萨中开发区中区西部二次开发井网重构研究
|
摘要
本论文主要针对萨中开发区中区西部二次开发井网重构进行研究,依据萨中开发区精细地质研究结果,利用精细地震三维技术、高精度动态监测技术、精细油藏描述技术、储层结构精细刻画技术,搞清剩余油分布,重新构建地下认识体系。对中区西部基本概况:构造与断层、储层特征、流体性质、油藏温度与压力、油藏类型、区块地质储量进行了介绍,对开发历程、区块内各矿场试验研究状况及目前开发中存在的主要问题进行了总结,并对中区西部油藏沉积特征、油层发育状况、油层非均质性进行了精细描述。
对现井网动用状况、剩余油分布特征及分布类型作了总结,二类油层剩余油类型及分布特征:一是井网控制不住型剩余油;二是注采不完善型剩余油;三是厚油层顶部剩余油。三类油层剩余油类型及分布特征:一是与河道砂呈镶边或搭桥形态的薄差层剩余油;二是井网控制不住型剩余油;三是注采不完善型剩余油。高台子油层剩余油类型及分布特征:一是分布在成片差油层区;二是层间干扰型剩余油;三是井网控制不住型剩余油;另外,还有少数因尖灭遮挡井网注采不完善形成的剩余油,但分布零散。
在精细地质研究和数值模拟的基础上,确定二次开发调整对象、开发次序及调整方式。优选合理的井网部署方案,共部署三套开发井网,其中包括萨葡二类油层三次采油井网、三类油层“两三结合”井网和高台子油层加密调整井网,每套井网均利用现井网并进行优化重组,细分了开发层系。
进行了井网适应性研究,确定了二次开发的井网井距设计标准:中区西部萨葡二类油层三元复合驱合理注采井距应为125m;中区西部萨葡三类油层“两三结合”井网注采井距应确定为100m左右较为合理;中区西部高台子油层加密井网注采井距应确定为100m左右较为合理,考虑到高台子油层加密要与老井网相适应,高台子油层加密调整井网井距也确定为106m左右。
并对开发潜力及开发指标预测:增储潜力预测、注采压力系统及合理压力初步设计、开发指标初步预测。二次开发的核心是提高老油田采收率,并通过地质建模和数值模拟进行历史拟合、指标预测,提高可采储量和采收率均达到设计要求,二次开发井网重构是可行的,经济效益显著,可在萨中开发区相似区块进行推广。
Based on findings of fine geology in Sa-Zhong Development Area, three-dimensional seismic technique, highly accurate dynamic monitoring techniques, fine reservoir description techniques, and fine reservoir structure description techniques, the paper aims at studying the secondary development of well pattern reconfiguration in Middle West of Sa-Zhong Development Area, in order to reveal remaining oil distribution and to reconstruct reservoir cognition.
The paper not only gives a basic overview of the Midwest, such as structure and fault structure, reservoir characteristics, fluid properties, reservoir pressure and temperature, reservoir type and geolograph reserves, etc., it also sums up the exploitation course, the condition of research in each mine field, and the problems in the exploitation. Furthermore, the paper describes the sedimentary feature of the Midwest, the reservoir development, and oil heterogeneity.
The paper introduces the producing condition of well pattern and the features and types of remaining oil distribution. Remaining oil distribution in class II reservoir: non-perforated well pattern; reservoir injection-production faultiness; the top of thick oil pay. Remaining oil distribution in class III reservoir: thin and poor reservoir in edging and bridging state with channel sand; non-perforated well pattern; reservoir injection-production faultiness. Remaining oil distribution in Gaotaizi oil layer: in poor layer; interlayer interference; non-perforated well pattern. Besides, some remaining oil exists because of the pinch-out sealing reservoir injection-production faultiness, but with loose scatter.
On the basis of fine geology and numerical simulation, the paper provides the secondary development object, development order and regulating methods. After close selection of some proper deployment schemes, the paper gives three schemes of the development of well pattern: Sapu class II reservoir tertiary recovery well pattern, class III reservoir“the combination of class II and class III”well pattern, and Gaotaizi oil layer infilling adjustment well pattern. Each uses the present well pattern but optimizes and reorganizes it, and subdivides the straticulate exploration.
The paper makes an adaptability study of well pattern, establishes standard for the secondary development of well pattern and well spacing: for ASP flooding in Sapu class II reservoir, producer-injector spacing is 125m; for“the combination of class II and class III”well pattern in Sapu class III reservoir, producer-injector spacing is about 100m; for Gaotaizi oil layer infilled well pattern, producer-injector spacing is about 100m. Since Gaotaizi oil layer infilled well pattern should be adaptable to old well pattern, its producer-injector spacing is set as 106m approximately.
The paper also involves the study of development potential and index forecast: forecast for the potential in increasing the storage, predesign for injection-production pressure system and proper pressure, index preliminary forecasting.
The focus of the secondary development is to improve the extraction ratio of old field. Through geological modeling and numerical simulation, the paper plans to make history matching and index forecast, in order to improve recoverable reserves and extraction ratio. The paper concludes that the secondary development of well pattern reconfiguration is practicable and can be spread in Sa-Zhong area because of its obvious economic benefit.
对现井网动用状况、剩余油分布特征及分布类型作了总结,二类油层剩余油类型及分布特征:一是井网控制不住型剩余油;二是注采不完善型剩余油;三是厚油层顶部剩余油。三类油层剩余油类型及分布特征:一是与河道砂呈镶边或搭桥形态的薄差层剩余油;二是井网控制不住型剩余油;三是注采不完善型剩余油。高台子油层剩余油类型及分布特征:一是分布在成片差油层区;二是层间干扰型剩余油;三是井网控制不住型剩余油;另外,还有少数因尖灭遮挡井网注采不完善形成的剩余油,但分布零散。
在精细地质研究和数值模拟的基础上,确定二次开发调整对象、开发次序及调整方式。优选合理的井网部署方案,共部署三套开发井网,其中包括萨葡二类油层三次采油井网、三类油层“两三结合”井网和高台子油层加密调整井网,每套井网均利用现井网并进行优化重组,细分了开发层系。
进行了井网适应性研究,确定了二次开发的井网井距设计标准:中区西部萨葡二类油层三元复合驱合理注采井距应为125m;中区西部萨葡三类油层“两三结合”井网注采井距应确定为100m左右较为合理;中区西部高台子油层加密井网注采井距应确定为100m左右较为合理,考虑到高台子油层加密要与老井网相适应,高台子油层加密调整井网井距也确定为106m左右。
并对开发潜力及开发指标预测:增储潜力预测、注采压力系统及合理压力初步设计、开发指标初步预测。二次开发的核心是提高老油田采收率,并通过地质建模和数值模拟进行历史拟合、指标预测,提高可采储量和采收率均达到设计要求,二次开发井网重构是可行的,经济效益显著,可在萨中开发区相似区块进行推广。
Based on findings of fine geology in Sa-Zhong Development Area, three-dimensional seismic technique, highly accurate dynamic monitoring techniques, fine reservoir description techniques, and fine reservoir structure description techniques, the paper aims at studying the secondary development of well pattern reconfiguration in Middle West of Sa-Zhong Development Area, in order to reveal remaining oil distribution and to reconstruct reservoir cognition.
The paper not only gives a basic overview of the Midwest, such as structure and fault structure, reservoir characteristics, fluid properties, reservoir pressure and temperature, reservoir type and geolograph reserves, etc., it also sums up the exploitation course, the condition of research in each mine field, and the problems in the exploitation. Furthermore, the paper describes the sedimentary feature of the Midwest, the reservoir development, and oil heterogeneity.
The paper introduces the producing condition of well pattern and the features and types of remaining oil distribution. Remaining oil distribution in class II reservoir: non-perforated well pattern; reservoir injection-production faultiness; the top of thick oil pay. Remaining oil distribution in class III reservoir: thin and poor reservoir in edging and bridging state with channel sand; non-perforated well pattern; reservoir injection-production faultiness. Remaining oil distribution in Gaotaizi oil layer: in poor layer; interlayer interference; non-perforated well pattern. Besides, some remaining oil exists because of the pinch-out sealing reservoir injection-production faultiness, but with loose scatter.
On the basis of fine geology and numerical simulation, the paper provides the secondary development object, development order and regulating methods. After close selection of some proper deployment schemes, the paper gives three schemes of the development of well pattern: Sapu class II reservoir tertiary recovery well pattern, class III reservoir“the combination of class II and class III”well pattern, and Gaotaizi oil layer infilling adjustment well pattern. Each uses the present well pattern but optimizes and reorganizes it, and subdivides the straticulate exploration.
The paper makes an adaptability study of well pattern, establishes standard for the secondary development of well pattern and well spacing: for ASP flooding in Sapu class II reservoir, producer-injector spacing is 125m; for“the combination of class II and class III”well pattern in Sapu class III reservoir, producer-injector spacing is about 100m; for Gaotaizi oil layer infilled well pattern, producer-injector spacing is about 100m. Since Gaotaizi oil layer infilled well pattern should be adaptable to old well pattern, its producer-injector spacing is set as 106m approximately.
The paper also involves the study of development potential and index forecast: forecast for the potential in increasing the storage, predesign for injection-production pressure system and proper pressure, index preliminary forecasting.
The focus of the secondary development is to improve the extraction ratio of old field. Through geological modeling and numerical simulation, the paper plans to make history matching and index forecast, in order to improve recoverable reserves and extraction ratio. The paper concludes that the secondary development of well pattern reconfiguration is practicable and can be spread in Sa-Zhong area because of its obvious economic benefit.
引文
[1]Chang Howard H.Minimum stream power and channel patterns[J].Journal of Hydrology,1979,41:303～327
[2]Church M.Pattern of instability in a wandering gravel bed channel.In:Collinson J D,Lewin J (eds).Modern and Ancient Fluvial Systems[A].Special Publication of the International Association of Sedimentologists[C].6,Blackwell,Oxford,1983.169～180
[3] Ferguson R I.Channel form and channel changes [J].In:Lewin J(ed.).British River [C].Allen and Unwin,Longdon,1981:90～211
[4] Friend P F,Slate rM J,Williams R C.Vertical and Lateral Building of River Sandstone Bodies1 36[M] .Journal of the Geological Society of London,EbroBasin,Spain,1979:39～46
[5] Friend P F.Towards the field classification of alluvial architecture or sequence[A].In:Collinson J D,Lewin J(eds).Mordern and Ancient Fluvial Systems[C].Special Publication of the International Association of the Sedi-mentollogists6,Balackwell.Oxford,1983:345～354
[6] Leopold L B,Wolman M G.River channel patterns,braided,meandering and straight.United States Geological Survey,Professional Paper,1957,282-B:45～62
[7]Miall A D.Architecture element analysis:a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits.Earth Science Review.1985,22(4):261-308
[8]Miall A D.Reservoir heterogeneities in fluvial sandstone:lessons from outcrop studies.AAPG.1988,72(6):682～697
[9]Miall A D.The Geology of Fluvial Deposits[M].SPRINGER-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,NewYork.1996:1～190,453～478
[10]Mi0all A D.Reconstructing Fluvial Macroform Architecture from Two-dimensional Outcrops:Examples from The Castlegate Sandstone,Book Cliffs,Utah[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1994,64(2):146～158
[11]Miall A D . Rescription and Interpretation of Fluvial Deposits : a Critical Perspective :Discussion[J].Sedimentology,1995,42:379～384
[12]Miall A D.Fluvial Sed-imentology[C].Canada Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 5,Calgary,1978:577～586
[13]Putnam P E.Amultidisciplinary analysis of Belly River-Brazeau (Campanian) fluvial channel reservoirs in west-central Alberta,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,1993,41(2):186～217
[14]陈琳凤,马启贵.Ebughu油田的二次开发,国外油田工程,2003 19(4)
[15]陈程,贾爱林,孙义梅.厚油层内部相结构模式及剩余油分布特征[M].石油学报,2000,21(5),P99-103
[16]陈亮,彭仕密,聂昌谋.胡状集油田胡十二断块剩余油微观形成机理研究[J].断块油气田.1997,4(4):43-45
[17]董冬,陈洁,邱明文.河流相储集层中剩余油类型和分布规律.油气采收率技术.1999,第6卷第3期.39～46
[18]邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[D].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2),P90-95.
[19]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙哲.层序地层基准面的识别对比技术及应用[D].石油勘探与开发,1996,17(3),P177-184.
[20]邓宏文.美国层序地层学研究中的新学派——高分辨率层序地层学[D].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2),P90-97.
[21]高健.滦河中游现代河流沉积构造与水动力关系[J].沉积学报,1983,1 (1):27～41
[22]宫秀梅,曾溅辉,金之钧.渤南洼陷深层(沙四段)油气成藏模拟实验研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(4):26～30
[23]赖志云.荆江太平口边滩现代沉积研究[J].沉积学报,1986,4(4):109～118
[24]李思田,李祯,孙永传,等.陕甘宁盆地河流砂体露头调查及地质知识库基础研究[R].中国油气储层研究(85～103)成果报告,1994:60～69
[25]李思田,焦养泉、付清平.鄂尔多斯盆地延安组三角洲砂体内部构成及非均质性研究,裘亦楠、薛叔浩,应风祥主编,中国油气储层研究论文集[C] .石油工业出版社,1993,312-325.
[26]刘建民,徐守余.河流相储层沉积模式及对剩余油分布的控制[M].2003,24(1):152～158
[27]刘国旗,赵爱武,赵磊,等.河流相多层砂岩油藏剩余油描述及挖潜技术[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(5)
[28]马世忠,付春权.单砂体三维地质的优势渗透率分析方法[J].大庆石油学院学报,2000,24(3),1～5
[29]马世忠,杨清彦.曲流点坝沉积模式、三维构形及其非均质模型[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):241～247
[30]束青林.孤岛油田河流相储层结构与剩余油分布规律研究[D].中国科学院:广州地球化学研究所,2005:119～126
[31]束青林,张本华.河道砂储层油藏动态模型和剩余油预测[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:P81～102
[32]隋新光.曲流河道砂体内部建筑结构研究[D].大庆石油学院,2006:55～60
[33]王平在,王俊玲.嫩江现代河流沉积层序及沉积模式[J].沉积学报,2003,21(2):228～233
[34]王俊玲,任纪舜.嫩江现代河流沉积体岩相及内部构形要素分析[J].地质科学,2001,36(4):385～394
[35]王继贿.根据河道形态和沉积物特征的河流新分类[J].沉积学报,1999,17 (2):240～246
[36]王俊玲.嫩江下游现代河流沉积特征[J].地质论评,2001,47(2):193～199
[37]薛培华.河流点坝相储层模式概论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991:5l～55
[38]许炯心.南运河弯曲河型的成因[J].地理学与国土研究,1989,5(2):54～59
[39]于兴河,王德法,陆相断陷盆地三角洲相构型要素及其储层地质模型[J].地质论评,1997,43(3).
[40]于翠玲,曾溅辉.断层幕式活动期和间歇期流体运移与油气成藏特征[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(2):129～133
[41]尹燕义,王国娟.曲流河点坝储集层侧积体类型研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(2).44～66
[42]尹太举,张昌民.建立储层流动单元模型的新方法[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(2):170～175
[43]张昌民.储层砂体建筑结构分析.江汉石油学院学报,1994,16(2):1～7
[44]魏纪德,杜庆龙,林春明,张同意.大庆油田剩余油的影响因素及分布.石油与天然气地质.2001,第22卷第1期.57～59
[45]周宗良,杨国安,肖建铃,河成单元构型非均质性研究[M].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4).P71-77.
[2]Church M.Pattern of instability in a wandering gravel bed channel.In:Collinson J D,Lewin J (eds).Modern and Ancient Fluvial Systems[A].Special Publication of the International Association of Sedimentologists[C].6,Blackwell,Oxford,1983.169～180
[3] Ferguson R I.Channel form and channel changes [J].In:Lewin J(ed.).British River [C].Allen and Unwin,Longdon,1981:90～211
[4] Friend P F,Slate rM J,Williams R C.Vertical and Lateral Building of River Sandstone Bodies1 36[M] .Journal of the Geological Society of London,EbroBasin,Spain,1979:39～46
[5] Friend P F.Towards the field classification of alluvial architecture or sequence[A].In:Collinson J D,Lewin J(eds).Mordern and Ancient Fluvial Systems[C].Special Publication of the International Association of the Sedi-mentollogists6,Balackwell.Oxford,1983:345～354
[6] Leopold L B,Wolman M G.River channel patterns,braided,meandering and straight.United States Geological Survey,Professional Paper,1957,282-B:45～62
[7]Miall A D.Architecture element analysis:a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits.Earth Science Review.1985,22(4):261-308
[8]Miall A D.Reservoir heterogeneities in fluvial sandstone:lessons from outcrop studies.AAPG.1988,72(6):682～697
[9]Miall A D.The Geology of Fluvial Deposits[M].SPRINGER-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,NewYork.1996:1～190,453～478
[10]Mi0all A D.Reconstructing Fluvial Macroform Architecture from Two-dimensional Outcrops:Examples from The Castlegate Sandstone,Book Cliffs,Utah[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1994,64(2):146～158
[11]Miall A D . Rescription and Interpretation of Fluvial Deposits : a Critical Perspective :Discussion[J].Sedimentology,1995,42:379～384
[12]Miall A D.Fluvial Sed-imentology[C].Canada Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 5,Calgary,1978:577～586
[13]Putnam P E.Amultidisciplinary analysis of Belly River-Brazeau (Campanian) fluvial channel reservoirs in west-central Alberta,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,1993,41(2):186～217
[14]陈琳凤,马启贵.Ebughu油田的二次开发,国外油田工程,2003 19(4)
[15]陈程,贾爱林,孙义梅.厚油层内部相结构模式及剩余油分布特征[M].石油学报,2000,21(5),P99-103
[16]陈亮,彭仕密,聂昌谋.胡状集油田胡十二断块剩余油微观形成机理研究[J].断块油气田.1997,4(4):43-45
[17]董冬,陈洁,邱明文.河流相储集层中剩余油类型和分布规律.油气采收率技术.1999,第6卷第3期.39～46
[18]邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[D].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2),P90-95.
[19]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙哲.层序地层基准面的识别对比技术及应用[D].石油勘探与开发,1996,17(3),P177-184.
[20]邓宏文.美国层序地层学研究中的新学派——高分辨率层序地层学[D].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2),P90-97.
[21]高健.滦河中游现代河流沉积构造与水动力关系[J].沉积学报,1983,1 (1):27～41
[22]宫秀梅,曾溅辉,金之钧.渤南洼陷深层(沙四段)油气成藏模拟实验研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(4):26～30
[23]赖志云.荆江太平口边滩现代沉积研究[J].沉积学报,1986,4(4):109～118
[24]李思田,李祯,孙永传,等.陕甘宁盆地河流砂体露头调查及地质知识库基础研究[R].中国油气储层研究(85～103)成果报告,1994:60～69
[25]李思田,焦养泉、付清平.鄂尔多斯盆地延安组三角洲砂体内部构成及非均质性研究,裘亦楠、薛叔浩,应风祥主编,中国油气储层研究论文集[C] .石油工业出版社,1993,312-325.
[26]刘建民,徐守余.河流相储层沉积模式及对剩余油分布的控制[M].2003,24(1):152～158
[27]刘国旗,赵爱武,赵磊,等.河流相多层砂岩油藏剩余油描述及挖潜技术[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(5)
[28]马世忠,付春权.单砂体三维地质的优势渗透率分析方法[J].大庆石油学院学报,2000,24(3),1～5
[29]马世忠,杨清彦.曲流点坝沉积模式、三维构形及其非均质模型[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):241～247
[30]束青林.孤岛油田河流相储层结构与剩余油分布规律研究[D].中国科学院:广州地球化学研究所,2005:119～126
[31]束青林,张本华.河道砂储层油藏动态模型和剩余油预测[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:P81～102
[32]隋新光.曲流河道砂体内部建筑结构研究[D].大庆石油学院,2006:55～60
[33]王平在,王俊玲.嫩江现代河流沉积层序及沉积模式[J].沉积学报,2003,21(2):228～233
[34]王俊玲,任纪舜.嫩江现代河流沉积体岩相及内部构形要素分析[J].地质科学,2001,36(4):385～394
[35]王继贿.根据河道形态和沉积物特征的河流新分类[J].沉积学报,1999,17 (2):240～246
[36]王俊玲.嫩江下游现代河流沉积特征[J].地质论评,2001,47(2):193～199
[37]薛培华.河流点坝相储层模式概论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991:5l～55
[38]许炯心.南运河弯曲河型的成因[J].地理学与国土研究,1989,5(2):54～59
[39]于兴河,王德法,陆相断陷盆地三角洲相构型要素及其储层地质模型[J].地质论评,1997,43(3).
[40]于翠玲,曾溅辉.断层幕式活动期和间歇期流体运移与油气成藏特征[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(2):129～133
[41]尹燕义,王国娟.曲流河点坝储集层侧积体类型研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(2).44～66
[42]尹太举,张昌民.建立储层流动单元模型的新方法[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(2):170～175
[43]张昌民.储层砂体建筑结构分析.江汉石油学院学报,1994,16(2):1～7
[44]魏纪德,杜庆龙,林春明,张同意.大庆油田剩余油的影响因素及分布.石油与天然气地质.2001,第22卷第1期.57～59
[45]周宗良,杨国安,肖建铃,河成单元构型非均质性研究[M].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4).P71-77.