine Engine & Power,1998,120(2):344~349.
    [90] Davison C.R, Birk A.M, Development of Fault Diagnosis and Failure Prediction Techniques for small Gas Turbine Engines, ASME 2002-GT-548.
    [91] Roemer M.J.,Development of diagnostic and prognostic technologies for aerospace health management applications , IEEE Aerospace Conference,Big Sky,Montana,USA,2001,6 :3139~3147.
    [92] http://www.efpac.com
    [93] http://www.jeteplan.com
    [94]何立武.备份航空发动机和教练机数量计算方法.航空学报. 1996,17(3) :383~384.
    [95]周圣林,吕日毅.航空发动机周转量计算与控制.海学航空工程学院学报. 2006, 21(3):322~324.
    [96]段宝军,孙志安,张恒喜.航空发动机备份量面向对象仿真研究.指挥技术学院学报. 2000, 11(6):34~38.
    [97]尚柏林,张恒喜,刘晓东.飞机后续备件供应保障系统面向对象仿真.系统工程与电子技术.2001, 23(7):38~51.
    [98]韦昀.利用统计技术确定航空公司备发数量.民航科技. 2003, (4):48~52.
    [99]吴学辉,陶增元.多型航空发动机备份量的决策方法.航空发动机.2005,31(1):40~43
    [100] R. Matson , R. Halsmer. Smoothing CFM56 engine removal rate at USAir utilizing ADEPT.AIAA 92-3928, AIAA 17th Aerospace Ground Testing Conference. USAir,Pittsburgh,PA,1992:1~7.
    [101] W.Wang.A.H.Christer. Towards a general condition based maintenance model for a stochastic system, Journal of Operational Research Society, 2000, 51:145~155.
    [102] W.Wang.PA.Scard. MAJ Smith.On the application of a model of condition-based maintenance. Journal of Operational Research Society, 2000, 51:1218~1227.
    [103] Yunxian jia.Wenbin Wang.A debelopment of a condition based maintenance model and its prototype software. The 5th International Conference on Reliability. Maintenance and Satety.Dalian.China.2002: 622~667.
    [104] A.Grall.C.Bérenguer.L.Dieulle. A condition based maintenance policy for stochastically deteriorating system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety.2002, 76:167~180.
    [105] Peter Bruns. Optimal maintenance strategies for systems with partial repair options and without assuming bounded costs. European Journal of Operational Research. 2002, 139(1):146~165.
    [106]ülküGürler. Alev Kaya. A maintenance policy for a system with multi-state components: an approximate solution. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2002, 76(2):117~127.
    [107] C.G. Vassiliadis. E.N.Pistikopoulos. Maintenance scheduling and process optimization under uncertainty. Computers &Chemical Engineering, 2001, 25:217~236.
    [108] J.H. Chiang. J.yuan. Optimal maintenance polity for a Markovian system under periodic inspection. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2001, 71(2):165~172.
    [109] Bodegraven G. V. Commercial aircraft DOC methods. AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aircraft Design, Systems and Operations Conference. Dayton, OH, AIAA, 1990:1~6.
    [110] NASA. A new method for estimating current and future transport aircraft operating economics. Washington, DC:National Aeronautics and Space Adminidtration, 1978.
    [111] Gordon R. E. Evaluation and selection of new aircraft for eighties. AIAA Aircraft Systems Meeting. Anaheim, California, AIAA, 1980:1~5.
    [112] AEA. Short-medium range aircraft AEA requirments. Burssel: AEA, 1989.
    [113] Olaf R. Engine maintenance costs. ENGINE YEARBOOK, 2005: 20~25.
    [114] Yoshihiko T., Shinichi N., et al. Large engine maintenance technique to support flight operation for commercial airlines. Tchnical Review, 2003, 40(2): 1~5.
    [115] Li Jiang, CF34-10A maintenance costs. China: GE Aircraft Engines, 2003.
    [116] AFAM. Understanding maintenance costs for new and existing aircraft. Airline Fleet & Asset Management, 2001(5): 56~62.
    [117] Day M. J., Stahr R. S. A technique for engine maintenance cost forcasting. Washington, DC:Rolls-Royce, Inc., 1979.
    [118] Glade M. Modelisation des couts de cycle de vie: prevision des couts de maintenance et de la fiabilite application a i'aeronautique. St Etienne CEDEX, France: MEGA doctoral school, 2005.
    [119] Fitzpatrick M., Paasch R. Analytical method for the prediction of reliability and maintainability based life-cycle labor costs. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 1999, 121(4): 606~613.
    [120] Birkler J. L., Garfinkle J. B., Marks K. E. Development and production cost estimating relationships for aircraft turbine engines. Washington: RAND, 1982.
    [121]徐志勇,彭友梅.航空发动机全寿命费用分析研究.航空系统工程, 1997(5): 39~44.
    [122] Fitzpatrick M., Paasch R. Analytical method for the prediction of reliability and maintainability based life-cycle labor costs. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 1999, 121(4): 606~613.
    [123] Chitra T. Life based maintenance policy for minimum cost. 2003 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Tampa, FL, 2003:470~472.
    [124] Jae-Hak L., Park D. H. Evaluation of average maintenance cost for imperfect-repair model. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1999, 48(2): 199~204.
    [125] Zequeira R. I., Berenguer C. Maintenance cost analysis of a two-component parallel system with failure interaction. RAMS 2004. Los Angeles, USA, 2004:220~225.
    [126]王修方.干线飞机直接使用成本的计算方法.民用飞机设计与研究, 1995(3): 39~43.
    [127]叶叶沛.支线客机直接使用成本计算方法.西飞科技, 1992(2): 21~25.
    [128]严善法,刘磊.民用飞机市场工作指南.北京:航空工业出版社, 1992.
    [129]王柏学,郭忱,汪大海.民用飞机销售工程系统(CASES).国际航空, 1997(9): 25~27.
    [130]都业富.民用飞机经济评价新方法.航空学报, 1995, 16(4): 509~511.
    [131]杨晓.浅谈飞机维修成本管理.江苏航空, 2004(3): 30~31.
    [132]张宇,张赪.航空公司企业维修成本控制程序中的细节管理.民航管理, 2005, 171(1): 58~61.
    [133]张建梅.降低维修成本探讨.中国民用航空, 2004, 48(11): 68.
    [134]许峰.加强航空公司机务维修成本管理的若干建议.海南金融, 2005(1): 63~66.
    [135]朱建军.浅谈飞机维修成本的控制.航空公司管理, 2002(3): 20~22.
    [136]李宗琦.关于我国航空机务维修成本管理信息化的思考.计算机工程, 2005, 31(增刊): 15~19.
    [137]何大文.航空企业维修成本控制. [硕士学位论文],成都,四川大学, 2004.
    [138]白暴力,杨琳,陈云翔.飞机维修费用估算的分析.空军工程大学学报, 2005, 6(5): 8~10.
    [139] Wu Jing-min, Zuo Hong-fu, Chen Yong. An estimation method for direct maintenance cost of aircraft components based on particle swarm optimization with immunity algorithm. Proceedings of International Workshop on Sustainable Manufacturing, Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2005, 12(Suppl.2): 95~101.
    [140]倪凯.航空发动机维修成本评估与分析. [硕士学位论文],南京,南京航空航天大学, 2002.
    [141]王伟.航空发动机维修成本评估研究. [硕士学位论文],南京,南京航空航天大学, 2001.
    [142]于玺强.民用飞机直接运营成本分析与建模. [硕士学位论文],南京,南京航空航天大学, 2004.
    [143]徐志勇,彭友梅.航空发动机全寿命费用分析研究.航空系统工程, 1997(5): 39~44.
    [144]莫布雷J.以可靠性为中心的维修[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 1995.
    [145] Bengtsson M. Standardization Issues in Condition Based Maintenance. Proceeding of the 16th International Congress of Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management. V?xj?, Sweden. 2003:1~10.
    [146] Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L. Maintenance concept development: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 89(3):395~405.
    [147]戎翔.民航发动机健康管理中的寿命预测与维修决策方法研究,[博士学位论文].南京:南京航空航天大学,2008.
    [148]郝英.基于智能技术的民航发动机故障诊断和寿命预测研究,[博士学位论文].南京:南京航空航天大学,2006.
    [149]郝英,发动机起飞EGT裕度的估算,航空维修与工程,2004(2):39~40.
    [150] Pratt&Whintey,Engine health monitoring(EHM)training guide,USA,Pratt&Whintey CustomerTraining Center,2001.
    [151] Pratt&Whintey,Engine condition monitoring(ECM)II training guide,USA,Pratt&Whintey Customer Training Center,1997.
    [152] GE Aircraft Engine/CFMI, Eegnie condition monitoring,USA,GEAE/CFMI,2001.
    [153] Boeing,B737 Aircraft Maintenance Manual(AMM),USA,Boeing,2001:ATA75-31-00:520~520,
    [154]许春生,民航发动机使用可靠性研究结题报告(该项目获国家科技进步二等奖),中国民航学院,2000.
    [155]贺尔铭,宋力涛.EGT影响因素分析及提高EGT裕度的措施.航空维修,1996,(6) :20~21
    [156]潘红宇.时间序列分析.北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社,2006.
    [157]吴振锋,左洪福,孙有朝.航空发动机磨损故障的常用监控手段及其对比.航空工程及维修, 2000.5: 25~27.
    [158]张树京,齐立心.时间序列分析简明教程.北京:清华大学出版社, 2003.
    [159]赵建印.基于性能退化数据的可靠性建模与应用研究,[博士学位论文].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2005.
    [160] LU H, KOLARIK W J, LU S S. Real-time performance reliability prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2001,50(4):353~357.
    [161]徐俊刚,戴国忠,王宏安.生产调度理论和方法研究综述.计算机研究与发展,2004,41(2):257~267.
    [162]唐恒永,赵传立.排序引论.北京:科学出版社,2002.
    [163]唐国春,张峰,罗守成等.现代排序论[M].上海:上海科学普及出版社.2003.
    [164]左洪福,张海军,戎翔.基于比例风险模型的航空发动机视情维修决策,航空动力学,2006,21(4):716~721.
    [165] GRAHAM R H. Bounds on multiprocessing timing anomalies. SIAM J Appl Math, 1969, 17: 416~429.
    [166] CHEN BO. A review of on-line machine scheduling: algorithms and competitiveness. Mathematical Theory and Application, 1999, 19(3):1~15.
    [167] CHEN BO, Vestjens. A P A. Scheduling on identical Machines: How Good is LPT in an On-line Setting. Operations Research Letters, 1997, 21:165~169.
    [168]陈仕平,张国川.两台平行机的实时到达在线排序.应用数学学报,2000,23(1):31~37.
    [169]王凌.车间调度及其遗传算法.北京:清华大学出版社.2003.
    [170] Kacprzynski G J, Roemer M J, Hess A J. Health management system design: development, simulation and cost/benefit optimization. Aerospace Conference Proceedings.2002-06:3065~3072.
    [171] ZHANG B Z, ZENG T X. Advanced Prognostics and Health Management Technology.Measurement & Control Technology,2003,22(11):4~6.(in Chinese)
    [172] Hess A, Fila L. The joint strike fighter(JSF) PHM concept: potential impact on aging aircraft problems.Aerospace Conference Proceedings.2002,06:3021~3026.
    [173]白芳,左洪福,文振华,戎翔,赵红华.基于视情维修策略的航空发动机调度方法.交通运输工程学报,2007,(03):29~33.
    [174] DoD. Use of cost estimating relationship versus accounting models for estimating maintenance and repair costs: A methodology demonstration, DoD: AD-A186 923: Washington.
    [175]梁剑,左洪福.民用飞机维修成本评估.交通运输学报, 2002. 2(4): 95~98.
    [176]甘茂治,康建设,高琦.军用装备维修工程学.北京:国防工业出版社,1999.
    [177]刘思峰,郭天榜,党耀国.灰色系统理论及其应用.北京:科学出版社,1999.
    [178]刘思锋,党耀国.预测方法与技术.北京:高等教育出版社, 2005.
    [179] Kennedy J., Eberhart R. C. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth, Australia, 1995:1942~1948.
    [180]吴静敏,左洪福,陈勇.基于免疫粒子群算法的组合预测方法.系统工程理论方法应用, 2006, 15(3): 229~233.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700