谷歌数字图书馆版权问题及我国版权策略研究
|
摘要
谷歌曾公开发表言论称,“谷歌的任务是组织世界一切信息使其可普遍获得与使用”,为了实现这一崇高任务谷歌宣布了数字图书馆计划。谷歌数字图书馆解决版权授权问题所采取的版权策略打破以往常规,而这种版权策略是否具有法律合理性,需对谷歌数字图书馆版权合理使用、opt-out与和解协议进行分析。而对于版权持有者——作者的表现非常矛盾,需通过分析美国作家协会对谷歌的版权诉讼以了解版权人的真正意志。谷歌数字图书馆的版权策略是一种版权强权行为,同时存在潜在的版权垄断风险。文中最后分析了谷歌版权策略对我国法律与版权授权管理的影响,据此提出我国法律建设与授权管理的应对策略,认为我国版权法律建设应重新审视信息技术的影响、完善合理使用制度、建立孤儿作品版权保护制度、规范默示许可行为、重新思考侵权行为管辖的地域性；我国授权管理应加强行业自律、加强版权行政管理等。
Google has claimed that organizing the information all over the word is their final goal and making it available and usable for anyone in public, so Google Inc., announced a projection -- Google Books (Google Digital Library). The solution taken in Google digital library for resolving copyright have broken the routine, and whether this copyright policy is legal or not will be judged by the analyzing of fair use, opt out and Settlement Agreement. But for the authors'paradoxical performance, we have to know which is their real volition via analyze the Author's Guild vs. Google Inc., The copyright policy of Google is a compulsory copyright behavior, and at the same time there is a potential risk of copyright monopoly. Then, this paper analyses the impact to our law and copyright management coming from Google's copyright method. Based all on, The author throw out the relevant strategy in law building and authorization management, and point out that we should think over the influence of the information technology in a new perspective view at the time of legislation, and should improve the fair use doctrine, establish the protection system of the orphan work s copyright, take effort to standardize the implied license, and reconsider the jurisdiction's district of infringement. At last, this paper pinpoint that we should strengthen industry self-discipline and copyright administrative management in authorization.
Google has claimed that organizing the information all over the word is their final goal and making it available and usable for anyone in public, so Google Inc., announced a projection -- Google Books (Google Digital Library). The solution taken in Google digital library for resolving copyright have broken the routine, and whether this copyright policy is legal or not will be judged by the analyzing of fair use, opt out and Settlement Agreement. But for the authors'paradoxical performance, we have to know which is their real volition via analyze the Author's Guild vs. Google Inc., The copyright policy of Google is a compulsory copyright behavior, and at the same time there is a potential risk of copyright monopoly. Then, this paper analyses the impact to our law and copyright management coming from Google's copyright method. Based all on, The author throw out the relevant strategy in law building and authorization management, and point out that we should think over the influence of the information technology in a new perspective view at the time of legislation, and should improve the fair use doctrine, establish the protection system of the orphan work s copyright, take effort to standardize the implied license, and reconsider the jurisdiction's district of infringement. At last, this paper pinpoint that we should strengthen industry self-discipline and copyright administrative management in authorization.
引文
[1]Eric Schmidt. Books of Revelation[EB/OL]. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/point-of-google-print.html./,[2010-12-20]
[2]刘燕.Google Library版权政策对图书馆授权模式探索与创新的启示[J].情报资料工作.2008(6)：66-68
[3]孙瑞灼.“谷歌事件”只是网络版权保护混乱的冰山一角[N].中国商报.2009-10-27(001)
[4]韩玲.图书馆数字化新模式中的版权问题——从Authors Guild v. Google Print谈起[J].电子知识产权,2006(9)：53-56
[5]周园.争辩与理性：Google Library计划版权政策的思考[J].图书馆学刊,2009(2)：15-17
[6]张久珍.GOOGLE数字图书馆计划考虑合理使用原则[J].数字图书馆论坛,2006(3)：10-13
[7]林晓华.论数字图书馆的著作权问题——关于Google print试用版的运行与评价[J].农业图书情报学刊,2006,18(9)：128-130
[8]吕炳斌.反思著作权法——从Google数字图书馆说起[J].图书馆杂志,2007(5)：3-6
[9]Jonathan Band. The Google Print Library Project:Fair or Foul Use?[J]. Journal of internet law,2005,9(4):11-13.
[10]Hal R. Varian. The Google Library Project[EB/OL]. http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2006/google-library .pdf,[2011-01-30]
[11]Jonathan Band. The Google Library Project They Copyright Debate[EB/OL].www.policybandwidth.com. [2010-3-18]
[12]Lichtman D.Copyright as Innovation Policy:Google Book Search from a Law and Economics Perspective[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1472167.[2010-3-21]
[13]Sanford G. Thatcher.Fair Use in Theory and Practice:Reflections on Its History and the Google Case. Journal of Scholarly Publishing-Volume 37, Number 3, April 2006, pp.215-229
[14]Prasad A, Agarwala A.Armageddon on the digital superhighway:Will Google's e-library project weather the storm? [EB/OL]. www.compseconline.com/publications/prodclaw.htm.[2010-3-20 ]
[15]Proskine E A.Googles Technicolor Dreamcoat:A Copyright Analysis of the Google Book Search Library Project[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol.21:213.
[16]Elhauge E. Framing the Antitrust Issues in the Google Books Settlement[EB/OL]. www.competitionpolicyinternational.com.[2010-3-1 7]
[17]Grimmelmann J.The Amended Google Books Settlement Is Still Exclusive[J]. The CPI Antitrust Journal,2010 (2):1-6
[18]Randal C. Assessing Competition Issues in the Amended Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1507172. [2010-3-6]
[19]Joint N. The Google Book settlement and academic libraries[EB/OL]. www.emeraldinsight.com/0024-2535.htm. [2010-3-7]
[20]Eric M. Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement:The Problem of Simultaneity[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1417722.[2010-3-7]
[21]Christopher A. Continued DOJ Oversight of the Google Book Search Settlement:Defending Our Public Values, Protecting Competition [EB/OL]. http//:www.lowschool.gov.[2010-6-23]
[22]Band J.The long and winding road to the Google Books settlement[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2006(1):2-50
[23]Class action complaint jury trial demanded[EB/OL]. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/ca ndce/5:2008cv03888/208514/1/0.pdf[2011-02-11]
[24]Answer, jury demand, and affirmative defenses of defendant Google Inc. [EB/OL].docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/c andce/4.../0.pdf[2010-11-21]
[25]陈蓉,网络环境下著作权合理使用[D].长沙：湖南大学,2005(4)：5-6,
[26]马恒通,曹红毅.论图书馆的公益性[J].图书情报工作,2004,48(8)：103-104
[27]吕炳斌.网络时代的版权默示许可制度——两起Google案的分析.电子知识产权,2009(7)：73
[28]The Google Print Library Project:Fair or Foul Use? By Jonathan Band Journal of internet law Volume9 Number4 October 2005
[29]王迁,[荷]Lucie Guibault.中欧网络版权保护比较研究[M].北京：法律出版社,2008：P31
[30]王迁,[荷]Lucie Guibault.中欧网络版权保护比较研究[M]北京：法律出版社,2008：P169
[31]Jonathan Band. The-Google-Library-Project-They-Copyright-Debate. American Library Association January, 2006[EB/OL]. http://www.policybandwidth.com/.[2010-12-20]
[32]Jonathan Band. The-Google-Library-Project-They-Copyright-Debate. American Library Association January, 2006[EB/OL].http://www.policybandwidth.com/.[2010-12-20]
[33]Re: Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement, Case No. 1:05-CV-8136-DC (S.D.N.Y.) p7
[34]Hanratty E.Google library:beyond fair use?[EB/OL]. http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0010.html. [ 2010-3-21]
[35]吴汉东.著作权合理使用制度研究[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社,1996：31
[36]吴汉东.著作权合理使用制度研究[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社,1996：33
[37]梁志文,数字著作权论——以《信息网络传播权保护条例》为中心,北京：知识产权出版社,2007：184
[38]Lichtman D. Copyright as information policy:google book search from a law and economics Perspective[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1472167.[2010-3-21].
[39]Band J.Google and fair use.[EB/OL]. [2010-3-9]. http://www.policybandwidth.com/doc/20080211-MLB104.pdf
[40]Band J. The long and winding road to the Google books settlement[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2006(1):2-50
[41]Emily Anne Proskine. Google s Technicolor dreamcoat:a copyright analysis of the Google book search library project. [EB/OL]. http://creativecOmmOns.Org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcOde. [2010-02-0 7]
[42][美]理查德.A.波斯纳.法律的经济分析(上)[M].蒋兆康,译.北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1997：20
[43]James Grimmelmann. The Google Book Search Settlement:Ends, Means, and the Future of Books. [EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1388846 )
[44]P Samuelson. Legally Speaking:The Dead Souls of the Google Booksearch Settlement. portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1538800&type=pdf.[2011-01-20]
[45]MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO THE SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL ON BEHALF OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. Case No.05-cv-8136 (DC)[EB/OL]. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/n ew-york/nysdce/1:2005cv08136/273913/179/0.pdf. [2011-01-20]
[46]Band J. The long and winding road to the google books settlement[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2006(1):2-50
[47]Isabel Howe. How the Settlement Will Work. [EB/OL]http://www.google.com.[2011-01-20]
[48]Picker, Randal C. The Google Book Search Settlement:A New Orphan-Works Monopoly? [EB/OL]. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1387582.[2010-5-20]
[49]Pamela Samuelson. Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL]. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553894.[2010-05-06]
[50]Pamela Samuelson. Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL].papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553 894. [2010-05-06]
[51]Brin S. a library to last forever[EB/OL]. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/opinion/09brin.html?_r=1&scp=1&s q=Sergey%20Brin%20A%20Library%20to%20Last%20Forever&st=cse.[2010-3-21]
[52]Google gains with librarians-newsletter sign-ups boom;book sales launch;wheres library link?[EB/OL]. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-145065500/google-gains- librarians-newsletter.html.[2010-3-21]
[53]中国新闻网.默多克连手微软维权,数字图书馆让谷歌四面楚歌[N].http://www.chinanews.com.cn/it/it-itxw/news/2009/11-24/1981195.shtml. [ 2010-3-21]
[54]Pamela Samuelson. Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL]. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553894.[2010-05-06]
[55]James Love. A presentation of compulsory licensing, International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine 13 (2000) 153-161
[56]吴雨珊.谷歌数字图书馆初步扫清版权障碍出版.商务周报[N].2008-11-10
[57]衣俊卿.现代性焦虑与文化批判[M].黑龙江大学出版社,2007：321
[58]张骥,刘中民.文化与当代国际政治[M].北京：人民出版社,2003：54-55
[59]吴雨珊.谷歌版权和解按倒葫芦浮起瓢.出版商务周报[N].2008(11)
[60]靳生玺.谷歌搜索的不只是图书.信息网络[N].2009,(1)：63
[61]A. Dirlik, National Security Strategy of the U. S.1990-1991, Washington D. C.:Brasseys Press,1990:7-11
[62]张文忠.全球化背景下的文化霸权[M].南京：南京师范大学.2006：14
[63]A. Dirlik, National Security Strategy of the U. S.1990-1991, Washington D.C.:Brasseys Press,1990:7-11
[64][美]亨特,意识形态与美国外交政策[M],北京：世界知识出版社,1999：13
[65]作家协会VS.谷歌.The Purpose of Copyright Law in Canada[J]. university of ottawa law & technology journal.2005,2(2):318
[66]Survey of Advertisers and Agencies SEMPO.The State of Search Engine Marketing 2008[R]. www.sempo.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/2008_exec_summary.pdf [2011-01-2 0]
[67]Google. Google's Economic Impact (2009) [R]www.google.com/economicimpact/pdf/google_economicimpact.pdf.[20 11-01-20]
[68]CNNIC.2009年中国搜索引擎用户行为研究报告[R].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/.[2011-01-20]
[69]Lessig, L. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York:Basic Books,1999: 125
[70]Puay Tang. Digital copyright and the "new" controversy:Is the law moulding technology and innovation? [J]. Research Policy.2005,34(6):859
[71]Robert A. Gorman. Copyright Law (Second Edition). Federal Judicial Center2006.01:20
[72]Daniel J. Gervais. The Purpose of Copyright Law in Canada[J]. university of ottawa law & technology journal.2005,2(2):318
[73]贾颖.我国著作权集体管理制度研究[D].武汉：武汉大学.2004：12
[74]张敏.数字环境下版权集体管理研究[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2004.3：20
[75]陈蓉,网络环境下著作权合理使用[D].长沙：湖南大学2005.4：10
[76]马慧芳.论知识产权的行政保护[D].武汉：华东政法大学.2009：4
[77]我 国 数 字 图 书 馆 大 都 曾 陷 版 权 危 机http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/mtjj/2010/201002/t20100205_491954. html
[78]版权局：”数字图书馆”侵权问题需加强自律和监管,[2011-02-15]. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/mtjj/2010/201009/t201 00928_539548.html
[79]中国图书对外推广网.数字出版联盟成立大会——北京出版集团公司牵头组建 首 个 全 国 数 字 出 版 联 盟 [EB/OL].http://www.cbi.gov.cn/wisework/content/90334.html.[2011-02-19]
[80]The Google Print Library Project:A Copyright Analysis[EB/OL]. www.policybandwidth.com/doc/googleprint.pdf.[2010-11-18]
[81]Google Print Library Program: International Publishers Association Rejects Google's Copyright Policy Change As Insufficient[EB/OL]. www.sne.fr/…/05-08-17communiquedepresseUIEGooglePrintLibraryProg ramme.pdf.[2010-06-18]
[2]刘燕.Google Library版权政策对图书馆授权模式探索与创新的启示[J].情报资料工作.2008(6)：66-68
[3]孙瑞灼.“谷歌事件”只是网络版权保护混乱的冰山一角[N].中国商报.2009-10-27(001)
[4]韩玲.图书馆数字化新模式中的版权问题——从Authors Guild v. Google Print谈起[J].电子知识产权,2006(9)：53-56
[5]周园.争辩与理性：Google Library计划版权政策的思考[J].图书馆学刊,2009(2)：15-17
[6]张久珍.GOOGLE数字图书馆计划考虑合理使用原则[J].数字图书馆论坛,2006(3)：10-13
[7]林晓华.论数字图书馆的著作权问题——关于Google print试用版的运行与评价[J].农业图书情报学刊,2006,18(9)：128-130
[8]吕炳斌.反思著作权法——从Google数字图书馆说起[J].图书馆杂志,2007(5)：3-6
[9]Jonathan Band. The Google Print Library Project:Fair or Foul Use?[J]. Journal of internet law,2005,9(4):11-13.
[10]Hal R. Varian. The Google Library Project[EB/OL]. http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2006/google-library .pdf,[2011-01-30]
[11]Jonathan Band. The Google Library Project They Copyright Debate[EB/OL].www.policybandwidth.com. [2010-3-18]
[12]Lichtman D.Copyright as Innovation Policy:Google Book Search from a Law and Economics Perspective[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1472167.[2010-3-21]
[13]Sanford G. Thatcher.Fair Use in Theory and Practice:Reflections on Its History and the Google Case. Journal of Scholarly Publishing-Volume 37, Number 3, April 2006, pp.215-229
[14]Prasad A, Agarwala A.Armageddon on the digital superhighway:Will Google's e-library project weather the storm? [EB/OL]. www.compseconline.com/publications/prodclaw.htm.[2010-3-20 ]
[15]Proskine E A.Googles Technicolor Dreamcoat:A Copyright Analysis of the Google Book Search Library Project[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol.21:213.
[16]Elhauge E. Framing the Antitrust Issues in the Google Books Settlement[EB/OL]. www.competitionpolicyinternational.com.[2010-3-1 7]
[17]Grimmelmann J.The Amended Google Books Settlement Is Still Exclusive[J]. The CPI Antitrust Journal,2010 (2):1-6
[18]Randal C. Assessing Competition Issues in the Amended Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1507172. [2010-3-6]
[19]Joint N. The Google Book settlement and academic libraries[EB/OL]. www.emeraldinsight.com/0024-2535.htm. [2010-3-7]
[20]Eric M. Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement:The Problem of Simultaneity[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1417722.[2010-3-7]
[21]Christopher A. Continued DOJ Oversight of the Google Book Search Settlement:Defending Our Public Values, Protecting Competition [EB/OL]. http//:www.lowschool.gov.[2010-6-23]
[22]Band J.The long and winding road to the Google Books settlement[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2006(1):2-50
[23]Class action complaint jury trial demanded[EB/OL]. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/ca ndce/5:2008cv03888/208514/1/0.pdf[2011-02-11]
[24]Answer, jury demand, and affirmative defenses of defendant Google Inc. [EB/OL].docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/c andce/4.../0.pdf[2010-11-21]
[25]陈蓉,网络环境下著作权合理使用[D].长沙：湖南大学,2005(4)：5-6,
[26]马恒通,曹红毅.论图书馆的公益性[J].图书情报工作,2004,48(8)：103-104
[27]吕炳斌.网络时代的版权默示许可制度——两起Google案的分析.电子知识产权,2009(7)：73
[28]The Google Print Library Project:Fair or Foul Use? By Jonathan Band Journal of internet law Volume9 Number4 October 2005
[29]王迁,[荷]Lucie Guibault.中欧网络版权保护比较研究[M].北京：法律出版社,2008：P31
[30]王迁,[荷]Lucie Guibault.中欧网络版权保护比较研究[M]北京：法律出版社,2008：P169
[31]Jonathan Band. The-Google-Library-Project-They-Copyright-Debate. American Library Association January, 2006[EB/OL]. http://www.policybandwidth.com/.[2010-12-20]
[32]Jonathan Band. The-Google-Library-Project-They-Copyright-Debate. American Library Association January, 2006[EB/OL].http://www.policybandwidth.com/.[2010-12-20]
[33]Re: Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement, Case No. 1:05-CV-8136-DC (S.D.N.Y.) p7
[34]Hanratty E.Google library:beyond fair use?[EB/OL]. http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0010.html. [ 2010-3-21]
[35]吴汉东.著作权合理使用制度研究[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社,1996：31
[36]吴汉东.著作权合理使用制度研究[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社,1996：33
[37]梁志文,数字著作权论——以《信息网络传播权保护条例》为中心,北京：知识产权出版社,2007：184
[38]Lichtman D. Copyright as information policy:google book search from a law and economics Perspective[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1472167.[2010-3-21].
[39]Band J.Google and fair use.[EB/OL]. [2010-3-9]. http://www.policybandwidth.com/doc/20080211-MLB104.pdf
[40]Band J. The long and winding road to the Google books settlement[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2006(1):2-50
[41]Emily Anne Proskine. Google s Technicolor dreamcoat:a copyright analysis of the Google book search library project. [EB/OL]. http://creativecOmmOns.Org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcOde. [2010-02-0 7]
[42][美]理查德.A.波斯纳.法律的经济分析(上)[M].蒋兆康,译.北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1997：20
[43]James Grimmelmann. The Google Book Search Settlement:Ends, Means, and the Future of Books. [EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1388846 )
[44]P Samuelson. Legally Speaking:The Dead Souls of the Google Booksearch Settlement. portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1538800&type=pdf.[2011-01-20]
[45]MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO THE SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL ON BEHALF OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. Case No.05-cv-8136 (DC)[EB/OL]. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/n ew-york/nysdce/1:2005cv08136/273913/179/0.pdf. [2011-01-20]
[46]Band J. The long and winding road to the google books settlement[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2006(1):2-50
[47]Isabel Howe. How the Settlement Will Work. [EB/OL]http://www.google.com.[2011-01-20]
[48]Picker, Randal C. The Google Book Search Settlement:A New Orphan-Works Monopoly? [EB/OL]. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1387582.[2010-5-20]
[49]Pamela Samuelson. Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL]. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553894.[2010-05-06]
[50]Pamela Samuelson. Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL].papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553 894. [2010-05-06]
[51]Brin S. a library to last forever[EB/OL]. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/opinion/09brin.html?_r=1&scp=1&s q=Sergey%20Brin%20A%20Library%20to%20Last%20Forever&st=cse.[2010-3-21]
[52]Google gains with librarians-newsletter sign-ups boom;book sales launch;wheres library link?[EB/OL]. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-145065500/google-gains- librarians-newsletter.html.[2010-3-21]
[53]中国新闻网.默多克连手微软维权,数字图书馆让谷歌四面楚歌[N].http://www.chinanews.com.cn/it/it-itxw/news/2009/11-24/1981195.shtml. [ 2010-3-21]
[54]Pamela Samuelson. Academic Author Objections to the Google Book Search Settlement[EB/OL]. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553894.[2010-05-06]
[55]James Love. A presentation of compulsory licensing, International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine 13 (2000) 153-161
[56]吴雨珊.谷歌数字图书馆初步扫清版权障碍出版.商务周报[N].2008-11-10
[57]衣俊卿.现代性焦虑与文化批判[M].黑龙江大学出版社,2007：321
[58]张骥,刘中民.文化与当代国际政治[M].北京：人民出版社,2003：54-55
[59]吴雨珊.谷歌版权和解按倒葫芦浮起瓢.出版商务周报[N].2008(11)
[60]靳生玺.谷歌搜索的不只是图书.信息网络[N].2009,(1)：63
[61]A. Dirlik, National Security Strategy of the U. S.1990-1991, Washington D. C.:Brasseys Press,1990:7-11
[62]张文忠.全球化背景下的文化霸权[M].南京：南京师范大学.2006：14
[63]A. Dirlik, National Security Strategy of the U. S.1990-1991, Washington D.C.:Brasseys Press,1990:7-11
[64][美]亨特,意识形态与美国外交政策[M],北京：世界知识出版社,1999：13
[65]作家协会VS.谷歌.The Purpose of Copyright Law in Canada[J]. university of ottawa law & technology journal.2005,2(2):318
[66]Survey of Advertisers and Agencies SEMPO.The State of Search Engine Marketing 2008[R]. www.sempo.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/2008_exec_summary.pdf [2011-01-2 0]
[67]Google. Google's Economic Impact (2009) [R]www.google.com/economicimpact/pdf/google_economicimpact.pdf.[20 11-01-20]
[68]CNNIC.2009年中国搜索引擎用户行为研究报告[R].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/.[2011-01-20]
[69]Lessig, L. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York:Basic Books,1999: 125
[70]Puay Tang. Digital copyright and the "new" controversy:Is the law moulding technology and innovation? [J]. Research Policy.2005,34(6):859
[71]Robert A. Gorman. Copyright Law (Second Edition). Federal Judicial Center2006.01:20
[72]Daniel J. Gervais. The Purpose of Copyright Law in Canada[J]. university of ottawa law & technology journal.2005,2(2):318
[73]贾颖.我国著作权集体管理制度研究[D].武汉：武汉大学.2004：12
[74]张敏.数字环境下版权集体管理研究[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2004.3：20
[75]陈蓉,网络环境下著作权合理使用[D].长沙：湖南大学2005.4：10
[76]马慧芳.论知识产权的行政保护[D].武汉：华东政法大学.2009：4
[77]我 国 数 字 图 书 馆 大 都 曾 陷 版 权 危 机http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/mtjj/2010/201002/t20100205_491954. html
[78]版权局：”数字图书馆”侵权问题需加强自律和监管,[2011-02-15]. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/mtjj/2010/201009/t201 00928_539548.html
[79]中国图书对外推广网.数字出版联盟成立大会——北京出版集团公司牵头组建 首 个 全 国 数 字 出 版 联 盟 [EB/OL].http://www.cbi.gov.cn/wisework/content/90334.html.[2011-02-19]
[80]The Google Print Library Project:A Copyright Analysis[EB/OL]. www.policybandwidth.com/doc/googleprint.pdf.[2010-11-18]
[81]Google Print Library Program: International Publishers Association Rejects Google's Copyright Policy Change As Insufficient[EB/OL]. www.sne.fr/…/05-08-17communiquedepresseUIEGooglePrintLibraryProg ramme.pdf.[2010-06-18]