跳远摆臂技术对起跳效果影响的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着跳远运动成绩的不断提高,人们越来越认识到起跳动作是跳远技术的主要环节,并且这一结论已被大量的理论及运动实践所证实。而起跳技术是由起跳腿的缓冲与蹬伸,并配合摆动动作的有效摆动来完成的。通过查阅有关的文献资料并进行整理分析后发现,目前,国内外关于跳远起跳动作的研究大多集中于起跳腿在起跳阶段的效应及其对运动成绩的影响方面,而对于摆动动作,尤其是上肢摆臂技术在起跳过程中的作用,研究的较少,也未引起人们足够重视。事实上,摆臂技术起着很重要的上下肢协调和配合作用。很多国外优秀的运动员,都是具备出色的助跑速度和向前性,并且也具备良好准确的踏板起跳技术,这为取得优异的跳远成绩打下了良好殷实的基础。
     然而,良好的助跑和踏跳是靠稳固的技术基础作为铺垫。无论是助跑的速度,向前性,还是踏板起跳的准确度都和运动员上下肢的配合是分不开的。一般来说,下肢是占着主导型作用,国外优秀的运动员具备良好的下肢技术优势,所以很多学者,对下肢技术研究较多也较深。一般我们认为在跳远助跑中,起跑,加速跑,途中跑,板前加速这四个环节是助跑技术好坏的关键,因此无论在教学还是训练中,教练员或教师都非常重视下肢技术,以便能更直接更快速的提高跳远成绩。而在上肢摆臂技术的教学和训练中,普遍不受教师甚至教练员的重视,而且教学方法及训练手段也较为单一。因此我们常常可以看到,许多学生或者运动员的摆臂动作存在很大的问题。例如不协调,不积极,方向不正,动作僵硬等不合理的技术现象。这样的错误技术其实再很大程度上影响着运动员在助跑或起跳中上下肢的配合,而不协调完善的上下肢动作,其实对跳远成绩有很大的制约,并且或多或少影响着成绩的发挥。有的学者或专家认为:“手臂动作越快,腿的动作越快”,“手臂动作越平稳,步子也就越平稳”,“助跑速度是摆臂加摆腿”。由此,我们可以看出,上肢摆臂的技术效果对跳远助跑和起跳其实有着非常重要的意义。所以,教师或者教练员不应在教学与训练中只重视到运动员下肢技术动作,而完全忽视上肢技术尤其是手臂动作。不止确的上肢技术可以造成整个技术动作不连贯不协调,甚至形成错误的技术动作,这样同样很人程度上影响着助跑的准确度及速度,严重的,同样会影响到跳远成绩的发挥。
     据此本文研究上肢摆臂技术,通过对陕西省体育运动学校田径队10名跳远运动员进行三个实验研究:一、摆臂技术可以加强运动员下肢在助跑中的后蹬力量的实验;二、伸掌摆臂与手掌半握拳摆臂在摆臂频率上存在不同差异的实验;三、上肢摆臂技术对于提高跳远中助跑步频的实验。通过对这三个实验研究的结果发现:1,要想发挥出下肢腿部最人力量是不能单纯的用支撑腿后蹬。后蹬力量是源于人的整体动作,摆臂可以加大下肢后蹬的力量,这样对助跑的向前性及速度都有较大的帮助。2,手掌半握拳摆臂前臂距离较短,而伸掌摆臂能够提高助跑速度。因为手掌半握拳摆臂不具备手掌的牵引作用。摆臂的力量和幅度较小。这样会影响了助跑的速度发挥,因为它对下肢助跑时的频率和步幅提高并不人。3,实验数据表明,运动员摆臂与不摆臂,甚至摆臂的好坏,对助跑的步频影响非常人,而步频也是决定起跳效果好坏的因素之一
     当前,优秀男子跳远运动员在助跑最后十米的速度已经达到10.65-11.25米/秒,在如此高速助跑的情况下,如果想将跳远项目的成绩水平推向一个新的阶段,进一步提高运动成绩,并向人类极限发起挑战,那么,起跳瞬间的蹬摆技术高度统一、协调用力就成为了整个起跳动作的关键,因此,研究起跳过程中的摆臂动作技术的运动学特征,并将这些技术细节问题归纳、总结,形成完整的、具有理论指导意义的研究成果,从中找出一些具有规律性的东西,使跳远技术项目更加系统和完善,使训练更加具有科学性和针对性,从而有效提高训练质量,为取得更为优异的成绩创造条件。
With the jumpers continue to improve, increasing awareness of action is to jump off the main aspects of technology, and, this conclusion has been a lot of theory and practice sports confirmed. The Take Off in the buffer by the take-off and kicking legs and swinging with the swing to the effective completion. By consulting the relevant literature and conducted and analyzed and found, at present, domestic and international action on the long jump take-off studies are focused on the take-off leg in the jump phase of the effect and its impact on their scores, and for swinging, especially the upper limb arm off the course in the role of the less, it did not attract enough attention. In fact, the swing arm technology plays a very important role in coordination and cooperation on the lower limbs. Many foreign athletes, all with excellent speed and ahead of the run-up, and also off the pedal with good accurate technology, which achieved excellent long jump to lay a good basis for well-off.
     However, a good approach and Jumping by a solid technical foundation is a foreshadowing. Both the run-up speed, forward of, or the accuracy of all the pedal off and athletes with upper and lower extremities are inseparable. In general, the lower extremity is occupied oriented role, the foreign athletes have a good technical advantages of lower extremities, many scholars have lower limb technology more deeply. Generally, we believe that in the run-up in the long jump, start, buildup, on the way to run, four links front of the board to speed up that run-up technology is the key to good or bad, so whether in teaching or training, coaches or teachers attach great importance to lower limb technology in order to more directly improve the long jump faster. Upper arm in the teaching and training in technology, the general attention from teachers and even coaches, and teaching methods and training methods are more simple. Therefore, we often see that many students or athletes there is a big problem arm movements. For example, lack of coordination, not positive, the direction is not straight, stiff and so unreasonable technical phenomenon. In fact, such a mistake again significantly influenced the technology players in the run-up or jump in with the upper and lower extremities, upper and lower limbs without perfect coordination of movements, in fact, long jump is very restricted, and the results more or less affected play. Some scholars or experts that:"the faster the arm action, leg action sooner," "The more smooth arm movements, the more stable pace," "run-up speed of arm plus leg swing." As a result, we can see that the technical effect of upper arm on the long jump approach and take-off has a very important fact. Therefore, teachers or coaches in teaching and training should not only attach importance to the Athletes Lower Extremity Technique, and completely ignore the technology, especially the upper arm movements. Incorrect technique can cause upper limb movements are not consistent throughout the technology uncoordinated, and even the formation of the wrong technology movements, such as a large extent influence the accuracy and speed of run-up, serious, it will also affect the long jump in the play.
     Accordingly this paper, upper arm technology, through the Shaanxi Provincial Sports School track and field team six 18-22 year-old man two long jumpers to three experimental studies:First, the swing arm technology can enhance the athletes in the run-up in the lower extremities after pedal power experiments; Second, Hand palm arm in arm with the palm arm fist half of the frequency difference between the existence of different experiments; third, upper arm technical assistance for improving the running long jump in the frequency of the experiment. Through these three experimental results of this study:1, in order to play the lower extremity leg strength is not simply the maximum use of the supporting leg after kicking. After kicking strength is derived from the overall action, after the pedal arm can increase leg strength, so that the forward to the run-up and speed are of great help.2, the hand arm forearm half-fist shorter distances, and Hand palm arm can improve the run-up speed. Because the arm does not have the palm of your hand palm fist half of the traction. Arm strength and a small range. This will affect the run-up speed of play, because of its lower limbs when the run-up to improve the frequency and stride length is not large.3, experimental data show that athletes with and without arm swing arm, and even arm is good or bad impact on the approach of the step frequency is very large, and the effect of stride frequency is good or bad decision to take off one of the factors.
     Currently, Long Jumpers speed of ten meters in the run-up has reached the final 10.65-11.25m/ s, high-speed run-up in such a case, if you want the level of achievement in the long jump to a new stage, to further improve athletic performance, challenge to human limits, then kicking off the moment technology is highly placed unified, coordinated force to become the key to the take-off action, and therefore the study arm off in the process of Kinematic Characteristics of action, and the technical details summarized the problem, summarize, a complete, theoretical significance of the research results, to find some things with regularity, the long jump more systematic and complete technology projects to make the training more scientific and relevant, so as to effectively improve training quality, to get more good results and create conditions.
引文
[1]董茜.跳远助跑速度利用率初探[J].体育科研,2006,11(9):201-214.
    [2]夏华.影响跳远助跑准确性的因素[J].上海体育学院学报,2004,4(6):11-12.
    [3]赵国雄.跳远助跑最后10m分段速度的研究[J].田径科技信息,2003,21(8):32.
    [4]侯日信,侯金云.助跑一决定跳远成绩的重要因素[J].田径,2004,3(8):41.
    [5]程万才,曹效文.关于跳远竞赛中助跑速度利用率以及心理因素的研究[J].体育科技,2005,12(9):6.
    [6]《体育心理学》[M].体育心理学编写组,高等教育出版社,1999,2.
    [7]《生物力学》[M].高等教育出版社,1999,7.
    [8]马冬梅.试论短跑中的摆臂技术[J].教育实践与研究,2002,8(5):26.
    [9]李玉森.摆臂技术队竞赛项目的影响[M].田径指南,中国田径协会,1996,3(4):78.
    [10]邹小更.先蹬地再摆臂[J]中国学校体育,2008,9(2):11.
    [11]冯树勇.我国高水平跳远运动员技术训练安排方面存在的问题[J].2002,21(7):13.
    [12]张建华.世界跳远运动发展特点及未来趋势[J].体育科研,2000,3(7):22.
    [13]阚文伟.对我国跳远技术和训练发展趋势的研究[J].中国体育教练员,2001,9(21):45-49.
    [14]D.D丘巴.跳远时身体重心移动的生物力学分析[J].体育理论与实践,1982,2(7):22.
    [15]佟艳华.水平速度的损失与跳远成绩之间的关系研究[J].中国体育科技,1999,12(5):112-120.
    [16]郭元奇.关于提高跳远运动员助跑准确性的研究[J].体育科学,2000,11(4):67.
    [17]蔡志坚.跳远踏跳阶段的生物力学分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2002,1(9):12-17.
    [18]马勇占.对我国跳远运动员助跑最后两步速度变化特征的研究[J].中国体育科技,2003,1(6):302-311.
    [19]马俊明.我国优秀男子跳远运动员助跑最后两步速度变化特征及研究[J].成都体育学院学报,2003,13(3):79.
    [20]徐勤儿.我国优秀男子跳远运动员起跳阶段若干指标分析[J].成都体育学院学报,2008,21(7):18-23.
    [21]张吾龙.我国优秀跳远运动员助跑过程的运动学分析[J].沈阳体育学院学报, 2008,4(3)18-19.
    [22]王丙振.影响我国优秀跳远运动员起跳效果主要因素的研究[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2008,5(2):33.
    [23]冯伟.影响我国跳远运动员助跑最后一步身体重心水平速度变化的因素[J].北京体育大学学报,2004,5(4):9-13.
    [24]李建臣.我国优秀女子跳远运动员助跑与起跳衔接技术运动因素研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2007,9(2):3.
    [25]滕树才.探讨挺身式跳远中摆臂技术的教法[J].中国教育与教学,2006,9
    [26]陈青.对我国高水平跳远运动员助跑准确性的研究[J].山西师大体育学院学报,2003,7(9):21.
    [27]林媛.浅析跳远的上肢技术特点[J].闽江职业大学学报,1999,1(7):15-18.
    [28]王东亚.我国优秀男子跳远运动员平跑速度对跳远成绩影响因素的研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2005,6(8):10.
    [29]丁伟.完善跳远技术评定指标的研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2007,1(1):4.
    [30]王振民.浅谈途中跑的摆臂技术[J].辽宁体育科技,998,(3):24-29.
    [31]孙艳萍.短距离跑中的摆臂技术[J].体育科技,(广西),1998,(4):52~56.
    [32]姚冰松.浅析跳远助跑接起跳及踏跳准确性的教学[J].贵州教育,2005(20):32.
    [33]林永捷.论跳远踏板准确性训练的调节与控制评论推荐[J].漳州师范学院学报,2006,(1).
    [34]肖威.心理学训练在田径运动中的应用[J].田径,2005,(7).
    [35]孙松珍.助跑速度与跳远成绩的相关性研究[D].许昌学院,2008.
    [36]孙庆杰.田径运动原理中决定跑速的因素[M].田径第二版高等体育教材,2001,(7):23.
    [37]李鸿江.跳远[M].田径教学训练使用丛书,2002,(7).
    [38]吴玲.中外男子跳远技术的发展趋势[J].安徽体育科技,2004,(2).
    [39]姚欣.近年我国田径跳跃项目科学研究的现状与发展[J].安徽体育科技,1997,(4).
    [40]丁伟.跳远助跑与起跳技术研究综述[J].首都体育学院学报,2005,3(2):15-18.
    [41]周继和.跳远助跑技术综述[J].成都体育学院学报,2000,(5).
    [42]刘新兰,林森华.跳远起跳技术你就综述[J].上海体育学院学报,2000,(11).
    [43]刘德松.论跳远成绩与助跑速度中几个相关因素的关系[J].湖北体育科技,2003,11(3):33-37.
    [44]杨青.我国优秀女子跳远运动员水平速度损失率研究[J].辽宁工学院学报,2002,(2):7-12
    [45]米卫国,杨学军.跳远助跑速度与起跳技术研究现状分析[J].体育科研,2003,4(4):2-8.
    [46]吾文生.谈跳远教学中不可忽视的摆臂技术[J].科技信息,2007,(11).
    [47]黄昌武.跳远中助跑摆臂技术的相关分析[J]湖南工业大学学报,2009,(11):4-6.
    [48]文超.田径运动高级教程[M].北京人民体育出版社,2003.
    [49]丁先琼.跑摆臂技术的分析与研究[J].云南师范大学学报,2002,11(5):33-39.
    [50]唐瑞群.途中跑关键技术综述[J].田径,2004,(4).

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700