河南省大学生孤独感结构研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
“孤独感”是近30年来受到西方学者广泛关注的研究领域,业已引起我国学者的研究兴趣。本研究在对国内外有关孤独感的理论、研究现状进行归纳整理的基础上,采用了开放式调查法、访谈法、问卷法、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析方法,对河南省大学生孤独感结构进行了初步研究,证实了研究提出的四个假设,获得的结论主要有:
     第一,河南省大学生孤独感结构主要包括四个维度,按重要性依次排列为社会孤独感、人际孤独感、自我孤独感和发展孤独感。
     第二,河南省大学生孤独感的内容并不仅仅局限于社会交往活动的范畴,而是至少包括与其自我同一性发展有关的内容。
     第三,河南省大学生孤独感并不总是消极的。更多的大学生认为适度的孤独感可以为其提供动力,因而也具有积极意义。
     第四,河南省大学生在孤独感结构问卷的各维度和总分上的得分存在性别、生源、学科门类、学历层次、年级、学校性质等人口学变量上的差异,但差异的表现是复杂多样的。
     本研究的创新之处可能集中在以下几点上:
     首先,在社会活动的领域里探讨孤独感的概念,而不是仅仅将其局限在社会交往的范畴里。这与西方学者关于孤独感的主流观点并不一致,可以说在某种程度上体现了我国的文化背景对中国人孤独感体验的制约作用。
     其次,从发展的角度来理解孤独感的概念,将孤独感和个体特定阶段的发展任务联系起来。特别地,将大学生孤独感和其自我同一性发展任务联系起来。这与西方学者仅将大学生作为成人被试来研究成人孤独感(不考虑发展)的视角不同,可以说在成人孤独感的研究中吸收了西方学者关于儿童青少年孤独感的研究优点(关注发展问题),而这更符合我国大学生发展的实际情况。
     第三,证明了大学生孤独感并不一定都是消极的,适度的孤独感可以为个体
    
    的活动提供动力,具有积极意义。
     第四,编制了本土化的河南省大学生孤独感结构问卷,不仅采用探索性因素
    分析探明河南省大学生孤独感的结构,并用验证性因素分析进行验证,提高了研
    究的科学水平。
     今后,关于孤独感的研究应该扩大研究对象范围、拓展研究领域、重视“自
    我同一性”问题并寻求研究方法上的突破。
Many studies on Loneliness have been done in late 30 years in Western countries, and psychologists in China have now been becoming interested in this field as well. The purpose of this paper is to examine the loneliness structure of college students in Henan Province using the methods of Investigation, Interview, Questionnaire Survey, Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results revealed that the structure of the college students' loneliness includes four dimensions. The four dimensions, arranged in descending order of importance to loneliness are: 1) social loneliness 2) intimate loneliness 3) self-loneliness and 4) development loneliness. This author maintains that loneliness is not only related to one's social relationship, but also to the development of one's self-identity. This author also points out that the college students' loneliness isn't necessarily an aversive experience; On the contrary, many college students view modest loneliness as a motivational factor and thus think
     it plays a positive role. Multiple differences in sex, source, major, academic rank, grade and the nature of the school, have been found on each dimension's scores and on the total loneliness scores.
    There are several new ideas brought forth by this paper as follows: a) One should explore the concept of loneliness not only in the field of social relationships, but also in the broad range of social life, b) View the concept of loneliness by including the individual's development. College students' loneliness and their self-identity development are combined in this paper to explore their loneliness, c) Results of this study suggested that not all college students' loneliness is an aversive experience. Modest loneliness may motivate one's activities and thus play a positive role, d) A questionnaire of the loneliness structure of college students in Henan Province has been
    
    
    developed in this study and it proves to have high reliability and validity by means of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmative Factor Analysis.
    Implications for future research are discussed.
引文
1 谢斌.当代大学的紧迫课题:大学生心理健康教育.机械工业高教研究,200l,3:39-43
    2 Daniel Perlman, Monica A. Landolt. Examination of Loneliness in Children-Adolencents and in Adults: Two Solitudes or Unified Enterprise. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999. 335
    3 Malka Margalit. Loneliness among children with special needs: theory, research, coping, and intervention. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1994.5-9
    4 Kim B. Burgess, Gary W. Ladd, Becky J. Kochenderger etal. Loneliness During Early Childhood:The Role of Interpersonal Behaviors and Relationships. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999. 109
    5 Jude Cassidy, Lisa J. Berlin. Understand the Origins of Childhood Loneliness: Contributions of Attachment Theory. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999.34
    6 Daniel Perlman, Monica A. Landolt. Examination of Loneliness in Children-Adolencents and in Adults: Two Solitudes or Unified Enterprise. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom:The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999. 342-344
    7 汪向东,王希林,马弘等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:282-305
    8 Beverley Terrell—Deutsch. The Conceptualization and Measurement of Childhood Loneliness. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999.14-18
    9 Goossens Luc, Beyers Wim. Comparing Measures of Childhood Loneliness: Internal Consistency and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 2002, 31(2): 252-263
    10 Daniel Perlman, Monica A. Landolt. Examination of Loneliness in Children-Adolencents and in Adults: Two Solitudes or Unified Enterprise. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999.333—337
    11 Daniel Perlman, Monica A. Landolt. Examination of Loneliness in Children-Adolencents and in Adults: Two Solitudes or Unified Enterprise. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999.338—339
    12 H.Cheng, A.Furnham. Personality, Peer Relations, and Self-Confidence As Predictors of Happiness and Loneliness. Journal of Adolescence, 2002,25(3): 327-339
    13 P.Martin, B.Hagberg, L.W. Poon. Predictors of loneliness in centenarians: A parallel study Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 1997,12(3): 203-224
    14 O. Kim. Predictors of Loneliness in Elderly Korean Immigrant Women Living in the United States of America. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1999,29(5): 1082-1088
    15 Pierce.Gregory R, Sarason. Irwin G, Sarason, Barbara R. General and Relationship-Based Perceptions of Social Support: Are Two Constructs Better Than One? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1991, 61(6): 1028-1039
    
    
    16 L.A. Kirkpatrick, D.J. Shillito, S.L. Kellas. Loneliness, Social Suport, and Perceived Relationship with God. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1999,16(4):513-522
    17 H.D.Johnson, J.C.LaVoie, M.Mahoney. Interparental Conflict and Family Cohesion: Predictors of Loneliness, Social Anxiety, and Social Avoidance in Late Adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research. 2001, 16 (3):304-318
    18 Anderson, Craig A, Miller, Rowland S, Riger, Alice L, Dill, Jody C, et al. Behavioral and Characterological Attributional Styles as Predictors of Depression and Loneliness. Review, refinement, and Test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1994, 66(3):549-558
    19 Parker Jeffrey G, Asher Steven R. Friendship and Friendship Quality in Middle Childhood: Links with Peer Group Acceptance and Feelings of Loneliness and Social Dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 1993,29(4):611-621
    20 B.Kochenderfer-Ladd, J.L. Wardrop. Chronicity and Instability of Children's Peer Victimization Experiences as Predictors of Loneliness and Social Satisfaction Trajectories. Child Development. 2001,72(1):134-151
    21 K.M.Cramer, K.A.Neyedle. Sex Differences in Loneliness: The Role of Masculinity and Femininity. Sex Roles. 1998,38(7):645-653
    22 J. de Jong-Gierveld, D.Kromhout, M. Tijhuis,E.Feskens. Changes in and Factors Related to Loneliness in Older Men. The Zutphen Elderly Study. Age and Ageing,1999,28(5): 491-495
    23 Chris Segrin, Jeanne Flora. Perceptions of Relational Histories, Marital Quality and Loneliness When Communication is Limited: An Examination of Married Prison Inmates. Journal of Family Communication. 2001,1(3):151-173
    24 Rotenberg, Ken J. Gruman, Jamie A. Ariganello, Meilisa. Behavioral Confirmation of the Loneliness Stereotype. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 2002, 24 (2): 81-89
    25 S.McGuire; J.Clifford. Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Loneliness in Children. Psychological Science. 2000,11(6): 487-491
    26 A.Rokach, T.Orzeck, J.Cripps, K.Lackovic-Grgin, Z.Penezic. The Effects of Culture on the Meaning of Loneliness. Social Indicators Research, 2001, 53 (1): 17-31
    27 Rokach Ami, Orzeck Tricia, Moya Miguei C, Exposito Francisca. Causes of Loneliness in North America and Spain. European Psychologist, 2002,7(1): 70-79
    28 Rokach Ami, Bauer, Natasha, Orzeck, Tricia. The Experience of Loneliness of Canadian and Czech youth. Journal of Adolescence, 2003, 26 (3): 267, 16p
    29 J. de Jong Gierveld, T. van Tilburg. Living Arrangements of Older Adults in the Netherlands and Italy: Coresidence Values and Behaviour and Their Consequences for Loneliness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 1999,14(1): 1-24
    30 Malikiosi-Loizos. Maria, Anderson.Lynn R. Accessible Friendships, Inclusive Friendships, Reciprocated Friendships as Related to Social and Emotional Loneliness in Greece and the USA. European Psychologist. 1999, 4(3): 165-178
    31 C.A.Anderson. Attributional Style, Depression, and Loneliness: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Chinese Students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999,25 (4):482-499
    32 Shireen Pavri, Lisa Monda-Amaya. Loneliness and Students with Learning Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms: Self-Perceptions, Coping Strategies, and Preferred Interventions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 2000,15(1):22-33
    33 Cooper Alvin, McCormack William A. Short-term Group Treatment for Adult Children of Alcoholics. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1992,39(3):350-355
    34 Ami Rokach, Heather Brock. Coping with Loneliness. The Journal of Psychology. 1998,132(1):107-127
    35 Qualter. Pamela. Loneliness in Children and Adolescents: What do Schools and Teachers Need
    
    to Know and How can They Help? Pastoral Care in Education, 2003,21(2): 10,9p
    36 骆光林,阮俊华,楼成礼等.大学生孤独心理的调查与分析.浙江大学学报(理学版),1999,26(3):112-115
    37 孟晋.533名大学生孤独感状况调查.健康心理学杂志,2002,10(2):113—116
    38 王希林,任桂英,赵晓明.孤独、抑郁情绪及其相互关系探讨.中国心理卫生杂志,2000,14(6):367-369
    39 李传银.549名大学生孤独心理及相关因素分析.中国行为医学科学,2000,9(6):429-435
    40 刘娅俐.孤独与自尊、抑郁的相关探讨.中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(3):115-116
    41 王登峰.Russell孤独量表的信度与效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志.1995,3(1):23-25
    42 李传银.大学生孤独心理的干预研究.山东省青年管理干部学院学报,2003,1:46-48
    43 赵芃.大学生孤独心理的成因与防治.思想教育研究,1998,6:42-43
    44 李传银.大学生的孤独心理探析.淄博师专学报,1998,3:78-80
    45 任国荣.新生孤独心理及其调适.河北师范大学学报(社会科学版),1996,19(4):121-123
    46 骆光林,阮俊华,楼成礼等.大学生孤独心理的调查与分析.浙江大学学报(理学版),1999,26(3):112-115
    47 刘娅俐.孤独与自尊、抑郁的相关探讨.中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(3):115-116
    48 李传银,檀立,刘娅俐.大中专生孤独、抑郁比较研究.健康心理学杂志,1998,6(1):86-87
    49 王希林,任桂英,赵晓明.孤独、抑郁情绪及其相互关系探讨.中国心理卫生杂志,2000,14(6):367-369
    50 孟晋.533名大学生孤独感状况调查.健康心理学杂志,2002,10(2):113-116
    51 李传银.549名大学生孤独心理及相关因素分析.中国行为医学科学,2000,9(6):429-435
    52 王登峰.Russell孤独量表的信度与效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志.1995,3(1):23-25
    53 李传银.大学生孤独心理的干预研究.山东省青年管理干部学院学报,2003,1:46-48
    54 Malka Margalit. Loneliness among children with special needs: theory, research, coping, and intervention. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1994.5
    55 朱汉国.关于社会史研究的若干问题——以民国时期的社会史研究为例.史学月刊,1998(3):82-91
    56 Daniel Perlman, Monica A. Landolt. Examination of Loneliness in Children-Adolencents and in Adults: Two Solitudes or Unified Enterprise. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999. 342-344
    57 张青方,郑日昌.青少年自我同一危机量表的信度、效度检验.中国心理卫生杂志,2002,16(5):304-307
    58 刘云艳,张大均.幼儿好奇心结构的探索性因素分析.心理科学,2004,27(1):127-129
    59 张青方,郑日昌.青少年自我同一危机量表的信度、效度检验.中国心理卫生杂志,2002,16(5):304-307
    60 车文博主编.弗洛伊德主义论评.吉林:吉林教育出版社,1992.1040
    61 刘国权.论“自我同一性”.松辽学刊(社会科学版).1995,(2):103-107
    62 郑宁.从埃里克森自我同一性理论看当代大学生人格发展.北京建筑工程学院学报,2000,16(4):106
    63 黄希庭.人格心理学.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2002年版:143-145
    64 Lorrie K. Sippola, William M.Bukowski. Self, Other, and Loneliness From A Development Perspective. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999.331
    
    
    65 佘双好.当代青年人学生价值观念基本特征及发展走向透析.当代青年研究,2002(1):6-10
    66 郑涌,黄希庭.自我概念的结构:Ⅱ大学生自我概念维度的因素探析.西南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版).1998,(5):51-56
    67 黄希庭.人格心理学.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2002年版:143
    68 洛神.孤独.http://wenxue.lycos.com.cn/yc/books/435/43455/1/1.html
    69 Daniel Perlman, Monica A. Landolt. Examination of Loneliness in Children-Adolencents and in Adults: Two Solitudes or Unified Enterprise. In: Ken J. Rotenberg, Shelley Hymel. Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, United Kingdom:The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999.331
    70 阴国恩.心理与教育科学研究方法.天津:南开大学出版社,1996年版:179-193
    71 汪向东,王希林,马弘等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:282
    72 郭金山.西方心理学自我同一性概念的解析.心理科学进展,2003,11(2):227-234
    73 Madrid, Jo Anna. Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Skills, and Loneliness. MA
    74 Kraut Robert, Patterson Michael, Lundmark Vicki, Kiesler Sara, Mukophadhyay Tridas, Scherlis William. Internet paradox." A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist. 1998,53(9):1017-1031
    75 Fogel Joshua, Albert Steven M, Schnabel Freya, Ditkoff Beth Ann, Neugut Alfred Ⅰ. Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychology. 2002,21(4): 398-404

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700