创业投资引导基金运行机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,我国创业投资引导基金蓬勃发展,通过实施创业投资引导基金制度,促进创业风险投资产业发展,搭建创业资本服务中小企业发展的平台,已成为各地政府促进经济产业发展,提高政府资金使用效率的有效途径之一。由于我国创业投资引导基金还属于发展初期,在管理模式、运行模式等方面还处于摸索阶段,因此,有必要结合我国国情,对创业投资引导基金运行机制进行深入研究,为指导我国创业投资引导基金持续健康发展提供理论参考。
     文章分为三个部分,导论、正文(共五章)和结论与展望。导论部分介绍了论文的研究背景和现实意义,文献综述和理论意义、主要内容和逻辑框架、以及研究的创新和不足;正文部分第二章对论文的基本概念进行了界定,包括创业投资引导基金的定位,运行系统及运行机制,明确了论文研究的主要对象。第三章从理论和现实两个层面对设立创业投资引导基金的必要性进行了论述,并对国外创业投资引导基金发展经验以及我国创业投资引导基金发展现状和存在问题进行了分析总结,进一步明确了论文需要解决的主要问题。第四章到第六章是论文的主体部分,分别针对创业投资引导基金运行过程中可能出现的逆向选择问题、道德风险问题以及利益冲突问题,利用相应的经济学模型进行了研究分析,并提出机制设计的建议。文章的结论与展望部分是对全文的一个总结,针对上述研究内容再次归纳了全文的主要结论,并提出了下一步的研究方向。
     基于上述研究,本文得到了以下几点主要结论:
     第一,以引导基金设立建议书为信息载体,通过将信号传递模型和信号甄别模型结合使用,能够有效地解决或减缓创业投资引导基金选择投资管理机构时可能出现的逆向选择问题。
     第二,引导基金投资经理存在显性和隐形两方面的需求,因此,有必要建立针对性的激励约束机制。引入“锦标赛”思想,建立以创业板投资退出时平均收益为考核基准的线性薪酬机制,能够剔除市场波动等外部因素的影响,更好的评价和激励投资经理的工作;同时,研究还发现声誉机制对投资经理的长期激励是有效的,能够弥补显性薪酬激励的不足。
     第三,创业投资引导基金运行中具有典型的共同代理特征,针对创业投资引导基金共同代理问题的研究发现,由于委托人(政府和社会投资者)之间利益取向不同,造成对代理人(投资经理)激励效能的弱化。通过建立引导基金协同监管机制,将投资经理多任务间努力的替代关系转化为互补关系,能够有效解决激励效能弱化问题。
     本文拟创新性的研究主要包括:第一,以引导基金运行机制为研究对象,为创业投资引导基金的研究引入了新的研究视角。第二构建了相对完整的创业投资引导基金运行机制研究框架,同时,从委托—代理的角度切入,抓住了问题的根本,并创新性的运用共同代理理论研究引导基金运行机制问题,突破了传统的双边委托代理理论框架。第三,从我国创业投资引导基金运行中的现实问题出发,运用相关经济学模型,针对创业投资引导基金运行中可能出现的逆向选择问题、道德风险问题和利益冲突问题进行了相应的机制设计,为规范引导基金运营提供了思路。
Recently,Venture Capital Guidance Fund (VCGF) has become a hot trend acrossthe country,which promote the development of venture investment industry andcreate a broad platform between venture capital and small-and-medium-sizedenterprises. Now VCGF has become an effective way to improve efficiency in the useof government funds and the national economy. But because of that VCGF belongingto the early stages of development and its management mode, run mode is still in theexploratory stage, it is necessary to study in-depth of the operating mechanism ofVCGF according to China's national conditions,which provide a theoretical referenceto guide our VCGF sustained and healthy development.
     This dissertation consists of three parts:introduction,main body,conclusion andfuture works. In the introduction,the background、practical significance and literaturereview of this study were introduced. Main content and the logical framework of thisstudy were presented. The innovation of results and future works were discussed. Inthe second chapter,the basic concepts of the thesis were is defined,including theconnotation、operating system and operating mechanism of the VCGF,which furtherclarified the main target of the thesis. In the third chapter,the Necessity to set upVCGF was discussed from both theoretical and practical levels,and foreign VCGFdevelopment experience,as well as our VCGF status and problems were analyzedand summarized,which further clarify the paper needs to address the problem.Chapter4to6is the main body of the dissertation. The Problem of adverse selection、moral hazard and conflicts of interest which may appear for the running of the VCGFwere research and analysis by the appropriate economic model,and put forward therecommendations of the mechanism design. The last part of the dissertationsummarizes issues of study and discusses the future work.
     The following conclusions were obtained from the study:
     First. The adverse selection problem exists in the VCGF to select the investmentmanagement organizations was effectively solved or relieved by combination of usingthe model of the signaling and screening model in which project proposal of theVCGF was the information signal.
     Second. Because of the explicit needs and hidden needs of the VCGF Investmentmanagers, it was very necessary to establish the incentive and restraint mechanisms.Market fluctuations and other external factors Can be effectively removed byEstablishing the a linear pay system which based on the average income of theinvestment in GEM,Therefore,the investment manager Can be effectively evaluatedand motivated. On the other hand,the study also found that the reputation mechanismon the long-term incentive of investment manager was effective,which was able tocompensate for the lack of incentive pay.
     Third. Because of the common agency, Incentive performance to agent(investment manager) is weakened when the interests between the principals(government and social investors) are inconsistent. The study found when themechanism of conflict management was established,the Incentive performanceWeakening can be effectively solved by transforming the Multi-Task of investmentmanager from Substitutes into the complementary relationship.
     There are several innovations in this study:1、the research perspective of theVCGF is broadened by taking operating mechanism as the object of study;2、Building a relatively complete framework of operating mechanism and seizing thekey issue by Starting with the principal-agent problems,moreover,The innovativeuse of common agency theory on operating mechanism of the VCGF Broke throughthe traditional framework of bilateral principal-agent theory;3、According to China'snational conditions,The strategies are designed for The problem of adverse selection,moral hazard problems and conflicts of interest,which provides a guideline for theVCGF operation.
引文
1王元,张晓原,赵明鹏.中国创业风险投资行业发展报告2011[M].经济管理出版社,2011.
    2唐国兴,张一章,詹朋朋.政府引导基金全景[J].中国风险投资,2010(3):64-69.
    3道格拉斯C诺斯.《经济史中的结构与变迁》[M].上海人民出版社,1997年版,第20页
    4《政治的逻辑:马克思主义政治学原理》.上海人民出版社,1994年,第73页
    5《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷.人民出版社,1995年,第79页
    6《马克思恩格斯全集》第19卷.人民出版社,1995年,第200页
    7《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷.人民出版社,1995年,第256页
    8《2011年中国风险投资年鉴》.民主与建设出版社,2011年
    9《马克思恩格斯全集》第48卷.人民出版社,1995年,第292页
    10《马克思恩格斯选集》第3卷.人民出版社,1995年,第12页
    11《马克思恩格斯选集》第3卷.人民出版社,1995年,第13页
    12陈德棉.《风险投资业的发展研究》.科学管理研究出版社,1998年,第105-106页
    13叶晓凌.风险投资:政府应扮演的角色[J].《投资北京》,2004年第6期
    14刘丁已,周纯,何国全.天使投资与风险投资基金的比较分析[J].商业经济与管理,2005(5):66-70
    15Coming D. J,Maclntosh J G.Venture capital investment duration in Canada and the United States [J].Journalof Multinational Management,2001(11)
    16陈敏灵.创业投资引导基金的组织运作模式分析[J].投资研究,2010(9):49-52
    17Douglas Cumming.Government Policy towards entrepreneurial finance:innovation investmentfunds[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2007(22):193-235.
    18资料来源:行政院国家开发基金网站(http://www.df.gov.tw)和中华民国创业投资商业同业公会网站(http://www.tvca.org.tw)
    19张亦春,王囯雄.借鉴成功经验发展大陆创业投资引导基金[J].武汉金融,2010(12):9-12
    20王利明王吉林.国内创业投资引导基金运作的现状、问题及对策研究.现代管理科学[J].2010(2):112-114
    21袁江天,张维..多任务委托代理模型下国企经理激励问题研究[J].管理科学学报,2006(3):45-52.
    22尼尔·瑞克曼,劳伦斯·傅德曼,李察·鲁夫.合作竞争大未来[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1998.:450
    [1]陈和.创业投资的政策性引导基金模式研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(5):79‐83
    [2]陈红辉,赵正堂.天使投资:我国的现状、问题与对策[J].金融观察,2004(8):34‐35
    [3]程宏伟.隐性契约与企业财务政策研究[M].中国经济出版社,2005(11):73‐74,108‐114
    [4]杜朝运,郑瑜.海峡西岸经济区发展创业投资引导基金研究—兼析台湾创业投资引导基金研究[J].福建金融,2009(5):27‐31
    [5]范柏乃,汪涛,马庆国.高技术产业风险投资的国际比较及中国对策[J].软科学,1998年期4期:5‐12
    [6]符加林.企业声誉效应对联盟伙伴机会主义行为约束研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
    [7]高亚平,王蓓蓓,周密.浅析创业投资引导基金的支持方式[J].江苏科技信息,2008(7):8‐11
    [8]龚建立,徐炳炳,王飞绒.政府性创业投资引导基金的运作模式研究[J].经济纵横,2007(8):28‐30
    [9]辜胜阻,李正友,刘入领.我国政府在科技风险投资中的角色[J].投资研究,1999(12):20‐23
    [10]顾骅珊.政府设立创业投资引导基金的运作管理模式探析[J].经济研究导刊,2009,41(3):67‐68
    [11]何国杰.风险投资引导基金研究[M].中山大学出版社,2010
    [12]何建洪,马凌.政府引导基金下创业投资经理人与风险企业的合谋分析[J].科技管理研究,2008(9):185‐187
    [13]姜博.创业投资中政府引导基金的SWOT分析[J].科技创业月刊,2009年第11期:38‐40
    [14]蒋芬,宁建荣.创业投资引导基金的发展概况及启示[J].今日科技,2008(7):45‐46
    [15]蒋瑞金.国有企业经理人人力资本特征及价值量化[J].中国集体经济,2008,273(3):94‐95
    [16]焦军利.关于国内外创业投资引导基金的比较分析报告[J].科技情报开发与经济,2007(34):129‐131
    [17]李开孟.我国政府性创业投资引导基金的运作模式及操作要点[J].中国投资,2009(4):100‐103
    [18]李涛.风险投资道德风险的防范和控制与投资契约设计研究[D].《四川大学》,2003
    [19]李万寿.创业资本引导基金:机理、制度与中国视野[M].中国财政经济出版社,2006年
    [20]李万寿.关于建立产业投资引导基金的政策建议[J].宏观经济研究,2005(2):47‐49
    [21]李希文.创业投资引导基金的运行现状和实施成效[J].中国科技投资,2011.4
    [22]刘健钧.借鉴国际经验发展我国创业投资引导基金[J].中国金融,2007(21):33‐34
    [23]刘健钧.中国政策性创业投资基金运作模式探讨[J].中国创业投资与高科技,2004(10):74‐76
    [24]刘江会.证券承销商声誉的理论与实证研究—墓于中国证券发行市场的分析[D].博士学位论文,复旦大学,2004.
    [25]刘涛.关于开发银行参与滨海创业投资引导基金的研究[J].华北金融,2008(8):14‐16
    [26]刘伟,李凤圣.产权通论[M].北京出版社,1998
    [27]刘正周.管理激励[M].上海财经人民大学出版社,1999
    [28]刘志远,林云.现代企业激励机制[M].机械工业出版社.1997(4)
    [29]卢现祥.《西方新制度经济学》[M].中国发展出版社,1999年版:34‐35
    [30]马全军,张玮.我国风险投资中的政府行为研究[J].财经理论与实践,1999年第3期:38‐42
    [31]美国小企业管理局.《小企业投资公司计划改革顾问委员会报告》[R].1995年6月
    [32]钱苹,张帏.我国创业投资的回报率及其影响因素[J].经济研究,2007年第5期:20‐23
    [33]曲宏,修军.政府应主动参与建立科技创业投资体系[J].科学学研究,2001年第2期:36‐38
    [34]斯曼通.《技术变革的经济分析》[M].机械工业出版社,1989年版:4‐5
    [35]苏启林.政府介入创业投资模式的国际比较与经验借鉴[J].外国经济与管理,2002年第11期:68‐71
    [36]谈毅,邵丰.风险投资过程中的风险识别与生存力评估[J].科技导报,2001年03期
    [37]闻岳春,程同朦.政府引导基金和海外风险资本在支持技术创新方面的应用研究[J].浙江金融,2008(11):8‐9
    [38]吴维臣.浅谈高新技术企业团队管理[J].中国集体经济,2007.04:85
    [39]杨军,褚保金.新西兰创业投资基金计划的实施机制[J].中国科技投资,2006(6):52‐53
    [40]杨青,任忆.高新技术离不开风险投资[J].瞭望,2000年第21期:37‐38
    [41]杨艳萍.风险投资家和风险企业家合作行为策略与声誉激励效应[J].企业经济,2006年08期
    [42]尹睿哲.政府对创业投资的支持:创业投资引导基金的比较研究[J],管理观察,2009(3):25‐27
    [43]于凤坤.政府创业投资引导基金的实践与作用[J].中国科技投资,2007(9):70‐71.
    [44]余津津.国外声誉理论研究综述[J].经济纵横,2003(10):60‐63.
    [45]张承惠.建立中国风险投资体系的构想及有关政策建议[J].金融研究,2000年第4期:88‐90
    [46]张戟.借鉴国外经验,建立政府对风险投资基金的扶持机制[J].中央财经大学学报,1998年第11期:20‐25
    [47]张力美,陆桂贤.我国创业投资环境问题的探析[J].南京财经大学学报,2005(3)
    [48]张陆洋,刘崇兴,张仁亮.中国风险投资的困境与对策研究[J].经济问题,2007年第1期:83‐85
    [49]张小蒂.风险投资基金:发展知识经济的推进器[J].金融研究,1998年第9期:60‐63
    [50]张小蒂.美国创业投资业成功运作的主要因素及启示[J].金融研究,1999年第9期:81‐85
    [51]张晓晴.中国创业资本引导基金治理模式研究[J].生产力研究,2008(23):53‐55
    [52]章彰,傅巧灵.政府干预与创业投资的发展[J].财经理论与实践,2000年第3期:23‐26
    [53]赵成国,陈莹.政府创业投资引导基金运作管理模式研究[J].上海金融,2008(4):35‐39
    [54]赵西萍,徐海波,张长征.从美国经验看中国风险投资中的政府行为[J].科学管理研究,2002年第2期:58‐61
    [55]郑安国.论政府在推动风险投资业发展中的地位与作用[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2000年第3期:125‐132
    [1] Aernoudt.R.European policy towards venture capital:myth or reality?[J].Venture Capital:An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance,1990(1):47‐57.
    [2] Ajay Khorana,Sunil Wahal,Marc Zenner[J].Agency Conflicts in Closed‐End Funds:The Case ofRights Offerings[J].Journal of Finanacial and Quantitative Analysis,2002,(37)2:177‐200
    [3] Akerlof.G.The market for "lemons":Quality and the market mechanism Quarterly[J].Journalof Economics,1970(84),488‐500.
    [4] Anand, Bharat.Narendra.Surviuors and Taxes: Essays on Economics of Entrepreneurship[D].Princeton University,1994
    [5] AnnaLee Saxenian,Regional Advantage.Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route128[M].1994
    [6] Arrow. K.J.Limit knowledge and economic analysis [J].American Economic Review,1974,64:1‐10.
    [7] Barbara Cornelius.Who's who in venture capital research?[J].Technovation,2005:782‐807
    [8] Benoit Leleux and Bernard Surlemon.Public versus private venture capital:seeding or crowdingout?[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2003:237‐259
    [9] Berle,Means.The Modern Corporation and Private Proper‐ty [M].Harcourt, Brace and World,Inc,New York,1967revised edition,22‐54.
    [10] Bernard Sinclair‐Desgagne.How to Restore Higher‐Powered Incentives in Multitask Agencies.[J].The Journal of Low Economy and Organization,1999(15):418‐433
    [11] Bernheim D,Whinston M.Common Marketing Agency as a Device for facili‐tating Collusion[J].The Rand Journal of Economics,Vol16,No2,1985:269‐281.
    [12] Bull.C.The Existence of Self‐enforcing Implicit Contracts [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1987,10(2):147‐160.
    [13] Calzolari.C and Scarpa.C[J]. Non‐intrinsic common agency [D]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?Abstract id=200558,1999.
    [14] Camerer.C,G.Loewenstein,D Prelec.Neuroeconomics:how neuroscience can informeconomics[J].Journal of Econom‐ic Literature,2005,43(1):9‐65
    [15] Chen H,Jegadeesh N,Wermers R.The Value of Active Mutual Fund Management: AnExamination of the Stockholdings and Trades of Fund Managers[J].Journal of Financial andQuantitative Analysis,2000,35(2):343‐368
    [16] Clarysse.B.,Wright.M.,Mustar P.Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies:A learningperspective[J].Research Policy,2009,38(10):1517‐1533
    [17] Coase.Ronald H.The Nature of the Firm [J].Economica,1937(4):386‐405.
    [18] Colin M. Mason.Public policy support for the informal venture capital market in Europe.Acritical review,2008.5‐19
    [19] Collewaert.V,Manigart.S and Aernoudt.R.An Assessment of Government Funding of BusinessAngel Networks:A Regional Study[R].University of Gent,2007
    [20] Core J,Guay W.Stock option plans for non‐executive employees[J].Journal of FinancialEconomics,2001,61(2):253‐289
    [21] Douglas Cumming.Finanicng entrepreneurs:Better Canadian policy for venture capital[R]..2007:4‐13
    [22] Douglas Cumming.Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance:Innovation investmentfunds[R].2005:14‐40
    [23] Eisenhardt K M.Agency theory:An assessment and review[J].Academy of ManagementReview.1999,14(1):57‐74
    [24] Fama.E.Agency problems and the theory of the firm [J].Journal of Political Economy,1980,88(2):288‐307.
    [25] Gil Avnimelech,Morris Teubal.Creating venture capital industries that co‐evolve with high‐tech:Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience[J].ResearchPolicy,2006:350‐378
    [26] Gordon.C.Murray,Richard.Marriott.Why has the investment performance of technologySpecialist,European venture capital funds been[J].Research Policy,1998:665‐674
    [27] Harold L. Cole,Timothy J. Kehoe.A self‐fulfilling model of Mexico's1994‐95debt crisis[R].Staff Report210Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,1996
    [28] Hellman,Thomas,Manju Puri.the interaction between product market and financialstrategy[J].Review of Financial Studies,2000(13)
    [29] Holmstrom.B,Milgrom.P.Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of IntertemporalIncentives.[J].Econo‐metrica,1987,55(2):303‐328.
    [30] Hong Harrison,Jeffrey Kubrik..Analysing the Analysts:Career Concerns and Biased EarningsForecasts.[J].Journal of Finance.2003,58(1):313‐351
    [31] J Carpente..Does Option Compensation Increase Managerial Risk Appetite?[J].Journal ofFinance.2000,55(5):2311‐2331
    [32] James M. Poterba.Venture Capital and Capital Gains Taxation.Tax policy and theEconomy,1989, Vol.3:.47‐48
    [33] Karsai.J.What has the state got to do with the venture capital market?[J].Public financing ofventure capital in Hungary Acta Oeconomica,2003, Vol.53.No.3:271–291
    [34] Klein.B., Leffler.K. B.The role of market forces in assuring contractual performantce[J].Journal of Political Economy,1981, August,615‐41.
    [35] Kreps.D,P..Roberts.Rational cooperation in the finitely Boner's dilemma[J].Journal ofEconomic Theory,1982(27),245‐252.
    [36] Lazear,Edward P.Why Is There Mandatory Retirement?[J].Journal of Political Economy,University of Chicago Press,1979,vol.87(6):1261‐84
    [37] Leslie A.Jeng,Philippe C.Wells.The determinants of venture capital funding:evidence acrosscountries[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2000(6):241‐289
    [38] Marco Da Rin,Giovanna Nicodano,Alessandro Sembenelli.Public policy and the creation ofactive venture capital markets[J].Journal of Public Economics,working paper,2006
    [39] Maula.M,Murray.G..Finnish Industry Investment ltd.:an International Evaluation[J].Helsinki:
    [40] Ministry of Trade&Industry,2003,175
    [41] Micheal Spence.market signaling:the informational structure of job markets and relatedphenomena[D].Phd. Thseis,Harvard university press,1972
    [42] Mike Wright,Andy Lockett,Bart Clarysse.Martin Binks.University spin‐out companies andventure capital[J].Research Policy,2006:753‐781
    [43] Milgrom.P.,Roberts.P..Predation,reputation and entry deterrence.[J].Journal of EconomicTheory,1982(27),280‐312.
    [44] Morgan A G.,Poulsen A B.Linking pay to performance‐compensation proposals in the S&P500[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2001,62(3):489‐523
    [45] Olaf Karitzki,Alexander Brink.How Can We Act Morally in a Merger Process? A StimulationBased on Implicit Contracts [J].Journal of Business Ethics,2003(1‐2):137‐152.
    [46] Ray da Silva Rosa,Gerard Velayuthen,Terry Walter.The share market performance ofAustralian venture capital‐backed and non‐venture capital‐backed IPOs[J].Pacific,BasinFinance Journal,2003:368‐398
    [47] Reka. S. S.Case Study.Essays on Reputation in Rural Credit Markets [D].A Honduran Universityof Wisconsin‐Madison,2005.
    [48] See Bengt Holmstrom.Moral Hazard in Teams [J].Bell Journal of Economics,1982, Vol.13,324—340.
    [49] Sofia Johan,Douglas Cumming.Pre‐seed government venture capital funds[R].2007:3‐32
    [50] Sophie Manigart.Supply of venture capital by European governments[M].2001
    [51] Spence. A. M.Market signaling[J].Harvard University Press,1974.
    [52] Tadelis,S.Pareto Optimality.OPtimistie Stability in RePeated Extensive Form Games[J].Joumal of Economie Theory,1996(69),470‐689
    [53] Tirole.J [J].A Theory of eolleetivere [J].Putation.ReviewofEeonomieStudies,1996(63),l‐22
    [54] Toru Yoshikawa,Phillip H.Phan,Jonathan Linton.The Effects of Ownership and CapitalStructure on Board Composition and Strategic Diversification in Japanese Corporations,Corporate Governance:An International Review[J].Research Policy,2004:273‐311
    [55] William D. Bygrave, Jeffry A. Timmons.Venture Capital At The Crossroads[M].1992

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700