梭鲈胚胎、仔鱼发育观察与细胞遗传学研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
梭鲈(Sander lucioperca(Linnaeus))具有适温广、生长快、耐盐碱、抗病、肉味鲜美的优良品质,在国际水产品贸易市场非常受欢迎,是一个有着良好市场前景的水产养殖名特优新品。本研究旨在通过开展梭鲈胚胎发育和胚后发育的过程进行系统的观察,了解梭鲈胚胎及仔鱼的生物学特性,以提高人工繁殖的孵化率及苗种质量,以及今后开展多倍体育种提供理论基础;通过对梭鲈染色体核型及显带的研究为该鱼的种质资源研究、种群鉴定以及染色体原位杂交开发奠定基础,为进一步开展细胞遗传学研究及构建基因组物理图谱的精细框架提供基础依据。主要结论包括:
     1.采用连续观察法通过显微观察和摄影,对梭鲈(Sander lucioperca(Linnaeus))的胚胎、仔鱼发育进行了观察和描述。结果表明:梭鲈成熟卵呈圆球状,呈淡黄色,卵径平均为0.96 mm (0.90~1.01 mm)、黏性。受精后1~2 min,吸水膨胀形成卵周隙,吸水后平均卵径为1.2 mm,卵质分布较均匀。受精卵在水温16.0~17.2℃的条件下,历时94 h完成胚胎发育过程,从受精到孵化出膜总积温为1616.8℃·h。整个胚胎发育过程分为24个期,包括受精卵、
     2细胞期、4细胞期、8细胞期、16细胞期、32细胞期、64细胞期、多细胞期、囊胚早期、囊胚中期、低囊胚期、囊胚晚期、原肠早期、原肠中期、原肠晚期、神经胚期、胚孔封闭期、肌节出现期、眼基期、眼囊期、尾鳍出现期、晶体出现期、肌肉效应期、耳石期、心跳期、出膜期;依公式K=N (T-C)对不同时间和地点梭鲈胚胎发育的平均温度和孵出时间进行线性关系统计分析,得出胚胎发育速度和水温度显著相关。并计算出梭鲈受精卵发育的理论起始温度为7.55℃,发育所需的理论有效积温为903.02℃·h。梭鲈仔鱼期可分为5个时期,分别为出膜仔鱼、眼黄色素期、眼黑色素期、鳔一室期、卵黄吸尽期。2.采用RPMI l640全培养基进行梭鲈淋巴细胞体外培养,通过对培养基PHA浓度、秋水仙素浓度及低渗时间条件的摸索,建立了效果较好的培养梭鲈血淋巴细胞制备染色体标本的实验方法。结果表明:每0.2ml梭鲈外周血细胞在5mlRPMI1640培养基中(RPMI 1640体积分数80%,PHA浓度为4 ug/ml小牛血清20%,青霉素、链霉素、卡那霉素各100 IU/ml),25℃培养72 h,培养终止前3~5h加入终浓度为0.05 ug/ml左右的秋水仙素,低渗50 min后固定、滴片及染色,可以制备出分裂相较好的染色体玻片标本。
     3.本试验以梭鲈外周血细胞为材料,采用PHA和秋水仙素体外培养法,经空气干燥制备了染色体并对其染色体核型进行分析。结果表明:梭鲈染色体数目为48条,包括2条中部着丝点染色体、10条亚中部着丝点染色体、12条亚端部着丝粒染色体和24条端部着丝粒染色体,未发现异型染色体对和随体。梭鲈核型公式为2n=48,2m+10sm+12st+24t,其染色体总臂数(NF)为60。
     4.通过对梭鲈染色体Ag-NORs显带及C-显带的初步研究获得了Ag-NORs显带、C-显带中期染色体分裂相图谱,并进行了核型分析。结果表明:梭鲈中期分裂相中, Ag-NORs出现的位置均在亚中部着丝粒染色体短臂末端,Ag-NORs的数目在不同的细胞中表现出不同的多态性,其数目为1~2个。在间期核中,通过银染表现出1个核仁的间期核数目的频率为53.99%;2个核仁的间期核数目为45.62%,大多数间期核Ag-NoRs为圆形点状。核型分析结果表明,梭鲈在第三对亚中部着丝点染色体的短臂端部区域出现NOR,为端部Ag-NORs。梭鲈的48条染色体多数有大小不一的C-带深染,同源染色体C带的大小、位置以及着色强度基本相同,不同染色体的C带强度有一定的差异。C带显示梭鲈所有染色体上都存在阳性带,主要位置为着丝粒区、中间区和末端区。
Pike-perch (Sander lucioperca(Linnaeus)) with wide-temperature resistant, fast growth, excellent resistance to salts, disease resistance, have become popular in International aquatic products trade market for their deliciousness, high values of nutrition and meat quality. The embryonic and larval development of pike-perch was observed, in order to know its biological characteristics. The result will be used in increasing its hatchability and fry quality. The karyotype analysis and chromosome banding of pike-perch were studied for its genetic diversity, population identification and FISH. It will provide basis for Cyrogenetics and genomic physical map. The main results are as follows:
     1. A successive observation was conducted to study the embryonic larval and juvenile development of pike-perch. The results showed that the eggs, measuring 0.90-1.01mm in diameter, were sticky and almost spherical in shape, with a pale yellow yolk and 1.2mm after absorbing water. Hatching occurred 94h after fertilization at 16.0-17.2℃. The embryonic development can be divided into 24 stages: fertilized egg , one cell stage, cleavage stage, 2-cell stage, 4-cell stag, 8-cell stage, 16-cell stage, morula stage, early blastula stage, mid blastula stage, late blastula stage, early gastrula stage, mid gastrula stage, late gastrula stage, neurula stage, closure of blastopore stage, body segment appearance stage, optic rudiment stage, optic vesicle stage, caudal fin formation stage, lens formation stage, muscular contraction stage, otolithes formation stage, heart pulsation stage, hatching-out stage. According to the formula K=N (T-C) , the average temperature and hatch time were analysis with statistics. Speed of embryonic development and water temperature was very closely related. It was calculated that the newly hatched larvae’s lowest temperature is about 7.55℃, and the sum calculated temperature 903.02℃·h is necessary. The larval development of pike-perch can be divided into 5 stages: hatching stage, xanthic eye stage, melanoid eye stage, one chamber air bladder stage, exhaustion of yolk stage.
     2. Use the whole culture medium of RPMI1640 to culture the blood cell in vitro. With researching the content of colchicines and permeating time, establish a set of mature experimental method to cultivate the blood lymphocytic cell and prepare chromosome of pike-perch. The result showed that the blood cell 0.2ml was cultivated in culture medium 5ml of RPMI1640 (RPMI 1640 : FBS=4:1; PHA concentration is 4 ug/ml; Penicillin, streptomycin, kanamycin each concentration is 100 IU/ml ) under a temperature of 25℃for 72h. Colchicines were added until it reached concentration of about 0.2ug/ml working for 3-5h before the end of cell cultivation. And the lymphocytes were permeated for 50min with KCl. The good chromosome specimens were prepared by the routine methods of hypotonicity, fixing and coloration.
     3. Metaphase chromosome specimens of pike-perch were prepared from short-term culture of peripheral blood lymphocytes with air-drying technique. It diploid chromosome number is 2n=48. The karyotype is compose of 2m, 10sm, 10st,12t, NF=60. The C-banding, NOR banding distribution were analyzed in chromosomes of pike-perch.The chromosomes of pike-perch were stained according to the method of Howell (1980) that was slightly modified. The result showed that 2 Ag-NORs bands were observed in these 2 species in their metaphases respectively. The position of nucleolus organizer regions of pike-perch was situated on the terminal region of short arm of the subteloeentrie chromosomes. The number of Ag-NORs showed polymorphism in different cells.The nucleus were stained by the Ag-staining, 53.99% of then have one nucleolus and 45.62% of nucleus have two nucleoli. All the chromosomes of pike-perch have C-bands. The C-bands of homologous chromosome are approximate the same in size, location and intensity of colouring. C-banding of pike-perch mainly distributed at centromeres, interstitial and terminal regions.
引文
秉志.1960.鲤鱼解剖.北京:科学出版社,42~48
    陈焜慈,邬国民,李恒颂.1999.梭鲈的繁殖.广东科技,26~27
    柴方营,于洪贤,薛金凤,李振,殷永力.2000.泥河水库梭鲈池塘养殖技术研究.水产科,4:8~9
    曹桂新,姜正炎,李胜忠,刘栓,陈国平,刘军,李周永,马哈沙提汉.2000.梭鲈含肉率及营养成分分析.水利渔业,6:3~4
    曹丽萍,丁炜东.2005.半微量全血培养法制备罗非鱼染色体标本的条件探索.上海水产大学学报,14(4):457~459
    常抗美,毛建平,吴剑锋,张科杰.2005.条石鲷胚胎及仔稚鱼的发育.海水产大学学报,4:401~405
    陈佳毅,叶元土,郭建林,萧培珍,袁建明,蔡卫俊,邱晓寒.2007.梭鲈、河鲈和加州鲈的肌肉营养成分分析.饲料研究,9:52~54
    陈罗明.2007.梭鲈批量化育苗技术基础及其与近缘种的关系研究.苏州大学硕士学位论文,15~19
    顾志敏,朱俊杰,贾永义等.2008.太湖翘嘴红鲌胚胎发育及胚后发育观察.中国水产科学,2:204~213
    郭明兰.2008.云纹石斑鱼与褐石斑鱼的比较研究,厦门大学博士学位论文.51~74
    海燕,黄晓,易梅生等.2001.一种改良的鱼类染色体富集制片方法.遗传.23(2):151~152
    胡先成,曹双俊,周忠良,孙帼英.花鲈胚胎发育的研究.重庆师范学院学报(自然科学版),1997,(02):195~198
    黄晓婷.2007.扇贝染色体的细胞遗传学研究.中国海洋大学博士学位论文,2~14
    解生勇.1990.细胞遗传学.北京农业大学出版社,37~38
    贾永义.2005.奥利亚罗非鱼(♀)×鳜(♂)杂交的受精生物学及染色体核型的研究.南京农业大学,20~30
    姜正炎,李胜忠,曹桂新.1998.布伦托海梭鲈的胚胎发育.水利渔业,5: 19~21
    李国珍.染色体及其研究方法.北京科学出版社,1985,2.
    李恒颂,邬国民,范阳等.2000.银鲈胚胎和仔鱼的发育.中国水产科学,2:5~9.
    李荣庆.1998.梭鲈人工繁殖试验.水利渔业,3:39~40
    李荣庆.1999.梭鲈生物学特性及养殖概况.中国水产,3:21~22
    李栒.1991.染色体遗传导论.湖南科学技术出版社,55~81
    李树深.1981.鱼类细胞分类学,生物科学动态,2:8~15
    李思发.1996.中国淡水鱼类种质资源和保护.中国农业出版社,163~167
    李霞.2005.水产动物组织胚胎学.中国农业出版社,204~248
    李永刚,卢自银,于仕斌,赵五洲,赵林.2004.梭鲈人工繁殖和苗种培育技术.中国水产,4:82~83
    林彬,黄宗文,骆剑,郭仁湘,杨薇,陈国华.2010.棕点石斑鱼胚胎发育的观察.海南师范大学学报(自然科学版),1:82~83
    林明敏,朱香萍,李美玉,衣瑞玲.2009.石鲽外周血细胞的培养及染色体制备条件的探讨.青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),26(4):325~329
    林义浩.1982.快速获得大量鱼类肾细胞中期分裂相的PHA体内注射法.水产学报,6(3):201~208
    林志宝,邢中贤,李福友,田向阳,李永光.2000.梭鲈繁殖习性及苗种培育技术总结.淡水渔业,30(2):7~8
    林治宝,邢忠贤.2000.梭鲈的生物学特性及增养殖前景.齐鲁渔业,17(1):20~21
    刘洪柏,宋苏祥,孙大江等.2000.施氏鲟的胚胎及胚后发育研究.中国水产科学,3:5~10
    刘军,李周永.1995.梭鲈鱼池塘人工繁殖试验.水产学杂志,8(1):76~80
    刘原.2001.梭鲈首次在湖北省“生儿育女”.渔业致富指南,10:22
    柳学周,徐永江,王妍妍,吕永谦,曲建忠.2008.条石鲷的早期生长发育特征.动物学报.2:332~341
    蒲德永,王志坚,张耀光等.2006.大眼鳜胚胎发育的观察.西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),28(4):651~655
    乔永刚,宋芸.2006.利用EXCEL制作核型模式图.农业网络信息,10:97~98
    任慕莲,郭众,张秀善等.2002.中国额尔齐斯河鱼类资源及渔业.新疆卫生科技出版社,192~194
    任修海,崔建勋,余其兴.1996.中国鲤科鱼类染色体核仁组织区研究.武汉大学学报(自然科学版),42:475~580
    任修海,余其兴,韦萍.1991.黄鳝染色体Ag-NORs多态性的研究.遗传学报,18(4):304~311.
    沙珍霞,陈松林,叶寒青,徐美瑜,刘洋,季相山,唐启升.2003.适合花鲈的几种染色体制备方法的比较.中国水产科学,10(6):469~473
    孙儒泳.1992.动物生态学原理.北京师范大学出版社,36~42
    孙儒泳.李博.1993.普通生态学.高等教育出版社,36
    田永胜,李胜忠,姜正炎,马哈萨提汉,李周永,刘军,陈国平,张福元.2000.梭鲈人工繁殖及仔幼鱼培育研究.中国水产,12:28~29
    庹云.2006.岩原鲤胚胎、胚后发育与早期器官分化的研究.西南大学硕士学位论文,24
    汪堃仁,薛绍白,柳惠图.1990.细胞生物学.北京师范大学出版社,15~58
    王昌留.2003.青岛文昌鱼染色体的核型及带型研究.中国海洋大学博士学位论文,1~15
    王世锋.2007.六种石斑鱼核型特征比较和染色体进化研究.厦门大学博士学位论文,33~63
    王彦怀,陶秉春,梁伟光,黄世宁.2006.金头鲷胚胎发育的初步观察.海洋水产研究,6:33~37
    王永波,陈国华,林彬等.2009.豹纹鳃棘鲈胚胎发育的初步观察.海洋科学,3:21~26
    王云新,王宏东,张海发等.2004.斜带石斑鱼与赤点石斑鱼的核型研究.湛江海洋大学学报,24:4
    吴金英,林浩然.2003.斜带石斑鱼消化系统胚后发育的组织学研究.水产学报,27(1):7~12.
    谢仰杰,翁朝红,林锦宗,郑金宝,许元青.1999.花尾胡椒鲷的胚胎和仔稚鱼形态发育的初步观察.中国动物学会成立65周年年会,郑州,1999.中国林业出版社,863~868
    许晖,钟必华.1987.加州鲈鱼的人工繁殖和胚胎发育.淡水渔业,1:33~34
    薛淑群.2009.虹蹲染色体显带技术研究.东北林业大学硕士学位论文,12~15
    闫永健,王成武,时永香,郭炳冉,付佩胜.2009.淡水黑鲷胚胎发育初步观察.水产科学.4:188~191.
    楼允东.1994.组织胚胎学.中国农业出版社,179~208
    殷名称.1991.鱼类早期生活研究与其进展.水产学报,15(4):348~358
    殷名称.1995.鱼类生态学.中国农业出版社,134~272
    余先觉,周敦,李渝成等.1989.中国淡水鱼类染色体.北京科学出版社,144
    昝瑞光.1982.滇池两种类型卿鱼的性染色体和C-带核型研究.遗传学报.9:32~39.
    曾国平.染色体遗传学基础.北京师范大学出版,1992,9.
    郑亘林,闫有利,罗德珍.1997.梭鲈生物学及引种养殖初报.水产科学.4:29~30
    郑文彪.1985.泥鳅胚胎和幼鱼发育的研究.水产学报,(1):37~47
    张四明等.1993.一种制备鱼类染色体的新方法.遗传,15(3):35~36
    张天荫.1996.动物胚胎学.山东科学技术出版社,143~158
    张伟明,吴萍,吴康,魏育红等.2003.两种鱼类染色体制片方法的比较研究.水利渔业.23(5):9~10
    张雅芝.2004.双棘黄姑鱼早期阶段的发育、摄食、生长及其苗种培育研究.中国海洋湖沼学会鱼类学分会、中国动物学会鱼类学分会2004年学术研讨会摘要汇编,41~42
    中国科学院动物研究所,中国科学院新疆生物土壤沙漠研究所,新疆维吾尔族自治区水产局.1979.新疆鱼类志.乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社,1~58.
    钟建兴,蔡良候,郑惠东,李雷斌.2010.黄条鰤胚胎发育观察.福建水产,2:22~24
    周墩.1984.鱼类染色体研究.动物学研究,5(1)增刊:38~45
    朱香萍,林明敏,李桢,张庭荣,尤锋.2007.牙鲆外周血淋巴细胞的培养及染色体制备条件的探讨.青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),24(4):253~256
    庄志猛.2006.半滑舌鳎早期发育生物学与种质资源研究.中国海洋大学博士学位论文,13~24
    卓孝磊,邹记兴.2007.我国海水鱼类核型及染色体显带研究进展.热带海洋学报,26(5):74~75
    邹记兴,余其兴,周菲.2005.点带石斑鱼的核型、C带、Ag~NoRs.水产学报,29:33~37
    小岛吉雄.1991.鱼类细胞遗传学.林义浩译.广东科学技术出版社,46~63
    A. Koed, K. Balleby and P. Mejlhede. 2002. Migratory behaviour of adult pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia . 483: 175~184
    A. Koed, P. Mejlhede, K. Balleby, K. Aarestrup. 2000. Annual movement and migration of adult pikeperch in a lowland river[J]. Journal of Fish Biology. 57( 5):1266~1279
    Aksiray,F. 1961. About Sudak (Lucioperca lucioperca L.) introduced into some lakes inTurkey. Proceedings of the den.Fish.Counc.Medit.6, 335~343.
    Amorim M.P., Gomes, B.V.C., Martins, Y.S., Sato, Y., Rizzo, E. &Bazzoli N. 2009. Early development of the silver catfish Rhamdia quelen (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824) (Pisces: Heptapteridae) from the Sao Francisco RiverBasin, Brazil. Aquac. Res. 40,172~80
    Beeer Z. A, Ikiz R. 1999. Reproduetive characteristics of pikepereh(Stizostedionlueioperca L., (1758)) in Eg irdirLake. Turkish Joumal of Zoology. 23:919~926.
    Billard R, Cosson M P. 1992. Some problems related to the assessment of sperm motility in freshwater fish. J Exp Zool. 261: 122~131
    Caspersson T, Farber S, Foley GE, Kudynowski J, Modest EJ, Simonsson E, Wagh U, Zech L. 1968. Chemical differentiation along metaphase chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res..49(1): 219~222.
    Cawkwell,C.&McAngus,J. 1976. Spread of the zander. Anglers'Mail,March . 3,12~13
    Dahl,J. 1982. A century of pikeperch in Denmark. EIFAC Technical Paper . 2:42
    Fickling N.J.and Lee R.L.G.. 1983. A Review of the Ecological Impact of the Introduction of the Zander(Stizostedion lucioperca L.)into Waters of the Eurasian Mainland. Fish.Mgmt. 14(3):151~155
    Fitzsimons JM. 1972. A revision of two genera of goodeid fishes(Cyprinodontiforms Osteiehthyes) from Mexiean Plateau. Copeia. 728~756.
    Fujiwara A., Nishida~Umehara C., Sakamoto T., Okamoto N., Nakayama and S. Abe. 2001. Improved fish lymphocyte culture for chromosome preparation. Genetica 111:77~89
    Ginzburg, A S, Detlaf, T A. 1969. Development of Acipenserid Fishes (Egg Ripening, Egg Activation and Embryogenesis ). Nauka, Moscow. 134 (in Russian ).
    Gold JR. 1984. ilver-staining and heteromorphism of chromosomal nucleolus organizer regions in North American cyprinid fishes. Copeia. 1: 133~139
    Goodpasture C, Bloom SE. 1975. Visualization of nucleolar organizer regions in mammalian chromosomes using silver staining. Chromosoma. 53(1): 37~50.
    Gorodilov, Y. N. 1996. Description of the early ontogeny of the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, with a novel system of interval (state) identification. Env. Biol. Fishes. 47, 109~127.
    Hansson S, AnheniusF, Nellbring S. 1997. Diet and growth of Pike perch(Stizostedio luciopercaL.)in a Baltic Sea area. Fisheries Research. 31:163~167
    Howell W, Black M.1980.Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus ganizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method.Expenertia,36:1014~1015.
    Hsu TC, Spirito SE, Pardue ML. 1975. Distribution of 18+28S ribosomal genes in mammalian genomes. Chromosoma. 53: 25~36.
    Ivanova,M.N. 1968. About effect of zander upon some fish populations.In Biological i Hydrobioiogich.Factory mestnykh percmescheniy ryb v vodrokhranilis chakh L.Nauka, 161~181
    Kamler. 2002. Ontogeny of yolk-feeding fish: an ecological perspective. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fishereis. 12:79~103.
    Keith, P. and J. Allardi (coords.) 2001. Atlas des poissons d'eau douce de France, 312~313.
    Klee,C. 1981. An assessment of the contribution made by zander to the decline of fisheries in
    the lower Great Ouse area. Brit.Freshw.fish Conf. 2:80~93 Kottelat, M. and J. Freyhof. 2007. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Publications Kottelat, Cornol, Switzerland, 534
    LeGrande W.H. 1975. Karyology of six species of Louisiana flarfishes( Pleuroneetiforms: Ostehthyes),CoPeia. 516~522.
    Levan A,etal. 1964. Nomenclatur of centrometic position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52(2):201~220.
    Linfield R.S.J, Rickards R.B.. 1979The Zander in Perspective. Fish Mgmt. 1:10
    Lozano R.,C.Ruiz Rejon, M. Rulz Rejon. 1991. Ananalysis of Coho salmon chromatin by
    means of C-banding, Ag and fluorochrome staining, and in situ digestion with restriction on endonucleases. Heredity. 66: 403~409
    Martinez, P., A. Vinas, C. Bouza, J. Arias, R. Amaro & L.Sanchez, 1991. Cytogenetical characterization of hatchery stocks and natural populations of Sea and Brown trout from northwestern Spain. Heredity. 66: 9-17.
    Masaki itono, Kagayaki morishimak, Takafumi Fujimmoto, Etsuko Bando, Etsuro Yamaha, and Katsutoshi Arai. 2006. Pre meiotic endomitosis produces diploid eggs in the natural cloneloach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Teleostei: Cobitidae). Journal of experimental zoology. 305A: 513~523
    Molina WF,Maia-LimaFA.Affonso PRAM.2002.Divergence between karyotypical pattem and speciation events in serranidae fish(Pereiformes).Caryologia.55:299~305
    Muus, B.J. and J.G. Nielsen. 1999 Sea fish. Scandinavian Fishing Year Book, Hedehusene, Denmark.282.
    Ohno S. 1970. The enormous diversity in genome size of fish as a reflction of nature’S extensive experiments with gene duplication. Hereditas. 59:169~187.
    Okumura Sei-ichi, Mizuho Sakai and Kanami Onuma. 2006. A simple and efficient method of chromosome preparation using larvae of the barfin flounder Verasper moseri (Osteichthyes, Pleurone ctiformes). Chromosome science, 9:95~97
    Popova OA,Sytina LA. 1977. Food and feeding relations of Eurasian Perch(Percafluviaril) and PikePereh (Stizostedion lueioperca) in various waters of the USSR. Journal of the Fisheries Researeh Board of Canada. 34:1559~1570.
    Riede, K. 2004 Global register of migratory species - from global to regional scales. Final Report of the R&D-Projekt 808 05 081. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, Germany,329
    Salonen S,Helminen H,Sarvala,J..1996.Feasibility of controlling coarse fish PoPulations through PikePereh(Stizostedion lucioperca) stoeking in Lake Koylionjarvi, SW Finland.Anllales Zoologici Fennici,33:451~457.
    Sanchez L.,P.Martinez,A.Vinas, C.Bouza. 1990. Analysis of the structure and variability of nueleolar organizer regions of Salmo trutta by C, Ag and restriction endonuclease banding Cytogenet CellGenet. 54:6~9
    Saulamo k., Lappalainen j.& Lehtonen h. 2005. biological characteristics of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, during spawning migration in a Baltic Bay Fisheries Management and Ecology. 12:131
    Spannhof, L. and Pavlov, D. A. 1984. Einfluss von Temperatur and Salinitat auf morphologische and physiologische Parameter der Reegenbogenforelle (Salmo gairdneri) wahrend der Embryonalenentwicklung[J]. Fischerei-Forschung. 22, 67~73.
    SolaL, Innoeentiis S,Gornung E,etal.2000.Cytogenetic analysis of Epinephelus marginatus (Pisees: Serranidae) with the chromosome localization of the 18S and 5SrRNA genes and of the(TTAGGG)n telomeric sequence.Marine Biology.137:47~51.
    Sumner A,Evans H,Buekland R.1971.New thchnique for distinguishing between human chromosomes.Nature New Biol,232(27):31~32
    Svadson G, Molin G. 1973. The impact of climate on Seandinavian PoPulations of the sande, Stizostedionlueioperca(L.). RePorts from the Institute of Freshwater Researeh. Drottningholm. 53:112~139.
    Thomas E. Hall,Peter Smith,and Ian A. Johnston. 2004. Stages of embryonic development in the Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua. Journal of morphology. 259:255~270.
    Vasnetsov, V. V. 1953. Developmental stages of bony fishes. In: Pavlovskij,E. N. (ed.) Ocherki po Obshchim Voprosam ikhtiologii. Akademiya Nauk Press. Moscow. 207~217 ( in Russian).
    Violeta da Rocha Perini, Yoshimi Sato, Elizete Rizzo and Nilo Bazzili. 2009. Biology of eggs, embryos and larvae of Rhinelepis aspera (Spix﹠Agassiz, 1829)(Pisces: Siluriformes). Zygote. 18: 159~171.
    Willemsen,J. 1969. Food and growth of pike-perch in Holland.Proc.Fourth Brit. Coarse FishConf. 72~78

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700