棉铃虫与烟青虫细胞遗传学比较研究
|
摘要
染色体是生物遗传物质的载体，其结构特征具有相对恒定性，对染色体进行分析研究可揭示生物间染色体结构差异，反映生物的遗传多样性及系统演化路线。对染色体进行研究的细胞遗传学是遗传学与细胞学相互交叉与结合的产物，是旨在阐明生物有机体遗传与变异细胞学基础的科学。对昆虫染色体的研究，可以丰富昆虫遗传学的理论内涵与知识体系，揭示昆虫的种类演替、种间进化、种内进化的客观规律，为昆虫分类系统建立、近缘种区分乃至种下分类提供新方法和技术，并指导害虫的遗传防治，也为探明昆虫抗药性形成的机理提供了新的途径。
棉铃虫和烟青虫是我国重要的农业害虫，其种间杂交可育。为揭示二者的细胞遗传学规律，本论文研究了二者核型特征、有丝分裂与减数分裂期间染色体行为、联会复合体、染色体变异等细胞遗传学特征，总结比较其差异，并比较了棉铃虫与烟青虫杂交子代的染色体特征，为分子遗传学深入研究奠定基础，也为发展对其高效防治新途径提供参考。
1、采用HSG显带和常规C显带法，对棉铃虫和烟青虫进行有丝分裂中期与减数分裂粗线期核型分析显示，棉铃虫与烟青虫单倍体数目为n=31条，部分染色体为弥散型着丝粒类型。棉铃虫染色体长从1.64μm到5.99μm，按Lima-De-Faria标准，其单倍体中含7条中型染色体和24条小型染色体。烟青虫染色体长从1.27μm到5.01μm，整体较棉铃虫为短，方差分析显示二者差异极显著，按Lima-De-Faria标准，烟青虫单倍体中含5条中型染色体和26条小型染色体。相比而言，棉铃虫有80％的分裂相染色体为31条，而烟青虫仅有50％为31条，说明烟青虫染色体多态性更为显著，而棉铃虫相对稳定。
2、分析棉铃虫与烟青虫卵的有丝分裂、性母细胞的减数分裂过程，二者染色体行为未见明显差异。
3、棉铃虫、烟青虫的联会复合体的侧生组分和中央组分的形态构造清晰可见；联会复合体核型分析显示，棉铃虫与烟青虫的单倍体中联会复合体数目均为31条，且棉铃虫与烟青虫联会复合体长度间差异不显著。二者粗线期染色体长与联会复合体长极显著相关，利用联会复合体代替减数分裂粗线期进行核型分析是可行的。
4、棉铃虫、烟青虫的性染色体在C-带、G-带等染色制片中不能被准确鉴别，但可在雌虫联会复合体中发现异型染色体即性染色体，其中较长者为W染色体，较短者为Z染色体，验证了鳞翅目蛾类昆虫性染色体为ZZ/ZW型的规律，为棉铃虫、烟青虫性染色体是ZZ／ZW型提供了细胞学证据。
5、棉铃虫与烟青虫杂交子代的染色体分析，其核型为单倍体n=31，与亲本无差异。染色体长度变化在2.4lμm到4.73μm之间，与亲本相比较，其变化幅度明显不如亲本变幅大。杂交子代联会复合体长度依然不如亲本变化幅度大。此外，杂交子代无论是雌性还是雄性，其联会复合体中均未发现异型染色体，其性染色体不能被准确识别，这一点明显与亲本有差异，显示杂交子代染色体已发生显著的变化。
Chromosome is the carrier of biotic genetic material, and its structure has the feature of relative constancy. So, through the study of chromosome, we can get the disclosure of the structural differences among organisms, and the reflection of the hereditary diversity and the systematic evolution route of the creatures. Cytogenetics, which focus on the research of chromosome, is the product of the reciprocal chiasmata and combination of genetics and cytology, it aims to demonstrate basic science of organic heredity and variation cytology. The study of insect chromosome can enrich the theory meaning and knowledge system of insect genetics, and reveal the natural rules of species succession, interspecific evolution, and intraspecific evolution of insect. Meanwhile, the study can also offer new method and technique to establish insect taxonomical system, specification of kindred, and subspecies identification. Moreover, it can be made the use of the genetic management of pests, and offer the new way to explore t
he mechanism of pest resistance to chemicals.
Helicoverpa armigera (Hiibner) and H. assulta (Guenee) are critical agricultural pests in China, Their interspecific hybrid can reproduce. In order to reveal the genetic rules between the two pests, we took a study of the chromosome of H. armigera and H. assulta, which contained the contents as following: the karyotype feature, the behaviors of the chromosome during the period of mitosis and meiosis, synaptonemal complex, chromosome variance, and F1 generalization comparison.
1 With the method of HSG-banding and normal C-binding technique, we made an analysis of the karyotypes for H. armigera and H. assulta during the period of mitosis metaphage and meiosis pachytene. The result showed that the numbers of haploid of H. armigera and H. assulta were all 31, part of chromosomes were of the kind of holocentromere. The chromosome length of H. armigera ranged from 1.64un to 5.99um. With Lima-De-Faria as the standard, there were 7 middle-sized and 24 small-sized chromosomes among all its haploid. The chromosome length of H, assulta ranged from 1.27 um to 5.01 Mm. The chromosome length of H, assulta was shorter than that of H, armigera, and there was very significant difference between the two pests from the result of variance analysis, there were 5 middle-sized and 26 small-sized chromosomes among all its haploid.
Comparatively speaking, 80% numbers of the chromosomes of H, armigera in split phase were 31, whereas, there are only 50% were 31 in the case of H. assulta. Consequently, it demonstrated that the chromosome polymorphisms of//, assulta turn out to be much more obvious, and the chromosome of//. armigera was relatively stable.
2 Through the analysis of the mitosis of egg and the meiosis of auxocyte, it appeared no significant difference of chromosome behavior in these procedures.
3 For H. armigera and H. assulta, we got a clear show of the shape and construction of synaptonemal complex's lateral element and central element; The analysis of synaptonemal complex karyotype showed that, in the body of H. armigera and H. assulta, the number of synaptonemal
complex among haploids were all 31, and it also turned out that the lengths of synaptonemal complex of H. armigera and H. assulta showed no significant difference according to variance analysis. The correlation analysis of the lengths in pachytene and the synaptonemal complex of the two pests showed that the two had an obvious linear dependence. So, the method that tries to take the place of meiosis pachytene by synaptonemal complex is feasible.
4 The chromosomes of H. armigera and H. assulta can not be detected correctly during staining flaking of C-band and G-band. Whereas, we can find heterotypic chromosome -sex chromosome in female synatonemal complex when doing the analysis of synatonemal complex. With the further analysis, we determined that the longer one is chromosome W, and the shorter one is chromosome Z. According to all the work we have done above, it fairly verified the law that the sex
棉铃虫和烟青虫是我国重要的农业害虫，其种间杂交可育。为揭示二者的细胞遗传学规律，本论文研究了二者核型特征、有丝分裂与减数分裂期间染色体行为、联会复合体、染色体变异等细胞遗传学特征，总结比较其差异，并比较了棉铃虫与烟青虫杂交子代的染色体特征，为分子遗传学深入研究奠定基础，也为发展对其高效防治新途径提供参考。
1、采用HSG显带和常规C显带法，对棉铃虫和烟青虫进行有丝分裂中期与减数分裂粗线期核型分析显示，棉铃虫与烟青虫单倍体数目为n=31条，部分染色体为弥散型着丝粒类型。棉铃虫染色体长从1.64μm到5.99μm，按Lima-De-Faria标准，其单倍体中含7条中型染色体和24条小型染色体。烟青虫染色体长从1.27μm到5.01μm，整体较棉铃虫为短，方差分析显示二者差异极显著，按Lima-De-Faria标准，烟青虫单倍体中含5条中型染色体和26条小型染色体。相比而言，棉铃虫有80％的分裂相染色体为31条，而烟青虫仅有50％为31条，说明烟青虫染色体多态性更为显著，而棉铃虫相对稳定。
2、分析棉铃虫与烟青虫卵的有丝分裂、性母细胞的减数分裂过程，二者染色体行为未见明显差异。
3、棉铃虫、烟青虫的联会复合体的侧生组分和中央组分的形态构造清晰可见；联会复合体核型分析显示，棉铃虫与烟青虫的单倍体中联会复合体数目均为31条，且棉铃虫与烟青虫联会复合体长度间差异不显著。二者粗线期染色体长与联会复合体长极显著相关，利用联会复合体代替减数分裂粗线期进行核型分析是可行的。
4、棉铃虫、烟青虫的性染色体在C-带、G-带等染色制片中不能被准确鉴别，但可在雌虫联会复合体中发现异型染色体即性染色体，其中较长者为W染色体，较短者为Z染色体，验证了鳞翅目蛾类昆虫性染色体为ZZ/ZW型的规律，为棉铃虫、烟青虫性染色体是ZZ／ZW型提供了细胞学证据。
5、棉铃虫与烟青虫杂交子代的染色体分析，其核型为单倍体n=31，与亲本无差异。染色体长度变化在2.4lμm到4.73μm之间，与亲本相比较，其变化幅度明显不如亲本变幅大。杂交子代联会复合体长度依然不如亲本变化幅度大。此外，杂交子代无论是雌性还是雄性，其联会复合体中均未发现异型染色体，其性染色体不能被准确识别，这一点明显与亲本有差异，显示杂交子代染色体已发生显著的变化。
Chromosome is the carrier of biotic genetic material, and its structure has the feature of relative constancy. So, through the study of chromosome, we can get the disclosure of the structural differences among organisms, and the reflection of the hereditary diversity and the systematic evolution route of the creatures. Cytogenetics, which focus on the research of chromosome, is the product of the reciprocal chiasmata and combination of genetics and cytology, it aims to demonstrate basic science of organic heredity and variation cytology. The study of insect chromosome can enrich the theory meaning and knowledge system of insect genetics, and reveal the natural rules of species succession, interspecific evolution, and intraspecific evolution of insect. Meanwhile, the study can also offer new method and technique to establish insect taxonomical system, specification of kindred, and subspecies identification. Moreover, it can be made the use of the genetic management of pests, and offer the new way to explore t
he mechanism of pest resistance to chemicals.
Helicoverpa armigera (Hiibner) and H. assulta (Guenee) are critical agricultural pests in China, Their interspecific hybrid can reproduce. In order to reveal the genetic rules between the two pests, we took a study of the chromosome of H. armigera and H. assulta, which contained the contents as following: the karyotype feature, the behaviors of the chromosome during the period of mitosis and meiosis, synaptonemal complex, chromosome variance, and F1 generalization comparison.
1 With the method of HSG-banding and normal C-binding technique, we made an analysis of the karyotypes for H. armigera and H. assulta during the period of mitosis metaphage and meiosis pachytene. The result showed that the numbers of haploid of H. armigera and H. assulta were all 31, part of chromosomes were of the kind of holocentromere. The chromosome length of H. armigera ranged from 1.64un to 5.99um. With Lima-De-Faria as the standard, there were 7 middle-sized and 24 small-sized chromosomes among all its haploid. The chromosome length of H, assulta ranged from 1.27 um to 5.01 Mm. The chromosome length of H, assulta was shorter than that of H, armigera, and there was very significant difference between the two pests from the result of variance analysis, there were 5 middle-sized and 26 small-sized chromosomes among all its haploid.
Comparatively speaking, 80% numbers of the chromosomes of H, armigera in split phase were 31, whereas, there are only 50% were 31 in the case of H. assulta. Consequently, it demonstrated that the chromosome polymorphisms of//, assulta turn out to be much more obvious, and the chromosome of//. armigera was relatively stable.
2 Through the analysis of the mitosis of egg and the meiosis of auxocyte, it appeared no significant difference of chromosome behavior in these procedures.
3 For H. armigera and H. assulta, we got a clear show of the shape and construction of synaptonemal complex's lateral element and central element; The analysis of synaptonemal complex karyotype showed that, in the body of H. armigera and H. assulta, the number of synaptonemal
complex among haploids were all 31, and it also turned out that the lengths of synaptonemal complex of H. armigera and H. assulta showed no significant difference according to variance analysis. The correlation analysis of the lengths in pachytene and the synaptonemal complex of the two pests showed that the two had an obvious linear dependence. So, the method that tries to take the place of meiosis pachytene by synaptonemal complex is feasible.
4 The chromosomes of H. armigera and H. assulta can not be detected correctly during staining flaking of C-band and G-band. Whereas, we can find heterotypic chromosome -sex chromosome in female synatonemal complex when doing the analysis of synatonemal complex. With the further analysis, we determined that the longer one is chromosome W, and the shorter one is chromosome Z. According to all the work we have done above, it fairly verified the law that the sex
引文
1．门正明，韩建林．动物细胞遗传学研究现状及其应用．甘肃农业大学学报，1993，28(4)：317
2．马昆，施立明．家蚕联会复合体组型分析．遗传学报，1988，15(5)：355～361
3．马思波，郑哲民．五种稻蝗的染色体核型和C-带带型．昆虫学报，1989，32(4)：399-405
4．马恩波，欧晓红，乔格侠．蝗总科染色体研究及科级综合比较(直翅目)．昆虫分类学报，2000，22(1)：6～10
5．马恩波，郑哲民．斑腿蝗科十属NOR定位及其细胞分类学意义．动物学研究，1993，14(3)：271～276
6．马恩波，郭亚平．伪稻蝗及其近缘属的细胞学分类．昆虫学报，1995，38(1)：54～60
7．尤平，郑哲民，蟋蟀总科(Grylloidae)的细胞分类研究概况及核型演化．昆虫知识，1997，34(2)：106～109
8．尹立中，刘建军，魏凌基．新疆垦区蚜虫染色体组型分析．石河子农学院学报，1994，12(3～4)：41～44
9．毛连菊，杨少闻，谢祚浑．摇蚊幼虫唾腺及其染色体的比较研究．中国水产科学，2000，7(2)：22～27
10．牛新华，邢娟．减数分裂联会复合体整体制片的银染技术．实验室研究与探索，2002，21(3)：154～157
11．牛新华，高宗华．解剖学杂志，2002，25(3)：296～298．
12．牛瑶，郑哲民．竹蝗属部分种类的染色体分类研究(直翅目：蝗总科)．见：廉振民，昆虫学研究．两安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，136～141
13．牛瑶，郑哲民．云南蝗虫—新属新种．昆虫分类学报，1993，15(1)：1-5
14．王义平，卜文俊，张虎芳．山地原花蝽核型研究(半翅目，花蝽科)．动物分类学报，2003，28(1)：126～129
15．王子淑．人体及动物细胞遗传学实验技术．成都：四川大学出版社，1987
16．王亚军，王喜忠，杨彪．家蚕染色体复制区带的初步显示．昆虫学报，1998，41(3)：237～242
17．王运湘，施立明．W+P普斑限性与Wze虎斑限性品系家蚕的联会复合体分析．遗传学报，1990，17(5)：349～353
18．王宗舜，钟香臣，郭郛．家蚕精母细胞结合丝复合体的研究．遗传学报，1981，8(1)：36～41
19．王念慈，李照会．棉铃虫和烟青虫生物学研究．山东农业大学学报，1984，(3)：13-25
20．王琛柱，董钧锋．棉铃虫和烟青虫的种间杂交．科学通报，2000，45(20)：2209-2212
21．王登元，于江南，羌松．棉铃虫种类的鉴别．新疆农业大学学报，1997，20(4)：65-69
22．邓一民，向仲怀．桑蟥细胞遗传学研究．西南农业大学学报，1993，15(6)：565-568
23．付鹏，郑哲民．四种蝗虫的染色体c带核型及所显示的分类关系．陕西师大学报，1988，16(增刊)：43-48
24．冯蜀举，施立明．德国蜚蠊精母细胞联会复合体(SCs)组型及辐射诱发的SCs畸变．遗传学报，1986，13(5)：377～382
25．叶炳辉，徐南．蚊虫染色体的制片方法．遗传，1979，1(4)：29～30
26．叶炳辉，黄品，蒋文斌．中华按蚊唾腺染色体的研究．遗传学报，1981，8(1)：42～49
27．甘代耀，林杭美，何玉仙．秋水仙碱对褐飞虱精细胞染色体的影响．华东昆虫学报，1996，5(1)：99～100
28．田润刚，袁锋．尖三刺角蝉的核型与性二型现象．昆虫分类学报，1995，17(3)：197～200．
29．石裕明，叶奕英．广西微小按蚊卵巢营养细胞多线染色体的观察．中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志，1990，8(2)：117～120
30．乔格侠，郑哲民．异爪蝗属部分种类染色体分类研究．见：廉振民．昆虫学研究．西安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，118～124
31．刘大钧．细胞遗传学．北京：中国农业出版社，1999
32．刘友樵，葛岚屏．鳞翅目蛾类科以上阶元分类的新进展．昆虫知识，1997，34(2)：121～124
33．刘侠，王子淑，陈文元，王喜中．雄蚕终变期染色体核型分析．昆虫学报，1989，34(4)：499～501
34．刘国章，何麟．我国人体寄生虫及病媒昆虫染色体研究概况．中国寄生虫及寄生虫病杂志，1989，7(2)：128～132．
35．刘振魁，严林，霍科科．青海三种草原毛虫染色体的观察．昆虫知识，1998，35(2)：101
36．刘淑珊，王林美，范琦．樗蚕(Philosamia cynthia)蛹精巢细胞系的建立．蚕业科学，1999，25(1)：41～45
37．孙延昌，邓守俭，公茂庆．染色体技术在医学昆虫研究中的应用．中国媒介生物学及控制杂志，1997，8(1)：71～72
38．孙延昌，邓守俭．多线染色体．生物学通报，1997，32(1)：7～9
39．孙红英，张锡然，苏翠荣，谢小燕，王进，高峰．蜉蝣目昆虫染色体制备方法探讨．动物学杂志，1998，32(2)：30～31
40．朱竑侃，郑建中，缪建吾．中国六种蚊虫的核型分析．昆虫学研究集刊，1981：81～87
41．汤德良，王深柱，罗林地，钦俊德．棉铃虫和地青虫幼虫检锥感器对某些化合物的反应特性．中国科学(C)，2000，30(5)：
42．许漱壁．赫坎按蚊与中华按蚊染色体的比较研究．第二军医大学学报，1991，12(3)：11～13
43．许漱璧，潭璟宪，薛景珉，孙建新．我国米赛按蚊有丝分裂染色体和种内多态现象的研究．第二军医大学学报，1990，11(1)：36～38
44．许漱璧，潭璟宪，薛景珉，孙建新．新疆米赛按蚊多线染色体及多态性臂内倒位的研究．第二军医大学学报，1989，10(4)：336～339
45．许漱璧，瞿逢伊．我国13种按蚊的染色体研究．第二军医大学学报，1991，12(3)：235～239
46．何利萍，凌发瑶，郑向忠．银额果蝇(Drosophila albomicans)B染色体对繁殖的影响．遗传学报，2000，27(2)：114～120
47．何康，李文盛，震金富．白纹伊蚁的染色体组型．遗传，1985，1(4)：40-41
48．余红梅，刘国章．我国媒介蚊虫染色体研究概况．医学动物防制，1993，9(3)：160～163
49．吴鹤龄，李汝祺．摇蚊唾腺多线染色体的研究Ⅱ：第Ⅰ和第Ⅱ染色体在幼虫到成虫期间的可逆性变化．遗传学报，1985，12(2)：132～136
50．宋方洲，向仲怀，刘绍兰．蓖麻蚕利栗蚕的性染色体研究．蚕业科学，1996，22(3)：170～174
51．宋方洲，常平安，刘运强．中国野桑蚕Giemsa淡染性染色体的研究．蚕业科学，2001，27(1)：6～10
52．宋方洲，曹平，代方银．家蚕虎斑易位系(ZW．Ze)染色体的研究．蚕业科学，1998，24(4)：221～225
53．张广学，乔格侠．蚜虫细胞分类学研究概况．见：廉振民．昆虫学研究．西安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，201～207
54．张礼生，张青文，蔡青年，等．中国昆虫染色体研究历史与展望．昆虫学报，2003，46(6)：773～782
55．张礼生，张青文，蔡青年，等．棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner)减数分裂精母细胞减数分裂研究．植物保护，2004，30(2)：33-36
56．张礼生，张青文，蔡青年，等．烟青虫减数分裂及单倍体核型研究．中国农业大学学报，2004，9(4)
57．张劳．赤拟谷盗——用于动物遗传育种研究的实验昆虫．农业科学集刊(第一集)，1993：386～389
58．张虎芳，郑乐怡．半翅目昆虫染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1998．35(4)：243～246
59．张虎芳，郑乐怡．四种蝽科昆虫的染色体研究．昆虫学报，1999，42(3)：234～240
60．张青文．昆虫遗传学．北京：科学出版社，2000
61．张春林，陈汉彬．贵州5种常见蚋的核型研究：(双翅目：蚋科)．寄生虫与医学昆虫学报，2000，7(1)：55～59
62．张维，康文，李元英．~(60)Coγ射线辐射对柑桔大实蝇(Daccus citri)染色体影响的研究．核农学报，1995，9(4)：203～206
63．李本文，刘多，谢氏松，叶炳辉，卢惠霖．中华按蚊唾液腺多线染色体中性染色体短臂的进一步确认．中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志，1988，6(2)：118～136
64．李红梅，徐元康．家蚕染色体的C～带带型及其扫描电镜的初步研究．汕头大学学报(自然科学版)，1998，13(1)：36～40
65．李锦华．棉铃虫和烟青虫的寄主特点和室内饲养观察．昆虫知识，1986．23(1)：12-14
66．李懋学，张学方．植物染色体研究技术．哈尔滨：东北林业大学出版社，1991
67．杨文，刘恒孝．凉山按蚊唾腺染色体研究．昆明医学院学报，1991，12(1)：30～33
68．杨志远，黄培，吴国雄．米象、玉米象及其杂交后代染色体的观察研究．昆虫学报，1989，32(4)：406～409
69．杨集昆，李法圣．棉铃虫和烟青虫的区别．植物保护，1964．2(2)：89-90
70．汪霞，王志平，王科．东方蜜蜂(Apis cerana Fab)染色体核型研究．中国养蜂，1988，(2)：2～4
71．沈以红，向仲怀．家蚕有丝分裂染色体研究．蚕业科学，1997，23(1)：42～46
72．陈一心．棉铃虫及其近似种的鉴别．昆虫知识，1981．18(1)：32-33
73．陈学新，陆伟．何俊华，马云．寄生蜂核型特征及其在分类上的应用．动物分类学报，2000，25(3)：285～290
74．陈复生．家蚕倍数性及其染色体组成的解析．中国蚕业，1998，(3)：11～12
75．陈晓光，何麟．蜚蠊的染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1989，26(4)：254～255
76．陈晓光．蜚蠊的染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1989，26(4)：254～255
77．陈晓社，张广学．萝卜蚜和豆蚜染色体C～带带型比较与分析．昆虫学报，1985，28(3)：271～273
78．陈晓社，张广学．北京地区51种蚜虫的染色体组型．动物学报，1985，31(1)：12～19
79．孟智启，伴野丰，土井良宏．家蚕染色体缺失的细胞学证明．浙江农业学报，1985，7(4)：320～322
80．孟智启，徐俊良．中国野蚕染色体结构及其变异的研究．蚕业科学，2000，26(1)：5～9
81．欧晓红，郑哲民．中国蝗总科昆虫细胞分类学研究概况．见：廉振民．昆虫学研究．西安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，216～227
82．俞天荣，缪建吾．敌百虫诱发淡色库蚊染色体易位的观察．昆虫学研究集刊，1980，第一集：99～103
83．施立明．染色体分带技术的回顾与展望．动物学研究，1984：5：1～12
84．洪靖君，詹永乐，陈复生．家蚕多倍体发生与染色体观察分析．安徽农业大学学报，2001，28(1)：66～69
85．赵建，何孟元，郝水．红翅皱膝蝗减数分裂染色体的螺旋与轴结构．实验生物学报，1990，23(3)：261～245
86．赵建，何孟元，郝水．红翅皱膝蝗减数分裂染色体轴的形成与联会复合体．遗传学报，1992，19(1)：34～37
87．赵章武，元景，樊永亮．亚洲玉米螟染色体研究．山西大学学报，1993，16(3)：311～315
88．赵惠燕，张改生，汪世泽，李秀娥．棉蚜体色变化与染色体观察．昆虫知识，1993，30(4)：218～220．
89．钦俊德．昆虫与植物的关系——论昆虫与植物的相互作用及其演化．北京：科学出版社，1987
90．凌发瑶．七种蝇的染色体核型研究．动物学研究，1984，5(3)：51～60
91．凌发瑶，王文．银额果蝇自然群体分化过程中的细胞遗传学．遗传学报，1997，24(6)：496～500
92．凌发瑶，林苏．三黄果蝇(Drosophila trilutea)近黄果蝇(D．paralutea)的有丝分裂中期染色体．动物学研究，1997，11(2)：145～146
93．凌发瑶，施立明．银额果蝇的B染色体研究，2．昆明群体的生活力和B染色体的关系．动物学研究，1992，13(3)：271～275
94．徐广，郭予元．实夜蛾亚科的种间杂交研究进展．昆虫知识，2001．38(1)：8～11
95．徐安英，方瑗，黄君霆．家蚕性连锁致死突变位点与ZW+sch染色体易位片段关系的研究．蚕业科学，1994，20(2)：120～121
96．贾潇凌，马恩波．斑翅蝗科部分种属细胞分类学的研究．山西大学学报(自然科学版)，2000，
21(3)：291～296
97．郭予元．棉铃虫迁飞规律及其与奇主植物取食、消化及解毒生理关系的比较研究．昆虫学报，1997，40(增刊)：1—6
98．常平安，宋方洲，刘明萱，等．蓖麻蚕有丝分裂染色体的研究．西南农业大学学报，2001，23(4)：371～373
99．常岩林，廉振民．螽斯科昆虫染色体研究现状．昆虫知识，1996，33(5)：310～313
100．常岩林，芦荣胜．纺织娘染色体核型和C带的研究(直翅目：螽斯总科)．动物科学，2002，6(4)：170～174
101．常岩林，郑哲民．鼓鸣螽属一新种及染色体核型研究(直翅目：螽斯总科)．昆虫分类学报，1997，19(1)：10～12
102．彩万志．蚂蚁染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1992，29(2)：120～129
103．彩万志．昆虫细胞分类学的基本问题及染色体系统发育的重建方法．昆虫分类学报，1994，16(1)：4～14
104．曹丽萍，何麟．四种蚤染色体组型及C分带研究．遗传，1994，16(4)：19～23
105．梁广勤，杨国海，梁帆，等．利用染色体和同工酶技术鉴定寡鬃实蝇幼虫．植物检疫，1994，8(1)：4～9
106．梁广勤，梁帆．桔小实蝇三龄幼虫染色体的组型．昆虫知识，1993，30(6)：356～358
107．梁铬球，郑哲民．中国蝗总科昆虫分类研究综述．昆虫知识，1994，31(2)：119～121
108．黄国洋，王荫长，尤子平．鳞翅目昆虫染色体的研究方法．华东昆虫学报，1994，3(1)：71～74
109．温小军．中国3种伊蚊的核型分析．贵阳医学院学报，2000，25(3)：224～225
110．程罗根．昆虫抗药性遗传机制研究进展．植物保护，1997，23(6)：33～34
111．董钧锋，王深柱，钦俊德．昆虫性比失调因子及共作用机理．昆虫知识，2001．38(3)：103～107
112．鲁成，代方银，向仲怀．家蚕体节畸形自然突变型的研究．西南农业大学学报，2000，22(1)：1～5
113．蒙小平，刘先蜀．西方蜜蜂染色体分带技术的初步研究．中国养蜂，1998，(2)：7
114．蓝明扬，赵郁光．细胞培养法制备中华按蚊有丝分裂染色体及其G、C分带．医学动物防制，1992，8(2)：68～71
115．缪克存，胡萃，Miao Kecun．褐刺蛾和扁刺蛾染色体数的观察．昆虫知识，1989，26(6)：340～342
116．蔡邦华，侯陶谦，宋士美．松毛虫的种间杂交及其余种生物学的初步观察．昆虫学报，1965．8(1)：347～358
117．潘星华，梁嘉靖．突变基因体细胞纯合的一种新机制——从双翅目昆虫到人类的体联会．自然杂志，1999，20(6)：353～354
118．薛增召，袁锋．世界蚜虫分类研究进展．昆虫分类学报，1992，14(2)：153～158．
119．瞿逢伊．我国蚊类研究五十年．中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志，1999，17(5)：264～266．
120. Agopian S., Moles L. Intra and interspecific karyotype vaviability in five species of Libellulidae (Anisoptera: Odonsta). Caryologia, 1988, 41(1): 69-78
121. Amin PW. Resistance of wild species of groundnut to insect and mite pests. In: International Crops Research Inst. for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, A.P. (India), ICRISAT, 1985:57-61
122. Arun K, Dphil A. Chromosome techniques (3rd edition). London: Butterworths Press, 1980
123. Ault J. Contributions of insect systems to the chromosome theory of inheritance and to our understanding of chromosome behavior on the spindle. Journal of Insect Morphology Embryol. Elsevier Science Ltd, 1996, 25(1/2): 93-114
124. Baird S. Haldane's rule by sexual transformation in caenorhabditis. Genetics, 2002. 161: 1349～1353
125. Bauer H. Die kinetische organisation der Lepidopteren chromosomen. Chromosoma (Berl.), 1967, 22:101～107
126. Bedo,D. Progress and problems in the cytology of Ceratitis capitata. Insect and Pest Control Newsletter. 1989, 43: 27-29.
127. Bella A, Jerusalem G, Barrion A, et al. Gamma ray induction oftranslocations in the corn earworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Philippine Entomologist, 1997, 11(2): 109-117
128. Belling J. The ultimate Chromosomes of Lilium and Aloe with regard to the number of genes. Univ. Calif. Pabl. Bot., 1928, 14:307～318
129. Bigger T. Karyotypes of some Lepidopters chromosomes. Cytologia, 1975, 40:713～726
130. Brown W. Textbook of cytogenetics. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Co., 1972
131. Carpenter J E. Effect of radiation dose on the incidence of visible chromosomal aberrations in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology, 1991, 20(5): 1457-1459.
132. Cases S, Smith S, Zheng, et al. Identification of a gene encoding an Acyl CoA:diacyiglycerol acyltransferase, a key enzyme in triacylglycerol synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998, 95(22): 13018-13023.
133. Clarke, C, Ford, E. Intersexuality in Lymantria dispar (L). In: A further reassessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 1980, 214: 285～288
134. Coyne J, Orn H. Two rules of speciation, pp 180～207. In: Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by Otte, D. and End, J. A. 1989. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass
135. Coyne, J. A. The genetic basis of Haldane's rule. Nature, 1985, 314. 736～738
136. Crick F. General model for the chromosomes of higher organisms. Nature, 1971, 234:25～27
137. Cueno M, Laurie P, Ocampo R. Cytogenetics of corn earworm (Helicoverpa armigera Hbn.). Philippine-Agriculturist, 1999, 81(1 and 2): 89-93
138. Curtis, C, Langley A, Trewem M. X-chromosome involvement in male hybrid sterility from Glosslvia morsitans subspecies crosses. Heredity, 1980, 45:405～410
139. Daly JC. Ecology and genetics of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera: interactions between selection and gene flow. Genetica, 1993, 90(2-3): 217-226
140. Daly JC. The use of electrophoretic data in a study of gene flow in the pest species Heliothis armigera (Hubner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). In: Loxdale HD, Hollander J. Electrophoretic studies on agricultural pests. New York, Oxford University Press,
1989:115-141
141. Davidson G. Genetic control of insect pests. 1974. Academic Press, New York
142. Degrugillier M, Newman S. Hereditary viruses of Heliothis, chromatin associated virus like particles in testes of six species of Heliothis and Helicoverpa, F1 and backcross male. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 1993.61:147～155
143. Dethier G. Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. EvolulioⅡ, 1954.8:33～54
144. DeVault J, Narang S. Transposable elements in Lepidoptera: hobo-like transposons in Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1994, 203(1): 169-175.
145. Dobzhansky T. Studies on hybrid sterility. Ⅱ. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics, 1936.21:113～135
146. Downes A. The gypsy moth and some possibilities of the control of insects by genetical means. The Canadian Entomologist, 1959. 661～664
147. ElSorady A, Feel E, Omar H. Cytological studies on the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and American bollworm Heliothis armigera (Huebner). Alexandria Journal of Agricultral Research, 1992, 37(1): 107-121
148. Feeny P, Stader E, Ahman I, et al. Effects of plant odor on oviposition by the black swallowtail butterfly Papilio polyxenes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 1989. 2: 803～827
149. Felsenstein J. Skepticism towards santa rosalia, or why are there so few kind of animals. EvolutIbn, 1981. 35. 124～138
150. Flemming W. 1882. Zellsubstanz, Kernund Zellteilung. Vogel, Leipzig.
151. Fletcher J, Wayadande A, Melcher U, et al. The phytopathogenic mollicute-insect vector interface: a closer look. Phytopathology, 1998, 88(12): 1351-1358
152. Fostef S, Clearwatef J, Muggleston S. et al. Probable sibling species complexes within two described New Zealand leaf roller moths. Naturwiss, 1986. 73: 156～158
153. Fostef S., Roelofs, W. Sex pheromone differences in populations of the brownhead leaf roller, Ctenopseustis obliquana. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1987. 13(3): 623～629
154. Fraccaro M, Trepolo L, Laudani V, et al. Y chromosome controls mating behavior on Anopheles mosquitoes. Nature, 1977, 265:327～328
155. Fuller, M. T Spermatogenesis, In: The Devetopment of drosophila melanogater, edited by Bate M, Martinez A. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, New York, 1993
156. Futuyma D, Peterson S. Genetic variation in the use of resources by insects. Annual Reviel of Entomology, 1985.30:217～238
157. Gill T, Gulati M, Pajni H. Chromosome number in Indian weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Coleopt. Bull. 1990, 44 (4): 437-441
158. Goldschmidt, R. Lymantria. Bibliographia Genetica. 1934, 11:1～186
159. Gottschaik W. Die chromosomenstruktur der solanaceen unter berucksichtgung phylogenetischer
Fragestellung. Chromosome, 1954, 6:539～626
160. Groh S, Gonzalez-de-Leon D, Khairallah M. et al. QTL mapping in tropical maize. Ⅲ. Genomic regions for resistance to Diatraea spp. and associated traits in two RIL populations. Crop-science, 1998, 38(4): 1062-1072
161. Grula, W. and Taylor, O. R. Some characteristics of hybrids derived from the sulfur butterflies, Colias euIytheme and C philodicef phenotypic effects of the X-chromosome. Evolution, 1980. 34f 673～687
162. Gutherz S. Zur Kenntis der Heterochromosomen. Arch Mikr. Anat. 1907.69:491
163. Haldane J. The causes of Evolution. Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1932
164. Haldane J. Sex-ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics, 1922. 12:101～109
165. Hansson B, Lofstedt C. and Roelofs, W. Inheritance of olfactory response to sex pheromone components in Ostrinltr nubilalis. Naturwissens, 1987.74:497～499
166. Hansson S, Lofstedt C, Z-linked inheritance of male olfactory response to sex pheromone components in two species of tortricid moths, Oenopseustis obliquana and Ctenopseustis sp. Entomology Expermentalis et Applicata, 1989.53:137～Ⅰ45
167. Hardwick D. The corn earworm complex. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 1965. 40. 3～247
168. Heath R, Mclaughlin J, Proshold E, et al. Periodicity of female sex pheromone titer and release in Heliothis subflexa and H. virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1991, 84: 182～189
169. Heemert C.Chromosomal rearrangements in the onion fly Hylemya antiqua (Meigen), induced and isolated for genetic insect control purposes. Studies on cytogenetics and fertility, with emphasis on an X-linked translocation. Wageningen (Netherlands). Landbou Whoge School, 1974
170. Heitz E. Das Heterochromotin der Moose. Ⅰ. Jahrb. Wiss. Botan. 1928, 69:762～818
171. Heitz E. Heterochromatin, Chromocertren, Chromomeren. Ber. Deutsch. Boton. Ges. 1929, 47: 274～284
172. Heppner J, Inoue, H. Checklist Lepidoptera of Taiwan 1(2), Gainesville: Association for Tropical Lepidoptera & Scientific Press, 1992
173. Hewitt G. M. Grasshopper and Crikets. Cytogenetics, Vol.3, Insecta Ⅰ. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.
174. Hirai H, Procunier W, Ochoa J. et al. A cytogenetic analysis of the Simulium ochraceum species complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Central America. Genome, 1994, 37(1): 36-53
175. Hovanitz W. Genetic data on the two races of Colias chrysotheme in North America and on a white form occurring in each. Genetics, 1944, 29:1～29
176. Ishikawa S. Responses of maxillary chemoreceptors in the larvae of the silkworm, Bonbyx mori, to stimulation by carbohydrates. Journal of Cellular physiology, 1963, 61:99～168
177. Jaenike J. Genetics of oviposition site preference in Drosophila trtounctata. Heredity, 1987, 59:
363～369
178. Jiggins C, Linares M, Naisbit R, et al. Sex-linked hybrid sterility in a butterfly. Ewhtion, 2001, 55: 1631～1638
179. Judd M, Shen MW, Kaufman TC. The anatomy and function of a segment of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 1992, 71: 139～156
180. Katayama, H. The sex chromosomes of a mayfly, Ameletus costalis Mats (Ephemerida). Jap. J. Cennt. 1989, 15(3):139-144
181. Kerremans P, Franz G. Isolation and cytogenetic analysis of genetic sexing strains for the medfly, Ceratitis capitata. Theor. Appl. genet. 1995, 91(2): 255-261
182. Kerremans, P, Bursch E. Chromosomal and molecular analysis of the med fly, Ceratitis capitata, in relation to genetic sex-separation mechanisms to improve the sterile insect technique. Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwweten schappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 1989, 54(3a): 759-766.
183. KJun J, Maini S. Genetic basis of an insect chemical communication system f the European com borer Environmental Entomoha, 1979, 8:423～426
184. Klun J A, Chapman O, Mattes K., Beroze M., Sonnet, P. Insect sex pheromones'a minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction. Ibid, 1973, 181: 661～663
185. Kochansky J, Carde T., Liebhern J. and Roelofs, W L. Sex pheromones of the European corn borer in New York. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1975, 1: 225～231
186. Kritikou D, Robinson A, Savakis C. Developments in cytological mapping of Ceratis capitata by in situ hybridization. Joint FAO/IAEA Div. of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. 1994,
187. Krueger M, Degrugiller ME, Narang SK. Size difference among 16S genes from end symbiotic bacteria found in tests of Heliothis virescens, H. subflexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and backcross sterile male moths. Fla. Entomologist, 1993, 76:382～383
188. Kuznetsova V, Sapunov V.B. Effect of X-rays on the morphological and karyological inconstancy of aphids. Population structure, genetics and taxonomy of aphids and thysanoptera. In: International Smyposia, held at Smolenice, Czechoslovakia. Eited by J. Holman et al. The Hague: SPB Academic, 1987, 134-138
189. Kuznetsova V.G. The chromosome mechanisms of sex determination in Insecta (with reference to Hemiptera). In: Regulation of insect reproduction Ⅳ: proceedings of a symposium held in Zinkovy, September, edited by Martin Tonner, Tomas Soldan, Blanka Bennettova. Praha: Academia Pub. House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1989, 293-301
190. LaChance L E, Kappenko, R. Hybrid sterility in Heliothis subflexa×H. virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) crosses: expression after infection with antiviral agents, heat shocks, and rearing at oxtreme temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1983, 76:104～109
191. LaChance L E. Identification of sterile backcross Heliothis males in field collections. Journal of Ecnomic Entomology, 1987, 80:1348～1350
192. LaChance L, Kappenko C, R. Effect of seven antibiotics on the growth and reproduction of Heliothis subflexa×H. virescens interspecific hybrids and backcross males. Annals of the
Entomological Society of America, 1981, 74:493～497
193. Lambert L, Beach R.M, Kilen T, et al. Soybean pubescence and its influence on larval development and oviposition preference of lepidopterous insects. Crop-science, 1992, 32(2): 463-466.
194. Lande R. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics, 1980, 94:203～215
195. Lastef, M L, Hardee D D. Intermating compatibility between the North American Helicoverpa zea and H. armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Russia. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1995, 88:77～80
196. Laster M L. Interspecific hybridization of Heliothis virescens and H. subflexa, Environmental Entomotogy, 1972, 1: 682～687
197. Laster ML, Hardee DD. Intermating Compatibility between North American Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera: noctuidae) from Russia. Journal Ecology Entomology, 1995, 88(1): 77～80
198. Laster ML, Sheng CF. Search for hybrid sterility for Helicoverpa zea in crosses between the North American H. zea and H. arrnigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from China. J. Econ. Entom. 1995, 88(5): 1288～1291
199. Lasted C. Population variation and genetic control of pheromone communication systems in moths. Entomotogta Experimentalist et Applicata, 1990, 54. 729～218
200. Laster ML. Interspecific hybridization of Heliothis virescens and H.subflexa. Environ. Entom., 1972, 1: 682～687
201. Laurie, C. The weaker sex is heterogametict 75 years of Haldane's rule. Genetics, 1997, 147: 937～951
202. Lima-de-Faria, A. 1952. The chromosome size gradient of the chromosomes of rye. Hereditas, 38: 246～248.
203. Lindsley, D. L. and Tokuyasu, K. T Spermatogenesis, pp 226～294 In: The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, edited by Ashbrunef, M. and Wright, T R. 1980. Clarendon Press
204. Liu M. Y, Cai, J. P and Tian Y Sex pheromone components of the oriental tobacco budworm, HelicoverPa assulta Gueneet identification and field trials. Entomologta Sinica, 1994, 1(1). 77～85
205. Lofstedt C, Hansson B, Roelofs W, et al. No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn boref, Ostrinia nubilalis Htibner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Genetics, 1989, 123: 553～556
206. Ma S.W, Corsaro B.G., Klebba PE, et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of a p40 structural protein gene of Helicoverpa zea nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology, 1993, 192(1): 224-233
207. Makino S. A review of the chromosome numbers in Animals. Revised Tokyo: Hokuryukan. 1956.
208. Makino S. An atlas of the chromosome mnumberers in animal ames. Iowa State College Press, 1951
209. Mallet J, Korman A, Heckel DG et al. Biochemical genetics of Heliothis and Helicoverpa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and evidence for a founder event in Helicoverpa zea. Annals of the
Entomological Society of America, 1993, 86(2): 189-197
210. Mandrioli M. Identification and chromosomal localization of marinerlike elements in the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera). Chromosome Research, 2003, 11(4): 319～322
211. Mandrioli, Manicardi M, Marrec F. Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of the MBSAT1 satellite DNA in holokinetic chromosomes of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera). Chromosome Research, 2003, 11: 51～56
212. Marec F, Traut W. Analysis of structural rearrangements of lepidoptera chromosomes using the centrifugation spreading technique. Management of insect pests: nuclear and related molecular and genetic techniques. 1993, 243-250
213. Mattews M. The classification of the Heliothinae (Noctuidae) Ph. D. thesis, London: University of London Press. 1987
214. McCreadie J, Adler P, Colbo M. Cytogenetics fo the Simulium venustum verecundum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) on the Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland. The Canadian entomologist. 1994, 126(1): 23-30
215. Miller G and Miller D. Infectious enterococcus from Heliothis virscens×H. subflexa backcross hybrids (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of tle EntomologicaI Society of America, 1996, 89: 420～427
216. Miller G, Huettel M, Davis M, Weber H and Weber L. Male sterility in Heliothis virscens×H. subflexa backcross hybrids, evidence for abnormal mitochondrial transcripts in testes. Molecular & General GeIletics, 1986, 203:451～461
217. Mitchell R, Hines R and Copeland W. Heliothis subflexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): establishment and maintenance of a laboratory colony. Ftorbo Entomologist, 1988, 71(2): 212～214
218. Moens PB. The fine structure of meiotic chromosome polarization and pairing in Locusta migratoria spermatocytes. Chromosoma, 1969, 23:1～25
219. Montgonery, T. H. Some observations and considerations upon the maturation phenomena of the germ cells. Biol. Bull. 1904, 6:137～158
220. Montgonery, T. H. Chromosomes in the spermatogenesis of the Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. (N.S.), 1906, 31:97～173
221. Morgante J, Selivon D, Solferini V N et al. Genetic and morphological differentiation in the specialist species Anastrepha pickeli and A. montei. In: Fruit fly pests a world assessment of their biology and management. Delray Beach, FL, St. Lucie Press, 1996, 273-276
222. Motara M.A, Hawkes P. Meiosis in the Eastern Cape grasshopper Phymateus leprosus (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphiphidae). J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr. 1985, 48(2): 217-221
223. Muller, H. J. Bearing of the Drosophila works on systematics, pp. 185～268 in The Nelv S, slematics, edited by Huxley, J. 1940. Oxford: Clarendon press
224. Muller, H. J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol Symp. 1942, 6: 71～125
225. Murakami A. cytological evidence for holocentric chromosome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori and mandarima. Chromosoma(Berl.), 1974, 47: 16～21
226. Naisbit R E, Jiggins D, Linares M, Salazar C and Mallet J. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule, and speciation in Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomele. Evolution, 2002
227. Ng, D. A novel level of interactions in plant-insect systems. Nature, 1988, 334:611～612
228. Orr H. A. Haldane's rule has multiple genetic causes. Nature, 1993, 361:532～533
229. Orr H. A. Haldane's rule. Annual Review of Ecotogy and Systematics, 1997, 28:195～218
230. Pashley D. P Quantitative genetics, development, and physiological adaptation in host strains of fall armyworm. Evolution, 1988, 42: 93～102
231. Proshold E, Raulston J, Martin F, and Laste L. The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations. Journal of Economic Entomoha, 1983, 76:626～631
232. Proshold. Release of backcross insects on St. Croix, U. S. Virgin Islands, to suppress the tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): infusion of sterility into a native population. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1983, 76:1353～1359
233. Proshold I and LaChance E. Analysis of sterility from interspecific crosses between Heliothis virescens and H suwa. Annals of the Entomotogical Society of America, 1974, 67.445～449
234. Rahman R, Rigney C, Busch-Petersen E. Irradiation as a quarantine treatment against Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae): anatomical and cytogenetic changes in mature larvae after gamma irradiation. Journal-of Economic Entomology, 1990, 83(4): 1449-1454
235. Ramaswamy, S. B. Host finding by moths f sensory modalities and behaviors. Journal of insect Phnioha, 1988, 34:235～249
236. RausheT, M. D. The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations. Evolution, 1984, 38: 596～608
237. Remington, C. L. Sutrezones of hybrid interaction between joined biota. Evoutionaly Bioha, 1968, 2:321～428
238. Renou, M. and Lucas, P Sex pheromone reception in Mamestra blxissicae L. (Lepidoptera) responses of olfactory receptor neurons to minor components of the pheromone blend. Journal of Insect Phaiotogy, 1994, 40:73-85
239. Renou,M. Gadenne, C. and Tauban, D. Electrophysiological investigations of pheromone sensitive sensilla in the hybrids between two moth species. Journal of Insect Physiology, 1996, 42(3): 267～277
240. Renwick, J. A. A. and Radke, C. D. Chemical stimulants and deterrents regulating acceptance or rejection of crucifers by cabbage butterflies. Journal of Chemltal Ecotogr, 1987, 13.1771～1775
241. Rieger, R., Michaelis A. and Green M.M. 1991. Glossary of genetics and cytogenetics classical and molecular. 5th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
242. Ris H. The structure of meiotic chromosomes in the grasshopper and its bearing on the nature of "chromomers" and "lamp～brush chromosomes". Bioi. Bull, 1945, 89:242～257
243. Robinson AS. Development and use of DNA probes in mapping insect genomes. Management of insect pests: nuclear and related molecular and genetic techniques. 1993, 101-114
244. Robinson R. Lepidoptera genetics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971
245. Roelofs, W, GlovefT, Tang XH, Sreng I., Robbins P, Eckenrode C, Hansson, B. S. and Bengtsson, B. O. Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex～linked genes. Proceedtogs of the National Academy of Scltrnces USA, 1987, 84:7585～7589
246. Roelvink P, Corsaro B, Granados R. Characterization of the Helicoverpa armigera and Pseudaletia unipuncta granulovirus enhancin genes. Journal of General Virology, 1995, 76(11): 2693-2705
247. Roessler Y. Genetics of the Mediterranean fruit fly in the sterile insect technique. Joint FAO/IAEA Div. of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, 1994
248. Roininen, H. and Tahvanainen, J. Host selechon and larval performance of two willow feeding sawflies. Ecotw, 1989, 70. 129～136
249. Rubini PG, Franco M.G, Rovati C, Vecchi M. Genetic variability of the sex balance in European populations of Musca domestica domestica L. In: Regulation of insect reproduction Ⅳ: proceedings of a symposium held in Zinkovy, Edited by Martin Tonner, Tomas Soldan, Blanka Bennettova. Praha, Academia Pub. House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1989, 303-315
250. Rummel D, Arnold M, Gannaway J, et al. Evaluation of Bt cottons resistant to injury from bollworm: implications for pest management in the Texas southern High Plains. The Southwestern entomologist, 1994, 19(3): 199-207
251. Samoilov Y.B. Genetic method of combatting the cabbage root flies. Ⅱ. Localization of factor determining male sex in the cabbage root fly Delia brassicae Bouche. Consultants Bureau. Nov 1985, 21(11): 1419-1424
252. Scriber, J. M., Giebink, B. L. and Snidef, D. ReciprocaI latitUdinal clines in oviposition behavior of PaPilio glaucus and P Canadensis across the Great Lakes hybrid zone'possible sex～linkage of oviposition preference. Oecologia, 1991, 87:360～368
253. Severson DW, Mori A, Zhang Y, et al. Chromosomal mapping of two loci affecting filarial worm susceptibility in Aedes aegypti. Insect Molecular Biology. 1994, 3(2): 67-72
254. Sezef, M. and Butlin, R. K. The genetic basis of host plant adaptation in the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). Heledity, 1998, 80:499～508
255. Sheck A.L., Gould. The genetic basis of host range in Heliothis virescen lariral survival and growth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1993, 69:157～172
256. Sheck, A. L. and Gould, F. Genetic analysis of differences in oviposition preferences of Heliothis vilrscens and H subsexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Envildniental Entomology, 1995, 24(2): 341～347
257. Sheck, A. L. and Gould, F. The genetic basis of differences in growth and behavior of specialist and generalist herbivore species of selection on hybrids of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa (Lepidoptera). Evolution, 1996. 50(2): 831～841
258. Silberglied R.E, Taylor O. R. Ultraviolet reflection and its behavioral role in the courtship of the sulfur butterflies, Colias eurytheme and C philodice (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Genetics, 1978, 31:
558～573
259. Silberglied, R. E. and TayloF, JR. O. R. Ultraviolet differences between the sulfur butterflies, Colias eurytheme and C. philodice, and possible isolating mechanism. Nature, 1973, 241.406～408
260. Singef M, Thomas C.D. Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution, 1988, 42(2). 977～985
261. Singer, M. C. The definition and measurement of oviposition preference in plant-feeding insects. In: Insect hunts Interactions, edited by Miller, J. R. and Miller, T A. 1986. Springer, New York
262. Smiley, J. Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from Hehconius and Passopra. Science, 1978, 201:745～747
263. Sorady A, Feel A, Omar H. Cytological studies on the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and American bollworm Heliothis armigera (Huebner). Alexandria Journal of Agricultral Research (Egypt). 1992, 37(1): 107-121
264. Sperling,.F.A.H. Sex-linked genes and species differences in Lepidoptera. The Canadian Entonlotogist, 1994, 126:807～818
265. Stadelbachef, E. A. Role of early～season wild and naturalized host plants in the buildup of the Fl generation of Heliothis zea and H. virescens in the delta of Mississippi. Economical Entomology, 1981, 10:766～770
266. Stadelbacher, E. A. Geranium dissectumf an unreported host of the tobacco budworm and bollworm and its role in the seasonal and long term population dynamics in the delta of Mississippi. Envhonmental Entomotogy 1979, 8:1153～1156
267. Stouthamer R, Kazmer D. Cytogenetics of microbe-associated parthenogenesis and its consequences for gene flow in Trichogramma wasps. Heredity, 1994, 73(3): 317-327
268. Subbarao SK, Nanda, Chandrahas R. Anopheles culicifacies complex: cytogenetic characterization of Rameshwaram island populations. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 1993, 9(1): 27-31
269. Taylof, D. R. Sex ratio in hybrids between Silene alba and Silene dioicar evidence for blinked restorers. Heredity, 1994, 73(5): 518～526
270. Teakle RE, Jenson, JM. Heliothis punctiger. In: Handbook of insect rearing. Edited by P.Singh and Moore R.F. Vol. 2. elsevier, Amsterdam. 1985
271. Teal P., Tumlinson J. Effects ofinterspecific hybridization between Heliothis virescens and Heliothis zea on the sex pheromone conununication system, pp 535～547 in Insectpheromone research new dthections, edited by Carde, R. T. and Minks, A. K. 1996. Intemational Thomson Publishing Chapman and Hall
272. Thompson, J. N. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experinlentalis et Applicata, 1988, 47: 3～14
273. Thompson, J. N. Evolutionary genetics of oviposition preference in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution, 1988, 42(6): 1223～1234
274. Thompson, J. N., Wehling, W and Podoisky, R. Evolutionary genetics of host use in swallowtail butteffiies. Nature, 1990, 344(8): 148～150
275. True, J. R., Weir, B. S. and Laurie, C. C. A genome wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritltrna chromosomes into Drosopthe simulans. Genend, 1996, 142:819～837
276. Turelli, M. The causes of Haldane's rule. Sctence, 1998, 282:889～891
277. Va S. Genetic covarjance between oviposition preference and larval performance in an insect herbivore. Evolution, 1986, 40:778～785
278. van Drongelen, van Loon A. Inheritance of gustatory sensitivity in Fl progeny of crosses between Yponomeuta cagnagellus and Y. nlaIinellus (Lepidoptera). Entomoha Experimentalis et Applicata, 1980. 28:199～203
279. Waldbauef, G P and Fraenkel, G Feeding on normally rejected plants by maxillectomized larvae of the tobacco homworm, Protoparce sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1961.54:477～485
280. Wang CZ, Dong JE Interspecific hybridization of Helicoverpa arraigera and H. assulta (Lepidopera: Noctuidae). Chinese Science Bulletin, 2001, 46(6): 489～491
281. Wang YX, Marec F, Traut W. The synaptonemal complex of the wax moth, Galleria mellonella. Hereditas, 1993, 118:113～119
282. White M. Animol cytology and evolution (the third editon), Combridge University Press. London, New York, 1973
283. Whitten M. A genetic perspective on pest control and the future of a autocidal control. In: FAO, Modern insect control: nuclear techniques and biotechnology. 1988, 41-55
284. Wiklund C. Genralist vs. specialist oviposition behaviour in Papillo machaon (Lepidoptera) and functional aspects on the hierarchy of oviposition preference. Oikos, 1981, 36:163～170
285. Wiklund, C. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L. Oecotogia, 1975, 18:185～197
286. Winte P C, Hickey G I. and Fletcher H. L. Instant Notes in Genetics. 1998. BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited
287. Wu C.I. and Davis W. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation'the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. American Naturalist, 1993, 142:187～212
288. Wu, C.I., Johnson, N. A. and Palopoli, M. E Haldane's rule and its legacyt why are there so many sterile males, TREE, 1996, 11(7): 281～284
289. Wu, D. M., Yan, Y H. and Cui, J. R. Sex pheromone components of Helicoverpa arnigera chendcal analysis and field tests. Entomohaa Sinica, 1997, 4(4): 350～356
290. Young, H., Galbreath, R. A., Benn, M. H., Holt, V A. and Struble, D. L. Sex pheromonecom ponents in New Zealand brownheaded leaf roller Ctenopseustis obltruana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Zoological technology, 1985.40:262～265
291. Zacharopoulou A, Gariou A, Kritikou D. Efforts to synthesize Balancer strains for chromosome 5
of Ceratitis capitata and cytological mapping of the cymutation. Joint FAO/IAEAD, Ⅳ. Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, 1994
292. Zacharopoulou A, Riva M, Malacrida A, et al. Cytogenic characterization of a genetic sexing strain in Ceratitis capitata. Genome, 1991, 34 (4): 606-611
293. Zhang H F, Zheng L Y. Study on the karyotypes of three species of genes Carbula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Entomologia Sinica, 2002, 9(2): 59～67
294. Zhang LS, Zhang QW, Cai QN, et al. The synaptonemal complexes and sex-chromosome of Helicoverpa assulta. Heredics, 2004
295. Zhang LS, Zhang QW, Cai QN, et al. The synaptonemal complexes of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Acta Sinica Sciences, 2004
2．马昆，施立明．家蚕联会复合体组型分析．遗传学报，1988，15(5)：355～361
3．马思波，郑哲民．五种稻蝗的染色体核型和C-带带型．昆虫学报，1989，32(4)：399-405
4．马恩波，欧晓红，乔格侠．蝗总科染色体研究及科级综合比较(直翅目)．昆虫分类学报，2000，22(1)：6～10
5．马恩波，郑哲民．斑腿蝗科十属NOR定位及其细胞分类学意义．动物学研究，1993，14(3)：271～276
6．马恩波，郭亚平．伪稻蝗及其近缘属的细胞学分类．昆虫学报，1995，38(1)：54～60
7．尤平，郑哲民，蟋蟀总科(Grylloidae)的细胞分类研究概况及核型演化．昆虫知识，1997，34(2)：106～109
8．尹立中，刘建军，魏凌基．新疆垦区蚜虫染色体组型分析．石河子农学院学报，1994，12(3～4)：41～44
9．毛连菊，杨少闻，谢祚浑．摇蚊幼虫唾腺及其染色体的比较研究．中国水产科学，2000，7(2)：22～27
10．牛新华，邢娟．减数分裂联会复合体整体制片的银染技术．实验室研究与探索，2002，21(3)：154～157
11．牛新华，高宗华．解剖学杂志，2002，25(3)：296～298．
12．牛瑶，郑哲民．竹蝗属部分种类的染色体分类研究(直翅目：蝗总科)．见：廉振民，昆虫学研究．两安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，136～141
13．牛瑶，郑哲民．云南蝗虫—新属新种．昆虫分类学报，1993，15(1)：1-5
14．王义平，卜文俊，张虎芳．山地原花蝽核型研究(半翅目，花蝽科)．动物分类学报，2003，28(1)：126～129
15．王子淑．人体及动物细胞遗传学实验技术．成都：四川大学出版社，1987
16．王亚军，王喜忠，杨彪．家蚕染色体复制区带的初步显示．昆虫学报，1998，41(3)：237～242
17．王运湘，施立明．W+P普斑限性与Wze虎斑限性品系家蚕的联会复合体分析．遗传学报，1990，17(5)：349～353
18．王宗舜，钟香臣，郭郛．家蚕精母细胞结合丝复合体的研究．遗传学报，1981，8(1)：36～41
19．王念慈，李照会．棉铃虫和烟青虫生物学研究．山东农业大学学报，1984，(3)：13-25
20．王琛柱，董钧锋．棉铃虫和烟青虫的种间杂交．科学通报，2000，45(20)：2209-2212
21．王登元，于江南，羌松．棉铃虫种类的鉴别．新疆农业大学学报，1997，20(4)：65-69
22．邓一民，向仲怀．桑蟥细胞遗传学研究．西南农业大学学报，1993，15(6)：565-568
23．付鹏，郑哲民．四种蝗虫的染色体c带核型及所显示的分类关系．陕西师大学报，1988，16(增刊)：43-48
24．冯蜀举，施立明．德国蜚蠊精母细胞联会复合体(SCs)组型及辐射诱发的SCs畸变．遗传学报，1986，13(5)：377～382
25．叶炳辉，徐南．蚊虫染色体的制片方法．遗传，1979，1(4)：29～30
26．叶炳辉，黄品，蒋文斌．中华按蚊唾腺染色体的研究．遗传学报，1981，8(1)：42～49
27．甘代耀，林杭美，何玉仙．秋水仙碱对褐飞虱精细胞染色体的影响．华东昆虫学报，1996，5(1)：99～100
28．田润刚，袁锋．尖三刺角蝉的核型与性二型现象．昆虫分类学报，1995，17(3)：197～200．
29．石裕明，叶奕英．广西微小按蚊卵巢营养细胞多线染色体的观察．中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志，1990，8(2)：117～120
30．乔格侠，郑哲民．异爪蝗属部分种类染色体分类研究．见：廉振民．昆虫学研究．西安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，118～124
31．刘大钧．细胞遗传学．北京：中国农业出版社，1999
32．刘友樵，葛岚屏．鳞翅目蛾类科以上阶元分类的新进展．昆虫知识，1997，34(2)：121～124
33．刘侠，王子淑，陈文元，王喜中．雄蚕终变期染色体核型分析．昆虫学报，1989，34(4)：499～501
34．刘国章，何麟．我国人体寄生虫及病媒昆虫染色体研究概况．中国寄生虫及寄生虫病杂志，1989，7(2)：128～132．
35．刘振魁，严林，霍科科．青海三种草原毛虫染色体的观察．昆虫知识，1998，35(2)：101
36．刘淑珊，王林美，范琦．樗蚕(Philosamia cynthia)蛹精巢细胞系的建立．蚕业科学，1999，25(1)：41～45
37．孙延昌，邓守俭，公茂庆．染色体技术在医学昆虫研究中的应用．中国媒介生物学及控制杂志，1997，8(1)：71～72
38．孙延昌，邓守俭．多线染色体．生物学通报，1997，32(1)：7～9
39．孙红英，张锡然，苏翠荣，谢小燕，王进，高峰．蜉蝣目昆虫染色体制备方法探讨．动物学杂志，1998，32(2)：30～31
40．朱竑侃，郑建中，缪建吾．中国六种蚊虫的核型分析．昆虫学研究集刊，1981：81～87
41．汤德良，王深柱，罗林地，钦俊德．棉铃虫和地青虫幼虫检锥感器对某些化合物的反应特性．中国科学(C)，2000，30(5)：
42．许漱壁．赫坎按蚊与中华按蚊染色体的比较研究．第二军医大学学报，1991，12(3)：11～13
43．许漱璧，潭璟宪，薛景珉，孙建新．我国米赛按蚊有丝分裂染色体和种内多态现象的研究．第二军医大学学报，1990，11(1)：36～38
44．许漱璧，潭璟宪，薛景珉，孙建新．新疆米赛按蚊多线染色体及多态性臂内倒位的研究．第二军医大学学报，1989，10(4)：336～339
45．许漱璧，瞿逢伊．我国13种按蚊的染色体研究．第二军医大学学报，1991，12(3)：235～239
46．何利萍，凌发瑶，郑向忠．银额果蝇(Drosophila albomicans)B染色体对繁殖的影响．遗传学报，2000，27(2)：114～120
47．何康，李文盛，震金富．白纹伊蚁的染色体组型．遗传，1985，1(4)：40-41
48．余红梅，刘国章．我国媒介蚊虫染色体研究概况．医学动物防制，1993，9(3)：160～163
49．吴鹤龄，李汝祺．摇蚊唾腺多线染色体的研究Ⅱ：第Ⅰ和第Ⅱ染色体在幼虫到成虫期间的可逆性变化．遗传学报，1985，12(2)：132～136
50．宋方洲，向仲怀，刘绍兰．蓖麻蚕利栗蚕的性染色体研究．蚕业科学，1996，22(3)：170～174
51．宋方洲，常平安，刘运强．中国野桑蚕Giemsa淡染性染色体的研究．蚕业科学，2001，27(1)：6～10
52．宋方洲，曹平，代方银．家蚕虎斑易位系(ZW．Ze)染色体的研究．蚕业科学，1998，24(4)：221～225
53．张广学，乔格侠．蚜虫细胞分类学研究概况．见：廉振民．昆虫学研究．西安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，201～207
54．张礼生，张青文，蔡青年，等．中国昆虫染色体研究历史与展望．昆虫学报，2003，46(6)：773～782
55．张礼生，张青文，蔡青年，等．棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner)减数分裂精母细胞减数分裂研究．植物保护，2004，30(2)：33-36
56．张礼生，张青文，蔡青年，等．烟青虫减数分裂及单倍体核型研究．中国农业大学学报，2004，9(4)
57．张劳．赤拟谷盗——用于动物遗传育种研究的实验昆虫．农业科学集刊(第一集)，1993：386～389
58．张虎芳，郑乐怡．半翅目昆虫染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1998．35(4)：243～246
59．张虎芳，郑乐怡．四种蝽科昆虫的染色体研究．昆虫学报，1999，42(3)：234～240
60．张青文．昆虫遗传学．北京：科学出版社，2000
61．张春林，陈汉彬．贵州5种常见蚋的核型研究：(双翅目：蚋科)．寄生虫与医学昆虫学报，2000，7(1)：55～59
62．张维，康文，李元英．~(60)Coγ射线辐射对柑桔大实蝇(Daccus citri)染色体影响的研究．核农学报，1995，9(4)：203～206
63．李本文，刘多，谢氏松，叶炳辉，卢惠霖．中华按蚊唾液腺多线染色体中性染色体短臂的进一步确认．中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志，1988，6(2)：118～136
64．李红梅，徐元康．家蚕染色体的C～带带型及其扫描电镜的初步研究．汕头大学学报(自然科学版)，1998，13(1)：36～40
65．李锦华．棉铃虫和烟青虫的寄主特点和室内饲养观察．昆虫知识，1986．23(1)：12-14
66．李懋学，张学方．植物染色体研究技术．哈尔滨：东北林业大学出版社，1991
67．杨文，刘恒孝．凉山按蚊唾腺染色体研究．昆明医学院学报，1991，12(1)：30～33
68．杨志远，黄培，吴国雄．米象、玉米象及其杂交后代染色体的观察研究．昆虫学报，1989，32(4)：406～409
69．杨集昆，李法圣．棉铃虫和烟青虫的区别．植物保护，1964．2(2)：89-90
70．汪霞，王志平，王科．东方蜜蜂(Apis cerana Fab)染色体核型研究．中国养蜂，1988，(2)：2～4
71．沈以红，向仲怀．家蚕有丝分裂染色体研究．蚕业科学，1997，23(1)：42～46
72．陈一心．棉铃虫及其近似种的鉴别．昆虫知识，1981．18(1)：32-33
73．陈学新，陆伟．何俊华，马云．寄生蜂核型特征及其在分类上的应用．动物分类学报，2000，25(3)：285～290
74．陈复生．家蚕倍数性及其染色体组成的解析．中国蚕业，1998，(3)：11～12
75．陈晓光，何麟．蜚蠊的染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1989，26(4)：254～255
76．陈晓光．蜚蠊的染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1989，26(4)：254～255
77．陈晓社，张广学．萝卜蚜和豆蚜染色体C～带带型比较与分析．昆虫学报，1985，28(3)：271～273
78．陈晓社，张广学．北京地区51种蚜虫的染色体组型．动物学报，1985，31(1)：12～19
79．孟智启，伴野丰，土井良宏．家蚕染色体缺失的细胞学证明．浙江农业学报，1985，7(4)：320～322
80．孟智启，徐俊良．中国野蚕染色体结构及其变异的研究．蚕业科学，2000，26(1)：5～9
81．欧晓红，郑哲民．中国蝗总科昆虫细胞分类学研究概况．见：廉振民．昆虫学研究．西安：陕西师范大学出版社，1994，216～227
82．俞天荣，缪建吾．敌百虫诱发淡色库蚊染色体易位的观察．昆虫学研究集刊，1980，第一集：99～103
83．施立明．染色体分带技术的回顾与展望．动物学研究，1984：5：1～12
84．洪靖君，詹永乐，陈复生．家蚕多倍体发生与染色体观察分析．安徽农业大学学报，2001，28(1)：66～69
85．赵建，何孟元，郝水．红翅皱膝蝗减数分裂染色体的螺旋与轴结构．实验生物学报，1990，23(3)：261～245
86．赵建，何孟元，郝水．红翅皱膝蝗减数分裂染色体轴的形成与联会复合体．遗传学报，1992，19(1)：34～37
87．赵章武，元景，樊永亮．亚洲玉米螟染色体研究．山西大学学报，1993，16(3)：311～315
88．赵惠燕，张改生，汪世泽，李秀娥．棉蚜体色变化与染色体观察．昆虫知识，1993，30(4)：218～220．
89．钦俊德．昆虫与植物的关系——论昆虫与植物的相互作用及其演化．北京：科学出版社，1987
90．凌发瑶．七种蝇的染色体核型研究．动物学研究，1984，5(3)：51～60
91．凌发瑶，王文．银额果蝇自然群体分化过程中的细胞遗传学．遗传学报，1997，24(6)：496～500
92．凌发瑶，林苏．三黄果蝇(Drosophila trilutea)近黄果蝇(D．paralutea)的有丝分裂中期染色体．动物学研究，1997，11(2)：145～146
93．凌发瑶，施立明．银额果蝇的B染色体研究，2．昆明群体的生活力和B染色体的关系．动物学研究，1992，13(3)：271～275
94．徐广，郭予元．实夜蛾亚科的种间杂交研究进展．昆虫知识，2001．38(1)：8～11
95．徐安英，方瑗，黄君霆．家蚕性连锁致死突变位点与ZW+sch染色体易位片段关系的研究．蚕业科学，1994，20(2)：120～121
96．贾潇凌，马恩波．斑翅蝗科部分种属细胞分类学的研究．山西大学学报(自然科学版)，2000，
21(3)：291～296
97．郭予元．棉铃虫迁飞规律及其与奇主植物取食、消化及解毒生理关系的比较研究．昆虫学报，1997，40(增刊)：1—6
98．常平安，宋方洲，刘明萱，等．蓖麻蚕有丝分裂染色体的研究．西南农业大学学报，2001，23(4)：371～373
99．常岩林，廉振民．螽斯科昆虫染色体研究现状．昆虫知识，1996，33(5)：310～313
100．常岩林，芦荣胜．纺织娘染色体核型和C带的研究(直翅目：螽斯总科)．动物科学，2002，6(4)：170～174
101．常岩林，郑哲民．鼓鸣螽属一新种及染色体核型研究(直翅目：螽斯总科)．昆虫分类学报，1997，19(1)：10～12
102．彩万志．蚂蚁染色体研究进展．昆虫知识，1992，29(2)：120～129
103．彩万志．昆虫细胞分类学的基本问题及染色体系统发育的重建方法．昆虫分类学报，1994，16(1)：4～14
104．曹丽萍，何麟．四种蚤染色体组型及C分带研究．遗传，1994，16(4)：19～23
105．梁广勤，杨国海，梁帆，等．利用染色体和同工酶技术鉴定寡鬃实蝇幼虫．植物检疫，1994，8(1)：4～9
106．梁广勤，梁帆．桔小实蝇三龄幼虫染色体的组型．昆虫知识，1993，30(6)：356～358
107．梁铬球，郑哲民．中国蝗总科昆虫分类研究综述．昆虫知识，1994，31(2)：119～121
108．黄国洋，王荫长，尤子平．鳞翅目昆虫染色体的研究方法．华东昆虫学报，1994，3(1)：71～74
109．温小军．中国3种伊蚊的核型分析．贵阳医学院学报，2000，25(3)：224～225
110．程罗根．昆虫抗药性遗传机制研究进展．植物保护，1997，23(6)：33～34
111．董钧锋，王深柱，钦俊德．昆虫性比失调因子及共作用机理．昆虫知识，2001．38(3)：103～107
112．鲁成，代方银，向仲怀．家蚕体节畸形自然突变型的研究．西南农业大学学报，2000，22(1)：1～5
113．蒙小平，刘先蜀．西方蜜蜂染色体分带技术的初步研究．中国养蜂，1998，(2)：7
114．蓝明扬，赵郁光．细胞培养法制备中华按蚊有丝分裂染色体及其G、C分带．医学动物防制，1992，8(2)：68～71
115．缪克存，胡萃，Miao Kecun．褐刺蛾和扁刺蛾染色体数的观察．昆虫知识，1989，26(6)：340～342
116．蔡邦华，侯陶谦，宋士美．松毛虫的种间杂交及其余种生物学的初步观察．昆虫学报，1965．8(1)：347～358
117．潘星华，梁嘉靖．突变基因体细胞纯合的一种新机制——从双翅目昆虫到人类的体联会．自然杂志，1999，20(6)：353～354
118．薛增召，袁锋．世界蚜虫分类研究进展．昆虫分类学报，1992，14(2)：153～158．
119．瞿逢伊．我国蚊类研究五十年．中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志，1999，17(5)：264～266．
120. Agopian S., Moles L. Intra and interspecific karyotype vaviability in five species of Libellulidae (Anisoptera: Odonsta). Caryologia, 1988, 41(1): 69-78
121. Amin PW. Resistance of wild species of groundnut to insect and mite pests. In: International Crops Research Inst. for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, A.P. (India), ICRISAT, 1985:57-61
122. Arun K, Dphil A. Chromosome techniques (3rd edition). London: Butterworths Press, 1980
123. Ault J. Contributions of insect systems to the chromosome theory of inheritance and to our understanding of chromosome behavior on the spindle. Journal of Insect Morphology Embryol. Elsevier Science Ltd, 1996, 25(1/2): 93-114
124. Baird S. Haldane's rule by sexual transformation in caenorhabditis. Genetics, 2002. 161: 1349～1353
125. Bauer H. Die kinetische organisation der Lepidopteren chromosomen. Chromosoma (Berl.), 1967, 22:101～107
126. Bedo,D. Progress and problems in the cytology of Ceratitis capitata. Insect and Pest Control Newsletter. 1989, 43: 27-29.
127. Bella A, Jerusalem G, Barrion A, et al. Gamma ray induction oftranslocations in the corn earworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Philippine Entomologist, 1997, 11(2): 109-117
128. Belling J. The ultimate Chromosomes of Lilium and Aloe with regard to the number of genes. Univ. Calif. Pabl. Bot., 1928, 14:307～318
129. Bigger T. Karyotypes of some Lepidopters chromosomes. Cytologia, 1975, 40:713～726
130. Brown W. Textbook of cytogenetics. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Co., 1972
131. Carpenter J E. Effect of radiation dose on the incidence of visible chromosomal aberrations in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology, 1991, 20(5): 1457-1459.
132. Cases S, Smith S, Zheng, et al. Identification of a gene encoding an Acyl CoA:diacyiglycerol acyltransferase, a key enzyme in triacylglycerol synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998, 95(22): 13018-13023.
133. Clarke, C, Ford, E. Intersexuality in Lymantria dispar (L). In: A further reassessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 1980, 214: 285～288
134. Coyne J, Orn H. Two rules of speciation, pp 180～207. In: Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by Otte, D. and End, J. A. 1989. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass
135. Coyne, J. A. The genetic basis of Haldane's rule. Nature, 1985, 314. 736～738
136. Crick F. General model for the chromosomes of higher organisms. Nature, 1971, 234:25～27
137. Cueno M, Laurie P, Ocampo R. Cytogenetics of corn earworm (Helicoverpa armigera Hbn.). Philippine-Agriculturist, 1999, 81(1 and 2): 89-93
138. Curtis, C, Langley A, Trewem M. X-chromosome involvement in male hybrid sterility from Glosslvia morsitans subspecies crosses. Heredity, 1980, 45:405～410
139. Daly JC. Ecology and genetics of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera: interactions between selection and gene flow. Genetica, 1993, 90(2-3): 217-226
140. Daly JC. The use of electrophoretic data in a study of gene flow in the pest species Heliothis armigera (Hubner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). In: Loxdale HD, Hollander J. Electrophoretic studies on agricultural pests. New York, Oxford University Press,
1989:115-141
141. Davidson G. Genetic control of insect pests. 1974. Academic Press, New York
142. Degrugillier M, Newman S. Hereditary viruses of Heliothis, chromatin associated virus like particles in testes of six species of Heliothis and Helicoverpa, F1 and backcross male. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 1993.61:147～155
143. Dethier G. Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. EvolulioⅡ, 1954.8:33～54
144. DeVault J, Narang S. Transposable elements in Lepidoptera: hobo-like transposons in Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1994, 203(1): 169-175.
145. Dobzhansky T. Studies on hybrid sterility. Ⅱ. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics, 1936.21:113～135
146. Downes A. The gypsy moth and some possibilities of the control of insects by genetical means. The Canadian Entomologist, 1959. 661～664
147. ElSorady A, Feel E, Omar H. Cytological studies on the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and American bollworm Heliothis armigera (Huebner). Alexandria Journal of Agricultral Research, 1992, 37(1): 107-121
148. Feeny P, Stader E, Ahman I, et al. Effects of plant odor on oviposition by the black swallowtail butterfly Papilio polyxenes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 1989. 2: 803～827
149. Felsenstein J. Skepticism towards santa rosalia, or why are there so few kind of animals. EvolutIbn, 1981. 35. 124～138
150. Flemming W. 1882. Zellsubstanz, Kernund Zellteilung. Vogel, Leipzig.
151. Fletcher J, Wayadande A, Melcher U, et al. The phytopathogenic mollicute-insect vector interface: a closer look. Phytopathology, 1998, 88(12): 1351-1358
152. Fostef S, Clearwatef J, Muggleston S. et al. Probable sibling species complexes within two described New Zealand leaf roller moths. Naturwiss, 1986. 73: 156～158
153. Fostef S., Roelofs, W. Sex pheromone differences in populations of the brownhead leaf roller, Ctenopseustis obliquana. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1987. 13(3): 623～629
154. Fraccaro M, Trepolo L, Laudani V, et al. Y chromosome controls mating behavior on Anopheles mosquitoes. Nature, 1977, 265:327～328
155. Fuller, M. T Spermatogenesis, In: The Devetopment of drosophila melanogater, edited by Bate M, Martinez A. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, New York, 1993
156. Futuyma D, Peterson S. Genetic variation in the use of resources by insects. Annual Reviel of Entomology, 1985.30:217～238
157. Gill T, Gulati M, Pajni H. Chromosome number in Indian weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Coleopt. Bull. 1990, 44 (4): 437-441
158. Goldschmidt, R. Lymantria. Bibliographia Genetica. 1934, 11:1～186
159. Gottschaik W. Die chromosomenstruktur der solanaceen unter berucksichtgung phylogenetischer
Fragestellung. Chromosome, 1954, 6:539～626
160. Groh S, Gonzalez-de-Leon D, Khairallah M. et al. QTL mapping in tropical maize. Ⅲ. Genomic regions for resistance to Diatraea spp. and associated traits in two RIL populations. Crop-science, 1998, 38(4): 1062-1072
161. Grula, W. and Taylor, O. R. Some characteristics of hybrids derived from the sulfur butterflies, Colias euIytheme and C philodicef phenotypic effects of the X-chromosome. Evolution, 1980. 34f 673～687
162. Gutherz S. Zur Kenntis der Heterochromosomen. Arch Mikr. Anat. 1907.69:491
163. Haldane J. The causes of Evolution. Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1932
164. Haldane J. Sex-ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics, 1922. 12:101～109
165. Hansson B, Lofstedt C. and Roelofs, W. Inheritance of olfactory response to sex pheromone components in Ostrinltr nubilalis. Naturwissens, 1987.74:497～499
166. Hansson S, Lofstedt C, Z-linked inheritance of male olfactory response to sex pheromone components in two species of tortricid moths, Oenopseustis obliquana and Ctenopseustis sp. Entomology Expermentalis et Applicata, 1989.53:137～Ⅰ45
167. Hardwick D. The corn earworm complex. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 1965. 40. 3～247
168. Heath R, Mclaughlin J, Proshold E, et al. Periodicity of female sex pheromone titer and release in Heliothis subflexa and H. virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1991, 84: 182～189
169. Heemert C.Chromosomal rearrangements in the onion fly Hylemya antiqua (Meigen), induced and isolated for genetic insect control purposes. Studies on cytogenetics and fertility, with emphasis on an X-linked translocation. Wageningen (Netherlands). Landbou Whoge School, 1974
170. Heitz E. Das Heterochromotin der Moose. Ⅰ. Jahrb. Wiss. Botan. 1928, 69:762～818
171. Heitz E. Heterochromatin, Chromocertren, Chromomeren. Ber. Deutsch. Boton. Ges. 1929, 47: 274～284
172. Heppner J, Inoue, H. Checklist Lepidoptera of Taiwan 1(2), Gainesville: Association for Tropical Lepidoptera & Scientific Press, 1992
173. Hewitt G. M. Grasshopper and Crikets. Cytogenetics, Vol.3, Insecta Ⅰ. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.
174. Hirai H, Procunier W, Ochoa J. et al. A cytogenetic analysis of the Simulium ochraceum species complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Central America. Genome, 1994, 37(1): 36-53
175. Hovanitz W. Genetic data on the two races of Colias chrysotheme in North America and on a white form occurring in each. Genetics, 1944, 29:1～29
176. Ishikawa S. Responses of maxillary chemoreceptors in the larvae of the silkworm, Bonbyx mori, to stimulation by carbohydrates. Journal of Cellular physiology, 1963, 61:99～168
177. Jaenike J. Genetics of oviposition site preference in Drosophila trtounctata. Heredity, 1987, 59:
363～369
178. Jiggins C, Linares M, Naisbit R, et al. Sex-linked hybrid sterility in a butterfly. Ewhtion, 2001, 55: 1631～1638
179. Judd M, Shen MW, Kaufman TC. The anatomy and function of a segment of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 1992, 71: 139～156
180. Katayama, H. The sex chromosomes of a mayfly, Ameletus costalis Mats (Ephemerida). Jap. J. Cennt. 1989, 15(3):139-144
181. Kerremans P, Franz G. Isolation and cytogenetic analysis of genetic sexing strains for the medfly, Ceratitis capitata. Theor. Appl. genet. 1995, 91(2): 255-261
182. Kerremans, P, Bursch E. Chromosomal and molecular analysis of the med fly, Ceratitis capitata, in relation to genetic sex-separation mechanisms to improve the sterile insect technique. Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwweten schappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 1989, 54(3a): 759-766.
183. KJun J, Maini S. Genetic basis of an insect chemical communication system f the European com borer Environmental Entomoha, 1979, 8:423～426
184. Klun J A, Chapman O, Mattes K., Beroze M., Sonnet, P. Insect sex pheromones'a minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction. Ibid, 1973, 181: 661～663
185. Kochansky J, Carde T., Liebhern J. and Roelofs, W L. Sex pheromones of the European corn borer in New York. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1975, 1: 225～231
186. Kritikou D, Robinson A, Savakis C. Developments in cytological mapping of Ceratis capitata by in situ hybridization. Joint FAO/IAEA Div. of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. 1994,
187. Krueger M, Degrugiller ME, Narang SK. Size difference among 16S genes from end symbiotic bacteria found in tests of Heliothis virescens, H. subflexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and backcross sterile male moths. Fla. Entomologist, 1993, 76:382～383
188. Kuznetsova V, Sapunov V.B. Effect of X-rays on the morphological and karyological inconstancy of aphids. Population structure, genetics and taxonomy of aphids and thysanoptera. In: International Smyposia, held at Smolenice, Czechoslovakia. Eited by J. Holman et al. The Hague: SPB Academic, 1987, 134-138
189. Kuznetsova V.G. The chromosome mechanisms of sex determination in Insecta (with reference to Hemiptera). In: Regulation of insect reproduction Ⅳ: proceedings of a symposium held in Zinkovy, September, edited by Martin Tonner, Tomas Soldan, Blanka Bennettova. Praha: Academia Pub. House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1989, 293-301
190. LaChance L E, Kappenko, R. Hybrid sterility in Heliothis subflexa×H. virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) crosses: expression after infection with antiviral agents, heat shocks, and rearing at oxtreme temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1983, 76:104～109
191. LaChance L E. Identification of sterile backcross Heliothis males in field collections. Journal of Ecnomic Entomology, 1987, 80:1348～1350
192. LaChance L, Kappenko C, R. Effect of seven antibiotics on the growth and reproduction of Heliothis subflexa×H. virescens interspecific hybrids and backcross males. Annals of the
Entomological Society of America, 1981, 74:493～497
193. Lambert L, Beach R.M, Kilen T, et al. Soybean pubescence and its influence on larval development and oviposition preference of lepidopterous insects. Crop-science, 1992, 32(2): 463-466.
194. Lande R. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics, 1980, 94:203～215
195. Lastef, M L, Hardee D D. Intermating compatibility between the North American Helicoverpa zea and H. armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Russia. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1995, 88:77～80
196. Laster M L. Interspecific hybridization of Heliothis virescens and H. subflexa, Environmental Entomotogy, 1972, 1: 682～687
197. Laster ML, Hardee DD. Intermating Compatibility between North American Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera: noctuidae) from Russia. Journal Ecology Entomology, 1995, 88(1): 77～80
198. Laster ML, Sheng CF. Search for hybrid sterility for Helicoverpa zea in crosses between the North American H. zea and H. arrnigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from China. J. Econ. Entom. 1995, 88(5): 1288～1291
199. Lasted C. Population variation and genetic control of pheromone communication systems in moths. Entomotogta Experimentalist et Applicata, 1990, 54. 729～218
200. Laster ML. Interspecific hybridization of Heliothis virescens and H.subflexa. Environ. Entom., 1972, 1: 682～687
201. Laurie, C. The weaker sex is heterogametict 75 years of Haldane's rule. Genetics, 1997, 147: 937～951
202. Lima-de-Faria, A. 1952. The chromosome size gradient of the chromosomes of rye. Hereditas, 38: 246～248.
203. Lindsley, D. L. and Tokuyasu, K. T Spermatogenesis, pp 226～294 In: The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, edited by Ashbrunef, M. and Wright, T R. 1980. Clarendon Press
204. Liu M. Y, Cai, J. P and Tian Y Sex pheromone components of the oriental tobacco budworm, HelicoverPa assulta Gueneet identification and field trials. Entomologta Sinica, 1994, 1(1). 77～85
205. Lofstedt C, Hansson B, Roelofs W, et al. No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn boref, Ostrinia nubilalis Htibner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Genetics, 1989, 123: 553～556
206. Ma S.W, Corsaro B.G., Klebba PE, et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of a p40 structural protein gene of Helicoverpa zea nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology, 1993, 192(1): 224-233
207. Makino S. A review of the chromosome numbers in Animals. Revised Tokyo: Hokuryukan. 1956.
208. Makino S. An atlas of the chromosome mnumberers in animal ames. Iowa State College Press, 1951
209. Mallet J, Korman A, Heckel DG et al. Biochemical genetics of Heliothis and Helicoverpa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and evidence for a founder event in Helicoverpa zea. Annals of the
Entomological Society of America, 1993, 86(2): 189-197
210. Mandrioli M. Identification and chromosomal localization of marinerlike elements in the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera). Chromosome Research, 2003, 11(4): 319～322
211. Mandrioli, Manicardi M, Marrec F. Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of the MBSAT1 satellite DNA in holokinetic chromosomes of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera). Chromosome Research, 2003, 11: 51～56
212. Marec F, Traut W. Analysis of structural rearrangements of lepidoptera chromosomes using the centrifugation spreading technique. Management of insect pests: nuclear and related molecular and genetic techniques. 1993, 243-250
213. Mattews M. The classification of the Heliothinae (Noctuidae) Ph. D. thesis, London: University of London Press. 1987
214. McCreadie J, Adler P, Colbo M. Cytogenetics fo the Simulium venustum verecundum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) on the Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland. The Canadian entomologist. 1994, 126(1): 23-30
215. Miller G and Miller D. Infectious enterococcus from Heliothis virscens×H. subflexa backcross hybrids (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of tle EntomologicaI Society of America, 1996, 89: 420～427
216. Miller G, Huettel M, Davis M, Weber H and Weber L. Male sterility in Heliothis virscens×H. subflexa backcross hybrids, evidence for abnormal mitochondrial transcripts in testes. Molecular & General GeIletics, 1986, 203:451～461
217. Mitchell R, Hines R and Copeland W. Heliothis subflexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): establishment and maintenance of a laboratory colony. Ftorbo Entomologist, 1988, 71(2): 212～214
218. Moens PB. The fine structure of meiotic chromosome polarization and pairing in Locusta migratoria spermatocytes. Chromosoma, 1969, 23:1～25
219. Montgonery, T. H. Some observations and considerations upon the maturation phenomena of the germ cells. Biol. Bull. 1904, 6:137～158
220. Montgonery, T. H. Chromosomes in the spermatogenesis of the Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. (N.S.), 1906, 31:97～173
221. Morgante J, Selivon D, Solferini V N et al. Genetic and morphological differentiation in the specialist species Anastrepha pickeli and A. montei. In: Fruit fly pests a world assessment of their biology and management. Delray Beach, FL, St. Lucie Press, 1996, 273-276
222. Motara M.A, Hawkes P. Meiosis in the Eastern Cape grasshopper Phymateus leprosus (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphiphidae). J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr. 1985, 48(2): 217-221
223. Muller, H. J. Bearing of the Drosophila works on systematics, pp. 185～268 in The Nelv S, slematics, edited by Huxley, J. 1940. Oxford: Clarendon press
224. Muller, H. J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol Symp. 1942, 6: 71～125
225. Murakami A. cytological evidence for holocentric chromosome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori and mandarima. Chromosoma(Berl.), 1974, 47: 16～21
226. Naisbit R E, Jiggins D, Linares M, Salazar C and Mallet J. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule, and speciation in Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomele. Evolution, 2002
227. Ng, D. A novel level of interactions in plant-insect systems. Nature, 1988, 334:611～612
228. Orr H. A. Haldane's rule has multiple genetic causes. Nature, 1993, 361:532～533
229. Orr H. A. Haldane's rule. Annual Review of Ecotogy and Systematics, 1997, 28:195～218
230. Pashley D. P Quantitative genetics, development, and physiological adaptation in host strains of fall armyworm. Evolution, 1988, 42: 93～102
231. Proshold E, Raulston J, Martin F, and Laste L. The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations. Journal of Economic Entomoha, 1983, 76:626～631
232. Proshold. Release of backcross insects on St. Croix, U. S. Virgin Islands, to suppress the tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): infusion of sterility into a native population. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1983, 76:1353～1359
233. Proshold I and LaChance E. Analysis of sterility from interspecific crosses between Heliothis virescens and H suwa. Annals of the Entomotogical Society of America, 1974, 67.445～449
234. Rahman R, Rigney C, Busch-Petersen E. Irradiation as a quarantine treatment against Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae): anatomical and cytogenetic changes in mature larvae after gamma irradiation. Journal-of Economic Entomology, 1990, 83(4): 1449-1454
235. Ramaswamy, S. B. Host finding by moths f sensory modalities and behaviors. Journal of insect Phnioha, 1988, 34:235～249
236. RausheT, M. D. The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations. Evolution, 1984, 38: 596～608
237. Remington, C. L. Sutrezones of hybrid interaction between joined biota. Evoutionaly Bioha, 1968, 2:321～428
238. Renou, M. and Lucas, P Sex pheromone reception in Mamestra blxissicae L. (Lepidoptera) responses of olfactory receptor neurons to minor components of the pheromone blend. Journal of Insect Phaiotogy, 1994, 40:73-85
239. Renou,M. Gadenne, C. and Tauban, D. Electrophysiological investigations of pheromone sensitive sensilla in the hybrids between two moth species. Journal of Insect Physiology, 1996, 42(3): 267～277
240. Renwick, J. A. A. and Radke, C. D. Chemical stimulants and deterrents regulating acceptance or rejection of crucifers by cabbage butterflies. Journal of Chemltal Ecotogr, 1987, 13.1771～1775
241. Rieger, R., Michaelis A. and Green M.M. 1991. Glossary of genetics and cytogenetics classical and molecular. 5th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
242. Ris H. The structure of meiotic chromosomes in the grasshopper and its bearing on the nature of "chromomers" and "lamp～brush chromosomes". Bioi. Bull, 1945, 89:242～257
243. Robinson AS. Development and use of DNA probes in mapping insect genomes. Management of insect pests: nuclear and related molecular and genetic techniques. 1993, 101-114
244. Robinson R. Lepidoptera genetics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971
245. Roelofs, W, GlovefT, Tang XH, Sreng I., Robbins P, Eckenrode C, Hansson, B. S. and Bengtsson, B. O. Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex～linked genes. Proceedtogs of the National Academy of Scltrnces USA, 1987, 84:7585～7589
246. Roelvink P, Corsaro B, Granados R. Characterization of the Helicoverpa armigera and Pseudaletia unipuncta granulovirus enhancin genes. Journal of General Virology, 1995, 76(11): 2693-2705
247. Roessler Y. Genetics of the Mediterranean fruit fly in the sterile insect technique. Joint FAO/IAEA Div. of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, 1994
248. Roininen, H. and Tahvanainen, J. Host selechon and larval performance of two willow feeding sawflies. Ecotw, 1989, 70. 129～136
249. Rubini PG, Franco M.G, Rovati C, Vecchi M. Genetic variability of the sex balance in European populations of Musca domestica domestica L. In: Regulation of insect reproduction Ⅳ: proceedings of a symposium held in Zinkovy, Edited by Martin Tonner, Tomas Soldan, Blanka Bennettova. Praha, Academia Pub. House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1989, 303-315
250. Rummel D, Arnold M, Gannaway J, et al. Evaluation of Bt cottons resistant to injury from bollworm: implications for pest management in the Texas southern High Plains. The Southwestern entomologist, 1994, 19(3): 199-207
251. Samoilov Y.B. Genetic method of combatting the cabbage root flies. Ⅱ. Localization of factor determining male sex in the cabbage root fly Delia brassicae Bouche. Consultants Bureau. Nov 1985, 21(11): 1419-1424
252. Scriber, J. M., Giebink, B. L. and Snidef, D. ReciprocaI latitUdinal clines in oviposition behavior of PaPilio glaucus and P Canadensis across the Great Lakes hybrid zone'possible sex～linkage of oviposition preference. Oecologia, 1991, 87:360～368
253. Severson DW, Mori A, Zhang Y, et al. Chromosomal mapping of two loci affecting filarial worm susceptibility in Aedes aegypti. Insect Molecular Biology. 1994, 3(2): 67-72
254. Sezef, M. and Butlin, R. K. The genetic basis of host plant adaptation in the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). Heledity, 1998, 80:499～508
255. Sheck A.L., Gould. The genetic basis of host range in Heliothis virescen lariral survival and growth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1993, 69:157～172
256. Sheck, A. L. and Gould, F. Genetic analysis of differences in oviposition preferences of Heliothis vilrscens and H subsexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Envildniental Entomology, 1995, 24(2): 341～347
257. Sheck, A. L. and Gould, F. The genetic basis of differences in growth and behavior of specialist and generalist herbivore species of selection on hybrids of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa (Lepidoptera). Evolution, 1996. 50(2): 831～841
258. Silberglied R.E, Taylor O. R. Ultraviolet reflection and its behavioral role in the courtship of the sulfur butterflies, Colias eurytheme and C philodice (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Genetics, 1978, 31:
558～573
259. Silberglied, R. E. and TayloF, JR. O. R. Ultraviolet differences between the sulfur butterflies, Colias eurytheme and C. philodice, and possible isolating mechanism. Nature, 1973, 241.406～408
260. Singef M, Thomas C.D. Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution, 1988, 42(2). 977～985
261. Singer, M. C. The definition and measurement of oviposition preference in plant-feeding insects. In: Insect hunts Interactions, edited by Miller, J. R. and Miller, T A. 1986. Springer, New York
262. Smiley, J. Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from Hehconius and Passopra. Science, 1978, 201:745～747
263. Sorady A, Feel A, Omar H. Cytological studies on the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and American bollworm Heliothis armigera (Huebner). Alexandria Journal of Agricultral Research (Egypt). 1992, 37(1): 107-121
264. Sperling,.F.A.H. Sex-linked genes and species differences in Lepidoptera. The Canadian Entonlotogist, 1994, 126:807～818
265. Stadelbachef, E. A. Role of early～season wild and naturalized host plants in the buildup of the Fl generation of Heliothis zea and H. virescens in the delta of Mississippi. Economical Entomology, 1981, 10:766～770
266. Stadelbacher, E. A. Geranium dissectumf an unreported host of the tobacco budworm and bollworm and its role in the seasonal and long term population dynamics in the delta of Mississippi. Envhonmental Entomotogy 1979, 8:1153～1156
267. Stouthamer R, Kazmer D. Cytogenetics of microbe-associated parthenogenesis and its consequences for gene flow in Trichogramma wasps. Heredity, 1994, 73(3): 317-327
268. Subbarao SK, Nanda, Chandrahas R. Anopheles culicifacies complex: cytogenetic characterization of Rameshwaram island populations. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 1993, 9(1): 27-31
269. Taylof, D. R. Sex ratio in hybrids between Silene alba and Silene dioicar evidence for blinked restorers. Heredity, 1994, 73(5): 518～526
270. Teakle RE, Jenson, JM. Heliothis punctiger. In: Handbook of insect rearing. Edited by P.Singh and Moore R.F. Vol. 2. elsevier, Amsterdam. 1985
271. Teal P., Tumlinson J. Effects ofinterspecific hybridization between Heliothis virescens and Heliothis zea on the sex pheromone conununication system, pp 535～547 in Insectpheromone research new dthections, edited by Carde, R. T. and Minks, A. K. 1996. Intemational Thomson Publishing Chapman and Hall
272. Thompson, J. N. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experinlentalis et Applicata, 1988, 47: 3～14
273. Thompson, J. N. Evolutionary genetics of oviposition preference in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution, 1988, 42(6): 1223～1234
274. Thompson, J. N., Wehling, W and Podoisky, R. Evolutionary genetics of host use in swallowtail butteffiies. Nature, 1990, 344(8): 148～150
275. True, J. R., Weir, B. S. and Laurie, C. C. A genome wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritltrna chromosomes into Drosopthe simulans. Genend, 1996, 142:819～837
276. Turelli, M. The causes of Haldane's rule. Sctence, 1998, 282:889～891
277. Va S. Genetic covarjance between oviposition preference and larval performance in an insect herbivore. Evolution, 1986, 40:778～785
278. van Drongelen, van Loon A. Inheritance of gustatory sensitivity in Fl progeny of crosses between Yponomeuta cagnagellus and Y. nlaIinellus (Lepidoptera). Entomoha Experimentalis et Applicata, 1980. 28:199～203
279. Waldbauef, G P and Fraenkel, G Feeding on normally rejected plants by maxillectomized larvae of the tobacco homworm, Protoparce sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1961.54:477～485
280. Wang CZ, Dong JE Interspecific hybridization of Helicoverpa arraigera and H. assulta (Lepidopera: Noctuidae). Chinese Science Bulletin, 2001, 46(6): 489～491
281. Wang YX, Marec F, Traut W. The synaptonemal complex of the wax moth, Galleria mellonella. Hereditas, 1993, 118:113～119
282. White M. Animol cytology and evolution (the third editon), Combridge University Press. London, New York, 1973
283. Whitten M. A genetic perspective on pest control and the future of a autocidal control. In: FAO, Modern insect control: nuclear techniques and biotechnology. 1988, 41-55
284. Wiklund C. Genralist vs. specialist oviposition behaviour in Papillo machaon (Lepidoptera) and functional aspects on the hierarchy of oviposition preference. Oikos, 1981, 36:163～170
285. Wiklund, C. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L. Oecotogia, 1975, 18:185～197
286. Winte P C, Hickey G I. and Fletcher H. L. Instant Notes in Genetics. 1998. BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited
287. Wu C.I. and Davis W. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation'the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. American Naturalist, 1993, 142:187～212
288. Wu, C.I., Johnson, N. A. and Palopoli, M. E Haldane's rule and its legacyt why are there so many sterile males, TREE, 1996, 11(7): 281～284
289. Wu, D. M., Yan, Y H. and Cui, J. R. Sex pheromone components of Helicoverpa arnigera chendcal analysis and field tests. Entomohaa Sinica, 1997, 4(4): 350～356
290. Young, H., Galbreath, R. A., Benn, M. H., Holt, V A. and Struble, D. L. Sex pheromonecom ponents in New Zealand brownheaded leaf roller Ctenopseustis obltruana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Zoological technology, 1985.40:262～265
291. Zacharopoulou A, Gariou A, Kritikou D. Efforts to synthesize Balancer strains for chromosome 5
of Ceratitis capitata and cytological mapping of the cymutation. Joint FAO/IAEAD, Ⅳ. Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, 1994
292. Zacharopoulou A, Riva M, Malacrida A, et al. Cytogenic characterization of a genetic sexing strain in Ceratitis capitata. Genome, 1991, 34 (4): 606-611
293. Zhang H F, Zheng L Y. Study on the karyotypes of three species of genes Carbula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Entomologia Sinica, 2002, 9(2): 59～67
294. Zhang LS, Zhang QW, Cai QN, et al. The synaptonemal complexes and sex-chromosome of Helicoverpa assulta. Heredics, 2004
295. Zhang LS, Zhang QW, Cai QN, et al. The synaptonemal complexes of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Acta Sinica Sciences, 2004