贸易保护背景下的农产品反倾销及其应对研究
摘要
反倾销是多边贸易规则允许的贸易救济手段,然而在贸易实践中,反倾销却更多地被作为一种贸易保护的工具来使用。长期游离于多边贸易规则之外的世界农产品贸易在被纳入世界贸易规则框架之后目前正在并将继续经历着关税水平不断下调、出口补贴逐渐取消等边境规则的改革,尽管从历史的角度看农产品反倾销案件只占全球反倾销总量的不到5%,但上述贸易规则的改变、农业地位的特殊性、反倾销手段的独特性以及国际反倾销规则和反倾销活动的未来发展态势都意味着农产品反倾销依然可能成为未来各国(经济体)实施农产品贸易保护的重要手段。因此,科学、系统地分析农产品反倾销的特点、影响、不同国家(经济体)农产品反倾销活动的具体做法以及国际农产品反倾销的未来发展趋势并在此基础上探索常态情况下系统应对国际农产品反倾销的有效途径显得尤为必要,这也构成了本文研究的主要内容和目的。
文章的主体研究内容由八部分构成,不同部分通过其研究内容所折射出的内在本质和结构功能构成彼此间或铺垫、或平行或承接的逻辑关系。
第一部分主要通过论证农业地位的特殊性凸显了各国进行农业保护的内在动机,运用历史分析和逻辑分析相结合的方法分析了反倾销作为未来时期农产品贸易保护手段的理论可能,为文章的后续研究提供了理论上的必要性;
第二部分通过20世纪80年代特别是世界贸易组织成立以来全球反倾销活动的历史数据分析了世界农产品反倾销活动在数量和结构方面的特征,同时对中国农产品遭受反倾销的国别情况和产品性质做了分析;
第三部分主要分析了反倾销活动的各种影响。分析遵循先一般后具体的逻辑思路,即在对反倾销一般性影响进行分析的基础上再进一步指出其对农产品影响的差异性,以期在分析上做到客观全面的同时实现对两种影响之间联系和区别的兼顾;
第四部分从原因、裁定、应对、生产过程与产品品质、群体行为以及效应等六个方面较为详细地分析了农产品反倾销的特殊性,指出农产品反倾销具有发起上的便利性、裁定上的容易性以及应对上的复杂性;
第五部分通过对国际反倾销规则的改革发展趋势以及各国反倾销实践的态势和可能走向进行分析指出反倾销不仅在短期内不会消亡而且在特定经济背景下还会激增,并且其使用方式也会不断深化和翻新,由此导致农产品反倾销的应对将变得更加复杂棘手,在此基础上分析了规则改革和实践活动趋势对农产品反倾销活动及其应对可能带来的具体影响;
第六部分在分析典型国家(经济体)反倾销活动的基础上尽可能的梳理出它们在农产品反倾销领域的做法和特点,以此归纳出可资启发之处并为文章对策部分的分析提供针对性;
第七部分通过分析我国农产品应对国外反倾销过程中的包括应诉态度、组织协调、市场经济地位以及应对机制等主要制约因素烘托出有效应对农产品反倾销必须研究构建科学、长期、动态的反倾销应对体系的极端重要性;
作为全文归宿的第八部分以生物学中的共生理论为基础结合共生理论在社会问题中的研究和应用提出了构建共生体系应对农产品反倾销的构想和设计。本部分首先根据共生条件以及农产品反倾销应对利益主体的职责功能分析了共生理论在农产品反倾销应对问题上的适用性,接着结合农产品反倾销及其应对过程的具体特征对共生合作应对反倾销的行为模式和组织模式选择进行了分析论证,最后对农产品反倾销应对共生体系共生机制的具体设计进行了分析。
通过构建共生体系应对国际农产品反倾销,能够有效地克服此前我国反倾销应对过程中出现的各种短期行为、本位主义和效率低下现象,是值得反倾销和其它贸易壁垒和纠纷应对考虑和选取的常态化的应对模式。
Anti-dumping is the trade remedy measures that permitted under the rules of multilateral trade, however, anti-dumping is more considered as a trade protection tool in practice. The world agricultural trade which has dissociated in a long period from the multilateral trade rules, is being followed and will continue to suffer from the reform of reducing tariff level, and phasing out export subsidies. Although, from a historical perspective, the quantity of agricultural anti-dumping case is less than 5% of the total anti-dumping cases, but the changes in trade rules,(as mentioned above), the special status of agriculture , the specificity of anti-dumping measures as well as the development of international anti-dumping rules and anti-dumping activities ,all of which mean that the anti-dumping of agricultural products are still likely to be an important way of agricultural trade protection for all countries (economies). Thus, it is important to conduct the research on characteristics and impact on agricultural anti-dumping, as well as the specific measures in anti-dumping taken by different countries, and the future of the international agricultural anti-dumping in a scientific, systematic way. Based upon this situation, exploring an international agricultural anti-dumping in an effective way is particularly essential, which are also the main content and the purpose of this paper.
The main research content of articles includes eight parts, different part has formed a logical relationship of matting, or parallel or continuing. This relationship is reflected from the inherent nature and structure of the functions.
In the first part, author highlights the intrinsic motivation for agricultural protection by demonstrating the speciality of agriculture status, a combining analysis of of historical analysis and logical analysis method has been used to analyze the theoretical possibility of using anti-dumping in agricultural products as means of trade protection, which provide a theoretical necessity for the follow-up study.
In the second part, by collecting the historical data of global anti-dumping activities since 20th century, 80 years, especially since the founding of the World Trade Organization, the author analyze the characteristics of world anti-dumping activities both in quantity and structure, meanwhile analysis has been done on China's agricultural products suffering anti-dumping according to country differences and product characters.
In the third part, author analyzes the various effects of anti-dumping activities. Specifically, the analysis conforms to the logic of general first and concrete latter, namely, based on the analysis of the general impact of anti-dumping, and then pointed out the impact of their differences on agricultural products. Achieving an objective and comprehensive analysis while balancing both connections and differences is the main purpose.
In the fourth part, the author conducts a detail analysis of the specificity of agricultural products anti-dumping from six aspects as follows: reason, ruling, response, production process and product quality, group behavior and effects .Author also points out that anti-dumping of agricultural products typifies a convenience on initiating, ease on ruling ,and complex on reacting.
In part five, author analyzes the international anti-dumping rules reform and development trends ,and national anti-dumping practice situation and possible trend, then points out that the anti-dumping will not only disappear in a short term but also will increase sharply in a particular economic situation, also its pattern will continue to deepen and retread. Such changes will result in a more complex and difficult reply on anti-dumping in agricultural products .On this basis, analysis has been made on the influence on anti-dumping which are brought by rules and practices reforms.
In part six, on the basic analysis of a typical countries (economies) of anti-dumping activities, the author tease out the practices and characteristics in the the area of anti-dumping. Then sum up an constructive suggestion and provide direction for the analysis of strategy part.
In part seven, by analyzing the attitude, coordination of organization, the market economic status and mechanisms of reacting in the process of China 's anti-dumping responding ,thus foil the importance of construction of a scientific and long-term, dynamic system in anti-dumping response.
For part eight, as an end-result of this paper, based on the theory of symbiotic, combined with the research and application of symbiotic theory in social problem, the author proposes to build a symbiotic system to cope with anti-dumping of agricultural products .In this section, the author firstly analyzes the symbiotic theory in response to anti-dumping agricultural products on the issue of applicability according to symbiotic conditions, as well as the interests of the principal agricultural products of anti-dumping duties. Combined with anti-dumping agricultural products and the specific characteristics when dealing with anti-dumping, the author analyze the behavior mode and organization mode in coping with anti-dumping behaviors, Finally, an analysis of specifically design of symbiotic mechanisms of the anti-dumping in agricultural products has been made.
In order to deal with international anti-dumping of agricultural products, we make get a conclusion that we need to build a symbiotic system, which can effectively overcome the current phenomenon of short-termism, parochial and inefficient. It is the normal pattern of response and is worthy of considering when dealing with anti-dumping, and other trade barriers and disputes.
文章的主体研究内容由八部分构成,不同部分通过其研究内容所折射出的内在本质和结构功能构成彼此间或铺垫、或平行或承接的逻辑关系。
第一部分主要通过论证农业地位的特殊性凸显了各国进行农业保护的内在动机,运用历史分析和逻辑分析相结合的方法分析了反倾销作为未来时期农产品贸易保护手段的理论可能,为文章的后续研究提供了理论上的必要性;
第二部分通过20世纪80年代特别是世界贸易组织成立以来全球反倾销活动的历史数据分析了世界农产品反倾销活动在数量和结构方面的特征,同时对中国农产品遭受反倾销的国别情况和产品性质做了分析;
第三部分主要分析了反倾销活动的各种影响。分析遵循先一般后具体的逻辑思路,即在对反倾销一般性影响进行分析的基础上再进一步指出其对农产品影响的差异性,以期在分析上做到客观全面的同时实现对两种影响之间联系和区别的兼顾;
第四部分从原因、裁定、应对、生产过程与产品品质、群体行为以及效应等六个方面较为详细地分析了农产品反倾销的特殊性,指出农产品反倾销具有发起上的便利性、裁定上的容易性以及应对上的复杂性;
第五部分通过对国际反倾销规则的改革发展趋势以及各国反倾销实践的态势和可能走向进行分析指出反倾销不仅在短期内不会消亡而且在特定经济背景下还会激增,并且其使用方式也会不断深化和翻新,由此导致农产品反倾销的应对将变得更加复杂棘手,在此基础上分析了规则改革和实践活动趋势对农产品反倾销活动及其应对可能带来的具体影响;
第六部分在分析典型国家(经济体)反倾销活动的基础上尽可能的梳理出它们在农产品反倾销领域的做法和特点,以此归纳出可资启发之处并为文章对策部分的分析提供针对性;
第七部分通过分析我国农产品应对国外反倾销过程中的包括应诉态度、组织协调、市场经济地位以及应对机制等主要制约因素烘托出有效应对农产品反倾销必须研究构建科学、长期、动态的反倾销应对体系的极端重要性;
作为全文归宿的第八部分以生物学中的共生理论为基础结合共生理论在社会问题中的研究和应用提出了构建共生体系应对农产品反倾销的构想和设计。本部分首先根据共生条件以及农产品反倾销应对利益主体的职责功能分析了共生理论在农产品反倾销应对问题上的适用性,接着结合农产品反倾销及其应对过程的具体特征对共生合作应对反倾销的行为模式和组织模式选择进行了分析论证,最后对农产品反倾销应对共生体系共生机制的具体设计进行了分析。
通过构建共生体系应对国际农产品反倾销,能够有效地克服此前我国反倾销应对过程中出现的各种短期行为、本位主义和效率低下现象,是值得反倾销和其它贸易壁垒和纠纷应对考虑和选取的常态化的应对模式。
Anti-dumping is the trade remedy measures that permitted under the rules of multilateral trade, however, anti-dumping is more considered as a trade protection tool in practice. The world agricultural trade which has dissociated in a long period from the multilateral trade rules, is being followed and will continue to suffer from the reform of reducing tariff level, and phasing out export subsidies. Although, from a historical perspective, the quantity of agricultural anti-dumping case is less than 5% of the total anti-dumping cases, but the changes in trade rules,(as mentioned above), the special status of agriculture , the specificity of anti-dumping measures as well as the development of international anti-dumping rules and anti-dumping activities ,all of which mean that the anti-dumping of agricultural products are still likely to be an important way of agricultural trade protection for all countries (economies). Thus, it is important to conduct the research on characteristics and impact on agricultural anti-dumping, as well as the specific measures in anti-dumping taken by different countries, and the future of the international agricultural anti-dumping in a scientific, systematic way. Based upon this situation, exploring an international agricultural anti-dumping in an effective way is particularly essential, which are also the main content and the purpose of this paper.
The main research content of articles includes eight parts, different part has formed a logical relationship of matting, or parallel or continuing. This relationship is reflected from the inherent nature and structure of the functions.
In the first part, author highlights the intrinsic motivation for agricultural protection by demonstrating the speciality of agriculture status, a combining analysis of of historical analysis and logical analysis method has been used to analyze the theoretical possibility of using anti-dumping in agricultural products as means of trade protection, which provide a theoretical necessity for the follow-up study.
In the second part, by collecting the historical data of global anti-dumping activities since 20th century, 80 years, especially since the founding of the World Trade Organization, the author analyze the characteristics of world anti-dumping activities both in quantity and structure, meanwhile analysis has been done on China's agricultural products suffering anti-dumping according to country differences and product characters.
In the third part, author analyzes the various effects of anti-dumping activities. Specifically, the analysis conforms to the logic of general first and concrete latter, namely, based on the analysis of the general impact of anti-dumping, and then pointed out the impact of their differences on agricultural products. Achieving an objective and comprehensive analysis while balancing both connections and differences is the main purpose.
In the fourth part, the author conducts a detail analysis of the specificity of agricultural products anti-dumping from six aspects as follows: reason, ruling, response, production process and product quality, group behavior and effects .Author also points out that anti-dumping of agricultural products typifies a convenience on initiating, ease on ruling ,and complex on reacting.
In part five, author analyzes the international anti-dumping rules reform and development trends ,and national anti-dumping practice situation and possible trend, then points out that the anti-dumping will not only disappear in a short term but also will increase sharply in a particular economic situation, also its pattern will continue to deepen and retread. Such changes will result in a more complex and difficult reply on anti-dumping in agricultural products .On this basis, analysis has been made on the influence on anti-dumping which are brought by rules and practices reforms.
In part six, on the basic analysis of a typical countries (economies) of anti-dumping activities, the author tease out the practices and characteristics in the the area of anti-dumping. Then sum up an constructive suggestion and provide direction for the analysis of strategy part.
In part seven, by analyzing the attitude, coordination of organization, the market economic status and mechanisms of reacting in the process of China 's anti-dumping responding ,thus foil the importance of construction of a scientific and long-term, dynamic system in anti-dumping response.
For part eight, as an end-result of this paper, based on the theory of symbiotic, combined with the research and application of symbiotic theory in social problem, the author proposes to build a symbiotic system to cope with anti-dumping of agricultural products .In this section, the author firstly analyzes the symbiotic theory in response to anti-dumping agricultural products on the issue of applicability according to symbiotic conditions, as well as the interests of the principal agricultural products of anti-dumping duties. Combined with anti-dumping agricultural products and the specific characteristics when dealing with anti-dumping, the author analyze the behavior mode and organization mode in coping with anti-dumping behaviors, Finally, an analysis of specifically design of symbiotic mechanisms of the anti-dumping in agricultural products has been made.
In order to deal with international anti-dumping of agricultural products, we make get a conclusion that we need to build a symbiotic system, which can effectively overcome the current phenomenon of short-termism, parochial and inefficient. It is the normal pattern of response and is worthy of considering when dealing with anti-dumping, and other trade barriers and disputes.
引文
[1] Anania, G. The negotiations on agriculture in development agenda round: current status and future prospects. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2005, 32(4), 539-574.
[2] Anderson, J. E. Strategic lobbying and antidumping. Journal of Economic Integration, 1994 (9), 129-155.
[3] Blonigen, B. A., & Chad, P. B. Antidumping and retaliation threats. Journal of International Economics, 2003, 60(2), 249-273.
[4] Chad, P. B. The WTO and antidumping in developing countries. Economics and Politics, 2008,20(2), 255-288.
[5] Douglas, A. I. The rise of U.S. antidumping activity in historical perspective. The World Economy, 2005,28 (5), 651-668.
[6] Durling, J. P. Deference, but only when due: WTO review of antidumping measures. Journal of International Economic Law, 2003,6(1), 125-153.
[7] Feinberg, R. M., & Kara, M. R. The spread of antidumping regimes and the role of retaliation in filings. Southern Economic Journal, 2006, 72(4), 877-890.
[8] Finger, J. M., Fung, K. C, Will GATT enforcement control antidumping. Journal of Economic Integration, 1994, 9,198-213.
[9] Francois, J., & Gunnar, N. Political influence in a new antidumping regime: evidence from Mexico. CEPR Working Paper, March, 2004, No. 4297.
[10] Gallaway, M. R., Blonigen, B. A., Flynn, J. E. Welfare costs of the U. S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws'. Journal of International Economics, 1999,49(2), 211-244.
[11] Hesse, J. Antidumping. International Trade Final Paper Fall 2001, ECON 421.
[12] James, B., & Paul, K. A reciprocal dumping model of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 1983,15,313-321.
[13] Kaplan, G B., Kamarck, L.G, Parker, M. Cost analysis under the antidumping law. Journal of International Law & Economics, 1998,21, 357-418.
[14] Kerr, W. A. Dumping - one of those economic myths. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy,2001(2),211-220.
[15]Liebman,B.Sunset reviews and ITC commissioner voting behavior.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics,2004,104(3),446-475.
[16]Liu,X.,& Vandenbussche,H.EU antidumping cases against China:an overview and future prospects with respect to China's WTO membership.LICOS discussion paper,LICOS,Centre for Transition Economics,2002.
[17]Maurizio,Zanardi.Antidumping:What are the numbers to discuss at Doha?.The World Economy,2004,27(3),403-433.
[18]Messerlin,P.,& Reed,G.The US and EC antidumping policies.The Economic Journal,1995,105,1565-1575.
[19]Michael,R.On ecological dumping.Oxford Economics Papers,1994,46,822-40.
[20]Miranda,J.,Raul,A.T.,Mario,R.The international use of antidumping:1987-1997.Journal of World Trade,1998,32,5-71.
[21]Moore,M.O.Commerce department antidumping sunset reviews:a first assessment.Journal of World Trade,2002,36(4),675-698.
[22]Mustapha,S.J.,& James,K.J.Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union.J Ind Compet Trade,2006,6,253-275.
[23]Nelson,D.R.The political economy of antidumping:a survey.European Journal of Political Economy,2006,22(3),554-590.
[24]Nisha,M.Antidumping duties in the agriculture Sector:trade restricting or trade deflecting?,http://www.econ.ubc.ca/ine,200-7-23.
[25]Prusa,T.J.Pricing behaviour in the presence of antidumping law.Journal of economic Integration,1994,92,260-289.
[26]Prusa,T.J.The trade effects of US antidumping action,in R.C.Feenstra(ed.),the effects of US trade protection and promotion policies.Chicago,University of Chicago Press,1997,191-213.
[27]Prusa,T.J.Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn?.Journal of International Economics,1992,33,1-20.
[28]Prusa,T.J.,& Skeath,S.The economic and strategic motives for antidumping filings.Review of World Economics,2002,138(3),389-413.
[29]Robert,M.F.,& Kara,M.R.The spread of antidumping regimes and the role of retaliation in filings.Southern Economic Association,2006,72(4),877-890.
[30]Robert,W.M.Ethical aspects of using government to subvert competition:antidumping laws as a case study of rent seeking activity.Journal of Business Ethics,2008,83(4),759-771.
[31]Robert,W.M.,& Block,W.Ethical aspects of initiating antidumping actions.International Journal of Social Economics,1997,24(6),599-608.
[32]Robert,W.M.,& Yeomin,Y.Antidumping and the people's republic of china:Five case studies.The Dumont Institute for-Public Policy Research,Working Paper,1998(5),98.
[33]Roldan,M.,& Joan,M.A.Trade and the environment:from a 'southern'perspective.Ecological Economics,2001,36,281-297.
[34]Sabry,F.An analysis of the decision to file,the dumping estimates,and the outcome of antidumping petitions.International Trade Journal,2000,14(2),109-145.
[35]Tharakan,P.K.M.Contingent protection:the US and the EC anti-dumping actions.The Word Economy,1999,16(5),575-600.
[36]Tharakan,P.K.M.Is Anti-dumping here to stay?.The World Economy,1999,22(3),179-206.
[37]Tharakan,P.K.M.,& Greenaway,D.Cumulation and injury determination of the european community in antidumping cases.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,1998,134,320-39.
[38]Thomas,J.P.Pricing behavior in the presence of antidnmping law.Journal of Economic Integration,1994,9(2),260-89.
[39]Thomas,J.P.The growing problem of antidumping protection.The World Economy,2005,28(5),683-700.
[40]曹靖.贸易自由化趋势下的农产品贸易保护.河北学刊,2002(6),76-79.
[41]常平凡.农产品出口的国际市场定位与营销对策.农业经济问题,2004(2),72-74.
[42]陈汉林.美国对华反倾销的贸易转移效应分析及对策.国际贸易,2008(9),18-22.
[43]陈姣,马君.信任的博弈论分析.华东经济管理,2005(4),81-85.
[44]陈静,王艳.反倾销的经济学分析.邢台职业技术学院学报,2005(4),18-20.
[45]陈颍.我国反倾销应诉搭便车的根源与对策.江苏商论,2003(12),38-39.
[46]陈勇.倾销和反倾销的经济学解释.深圳大学学报,2001(9),32-37.
[47]程燕.完善预警机制有 效应对反倾销.商业研究,2006(13),206-208.
[48]戴远泰.印度对中国反倾销的特点、原因及我国的对策.西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(1),116-121.
[49]戴远泰.印度反倾销调查利害关系方的互动和协调.南亚经济季刊,2003(2),42-46.
[50]邓聿文.中国为何屡遭反倾销.国际金融报,2003-12-25.
[51]丁育生.从败诉走向胜诉--江苏省粮油公司应对贸易摩擦启示.WTO经济导刊,2006(3),47-48.
[52]费杨生.空调反倾销:行业软肋被击中,企业行为待升级.http://homea.people.com.cn/GB/41391/3323409.html,2005-4-15.
[53]冯巨章.国际实施最终反倾销措施统计分析:1995-2006.统计研究,2008,25(3),51-55.
[54]付彩霞.国外反倾销新动向对我国比较优势的影响.经济论坛,2004(14),120-126.
[55]傅东辉.评欧盟对华反倾销新政策的灵活性和消极性.http://www.cacs.gov.cn/news/newshow.aspx?str1=2&articleId=36367,2001-4-28.
[56]格利高里(T.E.G Gregory).关税:方法研究.伦敦:1921,177等.
[57]关立新,于洋.多样化经济:中国走向现代农业的发展道路.http://www.hsderc.cn /lunwen/glx/glx03.pdf,2004-8-12.
[58]何秀荣.对华反倾销与非市场经济地位.农业经济问题,2005(4),4-8.
[59]胡麦秀,薛求知.美国对华实施反补贴的动因及其经济学分析.南京师范大学学报,2008(2),63-67.
[60]胡晓红.中国反倾销法理论与实践.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001,3-17.
[61]胡晓红.中国反倾销法理论与实践.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001,25-30.
[62]黄建康,孙文远.美国实施反倾销贸易政策的动因与绩效分析.世界经济研究,2006,(2),22-27.
[63]黄军,李岳云.对中国农产品遭受反倾销的思考.中国农村经济,2002(1),60-64.
[64]贾莉莉.反倾销视角下农产品成本计量浅析.财会通讯,2009(2),116-117.
[65]贾莉莉.浅议农产品反倾销应诉中的会计对策.中国乡镇企业会计,2009,(5),151-152.
[66]解媚霞.中国企业反倾销应诉中的会计权益问题研究.世界贸易组织动态与研究,2004(8),30-33.
[67]兰勇,王晰.我国农产品出口遭遇反倾销的原因及对策.企业技术开发,2009(12),85-87.
[68]雷雨田,崔强.执行新会计准则,积极应对反倾销.现代经济,2008(2),193-194.
[69]李昌奎.世界贸易组织反倾销协释义.北京:机械工业出版社,2005,7-46.
[70]李成钢.构建三位一体的反倾销体系--政府、企业、行会在反倾销中的定位.商业经济文荟,2002(6),46-48.
[71]李红春.反倾销应诉的集体行动研究-行业协会克服“搭便车”机制的思考.时代经贸,2006(6),67-68.
[72]李江冰.多边贸易体制下农产品贸易自由化困境的政治经济分析.硕士学位论文,武汉大学,2004.
[73]李军伟,崔强.浅析我国反倾销的发展状况..当代经济,2008(1),4-6.
[74]李俊锋.印度反倾销法律制度的初步研究,甘肃联合大学学报(社会科学版),2009,25(4),40-45.
[75]李俊江,康永刚.新贸易保护主义的经济学分析,东北亚论坛,2009,(3),47-52.
[76]李坤望,王孝松.美国对华反倾销的统计分析.亚太经济,2008,(4),74-77.
[77]李敏华,蒋艳君.发挥行业协会作用 积极应对反倾销.商场现代化,2006(3),21.
[78]李晓兵.当前我国出口型企业应对反倾销的几点措施.特区经济,2006(12),260-262.
[79]李鑫.浅析我国外贸企业应对反倾销的战略思考.财经研究,2007(12),48.
[80]李岩.浅谈我国农产品应对国外反倾销策略.农业经济,2004(9),44-45.
[81]李增力.浅析拉美国家反倾销调查中的领事认证制度.国际贸易问题,2008(4),96-100.
[82]廖秀健,张晓妮.美国对华农产品反倾销案例分析.陕西农业科学,2006(4),103-106.
[83]廖秀健.我国农产品遭遇反倾销原因及对策.全国商情,2006(1),18-20.
[84]林琳,唐骁鹏.论可置信性威胁在反倾销动态博弈中的应用.商业研究,2004(7),75-77.
[85]刘爱东,周以芳.我国农产品遭反倾销的案例统计分析.重庆工学院学报(社会科学),2009(2),58-63.
[86]刘爱东.会计准则趋同对我国企业应对反倾销影响的调查分析,会计研究,2008(9),33-38.
[87]刘菊堂.浅析政府在应对国外反倾销中的作用.中共山西省委党校学报,2004(8),70-71.
[88]刘琦.论倾销与反倾销动态博弈中可信性问题.国际贸易问题,2002(10),13-17.
[89]刘新民.反规避:发展趋势、不利影响及应对措施.http://www.eximbank.gov.cn/t opic/hwtz,2005-3-10.
[90]刘勇.多哈回合反倾销规则改革的最新成果探析.世界贸易组织动态与研究,2008(8),16-25.
[91]罗必良.农业性质、制度含义及其经济组织形式.中国农村观察,1999(5),8-16.
[92]罗霄.欧盟对外贸易反倾销的动因分析.世界经济与政治论坛,2009,(5),51-55.
[93]马述忠.对华农产品倾销与反倾销行为的产业损害分析.农业经济问题,2008(7),87-92.
[94]马有才,陈爱萍.基于产业安全的反倾销与反倾销联动策略.对外经贸实务,2006(7),9-11.
[95]潘悦,高文书.迎战“反倾销”--国际经验与中国对策基于产业安全的反倾销与反倾销联动策略.北京:中共中央党校出版社,2005,105-106.
[96]潘悦.构建有效应对反倾销摩擦的行业协会体制.中共中央党校学报,2005(4),63-67.
[97]秦玉娈.反倾销法中正常价值的界定探索.河北经济研究,2006(8),47-48.
[98]秦玉娈.关于反倾销法中正常价值问题研究.硕士学位论文,河北师范大学,2004.
[99]曲如晓,焦志文.商品倾销、生态倾销与社会倾销的比较及应对.甘肃社会科学,2006(4),55-58.
[100]尚明.反倾销,WTO规则及中外法律与实践.北京:法律出版社,2003,34-52;78-80;91-93:155;267-269;372;423-424;620-623.
[101]邵桂兰,高环玲,宋祖德.全球视角下农产品反倾销摩擦的成因和解决途径研究.现代经济,2008(2),188-190.
[102]沈国兵.反倾销与美中双边产业内贸易:经验分析.世界经济研究,2008,(3),48-55.
[103]寿海峰.构建政府、行业协会和企业“三位一体”的反倾销体系.上海企业,2005(10),51-53.
[104]舒文莉.当前中国如何应对反倾销的思考.北方经贸,2005(11),52-53.
[105]宋程丽.试论我国应对反倾销的对策措施.探求,2006(4),46-47.
[106]宋利芳.墨西哥反倾销政策及其特点探析.亚太经济,2007(4),92-95.
[107]宋利芳.印度反倾销政策及特点分析.国际贸易问题,2007(1),116-120.
[108]唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析.财贸经济,2004(11),65-69.
[109]田亦夫.国外对华反倾销的特点、原因及对策.侨乡论坛,2002(5),141-143.
[110]王冰.反倾销对中国的挑战.理论学习,2004(4),53-54.
[111]王海军.中印反倾销对对碰.进出口经纪人,2006(394),54-55.
[112]王林生,张汉林.反倾销热点剖析.北京:人民出版社,2004,78-104.
[113]王美娟.我国遭遇反倾销的原因及策略.合作经济与科技,2009(5),106-107.
[114]王培志,王效彬.‘三位一体'协同应对体系在我国应对农产品反倾销中的应用.理论学刊,2007(11),76-79.
[115]王世春,王琴华,张汉林.名家论坛--反倾销应对之道.北京:人民出版社,2004,2-26.
[116]王晓辉.对外投资与规避反倾销.商业研究,2004(11),13-15.
[117]王珍.WTO与农产品国际竞争力.北京:中国经济出版社,2004,1-42.
[118]吴金希,于永达.浅议政府在应对国外对华反倾销中的作用.中国行政管理,2004(8),35-38.
[119]吴湘生.反倾销,中美水产第一案.http://www.cdnj.gov.cn/newxnhtx/detail.php?id=1120439806&&lb=WTO%D3%EB%C5%A9%D2%B5&&gjz=,2005-7-4.
[120]武跃.美国新反倾销政策解读.http://www.szhboftec.gov.cn/info_detail.asp?id=1643,2005-4-12.
[121]谢狲,邢琳.国际新形势下农产品的反倾销问题.甘肃农业,2006(4),193-194.
[122]谢文泽.墨西哥应对贸易争端的经验与启示.拉丁美洲研究,2006,28(5),21-26.
[123]谢正勤.农产品贸易保护的政治经济学分析.江苏商论,2006(12),77-79.
[124]谢正勤.现阶段农产品贸易自由化的困境及其原因分析.南京财经大学学报,2006(3),36-39.
[125]徐祥林.如何理解农业是弱质产业.经济研究参考,1997(B5),43.
[126]徐元明.我国农产品国际贸易状况及发展对策.世界经济与政治论坛,2005(6),58-62.
[127]薛立,朱瑾.山东省农产品出口贸易遭遇的壁垒问题及对策.北方经贸,2007(11),32-34.
[128]雅各布·瓦伊纳[美].倾销,国际贸易中的一个问题.沈瑶译,熊性美校.北京:商务印书馆,2003,3;167-168.
[129]杨广志.欧盟贸易保护主义抬头.金融信息参考,2004(5),53.
[130]杨荣珍,王绍熙,陈静.反倾销应诉与起诉实务.北京:人民出版社,2004,2-5.
[131]杨荣珍.印度对华反倾销实践及其评价.亚太经济,2006,(4),46-49.
[132]杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源--基于经济理性角度的分析.审计与经济研究,2008(1),93-96.
[133]杨仕辉.博弈反倾销.进出口经理人,2003(3),5-7.
[134]杨仕辉.反倾销的国际比较/博弈与我国对策研究.北京:科学出版社,2005,161-163.
[135]杨仕辉.反倾销规则的博弈分析.世界经济,2001(11),31-41.
[136]杨秀平,刘合光,彭超.我国农产品面对的国际贸易环境变动态势分析.IAED研究简报,2009(2),1-8.
[137]叶全良,王世春.国际商务与反倾销.北京:人民出版社,2005,10-53.
[138]叶全良.论国际反倾销及其发展趋势.中南财经政法大学学报,2005(1),76-82.
[139]易淼清,付强.中国政府在应对反倾销中的作用分析.经济师,2006(5),59-61.
[140]尹成杰.农业国际化竞争与提高我国农业国际竞争力.农业经济问题,2003(1),5-10.
[141]尹肖妮.国际农产品贸易政策下中国农产品贸易发展分析.北方经贸,2006(4),27-29.
[142]尹肖妮.竞争优势理论与我国对外贸易战略的选择分析.经济师,2005(11),23-24.
[143]雍海英.中国应对反倾销策略的法律分析.中国发展,2006(2),61-64.
[144]于成龙.中国应对反倾销走出关键一步.中国物流与采购,2005(24),38-39.
[145]于维军.国外反倾销--我国农产品出口面临的新难题.中国禽业导刊,2003(2),15-17.
[146]于永达.反倾销MBA/MPA案例.北京:清华大学出版社,2003,10.16-28.
[147]余利红,刘海云.对华反补贴的最新动态、发展趋势与因应对策.国际商务研究,2009(3),21-29.
[148]余盛兴.警惕美对华反倾销“新政”--美对华反倾销可能出现新一轮高潮.WTO经济导刊,2005(10),59-61.
[149]俞国华.中国农产品贸易中的反倾销综合管理系统研究.工业技术经济,2005(4),87-89.
[150]袁纯清.共生理论--兼论小型经济.北京:经济科学出版社,1998,11-71.
[151]袁磊.反倾销会计.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2004,27-46.
[152]岳云霞.中拉贸易摩擦分析--拉美对华反倾销形势、特点与对策.拉丁美洲研究,2008(6),46-50.
[153]曾薇,蒋毅一.应对反倾销,关键在于未雨绸--论构建我国反倾销“前应诉”机制.集团经济研究,2007(30),129.
[154]张华.从反倾销实践中正常价值的认定看美欧的贸易保护主义色彩.北方经济,2006(1),79-80.
[155]张华.国际反倾销活动原因的经济增长方式分析.经济社会体制比较,2007(6),140-145.
[156]张华.国际农产品反倾销原因的一般性和特殊性分析.西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006,6(5),41-44.
[157]张华.我国农产品应对反倾销的“四体合作机制”构建研究.国际贸易问题,2009(7),82-87.
[158]张静春.中美贸易摩擦--反倾销.北京:世界知识出版社,2004,12-28.
[159]张立位,彭建军,崔振宇.美国、欧盟反倾销法确定非市场经济国家产品正常价值标准探析.湖北经济学院学报,2004(6),48-54.
[160]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学.上海:上海人民出版社,1996,80-85.
[161]张晓君.反倾销成案的哲学分析.学术论坛,2005(1),60-63.
[162]张雪绸.我国农产品出口应对反倾销的对策思考.农村经济,2003(10),6-7.
[163]张燕.应战美国反倾销.北京:法律出版社,2003,32-43.
[164]张颖璐.试论反倾销及我国的应对策略.http://www.law-lib.com/Lw/lw _view.asp?no=6107,2005-10-22.
[165]赵君峰.反倾销保护的政治经济学分析.技术经济,2006(8),44-45.
[166]赵萍,张立辉.外部因素对我国农产品出口的制约及对策.商场现代化,2008(27),5.
[167]郑晶.农产品优质优价问题的经济学思考.华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(1),6-10.
[168]郑良泽.我国应对反倾销的策略思考.现代商业,2009(6),56-58.
[169]芝兰.反倾销诉讼会计研究述评.财经理论与实践,2006(4),68-70.
[2] Anderson, J. E. Strategic lobbying and antidumping. Journal of Economic Integration, 1994 (9), 129-155.
[3] Blonigen, B. A., & Chad, P. B. Antidumping and retaliation threats. Journal of International Economics, 2003, 60(2), 249-273.
[4] Chad, P. B. The WTO and antidumping in developing countries. Economics and Politics, 2008,20(2), 255-288.
[5] Douglas, A. I. The rise of U.S. antidumping activity in historical perspective. The World Economy, 2005,28 (5), 651-668.
[6] Durling, J. P. Deference, but only when due: WTO review of antidumping measures. Journal of International Economic Law, 2003,6(1), 125-153.
[7] Feinberg, R. M., & Kara, M. R. The spread of antidumping regimes and the role of retaliation in filings. Southern Economic Journal, 2006, 72(4), 877-890.
[8] Finger, J. M., Fung, K. C, Will GATT enforcement control antidumping. Journal of Economic Integration, 1994, 9,198-213.
[9] Francois, J., & Gunnar, N. Political influence in a new antidumping regime: evidence from Mexico. CEPR Working Paper, March, 2004, No. 4297.
[10] Gallaway, M. R., Blonigen, B. A., Flynn, J. E. Welfare costs of the U. S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws'. Journal of International Economics, 1999,49(2), 211-244.
[11] Hesse, J. Antidumping. International Trade Final Paper Fall 2001, ECON 421.
[12] James, B., & Paul, K. A reciprocal dumping model of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 1983,15,313-321.
[13] Kaplan, G B., Kamarck, L.G, Parker, M. Cost analysis under the antidumping law. Journal of International Law & Economics, 1998,21, 357-418.
[14] Kerr, W. A. Dumping - one of those economic myths. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy,2001(2),211-220.
[15]Liebman,B.Sunset reviews and ITC commissioner voting behavior.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics,2004,104(3),446-475.
[16]Liu,X.,& Vandenbussche,H.EU antidumping cases against China:an overview and future prospects with respect to China's WTO membership.LICOS discussion paper,LICOS,Centre for Transition Economics,2002.
[17]Maurizio,Zanardi.Antidumping:What are the numbers to discuss at Doha?.The World Economy,2004,27(3),403-433.
[18]Messerlin,P.,& Reed,G.The US and EC antidumping policies.The Economic Journal,1995,105,1565-1575.
[19]Michael,R.On ecological dumping.Oxford Economics Papers,1994,46,822-40.
[20]Miranda,J.,Raul,A.T.,Mario,R.The international use of antidumping:1987-1997.Journal of World Trade,1998,32,5-71.
[21]Moore,M.O.Commerce department antidumping sunset reviews:a first assessment.Journal of World Trade,2002,36(4),675-698.
[22]Mustapha,S.J.,& James,K.J.Antidumping as Anticompetitive Practice Evidence from the United States and the European Union.J Ind Compet Trade,2006,6,253-275.
[23]Nelson,D.R.The political economy of antidumping:a survey.European Journal of Political Economy,2006,22(3),554-590.
[24]Nisha,M.Antidumping duties in the agriculture Sector:trade restricting or trade deflecting?,http://www.econ.ubc.ca/ine,200-7-23.
[25]Prusa,T.J.Pricing behaviour in the presence of antidumping law.Journal of economic Integration,1994,92,260-289.
[26]Prusa,T.J.The trade effects of US antidumping action,in R.C.Feenstra(ed.),the effects of US trade protection and promotion policies.Chicago,University of Chicago Press,1997,191-213.
[27]Prusa,T.J.Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn?.Journal of International Economics,1992,33,1-20.
[28]Prusa,T.J.,& Skeath,S.The economic and strategic motives for antidumping filings.Review of World Economics,2002,138(3),389-413.
[29]Robert,M.F.,& Kara,M.R.The spread of antidumping regimes and the role of retaliation in filings.Southern Economic Association,2006,72(4),877-890.
[30]Robert,W.M.Ethical aspects of using government to subvert competition:antidumping laws as a case study of rent seeking activity.Journal of Business Ethics,2008,83(4),759-771.
[31]Robert,W.M.,& Block,W.Ethical aspects of initiating antidumping actions.International Journal of Social Economics,1997,24(6),599-608.
[32]Robert,W.M.,& Yeomin,Y.Antidumping and the people's republic of china:Five case studies.The Dumont Institute for-Public Policy Research,Working Paper,1998(5),98.
[33]Roldan,M.,& Joan,M.A.Trade and the environment:from a 'southern'perspective.Ecological Economics,2001,36,281-297.
[34]Sabry,F.An analysis of the decision to file,the dumping estimates,and the outcome of antidumping petitions.International Trade Journal,2000,14(2),109-145.
[35]Tharakan,P.K.M.Contingent protection:the US and the EC anti-dumping actions.The Word Economy,1999,16(5),575-600.
[36]Tharakan,P.K.M.Is Anti-dumping here to stay?.The World Economy,1999,22(3),179-206.
[37]Tharakan,P.K.M.,& Greenaway,D.Cumulation and injury determination of the european community in antidumping cases.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,1998,134,320-39.
[38]Thomas,J.P.Pricing behavior in the presence of antidnmping law.Journal of Economic Integration,1994,9(2),260-89.
[39]Thomas,J.P.The growing problem of antidumping protection.The World Economy,2005,28(5),683-700.
[40]曹靖.贸易自由化趋势下的农产品贸易保护.河北学刊,2002(6),76-79.
[41]常平凡.农产品出口的国际市场定位与营销对策.农业经济问题,2004(2),72-74.
[42]陈汉林.美国对华反倾销的贸易转移效应分析及对策.国际贸易,2008(9),18-22.
[43]陈姣,马君.信任的博弈论分析.华东经济管理,2005(4),81-85.
[44]陈静,王艳.反倾销的经济学分析.邢台职业技术学院学报,2005(4),18-20.
[45]陈颍.我国反倾销应诉搭便车的根源与对策.江苏商论,2003(12),38-39.
[46]陈勇.倾销和反倾销的经济学解释.深圳大学学报,2001(9),32-37.
[47]程燕.完善预警机制有 效应对反倾销.商业研究,2006(13),206-208.
[48]戴远泰.印度对中国反倾销的特点、原因及我国的对策.西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(1),116-121.
[49]戴远泰.印度反倾销调查利害关系方的互动和协调.南亚经济季刊,2003(2),42-46.
[50]邓聿文.中国为何屡遭反倾销.国际金融报,2003-12-25.
[51]丁育生.从败诉走向胜诉--江苏省粮油公司应对贸易摩擦启示.WTO经济导刊,2006(3),47-48.
[52]费杨生.空调反倾销:行业软肋被击中,企业行为待升级.http://homea.people.com.cn/GB/41391/3323409.html,2005-4-15.
[53]冯巨章.国际实施最终反倾销措施统计分析:1995-2006.统计研究,2008,25(3),51-55.
[54]付彩霞.国外反倾销新动向对我国比较优势的影响.经济论坛,2004(14),120-126.
[55]傅东辉.评欧盟对华反倾销新政策的灵活性和消极性.http://www.cacs.gov.cn/news/newshow.aspx?str1=2&articleId=36367,2001-4-28.
[56]格利高里(T.E.G Gregory).关税:方法研究.伦敦:1921,177等.
[57]关立新,于洋.多样化经济:中国走向现代农业的发展道路.http://www.hsderc.cn /lunwen/glx/glx03.pdf,2004-8-12.
[58]何秀荣.对华反倾销与非市场经济地位.农业经济问题,2005(4),4-8.
[59]胡麦秀,薛求知.美国对华实施反补贴的动因及其经济学分析.南京师范大学学报,2008(2),63-67.
[60]胡晓红.中国反倾销法理论与实践.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001,3-17.
[61]胡晓红.中国反倾销法理论与实践.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001,25-30.
[62]黄建康,孙文远.美国实施反倾销贸易政策的动因与绩效分析.世界经济研究,2006,(2),22-27.
[63]黄军,李岳云.对中国农产品遭受反倾销的思考.中国农村经济,2002(1),60-64.
[64]贾莉莉.反倾销视角下农产品成本计量浅析.财会通讯,2009(2),116-117.
[65]贾莉莉.浅议农产品反倾销应诉中的会计对策.中国乡镇企业会计,2009,(5),151-152.
[66]解媚霞.中国企业反倾销应诉中的会计权益问题研究.世界贸易组织动态与研究,2004(8),30-33.
[67]兰勇,王晰.我国农产品出口遭遇反倾销的原因及对策.企业技术开发,2009(12),85-87.
[68]雷雨田,崔强.执行新会计准则,积极应对反倾销.现代经济,2008(2),193-194.
[69]李昌奎.世界贸易组织反倾销协释义.北京:机械工业出版社,2005,7-46.
[70]李成钢.构建三位一体的反倾销体系--政府、企业、行会在反倾销中的定位.商业经济文荟,2002(6),46-48.
[71]李红春.反倾销应诉的集体行动研究-行业协会克服“搭便车”机制的思考.时代经贸,2006(6),67-68.
[72]李江冰.多边贸易体制下农产品贸易自由化困境的政治经济分析.硕士学位论文,武汉大学,2004.
[73]李军伟,崔强.浅析我国反倾销的发展状况..当代经济,2008(1),4-6.
[74]李俊锋.印度反倾销法律制度的初步研究,甘肃联合大学学报(社会科学版),2009,25(4),40-45.
[75]李俊江,康永刚.新贸易保护主义的经济学分析,东北亚论坛,2009,(3),47-52.
[76]李坤望,王孝松.美国对华反倾销的统计分析.亚太经济,2008,(4),74-77.
[77]李敏华,蒋艳君.发挥行业协会作用 积极应对反倾销.商场现代化,2006(3),21.
[78]李晓兵.当前我国出口型企业应对反倾销的几点措施.特区经济,2006(12),260-262.
[79]李鑫.浅析我国外贸企业应对反倾销的战略思考.财经研究,2007(12),48.
[80]李岩.浅谈我国农产品应对国外反倾销策略.农业经济,2004(9),44-45.
[81]李增力.浅析拉美国家反倾销调查中的领事认证制度.国际贸易问题,2008(4),96-100.
[82]廖秀健,张晓妮.美国对华农产品反倾销案例分析.陕西农业科学,2006(4),103-106.
[83]廖秀健.我国农产品遭遇反倾销原因及对策.全国商情,2006(1),18-20.
[84]林琳,唐骁鹏.论可置信性威胁在反倾销动态博弈中的应用.商业研究,2004(7),75-77.
[85]刘爱东,周以芳.我国农产品遭反倾销的案例统计分析.重庆工学院学报(社会科学),2009(2),58-63.
[86]刘爱东.会计准则趋同对我国企业应对反倾销影响的调查分析,会计研究,2008(9),33-38.
[87]刘菊堂.浅析政府在应对国外反倾销中的作用.中共山西省委党校学报,2004(8),70-71.
[88]刘琦.论倾销与反倾销动态博弈中可信性问题.国际贸易问题,2002(10),13-17.
[89]刘新民.反规避:发展趋势、不利影响及应对措施.http://www.eximbank.gov.cn/t opic/hwtz,2005-3-10.
[90]刘勇.多哈回合反倾销规则改革的最新成果探析.世界贸易组织动态与研究,2008(8),16-25.
[91]罗必良.农业性质、制度含义及其经济组织形式.中国农村观察,1999(5),8-16.
[92]罗霄.欧盟对外贸易反倾销的动因分析.世界经济与政治论坛,2009,(5),51-55.
[93]马述忠.对华农产品倾销与反倾销行为的产业损害分析.农业经济问题,2008(7),87-92.
[94]马有才,陈爱萍.基于产业安全的反倾销与反倾销联动策略.对外经贸实务,2006(7),9-11.
[95]潘悦,高文书.迎战“反倾销”--国际经验与中国对策基于产业安全的反倾销与反倾销联动策略.北京:中共中央党校出版社,2005,105-106.
[96]潘悦.构建有效应对反倾销摩擦的行业协会体制.中共中央党校学报,2005(4),63-67.
[97]秦玉娈.反倾销法中正常价值的界定探索.河北经济研究,2006(8),47-48.
[98]秦玉娈.关于反倾销法中正常价值问题研究.硕士学位论文,河北师范大学,2004.
[99]曲如晓,焦志文.商品倾销、生态倾销与社会倾销的比较及应对.甘肃社会科学,2006(4),55-58.
[100]尚明.反倾销,WTO规则及中外法律与实践.北京:法律出版社,2003,34-52;78-80;91-93:155;267-269;372;423-424;620-623.
[101]邵桂兰,高环玲,宋祖德.全球视角下农产品反倾销摩擦的成因和解决途径研究.现代经济,2008(2),188-190.
[102]沈国兵.反倾销与美中双边产业内贸易:经验分析.世界经济研究,2008,(3),48-55.
[103]寿海峰.构建政府、行业协会和企业“三位一体”的反倾销体系.上海企业,2005(10),51-53.
[104]舒文莉.当前中国如何应对反倾销的思考.北方经贸,2005(11),52-53.
[105]宋程丽.试论我国应对反倾销的对策措施.探求,2006(4),46-47.
[106]宋利芳.墨西哥反倾销政策及其特点探析.亚太经济,2007(4),92-95.
[107]宋利芳.印度反倾销政策及特点分析.国际贸易问题,2007(1),116-120.
[108]唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析.财贸经济,2004(11),65-69.
[109]田亦夫.国外对华反倾销的特点、原因及对策.侨乡论坛,2002(5),141-143.
[110]王冰.反倾销对中国的挑战.理论学习,2004(4),53-54.
[111]王海军.中印反倾销对对碰.进出口经纪人,2006(394),54-55.
[112]王林生,张汉林.反倾销热点剖析.北京:人民出版社,2004,78-104.
[113]王美娟.我国遭遇反倾销的原因及策略.合作经济与科技,2009(5),106-107.
[114]王培志,王效彬.‘三位一体'协同应对体系在我国应对农产品反倾销中的应用.理论学刊,2007(11),76-79.
[115]王世春,王琴华,张汉林.名家论坛--反倾销应对之道.北京:人民出版社,2004,2-26.
[116]王晓辉.对外投资与规避反倾销.商业研究,2004(11),13-15.
[117]王珍.WTO与农产品国际竞争力.北京:中国经济出版社,2004,1-42.
[118]吴金希,于永达.浅议政府在应对国外对华反倾销中的作用.中国行政管理,2004(8),35-38.
[119]吴湘生.反倾销,中美水产第一案.http://www.cdnj.gov.cn/newxnhtx/detail.php?id=1120439806&&lb=WTO%D3%EB%C5%A9%D2%B5&&gjz=,2005-7-4.
[120]武跃.美国新反倾销政策解读.http://www.szhboftec.gov.cn/info_detail.asp?id=1643,2005-4-12.
[121]谢狲,邢琳.国际新形势下农产品的反倾销问题.甘肃农业,2006(4),193-194.
[122]谢文泽.墨西哥应对贸易争端的经验与启示.拉丁美洲研究,2006,28(5),21-26.
[123]谢正勤.农产品贸易保护的政治经济学分析.江苏商论,2006(12),77-79.
[124]谢正勤.现阶段农产品贸易自由化的困境及其原因分析.南京财经大学学报,2006(3),36-39.
[125]徐祥林.如何理解农业是弱质产业.经济研究参考,1997(B5),43.
[126]徐元明.我国农产品国际贸易状况及发展对策.世界经济与政治论坛,2005(6),58-62.
[127]薛立,朱瑾.山东省农产品出口贸易遭遇的壁垒问题及对策.北方经贸,2007(11),32-34.
[128]雅各布·瓦伊纳[美].倾销,国际贸易中的一个问题.沈瑶译,熊性美校.北京:商务印书馆,2003,3;167-168.
[129]杨广志.欧盟贸易保护主义抬头.金融信息参考,2004(5),53.
[130]杨荣珍,王绍熙,陈静.反倾销应诉与起诉实务.北京:人民出版社,2004,2-5.
[131]杨荣珍.印度对华反倾销实践及其评价.亚太经济,2006,(4),46-49.
[132]杨韶艳,黄建康.发达国家反倾销贸易保护主义探源--基于经济理性角度的分析.审计与经济研究,2008(1),93-96.
[133]杨仕辉.博弈反倾销.进出口经理人,2003(3),5-7.
[134]杨仕辉.反倾销的国际比较/博弈与我国对策研究.北京:科学出版社,2005,161-163.
[135]杨仕辉.反倾销规则的博弈分析.世界经济,2001(11),31-41.
[136]杨秀平,刘合光,彭超.我国农产品面对的国际贸易环境变动态势分析.IAED研究简报,2009(2),1-8.
[137]叶全良,王世春.国际商务与反倾销.北京:人民出版社,2005,10-53.
[138]叶全良.论国际反倾销及其发展趋势.中南财经政法大学学报,2005(1),76-82.
[139]易淼清,付强.中国政府在应对反倾销中的作用分析.经济师,2006(5),59-61.
[140]尹成杰.农业国际化竞争与提高我国农业国际竞争力.农业经济问题,2003(1),5-10.
[141]尹肖妮.国际农产品贸易政策下中国农产品贸易发展分析.北方经贸,2006(4),27-29.
[142]尹肖妮.竞争优势理论与我国对外贸易战略的选择分析.经济师,2005(11),23-24.
[143]雍海英.中国应对反倾销策略的法律分析.中国发展,2006(2),61-64.
[144]于成龙.中国应对反倾销走出关键一步.中国物流与采购,2005(24),38-39.
[145]于维军.国外反倾销--我国农产品出口面临的新难题.中国禽业导刊,2003(2),15-17.
[146]于永达.反倾销MBA/MPA案例.北京:清华大学出版社,2003,10.16-28.
[147]余利红,刘海云.对华反补贴的最新动态、发展趋势与因应对策.国际商务研究,2009(3),21-29.
[148]余盛兴.警惕美对华反倾销“新政”--美对华反倾销可能出现新一轮高潮.WTO经济导刊,2005(10),59-61.
[149]俞国华.中国农产品贸易中的反倾销综合管理系统研究.工业技术经济,2005(4),87-89.
[150]袁纯清.共生理论--兼论小型经济.北京:经济科学出版社,1998,11-71.
[151]袁磊.反倾销会计.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2004,27-46.
[152]岳云霞.中拉贸易摩擦分析--拉美对华反倾销形势、特点与对策.拉丁美洲研究,2008(6),46-50.
[153]曾薇,蒋毅一.应对反倾销,关键在于未雨绸--论构建我国反倾销“前应诉”机制.集团经济研究,2007(30),129.
[154]张华.从反倾销实践中正常价值的认定看美欧的贸易保护主义色彩.北方经济,2006(1),79-80.
[155]张华.国际反倾销活动原因的经济增长方式分析.经济社会体制比较,2007(6),140-145.
[156]张华.国际农产品反倾销原因的一般性和特殊性分析.西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006,6(5),41-44.
[157]张华.我国农产品应对反倾销的“四体合作机制”构建研究.国际贸易问题,2009(7),82-87.
[158]张静春.中美贸易摩擦--反倾销.北京:世界知识出版社,2004,12-28.
[159]张立位,彭建军,崔振宇.美国、欧盟反倾销法确定非市场经济国家产品正常价值标准探析.湖北经济学院学报,2004(6),48-54.
[160]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学.上海:上海人民出版社,1996,80-85.
[161]张晓君.反倾销成案的哲学分析.学术论坛,2005(1),60-63.
[162]张雪绸.我国农产品出口应对反倾销的对策思考.农村经济,2003(10),6-7.
[163]张燕.应战美国反倾销.北京:法律出版社,2003,32-43.
[164]张颖璐.试论反倾销及我国的应对策略.http://www.law-lib.com/Lw/lw _view.asp?no=6107,2005-10-22.
[165]赵君峰.反倾销保护的政治经济学分析.技术经济,2006(8),44-45.
[166]赵萍,张立辉.外部因素对我国农产品出口的制约及对策.商场现代化,2008(27),5.
[167]郑晶.农产品优质优价问题的经济学思考.华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(1),6-10.
[168]郑良泽.我国应对反倾销的策略思考.现代商业,2009(6),56-58.
[169]芝兰.反倾销诉讼会计研究述评.财经理论与实践,2006(4),68-70.