智力资本对企业成长影响机制研究
|
摘要
经济增长一直是人类社会的目标,企业成长又成为企业面临的主要问题,为了保证企业健康、快速成长,必须熟悉行业本质,懂得成长机理,如何在激烈的竞争中,保持快速成长已经成为各级政府、银行、企业等各部门共同关心的难题。
软件企业的成长不仅是软件行业本身的成长,软件业的发展对其他行业的发展具有非常重要而且明显的外部正效应,信息技术成为人类历史上继蒸汽机时代、电力运用时代后,第三次最伟大的技术革命。软件业的发展才能带来通讯、金融、航空航天、教育、甚至国防等部门的快速进步,才能给经济注入新的活力。我国软件业起步较晚,如何在国外软件巨头的夹击中生存、发展、壮大不仅事关软件业,而且事关整个民族的兴旺发达,所以,本研究选择我国软件企业为例。
在知识经济时代,智力资本有超越传统生产要素的趋势,并成为具有重要战略地位的竞争优势的来源。软件业作为知识密集型行业,竞争优势的来源已经从传统的物质资源转变为管理资产和服务的知识的价值,而这些知识价值被称为企业的智力资本,本研究中的智力资本是指企业拥有的提供竞争优势的知识、经验、技术、顾客关系和专业技能的集合,从智力资本的角度去研究软件企业的成长,可以清晰的反映软件企业成长机理,促进企业快速成长。
本文的章节结构如下:
第一章:绪论部分,主要描述研究的目的和意义,研究的内容和方法,以及可能的创新之处和全文的结构安排。
第二章:国内外文献梳理阶段,主要是针对国内外的企业成长理论和智力资本领域的研究成果进行消化和吸收,形成本文的理论基础,本文正是基于这些理论基础开展研究工作的。
第三章:介绍我国软件企业智力资本管理的现状及其对企业成长的影响,作为下一章的建立模型的理论基础。
第四章:结合理论研究和实际访谈,建立本研究的理论模型和研究框架,并提出相应的研究假设,然后进行问卷设计、变量测量以及数据分析方法的介绍,也是本文的核心部分,提出了从基本智力资本到核心智力资本到企业成长的研究框架。
第五章:软件企业成长的实证研究,利用Amos结构方程和SPSS统计分析软件进行效度和信度检验,然后验证本文的假设,最后分析了研究的结论,探讨不同的智力资本要素对企业成长的影响。
第六章:研究总结,包括本研究的贡献,不足之处,以及进一步研究的方向。
本研究所做的工作:
在本研究中,主要利用问卷进行大样本调查收集数据,问卷调查共发出问卷285份,回收161份,其中有效149份,有效回收率52.28%。问卷通过信度、效度分析后,利用结构方程模型检验假设,所做的工作主要包括:
在总结了前人研究和企业访谈的基础上,本文提出了针对我国软件企业的智力资本的两层次五要素结构,分别是人力资本、决策资本、关系资本、顾客资本和流程资本。在研究中,把企业的智力资本分为两类,一类称之为基本智力资本(包括人力资本、决策资本、关系资本和流程资本);另一类称之为核心智力资本(顾客资本)。
本研究首先建立了企业智力资本对企业成长的直接影响模型,大样本统计研究发现,企业的智力资本的五个要素对企业成长都具有显著的作用。
然后,建立了软件企业智力资本对企业成长的作用机理模型,以企业的核心智力资本(顾客资本)作为中介变量,建立完整模型,研究发现,企业核心智力资本(顾客资本)在基本智力资本和企业成长的关系中,具有显著的中介作用。在完整模型中,加进了中介变量顾客资本以后,企业的基本智力资本对企业成长的直接影响效果明显降低,而基本智力资本和核心智力资本之间,以及核心智力资本和企业成长之间的关系却显著相关,这说明软件企业的核心智力资本对基本智力资本和企业成长之间的关系具有中介作用。另外,基本智力资本一方面直接影响企业成长,另一方面,通过影响核心智力资本促进企业成长。
从未来发展趋势来看,智力资本管理对企业的重要性日益重要,只有有效获取、利用和管理智力资本的软件企业才能在未来的竞争中占据有利地位。本研究发现企业必须重点强化核心智力资本即顾客资本的地位和作用,企业的经营活动必须以提高、增加顾客价值创造为导向,这样才可以促进软件企业的竞争优势和快速成长。
本研究的创新之处有以下几点:
(1)本研究选择了从智力资本的角度研究软件企业成长问题,软件企业在我国大规模的出现不过20多年的历史,缺乏以往关于软企业成长的经验。本研究适应新时代的知识经济的发展方向,对揭示软件企业的成长机理具有重要的意义,特别是我国兼具发展中国家和转型时期市场特征的特殊背景下,研究成果将弥补现有文献单纯基于美国、日本、以色列、英国等成熟市场的不足,从而丰富相关领域研究成果,并为类似新兴国家提供参考。
(2)软件企业的智力资本的管理在企业成长中具有重要的地位,本文抓住软件企业成长的关键要素——从智力资本管理的视角去探讨企业成长机制,这在软件企业成长研究中,并不多见。
(3)梳理了智力资本研究以后,结合软件企业的特点,在智力资本组成要素中,新引入反映软件企业作为高科技企业而具有的高研发投入、研发流程复杂这一典型特征的变量——“流程资本”这一变量,提出了新的智力资本要素的两层次五要素结构,并且提出了软件企业的基本智力资本和核心智力资本的研究框架,这一框架不仅反应了软件企业的特征,同时,可以透过该框架深入分析智力资本对软件企业成长的作用机理,认为企业的核心智力资本在基本智力资本和企业成长之间的关系具有中介作用。
(4)研究发现智力资本各组成要素包括顾客资本、人力资本、流程资本、关系资本、决策资本对企业成长的影响显著,发现软件企业的创新资本对企业成长的影响并不显著(系数为0.019,显著性概率为0.791)。这点同已有的大多数学者的观念相悖,由此说明软件企业不能盲目追求创新,而应该首先关注公司到底能给客户带去什么样的价值,这样才可能获得快速成长,企业过度的创新,不仅会浪费公司有限的资源,更可能本末倒置,错失成长壮大的良机。
(5)和已有的结论不同,本研究发现,现阶段我国软件企业的流程资本和企业成长之间具有一定的负相关关系,在直接模型中,回归系数为-0.233,显著性概率为0.003;完整模型中,其回归系数为-0.354,显著性概率为0.002,无论直接模型和完整模型中,企业流程资本和企业成长都有显著的负相关关系,这说明现阶段,我国的软件企业必须认清自身形势,不能简单的片面的强制推行流程管理机制,不顾自身实力而冒然的引进CMM流程管理制度或者ISO9000体系,不结合自身特点而强制引入流程管控可能拖累企业的成长绩效。
软件企业成长问题十分复杂,本文探讨了智力资本对企业成长的作用机理,也只是在此领域做了一些小小的尝试,其缺陷也是显而易见的,仍然有必要投入更多的精力去研究、探索企业成长的理论和实践。
Economic growth has been the long-range goal of the human society. Firm growth has become the main problem facing enterprises . Firms must grasp the nature of the industry and understand the growth mechanism .How to survive in the hard competition and maintain rapid growth has become the problem concerned by many sectors such as government, banks and firms .
The growth of software firms is not only the growth of one industry ,but also a great positive external effect on other sectors. Information technology, following the steam engine era and the electricity era ,has been the 3~(rd) greatest technology revolution in the history. The development of software industry bring the prosperous and rapid progress of other sectors such as telecommunications, finance, aerospace, education and even national defense. Because of the late start of our nation's software industry , how to survive when facing other west software giants is a problem faced not only by software industry, but by our nations prosperity.
In the era of knowledge-based economy, intellectual capital has replaced the traditional production factors as the strategically important source of competitive advantage. Because of its' highly knowledge-based characteristic, the competitive advantage comes from the capabilty of management knowledge and service which has been called the Intellectual Capital. Here we refer the intellectual capital as knowledge, experience, organizational technology and expertise skills which can bring the competitive advantage.
It is essential to research the intellectual capital (IC) of software firms, it is not only the key importance to software industry. At the same time , highly effective software R&D can improve the efficiency of other sectors ,which has a great significance to promote the development of national strength.
In this dissertation, the chapter is structured as follows:
Chapter 1: Introduction. The main purpose of the research, the significance of the study, the innovation and the structure of this dissertation.
Chapter 2: Literature review. It reviews the literature about firm growth theory, the intellectual capital management, summarize it as the theory base of this dissertation.
Charpter 3: The introduction about the Intellectual Capital management in Chinese software firms and the affection on firm growth, which makes for the theoretical basis for the model in next charpter.
Chapter 4: Research model. The research framework are built based on the literature and cases, It is the core part of this dissertation. Then introduce the questionnaire design and measure variable and data processing method. The main affection hypersthesis is from basic IC to core IC and then to growth.
Chapter 5: Data processing : This chapter deals with how to porcess variables, the validity and reliability is tested by Amos structure equitation model and SPSS statistic software, and test the the hypothesis.
Chapter 6: The result of the research, Discuss the research contributions and shortcomings and tell the further research direction. The research contents of this dissertation.
This research combine the empirical study. The empirical survey consists of 285 questionnaires which was sent to software firms and 161 was received, of which 149 ware valid and effective . with effective recovery rate of 52.28%. After validity and reliability analysis, we use SPSS and Amos to test the assumptions.
The research build the intellectual capital model for the software firms, the IC was divided into 5 components as human capital, decision-making capital, relationship capital, customer capital and process capital. These 5 components was divided in two categories , one is basic IC ,including human capital ,decision capital, relation capital and process capital, The other is customer capital as core IC.
We build the direct model of the impact from IC on the firm growth , after testing assumptions ,we find there is significantly relation between the 5 IC components and firm growth.
The second step is indirect model, we use core IC ( customer capital ) as intermediate variable , and find that core IC has the significant the intermediate effect on the relationship between basic IC and firm growth. In the whole model , most relations between basic IC and firm growth are not significant, while the relation between basic IC and core IC , as well as the relation between core IC and firm growth is significantly. It shows us that the core IC is the intermediate variable between the basic IC and firm growth. It tells us the basic IC and core IC do not serve the same role in the model, the basic IC strength the core IC ,then affect the firm growth speed.
From the trend we can know that the management of IC have growing importance on the enterprises. Only those firms who can access, use intellectual capital effectively can get competitive advantage and fast growth in the hard competition. This dissertation give the suggestions that software managers to mind the great importance of core IC( customer capital), firms must improve customer value to strength growth. Only in this way ,they can promote the rapid growth of the software companies and gain the competitive advantage.
The main innovation include:
1. This dissertation is a study on the firm growth theory and intellectual capital in our developing countries, it expands the growth theory, the IC theory comes from the west countries to China, there is no such research framework in China. This dissertation verified the fitness of these theories to China ,a transaction period society, and the research result will simply fill the existing literature gap which is based on the developed countries such as the United States , Japan ,Israel and Britain . It will enrich the research results in related field.
2. The intellectual capital management research has important role in firm growth literature. This dissertation analyses intellectual capital management, which is the key factors to software firms growth. The research in this subject is seldom been found.
3. Based on the literature about the IC management literature and practice ,the author add new variable : process capital, which means the high R&D investment and complexity show the characteristic of software firms software development efficiency. We put forward a 5 dimensions of two-level model, the 5 dimensions are human capital, decision capital , relation capital, process capital and customer capital. The two-level are basic IC and core IC. The 5 dimentions of two-level model explore the IC management in software firms, It can help us to find the source advantage by exploring the affection mechanism of IC on growth. The author build the direct model between the IC and firm growth and indirect model between the basic IC , core IC and firm growth. Integrate the affections of 5 IC dimentions on firm growth. We can get the mechanism of influence from IC on growth.We explore the affection mechanism of IC on firm growth in whole model, and find that the various dimentions of IC on growth are different. The customer capital is core IC , the basic IC will strength the core IC and then strength the firm growth. The customer capital are the intermediary variable and they are the source of advantage and growth of software firms.
4. We find that the IC : customer capital, human capital , process capital, relation capital ,decision capital, have significant impact on firm growth , while the innovation capital does not influence on firm growth .its' coefficient is 0.019 ,with sig 0.791. This is unexpected by most researchers. This conclusion shows that firms can not focus on innovation especially. The customer capital can stimulate firm growth. Too much innovation will not only waste resource but also hurt growth.
5. We find that process capital is negative related with firm growth ,which is different from the previous researches. In the direct model, regression coefficient is -0.233, significance probobility is 0.003; In the whole model ,the regression coefficient is -0.354, the significance probability is 0.002. We find that the regression coefficient is signicicantly negative both in direct and whole model, which shows that the process capital is negative related with firm growth in software industry. It tells us that our software firms can not apply process management mechanically, The firm growth will be decreased if software firms can not control process management well.
Growth of software firms is very complicated, even this dissertation discusses the relationship between the IC and growth , it is still a very tiny step. There is much obvious defection of this dissertation. It need more research to explore the firm growth theory and practice.
软件企业的成长不仅是软件行业本身的成长,软件业的发展对其他行业的发展具有非常重要而且明显的外部正效应,信息技术成为人类历史上继蒸汽机时代、电力运用时代后,第三次最伟大的技术革命。软件业的发展才能带来通讯、金融、航空航天、教育、甚至国防等部门的快速进步,才能给经济注入新的活力。我国软件业起步较晚,如何在国外软件巨头的夹击中生存、发展、壮大不仅事关软件业,而且事关整个民族的兴旺发达,所以,本研究选择我国软件企业为例。
在知识经济时代,智力资本有超越传统生产要素的趋势,并成为具有重要战略地位的竞争优势的来源。软件业作为知识密集型行业,竞争优势的来源已经从传统的物质资源转变为管理资产和服务的知识的价值,而这些知识价值被称为企业的智力资本,本研究中的智力资本是指企业拥有的提供竞争优势的知识、经验、技术、顾客关系和专业技能的集合,从智力资本的角度去研究软件企业的成长,可以清晰的反映软件企业成长机理,促进企业快速成长。
本文的章节结构如下:
第一章:绪论部分,主要描述研究的目的和意义,研究的内容和方法,以及可能的创新之处和全文的结构安排。
第二章:国内外文献梳理阶段,主要是针对国内外的企业成长理论和智力资本领域的研究成果进行消化和吸收,形成本文的理论基础,本文正是基于这些理论基础开展研究工作的。
第三章:介绍我国软件企业智力资本管理的现状及其对企业成长的影响,作为下一章的建立模型的理论基础。
第四章:结合理论研究和实际访谈,建立本研究的理论模型和研究框架,并提出相应的研究假设,然后进行问卷设计、变量测量以及数据分析方法的介绍,也是本文的核心部分,提出了从基本智力资本到核心智力资本到企业成长的研究框架。
第五章:软件企业成长的实证研究,利用Amos结构方程和SPSS统计分析软件进行效度和信度检验,然后验证本文的假设,最后分析了研究的结论,探讨不同的智力资本要素对企业成长的影响。
第六章:研究总结,包括本研究的贡献,不足之处,以及进一步研究的方向。
本研究所做的工作:
在本研究中,主要利用问卷进行大样本调查收集数据,问卷调查共发出问卷285份,回收161份,其中有效149份,有效回收率52.28%。问卷通过信度、效度分析后,利用结构方程模型检验假设,所做的工作主要包括:
在总结了前人研究和企业访谈的基础上,本文提出了针对我国软件企业的智力资本的两层次五要素结构,分别是人力资本、决策资本、关系资本、顾客资本和流程资本。在研究中,把企业的智力资本分为两类,一类称之为基本智力资本(包括人力资本、决策资本、关系资本和流程资本);另一类称之为核心智力资本(顾客资本)。
本研究首先建立了企业智力资本对企业成长的直接影响模型,大样本统计研究发现,企业的智力资本的五个要素对企业成长都具有显著的作用。
然后,建立了软件企业智力资本对企业成长的作用机理模型,以企业的核心智力资本(顾客资本)作为中介变量,建立完整模型,研究发现,企业核心智力资本(顾客资本)在基本智力资本和企业成长的关系中,具有显著的中介作用。在完整模型中,加进了中介变量顾客资本以后,企业的基本智力资本对企业成长的直接影响效果明显降低,而基本智力资本和核心智力资本之间,以及核心智力资本和企业成长之间的关系却显著相关,这说明软件企业的核心智力资本对基本智力资本和企业成长之间的关系具有中介作用。另外,基本智力资本一方面直接影响企业成长,另一方面,通过影响核心智力资本促进企业成长。
从未来发展趋势来看,智力资本管理对企业的重要性日益重要,只有有效获取、利用和管理智力资本的软件企业才能在未来的竞争中占据有利地位。本研究发现企业必须重点强化核心智力资本即顾客资本的地位和作用,企业的经营活动必须以提高、增加顾客价值创造为导向,这样才可以促进软件企业的竞争优势和快速成长。
本研究的创新之处有以下几点:
(1)本研究选择了从智力资本的角度研究软件企业成长问题,软件企业在我国大规模的出现不过20多年的历史,缺乏以往关于软企业成长的经验。本研究适应新时代的知识经济的发展方向,对揭示软件企业的成长机理具有重要的意义,特别是我国兼具发展中国家和转型时期市场特征的特殊背景下,研究成果将弥补现有文献单纯基于美国、日本、以色列、英国等成熟市场的不足,从而丰富相关领域研究成果,并为类似新兴国家提供参考。
(2)软件企业的智力资本的管理在企业成长中具有重要的地位,本文抓住软件企业成长的关键要素——从智力资本管理的视角去探讨企业成长机制,这在软件企业成长研究中,并不多见。
(3)梳理了智力资本研究以后,结合软件企业的特点,在智力资本组成要素中,新引入反映软件企业作为高科技企业而具有的高研发投入、研发流程复杂这一典型特征的变量——“流程资本”这一变量,提出了新的智力资本要素的两层次五要素结构,并且提出了软件企业的基本智力资本和核心智力资本的研究框架,这一框架不仅反应了软件企业的特征,同时,可以透过该框架深入分析智力资本对软件企业成长的作用机理,认为企业的核心智力资本在基本智力资本和企业成长之间的关系具有中介作用。
(4)研究发现智力资本各组成要素包括顾客资本、人力资本、流程资本、关系资本、决策资本对企业成长的影响显著,发现软件企业的创新资本对企业成长的影响并不显著(系数为0.019,显著性概率为0.791)。这点同已有的大多数学者的观念相悖,由此说明软件企业不能盲目追求创新,而应该首先关注公司到底能给客户带去什么样的价值,这样才可能获得快速成长,企业过度的创新,不仅会浪费公司有限的资源,更可能本末倒置,错失成长壮大的良机。
(5)和已有的结论不同,本研究发现,现阶段我国软件企业的流程资本和企业成长之间具有一定的负相关关系,在直接模型中,回归系数为-0.233,显著性概率为0.003;完整模型中,其回归系数为-0.354,显著性概率为0.002,无论直接模型和完整模型中,企业流程资本和企业成长都有显著的负相关关系,这说明现阶段,我国的软件企业必须认清自身形势,不能简单的片面的强制推行流程管理机制,不顾自身实力而冒然的引进CMM流程管理制度或者ISO9000体系,不结合自身特点而强制引入流程管控可能拖累企业的成长绩效。
软件企业成长问题十分复杂,本文探讨了智力资本对企业成长的作用机理,也只是在此领域做了一些小小的尝试,其缺陷也是显而易见的,仍然有必要投入更多的精力去研究、探索企业成长的理论和实践。
Economic growth has been the long-range goal of the human society. Firm growth has become the main problem facing enterprises . Firms must grasp the nature of the industry and understand the growth mechanism .How to survive in the hard competition and maintain rapid growth has become the problem concerned by many sectors such as government, banks and firms .
The growth of software firms is not only the growth of one industry ,but also a great positive external effect on other sectors. Information technology, following the steam engine era and the electricity era ,has been the 3~(rd) greatest technology revolution in the history. The development of software industry bring the prosperous and rapid progress of other sectors such as telecommunications, finance, aerospace, education and even national defense. Because of the late start of our nation's software industry , how to survive when facing other west software giants is a problem faced not only by software industry, but by our nations prosperity.
In the era of knowledge-based economy, intellectual capital has replaced the traditional production factors as the strategically important source of competitive advantage. Because of its' highly knowledge-based characteristic, the competitive advantage comes from the capabilty of management knowledge and service which has been called the Intellectual Capital. Here we refer the intellectual capital as knowledge, experience, organizational technology and expertise skills which can bring the competitive advantage.
It is essential to research the intellectual capital (IC) of software firms, it is not only the key importance to software industry. At the same time , highly effective software R&D can improve the efficiency of other sectors ,which has a great significance to promote the development of national strength.
In this dissertation, the chapter is structured as follows:
Chapter 1: Introduction. The main purpose of the research, the significance of the study, the innovation and the structure of this dissertation.
Chapter 2: Literature review. It reviews the literature about firm growth theory, the intellectual capital management, summarize it as the theory base of this dissertation.
Charpter 3: The introduction about the Intellectual Capital management in Chinese software firms and the affection on firm growth, which makes for the theoretical basis for the model in next charpter.
Chapter 4: Research model. The research framework are built based on the literature and cases, It is the core part of this dissertation. Then introduce the questionnaire design and measure variable and data processing method. The main affection hypersthesis is from basic IC to core IC and then to growth.
Chapter 5: Data processing : This chapter deals with how to porcess variables, the validity and reliability is tested by Amos structure equitation model and SPSS statistic software, and test the the hypothesis.
Chapter 6: The result of the research, Discuss the research contributions and shortcomings and tell the further research direction. The research contents of this dissertation.
This research combine the empirical study. The empirical survey consists of 285 questionnaires which was sent to software firms and 161 was received, of which 149 ware valid and effective . with effective recovery rate of 52.28%. After validity and reliability analysis, we use SPSS and Amos to test the assumptions.
The research build the intellectual capital model for the software firms, the IC was divided into 5 components as human capital, decision-making capital, relationship capital, customer capital and process capital. These 5 components was divided in two categories , one is basic IC ,including human capital ,decision capital, relation capital and process capital, The other is customer capital as core IC.
We build the direct model of the impact from IC on the firm growth , after testing assumptions ,we find there is significantly relation between the 5 IC components and firm growth.
The second step is indirect model, we use core IC ( customer capital ) as intermediate variable , and find that core IC has the significant the intermediate effect on the relationship between basic IC and firm growth. In the whole model , most relations between basic IC and firm growth are not significant, while the relation between basic IC and core IC , as well as the relation between core IC and firm growth is significantly. It shows us that the core IC is the intermediate variable between the basic IC and firm growth. It tells us the basic IC and core IC do not serve the same role in the model, the basic IC strength the core IC ,then affect the firm growth speed.
From the trend we can know that the management of IC have growing importance on the enterprises. Only those firms who can access, use intellectual capital effectively can get competitive advantage and fast growth in the hard competition. This dissertation give the suggestions that software managers to mind the great importance of core IC( customer capital), firms must improve customer value to strength growth. Only in this way ,they can promote the rapid growth of the software companies and gain the competitive advantage.
The main innovation include:
1. This dissertation is a study on the firm growth theory and intellectual capital in our developing countries, it expands the growth theory, the IC theory comes from the west countries to China, there is no such research framework in China. This dissertation verified the fitness of these theories to China ,a transaction period society, and the research result will simply fill the existing literature gap which is based on the developed countries such as the United States , Japan ,Israel and Britain . It will enrich the research results in related field.
2. The intellectual capital management research has important role in firm growth literature. This dissertation analyses intellectual capital management, which is the key factors to software firms growth. The research in this subject is seldom been found.
3. Based on the literature about the IC management literature and practice ,the author add new variable : process capital, which means the high R&D investment and complexity show the characteristic of software firms software development efficiency. We put forward a 5 dimensions of two-level model, the 5 dimensions are human capital, decision capital , relation capital, process capital and customer capital. The two-level are basic IC and core IC. The 5 dimentions of two-level model explore the IC management in software firms, It can help us to find the source advantage by exploring the affection mechanism of IC on growth. The author build the direct model between the IC and firm growth and indirect model between the basic IC , core IC and firm growth. Integrate the affections of 5 IC dimentions on firm growth. We can get the mechanism of influence from IC on growth.We explore the affection mechanism of IC on firm growth in whole model, and find that the various dimentions of IC on growth are different. The customer capital is core IC , the basic IC will strength the core IC and then strength the firm growth. The customer capital are the intermediary variable and they are the source of advantage and growth of software firms.
4. We find that the IC : customer capital, human capital , process capital, relation capital ,decision capital, have significant impact on firm growth , while the innovation capital does not influence on firm growth .its' coefficient is 0.019 ,with sig 0.791. This is unexpected by most researchers. This conclusion shows that firms can not focus on innovation especially. The customer capital can stimulate firm growth. Too much innovation will not only waste resource but also hurt growth.
5. We find that process capital is negative related with firm growth ,which is different from the previous researches. In the direct model, regression coefficient is -0.233, significance probobility is 0.003; In the whole model ,the regression coefficient is -0.354, the significance probability is 0.002. We find that the regression coefficient is signicicantly negative both in direct and whole model, which shows that the process capital is negative related with firm growth in software industry. It tells us that our software firms can not apply process management mechanically, The firm growth will be decreased if software firms can not control process management well.
Growth of software firms is very complicated, even this dissertation discusses the relationship between the IC and growth , it is still a very tiny step. There is much obvious defection of this dissertation. It need more research to explore the firm growth theory and practice.
引文
[1] Ajitabh, S.H., & Momaya,K. Flexibility and Competitiveness : Case of Software/Services Firms in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,2001 ,(8),33-40.
[2] Aijo,T., Kuivalainen,O., &Saarenketo,S., et al. InternationalizationHandbook for the Software Business [R].2005.
[3] Amit,R.,& Schoemaker,P.J.H. Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14(1), 33-46.
[4] Andrestsch,D.B.,& Elston.J.A. Can Institutional Change Impact High-Technology Firm Growth? Evidence From Germany's Neuer Markt .Business media, 2006,( 25),9-23.
[5] Arenas,T. ,& Lavanderos,L .Intellectual Capital: Object or Process ? . Journal of intellectual capital,2008,(9), 77-85.
[6] Aschkenazi,J. Israeli Expatriate Managers an Empirical Study on Knowledge Transfer and Retention, phd paper, Capella University,2006.
[7] Ashton,R.H. Intellectual Capital and Value Creation: A Review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 2005,(24),53 -134.
[8] Banerjee,P. Resource dependence and core competence insights from Indian software firms. .Technovation ,2003,(23),251-263.
[9] Barney,J.B. Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework. Academy of Management., 1986a, 11 (4),791-800.
[10] Barney,J.B. Organizational culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage . Academy of Management Review,1986b,(11),656-665.
[11] Barney,J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
[12] Berdie,D.R. Questionnaire Length and Response Rate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973,(58), 278-280.
[13] Bhartesh,K.R.,& Bandyopadhyay,A.K. Intellectual Capital Concept and its Measurement. Finance india, 2005,(12), 1365-1374.
[14] Boedker,C.,Guthrie,J.,&Cuganesan,S. An Integrated Framework for Visualising Intellectual Capital Journal of intellectual capital, 2005,6(4),510-527.
[15] Bornemann,M. ,& Alwert,K. The German Guideline for Intellectual Capital Reporting: Method and Experiences. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007, 8(4),563-576.
[16] Bose,S. ,& Thomas,K. Valuation of Intellectual Capital in Knowledge-Based Firms; The Need For New Methods in a Changing Economic Paradigm . Management Decision, 2007,45(9), 1484-1496.
[17]Bontis,N.There's a Price on Your Head:Managing Intellectual Capital Strategically.Business Quarterly,Summer,1996,60(4),40-47.
[18]Botins,N.Assessing Knowledge Assets a Review of The Models Used to Measure Intellectual Vapital.International Journal of Management Reviews,2001,3(1),41-60.
[19]Bozbura,F.T.Measurement And Application of Intellectual Capital in Turkey.The Learning Organization,2004,11(4),357-367.
[20]Bozzolan,S.,O'Regan,P.,& Ricceri.E Intellectual capital disclosure(ICD);A comparison of Italy and the UK.Journal of HRCA:Human Resource Costing & Accounting,2006,10(2),92-113.
[21]Breznitz,D.Industrial R&D as a national policy:Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry.Research Policy,2007(2),1465-1482.
[22]Brooking,A.,& Lester,T.et.al.Intellectual Capital:Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise.Financial Times.Thomson Business;[London edition],1996(9),8.
[23]Bruton,G.D.,& Rubanik,Y.Resources of the firm,Russian high-technology startups,and term growth..Journal of business venturing,2002(17),553-576.
[24]Chen,J.,Zhu,Z.H.,& Xie,H.Y.Measuring intellectual capital:a new model and empirical study.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2004,5(1),195-212.
[25][美]Ehin,C.著,郭延航译.开发智力资本一企业内部智力资本的奥秘。北京:机械工业出版社,2003.5.
[26]Chen,Y.S.The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual canpital on competitive advantages of firms.Journal of business ethics,2008(77),271-286.
[27]Churchill,N.C.,& Lewis,V.L.The five stages of small business growth..Harvard Business Review,1983(5-6),30-50.
[28]Cohen,S.,&Kaimenakis,N.Intellectual capital and corporate performance in knowledge-intensive SMEs.The Learning Organization,2007,14(3),241-262.
[29][美]Cusumano.M.A著,中文版参见张云涛,龚玲,张燕译.软件业的生存之道.北京:电子工业出版社,2006.1.
[30]Buskirk,B.,Schmidt.S.M.P.,& Ralph.D.L.Patterns in High-Tech Firms Growth Strategies by Seeking Mass Mainstream Customer Adapations.Journal of Business Review,2007,8(1),34-39.
[31]Dooley,E.Intellectual Capital in The Software Industry An Empirical Test.Phd paper,University of Washington,2000.
[32]Erickson,G.S.,Brambandkar,A.,& Applebee,I.Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance in Aerospace/Defense.Competition Forum.Indiana,2007,5(1),126-130.
[33]Fukugawa,N.Science parks in Japan and Their Value-Added Contributions to New Technology-Based Firms.International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006(24),381-400.
[34] Garnsey,E., Stam,E. ,& Heffernan,P. New Firm Growth, Exploring Processes and Paths. .Industrial and innovation, 2006,13(1), 1-20.
[35] Ghiselli,E.E., Campbell,J.P. ,& Zedeck,S. Measurement Theory for the Behavioural Sciences. W. H. Freeman and Co,.New York. 1981.
[36] Goddard,J., Tavakoli, M.,& Wilson,J.O.S. Sources of Variation in Firm Profitability and Growth. Journal of business research, 2008(10),1-13.
[37] Grant,R.M. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 1991, 33(3),114-135.
[38] Grankham,C.E., Nichols,L.D. & Shonberner.M. A Framework for the Management of Intellectual Capital in The Health Care Industry. Journal of Health Care Finance. New York: Spring, 1997,23( 3), 1-19.
[39] Gregorio,M.C. ,& Pedro,L.S. Intellectual Capital in High-Tech Firms The Case of Spain, 2008,19(1),25-35.
[40] Gregorio,M.C, Pedro,L.S. ,& Jose,E.N.L. The Role of Corporate Reputation in Developing Relational Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2004,5(4),575-585.
[41] Guthrie,J., Petty,R. ,& Ricceri.F. Intellectual Capital Reporting: Lessons From Hongkong and Austria[R]. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, 2007.
[42] Hanks,S.H., Waston,C.J.,& Jansen,E. Tightening The Life-cycle Construct: A Taxonomic Study of Growth Stage Configurations in High-Technology Organizations. Enterpreneurship Theory and Practice, 1993,winter, 5-29.
[43] Herremans,I.M. ,& Isaac,R.G The Intellectual Capital Realization Process (ICRP) An Application of the Resource-based View of the Firm. Journal of Managerial issues, 2004,16(2),217-231.
[44] Hoch,D. ,& Purkert,G Secrets of Software Success - Management Insights From 100 Companies Around the World in One of the Most Dynamic Industries, 2000.2.
[45] Honjo,Y. ,& Harada.N . SME Policy, Financial Structure and Firm Growth Evidence from Japan. Journal of Business Economics, 2006(27),289-300.
[46] Hudson. W.J. Intellectual Capital: How to Build it,Enhance it ,Use it. Newyork: John Wiley, 1993,(1).
[47] Kannan,G. ,& Aulbur,W.G Intellectual capital: Measurement Effectiveness. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2004,5(3),389-413.
[48] Kao,M.C. Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process to Evaluate the Development Strategies of Intellectual Capital for Fabless Integrated Circuit Design Houses in Taiwan. The Business Review, Cambridge, 2007,8(2), 75-81.
[49] Khan,S. Intellectual Capital and the Perceived Relevance of the Balance Sheet as a Value Measure for Corporations. Journal of American Academy of Business. 2008,12(2),83-90.
[50] Kogut,B.,& Zander,U. Knowledge of Tthe Firm and The Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation . Journal of International Business Studies, 1993(4), 625-645.
[51] Kong,E. The strategic Importance of Intellectual Capital in The Non-Profit Sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007,8(4),721-731.
[52] Kotler,P. Marketing's New Paradigm :What's Really Happening Out There. Planning Review ,1992(20),50.
[53] Kraerner,T.D. Sustainable Rapid Growth, Why Some Firms Succeed and Others fail. Phd paper ,University of Pennsylvania ,2004.
[54] Kujansivu,P. Operationalising Intellectual Capital Management: Choosing a Suitable Approach. Measuring Business Excellence. Bradford ,2008,12(2), 25-37.
[55] Kujansivu,P. ,& Lunnqvist,A. Investigating the Value And Efficiency of Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007,8(2), 272-287.
[56] Kwantes,C.T. Organizational Commitment, Intellectual Capital and Organizational Competitiveness. South Asian Journal of Management.: Jul-Sep, 2007,14(3), 28-43.
[57] Landi,C.M. Constructive Comparative Advantage: How India Is Moving Up The Global Software Value Chain. Phd paper, The American university ,2002.
[58] Latham,S. Contrasting Strategic Response to Economic Recession in Start-Up versus Established Software Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 2009(4), 180-201.
[59] Liang,C.J. ,& Lin,Y.L. Which IC is More Important a Life Cycle Perspective. Journal of intellectual capital, 2008,9(1),62-76.
[60] Litschka,M., Markom,A. ,& Schunder,S. Measuring and Analysing Intellectual Assets an Integrative Approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital ,2006,7(2), 160-173.
[61] Liu,C, & Liu,W.D. Find New Financing Access for SMB--Angel Investment. The Eighth West Lake International Conference on SMB ,2006.12.
[62] Lowegren,M. New Technology-Based Firms in Science Parks-A study of Resources and Absorptive Capacity. Sweeden: Lund Business Press ,Institute of Economic Research, 2003.
[63] Ma,H. Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance. Competitiveness Review, 2000(10), 15-32.
[64] Marr,B. ,& Moustaghfir,K. Defining Intellectual Vapital a Three-Dimensional Approach. Management Decision, 2005,43(9), 1114-1128.
[65] Marr,B., Gray,D. ,& Neely,A. Why Do Frms Measure Their Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2003,4(4),441-464.
[66] Maxwell,L.M. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. Library Journal. New York, 1997,122(7),94.
[67] Mouritsen,J., Larse,H.T. ,& Bukh,P.N. et al. Reading an Intellectual Capital Statement: Describing and Prescribing Knowledge Management Strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2001,2(4),259-383.
[68] Neck,H.M. Firm Growth Following The Initial Public Offering The Impact of Organizational Slack on The Productive Opportunity of High Technology Entrepreneurial Firms, Phd paper , University of Colorado ,Graduate School, 2001.
[69] Nelson,R.,& Winter,S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA,1982.
[70] Ng,A.W Reporting Intellectual Capital Flow in Technology-Based Companies; Case Studies of Canadian Wireless Technology Companies. . Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2006,17(4), 492-510.
[71] Patricia,O.P. Intellectual Capital Reports in India Lessons From a Case Study. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2005, 6(1),141-149.
[72] Pena,I. Intellectual Capital and Business Start-up Success. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2002,3(2), 180-198.
[73] Penrose, E T. The Theory of The Growth of The Firm. John Wiley, New York, 1959
[74] Peteraf,M.A. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 1993(14), 179-191.
[75] Pike,S., Fernstrom,L. ,& Roos,G Intellectual Capital: Management Approach in ICS Ltd. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005,6(4), 489-509.
[76] Petty,R., Ricceri,F. ,& Guthrie.J. Intellectual capital: A Uuser's Perspective. Management Research News, 2008, 31(6), 434-447.
[77] Porter,M.E. Competitive strategy .New York: The Free Press, 1980.
[78] Porter,M.E. Competitive Advantage:. New York: The Free Press, 1985.
[79] Porter,M.E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations ,London: Macmillan press ltd, 1990.
[80] Ramirez,Y. ,Lorduy,C. ,& Antonio,J. Intellectual Capital Management in Spanish uiversities. Journal of Intellectual Capital. Bradford, 2007,8(4),732-748.
[81] Reichheld,F.F. Loyalty-Based Management. Havard Business Review , 1993,71(3-4), 64-74.
[82] Robinson,G. ,& Kleiner,B.H. How to Measure an Organization's Intellectual Capital. Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford, 1996,11 (8),36-51.
[83] Robert,M.G Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17), 109-122.
[84] Roslender,R. Intellectual Capital Reporting: Lessons From Hong Kong and Australia. Accounting and Business Research. Kingston Upon Thames, 2008,38(1), 91-98.
[85] Rumelt,R.P. Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm. Competitive Strategic Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984,556-570.
[86] Rumelt,R.P. How Much Does Industry Matter? Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12),167-186.
[87] Saint-Onge .,& Hubert. Tacit Knowledge: The Key to the Strategic Alignment of Intellectual Capital Trategy & Leadership, 1996, 24(2), 10-14.
[88] Schneider,A. ,& Samkin.G Intellectual Capital Reporting By the New Zealand Local Government sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2008,9(3), 456-486.
[89] Schiuma,G ,& Lerro,A. Intellectual Capital and Company's Performance Improvement Measuring Business Excellence, 2008,12(2), 3-9.
[90] Seleim,A. ,& Ashour,A. Intellectual Capital in Egyptian Software Firms. The Learning Organization, 2004,11(4),332-346.
[91] Sonnier,B.M., Carson,K.D. ,& Phillips.P et.al. Accounting for Intellectual Capital: The Relationship Between Profitability and Disclosure. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 2007,12(2),3-14.
[92] Stahle,P. ,& Bounfour,A. Understanding Dynamics of Intellectual Capital of nations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2008,9(2), 164-177.
[93] Stewart, T.A. Intellectual Capital, The New Wealth of organizations. Doubleday, Newyork, 1997(3).
[94] Suzuki,K.L, Kim,S.H. ,& Bae,Z.T. Entrepreneurship and Business Culture in Japan and the U.S. Japan and word economy, 1998(10),487-494.
[95] Sveiby,K.E. The Intangible Assets Monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting ,1997,2(1),73-97.
[96] Tan,H.P., Plowman,D.,& Hancock,P. Intellectual Capital and Financial Returns of Companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2007,8(1),76-95.
[97] Teece,D.J.,Piasno,G,& Shuen,A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management .Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18 (7),509-533.
[98] Tovstiga,G,& Tulugurova,E. Intellectual Capital Practices and Performance in Russsian Enterprise. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007,8(4),695-707.
[99] Tsai,W.,& Ghoshal,S. Social Capital and Value Creation: the Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 1998(41),464-478.
[100]Tsai,W. Social Capital, Strategic Relatedness, and the Formation of Intra-Organizational Strategic Linkage. Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21),925-939.
[101] Tsan,W.N. Measurement and Comparison of IT Industrial Intellectual Capital in Taiwan[R]. 2003(12).
[102] Tsan,W.N. ,& Chang,C.C. Intellectual Capital System Interaction in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005,6(2),285-298.
[103]Tome,E.The Hidden Face of Intellectual Capital:Social Policies.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2008,9(3),499-518.
[104]Tovstiga,G,& Tulugurova,E.Intellectual Capital Practices and Performance in Russian enterprises.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2007,8(4),695-707.
[105]Vandemaele,S.N.,Vergauwen,P.G,& Smits,A.J.Intellectual capital Disclosure in The Netherlands,Sweden and the UK:A Longitudinal and Comparative Study.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2005,6(3),417-426.
[106]Vincent,M.,& Zikmund,W.G.An Experimental Investigation of Situational Effects on Risk Perception.Advances in Consumer Research,1976,3(1),125-130.
[107]Walsh,D.A.An Evaluation of the Maturing Indian Software Industry.Phd Paper,Capella University,2005(12).
[108]Walz,J.T.The Wealth of Knowledge:Intellectual Capital and the Twenty-First Century Organization.Leadership.,& Organization Development Journal,2005,26(1/2),77-79.
[109]Wang,J.C.Executing Strategies on Intellectual Capital:Case Study for Management and Corporate Governance.Journal of American Academy of Business,Cambridge,2007,11(1),125-131.
[110]Wang,J.C.Utilizing Skandia Navigator System and Ohlson Model to Evaluate the Intellectual Capital Performance for Taiwan Electronic Corporations.The Business Review,2006,6(1),186-192.
[111]Wang,W.Y.,& Chang,C.F.Intellectual Capital and Performance in Causal Models Evidence From the Information Technology Industry in Taiwan.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2005,6(2),222-236.
[112]Watson,J.Managing Iintellectual Capital:Making the Most of the Best.The Canadian Manager,1996,21(3),11-13.
[113]W,J.L,Van,M.,& Singh,I.et.al.Is There an Association Between Intellectual Capital Disclosure,Underpricing and Long-run Performance?.Journal of HRCA:Human Resource Costing & Accounting,2007,11(3),178-213.
[114]Wernerfelt,B.A.Resource-based View of the Firm.Strategic Management Journal,1984,15(5),171-180.
[115]Youndt,M.A.& SnelI,S.A.Human Resource Configurations,Intellectual Capital,and Organizational Performance.Journal of Managerial Issues,2004.16(3),337-360.
[116]Zahra,S A.,& Gerard,G.Absorptive Capacity:A Review Reconceptualization and Extension.Academy of Management Review,2002,27.
[117][美]安得利.萨克森宁(Saxenian)著,中文版参见曹蓬.杨宇光等译,美国硅谷和128公路地区的文化与竞争----地区优势.上海:上海远东出版社,1999(9).
[118]安妮.布鲁金著,赵洁平译第三资源--智力资本及其管理.大连:东 北财经大学出版社1998(4).
[119]Blumling,M.,Frick.K.A.,&Meehan.W.F.软件业如何力挽狂澜.麦肯锡管理论丛,2002(3).
[120]宝贡敏.适合我国管理文化特点的企业管理模式.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,30(6),5-14.
[121]宝贡敏.现代企业战略管理.郑州:河南人民出版社,2001.
[122]陈峰.爱尔兰、以色列、新加坡三国软件产业发展现状.西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002(3),455-458.
[123]陈宏刚,沈向洋和刘念臻等.软件企业的管理与文化--剖析微软的制胜之道.北京:清华大学出版社,2003(2).
[124]陈劲,桂旺彬.复杂产品系统模块化创新流程与管理策略.研究与发展管理,2006(6)74-79.
[125]陈劲,谢洪源和朱朝晖.企业智力资本评价模型和实证研究.中国地质大学学报(社科版),2004(12),27-31.
[126]陈乃醒.中小企业成长案例评注.北京:民主与建设出版社,2002(6).
[127]崔光耀.与客户共同成长--东软解决方案论坛倡导绿色发展主题信息安全与通信保密,2004(12).
[128]钭志斌.财务视角下的中小企业成长性实证研究.商业时代,2008(21),75-76
[129]范剑锋.民营企业内创业行为及其与绩效关系的研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[130]高蔚卿.企业竞争战略:资源与竞争阶段的匹配.北京:知识产权出版社,2005(6).
[131]韩炜,薛红志.基于新进入缺陷的新企业成长研究前沿探析外国经济与管理,2008(5),14-20.
[132]郝文杰,鞠晓峰.智力资本对高技术企业绩效影响的实证研究.北京理工大学学报,2008(5),467-470.
[133]何艳.中国软件企业发展战略研究.硕士学位论文,华东师范大学,2005(5).
[134]洪茹燕,吴晓波.国外企业智力资本研究述评.外国经济与管理,2005(10),42-48.
[135]侯杰泰、温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社,2004(7).
[136]互联网实验室.中国软件产业发展战略研究,2006(6).
[137]黄志娜.中国软件企业成长路径和影响因素的实证研究.硕士学位论文,清华大学,2003(6).
[138]蒋东生.我国非公有制成长型中小企业的管理能力与技术创新.管理世界,2004(2),148,153.
[139]姜凌,文俊伟和夏奇峰.软件外包与软件产业的发展--基于中印的比较.科技管理研究,2006(6),64-66.
[140]江青虎.集群企业构建的集体学习机制研究---以浙江产业集群为例.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[141]蒋琰.智力资本与财务资本:谁对企业价值创造更有效--来自于江浙地区企业的实证研究.会计研究,2008(7),49-55.
[142]景莉.试析智力资本与公司价值.生产力研究,2004(2),165-167.
[143]鞠树成,姜春林.我国中小软件企业技术创新特点及其战略模式研究.科技管理研究,2006(11),102-104.
[144]郎成平.科幻--中国高新技术企业发展战略评判.北京:东方出版社,2006(1).
[145]郎成平.中国经济是全世界最浪费的经济.有色金属再生与利用,2006(10),6-8.
[146]郎成平.本质一--破解时尚产业战略突围之道.北京:东方出版社,2007(5).
[147]郎成平.本质二--破解娱乐传媒产业以小博大之谜.北京:东方出版社,2007(5).
[148]李宝山,王建军.高新企业资本增值论.北京企业管理出版社,2003(7).
[149]李柏洲、李晓娣,李海超.中国中小型高科技企业成长状况及对策研究.科技管理研究,2006(12),21-24.
[150]李冬琴.智力资本与企业绩效的关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2004.
[151]李扣庆.顾客价值优势论.北京:经济科学出版社,2004(6).
[152]李璐.卓越服务流程.创造客户价值.东软通过细节打造服务型软件企业.电子商务,2007(05),33.
[153]李平.智力资本与核心竞争力的比较分析.商业研究,2006(7),36-40.
[154]李平.企业智力资本开发理论与方法.黑龙江:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,2007(5).
[155]李平,刘希宋.国外企业智力资本报告模式分析及启示.研究与发展管理,2006(3),29-36.
[156]李斯特.政治经济学中的国民体系.北京:商务印书馆,1961.
[157]李显君.企业竞争力形成机理.数量经济技术经济研究,2002(10),57-60.
[158]梁华.软件企业管理国际标准及国际流行的软件开发与项目管理技术特点.科技信息,2008(22),191-193.
[159]梁莱歆,官小春.智力资本计量方法综述--兼论高科技企业智力资本的计量.科学学与科学技术管理,2004(4),99-102.
[160]林涛.东软集团BPO业务发展战略研究.硕士学位论文,大连理工大学,2005(11).
[161]刘超.风险投资的区域分布性研究.技术经济,2005(11),60-61.
[162]刘超.高科技创业企业的融资渠道:天使投资研究.技术经济,2006(2),36-38.
[163]刘超.风险投资的中止决策研究综述.工业技术经济,2006(3),152-154.
[164]刘超,马慧琪和刘卫东.软件企业的智力资本对软件企业成长的影响机制研究.技术经济与管理研究,2008(5),44-45.
[165]刘玲玲.中国和印度软件产业发展比较研究.硕士学位论文,湖南大学,2004(10).
[166]刘绍坚.软件外包:技术外溢与能力提升.北京:人民出版社,2008(11).
[167]刘树高.中国软件企业技术创新战略研究.硕士学位论文,大连理工大学,2005.
[168]刘卫东.a.上海高新技术开发区建设和发展研究.经济地理,2001(30,159-164.
[169]刘卫东.b.世界高科技园区建设和发展的趋势.世界地理研究,2001(3),36-40.
[170]刘友金,罗发友.基于焦点企业成长的集群演进机理研究--以长沙工程机械集群为例.管理世界,2005(10),159-161.
[171]娄勤俭.中国和印度IT产业发展比较报告.北京:中国经济出版社,2002(11).
[172][美]罗伯特.K.殷著.周海涛、李永贤、张蘅译.案例研究设计与方法.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2004(11).
[173]罗叶明.第八个管理--怎样赶超美国、印度软件.北京:清华大学出版社,2006(1).
[174]马天蔚.为客户创造价值--有感于东软产业化发展十周年庆典.每周电脑报2001(41).
[175]马庆国.管理统计--数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究.北京:科学出版社,2002.
[176]米周,尹生.中兴通讯:全面分散企业风险的中庸之道.北京:当代中国出版社,2005(1).
[177]彭晏飞,刘树启.基于CMM的中小型软件企业软件过程改进研究.中国西部科技,2008(10),47-49.
[178]漆婧.上海市民营科技企业成长特征研究.同济大学,2006.
[179]秦军,赵娟.中国软件产业竞争力研究.财经界,2006(6),62-63.
[180]秦燕、张国梁、汪克夷.从软件外包看中国软件企业的发展与创新.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(1),126-131.
[181]冉秋红.智力资本管理会计研究.博士学位论文,武汉大学,2005.
[182]饶淑华,张文贤.上市公司智力资本信息披露的建议.财会月刊,2005(9),13-14.
[183]芮明杰,陶志刚.中国产业竞争力报告.上海:上海人民出版社,2004(7).
[184]芮明杰.知识性企业成长与创新.上海:上海人民出版社,2006(10).
[185]沈超红.创业绩效结构与绩效形成机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007
[186]史玉柱.赢在中国电视视频整理,2007.
[187]宋良荣,徐福缘.知识型企业的智力资本核算研究.科学学研究.2004(2),174-178.
[188]苏文明.迅猛发展的以色列软件业.国际人才交流,2002(3),47-48.
[189]孙琎.巨人网络投资者关系管理:坚守对抗压力,2008(3).28.
[190]孙平.美国软件产业结构优化的经验与借鉴.中国科技论坛,2008(10),140-144.
[191]孙涛.智力资本评价及其对组织绩效的影响研究,硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2003.
[192]童亮.基于跨组织合作联结的复杂产品系统创新知识管理机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[193]童有好.中国软件业的发展的机会.国际融资,2006(5),49-52.
[194]王缉慈等.创新的空间-企业集群与区域发展.北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[195]王核成.基于动态能力观的企业竞争力及其演化研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[196]王德禄.区域创新--中关村走向未来.济南:山东教育出版社,1999(11).
[197]王立军.民营科技企业集群的成长机制研究.软科学,2005(2),76-80.
[198]王青海.成长之路--看世界著名企业如何做大做强.北京:经济科学出版社,2006(9).
[199]王庆喜.企业资源与竞争优势.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2004.
[200]王伟.美国软件业发展对策及对我国的启示.信息化建设,2005(Z1).
[201]王文京.中国将成长出世界级软件公司IT时代周刊,2004(7).
[202]王小明.高校智力资本评价模型与实证研究.清华大学教育研究,2005(5),81-86.
[203]王媛媛.印度软件业迅猛发展的原因、影响及对我国的启示.硕士学位论文,吉林大学,2006(3).
[204]王月欣.企业智力资本内在价值形成与特征的理论分析.商业研究,2008(22),48-50.
[205]汪少华.浙江省企业集群成长与创新模式研究.科研管理,2003(1),129-133.
[206]邬爱其.集群企业网络化成长机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[207]邬爱其,贾生华.企业成长机制理论研究综述.科研管理,2007(2).
[208]吴永林,吴振兴和张欣瑞.创新成长--北京高新技术企业成长问题研究.北京:方志出版社,2006(3).
[209]魏大鹏.系统构造企业的核心竞争力.管理世界,2001(1),206-207.
[210]魏江,朱海燕.高技术产业集群创新过程模式演化及发展研究-以杭州软件产业集群为例.研究与发展管理,2006(12),116-121.
[211]吴东晓.创业社会胜任力结构模型与绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[212]吴建国,冀勇庆.华为的世界.北京:中信出版社,2006(11).
[213]吴晓波,徐松屹和苗文斌.西方动态能力理论述评.国外社会科学,2006(2),18-25.
[214]席酉民,强化你的结构性智力资本.发现,200(8).
[215]谢洪源.企业智力资本评价模型和实证研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2002.
[216]熊晓鸽.赢在中国栏目,2007.
[217]徐光宇.软件企业价值研究.博士学位论文,同济大学,2006(5).
[218]徐鸿旺.企业导入软件知识管理之研究--以台湾飞利浦为例.硕士学位论文,台湾:中原大学,民国91.
[219]徐金发.在购并与战略联盟之间选择:企业选择外部成长战略的分析框架和决策模型.科研管理,2003(1),92-102.
[220]许庆瑞.研究、发展与技术创新管理.北京:高等教育出版社,2000(2004年重印).
[221]杨连柱.史玉柱如是说-中国顶级CEO的商道真经.北京:中国经济出版社,2008(5).
[222]杨国枢.中国人的心理与行为:本土化研究.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004(6).
[223]杨隽萍,蔡莉.基于智力资本的科技型大学衍生公司价值形成机理的实证研究.技术经济,2008(7),50-58.
[224]杨盘华.成长性企业财务管理问题与对策.商场现代化,2006(11), 253-234.
[225][英]伊迪丝.彭罗斯.企业成长理论.上海:上海人民出版社,2007(2).
[226]袁红林.小企业成长研究.北京:中国财经出版社,2004.
[227]原毅军,孙晓华和柏丹.我国软件企业智力资本价值创造潜力的评估.中国工业经济,2005(3),44-50.
[228]昝新明.智力资本对企业内社会资本影响机制的模型分析.2008(14),45-46.
[229]曾洁琼,陈君宁.企业智力资本报告研究.管理科学,2006(5),32-38.
[230]张丹.企业智力资本及其价值增长的管理理论与方法研究.北京:企业管理出版社,2007(8).
[231]张钢.人力资本、组织资本与组织创新.科学学研究,2000(1),67-74.
[232]张华.高技术企业成长研究.博士学位论文,四川大学,2003.
[233]张林.智力资本对知识型企业可持续成长能力的影响--基于资源基础观的视角.山西财经大学学报,2008(12),28-33.
[234]张其金.东软迷码.北京:经济管理出版社,2005.
[235]张权.结构方程建模在语言测试中的研究与应用.北京:高等教育出版社,2008.
[236]张炜,王重鸣.高技术企业智力资本形成机制的实证研究.科学学研究,2007(4),729-733.
[237]张炜,王重鸣.高技术企业创业智力资本结构验证性因素分析.科学学研究,2007(6),1173-1177.
[238]张炜,袁晓璐.企业创业智力资本与成长绩效实证研究.科学学研究,2008(3),584-588.
[239]章卫民.科技型中小企业成长阶段分析及划分标准.科学学与科学技术管理,2008(5),135-139.
[240]张维迎,周黎安和顾全林.高新技术企业的成长及其影响因素:分位回归模型的一个应用.管理世界,2005(10),94-102.
[241]张小红.智力资本及其管理研究--以科研机构为例.博士学位论文,中国农业科学院,2007.
[242]张旭梅.软件企业管理.北京:科学出版社,2007.
[243]张玉利.创业与企业家精神:管理者的思维模式和行为准则.南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(1),12-15.
[244]赵建明.中小软件企业的成长模式和影响因素.硕士学位论文,郑州大学,2006(5).
[245]赵敏,李湛和王荣.科技创业企业成长混沌模型.上海交通大学学报,2007(7),1150-1153.
[246]赵秀芳.智力资本评价方法的比较与分析.财会研究,2006(10),18-19.
[247]郑美群.基于智力资本的高技术企业绩效形成机理研究.博士学位论文,吉林大学,2006.
[248]中国软件产业发展战略研究报告.互联网实验室研究报告,2006(6).
[249]朱海林,方乐和梁异等.IT服务管理、控制与流程.北京:机械工业出版社,2006(7),P151.
[250]朱丽.企业成长、企业生命周期与并购的关联性分析.集团经济研究,2006(21),67-68.
[251]朱敏.史玉柱和郭广昌谈创业团队管理.http://news.csdn.net/n/20080104/112425.html.(2008.01.04/2008.11.11).
[252]朱祖平.刍议知识管理及其框架体系.科研管理,2000,21(1),19-25.
[253]左美云.国内外知识管理研究综述.科学决策,2000(3),31-37.
[2] Aijo,T., Kuivalainen,O., &Saarenketo,S., et al. InternationalizationHandbook for the Software Business [R].2005.
[3] Amit,R.,& Schoemaker,P.J.H. Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14(1), 33-46.
[4] Andrestsch,D.B.,& Elston.J.A. Can Institutional Change Impact High-Technology Firm Growth? Evidence From Germany's Neuer Markt .Business media, 2006,( 25),9-23.
[5] Arenas,T. ,& Lavanderos,L .Intellectual Capital: Object or Process ? . Journal of intellectual capital,2008,(9), 77-85.
[6] Aschkenazi,J. Israeli Expatriate Managers an Empirical Study on Knowledge Transfer and Retention, phd paper, Capella University,2006.
[7] Ashton,R.H. Intellectual Capital and Value Creation: A Review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 2005,(24),53 -134.
[8] Banerjee,P. Resource dependence and core competence insights from Indian software firms. .Technovation ,2003,(23),251-263.
[9] Barney,J.B. Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework. Academy of Management., 1986a, 11 (4),791-800.
[10] Barney,J.B. Organizational culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage . Academy of Management Review,1986b,(11),656-665.
[11] Barney,J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
[12] Berdie,D.R. Questionnaire Length and Response Rate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973,(58), 278-280.
[13] Bhartesh,K.R.,& Bandyopadhyay,A.K. Intellectual Capital Concept and its Measurement. Finance india, 2005,(12), 1365-1374.
[14] Boedker,C.,Guthrie,J.,&Cuganesan,S. An Integrated Framework for Visualising Intellectual Capital Journal of intellectual capital, 2005,6(4),510-527.
[15] Bornemann,M. ,& Alwert,K. The German Guideline for Intellectual Capital Reporting: Method and Experiences. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007, 8(4),563-576.
[16] Bose,S. ,& Thomas,K. Valuation of Intellectual Capital in Knowledge-Based Firms; The Need For New Methods in a Changing Economic Paradigm . Management Decision, 2007,45(9), 1484-1496.
[17]Bontis,N.There's a Price on Your Head:Managing Intellectual Capital Strategically.Business Quarterly,Summer,1996,60(4),40-47.
[18]Botins,N.Assessing Knowledge Assets a Review of The Models Used to Measure Intellectual Vapital.International Journal of Management Reviews,2001,3(1),41-60.
[19]Bozbura,F.T.Measurement And Application of Intellectual Capital in Turkey.The Learning Organization,2004,11(4),357-367.
[20]Bozzolan,S.,O'Regan,P.,& Ricceri.E Intellectual capital disclosure(ICD);A comparison of Italy and the UK.Journal of HRCA:Human Resource Costing & Accounting,2006,10(2),92-113.
[21]Breznitz,D.Industrial R&D as a national policy:Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry.Research Policy,2007(2),1465-1482.
[22]Brooking,A.,& Lester,T.et.al.Intellectual Capital:Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise.Financial Times.Thomson Business;[London edition],1996(9),8.
[23]Bruton,G.D.,& Rubanik,Y.Resources of the firm,Russian high-technology startups,and term growth..Journal of business venturing,2002(17),553-576.
[24]Chen,J.,Zhu,Z.H.,& Xie,H.Y.Measuring intellectual capital:a new model and empirical study.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2004,5(1),195-212.
[25][美]Ehin,C.著,郭延航译.开发智力资本一企业内部智力资本的奥秘。北京:机械工业出版社,2003.5.
[26]Chen,Y.S.The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual canpital on competitive advantages of firms.Journal of business ethics,2008(77),271-286.
[27]Churchill,N.C.,& Lewis,V.L.The five stages of small business growth..Harvard Business Review,1983(5-6),30-50.
[28]Cohen,S.,&Kaimenakis,N.Intellectual capital and corporate performance in knowledge-intensive SMEs.The Learning Organization,2007,14(3),241-262.
[29][美]Cusumano.M.A著,中文版参见张云涛,龚玲,张燕译.软件业的生存之道.北京:电子工业出版社,2006.1.
[30]Buskirk,B.,Schmidt.S.M.P.,& Ralph.D.L.Patterns in High-Tech Firms Growth Strategies by Seeking Mass Mainstream Customer Adapations.Journal of Business Review,2007,8(1),34-39.
[31]Dooley,E.Intellectual Capital in The Software Industry An Empirical Test.Phd paper,University of Washington,2000.
[32]Erickson,G.S.,Brambandkar,A.,& Applebee,I.Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance in Aerospace/Defense.Competition Forum.Indiana,2007,5(1),126-130.
[33]Fukugawa,N.Science parks in Japan and Their Value-Added Contributions to New Technology-Based Firms.International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006(24),381-400.
[34] Garnsey,E., Stam,E. ,& Heffernan,P. New Firm Growth, Exploring Processes and Paths. .Industrial and innovation, 2006,13(1), 1-20.
[35] Ghiselli,E.E., Campbell,J.P. ,& Zedeck,S. Measurement Theory for the Behavioural Sciences. W. H. Freeman and Co,.New York. 1981.
[36] Goddard,J., Tavakoli, M.,& Wilson,J.O.S. Sources of Variation in Firm Profitability and Growth. Journal of business research, 2008(10),1-13.
[37] Grant,R.M. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 1991, 33(3),114-135.
[38] Grankham,C.E., Nichols,L.D. & Shonberner.M. A Framework for the Management of Intellectual Capital in The Health Care Industry. Journal of Health Care Finance. New York: Spring, 1997,23( 3), 1-19.
[39] Gregorio,M.C. ,& Pedro,L.S. Intellectual Capital in High-Tech Firms The Case of Spain, 2008,19(1),25-35.
[40] Gregorio,M.C, Pedro,L.S. ,& Jose,E.N.L. The Role of Corporate Reputation in Developing Relational Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2004,5(4),575-585.
[41] Guthrie,J., Petty,R. ,& Ricceri.F. Intellectual Capital Reporting: Lessons From Hongkong and Austria[R]. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, 2007.
[42] Hanks,S.H., Waston,C.J.,& Jansen,E. Tightening The Life-cycle Construct: A Taxonomic Study of Growth Stage Configurations in High-Technology Organizations. Enterpreneurship Theory and Practice, 1993,winter, 5-29.
[43] Herremans,I.M. ,& Isaac,R.G The Intellectual Capital Realization Process (ICRP) An Application of the Resource-based View of the Firm. Journal of Managerial issues, 2004,16(2),217-231.
[44] Hoch,D. ,& Purkert,G Secrets of Software Success - Management Insights From 100 Companies Around the World in One of the Most Dynamic Industries, 2000.2.
[45] Honjo,Y. ,& Harada.N . SME Policy, Financial Structure and Firm Growth Evidence from Japan. Journal of Business Economics, 2006(27),289-300.
[46] Hudson. W.J. Intellectual Capital: How to Build it,Enhance it ,Use it. Newyork: John Wiley, 1993,(1).
[47] Kannan,G. ,& Aulbur,W.G Intellectual capital: Measurement Effectiveness. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2004,5(3),389-413.
[48] Kao,M.C. Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process to Evaluate the Development Strategies of Intellectual Capital for Fabless Integrated Circuit Design Houses in Taiwan. The Business Review, Cambridge, 2007,8(2), 75-81.
[49] Khan,S. Intellectual Capital and the Perceived Relevance of the Balance Sheet as a Value Measure for Corporations. Journal of American Academy of Business. 2008,12(2),83-90.
[50] Kogut,B.,& Zander,U. Knowledge of Tthe Firm and The Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation . Journal of International Business Studies, 1993(4), 625-645.
[51] Kong,E. The strategic Importance of Intellectual Capital in The Non-Profit Sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007,8(4),721-731.
[52] Kotler,P. Marketing's New Paradigm :What's Really Happening Out There. Planning Review ,1992(20),50.
[53] Kraerner,T.D. Sustainable Rapid Growth, Why Some Firms Succeed and Others fail. Phd paper ,University of Pennsylvania ,2004.
[54] Kujansivu,P. Operationalising Intellectual Capital Management: Choosing a Suitable Approach. Measuring Business Excellence. Bradford ,2008,12(2), 25-37.
[55] Kujansivu,P. ,& Lunnqvist,A. Investigating the Value And Efficiency of Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007,8(2), 272-287.
[56] Kwantes,C.T. Organizational Commitment, Intellectual Capital and Organizational Competitiveness. South Asian Journal of Management.: Jul-Sep, 2007,14(3), 28-43.
[57] Landi,C.M. Constructive Comparative Advantage: How India Is Moving Up The Global Software Value Chain. Phd paper, The American university ,2002.
[58] Latham,S. Contrasting Strategic Response to Economic Recession in Start-Up versus Established Software Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 2009(4), 180-201.
[59] Liang,C.J. ,& Lin,Y.L. Which IC is More Important a Life Cycle Perspective. Journal of intellectual capital, 2008,9(1),62-76.
[60] Litschka,M., Markom,A. ,& Schunder,S. Measuring and Analysing Intellectual Assets an Integrative Approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital ,2006,7(2), 160-173.
[61] Liu,C, & Liu,W.D. Find New Financing Access for SMB--Angel Investment. The Eighth West Lake International Conference on SMB ,2006.12.
[62] Lowegren,M. New Technology-Based Firms in Science Parks-A study of Resources and Absorptive Capacity. Sweeden: Lund Business Press ,Institute of Economic Research, 2003.
[63] Ma,H. Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance. Competitiveness Review, 2000(10), 15-32.
[64] Marr,B. ,& Moustaghfir,K. Defining Intellectual Vapital a Three-Dimensional Approach. Management Decision, 2005,43(9), 1114-1128.
[65] Marr,B., Gray,D. ,& Neely,A. Why Do Frms Measure Their Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2003,4(4),441-464.
[66] Maxwell,L.M. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. Library Journal. New York, 1997,122(7),94.
[67] Mouritsen,J., Larse,H.T. ,& Bukh,P.N. et al. Reading an Intellectual Capital Statement: Describing and Prescribing Knowledge Management Strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2001,2(4),259-383.
[68] Neck,H.M. Firm Growth Following The Initial Public Offering The Impact of Organizational Slack on The Productive Opportunity of High Technology Entrepreneurial Firms, Phd paper , University of Colorado ,Graduate School, 2001.
[69] Nelson,R.,& Winter,S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA,1982.
[70] Ng,A.W Reporting Intellectual Capital Flow in Technology-Based Companies; Case Studies of Canadian Wireless Technology Companies. . Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2006,17(4), 492-510.
[71] Patricia,O.P. Intellectual Capital Reports in India Lessons From a Case Study. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2005, 6(1),141-149.
[72] Pena,I. Intellectual Capital and Business Start-up Success. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2002,3(2), 180-198.
[73] Penrose, E T. The Theory of The Growth of The Firm. John Wiley, New York, 1959
[74] Peteraf,M.A. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 1993(14), 179-191.
[75] Pike,S., Fernstrom,L. ,& Roos,G Intellectual Capital: Management Approach in ICS Ltd. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005,6(4), 489-509.
[76] Petty,R., Ricceri,F. ,& Guthrie.J. Intellectual capital: A Uuser's Perspective. Management Research News, 2008, 31(6), 434-447.
[77] Porter,M.E. Competitive strategy .New York: The Free Press, 1980.
[78] Porter,M.E. Competitive Advantage:. New York: The Free Press, 1985.
[79] Porter,M.E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations ,London: Macmillan press ltd, 1990.
[80] Ramirez,Y. ,Lorduy,C. ,& Antonio,J. Intellectual Capital Management in Spanish uiversities. Journal of Intellectual Capital. Bradford, 2007,8(4),732-748.
[81] Reichheld,F.F. Loyalty-Based Management. Havard Business Review , 1993,71(3-4), 64-74.
[82] Robinson,G. ,& Kleiner,B.H. How to Measure an Organization's Intellectual Capital. Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford, 1996,11 (8),36-51.
[83] Robert,M.G Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17), 109-122.
[84] Roslender,R. Intellectual Capital Reporting: Lessons From Hong Kong and Australia. Accounting and Business Research. Kingston Upon Thames, 2008,38(1), 91-98.
[85] Rumelt,R.P. Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm. Competitive Strategic Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984,556-570.
[86] Rumelt,R.P. How Much Does Industry Matter? Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12),167-186.
[87] Saint-Onge .,& Hubert. Tacit Knowledge: The Key to the Strategic Alignment of Intellectual Capital Trategy & Leadership, 1996, 24(2), 10-14.
[88] Schneider,A. ,& Samkin.G Intellectual Capital Reporting By the New Zealand Local Government sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2008,9(3), 456-486.
[89] Schiuma,G ,& Lerro,A. Intellectual Capital and Company's Performance Improvement Measuring Business Excellence, 2008,12(2), 3-9.
[90] Seleim,A. ,& Ashour,A. Intellectual Capital in Egyptian Software Firms. The Learning Organization, 2004,11(4),332-346.
[91] Sonnier,B.M., Carson,K.D. ,& Phillips.P et.al. Accounting for Intellectual Capital: The Relationship Between Profitability and Disclosure. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 2007,12(2),3-14.
[92] Stahle,P. ,& Bounfour,A. Understanding Dynamics of Intellectual Capital of nations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2008,9(2), 164-177.
[93] Stewart, T.A. Intellectual Capital, The New Wealth of organizations. Doubleday, Newyork, 1997(3).
[94] Suzuki,K.L, Kim,S.H. ,& Bae,Z.T. Entrepreneurship and Business Culture in Japan and the U.S. Japan and word economy, 1998(10),487-494.
[95] Sveiby,K.E. The Intangible Assets Monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting ,1997,2(1),73-97.
[96] Tan,H.P., Plowman,D.,& Hancock,P. Intellectual Capital and Financial Returns of Companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2007,8(1),76-95.
[97] Teece,D.J.,Piasno,G,& Shuen,A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management .Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18 (7),509-533.
[98] Tovstiga,G,& Tulugurova,E. Intellectual Capital Practices and Performance in Russsian Enterprise. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007,8(4),695-707.
[99] Tsai,W.,& Ghoshal,S. Social Capital and Value Creation: the Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 1998(41),464-478.
[100]Tsai,W. Social Capital, Strategic Relatedness, and the Formation of Intra-Organizational Strategic Linkage. Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21),925-939.
[101] Tsan,W.N. Measurement and Comparison of IT Industrial Intellectual Capital in Taiwan[R]. 2003(12).
[102] Tsan,W.N. ,& Chang,C.C. Intellectual Capital System Interaction in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005,6(2),285-298.
[103]Tome,E.The Hidden Face of Intellectual Capital:Social Policies.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2008,9(3),499-518.
[104]Tovstiga,G,& Tulugurova,E.Intellectual Capital Practices and Performance in Russian enterprises.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2007,8(4),695-707.
[105]Vandemaele,S.N.,Vergauwen,P.G,& Smits,A.J.Intellectual capital Disclosure in The Netherlands,Sweden and the UK:A Longitudinal and Comparative Study.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2005,6(3),417-426.
[106]Vincent,M.,& Zikmund,W.G.An Experimental Investigation of Situational Effects on Risk Perception.Advances in Consumer Research,1976,3(1),125-130.
[107]Walsh,D.A.An Evaluation of the Maturing Indian Software Industry.Phd Paper,Capella University,2005(12).
[108]Walz,J.T.The Wealth of Knowledge:Intellectual Capital and the Twenty-First Century Organization.Leadership.,& Organization Development Journal,2005,26(1/2),77-79.
[109]Wang,J.C.Executing Strategies on Intellectual Capital:Case Study for Management and Corporate Governance.Journal of American Academy of Business,Cambridge,2007,11(1),125-131.
[110]Wang,J.C.Utilizing Skandia Navigator System and Ohlson Model to Evaluate the Intellectual Capital Performance for Taiwan Electronic Corporations.The Business Review,2006,6(1),186-192.
[111]Wang,W.Y.,& Chang,C.F.Intellectual Capital and Performance in Causal Models Evidence From the Information Technology Industry in Taiwan.Journal of Intellectual Capital,2005,6(2),222-236.
[112]Watson,J.Managing Iintellectual Capital:Making the Most of the Best.The Canadian Manager,1996,21(3),11-13.
[113]W,J.L,Van,M.,& Singh,I.et.al.Is There an Association Between Intellectual Capital Disclosure,Underpricing and Long-run Performance?.Journal of HRCA:Human Resource Costing & Accounting,2007,11(3),178-213.
[114]Wernerfelt,B.A.Resource-based View of the Firm.Strategic Management Journal,1984,15(5),171-180.
[115]Youndt,M.A.& SnelI,S.A.Human Resource Configurations,Intellectual Capital,and Organizational Performance.Journal of Managerial Issues,2004.16(3),337-360.
[116]Zahra,S A.,& Gerard,G.Absorptive Capacity:A Review Reconceptualization and Extension.Academy of Management Review,2002,27.
[117][美]安得利.萨克森宁(Saxenian)著,中文版参见曹蓬.杨宇光等译,美国硅谷和128公路地区的文化与竞争----地区优势.上海:上海远东出版社,1999(9).
[118]安妮.布鲁金著,赵洁平译第三资源--智力资本及其管理.大连:东 北财经大学出版社1998(4).
[119]Blumling,M.,Frick.K.A.,&Meehan.W.F.软件业如何力挽狂澜.麦肯锡管理论丛,2002(3).
[120]宝贡敏.适合我国管理文化特点的企业管理模式.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,30(6),5-14.
[121]宝贡敏.现代企业战略管理.郑州:河南人民出版社,2001.
[122]陈峰.爱尔兰、以色列、新加坡三国软件产业发展现状.西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002(3),455-458.
[123]陈宏刚,沈向洋和刘念臻等.软件企业的管理与文化--剖析微软的制胜之道.北京:清华大学出版社,2003(2).
[124]陈劲,桂旺彬.复杂产品系统模块化创新流程与管理策略.研究与发展管理,2006(6)74-79.
[125]陈劲,谢洪源和朱朝晖.企业智力资本评价模型和实证研究.中国地质大学学报(社科版),2004(12),27-31.
[126]陈乃醒.中小企业成长案例评注.北京:民主与建设出版社,2002(6).
[127]崔光耀.与客户共同成长--东软解决方案论坛倡导绿色发展主题信息安全与通信保密,2004(12).
[128]钭志斌.财务视角下的中小企业成长性实证研究.商业时代,2008(21),75-76
[129]范剑锋.民营企业内创业行为及其与绩效关系的研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[130]高蔚卿.企业竞争战略:资源与竞争阶段的匹配.北京:知识产权出版社,2005(6).
[131]韩炜,薛红志.基于新进入缺陷的新企业成长研究前沿探析外国经济与管理,2008(5),14-20.
[132]郝文杰,鞠晓峰.智力资本对高技术企业绩效影响的实证研究.北京理工大学学报,2008(5),467-470.
[133]何艳.中国软件企业发展战略研究.硕士学位论文,华东师范大学,2005(5).
[134]洪茹燕,吴晓波.国外企业智力资本研究述评.外国经济与管理,2005(10),42-48.
[135]侯杰泰、温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社,2004(7).
[136]互联网实验室.中国软件产业发展战略研究,2006(6).
[137]黄志娜.中国软件企业成长路径和影响因素的实证研究.硕士学位论文,清华大学,2003(6).
[138]蒋东生.我国非公有制成长型中小企业的管理能力与技术创新.管理世界,2004(2),148,153.
[139]姜凌,文俊伟和夏奇峰.软件外包与软件产业的发展--基于中印的比较.科技管理研究,2006(6),64-66.
[140]江青虎.集群企业构建的集体学习机制研究---以浙江产业集群为例.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[141]蒋琰.智力资本与财务资本:谁对企业价值创造更有效--来自于江浙地区企业的实证研究.会计研究,2008(7),49-55.
[142]景莉.试析智力资本与公司价值.生产力研究,2004(2),165-167.
[143]鞠树成,姜春林.我国中小软件企业技术创新特点及其战略模式研究.科技管理研究,2006(11),102-104.
[144]郎成平.科幻--中国高新技术企业发展战略评判.北京:东方出版社,2006(1).
[145]郎成平.中国经济是全世界最浪费的经济.有色金属再生与利用,2006(10),6-8.
[146]郎成平.本质一--破解时尚产业战略突围之道.北京:东方出版社,2007(5).
[147]郎成平.本质二--破解娱乐传媒产业以小博大之谜.北京:东方出版社,2007(5).
[148]李宝山,王建军.高新企业资本增值论.北京企业管理出版社,2003(7).
[149]李柏洲、李晓娣,李海超.中国中小型高科技企业成长状况及对策研究.科技管理研究,2006(12),21-24.
[150]李冬琴.智力资本与企业绩效的关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2004.
[151]李扣庆.顾客价值优势论.北京:经济科学出版社,2004(6).
[152]李璐.卓越服务流程.创造客户价值.东软通过细节打造服务型软件企业.电子商务,2007(05),33.
[153]李平.智力资本与核心竞争力的比较分析.商业研究,2006(7),36-40.
[154]李平.企业智力资本开发理论与方法.黑龙江:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,2007(5).
[155]李平,刘希宋.国外企业智力资本报告模式分析及启示.研究与发展管理,2006(3),29-36.
[156]李斯特.政治经济学中的国民体系.北京:商务印书馆,1961.
[157]李显君.企业竞争力形成机理.数量经济技术经济研究,2002(10),57-60.
[158]梁华.软件企业管理国际标准及国际流行的软件开发与项目管理技术特点.科技信息,2008(22),191-193.
[159]梁莱歆,官小春.智力资本计量方法综述--兼论高科技企业智力资本的计量.科学学与科学技术管理,2004(4),99-102.
[160]林涛.东软集团BPO业务发展战略研究.硕士学位论文,大连理工大学,2005(11).
[161]刘超.风险投资的区域分布性研究.技术经济,2005(11),60-61.
[162]刘超.高科技创业企业的融资渠道:天使投资研究.技术经济,2006(2),36-38.
[163]刘超.风险投资的中止决策研究综述.工业技术经济,2006(3),152-154.
[164]刘超,马慧琪和刘卫东.软件企业的智力资本对软件企业成长的影响机制研究.技术经济与管理研究,2008(5),44-45.
[165]刘玲玲.中国和印度软件产业发展比较研究.硕士学位论文,湖南大学,2004(10).
[166]刘绍坚.软件外包:技术外溢与能力提升.北京:人民出版社,2008(11).
[167]刘树高.中国软件企业技术创新战略研究.硕士学位论文,大连理工大学,2005.
[168]刘卫东.a.上海高新技术开发区建设和发展研究.经济地理,2001(30,159-164.
[169]刘卫东.b.世界高科技园区建设和发展的趋势.世界地理研究,2001(3),36-40.
[170]刘友金,罗发友.基于焦点企业成长的集群演进机理研究--以长沙工程机械集群为例.管理世界,2005(10),159-161.
[171]娄勤俭.中国和印度IT产业发展比较报告.北京:中国经济出版社,2002(11).
[172][美]罗伯特.K.殷著.周海涛、李永贤、张蘅译.案例研究设计与方法.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2004(11).
[173]罗叶明.第八个管理--怎样赶超美国、印度软件.北京:清华大学出版社,2006(1).
[174]马天蔚.为客户创造价值--有感于东软产业化发展十周年庆典.每周电脑报2001(41).
[175]马庆国.管理统计--数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究.北京:科学出版社,2002.
[176]米周,尹生.中兴通讯:全面分散企业风险的中庸之道.北京:当代中国出版社,2005(1).
[177]彭晏飞,刘树启.基于CMM的中小型软件企业软件过程改进研究.中国西部科技,2008(10),47-49.
[178]漆婧.上海市民营科技企业成长特征研究.同济大学,2006.
[179]秦军,赵娟.中国软件产业竞争力研究.财经界,2006(6),62-63.
[180]秦燕、张国梁、汪克夷.从软件外包看中国软件企业的发展与创新.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(1),126-131.
[181]冉秋红.智力资本管理会计研究.博士学位论文,武汉大学,2005.
[182]饶淑华,张文贤.上市公司智力资本信息披露的建议.财会月刊,2005(9),13-14.
[183]芮明杰,陶志刚.中国产业竞争力报告.上海:上海人民出版社,2004(7).
[184]芮明杰.知识性企业成长与创新.上海:上海人民出版社,2006(10).
[185]沈超红.创业绩效结构与绩效形成机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007
[186]史玉柱.赢在中国电视视频整理,2007.
[187]宋良荣,徐福缘.知识型企业的智力资本核算研究.科学学研究.2004(2),174-178.
[188]苏文明.迅猛发展的以色列软件业.国际人才交流,2002(3),47-48.
[189]孙琎.巨人网络投资者关系管理:坚守对抗压力,2008(3).28.
[190]孙平.美国软件产业结构优化的经验与借鉴.中国科技论坛,2008(10),140-144.
[191]孙涛.智力资本评价及其对组织绩效的影响研究,硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2003.
[192]童亮.基于跨组织合作联结的复杂产品系统创新知识管理机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[193]童有好.中国软件业的发展的机会.国际融资,2006(5),49-52.
[194]王缉慈等.创新的空间-企业集群与区域发展.北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[195]王核成.基于动态能力观的企业竞争力及其演化研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[196]王德禄.区域创新--中关村走向未来.济南:山东教育出版社,1999(11).
[197]王立军.民营科技企业集群的成长机制研究.软科学,2005(2),76-80.
[198]王青海.成长之路--看世界著名企业如何做大做强.北京:经济科学出版社,2006(9).
[199]王庆喜.企业资源与竞争优势.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2004.
[200]王伟.美国软件业发展对策及对我国的启示.信息化建设,2005(Z1).
[201]王文京.中国将成长出世界级软件公司IT时代周刊,2004(7).
[202]王小明.高校智力资本评价模型与实证研究.清华大学教育研究,2005(5),81-86.
[203]王媛媛.印度软件业迅猛发展的原因、影响及对我国的启示.硕士学位论文,吉林大学,2006(3).
[204]王月欣.企业智力资本内在价值形成与特征的理论分析.商业研究,2008(22),48-50.
[205]汪少华.浙江省企业集群成长与创新模式研究.科研管理,2003(1),129-133.
[206]邬爱其.集群企业网络化成长机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[207]邬爱其,贾生华.企业成长机制理论研究综述.科研管理,2007(2).
[208]吴永林,吴振兴和张欣瑞.创新成长--北京高新技术企业成长问题研究.北京:方志出版社,2006(3).
[209]魏大鹏.系统构造企业的核心竞争力.管理世界,2001(1),206-207.
[210]魏江,朱海燕.高技术产业集群创新过程模式演化及发展研究-以杭州软件产业集群为例.研究与发展管理,2006(12),116-121.
[211]吴东晓.创业社会胜任力结构模型与绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
[212]吴建国,冀勇庆.华为的世界.北京:中信出版社,2006(11).
[213]吴晓波,徐松屹和苗文斌.西方动态能力理论述评.国外社会科学,2006(2),18-25.
[214]席酉民,强化你的结构性智力资本.发现,200(8).
[215]谢洪源.企业智力资本评价模型和实证研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2002.
[216]熊晓鸽.赢在中国栏目,2007.
[217]徐光宇.软件企业价值研究.博士学位论文,同济大学,2006(5).
[218]徐鸿旺.企业导入软件知识管理之研究--以台湾飞利浦为例.硕士学位论文,台湾:中原大学,民国91.
[219]徐金发.在购并与战略联盟之间选择:企业选择外部成长战略的分析框架和决策模型.科研管理,2003(1),92-102.
[220]许庆瑞.研究、发展与技术创新管理.北京:高等教育出版社,2000(2004年重印).
[221]杨连柱.史玉柱如是说-中国顶级CEO的商道真经.北京:中国经济出版社,2008(5).
[222]杨国枢.中国人的心理与行为:本土化研究.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004(6).
[223]杨隽萍,蔡莉.基于智力资本的科技型大学衍生公司价值形成机理的实证研究.技术经济,2008(7),50-58.
[224]杨盘华.成长性企业财务管理问题与对策.商场现代化,2006(11), 253-234.
[225][英]伊迪丝.彭罗斯.企业成长理论.上海:上海人民出版社,2007(2).
[226]袁红林.小企业成长研究.北京:中国财经出版社,2004.
[227]原毅军,孙晓华和柏丹.我国软件企业智力资本价值创造潜力的评估.中国工业经济,2005(3),44-50.
[228]昝新明.智力资本对企业内社会资本影响机制的模型分析.2008(14),45-46.
[229]曾洁琼,陈君宁.企业智力资本报告研究.管理科学,2006(5),32-38.
[230]张丹.企业智力资本及其价值增长的管理理论与方法研究.北京:企业管理出版社,2007(8).
[231]张钢.人力资本、组织资本与组织创新.科学学研究,2000(1),67-74.
[232]张华.高技术企业成长研究.博士学位论文,四川大学,2003.
[233]张林.智力资本对知识型企业可持续成长能力的影响--基于资源基础观的视角.山西财经大学学报,2008(12),28-33.
[234]张其金.东软迷码.北京:经济管理出版社,2005.
[235]张权.结构方程建模在语言测试中的研究与应用.北京:高等教育出版社,2008.
[236]张炜,王重鸣.高技术企业智力资本形成机制的实证研究.科学学研究,2007(4),729-733.
[237]张炜,王重鸣.高技术企业创业智力资本结构验证性因素分析.科学学研究,2007(6),1173-1177.
[238]张炜,袁晓璐.企业创业智力资本与成长绩效实证研究.科学学研究,2008(3),584-588.
[239]章卫民.科技型中小企业成长阶段分析及划分标准.科学学与科学技术管理,2008(5),135-139.
[240]张维迎,周黎安和顾全林.高新技术企业的成长及其影响因素:分位回归模型的一个应用.管理世界,2005(10),94-102.
[241]张小红.智力资本及其管理研究--以科研机构为例.博士学位论文,中国农业科学院,2007.
[242]张旭梅.软件企业管理.北京:科学出版社,2007.
[243]张玉利.创业与企业家精神:管理者的思维模式和行为准则.南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(1),12-15.
[244]赵建明.中小软件企业的成长模式和影响因素.硕士学位论文,郑州大学,2006(5).
[245]赵敏,李湛和王荣.科技创业企业成长混沌模型.上海交通大学学报,2007(7),1150-1153.
[246]赵秀芳.智力资本评价方法的比较与分析.财会研究,2006(10),18-19.
[247]郑美群.基于智力资本的高技术企业绩效形成机理研究.博士学位论文,吉林大学,2006.
[248]中国软件产业发展战略研究报告.互联网实验室研究报告,2006(6).
[249]朱海林,方乐和梁异等.IT服务管理、控制与流程.北京:机械工业出版社,2006(7),P151.
[250]朱丽.企业成长、企业生命周期与并购的关联性分析.集团经济研究,2006(21),67-68.
[251]朱敏.史玉柱和郭广昌谈创业团队管理.http://news.csdn.net/n/20080104/112425.html.(2008.01.04/2008.11.11).
[252]朱祖平.刍议知识管理及其框架体系.科研管理,2000,21(1),19-25.
[253]左美云.国内外知识管理研究综述.科学决策,2000(3),31-37.