磁共振功能成像对脑转移瘤放射治疗疗效评价的应用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的
     本课题研究目的是对脑转移瘤患者在放射治疗前后不同时间进行MRS及DTI扫描,测量放疗前后肿瘤内各代谢物值及扩散成像各指标值,分析各值及其与对侧正常脑组织比值的分布情况、随时间的变化趋势,并分析各数值与肿瘤体积变化的相关性,筛选出可以用做预测治疗效果的早期评价指标,评价MRS和DTI对脑转移瘤放射治疗疗效判断的应用价值,为临床医生选择恰当的治疗方法提供帮助。
     材料与方法
     收集2007年9月至2009年3月在中国医科大学附属第一临床学院放疗科接受头部颅脑X-刀联合全脑照射治疗的肺癌脑转移患者33例,均有病理学证实,其中男20例,女13例,年龄46~78岁,平均62.7岁。因中途患者死亡及不配合的患者有12例,纳入本组患者共21例,其中鳞癌6例,腺癌10例,小细胞癌5例,单发11例,多发10例,共计42个病灶。
     各病例分别于治疗前3天内、治疗后第1天、1周、1个月、3个月、6个月进行常规MR检查及MRS、DTI及3D SPGR序列检查。另外于治疗前、治疗后第3个月、6个月同时行MR增强扫描。头刀治疗使用西门子公司PRIMUS直线加速器,Brain LAB公司立体定向治疗系统及SCAN4.0版本三维计划系统进行靶点定位和剂量计算,所有病灶均采用分次治疗,4~6次完成,间隔1天。颅脑X-刀治疗前或治疗后间隔1周时问给予全脑照射(WBRT),3~4周完成。
     肿瘤治疗后的疗效评价:放射治疗结束6个月行增强MRI检查,与治疗前的增强MRI检查做对比,确定肿瘤退缩情况。采用WHO制定的实体肿瘤评价标准(1)完全缓解(CR):病灶完全消失;(2)部分缓解(PR):病灶缩小50%以上或出现失增强效应及瘤体囊性变;(3)病灶稳定(NC):病灶缩小不及50%,或增大未及25%;(4)病变进展(PD):病灶增大25%以上或靶区周边复发。将1、2、3级病灶纳入治疗有效组,4级病灶纳入治疗无效组。
     采用SPSS13.0软件进行统计分析,脑肿瘤在MRS及DTI中各数值采用均数±标准差表示。通过重复测量的方差分析来检验不同时间点数值有无统计学差异,组间两两比较采用L-S-D检验,并分析各数值随时间变化的趋势。采用多元逐步线性回归分析方法分析各值与肿瘤体积变化的相关性。
     结果
     一、磁共振波谱成像对脑转移瘤放射治疗疗效评价的应用研究
     1、不同时间点MRS各指标测量值与病理类型间均无交互作用。
     2、有效组与无效组间有统计学差异的指标有Cho/Cr、Cho/nCho、Cr/nCr(P<0.05)。
     3、不同组间Cho/Cr比值随时间变化的趋势不同。Cho/Cr比值在放疗后一周到一个月期问曲线走行相反,且放疗后一个月时无效组变化程度较大,为41.73%,有效组变化程度为-19.84%。
     4、有效组与无效组Cho/nCho比值在放疗后一周时差异最大,无效组在放疗后一周Cho/nCho比值出现明显增高,且与有效组间差异最大。而有效组Cho/nCho比值持续呈下降趋势。无效组变化程度为96.92%,有效组变化程度为-7.14%。
     5、有效组与无效组Cr/nCr比值在放疗后一周时差异最大,无效组在放疗后一周Cr/nCr比值出现明显增高,且与有效组间差异最大。而有效组Cr/nCr比值相对较平稳。无效组变化程度为158.91%,有效组变化程度为5.53%。
     6、指标Cho、Cho/Cr、Cho/nCho与体积之间存在显著的正相关关系,即随着体积的增大而逐渐增加,以Cho与体积变化的相关性最显著。
     二、磁共振扩散张量成像对脑转移瘤放射治疗疗效评价的应用研究
     1、不同时间点各指标测量值与病理类型间有无交互作用。
     2、有效组与无效组间有统计学差异的指标有FA,rFA值。
     3、有效组和无效组间FA值差别有统计学意义(P=0.015),不同时间点间FA值差别有统计学意义(P=0.000),不同组别间FA值随时间变化的趋势不同。有效组与无效组FA值的变化趋势均呈上升趋势,其中有效组放疗后一周至一个月时FA值变化程度较大,为24.66%,而无效组FA值均较有效组减低,且随时间延长整体略有升高,但变化不明显。
     4、有效组和无效组间差别有统计学意义(P=0.023),不同时间点间rFA峰值差别有统计学意义(P=0.017),rFA峰的时间与组别间存在交互作用(P=0.002),即不同组别间rFA峰值随时间变化的趋势不同。有效组rFA值的变化趋势均呈上升趋势,其中有效组放疗后一周开始上升,一周至一个月时FA值变化程度较大为17.38%,而无效组rFA值均较有效组减低,且随时间延长整体升高不明显。
     5、FA与体积之间存在显著的负相关关系(r=-0.847,P=0.033),即FA值随着体积的增大而逐渐减小。
     结论
     1、肺癌脑转移瘤放疗前后MRS各代谢物值及DTI各指标的变化与病理类型无关。
     2、放疗后肿瘤的Cho、Cho/Cr、Cho/nCho值随着体积的增大而逐渐增大,以Cho与体积变化的相关性最明显。FA值随着体积的增大而逐渐减小。
     3、放疗后一个月时Cho/Cr比值和FA值的变化方向及变化程度要早于肿瘤体积的变化,可作为早期预测治疗效果指标,Cho/Cr比值增加41.73%,表明肿瘤对放疗不敏感,治疗无效,Cho/Cr比值降低19.84%,表明放射治疗有效。而FA值增加24.66%,表明放射治疗有效,FA值变化不明显,表明肿瘤对放疗不敏感,治疗无效。
The purpose of this research was to measure the metabolite value and the index value in patients with brain metastases before and after radiotherapy by using MRS and DTI,analyze the value and the ratio of the tumor tissue to the contralateral normal brain tissue and the relationship between the values,screen the value that could be used for early prediction of efficacy.
     Methods and materials
     Thirty-three patients(20 male,13 female,age range from 46 to 78 years old, average 62.7 years old) with brain metastasis from pathologic confirmed lung cancer were treated by LINAC radiosurgery in combination with WBRT.21 cases were included in this group,but 12 cases were excluded because they died or didn't cooperate.There were 6 cases of squamous cell carcinoma,10 cases of adenocarcinoma, and 5 cases of small cell carcinoma.11 cases were with single lesion,10 cases were with multiple lesions,and with 42 lesions in all.All cases were underwent examination of MRS and DTI before treatment,1 day after treatment,1 week after treatment,1 month after treatment,3 months after treatment and 6 months after treatment. Contrast-enhanced MRI was undertaken before treatment,3 months after treatment and 6 months after treatment to get the precise change of metastatic volume.LINAC radiosurgery was undertaken by 6 MV X-ray,6-8Gy/F,1 day for interval,4-6 fractions in all,and in combination with WBRT.The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated 6 months after LINAC radiosurgery.Therapeutic efficacy was classified to complete response(CR),partial response(PR),stable disease(SD) and progressive disease(PD), and the metastases of PR,CR and SD belonged to efficacy significant group,as well as those of PD belonged to efficacy insignificant group.SPSS13.0 software was used for statistical analysis.The comparison of the examined values of MRS and DTI between the two groups was undertaken.The multiple stepwise linear regression was used to analysis the relevance between the tumor volume and the values.
     Results
     1,Application of MRS in evaluating the efficacy of patients with brain metastasis treated by radiotherapy
     There was no interaction between the pathologic type and MRS values at different time points.
     Cho/Cr,Cho/nCho,Cr/nCr had significant difference between the effective group and the ineffective group(P<0.05).Cho/Cr ratio was over time in different trends between the two groups.The curves were opposite at 1 week to 1 month.The changing degree was 41.73%in the ineffective group and -19.84%in the effective group.The curves of Cho/nCho,Cr/nCr were different at 1 week.The changing degree was 96.92%,158.91%in the ineffective group and -7.14%,5.53%in the effective group respectively.
     There was a significant positive correlation between Cho,Cho/Cr,Cho/nCho and metastatic volume.That was to say the ratios would increase with the volume increase. Cho had the most significant relevance.
     2,Application of DTI in evaluating the efficacy of patients with brain metastasis treated by radiotherapy
     There was no interaction between the pathologic type and DTI values at different time points.
     FA and rFA had significant difference between the effective group and the ineffective group.
     FA and rFA was over time in different trends between the two groups.The curves were opposite at 1 week to 1 month.The changing degree was 24.66%in the effective group,but did not change significantly in the ineffective group.
     There was a significant negative correlation between FA and the metastatic volume(r=-0.847,P=0.033).That was to say FA would decrease with the volume increase.
     Conclusion
     1,There was no interaction between the pathologic type and MRS and DTI values at different time points in brain metastasis from lung cancer.
     2,The value of Cho,Cho/Cr,and Cho/nCho would increase with the volume increase,but of FA would decrease with the volume increase.
     3,The change of the direction and degree of Cho/Cr and of FA 1 month after treatment was earlier than the change of volume,and could be used as the early indicators of the efficacy of radiotherapy.
引文
1 王志宁,李光,张晓萌等.颅脑X刀治疗脑转移瘤临床疗效分析.中华放射肿瘤学杂志.2007;16(1):38-41.
    2 殷蔚伯,谷铣之,主编.肿瘤放射治疗学(第三版).北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2002:236-286.
    3 Alesander E,Moriarty TM,Davis RB,et al.Stereotactic radiosurgery for the definitive,noninvasive treatment of brain metastases.J Natl Cancer Inst,1995,87:34-40.
    4 Uros S,Matja Z,Viljem K.Brain metastases in lung cancer.Impact of prognostic factors on patient survival.Radiol Oncol,2003,37:213-216.
    5 Rudkin TM,Anrold DL.MR spectroscopy and the biochemical basis of neurological disease magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine[M].3~(rd) ed.2002:2021-2040.
    6 Smith JK,Caslillo M,Kwock L.MR spectroscopy of brain tumors.Magn Reson Imaging Clin NAM,2003,11(3):145-429.
    7 Fulham MJ,Bizzi A,Deitz MJ,et al.Mapping of brain tumor metabolites with Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging:Clinical Relevance.Radiology.1992,185(3):675-686.
    8 Howe EA,Opsiad KS.'H MR spectroscopy of brain tumors and masses.NMR Biomed,2003,16:123.
    9 Majos C,Alonso JI,Aguilera C,et al.Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy(~1H MRS) of human brain tumors:assessment of differences between tumor types and its applicability in brain tumor categorization.Eur Radiol,2003,13:582.
    10 Sijens PE,Levendag PC,Vecht CJ,et al.1H MRS spectroscopy detection of lipids and lactate in metastatic brain tumors.NMR Biomed,1996,9:65.
    11 Chernov MF,Kubo O,Hayashi M,et al.Proton MRS of the peritumoral brain.J Neuml Sci,2005,228:137.
    12 Hwang YF,Huang TY,Hwang SL,et al.Differentiation among metastatic brain tumors,radiation necrosis,and brain abscess using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Kaohsing J Med Sci,2004,20:437.
    13 陈炳恒.立体定向神经放射外科学.北京:北京出版社,1994;9.
    14 Meyers CA,Gears FET,Wong PF,et al.Neurocognitive effects of therapeutic irradiation for base of skull tumors.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,46(1):51-55.
    15 中文江,王绿化,主编.放射治疗损伤.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2001:21-37.
    16 Thiel A,Pietrzyk U,Sturm V,et al.Enhanced accuracy in differential diagnosis of radiation necrosis by PET-MRI coregistratiorv.technical case report.Neurosury,2000;46(1):232-234.
    17 Chan YL,Roebuck DJ,Yuen MP,et al.Long-term cerebral metabolite changes on proton MRS in patients cured of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with previous intrathecal methotrexate and cranial irradiation prophylaxis.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001;50(3):759-763.
    18 Wald LL,Nelson SJ,Day MR,et al.Serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscoty imaging of glioblastoma multiforme after brachytherapy.J Neurosurg,1997;87:525-534.
    19 Hwang YF,Huang TY,Hwang SL,et al.Differentiation among metastatic brain tumors,radiation necroses and brain abscesses using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.J Med Sci,2004,20:437-442.
    20 Weybright P,Sundgren PC,Maly P,et al.Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using MR spectroscopy.AJR,2005;185(6):1471-1476.
    21 Schlemmer HP,Bachert P,Herfarth KK,et al.Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy.AJNR,2001;22:1316-1324.
    22 Hearshen D,Rock JP,Scarpace L,et al.Correlations between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and image guided histopatholoty,with special attention to radiation necrosis.Neurosurg,2002;51:912-919.
    23 Schlemmer HP,Bachert P,Henze M,et al.Differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor progression using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Neuroradiol,2002;44:216-222.
    24 Plotkin M,Eisenacher J,Bruhn H,et al.I-IMT SPECT and 1H-MRS spectroscoty at 3.0T in the differential diagnosis of recurrent or residual glioma:a comparative study.J Neurooncol,2004,70:49-58.
    25 Chernov MF,Hayashi M,Izawa M,et al.Early metabolic changes in metastatic brain tumors after Gamma Knife radiosurgery:'H-MRS study.Brain Tumor Pathol.2004;21(2):63-67.
    26 Chernov MF,Ono Y,Kubo O,et al.Comparison of 'H-MRS detected metabolic characteristics in single metastatic brain tumors of different origin.Brain Tumor Pathol,2006:23:35-40.
    27 Ross DA,Sandler HM,Baiter JM,et al.Imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery of primary and secondary malignant brain tumors.J Neurooncol.2002;56(2):175-181.
    28 Chernov M,Hayashi M,Izawa M,et al.Differentiation of the radiation-induced necrosis and tumor recurrence after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases:importance of multi-voxel proton MRS.Minim Invasive Neurosurg.2005;48(4):228-234.
    29 Chernov M,Hayashi M,Izawa M,et al.Metabolic characteristics of intracranial metastases,detected by single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy,are seemingly not predictive for tumor response to gamma knife radiosurgery.Minim Invasive Neurosurg,2007;50(4):233-238.
    30 Flannery TW,Suntharalingam M,Kwok Y,et al.Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for synchronous versus metachronous solitary brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer.2003;42(3):327-333.
    31 Shiau CY,Sneed PK,Shu HK,et al.Radiosurgery for brain metastases:relationship of dose and pattern of enhancement to local control.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1997;37(2):375-383.
    32 Varlotto JM,Flickinger JC,Niranjan A,et al.Analysis of tumor control and toxicity in patients who have survived at least one year after radiosurgery for brain metastases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2003;57(2):452-464.
    33 Kaibara T,Tyson RL,Sutherland GR.Human cerebral neoplasms studied using MR spectroscopy:a review.Biochem Cell Biol.1998;76(2-3):477-486.
    34 Lee PL,Gonzalez RG.Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors.Curr Opin Oncol.2000;12(3):199-204.
    35 Kwock L,Smith JK,Castillo M,et al.Clinical applications of proton MR spectroscopy in oncology.Technol Cancer Res Treat.2002;1(1):17-28.
    36 Mikhail F,Chernov,Motohiro Hayashi,et al.Early metabolic changes in metastatic brain tumors after Gamma Knife radiosurgery:'H-MRS study.Brain Tumor Pathol.2004;21(2):63-67.
    37 Graves EE,Nelson SJ,Vigneron DB,et al.Serial proton MR spectroscopic imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas after gamma knife radiosurgery.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2001;22(4):613-624.
    38 Yoshino E,Ohmori Y,Imahori Y,et al.Irradiation effects on the metabolism of metastatic brain tumors:analysis by positron emission tomography and 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Stereotact Funct Neurosurg.1996;66(Suppl l):240-259.
    39 Kizu O,Naruse S,Furuya S,et al.Application of proton chemical shift imaging in monitoring of gamma knife radiosurgery on brain tumors.Magn Reson Imaging.1998;16(2):197-204.
    40 Esteve F,Rubin C,Grand S,et al.Transient metabolic changes observed with proton MR spectroscopy in normal human brain after radiation therapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1998;40(2):279-286.
    41 Kurita H,Kawahara N,Asai A,et al.Radiation-induced apoptosis of oligodendrocytes in the adult rat brain.Neuorl Res,2001,23(8):869-874.
    42 Kamiryo T,Lopes MB,Kassell NF,et al.Radiosurgery-induced micorvascular alterations precede necrosis of the brain neuorpil.Neuorsurgery,2001,49(2):409-415.
    43 Munter MW,Karger CP,Reith W,et al.Delayed vascular injury after single high-dose irradiation in the rat brain:histologic immunohistochemical and angiographic studies.Radiology,1999,212(2):475-482.
    44 Plowman PN.Stereotactic radiosurgery.Ⅷ.The classification of postradiation reactions.Br J Neurosurg,1999,13(3):256-264.
    45 Meyers CA,Gears FET,Wong PF,et al.Neurocognitive effects of therapeutic irradiation for base of skull tumors.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,46(1):51-55.
    46 Sener RN.Diffusion MRI:apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the normal brain and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values.Computered Medical Imaging and Graphics,2001;25:299-326.
    47 徐家兴.磁共振功能成像的一个新技术一扩散张量成像.放射学实践,2002,17(2):95-96.
    48 张雪宁,张云亭.正常老年脑与脑白质疏松症的MR扩散张量成像.国外医学临床放射学分册,2005:4(28):226-229.
    49 Werring DJ,Brassat D,Droogan AG et al.The pathogenesis of lesions and normal-appearing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis:a serial diffusion MRI study.Brain,2000;123:1667-1676.
    50 Munter MW,Karger CP,Reith W,et al.Delayed vascular injury after single high-dose injury in the rat brain:histologic immunohistochemical and angiographic studies.Radiology,1999;212(2):475-482.
    51 KamiryoT,Lopes MB,Kassell NF,et al.Radiosurgery-induced microvascular alterations precede necrosis of the brain neuropil.Neurosurgery,2001;49(2):409-415.
    52 韩鸿宾,王俭,谢敬霞,等.高扩散敏感系数扩散加权像异常高信号疾病的鉴别诊断.中华放射学杂志,2002;36(9):812-816.
    53 Nusbuam AO,Lu D,Tang CY,et al.Quantitative diffusion measurements in focal multiple sclerosis lesions:correlations with appearance on T1-weighted MR images.AJR,2000;175(3):821-825.
    54 Asao C,Korogi Y,Kitajima M,et al.Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurrence.Am J Neuroradiol,2005,26(6):1455-1460.
    55 Hall WA,Martin A,Liu H,et al.Improving diagnostic yield in brain biopsy:coupling spectroscopic targeting with real-time needle placement.J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,13(1):12-15.
    56 Tung GA,Evangelista P,Rogg JM,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of rim-enhancing brain masses:is markedly decreased water diffusion specific for brain abscess.AJR,2001;177(3):709-712.
    57 Filippi M,Cercignani M,Inglese M,et al.Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.Neurology.2001;56(3):304-311.
    58 Tivesky AL.Ptak T,Farkas J.Investigation of apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion tensor anisotrophy in acute and chronic multiple sclerosis lesions.Am J Neuroradiol.1999;20(8):1491 -1499.
    59 YoshiuarT,WuO,Zaheer A,et al.Highly diffusion-sensitized MRI of brain:dissociation of gray and white matter.Magn Reson Med.2001;45(5):734-740.
    60 Sorensen AG,Buonanno FS,Gonzalez RG,et al.Hyperacute stroke:evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging.Radiology.1996;199(2):391-401.
    61 谭湘萍,赵继泉,梁碧玲等.MR扩散张量成像对鼻咽癌放疗后早期放射性脑损伤的诊断价值.癌症,2004;23(11):1334-1337.
    62 张云亭,孙志华.MR弥散张量技术及其在中枢神经系统病变的应用.诊断学理论与实践,2005;4(4):333-335.
    1 Kurita H,Kawahara N,Asai A,et al.Radiation-induced apoptosis of oligodendrocytes in the adult rat brain.Neuorl Res,2001,23(8):869-874.
    2 Kamiryo T,Lopes MB,Kassell NF,et al.Radiosurgery-induced micorvascular alterations precede necrosis of the brain neuorpil.Neuorsurgery,2001,49(2):409-415.
    3 Munter MW,Karger CP,Reith W,et al.Delayed vascular injury after single high- dose irradiation in the rat brain:histologic immunohistochemical and angiographic studies.Radiology,1999,212(2):475-482.
    4 Plowman PN.Stereotactic radiosurgery.Ⅷ.The classification of postradiation reactions.Br J Neurosurg,1999,13(3):256-264.
    5 Meyers CA,Gears FET,Wong PF,et al.Neurocognitive effects of therapeutic irradiation for base of skull tumors.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,46(1):51-55.
    6 申文江,王绿化,主编.放射治疗损伤.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2001:21-37.
    7 殷蔚伯,谷铣之,主编.肿瘤放射治疗学(第三版).北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2002:236-286.
    8 New P.Radiation injury to the nervous system.Curr Opin Neurol,2001;14(6):725-734.
    9 Thiel A,Pietrzyk.U,Sturm V,et al.Enhanced accuracy in differential diagnosis of radiation necrosis by PET-MRI coregistrationtechnical case report.Neurosury,2000;46(1):232-234.
    10 Schwartz RB et al.Magn Reson Imaging,1998;8(4):1085-1088.
    11 Tomoi M et al.Radiat Med,1999;17(2):195-200.
    12 Vigliani MC et al.Neurooncol,1999;41(2):137-142.
    13 Kumar AJ,Leeds NE.Fuller GN,etal.Malignat gliomas:MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy-and chemotherapy induced necrosis of the brain after treatment.Radiology,2000,217(2):377-384.
    14 Flickinger JC,Kondziolka D,Lunsford LD,et al.A multi-institutional experience with stereotactic radiosurgery for solitary brain metastases.lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994;28:797-802.
    15 Loeffler JS,Larson DA,Shrieve DC,Flickinger JC.Radiosurgery for the treatment of intracranial lesions.Important Adv Oncol 1995;141-156.
    16 Peterson AM,Meltzer CC,Evanson EJ,et al.MR imaging response of brain metastases after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery.Radiology,1999;211:807-814.
    17 Sener RN.Diffusion MRI:apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) values in the normal brain and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values.Computered Medical Imaging and Graphics,2001;25:299-326.
    18 Werring DJ,Brassat D,Droogan AG et al.The pathogenesis of lesions and normal-appearing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis:a serial diffusion MRI study.Brain,2000;123:1667-1676.
    19 Tortorella C,Viti B,Bozzali M,et al.A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MS.Neurology,2000;54(1):186-193.
    20 Van Walderveen MA,Barkhof F,Pouwels PJ,et al.Neuronal damage in T1-hypointense multiple sclerosis lesions demonstrated in vivo using proton magnetic resonance specreoscopy.Ann Neurol,1999;46(1 ):79-57.
    21 Munter MW,Karger CP,Reith W,et al.Delayed vascular injury after single high-dose injury in the rat brain:histologic immunohistochemical and angiographic studies.Radiology,1999;212(2):475-482.
    22 KamiryoT,Lopes MB,Kassell NF,et al.Radiosurgery-induced microvascular alterations precede necrosis of the brain neuropil.Neurosurgery,2001;49(2):409-415.
    23 赵修义,张雪林,王劲,等.年龄与正常脑白质平均表观扩散系数的相关性.第一军医大学学报,2004;24(11):1316-1318.
    24 Sotak CH.Nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) measurement of the apparent diffusion coeffieient(ADC) of tissue water and its relationship to cell volume changes in Pathological states.Neurochemistry International,2004:45:569-582.
    25 韩鸿宾,王俭,谢敬霞,等.高扩散敏感系数扩散加权像异常高信号疾病的鉴别诊断.中华放射学杂志,2002;36(9):812-816.
    26 Nusbuam AO,Lu D,Tang CY,et al.Quantitative diffusion measurements in focal multiple sclerosis lesions:correlations with appearance on T1-weighted MR images.AJR,2000;175(3):821-825.
    27 Asao C,Korogi Y,Kitajima M,et al.Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurrence.Am J Neuroradiol,2005,26(6):1455-1460.
    28 Hall WA,Martin A,Liu H,et al.Improving diagnostic yield in brain biopsy:coupling spectroscopic targeting with real-time needle placement.J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,13(1):12-15.
    29 Tung GA,Evangelista P,Rogg JM,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of rim-enhancing brain masses:is markedly decreased water diffusion specific for brain abscess.AJR,2001;177(3):709-712.
    30 徐家兴.磁共振功能成像的一个新技术-扩散张量成像.放射学实践,2002,17(2):95-96.
    31 Ciccarelli O,Werring DJ,Wheeler-Kingshott CA,et al.Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations.Neurology.2001;56(7):926-933.
    32 Filippi M,Cercignani M,Inglese M,et al.Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.Neurology.2001;56(3):304-311.
    33 Tivesky AL,Ptak T,Farkas J.Investigation of apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion tensor anisotrophy in acute and chronic multiple sclerosis lesions.Am J Neuroradiol.1999;20(8):1491-1499.
    34 YoshiuarT,WuO,ZaheerA,et al.Highly diffusion-sensitized MRl of brain:dissociation of gray and white matter.Magn Reson Med.2001;45(5):734-740.
    35 Sorensen AG,Buonanno FS,Gonzalez RG,et al.Hyperacute stroke:evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging.Radiology.1996;199(2):391-401.
    36 谭湘萍,赵继泉,梁碧玲等.MR扩散张量成像对鼻咽癌放疗后早期放射性脑损伤的诊断价值.癌症,2004;23(11):1334-1337.
    37 Chan YL,Roebuck DJ,Yuen MP,et al.Long-term cerebral metabolite changes on proton MRS in patients cured of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with previous intrathecal methotrexate and cranial irradiation prophylaxis.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001;50(3):759-763.
    38 Wald LL,Nelson SJ,Day MR,et al.Serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscoty imaging of glioblastoma multiforme after brachytherapy.J Neurosurg,1997;87:525-534.
    39 Hwang YF,Huang TY,Hwang SL,et al.Differentiation among metastatic brain tumors,radiation necroses and brain abscesses using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.J Med Sci,2004,20:437-442.
    40 Weybright P,Sundgren PC,Maly P,et al.Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using MR spectroscopy.AJR,2005;185(6):1471-1476.
    41 Schlemmer HP,Bachert P,Herfarth KK,et al.Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy.AJNR,2001;22:1316-1324.
    42 Hearshen D,Rock JP,Scarpace L,et al.Correlations between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and image guided histopatholoty,with special attention to radiation necrosis.Neurosurg,2002;51:912-919.
    43 Schlemmer HP,Bachert P,Henze M,et al.Differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor progression using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Neuroradiol,2002;44:216-222.
    44 Plotkin M,Eisenacher J,Bruhn H,et al.I-IMT SPECT and 1H-MRS spectroscoty at 3.0T in the differential diagnosis of recurrent or residual glioma:a comparative study.J Neurooncol,2004,70:49-58.
    45 Chernov MF,Hayashi M,Izawa M,et al.Early metabolic changes in metastatic brain tumors after Gamma Knife radiosurgery:'H-MRS study.Brain Tumor Pathol.2004;21(2):63-67.
    46 Chernov MF,Ono Y,Kubo O,et al.Comparison of ~1H-MRS detected metabolic characteristics in single metastatic brain tumors of different origin.Brain Tumor Pathol,2006:23:35-40.
    47 Ross DA,Sandler HM,Baiter JM,et al.Imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery of primary and secondary malignant brain tumors.J Neurooncol.2002;56(2):175-181.
    48 Chernov M,Hayashi M,Izawa M,et al.Differentiation of the radiation-induced necrosis and tumor recurrence after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases:importance of multi-voxel proton MRS.Minim Invasive Neurosurg.2005;48(4):228-234.
    49 Chernov M,Hayashi M,Izawa M,et al.Metabolic characteristics of intracranial metastases,detected by single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy,are seemingly not predictive for tumor response to gamma knife radiosurgery.Minim Invasive Neurosurg,2007;50(4):233-238.
    50 Norris AM et al.Clin Radiol,1997;52(4):356-362.
    51 Sugahara T,Korogi Y,Tomiguchi S,et al.Posttherapeutic intraaxial brain tumor:the value of perfusion-sensitive-contrastenhanced MR imaging for differentiating tumor recurrence from nonneoplastic contrast-enhancing tissue.Am J Neuroradiol,2000;21(5):901-909.
    52 Teksam M,Kayahan EM,Yerli H,et al.Brain MR perfusion and MR spectroscoscopy in differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence(case report).Tani Girisim Radyol,2004,10(4):263-267.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700