森林生态效益补偿标准理论与方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
森林是陆地生态系统的主体,在改善生态环境、维护生态平衡中具有不可替代的作用。在森林可持续经营过程中,由于森林生态补偿制度尚未建立,森林经营者合法权益始终难以从根本上得到保障。森林生态效益补偿制度的建立,是一个渐进过程,有关森林生态效益补偿机制的研究,依然是林业可持续发展进程中亟待解决的重要课题。毫无疑问,符合社会主义市场经济体制要求的森林生态效益补偿制度,必将有利于加快生态公益林建设步伐,也为寻求合理的生态公益林管理制度和运行机制奠定经济基础。
     本文围绕森林可持续经营过程中,合理利益分配机制和资金来源这一中心,系统的论述了确定生态上合理、经济上可行、社会可接受的森林生态效益补偿标准是建立生态效益补偿制度的基础和关键。研究中,从确定森林生态效益补偿范围出法,提出了确定生态效益计量方法。以河北省孟滦林管局为具体研究对象,从该林管局森林经营财务状况分析入手,系统全面分析了该局资金运行情况,以此为基础提出以森林经营成本补偿为基础的补偿标准。采用综合分析手段,最终提出了适合该地区社会经济发展水平的补偿标准。论文主要结论包括:
     (1)社会主义市场经济体制下,森林可持续经营及其林业生态建设过程中,合理的资金来源包括是:国家投入、林业部门通过各类林产品和森林环境的利用获得经济收入和森林生态效益补偿三个方面。
     (2)森林生态效益补偿制度的实施,关键是确定合理的补偿标准,并以生态上合理、经济上可行和社会可接受作为判定补偿标准准则。
     (3)提出以森林经营过程实际资金缺口为依据,综合确定森林生态效益标准。
     (4)从效益补偿角度,孟滦林管局森林所发挥涵养水源效益年价值为7491.52万元;保育土壤的年价值为353.04万元;总计为7844.6万元,单位面积年补偿额两种方案分别为:355.48元/hm2和394.29元/hm2,并以此作为补偿标准的上限值。
     (5)从森林可持续经营成本角度,所确定的补偿资金缺口为6214.76万元,单位面积年补偿资金两种方案分别为196.74元/hm2和235.54元,并以此作为补偿标准的下限值。
     (6)从森林生态系统碳汇功能价值研究出发,管局森林碳汇价值为3732.5万元,单位面积年补偿额为506.5元/hm~2。
The forest is a main part of ecological system of land. It has a very important effect on improving environment of ecology and sustaining the balance of ecology. During the course of forest sustainable development, the legitimate rights and interests of the forest managers were difficult to guard because the standard of compensation for ecological benefits of forest presently was not founded. To build the system of the compensation for benefits of forest is an evolutional process .So the research about the system of the compensation for benefits of forest would still be a cruel problem until sustainable development of forest was solved. No doubt, the system of the compensation for benefits of forest that suite the socialist market economy would be speeded up the process of ecological public welfare forest, while it will be strengthen economy basis for seeking reasonable the system and mechanism of the compensation for benefits of forest.
    In this paper, it was foundation and crucial that forestry ecological benefit compensation standard of reason in ecology, acceptable in economic and society was confirmed, which was dissertated systemically in sustainable manager forest by distributing benefit reasonable and source of funds. The method of accruing ecological benefit measure was put forward by ascertaining the scale of ecological benefit compensation. The Forestry Management Bureau of Mengluan was set an example of studying. The Forestry Management Bureau of Mengluan funds management was analyzed systemically by analyzing its finance status of forest management which was base that forest management compensation standard was put forward. The cost compensation standard of acceptable the Forestry Management Bureau of Mengluan was put forward. The results were as follow:
    (1) Reasonable fund source such as nation investment, economy earning of forest department and forest sustainable management and forest ecological building under market economy system of socialism.
    (2) Forest ecological benefit compensation rule being implemented, it was key of ascertaining reasonable compensation standard, and reason in ecological, capable in economy; acceptable in society must be regarded as compensation standard rule.
    (3) That factual fund gap in the course of forest management was put forward, and forest ecological benefit standard was confirmed synthesizable.
    (4) Forest benefit annual value of self-retraining water almost is 74.91 millions
    
    
    Yuan; that of fixing soil almost is 3.53 millions Yuan; amount to78.45 millions Yuan. The benefit value of unit area for two kinds of schemes almost is 355.48 yuan/hm2 and 394.29 yuan/hm2. We take it the maximum of compensation standard.
    (5) Through the beneficial result operating cost angle, certain compensation capital gap of bureau is 62.15 millions yuan , the benefit value of unit area for two kinds of schemes almost is 196.74 yuan/hm2 and 235.54 yuan/hm2. We take it the minimum of compensation standard.
    (6) Through the beneficial result operating carbon gathers angle, certain compensation capital gap of bureau is 37.33 millions yuan , the benefit value of unit area almost is 506.5 yuan/hm2
引文
[1] 黄选瑞,滕起和,张国胜等.关于环境再生产过程中利益分配问题的探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2001,(3):19~22.
    [2] 赵思东,李前华,袁跃林,等.实行林业分类经营,推进山区库区生态与经济协调发展的理论与实践[J].林业资源管理,1999(特刊):129~133.
    [3] 殷广春,王佳才.工业城市征收生态环境补充费途径的探讨[J].环境保护,1994(11):18~19.
    [4] 李建光,宋立珍.森林与生态环境——一对建瓯市特大洪灾的思考[J].林业资源管理,1999,(3):56~59.
    [5] 张继贤,王华亮.关于加快建立林业两大体系的构想[J].中国林副特产,2003,8(3):59~60.
    [6] 郑天汉.论林业经营体制改革问题[J].林业经济问题,2001,2(1):50~54.
    [7] 祝列克,必须高度重视国土安全—谈森林在国土安全中的主体地位[N].中国绿色时报,1998—03—17(1).
    [8] 林明民,演变中的世界林业政策[J].中国软科学,1995,(10):125~128.
    [9] World Bank. Forests and forestry[J], http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/, Open Document.
    [10] Costanza , R., d' Arge, R., de Groot, R.Et al..The value of the world' s ecosystem sevices and nature capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387:253~260.
    [11] C.Chandrasekharan.林业可持续发展的资源调动与国际合作[M].第十一届世界林业大会文献选编,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998:315~326.
    [12] United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP's forest policy and aproposed action programme for the period1996~2000.Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.ISSN92-807-1612-3.
    [13] 赵爱云.林业机构、政策和投资的全球性走势[J].林业科技管理,1998,(1):18~21.
    [14] FAO.世界森林状况(M).英国:牛津文字出版社.ISSN92-5.5039776.
    [15] WorldBank.Forestsandforestry.http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/, OpenDocument.
    [16] Arnodo Contreras.Hermosilla.国家部门规划.第十一届世界林业大会文献选编[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998:311~314.
    [17] 赵爱云,卢琦.20世纪全球森林政策与国际合作的回顾与展望[J].世界林业研究,2000,2(1):1~5.
    [18] 余新晓.关于建立水土保持生态效益补偿制度的思考[J].中国水土保持,1994,(6):43~46.
    [19] 王玉玲,杨平.当前我国林业发展存在主要问题初析[J].林业经济,1999(4):13~17.
    [20] 林业部.林业可持续发展的战略与对策.中国21世纪议程林业行动计划[M].中国林业出版社,1995.
    
    
    [21]刘国成.公共财政与林业投资体制改革的探析[J].财政研究,2002,(12):26~29.
    [22]曹振卢.以六大工程为契机实现山西林业的历史性转变[J].经济问题 2003,(1期):63~65.
    [23]吴水荣,马天乐,赵伟.森林生态效益补偿政策进展与经济分析[J].林业经济 2001,(4):20~23.
    [24]董峻,姚润丰.中共中央国务院关于加快林业发展的决定[N].新华日报,2003—6—25(1).
    [25]《林业公共财政政策》课题组.公共财政对广东林业支持的政策研究[J].林业经济,2002,(6):36~38.
    [26]马志春.支持可持续发展建立绿色公共财政[J].内蒙古财会,1999,7(142):12~14。
    [27]沈峰.发展环境保护财政,优化公共财政收支结构[J].内蒙古财经学院学报.2001(4):52~54.
    [28]赵彤堂,顾寒琳,李继武,等.公益林补偿问题的探讨[J].吉林林业科技.1998.10(5):34~37.
    [29]蒋梅.我国林业扶持政策的探讨[J].林业财务与会计,2000(3):29.
    [30]刘常玲,辛峰.辛华,等.浅谈我国森林生态效益补偿工作的进展[J].河北林业科技,2002,8(4):43~44.
    [31]周洪,张晓静.森林生态效益补偿的市场化机制初探[J].中国林业,2003,4(B):31~32.
    [32]宋宗水.二氧化碳排放权交易问题[D].北京:中国社会科学院农村发展研究所,2000.
    [33]Atkinson, G. And Hamilton, K. 1996. Accounting for progress: indicators for sustainable development. Environment,36:16~24.
    [34]张佩昌,周晓峰,王凤友,等.天然林保护工程概论(M).北京:中国林业出版社,1999.255~257.
    [35]聂华.论林业经济的外部性[J].北京林业大学学报,1995,4(2):88~92.
    [36]姚大地.林业经营改革发展的必然趋势[J].北华大学学报(社会科学版),2000,1(3):18~20.
    [37]李梅,罗承德,郭东力.林业分类经营实施的主要制约因素及对策[J].四川农业大学学报,2002,20(4):344~346.
    [38]Robert Costanza等(陶大立译),全球生态系统服务与自然资本的价值估算,生态学杂志,1999,18(2):70~78.
    [39]徐信俭,范立敏.关于建立森林生态效益补偿基金的思考[J].林业经济,2000(4):54~57.
    [40]吴章文,顾晓艳.国内生态旅游客源市场特征研究[A].中国加入WTO后森林旅游对策研究[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:113-119.
    [41]林南枝,陶汉军.旅游经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002:28-55.
    
    
    [42]张秀丽,东淑华,孙淑华.关于建立森林生态效益补偿基金制度的探讨[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2003,26(2):11~13.
    [43]国家环保局,等.中国环境保护计划[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994.
    [44]黄选瑞,腾起和,赵连清,等.环境再生产与森林生态效益补偿[J].林业科学.2002,11(6):164~168.
    [45]徐启权.对建立生态效益补偿机制的再思考[J].林业经济问题(双月刊),2002,10(5):305~307.
    [46]Xn Jintao etol, implementting Forest Protection Program and the SloPing Land Conversion Progrs Lessons and Policy recommendations, Beijing: China Forestry Publishing house, 2002.
    [47]张涛.森林生态效益补偿机制研究[D].北京:中国林科院,2003.
    [48]于振伟,陈玮.森林生态效益补偿机制研究[J].中国林业企业[J],2003,(3):19~20.
    [49]侯元兆.森林环境价值核算[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2002:216~230.
    [50]郎奎建.林业生态工程10种森林生态效益计量理论和方法[J].东北林业大学学报,2000(1):1~8.
    [51]张建国.森林生态经济问题研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.
    [52]赵卫智.四川绵阳官司河流域防护林生态效益研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,1996.
    [53]孙立达,朱金兆.水土保持林体系综合效益研究与评价[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2000.
    [54]Daily, G.C(ed.).1997. Nature s service: Societal dependence on nature ecosystems. Island Press, WashingtonD. C..
    [55]刘青柏.林业分类经营与森林生态效益补偿制度初探[J].林业资源管理,1999(特):97~102.
    [56]万志芳,耿玉德.关于公益林生产经营补偿的思考[J].林业经济问题,1999,(3):16~18.
    [57]陈饮,黄和亮.试论林业外部性及补偿措施[J].林业经济问题,1999,(3):19~22.
    [58]段显明,许玫,林永兰.关于森林生态效益经济补偿机制的探讨[J].林业经济问题(双月刊)2001,2(2):79~82.
    [59]杨枢平.关于森林生态效益经济补偿的探索[J].山西林业,2003,(3):13~14.
    [60]陈根长.中国森林生态补偿制度的建立与完善[J].林业科技管理,2003,(3):1~3.
    [61]吕邯彪,农胜奇,覃兆海.广西雅长林场生态公益林效益补偿研究[J].中南林业调查规划,2003,2(2):48~51.
    [62]吴伟光,顾蕾,沈月琴.森林生态效益补偿苦干问题的思考[J].浙江林学院学报,2002,19(3):296~300.
    [63]黄选瑞,腾起和,赵连清等.环境再生产与森林生态效益补偿[J].林业科学,2002,
    
    11(6):164~168.
    [64]张晓珊,巫启新,刘延惠.贵州长防林体系生态经济效益计量与评价[J].贵州林业科技,2001,11(4):36~40.
    [65]康文星,田大伦.湖南省森林公益效能的经济评价[J].中南林学院学报,2001,12(4):1~4.
    [66]周晓峰,蒋敏元.黑龙江省森林效益的计量、评价及补偿[J].林业科学,1999,5(3):97~102.
    [67]周洪,张晓静.森林生态效益补偿的市场化机制初探中国林业[J],2003,4(B):31~32.
    [68]李静江,刘治兰.北京市森林资源核算及对国民经济帐户的调整[J].林业经济,2001,(9):35~38.
    [69]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务于自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报,2001,11(11):1918~1926.
    [70]蒋志刚,野生动物的价值与生态服务功能[J].生态学报,2001,11(11):1911~1917.
    [71]魏汉林,谷建才,郑金权,等.森林资源生态经济效益评估方法综述[J].河北林果研究,1997,9(3):258~262.
    [72]陈应发,陈放鸣.国外森林游憩价值评估的两种流行方法[J].北京林业大学学报,1994,7(3):97~105.
    [73]王树森.辽宁省森林生态效益的测评初探[J].林业经济,1999(1):47~51.
    [74]Goulder, L.H. And kennedy, D. 1997. Valuing ecosystem services: philosophical bases and empirical methods. In:G. Daily(ed.). Natures service: Societal dependence on nature ecosystems. Pp. 23~48. Island Press, Washington D. C.
    [75]许勤,绿化就是固碳造林等于减排[J],林业经济,2003(2):38~42.
    [76]徐正春.广东生态公益林体系建设的现状、问题与建议[J].中南林业调查规划,2001,20(增):156~161.
    [77]周晓峰.森林生态功能与经营途径(M).北京:中国林业出版社,1999,1~13.
    [78]Michael Totten, getting it right: Emerging markets for storing carbon in forests, world resources institute working paper. 1999
    [79]徐成立,边文,张建华,等.孟滦林管局森林三大效益探讨[J].河北林业,2003,(3):12~13.
    [80]宋小华.公益林生态效益补偿研究(D).北京:北京林业大学,2001.
    [81]侯秀瑞,许云龙,毕绪岱.河北省山地森林保土生态效益计量研究[J].水士保持通报,1998,2(1).
    [82]陈钦,徐益良.森林生态效益补偿研究现状及趋势[J].林业财务与会计,2000,(2):5~7

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700