黄秋葵嫩荚的食用品质及贮藏的生理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本试验以黄秋葵品种‘纤手’为试验材料,研究了黄秋葵荚果发育时期,特别是荚果食用品质形成期间,果实的形态、营养成分的变化,及其采收适朋形态与相关生理生化指标的关系,以及采后黄秋葵贮藏过程中,温度和壳聚糖涂膜对黄秋葵采后贮藏的影响。结果表明,随着黄秋葵开花后时间的延长,荚果的食用品质存在着明显的变化,采收不及时,黄秋葵荚果极易纤维化,失去食用价值;采收过早又显著降低产量。黄秋葵采后的贮藏试验表明:低温和壳聚糖处理能有效的保持黄秋葵采后的品质。
     本文重点研究了黄秋葵花谢后11天内荚果食用品质形成期间,各种营养成分的变化规律。研究结果表明,黄秋葵嫩荚在不同的采收期,荚果长度、直径、重量在生长初期呈明显的持续上升趋势,开花第九天后长度、直径、重量的增长才趋缓。可溶性蛋白质含量在花后第九天前呈一直下降趋势,但是前五天的下降量不大,第九天后荚果中可溶性蛋白质含量又有所上升。蔗糖、总糖呈先下降后上升的变化,还原糖则一直下降,果糖的含量略有变动,在荚果发育的各个阶段变化不大。总叶绿素含量总体上呈下降趋势,在第七天略有上升。黄秋葵荚果中粘性物质的粘度呈先上升至花后第五天达最高而后下降的变化。粗纤维含量在花后五天内呈缓慢的上升,花谢五天后荚果内粗纤维含量急剧上升。黄秋葵荚果中多数矿物元素随生长天数的增加含量呈下降趋势,但是变化不大,黄秋葵荚果富含钾、钙、镁、硫、磷等元素,还含有硒、钼等有益微量元素,而铅、砷等重金属元素的含量极低,未达到有害程度。综合本研究以上结论,花谢后5-7天左右是保持黄秋葵嫩荚食用品质,且能保证较高产量的最佳时期。
     本文还研究了温度及壳聚糖涂膜处理对黄秋葵采后贮藏期间品质和生理变化的影响。结果表明:低温结合壳聚糖涂膜处理在抑制黄秋葵荚果叶绿素的降解和纤维化中效果还是比较明显的,而低温和壳聚糖涂膜对荚果中的可溶性蛋白质和各种糖分的影响不明显,但是低温和壳聚糖涂膜还是有效地保持了贮藏期间果实中各种清除自由基的酶类的活性。高温(20℃)下先聚糖处理的果实中叶縁素、可溶性蛋白质、总糖的含量高于对照,还原糖、果糖的含量略高于对照,果实的纤维化明显慢于对照,各种清除自由基的酶的活性高于对照。在三种贮藏温度下,不管是壳聚糖涂膜处理的果实,还是对照果实,与膜质过氧化有关的MDA的含量变化趋势基本一致,相同贮藏时间的果实中MDA含量在11℃和20℃都高于
    
    对照,但是壳聚糖涂膜处理并没有明显的抑制MDA的上升。壳聚糖涂膜处理在
    低温下效果不明显,而在高温下的效果更明显,其价值在于无法采取低温的时空
    条件下,可以考虑应用壳聚糖涂膜处理,具体方法有待进一步的研究。
Okra (Hibicus esculenuts L. ) is one of popular vegetables in the world, especially in tropical and subtropical areas. Okra is cultivated mainly for its 'pods' which are cooked and eaten, although in some countries the young leaves are cooked also. Tender okra is a popular ingredient of soups and stews where a highly viscous consistency is desired. Okra not only serves as a thickening agent for soups and stews, but is an important source of nutrients in the diet. In addition to its being a good source of a viscous mucilage, okra also provides fiber and protein. It was conducted to study in detail the growth pattern of okra (cv. xianshou) pods after flowering, and chemical and physical changes between flowering and harvesting maturity were studied to determine the optimum harvesting stage. Fresh okra pods have a short post harvest life, being prone to physical and physiological changes that reduce quality. Fresh okra has a high respiration rate and is extremely perishable. Quality loss in harvested okra is usually manifested as shriveling, toughening, and chlorophyll degradation. Post harvest treatment of chiston coating have been used to study the quality and physiological changes of fresh okra in storage. The results were reported as follows:
    1.The quality of okra pods has significant difference at different stage after anthesis. The pods in 5 days after anthesis maintain higher soluble protein content, which decreased quickly after 5th day and then increased a little.The mucilage viscosity was higher at pll value 6-8, it showed that pH value of crude extract of okra pods in di fferent stage after flowering were about 6-7, the mucilage viscosity of the pods is highest in 5th day after anthesis, with pods development mucilage viscosity decreased quickly. Okra pods maintained lower crude fibre content in 5 days after anthesis, and then crude fibre content inereased quickly. Most of mineral elements in okra pod declined in the growth period. Mucilage
    
    
    
    and fibre content are main quality factor of okra pod , according to the content of Mucilage and fibre content at different stage after anthesis, we concluded that Harvesting maturity occurred about 5 days after flowering.
    2.Fresh okra pods harvested at six days after anthesis were stored for 12 days in 20 , 11 , 4 with0, 0. 5%, 1% chiston spraying to study the quality and physiological changes. The results suggested that chiston coating and low temperature are effective to restrain chlorophyll degradation and raise of crude fibre, and not distinct on soluble protein and sugar changes. But in storage chiston coating and low temperature could maintain the activity of enzyme such as SOD, POD, CAT. In 20 , tin-effects of chiston coating are better than control. In20 , the content of chorophyll, soluble protein, total sugar, deoxide sugar and frotuse are higher than that of control.
引文
1. 李曙轩等.中国农业百科全书·蔬菜卷.农业出版社,1990,103~104
    2. Salunkhe., D.K., Postharvest Biotechnology of Vegetable. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press, c1984.
    3. Yamagudi, Mas. World vegetable. Er. B., Ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, conn., 1983
    4. 陈学好,陈艳萍.酸化处理促进黄秋葵种子萌发的效应,种子科技.2000,18(6).-342-343
    5. 郁宗雄.台湾农友种苗公司.园艺之友,1990,21(7):21~52
    6. J S Siemonsma. Okra(Abelmoschus spp). Agrll. Uni. Wegeningen Netherland. 1982,1~7
    
    
    7. 江西省农牧渔业厅编.江西省蔬菜品种志.江西科技出版社,1986,484
    8. 福州市蔬菜所编.福建蔬菜品种资源.福州市蔬菜研究所,1988,132
    9. 钟惠宏等.秋葵属的种及其资源的搜集研究和利用.中国蔬菜,1996,2:49~52
    10. Culpepper, C.W and Moon, H.H., The growth and composition of the fruit of okra in relation to its eating quality. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ., 595,1941
    11. Woodroof, J.G. and Shelor, E., Okra for processing, Ga. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. N. S. 56,1958
    12. Rao, K.P.G.; Sulladmath, U.V. 1977. Changes in certain chemical constituents associated with maturation of okra (Abemodchus esculentus (L.) Moench) pods. Vegetable Science, 4(1), 37-42
    13. Hodossi, S; Pankotai, A. 1987. Elemental composition of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) and changes in it at different growth stages. Zoldsegtermesztesi Kutato Intezet Bulletinje. 20, 65-72;
    14. Singh, D.; Tripathi, R.D.; Singh, H.N. 1974. Effect of age of picking on the chemical composition of the fruits of okra. Indian dournal of Agricultural Science 44(1) 22-26
    15. El Mahdy, AR; El Sebaiy, LA. 1984, Preliminary studies on the mucilages extracted from okra fruits, taro tubers, Jew's mellow leaves and fenugreek seeds. Food Chemistry. 14: 4, 237-249
    16. Mungare TS; Jadhav HD; Patil JP; Hasure RR; Jadhav BS; Jaswant Singh; Singh J, 2000, Clarification technique for producing quality jaggery. Cooperative-Sugar. 32: 4, 283-285;
    17. Al Wandawi, H. 1983. Chemical composition of seeds of two okra cuitivars. dournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 31: 6, 1355-1358;
    18.李敏等.不同采收长度对黄秋葵荚果品质的影响.莱阳农学院学报,1995,12(1):27-30
    19. Ryall, A.L. and Lipton, W.J. Handing, Transportation and Storage of Fruits and Vegetables, Vol. Vegetables and Melons. AVI Publishing. Westport, conn.. 1972.
    
    
    20. Hatton, T.T., Jr., Pantastico, ER.B., and Akamine, E.K., Controlled atmosphere storage. Part Ⅲ. Individual commodity requirement, in Postharvest Physiology, Handing and Utilization of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits and Vegetables, Pantastico, Er.B, Ed., AVI Publishing, Westport, conn., 1975,201
    21. Lawford Baxter and Luther Waters, Jr. 1990a, Chemical changes in okra stored in air and controlled atmosphere, J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115(3):452-454
    22. Lawford Baxter and Luther Waters, Jr. 1990b, Controlled atmosphere effects on physical changes and ethylene evolution in harvested okra. HortScience 25(1):92-95
    23. Singh, B.P., Dhankhar, B.S., and Pandita, M.L., Effect of prepackaging materials on storage of fresh okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)Moench) fruits, Haryana J. Hortic. Sci., 9,175,1980.
    24. Singh, B.P., Dhankhar, D.K., and Gupta, O.P., Effect of growth retardants and wax emulsion on the shelf-life of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)Moench), Haryana J. Agric. Sci. 8,97,1979.
    25. Gupta, V.K. and Mukherjee, D., Effect of pre-and postharvest appliction of morphactin on the postharvest behaviour of okra, Sci. Hortic., 15,107,1981.
    26.严俊,1984,甲壳素的化学和应用.化学通报,11:26~31
    27.杜建明、孙东,1994,脱乙酰壳多糖在果实贮藏上的应用.中国果品研究,2:26~28
    28.胡文玉、吴姣莲,1994,壳聚糖的性质和用途及其在农业上的应用前景.植物生理学通讯,30(4):294~296
    29.陈天、张皓冰、叶秀莲,1991,儿丁质对草莓的保鲜作用研究.西南农业大学学报,16(4):333~335
    30. Du J, Gemma H, Iwahori S, 1997, Effects of chitosan coating on the storage of peach, Japanese pear and kiwifruit. Journal of the Japanese, Society for Horticultural Science, 66(1):15~22
    31.陈安和、孙敏、李坤培,1994a,儿丁质对草莓的保险作用研究.西南农业
    
    大学学报,16(4):333~335
    32.陈安和、孙敏、李坤培,1994b,儿丁质对贮存草莓中SOD和Vc含量的影响.食品科学,(7):65~37
    33. Ghaouth ELA, Arul J, Ponnampalam R, 1991a, Chitosan coating effect on storability of fresh strawberries. Journal of Food Science, 56(6):1618~1620, 1631
    34. Ghaouth ELA, Arul J, Grenier J, et al, 1992a, Antifungal activity of chitosan on two postharvest pathogens of strawberry fruits. Phytopathology, 82(4)398~402
    35. Ghaouth ELA, Arul J, Ponnampalam R, 1991b, Use of chitosan coating to reduce water loss and maintain quality of cucumber and bell pepper fruits. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 15:359~368
    36. Ghaouth ELA, Ponnampalam R, Castaigne F, 1992b, Chitosan coating to extend the storage life of tomatos. Hortscience, 27(9): 1016~1018
    37.袁毅桦、赖兴华、霍银英,1994,壳聚糖常温保鲜西红柿的研究.食品科学,(7):62~65
    38.胡文玉、邹良栋,1998,壳聚糖涂抹对苹果的保鲜效应(演示文稿).植物生理学通讯,34(1):17~19
    39. Lau OL, Yastremski R, 1991, Retention of quality of "Golden Delicioous" apples by controlled and modified atmosphere storage. Hortscience, 26(5):564~565
    40.郑学勤、宫明波、为绍文等,1996,壳聚糖衍生物对苹果和梨的贮藏保鲜效果.中国果树,5:16~19
    41.李红叶、黎军英、曹若彬,1997,脱乙酰壳多糖对桃软腐病、褐腐病菌的抑制和采后软腐病的防治研究.浙江农业学报,9(2):87~92
    42.黄向红、陈曼云,1995,壳聚糖保鲜四季柚的效果研究.四川果树,4:12~13
    43.陈志宏、陈洪斌、曾水忠.1997,儿丁质对贮藏期芒果几页生理指标的影响.热带作物科技,1:38~39
    44.李锡香等编著.新鲜果蔬的品质及其分析法.中国农业出版社,1994
    45. Cakmask I, Marschner H, 1992, Magnesium deticiency and high light intensity enhance activities of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione
    
    reductase in bean leaves. Plant Physiol. 98:1222-1227
    46. Giannopolitis CN and Ries SK, 1997, Superoxide dismutase: Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 59:309-314
    47. Malcolm C. 1980, Bourne: Texture evaluation of horticultural crops, Hort Science 15(1):51-57
    48. M. Martens. 1984, Quality and quality evaluation. Acta Horticulturae, 163:15-20
    49.陈少裕.1991,膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害.植物生理学通讯,,27(2):84-90
    50.吕均良、陈昆松、张上隆.1993,猕猴桃果实后熟过程的乙烯生成.超氧物歧化酶和过氧化物酶的活性变化.浙江农业大学学报,19(2):135—138
    51.吴岳轩,王荣臣,曾富华.1996.杂交稻对白叶枯病的诱导抗性与细胞内防御酶系统关系的初步研究[J].植物病理学报.26(2):127-131
    52.林植芳.1984.水稻叶片衰老与超氧物歧化酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的关系(简报).植物学报.26(6):605-615
    53.林植芳,李双顺,张东林等.1988,荔枝果实采后氧化物和过氧化物变化(简报),植物学报,30(4):382-384
    54.水茂兴等.2001.壳聚糖处理番茄、青椒的保鲜效果.(4):164-167
    55.王建华,刘鸿先,徐同.1989.超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)在植物逆境和衰老生理中的作用。植物生理学通讯.(1):1-7
    56.许长成,赵世杰等.1993.植物膜脂过氧化水平硫代巴比妥酸测定法中的干扰因素.植物生理学通讯.29(5):363—365
    57. Adel A. Kader, ed. Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops(3rd ed). Oakland, Calif.: University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2002,39pp.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700