摘要
目的:随着交通及体育事业的迅速发展,髌骨骨折患者呈上升趋势。对于髌骨骨折,临床上最常用的治疗方法是克氏针钢丝张力带固定,其优点是其优点是操作简单、价格低廉、符合生物力学、固定可靠、适用于各种类型的髌骨骨折,但其也有一些不足,如:钢丝结刺激皮肤,术后钢丝断裂、松动,骨折愈合后需二次手术取出等。近年来随着生物医学工程的发展,可吸收内置物逐渐应用于临床,一些学者认为应用可吸收线张力带固定髌骨骨折可避免钢丝张力带的各种不足。据文献报道多名学者应用不同的可吸收线张力带固定法治疗髌骨骨折取得了较好的临床疗效。本实验通过对髌骨横断骨折模型,应用4种可吸收线张力带与克氏针钢丝张力带进行比较,测试可吸收线张力带的稳定性,为临床医师选择髌骨骨折的治疗方式提供理论依据。
方法:取4个成人尸体膝关节标本,将髌骨制成简单横断骨折模型,因所测试的内固定方法相近,测试后髌骨标本不会被破坏,因此髌骨标本可反复利用多次。将膝关节标本的股骨端与胫骨端分别固定于自制夹具上,保持膝关节屈曲36°。首先将髌骨骨折解剖复位,而后依次应用:两种单独应用可吸收线构筑张力带固定法、克氏针可吸收线张力带固定法、克氏针可吸收线张力带结合髌骨胫骨结节环扎术固定法、克氏针钢丝张力带固定法,共五种方法对每个髌骨标本进行固定,应用生物力学机对股四头肌进行牵拉,记录髌骨骨折内固定失败时的牵张力大小,规定骨折端分离2.0mm为内固定失败。
结果:在内固定失败时各内固定组承受的牵张力大小分别为:
(A组)第一种单独应用可吸收线构筑张力带固定法166.500±6.350N;
(B组)第二种单独应用可吸收线构筑张力带固定法226.250±6.500N;
(C组)克氏针可吸收线张力带固定法228.500±19.226N;
(D组)克氏针可吸收线张力带结合髌骨胫骨结节可吸收线环扎术固定法425.500±18.734N;
(E组)克氏针钢丝张力带固定法480.750±15.370。
B组与C组之间比较,结果无统计学意义(p>0.05);B、C组与A组、D组、E组之间两两比较,结果均有统计学意义(p<0.05)
结论:
1各内固定组的稳定性:克氏针钢丝张力带固定法>克氏针可吸收线张力带结合髌骨胫骨结节可吸收线环扎术固定法>克氏针可吸收线张力带固定法=第二种单独应用可吸收线张力带固定法>第一种单独应用可吸收线张力带固定法。
2第一种可吸收线张力带法稳定性差,不宜单独应用于髌骨骨折的治疗。
3第二种可吸收线张力带法与克氏针可吸收线张力带法,稳定性不足以支持膝关节的早期功能练习,如应用则建议术后早期行石膏托外固定。
4克氏针钢丝张力带固定法的稳定性最好,克氏针可吸收线张力带结合髌骨胫骨结节可吸收线环扎术固定法次之,两种固定方法均可承受425牛以上的股四头肌牵张力及同时产生的髌股关节作用力,术后可早期行膝关节不负重功能锻炼。
5髌骨胫骨结节可吸收线环扎术可辅助治疗髌骨骨折。
6可吸收线虽具有较好的生物学特性,但对于髌骨骨折来说,其无法提供骨折端静态加压,其弹性形变较钢丝大,因此固定的稳定性欠佳,不建议用可吸收线替代钢丝治疗髌骨骨折,其主要适用于髌骨骨折的辅助固定。如应用可吸收线张力带治疗髌骨骨折,则需加用髌骨胫骨结节可吸收线环扎术进行保护。
Objective: In recent years, with the development of transport and sportcareer, the incidence of patella fracture has been increasing. For patellafracture, the most widely used method is K-wire and tension band wiringfixation.The advantage of K-wire and tension band wiring fixation method issimple、cheap price、conforming to biomechanics、relatively stable、applicableto all types of patellar fracture;however, there are also some disadvantagessuch as steel nodular skin irrigation、wire loose or break、stell wire has to beremoved after the healing of fracture,and so on. In recent years, absorbableimplants gradually applied to clinic with the development of BiomedicalEngineering. Some scholars believe that the application of tension bandabsorbable suture for patella fracture can avoid various defects of tensionband wiring, and some scholars used different kinds of tension bandabsorbable suture in the treatment of patella fractures and achieved goodtherapeutic effect according to literature.This experiment based on transversefracture of the patella model respectively using K-wire and tension bandwiring and four kinds of tension band absorbable suture,a total of fivetreatment methods for biomechanical comparison.the stability was tested toprovide a theoretical basis for clinicians to choose the treatment of patellafracture.
Method: The transverse fracture model of the patella was made in4keenjoints of adult cadaveric.The test methods of fixation were Similar, patellaspecimens were not destroyed after test, thus the patella specimens could bereused.The femur and the tibia of the specimen were fixed on the homemadeclamp,the femur was parallel to the ground and the knee was flexed36°.First,the patella fracture was anatomically reducted,then each of the patellaspecimens were sequentially fixed with five methods: two kinds of tension band absorbable suture、K-wire and tension band absorbable suture、K-wireand tension-band absorbable suture combined with patella and tibial tuberclecerclage by absorbable suture, K-wire and tension band wiring.The quadricepsfemoris of specimens were pulled by CSS-44020biomechanics machine,andthe tensile strength was recorded when the internal fixation was failure.Wedefined that the internal fixation was failure when the separation distance ofthe patella fracture was2mm under tension.
Result: The tensile strength of each group when the internal fixation wasfailure:
(group A)the first kind of tension band absorbable suture:166.500±6.350N;
(group B)the second kind of tension band absorbable suture:226.250±6.500N;
(group C)K-wire and tension band absorbable suture:228.500±19.226N;
(group D)K-wire and tension-band absorbable suture combined withpatella and tibial tubercle cerclage by absorbable suture:425.500±18.734N;
(group E)K-wire and tension band wiring:480.750±15.370N.
There were statistical significances(p<0.05) in comparison between anytwo groups except between group B and group C.
Conclusions:
1The stability of internal fixation groups: K-wire and tension band wiring>K-wire and tension-band absorbable suture combined with patella and tibialtubercle cerclage by absorbable suture>K-wire and tension band absorbablesuture=the second kind of tension band absorbable suture>the first kind oftension band absorbable suture.
2The stability of the first kind of tension band absorbable suture is poor,should not be used for the treatment of patellar fracture
3The stability of the second kind of tension band absorbable suture andK-wire and tension band absorbable suture are not sufficient to support the early functional exercises of the knee. If these two fixtion methods areapplied,we propose a plaster external fixation postoperative.
4The stability of the K-wire and tension band wiring is better than K-wire andtension-band absorbable suture combined with patella and tibial tuberclecerclage by absorbable suture, these two fixtion methods can withstand thetension of quadriceps femoris more than425N,and withstand the patello-femoral pressure at the same time. If these two fixtion methods are applied,the patients can take early functional exercise of the knee postoperative.
5Patella and tibial tubercle cerclage by absorbable suture can be used for aadjuvant treatment of patellar fracture.
6Although the absorbable suture has good biological characteristics, but forpatellar fracture, it cannot provide static compression at both ends of the fract-ure,and it is more flexible, so the stability of fixation with absorbable suture isnot enough.we do not recommend to use absorbable suture instead of steelwire for the treatment of patellar fracture, it is mainly applied to the assistedfixation of patella fracture. If the tension band absorbable suture was applied,patella and tibial tubercle cerclage by absorbable suture must be used forprotection.
引文
1刘远禄,李帮春,苟景跃,等.普迪思线张力带固定治疗髌骨骨折的临床研究.中华创伤杂志,2005,21(4):279-282
2顾晓晖.髌骨骨折应用MAXON可吸收缝线固定.骨与关节损伤杂志,2002,17(6):453-454
3赵英林,钱洁,胡滨成.髌骨关节面的应用解剖学研究.局解手术学杂志,1997,6:2-5
4White BJ,Sherman OH.Patellofemoral instability.Bull NYU Hosp JtDis,2009,67(1):22-29
5Reilly DT,Martens M.Experimental analysis of the quadriceps muscleforce and patello-femoral joint reaction force for various activities.ActaOrthop Scand,1972,43:126-137
6Hungerford DS,Barry B.Biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint.ClinOrthop,1979,144:9-12
7Kose KC,Kuru I,Maralcan G,et al.Comparison of a technique using anew percutaneous osteosynthesis device with conventional open surgeryfor displaced patella fractures.J Orthop Trauma,2007,1:77-78
8王岩主译.坎贝尔骨科手术学.第11版.北京:人民军医出版社,2009:2486
9谢扬,郑佳坤,林本丹,等.可吸收线张力带治疗髌骨骨折的生物力学研究及其临床意义.中华创伤杂志,2004,20(5):300-302
10谢扬,郑佳坤,林本丹,等.可吸收线张力带治疗髌骨骨折.中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(14):1104-1106
11姚光伟,许斌.可吸收内植物张力带固定治疗髌骨骨折的生物力学与临床研究.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(9):595-597
12王兴元,王一剑,张亮,等.可吸收张力带内固定内固定在髌骨骨折治疗中的应用.临床骨科杂志,2008,11(4):339-340
13刘涛,殷梅,郑继广,等.可吸收线内固定治疗髌骨骨折疗效观察.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(4):358-359
14郑季南,徐新华,洪庆南,等.髌骨骨折不同改良方式张力带钢丝固定的生物力学研究及临床应用.中国骨伤,2002,15(4):208-210
15危杰,刘璠,吴新宝,等主译.骨折治疗的AO原则.第二版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2010:604
16范小良,吴小兴,陈作人.可吸收线张力带加环形缝合治疗髌骨骨折.中华急诊医学杂志,2003,12(2):129
1El-Sayed AM,Ragab RK.Arthroscopic-assisted reduction and stabilizationof transverse fractures of the patella.Knee,2009,16(1):54-57
2张英泽.临床创伤骨科流行病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:525
3赵英林,钱洁,胡滨成.髌骨关节面的应用解剖学研究.局解手术学杂志,1997,6:2-5
4White BJ,Sherman OH.Patellofemoral instability.Bull NYU Hosp JtDis,2009,67(1):22-29
5Reilly DT,Martens M.Experimental analysis of the quadriceps muscleforce and patello-femoral joint reaction force for various activities.ActaOrthop Scand,1972,43:126-137
6刘建伟,熊波.髌骨骨折的手术治疗.中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(6):442-444
7Kose KC,Kuru I,Maralcan G,et al.Comparison of a technique using anew percutaneous osteosynthesis device with conventional open surgeryfor displaced patella fractures.J Orthop Trauma,2007,1:77-78
8王岩主译.坎贝尔骨科手术学.第11版.北京:人民军医出版社,2009:2486
9葛宝丰,卢世璧.手术学全卷:矫形外科手术.北京:人民军医出版社,1996:374
10蒋元斌,张伟中,徐浩,等.两种手术切口在髌骨骨折治疗中的应用疗效分析.临床和实验医学杂志,2009,8(10):87-88
11胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学,第二版.北京:人民军医出版社,1999:705
12Mihra S,Taljanovis MO,Marci D.et al.Fracture fixation.RadioGraphics,2003,23:1569-1590
13郑季南,徐新华,洪庆南,等.髌骨骨折不同改良方式张力带钢丝固定的生物力学研究及临床应用.中国骨伤,2002,15(4):208-210
14Smith ST,Cramere KE,Karges DE, et al.Early complications in theoperative treatment of patella fractures.J Orthop Trauma,1997,11:183-187
15Wild M,Khayal T,Miersch D, et al.Dynamic cerclage wiring of patellarfractures Complications and midterm functional results.Unfallchirurg,2008,111:892-897
16Harris RM,Fractures of the patella and injuries to the extensormechanism.In:Bucholz RW,Heckman JD,Court-Brown CM,eds.Fracturesin Adults.Ed6.Philadelphia,PA:Lippincott Williams andWilkins,2006:1969-1998
17修玉才,任先军.髌骨骨折空心拉力螺钉组合张力带固定的生物力学.中国矫形外科杂志,20018(4):381-383
18Buehler W,Gilfrich J,Wiley R.Effect of low temperature phase changeson the mechanical properties of alloys near composition TiNi.J ApplPhys,1963,34:1475-1477
19孙沪霞,钱国正,张春才,等.镍钛-聚髌器治疗骨折的生物力学特性研究.中华骨科杂志,1992,12(5):361
20李松哲,李成福,李林.改良AO克氏针张力带钢丝与聚髌器治疗髌骨骨折临床分析,中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(11):1153-1154
21张治国,成明华,熊波.聚髌器与克氏针张力带治疗髌骨骨折的临床疗效分析.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2009,24(3):253-254
22黄西勤,何春雷,廖文杰,等.镍钛-聚髌器治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折的临床应用.中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(2):178-179
23黄卫国,李玉民,袁义明,等.膝前正中直切口镍钛聚髌器治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折.中华骨科杂志,2007,27(7):514-517
24季湘玲,张世民.髌骨下极骨折治疗进展.国际骨科学杂志,2009,30(1):18-20
25冯青,刘运存,范陆军.应用不同内固定方法治疗髌骨骨折71例疗效分析.中国误诊学杂志,2008,8(6):1427-1428
26王勇平,陈根元,刘小荣.镍钛形状记忆合金材料再骨科应用的研究进展.生物骨科材料与临床研究,2010,7(2):31-35
27谈绎文,匡勇,俞仲翔,等.分体式髌骨爪在髌骨骨折治疗中的应用.临床骨科杂志,2010,13(1):113
28顾晓晖.髌骨骨折应用MAXON可吸收缝线固定.骨与关节损伤杂志,2002,17(6):453-454
29谢扬,郑佳坤,林本丹,等.可吸收线张力带治疗髌骨骨折的生物力学研究及其临床意义.中华创伤杂志,2004,20(5):300-302
30姚光伟,许斌.可吸收内植物张力带固定治疗髌骨骨折的生物力学与临床研究.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(9):595-597
31谢扬,郑佳坤,林本丹,等.可吸收线张力带治疗髌骨骨折.中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(14):1104-1106
32王兴元,王一剑,张亮,等.可吸收张力带内固定内固定在髌骨骨折治疗中的应用.临床骨科杂志,2008,11(4):339-340
33Weiler A,Hormann RF,Stahelin AC,et a1.Biodegradable implants insports medicine,the biological base.Arthroscopy,2000,16(3):305—321
34Cekin T,Tükenmez M,Tezeren G.Comparison of three fixation methods intransverse fractures of the patella in a calf model[J].Acta OrthopTraumatol Turc,2006,3:248-251
35倪卫东,高仕长,梁安霖.钢缆钉与张力带钢丝治疗髌骨骨折的疗效分析.第三军医大学学报,2008,30(12):1203-1205
36杨宝利,银存举,杨亚军,等.Cable-pin系统并髌前直纵切口入路治疗髌骨骨折.中国医师进修杂志,2011,34(29):62-64
37张权,危杰,王满宜.Cable—Pin系统在髌骨骨折治疗中的应用.中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(3):214-217
38叶添文,李阳,欧阳跃平,等.医用钛缆在髌骨粉碎性骨折治疗中的应用.中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(4):268
39Wild M, Eichler C,Thelen S,et al.Fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of thepatella—An alternative to tension wiring? Clinical Biomechanics2010,25:341-347
40李健,颜登鲁,张在恒,等.微创与切开复位张力带固定治疗横断型髌骨骨折的生物力学比较.中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(8):990-992
41李健,颜登鲁,高梁斌,等.微创张力带固定治疗横断型骸骨骨折.中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(6):529-531
42李健,肖祥池,朱文雄,等.经皮穿刺张力带固定术治疗髌骨骨折12例,中华创伤杂志,2003,19(7):433-435
43徐立录,王贵清,谢道远,等.关节镜下经皮张力带钢丝固定治疗髌骨骨折.中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(3):218-220
44孔建中,翁益民,郭小山,等.经皮内固定术选择性治疗髌骨骨折.中华创伤杂志,2005,21(2):87-90
45林瑞新,董伊隆,余斌锋,等.带线锚钉治疗急性髌骨下极撕脱性骨折.中华骨科杂志,2011,31(4):331-334
46曾昭浚,王金水.髌骨部分切除对膝关节功能的影响.骨与关节损伤杂志,1998,13:106-107
47Haklar U,Kocaoglu B,Gereli A,et al.Arthroscopie inspection after thesurgical treatment of patella fractures.Int Orthop,2009,33(3):665-670
48危杰,刘璠,吴新宝,等主译.骨折治疗的AO原则.第二版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2010:604
49马战备,吴希瑞,贾志刚,等.髌骨鹰嘴化结合张力带钢丝治疗髌骨下极骨折.中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(3):291-292
50林瑞新,董伊隆,余斌锋,等.带线锚钉治疗急性髌骨下极撕脱性骨折.中华骨科杂志,2011,31(4):331-334
51Khasen GE,Wilson AN,Ashfaq S,et a1.Fixation of ealcaneal avulsionfractures using screws with and without suture anchors:a biomechaniealinvestigation.Foot Ankle Int,2007,28(11):1183-1186
52傅仰攀,黄长明,张少战,等.锚钉系统在髌骨下极骨折中的应用.实用骨科杂志,2011,17(6):564-565
53Matejcic A,Smiljanic B,Bekavac-beslin M,et a1.The basket plate inosteosynthesis of comminuted fractures of distal pole of thepatella.Injury,2006,37(6):525-530
54Matejcic A,Puljiz Z,Elabjer E, et a1. Multifragment fracture of thepatellar apex: basket plate osteosynthesis compared with partialpatellectomy,Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2008,128(4):403-408
55Kastelec M.Veselko M.Inferior patellar pole avulsion fracture:osteosynthe-s is compared with pole resection.J Bone Joint Surg
Am.2004,86(4):696-701