两种新型喷枪在水稻上喷雾的定性定量及对稻飞虱的防效研究
|
摘要
水稻病虫害种类多,危害重,给世界粮食生产安全带来严重威胁。因此,抓好水稻病虫害防治已成为我国目前稳定发展粮食生产中一项最具潜力,最为直接,最为有效的重要措施。病虫害的防治方法有农业防治、物理防治、生物防治以及化学防治措施。目前最常用、最经济、最有效、最方便的防治方法仍是以化学防治为主。随着我国“四化两型”社会建设的快速发展,现代农业与新农村建设的加快推进,农村务农劳动力已呈现妇女化和老年化的状况。而面对全球气候异常,农作物病虫害多发、频发、重发趋势日渐明显,显然,以家庭为单位的防治难以实现控害保安、减损增产的目的。
近年来,各级农业植保部门转变服务指导方式,积极推进农作物病虫害专业化统防统治发展。但在发展中普遍认为,专业化服务组织受现有施药机械劳动强度高、施药质量差、作业效率低的约束,严重影响其健康快速发展。湖南省植保植检站唐会联研究员创新研发了3WZ-34系列手推便携式机动喷雾机、新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪以及新型远程宽幅喷枪,本研究采用3WZ-34系列手推便携式机动喷雾机分别与新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪和新型远程宽幅喷枪配套使用。测定其雾滴参数,包括雾滴谱、流量、喷幅以及在田间的行走速度。并在水稻田中进行雾滴分布均匀性和沉积量的测定。同时对水稻上的常见虫害——稻飞虱进行了防治效果试验。实验以大流量远程宽幅喷枪和手动喷雾器作对照。结果如下：
1、对几种喷雾装置在不同压力下进行雾滴雾化程度的比较,几种喷雾装置的最佳工作压力分别是：新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪(8m)为1MPa、新型远程宽幅喷枪为4MPa、大流量远程宽幅喷枪为3MPa。
2、几种喷雾方法的VMD由小到大依次为新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪(47.19μm)<新型远程宽幅喷枪(51.77μm)<大流量远程宽幅喷枪(122.4μm)<手动喷雾器(148.2μm)。新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪与新型远程宽幅喷枪的雾滴体积中径(VMD)明显小于其他两种喷雾方法,且雾滴谱较窄,明显优于改进前的喷枪以及目前在农村广泛使用的手动喷雾器。
3、几种喷雾装置在水稻上的雾滴分布均匀性和沉积量测定结果表明：新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪和新型远程宽幅喷枪在作物上、中、下部的雾滴分布较均匀,且雾滴大小均匀性较好,在作物叶片表面的沉积率较高。
4、通过对田间稻飞虱的防治试验,调查结果表明几种喷雾装置喷雾后的校正死亡率都达到了90%以上,其中新型远程宽幅喷枪的效果最好,达到了97.2%。
There are many types of crop disease and pests, serious harm, have caused damages to world agricultural production. Therefore, pest management is the critical parts of agricultural production. The preventing and controlling methods include cultural control, physical control, biological control and chemical control. At present, chemical control is the most common and efficient way. Due to the basic requirement of modern agriculture and the new village construction, a larger explosion of harmful organisms, the existing rural labors tend to be older or poorly educated. The traditional prevention and treatment measure which at the household level rarely suffices pest management.
Specialized control is making fundamental reform and innovation to traditional prevention and treatment measure. In recent years, boosted by central government and all levels of government, specialized control has also been a good development and achieved some results successively.
In this study, we use 3WZ-34 series push-portable-motor driven sprayer which is the special equipment of specialized control with use of the new manpower spray lance and the new long-distance and wide-size spray lance. Determine the parameters of the droplets, including the spectrum of fog particles, flow, sprinkling breadth and the best travel speed in the field. Also determine spray deposition uniformity and The deposit amount of fogdrops. And determine the control efficacy to rice planthopper. Use the long-distance and wide-size spray lance and hand sprayer as the control. Result:
1. Compared spraying performance of sprayers under different ambient pressure, the best ambient pressures were:the new manpower spray lance(8m)was 1MPa、the new long-distance and wide-size spray lance was 4MPa、the long-distance and wide-size spray lance was 3MPa.
2. The VMD of several sprayers were:the new manpower spray lance(47.19μm) 3. Determine spray deposition uniformity and the deposit amount of fogdrops. The experimental results demonstrate that fogdrops sprayed by the new manpower spray lance and the new long-distance and wide-size spray lance deposition uniformity was good, and had a higher deposit amount of fogdrops on the surface of the leaves.
4. By control experiments to rice planthopper, results showed that the mortality rate of every sprayer accounts for 90%or more, the effect of the new long-distance and wide-size spray lance was the best, up to 97.2%.
近年来,各级农业植保部门转变服务指导方式,积极推进农作物病虫害专业化统防统治发展。但在发展中普遍认为,专业化服务组织受现有施药机械劳动强度高、施药质量差、作业效率低的约束,严重影响其健康快速发展。湖南省植保植检站唐会联研究员创新研发了3WZ-34系列手推便携式机动喷雾机、新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪以及新型远程宽幅喷枪,本研究采用3WZ-34系列手推便携式机动喷雾机分别与新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪和新型远程宽幅喷枪配套使用。测定其雾滴参数,包括雾滴谱、流量、喷幅以及在田间的行走速度。并在水稻田中进行雾滴分布均匀性和沉积量的测定。同时对水稻上的常见虫害——稻飞虱进行了防治效果试验。实验以大流量远程宽幅喷枪和手动喷雾器作对照。结果如下：
1、对几种喷雾装置在不同压力下进行雾滴雾化程度的比较,几种喷雾装置的最佳工作压力分别是：新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪(8m)为1MPa、新型远程宽幅喷枪为4MPa、大流量远程宽幅喷枪为3MPa。
2、几种喷雾方法的VMD由小到大依次为新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪(47.19μm)<新型远程宽幅喷枪(51.77μm)<大流量远程宽幅喷枪(122.4μm)<手动喷雾器(148.2μm)。新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪与新型远程宽幅喷枪的雾滴体积中径(VMD)明显小于其他两种喷雾方法,且雾滴谱较窄,明显优于改进前的喷枪以及目前在农村广泛使用的手动喷雾器。
3、几种喷雾装置在水稻上的雾滴分布均匀性和沉积量测定结果表明：新型人力牵引喷杆喷枪和新型远程宽幅喷枪在作物上、中、下部的雾滴分布较均匀,且雾滴大小均匀性较好,在作物叶片表面的沉积率较高。
4、通过对田间稻飞虱的防治试验,调查结果表明几种喷雾装置喷雾后的校正死亡率都达到了90%以上,其中新型远程宽幅喷枪的效果最好,达到了97.2%。
There are many types of crop disease and pests, serious harm, have caused damages to world agricultural production. Therefore, pest management is the critical parts of agricultural production. The preventing and controlling methods include cultural control, physical control, biological control and chemical control. At present, chemical control is the most common and efficient way. Due to the basic requirement of modern agriculture and the new village construction, a larger explosion of harmful organisms, the existing rural labors tend to be older or poorly educated. The traditional prevention and treatment measure which at the household level rarely suffices pest management.
Specialized control is making fundamental reform and innovation to traditional prevention and treatment measure. In recent years, boosted by central government and all levels of government, specialized control has also been a good development and achieved some results successively.
In this study, we use 3WZ-34 series push-portable-motor driven sprayer which is the special equipment of specialized control with use of the new manpower spray lance and the new long-distance and wide-size spray lance. Determine the parameters of the droplets, including the spectrum of fog particles, flow, sprinkling breadth and the best travel speed in the field. Also determine spray deposition uniformity and The deposit amount of fogdrops. And determine the control efficacy to rice planthopper. Use the long-distance and wide-size spray lance and hand sprayer as the control. Result:
1. Compared spraying performance of sprayers under different ambient pressure, the best ambient pressures were:the new manpower spray lance(8m)was 1MPa、the new long-distance and wide-size spray lance was 4MPa、the long-distance and wide-size spray lance was 3MPa.
2. The VMD of several sprayers were:the new manpower spray lance(47.19μm)
4. By control experiments to rice planthopper, results showed that the mortality rate of every sprayer accounts for 90%or more, the effect of the new long-distance and wide-size spray lance was the best, up to 97.2%.
引文
[1]王涛,何金戈等.植物保护喷雾机械的发展研究现状综述[J].安徽农学通报,2008,14(21)：163-164.
[2]陈会柱.求真务实稳步推进重人病虫害专业化防治[J].中国植保导刊,2009,3：43-45.
[3]唐会联.农作物病虫害专业化防治问答(连载一)[J].湖南农业,2009,6：14.
[4]唐会联.农作物病虫害专业化防治问答(连载二)[J].湖南农业,2009,7：14.
[5]熊勇军.大力推进农作物病虫害专业化防治[J].作物研究,2009,23(1)：70-72.
[6]乐承伟.浅谈建立植保专业化防治体系[J].福建农业,2009,4：24.
[7]李义,王蕊.以新型植保专业化防治组织推进社会化服务[J].中国园艺文摘,2009,25(7) ：170-171.
[8]唐会联.农作物病虫害专业化防治问答(连载三)[J].湖南农业,2009,8：14.
[9]张全胜.抚州市水稻病虫害专业化防治组织建设初见成效[J].中国植保导刊,2009,4：45-46.
[10]张跃.关于含山县植保专业化防治组织发展的思考[J].现代农业科技,2009,13：183-184.
[11]赵禹.邯郸市病虫害专业化防治服务组织建设的现状及对策[J].中国植保导刊,2008,28(9) ：43-45.
[12]刘明熙.广德县农业重大病虫专业化防治的发展与思考[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(13) ：158.
[13]钱建,程枫叶,陈伟.南通市农作物病虫专业化防治时间与发展对策[J].上海农业科技,2010,2：13-15.
[14]苏彪,吴觉辉等.益阳市农作物病虫害专业化防治工作实践与思考[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(17)：151-152.
[15]郑文钟,应霞芳,我国植保机械和施药技术的现状、问题及对策[J].农机化研究,2008,5：219-221.
[16]戴奋奋,袁会珠,党玲等.植保机械与施药技术规范化[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2002,(4)：5-8.
[17]徐映明.农药施用技术.北京：化学工业出版社,1999.
[18]何雄奎.植保机械与施药技术[J].植保机械与清洗机械动态,2002,(4)：5-8.
[19]杨学军,严荷荣.植保机械的研究现状及发展趋势[J].农业机械学报,2002,6(33)：129-131.
[20]何雄奎.大力发展我国植保机械与施药技术[J].科学时报,2003,5(28)：32-37.
[21]Hans Schoen. Elek tronik und computer in der landw irtschaft [M]. Stuttgart:V erlag Eugen U lmer,1993.
[22]宋坚利,何雄奎等.罩盖牵引喷雾机的设计与防飘试验[J].农业机械学报,2007,38(8) ：74-77.
[23]林明远,赵刚.国外植保机械安全施药技术[J].农业机械学报,1996,10(27)：149-154.
[24]耿爱军,李法德等.国内外植保机械及植保技术研究现状[J].农机化研究,2004,7(4)：189-191.
[25]唐辉宇.国外植保机械的发展方向[J].南方农机,2004(6)：43.
[26]张玲,戴奋奋.我国植保机械及施药技术现状与发展趋势[J].中国农机化,2002(6)：34-35.
[27]陈东耀,石永年.试述植保机械化新技术[J].农机化研究,2002(8)：215.
[28]陆泳平.植保技术现状与发展趋势[J].湖南农机,2001(5)：9-11.
[29]徐赛章.我国植保机械现状及展望[J].农村机械化,1997(3)：911.
[30]刘建,吕新民,党革荣等.植保机械的研究现状与发展趋势[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2003,31(10)增刊：202-204.
[31]王涛,何金戈等.植物保护喷雾机械的发展研究状况综述[J].安徽农学通报,2008,14(21)：163-164.
[32]席孟玲.植保机械使用现状及发展方向浅析[J],河南农业,2006,8：29.
[33]赵茂程,政加强.树形识别与精确对靶施药的模拟研究[J],农业工程学报,2003,19(6)：151-153.
[34]何雄奎,严苛荣,储金宇等,果园自动对靶静电喷雾机设计与试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(6)：78-80.
[35]何雄奎.改变我国植保机械和施药技术严重落后的现状[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(1) ：13-15.
[36]高焕文,李问盈.我国农业机械化的跨世纪展望[J].农业工程学报,2000,(2)：9- 12.
[37]张忠谋,刘天龙等.病虫防治现状堪忧专业化防治势在必行[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(1) ：152.
[38]陆琳.植保机械及施药技术落后的原因[J].云南农业,2008,9：20.
[39]刘源,刘安敏.50%吡蚜酮水分散粒剂防治水稻稻飞虱田间药效试验[J].山东农业科学,2010,10：94-95.
[40]李云瑞.农业昆虫学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005,147-153.
[41]袁锋.农业昆虫学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2001,156-163.
[42]花蕾.植物保护学[M].北京：科学出版社,2009,237-242.
[43]翟丽英.水稻稻飞虱的发生特点及防治对策[J].安徽农业,2004,32(4)：19-20.
[44]程家安,朱金良等.稻田飞虱灾变与环境调控[J].环境昆虫学报,2008,30(2)175-176.
[45]陆晓峰,吉用铨等.乙虫腈10%悬浮剂和毗蚜酮25%可湿性粉剂防治稻飞虱田间药效试验[J].农业科学与管理,2010,31(3)：75-77.
[46]程遐年,吴进才,马飞.褐飞虱研究与防治[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2003：29-31.
[47]卿雨文,李春,张志东,等.泸州地区白背飞虱种群动态及预测预报[J].西南农业大学学报,2000,22(1)：49-52,70.
[48]唐启义,胡国文,唐健,等. 白背飞虱猖獗频率增加与杂交稻面积增加的关系分析[J].西南农业大学学报,2000,22(5)：456-459.
[49]何月平,陈利,等. 吡蚜酮对水稻褐飞虱取食行为的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2010,24(6)：635-640.
[50]Hirai K. Recent trends of insecticide susceptibility in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stgal) (Homoptera:Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool,1993, 28(3):339-346.
[51]Endo S, Tsurumachi M.Insecticide susceptibility of the brown planthopper and the white—backed planthopper collected from southeast Asia. Jap J Pestic Sci, 2001,26(1):82-86.
[52]Wang Y H,Gao C F.Zhu Y C, et al. Imidacloprid susceptibility survey and selection risk assessment in field populations of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae). J EconEntomol,2008,101(2):515-522.
[53]Fluckiger C R, Kristinsson H, Senn R, et al. CGA 215'944//Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference on Pests and Diseases:Vol.1. Croydon:BCPC Publications,1992:43-50.
[54]Senn R, Sechser B, Fluckiger C R. Use of pymetrozine in IPM vegetable programs //Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Confercnce on Pests and Diseases: Vol.3. Faraham, Surrey:British Crop protection Council, Faraham, Surrey: British crop protection Council,1994:1187-1192.
[55]Harrewijin P, Kayser H. Pymetrozine, a fast-acting and selective inhibitor of aphid feeding:ln-situ studies with electronic monitoring of feeding behaviour.Pestie Sci,1997,49(2):130-140.
[56]Aushorn J, Wolf H, Mader W, et al. The insecticide pymetrozine selectively affects chordotonal mechanoreceptors. J E xp Biol,2005,208(23):4451-4466.
[57]Kaufmann I, Schurmann F, Yiallouros M, et al. The serotonergic system is involved in feeding inhibition by pymetrozine:Studies on a locust (Locusta migratoria) and anaphid (M yzus persicae). Comp Biochem Physiol,2004,138(4): 469-483.
[58]Velusamy R, Heinrichs E A. Electronic monitoring of feeding behaviour of Nilaparvata lugens(Homoptera-Delphacidae)on resistant and susceptible rice cultivars. Environ Entomol,1986,15(3):678-682.
[59]Khan Z R, Saxena R C. Probing behavior of three biotypes of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera:Delphacidae) on different resistant and susceptible rice varieties. J Econ Entomol,1988,81(5):1338-1345.
[60]Kimmins F M. Electrical penetration graphs from Nilaparvata lugens on resistant and susceptible rice varieties. Entomol ExpAppl,1989,50(1):69-79.
[61]Losel P M, Goodman L J. Effects on the feeding behavior of Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)of sublethal concentrations of the foliarly applied nitromethylene heterocycle 2-nitromethylene-1,3-thiazinan-3-yl-carbarnal dehyde. Physiol Entomol,1993,18(1):67-74.
[62]Hattori M. Probing behavior of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)(Homoptera:Delphacidae)on a nonhost barnyard grass,and resistant and susceptible varieties of rice. Appl Entomol Zool,2001,36(1); 83-89.
[63]Hattori M. Electronic monitoring of feeding and oviposition behaviour of rice planthopper and its application in plant resistance study. Chin J Rice Sci, 2003,17 (Sup):31-36.
[64]丁锦华,苏建业.农业昆虫学(南方本)[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2002：173-176.
[65]顾中言,韩丽娟,钟定亮,等.农药复配剂增效作用的定性定量分析[J].汀苏农业科学,1990,3：31-34.
[66]Matthews GA. Determination of droplet size [J].PANS,1975,21(2):231-225.
[67]Matthews GA. Pesticide application methods [M]. NewYork:Longman Group Limited,1979.
[68]杨祖英,李学良.食品中诱惑红的测定方法[J].卫生研究,1994,23(4)：239-242.
[69]王志辉.利用分光光度法同时测定混合染料中三种染色剂成分的初步研究[J].现代科学仪器,2004,5：57-59.
[70]王民玉.利用Excel电了表格制作标准曲线及查询测定结果[J].中华检验医学杂志,2000，23(2)：128.
[71]邱占奎,袁会珠,楼少巍,等.水溶剂染色剂诱惑红和丽春红-G作为农药沉积分布的示踪剂研究[J].农药,2007,46(5)：324-327.
[2]陈会柱.求真务实稳步推进重人病虫害专业化防治[J].中国植保导刊,2009,3：43-45.
[3]唐会联.农作物病虫害专业化防治问答(连载一)[J].湖南农业,2009,6：14.
[4]唐会联.农作物病虫害专业化防治问答(连载二)[J].湖南农业,2009,7：14.
[5]熊勇军.大力推进农作物病虫害专业化防治[J].作物研究,2009,23(1)：70-72.
[6]乐承伟.浅谈建立植保专业化防治体系[J].福建农业,2009,4：24.
[7]李义,王蕊.以新型植保专业化防治组织推进社会化服务[J].中国园艺文摘,2009,25(7) ：170-171.
[8]唐会联.农作物病虫害专业化防治问答(连载三)[J].湖南农业,2009,8：14.
[9]张全胜.抚州市水稻病虫害专业化防治组织建设初见成效[J].中国植保导刊,2009,4：45-46.
[10]张跃.关于含山县植保专业化防治组织发展的思考[J].现代农业科技,2009,13：183-184.
[11]赵禹.邯郸市病虫害专业化防治服务组织建设的现状及对策[J].中国植保导刊,2008,28(9) ：43-45.
[12]刘明熙.广德县农业重大病虫专业化防治的发展与思考[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(13) ：158.
[13]钱建,程枫叶,陈伟.南通市农作物病虫专业化防治时间与发展对策[J].上海农业科技,2010,2：13-15.
[14]苏彪,吴觉辉等.益阳市农作物病虫害专业化防治工作实践与思考[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(17)：151-152.
[15]郑文钟,应霞芳,我国植保机械和施药技术的现状、问题及对策[J].农机化研究,2008,5：219-221.
[16]戴奋奋,袁会珠,党玲等.植保机械与施药技术规范化[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2002,(4)：5-8.
[17]徐映明.农药施用技术.北京：化学工业出版社,1999.
[18]何雄奎.植保机械与施药技术[J].植保机械与清洗机械动态,2002,(4)：5-8.
[19]杨学军,严荷荣.植保机械的研究现状及发展趋势[J].农业机械学报,2002,6(33)：129-131.
[20]何雄奎.大力发展我国植保机械与施药技术[J].科学时报,2003,5(28)：32-37.
[21]Hans Schoen. Elek tronik und computer in der landw irtschaft [M]. Stuttgart:V erlag Eugen U lmer,1993.
[22]宋坚利,何雄奎等.罩盖牵引喷雾机的设计与防飘试验[J].农业机械学报,2007,38(8) ：74-77.
[23]林明远,赵刚.国外植保机械安全施药技术[J].农业机械学报,1996,10(27)：149-154.
[24]耿爱军,李法德等.国内外植保机械及植保技术研究现状[J].农机化研究,2004,7(4)：189-191.
[25]唐辉宇.国外植保机械的发展方向[J].南方农机,2004(6)：43.
[26]张玲,戴奋奋.我国植保机械及施药技术现状与发展趋势[J].中国农机化,2002(6)：34-35.
[27]陈东耀,石永年.试述植保机械化新技术[J].农机化研究,2002(8)：215.
[28]陆泳平.植保技术现状与发展趋势[J].湖南农机,2001(5)：9-11.
[29]徐赛章.我国植保机械现状及展望[J].农村机械化,1997(3)：911.
[30]刘建,吕新民,党革荣等.植保机械的研究现状与发展趋势[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2003,31(10)增刊：202-204.
[31]王涛,何金戈等.植物保护喷雾机械的发展研究状况综述[J].安徽农学通报,2008,14(21)：163-164.
[32]席孟玲.植保机械使用现状及发展方向浅析[J],河南农业,2006,8：29.
[33]赵茂程,政加强.树形识别与精确对靶施药的模拟研究[J],农业工程学报,2003,19(6)：151-153.
[34]何雄奎,严苛荣,储金宇等,果园自动对靶静电喷雾机设计与试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(6)：78-80.
[35]何雄奎.改变我国植保机械和施药技术严重落后的现状[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(1) ：13-15.
[36]高焕文,李问盈.我国农业机械化的跨世纪展望[J].农业工程学报,2000,(2)：9- 12.
[37]张忠谋,刘天龙等.病虫防治现状堪忧专业化防治势在必行[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(1) ：152.
[38]陆琳.植保机械及施药技术落后的原因[J].云南农业,2008,9：20.
[39]刘源,刘安敏.50%吡蚜酮水分散粒剂防治水稻稻飞虱田间药效试验[J].山东农业科学,2010,10：94-95.
[40]李云瑞.农业昆虫学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005,147-153.
[41]袁锋.农业昆虫学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2001,156-163.
[42]花蕾.植物保护学[M].北京：科学出版社,2009,237-242.
[43]翟丽英.水稻稻飞虱的发生特点及防治对策[J].安徽农业,2004,32(4)：19-20.
[44]程家安,朱金良等.稻田飞虱灾变与环境调控[J].环境昆虫学报,2008,30(2)175-176.
[45]陆晓峰,吉用铨等.乙虫腈10%悬浮剂和毗蚜酮25%可湿性粉剂防治稻飞虱田间药效试验[J].农业科学与管理,2010,31(3)：75-77.
[46]程遐年,吴进才,马飞.褐飞虱研究与防治[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2003：29-31.
[47]卿雨文,李春,张志东,等.泸州地区白背飞虱种群动态及预测预报[J].西南农业大学学报,2000,22(1)：49-52,70.
[48]唐启义,胡国文,唐健,等. 白背飞虱猖獗频率增加与杂交稻面积增加的关系分析[J].西南农业大学学报,2000,22(5)：456-459.
[49]何月平,陈利,等. 吡蚜酮对水稻褐飞虱取食行为的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2010,24(6)：635-640.
[50]Hirai K. Recent trends of insecticide susceptibility in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stgal) (Homoptera:Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool,1993, 28(3):339-346.
[51]Endo S, Tsurumachi M.Insecticide susceptibility of the brown planthopper and the white—backed planthopper collected from southeast Asia. Jap J Pestic Sci, 2001,26(1):82-86.
[52]Wang Y H,Gao C F.Zhu Y C, et al. Imidacloprid susceptibility survey and selection risk assessment in field populations of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae). J EconEntomol,2008,101(2):515-522.
[53]Fluckiger C R, Kristinsson H, Senn R, et al. CGA 215'944//Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference on Pests and Diseases:Vol.1. Croydon:BCPC Publications,1992:43-50.
[54]Senn R, Sechser B, Fluckiger C R. Use of pymetrozine in IPM vegetable programs //Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Confercnce on Pests and Diseases: Vol.3. Faraham, Surrey:British Crop protection Council, Faraham, Surrey: British crop protection Council,1994:1187-1192.
[55]Harrewijin P, Kayser H. Pymetrozine, a fast-acting and selective inhibitor of aphid feeding:ln-situ studies with electronic monitoring of feeding behaviour.Pestie Sci,1997,49(2):130-140.
[56]Aushorn J, Wolf H, Mader W, et al. The insecticide pymetrozine selectively affects chordotonal mechanoreceptors. J E xp Biol,2005,208(23):4451-4466.
[57]Kaufmann I, Schurmann F, Yiallouros M, et al. The serotonergic system is involved in feeding inhibition by pymetrozine:Studies on a locust (Locusta migratoria) and anaphid (M yzus persicae). Comp Biochem Physiol,2004,138(4): 469-483.
[58]Velusamy R, Heinrichs E A. Electronic monitoring of feeding behaviour of Nilaparvata lugens(Homoptera-Delphacidae)on resistant and susceptible rice cultivars. Environ Entomol,1986,15(3):678-682.
[59]Khan Z R, Saxena R C. Probing behavior of three biotypes of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera:Delphacidae) on different resistant and susceptible rice varieties. J Econ Entomol,1988,81(5):1338-1345.
[60]Kimmins F M. Electrical penetration graphs from Nilaparvata lugens on resistant and susceptible rice varieties. Entomol ExpAppl,1989,50(1):69-79.
[61]Losel P M, Goodman L J. Effects on the feeding behavior of Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)of sublethal concentrations of the foliarly applied nitromethylene heterocycle 2-nitromethylene-1,3-thiazinan-3-yl-carbarnal dehyde. Physiol Entomol,1993,18(1):67-74.
[62]Hattori M. Probing behavior of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)(Homoptera:Delphacidae)on a nonhost barnyard grass,and resistant and susceptible varieties of rice. Appl Entomol Zool,2001,36(1); 83-89.
[63]Hattori M. Electronic monitoring of feeding and oviposition behaviour of rice planthopper and its application in plant resistance study. Chin J Rice Sci, 2003,17 (Sup):31-36.
[64]丁锦华,苏建业.农业昆虫学(南方本)[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2002：173-176.
[65]顾中言,韩丽娟,钟定亮,等.农药复配剂增效作用的定性定量分析[J].汀苏农业科学,1990,3：31-34.
[66]Matthews GA. Determination of droplet size [J].PANS,1975,21(2):231-225.
[67]Matthews GA. Pesticide application methods [M]. NewYork:Longman Group Limited,1979.
[68]杨祖英,李学良.食品中诱惑红的测定方法[J].卫生研究,1994,23(4)：239-242.
[69]王志辉.利用分光光度法同时测定混合染料中三种染色剂成分的初步研究[J].现代科学仪器,2004,5：57-59.
[70]王民玉.利用Excel电了表格制作标准曲线及查询测定结果[J].中华检验医学杂志,2000，23(2)：128.
[71]邱占奎,袁会珠,楼少巍,等.水溶剂染色剂诱惑红和丽春红-G作为农药沉积分布的示踪剂研究[J].农药,2007,46(5)：324-327.