失去农民的村庄:夏村叙事(1976-2006)
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究沿着费孝通的“差序格局”理论脉络,通过梳理30年来汉学人类学理论发展和相关学科研究进程,使用了“差序场”的分析框架,进行了深入思考;同时用田野调查的方法在浙江宁县夏村做了长期研究,积累了大量的资料,并以民族志“深描”和“阐释”作为研究方法,厘清了小社区和大历史的远近关系,完成了一个综合民族志。
     在这个民族志中,细致描述了夏村人社会流动的内在动力、家和分家关系的变化、为了土地所做的斗争、处于城市郊区的时空特点、日常生活中的娱乐和话语、村民性关系的变迁、村庄权力格局的动态进程等方面,从自我、家庭、村庄、村-镇关系、更广阔的时空整合,解释30年以来江南农村的社会变迁。
     作者认为,现在的沿海村庄已经由横向的社会整合,转变为横向整合和纵向整合结合的格局,“差序场”就是在“差序格局”的基础上,以行动和结构互动为特征,以日常生活的意义构建为内容,形成与汉学人类学传统理论的对话。“差序场”的概念(费孝通,1999n)被使用,并不是对于费孝通提出这一概念的理论思考,而是将此放到前述对立当中,以期看到作为“理论”的分析性框架的解释力。家庭的经济功能被家外组织主导,使差序场沿着家庭和家外组织的双重脉络发展。社会纵向的整合超越了“序”作为文化等级观的概念,“伦”确定的文化等级逐渐被更加复杂的社会整合代替。村庄原来由“伦”的文化约定而确立的尊卑等级和权利义务,进一步被日益渗透的现代国家通过政治、经济、法律规范来厘定,村庄渐渐失去约定权和裁决权。其次,各种组织通过资源控制削弱了伦的力量,而转向公共等级的象征资源:职业、身份、学历、财富、居住、消费、格调等,这些东西成为“序”的主要指标。“差”表示的社会差等机制,仍然是社会秩序的重要构成。由于从人生的时间分布看,大部分时间和亲人聚居、得到生活照顾和情感濡化、居住在村庄范围、共享一套方言和较多文化记忆。“场”的主体是村民和与村民不断互动的各类权力主体,同时也可以认为是村民作为权力主体面向政治力量、社会力量、经济力量的运作领域。“场”是一个客观的存在,是空间性的,也是时间性的,它是一个变动的过程,也是一个提炼的结构。“场”和“格局”相比重要的是突出其多主体同时在场和变动不居的一面,以及对于静态时空观的反动。它不仅仅是费孝通意识到的文化场:重叠、交融、互动;也是经济场:劳动、追逐金钱、买卖商品、消费;也有政治场:占据地位、追求权力、顺从或反抗意识形态等等。
     本研究的创新意义在于,传统汉学人类学研究多数着重“华南”、“华北”地域研究,此研究以综合民族志作为理论和方法,对于“江南”地域的汉学人类学做了继承和发展;通过建构微观“小历史”和生活史,与大历史形成对照,更好的理解小人物、家庭、小社区在历史洪流中的位置、情感和生计;研究继承了“差序格局”理论揭示的个体行动和社会结构互动的特点,认为“差序场”作为分析框架,能够解释30年来社会整合的内容和趋势,为人类学扩展个案的全局视野和意义延展做了一些探索。
Following the path of Fei Hsiaotung’s theory of ChaXuGeJu(pattern of difference sequence), the research has conducted a deep going reflection on the theory development of Chinese anthropology and the research progress in relative courses in the past thirty years by using the analysis framework of ChaXuChang(field of difference sequence). Meanwhile, with a method of field survey procedure, the research accumulated a large amount of materials based on the long-term study on Xia village, Ning County in Zhejiang Province. And it completed an integrated ethnography by way of thick description that clarified the relationship between small community and macro-history.
     In this integrated ethnography, a detailed narrative about Xia villagers is given in aspects such as the inner motivation to social mobility, variation in the relationship between family and family divisions, struggles for the land, space-time feature of being a suburban village, entertainment and discourse in daily lives, changes in sexual relations and the dynamic progress of power pattern in the village. From self, family, village, village-town relation and broader space-time integration, it explains the social changes in the areas south of the Yangtze River in the last thirty years.
     The author holds the opinion that now the coastal villages have transformed from lateral social integration to the combination pattern of lateral integration with vertical integration. With the construction of daily life as its contents, ChaXu-Chang, based on ChaXu-GeJu and featured by the interaction of action and structure, forms a dialogue with traditional Chinese anthropology.
     The innovative meaning of the research lies in that it inherited and developed the Chinese anthropology in the areas south of the Yangtze River through a theory and method of integrated ethnography while most researches in traditional Chinese anthropology focused on areas like south China and north China; it formed a contrast with macro-history by constructing micro-history and life history to better understand the emotions and lives of ordinary people as well as the position of small community in the mighty history torrent; it inherited ChaXu-GeJu theory to expose the characteristics of the interaction of individual action and social structure and explored an overall point of view and meaning extension for extended& crossover case in anthropology through the analysis framework of ChaXu-Chang.
引文
[1]阿成.1984.棋王.上海文学(7).3-27
    [2]阿尔弗雷德·许茨(Alfred Schutz).1962/2001.社会实在问题.霍桂桓等译.华夏出版社.22-76
    [3]阿兰.巴纳德.2006.人类学历史与理论.王建民等译.北京:华夏出版社.33-56
    [4]埃文思-普里查德.2002/1940.努尔人:对尼罗河畔一个人群的生活方式和政治制度的描述.褚建芳译.华夏出版社.21-33
    [5]埃文斯-普理查德. E.E.2001.原始宗教理论.商务印书馆.24-26
    [6]安克强.2004.上海妓女:19-20世纪中国的卖淫与性.上海古籍出版社出版.28-75
    [7]贝克尔.1988.成为大麻吸食者的过程.载罗斯(eds.).当代社会学研究解析-社会学调查报告的系统分析.林彬和时宪民译.宁夏人民出版社.224-227
    [8] Bernard Gallin .1979.小龙村——蜕变中的台湾农村.台北:联经出版事业公司.1-9
    [9]贝卡利亚.1980.论犯罪和刑罚.成都:西南政法学院编印.34-39
    [10]波兰尼.2007.大转型:我们时代的政治与经济起源冯钢,刘阳译.杭州:浙江人民出版社.189-210
    [11]边燕杰.1999.社会网络与求职过程.北京:国外社会学.第4期.9-17
    [12]边燕杰.2002.市场转型与社会分层.生活·读书·新知三联书店.129-188
    [13]布迪,莫里斯.1995.中华帝国的法律.朱勇.南京:江苏人民出版社.5-60
    [14]布迪厄.2003.实践感..译林出版社。22-39
    [15]布迪厄.1998.实践与反思.李猛,李康译.北京:中央编译出版社.100-180
    [16]布迪厄.2003.实践感.蒋梓骅译.南京:译林出版社.208-235
    [17]陈春声2003“乡村的故事与国家的历史”黄宗智中国乡村研究(第二辑)北京:商务印书馆.1-33
    [18]陈佩华、安戈、赵文词.1996.孙万国等译.当代中国农村历沧桑:毛邓体制下的陈村.香港牛津大学出版社出版.21-54
    [19]陈益南.2005.青春无痕──一个工人的十年“文革”.香港中文大学出版社.1-9
    [20]邓正来.1992布莱克维尔政治学百科全书.北京:中国政法学大学出版社.22-38
    [21]邓正来,亚历山大.2002.国家与市民社会.北京:中央编译出版社.27-29
    [22]迪尔凯姆.1996.自杀论.冯韵文译北京:商务印书馆.270-278
    [23]大卫·哈维.2006.希望的空间.胡大平译.南京:南京大学出版社.22-35
    [24]戴望舒.1981/1927.《戴望舒诗集》.四川人民出版社.13-325
    [25]单之蔷.2007.“江南”是怎样炼成的.中国国家地理(3).2-7
    [26]德里克.2005.革命与历史.江苏人民出版社.29-35
    [27]杜蒙(Homo Hierarchicus).1992.阶序人:卡斯特体系及其衍生现象.王志明译.台北:远流出版事业公司.7-11
    [28]杜赞奇. 2003.从民族国家拯救历史.社会科学文献出版社.21-57
    [29]杜赞奇.1996.文化、权力与国家.王福明译.南京:江苏人民出版社.21-37
    [30]法政学社.1924/2002.中国民事习惯大全.广益书局出版.上海书店影印.165-176
    [31]费孝通.1999a-n.费孝通文集(第1卷-第14卷).北京:群言出版社.1-555
    [32]费孝通.2000.经济全球化和中国“三级两跳”中的文化思考.北京:光明日报. 11-07.
    [33]弗里德曼.2000.中国东南的宗族组织.刘晓春译上海:上海人民出版社8-20
    [34]弗里曼.2002.中国乡村、社会主义国家.陶鹤山译.北京:社会科学文献出版社.5-15
    [35]福柯.1989.性史(第一第二卷).上海科学技术文献出版社.7-29
    [36]福柯.1998.知识考古学生活·读书·新知三联书店.19-27
    [37]福柯.1999.规训与惩罚.生活·读书·新知三联书店.33-75
    [38]福柯.2001.词与物.莫伟明译.上海:上海三联书店9-25
    [39]戈夫曼(Erving Goffman).1989.日常生活中的自我呈现.浙江人民出版社.
    [40] E.古德.1988.吸食多种毒品者的研究.载罗斯(eds.).林彬和时宪民译.当代社会学研究解析-社会学调查报告的系统分析.宁夏人民出版社.27-87
    [41]格尔兹1999尼加拉:十九世纪巴厘剧场国家赵丙祥译上海:上海人民出版社15-20
    [42]格尔茨.2000.地方性知识.中央编译出版社。5-17
    [43]格尔兹著.1999.纳日碧力戈译.文化的解释.上海人民出版社.379-487
    [44]郭于华.2000.仪式与社会变迁.北京:社会科学文献出版社.6-98
    [45]哈维兰.2006.文化人类学(第10版).瞿铁鹏,张钰译.上海:上海社会科学院出版社.388-415
    [46]韩丁.1980.翻身:中国一个革命村庄的纪实.北京:北京出版社.78-298
    [47]韩少功.2006.“文革”为何结束?.开放时代(1)5-11
    [48]贺雪峰.2000.论半熟人社会.政治学研究(3).23-29
    [49]贺雪峰.2003.乡村治理的社会基础.中国社会科学出版社.22-87
    [50]胡伊青加(JHuizinga).1998.成穷译.人:游戏者——对文化中游戏因素的研究.贵州人民出版社.12-96
    [51]华尔德.1986.龚小夏译.共产党社会的新传统主义:中国工业中的工作环境和权力结构.香港:牛津大学出版社.33-75
    [52]黄盈盈.潘绥铭.2003.中国东北地区劳动力市场中的女性性工作者.社会学研究(3).P51-63.
    [53]黄宗智.1998.民事审判与民间调解.中国社会科学出版社.33-54
    [54]黄宗智.2003.法典、习惯与司法实践:清代与民国的比较.上海:上海人民出版社.21-45
    [55]黄宗智.2003.中国研究的范式问题讨论.社会科学文献出版社.22-27
    [56]黄宗智2000华北的小农经济与社会变迁北京:中华书局.33-65
    [57]黄树民.2002.《林村的故事》.素兰,纳日碧力戈译.北京:三联书店.105-125
    [58]黄淑娉、龚佩华.2004.《文化人类学理论方法研究》.广州:广东高等教育出版社出版.420-553
    [59]黄应贵.1983.《光复后台湾地区人类学研究的发展》.台北:中研院民族研究所集刊》(55).5-9
    [60]吉尔兹.2000.地方性知识.王海龙,张家瑄译.北京:中央编译出版社.70-92
    [61]吉登斯.1998.现代性与自我认同.生活·读书·新知三联书店.18-32
    [62]吉登斯. 1998.民族-国家与暴力.生活·读书·新知三联书店.29-87
    [63]吉登斯.社会的构成1998.生活·读书·新知三联书店.37-76
    [64]杰华(Tamara Jacka).2006.都市里的农家女.江苏人民出版社.9-23
    [65]景军.2001.“知识、组织与象征资本”.杨念群eds..空间·记忆·社会转型上海:上海人民出版社349-386
    [66]瞿同祖.2003a.清代地方政府.法律出版社.76-98
    [67]瞿同祖.2003b.中国法律与中国社会.中华书局.14-127
    [68]克利福德,马库斯2006写文化.高丙中等译.北京.商务印书馆.25-29
    [69]柯鲁克等.1982.十里店:中国一个村庄的群众运动.安强,高建译.北京:北京出版社.23-58
    [70]孔飞力.1999.叫魂.刘昶,陈兼译.上海:上海三联书店.244-303
    [71]蓝宇蕴.2005.都市里的村庄.北京:三联书店.361-424
    [72]勒华拉杜里.1997.蒙塔尤:1294-1324年奥克西坦尼的一个山村.许明龙,马胜利译.北京:商务印书馆1-13
    [73]雷纳托·罗萨尔多.2006/1986.从他的帐篷门口:田野工作者与审讯者.高丙中译.写文化.北京:商务印书馆.110-135.
    [74]李伯重.2000.江南的早期工业化.1500-1850年.中国社会科学文献出版社.9-22
    [75]李明欢.2005.隔洋情怀:欧洲的东南亚华裔与海洋亚洲.华侨华人历史研究(4)1-9
    [76]李培林.2004.村落的终结.商务印书馆。12-35
    [77]李银河.2003.李银河文集:生育与村落文化、一爷之孙.文化艺术出版社.33-207
    [78]李猛.1999.“论抽象社会”.社会学研究(1)1~26
    [79]李沛良.1993.“论中国式社会学研究的关联概念与命题”北京大学社会学人类学所东亚社会研究北京:北京大学出版社1-15
    [80]李亦园.1999《.民族志学与社会人类学——台湾人类学研究与发展若干趋势》.载潘乃穆等编.《中和位育一潘光旦百年诞辰纪念》.北京:中国人民大学出版社.552-553
    [81]李亦园.2002.李亦园自选集.上海:上海教育出版社241-254
    [82]龙平平.1998.《旧中国民族学的理论流派》.台北:中央民族学院出版社.29-65
    [83]梁漱溟2006梁漱溟全集(第三卷)济南:山东人民出版社602-665
    [84]廖楚强.2001.“老板”考.人民日报海外版.4月02日第七版。
    [85]林耀华.2000.金翼——中国家族制度的社会学研究.北京:三联书店.5-21
    [86]林耀华.2000.序的宗族研究.三联书店.22-127
    [87]林毅夫.1993.制度、技术和中国农业发展.上海人民出版社和三联出版社.9-35
    [88]林毅夫.2000.再论制度、技术与中国农业发展.北京大学出版社.54-79
    [89]刘平.2007.新二元社会与中国社会转型研究.载中国社会科学.(1)。5-11
    [90]刘晓春.2003.仪式与象征秩序.商务印书馆。12-43
    [91]刘新(流心.Xin Liu).2005/2002.常姝译.自我的他性:当代中国的自我系谱.上海人民出版社.12-54
    [92]刘雪婷.2007.拉德克里夫-布朗在中国:1935-1936.社会学研究(1).78-98
    [93]卢晖临“革命前后中国乡村社会分化模式及其变化”黄宗智中国乡村研究(第一辑)北京:商务印书馆.138-171
    [94]鲁迅.1995.南腔北调集为了忘却的纪念.鲁迅全集(4).北京:人民文学出版社.95
    [95]麻国庆.1999.家与中国社会结构.北京:文物出版社.26-65
    [96]麻国庆.1999.分家:分中有继也有合——中国分家制度研究.中国社会科学(1)9-17
    [97]马克思恩格斯全集.26卷1册.1972.北京:人民出版社。329-365
    [98]马林诺夫斯基.2002.《西太平洋的航海者》.梁永佳等译.华夏出版社.23-74
    [99]马歇尔萨林斯(Marshall Sahlins).2003.蓝达居等译.历史之岛.上海人民出版社.9-39
    [100]莫里斯﹒弗里德曼(Maurice Freedman).1958/2000.刘晓春译.中国东南的宗族组织.上海人民出版社.11-128
    [101]牟宗三.1970/1993.牟宗三集.群言出版社.39-276
    [102]穆光宗.1999.我国农村家庭养老问题的理论分析.社会科学(12).22-81
    [103]米尔斯.2001.社会学的想象力陈强.张永强译北京.三联书店.5~10
    [104] Perry .Elizabeth. 2001.重访中国革命:以情感的模式.中国学术(4).22-65
    [105]潘宁.1998.21世纪谁来当村“官”——村干部的困境与出路.调研世界(3)2-7
    [106]潘绥铭.2000.存在与荒谬:中国地下“性产业”考察.中国社会科学出版社.22-43
    [107]潘绥铭.2000.生存与体验――对一个地下“红灯区”的追踪考察.中国社会科学出版社.32-54
    [108]潘绥铭.2002.社会对于个人行为的作用:以“多伴侣性行为”的调查分析为例.载中国社会科学(4).
    [109]齐美尔.2002.社会是如何可能的.林荣远译桂林:广西师范大学出版社.349-375
    [110]恰亚诺夫.1996.农民经济组织萧正洪译北京:中央编译出版社.35-64
    [111]乔健.2006.“关系诌议”杨国枢中国人的心理.南京:江苏教育出版社82-95
    [112]瞿同祖.2003.清代地方政府.范忠信等译.北京:法律出版社156-189
    [113] R.E.帕克等.城市社会学——芝加哥学派城市研究文集.华夏出版社.1987年.29-156
    [114] RS林德、H.林德.1928/1999.米德尔敦:当代美国文化研究.商务印书馆.126-276
    [115]萨林斯.2003a.历史之岛.上海人民出版社.9-13
    [116]萨林斯.2003b.“土著”如何思考.上海人民出版社.27-49
    [117]萨义德.1999.东方学.北京:三联书店.9-33
    [118]上野千鹤子.2004.近代家庭的形成和终结.吴咏梅译北京:商务印书馆1-66
    [119]赛尔登.2002.革命中的中国:延安道路.社会科学文献出版社.37-96
    [120]史景迁.2005.王氏之死.上海远东出版社.9-39
    [121]斯波义信.2001.宋代江南经济史研究.南京:江苏人民出版社.5-32
    [122]斯科特.2001.农民的道义经济学.译林出版社.12-54
    [123]孙本文.1947.现代中国社会问题.上海:商务印书馆.9-11
    [124]孙力平.2004.转型与断裂:改革以来中国社会结构的变迁.北京:清华大学出版社.4-17
    [125]孙立平.2003.断裂:20世纪90年代以来的中国社会北京:社会科学文献出版社.2-56
    [126]孙立平,郭于华.2000.“‘软硬兼施’:正式权力非正式运用的过程分析”.清华大学社会学系:清华社会学评论(特辑)厦门:鹭江出版社.23~35
    [127]谭同学.2007.乡村社会转型中的道德、权力与社会结构——迈向“核心家庭本位”的桥村.华中科技大学博士论文.46-87
    [128] TZSGAZ.2001.编撰委员会编.台州市公安志.汉语大辞典出版社.127-543
    [129]田汝康.1946.芒市边民的摆.重庆:商务印书馆.1-21
    [130]唐君毅.2005.中国人文精神之发展.桂林:广西师范大学出版社.210-277
    [131]涂尔干.1999.宗教生活的基本形式.渠东.汲喆译.上海:上海人民出版社.16-52
    [132]涂尔干.2001.职业伦理与公民道德.渠东.付德根译.上海:上海人民出版社.16-81
    [133]汪晖.2004.现代中国思想的兴起(四卷).生活读书新知三联书店.29-332
    [134]王金玲、徐嗣荪.1997.新生卖淫女性构成、身心特征与行为之缘起.载李小江.朱虹、董秀玉主编.平等与发展.北京:生活读书新知三联书。37-87
    [135]王明珂.1997.华夏边缘:历史记忆与族群认同.台北:允晨文化实业股份有限公司.59-106
    [136]王铭铭.1997.小地方与大社会——中国社会的社区观察.社会学研究(1)56-78
    [137]王铭铭.2003.走在乡土上.中国人民大学出版社.32-77
    [138]王铭铭.2004.溪村家族.贵州人民出版社.5-75
    [139]王铭铭.2005a.西方人类学思潮十讲.广西师范大学出版社.12-97
    [140]王铭铭.2005b.西学“中国化”的历史困境.广西师范大学出版社.66-84
    [141]王铭铭.2005c.社会人类学与中国研究.广西师范大学出版社.86-127
    [142]王铭铭.2007.“蝮与蛇——引言”.中国人类学评论(4).2-6.
    [143]王绍光.1993.理性与疯狂:文化大革命中的群众.香港:牛津大学出版社.11-44
    [144]王阳明.1992.训蒙大意示教读刘伯颂等.王阳明全集.上海古籍出版社.9-243
    [145]王跃生.2000.清中期分爨分产与立嗣继产的方式与冲突.清史论丛.12-87
    [146]韦伯.2004a.韦伯作品集III:支配社会学.康乐等译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社89~380
    [147]韦伯.2004b.韦伯作品集II:经济与历史-支配的类型.康乐,简惠美译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社297~370
    [148]韦伯.2004c.韦伯作品集I:学术与政治.钱永祥等译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社101~152
    [149]韦伯.2004d.韦伯作品集IV:经济行动与社会团体.康乐,简惠美译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社255~294
    [150]威廉A哈维兰.1987王铭铭等译.当代人类学.上海人民出版社.13-154
    [151]魏特夫.1989.东方专制主义.中国社会科学出版社.99-176
    [152]沃尔夫.2006.欧洲与没有历史的人民.上海:上海人民出版社.7-32
    [153]吴思.2001.潜规则.昆明:云南人民出版社.5-10
    [154]吴晓刚.2006.“下海”:中国城乡劳动力市场转型中的自雇活动与社会分层(1978-1996).社会学研究(6).27-45
    [155]吴毅.2007.小镇喧嚣:一个乡镇政治运作的演绎与阐释.生活读书新知三联书店. 610-630
    [156]吴毅.2001.“‘双重角色’、‘经纪模式’与‘守夜人’和‘撞钟者’”.开放时代(12).114-117
    [157]吴毅.2002.村治变迁中的权威与秩序.北京:中国社会科学出版社57-369
    [158]西美尔.2002a.社会学.林荣远译.北京:华夏出版社50-120
    [159]西美尔.2002b.货币哲学.陈戎女译.北京:华夏出版社23-156
    [160]西美尔.2003.现代人与宗教.曹卫东等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社46-98
    [161]夏光.2005.现代性与文化:韦伯的理论遗产之重估.社会学研究(5).7-19
    [162]夏氏宗谱.民国甲寅年刻.宁县博物馆。
    [163]项飚.2000.跨越边界的社区.北京:三联书店230-250
    [164]萧楼,王小军.2001.“互构村庄:权力转换机制与村庄治理结构”.开放时代(3).82-91
    [165]萧楼.2002.“柔性政权:‘政治动员’下的乡镇和村庄”浙江学刊(4).70-78
    [166]萧楼.2004.“基于村庄选举的政治场域搭建”.华中师范大学学报(4).62-70
    [167]萧楼.2006.村落的政治.北京:社会科学文献出版社.115-160
    [168]萧楼,徐丽芳.2006.“钟摆型政府:乡镇财政和政府行为”.吴毅.乡村中国评论(第1辑).桂林:广西师范大学出版社.134-149
    [169]徐勇.2003.圈子.载乡村治理与中国政治.中国社会科学出版社.17-24
    [170]许烺光.2001.祖荫下:中国的亲属关系.文化人格.和社会流动.王芃.徐隆德译.台北:台湾南天书局.11-42
    [171]晏阳初.1989.晏阳初全集(第一卷).长沙:湖南教育出版社.57-89
    [172]晏阳初.1992.晏阳初全集(第二卷).长沙:湖南教育出版社.235-289
    [173]晏阳初.1992.晏阳初全集(第二卷).长沙:湖南教育出版社.235-289
    [174]阎云翔.2006a.私人生活的变革龚小夏译.上海:上海书店出版社.60-189
    [175]阎云翔.2006b.“差序格局与中国文化的等级观”社会学研究(4)201-213
    [176]杨懋春.2001.一个中国村庄:山东台头.张雄等译.南京:江苏人民出版社.15-45
    [177]杨念群.2001a.空间记忆社会转型.上海人民出版社.17-125
    [178]杨念群.2001b.中层理论.江西教育出版社.19-33
    [179]杨善华、刘小京.2000.近期中国农村家族研究的若干理论问题.中国社会科学(5).7-25
    [180]伊莎贝尔.克鲁格和大卫.克鲁格.1982.十里店:中国一个村庄的群众运动.北京:北京人民出版社. 12-125
    [181]应星.2001.大河移民上访的故事.北京:三联书店314~336
    [182]应星.2003..身体与乡村日常生活中的权力运作.黄宗智eds.中国乡村研究(第二辑).北京:商务印书馆133~172
    [183]张国刚.2004.家庭史研究的新视野.生活读书新知三联书店.12-187
    [184]张江华.2007.公分制下的劳动激励和集体行动的效率.社会学研究(5).5-14
    [185]张乐天.2005.告别理想:人民公社制度研究上海:上海人民出版社250-305
    [186]张佩国.2002a.近代江南乡村地权的历史人类学研究.上海:上海人民出版社.150-256
    [187]张佩国.2002b.“近代江南的农家生计与家庭再生产”.中国农史(3).68~80
    [188]张佩国.2006.“公产与私产之间”.社会学研究(5).26~49
    [189]张廷琛.1989.拨开性的历史迷雾——福柯性史.译序.载福柯.性史(第一第二卷).上海科学技术文献出版社.2-11.
    [190]张翼.1998.冲突:性、婚姻和家庭的分离与统一.引自中国社会现象分析.北京:中国城市出版社.27-98
    [191]张仲礼.2001.中国绅士的收入.上海社会科学院出版社.12-77
    [192]张仲礼.1991.中国绅士.李荣昌译.上海:上海社会科学院出版社.30~56
    [193]章太炎.1985.驳中国用万国新语说.章太炎全集(4).上海人民出版社129-229
    [194]赵世瑜.2002.狂欢与日常.生活读书新知三联书店.12-45
    [195]赵世瑜.2006.小历史与大历史.北京:三联书店.15-83
    [196]赵旭东.2003.权力与公正.天津:天津古籍出版社.250-288
    [197]赵耀辉.刘启明.1997.中国城乡迁移的历史研究:1949~1985《.中国人口科学》(2)12-34
    [198]郑金兰主编.1989.风筝的学问.学林出版社.12-36
    [199]周其仁.2002.产权与制度变迁.中国社会科学文献出版社.12-55
    [200]折晓叶.1997.村庄的再造北京:中国社会科学出版社.23-50
    [201]朱晓阳.2003.罪过与惩罚.天津:天津古籍出版社.193~292
    [202]庄孔韶.2000.银翅:中国的地方社会与文化变迁.北京:三联书店129~222
    [203]庄英章.1981.台湾农村家族对农村现代化的适应.台湾中央研究院民族学研究所集刊(52).65-69
    [204]滋贺秀三.2003.中国家族法原理.张建国,李力译.北京:法律出版社.254~443
    [205]滋贺秀三.1998.中国法文化的考察.载.明清时期的民事审判与民间契约.法律出版社.
    [206]中根千枝.1997.《家族的结构——社会人类学的分析》.东京:东京大学出版社.
    [207]周大鸣.2005.渴望生存:农民工流动的人类学考察.广州:中山大学出版社.48~85
    [208]周晓虹.2004.中国社会与中国研究.北京:社会科学文献出版社.102~382
    [209] Ahern Emily M.. 1981. Chinese Ritual and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.78~96
    [210] Arthur W.. 1974. Gods, Ghosts and Ancestors. in Arthur W.. Religion and Ritural in Chinese Society. California: Standford University Press.49~95 A. Doak Barnett.Cadres. 1967 Bureaucracy and Political Power in Communist China. New York: Columbia University Press.7~37
    [211] Atkinson. P. 1990. the Ethnographic Imagination: Textual Constructions of Reality. London: Rout ledge.27~63
    [212] Avery N. Goldstein. 1991. From Bandwagon to Balance-of-Power Politics: Structural Constraints and Politics in China. 1949-1978. Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.22~35
    [213] Bennett M. Berger .1986.Taste and Domination. AJS (The American Journal of Sociology)Volume 91 Number 6 pp. 1445-1453
    [214] Blau. Peter. M. and Danching Ruan. 1990. Inequality of opportunity in urban China and America. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility (9).3~32.
    [215] Bourdieu. Pierre. 1984/1979. Distinction: A Social Critique Of the Judgment of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice 1984. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.63~87
    [216] Burton Pasternak. 1972. Kinship & Community in Two Chinese Villages. Stanford: Stanford University Press.3~56.
    [217] Baker. Hugh D. R.. 1968. A Chinese Lineage Village: Sheung Shui. Stanford: Stanford University Press.9~20
    [218] Baker Hugh. 1979. Chinese Family and Kinship. London: Macmillan.78~142
    [219] Bernard Gallin. 1966. Hsin Hing, Taiwan: A Chinese Village in Change. Berkeley: University California Press.89~151
    [220] Chan. A., Madsen R., Unger J.. 1984. Chen Village: The Recent History of A Peasant Community in Mao's China. California: University of California Press.120~180
    [221] C. K. Yang. 1961. Religion in Chinese Society:A Study of Contemporary Social Functions of Religion and Some of their Historical Factors. Berkeley: University of California Press.49~103
    [222] Cohen Myron L.. 1976. House United, House Divided: The Chinese Family in Taiwan. New York: Columbia University Press.46~95
    [223] David Faure. 1986. The Structure of Chinese Rural Society. New York: Oxford University Press.89~152
    [224] Dean K.. 1993. Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of South-east China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.78~95
    [225] Dean K.. 1998. Lord of the Three in One: The Spead of a Cult in South-east China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.83~98
    [226] Dean K.. 2003. Local Communal Religion in Contemporary South-east China. The China Quarterly. (174)338~358
    [227] Edmund Leach. 1983. Social Anthropology. London: Fontana Press.7~21
    [228] Fetterman. D. 1998. Ethnography: Step by Step. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.22~40
    [229] Feuchtwang Stephan. 1992. The Imperial Metaphor. London and New York: Routledge.89~162
    [230] Freedman M.. 1966. Chinese Lingeage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung. Lundon: Athlone Press.65~122
    [231] Foucault. Michel.2001.Dits etécrits II 1954-1988.Paris:Gallimard.22~35(参见“另类空间”.世界哲学.2006(6)节译)
    [232] Foucault.M.1980. Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Wittings: 1972—1977. Harvester Press.27~34
    [233] Gallin. B. and R.S. Gallin 1982 The Chinese Joint Family in Changing RuralTaiwan. In S.L. Greenblatt. R.W. Wilson. (eds) Social Interaction in Chinese Society. New York:Praeger.5~37
    [234] Garfinkel. Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethno methodology. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.105~162
    [235] Gellner.Ernest.1992. Postmodernism. Reason and religion. London: Rutledge.21~32
    [236] Gellner E.. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.13~51
    [237] Gilmartin C. 1989. Gender. politics. and patriarchy in China: the experiences of early women communists. 1920–27. pp. 82~104. In Sonia Kruks. Rayna Rapp. and Marilyn Young (eds.). Promissory Notes: Women in the Transition to Socialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
    [238] Goldman et al..1999.the paradox of china’s post-Mao reform. Harvard university press.10~55
    [239] Gregory. C. A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.7~23
    [240] Griffin.“Temporality.Event.and Explanation in Historical Sociology”.Sociological Methods and Research.1992.20(4).7~21
    [241] Helen F. Siu.1989.Agents and Victims in South China:Accomplices in Rural RevolutionNew Haven:Yale University Press.37~43
    [242] Hillman Ben. 2004.“The Rise of the Community in Rural China: Village Politics, Cultural Identity and Religious in a Hui Hamlet”. The China Journal. (51)104~113
    [243] Jacka Tamara. 1997. Women’s Work in Rural China: Chang and Continuity in and Era of Reform. Cambridge: Combridge University Press.48~95
    [244] Jean Oi.1989.State and peasant in contemporary china. Berkeley :University of California press.9~34
    [245] Jean Oi.1999.Rural china takes off .university of California press .102~09
    [246] Joseph W. Esherick & Amary Backus Rankin. eds.. Chinese Local Elite and Patterns of Dominance. Berkeley :University of California Press. 1990.37~54
    [247] Jing Jun. 1996. The Temple of Memories. California: Stanford University Press.54~156
    [248] Jing Jun.1999.“Villages Dammed, Villages Repossessed: A Memorial Movement in Northwestern China”. American Ethnologist. 26(2).324~343
    [249] Kathryn Bernhardt. 1992 Rents. Taxes. and Peasant Resistance-The Lower Yangzi Region. 1840-1950. Stanford:Stanford University Press.93~102
    [250] Kelliher.1994.Chinese Communist Political Theory and the Rediscovery of the Peasantry. Modern China. 20(4) 387~415.
    [251] Larry J.Griffin.“Narrative.Event-structure Analysis.and Causal Interpritation in Historical Sociology”.America Journal Sociology.1993.98(5).95~102
    [252] Leach. E. R. 1961. Rethinking Anthropology. London: Athlone Press.37~41
    [253] Lefebvre. 1991.The Production of Space .translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.22~30
    [254] li.hongbin &Scott rozelle .2003.privatizing rural china : insider privatization .innovative contracts and the performance of township enterprises. China Quarterly 174. December. 981~1005
    [255] Lin.Nan 1999. Social Networks and Status Attainment. Annual Review of Sociology. Volume 25.109~127
    [256] Lin.Nan 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.7~11
    [257] Liu Xin. 2000. In One’s Own Shadow: An Ethnographic Account of Post-reform Rural China. California: The University of California Press.98~153
    [258] Madsen.Richard.1984.Morality and Power in a Chinese Village. Berkeley.CA:University of California Press.9~20
    [259] Mary S. Mander. 1987.Bourdieu. the Sociology of Culture and Cultural Studies: A Critique .European Journal of Communication (2).427~453
    [260] Meisner .Maurice .1986.Mao's China and After:A History of the People's Republic .New York :Free Press.77~101
    [261] Mette H. Hansen. 2005. Frontier People: Han Settlers in Minority Areas of China. Hongkong: The University of British Columbia.159~242
    [262] Nigel Barley.1983/2001.The Innocent Anthropologist: Notes from a Mud Hut. London: British Museum Publication.参见何穎怡譯本.2001.天真的人類學家----小泥屋筆記.台北:商周出版社.
    [263] Oi J.. 1989. State and Peasant in Contemporary China. California: University of California Press.89~125
    [264] Oi. J.. 1999. Rural China Takes Off. California: University of California Press.56~124
    [265] Pasternak Burton. Kinship & Community in two Chinese Villages. California: Standford University Press 1972.77~143
    [266] Parish.William L.1981. Egalitarianism in Chinese Society. Problems of Communism (29).37~53
    [267] Parish.William L.1984.Destratification in China. In J.Watson(ed.).Hass and Social Stratification in Post-Revolution China. NY :Cambridge University Press . 84~120
    [268] Park. Robert Ezra. 1950. Race and Culture. Glencoe. IL: The Free Press.89~102
    [269] Pellegrini. A. D. (Ed.). 1995. the future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith. Albany. NY: State University of New York Press.27~203
    [270] Pellegrini. A. D.. & Smith. P. K.. 1998. Physical activity play: The Nature and function of neglected aspect of play. Child Development (69). 577~598
    [271] Perry Elizabeth J.. 1985.“Rural Violence in Socialist China”. China Quarterly. (103).162~168
    [272] Philip A. Kuhn. 2002. Origins of the Modern Chinese State. California: Stanford University Press.49~89
    [273] Philip A. Kuhn. Local Self-Government under the Republic: Problems of Control. Autonomy and Mobilization. in Frederic Wakeman and Carolyn Grant eds.. The Conflict and Control in Late Imperial China. Stanford:University of California Press.1975. 257.
    [274] Potter. Jack M . 1968. Capitalism and the Chinese peasant: social and economic change in a Hong Kong Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.27~33
    [275] Potter. Jack M1970. Land and lineage in traditional China. in M. Freedman (ed.). Family and. Kinship in Chinese Society. Palo Alto. CA: Stanford UniversityPress.203~215
    [276] Popkin Samuel. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.76~149
    [277] Potter S., Potter J.. 1990. China’s Peasants: the Anthropology of a Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.83~156
    [278] Richard Madsen. 1977. Revolutionary Asceticism in Communist China: Social Causes and Consequences of Commitment to the Maoist Ethos in a South China Village. PhD Dissertation for Harvard University.68~185
    [279] Richard. Madsen. 1984. Morality and Power in a Chinese Village. California: University of California Press.26~179
    [280] Richard. Madsen. 1990.“The Politics of Revenge in Rural China During the Culture Revolution”. in Jonathan N. Lipman and Stevan Harrell. Violence in China. Alblany: State University of New York Press.175~201
    [281] Ruf Gregory A. 1998. Cadres and Kin: Making a Socialist Village in West China, 1921~1991. California: Stanford University Press.125~164
    [282] Sangren P. Steven. 1987. History and Magical Power in a Chinese Community. California: Stanford University Press.152~186
    [283] Shue Vivienne. 1988. The Reach of the State: Sketches of Chinese Body Politic. California: Stanford University Press.61~125
    [284] Simmel. 1950 . The Sociology of Georg Simmel. edited by Kurt H. Wolff. IL: The Free Press.26~30
    [285] Stanley Diamond. 1974. In Search of the Primitive: A Critique of Civilization. New. Brunswick. NJ: Transaction Books.33~42
    [286] Steinmetz. G.. and E. O. Wright. 1989. The fall and rise of the petty bourgeoisie: Changing patterns of self-employment in the postwar United States.American Journal of Sociology. 94(5).25~37
    [287] Susan Shirk.1982.Competitive Comrades : Career Incentives and Student Strategies in China. Berkeley and Los Angeles : University of California Press.193~207
    [288] Siu Helen F.. 1989. Agents and Victims in South China. New Haven: Yaleuniversity press.42~86
    [289] Stacey Judith. 1983. Patrearchy and Socialist Revolution in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.48~124
    [290] Theda Skoclpol. States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1979.22~53
    [291] Thomas R. Cole. 1992. The Journey of Life: A Cultural History of Ageing in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.43~55
    [292] Tilly C.. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton University Press.23~95
    [293] Walder A. G.. 1986. Communist Neo-traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. California: University of California Press.53~182
    [294] Walder A. G.. 1998. Zouping in Transition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.23~56
    [295] Waston J.. 1975. Emigration and theChinese Lineage. California: University of California Press.78~152
    [296] Wolf Margery. 1972. Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. California: Stanford University Press.53~151
    [297] Yang Dali. 1996. Calamity and Reform in China. California: Stanford University Press.102~114
    [298] Yang Mayfair. 1994. Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: the Art of Social Relationships in China. New York: Cornell University Press.58~122

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700