临床—弥散不匹配与急性缺血性卒中患者临床结局及中医证候的关系
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
背景
     卒中试验已经证明超过溶栓时间窗的患者并不能从溶栓治疗中获益,大部分患者都无法获得溶栓治疗。但是通过一定方法筛选那些具有缺血半暗带的超窗患者却有可能从溶栓治疗中获益。目前的临床试验广泛采用核磁灌注-弥散不匹配法选择具有半暗带的患者进行溶栓治疗,但由于灌注检查条件要求较高,限制了其在临床中的应用。卒中试验NIHSS评分评估缺血性卒中的严重程度与其弥散加权成像(DWI)所示的梗死容积不匹配即临床-弥散不匹配(Clinical-Diffusion Mismatch,CDM)被认为是最有可能代替核磁灌注-弥散不匹配识别那些可能从再灌注治疗中获益患者的方法。但目前国内外对临床-弥散不匹配的研究多选择超早期的患者进行研究,很少有研究者将视野扩展到更晚时间。发病1周内的患者是否存在半暗带,其与临床结局及中医证候的相关性仍然不清楚。
     目的
     初步研究急性缺血性卒中发病后1周内患者临床-弥散不匹配规律,并分析其与临床结局及中医证候演变的关系,为不同患者的临床管理策略制定提供依据。
     方法
     本研究为前瞻性研究,56例卒中发病72h内入院的急性缺血性卒中患者,在发病1周内完成头颅核磁检查,并诊断为大脑中动脉供血区域梗死,采用计算机软件半自动方法计算其DWI梗死容积,并分别在在入院时、入院第7天、入院第15天、第30天分别对患者进行NIHSS评分,mRS评分及中医证候评分。临床-弥散不匹配定义为:DWI容积≤5mL而NIHSS评分≥8分。良好临床结局定义如下:(1)NIHSS评分改善≥8分或观察终点NIHSS评分为0-1分;(2)观察终点mRS评分为0-2分。
     结果
     1.56例患者中的16例(28.6%)患者存在临床-弥散不匹配。存在CDM和无CDM的患者良好临床结局和死亡病例数统计均无显著差异(P值分别为0.091和1.000)。CDM组和无CDM组患者分别有4例(25%)和14例(35%)患者神经恶化,但无统计学差异(p=0.473)。
     2.患者从入院基线至入院第7天,存在CDM组和无CDM组NIHSS评分分别减少2.7分和0.4分,且有统计学差异(p=0.026);从基线时间至入院第15天,有CDM组NIHSS评分减少2.3分;无CDM组NIHSS评分减少0.7分(p=0.022);至第30天,两组NIHSS评分减少分别为2.5分和1.7分(p=0.040)。
     3. NIHSS评分与DWI梗死容积具有很好的相关性(rs=0.721,p=0.009),但CDM组(rs=0.610,P=0.012)与无CDM组(rs=0.847,P=0.000)患者DWI梗死容积与NIHSS相关性却有所不同:无CDM组NIHSS评分与DWI容积相关性优于CDM组。
     4.随着卒中发病时间的延长,临床-弥散不匹配出现比例降低。发病72h内行头颅核磁检查的33例患者中,共有12例(36.3%)患者出现CDM,而在72h后行头颅核磁检查的23例患者中,共有4例(17.4%)患者出现CDM。
     5.所有患者卒中发病72h内,以风证和血瘀证候评分最高,中位数均为6.0分。入院第7天,痰证较重(中位数=7分),火热证(中位数=3分)和瘀血(中
     位数=6分)证候评分较前无明显变化,而气虚证候加重(中位数=6分)。入院第15天,风证证候评分继续下降(中位数=2分),火热证较前无明显变化[中位数=3.5分),痰证评分较前下降(中位数=6分),血瘀证较前无明显变化,气虚证候较前加重(中位数=7.5分)。入院第30天,风证评分继续较前无变化,而痰证和瘀血证较前减低,气虚证候有所缓解(中位数=6.0分)。
     6.两组患者从基线时间至发病第30天瘀血证评分和气虚证评分变化有显著统计学差异:CDM组瘀血证评分变化中位数为-1.0分,而这一数值在无CDM组为-5.5分(p=0.040);对气虚证候评分30天内变化,两组分别为-0.5分和3.0分(p=0.004)。其余证候得分变化均无显著差异。
     7.对所有患者,只有活血化瘀治疗与mRS变化显著相关(rs=-0.331,p=0.013);对CDM组患者,抗血小板聚集与mRS改变成负相关(rs=-0.504),且有统计学意义(p=0.047),对无CDM组患者,抗血小板聚集与mRS改变无显著相关性(rs=-0.204,p=0.206);另一方面,活血化瘀治疗与CDM组患者mRS改变无显著相关性(rs=-0.385,p=0.141),而与无CDM组患者mRS改变却显著相关(rs=-0.377,p=0.016)。
     结论
     急性缺血性卒中患者发病1周内,仍然可能存在可挽救组织;存在CDM的患者与无CDM的患者临床结局无显著差异;但存在CDM的患者NIHSS评分改善更明显,神经学结局优于无CDM组;两组患者中医证候演变有所差异,主要体现在瘀血和气虚证候的演变上;这两类患者对相同治疗药物的临床反应不同;针对这两类患者应该制定不同的临床管理方案。
Background Stroke trials have failed to show a significant benefit of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator(tPA) when administered beyond time window. More importantly, most patients do not have a chance to get thrombolytic therapy. However, there is evidence that even at later treatment times, carefully selected patients may benefit from reperfusion. Currently, Perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) and diffusion-weighted MRI(DWI)mismatch is used for selecting patients with a penumbra to take thrombolytic therapy, which is widely used in clinical trials. A limitation of this model is the comparatively high requirement, which have limited its routine clinical use. Mismatch between stroke severity, assessed with the national institutes of health stroke scale(NIHSS), and the volume of the DWI lesion(clinical diffusion mismatch, CDM) has been suggested as a most promising select tool for identifying patients with penumbral tissue, replacing PWI-DWI mismatch.
     Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the law of CDM within1week of symptom onset and analysis the relationship between CDM and outcomes and TCM Syndromes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Consequently, we pursue to provide evidence for clinical management strategies for different patients.
     Methods We conducted a prospective study. Fifty-six patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) were admitted to hospital within72hours and imaged within168hours of symptom onset. DWI volumes were measured with using semi-automated thresholding technique. We performed clinical assessment including NIHSSS, mRS, TCM syndromes in admission time points,7days,15days and30days after symptom onset, respectively. CDM was defined as NIHSS>8and DWI<25mL. favorable clinical outcome was defined as an improvement on the NIHSS at least8points between baseline and30days or NIHSS<1at30days or mRS<2at30days.
     Results
     1. A total of16of56(28.6%) patients fulfilled the proposed definition of CDM. favorable clinical outcome and death cases were not significantly different between with CDM and without CDM (p=0.091,1.000, respectively). And then, the CDM group and without CDM group have4of16and14of40cases got neurologic deterioration, but not significant (p=0.473).
     2. The changes of NIHSS between the two groups were significantly different. From the baseline to day7, the NIHSS of with CDM group declined2.7while this figure in the without CDM group is0.4(p=0.026). At day15, the changes of with CDM and without CDM group were-2.3and-0.7respectively (p=0.022). At the endpoint of our observation (day30), the changes of NIHSS for the two groups were-2.5and-1.7, respectively (p=0.04).
     3. There was a highly significant positive correlation between NIHSS and DWI volume(rs=0.721, p=0.009), but the data in without CDM group(rs=0.847, P=0.000) is better correlated with NIHSS than that of with CDM group (rs=0.610, P=0.012).
     4. With the extension of onset time, the ratio of CDM declined gradually.12of33(36.3%) patients who were performed with MRI examinations within72hours after onset while the figure in the others who took MRl examinations beyond72hours was4of23(17.4%).
     5. The wind syndrome and blood stasis syndrome got the highest score (median of both=6.0). At day7, phegmdampness syndrome was comparatively severity (median=7.0). Firehot and blood stasis syndrome remained stable(median=:3.0and6.0,respectively). However, Qi deficiency syndrome became more serious(median=6.0).at day15,both wind syndrome and phegmdampness experienced an consistent decline(median=2.0and6.0,respectively). firehot did not show a significant fluctuation(median=3.5). at the same time, qi deficiency showed an increasing trends(median=7.5). After that, the wind syndrome showed little change. The phegmdampbess syndrome and blood stasis syndrome descend, qi deficiency also released at some extent.
     6. From baseline to day30, The two groups were significantly different in the scores change of Blood stasis (median-1.0vs-5.5, p=0.040) and Qi deficiency (median=-0.5vs3.0, p=0.004). The change of the rest TCM syndromes were not significantly.
     7. There was a highly significant negative correlation between promoting blood circulation for removing blood stasis and mRS (rs=-0.331, p=0.013). precisely, in the patients with CDM, inhibition of platelet aggregation also showed a negative correlation with the transformation of mRS (rs=-0.504, p=0.047). for the other group, Inhibition of platelet aggregation did not show a significantly correlation with the fluctuation of mRS (rs=-0.204, p=0.206); promoting blood circulation for removing blood stasis was not significantly correlated with the change of mRS (rs=-0.385, p=0.141),on the other hand, it was significantly correlated with mRS change(rs=-0.377, p=0.016).
     Conclusion Potential salvageable tissue may still exist in patients with acute ischemic stroke within1week, in the daily clinical routines, there are no significantly difference in clinical outcomes between patients with CDM and without CDM. however, the improvement of NIHSS for with CDM group was more obvious than that of without CDM group, and the neurological outcome of CDM group was better than the other group.The evolutions of TCM syndromes in the two groups are vary from each other, which was shown in the change of Blood stasis and Qi deficiency. Also, the clinical responses of them are different. We should develop different clinical management strategies for the two types of patients.
引文
[1]郭蕾,王永炎,张志斌.关于证候概念的诠释[J].北京中医药大学学报,2003(2):5-8.
    [2]国家中医药管理局脑病急症科研组.中风病辨证诊断标准(试行)[J].北京中医药大学学报,1994(3):64-66.
    [3]中风病诊断与疗效评定标准(试行)[J].北京中医药大学学报,1996(1):55-56.
    [4]张聪,高颖.《中风病辨证诊断标准》应用现状存在问题及对策[J].天津中医药,2007(1):12-14.
    [5]王玉来,郑慧,刘文娜.中风急症证候分析[J].中国中医急症,1995:75-78.
    [6]中风病证候学与临床诊断研究组.《中风病诊断与疗效评定标准》的临床检验报告[J].北京中医药大学学报,1996(1):57-59.
    [7]蒋荣鑫,易振佳.中风后遗症中医治疗研究进展[J].湖南中医药导报,2002(5):233-235.
    [8]任占利,郭蓉娟.中风病证候诊断标准的研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,1996(4):49-50.
    [9]高颖,马斌,刘强,等《缺血性中风证候要素诊断量表》临床验证[J].中医杂志,2012(01):23-25.
    [10]高颖,马斌,刘强,等.缺血性中风证候要素诊断量表编制及方法学探讨[J].中医杂志, 2011(24):2097-2101.
    [11]耿晓娟,张军平,高颖,等.缺血性中风病急性期证候变化规律研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2010(09):1485-1487.
    [12]吴文辉,叶美颜,吴星宇.不同年龄组缺血性中风患者急性期证候分布规律的研究[J].中国中医药科技,2011(06):457-458.
    [13]秦骥,张运克.不同年龄组缺血性中风患者证候分布规律分析[J].河南中医,2007(12):37-38.
    [14]韩辉,田金洲,韩明向,等.糖尿病脑梗死的中医证候特征[J].中医药临床杂志,2010(11):1002-1005.
    [15]成杰辉,刘志龙,陈昕,等.糖尿病并发急性脑梗死的证候研究[J].山西中医,2010(12):44-46.
    [16]王嘉麟,王玉来,郭蓉娟,等.高血压病与急性脑梗死的证候要素对比分析[Z].中国河南南阳:2010421-428.
    [17]吴海科,谭峰,万赛英,等.急性缺血性中风中经络构音障碍患者的证候特点及Frenchay评定分析[J].临床医学工程,2010(08):19-21.
    [18]宋娟.卒中后抑郁的相关因素及中医证候研究[D].北京中医药大学,2011.
    [19]刘蓓蓓,李和平.中医气郁体质与脑卒中后抑郁症证候关系研究[J].河南中医,2010(11):1068-1070.
    [20]李京,曹锐,朱宏勋,等.急性脑梗死风痰瘀阻证患者证候与凝血象的相关性研究[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2011(04):427-428.
    [21]陶冶,张允岭,侯小兵,等.急性脑梗死证候要素与凝血因子的相关性研究[z].中国河南南阳:2010443-447.
    [22]麻志恒,施志琴,张汉新,等.崇明地区急性脑梗死患者中医辨证分型特点及与血黏度的相关性[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2012(01):231-233.
    [23]陈维铭,钱涯邻,王馨然.急性脑梗死患者血浆D-二聚体与中医辨证分型相关性研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2010(01):19-21.
    [24]成杰辉,刘志龙.糖尿病并发急性脑梗死的中医证候与血液指标的相关性研究[J].陕西中医,2009(06):660-663.
    [25]张丽,张允岭,郭荣娟,等.脑梗死急性期证候要素与血脂代谢紊乱的相关性研究[J].天津中医药,2009(04):284-286.
    [26]刘璐,高颖,马斌.缺血性中风急性期证候特征与生物学指标的关系[J].中华中医药杂志,2011(05):1086-1090.
    [27]彭广军,宋洪波,赵永辰.胰岛素样生长因子-1与脑梗死中医证候类型的关系[J].中华中医药杂志,2009(09):1228-1229.
    [28]仓志兰,姜亚军.急性脑梗死中医辨证分型与IL-6的关系探讨[J].江苏中医药,2006(09):27-28.
    [29]张艳霞,张允岭,张志辰,等.血糖与缺血性中风急性期中医证候要素相关性研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2011(09):1721-1723.
    [30]高丽.缺血性中风急性期证候与头颅CT的相关性研究[J].内蒙古中医药,2011(17):100.
    [31]庞冉,赵晶,潘纪戍,等.缺血性脑卒中急性期核磁共振表现与卒中计量表及中医证候要素的相关性[J].北京中医药大学学报,2010(11):777-781.
    [32]Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, et al. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction[J], Lancet,1991,337(8756):1521-1526.
    [33]Pittock S J, Meldrum D, Hardiman O, et al. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification:correlation with imaging, associated complications, and prediction of outcome in acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2003,12(1):1-7.
    [34]Paci M, Nannetti L, D'Ippolito P, et al. Outcomes from ischemic stroke subtypes classified by the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project:a systematic review[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med,2011,47(1): 19-23.
    [35]Kobayashi A, Wardlaw J M, Lindley R 1, et al. Oxfordshire community stroke project clinical stroke syndrome and appearances of tissue and vascular lesions on pretreatment ct in hyperacute ischemic stroke among the first 510 patients in the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)[J]. Stroke, 2009,40(3):743-748.
    [36]刘健,戴慧寒,梁耀基,等.广东顺德地区急性脑梗死患者中医证候与牛津郡社区卒中项目分型的相关性:中医微观辨证探讨[J].中国临床康复,2005(21):152-154.
    [37]黄粤,张华,高颖,等.缺血性中风急性期证候要素与OCSP分型的相关性研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2010(12):2109-2111.
    [38]高颖,黄粤,张华,等.应用时序序列探讨缺血性中风急性期证候与OCSP分型的相关性[J].北京中医药大学学报,2010(10):685-689.
    [39]黄粤,张华,高颖,等.应用广义规则归纳探讨缺血性中风急性期证候与OCSP分型的相关性[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2011(05):497-499.
    [40]孙灵芝.山东中医药大学,2010.
    [41]王乐,张志辰,张允岭CISS卒中分型与中医证候要素相关性分析及其预后评判的意义初探[J].天津中医药,2011(05):366-369.
    [42]贾春华,王永炎,黄启福,等.基于命题逻辑的伤寒论方证论治系统构建[J].北京中医药大学学报,2007(6):369-373.
    [43]辛喜艳,张华,高颖.缺血性中风急性期痰热证的证候演变特点及其与神经功能缺损程度的关系[J].辽宁中医杂志,2010(09):1644-1646.
    [44]张华,高颍.缺血性中风证候演变与神经功能缺损的相关性研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2007(04):274-278.
    [45]陈颖.缺血性中风急性期证候要素与预后关系的研究[D].北京中医药大学,2010.
    [46]周冬梅,刘红权Essen卒中风险评分对中医不同证型急性脑梗死的研究分析[J].中国中医急症,2011(01):54-55.
    [47]彭茂,高利,魏翠柏,等.缺血性中风证候要素对患者早期疗效影响的研究[J].北京中医药,2010(02):83-85.
    [48]王乐,陈志刚,张允岭,等.缺血性中风证候要素与既往短暂脑缺血发作及血流动力学变化相关性分析[J].北京中医药大学学报,2010(09):632-635.
    [49]王越.非急性期脑梗死危险分层与中医证候要素的相关分析[D].山东中医药大学,2011.
    [50]赵振武,谢颖桢,马洪明,等.急性缺血性中风后认知功能减退的证候要素特征[J].辽宁中医杂志,2010(02):208-210.
    [51]赵振武,谢颖桢,孟繁兴,等.基于缺血性中风后认知功能减退神经心理特征的证候要素动态分析[J].中医杂志,2010(03):256-258.
    [52]鲁喦,李涛.脑梗死超早期动脉溶栓后证候演变观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2011(02):166-169.
    [I]Astrup J, Symon L, Branston N M, et al. Cortical evoked potential and extracellular K+and H+at critical levels of brain ischemia[J]. Stroke,1977,8(1):51-57.
    [2]Heiss W D. The ischemic penumbra:correlates in imaging and implications for treatment of ischemic stroke. The Johann Jacob Wepfer award 2011[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis,2011,32(4):307-320.
    [3]Ramos-Cabrer P, Campos F, Sobrino T, et al. Targeting the ischemic penumbra[J]. Stroke,2011, 42(1 Suppl):S7-Sll.
    [4]Donnan G A, Baron JC, Ma H, et al. Penumbral selection of patients for trials of acute stroke therapy[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009,8(3):261-269.
    [5]Baron JC, Lebrun-Grandie P, Col lard P, et al. Noninvasive measurement of blood flow, oxygen consumption, and glucose utilization in the same brain regions in man by positron emission tomography:concise communication[J]. JNuel Med,1982,23(5):391-399.
    [6]Maulaz A, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Michel P, et al. Selecting patients for early stroke treatment with penumbra images[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis,2005,20 Supp12:19-24.
    [7]Baird A E, Austin M C, Mckay W J, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT cerebral perfusion measurements during the first 48 hours for the localization of cerebral infarction[J]. Stroke,1997,28(5):976-980.
    [8]Heiss W D. Ischemic penumbra:evidence from functional imaging in man[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2000,20(9):1276-1293.
    [9]Parsons M W, Pepper E M, Bateman G A, et al. Identification of the penumbra and infarct core on hyperacute noncontrast and perfusion CT[J]. Neurology,2007,68(10):730-736.
    [10]Tan J C, Dillon W P, Liu S, et al. Systematic comparison of perfusion-CT and CT-angiography in acute stroke patients[J]. Ann Neurol,2007,61(6):533-543.
    [11]Wintermark M, Flanders A E, Velthuis B, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra:receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke[J]. Stroke,2006,37(4):979-985.
    [12]Schaefer P W, Barak E R, Kamalian S, et al. Quantitative Assessment of Core/Penumbra Mismatch in Acute Stroke CT and MR Perfusion Imaging Are Strongly Correlated When Sufficient Brain Volume Is Imaged[J]. STROKE,2008,39(11):2986-2992.
    [13]Schramm P, Schellinger P D, Fiebach J B, et al. Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset[J]. Stroke,2002,33(10):2426-2432.
    [14]Hacke W, Furlan A J, Al-Rawi Y, et al. Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2):a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009,8(2):141-150.
    [15]Chalela J A, Kidwell C S, Nentwich L M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke:a prospective comparison[J]. Lancet,2007,369(9558):293-298.
    [16]Waracb S, Dashe J F, Edelman R R. Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging:a preliminary analysis[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,1996,16(1):53-59.
    [17]Barber P A, Darby D G, Desmond P M, et al. Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion-and diffusion-weighted MRI[J], Neurology,1998,51(2):418-426.
    [18]Darby D G, Barber P A, Gerraty R P, et al. Pathophysiological topography of acute ischemia by combined diffusion-weighted and perfusion MRI[J]. Stroke,1999,30(10):2043-2052.
    [19]Guadagno J V, Warburton E A, Aigbirhio F I, et al. Does the acute diffusion-weighted imaging lesion represent penumbra as well as core? A combined quantitative PET/MRI voxel-based study[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2004,24(11):1249-1254.
    [20]Kidwell C S, Saver J L, Mattiello J, et al. Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Ann Neurol,2000,47(4): 462-469.
    [21]Chemmanam T, Campbell B C, Christensen S, et al. Ischemic diffusion lesion reversal is uncommon and rarely alters perfusion-diffusion mismatch[J]. Neurology,2010,75(12):1040-1047.
    [22]Lansberg M G, Thijs V N, Bammer R, et al. The MRA-DWI mismatch identifies patients with stroke who are likely to benefit from reperfusion[J]. STROKE,2008,39(9):2491-2496.
    [23]Hill M D. Desmoteplase and imaging science[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009,8(2):126-128.
    [24]Prosser J, Butcher K, Allport L, et al. Clinical-diffusion mismatch predicts the putative penumbra with high specificity [J]. Stroke,2005,36(8):1700-1704.
    [25]Davalos A, Blanco M, Pedraza S, et al. The clinical-DWI mismatch:a new diagnostic approach to the brain tissue at risk of infarction[J]. Neurology,2004,62(12):2187-2192.
    [26]Prosser J, Butcher K, Allport L, et al. Clinical-diffusion mismatch predicts the putative penumbra with high specificity[J]. Stroke,2005,36(8):1700-1704.
    [27]Tei H, Uchiyama S, Usui T. Clinical-diffusion mismatch defined by NIHSS and ASPECTS in non-lacunar anterior circulation infarction[J]. J Neurol,2007,254(3):340-346.
    [28]Lansberg M G, Lee J, Christensen S, et al. RAPID Automated Patient Selection for Reperfusion Therapy:A Pooled Analysis of the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET) and the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) Study[J]. Stroke,2011,42(6):1608-1614.
    [29]Lansberg M G, Thijs V N, Hamilton S, et al. Evaluation of the clinical-diffusion and perfusion-diffusion mismatch models in DEFUSE[J]. Stroke,2007,38(6):1826-1830.
    [30]Kent D M, Hill M D, Ruthazer R, et al. "Clinical-CT mismatch" and the response to systemic thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke,2005,36(8):1695-1699.
    [31]Messe S R, Kasner S E, Chalela J A, et al. CT-NIHSS mismatch does not correlate with MRI diffusion-perfusion mismatch[J]. Stroke,2007,38(7):2079-2084.
    [32]Ogata T, Nagakane Y, Christensen S, et al. A Topographic Study of the Evolution of the MR DWI/PWI Mismatch Pattern and Its Clinical Impact:A Study by the EPITHET and DEFUSE Investigators[J]. Stroke,2011,42(6):1596-1601.
    [33]Albers G W, Thijs V N, Wechsler L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion:the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study[J]. Ann Neurol,2006,60(5):508-517.
    [34]Davis S M, Donnan G A, Parsons M W, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond.3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET):a placebo-controlled randomised trial[J], Lancet Neurol,2008,7(4):299-309.
    [35]Rivers C S, Wardlaw J M, Armitage P A, et al. Do acute diffusion-and perfusion-weighted MRl lesions identify final infarct volume in ischemic stroke?[J]. Stroke,2006,37(1):98-104.
    [36]Baron JC. Mapping the ischaemic penumbra with PET:implications for acute stroke treatment[J], Cerebrovasc Dis,1999,9(4):193-201.
    [37]Bang O Y, Saver J L, Buck B H, et al. Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2008,79(6):625-629.
    [38]Arakawa S, Wright P M, Koga M, et al. Ischemic thresholds for gray and white matter:a diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance study[J]. Stroke,2006,37(5):1211-1216.
    [39]Ma H K, Zavala J A, Churilov L, et al. The hidden mismatch:an explanation for infarct growth without perfusion-weighted imaging/diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke,2011,42(3):662-668.
    [40]De Silva D A, Fink J N, Christensen S, et al. Assessing reperfusion and recanalization as markers of clinical outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (EPITHET)[J]. Stroke,2009,40(8):2872-2874.
    [41]Nagakane Y, Christensen S, Brekenfeld C, et al. EPITHET:Positive Result After Reanalysis Using Baseline Diffusion-Weighted Imaging/Perfusion-Weighted Imaging Co-Registration[J]. Stroke, 2011,42(1):59-64.
    [42]Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, et al. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase[J]. Stroke,2005,36(1):66-73.
    [43]Hacke W, Furlan A J, Al-Rawi Y, et al. Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2):a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009,8(2):141-150.
    [44]Furlan A J, Eyding D, Albers G W, et al. Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DEDAS):evidence of safety and efficacy 3 to 9 hours after stroke onset[J]. Stroke,2006,37(5): 1227-1231.
    [45]ClinicalTrials. Gov. Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy (MR RESCUE)[Z].2006:2011.
    [46]ReoPro Retavase Reperfusion of Stroke Safety Study-Imaging Evaluation[Z].2009.
    [47]Efficacy and Safety Study of Desmoteplase to Treat Acute Ischemic Stroke (DIAS-3) [Z].2008:2011.
    [48]Efficacy and Safety Study of Desmoteplase to Treat Acute Ischemic Stroke (DIAS-4) [Z].2009:2011.
    [1]Donnan G A, Fisher M, Macleod M, et al. Stroke[J]. Lancet,2008,371(9624):1612-1623.
    [2]Lim H S, Lip G Y. Thromboprophylaxis in acute ischaemic stroke:how can we PREVAIL?[J]. Lancet Neurol,2007,6(7):578-579.
    [3]Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST):an observational study[J]. Lancet,2007,369(9558):275-282.
    [4]Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke[J]. N Engl J Med,2008,359(13):1317-1329.
    [5]Donnan G A, Baron JC, Ma H, et al. Penumbral selection of patients for trials of acute stroke therapy[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009,8(3):261-269.
    [6]Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, et al. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS):a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase[J]. Stroke,2005,36(1):66-73.
    [7]Davis S M, Donnan G A, Parsons M W, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET):a placebo-controlled randomised trial[J]. Lancet Neurol,2008,7(4):299-309.
    [8]Albers G W, Thijs V N, Wechsler L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion:the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study[J]. Ann Neurol,2006,60(5):508-517.
    [9]Furlan A J, Eyding D, Albers G W, et al. Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DEDAS):evidence of safety and efficacy 3 to 9 hours after stroke onset[J]. Stroke,2006,37(5): 1227-1231.
    [10]Hacke W, Furlan A J. Al-Rawi Y, et al. Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2):a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009,8(2):141-150.
    [11]Davalos A, Blanco M, Pedraza S, et al. The clinical-DWI mismatch:a new diagnostic approach to the brain tissue at risk of infarction[J]. Neurology,2004,62(12):2187-2192.
    [12]Prosser J, Butcher K, Allport L, et al. Clinical-diffusion mismatch predicts the putative penumbra with high specificity[J]. Stroke,2005,36(8):1700-1704.
    [13]Sanak D, Horak D, Kral M, et al. Is Clinical-Diffusion Mismatch Associated with Good Clinical Outcome in Acute Stroke Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis?[J]. CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE,2009,72(6):548-552.
    [14]Deguchi I, Takeda H, Furuya D, et al. Significance of Clinical-Diffusion Mismatch in Hyperacute Cerebral Infarction[J]. JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES,2011,20(1): 62-67.
    [15]Bang O Y, Saver J L, Buck B H, et al. Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2008,79(6):625-629.
    [16]Arakawa S, Wright P M, Koga M, et al. Ischemic thresholds for gray and white matter:a diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance study[J]. Stroke,2006,37(5):1211-1216.
    [17]王永炎.关于提高脑血管疾病疗效难点的思考[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1997(4):195-196.
    [18]陶冶,张允岭,侯小兵,等.急性脑梗死证候要素与凝血因子的相关性研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2009(11).
    [19]高颖,黄粤,张华,等.应用时序序列探讨缺血性中风急性期证候与OCSP分型的相关性[J].北京中医药大学学报,2010(10):685-689.
    [20]黄粤,张华,高颖,等.缺血性中风急性期证候要素与OCSP分型的相关性研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2010(12):2109-2111.
    [21]国家中医药管理局脑病急症协作组.中风病诊断与疗效评定标准(试行)[J].北京中医药大学学报,1996(1):55-56.
    [22]国家中医药管理局脑病急症科研组.中风病辨证诊断标准(试行)[J].北京中医药大学学报,1994(3):64-66.
    [23]Kasner S E. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales[J]. Lancet Neurol,2006,5(7):603-612.
    [24]van Swieten J C, Koudstaal P J, Visser M C, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients[J]. Stroke,1988,19(5):604-607.
    [25]Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, et al. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase[J], Stroke,2005,36(1):66-73.
    [26]Darby D G, Barber P A, Gerraty R P, et al. Pathophysiological topography of acute ischemia by combined diffusion-weighted and perfusion MRI[J]. Stroke,1999,30(10):2043-2052.
    [27]Barber P A, Darby D G, Desmond P M, et al. Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion-and diffusion-weighted MRI[J]. Neurology,1998,51(2):418-426.
    [28]Shih L C, Saver J L, Alger J R, et al. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging thresholds identifying core, irreversibly infarcted tissue[J]. Stroke,2003,34(6):1425-1430.
    [29]Tong D C, Yenari M A, Albers G W, et al. Correlation of perfusion-and diffusion-weighted MRI with NIHSS score in acute (<6.5 hour) ischemic stroke[J]. Neurology,1998,50(4):864-870.
    [30]Asplund K, Glader E L, Norrving B, et al. Effects of extending the time window of thrombolysis to 4.5 hours:observations in the Swedish stroke register (riks-stroke)[J]. Stroke,2011,42(9): 2492-2497.
    [31]马斌,高颖.中风病发病第7天和第14天证候要素演变规律初步研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006(12):1561-1563.
    [32]刘璐,高颖,马斌.缺血性中风急性期证候特征与生物学指标的关系[J].中华中医药杂志,2011(5):1086-1090.
    [33]沈自尹.微观辨证和辨证微观化[J].中医杂志,1986(2):55-57.
    [34]王平.中医证候研究几个问题的思考[J].湖北中医学院学报,2004(4):70-72.
    [35]张志斌,王永炎.辨证方法新体系的建立[J].北京中医药大学学报,2005(1):1-3.
    [36]王永炎.完善中医辨证方法体系的建议[J].中医杂志,2004(10):729-731.
    [37]罗和古,陈家旭.代谢组学技术与中医证候的研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2007(5):3-5.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700