反倾销理论与实践争议问题研究
|
摘要
反倾销政策的发展贯穿整个20世纪,目前形成国内法、国际多边贸易协定、区域贸易协定同时并存、相互影响的复杂局面。反倾销实际上是进口国当局平衡各方利益下的贸易保护政策。反倾销实践过程中形成的非市场经济制度看似技术性规则的集合,实则发达国家实现其贸易保护目的之手段。非市场经济制度中的替代国方法是反倾销当局操纵倾销幅度的“有效”方法。实践表明反倾销是持久性的贸易救济行动。美国对非市场经济国家的特定案件同时采取反倾销、反补贴行动标志着贸易保护手段朝着复杂、多样的方向发展。我国出口贸易区域结构的失衡和出口商品结构的集中以及具有价格竞争力的出口产品对国外同类产业造成冲击,出口企业必然遭到进口国贸易保护措施的围攻,反倾销仅仅是其中有效的方法而已。目前在全球经济危机、贸易保护主义思想滋生的背景下,反倾销实践还会在一段时间内持续。
China has been the key target of antidumping for the previous 14 years. With the context of financial crisis nowadays, the trade protection demand is increasingly growing.“Made in China”will continually face the challenges of antidumping. It will be significant for China to understand the antidumping evolvement, study the essence and aim of antidumping, apperceive its development trend in order to tackle the consistent antidumping disputes
Chapter 1 General Remarks
The foreign literatures on antidumping are mainly from the scholars in the United States and EU from where the legislation and early practices of antidumping are. The contents are covered in various aspects including the essence, reason and effect of antidumping, issues on the substantial and procedural rules and renovation proposals, and how government policies and company behavior interact the antidumping. The study of scholars in China covers in a multi-facets manner from the perspective of economy, law and practice. In sum, the study involves the essences of antidumping, elaborations on the substantial and procedural issues, affects, the reasons of being targeted through antidumping against China and its strategy, the renovation topics etc.
It began from the evolvement of antidumping policy and summarized its development trend according to the antidumping practices and rules renovation process. The view is that the antidumping practices are the trade remedies actions with continuation. Through the analysis on the economic rationality and fairness of dumping, it revealed the essence of antidumping which is the trade protection policy from the interests balancing perspective. NME system formed from the antidumping practices is the political tools materializing trade protection purpose. The arrogate method stipulated in the NME is the“effective”method for importing countries to manipulate dumping margin and investigation result. The United States took the lead in initiating double measures of antidumping and antisubsidy towards the Chinese product, it labeled that the trade protection moved with complexity and diversity. China’s increasingly growing degree of dependence on Foreign Trade, imbalance of foreign trade structure and highly competitive pricing of exporting goods bring out the threat against the industry of importing country. The importing country makes best us of“surrogate method”derived from the NME system and initiates antidumping actions frequently against China for the purpose of protecting domestic industry.
Chapter 2 The Historical Evolvement of Antidumping Policy
The evolvement of antidumping policy was throughout the whole twenty century. It first appeared in the domestic rules and later on existed in the multinational rules. The multinational rules interacted with the domestic rules. Meanwhile, antidumping rules are found in the regional trade agreements. Antidumping rules are coexisted and interacted amongst the domestic, international and regional level. Its legislation purpose was unchanged from the very beginning, which is the trade policy providing protection to the domestic industries. The international antidumping rules were mainly drawn from the stipulations of the United States and it experienced a few rounds revision. The interaction and impact among the domestic and multinational level result the highly convergence regarding the basic content of antidumping policy. However, antidumping rules shown in the regional trade agreement has increasingly diverged from its original track. Its diversity trend intensifies the complexity of trade rules.
Chapter 3 The Practices of Anti-dumping: Continual Trade Remedy Actions
Antidumping cases is arising, the memberships of the antidumping club is increasing. The main target country of antidumping is centered to the a few countries. The arising trend of antidumping measures is keeping the same pace of tariff descending trend. The antidumping renovation proposal is limited to the procedural issues in the implementation and practicing stage. The significant and substantial issues affected exporters in the antidumping rules will remain unchanged. The proposal is greatly affected by US and either proposal raised by the scholars was limited in the theoretical level. No any substantial progress has been made on the antidumping reform for the previous eight years. With the context of descending of trade and investment, economic depression, growing unemployment, decreasing exportation and no substantial result has been achieved on the antidumping reform, the antidumping measures will be adopted continually and its practices will be lasted for some time.
Chapter 4 the Essence of Antidumping: The Trade Protection Policy from the Perspective of Interests Balance
The reason of antidumping is not because dumping is unreasonable nor is unfair. Antidumping has nothing to do with the harmful dumping or unfair trade practice. The decision whether the final antidumping measures would be made has actually involved the gaming and collision of various interests. The consideration of political and economic elements will affect the position of each interested party. Therefore, antidumping is antidumping is the trade protection policy tools with balancing the domestic interests.
Chapter 5 NME System– The Political Tools of Trade Protection
NME looks like the collection of technical rules; it is in fact the tools of trade protection for the developed countries. It has no direct link with the market status of exporting countries, especially China. Due to the existence of NME, Chinese product is very possibly encountered accusation of dumping despite the fact that its exporting price is much higher than its domestic prices. The exporting companies in China have been put in a passive position due to NME. NME is becoming the one of the external reasons of being antidumped against China as well as means of successfully levying antidumping duty towards Chinese companies. To realize its trade protection
Chapter 6 Surrogate Method– The“Effective”method of Manipulating the Anti-dumping Margin
The surrogate method was originated from American’s administrative practice and it was introduced to the multinational trade agreements by the United States. Due to NME, Chinese exporter has to fact the issue of surrogate country in the most of antidumping cases. Antidumping authority has right to select the surrogate country which is deemed as appropriate. The norm of appropriateness and reasonableness is a very absolute and subjective criterion. Meanwhile, the elements like resource advantage, cost advantage, production method, pricing model, consumption habit involved in the production stages of same product in each country is not same as the others. The pricing and cost of the product in the surrogate country is more or less different than the product involved. The reasonable and appropriate surrogate price is almost not available. The protectionism as the key feature of antidumping system will result in the unreasonable and inappropriate selection towards the surrogate country for Chinese product. The surrogate method is the key of success of initiating antidumping measures against China and it is the“effective”method of manipulating the anti-dumping margin against NME.
Chapter 7 New Protection Method: Double-anti Actions
The trade deficit has brought the significant threat to the United States. Adopting one kind of tread remedy such as antidumping is not well enough for the manufacturers in the United States. Being influenced by the intense lobby of interest groups, DOC has changed the customs existing for the previous 23 years, which there is no countervail measures towards NME countries. Instead, DOC has initiated double-anti actions against Chinese exporters in the name of fighting for“unfair competition”. Double-anti actions will bring about the effects like diffusion, retaliation, injury and imitation. It signals that the trade protection is moving towards more complex and diverse direction.
Chapter 8 Antidumping and China
Antidumping policy is just the tool of trade protection. The fact that the imbalanced distribution of the exporting regions and accumulated product structures make the assault of trade protection possible. Antidumping is only the effective method. Its effectiveness was reflected via the NME system and surrogate method, which allow importing countries manipulating antidumping result. The fact that the exporting companies behave as their own ways, responding the actions in a passive manner and industry associating failing to perform its roles has increased the successful ration of antidumping actions. In the context of global economy recession and growing unemployment ration, the trade protection demand from the importing countries is going to increase. Antidumping is going to continue. Our companies will remain the exporting strategy as well as alleviate the harassment of antidumping via the collaboration among the industries, government and associations.
China has been the key target of antidumping for the previous 14 years. With the context of financial crisis nowadays, the trade protection demand is increasingly growing.“Made in China”will continually face the challenges of antidumping. It will be significant for China to understand the antidumping evolvement, study the essence and aim of antidumping, apperceive its development trend in order to tackle the consistent antidumping disputes
Chapter 1 General Remarks
The foreign literatures on antidumping are mainly from the scholars in the United States and EU from where the legislation and early practices of antidumping are. The contents are covered in various aspects including the essence, reason and effect of antidumping, issues on the substantial and procedural rules and renovation proposals, and how government policies and company behavior interact the antidumping. The study of scholars in China covers in a multi-facets manner from the perspective of economy, law and practice. In sum, the study involves the essences of antidumping, elaborations on the substantial and procedural issues, affects, the reasons of being targeted through antidumping against China and its strategy, the renovation topics etc.
It began from the evolvement of antidumping policy and summarized its development trend according to the antidumping practices and rules renovation process. The view is that the antidumping practices are the trade remedies actions with continuation. Through the analysis on the economic rationality and fairness of dumping, it revealed the essence of antidumping which is the trade protection policy from the interests balancing perspective. NME system formed from the antidumping practices is the political tools materializing trade protection purpose. The arrogate method stipulated in the NME is the“effective”method for importing countries to manipulate dumping margin and investigation result. The United States took the lead in initiating double measures of antidumping and antisubsidy towards the Chinese product, it labeled that the trade protection moved with complexity and diversity. China’s increasingly growing degree of dependence on Foreign Trade, imbalance of foreign trade structure and highly competitive pricing of exporting goods bring out the threat against the industry of importing country. The importing country makes best us of“surrogate method”derived from the NME system and initiates antidumping actions frequently against China for the purpose of protecting domestic industry.
Chapter 2 The Historical Evolvement of Antidumping Policy
The evolvement of antidumping policy was throughout the whole twenty century. It first appeared in the domestic rules and later on existed in the multinational rules. The multinational rules interacted with the domestic rules. Meanwhile, antidumping rules are found in the regional trade agreements. Antidumping rules are coexisted and interacted amongst the domestic, international and regional level. Its legislation purpose was unchanged from the very beginning, which is the trade policy providing protection to the domestic industries. The international antidumping rules were mainly drawn from the stipulations of the United States and it experienced a few rounds revision. The interaction and impact among the domestic and multinational level result the highly convergence regarding the basic content of antidumping policy. However, antidumping rules shown in the regional trade agreement has increasingly diverged from its original track. Its diversity trend intensifies the complexity of trade rules.
Chapter 3 The Practices of Anti-dumping: Continual Trade Remedy Actions
Antidumping cases is arising, the memberships of the antidumping club is increasing. The main target country of antidumping is centered to the a few countries. The arising trend of antidumping measures is keeping the same pace of tariff descending trend. The antidumping renovation proposal is limited to the procedural issues in the implementation and practicing stage. The significant and substantial issues affected exporters in the antidumping rules will remain unchanged. The proposal is greatly affected by US and either proposal raised by the scholars was limited in the theoretical level. No any substantial progress has been made on the antidumping reform for the previous eight years. With the context of descending of trade and investment, economic depression, growing unemployment, decreasing exportation and no substantial result has been achieved on the antidumping reform, the antidumping measures will be adopted continually and its practices will be lasted for some time.
Chapter 4 the Essence of Antidumping: The Trade Protection Policy from the Perspective of Interests Balance
The reason of antidumping is not because dumping is unreasonable nor is unfair. Antidumping has nothing to do with the harmful dumping or unfair trade practice. The decision whether the final antidumping measures would be made has actually involved the gaming and collision of various interests. The consideration of political and economic elements will affect the position of each interested party. Therefore, antidumping is antidumping is the trade protection policy tools with balancing the domestic interests.
Chapter 5 NME System– The Political Tools of Trade Protection
NME looks like the collection of technical rules; it is in fact the tools of trade protection for the developed countries. It has no direct link with the market status of exporting countries, especially China. Due to the existence of NME, Chinese product is very possibly encountered accusation of dumping despite the fact that its exporting price is much higher than its domestic prices. The exporting companies in China have been put in a passive position due to NME. NME is becoming the one of the external reasons of being antidumped against China as well as means of successfully levying antidumping duty towards Chinese companies. To realize its trade protection
Chapter 6 Surrogate Method– The“Effective”method of Manipulating the Anti-dumping Margin
The surrogate method was originated from American’s administrative practice and it was introduced to the multinational trade agreements by the United States. Due to NME, Chinese exporter has to fact the issue of surrogate country in the most of antidumping cases. Antidumping authority has right to select the surrogate country which is deemed as appropriate. The norm of appropriateness and reasonableness is a very absolute and subjective criterion. Meanwhile, the elements like resource advantage, cost advantage, production method, pricing model, consumption habit involved in the production stages of same product in each country is not same as the others. The pricing and cost of the product in the surrogate country is more or less different than the product involved. The reasonable and appropriate surrogate price is almost not available. The protectionism as the key feature of antidumping system will result in the unreasonable and inappropriate selection towards the surrogate country for Chinese product. The surrogate method is the key of success of initiating antidumping measures against China and it is the“effective”method of manipulating the anti-dumping margin against NME.
Chapter 7 New Protection Method: Double-anti Actions
The trade deficit has brought the significant threat to the United States. Adopting one kind of tread remedy such as antidumping is not well enough for the manufacturers in the United States. Being influenced by the intense lobby of interest groups, DOC has changed the customs existing for the previous 23 years, which there is no countervail measures towards NME countries. Instead, DOC has initiated double-anti actions against Chinese exporters in the name of fighting for“unfair competition”. Double-anti actions will bring about the effects like diffusion, retaliation, injury and imitation. It signals that the trade protection is moving towards more complex and diverse direction.
Chapter 8 Antidumping and China
Antidumping policy is just the tool of trade protection. The fact that the imbalanced distribution of the exporting regions and accumulated product structures make the assault of trade protection possible. Antidumping is only the effective method. Its effectiveness was reflected via the NME system and surrogate method, which allow importing countries manipulating antidumping result. The fact that the exporting companies behave as their own ways, responding the actions in a passive manner and industry associating failing to perform its roles has increased the successful ration of antidumping actions. In the context of global economy recession and growing unemployment ration, the trade protection demand from the importing countries is going to increase. Antidumping is going to continue. Our companies will remain the exporting strategy as well as alleviate the harassment of antidumping via the collaboration among the industries, government and associations.
引文
①JEFFREY M. DROPE, WENDY L. HANSEN. Anti-dumping's Happy Birthday? [J]. The World Economy,2006(29):471.
②世界贸易秘书处.贸易走向未来—世界贸易组织概要(中译本)[M].北京:法律出版社,1999:8.
③杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源—基于经济理性角度的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2008(1):95.LINDSEY B,IKENSON D. Antidumping:The Devilish Details of“unfair trade”law[J]. CATO Trade Policy Anylysis, 2002(20).
①[2008-07-03].http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm.
②THOMAS J. PRUSA. On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping(EB/OL).(2007-12-01)[2008-07-01]. http://www.nber.org/digest/apr00/w7404.html.
①[美]理查德·A·波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].蒋兆康译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社, 1997:405.
①DOUGLAS A.IRWIN.The Rise of US Anti-dumping Activity in Historical Perspective [J].The World Economy,2005,28(5): 651-668.
①郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
②孙文远,黄健康.美国实施反倾销贸易政策的动因、绩效与启示[J].国际贸易问题,2007(1):95.
③郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
④郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
⑤郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
⑥刘亚军.进口国反倾销诉讼动因探悉[J].宁夏社会科学,2007(4):30.
①朱庆华,唐宇.中国反倾销措施的实证分析[J].山东财政学院学报, 2004(6):79.
②车幸原.不完全信息条件下的反倾销政策效果[J].财贸经济,2004(10):83.
③车幸原.不完全信息条件下的反倾销政策效果[J].财贸经济,2004(10):83.
④CORINNE M. KRUPP,SUSAN SKEATH.关于反倾销措施对上、下游产业影响的论证[J]邹超,廖枚译.经济资料译丛,2004(3):8.
⑤鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007(2):73.
⑥唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析[J].财贸经济,2004(11):66.
⑦唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析[J].财贸经济,2004(11):67.
①唐宇.保障措施条款替代反倾销规则的可行性分析[J].财贸经济, 2007(7):88.
②杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源—基于经济理性角度的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2008(1):94.
③程卫东.国与国之间的利益协调—国际反倾销法的晚近发展[J].国际贸易,2001(8):43.
①王荣艳.传统幼稚工业保护论与新贸易保护论之异同[J].现代财经,2003(3):54.
②赵亮,张艳.贸易保护理论的发展及比较研究[J].商业时代(理论版),2004年(15):56.
①陈荣辉.西方贸易保护理论的演变[N].福建日报,2002-2-12(11).
②杨丹辉.新贸易保护主义及其对我国的影响[N].中国经济时报,2006-3-27(5).
①[英]亚当·斯密.国富论[M].王亚南译.北京:商务印书馆,1994:88.
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:33.
②[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:39.
③[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:69.
④[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:41-42.
⑤[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:47.
⑥[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:33.
⑦[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:76.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping: What are the numbers to discuss at Doha? [J]. The world Economy, 2004, 27(3): 407.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:166-177.
②摘自《众议院,议会辩论》,1916年8月2日,第340辑[M]//雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题.沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:216.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:210.
②雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:210-211.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:210-219.
②姜栋.美国反倾销法的历史与现状[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(3):136.
③卢征良,蒋立场.20世纪30年代中国水泥业反倾销研究——以上海华商水泥公司为中心的考察[J].国际贸易问题, 2008(1):115.
①上海社会科学院经济研究所编.刘鸿生企业史料(上册)[M].上海人民出版社,1981:226.
②谢扶民编著.中华民国立法史[M].台北:中正书局,中华民国二十六年:687.
③雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:32.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:144-147.
②JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations—Cases, Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations [M]. 4th ed. MN: West Group, 2002:693-694.
③李炼.自由贸易条件下公平竞争的法律保护—对国际反倾销法的重新认识[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),1997(3):48.
①JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations—Cases, Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation Of Transnational Economic Relations [M]. 4th ed. MN: West Group, 2002:695-696.
②薛爽.乌拉圭回合与东京回合《反倾销守则》之比较[J].国际经贸探索,1994(5):38-40.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping:What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27):409.
②唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].东北财经大学出版社,2007(1):43.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping:What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27): 409 -410.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27):409 -410.
①ROBERT TEH, THOMAS J, PRUSA, MICHAEL BUDETTA. Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements [M/OL]. 2007:76. [2008-10-3]. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200703_e.pdf
①DUKGEUN AHN. Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2008(11):107-108.
②ROBERT TEH, THOMAS J, PRUSA, MICHAEL BUDETTA. Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements[M/OL]. 2007:50. [2008-09-30]. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200703_e.pdf
③DUKGEUN AHN. Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2008(11):111-115.
①ROBERT TEH, THOMAS J, PRUSA, MICHAEL BUDETTA. Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements[M/OL]. 2007:2-5.[2008-09-25]. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200703_e.pdf
①程卫东.国与国之间的利益协调-国际反倾销法的晚近发展[J].国际贸易, 2001(8):44.
①DAN CIURIAK.Anti-dumping at 100 Years and Counting: A Canadian Perspective[J]. The World Economy, 2005(28):645.
①CLIFF STEVENSON.Global Trade Protection Report 2008[EB/OL].(2008-12-15) [2009-1-5]. http:// www.antidumpingpublishing.com
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping:What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27): 414-415.
①THOMAS J. PRUSA. Anti-dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade[J].The World Economy, 2005(28):685-689.
①CLIFF STEVENSON.Global Trade Protection Report 2008[EB/OL].(2008-12-15)[2009-01-05]. http://www.antidumpingpublishing.com
①IAN WOOTON, MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping Versus Anti-Trust[EB/OL] [2008-10-13]. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_22263_en.pdf
①曾惠逸.反倾销议题谈判进展与争端解决趋势之分析[EB/OL].(1995-10-13)[2009-02-12]. http://www.wtocenter.org.tw/SmartKMS/do/www/readDoc?document_id=82204
②安徽省商务厅.《反倾销措施协议》与多哈回合谈判[EB/OL].(2005-08-04)[2009-02-12]. http://info.jj.hc360.com/2005/08/04154312999-5.shtml
③余盛兴.多哈反倾销规则谈判:对你当报何种期望[J].WTO经济导刊, 2009(2):67.
①P.K.M.THARAKAN. Is Anti-Dumping Here to Stay?[J].The World Economy,1999(22):188.
①GARY HORLICK,EDWIN VERMULST. The 10 Major Problems With the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2005,39(1):67-73.
②GRIMWADE N. Anti-dumping Policy after the Uruguay Round– an appraisal[J]. National Institute Economic Review, 1996(2):100.
③吕航.印度反倾销案件现状研究[J].长春师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),2008(27): 88-90.
①THOMAS. J. PRUSA. Anti-dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade[J].The World Economy, 2005(28):683.
②It says“contracting parties recognize that dumping, by which products of one country are introduced into the commerce of another country at less than the normal value of the products, is to be condemned if it causes or threatens material injury to an established industry in the territory of a contractng party or materially retards the establishment of a domestic industry.”
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:2.
②[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:3.
③[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:4.
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:21-22.
②[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:22.
①孙立文.WTO《反倾销协议》改革-政策和法律分析[M].武汉大学出版社,2006(1):11-12.
②CHRISTIAN A. CONRAD: Dumping and Anti-dumping Measures from a Competition and Allocation Perspective[J]. Journal of World Trade,2002,36(3):564.
③[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:24.
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:24.
②ROBERT M. FEINBERG. Exchange Rates and“Unfair Trade”[J]. 71 Rev. of Economics and Statistics, 1989(4):704-707. CHRISTIAN A. CONRAD: Dumping and Anti-dumping Measures from a Competition and Allocation Perspective[J]. Journal of World Trade,2002,36(3):566.
③王亚星,李玉刚.试论倾销与反倾销的关系[J].中国人民大学学报,1999(2):121.
①JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of Interntional Economic Relations--Cases. Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M], 4th ed., St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002(4):683.
①JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of Interntional Economic Relations--Cases. Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M], 4th ed., St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002(4):684-686.
②陈勇.倾销和反倾销的经济学解说[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001( 5):35.
③周莉.反倾销:理论目标与现实冲突[J].国际贸易问题,1995(4):25.
④JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of Interntional Economic Relations--Cases. Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M], 4th ed., St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002(4): 687-688.
①罗亚萍,邓霓.论反倾销法的政治经济功能[J].国家关系学院学报,2006(6):31.
②MICHAEL P RYAN. Leveling the Playing Field: Settling Pacific Basin Disputes Regarding Unfair East Asian Trade Practices(M)//孙立文.WTO《反倾销协议》改革-政策和法律分析.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006(1):99.
①US Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States[R].US:Bureau of the Census, 1998:544.
①唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].东北财经大学出版社,2007(1):42-43.
②李雄刚.贸易保护主义的法理分析[J].当代法学,2003(10):36.
①周曙东,吴方卫.国际贸易中战略性贸易保护的博弈分析—兼谈反倾销.特别保障措施和绿色壁垒[J].农业经济问题, 2003(10):20.
②姜栋.论美国反倾销法的立法和执法过程—以利益冲突为视角[J].法学家, 2007(1):145.
③MICHAEL J. FINGER.Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt[M]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press,1993:19-20.
①姜栋.美国反倾销法的历史与现实[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(3):135.
②[美]E.博登·海默.法理学--法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.中国政法大学出版社,2004:413.
③HERALD WENIG.The European Community’s Anti-dumping System: Salient Features[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2005(30):787.
④EDWIN VERMULST.欧盟贸易政策与反倾销[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,1996(3):15.
①HARALD WENIG.欧共体反倾销制度的突出特点[J].吕航译.国际经贸探索,2008(4):81.
②SIMON J. EVENETT, EDWIN VERMULST.The Politicisation of EC Anti-dumping Policy: Member States, Their Votes and the European Commission[J]. The World Economy, 2005,28(5):702.
①SIMON J. EVENETT, EDWIN VERMULST.The Politicisation of EC Anti-dumping Policy: Member States, Their Votes and the European Commission[J]. The World Economy, 2005,28(5):710-711.
①金融时报(社评).欧盟反倾销是愚蠢[EB/OL].梁彦译. (2006-02-27) [2008-12-15]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001003109
②GEORGE PARKER.欧盟就反倾销鞋出现分歧[EB/OL].张征译.(2006-07-21)[2008-12-18]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001005740
①GUY DE JONQUIERES.中国是市场经济国家吗?[EB/OL].梁彦译.[2008-12-18]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story_print.php?storyid=001004241
①高永富,张玉卿主编.国际反倾销法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2001:272.
②陈力.欧盟对华反倾销“非市场经济”问题探悉[J].欧洲研究, 2003(3):131-148.
③蒋小红.欧共体非市场经济反倾销规则研究[J].外国法译评, 2000(4):22-37.
④刘惠荣,李楠.反倾销法中的“非市场经济国家”问题研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(1):87-91.
⑤沈瑶,李雅源.反倾销因素中“市场经济”地位问题-由两个案例引发的思考[J].云南财贸学院学报(社会科学版), 2003(2):13-15.
①FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):371.
②蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].法律出版社,2007(1):267.
③MARTIN WOLF.从凯恩斯主义反省金融危机[EB/OL].管婧译.(2009-01-06)[2009-01-07] http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001024050
④[美]保罗·A·萨繆尔森,威廉·D·诺德豪斯.经济学[M].北京:发展出版社,1992:68.
①马松,吉华.论市场经济国家地位-理论分析.中国的现状及对策[J].经济体制改革,2005(2):26.
②JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text[M].3rd ed.MN:West Group, 1995:1156.
①J.F BESELER, A.N. WILLIAMS. Anti-dumping and Anti-Subsidy Law: The European Communities(M).London:Sweet & Maxwell, 1986:64.
②WILCYNSKI. Dumping and Central Planning[J]. Political Economy, 1996(74): 261.
③IANNI. The international Treatment of State trading[J]. Journal of world trade law,1982(16):482.
④FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):420.
⑤FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J]. European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):379.
①Second Supplementary Provision to paragraph 1 of Article VI in Annex I to GATT 1947. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts(WTO, Geneva),1995:545-546.
①Agreement on Implementation of Article VI (Anti-dumping Code), art. 2(d)(General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Geneva, 1969).GATT Sales No/ GATT/1969-5.
②Agreement on Implementation of Ariticle VI, Art 14 (General Agrement on Traiffs and Trade, Geneva, 1969).GATT Sales No. GATT/1969-5.
①FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):417.
①陈力.欧盟对华反倾销“非市场经济”问题探析[J].欧洲研究, 2003(3):134.
②参见欧盟官方公报OJ NO L128,30.04.
①GUY DE JONQUIERES.中国是市场经济国家吗? [EB/OL].梁彦译.(2006-05-08) [2009-01-05]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001004241
②马松,吉华.论市场经济国家地位-理论分析.中国的现状及对策[J].经济体制改革, 2005(2):27.
③蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:286.
④蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:291.
①FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):370-372.
①HORLICK. The United States Antidumping System[M]// JOHN H. JACKSON, EDWIN A. VERMULST(eds), University of Michigan Press: Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study, c1990:140.
②Accession of Poland[C] Report of the Working Party. June 26,1967, (L/2806),in GATT, BISD, 15th Supplement, Geneva:,c1968: 111.
③CUNEO, MANUEL. Rodadblock to Trade: The State-Controlled Economy Issue in Antidumping Law Administration[J]. Fordham International Law Journal,1982,(5):290-291.
①HARISH KAPUR. China and the European Economic Community: The New Connection[J]. China Trade and Economic Newsletter, 1984(330):78-80.
②EDWIN A. VERMULST. Anti-dumping Law and Practice in the United States and the European Communities[M]. Elsevier North Holland, 1987:434.
③YANNOPOULOS. EC External Commercial Policies and East-West Trade in Europe[J]. Journal of Common Market Studies, 1985(9): 32.
④GARY N. HORLICK,SHANNON S. SCHUMAN. Nonmarket Economy Trade and U.S.Anti-dumping/Countervailing Duty Laws[J]. The International Lawer,1984(18):816.
①J.F. BESELER, A.N. WILLIAMS. Anti-dumping and Anti-Subsidy Law: The European Communities[M]. Sweet & Maxwell, 1986:291.
②尚明.反倾销:WTO规则及中外法律与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:80.
③JORGEN ULFF-MOLLER NIELSEN,ALEKSANDER RUTKOWSKI.The EU Anti-dumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country[J].The World Economy,2005,28(1):119.
①JORGEN ULFF-MOLLER NIELSEN,ALEKSANDER RUTKOWSKI.The EU Anti-dumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country[J].The World Economy,2005,28(1):122.
②CLIFF STEVENSON. GlobalAnti-Dumping Briefing[EB/OL],(2007-10-23)[2008-10-11]. http://www.antidumpingpublishing.com/newsletters/
③JORGEN ULFF-MOLLER NIELSEN,ALEKSANDER RUTKOWSKI.The EU Anti-dumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country[J].The World Economy,2005,28(1):120.
①LINDER, S.B.(1961), An essey on Trade and Transformation[M]. Stockholm:Almqvist & Wiksell,1961.
②FALVEY.(1981)Commercial Policy and Intra-Industry Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1961(11):495-511.
③FALVERY,R.E, H. KIERZKOWSKI. Product Quality, Intra-indusry Trade, and (Im)perfect Competition[M]/H. KIERZKOWSKI(ed.) Protection and Competition in International Trade. Oxford: Blackwell,1987.
④GROSSMAN,G. , E.HELPMAN.Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1991.
①Council Regulation(EC)No.1567/97 of 1 August, 1997, imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of leather handbags originating in the People’s Republic of China and terminating the prceeding concerning imports of plastic and textile handbags originating in the People’s Republic of China.
②高永富,张玉卿主编.国际反倾销法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2001:272-273.
①余盛兴.反倾销:告倒美国商务部[J].WTO经济导刊, 2006(8):31.
②赵晓霞.欧盟对华反倾销不公平性的研究[J].经济问题2004(10):69.
③余盛兴.欧盟皮鞋反倾销调查案:将抗辩进行到底?[J]. WTO经济导刊, 2006(11):55.
④余菲,余盛兴.美国对华反倾销:显失公平的游戏[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(12):55.
①丁炎炎.美国多华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊, 2007(5):87.
①丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):85.
②冯迪凡.美对华铜板纸“双反”案终裁“不合时宜”[N].第一次财经日报, 2007-10-22(3).
①Why Proposals to Apply Countervailing Duty Law to Non-Market Economies Require Reform(H.R.1229/S.974)[EB/OL]. (2007-7-27) [2009-01-15]. http://www.ecattrade.com/uploads/content/24FF609BAC8A47D59387CA903B674221.pdf.
②丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):86.
③丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):86-87.
①丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):85-87..
②Georgetown Steel Corp v United States, 801 F. 2d 1308, 1317(Fed. Cir. 1986)
①臧立. WTO法律体系下实施“双反”措施的合法性研究-由“美国对华铜版纸案”引发的思考[J].法商研究,2008(1):17.
②臧立. WTO法律体系下实施“双反”措施的合法性研究-由“美国对华铜版纸案”引发的思考[J].法商研究,2008(1):17.
③《补贴与反补贴措施协议》19.2规定“在所有征收反补贴税的要求均已获满足的情况下是否征税的决定,及征收反补贴税金额是否应等于或小于补贴的全部金额的决定,均由进口成员的主管机关作出。”
①Uruguay Round Agreements Act Statement of Administrative Action at 926.
②作者不详.从美国对华标准钢管双反案看中国应对贸易摩擦的新形势[EB/OL].(2008-06-13)[2009-02-01]. http://www.sdll.cn/plus/view.php?aid=5031.
①商务部.商务部谈美薄壁矩形钢管反倾销反补贴案终裁[EB/OL].(2008-06-30)[2009-02-10]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2008-06/30/content_1031297.htm.
②作者不详.美发布对华编织袋反补贴税令[EB/OL].(2008-08-13)[2009-02-10]. http://cloth.ocn.com.cn/2008813/Info2008813355.html.
③作者不详.美国对华非公路用轮胎发布双反措施令[EB/OL]. (2008-09-11)[2009-02-03]. http://gpmy.zftec.gov.cn/gpmy/zwxx/T214502.shtml.
④靳亥星.美国终裁中国产橡胶磁存在倾销[EB/OL].(2008-07-04) [2009-02-03]. http://www.caijing.com.cn/2008-07-04/100073041.html
①史云庆.美国对华低克重热敏纸作出双反产业损害裁决[EB/OL].(2008-10-31) [2009-01-18]. http://www.cacs.gov.cn/news/newshow.aspx?str1=2&articleId=46278.
②荆灿.中方获胜美铜版纸“双反”案,调查背后凸显中美贸易复杂性[N].中国贸易报, 2007-12-16(10).
③王晓慧.双反”调查给中美贸易带来危机[J].新财经,2007(10):71.
①陈云富.欧盟对华“双反”定调[N].中国联合商报,2007-11-26(1).
②王晓慧.“双反”调查给中美贸易带来危机[J].新财经,2007(10):70.
①ROBERTE LIGHTHIZER.Hearning on Trade Enforcement for a 21st Century Economy[EB/OL].(2007-06-12)[2009-02-05]. http:// finance.senate.gov/hearings/testimony/2007test/061207testrl.pdf
①GEOFF DYER.中国出口大幅下跌的祸福[EB/OL].(2009-3-12)[2009-3-12].http://www.FTChinese.com.
①沈木珠.中国反倾销立法评价及其完善思考[J].政法论坛(中国政府大学学报),2004(4):18.
①CLIFF STEVENSON. Global Trade Protection Report 2008. www.antidumpingpublishing.com
①唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].东北财经大学出版社,2007(1):331-332.
①胡麦秀,严明义.反倾销保护引致的市场转移效应分析-基于中国彩电出口的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2005(10):20.
②钟庭军.结构矛盾.利益冲突以及出口反倾销政策工具选择的合意性[J].首都经济贸易大学学报, 2005(5):91.
①宋才发.论WTO后过渡期中国企业的反倾销法律对策[J].河北法学,2006(11):69.
①家具厂家的反倾销应诉[N].中国日报(中国香港版), 2003-11-6(15).
②余菲,余盛兴.美国对华反倾销:显失公平的游戏[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(12):57.
①蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007(1):36-40.
①周灏.与进口商合作:反倾销应诉的重要策略[J].WTO经济导刊[J],2005(9):71.
②唐宜红,徐世腾.欧盟对华皮鞋反倾销的政治经济分析[J].国际贸易,2007(1):12.
③胡晓虹.论我国利用进口国利益集团应对反倾销之策略-自行车零件胜诉案分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(11):25-26.
④沈四宝.企业低价竞销与法律规制—反倾销是腋下的对外出口低价竞销原因分析和法律规制[J].国际贸易,2006(3):62-63.
①龙桂先.美国对华彩电反倾销案之经营策略原因浅谈[J].经济与社会发展,2004(10):28.
②祝福云,冯宗宪.我国对外反倾销调查与外商在华直接投资研究[J].财贸研究2006(6):29-30.
①朱东红,常亚平.出口企业应对国外反倾销胜诉几点启示-基于湛江国联打赢对美虾产品出口反倾销案的分析[J].对外经贸事务,2006(10):54-56.
①[2009-01-01]. http://www.cacs.gov.cn/member/classification.aspx?fromurl=http://www.cacs.gov.cn/
①[2009-02-10]. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm
②[2009-03-01]. http://commerce.nic.in/ad_cases.htm
③刘东光,姜中其.我国行业协会在反倾销中作用的提升对策[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(12):61-62.
①成新轩,应寅峰,贾素伟.欧盟对华反倾销政策目标与效果的错位分析[J].河北学刊,2006(2):167. KNETT, PRUSA. Macroeconmic Factors and Anti-dumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries[J].Journal of International Economics, 2003 (61): 1-17.
②[美]曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995:2-3.
[1]白玲,杜创.反倾销法中的损害权问题[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2005(6).
[2]鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007(2):73.
[3]宾建成.从五种经济模式看如何应对欧盟对华反倾销[J].山西财经大学学报,2007(9).
[4]宾建成.中国首次反倾销措施执行效果评估[J].世界经济,2003(9).
[5]车丕照,杜明.欧共体反倾销条例“共同体利益”条款研究—兼论对完善我国反倾销法的若干启示[J].欧洲研究,2004(3).
[6]车幸原.不完全信息条件下的反倾销政策效果[J].财贸经济,2004(10).
[7]陈达.反倾销法的缺陷分析及其改革方向[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(1).
[8]陈力.欧盟对华反倾销“非市场经济”问题探析[J].欧洲研究,2003(3).
[9]陈立虎.论反倾销法上的日落复审制度[J].法学家,2007(6).
[10]成新轩,应寅峰,贾素伟.欧盟对华反倾销政策目标与效果的错位分析[J].河北学刊,2006(2).
[11]陈勇.倾销和反倾销的经济学解说[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001(5).
[12]程卫东.国与国之间的利益协调—国际反倾销法的晚近发展[J].国际贸易,2001(8).
[13] Corinne M. Krupp,SusanSkeath,关于反倾销措施对上、下游产业影响的论证[J]邹超,廖枚译.经济资料译丛,2004(3):8,原载北美经济与金融杂志,2002,13(2).
[14]戴远泰.印度应对反倾销挑战的政策措施[J].南亚研究季刊,2003(1).
[15]邓纲.刍议反倾销规则并入竞争法体系的几个问题[J].现代法学,2007(5).
[16]丁炎炎.美国多华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊, 2007(5).
[17]冯巨章.中国反倾销应速率影响因素的实证分析[J].经济评论,2006(5).
[18]傅东辉,柴森.反倾销:自由贸易的保护?贸易保护的措施?[J].中国对外贸易, 2003(43).
[19]傅东辉.选择正确的贸易救济政策是对产业竞争力的基本保障[J].国际贸易,2007(3).
[20]傅东辉.总体发展与局部保护的杠杆——欧盟“公共利益”条款对中国反倾销立法的借鉴[J].国际贸易,2005(1).
[21]高永富,张玉卿主编.国际反倾销法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2001
[22]付荣.反倾销法中实质性阻碍问题的合理性探析[J].法学论坛,2006(2).
[23]高波,韩秀丽.关于国际反倾销法改革——日本视角[J].国际经贸探索,2008(4).
[24]高磊,鲍晓华.美国对华反倾销动态博弈研究[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,2006(11).
[25]郭双焦,米家龙.WTO反倾销制度与竞争政策的关联与冲突[J].国际经贸探索,2008(1)
[26]郭守亭,赵君峰.出口企业应对反倾销搭便车行为分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(2).
[27]郭跃,靳芳.贸易法和竞争法的冲突浅析——以反倾销和保障措施为例[J].大连大学学报,2007(5).
[28]韩秀丽.欧洲法院在反倾销案件中对比例原则的适用[J].欧洲研究,2005(6).
[29]贺小勇.论DSB对“反倾销协定”解释的边界—“反倾销协议”第17.6(ii)条评析[J].法学,2005(9).
[30]候海英.倾销与反倾销缘何在钢铁产业中盛行[J].世界经济研究,2004(3).
[31]胡丹婷,何建华,史亚冲.行业反倾销申诉---混合策略均衡下的后果及平衡的突破[J].国际贸易问题,2006(12).
[32]胡麦秀,周延云.跨越反倾销壁垒与引致的对外直接投资研究[J].宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005(3).
[33]胡晓虹.论我国利用进口国利益集团应对反倾销之策略-自行车零件胜诉案分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(11).
[34]贾宁,梅仁毅. 1980-2003年美国反倾销实务定量分析[J].国际经贸问题,2007(3).
[35]蒋德恩.反倾销的滥用及其贸易保护主义效应[J].国际贸易问题,2007(3).
[36]姜栋.论美国反倾销法的立法和执法过程—以利益冲突为视角[J].法学家,2007(1)
[37]姜栋.美国反倾销法的利益分析及其启示[J].法商研究,2007(4).
[38]姜栋.美国反倾销法的正义分析[J].法制与社会发展,2007(3).
[39]姜栋.美国反倾销法的历史与现实[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(3).
[40]蒋小红.欧通体非市场经济反倾销规则研究[J].外国法译评,2000(4).
[41]蒋珠燕,陶丽萍.倾销与反倾销的经济学分析[J].上海经济研究,2003(10).
[42]金祥荣,田青,陆菁.贸易保护制度的经济分析[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2001.
[43]金晓晨.反倾销之能够公共利益原则的法理分析[J].当代法学,2007(9).
[44]梁枫,钟根元.欧盟对华“一国一税”反倾销政策的博弈分析[J].国际经贸探索,2007(6).
[45]李炼,候雁.反倾销:有条件地限制价格竞争的规则[J].经济问题探索,2005(11).
[46]李炼.自由贸易条件下公平竞争的法律保护—对国际反倾销法的重新认识[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),1997(3).
[47]李文玺.世贸组织/关贸总协定反倾销法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006.
[48]李雄刚.贸易保护主义的法理分析[J].当代法学,2003(10).
[49]李月芬.中国何以成为世界头号反倾销目标?[J].世界经济与政治,2006(4).
[50]梁枫,钟根元,欧美对华“一国一税”反倾销政策的博弈分析[J]。国际经贸探索,2007(6).
[51]梁咏.论中国运用WTO争端解决机制对反倾销诉讼的应对措施—一个比较法的观点[J].财经问题研究,2002(6).
[52]林丽萍,李炼,林钻煌.基于进化博弈的企业倾销与反倾销分析[J].国际经贸探索,2005(3).
[53]凌慧名.WTO反倾销法的宏观分析[J].法学评论,2003(4).
[54]龙桂先.美国对华彩电反倾销案之经营策略原因浅谈[J].经济与社会发展, 2004(10).
[55]罗昌发.贸易与竞争之法律互动[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[56]刘东光,姜中其.我国行业协会在反倾销中作用的提升对策[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(12).
[57]刘惠荣,李楠.反倾销法中的“非市场经济国家”问题研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(1).
[58]刘继森,付新隆.反倾销过程中的市场失灵:规避和吸收[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,2007(8).
[59]刘勇.论世贸组织《反倾销协定》若干特点[J].国际贸易问题,2008(2).
[60]刘永伟.反倾销法因果关系标准比较研究[J].法商研究,2001(5).
[61]刘亚军.进口国反倾销诉讼动因探悉[J].宁夏社会科学,2007(4).
[62]刘亚军.浅议反倾销对进口国经济的不利影响[J].宁夏社会科学,2005(5).
[63]卢征良,蒋立场.20世纪30年代中国水泥业反倾销研究---以上海华商水泥公司为中心的考察[J].国际贸易问题,2008(1).
[64]栾信杰.当竞争被严重扭曲时——国际反倾销与竞争政策的冲突和协调[J].国际贸易,1999(12).
[65]罗亚萍,邓霓.论反倾销的政治经济功能[J].国际关系学院学报,2006(6).
[66]罗之仁,郭双焦.反倾销税的经济学分析[J].湖南涉外经济学院学报,2006(3).
[67]骆旭旭.世贸组织反倾销谈判及中国的立场[J].国际贸易问题,2006(6).
[68]马向敏,刘富利.进口反倾销对上下游产业的影响——基于我国造纸业反倾销的分析[J].当代经济,2007(12).
[69]吕航.印度反倾销案件现状研究[J].长春师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),2008 (27).
[70]马松,吉华.论市场经济国家地位-理论分析.中国的现状及对策[J].经济体制改革,2005(2).
[71]马述忠,黄祖辉.农产品反倾销国内外研究动态评述[J].农业经济问题,2005(3).
[72]彭熙海.反倾销公共利益审查目的论[J].河北法学,2005(8).
[73]蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[74]曲如晓,江铨.论反倾销保护对企业R&D投入的影响[J].经济经纬,2007(5).
[75]尚明.反倾销:WTO规则及中外法律与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[76]卲学言,张辰利.国家利益冲突与反倾销—发达国家政策取向与经济学解释得背离[J].国际经贸探索,2005(6).
[77]沈木珠.中国反倾销立法评价及其完善思考[J].政法论坛(中国政府大学学报),2004(4).
[78]沈四宝.企业低价竞销与法律规制—反倾销是腋下的对外出口低价竞销原因分析和法律规制[J].国际贸易,2006(3)
[79]沈瑶,李雅源.反倾销因素中“市场经济”地位问题-由两个案例引发的思考[J].云南财贸学院学报(社会科学版), 2003(2).
[80]沈瑶,朱益,王继柯.中国反倾销实施中的产业关联研究:以聚氯乙烯案为例[J].国际贸易问题,2005(3).
[81]沈瑶,王继柯.中国反倾销实施中的贸易转向研究:以丙烯酸酯为例[J].国际贸易问题,2004(3).
[82]沈瑶.模仿生产与低于成本倾销—兼论针对发展中国家反倾销措施的公平问题[J].世界经济,2003(10).
[83]沈瑶,王继柯,单晓菁.中间品反倾销税的适度征收问题研究[J],南开经济研究,2003(4).
[84]沈瑶.倾销与反倾销的历史起源[J].世界经济,2002(8).
[85]世界贸易秘书处.贸易走向未来—世界贸易组织概要(中译本)[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.
[86]宋丽芳.WTO成立以来的全球反倾销摩擦及其特点[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(6).
[87]宋波.贸易自由与贸易保护的相关性研究—评国际反倾销法发展的规律[J].江西行政学院学报,2003(1).
[88]孙赫,李平.反倾销内生性之初探[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(9).
[89]孙立文.WTO〈反倾销协议〉改革--政策和法律分析[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006.
[90][英]SNYDER,唐青阳.欧盟反倾销制度与实务研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2005.
[91]孙雯.反倾销发与竞争法之冲突与协调[J].河北法学,2006(1).
[92]孙文远,黄建康.美国实施反倾销贸易政策的动因.绩效与启示[J].国际贸易问题,2007(1).
[93]孙晓光,杨秀翰.对反倾销法存在合理性的再思考[J].山东行政学院.山东省经济管理干部学院学报,2004(5).
[94]覃红,潘毅华.反倾销制度的法律经济分析[J].国际经贸探索,2006(3).
[95]唐凌.反倾销诉讼动态博弈分析[J].产业经济研究,2007(4).
[96]唐凌.倾销与反倾销的经济分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(7).
[97]唐凌,李春杰.反倾销中的价格竞争及被诉企业策略研究[J].预测,2003(5).
[98]唐宜红,徐世腾.欧盟对华皮鞋反倾销的政治经济分析[J].国际贸易,2007(1).
[99]唐宇.保障措施条款替代反倾销规则的可行性分析[J].财贸经济,2007(7).
[100]唐宇,张静.美国反倾销因果关系的五种裁定方法分析[J].国际贸易问题,2005(5).
[101]唐宇.反其国内销保护印发的四种经济效应分析[J].财贸经济,2004(11).
[102]唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2007.
[103]屠新泉,张汉林.抑制还是鼓励—多边贸易体制与反倾销的关系[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(4).
[104]王超.论多边贸易体制下反倾销法与竞争政策的协调[J].亚太经济,2008(1).
[105]王超.试论多边贸易体制下反倾销法与竞争政策的协调[J].福建法学,2007(4).
[106]王贵国.全球化以致中和—从阿根廷家禽反倾销案说起[J].法学家,2003(4).
[107]王丽华.国际反倾销制度的实质不公平及我国的对策[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(2).
[108]王荣艳.传统幼稚工业保护论与新贸易保护论之异同[J].现代财经,2003(3).
[109]王伟,王先林.反垄断法视野中的反倾销问题[J].法学家,2007(2).
[110]王亚星,李玉刚.试论倾销与反倾销的关系[J].中国人民大学学报,1999(2).
[111]吴小丁.反垄断与经济发展——日本竞争政策研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
[112]夏先良.论自由贸易与保护贸易政策的选择[J].财贸经济,1995(10).
[113]谢海霞.从竞争法角度看反倾销法律制度[J].河北法学,2004(3).
[114]谢正勤.多哈回合中我国反倾销谈判立场的调整[J].山东社会科学,2004(11).
[115]薛荣,李居迁.反倾销法的理念及其局限论析[J].现代法学,2002(4).
[116]杨长春,刘妮.自由贸易理论与反倾销原理是否形成悖论[J].国际贸易问题,2005(5).
[117]薛爽.乌拉圭回合与东京回合《反倾销守则》之比较[J].国际经贸探索,1994(5).
[118]杨伏英.国际反倾销制度中公共利益原则的缺陷分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2007 (4).
[119]杨军.反倾销法与竞争法的冲突辨析[J].华东政法学院学报,2004(5).
[120]杨红强,聂影.国外对华反倾销措施效果评价的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2007(11).
[121]杨韶艳.发达国家反倾销的动因[J].财贸研究,2007(5).
[122]杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源—基于经济理性角度的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2008(1)
[123]杨仕辉.美国对中韩彩电回应反倾销比较分析[J].国际经贸探索,2005(1).
[124]杨仕辉.美国对中韩彩电回应反倾销比较分析[J].国际经贸探索,2005(1).
[125]杨仕辉.反倾销规则的博弈分析[J].世界经济,2001(11).
[126]杨仕辉.反倾销博弈与逆向选择[J].世界经济,2000(1).
[127]杨仕辉,肖德.反倾销对抗博弈—兼论我国少有对外反倾销申诉的成因分析[J].预测,2000(6).
[128]杨悦,何海燕,王宪良.进口反倾销行为对产业价格指数影响的实证研究—以钢铁行业为例[J].财贸研究,2007(6).
[129]叶华,林霖.贸易保护的政治经济学分析—以中国加入WTO后遭受反倾销增多为例[J]理论界,2005(4).
[130]尹尊声.反倾销战和中国的策略选择[J].社会科学研究,2003(4).
[131]余菲.论美国对华反倾销的不公平性及因应策略[J].世界经济研究,2007(5).
[132]余菲,余盛兴.美国对华反倾销:显失公平的游戏[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(12):55.
[133]俞燕宁.多哈发展议程中关于反倾销的若干问题[J].法学杂志,2007(1).
[134]于矗礼.倾销的经济本质分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(9).
[135]余晖. WTO体制下行业协会的应对策略——以反倾销为例[J].中国工业经济,2002(3).
[136]于璐瑶,冯宗宪.进口反倾销调查对外商投资与国内上下游产业链的影响及其对策[J].国际贸易,2007(9).
[137]余盛兴.欧盟皮鞋反倾销调查案:将抗辩进行到底?[J]. WTO经济导刊.2006(11).
[138]余盛兴.多哈反倾销规则谈判:对你当报何种期望[J].WTO经济导刊,2009(2).
[139]余盛兴.反倾销:告倒美国商务部[J].WTO经济导刊, 2006(8).
[140]余盛兴.欧盟皮鞋反倾销调查案:将抗辩进行到底?[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(11):55.
[141]袁磊,颜延,蒋群英.论反倾销法的历史局限性[J].财经研究,2003(3).
[142]袁欣.国际反倾销规则中的贸易保护主义因素分析[J].经济经纬,2006(1)47.
[143]阮振宇.反倾销法与竞争法德关系-从WTO“美国1916年反倾销法案”谈起[J].国际经贸探索,2001(2).
[144]臧立. WTO法律体系下实施“双反”措施的合法性研究-由“美国对华铜版纸案”引发的思考[J].法商研究,2008(1).
[145]张金平.反倾销不应诉的原因及应对策略[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,2006(12).
[146]张亮.欧共体反倾销损害幅度确定问题研究[J].欧洲研究,2007(6).
[147]张敏.论反倾销法利益平衡原则—以和谐贸易为视角[J].法治研究,2007(7).
[148]张淑娟,隋广军.反倾销争端与外国对华的歧视待遇——基于博弈论视角的解析[J].当代财经,2006(5).
[149]张苑.反倾销的政策绩效研究及其对中国实践的启示[J].学术研究,2006(10).
[150]张箢洺.中国进口反倾销调查对外国直接投资的影响[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2007(5).
[151]张瑞萍.对我国反垄断立法的思考[J].甘肃政法成人教育学院学报,2006(4).
[152]张瑞萍.反倾销法的性质与演进之分析[J].当代法学,2002(115).
[153]张瑞萍.反倾销法的价值取向及实际功效分析[J].法制与社会发展,1999(2).
[154]张晓君.反倾销因果关系标准探微—基于贸易政策的分析[J].甘肃社会科学,2004(1).
[155]张晓君.反倾销案因果关系的立法分析及我国的对策[J].现代法学,2004(1).
[156]赵安民.两起反倾销案的胜败得失与理性思考[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2005(3).
[157]赵亮,张艳.易保护理论的发展及比较研究,商业时代(理论版)[J].2004年(15).
[158]赵晓霞.欧盟对华反倾销不公平性的研究[J].经济问题2004(10).
[159]郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10).
[160]郑瑞芳,田明华,郭秀君.倾销和反倾销对中国新闻纸产业的影响[J].对外经贸实务,2006(2)
[161]钟庭军.结构矛盾.利益冲突以及出口反倾销政策工具选择的合意性[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2005(5).
[162]周会青.对美国反倾销的微观分析[J].对外经济实务,2004(12).
[163]周莉.反倾销:理论目标与现实冲突[J].国际贸易问题,1995(4).
[164]周俐军,何元贵.完全市场经济地位并非应对反倾销的救命稻草—反倾销与“非市场经济地位”关系探析[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2005(3).
[165]周申.论贸易自由化与反倾销[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(5).
[166]周曙东,吴方卫.国际贸易中战略性贸易保护的博弈分析——兼谈反倾销、特别保障措施和绿色壁垒[J].农业经济问题,2003(10).
[167]周灏.与进口商合作:反倾销应诉的重要策略[J].WTO经济导刊[J],2005(9)
[168]朱东红,常亚平.出口企业应对国外反倾销胜诉几点启示-基于湛江国联打赢对美虾产品出口反倾销案的分析[J].对外经贸事务,2006(10).
[169]祝福云,冯宗宪.我国对外反倾销调查与外商在华直接投资研究[J].财贸研究2006(6).
[170]朱庆华.反倾销发展中国家的特殊合差别待遇问题[J].国际贸易问题,2004(3).
[171]朱庆华,唐宇.中国反倾销措施的实证分析[J].山东财政学院学报,2004(6):79
[172]朱鹏飞,穆伯祥.论反倾销立法中的实质性阻碍损害标准[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2007(2).
[173]朱孝新.论世贸组织“反倾销协议”与竞争法的冲突与协调[J].国际贸易问题,2003(7).
[174]朱允卫,易开刚.我国对外反倾销的特点.存在问题及其完善[J].国际贸易问题,2005(3).
[175]朱志晟,张亮.被政治化了的法律问题:评美国反倾销法中的非市场经济国家界定标准[J].当代法学,2003(5).
[176]朱钟棣,鲍晓华.反倾销措施对产业的关联影响——反倾销税价格效应的投入产出分析[J].经济研究,2004(1).
[1][美]大卫·D·弗里德曼.经济学语境下的法律规则[M].杨欣欣译.北京:法律出版社,2004.
[2][美]保罗·A·萨繆尔森,威廉·D·诺德豪斯.经济学[M].北京:发展出版社, 1992
[3][英]弗里德利希·冯·哈耶克.自由秩序原理[M].邓正来译.北京:三联书店,1997.
[4][德]柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学社会秩序与公共政策[M].韩朝华译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[5][美]理查德·A·波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].蒋兆康译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.
[6][美]曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
[7][英]亚当·斯密.国富论[M].王亚南译.北京:商务印书馆,1994.
[8][美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[1] AHN D. Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules [J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2008(11)
[2] BALDWIN R E. The Political Economy of Reforming the Antidumping Laws[J].The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[3] BARFIELD C. Antidumping Reform: Time to Go Back to Basics [J].The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[4] BARUAH N. An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Antidumping Behavior in India[J].The World Economy,2007,30(7).
[5] BEKKER D. The Strategic Use of Antidumping in International Trade[J]. The South African Journal of Economics,2006,74(3).
[6]BESELER J F, WILLIAMS A N. Anti-dumping and Anti-Subsidy Law: The European Communities [M]. UK: Sweet & Maxwell, 1986.
[7]BLONIGEN B A, HAYNES S E. Antidumping Investigations and the Pass-Through of Exchange Rates and Antidumping Duties[J], NBER Working Paper No. 7378,October 1999.
[8]BLONIGEN B A. Tariff-Jumping Antidumping Duties [J], NBER Working Paper No.7776, July 2000.
[9]BLONIGEN B A, PRUSA T J. Antidumping [J], NBER Working Paper No. 8398, June 2001.
[10]BLONIGEN B A, BOWN C P. Antidumping and Retaliation Threats [J], NBER Working Paper No. 8576, October 2001.
[11]BLONIGEN B A. Evolving Discretionary Practices of US Antidumping Activity [J], NBER Working Paper No. 9625, April 2003.
[12]BLONIGEN B A. Working the System: Firm Learning and the Antidumping Process [J], NBER Working Paper No.10783, September 2004.
[13]BOWN C P. Canada's Antidumping and Safeguard Policies: Overt and Subtle Forms of Discrimination [J].The World Economy,2007,30(9).
[14]CHENG L K, QIU L D, WONG K P. Antidumping Measures as a Tool of Protectionism:A Mechanism Design Approach [J].Canadian Journal of Economics,2001,34(3).
[15]CIURIAK D. Antidumping at 100 Years and Counting: A Canadian Perspective[J].The World Economy, 2005,28(5).
[16]CONRAD C A. Dumping and Anti-dumping Measures from a Competition and Allocation Perspective [J]. Journal of World Trade,2002,36(3).
[17]CUYVERS L, DUMONT M.EU Antidumping Measures against ASEAN Countries: Impact on Trade Flows[J]. Asian Economic Journal,2005,19(3).
[18]DEARDORFF A V, ROBERT M, STERN A. Centennial of Antidumping Legislation and Implementation: Introduction and Overview [J].The World Economy, 2005, 28(5).
[19]DEBROY B, CHAKRABORTY D. Antidumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument [M].1st ed. New Delhi: Academic Foundation, 2007.
[20]DROPE J M, HANSEN W L. Antidumping’s Happy Birthday? [J].The World Economy,2006,29(4).
[21]EVENETT S J, VERMULST E. The Politicization of EC Antidumping Policy: Member States, Their Votes and the European Commission[J]. The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[22]FEINBERG R M. Exchange Rates and“Unfair Trade”[J]. 71 Rev. of Economics and Statistics,1989(4).
[23] FINGER M J. Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt[M]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1993.
[24]GRIMWADE N. Anti-dumping Policy After the Uruguay Round-An Appraisal [J]. National Institute Economic Review, 1996(2).
[25]HORLICK G, VERMULST E. The 10 Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis [J]. Journal of World Trade, 2005, 39(1).
[26]HOU X Z, REN R M. Cooperate or Antagonize: The EU's Dilemma on Antidumping and Safeguard Measures against China[J].China & World Economy,2006,14(6).
[27]IANNI.The International Treatment of State trading[J]. Journal of World Trade Law,1982 (16).
[28]IRWIN D A. The Rise of US Antidumping Activity in Historical Perspective [J].The World Economy, 2005,28(5).
[29]JACKSON J H. The Jurisprudence of GATT & the WTO[M].2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press,2002.
[30]JACKSON J H, DAVERY W J, SYKES A O Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations– Cases, Materials and Text on the National and International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M].4th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Group,2002.
[31]JAFTA R C C. Antidumping and Market Access: A Note [J].The South African Journal of Economics, 2006,74(3).
[32]JAMES W E. The Rise of Antidumping: Does Regionalism Promote Administered Protection? [J].Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2000,14(2).
[33]KAPUR H. China and the European Economic Community: The New Connection [J]. China Trade and Economic Newsletter, 1984(330).
[34]KNETT, PRUSA. Macroeconomic Factors and Anti-dumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries[J].Journal of International Economics, 2003(61).
[35]LIMA-CAMPOS A D,VITO A. Abuse and Discretion, The impact of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings on Brazilian Exports to the United States[J].Journal of World Trade,2004,38(1).
[36]LINDSEY B,IKENSON D. Antidumping:The Devilish Details of“Unfair Trade”Law [J]. CATO Trade Policy Analysis, 2002(20).
[37]MAH J S. The United States’Antidumping Decisions Against the Northeast Asian Dynamic Economies [J].The World Economy,2000,23(5).
[38]MASTEL G. Antidumping Laws and the U.S Economy[M].Armonk,NY: ME Sharpe,1998.
[39]MARCEAU G Z. Antidumping and Anti-trust Issues in Free-trade Areas [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1996(XXXIV):1968-1969.
[40]NIELSEN J U, RUTKOWSKI A. The EU Antidumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country [J]. The World Economy, 2005,28(1).
[41]PANAGARIYA A, GUPTA P. Antidumping Duty Versus Price Negotiations [J].The World Economy, 1998,21(8).
[42]PATTERSON. Improving GATT Rules for Nonmarket Economies[J]. Journal of World Trade Law, 1986(20).
[43] PRUSA T J. Cumulating and Antidumping: A Challenge to Competition[J]. The World Economy, 1998,21(8).
[44]PRUSA T J. On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,2001,34(3).
[45]PRUSA T J. SKEATH S. The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filings [J].NEBR Working Paper No.8424,2001(7).
[46]PRUSA T J. East Asia's Antidumping Problem [J].The World Economy, 2006, 29(6).
[47]PRUSA T J. Antidumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade [J]. The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[48]RODRIK D. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? [M] Washington DC: Institute for International Economics (1997).
[49]RUTKOWSKI A. Withdrawals of Antidumping Complaints in the EU: A Sign of Collusion [J].The World Economy, 2007,30(3).
[50]SNYDER F. The Origins of the“Nonmarket Economy”: Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Antidumping Law about China [J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4).
[51]STAIGER R W, WOLAK F A. Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States[J].NBER Working Paper No.4696, 1994(3).
[52]THARAKAN P K M. Is Antidumping Here to Stay?[J].The World Economy,1999, 22(2).
[53]THARAKAN P K M, VERMULST E, THARAKAN J. Interface Between Antidumping Policy and Competition Policy: A Case Study[J].The World Economy, 1998,21(8).
[54]TIVIG T, WALZ U. Market Share, Cost-based Dumping, and Antidumping Policy [J].Canadian Journal of Economics,2000,33(1).
[55]WENIG H. The European Community’s Anti-dumping System: Salient N Features [J].Journal of World Trade,2005(30).
[56]ZANARDI M. Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha? [J]. The World Economy,2004,27(3).
②世界贸易秘书处.贸易走向未来—世界贸易组织概要(中译本)[M].北京:法律出版社,1999:8.
③杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源—基于经济理性角度的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2008(1):95.LINDSEY B,IKENSON D. Antidumping:The Devilish Details of“unfair trade”law[J]. CATO Trade Policy Anylysis, 2002(20).
①[2008-07-03].http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm.
②THOMAS J. PRUSA. On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping(EB/OL).(2007-12-01)[2008-07-01]. http://www.nber.org/digest/apr00/w7404.html.
①[美]理查德·A·波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].蒋兆康译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社, 1997:405.
①DOUGLAS A.IRWIN.The Rise of US Anti-dumping Activity in Historical Perspective [J].The World Economy,2005,28(5): 651-668.
①郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
②孙文远,黄健康.美国实施反倾销贸易政策的动因、绩效与启示[J].国际贸易问题,2007(1):95.
③郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
④郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
⑤郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):74.
⑥刘亚军.进口国反倾销诉讼动因探悉[J].宁夏社会科学,2007(4):30.
①朱庆华,唐宇.中国反倾销措施的实证分析[J].山东财政学院学报, 2004(6):79.
②车幸原.不完全信息条件下的反倾销政策效果[J].财贸经济,2004(10):83.
③车幸原.不完全信息条件下的反倾销政策效果[J].财贸经济,2004(10):83.
④CORINNE M. KRUPP,SUSAN SKEATH.关于反倾销措施对上、下游产业影响的论证[J]邹超,廖枚译.经济资料译丛,2004(3):8.
⑤鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007(2):73.
⑥唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析[J].财贸经济,2004(11):66.
⑦唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析[J].财贸经济,2004(11):67.
①唐宇.保障措施条款替代反倾销规则的可行性分析[J].财贸经济, 2007(7):88.
②杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源—基于经济理性角度的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2008(1):94.
③程卫东.国与国之间的利益协调—国际反倾销法的晚近发展[J].国际贸易,2001(8):43.
①王荣艳.传统幼稚工业保护论与新贸易保护论之异同[J].现代财经,2003(3):54.
②赵亮,张艳.贸易保护理论的发展及比较研究[J].商业时代(理论版),2004年(15):56.
①陈荣辉.西方贸易保护理论的演变[N].福建日报,2002-2-12(11).
②杨丹辉.新贸易保护主义及其对我国的影响[N].中国经济时报,2006-3-27(5).
①[英]亚当·斯密.国富论[M].王亚南译.北京:商务印书馆,1994:88.
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:33.
②[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:39.
③[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:69.
④[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:41-42.
⑤[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:47.
⑥[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:33.
⑦[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:76.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping: What are the numbers to discuss at Doha? [J]. The world Economy, 2004, 27(3): 407.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:166-177.
②摘自《众议院,议会辩论》,1916年8月2日,第340辑[M]//雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题.沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:216.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:210.
②雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:210-211.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:210-219.
②姜栋.美国反倾销法的历史与现状[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(3):136.
③卢征良,蒋立场.20世纪30年代中国水泥业反倾销研究——以上海华商水泥公司为中心的考察[J].国际贸易问题, 2008(1):115.
①上海社会科学院经济研究所编.刘鸿生企业史料(上册)[M].上海人民出版社,1981:226.
②谢扶民编著.中华民国立法史[M].台北:中正书局,中华民国二十六年:687.
③雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:32.
①雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:144-147.
②JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations—Cases, Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations [M]. 4th ed. MN: West Group, 2002:693-694.
③李炼.自由贸易条件下公平竞争的法律保护—对国际反倾销法的重新认识[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),1997(3):48.
①JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations—Cases, Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation Of Transnational Economic Relations [M]. 4th ed. MN: West Group, 2002:695-696.
②薛爽.乌拉圭回合与东京回合《反倾销守则》之比较[J].国际经贸探索,1994(5):38-40.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping:What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27):409.
②唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].东北财经大学出版社,2007(1):43.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping:What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27): 409 -410.
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27):409 -410.
①ROBERT TEH, THOMAS J, PRUSA, MICHAEL BUDETTA. Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements [M/OL]. 2007:76. [2008-10-3]. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200703_e.pdf
①DUKGEUN AHN. Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2008(11):107-108.
②ROBERT TEH, THOMAS J, PRUSA, MICHAEL BUDETTA. Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements[M/OL]. 2007:50. [2008-09-30]. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200703_e.pdf
③DUKGEUN AHN. Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2008(11):111-115.
①ROBERT TEH, THOMAS J, PRUSA, MICHAEL BUDETTA. Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements[M/OL]. 2007:2-5.[2008-09-25]. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200703_e.pdf
①程卫东.国与国之间的利益协调-国际反倾销法的晚近发展[J].国际贸易, 2001(8):44.
①DAN CIURIAK.Anti-dumping at 100 Years and Counting: A Canadian Perspective[J]. The World Economy, 2005(28):645.
①CLIFF STEVENSON.Global Trade Protection Report 2008[EB/OL].(2008-12-15) [2009-1-5]. http:// www.antidumpingpublishing.com
①MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Anti-dumping:What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?[J]. The World Economy, 2004(27): 414-415.
①THOMAS J. PRUSA. Anti-dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade[J].The World Economy, 2005(28):685-689.
①CLIFF STEVENSON.Global Trade Protection Report 2008[EB/OL].(2008-12-15)[2009-01-05]. http://www.antidumpingpublishing.com
①IAN WOOTON, MAURIZIO ZANARDI. Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping Versus Anti-Trust[EB/OL] [2008-10-13]. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_22263_en.pdf
①曾惠逸.反倾销议题谈判进展与争端解决趋势之分析[EB/OL].(1995-10-13)[2009-02-12]. http://www.wtocenter.org.tw/SmartKMS/do/www/readDoc?document_id=82204
②安徽省商务厅.《反倾销措施协议》与多哈回合谈判[EB/OL].(2005-08-04)[2009-02-12]. http://info.jj.hc360.com/2005/08/04154312999-5.shtml
③余盛兴.多哈反倾销规则谈判:对你当报何种期望[J].WTO经济导刊, 2009(2):67.
①P.K.M.THARAKAN. Is Anti-Dumping Here to Stay?[J].The World Economy,1999(22):188.
①GARY HORLICK,EDWIN VERMULST. The 10 Major Problems With the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2005,39(1):67-73.
②GRIMWADE N. Anti-dumping Policy after the Uruguay Round– an appraisal[J]. National Institute Economic Review, 1996(2):100.
③吕航.印度反倾销案件现状研究[J].长春师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),2008(27): 88-90.
①THOMAS. J. PRUSA. Anti-dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade[J].The World Economy, 2005(28):683.
②It says“contracting parties recognize that dumping, by which products of one country are introduced into the commerce of another country at less than the normal value of the products, is to be condemned if it causes or threatens material injury to an established industry in the territory of a contractng party or materially retards the establishment of a domestic industry.”
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:2.
②[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:3.
③[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:4.
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:21-22.
②[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:22.
①孙立文.WTO《反倾销协议》改革-政策和法律分析[M].武汉大学出版社,2006(1):11-12.
②CHRISTIAN A. CONRAD: Dumping and Anti-dumping Measures from a Competition and Allocation Perspective[J]. Journal of World Trade,2002,36(3):564.
③[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:24.
①[美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆2003:24.
②ROBERT M. FEINBERG. Exchange Rates and“Unfair Trade”[J]. 71 Rev. of Economics and Statistics, 1989(4):704-707. CHRISTIAN A. CONRAD: Dumping and Anti-dumping Measures from a Competition and Allocation Perspective[J]. Journal of World Trade,2002,36(3):566.
③王亚星,李玉刚.试论倾销与反倾销的关系[J].中国人民大学学报,1999(2):121.
①JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of Interntional Economic Relations--Cases. Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M], 4th ed., St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002(4):683.
①JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of Interntional Economic Relations--Cases. Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M], 4th ed., St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002(4):684-686.
②陈勇.倾销和反倾销的经济学解说[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001( 5):35.
③周莉.反倾销:理论目标与现实冲突[J].国际贸易问题,1995(4):25.
④JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES, Jr. Legal Problems of Interntional Economic Relations--Cases. Materials And Text On The National And International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M], 4th ed., St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002(4): 687-688.
①罗亚萍,邓霓.论反倾销法的政治经济功能[J].国家关系学院学报,2006(6):31.
②MICHAEL P RYAN. Leveling the Playing Field: Settling Pacific Basin Disputes Regarding Unfair East Asian Trade Practices(M)//孙立文.WTO《反倾销协议》改革-政策和法律分析.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006(1):99.
①US Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States[R].US:Bureau of the Census, 1998:544.
①唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].东北财经大学出版社,2007(1):42-43.
②李雄刚.贸易保护主义的法理分析[J].当代法学,2003(10):36.
①周曙东,吴方卫.国际贸易中战略性贸易保护的博弈分析—兼谈反倾销.特别保障措施和绿色壁垒[J].农业经济问题, 2003(10):20.
②姜栋.论美国反倾销法的立法和执法过程—以利益冲突为视角[J].法学家, 2007(1):145.
③MICHAEL J. FINGER.Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt[M]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press,1993:19-20.
①姜栋.美国反倾销法的历史与现实[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(3):135.
②[美]E.博登·海默.法理学--法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.中国政法大学出版社,2004:413.
③HERALD WENIG.The European Community’s Anti-dumping System: Salient Features[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2005(30):787.
④EDWIN VERMULST.欧盟贸易政策与反倾销[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,1996(3):15.
①HARALD WENIG.欧共体反倾销制度的突出特点[J].吕航译.国际经贸探索,2008(4):81.
②SIMON J. EVENETT, EDWIN VERMULST.The Politicisation of EC Anti-dumping Policy: Member States, Their Votes and the European Commission[J]. The World Economy, 2005,28(5):702.
①SIMON J. EVENETT, EDWIN VERMULST.The Politicisation of EC Anti-dumping Policy: Member States, Their Votes and the European Commission[J]. The World Economy, 2005,28(5):710-711.
①金融时报(社评).欧盟反倾销是愚蠢[EB/OL].梁彦译. (2006-02-27) [2008-12-15]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001003109
②GEORGE PARKER.欧盟就反倾销鞋出现分歧[EB/OL].张征译.(2006-07-21)[2008-12-18]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001005740
①GUY DE JONQUIERES.中国是市场经济国家吗?[EB/OL].梁彦译.[2008-12-18]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story_print.php?storyid=001004241
①高永富,张玉卿主编.国际反倾销法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2001:272.
②陈力.欧盟对华反倾销“非市场经济”问题探悉[J].欧洲研究, 2003(3):131-148.
③蒋小红.欧共体非市场经济反倾销规则研究[J].外国法译评, 2000(4):22-37.
④刘惠荣,李楠.反倾销法中的“非市场经济国家”问题研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(1):87-91.
⑤沈瑶,李雅源.反倾销因素中“市场经济”地位问题-由两个案例引发的思考[J].云南财贸学院学报(社会科学版), 2003(2):13-15.
①FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):371.
②蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].法律出版社,2007(1):267.
③MARTIN WOLF.从凯恩斯主义反省金融危机[EB/OL].管婧译.(2009-01-06)[2009-01-07] http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001024050
④[美]保罗·A·萨繆尔森,威廉·D·诺德豪斯.经济学[M].北京:发展出版社,1992:68.
①马松,吉华.论市场经济国家地位-理论分析.中国的现状及对策[J].经济体制改革,2005(2):26.
②JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVERY, ALAN O. SYKES. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text[M].3rd ed.MN:West Group, 1995:1156.
①J.F BESELER, A.N. WILLIAMS. Anti-dumping and Anti-Subsidy Law: The European Communities(M).London:Sweet & Maxwell, 1986:64.
②WILCYNSKI. Dumping and Central Planning[J]. Political Economy, 1996(74): 261.
③IANNI. The international Treatment of State trading[J]. Journal of world trade law,1982(16):482.
④FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):420.
⑤FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J]. European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):379.
①Second Supplementary Provision to paragraph 1 of Article VI in Annex I to GATT 1947. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts(WTO, Geneva),1995:545-546.
①Agreement on Implementation of Article VI (Anti-dumping Code), art. 2(d)(General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Geneva, 1969).GATT Sales No/ GATT/1969-5.
②Agreement on Implementation of Ariticle VI, Art 14 (General Agrement on Traiffs and Trade, Geneva, 1969).GATT Sales No. GATT/1969-5.
①FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):417.
①陈力.欧盟对华反倾销“非市场经济”问题探析[J].欧洲研究, 2003(3):134.
②参见欧盟官方公报OJ NO L128,30.04.
①GUY DE JONQUIERES.中国是市场经济国家吗? [EB/OL].梁彦译.(2006-05-08) [2009-01-05]. http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001004241
②马松,吉华.论市场经济国家地位-理论分析.中国的现状及对策[J].经济体制改革, 2005(2):27.
③蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:286.
④蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:291.
①FRANCIS SNYDER.The Origins of the 'Nonmarket Economy': Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Anti-dumping Law about China[J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4):370-372.
①HORLICK. The United States Antidumping System[M]// JOHN H. JACKSON, EDWIN A. VERMULST(eds), University of Michigan Press: Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study, c1990:140.
②Accession of Poland[C] Report of the Working Party. June 26,1967, (L/2806),in GATT, BISD, 15th Supplement, Geneva:,c1968: 111.
③CUNEO, MANUEL. Rodadblock to Trade: The State-Controlled Economy Issue in Antidumping Law Administration[J]. Fordham International Law Journal,1982,(5):290-291.
①HARISH KAPUR. China and the European Economic Community: The New Connection[J]. China Trade and Economic Newsletter, 1984(330):78-80.
②EDWIN A. VERMULST. Anti-dumping Law and Practice in the United States and the European Communities[M]. Elsevier North Holland, 1987:434.
③YANNOPOULOS. EC External Commercial Policies and East-West Trade in Europe[J]. Journal of Common Market Studies, 1985(9): 32.
④GARY N. HORLICK,SHANNON S. SCHUMAN. Nonmarket Economy Trade and U.S.Anti-dumping/Countervailing Duty Laws[J]. The International Lawer,1984(18):816.
①J.F. BESELER, A.N. WILLIAMS. Anti-dumping and Anti-Subsidy Law: The European Communities[M]. Sweet & Maxwell, 1986:291.
②尚明.反倾销:WTO规则及中外法律与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:80.
③JORGEN ULFF-MOLLER NIELSEN,ALEKSANDER RUTKOWSKI.The EU Anti-dumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country[J].The World Economy,2005,28(1):119.
①JORGEN ULFF-MOLLER NIELSEN,ALEKSANDER RUTKOWSKI.The EU Anti-dumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country[J].The World Economy,2005,28(1):122.
②CLIFF STEVENSON. GlobalAnti-Dumping Briefing[EB/OL],(2007-10-23)[2008-10-11]. http://www.antidumpingpublishing.com/newsletters/
③JORGEN ULFF-MOLLER NIELSEN,ALEKSANDER RUTKOWSKI.The EU Anti-dumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country[J].The World Economy,2005,28(1):120.
①LINDER, S.B.(1961), An essey on Trade and Transformation[M]. Stockholm:Almqvist & Wiksell,1961.
②FALVEY.(1981)Commercial Policy and Intra-Industry Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1961(11):495-511.
③FALVERY,R.E, H. KIERZKOWSKI. Product Quality, Intra-indusry Trade, and (Im)perfect Competition[M]/H. KIERZKOWSKI(ed.) Protection and Competition in International Trade. Oxford: Blackwell,1987.
④GROSSMAN,G. , E.HELPMAN.Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1991.
①Council Regulation(EC)No.1567/97 of 1 August, 1997, imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of leather handbags originating in the People’s Republic of China and terminating the prceeding concerning imports of plastic and textile handbags originating in the People’s Republic of China.
②高永富,张玉卿主编.国际反倾销法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2001:272-273.
①余盛兴.反倾销:告倒美国商务部[J].WTO经济导刊, 2006(8):31.
②赵晓霞.欧盟对华反倾销不公平性的研究[J].经济问题2004(10):69.
③余盛兴.欧盟皮鞋反倾销调查案:将抗辩进行到底?[J]. WTO经济导刊, 2006(11):55.
④余菲,余盛兴.美国对华反倾销:显失公平的游戏[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(12):55.
①丁炎炎.美国多华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊, 2007(5):87.
①丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):85.
②冯迪凡.美对华铜板纸“双反”案终裁“不合时宜”[N].第一次财经日报, 2007-10-22(3).
①Why Proposals to Apply Countervailing Duty Law to Non-Market Economies Require Reform(H.R.1229/S.974)[EB/OL]. (2007-7-27) [2009-01-15]. http://www.ecattrade.com/uploads/content/24FF609BAC8A47D59387CA903B674221.pdf.
②丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):86.
③丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):86-87.
①丁焱焱.美国对华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(5):85-87..
②Georgetown Steel Corp v United States, 801 F. 2d 1308, 1317(Fed. Cir. 1986)
①臧立. WTO法律体系下实施“双反”措施的合法性研究-由“美国对华铜版纸案”引发的思考[J].法商研究,2008(1):17.
②臧立. WTO法律体系下实施“双反”措施的合法性研究-由“美国对华铜版纸案”引发的思考[J].法商研究,2008(1):17.
③《补贴与反补贴措施协议》19.2规定“在所有征收反补贴税的要求均已获满足的情况下是否征税的决定,及征收反补贴税金额是否应等于或小于补贴的全部金额的决定,均由进口成员的主管机关作出。”
①Uruguay Round Agreements Act Statement of Administrative Action at 926.
②作者不详.从美国对华标准钢管双反案看中国应对贸易摩擦的新形势[EB/OL].(2008-06-13)[2009-02-01]. http://www.sdll.cn/plus/view.php?aid=5031.
①商务部.商务部谈美薄壁矩形钢管反倾销反补贴案终裁[EB/OL].(2008-06-30)[2009-02-10]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2008-06/30/content_1031297.htm.
②作者不详.美发布对华编织袋反补贴税令[EB/OL].(2008-08-13)[2009-02-10]. http://cloth.ocn.com.cn/2008813/Info2008813355.html.
③作者不详.美国对华非公路用轮胎发布双反措施令[EB/OL]. (2008-09-11)[2009-02-03]. http://gpmy.zftec.gov.cn/gpmy/zwxx/T214502.shtml.
④靳亥星.美国终裁中国产橡胶磁存在倾销[EB/OL].(2008-07-04) [2009-02-03]. http://www.caijing.com.cn/2008-07-04/100073041.html
①史云庆.美国对华低克重热敏纸作出双反产业损害裁决[EB/OL].(2008-10-31) [2009-01-18]. http://www.cacs.gov.cn/news/newshow.aspx?str1=2&articleId=46278.
②荆灿.中方获胜美铜版纸“双反”案,调查背后凸显中美贸易复杂性[N].中国贸易报, 2007-12-16(10).
③王晓慧.双反”调查给中美贸易带来危机[J].新财经,2007(10):71.
①陈云富.欧盟对华“双反”定调[N].中国联合商报,2007-11-26(1).
②王晓慧.“双反”调查给中美贸易带来危机[J].新财经,2007(10):70.
①ROBERTE LIGHTHIZER.Hearning on Trade Enforcement for a 21st Century Economy[EB/OL].(2007-06-12)[2009-02-05]. http:// finance.senate.gov/hearings/testimony/2007test/061207testrl.pdf
①GEOFF DYER.中国出口大幅下跌的祸福[EB/OL].(2009-3-12)[2009-3-12].http://www.FTChinese.com.
①沈木珠.中国反倾销立法评价及其完善思考[J].政法论坛(中国政府大学学报),2004(4):18.
①CLIFF STEVENSON. Global Trade Protection Report 2008. www.antidumpingpublishing.com
①唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].东北财经大学出版社,2007(1):331-332.
①胡麦秀,严明义.反倾销保护引致的市场转移效应分析-基于中国彩电出口的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2005(10):20.
②钟庭军.结构矛盾.利益冲突以及出口反倾销政策工具选择的合意性[J].首都经济贸易大学学报, 2005(5):91.
①宋才发.论WTO后过渡期中国企业的反倾销法律对策[J].河北法学,2006(11):69.
①家具厂家的反倾销应诉[N].中国日报(中国香港版), 2003-11-6(15).
②余菲,余盛兴.美国对华反倾销:显失公平的游戏[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(12):57.
①蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007(1):36-40.
①周灏.与进口商合作:反倾销应诉的重要策略[J].WTO经济导刊[J],2005(9):71.
②唐宜红,徐世腾.欧盟对华皮鞋反倾销的政治经济分析[J].国际贸易,2007(1):12.
③胡晓虹.论我国利用进口国利益集团应对反倾销之策略-自行车零件胜诉案分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(11):25-26.
④沈四宝.企业低价竞销与法律规制—反倾销是腋下的对外出口低价竞销原因分析和法律规制[J].国际贸易,2006(3):62-63.
①龙桂先.美国对华彩电反倾销案之经营策略原因浅谈[J].经济与社会发展,2004(10):28.
②祝福云,冯宗宪.我国对外反倾销调查与外商在华直接投资研究[J].财贸研究2006(6):29-30.
①朱东红,常亚平.出口企业应对国外反倾销胜诉几点启示-基于湛江国联打赢对美虾产品出口反倾销案的分析[J].对外经贸事务,2006(10):54-56.
①[2009-01-01]. http://www.cacs.gov.cn/member/classification.aspx?fromurl=http://www.cacs.gov.cn/
①[2009-02-10]. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm
②[2009-03-01]. http://commerce.nic.in/ad_cases.htm
③刘东光,姜中其.我国行业协会在反倾销中作用的提升对策[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(12):61-62.
①成新轩,应寅峰,贾素伟.欧盟对华反倾销政策目标与效果的错位分析[J].河北学刊,2006(2):167. KNETT, PRUSA. Macroeconmic Factors and Anti-dumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries[J].Journal of International Economics, 2003 (61): 1-17.
②[美]曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995:2-3.
[1]白玲,杜创.反倾销法中的损害权问题[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2005(6).
[2]鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007(2):73.
[3]宾建成.从五种经济模式看如何应对欧盟对华反倾销[J].山西财经大学学报,2007(9).
[4]宾建成.中国首次反倾销措施执行效果评估[J].世界经济,2003(9).
[5]车丕照,杜明.欧共体反倾销条例“共同体利益”条款研究—兼论对完善我国反倾销法的若干启示[J].欧洲研究,2004(3).
[6]车幸原.不完全信息条件下的反倾销政策效果[J].财贸经济,2004(10).
[7]陈达.反倾销法的缺陷分析及其改革方向[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(1).
[8]陈力.欧盟对华反倾销“非市场经济”问题探析[J].欧洲研究,2003(3).
[9]陈立虎.论反倾销法上的日落复审制度[J].法学家,2007(6).
[10]成新轩,应寅峰,贾素伟.欧盟对华反倾销政策目标与效果的错位分析[J].河北学刊,2006(2).
[11]陈勇.倾销和反倾销的经济学解说[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001(5).
[12]程卫东.国与国之间的利益协调—国际反倾销法的晚近发展[J].国际贸易,2001(8).
[13] Corinne M. Krupp,SusanSkeath,关于反倾销措施对上、下游产业影响的论证[J]邹超,廖枚译.经济资料译丛,2004(3):8,原载北美经济与金融杂志,2002,13(2).
[14]戴远泰.印度应对反倾销挑战的政策措施[J].南亚研究季刊,2003(1).
[15]邓纲.刍议反倾销规则并入竞争法体系的几个问题[J].现代法学,2007(5).
[16]丁炎炎.美国多华铜版纸反补贴案解析[J].WTO经济导刊, 2007(5).
[17]冯巨章.中国反倾销应速率影响因素的实证分析[J].经济评论,2006(5).
[18]傅东辉,柴森.反倾销:自由贸易的保护?贸易保护的措施?[J].中国对外贸易, 2003(43).
[19]傅东辉.选择正确的贸易救济政策是对产业竞争力的基本保障[J].国际贸易,2007(3).
[20]傅东辉.总体发展与局部保护的杠杆——欧盟“公共利益”条款对中国反倾销立法的借鉴[J].国际贸易,2005(1).
[21]高永富,张玉卿主编.国际反倾销法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2001
[22]付荣.反倾销法中实质性阻碍问题的合理性探析[J].法学论坛,2006(2).
[23]高波,韩秀丽.关于国际反倾销法改革——日本视角[J].国际经贸探索,2008(4).
[24]高磊,鲍晓华.美国对华反倾销动态博弈研究[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,2006(11).
[25]郭双焦,米家龙.WTO反倾销制度与竞争政策的关联与冲突[J].国际经贸探索,2008(1)
[26]郭守亭,赵君峰.出口企业应对反倾销搭便车行为分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(2).
[27]郭跃,靳芳.贸易法和竞争法的冲突浅析——以反倾销和保障措施为例[J].大连大学学报,2007(5).
[28]韩秀丽.欧洲法院在反倾销案件中对比例原则的适用[J].欧洲研究,2005(6).
[29]贺小勇.论DSB对“反倾销协定”解释的边界—“反倾销协议”第17.6(ii)条评析[J].法学,2005(9).
[30]候海英.倾销与反倾销缘何在钢铁产业中盛行[J].世界经济研究,2004(3).
[31]胡丹婷,何建华,史亚冲.行业反倾销申诉---混合策略均衡下的后果及平衡的突破[J].国际贸易问题,2006(12).
[32]胡麦秀,周延云.跨越反倾销壁垒与引致的对外直接投资研究[J].宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005(3).
[33]胡晓虹.论我国利用进口国利益集团应对反倾销之策略-自行车零件胜诉案分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(11).
[34]贾宁,梅仁毅. 1980-2003年美国反倾销实务定量分析[J].国际经贸问题,2007(3).
[35]蒋德恩.反倾销的滥用及其贸易保护主义效应[J].国际贸易问题,2007(3).
[36]姜栋.论美国反倾销法的立法和执法过程—以利益冲突为视角[J].法学家,2007(1)
[37]姜栋.美国反倾销法的利益分析及其启示[J].法商研究,2007(4).
[38]姜栋.美国反倾销法的正义分析[J].法制与社会发展,2007(3).
[39]姜栋.美国反倾销法的历史与现实[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(3).
[40]蒋小红.欧通体非市场经济反倾销规则研究[J].外国法译评,2000(4).
[41]蒋珠燕,陶丽萍.倾销与反倾销的经济学分析[J].上海经济研究,2003(10).
[42]金祥荣,田青,陆菁.贸易保护制度的经济分析[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2001.
[43]金晓晨.反倾销之能够公共利益原则的法理分析[J].当代法学,2007(9).
[44]梁枫,钟根元.欧盟对华“一国一税”反倾销政策的博弈分析[J].国际经贸探索,2007(6).
[45]李炼,候雁.反倾销:有条件地限制价格竞争的规则[J].经济问题探索,2005(11).
[46]李炼.自由贸易条件下公平竞争的法律保护—对国际反倾销法的重新认识[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),1997(3).
[47]李文玺.世贸组织/关贸总协定反倾销法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006.
[48]李雄刚.贸易保护主义的法理分析[J].当代法学,2003(10).
[49]李月芬.中国何以成为世界头号反倾销目标?[J].世界经济与政治,2006(4).
[50]梁枫,钟根元,欧美对华“一国一税”反倾销政策的博弈分析[J]。国际经贸探索,2007(6).
[51]梁咏.论中国运用WTO争端解决机制对反倾销诉讼的应对措施—一个比较法的观点[J].财经问题研究,2002(6).
[52]林丽萍,李炼,林钻煌.基于进化博弈的企业倾销与反倾销分析[J].国际经贸探索,2005(3).
[53]凌慧名.WTO反倾销法的宏观分析[J].法学评论,2003(4).
[54]龙桂先.美国对华彩电反倾销案之经营策略原因浅谈[J].经济与社会发展, 2004(10).
[55]罗昌发.贸易与竞争之法律互动[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[56]刘东光,姜中其.我国行业协会在反倾销中作用的提升对策[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(12).
[57]刘惠荣,李楠.反倾销法中的“非市场经济国家”问题研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(1).
[58]刘继森,付新隆.反倾销过程中的市场失灵:规避和吸收[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,2007(8).
[59]刘勇.论世贸组织《反倾销协定》若干特点[J].国际贸易问题,2008(2).
[60]刘永伟.反倾销法因果关系标准比较研究[J].法商研究,2001(5).
[61]刘亚军.进口国反倾销诉讼动因探悉[J].宁夏社会科学,2007(4).
[62]刘亚军.浅议反倾销对进口国经济的不利影响[J].宁夏社会科学,2005(5).
[63]卢征良,蒋立场.20世纪30年代中国水泥业反倾销研究---以上海华商水泥公司为中心的考察[J].国际贸易问题,2008(1).
[64]栾信杰.当竞争被严重扭曲时——国际反倾销与竞争政策的冲突和协调[J].国际贸易,1999(12).
[65]罗亚萍,邓霓.论反倾销的政治经济功能[J].国际关系学院学报,2006(6).
[66]罗之仁,郭双焦.反倾销税的经济学分析[J].湖南涉外经济学院学报,2006(3).
[67]骆旭旭.世贸组织反倾销谈判及中国的立场[J].国际贸易问题,2006(6).
[68]马向敏,刘富利.进口反倾销对上下游产业的影响——基于我国造纸业反倾销的分析[J].当代经济,2007(12).
[69]吕航.印度反倾销案件现状研究[J].长春师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),2008 (27).
[70]马松,吉华.论市场经济国家地位-理论分析.中国的现状及对策[J].经济体制改革,2005(2).
[71]马述忠,黄祖辉.农产品反倾销国内外研究动态评述[J].农业经济问题,2005(3).
[72]彭熙海.反倾销公共利益审查目的论[J].河北法学,2005(8).
[73]蒲凌尘.应诉欧共体反倾销律师业务[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[74]曲如晓,江铨.论反倾销保护对企业R&D投入的影响[J].经济经纬,2007(5).
[75]尚明.反倾销:WTO规则及中外法律与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[76]卲学言,张辰利.国家利益冲突与反倾销—发达国家政策取向与经济学解释得背离[J].国际经贸探索,2005(6).
[77]沈木珠.中国反倾销立法评价及其完善思考[J].政法论坛(中国政府大学学报),2004(4).
[78]沈四宝.企业低价竞销与法律规制—反倾销是腋下的对外出口低价竞销原因分析和法律规制[J].国际贸易,2006(3)
[79]沈瑶,李雅源.反倾销因素中“市场经济”地位问题-由两个案例引发的思考[J].云南财贸学院学报(社会科学版), 2003(2).
[80]沈瑶,朱益,王继柯.中国反倾销实施中的产业关联研究:以聚氯乙烯案为例[J].国际贸易问题,2005(3).
[81]沈瑶,王继柯.中国反倾销实施中的贸易转向研究:以丙烯酸酯为例[J].国际贸易问题,2004(3).
[82]沈瑶.模仿生产与低于成本倾销—兼论针对发展中国家反倾销措施的公平问题[J].世界经济,2003(10).
[83]沈瑶,王继柯,单晓菁.中间品反倾销税的适度征收问题研究[J],南开经济研究,2003(4).
[84]沈瑶.倾销与反倾销的历史起源[J].世界经济,2002(8).
[85]世界贸易秘书处.贸易走向未来—世界贸易组织概要(中译本)[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.
[86]宋丽芳.WTO成立以来的全球反倾销摩擦及其特点[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(6).
[87]宋波.贸易自由与贸易保护的相关性研究—评国际反倾销法发展的规律[J].江西行政学院学报,2003(1).
[88]孙赫,李平.反倾销内生性之初探[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(9).
[89]孙立文.WTO〈反倾销协议〉改革--政策和法律分析[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006.
[90][英]SNYDER,唐青阳.欧盟反倾销制度与实务研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2005.
[91]孙雯.反倾销发与竞争法之冲突与协调[J].河北法学,2006(1).
[92]孙文远,黄建康.美国实施反倾销贸易政策的动因.绩效与启示[J].国际贸易问题,2007(1).
[93]孙晓光,杨秀翰.对反倾销法存在合理性的再思考[J].山东行政学院.山东省经济管理干部学院学报,2004(5).
[94]覃红,潘毅华.反倾销制度的法律经济分析[J].国际经贸探索,2006(3).
[95]唐凌.反倾销诉讼动态博弈分析[J].产业经济研究,2007(4).
[96]唐凌.倾销与反倾销的经济分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(7).
[97]唐凌,李春杰.反倾销中的价格竞争及被诉企业策略研究[J].预测,2003(5).
[98]唐宜红,徐世腾.欧盟对华皮鞋反倾销的政治经济分析[J].国际贸易,2007(1).
[99]唐宇.保障措施条款替代反倾销规则的可行性分析[J].财贸经济,2007(7).
[100]唐宇,张静.美国反倾销因果关系的五种裁定方法分析[J].国际贸易问题,2005(5).
[101]唐宇.反其国内销保护印发的四种经济效应分析[J].财贸经济,2004(11).
[102]唐宇.论反倾销规则的弊端与改革[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2007.
[103]屠新泉,张汉林.抑制还是鼓励—多边贸易体制与反倾销的关系[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(4).
[104]王超.论多边贸易体制下反倾销法与竞争政策的协调[J].亚太经济,2008(1).
[105]王超.试论多边贸易体制下反倾销法与竞争政策的协调[J].福建法学,2007(4).
[106]王贵国.全球化以致中和—从阿根廷家禽反倾销案说起[J].法学家,2003(4).
[107]王丽华.国际反倾销制度的实质不公平及我国的对策[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(2).
[108]王荣艳.传统幼稚工业保护论与新贸易保护论之异同[J].现代财经,2003(3).
[109]王伟,王先林.反垄断法视野中的反倾销问题[J].法学家,2007(2).
[110]王亚星,李玉刚.试论倾销与反倾销的关系[J].中国人民大学学报,1999(2).
[111]吴小丁.反垄断与经济发展——日本竞争政策研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
[112]夏先良.论自由贸易与保护贸易政策的选择[J].财贸经济,1995(10).
[113]谢海霞.从竞争法角度看反倾销法律制度[J].河北法学,2004(3).
[114]谢正勤.多哈回合中我国反倾销谈判立场的调整[J].山东社会科学,2004(11).
[115]薛荣,李居迁.反倾销法的理念及其局限论析[J].现代法学,2002(4).
[116]杨长春,刘妮.自由贸易理论与反倾销原理是否形成悖论[J].国际贸易问题,2005(5).
[117]薛爽.乌拉圭回合与东京回合《反倾销守则》之比较[J].国际经贸探索,1994(5).
[118]杨伏英.国际反倾销制度中公共利益原则的缺陷分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2007 (4).
[119]杨军.反倾销法与竞争法的冲突辨析[J].华东政法学院学报,2004(5).
[120]杨红强,聂影.国外对华反倾销措施效果评价的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2007(11).
[121]杨韶艳.发达国家反倾销的动因[J].财贸研究,2007(5).
[122]杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源—基于经济理性角度的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2008(1)
[123]杨仕辉.美国对中韩彩电回应反倾销比较分析[J].国际经贸探索,2005(1).
[124]杨仕辉.美国对中韩彩电回应反倾销比较分析[J].国际经贸探索,2005(1).
[125]杨仕辉.反倾销规则的博弈分析[J].世界经济,2001(11).
[126]杨仕辉.反倾销博弈与逆向选择[J].世界经济,2000(1).
[127]杨仕辉,肖德.反倾销对抗博弈—兼论我国少有对外反倾销申诉的成因分析[J].预测,2000(6).
[128]杨悦,何海燕,王宪良.进口反倾销行为对产业价格指数影响的实证研究—以钢铁行业为例[J].财贸研究,2007(6).
[129]叶华,林霖.贸易保护的政治经济学分析—以中国加入WTO后遭受反倾销增多为例[J]理论界,2005(4).
[130]尹尊声.反倾销战和中国的策略选择[J].社会科学研究,2003(4).
[131]余菲.论美国对华反倾销的不公平性及因应策略[J].世界经济研究,2007(5).
[132]余菲,余盛兴.美国对华反倾销:显失公平的游戏[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(12):55.
[133]俞燕宁.多哈发展议程中关于反倾销的若干问题[J].法学杂志,2007(1).
[134]于矗礼.倾销的经济本质分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2005(9).
[135]余晖. WTO体制下行业协会的应对策略——以反倾销为例[J].中国工业经济,2002(3).
[136]于璐瑶,冯宗宪.进口反倾销调查对外商投资与国内上下游产业链的影响及其对策[J].国际贸易,2007(9).
[137]余盛兴.欧盟皮鞋反倾销调查案:将抗辩进行到底?[J]. WTO经济导刊.2006(11).
[138]余盛兴.多哈反倾销规则谈判:对你当报何种期望[J].WTO经济导刊,2009(2).
[139]余盛兴.反倾销:告倒美国商务部[J].WTO经济导刊, 2006(8).
[140]余盛兴.欧盟皮鞋反倾销调查案:将抗辩进行到底?[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(11):55.
[141]袁磊,颜延,蒋群英.论反倾销法的历史局限性[J].财经研究,2003(3).
[142]袁欣.国际反倾销规则中的贸易保护主义因素分析[J].经济经纬,2006(1)47.
[143]阮振宇.反倾销法与竞争法德关系-从WTO“美国1916年反倾销法案”谈起[J].国际经贸探索,2001(2).
[144]臧立. WTO法律体系下实施“双反”措施的合法性研究-由“美国对华铜版纸案”引发的思考[J].法商研究,2008(1).
[145]张金平.反倾销不应诉的原因及应对策略[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究,2006(12).
[146]张亮.欧共体反倾销损害幅度确定问题研究[J].欧洲研究,2007(6).
[147]张敏.论反倾销法利益平衡原则—以和谐贸易为视角[J].法治研究,2007(7).
[148]张淑娟,隋广军.反倾销争端与外国对华的歧视待遇——基于博弈论视角的解析[J].当代财经,2006(5).
[149]张苑.反倾销的政策绩效研究及其对中国实践的启示[J].学术研究,2006(10).
[150]张箢洺.中国进口反倾销调查对外国直接投资的影响[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2007(5).
[151]张瑞萍.对我国反垄断立法的思考[J].甘肃政法成人教育学院学报,2006(4).
[152]张瑞萍.反倾销法的性质与演进之分析[J].当代法学,2002(115).
[153]张瑞萍.反倾销法的价值取向及实际功效分析[J].法制与社会发展,1999(2).
[154]张晓君.反倾销因果关系标准探微—基于贸易政策的分析[J].甘肃社会科学,2004(1).
[155]张晓君.反倾销案因果关系的立法分析及我国的对策[J].现代法学,2004(1).
[156]赵安民.两起反倾销案的胜败得失与理性思考[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2005(3).
[157]赵亮,张艳.易保护理论的发展及比较研究,商业时代(理论版)[J].2004年(15).
[158]赵晓霞.欧盟对华反倾销不公平性的研究[J].经济问题2004(10).
[159]郑甘澍,邓力平.反倾销税与反倾销补贴的经济学思考[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10).
[160]郑瑞芳,田明华,郭秀君.倾销和反倾销对中国新闻纸产业的影响[J].对外经贸实务,2006(2)
[161]钟庭军.结构矛盾.利益冲突以及出口反倾销政策工具选择的合意性[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2005(5).
[162]周会青.对美国反倾销的微观分析[J].对外经济实务,2004(12).
[163]周莉.反倾销:理论目标与现实冲突[J].国际贸易问题,1995(4).
[164]周俐军,何元贵.完全市场经济地位并非应对反倾销的救命稻草—反倾销与“非市场经济地位”关系探析[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2005(3).
[165]周申.论贸易自由化与反倾销[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(5).
[166]周曙东,吴方卫.国际贸易中战略性贸易保护的博弈分析——兼谈反倾销、特别保障措施和绿色壁垒[J].农业经济问题,2003(10).
[167]周灏.与进口商合作:反倾销应诉的重要策略[J].WTO经济导刊[J],2005(9)
[168]朱东红,常亚平.出口企业应对国外反倾销胜诉几点启示-基于湛江国联打赢对美虾产品出口反倾销案的分析[J].对外经贸事务,2006(10).
[169]祝福云,冯宗宪.我国对外反倾销调查与外商在华直接投资研究[J].财贸研究2006(6).
[170]朱庆华.反倾销发展中国家的特殊合差别待遇问题[J].国际贸易问题,2004(3).
[171]朱庆华,唐宇.中国反倾销措施的实证分析[J].山东财政学院学报,2004(6):79
[172]朱鹏飞,穆伯祥.论反倾销立法中的实质性阻碍损害标准[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2007(2).
[173]朱孝新.论世贸组织“反倾销协议”与竞争法的冲突与协调[J].国际贸易问题,2003(7).
[174]朱允卫,易开刚.我国对外反倾销的特点.存在问题及其完善[J].国际贸易问题,2005(3).
[175]朱志晟,张亮.被政治化了的法律问题:评美国反倾销法中的非市场经济国家界定标准[J].当代法学,2003(5).
[176]朱钟棣,鲍晓华.反倾销措施对产业的关联影响——反倾销税价格效应的投入产出分析[J].经济研究,2004(1).
[1][美]大卫·D·弗里德曼.经济学语境下的法律规则[M].杨欣欣译.北京:法律出版社,2004.
[2][美]保罗·A·萨繆尔森,威廉·D·诺德豪斯.经济学[M].北京:发展出版社, 1992
[3][英]弗里德利希·冯·哈耶克.自由秩序原理[M].邓正来译.北京:三联书店,1997.
[4][德]柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学社会秩序与公共政策[M].韩朝华译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[5][美]理查德·A·波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].蒋兆康译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.
[6][美]曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
[7][英]亚当·斯密.国富论[M].王亚南译.北京:商务印书馆,1994.
[8][美]雅各布·瓦伊纳.倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题[M].沈瑶译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[1] AHN D. Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules [J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2008(11)
[2] BALDWIN R E. The Political Economy of Reforming the Antidumping Laws[J].The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[3] BARFIELD C. Antidumping Reform: Time to Go Back to Basics [J].The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[4] BARUAH N. An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Antidumping Behavior in India[J].The World Economy,2007,30(7).
[5] BEKKER D. The Strategic Use of Antidumping in International Trade[J]. The South African Journal of Economics,2006,74(3).
[6]BESELER J F, WILLIAMS A N. Anti-dumping and Anti-Subsidy Law: The European Communities [M]. UK: Sweet & Maxwell, 1986.
[7]BLONIGEN B A, HAYNES S E. Antidumping Investigations and the Pass-Through of Exchange Rates and Antidumping Duties[J], NBER Working Paper No. 7378,October 1999.
[8]BLONIGEN B A. Tariff-Jumping Antidumping Duties [J], NBER Working Paper No.7776, July 2000.
[9]BLONIGEN B A, PRUSA T J. Antidumping [J], NBER Working Paper No. 8398, June 2001.
[10]BLONIGEN B A, BOWN C P. Antidumping and Retaliation Threats [J], NBER Working Paper No. 8576, October 2001.
[11]BLONIGEN B A. Evolving Discretionary Practices of US Antidumping Activity [J], NBER Working Paper No. 9625, April 2003.
[12]BLONIGEN B A. Working the System: Firm Learning and the Antidumping Process [J], NBER Working Paper No.10783, September 2004.
[13]BOWN C P. Canada's Antidumping and Safeguard Policies: Overt and Subtle Forms of Discrimination [J].The World Economy,2007,30(9).
[14]CHENG L K, QIU L D, WONG K P. Antidumping Measures as a Tool of Protectionism:A Mechanism Design Approach [J].Canadian Journal of Economics,2001,34(3).
[15]CIURIAK D. Antidumping at 100 Years and Counting: A Canadian Perspective[J].The World Economy, 2005,28(5).
[16]CONRAD C A. Dumping and Anti-dumping Measures from a Competition and Allocation Perspective [J]. Journal of World Trade,2002,36(3).
[17]CUYVERS L, DUMONT M.EU Antidumping Measures against ASEAN Countries: Impact on Trade Flows[J]. Asian Economic Journal,2005,19(3).
[18]DEARDORFF A V, ROBERT M, STERN A. Centennial of Antidumping Legislation and Implementation: Introduction and Overview [J].The World Economy, 2005, 28(5).
[19]DEBROY B, CHAKRABORTY D. Antidumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument [M].1st ed. New Delhi: Academic Foundation, 2007.
[20]DROPE J M, HANSEN W L. Antidumping’s Happy Birthday? [J].The World Economy,2006,29(4).
[21]EVENETT S J, VERMULST E. The Politicization of EC Antidumping Policy: Member States, Their Votes and the European Commission[J]. The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[22]FEINBERG R M. Exchange Rates and“Unfair Trade”[J]. 71 Rev. of Economics and Statistics,1989(4).
[23] FINGER M J. Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt[M]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1993.
[24]GRIMWADE N. Anti-dumping Policy After the Uruguay Round-An Appraisal [J]. National Institute Economic Review, 1996(2).
[25]HORLICK G, VERMULST E. The 10 Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis [J]. Journal of World Trade, 2005, 39(1).
[26]HOU X Z, REN R M. Cooperate or Antagonize: The EU's Dilemma on Antidumping and Safeguard Measures against China[J].China & World Economy,2006,14(6).
[27]IANNI.The International Treatment of State trading[J]. Journal of World Trade Law,1982 (16).
[28]IRWIN D A. The Rise of US Antidumping Activity in Historical Perspective [J].The World Economy, 2005,28(5).
[29]JACKSON J H. The Jurisprudence of GATT & the WTO[M].2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press,2002.
[30]JACKSON J H, DAVERY W J, SYKES A O Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations– Cases, Materials and Text on the National and International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations[M].4th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Group,2002.
[31]JAFTA R C C. Antidumping and Market Access: A Note [J].The South African Journal of Economics, 2006,74(3).
[32]JAMES W E. The Rise of Antidumping: Does Regionalism Promote Administered Protection? [J].Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2000,14(2).
[33]KAPUR H. China and the European Economic Community: The New Connection [J]. China Trade and Economic Newsletter, 1984(330).
[34]KNETT, PRUSA. Macroeconomic Factors and Anti-dumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries[J].Journal of International Economics, 2003(61).
[35]LIMA-CAMPOS A D,VITO A. Abuse and Discretion, The impact of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings on Brazilian Exports to the United States[J].Journal of World Trade,2004,38(1).
[36]LINDSEY B,IKENSON D. Antidumping:The Devilish Details of“Unfair Trade”Law [J]. CATO Trade Policy Analysis, 2002(20).
[37]MAH J S. The United States’Antidumping Decisions Against the Northeast Asian Dynamic Economies [J].The World Economy,2000,23(5).
[38]MASTEL G. Antidumping Laws and the U.S Economy[M].Armonk,NY: ME Sharpe,1998.
[39]MARCEAU G Z. Antidumping and Anti-trust Issues in Free-trade Areas [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1996(XXXIV):1968-1969.
[40]NIELSEN J U, RUTKOWSKI A. The EU Antidumping Policy Towards Russia and China: Product Quality and the Choice of an Analogue Country [J]. The World Economy, 2005,28(1).
[41]PANAGARIYA A, GUPTA P. Antidumping Duty Versus Price Negotiations [J].The World Economy, 1998,21(8).
[42]PATTERSON. Improving GATT Rules for Nonmarket Economies[J]. Journal of World Trade Law, 1986(20).
[43] PRUSA T J. Cumulating and Antidumping: A Challenge to Competition[J]. The World Economy, 1998,21(8).
[44]PRUSA T J. On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,2001,34(3).
[45]PRUSA T J. SKEATH S. The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filings [J].NEBR Working Paper No.8424,2001(7).
[46]PRUSA T J. East Asia's Antidumping Problem [J].The World Economy, 2006, 29(6).
[47]PRUSA T J. Antidumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade [J]. The World Economy,2005,28(5).
[48]RODRIK D. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? [M] Washington DC: Institute for International Economics (1997).
[49]RUTKOWSKI A. Withdrawals of Antidumping Complaints in the EU: A Sign of Collusion [J].The World Economy, 2007,30(3).
[50]SNYDER F. The Origins of the“Nonmarket Economy”: Ideas, Pluralism & Power in EC Antidumping Law about China [J].European Law Journal, 2001,7(4).
[51]STAIGER R W, WOLAK F A. Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States[J].NBER Working Paper No.4696, 1994(3).
[52]THARAKAN P K M. Is Antidumping Here to Stay?[J].The World Economy,1999, 22(2).
[53]THARAKAN P K M, VERMULST E, THARAKAN J. Interface Between Antidumping Policy and Competition Policy: A Case Study[J].The World Economy, 1998,21(8).
[54]TIVIG T, WALZ U. Market Share, Cost-based Dumping, and Antidumping Policy [J].Canadian Journal of Economics,2000,33(1).
[55]WENIG H. The European Community’s Anti-dumping System: Salient N Features [J].Journal of World Trade,2005(30).
[56]ZANARDI M. Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha? [J]. The World Economy,2004,27(3).