GSM国际漫游质量评估方法研究
|
摘要
自20世纪90年代开始,随着中国经济的持续繁荣,国内外的交流与合作日益频繁,又一次激发了国际和国漫业务的发展高潮。随着中国移动在国际通信行业中的不断崛起,国际业务的地位越来越重要,随之而来对国际国漫业务的要求也越来越高。
尤其是2001年以来中国的移动和联通各自展开了自属国际通信网的建设、经过多年的发展将国际漫游业务与中国电信的分离,截至2008年9月仅中国移动已经与300余家国外运营商的网络进行了互联和结构调整,已建立起了全球最大的一张GSM移动自动漫游网络。
本文从运营商角度分析了目前国际漫游网络和业务分析及管理上的问题。首先介绍了目前国际漫游业务推陈出新和网络发展的趋势,而与之不相协调的服务现状。然后,针对目前国内外移动运营商对国漫业务质量的观察角度凌乱,数据采集和指标分析的单一性,并且直观性和比对性差等问题,研究了底层数据和指标群的关联度。再对数据和基础指标进行梳理,以国家或行业规范为依据,筛选重点指标群,创新性的定义出三层“指标架构”,并采用“AHP层次分析法”对指标权重进行了模拟估算,提出了两个全新观察指标“GSM国漫网络指数”和“GSM国漫业务指数”。之后又利用中移动国漫网络这个典型环境,采集了大量现网实测数据进行计算,获得了第一手资料,论证了两个一级指标“GSM国漫网络指数”和“GSM国漫业务指数”的应用方法和指导价值。最后,通过这种方法对国内外运营商的网络质量和业务表现进行了评估,以两个一级指标“GSM国漫业务指标”和“GSM国漫网络指标”的差异性为切入点,提供给所有GSM移动运营商一个简单但又全面综合评估国漫运营质量的方法,从一个新的角度探讨如何综合评估一个大型网络质量、业务发展以及他们之间关系。
本文是对以往国际国漫维护工作经验的一种纵向的探索和研究,将很大程度上提升中国运营商在移动国际国漫业务上的维护和管理水平。
With economic boom of China, there are more and more international exchange and cooperation, which stimulate the great development of international communication service. Along with China Mobile rising in the international communication industry, the international communication service is becoming more and more important and increasing highly.
In particular, China Mobile has set up one of the world's largest GSM mobile automatic roaming network with ore than 300 foreign operators.
This article analyzes the current international roaming network service and management problems from the operator point of view First of all, the international roaming service and network development trend and the international communication Service are introduced. Secondly, the basic date and the Correlation of Indicators are researched for the problem of the international mobile communication operator. And then the data and basic indicators are sort out according to national or industry specifications with an emphasis on on key indicators group, and the innovative three-tier "target architecture" is defined. Based on "AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process", a simulation estimate for the index weight of the indicators, and two new indicators which are "GSM country diffuse network index" and "GSM country diffuse service index", are brought up.In the mobile network typical environment, a large number of data are collected and calculated. Based on the first-hand information, this article demonstrates the two-level indicators "GSM country diffuse network index" and "GSM country diffuse service index" Application of methods and guidance values. Finally, some typical operator's network quality and operational performance are demonstrated by this method. Looking the differences between two-level indicators "GSM country diffuse service indicators" and "GSM diffuse network of country indicators" as the breakthrough point, this article gives a simple and comprehensive method which can demonstrate the quality of international roaming service.
This article is an exploration based on the experience of the maintenance of international roaming network, it will greatly enhance the Chinese operators’maintenance and management level of the international service.
尤其是2001年以来中国的移动和联通各自展开了自属国际通信网的建设、经过多年的发展将国际漫游业务与中国电信的分离,截至2008年9月仅中国移动已经与300余家国外运营商的网络进行了互联和结构调整,已建立起了全球最大的一张GSM移动自动漫游网络。
本文从运营商角度分析了目前国际漫游网络和业务分析及管理上的问题。首先介绍了目前国际漫游业务推陈出新和网络发展的趋势,而与之不相协调的服务现状。然后,针对目前国内外移动运营商对国漫业务质量的观察角度凌乱,数据采集和指标分析的单一性,并且直观性和比对性差等问题,研究了底层数据和指标群的关联度。再对数据和基础指标进行梳理,以国家或行业规范为依据,筛选重点指标群,创新性的定义出三层“指标架构”,并采用“AHP层次分析法”对指标权重进行了模拟估算,提出了两个全新观察指标“GSM国漫网络指数”和“GSM国漫业务指数”。之后又利用中移动国漫网络这个典型环境,采集了大量现网实测数据进行计算,获得了第一手资料,论证了两个一级指标“GSM国漫网络指数”和“GSM国漫业务指数”的应用方法和指导价值。最后,通过这种方法对国内外运营商的网络质量和业务表现进行了评估,以两个一级指标“GSM国漫业务指标”和“GSM国漫网络指标”的差异性为切入点,提供给所有GSM移动运营商一个简单但又全面综合评估国漫运营质量的方法,从一个新的角度探讨如何综合评估一个大型网络质量、业务发展以及他们之间关系。
本文是对以往国际国漫维护工作经验的一种纵向的探索和研究,将很大程度上提升中国运营商在移动国际国漫业务上的维护和管理水平。
With economic boom of China, there are more and more international exchange and cooperation, which stimulate the great development of international communication service. Along with China Mobile rising in the international communication industry, the international communication service is becoming more and more important and increasing highly.
In particular, China Mobile has set up one of the world's largest GSM mobile automatic roaming network with ore than 300 foreign operators.
This article analyzes the current international roaming network service and management problems from the operator point of view First of all, the international roaming service and network development trend and the international communication Service are introduced. Secondly, the basic date and the Correlation of Indicators are researched for the problem of the international mobile communication operator. And then the data and basic indicators are sort out according to national or industry specifications with an emphasis on on key indicators group, and the innovative three-tier "target architecture" is defined. Based on "AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process", a simulation estimate for the index weight of the indicators, and two new indicators which are "GSM country diffuse network index" and "GSM country diffuse service index", are brought up.In the mobile network typical environment, a large number of data are collected and calculated. Based on the first-hand information, this article demonstrates the two-level indicators "GSM country diffuse network index" and "GSM country diffuse service index" Application of methods and guidance values. Finally, some typical operator's network quality and operational performance are demonstrated by this method. Looking the differences between two-level indicators "GSM country diffuse service indicators" and "GSM diffuse network of country indicators" as the breakthrough point, this article gives a simple and comprehensive method which can demonstrate the quality of international roaming service.
This article is an exploration based on the experience of the maintenance of international roaming network, it will greatly enhance the Chinese operators’maintenance and management level of the international service.
引文
[1] Kwiesielewicz M, Uden E; Inconsistent and contradictory judgments in pairwise comparison method in the AHP [M];Computers & Operations Research; 2004
[2] T.L. Saaty,, L.G. Vargas; Inconsistency and rank preservation [J] [M];Journal of Math. Psychology; 1984
[3] Saaty T L.The analytic hierarchy process[M].New York:McGraw Hill,1980.
[4] Aczel J,Alsina C.Synthesizing judgments:A functional equations approach[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,1987,9(3):311-320.
[5] Saaty T L; Highlights and critical points in thetheory and application of the Analytic HierarchyProcess [M];European Journal of OperationalResearch; 1994
[6] Schoner B,Wedley W C,Choo E U; A unifiedapproach to AHP with linking pins [M];EuropeanJournal of Operational Research; 1993
[7] Schenkerman S; Voiding rank reversal in AHPdecision support models [M];European Journal ofOperational Research; 1994
[8] Saaty T L; Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process [M];Management Science; 1986
[9] Vargas L G; Why the multiplicative AHP is invalid:a practical example [M];Journal of Multi-CriteriaDecision Analysis; 1997
[10] Karapetrovic S, Rosenbloom E; A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP [M];European Journal of Operational Research; 1999
[11] Xu Z; On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP [M];European Journal of Operational Research; 2000
[12] Dyer JS; Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process [M];Management Science; 1990
[13] Xu Zeshui, Wei Cuiping; A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process [M];European Journal of Operational Research; 1999
[14] T. L. Saaty; A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures [M];Journal of Math. Psychology; 1997
[15] Belton V,Gear T; On a shortcoming of Saaty’smethod of analytic hierarchies [M];Omega; 1983
[16] Saaty T L.Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory[C].RWS Publications.Pittsburgh,1994:1-127.
[17] Belton V,Gear T; The legitimacy of rank reversal-a comment [M];Omega; 1985
[18] Barzilai J,Golany B; AHP rank reversal,normalization and aggregation rules [M];INFOR; 1994
[19]中华人民共和国通信行业标准:YD/T 1038-2000: 900/1800MHZ TDMA数字蜂窝移动通信网移动应用部分(Phase 2+)技术规范
[20] T.L. Saaty; The Analytic Hierarchy Process [M]. [M];; 1980年
[21]国内NO.7信令方式技术规范:信令连接控制部分(SCCP)
[22]李登峰.模糊多目标多人决策与对策[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2003.
[23]张跃.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1992.
[24]中华人民共和国邮电部技术规定: YDN 038-1997:国内NO.7信令方式技术规范综合业务数字网用户部分(ISUP)
[25]骆正清,杨善林.层次分析法中几种标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(9):51-60.
[26]吕跃进.层次分析法标度系统评价研究[C].决策科学理论与方法.北京;海洋出版社,2001:50-58.
[27]邮电部技术规定: YDN 039-1997:国内NO.7信令方式事务处理能力(TC)部分测试规范
[28]邮电通信网技术规范:GF011-95 :国内NO.7信令方式技术规范事务处理能力(TC)部分
[29]吴自库.曲仕敬一种AHP判断矩阵一致性调整的有效方法[期刊论文] -青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版) 2008(02)
[30]单汨源.张丽.吴娟基于RAGA-AHP法的项目优先级评定研究[期刊论文] -科技管理研究2008(03)
[31]詹棠森.林卫中.邱望仁修正AHP中判断矩阵的近似加速算法[期刊论文] -数学的实践与认识2007(03)
[32]汪菁.苏炜高等级公路路线方案的多目标量化优选[期刊论文] -数学的实践与认识2007(14)
[33]郭亚军王学军.基于G1法的判断矩阵的一致性分析[期刊论文] -中国管理科学2006(03)
[34]赵伏军.谢世勇.杨磊.陈世强基于层次分析法-模糊综合评价(AHP-FCE)模型优化矿井通风系统的研究[期刊论文] -中国安全科学学报2006(04)
[35]叶跃祥.糜仲春.王宏宇.梁晓艳AHP判断矩阵一致性调整的前瞻算法[期刊论文] -系统工程2006(10)
[36]朱海莹.康虹.卢瑞甫构建中型企业中层管理者素质测评指标体系[期刊论文] -西安工业大学学报2006(04)
[37]高太忠.高京.王海云.黄群贤南水北调河北省受水区水资源可持续利用AHP量化研究[期刊论文] -灌溉排水学报2007(04)
[38]林济铿.蒋越梅.岳顺民.郑卫洪.王海林.时燕新.顾强基于DEA/AHP模型的电力系统黑启动有效方案评估[期刊论文] -电力系统自动化2007(15)
[39]刘奇志.层次分析积因子方法的特性及其理论基础[C].决策科学理论与方法.北京:海洋出版社,2001:19-33.
[40]唐有文.模糊层次分析法[J].青海师范大学学报,2002,(3):19-23.
[41]吴殿廷,李东方.层次分析法的不足及其改进的途径[J].北京师范大学学报,2004,40(2):264-268.
[42]马荣国,杨立波.一种基于模糊理论的AHP改进算法[J].长安大学学报,2002,22(2):92-94.
[2] T.L. Saaty,, L.G. Vargas; Inconsistency and rank preservation [J] [M];Journal of Math. Psychology; 1984
[3] Saaty T L.The analytic hierarchy process[M].New York:McGraw Hill,1980.
[4] Aczel J,Alsina C.Synthesizing judgments:A functional equations approach[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,1987,9(3):311-320.
[5] Saaty T L; Highlights and critical points in thetheory and application of the Analytic HierarchyProcess [M];European Journal of OperationalResearch; 1994
[6] Schoner B,Wedley W C,Choo E U; A unifiedapproach to AHP with linking pins [M];EuropeanJournal of Operational Research; 1993
[7] Schenkerman S; Voiding rank reversal in AHPdecision support models [M];European Journal ofOperational Research; 1994
[8] Saaty T L; Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process [M];Management Science; 1986
[9] Vargas L G; Why the multiplicative AHP is invalid:a practical example [M];Journal of Multi-CriteriaDecision Analysis; 1997
[10] Karapetrovic S, Rosenbloom E; A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP [M];European Journal of Operational Research; 1999
[11] Xu Z; On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP [M];European Journal of Operational Research; 2000
[12] Dyer JS; Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process [M];Management Science; 1990
[13] Xu Zeshui, Wei Cuiping; A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process [M];European Journal of Operational Research; 1999
[14] T. L. Saaty; A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures [M];Journal of Math. Psychology; 1997
[15] Belton V,Gear T; On a shortcoming of Saaty’smethod of analytic hierarchies [M];Omega; 1983
[16] Saaty T L.Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory[C].RWS Publications.Pittsburgh,1994:1-127.
[17] Belton V,Gear T; The legitimacy of rank reversal-a comment [M];Omega; 1985
[18] Barzilai J,Golany B; AHP rank reversal,normalization and aggregation rules [M];INFOR; 1994
[19]中华人民共和国通信行业标准:YD/T 1038-2000: 900/1800MHZ TDMA数字蜂窝移动通信网移动应用部分(Phase 2+)技术规范
[20] T.L. Saaty; The Analytic Hierarchy Process [M]. [M];; 1980年
[21]国内NO.7信令方式技术规范:信令连接控制部分(SCCP)
[22]李登峰.模糊多目标多人决策与对策[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2003.
[23]张跃.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1992.
[24]中华人民共和国邮电部技术规定: YDN 038-1997:国内NO.7信令方式技术规范综合业务数字网用户部分(ISUP)
[25]骆正清,杨善林.层次分析法中几种标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(9):51-60.
[26]吕跃进.层次分析法标度系统评价研究[C].决策科学理论与方法.北京;海洋出版社,2001:50-58.
[27]邮电部技术规定: YDN 039-1997:国内NO.7信令方式事务处理能力(TC)部分测试规范
[28]邮电通信网技术规范:GF011-95 :国内NO.7信令方式技术规范事务处理能力(TC)部分
[29]吴自库.曲仕敬一种AHP判断矩阵一致性调整的有效方法[期刊论文] -青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版) 2008(02)
[30]单汨源.张丽.吴娟基于RAGA-AHP法的项目优先级评定研究[期刊论文] -科技管理研究2008(03)
[31]詹棠森.林卫中.邱望仁修正AHP中判断矩阵的近似加速算法[期刊论文] -数学的实践与认识2007(03)
[32]汪菁.苏炜高等级公路路线方案的多目标量化优选[期刊论文] -数学的实践与认识2007(14)
[33]郭亚军王学军.基于G1法的判断矩阵的一致性分析[期刊论文] -中国管理科学2006(03)
[34]赵伏军.谢世勇.杨磊.陈世强基于层次分析法-模糊综合评价(AHP-FCE)模型优化矿井通风系统的研究[期刊论文] -中国安全科学学报2006(04)
[35]叶跃祥.糜仲春.王宏宇.梁晓艳AHP判断矩阵一致性调整的前瞻算法[期刊论文] -系统工程2006(10)
[36]朱海莹.康虹.卢瑞甫构建中型企业中层管理者素质测评指标体系[期刊论文] -西安工业大学学报2006(04)
[37]高太忠.高京.王海云.黄群贤南水北调河北省受水区水资源可持续利用AHP量化研究[期刊论文] -灌溉排水学报2007(04)
[38]林济铿.蒋越梅.岳顺民.郑卫洪.王海林.时燕新.顾强基于DEA/AHP模型的电力系统黑启动有效方案评估[期刊论文] -电力系统自动化2007(15)
[39]刘奇志.层次分析积因子方法的特性及其理论基础[C].决策科学理论与方法.北京:海洋出版社,2001:19-33.
[40]唐有文.模糊层次分析法[J].青海师范大学学报,2002,(3):19-23.
[41]吴殿廷,李东方.层次分析法的不足及其改进的途径[J].北京师范大学学报,2004,40(2):264-268.
[42]马荣国,杨立波.一种基于模糊理论的AHP改进算法[J].长安大学学报,2002,22(2):92-94.