黑龙江省鸡东金场沟铜钼矿控矿条件与成矿预测
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文在对前人地质及物化探资料的综合分析和二次开发的基础上,对金场沟钼铜矿研究区的地层、构造、岩浆岩等进行了详细解剖,较全面地总结了矿区内钼铜金矿化的地质特征、分析了区域和矿区成矿条件以及不同期次和类型侵入岩与区内钼铜金矿化的关系等。研究认为矿区出露的花岗闪长斑岩、闪长(玢)岩属富钾钙碱性岩石系列岩石,可能为与次火山作用有关的超浅成酸性侵入体。其晚期岩浆热液为主要的成矿介质和矿质来源,与岩浆热液活动有关的角砾岩筒及区内NNE-NE向的断裂构造为矿区主要控矿构造。在对矿区矿化、矿物组合和矿石组构特点研究、成矿阶段划分和构造控矿特点讨论的基础上,建立了金场沟铜钼矿的成矿模式。依据研究区矿床地质、土壤地球化学、地球物理等成矿信息分析,总结了研究区矿床的找矿标志,建立了矿床综合预测模型并优选出有利的找矿预测靶区6处(Ⅰ级靶区2处,Ⅱ级靶区4处),为今后找矿指明了方向。
The Jinchanggou copper-molybdenum deposit is located 50 kilometer southeast of the the Jidong City, and it contains an area of about 7.3 km2 and is at a longitude of 131°01′00″~131°03′00″E and an latitudes of 44°52′30″~44°54′15″N.
     The copper-molybdenum deposit lies at the northern end of a polymetallic metallogenic belt in the Taipingling uplift in the Khanka-Bureyan block and it is adjacent to a regional sinistral strike-slip fault belt called the Dun-Mi fault belt to the southwest. The faults related to the Dun-Mi fault belt in the studied area apparently had an effect on the magmatic activities and controlled the metallogenesis in the area.
     The deposit under study is controlled both by several NNE-trending faults (F1~F2) and by hypabyssal, sub-hypabyssal breccia pipes which are thought to be related to the hypabyssal intrusions exposed in the area. The Ore-controlling breccia pipes are unique and major characteristics of the copper-molybdenum deposit.
     According to the vertical zoning of the breccia pipes proposed by Baker(1985),we consider that the denuation of the No. I,Ⅳbreccia pipes are weak and they are well-preserved; other pipes could have reached their middle portion. So, based on study of these breccia pipes, we think that the deposit is potential at deep levels.
     Based on the research on the Mesozoic intrusions in the area, it is found that the ore bodies are spatially controlled both by the granodiorite porphyry and by the faults. The formation of the copper-molybdenum deposit is closely related to granodiorite porphyry in both time-space and derivation of the ore-components. Late magmatic hydrothermal fluids are responsible for the main source of the ore-forming fluids.
     Major ore minerals include chalcopyrite, molybedenite, pyrite and so on. The ore structure is characterized by development of veinlet, breccia and veinlet–disseminated structures. The Ore texture includes corrosion, metasomatic texture, platy and hypautomorphic granular ones. The ores averaged at about 0.274% of Mo, 0.62% of Cu and 3.93g/t of Au. The geological and geochemical studies of the Jinchanggou copper-molybdenum deposit indicate that three types of mineralizations, breccia-, veinlet- and veinlet disseminated-are frequently met and the first type is most extensively exposed in the deposit.
     By compiling data from the previous researches, and based on the study on the ore fabric and the mineral assemblages of the deposit, we have classify the evolution of the deposit into four metallogenic stages. The metallogenic model of the Jinchanggou copper-molybdenum deposit is set up based on the detailed summary on the geological features, the ore-forming constraints and on the spatial distribution of the ore bodies.
     By comprehensive analysis and summary of the geological, and geochemical and geophysical information of the deposit, the indicators for searching the new and blind ore bodies are listed as the followings: 1)both the NNE-trending and the NW-trending faults controlled the distribution of the diorite porphyrite and granodiorite porphyry and the intersection parts of the two differently oriented faults and granodiorite porphyry body controlled the distribution of breccia pipes; 2)The breccia pipes are the favorable sites for the existence of the Mo(Cu) ore-bodies; 3) granodiorite porphyry are the main host for the breccia pipes and for the Mo(Cu) ore-bodies; 4) alteration to malachite, covelline, pyrite and chalcopyrite and silicification, are the main proximal alteration of the host rocks. In anomalous concentrations of elements maps of soil samples at 1:10000 scale, high anomalous concentration and apparent element concentration centers are thought to be the direct indicators for Mo(Cu) minerlizations in the deposit. Higher polarizability(Fa>5.0%), low resistivity(ρ<400Ωm) are important indirect indicators of the conceal ore bodies in the studied area.
     Based on the metallogenic model and ore constraints of the deposit, combined with the ore indictors summarized, the paper has made some target prediction. 2 first rank, and 4 second rank, of the ore body targets have been defined, and among them one is most promising.
引文
[1] 田豫才.佳木斯隆起东南缘地质背景、金矿成矿地质条件及找矿方向.桂林工学报[J].1999.19(4):303-310
    [2] 袁见齐,朱上庆,翟裕生,主编.矿床学[M].北京:地质出版社,1985.
    [3] Lindgren W.Mineral Deposits[M].4th ed.NewYork:McGraw Hill,1933:1-930.
    [4] V.F.Hollister.主编.浅成低温热液贵金属矿床[M].周明宝,刘莉萍,译.乌鲁木齐:新疆有色金属公司出版.1988.
    [5] 赵爱林,李景春,王力,等.金矿床研究的回顾与展望[J].地质与资源,2003,12(2):125—128.
    [6] Berger B R,Eimon P.Conceptual models of epithermal precious deposits{A}.In :Shanks W C(red.)Cameron Wolume on Unconventional Mineral Deposits[J].AI ME Soc.Min.Eng.1983.191-205
    [7] Chen Y J,Bao J X,Zhang Z J,et.Laumontization as exporation indicator of epithermal gold deposit:A case study of the Axi and other epithermal systems in We-st Tianshan.China[J]. Chese Journal of Geochemistry.2003.22:289-301
    [8] 陈衍景.中国西北地球中亚型造山—成矿作用的研究意义和进展[J].高校地质学报. 2000.6:17-22
    [9] 鲍景新.阿希和艾肯浅成低温热液型金铜矿成因研究[D].北京大学博士论文.2001.108
    [10] Sillitoe R H.Gold deposits in western Paxcific islandarcs :the magma-tic connectio-n[J].Economic Monograph.1989.6:274-291
    [11] 王照波.隐爆岩及其形成模式探讨.地质找矿论丛.2001.16(3):201-204
    [12] 李生元,马小兵.晋东北隐爆岩及其对金银的控矿作用.地质找矿论丛[J].1999,14(4):9-11
    [13] 卿敏,韩先菊.隐爆角砾岩型金矿研究述评.黄金地质[J].2002,8(2):2-9
    [14] MARIANNE R. LANDTWING, ERIC D. DILLENBECK .Evolution of the Breccia-Hosted Porphyry Cu-Mo-Au Deposit at Agua Rica, Argentina: Progressive Unroofing of a Magmatic Hydrothermal System[J].Economic Geology. 2002.(97):1273-1202
    [15] Sillitoe R.H. Ore-related breccias in volcanoplutonic ares [J]. Economic Geology , 1985, 80, (6): 1467-1514.
    [16] 罗镇宽,苗来成等.角砾岩型金矿—一种值得重视的金矿类型.地质找矿论丛[J]. 1999.14(4):8)
    [17] 冯建忠,王书来等.河南毛堂及蒲堂金矿成矿物理化学条件和流体演化.黄金地质[J].1997.(3):21
    [18] 艾霞.隐爆角砾岩型金矿成矿地质条件、构造类型及找矿标志.矿床地质[J]. 2002 .21(增刊):569-572
    [19] 宋得冒,张宝林等.隐爆角砾岩型金矿的成矿机理探讨.矿床地质[J].2002.21(增刊):662-665
    [20] Burnham C.W. Energy release in subvolcanic Environments:Implications for Brece a Formation [J].Economic Geology .1985.80(6):1515-1522
    [21] Mccallum ME. Experimental Evidence for Fluidization Proces is in Breccia Pipe Formation [J] Economic Geology . 1985. 86(6):1523-1543
    [22] RichardHlllitoe.Ore-related Breccia in Vocanoplution Ares [J]. Economic Geology.1985.80(6):1467-151
    [23] 林强,葛文春,孙德有等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义.地质科学[J].1998.33(2):129-140
    [24] 陈毓川,李兆鼐等.中国金矿床及其成矿规律[M].北京:地质出版社. 2001.167-180
    [25] 程裕淇.中国区域地质概论[M]. 北京:地质出版社.1994.60-130
    [26] 林强,葛文春等.东北亚中生代火山岩的地球动力学意义.地球物理学报[J].1999.42(增刊):75-85
    [27] 赵海玲,邓晋福等,中国东部地区中生代火山岩岩石学特征与盆地形成,现代地质[J].1998.12(1):56-59
    [28] 耿文辉.中国东部中生代次火山岩型铜银多金属矿床地质特征及找矿评价标志.博士论文.成都理工大学.2005:40-58
    [29] White DE.活动地热系统与热液矿床.美国经济地质杂志创刊 75 周年论文集(金属矿床成矿理论及找矿方法) [J].冶金工业部北京冶金地质研究所.1981
    [30] 黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志 [M].北京:地质出版社.1993:537-556
    [31] 祁进平.东北地区浅成低温热液矿床的地质特征和构造背景.矿物岩石[J].2005.25(2):47-59
    [32] 贾国志,陈锦荣等.金厂特大型金矿床的地质特征与成因研究.地质学报[J].2005.79(5):661-671
    [33] 芮宗瑶.张洪涛等.吉林延边地球斑岩型—浅成热液型金铜矿床.矿床地质[J].1995.14(2)99-113
    [34] 时俊峰.小西南岔金铜矿床地质特征及成因机制.贵金属地质[J].1998. 7(4):276—280
    [35] 姜开君,周永昶.吉林珲春东部中生代内生成矿作用探讨——以小西南岔铜金矿床为例.地质与勘探[J].1992.60-65
    [36] 孟庆丽,周永昶.吉林延边东部 J2-K1 火山—侵入杂岩岩浆的生成与演化.岩石矿物学杂志[J].1998.17(3):235-240
    [37] 姜杉,王建新等. 延边复兴—杜荒岭金矿化区控矿规律与找矿方向.黄金[J].2006,27(3):17~21
    [38] 姜泽阳,王晓勇等吉东火山岩型金矿地质特征及流体包裹体研究.黄金地质[J].2002. 8(2):26-30
    [39] 冯守忠.吉林五凤—五星低硫型浅成热液金矿地质特征与成矿条件.火山地质与矿产[J].1998.19(2):113-118
    [40] 芮宗瑶,张洪涛等.吉林延边地区斑岩型—浅成热液型金铜矿床.矿床地质[J].1995.14(2)99-113
    [41] 贾大成,胡瑞忠等.吉林延边地区中生代火山岩金铜成矿系列及区域成矿模式.长春科技大学学报[J].2001.31(3):224-229
    [42] 苏凤霞,王晓勇等.吉林闹枝金矿床黄铁矿的表型特征研究.黄金[J].2003.5(24):13-16
    [43] 赵宏光,姚凤良,孙景贵.吉林省东部斑岩型多金属矿床成矿规律及成矿条件研究——以小西南岔金铜矿为例.黄金[J].2005.26(7):12-14
    [44] 卿敏,韩先菊.隐爆角砾岩型金矿研究述评.黄金地质[J].2002,8(2):2-9
    [45] 王照波.隐爆岩及其形成模式探讨.地质找矿论丛[J].2001.16(3):201-204
    [46] 罗镇宽,苗来成等.角砾岩型金矿—一种值得重视的金矿类型.地质找矿论丛[J]. 1999.14(4):8
    [47] 汪劲草,彭恩生等.流体动力角砾岩分类及其地质意义.长春科技大学学报[J].2000.30(1):18-23.
    [48] 黄广平,杨增武等.黑龙江省金场沟铜钼矿成矿地质条件分析.黄金科学技术[J].2007.15(3):24-28
    [49] 李守义,叶松青.矿床勘查学[M].北京:地质出版社.2003.
    [50] 黄永卫,李光辉等.黑龙江省四山林场金银矿矿床成因及找矿标志.世界地质[J].2008.27(1):14-18.
    [51] 鄢明才,迟清华.中国东部地壳与岩石的化学组成[M].科学出版社.1997.73~100.
    [52] 黄定华,向树元等.中浅成岩浆的隐爆机制及其成矿动力学意义.地质科技情报[J].1997.16(1):77-80
    [53] Sato K, Vrublevsky A A, Rodionov S M, Pomanovsky N P, and Nedachi M. Mid-Cretaceous episodic magmatism and tin mineralization in Khingan-Okhotsk volcanic-plutonic belt[J], Far East Russia. Resource Geology, 2002, 52(1):1-14.
    [54] Otsuki K. Oblique subduction, collision of microcontinents and subduction of oceanic ridge:Their implications on the Cretaceous tectonics of Japan[J]. The Island Arc,1992. 1:51-63.
    [55] Baker E M , Kirwin D J , Taylor R G .1986. Hydrothermal breccia pipes : EGRU Contribution 12[J]. James Cook University , Townsville , Australia.229
    [56] 翟裕生,林新多主编. 矿田构造学[M].北京:地质出版社.1993.84-90
    [57] 国外火山岩区工作中的一些基础地质问题[J].中国地质科学院情报所.1977
    [58] 耿文辉,姚金炎.中国东部次火山岩型铜银多金属矿床找矿规律.矿产与地质[J].1999.13(4):193-199
    [59] 华仁民.成矿过程中由流体混合而导致金属沉淀的研究.地球科学进展[J].1994.9(4):15-22
    [60] 戴才,陈行时.黑龙江省东部中生代火山机制基本特征.黑龙江省地质[J].1999.10(2):9-18.
    [61] 夏军,王成善等.海拉尔及其邻区中生代火山岩的特征及其边缘陆块火山岩的提出.成都地质学院学报.1993.20(4):67-79
    [62] 邱家骧.岩浆岩岩石学[M].北京:地质出版社. 1985.20-30
    [63] 王秀之,赵清泉等.黑龙江省东宁县洋灰洞子铜矿床成矿岩体特征.矿床与地质[J].2004.18(5):450-455
    [64] 黎彤.地球和地壳的化学元素丰度[M].北京:地质出版社.1990.70-80

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700