竞业限制制度研究
|
摘要
我国新颁布的《劳动合同法》第22条、23条和24条对竞业限制的主体、范围、地域、期限以及补偿方式做出了明确的规定,这些规定很好的规范了现实中日益增多的竞业限制争议,使得这些争议有法可依。但是,我国立法对竞业限制制度还是没有系统的规定,在该制度的保护对象和认定竞业限制协议的有效的标准上还存在着立法缺失。
本文从竞业限制与商业秘密保护的关系出发,论述了竞业限制的含义、性质及法理基础。本文还重点论述了竞业限制是商业秘密保护的必要补充,并通过比较法介绍和评价了域外法和实践关于竞业限制制度的规定以及针对目前我国竞业限制制度立法和司法的不足提出了完善该制度的建议。
全文共分五部分,具体如下:
引言部分主要论述了论文选题的背景和意义,论文的主要研究领域、研究内容、研究方法以及预期取得的研究成果。
竞业限制制度的一般性分析部分主要包括竞业限制制度的含义、性质、与商业秘密保护的关系及其法理基础。该部分创新之处在竞业限制和商业秘密保护的关系方面。笔者认为,竞业限制制度在保护商业秘密上比传统的商业秘密保护制度有优势,同时竞业限制制度保护的对象又不限于商业秘密,而是包括商业秘密在内的雇主的正当合法的权益。
竞业限制域外法和实践之比较研究部分主要比较研究了英美法系和大陆法系几个法制比较成熟的国家有关竞业限制制度的立法规定和实践做法。笔者希望通过比较法研究能对完善我国竞业限制制度起启示作用。
竞业限制协议的规范化和认可这一部分是在第二章比较法研究上的归纳和提炼。该部分既提出了认定竞业限制协议有效的原则性标准,也对规范竞业限制制度的具体考量因素做了详细的论述。
我国竞业限制制度的评价和完善部分从我国竞业限制制度在现行立法和实践中的不足谈起,针对性地从立法和司法两个方面,从微观和宏观两个层面,提出了完善我国竞业限制制度的建议。
结束语谈到竞业限制协议在社会经济生活中大量存在,制度规定的不足,导致同案不同判的情形时有发生,劳资双方及社会公共利益不能有效平衡,研究竟业限制制度已成为必要。
China's new "Labor Contract Law" Section 22, 23 and 24 pairs of the main research center, scope, geographic, as well as compensation for ways to make clear rules which regulate the good growing reality The research center controversy, the law makes these disputes. However, the research center of China's legislative system is not the system, the target system and the protection of the not to compete agreement that effective standards still exist in the legislative defect.
In this paper, research center and the protection of commercial secrets of the relationship, a research center on the meaning of nature and legal basis. This paper also focuses on a research center in the protection of commercial secrets is a necessary complement to, and through comparison and evaluation of the law on extra-territorial law and practice on the system requirements as well as a research center on China's current research center is legislative and judicial system to the inadequate the refinement of the system.
The full text is divided into five parts, as follows:
Introduction of the main topics discussed papers on the background and significance of the main thesis research, study, research methods as well as the expected research results.
Chapter 1 research center in the general analysis system
The main part of the meaning of the system including research center, nature, and the relationship between the protection of commercial secrets and its legal basis. Part of the innovation in the research center and the protection of commercial secrets relations. In my view, no compete system in the protection of commercial secrets than the traditional commercial secret protection system has advantages and research center in the target system is not limited to the protection of commercial secrets, commercial secrets, but also the legitimacy of the employer's interests.
Chapter II research center outside the law and practice of comparative study Comparison of the main part of the common law and civil law legal system several more mature system of the relevant national research center in the legislative provisions and practices. The author hopes that by comparing the method can improve our system from the research center Enlightenment role.
Chapter III no compete agreement and recognition of the standardization
In the second part of this chapter comparison study of the method of induction and refining. Both part of the no compete agreement that put forward the principle of effective standards, but also in regulating the research center system to the specific considerations are discussed in detail.
Chapter IV research center in China and improve the evaluation system
Part of the system from China's research center in the existing legislation and practice about the shortcomings, targeted two from the Legislature and the Judiciary, from the micro and macro levels, and improve our research center in the proposed system.
Part V conclusion
Concluding remarks on no compete agreement in the socio-economic life of a large number exists, the system provides inadequate, resulting in co-different judgments in the cases occur from time to time, both employers and employees and the community can not effectively balance the public interest to study the system has become necessary research center.
本文从竞业限制与商业秘密保护的关系出发,论述了竞业限制的含义、性质及法理基础。本文还重点论述了竞业限制是商业秘密保护的必要补充,并通过比较法介绍和评价了域外法和实践关于竞业限制制度的规定以及针对目前我国竞业限制制度立法和司法的不足提出了完善该制度的建议。
全文共分五部分,具体如下:
引言部分主要论述了论文选题的背景和意义,论文的主要研究领域、研究内容、研究方法以及预期取得的研究成果。
竞业限制制度的一般性分析部分主要包括竞业限制制度的含义、性质、与商业秘密保护的关系及其法理基础。该部分创新之处在竞业限制和商业秘密保护的关系方面。笔者认为,竞业限制制度在保护商业秘密上比传统的商业秘密保护制度有优势,同时竞业限制制度保护的对象又不限于商业秘密,而是包括商业秘密在内的雇主的正当合法的权益。
竞业限制域外法和实践之比较研究部分主要比较研究了英美法系和大陆法系几个法制比较成熟的国家有关竞业限制制度的立法规定和实践做法。笔者希望通过比较法研究能对完善我国竞业限制制度起启示作用。
竞业限制协议的规范化和认可这一部分是在第二章比较法研究上的归纳和提炼。该部分既提出了认定竞业限制协议有效的原则性标准,也对规范竞业限制制度的具体考量因素做了详细的论述。
我国竞业限制制度的评价和完善部分从我国竞业限制制度在现行立法和实践中的不足谈起,针对性地从立法和司法两个方面,从微观和宏观两个层面,提出了完善我国竞业限制制度的建议。
结束语谈到竞业限制协议在社会经济生活中大量存在,制度规定的不足,导致同案不同判的情形时有发生,劳资双方及社会公共利益不能有效平衡,研究竟业限制制度已成为必要。
China's new "Labor Contract Law" Section 22, 23 and 24 pairs of the main research center, scope, geographic, as well as compensation for ways to make clear rules which regulate the good growing reality The research center controversy, the law makes these disputes. However, the research center of China's legislative system is not the system, the target system and the protection of the not to compete agreement that effective standards still exist in the legislative defect.
In this paper, research center and the protection of commercial secrets of the relationship, a research center on the meaning of nature and legal basis. This paper also focuses on a research center in the protection of commercial secrets is a necessary complement to, and through comparison and evaluation of the law on extra-territorial law and practice on the system requirements as well as a research center on China's current research center is legislative and judicial system to the inadequate the refinement of the system.
The full text is divided into five parts, as follows:
Introduction of the main topics discussed papers on the background and significance of the main thesis research, study, research methods as well as the expected research results.
Chapter 1 research center in the general analysis system
The main part of the meaning of the system including research center, nature, and the relationship between the protection of commercial secrets and its legal basis. Part of the innovation in the research center and the protection of commercial secrets relations. In my view, no compete system in the protection of commercial secrets than the traditional commercial secret protection system has advantages and research center in the target system is not limited to the protection of commercial secrets, commercial secrets, but also the legitimacy of the employer's interests.
Chapter II research center outside the law and practice of comparative study Comparison of the main part of the common law and civil law legal system several more mature system of the relevant national research center in the legislative provisions and practices. The author hopes that by comparing the method can improve our system from the research center Enlightenment role.
Chapter III no compete agreement and recognition of the standardization
In the second part of this chapter comparison study of the method of induction and refining. Both part of the no compete agreement that put forward the principle of effective standards, but also in regulating the research center system to the specific considerations are discussed in detail.
Chapter IV research center in China and improve the evaluation system
Part of the system from China's research center in the existing legislation and practice about the shortcomings, targeted two from the Legislature and the Judiciary, from the micro and macro levels, and improve our research center in the proposed system.
Part V conclusion
Concluding remarks on no compete agreement in the socio-economic life of a large number exists, the system provides inadequate, resulting in co-different judgments in the cases occur from time to time, both employers and employees and the community can not effectively balance the public interest to study the system has become necessary research center.
引文
[1]刘清波.民法问题研究[M].台湾:台湾三联出版社,1996.316.
[2]同上。
[1]方龙华.商业秘密竟业禁止若干问题研讨[J].法商研究,1996,(6).
[1]防祥俊.反不正当竞争法新论[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2001,[5].714.
[1][美]罗伯特·P·墨杰斯彼特·S·迈乃尔等.新技术时代的知识产权法[M].齐药,张清等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.40.
[1][美]罗伯特·P·墨杰斯彼特·S·迈乃尔等.新技术时代的知识产权法[M].齐药,张清等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.40.
[1]赵焕芝.商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止协议制度研究(硕士学位论文)[D].山东:山东大学,2007.3.
[1]赵焕芝.商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止协议制度研究(硕士学位论文)[D].山东:山东大学,2007.3.
[2]Nakoshi.日本新商业秘密法[M].1993.
[1]张玉瑞.商业秘密法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.426.
[2]张凯娜.竞业禁止与营业秘密之保护[J].台湾:月旦杂志(20).52.
[1]美国1994年《得克萨斯州商业和贸易行为规范》第15条。
[1]陈琪遐.竞业禁止应以保障劳动者平等就业权为原则http://rmfyb.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=116554,2008-01-31.
[1]张玉瑞.商业秘密法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.269.
[1]林立发.跳槽:竞业禁止与保密条款[J].台湾:万国法律2006.85.
[2]陆平辉.利益冲突的法律控制[J].北京:法制与社会发展,2003.60.
[1]韩立余.美国对外贸易中的知识产权保护[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2006.
[2]孔祥俊.商业秘密保护法原理[M].北京:中国法制出版社年版,2005.
[3]李明德.美国知识产权法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
[4]刘清波.民法问题研究[M].台湾:台湾三联出版社,1996.316.
[5]谢铭洋,古清华,丁中原,张凯娜.营业秘密法解读[M].北京:中国政法大学,2003..
[6]徐德敏.知识产权法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[7]张乃根.国际贸易中的知识产权[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999.
[8]郑成思.知识产权文丛[C].北京:中国方正出版社,2003.
[9][美]罗伯特·P·墨杰斯彼特·S·迈乃尔等.新技术时代的知识产权法[M].齐药,张清等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003,(10).40.
[10]Nakoshi.日本新商业秘密法[M].1993.
[11]Stephen M.知识产权法案例与解析[M].北京:中信出版社,2003.
[1]吕宇林.论商业秘密的界定及法律保护(硕士学位论文)[D].北京:中国政法大学,2006,(11).
[2]叶志军.论竞业禁止协议的法律保护(硕士学位论文)[D].北京:中国政法大学,2006.
[3]赵唤之.商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止协议制度研究(硕士学位论文)[D].山东:山东大学,2007,(3).
[1]崔文星.侵害商业秘密行为的构成及其司法考量_兼评当竞争民事纠纷案件适用法律若干思考[J].北京:专题探讨,2007,(4).
[2]单海玲.离职雇员的商业秘密管制_竞业禁止与保密义务[J].专题探讨,2007,(4).
[3]方龙华.商业秘密竞业禁止若干问题研讨[J].法商研究,1996,(6).
[4]韩薇.浅析商业秘密[J].法制与社会,2007,(6).
[5]韩中节.商业秘密侵权案什的几点思考[J].北京:法律适用,2007,(6).
[6]黄武双.美国商:业秘密保护法的不可避免泄露规则及对我国的启示[J].法学,2007,(8).
[7]李祖明.高素质的执法队伍是商业秘密保护的关键[J].前沿,2006,(5).
[8]林立发.跳槽:竞业禁止与保密条款[J].台湾:万国法律2006,(10).85.
[9]陆平辉.利益冲突的法律控制[J].北京:法制与社会发展,2003,(2).60.
[10]彭心龙.竞业禁止与利益平衡[J].武汉:武汉大学学报,2006,(1).
[11]全球十大经典商业间谍案[J].北京:经营者,2007,(4).
[12]施丽.论企业商业秘密的保护[J]一匕京:前沿,2007,(7).
[13]烁丽娜.侵犯商业秘密的认定与救济[J].北京:前沿,2007,(8).
[14]宋慧.论我国对商业秘密保护的完善-以Trips视野反观我国首个反不正当竞争法司法解释[J].新学术,2007,(3).
[15]宋丽.技术工人携专利技术跳槽是否侵犯他人商业秘密[J].知识产权,2001,(5).
[16]王奎.美中商业秘密内涵的思考[J].政法论坛,2007,(5).
[17]魏浩征.点评2005年10大劳动争议案_上[J].经济问题探索,2004,(9).
[18]文剑.论英国法下员工的保密责任[J].论点与思考,2006,(2).
[19]徐瑜.浅析竞业禁止与人才的自由流动[J].财经界,2007,(1).
[20]尹明理、李原.论竞争情报在企业发展中的地位[J].管理创新,2007,(6).
[21]于海燕.商业秘密侵权诉讼举证问题探析[J].北京:法律适用,2007,(8).
[22]张景朝.商业秘密侵权案例研究专题[J].北京:工商行政管理,2007,(6).
[23]张婧.商业秘密侵权中的善意第三人责任探究[J].北京:前沿,2006,(3).
[24]赵松.论企业商业秘密的竞业禁止协议保护[J].商业经济,2006,(2).
[25]朱妙春.华明公司商业秘密案代理纪实[J].知识产权研究,2005,(3).
[26]朱妙春.证据之战_减水剂案代理纪实[J].上海:律师手记,2007,(7).[27]邹开亮.企业知识产权战略的实施及应对_基于对江中集团知识产权战略的实证分析[J].企业实证,2007,(4).
[2]同上。
[1]方龙华.商业秘密竟业禁止若干问题研讨[J].法商研究,1996,(6).
[1]防祥俊.反不正当竞争法新论[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2001,[5].714.
[1][美]罗伯特·P·墨杰斯彼特·S·迈乃尔等.新技术时代的知识产权法[M].齐药,张清等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.40.
[1][美]罗伯特·P·墨杰斯彼特·S·迈乃尔等.新技术时代的知识产权法[M].齐药,张清等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.40.
[1]赵焕芝.商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止协议制度研究(硕士学位论文)[D].山东:山东大学,2007.3.
[1]赵焕芝.商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止协议制度研究(硕士学位论文)[D].山东:山东大学,2007.3.
[2]Nakoshi.日本新商业秘密法[M].1993.
[1]张玉瑞.商业秘密法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.426.
[2]张凯娜.竞业禁止与营业秘密之保护[J].台湾:月旦杂志(20).52.
[1]美国1994年《得克萨斯州商业和贸易行为规范》第15条。
[1]陈琪遐.竞业禁止应以保障劳动者平等就业权为原则http://rmfyb.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=116554,2008-01-31.
[1]张玉瑞.商业秘密法学[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.269.
[1]林立发.跳槽:竞业禁止与保密条款[J].台湾:万国法律2006.85.
[2]陆平辉.利益冲突的法律控制[J].北京:法制与社会发展,2003.60.
[1]韩立余.美国对外贸易中的知识产权保护[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2006.
[2]孔祥俊.商业秘密保护法原理[M].北京:中国法制出版社年版,2005.
[3]李明德.美国知识产权法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
[4]刘清波.民法问题研究[M].台湾:台湾三联出版社,1996.316.
[5]谢铭洋,古清华,丁中原,张凯娜.营业秘密法解读[M].北京:中国政法大学,2003..
[6]徐德敏.知识产权法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
[7]张乃根.国际贸易中的知识产权[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999.
[8]郑成思.知识产权文丛[C].北京:中国方正出版社,2003.
[9][美]罗伯特·P·墨杰斯彼特·S·迈乃尔等.新技术时代的知识产权法[M].齐药,张清等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003,(10).40.
[10]Nakoshi.日本新商业秘密法[M].1993.
[11]Stephen M.知识产权法案例与解析[M].北京:中信出版社,2003.
[1]吕宇林.论商业秘密的界定及法律保护(硕士学位论文)[D].北京:中国政法大学,2006,(11).
[2]叶志军.论竞业禁止协议的法律保护(硕士学位论文)[D].北京:中国政法大学,2006.
[3]赵唤之.商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止协议制度研究(硕士学位论文)[D].山东:山东大学,2007,(3).
[1]崔文星.侵害商业秘密行为的构成及其司法考量_兼评当竞争民事纠纷案件适用法律若干思考[J].北京:专题探讨,2007,(4).
[2]单海玲.离职雇员的商业秘密管制_竞业禁止与保密义务[J].专题探讨,2007,(4).
[3]方龙华.商业秘密竞业禁止若干问题研讨[J].法商研究,1996,(6).
[4]韩薇.浅析商业秘密[J].法制与社会,2007,(6).
[5]韩中节.商业秘密侵权案什的几点思考[J].北京:法律适用,2007,(6).
[6]黄武双.美国商:业秘密保护法的不可避免泄露规则及对我国的启示[J].法学,2007,(8).
[7]李祖明.高素质的执法队伍是商业秘密保护的关键[J].前沿,2006,(5).
[8]林立发.跳槽:竞业禁止与保密条款[J].台湾:万国法律2006,(10).85.
[9]陆平辉.利益冲突的法律控制[J].北京:法制与社会发展,2003,(2).60.
[10]彭心龙.竞业禁止与利益平衡[J].武汉:武汉大学学报,2006,(1).
[11]全球十大经典商业间谍案[J].北京:经营者,2007,(4).
[12]施丽.论企业商业秘密的保护[J]一匕京:前沿,2007,(7).
[13]烁丽娜.侵犯商业秘密的认定与救济[J].北京:前沿,2007,(8).
[14]宋慧.论我国对商业秘密保护的完善-以Trips视野反观我国首个反不正当竞争法司法解释[J].新学术,2007,(3).
[15]宋丽.技术工人携专利技术跳槽是否侵犯他人商业秘密[J].知识产权,2001,(5).
[16]王奎.美中商业秘密内涵的思考[J].政法论坛,2007,(5).
[17]魏浩征.点评2005年10大劳动争议案_上[J].经济问题探索,2004,(9).
[18]文剑.论英国法下员工的保密责任[J].论点与思考,2006,(2).
[19]徐瑜.浅析竞业禁止与人才的自由流动[J].财经界,2007,(1).
[20]尹明理、李原.论竞争情报在企业发展中的地位[J].管理创新,2007,(6).
[21]于海燕.商业秘密侵权诉讼举证问题探析[J].北京:法律适用,2007,(8).
[22]张景朝.商业秘密侵权案例研究专题[J].北京:工商行政管理,2007,(6).
[23]张婧.商业秘密侵权中的善意第三人责任探究[J].北京:前沿,2006,(3).
[24]赵松.论企业商业秘密的竞业禁止协议保护[J].商业经济,2006,(2).
[25]朱妙春.华明公司商业秘密案代理纪实[J].知识产权研究,2005,(3).
[26]朱妙春.证据之战_减水剂案代理纪实[J].上海:律师手记,2007,(7).[27]邹开亮.企业知识产权战略的实施及应对_基于对江中集团知识产权战略的实证分析[J].企业实证,2007,(4).