全球技术网络及其对地方企业网络演化的影响
|
摘要
世界发达国家(地区)区域发展的实践表明,地方企业网络已经成为实现区域经济发展的动力源泉和载体,因而受到一大批包括经济地理学家在内的多专业领域学者的广泛关注。20世纪90年代以来,随着经济全球化的快速推进以及知识经济的发展,土地、资本、劳动力等支撑地方企业网络形成和发展的传统要素的作用逐渐弱化,技术要素取而代之,成为影响企业网络发展和演化的重要因素。在此背景下,本文拟以全球技术网络为切入点,研究全球技术网络对于后发工业化国家地方企业网络演化以及升级的影响,为经济地理学的理论创新和指导区域经济发展规划服务。
论文以导师主持的教育部人文社科基金项目“网络权力与企业空间行为、企业创新”、国家自然科学基金项目“社会文化环境差异对上海地区中德企业网络构建的影响”、上海市经济和信息化委员会“十二五”产业规划重大课题“大浦东地区产业发展思路及布局研究”、上海市科技发展基金软科学研究重点项目“上海张江高新区产业布局规划研究”等课题为支撑,对上海张江高科技园区处于产业链不同环节的集成电路企业,上海市经信委、上海市发展改革委、浦东新区发展改革委、张江高科技园区产业研究室等政府部门以及上海市、浦东新区集成电路行业协会进行了20多次的访谈和调研。特别是和国外学者建立了友好的联系,与德国Justus Liebig University Giessen的经济地理学教授Prof.Dr.Ingo Liefner,国际知名经济地理学家、加拿大Toranto University经济地理学教授Prof. Dr. Harald Bathelt等国外同行多次交流学术研究心得,获取了较多国外最新的研究成果,这些为本文的顺利完成奠定了扎实的基础。
通过对国内外相关文献的分析,笔者发现,在企业网络的相关研究中,学者们已经普遍关注到技术已经成为影响企业网络发展的重要因素,技术水平的差异决定了企业在地方企业网络中的地位,进而影响到企业网络的全球、地方竞争能力。但是,研究成果偏重于企业网络对于技术创新绩效、技术扩散的作用与影响,而从技术的视角探讨企业网络发展与演化的成果不多。近年来,有学者从网络权力、技术权力的视角探讨了企业网络的发展和演化。但在经济全球化背景下,跨国公司将愈来愈多的技术活动纳入到企业间国际技术网络之中。因而有必要从全球技术网络的视角探讨企业网络的演化,但是这方面的研究却被忽视了。此外,企业网络并不是是固定不变的,而是经历着初创到成熟的过程。现有企业网络的研究主要集中在网络的静态性质方面,对网络的动态变化方面研究较少。技术是影响企业网络演化的重要因素,技术的空间移动对于企业网络的发展及演化有着重要影响,是值得探讨的问题。
论文在对现有技术扩散和技术学习等相关领域研究成果进行系统回顾和总结的基础上,界定了全球技术网络的概念、内涵,并对全球技术网络形成的背景与基础、形成机制、影响因子、作用方式进行了系统深入的讨论。在实地调研的基础上,对全球技术网络作用下的上海张江集成电路地方企业网络的发展历程、演化路径进行了深入分析,得出以下几点结论：
第一,全球技术网络是知识经济时代地方企业网络演化的重要力量。全球技术网络是指企业间及企业与其他行为主体(供应商、用户、同行竞争者、大学、科研机构、中介机构、政府部门等)乃至外部企业和相关机构在技术扩散和技术学习过程中形成的彼此信任的、正式或非正式的、动态关系的集合。网络内主体活动为企业间或企业与相关主体间进行的正式或非正式的相互学习、技术或经验的交流活动。网络资源为企业发展相关的所有隐性和显性技术知识。从空间尺度上讲,全球技术网络由全球技术中心及其对应的高技术势能企业、区域技术中心及其对应的中技术势能企业、地方技术低地及其对应的低技术势能企业以及这些企业之间的技术联系构成。贸易自由化是全球技术网络形成的强大驱动力；信息技术的发展为全球技术网络的形成奠定了坚实基础；跨国公司是全球技术网络形成的核心载体。以经济地理学的视角来看,地方企业网络技术扩散、技术学习的来源,不应局限于所在区域,而应该在全球范围内获取技术溢出与扩散。通过开展技术学习活动,提升技术能力。另外,关系临近也是隐性技术知识进行传播与扩散的一种手段媒介,特别是基于关系临近的实践社区/技术社区,能够实现隐性技术知识的远距离、跨区域/国界的传播,从而促使全球技术网络的形成。值得一提的是,技术扩散与技术溢出是全球技术网络中技术流动的主要方式；技术学习与创新是全球技术网络中技术区位演变的重要途径；跨国技术社区是全球技术网络的重要技术通道。
第二,全球技术网络影响企业空间行为和创新能力,进而影响地方企业网络的演化。在地方企业网络组建期,全球技术网络的空间影响起主导作用。领先公司的技术扩散/溢出能够增加企业的知识积累和新知识创造。获取技术溢出效应是企业策略性选址或区位选择的重要影响因素,由此导致了大量中小企业在某地的空间集聚。在网络成长期,全球技术网络的技术扩散/溢出依然吸引企业的空间集聚,特别是跨国公司研发机构以及大学、科研院所的入驻。在创新方面,全球技术网络中的技术领先企业为了加速实现网络的本地化根植,将会提供多种形式的技术输出,目的在于使更多的企业有能力成为技术领先企业的配套商,实现网络内部的专业化分工。在网络发展期,全球技术网络的创新影响起主导作用,全球技术网络中先进技术首先转移到地方企业网络中的技术守门员,其进行消化吸收后,转化为地方企业网络内共同的隐性技术知识,实现了网络整体技术水平的提升。从技术进步及流动的视角看,地方企业网络经历了“全球技术网络技术推入—技术守门员消化吸收—技术溢出扩散一地方企业网络整体技术水平提升—吸收能力增强—技术守门员引进更先进技术”的技术能力不断提升的循环。
第三,全球技术网络在张江IC企业网络演化中发挥重要作用。张江IC地方企业网络的技术发展历程为：技术引进—技术合作—技术创新。在网络组建期,全球技术网络的技术扩散/溢出促进了地方企业网络的形成。“中芯国际”通过外资的技术溢出和扩散,获得了先进技术,逐渐发展壮大,进而带动了张江高科技园区上下游企业的空间集聚。在网络的成长期,全球技术领先企业(研发机构)通过与地方企业网络内各类公共服务平台在技术研发、技术转移和扩散、人员培训等方面的合作,有效地促进了企业网络的发展。IMEC与上海集成电路研发中心联合进行技术研发,并将研发成果成功转移到上海华虹NEC生产线。在地方企业网络的发展期,跨国技术社区加速了地方企业网络内的创新。“展讯通信”的成功表明,“硅谷群”核心研发团队、“硅谷—大陆”双向互动的运作模式、强化与硅谷的技术联系是其获得成功的关键。同时,全球技术网络中,技术领先国家(地区)的技术控制,在一定程度上也阻碍张江IC地方企业网络的功能升级。
The practice of regional development in developed countries has proved that a well-developed enterprise networks is a driving force for regional development. And thus a large number of scholars from various professional fields including economic geographers fix their attention on this study. Since 1990s, with globalization and development of knowledge-based economy, the importance of traditional network resources such as labor, capital and land has being weakened gradually. However, technology will become the important element on influencing the evolvement and development of the enterprises. In this context, this paper takes a perspective of global technology network, aiming to study its impact to the evolution and upgrading in the enterprise networks. Furthermore, it can service for the theory innovation of economic geography and guide the healthy development of regional economy.
Through the analysis over literatures of home and abroad, this paper found that in the related research on enterprise networks, scholars have generally concerned about that technology has become an important factor in the development of enterprise networks. The technological level of a firm determined its status in the regional enterprise networks, as well as the global and regional competitiveness. However, the study focused on how enterprise networks impact the technological innovation performance and the technology diffusion. On the other hand, there has been very little research analysis on how technical impact the evolution of enterprise networks. In recent years, many scholars studied the development and evolution of enterprise networks from the perspective of network power and technological power. In the context of globalization, more and more multinational companies take their technical activities into an international technology network. So it is worth studying the evolution of enterprise networks from the perspective of global technology network. But researches in this area have been neglected. In addition, there are many static researches but little dynamic research on the enterprise networks. Technology is the very important factor which impacts the evolution of enterprise networks, how the spatial mobility of technology impact the evolution of enterprise networks is worth exploring.
This paper reviewed and summarized the existing researches on enterprise networks. Based on the forefront of economic geography such as technology diffusion, technology learning, this paper put forward the concept of global technology network, discussed the background and basic foundation, formation mechanism, influencing factors, action model on enterprise networks. Based on a large number of field surveys in the Shanghai Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks, the author analyzed how global technology network impact on its development process, evolutionary path, mechanism. This paper got some new findings as well:
Firstly, the global technology network is the important evolutionary force to the evolutionary of the regional enterprise networks. Global technology network is a set of mutual trust, formal or informal, dynamic relationships between enterprises and other members (including suppliers, users, peer competitors, universities, research institutions, intermediaries, government, etc.) as well as external firms and related institutions. The relationships are formatted in the process of technology diffusion and technology learning. Network activities are activities of formal or informal mutual learning, technology and experience exchanging between firms or between firms and other actors existed in the network. Network resources are related technical knowledge including implicit and explicit technical knowledge. From the perspective of spatial scale, global technology network including the global technology center and the corresponding firms which has high technology potential energy, and regional technical centers and the corresponding firms which have middle technology potential energy as well as the lowland technical centers and the corresponding firms which have low-lying technology potential energy.
Trade liberalization is an import driving force. Information technology provides a solid foundation, and multinational companies are the core carrier to the formation of the global technology networks. From the perspective of economic geography, the technology diffusion and technology learning in the enterprise networks should not be limited in the region, but should catch the global technology spillovers and diffusion all around the world, and enhance the technical capabilities through the technological learning. In addition, not only geographical proximity but also relational proximity can be as a means of explicit technical knowledge spread and diffusion, especially the practice communities/technology communities based on the relational proximity, can achieve the explicit technical knowledge spread and diffusion of long-range, cross-regional/national boundaries. Based on the above two points, the global technology network was formed. Global technology network has two main activities, technology diffusion and spillover is the main way of technology flow, technology learning and innovation is an important means of the evolution of technology location in the global technology network.
Secondly, the global technology network affects the spatial behavior and innovation, thereby affecting the evolution of the regional enterprise networks. In the formation period of the regional enterprise networks, spatial impact played a leading role. Technology diffusion/spillover can increase the firm's knowledge accumulation and creation of new knowledge, it is an important chance to improve their innovation capability, as well as improve the competitive advantage. Technology diffusion/ spillover have become the important factor which influences the location choice of a firm. In order to catch the technology diffusion/spillover, firms tend to gather in one place. In the growing period of the regional enterprise networks, technology diffusion /spillover which lead to firms'spatial concentration are still attractive, especially lots of company's R & D institutions, universities, research institutes'entering into. In the aspect of innovation, in order to accelerate the localization of the enterprise networks, the leader firm in the global technology network will provide various forms of technology diffusion/spillover; aiming to enable more firms have the ability to become a supporter to the leader firm, to achieve specialization within the network. In the developing period of the regional enterprise networks, innovative impact played a leading role.In the first place, advanced technology from the global technology network will be transferred to the technological goalkeeper in regional enterprise networks, after the digestion and absorption, these technologies has become the common recessive technical knowledge in regional enterprise networks, rising the technological level of the network. Formed a cycle in which the technical capacity improvement continuously, pushing advanced technology by global technology network-digestion and absorption of technology goalkeeper-technology spillovers and diffusion-rising the technological level of the network-enhancing absorptive capacity-pushing more advanced technology.
Thirdly, Global technology network played an important role in evolution of Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks. The process of technology development in Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks is the introduction of technology-technology cooperation-technology innovation, In the construction period of the regional enterprise networks, technology diffusion/spillover of the global technology network promoted the formation of the regional enterprise networks. SMIC got the advanced technology from the technology diffusion/spillover of leader firms in the global technology network. Thus it led to the agglomeration of upstream and downstream firms in Zhangjiang Park. In the growing period, global technology leader firms(R & D institutions) connected the various public service platforms in the regional enterprise networks through joint technology research and development, technology transfer and diffusion, personnel training, etc., promoted the development of enterprise networks effectively, In the developing period of the regional enterprise networks, the transnational technical community accelerated the innovation within the regional enterprise networks. The case of Spreadtrum shows that R & D team which from Silicon Valley, interactive mode between Silicon Valley and mainland, and strengthen technology links with Silicon Valley have been the key to its success. Meanwhile, technical controls from the technology leader firms or countries, to some extent, hinder the functional upgrading in Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks.
论文以导师主持的教育部人文社科基金项目“网络权力与企业空间行为、企业创新”、国家自然科学基金项目“社会文化环境差异对上海地区中德企业网络构建的影响”、上海市经济和信息化委员会“十二五”产业规划重大课题“大浦东地区产业发展思路及布局研究”、上海市科技发展基金软科学研究重点项目“上海张江高新区产业布局规划研究”等课题为支撑,对上海张江高科技园区处于产业链不同环节的集成电路企业,上海市经信委、上海市发展改革委、浦东新区发展改革委、张江高科技园区产业研究室等政府部门以及上海市、浦东新区集成电路行业协会进行了20多次的访谈和调研。特别是和国外学者建立了友好的联系,与德国Justus Liebig University Giessen的经济地理学教授Prof.Dr.Ingo Liefner,国际知名经济地理学家、加拿大Toranto University经济地理学教授Prof. Dr. Harald Bathelt等国外同行多次交流学术研究心得,获取了较多国外最新的研究成果,这些为本文的顺利完成奠定了扎实的基础。
通过对国内外相关文献的分析,笔者发现,在企业网络的相关研究中,学者们已经普遍关注到技术已经成为影响企业网络发展的重要因素,技术水平的差异决定了企业在地方企业网络中的地位,进而影响到企业网络的全球、地方竞争能力。但是,研究成果偏重于企业网络对于技术创新绩效、技术扩散的作用与影响,而从技术的视角探讨企业网络发展与演化的成果不多。近年来,有学者从网络权力、技术权力的视角探讨了企业网络的发展和演化。但在经济全球化背景下,跨国公司将愈来愈多的技术活动纳入到企业间国际技术网络之中。因而有必要从全球技术网络的视角探讨企业网络的演化,但是这方面的研究却被忽视了。此外,企业网络并不是是固定不变的,而是经历着初创到成熟的过程。现有企业网络的研究主要集中在网络的静态性质方面,对网络的动态变化方面研究较少。技术是影响企业网络演化的重要因素,技术的空间移动对于企业网络的发展及演化有着重要影响,是值得探讨的问题。
论文在对现有技术扩散和技术学习等相关领域研究成果进行系统回顾和总结的基础上,界定了全球技术网络的概念、内涵,并对全球技术网络形成的背景与基础、形成机制、影响因子、作用方式进行了系统深入的讨论。在实地调研的基础上,对全球技术网络作用下的上海张江集成电路地方企业网络的发展历程、演化路径进行了深入分析,得出以下几点结论：
第一,全球技术网络是知识经济时代地方企业网络演化的重要力量。全球技术网络是指企业间及企业与其他行为主体(供应商、用户、同行竞争者、大学、科研机构、中介机构、政府部门等)乃至外部企业和相关机构在技术扩散和技术学习过程中形成的彼此信任的、正式或非正式的、动态关系的集合。网络内主体活动为企业间或企业与相关主体间进行的正式或非正式的相互学习、技术或经验的交流活动。网络资源为企业发展相关的所有隐性和显性技术知识。从空间尺度上讲,全球技术网络由全球技术中心及其对应的高技术势能企业、区域技术中心及其对应的中技术势能企业、地方技术低地及其对应的低技术势能企业以及这些企业之间的技术联系构成。贸易自由化是全球技术网络形成的强大驱动力；信息技术的发展为全球技术网络的形成奠定了坚实基础；跨国公司是全球技术网络形成的核心载体。以经济地理学的视角来看,地方企业网络技术扩散、技术学习的来源,不应局限于所在区域,而应该在全球范围内获取技术溢出与扩散。通过开展技术学习活动,提升技术能力。另外,关系临近也是隐性技术知识进行传播与扩散的一种手段媒介,特别是基于关系临近的实践社区/技术社区,能够实现隐性技术知识的远距离、跨区域/国界的传播,从而促使全球技术网络的形成。值得一提的是,技术扩散与技术溢出是全球技术网络中技术流动的主要方式；技术学习与创新是全球技术网络中技术区位演变的重要途径；跨国技术社区是全球技术网络的重要技术通道。
第二,全球技术网络影响企业空间行为和创新能力,进而影响地方企业网络的演化。在地方企业网络组建期,全球技术网络的空间影响起主导作用。领先公司的技术扩散/溢出能够增加企业的知识积累和新知识创造。获取技术溢出效应是企业策略性选址或区位选择的重要影响因素,由此导致了大量中小企业在某地的空间集聚。在网络成长期,全球技术网络的技术扩散/溢出依然吸引企业的空间集聚,特别是跨国公司研发机构以及大学、科研院所的入驻。在创新方面,全球技术网络中的技术领先企业为了加速实现网络的本地化根植,将会提供多种形式的技术输出,目的在于使更多的企业有能力成为技术领先企业的配套商,实现网络内部的专业化分工。在网络发展期,全球技术网络的创新影响起主导作用,全球技术网络中先进技术首先转移到地方企业网络中的技术守门员,其进行消化吸收后,转化为地方企业网络内共同的隐性技术知识,实现了网络整体技术水平的提升。从技术进步及流动的视角看,地方企业网络经历了“全球技术网络技术推入—技术守门员消化吸收—技术溢出扩散一地方企业网络整体技术水平提升—吸收能力增强—技术守门员引进更先进技术”的技术能力不断提升的循环。
第三,全球技术网络在张江IC企业网络演化中发挥重要作用。张江IC地方企业网络的技术发展历程为：技术引进—技术合作—技术创新。在网络组建期,全球技术网络的技术扩散/溢出促进了地方企业网络的形成。“中芯国际”通过外资的技术溢出和扩散,获得了先进技术,逐渐发展壮大,进而带动了张江高科技园区上下游企业的空间集聚。在网络的成长期,全球技术领先企业(研发机构)通过与地方企业网络内各类公共服务平台在技术研发、技术转移和扩散、人员培训等方面的合作,有效地促进了企业网络的发展。IMEC与上海集成电路研发中心联合进行技术研发,并将研发成果成功转移到上海华虹NEC生产线。在地方企业网络的发展期,跨国技术社区加速了地方企业网络内的创新。“展讯通信”的成功表明,“硅谷群”核心研发团队、“硅谷—大陆”双向互动的运作模式、强化与硅谷的技术联系是其获得成功的关键。同时,全球技术网络中,技术领先国家(地区)的技术控制,在一定程度上也阻碍张江IC地方企业网络的功能升级。
The practice of regional development in developed countries has proved that a well-developed enterprise networks is a driving force for regional development. And thus a large number of scholars from various professional fields including economic geographers fix their attention on this study. Since 1990s, with globalization and development of knowledge-based economy, the importance of traditional network resources such as labor, capital and land has being weakened gradually. However, technology will become the important element on influencing the evolvement and development of the enterprises. In this context, this paper takes a perspective of global technology network, aiming to study its impact to the evolution and upgrading in the enterprise networks. Furthermore, it can service for the theory innovation of economic geography and guide the healthy development of regional economy.
Through the analysis over literatures of home and abroad, this paper found that in the related research on enterprise networks, scholars have generally concerned about that technology has become an important factor in the development of enterprise networks. The technological level of a firm determined its status in the regional enterprise networks, as well as the global and regional competitiveness. However, the study focused on how enterprise networks impact the technological innovation performance and the technology diffusion. On the other hand, there has been very little research analysis on how technical impact the evolution of enterprise networks. In recent years, many scholars studied the development and evolution of enterprise networks from the perspective of network power and technological power. In the context of globalization, more and more multinational companies take their technical activities into an international technology network. So it is worth studying the evolution of enterprise networks from the perspective of global technology network. But researches in this area have been neglected. In addition, there are many static researches but little dynamic research on the enterprise networks. Technology is the very important factor which impacts the evolution of enterprise networks, how the spatial mobility of technology impact the evolution of enterprise networks is worth exploring.
This paper reviewed and summarized the existing researches on enterprise networks. Based on the forefront of economic geography such as technology diffusion, technology learning, this paper put forward the concept of global technology network, discussed the background and basic foundation, formation mechanism, influencing factors, action model on enterprise networks. Based on a large number of field surveys in the Shanghai Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks, the author analyzed how global technology network impact on its development process, evolutionary path, mechanism. This paper got some new findings as well:
Firstly, the global technology network is the important evolutionary force to the evolutionary of the regional enterprise networks. Global technology network is a set of mutual trust, formal or informal, dynamic relationships between enterprises and other members (including suppliers, users, peer competitors, universities, research institutions, intermediaries, government, etc.) as well as external firms and related institutions. The relationships are formatted in the process of technology diffusion and technology learning. Network activities are activities of formal or informal mutual learning, technology and experience exchanging between firms or between firms and other actors existed in the network. Network resources are related technical knowledge including implicit and explicit technical knowledge. From the perspective of spatial scale, global technology network including the global technology center and the corresponding firms which has high technology potential energy, and regional technical centers and the corresponding firms which have middle technology potential energy as well as the lowland technical centers and the corresponding firms which have low-lying technology potential energy.
Trade liberalization is an import driving force. Information technology provides a solid foundation, and multinational companies are the core carrier to the formation of the global technology networks. From the perspective of economic geography, the technology diffusion and technology learning in the enterprise networks should not be limited in the region, but should catch the global technology spillovers and diffusion all around the world, and enhance the technical capabilities through the technological learning. In addition, not only geographical proximity but also relational proximity can be as a means of explicit technical knowledge spread and diffusion, especially the practice communities/technology communities based on the relational proximity, can achieve the explicit technical knowledge spread and diffusion of long-range, cross-regional/national boundaries. Based on the above two points, the global technology network was formed. Global technology network has two main activities, technology diffusion and spillover is the main way of technology flow, technology learning and innovation is an important means of the evolution of technology location in the global technology network.
Secondly, the global technology network affects the spatial behavior and innovation, thereby affecting the evolution of the regional enterprise networks. In the formation period of the regional enterprise networks, spatial impact played a leading role. Technology diffusion/spillover can increase the firm's knowledge accumulation and creation of new knowledge, it is an important chance to improve their innovation capability, as well as improve the competitive advantage. Technology diffusion/ spillover have become the important factor which influences the location choice of a firm. In order to catch the technology diffusion/spillover, firms tend to gather in one place. In the growing period of the regional enterprise networks, technology diffusion /spillover which lead to firms'spatial concentration are still attractive, especially lots of company's R & D institutions, universities, research institutes'entering into. In the aspect of innovation, in order to accelerate the localization of the enterprise networks, the leader firm in the global technology network will provide various forms of technology diffusion/spillover; aiming to enable more firms have the ability to become a supporter to the leader firm, to achieve specialization within the network. In the developing period of the regional enterprise networks, innovative impact played a leading role.In the first place, advanced technology from the global technology network will be transferred to the technological goalkeeper in regional enterprise networks, after the digestion and absorption, these technologies has become the common recessive technical knowledge in regional enterprise networks, rising the technological level of the network. Formed a cycle in which the technical capacity improvement continuously, pushing advanced technology by global technology network-digestion and absorption of technology goalkeeper-technology spillovers and diffusion-rising the technological level of the network-enhancing absorptive capacity-pushing more advanced technology.
Thirdly, Global technology network played an important role in evolution of Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks. The process of technology development in Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks is the introduction of technology-technology cooperation-technology innovation, In the construction period of the regional enterprise networks, technology diffusion/spillover of the global technology network promoted the formation of the regional enterprise networks. SMIC got the advanced technology from the technology diffusion/spillover of leader firms in the global technology network. Thus it led to the agglomeration of upstream and downstream firms in Zhangjiang Park. In the growing period, global technology leader firms(R & D institutions) connected the various public service platforms in the regional enterprise networks through joint technology research and development, technology transfer and diffusion, personnel training, etc., promoted the development of enterprise networks effectively, In the developing period of the regional enterprise networks, the transnational technical community accelerated the innovation within the regional enterprise networks. The case of Spreadtrum shows that R & D team which from Silicon Valley, interactive mode between Silicon Valley and mainland, and strengthen technology links with Silicon Valley have been the key to its success. Meanwhile, technical controls from the technology leader firms or countries, to some extent, hinder the functional upgrading in Zhangjiang IC enterprise networks.
引文
[1]Abreu M, Florax R. Spatial Patterns of Technology Diffusion[R].Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper,2004.
[2]Acs Z, Varga A. Geography, endogenous growth and innovation[J].International Regional Science Review,2002,26(2),153-66.
[3]Ahokangas P, Hyry M, Rasanen P. Small Technology-based Firms in Fast-growing Regional Cluster[J].New England Journal of Entrepreneurship,1999(2):19-26.
[4]Albino V, Garavelli A, Schiuma G. Knowledge Transfer and Inter-Firm Relationship in Industrial Districts: The Role of the leader Firm [J]. Technovation,1999(1):53-63.
[5]Almeida P, Kogut B. Technology and Geography: The Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Patent Holders[R].Working paper,1996.
[6]Amin A, Thrift N. Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1994.
[7]Amin A, Thrift N. Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1996.
[8]Amsden A H. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,1989.
[9]Antonelli C. The Evolution of the Industrial Organization of the Production of knowledge [J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,1999,23(2):243-260.
[10]Ariken B, Harrison A. Are There Spillovers From Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from Panel Data for Venezuela [M]. Mimeo, MIT and the World Bank,1991.
[11]Arora A. Complementarity and external linkages:the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology [J].Journal of Industrial Economics,1990,38(4):361-379.
[12]Arora A, Gambardella A. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1994,24(1):91-114.
[13]Asheim B, Isaksen A. Regional Innovation Systems:The Integration of Local'Sticky' and Global' Ubiquitous' Knowledge [J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):77-86.
[14]Audretsch B, Feldman P.R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production [J].American Economic Review,1996,86(3):630-640.
[15]Autio E. Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation [J].European Planning Studies, 1998,6(2):131-140.
[16]Bair J. Global capitalism and commodity chains: looking back, going forward [J].Competition and Change,2005,9(2):153-180.
[17]Baptista R. Geographical Clusters and Innovation Diffusion [J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2001,66(1):31-46.
[18]Barnety Jay B. Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage [J].Journal Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
[19]Barro R. Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth [J].Journal of Economic Growth, 1997,2(1):1-26.
[20]Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation [J].Progress in Human Geography,2004,28(1):31-56.
[21]Batonda G, Perry G. Approaches to Relationship Development Processes in Inter-firm Networks [J]. European Journal of Marketing,2003,37(10):1457-1484.
[22]Baum J, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don't go it alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups' Performance in Canadian Biotechnology [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000, 21(3):267-294.
[23]Bell M, Pavitt K. National Capacities for Technological Accumulation: Evidence and Implications for Developing Countries[C].World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics,1992.
[24]Benhabib, Spiegel.The Roles of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data [J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1994,34(2):143-173.
[25]Berg S, Friedman P. Impacts of Domestic Joint Ventures on Industrial Rates of Return: A Pooled Cross Section Analysis [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1981,63(1): 293-298.
[26]Bernard T.Sources of Regional Income Inequality: An Examination of Small Regions in Queensland [J].Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies,2005,17(1):35-50.
[27]Bhide A. How Entrepreneurs Craft Strategies that Work [J].Harvard Business Review,1994, 73(2):150-161.
[28]Blomstrom M, Kokko A. Multinational Corporations and spillovers [J].Journal of Economic Surveys,1998,12(3):247-277.
[29]Blomstrom M, Sjoholm F. Technology Transfer and spillovers:Does Local participation with Multinationals Matter? [J].European Economic Review.1999,43(4-6):915-943.
[30]Borenztein et al. How does foreign investment affect economic growth? [J] Journal of international Economics,1998,45(1):115-135.
[31]Boschma R A, Anne L J. Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the South of Italy [J].Industry & Innovation,2007, 14(2):177-199.
[32]Bradburd R M, Caves R E. A Closer Look at the Effect of Market Growth on Industries' Profits [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics,1982,64(4):635-645.
[33]Brennenraedts R, Bekkers R, Verspagen B. The different channels of university-industry knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence from Biomedical Engineering [R]. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies. The Netherlands, Working Paper,2006.
[34]Brito C.Towards an Institutional Theory of the Dynamics of Industrial Networks [J].Journal of business & Industrial Marketing,2001,16(3):150-166.
[35]Brooke M, Remmers H. The Strategy of Multinational Enterprise: Organization and Finance [M] New York: American Elsevier,1970.
[36]Brown J S, Duguid P. Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation [J].Organization Science,1991, 2(1):40-57.
[37]Butler J, Hansen G. Network evolution, entrepreneurial success, and regional development [J].Entrepreneurship &Regional Development,1991,3(1):1-16.
[38]Capello R. Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux:Learning versus Collective Learning Processes [J].Journal of the Regional Studies Association,1999, 33(4):353-365.
[39]Carlsson B, Jacobsson S& Holmen M, Rickne A. Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues [J].Research Policy,2002,31(2):233-245.
[40]Carrincazeaux C, Lung Y, Rallet A. Proximity and localization of corporate R&D activities[J].Research Policy,2001,30(5):777-789.
[41]Caves. Multinational Firms, Competition and Productivity in Host-Country Markets [J]. Economica,1974,41(162):176-193.
[42]Chang Y C, Chen M H. Comparing approaches to systems of innovation: the knowledge perspective[J].Technology in Society,2004,26(1):17-37
[43]Chen E. Multinational Corporations, Employment and Technology [M].London: Macmillan, 1983.
[44]Coe, Helpman, Hoffmaister. International R&D Spillovers and Institutions [J].European Economic Review,2009(2):1-19.
[45]Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152.
[46]Cooke P, Schienstock G. Structural competitiveness and learning regions[J].Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies,2000,1(3):265-280.
[47]Cooke P, Uranga M, Etxebarria G. Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective [J]. Environment and Planning A,1998,30(9):1563-1584.
[48]Cooke P. Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy [J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2001,10(4):945-974.
[49]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence form Biotechnology Clusters [J].Journal of Technology Transfer.2002,27(1):133-145.
[50]Cooper C. Are Innovation Studies on Industrialized Economies Relevant to Technology Policy in Developing Countries[R].UUN/INTECH, Working Paper,1991.
[51]Coro G, Grandinetti R. Evolutionary patterns of Italian industrial districts [J].Human Systems Management.1999,18(2):117-129.
[52]Das T, Teng B. Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective [J].Organization Science,2000, 11(1):77-101.
[53]Deardorff A. Fragmentation Across Cones [A].in: Arndt& Kierzkowski (eds.).Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2001.
[54]Dicken P, Kelly P, Olds K. Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analyzing the global economy [J].Global Networks,2001,1(2): 89-112.
[55]Dicken P. Global Shift: Transformation the World Economy [M].3rded. London: Paul Chapman,1998.
[56]Dicken, Peter, Kelly et al. Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Towards an Analytical Framework for the Global Economy [J].Global Networks,2001,1(2):89-112.
[57]Doloreux D, Edquist C, Hommen L. The institutional and functional underpinnings of the regional innovation system of East-Gothia in Sweden[R].Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference,2003.
[58]Doloreux D. Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues [J].Technology in Society,2005,27(2):133-153.
[59]Doloreux D. What we should know about regional systems of innovation [J].Technology in Society,2002,24(3):243-263.
[60]Duranton G, Puga D. Micro-foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies[R].CEPR Discussion Papers,2003.
[61]Dyer J, Nobeoka K. Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network: The Toyota case [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):345-367.
[62]Dyer J. Effective Inter-firm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value [J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):535-556.
[63]Eisenhardt K, Schoonhoven C. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms [J]. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136-150.
[64]Ernst D, Kim L. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation [J]. Research Policy,2002,31(8-9):1417-1429.
[65]Evenson R E, Ranis G. Science and Technology: Lessons for Development Policy [M].C0: West view Press,1990.
[66]Fallick B, Fleischman A, Rebitzer B. Job hopping in Silicon Valley: Some evidence concerning the micro-foundations of a high technology cluster [J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,2006,88(3):472-481.
[67]Feldman P, Francis J, Bercovitz J. Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters [J].Regional Studies,2005,39(1):129-141.
[68]Felsenstein D. The spatial agglomeration of technological activity: proximity or proclivity? [R].Paper presented at the 29th International Geographical Congress,2000.
[69]Findlay R. Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1978,92(1):1-16.
[70]Ford D. Trust and knowledge management: The key to success[R]. Centre for Knowledge-based Enterprises Working Paper,2001.
[71]Fornahl D, Menzel M. Co-Development of Firm Founding and Regional Clusters[R].Paper presented at the Conference on Clusters, Industrial Districts and Firms: the Challenge of Globalization,2003.
[72]Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance:Lesson from Japan [M].London: Frances Pinter,1987.
[73]Fritsch M. Measuring the Quality of Regional Innovation Systems: A Knowledge Production Function Approach [J].International Regional Science Review,2002,25(1):86-101.
[74]Funke M, Niebuhr A. Regional geographic R&D spillovers and economic growth: Evidence from West Germany [J].Regional Studies,2005,39(1):143-154.
[75]Funke M, Niebuhr A. Threshold effects and regional economic growth: evidence from West Germany [J].Economic Modelling,2005,22(l):61-80.
[76]Gereffi G (eds.).Introduction: globalization value chains and development [J].IDS Bulletin 2001,32(3):1-8.
[77]Gereffi G, Korzeniewicz M. Commodity chains and global capitalism [M]. London: Praeger, 1994.
[78]Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The Governance of global value chains [J]. Forthcoming in Review of International Political Economy,2003,11(4):5-11.
[79]Gereffi G.A Commodity Chains Framework for Analyzing Global Industries [Z].Working Paper for IDS,1999.
[80]Gereffi G. International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chains [J].Journal of International Economics,1999,48(1):37-70.
[81]Gerybadze, Alexander, Reger. Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations [J].Research Policy,1999,28 (2-3):251-274.
[82]Glaister K, Buckley P. Strategic motives for international alliance formation [J].Journal of Management Studies,1996,33(3):301-332.
[83]Gluckler J. Economic geography and the evolution of networks [J].Journal of Economic Geography.2007,7(5):619-634.
[84]Grandori A, Soda G. Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms [J].Organization Studies,1995,16(2):183-214.
[85]Grandori A. An Organizational Assessment of Inter-firm Coordination Modes [J].Organization Studies,1997,18(6):897-925.
[86]Grandori A. Corporate Governance and Firm organization [M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2004.
[87]Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where Do Inter-organizational Networks come from [J].American Journal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439-1493.
[88]Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation [J].Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(5):397-420.
[89]Gupta A, Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(4):473-496.
[90]Hagedoorn J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Inter organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences [J].Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(5):371-385.
[91]Hakansson H. Industrial Technological Development:A Network Approach [M]. London: Croom Helm,1987.
[92]Halinen A, Salmi A, Havila V. From Dyadic Change to Changing Business Networks:An Analytical Framework [J]. Journal of Management Studies,1999,36(6):779-794.
[93]Hanushek E, Kimko D. Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations [J].American Economic Association,2000,90(5):1184-1208.
[94]Harrigan K, Newman W. Bases of Inter-organization Cooperation: Propensity, Power, Persistence [J]. Journal of Management Studies,1990,27(4):417-434.
[95]Hbrte S. Knowledge spillover aspects of co-operation and competition[C].To be discussed at the international Workshop on Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Management in Economic Networks and Industrial Clusters,2002.
[96]Henderson J. Danger and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific [A].In: Thompson G (eds).Economic dynamism in the Asia Pacific[C]. London: Routledge,1998.
[97]Hess M, Yeung H. Whither global production networks in economic geography? Past, present and future [J]. Environment and Planning A,2006,38(7):1193-1204.
[98]Hobday M. Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan [M].Aldershot:Edward Elgar, 1995.
[99]Hummels D, Specialization Ishii J and Yi. The Nature and Growth of Vertical in World Trade [J]Journal of International Economics,2001,54(1):75-96.
[100]Humphrey J, Schmitz H. Governance and Upgrading: Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain[R].IDS Working Paper,2000.
[101]Humphrey J, Schmitz H. Governance in global value chains [J]. IDS Bulletin,2001, 32(3):19-29.
[102]Humphrey J, Schmitz H. How does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters [J].Regional Studies,2002,36(9):1017-1027.
[103]Inkpen A, Tsang E. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(1):146-165.
[104]Isaksen A. Building regional innovation systems:a possibility of endogenous industrial development in the global economy [J]. Canadian Journal of Regional Science,2001(1): 101-120.
[105]Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research [J]. American Economic Review,1989,79(5): 984-1001.
[106]Jarillo J. On Strategic Networks [J].Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(1):31-34.
[107]John C, Santangelo, Grazia D. The frontier of international technology networks:sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capabilities [J]. Information Economics and Policy,1999, 11(1):101-123.
[108]Kaplinsky R, Morris M. Governance Matters in Value Chains [J]. Developing Alternatives, 2003,9(1):11-18.
[109]Kaplinsky R, Morris M.A Handbook for Value Chain Research [R]. Prepared for the IDRC, 2002.
[110]Kaplinsky R, Morris M. Governance Matters in Value Chains [J].Developing Alternatives, 2003,9(1):11-18.
[111]Kaplinsky R. Spreading the Gains from Globalization: What Can Be Learned from Value Chain Analysis? [J]. Journal of Development Studies,2000,37(2):117-146.
[112]Katz J M. Technology creation in Latin American manufacturing industries [M]. New York: Si. Martin Press,1987.
[113]Katz. Production Functions, Foreign Investment and Growth [M].Amsterdam: North Holland, 1969.
[114]Keller W. Absorptive Capacity: On the Creation and Acquisition of Technology in Development [J] Journal of Development Economics,1996,49(1):199-227.
[115]Kelly M, Hageman A. Marshallian Externalities in Innovation [J].Journal of Economic Growth,1999,4(1):39-54.
[116]Kim L. Imitation to Innovation: the Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning [M], Boston: Harvard Business School Press,1997.
[117]Kim L. Korea's Entry into the Computer Industry and Its Acquisition of Technological Capability [J]. Technovation,1987(6):277-293.
[118]Kinoshita Y.R&D and Technology Spillovers through FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity[R].IMF Working Paper,2000.
[119]Kodama F. Emerging Patterns of Innovation [M].Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press,1991.
[120]Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1993,34(6):625-645.
[121]Kogut B. Joint Ventures:Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(4):319-332.
[122]Kokko A, Blomstrom M. Policies to encourage inflows of Technology through foreign multinationals [J].Journal of World Development,1995,23:459-468.
[123]Kokko A. Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers [J].Journal of Development Economics,1994,43(2):279-293.
[124]Kokko A. Foreign direct investment, host country characteristics, and spillovers [M].The Economics Research Institute, Stockholm,1992.
[125]Kuo, Chun-Chien, Chih-Hai Yang. Knowledge Capital and Spillover on Regional Economic Growth:Evidence from China [J].China Economic Review,2008,19(4):594-604.
[126]Lall S. Developing Countries as Exporters of Technology [M].London: Macmillan Press, 1982.
[127]Lall S. Vertical Inter-Firm Linkages in LDCs: An Empirical Study [J].Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,1980,43(3):203-206.
[128]Larsson, Richard. The Handshake between Invisible and Visible Hands [J].International Studies of Management and Organization,1993,23(1):87-106.
[129]Lechner C, Dowling M. The Evolution of Industrial Districts and Regional Networks [J].Journal of Management and Governance,1999,3(4):309-338.
[130]Los B. The empirical performance of a new inter-industry technology spillover measure [A].In Lundvall B. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theorem of Innovation and Interactive Learning [M]. London: Pinter Publications,1992.
[131]MacKinnon D, Phelps N. Devolution and the Territorial Politics of Foreign Direct Investment [J].Political Geography,2001,20(3):353-379.
[132]Magnus B, Sjoholm F. Technology transfer and spillovers: does local participation with multinationals matter? [J].European Economic Review,1999,43(4-6):915-923.
[133]Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production [J].Research Policy,2002, 31(5):247-264.
[134]Mansfield E, Romeo A. Technology Transfer to Overseas Subsidiaries by US Based Firms [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1980,95(4):737-750.
[135]Mansfield E. Estimating social and private returns from innovations based on the advanced technology program: Problems and opportunities [M].Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology,1996.
[136]Mansfield E. International technology transfer: Firms resource requirements and policies [J]. American Economic Review,1975,65(2):372-376.
[137]March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J].Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87.
[138]Martino J. Technological forecasting for decision making [M].New York: North Holland Publishers,1983.
[139]Maskell P, Malmberg A. Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution[J].Journal of Economic Geography.2007,7(5):603-618.
[140]McCallum J. National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns [J].The American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623.
[141]McDonald F, Vertova G. Geographical concentration and competitiveness in the European Union [J].European Business Review,2001,13(3):157-165.
[142]Miotti L, Sachwald F. Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? [J].Research Policy,2003,32(8):1481-1499.
[143]Mothe J, Paquet G. Local and Regional Systems of Innovation [M].Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers,1998.
[144]Mowery D, Oxley J, Silverman B. Technological overlap and inter firm cooperation: Implications for the resource based view of the firm [J].Research Policy,1998, 27(5):507-523.
[145]Nelson R. National Innovation Systems:A Comparative Analysis [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,1993.
[146]Ng F, Yeats A. Production Sharing in East Asia: Who Does What for Whom and Why? [R]. World Bank, Policy, Research Working Paper,1999.
[147]Nohria N.Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? [A].in Nohria N, Eccles R (eds).Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action[C].Boston: Harvard Business School Press,1992.
[148]Nooteboom B. Learning and governance in inter-firm relations [J].Revue d'economie politique,2004,114(1):55-76.
[149]OECD. National Innovation Systems[R].Paris:OECD,1997.
[150]Ohmae K. The rise of the region state [J].Foreign Affairs,1993,72(2):78-87.
[151]Ozman M. Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature [J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2009,18(1):39-67.
[152]Pach H, Westphal L E. Industrial Strategy and Technological Change [J]Journal of Development Economies,1986,22(1):87-128.
[153]Paul Krugman.Trade and Geography [M].The MIT Press,1991.
[154]Pearce R D. The Internationalization of Research and Development by multinational enterprises [M]. New York: St. Martin Press,1989.
[155]Peri, G. Knowledge Flows, R&D Spillovers and Innovation[R]. ZEW Discussion Papers, 2003.
[156]Pfeffer J, Salancik G. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective [M].New York: Harper and Row,1978.
[157]Piore J, Sable F. Mass production as destiny and blind decision[R].Working paper,1984.
[158]Posner M. International Trade and Technical Change [J].Oxford Economic Papers,1961, 13(3):323-341.
[159]Powell W, Koput K, Doerr S. Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1996, 41(1):116-145.
[160]Powell, Walter. Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization [A].in Michael Jeremy Handel. The sociology of organizations:classic, contemporary, and critical readings[C].London: Sage Publications,1990.
[161]Prahalad C K, Gary Hame 1. The Core Competence of the Corporation [J].Harvard Business Review,1990,68(5-6):79-91.
[162]Raghu G, Praveen R. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by inter-temporal technology transfer [J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(5): 365-385.
[163]Rakesh Basant. Knowledge flows and Industrial Clusters [A].Working Paper,2002.
[164]Reddy P. New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: a survey from India [J].World Development,1997, 25(11):1821-1837.
[165]Richard R (eds.).Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economics Growth [J].American Economics Review,1966,56(1-2):69-75.
[166]Richardson G. The Organization of Industry[J].The Economic Journal,1972,82(3):883-896
[167]Riedel.The nature and determinants of export-oriented direct foreign investment in a developing country: A case study of Taiwan [J]. Review of World Economics,1975, 111(3):505-528.
[168]Rosenberg. Technological Innovation and Long Waves [J].Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1984,8(1):7-24.
[169]Saad I. Foreign direct investment, structural change, and deregulation in Indonesia [A].in The New Wave of Foreign Direct Investment in Asia[C].Nomura Research Institute and ISEAS,1995.
[170]Saggi K. Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer[C].Word Bank, Washington,2000.
[171]Saviotti P, Nooteboom B. Technology and knowledge [M].Edward Elgar Publishing,2000.
[172]Saxenian A. Response to Richard Florida and Martin Kenney [J].California Management Review,1991,33(6):136-142.
[173]Scott A. Regions and the World Economy [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1998.
[174]Scott A. Variations on the Theme of Agglomeration and Growth: The Gem and Jewelry Industry in Los Angeles and Bangkok [J].Geoforum,1994(25):249-263.
[175]Scott A. Regional push: towards a geography of development and growth in low-and middle income countries [J].Third World Quarterly,2002,23(6):37-61.
[176]Shan L, Dorothy E. Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing [J].Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2003,12(1):71-88.
[177]Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B. Inter-firm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry[J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(5):387-394.
[178]Simeon D, Bernard H. Foreign Investment and productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises [J].World Bank Economic Review,2000,14(1):49-64.
[179]Sjoholm F. Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foreign investment: evidence from establishment data [J].Journal of development studies,1999,36(1):53-73.
[180]Sounder W. Managing New Product Innovation [M]. Mass: Lexington,1986.
[181]Stam E. Why Butterflies Don't Leave:Locational Behavior of Entrepreneurial Firms [J]. Economic Geography.2007,83(1):27-50.
[182]Stefan Kuhimann. European/German efforts and policy evaluation in regional innovation[R]. International Workshop on the Comprehensive Review of the S&T Basic Plans in Japan, 2004.
[183]Steier L, Greenwood R. Newly created firms and informal angel investors:a four-stage model of network development [J]. Venture Capital,1999 (2):147-167.
[184]Stenberg R, Tamsy C. Munich as Germany's No.1 High Technology Region: Empirical Evidence, Theoretical Explanations and Role of Small Firm/Large Firm Relationships [J].Regional Studies,1999,33(4):367-377.
[185]Stoper M. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy [M].New York: The Guilford Press,1997.
[186]Storper M, ScottA.The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes [A].in: Wolch J, Dear M. The Power of Geography [M].London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
[187]Storper M. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy[M].New York: Guilford press,1997
[188]Stuckey J A. Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry [M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1983.
[189]Sturgeon T, Lee J. Industry Co-evolution and the Rise of a Shared Supply-base for Electronics Manufacturing[R].Paper Presented at Nelson and Winter Conference,2001.
[190]Swyngedouw E. Neither global nor local:"Globalization" and the politics of scale [A]. In K Cox (eds) Spaces of Globalization [C]. New York: Guilford,1997.
[191]Taylor M, Conti S. Interdependent and Uneven Development Global-local Perspectives [M].Ashgate publishing,1997.
[192]Thompson G, Frances J, Levacie R. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks:the Coordination of Social Life [M].London: Sage,1991.
[193]Thorelli H. Network: between Markets and Hierarchies [J].Strategic Management Journal, 1986,7(1):37-51.
[194]Tichy. Less dispensable and more risky than ever [M].London: Pion Limited,1998.
[195]Tidd J. Complexity, networks and learning: Integrative themes for research on the management of innovation [J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,1997, 1(1):1-21.
[196]Todtung F, Kaufmann A. Innovation systems in regions of European—a comparative perspective [J].European Planning Studies,2000,7(6):699-717.
[197]Tsui-Auch L. Regional production relationship and developmental impacts:a comparative study of three regional networks [J].International Journal of Urban and Regional search,1999, 23(2):345-359.
[198]Varga A. Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity [J].Journal of Regional Science,2000,40(2):289-309.
[199]Vernon R. International Investment and International Trade in Product Cycle [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,80(5):197-207.
[200]Walcott. Chinese Industrial and Science Parks: Bridging the Gap [J]. Professional Geographer,2002(3):349-364.
[201]Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social Capital, Structural Holes, and the Formation of an Industry Network [J]. Organization science,1997,8(2):109-125.
[202]Wenger E, Snyder W. Communities of Practice [J].Harvard Business Review,2000, 78(1):139-145.
[203]Wenger E. Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity [M].New York: Cambridge University Press,1998.
[204]Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm [J].Strategic Management Journal,1984, 5(2):171-180.
[205]Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism [M]. New York: Free Press,1985.
[206]Williamson. Transaction Cost Economics:The Governance of Contractual Relations [J].Journal of law and Economics,1979,22(4):3-61.
[207]Wong P. Technology transfer in Thailand: descriptive validation of a technology transfer model [J].International Journal of Technology Management,1995,10(7):788-796.
[208]Xu B. Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth [J].Journal of Development Economics,2000,62(2):477-493.
[209]Yeats A. Just How Big is Global Production Sharing? [A].in: Arndt & Kierzkowski (eds.). Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2001.
[210]Yeung H. Critical reviews of geographical perspectives on business organizations and the organization of production:Towards a network approach [J].Progress in Human Geography, 1994,18(4):460-490.
[211]Yeung H. Organizing the firm in industrial geography Ⅰ:networks, institutions and regional development [J].Progress in Human Geography,2000,24(2):301-315.
[212]Yeung H. The Dynamics of the Globalization of Chinese Business Firms [A].in Yeung H and Kris Olds (eds.).Globalization of Chinese Business Firms[C].London:Macmillan,2000.
[213]Yiu D, Lin J. Sharing tacit knowledge in Asia [J].Knowledge Management Review,2002, 5(3):5-11.
[214]Zander I. Where to the multinational:the evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational networks [J].International Business Review,1999,8(3):261-291.
[215]艾少伟.中国开发区技术学习通道研究[D].河南大学博士学位论文,2007.
[216]彼得·迪肯[著],刘卫东等[译].全球性转变：重塑21世纪的全球经济地图[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007.
[217]蔡宁,吴结兵.企业集群的竞争优势：资源的结构性整合[J].中国工业经济,2002(7)：45-50.
[218]曹兴,郭然.知识转移影响因素研究及其展望[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2008,14(2)：230-236.
[219]陈丹宇.区域创新系统研究的回顾与评述[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(8)：205-209.
[220]陈飞翔,胡靖等.利用外资与技术转移[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2006.
[221]陈剑锋,唐振鹏.国外产业集群研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2002(8)：22-27.
[222]陈丽珍,王术文.技术扩散及其相关概念辨析[J].现代管理科学,2005(2)：56-57.
[223]陈守明.现代企业网络[M].上海：上海人民出版社.2002.
[224]程宏.利用外资促进我国产业结构升级的新思路[J].南方经济,2001(4)：28-30.
[225]程新章.创新、产业集群与区域创新系统[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2005,12(6)：39-44.
[226]戴佳雯.高科技产业网络特色之探讨[D].台湾中山大学企业管理研究所硕士论文,1999.
[227]丁焕峰.技术扩散与产业结构优化的理论关系分析[J].工业技术经济,2006,25(5)：95-98.
[228]董景荣.技术创新扩散的理论、方法与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2009.
[229]杜长征,杨磊.技术创新、技术进步与技术扩散概念研究[J].经济师,2002(3)：43-44.
[230]段存广.产业集群演化与生命周期研究述评[J].当代经济管理,2010,32(8)：53-55.
[231]樊增强.跨国公司技术扩散的障碍及对策[J].经济纵横,2005(1)：35-37.
[232]范黎波,宋志红,刘世敏.国际合资企业的战略演进与技术学习[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,23(S2)：75-84.
[233]丰智勇.基于科技中介服务机构的产业密集区技术扩散研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2006.
[234]符淼.地理距离和技术外溢效应[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(4)：1549-1566.
[235]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[236]傅荣,裘丽.企业间网络演化中的知识、信任与资源：一个层次分析框架[J].科技管理研究,2007(8)：256-258.
[237]傅正华,林耕,李明亮.我国技术转移的理论与实践[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2007.
[238]盖文启.创新网络——区域经济发展新思维[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2002.
[239]盖骁敏.产业集聚形成过程中的FDI溢出效应分析[J].东岳论丛,2010,31(9)：95-98.
[240]盖翊中.空间集聚与产业网络的相关模型——以台商在东莞投资的电子制造业为例[J].当代财经,2007(5)：81-85.
[241]古继宝,吴赵龙.三类集群的转化关系分析及其对我国集群发展的启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(2)：69-74.
[242]郭长禄,王家庭.跨国公司在华技术扩散问题的若干思考[J].宁夏党校学报,1999(1)：34-39.
[243]郭韧,曾国祥.产业集群的知识溢出效应研究[J].中国市场,2007(40)：102-103.
[244]韩剑.知识溢出的空间有限性与企业R&D集聚[J].研究与发展管理,2009,21(3)：22-27.
[245]韩玉雄,李怀祖.知识产权保护对工资率水平及经济增长的影响：一个修正的技术扩散模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004,(11)：152-159.
[246]韩振海,李国平.国家创新系统理论的演变评述[J].科学管理研究,2004,22(2)：24-26.
[247]何予平,等.全球化中的技术垄断与技术扩散[M].北京：科学出版社,2009.
[248]洪茹燕.基于技术能力演进的企业技术学习模式选择机制研究[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(4)：20-24.
[249]胡明铭.区域创新系统理论与建设研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26(9)：45-49.
[250]胡志坚等.国家创新系统：理论分析与国际比较[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[251]黄鲁成.关于区域创新系统研究内容的探讨[J].科研管理,2000(2)：43-48.
[252]黄泰岩,牛飞亮.西方企业网络理论述评[J].经济学动态,1999(4)：63-67.
[253]黄智淋,俞培果.我国区域间技术扩散研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(4)：58-61.
[254]纪慰华.社会文化环境对企业网络构建的影响——以上海大众供货商网络为例[D].华东师范大学博士论文,2004.
[255]贾根良.劳动分工、制度变迁与经济发展[M].天津：南开大学出版社,1999.
[256]江小涓.理解科技全球化—资源重组、优势集成和自主创新能力的提升[J].管理世界,2004(6)：4-13.
[257]景秀艳,曾刚.从对称到非对称：内生型产业集群权力结构演化及其影响研究[J].经济问题探索,2006(10)：41-44.
[258]孔翔,曾刚.全球技术空间体系及我国的对策初探[J].人文地理,2003,18(5)：42-45.
[259]孔翔.技术吸收型对外贸易战略研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2006.
[260]孔翔.势差一廊道模型与中国技术流通网络的构建[J].科技管理研究,2003(1)：73-75.
[261]李碧宏.技术扩散机制的优化[J].经营与管理,2009(2)：74-75.
[262]李二玲.中国中部农区产业集群的企业网络研究[D].河南大学博士学位论文,2006.
[263]李建民.技术扩散、技术垄断与中国科技战略转变[J].中国科技论坛,2006(2)：18-22.
[264]李建伟.论贸易自由化与发展中国家的技术进步[J].社会科学家,2010(9)：103-105.
[265]李健.从全球生产网络到大都市区生产空间组织[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2008.
[266]李凌.企业网络形成与演变的博弈论分析[D].上海社会科学院硕士学位论文,2006.
[267]李平,刘建.国际技术垄断与技术扩散关系的政治经济学分析[J].世界经济与政治,2006(5)：68-73.
[268]李平.国际技术扩散对发展中国家技术进步的影响：机制、效果及对策分析[M].北京：三联书店,2007.
[269]李平.技术扩散理论及实证研究[M].太原：山西经济出版社,1999.
[270]李树培,白战伟.知识资本化、跨国公司技术垄断与我国技术发展的应对策略[J].未来与发展,2009(1)：40-43.
[271]李文东.全球化中的技术垄断[J].世界经济与政治,2004(9)：42-49.
[272]李小建.经济地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[273]李新春.企业联盟与网络[M].广州：广东人民出版社,2000.
[274]李新春.专业镇与企业创新网络[J].广东社会科学,2000,(6)：29-33.
[275]李玉华.基于网络理论的高新技术产业集群演化机理研究[D].北京工业大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[276]李媛.从学习到创新：技术学习过程研究[D].东南大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[277]李卓.产业集聚下的技术扩散研究：基于中国高技术产业的分析[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[278]林兰.技术扩散与高新技术企业技术区位研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2007.
[279]刘昌年,梅强.基于企业网络的中小企业组织间隐性知识转移研究[J].中国科技论坛,2008(4)：75-79.
[280]刘恒江,陈继祥,周莉娜.产业集群的动力机制研究的最新动态[J].外国经济与管理,2004(7)：2-7.
[281]刘洪涛.国家创新系统理论与中国技术创新模式的实证研究[D].西安交大博士学位论文,1997.
[282]刘佳勇.企业网络的效率边界研究评述[J].西安财经学院学报,2006,19(6)：84-87.
[283]刘仁军.交易成本、社会资本与企业网络[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,2004.
[284]刘友金.中小企业集群式创新研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学博士学位论文,2002.
[285]刘志彪,张晔.中国沿海地区外资加工贸易模式与本土产业升级[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005(8)：57-62.
[286]卢锋.产品内分工[J].经济学(季刊),2004(10)：56-82.
[287]陆园园,谭劲松,薛红志.“引进-模仿-改进-创新”模型与韩国企业技术学习的演进过程[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(5)：74-82.
[288]路甬祥等.创新与未来[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[289]吕国辉.长江三角洲区域创新系统研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2008.
[290]吕洪良.论国家创新体系中的知识管理[J].技术经济,2004(6)：2-4.
[291]吕文栋,朱华晟.浙江产业集群的动力机制——基于企业家的视角[J].巾国工业经济,2005(4)：86-93.
[292]罗仲伟.网络组织的特征及其经济和区域发展理论[J].外国经济与管理,2000,22(6)：25-28.
[293]马爱民,李志祥,宋清.技术生命周期对区域创新体系运行机制的影响分析[J].中国市场,2010(14)：25-26.
[294]苗长虹.全球-地方联结与产业集群的技术学习[J].地理学报,2006,61(4)：425-434.
[295]苗长虹,魏也华.技术学习与创新：经济地理学的视角[J].人文地理,2007(5)：1-9.
[296]苗长虹,魏也华.西方经济地理学理论建构的发展与论争[J].地理研究,2007,26(6)：1233-1246.
[297]苗长虹,樊杰,张文忠.西方经济地理学区域研究新视角[J].经济地理,2002,22(6)：644-650.
[298]马丽,等.经济全球化下地方生产网络模式演变分析[J].地理研究,2004(1)：87-96.
[299]马庆国,等.软技术概念的重新界定[J].科研管理,2005,26(6)：99-105.
[300]慕继丰,等.基于企业网络的经济和区域发展(上)[J].外国经济与管理,2001(3)：26-29.
[301]慕继丰,等.基于企业网络的经济和区域发展(下)[J].外国经济与管理,2001(4)：26-30.
[302]慕继丰,冯宗宪,陈方丽.企业网络的运行机理与企业的网络管理能力[J].外国经济与管理,2001(10)：21-25.
[303]宁军明.论知识溢出在产业集聚中的作用[J].科技与管理2008,10(4)：78-80.
[304]潘雄峰.高技术产业集群创新机理研究—基于创新网络与技术学习的视角[D].大连理工大学博士学位论文,2007.
[305]彭中文,何新城.外资R&D溢出与高技术产业集聚的实证分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2008(10)：84-88.
[306]齐建国等.技术创新—国家系统的改革与重组[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,1995.
[307]秦夏明,董沛武,李汉铃.产业集群形态演化阶段探讨[J].中国软科学,2004(12)：150-154.
[308]区毅勇.产业集群中的技术扩散研究—基于珠江三角洲的实证分析[D].华南理工大学博 士学位论文,2009.
[309]曲建君.全要素生产率研究综述[J].经济师,2007(1)：46-47.
[310]任胜刚,李燚.基于跨国公司视角的集群分类研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005(6)：5-7.
[311]任胜刚.论跨国公司与集群的互动关系[D].复旦大学博士学位论文,2004.
[312]任胜钢,关涛.区域创新系统内涵研究框架探讨[J].软科学,2006,20(4)：90-94.
[313]盛亚.技术创新扩散与新产品营销[M].北京：中国发展出版社,2002.
[314]石定寰主编.国家创新系统：现状与未来[M].北京：经济管理出版社,1999.
[315]石培基,罗哲.企业网络与西部欠发达地区县域经济发展[J].开发研究,2006(4)：10-14.
[316]时云辉.核心企业网络演变与区域发展研究[D].河南大学博士学位论文,2009.
[317]世界银行.发展中国家必须提升吸收和采纳技术的能力[J].国际融资,2008(3)：68-69.
[318]苏靖.关于国家创新系统的基本理论、知识流动和研究方法[J].中国软科学,1999(1)：59-61.
[319]孙伟,黄鲁成.产业群技术创新动力分析[J].软科学,2003,17(2)：82-84.
[320]孙文祥,彭纪生.跨国公司技术转移研究评述[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2004,31(4)：23-30.
[321]田家欣.企业网络、企业能力与集群企业升级[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007.
[322]汪升平.科技全球化背景下我国企业技术学习能力研究[D].南京财经大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[323]王春法,武夷山,薛澜.科技全球化及中国的对策[J].中国科技论坛,2001(3)：3-9.
[324]王春法.关于国家创新体系理论的思考[J].中国软科学,2003(5)：99-104.
[325]王广凤,朱越杰,孙凤芹.从技术学习到自主创新：文献综述[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(2)：5-8.
[326]王海峰、演化经济学视角下的产业集群演化机制研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2008(1)：98-100.
[327]王缉慈,等.超越集群—中国产业集群的理论探索[M].北京：科学出版社,2010.
[328]王缉慈,林涛.我国外向型制造业集群发展和研究的新视角[J].北京大学学报,2007,43(6)：839-846.
[329]王缉慈,张晔.沿海地区外向型产业集群的形成、困境摆脱与升级前景[J].改革,2008(5)：53-59.
[330]王江.产业技术扩散理论与实证研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2010.
[331]王维.跨国公司对外直接投资与发展中国家的技术进步—兼论中国引进外资的技术扩散效应[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2004(6)：35-39.
[332]王文岩,刘建.FDI国际技术扩散与发展中国家和地区的对策分析[J].中国科技论坛,2007(5)：141-144.
[333]王向阳.FDI技术溢出对高技术企业技术创新的影响研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2009.
[334]王晓璐.国际技术扩散对我国技术进步的影响[D].西北大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[335]王雪梅,雷家骗.面向超越的技术学习模式研究[J].中国科技论坛,2008(9)：107-110.
[336]王益民,宋琰纹.基于全球产业空间疆域变迁视角的产业集群演化与升级——以新加坡硬盘驱动器(HDD)产业集群为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(9)：84-88.
[337]王铮,马翠芳,王莹,等.区域间知识溢出的空间认识[J].地理学报,2003,58(5)：773-780.
[338]王梓薇,王大洲.跨国创新网络中的企业技术学习[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,8(2)：15-19.
[339]魏江.产业集群：系统创新与技术学习[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[340]魏江.小企业集群创新网络的知识溢出效应分析[J].科研管理,2003(4)：54-59.
[341]魏守华.产业群的动态研究以及实证分析[J].世界地理研究,2002(3)：16-24.
[342]文嫮,李小建.非正式因素影响下的中小企业网络学习与区域发展—河南省偃师市翟镇针织业的研究[J].人文地理.2003(3)：73-76.
[343]文嫮,李小建.企业网络发育程度与区域创新能力研究.世界地理研究.2003,12(2)：39-46.
[344]文嫮,曾刚.从地方到全球：全球价值链框架下集群的升级研究[J].人文地理,2005,84(4)：21-25.
[345]文嫣,曾刚.嵌入全球价值链的地方产业集群发展—地方建筑陶瓷产业集群研究[J].中国工业经济,2004(6)：36-42.
[346]文嫮.基于全球性互动的地方产业网络发展研究[J].当代经济管理,2006,28(4)：77-82.
[347]文嫮.嵌入全球价值链的中国地方产业网络升级机制的理论与实践研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2005.
[348]文嫮.全球化背景下人才跨国环流与地方产业发展研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008(6)：172-175.
[349]吴国林.中小企业网络：发展中西部区域经济的关节点[J].经济问题探索.2001(7)：23-26.
[350]吴宏.世界知识产权规则的发展演变对国际技术扩散的影响[J].经济研究参考,2004(64)：4-10.
[351]吴结兵.基于企业网络结构与动态能力的产业集群竞争优势研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006.
[352]肖武岭.跨国公司技术垄断战略对我国的启示[J].科技与经济,2005,18(6)：39-42.
[353]谢奉军.江西工业园区企业网络发展研究[D].南昌大学博士学位论文,2006.
[354]谢富纪,董正英.技术转移与技术交易[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2006.
[355]谢富胜.企业网络：激进学者的分析范式[J].经济理论与经济管理,2006(7)：25-30.
[356]谢伟,吴贵生.技术学习的功能和来源[J].科研管理,2000,21(1)：8-13.
[357]谢伟.技术学习过程的新模式[J].科研管理,1999,20(4)：1-7.
[358]谢伟.模仿和技术学习：文献综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(7)：85-89.
[359]许学强,王欣,阎小培；技术流的动力机制、渠道与模式——以珠江三角洲为例[J].地理学报,2002,57(4)：489-496.
[360]薛澜,沈群红.科技全球化及其对中国科技发展的政策涵义[J].世界经济,2001(10)：57-62.
[361]薛澜.科技全球化及中国的机遇、挑战与对策[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2000(9)：4-8.
[362]闫巧丽.当代科技全球化背景下我国科技人才管理对策研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[363]杨春平,刘则渊.技术创新——国家创新体系的核心[J].科技管理研究,2006(4)：12-14.
[364]杨蕙馨,刘春玉.知识溢出效应与企业集聚定位决策[J].中国工业经济,2005(12)：41-48.
[365]杨瑞龙,冯健.企业间网络及其效率的经济学分析[J].江苏社会科学,2004(3)：55-58.
[366]杨先明.国际直接投资、技术转移与我国的技术发展[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
[367]杨友仁,夏铸九.跨界生产网络的组织治理模式—以苏州地区信息电子业台商为例[J].地理研究,2005(2)：253-264.
[368]姚水洪,陈仕萍.国际技术扩散研究述评[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(4)：4143.
[369]叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集群[J].经济科学,2001(3)：23-30.
[370]尤琦英.技术进步对交通运输业贡献率的定量分析[D].长安大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[371]约瑟夫·熊彼特.经济发展理论——对于利润、资本、信贷、利息和经济周期的考察[M].北京：商务印书馆,1990.
[372]曾德明,王业静,覃荔荔.基于知识流动视角的国家创新系统与创新政策体系互动关系研究[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,23(2)：39-43.
[373]曾刚,林兰,樊鸿伟.论技术扩散的影响因子[J].世界地理研究,2006(1)：1-8.
[374]曾刚,林兰.技术扩散与高新技术企业技术区位研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[375]曾刚,林兰.不同空间尺度的技术扩散影响因子研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(2)：22-27.
[376]曾刚,林兰.技术扩散与高技术企业区位研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[377]曾刚,林兰.跨国公司技术溢出与溢出地技术区位研究[J].世界地理研究,2007(4)：98-105.
[378]曾刚,文嫮.全球价值链视角下的瓷砖地方产业集群发展研究[J].经济地理,2005(4)：467-470.
[379]曾刚,文嫮.上海浦东信息产业集群的建设[J].地理学报,2004(S1)：59-66.
[380]曾刚,袁莉莉.长江三角洲技术扩散规律及其对策初探[J].人文地理,1999(1)：1-5.
[381]曾刚.技术扩散与区域经济发展[J].地域研究与开发,2002(9)：38-41.
[382]曾刚.我国高新技术产业开发区的现状及发展[J].地域研究与开发,1997(1)：48-52.
[383]曾菊新.现代城乡网络化发展模式[M].北京：科学出版社,2001.
[384]张纪.产品内国际分工的技术扩散效应——基于中国1980-2005年时间序列数据的实证分析[J],世界经济研究,2008(1)：53-58.
[385]张晓平.国有大型企业网络变化及对区域经济发展的影响-以中国—拖为例[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(2)：176-185.
[386]张延茜.当代科技全球化的主要特征及动因研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2009.
[387]张晔.论买方垄断势力下跨国公司对当地配套企业的纵向压榨[J].中国工业经济,2006(12)：29-36.
[388]张毅,张子刚.企业网络与组织间学习的关系链模型[J].科研管理,2005,26(2)：136-142.
[389]张泳.国家创新体系背景下的产学研一体化：理论探讨与实证研究[D].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[390]张玉杰.技术转移理论、方法、战略[M].北京：企业管理出版社,2003.
[391]张云逸.基于技术权力的地方企业网络演化研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2009.
[392]赵建吉,曾刚.技术社区视角下新竹IC产业的发展及其对张江的启示[J].经济地理,2010,30(3)：438-442.
[393]赵建吉,曾刚.创新的空间测度：数据与指标[J].经济地理,2009(8)：1250-1255.
[394]赵建吉,曾刚.两区合并背景下大浦东产业发展及空间布局研究[J].经济地理,2010(8)：1266-1270.
[395]赵建吉,曾刚.专业化、多样化与产业增长——以中原城市群为例[J].经济问题探索,2009(8)：18-22.
[396]赵海东,吴晓军.产业集群的阶段性演进[J].理论界,2006(6)：50-52.
[397]赵江林.外资与人力资源开发：对中国经验的总结[J].经济研究,2004(2)：47-54.
[398]赵晓庆.技术学习的模式[J].科研管理,2003,24(3)：39-44.
[399]郑小平.国家创新体系研究综述[J].科学管理研究,2006,24(4)：1-5.
[400]周牧之.城市化：中国现代化的主旋律[M].长沙：湖南人民出版社,2001.
[401]周倩.当代科技全球化的特点与我国科技发展对策[J].昆明理工大学学报,2005(1)：7-10.
[402]朱彬.实践社区的隐性知识共享与创新研究[J].重庆科技学院学报,2010(6)：61-62.
[403]朱彬.知识管理的新趋势——实践社区的隐性知识共享与创新机理研究[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2010(3)：66-71.
[404]朱朝晖.发展中国家技术学习模式研究：文献综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(1)：78-82.
[405]朱朝晖.基于开放式创新的技术学习协同与机理研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007.
[2]Acs Z, Varga A. Geography, endogenous growth and innovation[J].International Regional Science Review,2002,26(2),153-66.
[3]Ahokangas P, Hyry M, Rasanen P. Small Technology-based Firms in Fast-growing Regional Cluster[J].New England Journal of Entrepreneurship,1999(2):19-26.
[4]Albino V, Garavelli A, Schiuma G. Knowledge Transfer and Inter-Firm Relationship in Industrial Districts: The Role of the leader Firm [J]. Technovation,1999(1):53-63.
[5]Almeida P, Kogut B. Technology and Geography: The Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Patent Holders[R].Working paper,1996.
[6]Amin A, Thrift N. Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1994.
[7]Amin A, Thrift N. Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1996.
[8]Amsden A H. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,1989.
[9]Antonelli C. The Evolution of the Industrial Organization of the Production of knowledge [J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,1999,23(2):243-260.
[10]Ariken B, Harrison A. Are There Spillovers From Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from Panel Data for Venezuela [M]. Mimeo, MIT and the World Bank,1991.
[11]Arora A. Complementarity and external linkages:the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology [J].Journal of Industrial Economics,1990,38(4):361-379.
[12]Arora A, Gambardella A. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1994,24(1):91-114.
[13]Asheim B, Isaksen A. Regional Innovation Systems:The Integration of Local'Sticky' and Global' Ubiquitous' Knowledge [J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):77-86.
[14]Audretsch B, Feldman P.R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production [J].American Economic Review,1996,86(3):630-640.
[15]Autio E. Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation [J].European Planning Studies, 1998,6(2):131-140.
[16]Bair J. Global capitalism and commodity chains: looking back, going forward [J].Competition and Change,2005,9(2):153-180.
[17]Baptista R. Geographical Clusters and Innovation Diffusion [J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2001,66(1):31-46.
[18]Barnety Jay B. Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage [J].Journal Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
[19]Barro R. Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth [J].Journal of Economic Growth, 1997,2(1):1-26.
[20]Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation [J].Progress in Human Geography,2004,28(1):31-56.
[21]Batonda G, Perry G. Approaches to Relationship Development Processes in Inter-firm Networks [J]. European Journal of Marketing,2003,37(10):1457-1484.
[22]Baum J, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don't go it alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups' Performance in Canadian Biotechnology [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000, 21(3):267-294.
[23]Bell M, Pavitt K. National Capacities for Technological Accumulation: Evidence and Implications for Developing Countries[C].World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics,1992.
[24]Benhabib, Spiegel.The Roles of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data [J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1994,34(2):143-173.
[25]Berg S, Friedman P. Impacts of Domestic Joint Ventures on Industrial Rates of Return: A Pooled Cross Section Analysis [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1981,63(1): 293-298.
[26]Bernard T.Sources of Regional Income Inequality: An Examination of Small Regions in Queensland [J].Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies,2005,17(1):35-50.
[27]Bhide A. How Entrepreneurs Craft Strategies that Work [J].Harvard Business Review,1994, 73(2):150-161.
[28]Blomstrom M, Kokko A. Multinational Corporations and spillovers [J].Journal of Economic Surveys,1998,12(3):247-277.
[29]Blomstrom M, Sjoholm F. Technology Transfer and spillovers:Does Local participation with Multinationals Matter? [J].European Economic Review.1999,43(4-6):915-943.
[30]Borenztein et al. How does foreign investment affect economic growth? [J] Journal of international Economics,1998,45(1):115-135.
[31]Boschma R A, Anne L J. Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the South of Italy [J].Industry & Innovation,2007, 14(2):177-199.
[32]Bradburd R M, Caves R E. A Closer Look at the Effect of Market Growth on Industries' Profits [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics,1982,64(4):635-645.
[33]Brennenraedts R, Bekkers R, Verspagen B. The different channels of university-industry knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence from Biomedical Engineering [R]. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies. The Netherlands, Working Paper,2006.
[34]Brito C.Towards an Institutional Theory of the Dynamics of Industrial Networks [J].Journal of business & Industrial Marketing,2001,16(3):150-166.
[35]Brooke M, Remmers H. The Strategy of Multinational Enterprise: Organization and Finance [M] New York: American Elsevier,1970.
[36]Brown J S, Duguid P. Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation [J].Organization Science,1991, 2(1):40-57.
[37]Butler J, Hansen G. Network evolution, entrepreneurial success, and regional development [J].Entrepreneurship &Regional Development,1991,3(1):1-16.
[38]Capello R. Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux:Learning versus Collective Learning Processes [J].Journal of the Regional Studies Association,1999, 33(4):353-365.
[39]Carlsson B, Jacobsson S& Holmen M, Rickne A. Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues [J].Research Policy,2002,31(2):233-245.
[40]Carrincazeaux C, Lung Y, Rallet A. Proximity and localization of corporate R&D activities[J].Research Policy,2001,30(5):777-789.
[41]Caves. Multinational Firms, Competition and Productivity in Host-Country Markets [J]. Economica,1974,41(162):176-193.
[42]Chang Y C, Chen M H. Comparing approaches to systems of innovation: the knowledge perspective[J].Technology in Society,2004,26(1):17-37
[43]Chen E. Multinational Corporations, Employment and Technology [M].London: Macmillan, 1983.
[44]Coe, Helpman, Hoffmaister. International R&D Spillovers and Institutions [J].European Economic Review,2009(2):1-19.
[45]Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152.
[46]Cooke P, Schienstock G. Structural competitiveness and learning regions[J].Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies,2000,1(3):265-280.
[47]Cooke P, Uranga M, Etxebarria G. Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective [J]. Environment and Planning A,1998,30(9):1563-1584.
[48]Cooke P. Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy [J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2001,10(4):945-974.
[49]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence form Biotechnology Clusters [J].Journal of Technology Transfer.2002,27(1):133-145.
[50]Cooper C. Are Innovation Studies on Industrialized Economies Relevant to Technology Policy in Developing Countries[R].UUN/INTECH, Working Paper,1991.
[51]Coro G, Grandinetti R. Evolutionary patterns of Italian industrial districts [J].Human Systems Management.1999,18(2):117-129.
[52]Das T, Teng B. Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective [J].Organization Science,2000, 11(1):77-101.
[53]Deardorff A. Fragmentation Across Cones [A].in: Arndt& Kierzkowski (eds.).Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2001.
[54]Dicken P, Kelly P, Olds K. Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analyzing the global economy [J].Global Networks,2001,1(2): 89-112.
[55]Dicken P. Global Shift: Transformation the World Economy [M].3rded. London: Paul Chapman,1998.
[56]Dicken, Peter, Kelly et al. Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Towards an Analytical Framework for the Global Economy [J].Global Networks,2001,1(2):89-112.
[57]Doloreux D, Edquist C, Hommen L. The institutional and functional underpinnings of the regional innovation system of East-Gothia in Sweden[R].Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference,2003.
[58]Doloreux D. Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues [J].Technology in Society,2005,27(2):133-153.
[59]Doloreux D. What we should know about regional systems of innovation [J].Technology in Society,2002,24(3):243-263.
[60]Duranton G, Puga D. Micro-foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies[R].CEPR Discussion Papers,2003.
[61]Dyer J, Nobeoka K. Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network: The Toyota case [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):345-367.
[62]Dyer J. Effective Inter-firm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value [J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):535-556.
[63]Eisenhardt K, Schoonhoven C. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms [J]. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136-150.
[64]Ernst D, Kim L. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation [J]. Research Policy,2002,31(8-9):1417-1429.
[65]Evenson R E, Ranis G. Science and Technology: Lessons for Development Policy [M].C0: West view Press,1990.
[66]Fallick B, Fleischman A, Rebitzer B. Job hopping in Silicon Valley: Some evidence concerning the micro-foundations of a high technology cluster [J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,2006,88(3):472-481.
[67]Feldman P, Francis J, Bercovitz J. Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters [J].Regional Studies,2005,39(1):129-141.
[68]Felsenstein D. The spatial agglomeration of technological activity: proximity or proclivity? [R].Paper presented at the 29th International Geographical Congress,2000.
[69]Findlay R. Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1978,92(1):1-16.
[70]Ford D. Trust and knowledge management: The key to success[R]. Centre for Knowledge-based Enterprises Working Paper,2001.
[71]Fornahl D, Menzel M. Co-Development of Firm Founding and Regional Clusters[R].Paper presented at the Conference on Clusters, Industrial Districts and Firms: the Challenge of Globalization,2003.
[72]Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance:Lesson from Japan [M].London: Frances Pinter,1987.
[73]Fritsch M. Measuring the Quality of Regional Innovation Systems: A Knowledge Production Function Approach [J].International Regional Science Review,2002,25(1):86-101.
[74]Funke M, Niebuhr A. Regional geographic R&D spillovers and economic growth: Evidence from West Germany [J].Regional Studies,2005,39(1):143-154.
[75]Funke M, Niebuhr A. Threshold effects and regional economic growth: evidence from West Germany [J].Economic Modelling,2005,22(l):61-80.
[76]Gereffi G (eds.).Introduction: globalization value chains and development [J].IDS Bulletin 2001,32(3):1-8.
[77]Gereffi G, Korzeniewicz M. Commodity chains and global capitalism [M]. London: Praeger, 1994.
[78]Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The Governance of global value chains [J]. Forthcoming in Review of International Political Economy,2003,11(4):5-11.
[79]Gereffi G.A Commodity Chains Framework for Analyzing Global Industries [Z].Working Paper for IDS,1999.
[80]Gereffi G. International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chains [J].Journal of International Economics,1999,48(1):37-70.
[81]Gerybadze, Alexander, Reger. Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations [J].Research Policy,1999,28 (2-3):251-274.
[82]Glaister K, Buckley P. Strategic motives for international alliance formation [J].Journal of Management Studies,1996,33(3):301-332.
[83]Gluckler J. Economic geography and the evolution of networks [J].Journal of Economic Geography.2007,7(5):619-634.
[84]Grandori A, Soda G. Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms [J].Organization Studies,1995,16(2):183-214.
[85]Grandori A. An Organizational Assessment of Inter-firm Coordination Modes [J].Organization Studies,1997,18(6):897-925.
[86]Grandori A. Corporate Governance and Firm organization [M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2004.
[87]Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where Do Inter-organizational Networks come from [J].American Journal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439-1493.
[88]Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation [J].Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(5):397-420.
[89]Gupta A, Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(4):473-496.
[90]Hagedoorn J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Inter organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences [J].Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(5):371-385.
[91]Hakansson H. Industrial Technological Development:A Network Approach [M]. London: Croom Helm,1987.
[92]Halinen A, Salmi A, Havila V. From Dyadic Change to Changing Business Networks:An Analytical Framework [J]. Journal of Management Studies,1999,36(6):779-794.
[93]Hanushek E, Kimko D. Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations [J].American Economic Association,2000,90(5):1184-1208.
[94]Harrigan K, Newman W. Bases of Inter-organization Cooperation: Propensity, Power, Persistence [J]. Journal of Management Studies,1990,27(4):417-434.
[95]Hbrte S. Knowledge spillover aspects of co-operation and competition[C].To be discussed at the international Workshop on Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Management in Economic Networks and Industrial Clusters,2002.
[96]Henderson J. Danger and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific [A].In: Thompson G (eds).Economic dynamism in the Asia Pacific[C]. London: Routledge,1998.
[97]Hess M, Yeung H. Whither global production networks in economic geography? Past, present and future [J]. Environment and Planning A,2006,38(7):1193-1204.
[98]Hobday M. Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan [M].Aldershot:Edward Elgar, 1995.
[99]Hummels D, Specialization Ishii J and Yi. The Nature and Growth of Vertical in World Trade [J]Journal of International Economics,2001,54(1):75-96.
[100]Humphrey J, Schmitz H. Governance and Upgrading: Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain[R].IDS Working Paper,2000.
[101]Humphrey J, Schmitz H. Governance in global value chains [J]. IDS Bulletin,2001, 32(3):19-29.
[102]Humphrey J, Schmitz H. How does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters [J].Regional Studies,2002,36(9):1017-1027.
[103]Inkpen A, Tsang E. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(1):146-165.
[104]Isaksen A. Building regional innovation systems:a possibility of endogenous industrial development in the global economy [J]. Canadian Journal of Regional Science,2001(1): 101-120.
[105]Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research [J]. American Economic Review,1989,79(5): 984-1001.
[106]Jarillo J. On Strategic Networks [J].Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(1):31-34.
[107]John C, Santangelo, Grazia D. The frontier of international technology networks:sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capabilities [J]. Information Economics and Policy,1999, 11(1):101-123.
[108]Kaplinsky R, Morris M. Governance Matters in Value Chains [J]. Developing Alternatives, 2003,9(1):11-18.
[109]Kaplinsky R, Morris M.A Handbook for Value Chain Research [R]. Prepared for the IDRC, 2002.
[110]Kaplinsky R, Morris M. Governance Matters in Value Chains [J].Developing Alternatives, 2003,9(1):11-18.
[111]Kaplinsky R. Spreading the Gains from Globalization: What Can Be Learned from Value Chain Analysis? [J]. Journal of Development Studies,2000,37(2):117-146.
[112]Katz J M. Technology creation in Latin American manufacturing industries [M]. New York: Si. Martin Press,1987.
[113]Katz. Production Functions, Foreign Investment and Growth [M].Amsterdam: North Holland, 1969.
[114]Keller W. Absorptive Capacity: On the Creation and Acquisition of Technology in Development [J] Journal of Development Economics,1996,49(1):199-227.
[115]Kelly M, Hageman A. Marshallian Externalities in Innovation [J].Journal of Economic Growth,1999,4(1):39-54.
[116]Kim L. Imitation to Innovation: the Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning [M], Boston: Harvard Business School Press,1997.
[117]Kim L. Korea's Entry into the Computer Industry and Its Acquisition of Technological Capability [J]. Technovation,1987(6):277-293.
[118]Kinoshita Y.R&D and Technology Spillovers through FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity[R].IMF Working Paper,2000.
[119]Kodama F. Emerging Patterns of Innovation [M].Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press,1991.
[120]Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1993,34(6):625-645.
[121]Kogut B. Joint Ventures:Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(4):319-332.
[122]Kokko A, Blomstrom M. Policies to encourage inflows of Technology through foreign multinationals [J].Journal of World Development,1995,23:459-468.
[123]Kokko A. Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers [J].Journal of Development Economics,1994,43(2):279-293.
[124]Kokko A. Foreign direct investment, host country characteristics, and spillovers [M].The Economics Research Institute, Stockholm,1992.
[125]Kuo, Chun-Chien, Chih-Hai Yang. Knowledge Capital and Spillover on Regional Economic Growth:Evidence from China [J].China Economic Review,2008,19(4):594-604.
[126]Lall S. Developing Countries as Exporters of Technology [M].London: Macmillan Press, 1982.
[127]Lall S. Vertical Inter-Firm Linkages in LDCs: An Empirical Study [J].Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,1980,43(3):203-206.
[128]Larsson, Richard. The Handshake between Invisible and Visible Hands [J].International Studies of Management and Organization,1993,23(1):87-106.
[129]Lechner C, Dowling M. The Evolution of Industrial Districts and Regional Networks [J].Journal of Management and Governance,1999,3(4):309-338.
[130]Los B. The empirical performance of a new inter-industry technology spillover measure [A].In Lundvall B. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theorem of Innovation and Interactive Learning [M]. London: Pinter Publications,1992.
[131]MacKinnon D, Phelps N. Devolution and the Territorial Politics of Foreign Direct Investment [J].Political Geography,2001,20(3):353-379.
[132]Magnus B, Sjoholm F. Technology transfer and spillovers: does local participation with multinationals matter? [J].European Economic Review,1999,43(4-6):915-923.
[133]Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production [J].Research Policy,2002, 31(5):247-264.
[134]Mansfield E, Romeo A. Technology Transfer to Overseas Subsidiaries by US Based Firms [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1980,95(4):737-750.
[135]Mansfield E. Estimating social and private returns from innovations based on the advanced technology program: Problems and opportunities [M].Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology,1996.
[136]Mansfield E. International technology transfer: Firms resource requirements and policies [J]. American Economic Review,1975,65(2):372-376.
[137]March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J].Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87.
[138]Martino J. Technological forecasting for decision making [M].New York: North Holland Publishers,1983.
[139]Maskell P, Malmberg A. Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution[J].Journal of Economic Geography.2007,7(5):603-618.
[140]McCallum J. National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns [J].The American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623.
[141]McDonald F, Vertova G. Geographical concentration and competitiveness in the European Union [J].European Business Review,2001,13(3):157-165.
[142]Miotti L, Sachwald F. Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? [J].Research Policy,2003,32(8):1481-1499.
[143]Mothe J, Paquet G. Local and Regional Systems of Innovation [M].Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers,1998.
[144]Mowery D, Oxley J, Silverman B. Technological overlap and inter firm cooperation: Implications for the resource based view of the firm [J].Research Policy,1998, 27(5):507-523.
[145]Nelson R. National Innovation Systems:A Comparative Analysis [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,1993.
[146]Ng F, Yeats A. Production Sharing in East Asia: Who Does What for Whom and Why? [R]. World Bank, Policy, Research Working Paper,1999.
[147]Nohria N.Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? [A].in Nohria N, Eccles R (eds).Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action[C].Boston: Harvard Business School Press,1992.
[148]Nooteboom B. Learning and governance in inter-firm relations [J].Revue d'economie politique,2004,114(1):55-76.
[149]OECD. National Innovation Systems[R].Paris:OECD,1997.
[150]Ohmae K. The rise of the region state [J].Foreign Affairs,1993,72(2):78-87.
[151]Ozman M. Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature [J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2009,18(1):39-67.
[152]Pach H, Westphal L E. Industrial Strategy and Technological Change [J]Journal of Development Economies,1986,22(1):87-128.
[153]Paul Krugman.Trade and Geography [M].The MIT Press,1991.
[154]Pearce R D. The Internationalization of Research and Development by multinational enterprises [M]. New York: St. Martin Press,1989.
[155]Peri, G. Knowledge Flows, R&D Spillovers and Innovation[R]. ZEW Discussion Papers, 2003.
[156]Pfeffer J, Salancik G. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective [M].New York: Harper and Row,1978.
[157]Piore J, Sable F. Mass production as destiny and blind decision[R].Working paper,1984.
[158]Posner M. International Trade and Technical Change [J].Oxford Economic Papers,1961, 13(3):323-341.
[159]Powell W, Koput K, Doerr S. Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1996, 41(1):116-145.
[160]Powell, Walter. Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization [A].in Michael Jeremy Handel. The sociology of organizations:classic, contemporary, and critical readings[C].London: Sage Publications,1990.
[161]Prahalad C K, Gary Hame 1. The Core Competence of the Corporation [J].Harvard Business Review,1990,68(5-6):79-91.
[162]Raghu G, Praveen R. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by inter-temporal technology transfer [J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(5): 365-385.
[163]Rakesh Basant. Knowledge flows and Industrial Clusters [A].Working Paper,2002.
[164]Reddy P. New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: a survey from India [J].World Development,1997, 25(11):1821-1837.
[165]Richard R (eds.).Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economics Growth [J].American Economics Review,1966,56(1-2):69-75.
[166]Richardson G. The Organization of Industry[J].The Economic Journal,1972,82(3):883-896
[167]Riedel.The nature and determinants of export-oriented direct foreign investment in a developing country: A case study of Taiwan [J]. Review of World Economics,1975, 111(3):505-528.
[168]Rosenberg. Technological Innovation and Long Waves [J].Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1984,8(1):7-24.
[169]Saad I. Foreign direct investment, structural change, and deregulation in Indonesia [A].in The New Wave of Foreign Direct Investment in Asia[C].Nomura Research Institute and ISEAS,1995.
[170]Saggi K. Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer[C].Word Bank, Washington,2000.
[171]Saviotti P, Nooteboom B. Technology and knowledge [M].Edward Elgar Publishing,2000.
[172]Saxenian A. Response to Richard Florida and Martin Kenney [J].California Management Review,1991,33(6):136-142.
[173]Scott A. Regions and the World Economy [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1998.
[174]Scott A. Variations on the Theme of Agglomeration and Growth: The Gem and Jewelry Industry in Los Angeles and Bangkok [J].Geoforum,1994(25):249-263.
[175]Scott A. Regional push: towards a geography of development and growth in low-and middle income countries [J].Third World Quarterly,2002,23(6):37-61.
[176]Shan L, Dorothy E. Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing [J].Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2003,12(1):71-88.
[177]Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B. Inter-firm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry[J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(5):387-394.
[178]Simeon D, Bernard H. Foreign Investment and productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises [J].World Bank Economic Review,2000,14(1):49-64.
[179]Sjoholm F. Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foreign investment: evidence from establishment data [J].Journal of development studies,1999,36(1):53-73.
[180]Sounder W. Managing New Product Innovation [M]. Mass: Lexington,1986.
[181]Stam E. Why Butterflies Don't Leave:Locational Behavior of Entrepreneurial Firms [J]. Economic Geography.2007,83(1):27-50.
[182]Stefan Kuhimann. European/German efforts and policy evaluation in regional innovation[R]. International Workshop on the Comprehensive Review of the S&T Basic Plans in Japan, 2004.
[183]Steier L, Greenwood R. Newly created firms and informal angel investors:a four-stage model of network development [J]. Venture Capital,1999 (2):147-167.
[184]Stenberg R, Tamsy C. Munich as Germany's No.1 High Technology Region: Empirical Evidence, Theoretical Explanations and Role of Small Firm/Large Firm Relationships [J].Regional Studies,1999,33(4):367-377.
[185]Stoper M. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy [M].New York: The Guilford Press,1997.
[186]Storper M, ScottA.The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes [A].in: Wolch J, Dear M. The Power of Geography [M].London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
[187]Storper M. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy[M].New York: Guilford press,1997
[188]Stuckey J A. Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry [M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1983.
[189]Sturgeon T, Lee J. Industry Co-evolution and the Rise of a Shared Supply-base for Electronics Manufacturing[R].Paper Presented at Nelson and Winter Conference,2001.
[190]Swyngedouw E. Neither global nor local:"Globalization" and the politics of scale [A]. In K Cox (eds) Spaces of Globalization [C]. New York: Guilford,1997.
[191]Taylor M, Conti S. Interdependent and Uneven Development Global-local Perspectives [M].Ashgate publishing,1997.
[192]Thompson G, Frances J, Levacie R. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks:the Coordination of Social Life [M].London: Sage,1991.
[193]Thorelli H. Network: between Markets and Hierarchies [J].Strategic Management Journal, 1986,7(1):37-51.
[194]Tichy. Less dispensable and more risky than ever [M].London: Pion Limited,1998.
[195]Tidd J. Complexity, networks and learning: Integrative themes for research on the management of innovation [J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,1997, 1(1):1-21.
[196]Todtung F, Kaufmann A. Innovation systems in regions of European—a comparative perspective [J].European Planning Studies,2000,7(6):699-717.
[197]Tsui-Auch L. Regional production relationship and developmental impacts:a comparative study of three regional networks [J].International Journal of Urban and Regional search,1999, 23(2):345-359.
[198]Varga A. Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity [J].Journal of Regional Science,2000,40(2):289-309.
[199]Vernon R. International Investment and International Trade in Product Cycle [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,80(5):197-207.
[200]Walcott. Chinese Industrial and Science Parks: Bridging the Gap [J]. Professional Geographer,2002(3):349-364.
[201]Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social Capital, Structural Holes, and the Formation of an Industry Network [J]. Organization science,1997,8(2):109-125.
[202]Wenger E, Snyder W. Communities of Practice [J].Harvard Business Review,2000, 78(1):139-145.
[203]Wenger E. Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity [M].New York: Cambridge University Press,1998.
[204]Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm [J].Strategic Management Journal,1984, 5(2):171-180.
[205]Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism [M]. New York: Free Press,1985.
[206]Williamson. Transaction Cost Economics:The Governance of Contractual Relations [J].Journal of law and Economics,1979,22(4):3-61.
[207]Wong P. Technology transfer in Thailand: descriptive validation of a technology transfer model [J].International Journal of Technology Management,1995,10(7):788-796.
[208]Xu B. Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth [J].Journal of Development Economics,2000,62(2):477-493.
[209]Yeats A. Just How Big is Global Production Sharing? [A].in: Arndt & Kierzkowski (eds.). Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2001.
[210]Yeung H. Critical reviews of geographical perspectives on business organizations and the organization of production:Towards a network approach [J].Progress in Human Geography, 1994,18(4):460-490.
[211]Yeung H. Organizing the firm in industrial geography Ⅰ:networks, institutions and regional development [J].Progress in Human Geography,2000,24(2):301-315.
[212]Yeung H. The Dynamics of the Globalization of Chinese Business Firms [A].in Yeung H and Kris Olds (eds.).Globalization of Chinese Business Firms[C].London:Macmillan,2000.
[213]Yiu D, Lin J. Sharing tacit knowledge in Asia [J].Knowledge Management Review,2002, 5(3):5-11.
[214]Zander I. Where to the multinational:the evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational networks [J].International Business Review,1999,8(3):261-291.
[215]艾少伟.中国开发区技术学习通道研究[D].河南大学博士学位论文,2007.
[216]彼得·迪肯[著],刘卫东等[译].全球性转变：重塑21世纪的全球经济地图[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007.
[217]蔡宁,吴结兵.企业集群的竞争优势：资源的结构性整合[J].中国工业经济,2002(7)：45-50.
[218]曹兴,郭然.知识转移影响因素研究及其展望[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2008,14(2)：230-236.
[219]陈丹宇.区域创新系统研究的回顾与评述[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(8)：205-209.
[220]陈飞翔,胡靖等.利用外资与技术转移[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2006.
[221]陈剑锋,唐振鹏.国外产业集群研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2002(8)：22-27.
[222]陈丽珍,王术文.技术扩散及其相关概念辨析[J].现代管理科学,2005(2)：56-57.
[223]陈守明.现代企业网络[M].上海：上海人民出版社.2002.
[224]程宏.利用外资促进我国产业结构升级的新思路[J].南方经济,2001(4)：28-30.
[225]程新章.创新、产业集群与区域创新系统[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2005,12(6)：39-44.
[226]戴佳雯.高科技产业网络特色之探讨[D].台湾中山大学企业管理研究所硕士论文,1999.
[227]丁焕峰.技术扩散与产业结构优化的理论关系分析[J].工业技术经济,2006,25(5)：95-98.
[228]董景荣.技术创新扩散的理论、方法与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2009.
[229]杜长征,杨磊.技术创新、技术进步与技术扩散概念研究[J].经济师,2002(3)：43-44.
[230]段存广.产业集群演化与生命周期研究述评[J].当代经济管理,2010,32(8)：53-55.
[231]樊增强.跨国公司技术扩散的障碍及对策[J].经济纵横,2005(1)：35-37.
[232]范黎波,宋志红,刘世敏.国际合资企业的战略演进与技术学习[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,23(S2)：75-84.
[233]丰智勇.基于科技中介服务机构的产业密集区技术扩散研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2006.
[234]符淼.地理距离和技术外溢效应[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(4)：1549-1566.
[235]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[236]傅荣,裘丽.企业间网络演化中的知识、信任与资源：一个层次分析框架[J].科技管理研究,2007(8)：256-258.
[237]傅正华,林耕,李明亮.我国技术转移的理论与实践[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2007.
[238]盖文启.创新网络——区域经济发展新思维[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2002.
[239]盖骁敏.产业集聚形成过程中的FDI溢出效应分析[J].东岳论丛,2010,31(9)：95-98.
[240]盖翊中.空间集聚与产业网络的相关模型——以台商在东莞投资的电子制造业为例[J].当代财经,2007(5)：81-85.
[241]古继宝,吴赵龙.三类集群的转化关系分析及其对我国集群发展的启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(2)：69-74.
[242]郭长禄,王家庭.跨国公司在华技术扩散问题的若干思考[J].宁夏党校学报,1999(1)：34-39.
[243]郭韧,曾国祥.产业集群的知识溢出效应研究[J].中国市场,2007(40)：102-103.
[244]韩剑.知识溢出的空间有限性与企业R&D集聚[J].研究与发展管理,2009,21(3)：22-27.
[245]韩玉雄,李怀祖.知识产权保护对工资率水平及经济增长的影响：一个修正的技术扩散模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004,(11)：152-159.
[246]韩振海,李国平.国家创新系统理论的演变评述[J].科学管理研究,2004,22(2)：24-26.
[247]何予平,等.全球化中的技术垄断与技术扩散[M].北京：科学出版社,2009.
[248]洪茹燕.基于技术能力演进的企业技术学习模式选择机制研究[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(4)：20-24.
[249]胡明铭.区域创新系统理论与建设研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26(9)：45-49.
[250]胡志坚等.国家创新系统：理论分析与国际比较[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[251]黄鲁成.关于区域创新系统研究内容的探讨[J].科研管理,2000(2)：43-48.
[252]黄泰岩,牛飞亮.西方企业网络理论述评[J].经济学动态,1999(4)：63-67.
[253]黄智淋,俞培果.我国区域间技术扩散研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(4)：58-61.
[254]纪慰华.社会文化环境对企业网络构建的影响——以上海大众供货商网络为例[D].华东师范大学博士论文,2004.
[255]贾根良.劳动分工、制度变迁与经济发展[M].天津：南开大学出版社,1999.
[256]江小涓.理解科技全球化—资源重组、优势集成和自主创新能力的提升[J].管理世界,2004(6)：4-13.
[257]景秀艳,曾刚.从对称到非对称：内生型产业集群权力结构演化及其影响研究[J].经济问题探索,2006(10)：41-44.
[258]孔翔,曾刚.全球技术空间体系及我国的对策初探[J].人文地理,2003,18(5)：42-45.
[259]孔翔.技术吸收型对外贸易战略研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2006.
[260]孔翔.势差一廊道模型与中国技术流通网络的构建[J].科技管理研究,2003(1)：73-75.
[261]李碧宏.技术扩散机制的优化[J].经营与管理,2009(2)：74-75.
[262]李二玲.中国中部农区产业集群的企业网络研究[D].河南大学博士学位论文,2006.
[263]李建民.技术扩散、技术垄断与中国科技战略转变[J].中国科技论坛,2006(2)：18-22.
[264]李建伟.论贸易自由化与发展中国家的技术进步[J].社会科学家,2010(9)：103-105.
[265]李健.从全球生产网络到大都市区生产空间组织[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2008.
[266]李凌.企业网络形成与演变的博弈论分析[D].上海社会科学院硕士学位论文,2006.
[267]李平,刘建.国际技术垄断与技术扩散关系的政治经济学分析[J].世界经济与政治,2006(5)：68-73.
[268]李平.国际技术扩散对发展中国家技术进步的影响：机制、效果及对策分析[M].北京：三联书店,2007.
[269]李平.技术扩散理论及实证研究[M].太原：山西经济出版社,1999.
[270]李树培,白战伟.知识资本化、跨国公司技术垄断与我国技术发展的应对策略[J].未来与发展,2009(1)：40-43.
[271]李文东.全球化中的技术垄断[J].世界经济与政治,2004(9)：42-49.
[272]李小建.经济地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[273]李新春.企业联盟与网络[M].广州：广东人民出版社,2000.
[274]李新春.专业镇与企业创新网络[J].广东社会科学,2000,(6)：29-33.
[275]李玉华.基于网络理论的高新技术产业集群演化机理研究[D].北京工业大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[276]李媛.从学习到创新：技术学习过程研究[D].东南大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[277]李卓.产业集聚下的技术扩散研究：基于中国高技术产业的分析[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[278]林兰.技术扩散与高新技术企业技术区位研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2007.
[279]刘昌年,梅强.基于企业网络的中小企业组织间隐性知识转移研究[J].中国科技论坛,2008(4)：75-79.
[280]刘恒江,陈继祥,周莉娜.产业集群的动力机制研究的最新动态[J].外国经济与管理,2004(7)：2-7.
[281]刘洪涛.国家创新系统理论与中国技术创新模式的实证研究[D].西安交大博士学位论文,1997.
[282]刘佳勇.企业网络的效率边界研究评述[J].西安财经学院学报,2006,19(6)：84-87.
[283]刘仁军.交易成本、社会资本与企业网络[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,2004.
[284]刘友金.中小企业集群式创新研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学博士学位论文,2002.
[285]刘志彪,张晔.中国沿海地区外资加工贸易模式与本土产业升级[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005(8)：57-62.
[286]卢锋.产品内分工[J].经济学(季刊),2004(10)：56-82.
[287]陆园园,谭劲松,薛红志.“引进-模仿-改进-创新”模型与韩国企业技术学习的演进过程[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(5)：74-82.
[288]路甬祥等.创新与未来[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[289]吕国辉.长江三角洲区域创新系统研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2008.
[290]吕洪良.论国家创新体系中的知识管理[J].技术经济,2004(6)：2-4.
[291]吕文栋,朱华晟.浙江产业集群的动力机制——基于企业家的视角[J].巾国工业经济,2005(4)：86-93.
[292]罗仲伟.网络组织的特征及其经济和区域发展理论[J].外国经济与管理,2000,22(6)：25-28.
[293]马爱民,李志祥,宋清.技术生命周期对区域创新体系运行机制的影响分析[J].中国市场,2010(14)：25-26.
[294]苗长虹.全球-地方联结与产业集群的技术学习[J].地理学报,2006,61(4)：425-434.
[295]苗长虹,魏也华.技术学习与创新：经济地理学的视角[J].人文地理,2007(5)：1-9.
[296]苗长虹,魏也华.西方经济地理学理论建构的发展与论争[J].地理研究,2007,26(6)：1233-1246.
[297]苗长虹,樊杰,张文忠.西方经济地理学区域研究新视角[J].经济地理,2002,22(6)：644-650.
[298]马丽,等.经济全球化下地方生产网络模式演变分析[J].地理研究,2004(1)：87-96.
[299]马庆国,等.软技术概念的重新界定[J].科研管理,2005,26(6)：99-105.
[300]慕继丰,等.基于企业网络的经济和区域发展(上)[J].外国经济与管理,2001(3)：26-29.
[301]慕继丰,等.基于企业网络的经济和区域发展(下)[J].外国经济与管理,2001(4)：26-30.
[302]慕继丰,冯宗宪,陈方丽.企业网络的运行机理与企业的网络管理能力[J].外国经济与管理,2001(10)：21-25.
[303]宁军明.论知识溢出在产业集聚中的作用[J].科技与管理2008,10(4)：78-80.
[304]潘雄峰.高技术产业集群创新机理研究—基于创新网络与技术学习的视角[D].大连理工大学博士学位论文,2007.
[305]彭中文,何新城.外资R&D溢出与高技术产业集聚的实证分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2008(10)：84-88.
[306]齐建国等.技术创新—国家系统的改革与重组[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,1995.
[307]秦夏明,董沛武,李汉铃.产业集群形态演化阶段探讨[J].中国软科学,2004(12)：150-154.
[308]区毅勇.产业集群中的技术扩散研究—基于珠江三角洲的实证分析[D].华南理工大学博 士学位论文,2009.
[309]曲建君.全要素生产率研究综述[J].经济师,2007(1)：46-47.
[310]任胜刚,李燚.基于跨国公司视角的集群分类研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005(6)：5-7.
[311]任胜刚.论跨国公司与集群的互动关系[D].复旦大学博士学位论文,2004.
[312]任胜钢,关涛.区域创新系统内涵研究框架探讨[J].软科学,2006,20(4)：90-94.
[313]盛亚.技术创新扩散与新产品营销[M].北京：中国发展出版社,2002.
[314]石定寰主编.国家创新系统：现状与未来[M].北京：经济管理出版社,1999.
[315]石培基,罗哲.企业网络与西部欠发达地区县域经济发展[J].开发研究,2006(4)：10-14.
[316]时云辉.核心企业网络演变与区域发展研究[D].河南大学博士学位论文,2009.
[317]世界银行.发展中国家必须提升吸收和采纳技术的能力[J].国际融资,2008(3)：68-69.
[318]苏靖.关于国家创新系统的基本理论、知识流动和研究方法[J].中国软科学,1999(1)：59-61.
[319]孙伟,黄鲁成.产业群技术创新动力分析[J].软科学,2003,17(2)：82-84.
[320]孙文祥,彭纪生.跨国公司技术转移研究评述[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2004,31(4)：23-30.
[321]田家欣.企业网络、企业能力与集群企业升级[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007.
[322]汪升平.科技全球化背景下我国企业技术学习能力研究[D].南京财经大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[323]王春法,武夷山,薛澜.科技全球化及中国的对策[J].中国科技论坛,2001(3)：3-9.
[324]王春法.关于国家创新体系理论的思考[J].中国软科学,2003(5)：99-104.
[325]王广凤,朱越杰,孙凤芹.从技术学习到自主创新：文献综述[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(2)：5-8.
[326]王海峰、演化经济学视角下的产业集群演化机制研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2008(1)：98-100.
[327]王缉慈,等.超越集群—中国产业集群的理论探索[M].北京：科学出版社,2010.
[328]王缉慈,林涛.我国外向型制造业集群发展和研究的新视角[J].北京大学学报,2007,43(6)：839-846.
[329]王缉慈,张晔.沿海地区外向型产业集群的形成、困境摆脱与升级前景[J].改革,2008(5)：53-59.
[330]王江.产业技术扩散理论与实证研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2010.
[331]王维.跨国公司对外直接投资与发展中国家的技术进步—兼论中国引进外资的技术扩散效应[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2004(6)：35-39.
[332]王文岩,刘建.FDI国际技术扩散与发展中国家和地区的对策分析[J].中国科技论坛,2007(5)：141-144.
[333]王向阳.FDI技术溢出对高技术企业技术创新的影响研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2009.
[334]王晓璐.国际技术扩散对我国技术进步的影响[D].西北大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[335]王雪梅,雷家骗.面向超越的技术学习模式研究[J].中国科技论坛,2008(9)：107-110.
[336]王益民,宋琰纹.基于全球产业空间疆域变迁视角的产业集群演化与升级——以新加坡硬盘驱动器(HDD)产业集群为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(9)：84-88.
[337]王铮,马翠芳,王莹,等.区域间知识溢出的空间认识[J].地理学报,2003,58(5)：773-780.
[338]王梓薇,王大洲.跨国创新网络中的企业技术学习[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,8(2)：15-19.
[339]魏江.产业集群：系统创新与技术学习[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[340]魏江.小企业集群创新网络的知识溢出效应分析[J].科研管理,2003(4)：54-59.
[341]魏守华.产业群的动态研究以及实证分析[J].世界地理研究,2002(3)：16-24.
[342]文嫮,李小建.非正式因素影响下的中小企业网络学习与区域发展—河南省偃师市翟镇针织业的研究[J].人文地理.2003(3)：73-76.
[343]文嫮,李小建.企业网络发育程度与区域创新能力研究.世界地理研究.2003,12(2)：39-46.
[344]文嫮,曾刚.从地方到全球：全球价值链框架下集群的升级研究[J].人文地理,2005,84(4)：21-25.
[345]文嫣,曾刚.嵌入全球价值链的地方产业集群发展—地方建筑陶瓷产业集群研究[J].中国工业经济,2004(6)：36-42.
[346]文嫮.基于全球性互动的地方产业网络发展研究[J].当代经济管理,2006,28(4)：77-82.
[347]文嫮.嵌入全球价值链的中国地方产业网络升级机制的理论与实践研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2005.
[348]文嫮.全球化背景下人才跨国环流与地方产业发展研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008(6)：172-175.
[349]吴国林.中小企业网络：发展中西部区域经济的关节点[J].经济问题探索.2001(7)：23-26.
[350]吴宏.世界知识产权规则的发展演变对国际技术扩散的影响[J].经济研究参考,2004(64)：4-10.
[351]吴结兵.基于企业网络结构与动态能力的产业集群竞争优势研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006.
[352]肖武岭.跨国公司技术垄断战略对我国的启示[J].科技与经济,2005,18(6)：39-42.
[353]谢奉军.江西工业园区企业网络发展研究[D].南昌大学博士学位论文,2006.
[354]谢富纪,董正英.技术转移与技术交易[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2006.
[355]谢富胜.企业网络：激进学者的分析范式[J].经济理论与经济管理,2006(7)：25-30.
[356]谢伟,吴贵生.技术学习的功能和来源[J].科研管理,2000,21(1)：8-13.
[357]谢伟.技术学习过程的新模式[J].科研管理,1999,20(4)：1-7.
[358]谢伟.模仿和技术学习：文献综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(7)：85-89.
[359]许学强,王欣,阎小培；技术流的动力机制、渠道与模式——以珠江三角洲为例[J].地理学报,2002,57(4)：489-496.
[360]薛澜,沈群红.科技全球化及其对中国科技发展的政策涵义[J].世界经济,2001(10)：57-62.
[361]薛澜.科技全球化及中国的机遇、挑战与对策[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2000(9)：4-8.
[362]闫巧丽.当代科技全球化背景下我国科技人才管理对策研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[363]杨春平,刘则渊.技术创新——国家创新体系的核心[J].科技管理研究,2006(4)：12-14.
[364]杨蕙馨,刘春玉.知识溢出效应与企业集聚定位决策[J].中国工业经济,2005(12)：41-48.
[365]杨瑞龙,冯健.企业间网络及其效率的经济学分析[J].江苏社会科学,2004(3)：55-58.
[366]杨先明.国际直接投资、技术转移与我国的技术发展[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
[367]杨友仁,夏铸九.跨界生产网络的组织治理模式—以苏州地区信息电子业台商为例[J].地理研究,2005(2)：253-264.
[368]姚水洪,陈仕萍.国际技术扩散研究述评[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(4)：4143.
[369]叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集群[J].经济科学,2001(3)：23-30.
[370]尤琦英.技术进步对交通运输业贡献率的定量分析[D].长安大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[371]约瑟夫·熊彼特.经济发展理论——对于利润、资本、信贷、利息和经济周期的考察[M].北京：商务印书馆,1990.
[372]曾德明,王业静,覃荔荔.基于知识流动视角的国家创新系统与创新政策体系互动关系研究[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,23(2)：39-43.
[373]曾刚,林兰,樊鸿伟.论技术扩散的影响因子[J].世界地理研究,2006(1)：1-8.
[374]曾刚,林兰.技术扩散与高新技术企业技术区位研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[375]曾刚,林兰.不同空间尺度的技术扩散影响因子研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(2)：22-27.
[376]曾刚,林兰.技术扩散与高技术企业区位研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[377]曾刚,林兰.跨国公司技术溢出与溢出地技术区位研究[J].世界地理研究,2007(4)：98-105.
[378]曾刚,文嫮.全球价值链视角下的瓷砖地方产业集群发展研究[J].经济地理,2005(4)：467-470.
[379]曾刚,文嫮.上海浦东信息产业集群的建设[J].地理学报,2004(S1)：59-66.
[380]曾刚,袁莉莉.长江三角洲技术扩散规律及其对策初探[J].人文地理,1999(1)：1-5.
[381]曾刚.技术扩散与区域经济发展[J].地域研究与开发,2002(9)：38-41.
[382]曾刚.我国高新技术产业开发区的现状及发展[J].地域研究与开发,1997(1)：48-52.
[383]曾菊新.现代城乡网络化发展模式[M].北京：科学出版社,2001.
[384]张纪.产品内国际分工的技术扩散效应——基于中国1980-2005年时间序列数据的实证分析[J],世界经济研究,2008(1)：53-58.
[385]张晓平.国有大型企业网络变化及对区域经济发展的影响-以中国—拖为例[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(2)：176-185.
[386]张延茜.当代科技全球化的主要特征及动因研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2009.
[387]张晔.论买方垄断势力下跨国公司对当地配套企业的纵向压榨[J].中国工业经济,2006(12)：29-36.
[388]张毅,张子刚.企业网络与组织间学习的关系链模型[J].科研管理,2005,26(2)：136-142.
[389]张泳.国家创新体系背景下的产学研一体化：理论探讨与实证研究[D].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[390]张玉杰.技术转移理论、方法、战略[M].北京：企业管理出版社,2003.
[391]张云逸.基于技术权力的地方企业网络演化研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2009.
[392]赵建吉,曾刚.技术社区视角下新竹IC产业的发展及其对张江的启示[J].经济地理,2010,30(3)：438-442.
[393]赵建吉,曾刚.创新的空间测度：数据与指标[J].经济地理,2009(8)：1250-1255.
[394]赵建吉,曾刚.两区合并背景下大浦东产业发展及空间布局研究[J].经济地理,2010(8)：1266-1270.
[395]赵建吉,曾刚.专业化、多样化与产业增长——以中原城市群为例[J].经济问题探索,2009(8)：18-22.
[396]赵海东,吴晓军.产业集群的阶段性演进[J].理论界,2006(6)：50-52.
[397]赵江林.外资与人力资源开发：对中国经验的总结[J].经济研究,2004(2)：47-54.
[398]赵晓庆.技术学习的模式[J].科研管理,2003,24(3)：39-44.
[399]郑小平.国家创新体系研究综述[J].科学管理研究,2006,24(4)：1-5.
[400]周牧之.城市化：中国现代化的主旋律[M].长沙：湖南人民出版社,2001.
[401]周倩.当代科技全球化的特点与我国科技发展对策[J].昆明理工大学学报,2005(1)：7-10.
[402]朱彬.实践社区的隐性知识共享与创新研究[J].重庆科技学院学报,2010(6)：61-62.
[403]朱彬.知识管理的新趋势——实践社区的隐性知识共享与创新机理研究[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2010(3)：66-71.
[404]朱朝晖.发展中国家技术学习模式研究：文献综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(1)：78-82.
[405]朱朝晖.基于开放式创新的技术学习协同与机理研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007.