针药结合治疗脑梗死急性期、恢复期临床观察
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:观察针药结合治疗脑梗死急性期、恢复期的临床疗效,为临床提出新的有效思路。
     方法:以脑梗死为研究对象,选取江苏省第二中医院针灸科急性脑梗死住院病人100人:急性期40人、恢复期患者60人。将急性期的患者按住院顺序先后编号,按奇、偶数分为针药治疗组和药物对照组,每组20人;将恢复期的患者按住院顺序先后编号,按1、2、3次序及倍数分为针药治疗组、针刺对照组和药物对照组,每组20人。急性期针药组采用针刺醒脑开窍法结合头针,药物选用依达拉奉和血塞通;药物组和针药组所选药物相同。恢复期针药组针刺采用醒脑开窍法结合头针,药物选用乙酰谷酰胺和血塞通;药物组和针药组所选药物相同;针刺组和针药组所采用针刺法相同。每周连续治疗5天,休息2天,4周为一疗程。根据神经功能缺损程度评分、日常生活能力等指标进行观察,并统计治疗后各组疗效。观察对比脑梗死急性期针刺结合神经保护剂与单纯使用神经保护剂的疗效差异,脑梗死恢复期针刺结合药物治疗、单纯使用药物治疗与单纯使用针刺治疗的疗效差异。
     结果:急性期:针药结合组基本痊愈7例,显著进步9例,进步3例,无效1例,总有效率为95%;药物组基本痊愈2例,显著进步3例,进步8例,无效7例,总有效率为65.%。神经功能缺损积分降低值比较,治疗后,针药结合组为14.52±5.64,药物组为10.84±6.06,提示针药结合组神经功能缺损积分降低值明显高于针刺组。Barthel指数变化比较,经治疗后,针药结合组为78.89±13.782分,药物组为64.05±15.563分,提示针药结合组Barthel指数明显高于针刺组。经统计学分析,针药结合组疗效优于药物组(P<0.05)。恢复期:针药结合组基本痊愈3例,显著进步9例,进步6例,无效2例,总有效率为90.0%;针刺组基本痊愈2例,显著进步11例,进步4、例,无效3例,总有效率为85.0%,药物组基本痊愈2例,显著进步3例,进步6例,无效9例,总有效率为65.0%。神经功能缺损积分比较,治疗后,针药结合组为18.12±3.81,针刺组为17.35±2.79,药物组12.08士5.20,提示针药结合组神经功能缺损积分降低值明显高于药物组,但和针刺组无明显差异。Barthel指数变化比较,经治疗后,针药结合组为75.63±14.79分,针刺组为71.15±11.02分,药物组56.52±15.26分,提示针药结合组Barthel指数明显高于药物组,但和针刺组无明显差异。经统计学分析,针药结合组疗效优于药物组(P<0.05),但和针刺组无明显差异(P>0.05)。
     结论:急性期针药结合组治疗效果明显优于药物组,恢复期针药结合组治疗效果虽然优于药物组,但与单纯针刺治疗无明显差异。
Objective:This research dies observe the efficacy of acute cerebral infarction with acupuncture and simple drug treatment, and the efficacy of recovery with simple drug treatment,simple acupuncture and acupuncture compared drug, propose new and effective clinical treatment.
     Method:In this study, as the study with cerebral infarction, acute cerebral infarction through the control of acupuncture combined use of neuroprotective agents with simple differences in the efficacy of neuroprotective agents, controlled study of acupuncture combined with drug treatment cerebral recovery, simple to use and simple drug treatment differences in the efficacy of using acupuncture. Select the second Hospital of Jiangsu Province, acupuncture 100 patients with acute cerebral infarction:acute 40,60 convalescent patients. Patients with acute phase of the order has numbered according to hospital, according to odd and even numbers are divided into acupuncture and drug treatment group control group 20; the recovery of patients by hospital number sequence has, by order of points 1,2,3 for the acupuncture group, acupuncture group and drug control group of 20 people. Continuously for 5 days per week,2 days off for 4 weeks, after a course of treatment based on neurological deficit scores, activities of daily living such as observation, and statistical assessment of treatment efficacy in each group compared.
     Results:Acute phase:effect of acupuncture combined group than the acupuncture group, drug group (P<0.05). Neurologic impairment effect of comparing acupuncture combined set of basic recovery in 7 cases, significant progress in 9 cases, progress in 3 patients,1 case, the total effective rate was 95%; drugs set of basic recovery in 2 cases, significant progress in 3 cases, progress 8 Cases,7 cases, total effective rate was 65.%. Barthel index in comparison, after treatment, acupuncture combined group was 78.89±13.782 points, the drug group was 64.05±15.563 points, suggesting that acupuncture combined group was significantly higher than the acupuncture group Barthel Index. Recovery:effect of acupuncture combined group than the drug group (P<0.05), and the acupuncture group but no significant difference (P> 0.05). Comparative efficacy of neurologic impairment, the basic acupuncture combined with group 3 patients recovered,9 cases of significant progress, progress in 6 cases,2 cases, the total effective rate was 90.0%; basic acupuncture group recovered in 2 cases,11 cases of significant progress, progress 4 cases and 3 cases, the total effective rate was 85.0%, the basic drug group recovered in 2 cases,3 cases of significant progress, progress in 6 cases,9 cases, total effective rate was 65.0%. Barthel index in comparison, after treatment, acupuncture combined group was 75.65±14.794 points, the acupuncture group was 71.45±15.023 points, drug group,56.52±15.248 points, suggesting that acupuncture combined group was significantly higher than the Barthel index drug group, but, and No significant difference between the acupuncture group.
     Conclusion:Acute effects of acupuncture combined treatment group was significantly better than the drug group and recovery effect of acupuncture combined treatment group although better than the drug group, acupuncture group, but recovery of cerebral infarction treated with acupuncture combined and simple acupuncture treatment was no significant difference Indicating that acupuncture combined therapy in patients with acute cerebral infarction of limb function, activities of daily living improved significantly improve, with clinical significance. Recovery of cerebral infarction treated with acupuncture alone could be taken.
引文
01杨期东.神经病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:118
    02王维治.神经病学.第四版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:130-134
    03吴正国,吴以岭.中药对缺血性脑损伤保护作用的研究进展[J]国外医学中医中药分册,2004,26(2):70-73
    04周纡,樊永平,胡磷媛,等.脑梗死急性期的中医药研究进展[J].北京中医,2006(9):570-572
    05石学敏.针刺治疗中风病的临床研究[J].上海针灸杂志,1992,(4):4
    06李熳,穆腊梅.王兴.头针疗法治疗中风进展[J].中国针灸,1993,11(3):87
    07马松涛.头针治疗中风偏瘫的临床观察[J].河北中医,1993,15(1):28
    08于志顺.头针刺激区与头部腧穴关系[J].中医药学报,1987,1(1):7
    09石宪,张志芳,李晓燕,等.头部“菱形区”,治疗中风偏瘫的临床研究[J].针灸学报,1991,7(3):35
    10范刚启,蔡辉,赵凌杰,等.对目前针灸治疗中风病研究的儿点建议[J].中国针灸2004,4(6):434-436
    11许佳年,贾怡蓓,韩天雄,等.针药结合对脑梗塞患者血脂和血液流变学的影响[J]辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(12):1528-1529
    12陈东.缺血性脑卒中发病机制研究新进展Foreign Medical Science Section on Neurology & Neurosurgery,2001,28(1):32-34
    13 Martin,R.L,Lloyd HQCowan AI.The early events of oxygen and glu-cose deprivation:setting the scene for neuronal death Trends Neurosci,1994; 17:251-257
    14 Kaufmann AM,Firlik AD,Fukui MB,et al.Ischemic core and penrmbrain human stroke. Stroke, 1999;30(1):93-99
    15 Bond A,O'Neill MJ,Hicks CA,et al.Neuroprotective effects of a sys-temically active group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonis LY35470 in a gerbil model of global ischaemia. Neuroreport,1998;9191-193
    16 Hossmann,KA.Viability thresholds and the penumbra of focal ischemia.Ann Neurol,1994; 36:557-565
    17 SiesjoBK,Elmer E,Janelidze S,et al.Role and mechanisms of secondary mitochondrial failure. Acta Neurochir Suppl(Wien),1999;73:7-13
    18 Obrenovitch,TP.The ischemic penumbra:twenty years on CerebrovascBrain Metab. Rev.1995;7(4):297-323
    19 Hossmann,KA.Periin farct depolarizations. Cerebrovasc. Brain MetabRev,1996;8:195-208
    20 Mies G,Iijima T,Hossmann KA.Correlation between peri-infarct DCshifts and ischaemic neuronal damage in rat. Neuroreport,1993;4:70-71
    21 O'Neill LA,Kaltschmidt C. NF-kappa B:a crucial transcription facto for glial and neuronal cell function. Trends Neurosci,1997;20(6):25-28
    22 Iadecola C,Salkowski CA,Zhang F,et al.The transcription factor inter-feron regulatory factor 1 is expressed after cerebral ischemia and con-tributes to ischemic brain injury. J Exp Med,1999; 189(4):719-727
    23 Planas AM,Soriano MA,Berruezo M, et al.Induction of stat3,a signal transducer and teanscreption factor in reactive microglia following tran-sient focal cerebral ischaemia. Eur J Neurosci,1996;8(12):2612-2618
    24 Duan W,Gui L,Zhou Z,et al.Adenosine A(2A)receptor deficencyexacerbates white matter lesions and cognitive deficits induced bychronic cerebral hypoperfusion in mice [J].Neurol Sci,2009,285(1):39-45
    25 Ritter Ls,Orozco jA,Coull BM,et al.Leukocyte accumulation and hemodynamic changes in the cerebral microcirculation during early reperfusion after stroke,2000,31(5):1153-1161
    26 Rothwell NJ,Hopkins SJ.Cytokines and the nervous system Ⅱ:Actionsand mechanisms of action. Trends Neurosci,1995;18:130-136
    27 Iadecola C. Bright and dark sides of nitric oxide in ischemic brain in-jury. Trends Neurosci,1997;20: 132-139
    28 Leist M, Nicotera P. Apoptosis, excitotoxicity, and neuropathology.Exp Cell Res,1998;239(2):183-201
    29 Chinnaiyan AM.O'Rourke K,Lane BR,et al.Interaction of CED-4with CED-3 and CED-9:a molecular framework for cell death. Sci-ence,1997;275(5303):1122-1126
    30 Hickenbottom SL, Grotta J. Neuroprotective therapy [J].Semin Neurol,1998,18 (4) 485-492.
    31黄如训,苏镇培.脑卒中[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:185.
    32高希言等.针药结合研究的探讨[J].中医杂志,1999,40(9):562—56334
    34徐斌,陆金平,孙建华等.针药结合对缺血性脑血管病患者神经肽的影响[J].中国临床康复,2001,19(7):2646-2647
    35陈莉秋.针药结合治疗脑梗死32例疗效观察[J].河北中医,2008,30(1):67-68
    36许佳年,贾怡蓓,韩天雄等.针药结合对脑梗死患者血脂和血液流变学的影响[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(12):1528-1529
    37高建平,邱霞,廉世松.早期补肾醒脑针法干预缺血性中风患者神经功能缺损的临床观察[J].中华中医药杂志,2008,23(4):367-368
    38李宗桥,韩永,陈会君.针药结合对急性脑梗死患者神经功能恢复的影响[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(10):25-26
    39严文广,谢雪姣,黄政德,等.针药结合干预大鼠局灶性脑缺血组织ATP酶活性及能量代谢的研究[J]湖南中医药大学学报,2007,27(3):59-62。
    40陶陶,徐坚,董佑忠,等.电针及天麻对大鼠脑缺血再灌注后神经细胞凋亡及相关蛋白Bc1-2、Bax表达的影响[J]中国针灸,2004,24(9):645-648。
    41成泽东,陈以国,王树东.针药结合对脑缺血再灌注大鼠血清SOD、MDA及海马组织超微结构的影响[J]中医研究,2008,21(10):9-11。
    42中华神经科学会,中华神经外科学会.各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J).中华神经科杂志,1996,29:379—380.
    43国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组.中风病诊断与疗效评定标准(试行)[5].北京中医药大学学报,1996,19(1):55
    44全国第四次脑血管病学术会议.脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程序评分标准(1995)(J).中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):381—383
    45石学敏.中风病与醒脑开窍针刺法[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1998.5
    46康明明,张智龙.醒脑开窍针刺法主穴特征的稽考和再认识[J].辽宁中医药杂志,2010,37(5)917-918
    47杜元灏,冀健民.醒脑开窍针法中水沟穴作用探讨[J].中国针灸,2001,21(9):535-536.
    48付平,贾建平,王葳,等.电针内关和神门穴对脑功能成像不同影响的观察[J].中国针灸,2005,25(1):61-63.
    49赵宁伙,郭瑞林,任秦有,等.艾灸三阴交穴对健康人血液流变学及红细胞聚集指数的影响[J].云南中医学院学报,2003,26(4):31-32.
    50陈太福.三阴交为主针刺治疗单纯性高脂血症[J].黑龙江中医药,2003(1):43-44.
    51章嵘,邹燕琴,黄穗乔,等.脑功能磁共振成像在针刺合谷、足三里与内关、三阴交穴位后的影像学特征变化比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,22(11):4271-4274.
    52龚萍,张明敏,江利明,等.针刺三阴交的PET脑功能研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2006,26(2)119-121.
    53严振国.常用穴位解剖基础,[M]上海:上海中医药大学出版社,1990
    54焦顺发.头针,[M].山西人民出版社,1982,1-4
    55周利,张红星.头针治疗中风偏瘫的临床研究进展.湖北中医学院学报,2006,8(2):62
    56倪光夏.冉群芳.针药结合治疗脑梗死的规律性探讨,[J]辽宁中医药杂志,2008,35(12):1824-1825
    57范刚启.陆艳,赵杨,等针药结合治疗中风的系统分析,[J]针刺研究,2007,32(2):139-141

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700