少耕留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米的水分利用特征及其主要影响因素
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
针对河西绿洲灌区间套种植耗水量多与水资源日益紧缺的矛盾,通过大田试验,在不同供水水平下,研究了间作小麦高茬收割覆盖对间作群体产量和水分利用效率的影响,解析了间作结合留茬影响作物产量和水分利用效率的基本机理,得到了如下主要结论:
     1.留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米可显著提高土地利用率和作物产量。低、中、高供水水平下,高留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米土地当量比(LER)分别为1.52、1.62、1.60,不留茬的LER分别为1.48、1.56、1.58,小麦高留茬具有提高间作LER的作用;在相同占地面积上与单作相比,留茬覆盖间作小麦产量分别提高了50.2%、67.0%、68.4%,不留茬覆盖间作小麦分别提高了35.3%、57.6%、67.5%,留茬覆盖间作玉米分别提高了51.8%、57.7%、52.2%,不留茬覆盖间作玉米分别提高了61.2%、54.6%、48.5%。留茬覆盖间作作物的增产作用显著。
     2.间作增大了小麦、玉米的耗水量,小麦留茬覆盖可显著降低间作耗水量,随灌水水平的增大间作群体的耗水量显著增大。在低、中、高三个供水水平下,留茬覆盖间作耗水量较单作加权平均分别增加34.6%、28.7%、29.8%,不留茬覆盖间作耗水量较单作加权平均分别增加40.8%、38.9%、31.8%,留茬覆盖间作比不留茬覆盖间作耗水量分别低7.8%、12.8%、3.8%,留茬覆盖降低间作耗水量的作用显著。在留茬覆盖间作中,高灌水较低、中水平耗水量分别高21.9%、11.5%,在不留茬覆盖间作中,高灌水较低、中水平耗水量分别高16.4%、7.7%。
     3.间作具有提高小麦、玉米WUE的作用,小麦高留茬覆盖可提高间作作物的WUE,但高灌水水平不利于间作WUE的提高。与单作小麦和玉米WUE加权平均比较,在低、中、高三个灌水水平下,留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米的WUE分别提高了6.5%、15.0%、13.2%,不留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米的WUE分别提高了3.0%、11.1%、15.6%,留茬覆盖间作比不留茬覆盖间作WUE分别高8.0%、4.3%、-1.5%,小麦高留茬具有在较低供水水平下提高间作WUE的作用。在留茬覆盖间作中,高灌水较低、中水平WUE分别高6.3%、-8.6%,在不留茬覆盖间作中,高灌水较低、中水平WUE分别高16.6%、-3.3%,中灌水水平下,采用留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米可有效提高作物WUE。
     4.留茬覆盖间作提高作物水分利用效率的主要原因是,提高了叶日积(LAID)和土壤含水量,降低了作物棵间蒸发量占耗水量比例(E/ET)和地温。在低、中、高三个供水水平下,留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米比单作加权平均LAID分别提高28.7%、26.5%、26.0%,不留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米比单作加权平均LAID分别提高26.0%、25.7%、26.8%;留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米比单作加权平均土壤含水量分别提高4.9%、3·3%、2.7%,不留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米比单作加权平均土壤含水量分别提高3.3%、1.6%、3.2%:留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米比单作加权平均E/ET分别降低25.4%、21.0%、20.8%,不留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米比单作加权平均E/ET分别降低29.6%、27.1%、23.1%;留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米比不留茬覆盖小麦间作玉米地温分别低0.4℃、0.9℃、0.6℃。
Aiming at solving the contraction between excessive water consumption of intercropping systems in the oasis area and increasing scarcity of water resouce. A field experiment was cconducted at a typical oasis research station, in order to investigating the effects of intercropping and reduced tillage combined with wheat straw mulching on yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of wheat corn intercropping, and the mechanism of intercropping can improve the yield and WUE of wheat and corn was analyzed. The main results as following:
     1. Intercropping combined with reduced tillage and wheat straw mulching can significantly increase the land use efficiency (LER) and yield of wheat and corn. The LER of wheat corn intercropping system with straw mulching was 1.52,1.62,1.60 at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively, and that of the without mulching intercropping system was 1.48,1.56,1.58 respectively at three different irrigation level.Compared to mono-cropping crops, the economic yield of intercropping wheat with straw mulching was increased by 50.2%, 67.0%,68.4%, and the yield of intercropping wheat without straw mulching was increased by 35.3%,57.6%, 67.5% at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively; the yield of corn in intercropping system with and without straw mulching was increased by 51.8%,57.7%,52.2% and 61.2%,54.6%,48.5% at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively. Intercropping with straw mulching can significantly increase crop economic yield.
     2. The water use of wheat corn intercropping was increaed, and was significantly decreased in the intercropping systems with wheat straw mulching. The water use of intercropping increased with increasing amount of irrigation quota. Compared to mono-cropping crops the weighted average water use, the intercropping with straw mulching was increased by 34.6%,28.7%,29.8%, and the water use of intercropping without straw mulching was increased by 40.8%,38.9%,31.8% at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively. Compared to the intercropping without straw mulching, the water use of intercropping with straw mulching was decreased by 7.8%,12.8%,3.8% at low, medium, high water irrigation level respectively. The intercropping with straw mulching can significantly decrease water use. In the intercropping systems with straw mulching and without straw mulching, the water use of high irrigation level increased 21.9%,11.5% and 16.4%,7.7% than low, medium irrigation level respectively.
     3. The WUE of wheat corn intercropping with straw mulching was significantly improved except the high irrigation rate. Compared to mono-cropping wheat and corn the weighted average WUE, the intercropping with straw mulching was increased by 6.5%,15.0%,13.2% and the intercropping without straw mulching was increased by 3.0%,11.1%,15.6% at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively. Compared to the intercropping without straw mulching, the WUE of intercropping with straw mulching was increased by 8.0%, 4.3%,-1.5% at low, medium, high water irrigation level respectively, straw mulching can significantly increased the WUE of intercropping with lower irrigation level. In the intercropping systems with straw mulching and without straw mulching, the WUE of high irrigation level increased by 6.3%,-8.6% and by 16.6%,-3.3% than low, medium irrigation level respectively. The wheat corn intercropping with straw mulching can significantly improve WUE at the medium irrigation level.
     4. The mechanism which the intercropping with reduced tillage combined with straw mulching can increased significantly WUE was caused by increasing LAID and soil water content, decreasing E/ET and soil temperature. Compared to mono-cropping wheat and corn the weighted average LAID, the intercropping with straw mulching was increased by 28.7%,26.5%,26.0% and the intercropping without straw mulching was increased by 26.0%,25.7%,26.8% at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively. Compared to mono-cropping wheat and corn the weighted average soil water content, the intercropping with straw mulching was increased by 4.9%、3.3%、2.7% and the intercropping without straw mulching was increased by 3.3%,1.6%,3.2% at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively. Compared to mono-cropping wheat and corn the weighted average soil E/ET, the intercropping with straw mulching was decreased by 25.4%,21.0%, 20.8% and the intercropping without straw mulching was decreased by 29.6%,27.1%,23.1% at low, medium, high irrigation level respectively. Compared to the intercropping without straw mulching, soil temperature of intercropping with straw mulching was decreased 0.4℃,0.9℃,0.6℃.
引文
[1]胡恒觉,黄高宝主编新型多熟种植[M].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社,1999.1-10
    [2]Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, etal. Wheat maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients[J]. Field crops research,2001,71:123-137
    [3]王立祥,李军.农作学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:117-181
    [4]柴强,黄高宝.河西走廊区水土应用现状及可持续开发研究.干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(3):75-79
    [5]常兆丰,刘俊虎.甘肃省河西内陆河流域荒漠化综合防治(Ⅰ).防护林科技,2003,54(1):19-23
    [6]吴建民,高焕文.甘肃河西走廊水资源供需分析及耕作节水研究.农业工程学报,2005,22(3):36-39
    [7]李新文,柴强.甘肃河西走廊灌溉农业水资源利用及其潜力开发对策[J].开发研究,2001,6:39-40
    [8]柴强,高育峰,黄高宝.绿洲灌区多熟种植现状潜力与开发对策—以张掖市甘州区为例[J],甘肃农业大学学报,2005,40(6):832-836
    [9]山仑.节水农业与作物高效用水[J].河南大学学报,2003,33(1):1-5
    [10]叶优良,李隆,孙建好.三种豆科作物与玉米间作对水分利用的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2008,27(4)33-36
    [11]李玲玲,黄高宝,张仁陟.甘肃黄土高原西部保护性农业发展研究.见:高旺盛主编.粮食安全与农作制度建设[M].湖南科技出版社,2004:188-200
    [12]高旺盛.论保护性耕作技术的基本原理与发展趋势[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(12):2702-2708
    [13]Franzluebbers A J. Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth. Soil & Tillage Research,2002,66:197-205
    [14]沈裕琥,黄相国,王海庆.秸秆覆盖的农田效应.干旱地区农业研究,1998,16(1):45-50
    [15]Baumhardt R L, Jones O R. Residue management and tillage effects on soil water storage and grain yield of dryland wheat and sorghum for a clay loam in Texas. Soil & Tillage Research,2002,68:71-82
    [16]Lich t A Mark, A lKaisi M ahdi. Strip tillage effect on seed bed soil temperature and other soil physical properties. Soil & Tillage Research,2005,80:233-249
    [17]于舜章,陈雨海,周勋波等.冬小麦期覆盖秸秆对夏玉米土壤水分动态变化及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):175-178
    [18]黄高宝,郭清毅,张仁陟等.保护性耕作条件下旱地农田麦豆双序列轮作体系的水分动态及产量效应[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1176-1185
    [19]张正斌,徐萍,董宝娣等.水分利用效率——未来农业研究的关键问题[J].世界科技研究与发展,2005,27(1):52-61
    [20]陈素英,张喜英,胡春胜等.秸秆覆盖对夏玉米生长过程及水分利用的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(4):55-57
    [21]朱自玺,方文松,赵国强等.麦秸和残茬覆盖对夏玉米农田小气候的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2000,18(2):19-24
    [22]孟文,常中央,魏新平.河西地区麦田不同种植模式的水效益比较[J].甘肃农业大学学报,1996,31(1):42-46
    [23]李凤霞,黄峰,徐阳春等.春小麦不同种植模式水分利用效率比较[J].节水灌溉,2003,(3):15-16,46
    [24]刘昌明,何希吾,任鸿遵主编.中国水问题研究[M].北京:气象出版社,1996:13-18
    [25]柴强.间套复合群体水分高效利用机理研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报,2008,10(4):11-15
    [26]柴强,黄高宝.河西节水农业的现状评价与重点领域研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(10):216-220
    [27]夏萍,任丽.机械作业下土壤理化性质和生态因子的变化[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(3):319-322
    [28]刘巽浩.耕作学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994:221-224
    [29]赵致禧,姚正良,肖占文.张掖地区应压缩小麦/玉米带田种植面积[J].甘肃农业科技,2002,(4):12-14
    [30]毋玲玲,柴强.河西绿洲灌区高产高效多熟种植模式筛选研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究.2005,21(2):121-124
    [31]高焕文,李洪文,陈君达.可持续机械化旱作农业技术研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999,17(1):57-62
    [32]杨学明,张晓平,方华军等.北美保护性耕作及对中国的意义应用[J].生态学报,2004,15(2):335-340
    [33]孙刚,郭金胜.玉米大豆交互换带种植保护性耕作技术[J].杂粮作物,2008,28(2):99-100
    [34]郭清毅,黄高宝,Guangdi Li等.保护性耕作对早地麦-豆双序列轮作农田土壤水分及利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):165-169
    [35]付国占,李潮海,王俊忠等.残茬覆盖与耕作方式对土壤性状及夏玉米水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(1):52-56
    [36]李玲玲,黄高宝,张仁陟等.不同保护性耕作措施对早作农田土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2326-2332
    [37]周凌云.农田秸秆覆盖节水效应研究[J].生态农业研究,1996,15(3):49-52
    [38]周兴祥,高焕文,刘晓峰.华北平原一年两熟保护性耕作体系试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(6):81-84
    [39]柴强,黄高宝.集雨补灌对冬小麦套玉米复合群体生长特性研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(4):76-79
    [40]宋尚有,樊廷录.旱地间套复合群体的水分利用特性[A].见:王吉庆,宋尚有,秦富华等.陇东高原半湿润偏早区农业综合发展研究[C].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社,1995:86-92
    [41]刘浩,段爱旺,高阳.间作种植模式下冬小麦棵间蒸发变化规律及估算模型研究[J].2006,22(12):34-37
    [42]陈四龙,陈素英,孙宏勇等.耕作方式对冬小麦棵间蒸发及水分利用效率的影响[J].土壤通报,2006,37(4):817-820
    [43]赵聚宝,刁凤贵.秸秆覆盖对旱地作物水分利用效率的影响[J].中国农业科学,1996,29(2):59-66
    [44]付时丰,李中,杨丽娟等.保护地栽培条件下灌水方法对土壤温度的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2006,25(1)67-70
    [45]王宇明,蔡焕杰,王健.冬小麦辣椒间套作对光合有效辐射和地温的影响[J].中国农村水利水电,2010,(1):14-17
    [46]MorrisB A, GarrityD P. Resources capture and utilization in intercropping:water[J].Field Crops Research,1993,34:303-317
    [47]叶优良,肖焱波,李隆等.小麦/玉米和蚕豆/玉米间作对水分利用的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(3):445-449
    [48]高阳,段爱旺.冬小麦间作种植方式下棵间蒸发规律试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2005,24(2):13-17
    [49]孟繁静.植物生理学基础[M].北京:农业出版社,1987,53-55
    [50]刘安能,周新国,孟兆江等.麦棉套作方式下小麦棵间蒸发量研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2006,40(4):375-379
    [51]任根深,柴强.限量补灌冬小麦套作玉米土壤水分的时空分布及利用效率[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(1):145-149
    [52]黄鹏,柴强,黄高宝.小麦/玉米复合群体光合特性与作物生产力间的相关性[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2000,35(1):70-74
    [53]柴强,黄高宝,黄鹏.间甲酚和供磷对小麦间作蚕豆生产力和组分竞争力的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2004,2(4):313-316
    [54]罗照霞,柴强.不同供水水平下间甲酚和间作对小麦、蚕豆耗水特性及产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(6):1478-1482
    [55]齐万海,柴强.不同隔根方式下间作小麦玉米的竞争力及产量响应[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(1):31-34
    [56]罗照霞,柴强.不同灌溉方式及间作对小麦产量及边际效应的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2009,44(1)69-73
    [57]齐万海.绿洲灌区小麦间作玉米的耗水特性及其与根系时空分布的关系[D].甘肃:甘肃农业大学,硕士学位论文,2009
    [58]刘海亮.绿洲灌区小麦//玉米田间水分的蒸散特性及主要影响因素[D].甘肃:甘肃农业大学,硕士学位论文,2009
    [59]叶优良,李隆.水氮量对小麦/玉米间作土壤硝态氮累积和水氮利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(1):33-39
    [60]叶优良,李隆,孙建好.小麦/玉米间作和氮肥对水分利用的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(4):176-182
    [61]毛树春,宋美珍,张朝军等.黄淮海平原棉麦共生期间棉田土壤温度效应的研究[J].中国农业科学,1983,31(6):1-5
    [62]罗照霞.绿洲灌区交替灌溉小麦间作玉米的水分利用特征及其影响因素[D].甘肃:甘肃农业大学,硕士学位论文,2008
    [63]陈阜,逢焕成.冬小麦/春玉米/夏玉米间套作复合群体的高产机理探讨[J].中国农业大学学报,2000,5(5):12-16
    [64]焦念元,李增嘉,付国占等.玉米花生间作复合群体的光合物质积累与叶面积指数变化[J].作物杂志,2007,1:34-35
    [65]Willis W Q, Bond J J. Soil water evaporation reduction by simulated tillage[J]. Soil Sci Sot Am. Proc,1971,35:526-529
    [66]Sarkar S, Singh S R. Interactive effect of tillage depth and mulch on soil temperature, productivity and water use pattern of rainfed barley(Hordium vulgareL.)[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2007,92:79-86
    [67]Sarkar S, Paramanick M, Goswami S B. Soil temperature, water use and yield of yellow sarson(Brassica napusL. var. glauca) in relation to tillage intensity and mulch management under rainfed lowland ecosystem in eastern India[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2007,93:94-101
    [68]蔺海明,陈垣,李有忠.半干旱地区少免耕对土壤水分动态的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,1996,1:32-35
    [69]张海林,高旺盛,王广章等.覆盖免耕夏玉米生长及水分利用的研究[J].作物杂志,2000(4):7-93
    [70]王育红,姚宇卿,吕军杰等.豫西坡耕地不同耕作方式麦田水分动态及其生态效益[J].西北农业学报,2001,10(4):55-57
    [71]张志国,徐琪,Blevins R L.长期秸秆覆盖免耕对土壤某些理化性质及玉米产量的影响[J].土壤学报,1998,35(3):385-389
    [72]付增光,杜世平,廖充成.渭北留茬深松膜侧沟播耕作技术体系研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(2):12-16
    [73]冯福学,黄高宝,柴强等.不同保护性耕作措施对武威绿洲灌区冬小麦水分利用的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(5),1060-1065
    [74]江晓东,李增嘉,侯连涛等.少免耕对灌溉农田冬小麦/夏玉米作物水、肥利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(7):20-23
    [75]张睿,刘党校.麦草覆盖对小麦生长发育及产量效应的研究[J].陕西农业科学,1998,(3):7-8
    [76]赵印英,王瑞芬,刘威等.麦秸秆覆盖节水增产机理探讨[J].山西水利科技,1998,15(3):33-34
    [77]Gao Zhiqiang,Yin Jun.Effects of Tillage and Mulch Methods on Soil Moisture in Wheat Fields of Loess Plateau,China[J]. Pedosphere,1999,9(2):161-168
    [78]Domzal H.Slowinska-Jurkiewica A.Effects of Tillage and Weather Conditions on Structure and Physical Properties of Soil and Yield of Winter Wheat[J].Soil and Tillage Research,1987,10:225-241
    [79]王小彬,蔡典雄,姚宇卿等.旱坡地麦田夏闲期耕作对土壤水分有效性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(9):1044-1049
    [80]许迪,Schmid R,Mermoud A.耕作方式对土壤水动态变化及夏玉米产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,1999,15(3):101-106
    [81]李洪文,陈军达.旱地表土耕作效应研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2000,18(2):13-18
    [82]杜兵,邓健,李问盈.冬小麦保护性耕作法与传统耕作法的田间对比试验[J].中国农业大学学报,2000,5(2):55-58
    [83]冯福学,黄高宝,柴强等.不同耕作措施对冬小麦根系时空分布和产量的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2549-2505
    [84]王法宏,王旭清,于振文等.土壤深松对小麦根系活性的垂直分布及旗叶衰老的影响[J].核农学报,2003,17(1):56-61
    [85]马世均.国外农业的发展现状[J].中国农学通报,1989,14(2):30-31
    [86]袁家福.麦田秸秆覆盖及增产作用[J].生态农业研究,1996,4(3):61-65
    [87]王树楼,丁玉川,王笳.早地玉米免耕秸秆半覆盖耕作技术研究[J].耕作与栽培,1994,14(4):11-14
    [88]门旗,李毅,冯广平.地膜覆盖对土壤棵间蒸发影响的研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2003,22(2):17-20
    [89]朱钟麟,卿明福,郑家国等.免耕和秸秆覆盖对小麦、油菜水分利用效率的影响[J].西南农业学报,2005,18(5):565-568
    [90]马月存,秦红灵,高旺盛等.农牧交错带不同耕作方式土壤水分动态变化特征[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2523-2530
    [91]于舜章,陈雨海,周勋波等.冬小麦期覆盖秸秆对夏玉米土壤水分动态变化及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):175-178
    [92]彭文英.免耕措施对土壤水分及利用效率的影响[J].土壤通报,2007,38(2):379-383
    [93]张晓平,方华军,杨学明等.免耕对黑土春夏季节温度和水分的影响[J].土壤通报,2005,36(3):313-316
    [94]Basic F, Kisic I, Mesic M, et al. Tillage and crop management effects on soil erosion in central Croatia[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2004,78:197-206
    [95]Mark ALicht, Mahdi Al-Kaisi. Strip-tillage effect on seedbed soil temperature and other soil physical properties[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2005,80:233-249
    [96]于晓蕾,吴普特,汪有科等.不同秸秆覆盖量对冬小麦生理及土壤温、湿状况的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(4):41-44
    [97]黄高宝,李玲玲,张仁陟等.免耕秸秆覆盖对旱作麦田土壤温度的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(5):1-4
    [98]杜新艳,杨路华,脱云飞等.秸秆覆盖对夏玉米农田水分状况、土壤温度及生长发育的影响[J].南水北调与水利科技,2006,4(2):24-26
    [99]陈素英,张喜英,刘孟雨.玉米秸秆覆盖麦田下的土壤温度和土壤水分动态规律[J].中国农业气象,2003,23(4):34-37
    [100]杨祁峰,岳云,熊春蓉等.不同覆膜方式对陇东旱塬玉米田土壤温度的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(6):29-33
    [101]张寄阳,刘祖贵,孙景生等.风沙区春玉米棵间蒸发变化规律的研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2002,12:33-35
    [102]常旭虹,赵广才,孟祥云等.农牧交错区保护性耕作对土壤含水量和温度的影响[J].土壤,2006,38(3):328-332
    [103]于爱忠,黄高宝,冯福学.不同耕作措施对冬小麦农田土壤水分和温度的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(1):84-88
    [104]李守谦,兰念军.干旱地区作物需水量及节水灌溉研究[M].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社,1992,7-13
    [105]曹诗瑜.河西绿洲灌区带田微垄沟灌节水技术研究[J].甘肃农业科技,2002,7:23-24
    [106]杨秀英,石培泽.沙漠绿洲灌区主要粮经作物需水规律及灌溉制度试验研究[J].甘肃水利水电,1997,1:60-64
    [107]王仰仁,杨丽霞.作物组合种植的需水量研究[J].灌溉排水,2000,19(4):64-67
    [108]张恩和,李玲玲,黄高宝等.供肥对小麦间作蚕豆群体产量及根系的调控[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):939-942
    [109]王立敏,魏永霞,王斌.有限供水对玉米干物质积累影响的研究[J].海河水利,2004,(6):34-37
    [110]柴强,黄高宝.集雨补灌冬小麦套作玉米复合群体生理生态特性研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(2):70-72
    [111]Chatterjee B N, MandalB K. Present trends in research on intercropping [J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,1992, 62(8):507-518
    [112]张岁岐,山仑.植物水分利用效率及其研究进展[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(4):1-4
    [113]王会肖,刘昌明,作物水分利用效率内涵及研究进展[J].水科学进展,2000,11(1)99-104
    [114]张恩和,吴圣龙,黄高宝.施肥对小麦/大豆农田土壤水分时空分布的调节[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报.1999,5(3):64-68
    [115]胡新元,郭天文,邱进怀等.河西绿洲灌区小麦/玉米带田高效种植方式研究[J].甘肃农业科技,2001,5:65-67
    [116]黄鹏,柴强,黄高宝.小麦/玉米复合群体光和特性与作物生产力间的相关性[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2000,35(1):70-74
    [117]Willey R.W. Intercropping-Its importance and research needs. part Ⅰ. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstract,1979,32(1):1-10

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700