16层螺旋CT在直肠癌浆膜面浸润及TN分级的诊断价值
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
第一部分16层螺旋CT对直肠癌肿瘤浆膜面浸润的影像诊断
     目的:评价16层螺旋CT对直肠癌肿瘤浆膜面浸润的诊断价值。
     方法:采用16层螺旋CT对64例直肠癌病人进行平扫及增强三期扫描,男性36例,女性28例,平均年龄56.6岁。前瞻性分析影像表现,并与手术病理进行对照究,对所得数据进行统计分析。
     结果:CT表现浆膜面毛糙,诊断浆膜面浸润的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性似然比及阴性似然比分别为71%、58%、67%、1.69、0.50;表现肿瘤层面浆膜外脂肪间隙模糊诊断浆膜面浸润的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性似然比及阴性似然比分别为73%、47%、66%,1.38,0.57;同时出现两种征象联合诊断浆膜面浸润敏感性、特异性、准确性为69%、58%、66% ;CT表现浆膜面外结节状突起的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为20%、100%、44%。
     结论:联合两种征象作为判定浆膜面受侵诊断标准,特异性及准确性均较好,浆膜面结节诊断浆膜面浸润可靠性为100%。
     第二部分16层螺旋CT评价直肠癌浆膜面浸润相关因素分析
     目的:结合16层螺旋CT直肠癌影像表现及临床资料,探讨影响直肠癌浆膜面浸润的相关因素。
     方法:64例直肠癌手术患者,男性36例,女性28例,平均年龄56.6岁。所有患者术前均行16层螺旋CT平扫,观察肿块大小、形态、淋巴结肿大情况;54例行三期动态强化扫描:按照强化程度分型,结合临床资料,分析各因素与直肠癌浆膜面浸润的相关性。
     结果:全组病例浆膜面浸润率为70%;单因素分析显示,直肠癌癌肿浆膜面的浸润与患者的性别、年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤大体类型、肠管周径侵犯程度、肿瘤强化净增值均无相关性(P>0.05);而与肿瘤CT分型、肿瘤分化程度及淋巴结转移有相关性(P<0.05)。
     结论:直肠癌肿瘤CT分型、肿瘤的分化程度、淋巴结转移等均可影响肿瘤浆膜面浸润,其中肿瘤分化程度是影响肿瘤浆膜面浸润的最重要因素。
     第三部分采用16层螺旋CT诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步
     目的:评价16层螺旋CT扫描对直肠癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值。
     方法:回顾性分析64例经手术病理证实的直肠癌CT表现,统计直肠肿瘤周围淋巴结肿大情况与术后病理结果进行对照分析。
     结果:以3mm、6mm、8mm、10mm短径为标准,直肠癌淋巴结转移的转移率分别为31%,37%,54%,75%。以6mm作为诊断标准时,敏感度及准确度分别为95%、47%,阴性似然比为0.2。淋巴结个数≤4枚,转移率为6.25%;4-9枚组,转移率为52.3%;淋巴结≥10枚组,转移率为29.6%,淋巴结≤4枚组与4-9枚组、≥10枚组之间比较差别有统计学意义(P<0.05);浆膜面浸润组淋巴结转移率(40%)明显高于无浆膜面浸润组(11%)(P<0.05)。
     结论: CT扫描有助于发现直肠癌癌肿周围肿大的淋巴结,淋巴结短径≥6mm提示直肠癌淋巴结转移,直肠周围淋巴结数目大于4枚及肿瘤浆膜层浸润淋巴结转移率明显提高。
     第四部分采用16层螺旋CT评价直肠癌T分级与病理对照
     目的:采用多层螺旋CT重新评价传统直肠癌CT分期,进一步制定合理的T分级。
     方法:67例经手术病理证实的直肠癌患者,前瞻性行术前多层螺旋CT盆腔平扫及增强扫描,男性39例,女性28例,平均年龄58岁,统计病变大小、肠壁厚度及周围浸润情况,并与术后病理对照分析。
     结果:按照Fleming分期标准分析CT资料并将T分为三期,与术后病理T分期对照,一致性较好(Kappa值=0.53);按照Patrick分期标准进行T分期,与病理分期对照,一致性较好(Kappa值=0.56);本究结合病理分型制定改良T分期,与术后病理T分期对照,有较好的一致性(Kappa值=0.67)。
     结论:改良T分期标准与PTNM分期标准一致性好,通过直肠癌的CT征象分析,对术前判断肿瘤的恶性程度及患者预后有重要的价值。
Part I The Diagnosic Value of 16-Slices Spiral CT in the judgemen of invasion to serosa of Rectal Carcinoma
     Objective: To evaluate the value of judgemen of invasion to serosa of rectal carcinoma.
     Methods: 64 rectal carcinoma cases, women 28 and men 36 with average age 56.6 years old. CT scan was performed with 16-slice spiral CT in 64 rectal carcinoma cases,and compared CT findings and clinical material with pathologic diagnosis.
     Results: The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy,positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of serous rough in 16-slice spiral CT to judge the serous infiltrated were 71%, 58%, 67%,1.69 and 0.5,respectively; and the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of blurred fat space in 16-slice spiral CT to judge the serous infiltrated were 73%, 47%, 66%, 1.38, 0.57, respectively; The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of combining rough serous with blurred fat space were 69%, 58%, 66%, respectively; The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of serosa nodular for judg the serous infiltration were 20%, 100%, 44%, respectively.
     Conclusion: The synthetic analyses of the two signs both rough serous and blurred fat space could increase the accuracy of diagnosis. The authenticity of the sign of serosa nodular to judg the serous infiltration is 100%.
     Part2 Analysis the relative factors of serosa infiltration in rectal arcinomas by 16-Slices Spiral CT
     Objective: To evaluate the relative factors of serosa infiltrate in rectal carcinomas by 16-Slices Spiral CT.
     Methods: 64 rectal carcinoma cases, women 28 and men 36 with average age 56.6 years old. 16-Slices Spiral CT scanning were performed in 64 patiens ,of which 54 cases were performed by enhenced CT. tumor size,shape lymphadenectasis , the degree of mass enhancement and clinical data were analyzed. and compared with pathology .
     Results: The rate of local serous infiltrated in all patients was 70%;serosa invasion in rectal cancer cases was not significantly correlated with gender,age,increment of mass enhancement, intestinal circumference invasion,tumor size and differentiation tumor type (P>0. 05), but it was closely correlated with differentiation CT grouping, lymph node metastasis and carcinoma differentiation degree (P<0. 05).
     Conclusion: Of the influencing factors such as differentiation CT grouping , Lymph node metastasis and differentiation degree, differentiation degree is the most important factor in serosa invasion in rectal cancer patients.
     Part3 Assessment of diagnostic Value for Lymph Node metastasis of rectal carcinoma by16 -Slices Spiral CT
     Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic criterion for lymph node metastasis of rectal carcinoma by 16-slice spiral CT.
     Methods: Clinical data of 64 cases of rectal cancer proved by operation were analyzed,Pathologic findings were compared with the CT findings.
     Results: The criterions for lymph node metastasis on CT scans were 3mm,6mm,8mm,10mm in short-transverse diameter,the positive predictive value were 31%,37%,54%,75% ,respectively. The criterion was≥6 mm on CT scan in short-transverse diameter for lymph node,The sensitivity,specificity、accuracy and negative likelihood ratio were 63%,91%,81% and 0.2 respectively. Lymphatic metastatic rate in≤4 group ,4-9group as well as≥10 group of lymph node number were 6.25%,52.3%,29.6% respectively. The results to show a significantly higher rate of metastases in≤4 group than in 4-9 group as well as in≥10 group (P<0.05). Lymphatic metastatic rate was more higher in serosa invasion groop than normal serosa of rectal carcinoma.
     Conclusion: 16-Slices Spiral CT is a helpful method to assess the metastasis of lymph nodes in patients with rectal carcinoma. We suggest that the criterion of lymph node metastasis by CT scans is≥6mm in the short diameter. Lymphatic metastatic rate were higher when the number of lymph node were more than 4 or serous is infiltrated in rectal carcinoma.
     Part4 Comparative Study of Modified T staging Criteria by16-slice spiral CT and Pathological classification for rectal carcinoma
     Objective: To reevaluate the accuracy of 16-Slices Spiral CT staging criteria in rectal carcinoma, and make a reasonable staging of the disease.
     Methods: 16-Slices Spiral CT plain and enhancement scan were performed in patients with rectal cancer confirmed by pathology before surgery. 67 rectal carcinoma cases ,women 28 and men 39 with average age 58 years old,and the tumor size、thickness of the bowel wall and the invasion of surrounding were revaluated, the results were compared with the postoperative pathological results.
     Results: The preoperative 16-Slices Spiral CT scan materials of 67 patients analyzed according to Fleming CT criteria were well correlated (kappa=0.53) with clinical pathology staging. The data were also analyzed based on the criteria used by Patrick, and the results significantly correlated with those from pT classification (Kappa=0.56). We modified the T classification which was classified into four stages, the data obtained according to the criteria were significantly associated with those based on the pT classification (Kappa=0.67).
     Conclusion: Modified T criteria made a good consistency with imaging diagnosis and pathological diagnosis. It is of important value in assessing the degree of malignancy and patient’s prognosis by preoperative CT appearance of rectal cancer.
引文
1赵心明,石木兰,陈雁.直肠癌术前扫描的价值.临床放射学杂志,1999,18(4):218
    2靳明林,詹新恩,石彦,结直肠癌淋巴结转移规律的临床究,肿瘤防治究,2001,28(3):229-227
    3杨进华,李宗文,张甲佑,等.直肠癌患者淋巴结转移的相关因素分析,中国综合临床,2006,22(1):8-10
    4黄鸿源,周国兴,张覃泉,直肠癌的CT分期与病理对照分析,上海医学影像杂志,2001,10(4):63-64
    5王卓群,原发性直肠癌的CT分型及病理基础,镇江医学院学报,2001,11(5):679
    6 Gossios KJ,Tsianos EV,Kontogiannis DS,et al.Water as contrast Medium for computed tomography by study of colonic wall lessions.Gastronintest Radiol,1992,17(2): 125-128
    7 Seishi Kumano, MD, Takamichi Murakami, MD,et al,T Staging of Gastric Cancer:Role of Multi–Detector-Row CT,Radiology 2005, 237:961–966
    8李健丁,孙华平,张耀珍,等.多层螺旋CT在进展期胃癌中的应用价值.中华普通外科杂志, 2002, 17 (10):630- 631.
    9 Shimizu K,Ito K,Matsunaga N,et al.Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction:CT-histologic correlation.A-JR Am J Roentgenol ,2005, 185(5):1152-1158
    10 Lim JS,Yun MJ,Kim MJ,et al.CT and PET in stomach cancer:preoperative staging and monitoring of response to therapy.Radiographics,2006,26(1):143-156
    11于韬,罗娅红,邱岩,进展期胃癌浆膜面浸润的多层螺旋CT增强表现与病理对照究,中国肿瘤,2007,16(12): 1040-1042
    12邓小飞,汪志杰,直肠癌多层螺旋CT诊断及影响因素的探讨,结直肠肛门外科,2007,13(5):282-285
    1赵心明,石木兰,陈雁.直肠癌术前扫描的价值.临床放射学杂志,1999,18(4):218-221
    2靳明林,詹新恩,石彦,结直肠癌淋巴结转移规律的临床究,瘤防治究,2001,28(3):227-229
    3杨进华,李宗文,张甲佑,等.直肠癌患者淋巴结转移的相关因素分析,中国综合临床,2006,22(1):8-10
    4黄鸿源,周国兴,张覃泉,直肠癌的CT分期与病理对照分析,上海医学影像杂志,2001,10(4):263-264.
    5 Seishi Kumano, Takamichi Murakami, Tonsok Kim,etal,T Staging of Gastric Cancer: Role of Multi–Detector Row CT, Radiology, 2005,237:961-966
    6 Harvey Z. Amin C.HareA. R,etal,Helical CT Pneumocolon to Assess Colonic Tumors: RadiologicPathologicCorrelation ,AJR,1998,6:1439-1443
    7 Gazelle GS, Gaa J, Saini S, et al. Staging of colon carcinoma using water enema CT. J Computer Assisted Tomography,1995,19:87-91
    8余丹,李铁钢,姚宏亮,等.直肠癌淋巴结转移相关因素的临床探讨,中南大学学报(医学版),2006, 31(1):128-130
    9杨海军,张三申,赵卫江,等.大肠癌淋巴结转移的相关病理因素368例分析.河南肿瘤杂志,2000, 13(6):403-404
    10徐肇斌,熊斌,张坤林,等.大肠癌淋巴结转移规律及其相关因素分析.临床外科杂志, 2003, 11(2):90-91
    1赵心明,石木兰,陈雁.直肠癌术前扫描的价值.临床放射学杂志,1999,18(4):218
    2 Fleming ID,Cooper JS,Henson DE,et al. AJCC cancstaging manual,5th,Philadelphia. Lippincort Rave Publishers, 1997. 83-88.
    3大肠癌病理与预后关系究协作组. 3147例大肠癌病理因.素与预后的关系.中华肿瘤杂志,1986,8:136-138
    4 Maurel J,Launoy G,Grosclaude P,et al. Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the largebowel: a French population-based study . Cancer, 1998, 82(8): 1482-1487
    5李果珍.临床CT诊断学.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994.10
    6 Stefan P. Monig,Stephan E. Baldus,etal,Lymph Node Size and Metastatic Infiltration in Colon Cancer,Annals of Surgical Oncology,6(6):579–581
    7靳明林,石彦,蔡志民,结直肠癌与淋巴结转移关系的究,第三军医大学学报,2003,25(13),1194-1196
    8 Stefan P. Monig, Stephan E. Baldus, etal, Lymph Node Size and Metastatic Infiltration in Colon Cancer,Annals of Surgical Oncology,6(6):579-581
    9靳明林,詹新恩,石彦,结直肠癌淋巴结转移规律的临床究,肿瘤防治究,2001,28(3):229-227
    10杨进华,李宗文,张甲佑,等.直肠癌患者淋巴结转移的相关因素分析.中国综合临床,2006,22(1):8-10
    11黄鸿源,周国兴,张覃泉,直肠癌的CT分期与病理对照分析,海医学影像杂志,2001,10(4):263-264.
    12李健丁,孙华平,张耀珍,等.多层螺旋CT在进展期胃癌中的应用价值.中华普通外科杂志,2002,10(17):630-631
    13 Shimizu K,Ito K,Matsunaga N,et al.Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction:CT-histologic correlation.A-JR Am J Roentgenol ,2005,185(5): 1152-1158
    14 Lim JS, Yun MJ, Kim MJ, et al.CT and PET in stomach cancenpreoperative staging and monitoring of response to therapy.Radiographics,2006,26(l): 143-156
    1 Shin SS, Jeong YY, Min JJ, Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: CT vs. integrated FDG PET/CT. Abdom Imaging. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):270-277
    2 Fleming ID,Cooper JS,Henson DE,et al. AJCC cancer staging manual,5th,Philadelphia. Lippincort Raven Publishers, 1997.83-88
    3吴恩惠.医学影像诊断学.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2001. 643
    4 Patrick Veit-Haibach,Christiane A. Kuehle,Thomas Beyer,etal. Diagnostic Accuracy of Colorectal Cancer Staging With Whole-Body PET/CT Colonography . JAMA. 2006; 296: 2590-2600
    5 Freeny PCMarks WM,Ryan JA,Bolen JW.Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT:preoperative staging and detection of postop-erative recurrence. Radiology 1986; 158: 347-353
    6 Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Nai-dich DP. Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT. AJR 1988,150:301-306
    7 Seishi Kumano,Takamichi Murakami,Tonsok Kim,etal,T Staging of Gastric Cancer: Role of Multi–Detector Row CT, Radiology,2005;237:961-966
    8 Hara AK,Johnson CD,MacCarty RL,et al. CTeolonography: sversus multidetector row imaging. Radiology, 2001, 219: 464-465
    9 Hundt W,Braunschweig R,Reiser M .Eveluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma.Eur Radio, 1999, 9: 78-84
    10杨岳松,缪竞陶,陈九如.直肠癌影像学.中国医学计算机成像杂志,2001,2:111-117
    1赵心明,石木兰,陈雁.直肠癌术前扫描的价值.临床放射学杂志,1999,18(4):218.
    2 Hara AK,Johnson CD,MacCarty RL,et al. CTeolonography: sversus multidetector row imaging. Radiology,2001, 219: 464-465.
    3 Hundt W,Braunschweig R,Reiser M .Eveluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma.Eur Radiol,1999,9:78-84
    4孙灿辉,孟悛非,李子平,彭李青等,结直肠癌螺旋CT灌注成像的初步究,临床放射学杂志,2005,24(6):506-510
    5王守安.肝脏的CT灌注成像及临床应用现状,国外医学临床放射学分册,2003,26(6) :372-376.
    6赵雪梅,马民,张宗明,等.结肠癌多层螺旋CT表现与术后病理的相关性分析,世界华人消化杂志, 2007, 15(16): 1815-1819
    7 Fukuya T,HindaH,Kancko K,etal. Efficacy of helical CT in T-staging of gastric cancer·J Comput Assist Tomgr,1997,21 (1):73-81
    8 Freeny PC,Marks WM,Ryan JA,Bolen JW.Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT:preoperative staging and detection of postop-erative recurrence. Radiology 1986;158:347-353
    9 Balthazar EJ,Megibow AJ,Hulnick DH,Nai-dich DP. Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT. AJR 1988,150:301-306
    10 Hundt W,Braunschweig R,Reiser M .Eveluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma.Eur Radiol, 1999, 9:78-84
    11 Fleming ID,Cooper JS,Henson DE,et al. AJCC cancer staging manual,5th,Philadelphia. Lippincort Raven Publishers, 1997. 83-88
    12刘文瑾.直肠癌的CT诊断和术前分期.中国医学影像技术, 2002,18(1):57-58
    13蔡香然,孟悛非,陈棣华,等,钡灌肠和CT及MRI对结直肠癌诊断的比较影像学究,中华胃肠外科杂志, 2005, 8(1):46-49
    14 Thoeni RF,Colorectal cancer;cross-sectional imaging for staging of primary tumor and derdction of local recurrence. AJR,1991,156(5):909-915
    15杨岳松,缪竞陶,陈九如.直肠癌影像学.中国医学计算机志,2001,7:111-117
    16 Shimizu K,Ito K,Matsunaga N,et al.Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction:CT-histologic correlation.A-JR Am JRoentgenol ,2005, 185(5):1152-1158
    17 Lim JS,Yun MJ,Kim MJ,et al.CT and PET in stomach cancer:preoperative staging and monitoring of response to therapy.Radiographics,2006,26(1),143-156
    18 StocchiL,Nelson H,Sargent DJ,etal.Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cance:a United states community and cooperative group report. Jclin Oncol, 2001, 19(18) : 3895-3902
    19 Heald RJ,Moran BJ,Ryall RD,etal.Rectal cance: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision,. Arch Surg, 1998,133(8):894-899
    20 Mani NBS,Suri S,Gupta S,et al.Two phase dynamic contrast enhanced CT with water-filling method for staging of gastric carcinoma.Clin Imaging,2001,25(1):38-43
    21 Fukuya TMD,Honda.Lymph-node metastases:efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer, Radiology, 1995,197(3):705-711
    22郑阳春,周总光,王蓉.直肠癌系膜内淋巴结微转移及其临床意义分析.中国实用外科杂志, 2004, 24(9): 552-553.
    23石桥,王维,刘晟,等.螺旋CT扫描对中晚期直肠癌的诊断价值,中国医师杂志,2005, 7(4):479-481
    1 Sith Phongkitkarun, Satoshi Kobayashi, Zuxing Kan, etal. Quantification of Angiogenesis by Functional Computed Tomography in a Matrigel Model in Rats1.Academic Radiology, 2004, 11 (5):573-582.
    2 Miles KA,Griffiths MR. Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhanceme.Br J Radiol,2003,76:220-231.
    3 Eastwood J D, Lev M H, Azhari T, et al. CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis:pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Radiology, 2002, 222(1):227-236.
    4凌华威,陈克敏. CT灌注成像及其在中枢神经系统的临床应用.诊断学理论与实践,2005,4(4):266-267.
    5 Huan Zhang, Zilai Pan, Lianjun Du, etal, Advanced Gastric Cancer and Perfusion Imaging Using a Multidetector Row Computed Tomography: Correlation with Prognostic Determinants. Korean Journal of Radiology,2008: 9(2): 119-127.
    6 Miles KA. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. BrJRadiol,1991,64(761):409-412
    7 Miles KA, Hayball M, Dixon AK. Colour perfusion imaging:a new application of computed tomography.Lancet,1991, 337(8742): 643-645.
    8 Miles KA, Hayball MP, Dixon AK. Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT . Radiology, 1993,188(2):405-411
    9 Miles KA, Hayball MP, Dixon AK. Measurement of human pancreatic perfusion using dynamic computed tomography with perfusion imaging.BrJRadiol,1995,68 (809) :471-475
    10 Tsushima Y,AokiJ,EndoK.Underestimation of renal cortical perfusion calculated from dynamic CT date. Radiology, 2002, 224(2):613-614
    11 CenicA, NabaviDG, Craen RA, etal. Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: avalidationstudy. AJNRAmJ Neuroradiol, 1999,20(1) 63-67
    12孙灿辉,孟悛非,李子平,彭李青,等.结直肠癌螺旋CT灌注成像的初步究,临床放射学杂志,2005,24(6): 506-510
    13王守安.肝脏的CT灌注成像及临床应用现状,国外医学临床放射学分册,2003,26(6):372-376.
    14 Machida K, Oohashi N, Nakano H. Method of injection of contrast medium for brain perfusion CT. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2002,58:962–966
    15 Klotz E, Konig M. Perfusion measurements of the brain: using dynamic CT for the quantitative assessment of cerebral ischemia in acute stroke. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:170–184
    16 Koenig M, Klotz E, Luka B, et al. Perfusion CT of the brain:diagnostic approach for early detection of ischemic stroke. Radiology, 1998,209:85–93
    17 Claussen CD, Banzer D, Pfretzschner C, et al. Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. Radiology 1984,153:365-368
    18 Chun-Hong Hu , Qing-De Wu, Xiao-Yun Hu, Hemodynamic studies on brain CT perfusion imaging with varied injection rates,Clinical Imaging,2007;31:151-154
    19 Kiessling F,Boese J,Corvinus C,et.al,Perfusion CT in patients with advanced bronchial carcinomas:a novel chance for characterization and treatment monitoring? Eur Radiol. 2004, 14(7):1226-1233
    20张红梅,高培毅,胡平英.组织血流灌注的动态CT定量究.中华放射学杂志,1999,33(7):448-451
    21 Bell SD, Peters A M. Measurement of blood flow from first-pass radionuclide angiography:influence of bolus volume. Eur J Nucl Med, 1991, 18(11): 885-888.
    22 Bader TR,1Herneth AM, Blaicher W, et al 1 Hepatic perfusion after liver transplantation: noninvasive measurement with dynamic single - section CT,adiology, 1998 , 209(1):129-134
    23 Dushyant V. Sahani, Sanjeeva P. Kalva, etal,Assessing Tumor Perfusion and Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer with Multisection CT: Initial Observations ,Radiology 2005,234:785-792
    24 Mannudeep K. Kalra, William C.etal, A 45-Second CT Perfusion Protocol for Rectal Cancers May Not Be Adequate to InferVascular Permeability–Surface AreaProducts. Radiology,2006, 238:755-756
    25陈乐平,结直肠癌最佳CT灌注时间分析,实用预防医学,2007,14(4):1193-1195
    26 Zhang MM,Kono M.Solitary pulmonary nodules :evaluation of bloodflow patterns with dynamic CT . Radiology, 1997, 205(10): 471-478.
    27刘于宝,梁长虹,张忠林, 64层螺旋CT灌注成像评价直肠癌术后复发或瘢痕组织,放射学实践,2006,21 (5):503-506
    28 SahaniDV,KlavaSP,HambergLM,etal.Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT ; initial observation.Radiology,2005,234(3):785-792
    29 Dugdale PE , Miles KA , Bunce I , etal . CT measurement of perfusion and permeability within lymphoma masses and its ability to assess grade,activity,and chemotherapeutic response . J Comput Assist Tomogr,1999;23(4):540-547
    30 Brix G, Bahner ML , Hoffmann U ,etal.Regional blood flow ,capillary permeability , and compartmental volumes : measurement with dynamic CT initial experience. Radiology ,1999:210(1):269-276
    31 Flokman J.Tumer angiogenesis.Therapeutic implication. N EngI J Med.1971,285:1182-1186
    32 Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature 2000;407:249-257
    33 Brem S, Cotran R, Folkman J. Tumor Anginogenesis :aQuantitative Method for Histologic Grading . N EnglCancerinst, 1972 , 48(2): 347-356
    34 Nakasaki T,Wada H,Shigernori C, etal.Exprission of tissue factor and vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. AmJHematol , 2002,69 (4): 247-254
    35 AcikalinM F.oner U,Topcu I etal Tumour angiogenesis and mast cell density in the prognostic assessment of colorectal carcinomas . Dig Liver Dis,2005,37(3):162-169
    36 Shan Y S,Lee J C,Chow H N,etal, Immunohisto chemical microvessel count is not a reliable prognostic predictor in colorectal carcinomas Hepatogastroenterology, 2003 ,50(53): 1316-1320
    37 White JD, Hewett PW, Kosuge D, et al1 Vascular endothelial growth factor expression is an independent prognostic marker forsurvival in colorectal carcinoma1 Cancer Res, 2002, 62: 1669-1675
    38孙灿辉,孟悛非,李子平等,结直肠癌微血管密度与螺旋CT灌注成像的相关性,中华放射学杂志,2006, 40(1):77-80
    39 Chen CN, Cheng YM, Lin MT, et al1 Association of color Dopp lervascularity index and icrovessel density with survival in patientswith gastric cancer1 Ann Surg, 2002,235: 512-518
    40赵玉珍,于跃明,叶卫华,直肠癌腔内超声血管定量与TNM分期及病理微血管密度相关性究,中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(11):852-854
    41 Willett CG, Boucher Y, di Tomaso E, et al. Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. NatMed 2004, 10:145-147
    42 Hawighorst H,Knapstein PG,Knopp MV,etal.Uterinecervical carcinoma:comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curve for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patientsurvival. CancerRes, 1998, 58(8): 3598-3602
    43李慎江,肖湘生,刘士远,等.明显强化孤立肺结节血流模式的临床价值.中华放射学杂志,2004,38 (10):1062-1068
    44张敏鸣,周华,邹煜,等.肺癌肿瘤血管生成CT及MR灌注成像究.放射学实践,2005,20(4):286-290
    45丁国芳,李继承,徐银峰,等.前列腺癌组织TGF-β1、CD31表达及与PSA、TNM分期的相关性究,中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):315-317
    46王粉荣,李荣,宋政军,肿瘤微血管密度和血管内皮生长因子的表达与胃癌病理及临床分期的关系,西安交通大学学报(医学版),2006,27(6):578-581
    47 HanJ,XiaC,GaoJ,etal.Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in colorectal cancer and its clinical significance.Zhong hua Yi Xue Za Zhi,2002,82(7):481-483.
    48 Nakayama Y,Sako T,Shibao K, etal.Prognostic value of plasmavascular endothelial growth factor in patients withcolorectal cancer . AnticancerRes,2002,22(4):2437-2442
    49彭李青,黄菊花,曾粦春,等.结直肠癌螺旋CT灌注成像与肿瘤血管生成的相关性,中国医学影像技术,2006, 22 (7):1051-1054
    50王琦,徐克等,正常胰腺和胰腺癌多层螺旋CT灌注成像的临床及实验

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700