我国农产品反倾销联动机制及其运作模式研究
|
摘要
我国加入世界贸易组织(WTO)以来,农产品的出口贸易有了大幅增长,但是仍然面临着较多的出口壁垒,其中反倾销压力的增长尤其迅速。这不仅是因为农业本身的特殊性和我国农产品进出口行业自身的缺陷,也是因为其它国家在面对我国农产品的竞争压力时采取了反倾销作为市场保护手段。本文从应对现实中的反倾销压力出发,提出了农产品反倾销联动体系的概念,期望系统地整合各方资源,为我国农产品反倾销提供有效的、可行的策略。
本研究的主要思路是,在界定参与反倾销各个主体功能的基础上,根据我国遭受的反倾销诉讼和农产品出口的现实情况,构建我国农产品反倾销联动体系,并通过因子分析和路径分析,分析制约该系统构成和运行的因素,提出有效建立农产品反倾销联动体系的政策建议。本研究主要分为以下几个部分:
第一部分对反倾销状况进行初步介绍,定位研究的意义,对国内外研究状况进行理论回顾。
第二部分界定反倾销概念,明确本文的研究对象,反倾销的历史发展,反倾销发生的原因,寻找中国遭遇反倾销的成因和对策。
第三部分对行业协会在农产品反倾销中的现状进行分析,结合国内学者对反倾销联动体系的研究建议,建立一个以政府、行业协会、企业和专业合作社为行为主体的农产品反倾销联动体系的概念模型。
第四部分在理论分析的基础上,提出实证研究的模型和假设,利用问卷调查获得实证研究所需数据,然后运用SPSS和AMOS工具进行统计分析和结构方程建模分析,得到如下结论:(1)在政府、行业协会、企业和专业合作社四大主体中,前两者对农产品公平贸易救济体系构成的影响度较大,后两者较小;(2)行业协会的反倾销职能对农产品反倾销联动体系构成的影响度最高;(3)该体系的构建对反倾销应诉的运作有较大的促进作用,对信息沟通也有一定促进作用;但是信息沟通对运作的促进作用不大,运作对构建没有正向促进作用;(4)总体看来,我国农产品反倾销各主体还没有形成一个良性循环、互相促进的体系。
第五部分根据理论、现实情况和实证分析的结果,提出以下规避农产品反倾销的政策建议:(1)完善各方主体的职能,建立相关机制;(2)宣传反倾销知识,促进各方主体沟通;(3)循序渐进促进农产品反倾销联动体系的整合。
Since China's access to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the export of agricultural products has been increasing significantly; at the same time, however, China's exports of agricultural products are facing severe export barriers, especially anti-dumping. This is not only on account of the essence of agriculture production and shortcomings of agri-product import and export industry in China, but also because of the unfair trade practice adopted by other countries when facing intense competition pressure from China. Based on the background above, this paper proposes the concept of anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products, expecting to integrate systematically the resources of all parties involved and provide effective and feasible strategies for China's dealing with agri-product anti-dumping claims.
On the basis of defining each agent's function, the main idea of this paper is to construct an anti-dumping co-ordination system for China's agricultural products exporting according to the anti-dumping claims and the reality of agri-product exporting which China are confronted with, analyze factors which are constraining the construction and functioning of the system with the methods of factor analysis and path analysis, and put forward policy recommendations to avoid unfair trade practices effectively. This paper consists of the following parts.
In the first part, a literature review on the theory of anti-dumping is made, the key concepts in the research are defined, and the object and the theoretical framework for the research are built.
In the second part, the WTO trade disputes on agricultural products are mainly studied, and the characteristics and cause of anti-dumping practices for agricultural products are analyzed. Then on the basis of the former study, comparative study on the anti-dumping practices which China suffers has been made.
In the third part, the paper studies the actuality of the domestic agricultural anti-dumping co-ordination. Afterwards, combined with the preceding suggestion on anti-dumping co-ordination by domestic scholars, the author establishes a conceptual model of the anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products, in which government, guild, corporation and farmers cooperative are incorporated as the main four agents.
In the fourth part, on the basis of theoretical analysis, it proposes empirical research models and assumptions, and does statistical analysis and structural equation modeling with data obtained by questionnaire survey and with the tools of AMOS and SPSS. The conclusions are as follow: (1) Among the four main agents, government and guild have much greater influence on the composing of the fair trade remedy system for agricultural products, while corporation and farmers cooperative have smaller influence; (2) Guild's anti-dumping function is proved to be greatest of the impact on the composing of the anti-dumping system; (3) The construction of the system has largely promoted the operation of answering anti-dumpling claims and has a certain advantage to information exchange; however, the information exchange contributes little to the operation, and the operation plays no positive role in promoting the system construction; (4) Generally speaking, China's anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products has not yet exhibited a virtuously cycling and mutually accelerated system.
In the fifth part, based on the theory, the actual situation and the empirical analysis, the policy recommendations for agri-product anti-dumping practice are given as follows: (1) To improve the functions of the main agents and establish related mechanisms; (2) To publicize the knowledge of anti-dumping and promote the communication among the main agents; (3) To advance step by step the integration of the anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products.
本研究的主要思路是,在界定参与反倾销各个主体功能的基础上,根据我国遭受的反倾销诉讼和农产品出口的现实情况,构建我国农产品反倾销联动体系,并通过因子分析和路径分析,分析制约该系统构成和运行的因素,提出有效建立农产品反倾销联动体系的政策建议。本研究主要分为以下几个部分:
第一部分对反倾销状况进行初步介绍,定位研究的意义,对国内外研究状况进行理论回顾。
第二部分界定反倾销概念,明确本文的研究对象,反倾销的历史发展,反倾销发生的原因,寻找中国遭遇反倾销的成因和对策。
第三部分对行业协会在农产品反倾销中的现状进行分析,结合国内学者对反倾销联动体系的研究建议,建立一个以政府、行业协会、企业和专业合作社为行为主体的农产品反倾销联动体系的概念模型。
第四部分在理论分析的基础上,提出实证研究的模型和假设,利用问卷调查获得实证研究所需数据,然后运用SPSS和AMOS工具进行统计分析和结构方程建模分析,得到如下结论:(1)在政府、行业协会、企业和专业合作社四大主体中,前两者对农产品公平贸易救济体系构成的影响度较大,后两者较小;(2)行业协会的反倾销职能对农产品反倾销联动体系构成的影响度最高;(3)该体系的构建对反倾销应诉的运作有较大的促进作用,对信息沟通也有一定促进作用;但是信息沟通对运作的促进作用不大,运作对构建没有正向促进作用;(4)总体看来,我国农产品反倾销各主体还没有形成一个良性循环、互相促进的体系。
第五部分根据理论、现实情况和实证分析的结果,提出以下规避农产品反倾销的政策建议:(1)完善各方主体的职能,建立相关机制;(2)宣传反倾销知识,促进各方主体沟通;(3)循序渐进促进农产品反倾销联动体系的整合。
Since China's access to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the export of agricultural products has been increasing significantly; at the same time, however, China's exports of agricultural products are facing severe export barriers, especially anti-dumping. This is not only on account of the essence of agriculture production and shortcomings of agri-product import and export industry in China, but also because of the unfair trade practice adopted by other countries when facing intense competition pressure from China. Based on the background above, this paper proposes the concept of anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products, expecting to integrate systematically the resources of all parties involved and provide effective and feasible strategies for China's dealing with agri-product anti-dumping claims.
On the basis of defining each agent's function, the main idea of this paper is to construct an anti-dumping co-ordination system for China's agricultural products exporting according to the anti-dumping claims and the reality of agri-product exporting which China are confronted with, analyze factors which are constraining the construction and functioning of the system with the methods of factor analysis and path analysis, and put forward policy recommendations to avoid unfair trade practices effectively. This paper consists of the following parts.
In the first part, a literature review on the theory of anti-dumping is made, the key concepts in the research are defined, and the object and the theoretical framework for the research are built.
In the second part, the WTO trade disputes on agricultural products are mainly studied, and the characteristics and cause of anti-dumping practices for agricultural products are analyzed. Then on the basis of the former study, comparative study on the anti-dumping practices which China suffers has been made.
In the third part, the paper studies the actuality of the domestic agricultural anti-dumping co-ordination. Afterwards, combined with the preceding suggestion on anti-dumping co-ordination by domestic scholars, the author establishes a conceptual model of the anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products, in which government, guild, corporation and farmers cooperative are incorporated as the main four agents.
In the fourth part, on the basis of theoretical analysis, it proposes empirical research models and assumptions, and does statistical analysis and structural equation modeling with data obtained by questionnaire survey and with the tools of AMOS and SPSS. The conclusions are as follow: (1) Among the four main agents, government and guild have much greater influence on the composing of the fair trade remedy system for agricultural products, while corporation and farmers cooperative have smaller influence; (2) Guild's anti-dumping function is proved to be greatest of the impact on the composing of the anti-dumping system; (3) The construction of the system has largely promoted the operation of answering anti-dumpling claims and has a certain advantage to information exchange; however, the information exchange contributes little to the operation, and the operation plays no positive role in promoting the system construction; (4) Generally speaking, China's anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products has not yet exhibited a virtuously cycling and mutually accelerated system.
In the fifth part, based on the theory, the actual situation and the empirical analysis, the policy recommendations for agri-product anti-dumping practice are given as follows: (1) To improve the functions of the main agents and establish related mechanisms; (2) To publicize the knowledge of anti-dumping and promote the communication among the main agents; (3) To advance step by step the integration of the anti-dumping co-ordination system for agricultural products.
引文
[1]Braga,C,Alberto,P.& Simao,D.S.Brazilian Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice:The Folly of Unfair Trade Cases.In Antidumping:How It Works and Who Gets Hurt,ed.Michael.J.Finger,.Ann Arbor.MI[M].University of Michigan Press.1993:83-101
[2]Fisher,R.D.Endogenous,Probability of Protection and Firm Behaviour[J].Journal of International Economics,1992(32):149-163
[3]Hartigan,J.C.Is the GATT/WTO Biased Against Agricultural Products in Unfair Intemational Trade Investigations? Review of International Economics[J].2000(4):634-646
[4]Larsson.The Handshake between Invisihle-andVisihle Hands:Towarda Tripolar Instlilutional-Framework[J].Int.StludiesofMgt.&Org.,1993,23(1):87-106
[5]Mendez,Jose.The Development of the Colombian Cut Flower Industry:A Textbook Example of How a Market Economy Works.In Antidumping:How It Works and Who Gets Hurt,ed.Michael.J.Finger,Ann Arbor.MI[M].University of Michigan Press.1993:103-120
[6]Palmeter,N.D.Agriculture and Trade Regulation:Selected Issues in the Application of U.S.Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws[J].Journal of World Trade,1989(1):47-68
[7]Roberts,K.J.Import and Consumer Impacts of U.S.Antidumping Tariffs:Freshwater Crawfish from China.Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade[EB/OL].http://oregonstate.edu/Dept/IIFET/2000/papers/oberts.pdf.2000
[8]Staigei,R.W.& Wolak,F.A.The Effent of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Forengn Monopolist[J].Journal of International Economics,1992(32):265-287
[9]Williamson.Comparative Economic Organization The Analysis of Disrete Struotural Alternatives[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1991(36):269-296
[10]邓功,谭建明.倾销与反倾销问题分析[J].中国检验检疫,2001(10):53-54
[11]董丽雅.中间组织的交易成本分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2006,8(1):32-34
[12]费方域.交易合同关系的治理和企业[J].外国经济与管理,1996(8):8-12
[13]傅铮铮.“底气”足浙江迎战出口反倾销变被动为主动[EB/OL].http://biz.zjol.com.cn/05biz/system/2006/09/11/007863478.shtml,2006.9.11
[14]高崇有.中国加入WTO后要更加重视应对国际反倾销[J].中共云南省委党 校学报,2004,5(4):84-86
[15]郭守亭,赵君峰.出口企业应对反倾销搭便车行为分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(2):120-123
[16]杭争.技术性贸易壁垒对我国对外贸易的影响及对策[J].国际贸易问题,2003(2):33-37
[17]贺培.对国外反倾销的剖析与对策[J].中央财经大学学报,1996(8):8-11
[18]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:112-121
[19]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:117
[20]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:125-127
[21]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:142
[22]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:153
[23]黄军,李岳云.对中国农产品遭受反倾销的思考[J].中国农村经济,2002(1):59-64
[24]黄珺,顾海英和朱国玮.中国农户合作行为的博弈分析和现实阐释[J].中国软科学,2005(12):60-66
[25]黄祖辉,胡剑锋.建立我国农业行业协会的思路与方案研究[J].浙江学刊,2004(1):192-195
[26]贾根良.超越市场与企业两分法[J].经济社会体制比较,1998(4):13-19
[27]江南,夏卫捷.反倾销阻碍食品外贸的发展[J].中国食品工业,1998(5):44-45
[28]兰勇,王晰.我国农产品出口遭遇反倾销的原因及对策农业合作组织:历史变迁和制度演进[J].企业技术开发,2006(12):85-87
[29]李昌凤.入世后我国应对反倾销若干问题的思考[J].市场研究,2004(2):33-35
[30]李成钢.构建三位一体的反倾销体系——政府、企业、行会在反倾销中的定位[J].商业经济文荟,2002(6):46-48.
[31]李淳.对印度实行生丝反倾销措施的思考与对策[J].丝绸,2003(12):4、15
[32]李海舰,聂辉华.论企业与市场的相互融合[J].中国工业经济,2004(8):26-35
[33]李洪娟,王志宇.国际贸易中倾销与反倾销的福利分析[J].经济论坛,2006(8):62-63
[34]李建丽.论政府与行业协会的关系一个从交易成本分析的模型[J].集团经济研究,2006(12):190-191
[35]李洁.“四体联动”提高企业应诉反倾销积极性[J].中国企业报,2004.6.29
[36]李丽纯,熊跃平.基于经济利益圆周假说的农民专业合作行为分析[J].江西财经大学学报,2006(6):64-67
[37]李龙,张健和窦永群.应战印度反倾销政策,促进我国生丝价格回升[J].丝绸,2003(9):3-5
[38]李世杰.产业集群的组织分析[D].博士学位论文,东北大学,2006
[39]李斯特[德].政治经济学的国民体系[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997:109
[40]李斯特[德].政治经济学的国民体系[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997:118
[41]李斯特[德].政治经济学的国民体系[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997:129
[42]李岩.浅谈我国农产品应对国外反倾销策略[J].农业经济,2004(9):44-45
[43]梁静.中国农产品如何成功应对国外反倾销[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2003(6):23-27,35
[44]廖良美,冯中朝.行业协会应对反倾销的理论依据和对策[J].商业时代,2006(9):72-73
[45]刘宝荣,徐世文.对我输美小龙虾反倾销应诉失败的反思[J].中国商检,1998(4):33-34
[46]刘宏青,郭双焦和米家龙.论行业协会在反倾销申诉与应诉中作用的发挥[J].武汉市经济管理干部学院学报,2004(4):60-64
[47]刘宏青,侯杰和颜凌芳.行业协会:有待发掘的反倾销应诉的中坚力量[J].江苏商论,2006(4):100-101
[48]刘晖.论反倾销中行业协会的作用[EB/OL].http://ww.xinxihua.cn/htmlcontent.asp,2005-5-8
[49]刘伟峰.中间组织的交易费用经济学分析[D].硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2002
[50]刘正良,刘厚俊.新贸易保护主义政策调整与我国外贸发展[J].宏观经济,2004(7):15-18
[51]卢光明.基于纠纷管理的我国农产品出口贸易组织治理研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005
[52]吕恒立.试论公共产品的私人供给[D].硕士学位论文,北京大学,2003
[53]马敬桂,黄兴年.论新环境下我国农业组织创新[J].新疆农垦经济,2004(5):29-32
[54]马庆国.管理统计[M].北京:科学出版社:320
[55]马述忠,黄祖辉.农产品反倾销国内外研究动态评述[J].农业经济问题,2005(3):18-25
[56]马述忠,马成武.对我国农产品反倾销体系构建的分析与设计[J].山东农业大学学报,社会科学版,2005,7(1):28-33.
[57]马述忠.中美浓缩苹果汁反倾销案及其启示[J].国际贸易问题,2004(6):53-56
[58]孟祥霞.中国遭遇反倾销制裁的原因及对策分析[J].市场研究,2004(7):37-38
[59]尚杰,姜国刚.内生比较优势与我国农产品对外贸易研究[J].农业经济问题,2006(1):71-74
[60]石齐平.农业不只是一种产业[J].南风窗,2006(1):86
[61]寿海峰.政府、行业协会和企业“三位一体”的反倾销体系研究[D].硕士论文,浙江大学,2005
[62]孙本芝,赵世伟.我国对外贸易遭遇技术壁垒的原因及对策研究[J].国际经贸探索,2003,19(5):67-70
[63]孙伟.我国屡遭反倾销调查的原因及对策[J].理论界,2004(4):248
[64]陶金国.反倾销:地方行业协会的优势及功能[J].国际贸易问题,2006(2):64-67
[65]田明华.从比较优势理论看倾销与反倾销[J].南京经济学院学报,2001(2):33-36
[66]王炜.论我国行业协会在反倾销过程中的缺位及改进措施[J].上海对外贸易学院学报,2006(8):21-26
[67]王玉珍.运用“经济人—道德人”假说对合作行为的分析经济问题[J].2004(1):15-17
[68]王允贵.贸易条件持续恶化——中国粗放型进出口贸易模式亟待改变[J].国际贸易,2004(6):14-16
[69]巫小强,周庆行和江炯.我国反倾销的现状及应对策略[J].经济论坛,2004(13):120-121,130
[70]吴佳华,龚柏华.评述美国国际贸易法院对中国罐装蘑菇反倾销裁决的司法审查[J].国际商务研究,2004(1):52-56
[71]武义海.浅谈对美冻煮淡水小龙虾仁反倾销应诉败诉原因[J].对外经贸实务,1998(3):31-32
[72]席小炎.论我国行业协会在反倾销应诉中的作用——温州烟具协会应对欧洲打火机反倾销案例分析[J].江西社会科学,2005(4):253-255
[73]辛德树.农业合作社的制度经济学分析[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004(3):4-6
[74]邢宝华,姚忠福.中国企业反倾销机制分析[J].财经问题研究,2004(3):64-66
[75]邢永杰.基于博弈论的虚拟组织理论研究[D].博士学位论文,天津大学,2003
[76]熊红颖,寿志敏.从经济意义上浅析农民组织化问题[J].商场现代化,2007(上旬刊):368-369
[77]徐国钧,梁勤.美国对中国蜂蜜的反倾销调查及其对策[J].福建农业大学学报(社会科学版),2001(2):43-47
[78]徐月芳.对华反倾销态势的灰色建模预测[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2005 (4):75-78
[79]许征文,刘敏.企业囚徒困境的合作解[J].统计与决策,2007(11):165-166
[80]亚当斯密[英].郭大力等译.国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下)[J].商务印书馆,2004:76
[81]杨晓耘,刘强.原产地规则与反倾销[J].中国海关,2003(7):31-32
[82]姚小涛,席酉民.对企业性质的再认识:超越交易费用标准[J].经济学家,2000(3):84-89
[83]姚作汀,张金强.浙江省行业协会民间化进程及对策研究[EB/OL].http://www.zj.xinhuanet.com/zjgov/2007-06/06/content_10221601.htm,2007.06.06
[84]叶华,林霖.贸易保护的政治经济学分析——以中国加入WTO后遭受反倾销增多为例[J].理论界,2005(4):40-41
[85]于斌.勇敢应对,从长计议——由我国虾产品遭美反倾销调查引起的思考[J].中国水产,2004(3):12-14
[86]于维军.国外反倾销对我国农产品出口的制约[J].国际商报,2003.6.23
[87]袁迎珍.2004农业合作组织:历史变迁和制度演进—推进我国农业经营组织化的新制度经济学[J].重庆社会科学,2004(1):18-20
[88]袁迎珍.农业合作组织:历史变迁和制度演进—推进我国农业经营组织化的新制度经济学介析[J].重庆社会科学,2004(1):18-20
[89]约瑟夫·熊彼特[德].经济分析史(第二卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004:28
[90]约瑟夫·熊彼特[德].经济分析史(第一卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001:515
[91]曾楚宏,吴能全.中间组织的起源及比较优势——一个新的理论分析框架[J].企业经济,2006(5):42-49
[92]张百杰.全球化背景下国际反倾销制度合理性之反思[J].政法学刊,2006(4):48-52
[93]张华.国际农产品反倾销原因的一般性和特殊性分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2006(5):41-44
[94]张军.中国应对反倾销挑战中的政府行为分析[J].华北电力大学学报,2003(2):18-20
[95]张晓静.对倾销与反倾销的经济分析与思考[D].硕士论文,河北大学,2003
[96]张雪绸.我国农产品出口应对反倾销的对策思考[J].农村经济,2003(10):6-7
[97]周健勇.论合作:一种行为模式解析[J].江汉论坛,2003(3):119-122
[98]周娜,刘宏青.试论行业协会反倾销中坚地位的确立[J].企业家天地,2005(3):36-37
[2]Fisher,R.D.Endogenous,Probability of Protection and Firm Behaviour[J].Journal of International Economics,1992(32):149-163
[3]Hartigan,J.C.Is the GATT/WTO Biased Against Agricultural Products in Unfair Intemational Trade Investigations? Review of International Economics[J].2000(4):634-646
[4]Larsson.The Handshake between Invisihle-andVisihle Hands:Towarda Tripolar Instlilutional-Framework[J].Int.StludiesofMgt.&Org.,1993,23(1):87-106
[5]Mendez,Jose.The Development of the Colombian Cut Flower Industry:A Textbook Example of How a Market Economy Works.In Antidumping:How It Works and Who Gets Hurt,ed.Michael.J.Finger,Ann Arbor.MI[M].University of Michigan Press.1993:103-120
[6]Palmeter,N.D.Agriculture and Trade Regulation:Selected Issues in the Application of U.S.Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws[J].Journal of World Trade,1989(1):47-68
[7]Roberts,K.J.Import and Consumer Impacts of U.S.Antidumping Tariffs:Freshwater Crawfish from China.Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade[EB/OL].http://oregonstate.edu/Dept/IIFET/2000/papers/oberts.pdf.2000
[8]Staigei,R.W.& Wolak,F.A.The Effent of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Forengn Monopolist[J].Journal of International Economics,1992(32):265-287
[9]Williamson.Comparative Economic Organization The Analysis of Disrete Struotural Alternatives[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1991(36):269-296
[10]邓功,谭建明.倾销与反倾销问题分析[J].中国检验检疫,2001(10):53-54
[11]董丽雅.中间组织的交易成本分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2006,8(1):32-34
[12]费方域.交易合同关系的治理和企业[J].外国经济与管理,1996(8):8-12
[13]傅铮铮.“底气”足浙江迎战出口反倾销变被动为主动[EB/OL].http://biz.zjol.com.cn/05biz/system/2006/09/11/007863478.shtml,2006.9.11
[14]高崇有.中国加入WTO后要更加重视应对国际反倾销[J].中共云南省委党 校学报,2004,5(4):84-86
[15]郭守亭,赵君峰.出口企业应对反倾销搭便车行为分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(2):120-123
[16]杭争.技术性贸易壁垒对我国对外贸易的影响及对策[J].国际贸易问题,2003(2):33-37
[17]贺培.对国外反倾销的剖析与对策[J].中央财经大学学报,1996(8):8-11
[18]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:112-121
[19]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:117
[20]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:125-127
[21]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:142
[22]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:153
[23]黄军,李岳云.对中国农产品遭受反倾销的思考[J].中国农村经济,2002(1):59-64
[24]黄珺,顾海英和朱国玮.中国农户合作行为的博弈分析和现实阐释[J].中国软科学,2005(12):60-66
[25]黄祖辉,胡剑锋.建立我国农业行业协会的思路与方案研究[J].浙江学刊,2004(1):192-195
[26]贾根良.超越市场与企业两分法[J].经济社会体制比较,1998(4):13-19
[27]江南,夏卫捷.反倾销阻碍食品外贸的发展[J].中国食品工业,1998(5):44-45
[28]兰勇,王晰.我国农产品出口遭遇反倾销的原因及对策农业合作组织:历史变迁和制度演进[J].企业技术开发,2006(12):85-87
[29]李昌凤.入世后我国应对反倾销若干问题的思考[J].市场研究,2004(2):33-35
[30]李成钢.构建三位一体的反倾销体系——政府、企业、行会在反倾销中的定位[J].商业经济文荟,2002(6):46-48.
[31]李淳.对印度实行生丝反倾销措施的思考与对策[J].丝绸,2003(12):4、15
[32]李海舰,聂辉华.论企业与市场的相互融合[J].中国工业经济,2004(8):26-35
[33]李洪娟,王志宇.国际贸易中倾销与反倾销的福利分析[J].经济论坛,2006(8):62-63
[34]李建丽.论政府与行业协会的关系一个从交易成本分析的模型[J].集团经济研究,2006(12):190-191
[35]李洁.“四体联动”提高企业应诉反倾销积极性[J].中国企业报,2004.6.29
[36]李丽纯,熊跃平.基于经济利益圆周假说的农民专业合作行为分析[J].江西财经大学学报,2006(6):64-67
[37]李龙,张健和窦永群.应战印度反倾销政策,促进我国生丝价格回升[J].丝绸,2003(9):3-5
[38]李世杰.产业集群的组织分析[D].博士学位论文,东北大学,2006
[39]李斯特[德].政治经济学的国民体系[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997:109
[40]李斯特[德].政治经济学的国民体系[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997:118
[41]李斯特[德].政治经济学的国民体系[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997:129
[42]李岩.浅谈我国农产品应对国外反倾销策略[J].农业经济,2004(9):44-45
[43]梁静.中国农产品如何成功应对国外反倾销[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2003(6):23-27,35
[44]廖良美,冯中朝.行业协会应对反倾销的理论依据和对策[J].商业时代,2006(9):72-73
[45]刘宝荣,徐世文.对我输美小龙虾反倾销应诉失败的反思[J].中国商检,1998(4):33-34
[46]刘宏青,郭双焦和米家龙.论行业协会在反倾销申诉与应诉中作用的发挥[J].武汉市经济管理干部学院学报,2004(4):60-64
[47]刘宏青,侯杰和颜凌芳.行业协会:有待发掘的反倾销应诉的中坚力量[J].江苏商论,2006(4):100-101
[48]刘晖.论反倾销中行业协会的作用[EB/OL].http://ww.xinxihua.cn/htmlcontent.asp,2005-5-8
[49]刘伟峰.中间组织的交易费用经济学分析[D].硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2002
[50]刘正良,刘厚俊.新贸易保护主义政策调整与我国外贸发展[J].宏观经济,2004(7):15-18
[51]卢光明.基于纠纷管理的我国农产品出口贸易组织治理研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005
[52]吕恒立.试论公共产品的私人供给[D].硕士学位论文,北京大学,2003
[53]马敬桂,黄兴年.论新环境下我国农业组织创新[J].新疆农垦经济,2004(5):29-32
[54]马庆国.管理统计[M].北京:科学出版社:320
[55]马述忠,黄祖辉.农产品反倾销国内外研究动态评述[J].农业经济问题,2005(3):18-25
[56]马述忠,马成武.对我国农产品反倾销体系构建的分析与设计[J].山东农业大学学报,社会科学版,2005,7(1):28-33.
[57]马述忠.中美浓缩苹果汁反倾销案及其启示[J].国际贸易问题,2004(6):53-56
[58]孟祥霞.中国遭遇反倾销制裁的原因及对策分析[J].市场研究,2004(7):37-38
[59]尚杰,姜国刚.内生比较优势与我国农产品对外贸易研究[J].农业经济问题,2006(1):71-74
[60]石齐平.农业不只是一种产业[J].南风窗,2006(1):86
[61]寿海峰.政府、行业协会和企业“三位一体”的反倾销体系研究[D].硕士论文,浙江大学,2005
[62]孙本芝,赵世伟.我国对外贸易遭遇技术壁垒的原因及对策研究[J].国际经贸探索,2003,19(5):67-70
[63]孙伟.我国屡遭反倾销调查的原因及对策[J].理论界,2004(4):248
[64]陶金国.反倾销:地方行业协会的优势及功能[J].国际贸易问题,2006(2):64-67
[65]田明华.从比较优势理论看倾销与反倾销[J].南京经济学院学报,2001(2):33-36
[66]王炜.论我国行业协会在反倾销过程中的缺位及改进措施[J].上海对外贸易学院学报,2006(8):21-26
[67]王玉珍.运用“经济人—道德人”假说对合作行为的分析经济问题[J].2004(1):15-17
[68]王允贵.贸易条件持续恶化——中国粗放型进出口贸易模式亟待改变[J].国际贸易,2004(6):14-16
[69]巫小强,周庆行和江炯.我国反倾销的现状及应对策略[J].经济论坛,2004(13):120-121,130
[70]吴佳华,龚柏华.评述美国国际贸易法院对中国罐装蘑菇反倾销裁决的司法审查[J].国际商务研究,2004(1):52-56
[71]武义海.浅谈对美冻煮淡水小龙虾仁反倾销应诉败诉原因[J].对外经贸实务,1998(3):31-32
[72]席小炎.论我国行业协会在反倾销应诉中的作用——温州烟具协会应对欧洲打火机反倾销案例分析[J].江西社会科学,2005(4):253-255
[73]辛德树.农业合作社的制度经济学分析[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004(3):4-6
[74]邢宝华,姚忠福.中国企业反倾销机制分析[J].财经问题研究,2004(3):64-66
[75]邢永杰.基于博弈论的虚拟组织理论研究[D].博士学位论文,天津大学,2003
[76]熊红颖,寿志敏.从经济意义上浅析农民组织化问题[J].商场现代化,2007(上旬刊):368-369
[77]徐国钧,梁勤.美国对中国蜂蜜的反倾销调查及其对策[J].福建农业大学学报(社会科学版),2001(2):43-47
[78]徐月芳.对华反倾销态势的灰色建模预测[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2005 (4):75-78
[79]许征文,刘敏.企业囚徒困境的合作解[J].统计与决策,2007(11):165-166
[80]亚当斯密[英].郭大力等译.国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下)[J].商务印书馆,2004:76
[81]杨晓耘,刘强.原产地规则与反倾销[J].中国海关,2003(7):31-32
[82]姚小涛,席酉民.对企业性质的再认识:超越交易费用标准[J].经济学家,2000(3):84-89
[83]姚作汀,张金强.浙江省行业协会民间化进程及对策研究[EB/OL].http://www.zj.xinhuanet.com/zjgov/2007-06/06/content_10221601.htm,2007.06.06
[84]叶华,林霖.贸易保护的政治经济学分析——以中国加入WTO后遭受反倾销增多为例[J].理论界,2005(4):40-41
[85]于斌.勇敢应对,从长计议——由我国虾产品遭美反倾销调查引起的思考[J].中国水产,2004(3):12-14
[86]于维军.国外反倾销对我国农产品出口的制约[J].国际商报,2003.6.23
[87]袁迎珍.2004农业合作组织:历史变迁和制度演进—推进我国农业经营组织化的新制度经济学[J].重庆社会科学,2004(1):18-20
[88]袁迎珍.农业合作组织:历史变迁和制度演进—推进我国农业经营组织化的新制度经济学介析[J].重庆社会科学,2004(1):18-20
[89]约瑟夫·熊彼特[德].经济分析史(第二卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004:28
[90]约瑟夫·熊彼特[德].经济分析史(第一卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001:515
[91]曾楚宏,吴能全.中间组织的起源及比较优势——一个新的理论分析框架[J].企业经济,2006(5):42-49
[92]张百杰.全球化背景下国际反倾销制度合理性之反思[J].政法学刊,2006(4):48-52
[93]张华.国际农产品反倾销原因的一般性和特殊性分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2006(5):41-44
[94]张军.中国应对反倾销挑战中的政府行为分析[J].华北电力大学学报,2003(2):18-20
[95]张晓静.对倾销与反倾销的经济分析与思考[D].硕士论文,河北大学,2003
[96]张雪绸.我国农产品出口应对反倾销的对策思考[J].农村经济,2003(10):6-7
[97]周健勇.论合作:一种行为模式解析[J].江汉论坛,2003(3):119-122
[98]周娜,刘宏青.试论行业协会反倾销中坚地位的确立[J].企业家天地,2005(3):36-37