添加纤维素酶对奶牛夏季生产性能及人工瘤胃发酵的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文研究了纤维素酶对奶牛夏季生产性能的作用以及对人工瘤胃发酵的影响,目的是为奶牛生产中纤维素酶的应用进一步提供科学依据,并探讨纤维素酶对奶牛生产性能影响的可能机制。
     试验1研究添加纤维素酶对奶牛夏季产奶量及奶品质的影响。选用50头产奶量、泌乳期相近的中国荷斯坦奶牛,随机分成5组(n=10),在试验1组和试验2组的精料补充料中分别添加复合纤维素酶50 g/吨、100 g/吨,试验3组和试验4组的精料补充料中分别添加单一纤维素酶80 g/吨、160 g/吨,第五组为对照组。试验时间为:2005年7月15日—9月15日,分别测定5个组的奶牛产奶量和乳品质。结果表明,各试验组奶牛的产奶量分别比对照组提高5.73%(P<0.05)、4.84%(P<0.05)、3.62%和0.51%,但对奶牛采食量、乳脂肪含量没有显著影响。
     试验2研究添加不同种类纤维素酶对人工瘤胃发酵的影响。本试验瘤胃液来自3只安装永久性瘤胃瘘管的荷斯坦阉公牛,体外人工瘤胃试验分为8个组,分别是空白组、对照组、复合纤维素酶3个组,分别是1、2和3组(每千克培养底物添加纤维素酶的量分别为66.7、200、100mg)和单一纤维素酶组3个组,分别是1、2和3组(每千克培养底物添加纤维素酶的量分别为66.7、200、100mg/kg),培养96h,测定人工瘤胃的产气量、发酵液pH值、干物质消失率、培养液中的NH3—N、TVFA产量及乙酸、丙酸、丁酸的产量,以研究添加纤维素酶对人工瘤胃发酵的影响。试验结果表明:从产气量上看,复合纤维素酶100mg/kg组的产气量最大,96h时比对照组多产气23.7%(P<0.05),产气量最小的是单一纤维素酶66.7mg/kg组,与对照组相比差异不显著(P>0.05);从pH值看,96h除复合纤维素酶3组比对照组低0.2,其余各组差异均不显著(P>0.05);96h复合纤维素酶100mg/kg组的干物质消失率比对照组高7.57%,其次是复合纤维素酶200mg/kg组比对照组高5.6%;NH3—N含量从0h—24h逐渐下降至24h时最低,24h—96h NH3—N含量逐渐上升,96h复合纤维素酶3组的NH3—N浓度在各组中均最高,比对照组高4.3 mg/100ml;96h,复合纤维素酶3组的乙酸和TVFA含量最大,比对照组高7.62和9.16 m mol/L(P<0.05)。
     本研究表明,日粮中添加不同纤维素酶可以提高奶牛夏季的产奶量,具有缓解夏季炎热季节造成奶牛生产性能下降的作用,但对奶牛采食量、牛乳品质无显著影响。纤维素酶的饲喂效果与酶的种类和添加量有关,复合纤维素酶的效果优于单一纤维素酶,而复合纤维素酶添加量以50 g/吨的饲喂效果较好。
The effects of supplementing cellulases on production performance of lactating dairy cows in the summer and on in vitro rumen fermentation were studied to further provide experiment evidence on cellulase utilization in dairy cow production and its possible mechanisms.
     Exp1. Effects of cellulase on milk production and milk quality in dairy cow in the summer. 50 Chinese Holstein dairy cows with body condition, milk production and lactation approximately accordant were randomly divided into five groups (with 10 cows in each group). The concentrates of group 1 and group 2 were added into mixed-cellulase at level of 50g/t and 100g/t, respectively, and the concentrates of group 3 and group 4 at level of 80g/t and 100g/t, respectively. The time from July 15 to September 15 .The results showed that milk production of cows in groups of 1, 2,3 and 4 increased by 5.73%(P<0.05), 4.84%(P<0.05), 3.62% and 0.51% compared with that of control group.
     Exp 2. Effects of supplemental cellulases on in vitro rumen fermentation. Rummen fliud inoculum was collected from three rumen-fistulated Holstein bulls. Compound or single cellulases (CC or SC, mg) /substrate(S, kg) were 66.7, 200 and 100 respectively. The time of incubation was 96h. Gas production, pH, DM degradation, NH3-N concentration, total VFA,acetate,propionate and butyrate production were drtermined. The results showed that the 96h cumulative gas production was the highest and increased by 23.7%(P<0.05)compared with the control group when CC/S was 100. There was no diffenrce between group of 66.7mg/kg and the control. The pH in group of 100mg/kg was lower 0.2 than the control group, and other groups had no difference with the control group. The 96h DM degradation in groups of 100mg/kg and 200mg/kg increased by 7.57% and 5.6% compared with the control(P<0.05). The concentration of NH3-N decreased gradually from 0h to 24h and reached the lowest at 24h, and then gradually increased from 24h to 96h. The concentration of NH3-N from 12h to 96h was the highest for group of 100mg/kg ( 4.3 mg/100ml more than the contol). The concentrations of acetate and TVFA were the highest for group of 100mg/kg and higher 7.62 and 9.16 mmol/L than that of the control group, respectively.
     The present study indicated that milk production of lactating cows could be enhanced in the summer by supllementation of cellulases, but the intake and fat content in milk were not affected. The effect was retalted with the kind of celluase and adding level. In the whole, the effect of compound cellulases was better than that of single cellulases, and the level of 50g/t was more effective for compound cellulases.
引文
[1] 卜登攀. 饲用纤维素酶及产酶微生物[J].宁夏农学院学报,2000,4:72-78
    [2] 陈冠军,杜宗军,高培基.耐碱性真菌纤维素酶生产菌的筛选及酶学性质的初步研究[J].工业微生物,2000,30(4):23-26
    [3] 陈洪章.影响纤维素酶的因素和纤维素酶被吸附性能的研究[J].化学反应工程与工艺,2000,16(1):30-35
    [4] 陈力宏.纤维素酶在食品发酵中的应用[J].中国酿造,1990(5):2-5
    [5] 崔福绵,刘菡,韩辉.康宁木霉 Cp8829 纤维素酶生产条件的研究[J].微生物通报,1995 ,22(2):72-75
    [6] 戴四光,金光明,王立克,等.纤维素酶研究现状及其在畜牧业中的应用[J].安徽技术师范学院学报, 2001,15(3):32-38
    [7] 但堂胜等.饲用酶制剂及其应用[J].国外畜牧科技,1998,25(1):27-29
    [8] 段金柱,曹淡君.固体发酵与液体发酵生产纤维素酶产率与催化性能比较[J].粮食与饲料工业,2000 (3):24-26
    [9] 方俊,王涛.纤维素酶在奶牛饲粮中的研究与应用[J].饲料博览.2003,8:34-36
    [10] 付连胜,吕兴有.奶牛饲喂高活性纤维素酶的效果观察[J].中国饲料,1998,3:25
    [11] 傅彤,刘庆生,范志影,等.应用离子色谱测定青贮饲料中有机酸含量的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,32(5):16-17
    [12] 郭松林等.纤维素酶及其在畜禽生产中的应用[J].中国饲料,2001.9:23-24
    [13] 管斌,谢来苏,丁友.里氏木霉纤维素酶高产菌株发酵特性的测试[J].中国酿造,2000 (5):14-16
    [14] 郭庭双,张智山.“秸杆畜牧业”十问[J].饲料研究,1993 (2):37
    [15] 郭庭双.秸秆畜牧业[M].上海科技出版社.1995
    [16] 耿忠诚等.我国的饲用酶及其应用[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2000.8:16
    [17] 韩正康,陈杰..反刍动物瘤胃的消化和代谢[J].北京:科学出版社,1988:49-53
    [18] 江均平等.海枣曲霉木聚糖酶的纯化及末端序列的研究[J].生物化学与生物物理学报,1995,27(2):159-163
    [19] 江均平等.海枣曲霉木聚糖酶降解寡聚木糖的特性[J].生物化学与生物物理学报,1995,27(2):288-291
    [20] 姜锡瑞,酶制剂应用手册[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,1999,191-194
    [21] 焦平林,苏辉,吴明楼,等.纤维素酶制剂对肉牛及奶牛生产性能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,1997,(2):43-44
    [22] 居乃琥.酶工程研究和酶工程产业的新进展( Ⅱ ) [J].食品与发酵工业,2000,26(4):40-42
    [23] 李德发主编.中国饲料大全[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2001
    [24] 李声永论文.几种酵母培养物对瘤胃发酵及消化代谢的影响研究:[D].2002
    [25] 李祥.酶制剂在饲料中的应用技术[J].动物营养研究进展,2000
    [26] 梁霆,王毅,莫志忠等.纤维素酶液体深层发酵条件的研究[J].生物技术,1997,7 (6) :22-26
    [27] 林凤.纤维素酶的生物化学和分子生物学研究新进展[J].生命科学,1994,6(1):18-23
    [28] 刘建昌,林洁荣,苏水金,等.添加纤维素酶制剂对奶牛产奶性能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2001,(3):31-32
    [29] 刘娟等.酶在肉用仔鸡生产中的应用[J].饲料工业,1996 (6) :20-21
    [30] 卢庆萍.用体内、体外法研究纤维素酶、酵母培养物对瘤胃发酵的影响[J].中国草食动物,1(5):3-5
    [31] 穆小民,吴显荣.纤维素酶分子生物学研究进展及趋向[J].饲料工业, 1998,10:7-9
    [32] 瞿明仁.饲用真菌纤维素酶研究及应用[J].饲料工业,1999,12:30-32
    [33] 史小丽,潘锋,孙东平等.产纤维素菌株宇佐美曲霉 Y- 11 产酶条件及酶性质的研究[J].生物学杂志,2000 ,17(5):22-23
    [34] 史占全等.添加纤维素复酶提高玉米青贮和黄贮饲用价值的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,1999(3):3-4
    [35] 宋桂经.微生物酶饲料添加剂与加酶饲料和酶化饲料[J].中国饲料,1996,(9)17-19
    [36] 宋向阳,余世袁. 纤维素酶制备过程中不同底物、菌种的研究[J].生物学杂志,2001, 18(1):20—21
    [37] 谭宏,刘淑欢等.长梗木霉纤维素酶的产生及提取[J].微生学通报,1993 ,20(2) :90-93
    [38] 王安,等.纤维素复合酶作为青贮饲料添加剂的研究[J].东北农业大学学报,1997,28(4):358-365
    [39] 汪敬等.不同酶促反应条件及热处理对木聚酶酶活的影响[J].饲料研究,2000,(3):1—3
    [40] 王全军.浅论反刍动物应用酶制剂的必要性[J].饲料博览,2000,4 :37-38
    [41] 汪维云,朱金华,吴守一.纤维素科学及纤维素酶的研究进展[J].江苏理工大学学报,1998:20—26
    [42] 王沁等.黑曲霉纤维素酶的化学组成[J].微生物学杂志,1994,14:6-8
    [43] 梶川博.反刍家畜营养学最新动向[J].畜产研究,2001,55(1):61—64
    [44] 吴克谦.细菌和真菌降解纤维素的机理[J].国外畜牧科技,1992,19(1):34—39
    [45] 吴显民,穆小民.纤维素酶分子生物学研究进展及趋向[J].生物工程进展,200014(4):25-28
    [46] 熊谱成.饲用酶制剂的应用[J].饲料与畜牧,1996,(1):19-20
    [47] 阎伯旭,等.纤维素酶分子结构和功能研究进展[J].生物化学和生物物理进展,1999,26(3):233-235
    [48] 阎伯旭等.纤维素酶分子结构与功能研究进展[J].生命科学,1995,5 :22-26
    [49] 严岩,张全福.纤维素酶的性质应用及其环保意义[J].农业环境与发展,1997,(1):17-20
    [50] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京农业大学出版社.1993
    [51] 杨永明论文,2002,内蒙古农业大学,外源纤维复合酶在绵羊饲养中的作用效果及其作用机制的研究[D]
    [52] 杨志刚,沈益新,陈阿琴.纤维素酶在青贮饲料中的应用[J].饲料博览,2002,(1):39-41
    [53] 尹清强,王景林.纤维素酶制剂对奶牛产奶量和饲料效率的影响[J].吉林畜牧兽医,1991(6):12—14
    [54] 余东游,冯杰.纤维素酶在动物营养上的研究进展[J].饲料研究,2000,(5):20-23
    [55] 余蓝斌,具润漠.分批与流加发酵法生产纤维素酶的研究[J].食品与发酵工业,1999, 25(1):16—19
    [56] 张国立.饲用酶制剂的应用及发展趋势[J].中国饲料,1996,(19):6-8
    [57] 张镁等.纤维素酶的增效与保护问题浅析[J].印染,1996.22(9):9—14
    [58] 张勇等.纤维素酶的应用进展[J].中国饲料 ,2002.4:17—18
    [59] 章练红.纤维质饲料资源的开发利用概况[J].粮食与饲料工业,1993 (1) :26—29
    [60] 张勇,陶青燕.纤维素酶的应用进展[J].中国饲料,2002,(4):17—18
    [61] 张礼星,石贵阳,徐柔等.里氏木霉利用麦糟生产纤维素酶[J].食品与发酵工业, 1999,25(3):23—25
    [62] 赵小蓉,林启美,孙焱鑫等. 纤维素分解菌对不同纤维素类物质的分解作用[J].微生物学杂志,2000 ,20(3) :12—14
    [63] Baran,M.and B.Kmet. Effect of pectinase on rumen fermentation in sheep and lambs[J].Arch.Anim Nutr. Berlin,1987,8:643—646
    [64] Beauchemin K A,Rode L M,Maekawa M.Evaluation of a non starch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets[J].J Dairy Sci,2000,83:543
    [65] Broderick G. A.,and Kang J.H.. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].J. Dairy Sci.,1980,63:64—75.
    [66] Dhiman T R,Zaman M S..Performance of dairy cows fed forage treated with fibrolytic enzymes prior to feeding[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2002,,101:115—125
    [67] D.P.Morgavi et al.Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum...J.Dairy Sci.,2000a ,83:1310—1321
    [68] Erasmus,L.H.,P.M.Botha and A.Kistner.1992.Effect of yeast culture supplement on productionrumen fermentation and duodenal nitrogen flow in dairy cows[J].J. Dairy.Sci,75:30-56
    [69] Eunki Kim, et al .Factorial Optimization of a Six Cellulase Mixture[J].Biotechnolog and Bioengineering ,1998 ,58(5):496—501
    [70] Fontes,C.M. G.A.,J.T.Hall,B.H.Hirst,G.P.Hazelwood,and H.J.Gilbert.The resistance of cellulases and xylanases to proteolytic in avtivation[J]. APP, Microbuol.BIOTHCHNOL,1995,43:52—57
    [71] Hession,A.O.R.S.Tung, E.M.Kreck and L.Kung.. Effect of adding live yeast culture in vitro ruminal fermentation[J]. J.Anim.Sci,1992,70(suppl.l)::309
    [72] Hristov A N,McAllister T A,Cheng K.Effect of dietaryor abomasal supplementation of exogenous polysaccharide—degrading enzymes on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility[J].J Anim Sci,1998,76:31-46
    [73] HRISTOV A N, MCALLISTER T A, CHENG K J. Stability of exogenous polysaccharide— degrading emzymes in rumen[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,,1998,76:161-168
    [74] Humpheg AE. The Hydlolysis of Cellulosic Matelialo to Uletrl Products[J] . Adv. Chem Sel ,1979 (181):25—53
    [75] Kung Jr L.Directfed microbial and enzyme feed additives[J].Direct—fed Microbial,Enzyme and Forage Additives Compendium,1996:15—20
    [76] Lewis G E,Hunt C W,Sanchez W K,et al.Effect of direct—fed fibrolytic enzymes on the digestive characteristics of a forage—based diet fed to beef steers[J].J Anim Sci,1996,74:3020-3028
    [77] Lewis,g.e.,W.K.Sanchez,C.W.Hunt,M.A.Guy,G.T.Prichard,B.I.Swanson,and R.J.Treacher. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy coes[J].J.Dairy Sci,1999,82:611-617
    [78] Luchini N D,Broderick G A,Hefner D L,et al.Production response to treating forage with fibrolytic enzymes prior to feeding to lactating cows[J].J Dairy Sci,1997,80:262
    [79] Martin ,S.A., and D.J.Nisbet, and R.G.Dean. 1989.Influence of commercial yeast supplement on the in vitro ruminal fermentation[J].Nutr.rep,Int,40-395
    [80] Medve,et al . Adsorption and Synergismof Trichoderma Cellulase[J] . Biotechnolg and Bioengineering, 1998 ,59(5) :621—634
    [81] Menke K H, H Steingass. Estimation of the energy feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro production using rumen fluid[J]. Anim Res,1988,28:55-72
    [82] Menke K H, Raab L, Salewski A,et a.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J].Journal of Agriculture Science (Cambridge),1979,93:217—222
    [83] Nussio L G,Huber J T,Theurer C B,et al.Influence of a cellulose/xylanase complex (c/x) on lactational performance of dairy cows fed alfalfa hay (AH)—based diets[J].J Dairy Sci,1997,,80:220
    [84] Orskov E R et al ..1979.The catimation of prition degradability in the rumen incubation meauments weighted according to tate of passage[J].Journal of Dairy Science, Cambridgs ,92:499-503
    [85] Pritchard G,Hunt C,Allen A,et al.Effect of direct—fed fibrolytic enzymes on digestion and growth performance of beef cattle[J].J Anim Sci,1996,74:296
    [86] Pritchard, G., Hunt, C., Allen, A., Treacher, R., 1996.Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on digestion and growth performance of beefcattle[J].J.Anim. Sci,74(Suppl.1),296
    [87] Ramos et al ,The use of Enzyme resyellng and the influence of accumalution on cellulose hydrolysis by Triohoderma colhlases[J],Enzxyme ,Miorob,technol,1993,139:187—194.
    [88] Rode L M., Yang W Z., and Beauchemin K A..Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation[J]. J. Dairy Sci. 1999,82:2121—2126
    [89] Sanchez W K,Hunt C W,Guy M A,et al.Effect of fibrolytic enzymes on lactational performance of dairy cows[J].J Dairy Sci,1996,79(1):183
    [90] Tsao ,G. T. . In advanced Biochemical Engineering ,ed.Burgay ,H. R. and Belfort ,G. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 1987 ,79—101
    [91] Wood TM, Maccpae S I. In Bioconversion of Cellulose Substance into Energy, Chemicals and Microbial Protein[M]. Edited by T K Ghose Gal India ,1978..111-141
    [92] YANG W Z, BEAUCHEMIN K A, RODE L M. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows [J].J Dairy Sci ,1998,82::391-403

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700