铝胁迫下蓼属植物和饭豆根系有机酸分泌特性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
铝(Al)毒是酸性土壤上影响作物产量和植物生长的主要限制因子之一。筛选得到高抗Al的植物种类或品种,并进一步阐明植物的抗Al机制,是选育和通过生物技术手段创建适应酸性Al毒土壤上生长的植物的经济有效的手段。Al诱导植物根系分泌有机酸是迄今为止公认的一种最为重要的植物抗Al机制,但Al调控有机酸分泌的过程还没有完全明确。为深入理解Al调控有机酸分泌的过程,本文研究了三种蓼属植物(Polygonum)的抗Al程度与其生长地域土壤性质之间的关系,并从酸性土壤地区筛选得到一中度抗Al的作物一饭豆(Vigna umbellate [Thunb.]Ohwi&Ohashi),继而以这几种植物为材料,从有机酸分泌在植物抗Al中的作用,有机酸分泌时间模式比较,共质体和质外体Al在诱导有机酸分泌中的作用以及金属元素镁(Mg)提高Al诱导有机酸分泌的机制等多方面研究了Al胁迫下蓼属植物和饭豆根系有机酸的分泌特性,结果概述如下:
     1.蓼属植物的抗Al性比较及其抗Al机制
     源自强酸性土壤上的萹蓄(Polygonum aviculare L)和酸模叶蓼(Polygonum lapathifolium L)具有特殊高抗Al性,而中性土壤上的本氏蓼(Polygonum bungeanum Turcz)对Al极敏感。三种野生蓼属植物的抗Al程度与其生长地域土壤的pH值及活性Al含量密切相关,因而得出土壤环境是寻找发现高抗Al植物的良好指示。Al胁迫下三种蓼属植物根系的草酸分泌量与其抗Al程度正相关,与根尖的Al含量负相关,当草酸的分泌受抑时,加重了根系受Al抑制的程度,所以Al诱导草酸的分泌是蓼属植物的重要抗Al机制。与同属蓼科的荞麦相比,抗Al的萹蓄和酸模叶蓼都不是Al累积植物,尽管它们的抗Al性分别高于及等同于荞麦,而它们的有机酸分泌量远远低于荞麦,可知,除Al诱导有机酸的分泌外,萹蓄和酸模叶蓼还拥有其它有待于进一步探明的抗Al机制。
     2.萹蓄和饭豆在Al胁迫条件下有机酸分泌特性的比较
Aluminum (Al) toxicity is one of the most significant constaints limiting plant growth and crop production in acid soils, which comprise approximately 30% of arable land worldwide. Al at micromolar concentrations rapidly inhibits root elongation and the uptake of water and nutrients, leading to reduced plant growth and increased susceptibility to environmental stresses. However, some plant species or genotypes, especially native plant species, grow vigorously in acid soils, indicating these species or genotypes have adapted well to high levels of Al in the growth medium. The mechanisms of Al tolerance are not fully understood despite extensive research efforts have contributed to our understanding of Al resistance in plant. For example, the role of organic acids in detoxifying Al both externally and internally in some species has been well documented in the past decade, but it cannot explain high Al resistance in others. To date, most studies of Al-resistance mechanisms have focued on Al-resistant genotypes of crops that have a long breeding history. Therefore, it is very likely that some Al resistance genes have been lost when selection for other agronomic features. In the present study, three native Polygonum species were selected to study Al resistant mechanisms and the relationship between their Al resistance and the soil characteristics of their orgins. On the other hand, although Al-induced organic acid anions secretion has been proven as one of the most important Al resistance mechanisms in many plant species and cultivars, the process of how Al regulated the organic acid anions secretion has not been completely understood. In the present study, Polygonums and rice bean {Vigna umbellate [Thunb.] Ohwi & Ohashi) were selected as the plant materials to study the physiological basis of Al-inuduced oranic acid anions secretion. Because we have proven that Polygonum aviculare L exude oxalate rapidly under Al stress and fitted into Pattern Ⅰ type, but rice bean exude citrate delayed by several hours in response to Al stress and fitted into Pattern Ⅱ type. Thus, the two species must differ greatly in the mechanisms of Al-induced organic acid anions efflux. The results were as follows:1. A comparison of aluminum resistance among Polygonum species originating on
    strongly acidic and neutral soilsPolygonum aviculare L and Polygonum lapathifolium L grown in tea garden soils at pH around 3.5 showed high Al resistance, but Polygonum bungeanum Turcz grown in neutral soils was extremely sensitive to Al. Hydrophonic experiments showed that the root elongation was only inhibited by 15% in P. aviculare and 35% in P. lapathifolium after exposure to 50 uM Al for 24 h. Their Al resistance was respectively higher than and similar to that in an Al resistant buckwheat {Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) cultivar. In contrast, the root elongation of P. bungeanum was inhibited by 80% under the same condition. The differences in Al resistance among Polygonum species were confirmed in a 10-d intermittent Al treatment experiment, the root biomass of the former two species were unaltered but decreased by 50% in the latter species. However, high Al accumulation was not found in the leaves, indicating these species were not Al accumulators. Oxalate efflux was detected in root exudates of both Al resistant species. No organic acid anions were detected in the root exudates of the Al sensitive species. The anion channel inhibitor phenylglyoxal (PG) inhibited the oxalate efflux greatly. Inhibition of root elongation was greater in the presence of PG, confirming that oxalate efflux was associated with the Al resistance. However, since the efflux rate was much lower than their related species buckwheat, other mechanisms must be involved in Al resistance and these need to be studied further.2. A comparative study on Al induced oxalate secretion in P. aviculare and citrate secretion in rice beanIn order to clarify the processes of Al induced organic acid anions secretion in different plants with different patterns, the characteristics of Al induced organic acid anions efflux in the roots of rice bean and P. aviculare was investigated. Oxalate secretion in P. aviculare roots occurred within 30 min of Al exposure, while citrate secretion in rice bean roots was induced by at least 4 h Al exposure. Therefore, the former was classified to pattern I, and the latter pattern II. A broad protein-synthesis inhibitor cyclohexide had no obvious effect on the Al-induced oxalate secretion in P.
    aviculare, but inhibited the Al-induced citrate secretion in rice bean roots by about 84%. This suggested that novel protein synthesis didn't involved in the Al-induced oxalate secretion in P. aviuculare, but was essential in regulating the Al-induced citrate secretion in rice bean. Al exposure did not affect the oxalate content in P. aviculare root apices, but stimulate citrate synthesis in rice bean. The oxalate secretion in P. aviculare was sensitive to anion channel blocker PG and the citrate secretion in rice bean was sensitive to anthrancene-9-carboxylic acid, indicating anion channels involved in organic acid anions secretion in both plants but their pharmacological properties were different from each other.3. Al in symplast played very important role in regulating oxalate secretion in P. aviculare rootsIn order to determine whether Al in the apoplast or symplast activated the organic acid anion channels in plasma membrane, P. aviculare was grown in nutrient solution with or without NaCl to modify the root cell wall properties. Results showed that neither root plasma membrane intergrity nor oxalate content in root tips was affected by NaCl pretreatment. However, NaCl pretreatment resulted in about 36 % increase in total pectin content of P. aviculare root apices, and enhanced the Al adsorption rate and total Al accumulation in the extracted root cell walls. The oxalate efflux occurred after 3 h of Al exposure in the NaCl pretreatment P. aviculare roots although that occurred within 30 mins Al exposure in the control roots. This was consistent with the delay of Al entry into root symplasm. Therefore, it was suggested that Al must enter into symplast to induce oxalate secretion from P. aviculare roots. An alternative explanation for the present result is that there is a critical Al content in root symplsam to active oxalate efflux. However, the possibility remains that NaCl pretreatment delayed the oxalate secretion by affecting the activity of enzymes or signal substance involved in the opening of anion channels. This needs further investigation in the future.4. The physiological mechanism of Mg alleviating Al toxicityMagnesium (Mg) can alleviate Al toxicity, but the physiological mechanisms are
    still not clear. Here we found that micromolar level of Mg obviously alleviated Al-induced but not lanthanum-induced root elongation inhibition in rice bean. The increase of Al-induced citrate efflux paralleled with the decrease of root elongation inhibition with the addition of Mg at either dose (10-50 uM) or time-course (0-4, 4-8, 8-12 and 12-24 h) manner, suggesting that the ameliorative effect by Mg might be closely associated with Mg-enhanced citrate efflux from rice bean roots. Vanadate (an effective H+-ATPase inhibitor) decreased the Al-induced citrate efflux, while addition of Mg partly restored the efflux;Mg addition obviously increased the activity of Al-reduced plasma membrane H+-ATPase, and Mg and calcium contents in root apices significantly. Taken together, we proposed the following scheme: Mg addition compensated the Al-induced Mg decrease, the increased intracellular Mg content up-regulated the activity of plasma membrane H+-ATPase, and finally resulted in the increase of Al-induced citrate efflux.
引文
熊毅,李庆魁(1987).中国土壤.北京:科学出版社,39
    Ahn SJ, Sivaguru M, Chung GC, Rengel Z and Matsumoto H.(2002). Aluminium-induced growth inhibition is associated with impaired efflux and influx of H~+ across the plasma membrane in root apixes of squash (Cucurbita pepo). J. exp. Bot. 376: 1959-1966.
    Ahn SJ, Sivaguru M, Osawa H, Chung GC and Matsumoto H. (2001). Aluminum inhibits the H~+-ATPase activity by permanently altering the plasma membrane surface potentials in squash roots. Plant Physiol. 126:1381-1390.
    Akeson M and Murms DN. (1989). Lipid bilayer permeation by neutral aluminum citrate and by three alpha hydroxy carboxylic acids. Biochem. biophys. Acta. 984: 200-206.
    Akeson M, Munns DN, Burau RG.(1989). Adsorption of Al~(3+) to phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochem. biophys. Acta. 986: 33-40.
    Basu A, Basu U, Taylor GJ. (1994). Induction of microsomal membrane proteins in roots of an aluminum-resistant cultivar of Triticum aestivum L. under conditions of aluminum stress. Plant Physiol. 104:1007-1013.
    Berridge MJ. (1987). Inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerol: two interacting second messengers. Ann. Biochem. 56: 159-193.
    Blamey FPC. (2001). The role of the root cell wall in aluminum toxicity. In Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K, Srinivasan A. (ed). Plant Nutritent Acquisition. New Perspectives. pp.201-226. Springer-Verlag, Tokoyo.
    Blancaflor EB, Jones DL and Gilroy S. (1998). Alterations in the cytoskeleton accompany aluminum-induced growth inhibition and morphological changes in primary roots of maize. Plant Physiol. 118:159-72.
    Clarkson DT. (1967). Interaction between aluminum and phosphorous on root surfaces and cell wall material. Plant Soil 27: 347-356.
    Delhaize E and Ryan PR. (1995). Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. 107: 315-321.
    Degenhardt J, Larsen PB, Howell SH and Kochian LV. (1998). Aluminum resistance in the arabidopsis mutant alr-104 is caused by an aluminum-induced increase in rhizosphere pH. Plant Physiol. 117:19-27.
    Ezaki B, Gardner RC, Ezaki Y, Matsumoto H. (2000) Expression of aluminum-induced genes in transgenic arabidopsis plants can ameliorate aluminum stress and/or oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 122: 657-665.
    Foy CD. (1988). Plant adaptation to acid, aluminum-toxic soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 19: 959-987.
    Gunse B, Poschenrieder C and Barcelo J. (1997). Water transport properties of roots and root cortical cells in proton- and Al stressed maize varieties. Plant Physiol. 113:595-602.
    Grabski S and Schindler M. (1995). Aluminum induces rigor within the actin network of soybean cells. Plant Physiol. 108: 897- 901
    Horst WJ, Asher C, Cakmak I, Szulkiewicz P and Wissemeier A H. (1992). Short-term responses of soybean roots to aluminium. J. Plant Physiol. 140:174-78.
    Huck MG. (1972). Impairment of sucrose utilization for cell wall formation in the roots of aluminum-damaged cotton seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 13: 7-14.
    Ishikawa S, Wagatsuma T, Takano T, Tawaraya K and Oomata K. (2001). The plasma membrane intactness of root-tip cell is a primary factor for Al-tolerance in cultivars of five species. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 47: 489-501.
    Jones DL and Kochian LV. (1995). Aluminum inhibition of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate signal transduction pathway in wheat roots: a role in aluminum toxicity?Plant Cell 7:1913-22.
    Kaneko M, Yoshimura E, Nishizawa NK. (2002). Time course study of aluminum-induced callose formation roots as observed digital microscopy and low-vacuum scanning electron microscopy. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 45: 701-712.
    Larsen PB Degenhardt J, Tai CY, Stenzler LM, Howell SH and Kochian LV. (1998). Aluminum-resistant Arabidopsis mutants that exhibit altered patterns of aluminum accumulation and organic acid release from roots. Plant Physiol. 117: 9-18.
    Llungany M, Poschennjeder C and Barcelo J. (1995). Monitoring of aluminium-induced inhibition of root elongation in four maize cultivars differing in tolerance to
     aluminium and proton toxicity. Physiol. Plant. 93: 265-271.
    Ma JF, Hiradate S, Nomoto K, Iwashita T and Matsumoto H. (1997). Internal detoxification mechanism of Al in Hydrangea, identification of Al form in the leaves. Plant Physiol. 113: 1033-1039.
    Ma JF and Hiradate S. 2000. Form of aluminium for uptake and translocation in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Planta 211:355-360.
    Matsumoto H, Hirasawa E, Torikai H and Takahashi E. (1976). Localization of absorbed aluminum in pea root and its binding to nucleic acids. Plant Cell Physiol. 17: 127-137.
    Matsumoto H. (1991). Biochemical mechanism of the toxicity of aluminium and the sequestration of aluminum in plant cells. In: Wright RJ, Baligar VC and Murrmann RP. (ed.) Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH. pp. 825-838. Kluwer Academic Publ, Dordrecht.
    Marienfeld S and Stelzer R. (1993). X-ray microanalyses in roots of Altreated Avena sativa plants. J. Plant Physiol. 141: 569-573.
    Kataoka T, Furukawa J and Nakanishi TM (2003).The decrease of extracted apoplast protein in soybean root tip by aluminium treatment. Biol. Plant. 46: 445-449.
    Kenzhebaeva SS, Yamamoto Y and Matsumoto H. (1999). Aluminum induced changes in cell-wall glycoproteins in the root tips of Al-tolerant and Al-sensitive wheat lines. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 48: 441-447.
    Kidd PS, Poschenrieder C and Barcelo J. (2001). Does root exudation of phenolics play a role in aluminum resistance in maize (Lea may L)? In: Horst et al (ed). Plant Nutrition-Food Security and Sustainability of Agro-Ecosystems, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 504-505.
    Kinraide TB. (1991). Identity of the rhizotoxic species. Plant soil 134: 167-178.
    Kinraide TB, Ryan PR and Kochian LV. (1992). Interactive effects of Ai3+, H+, and other cations on root elongation considered in terms of cell-surface electrical potential. Plant Physiol. 99: 1461-1468.
    Kinraide TB. (1994) Use of Gouy-Chapman-Stern model for membrane-surface-electrical potential to interpret some feature of mineral rhizotoxicity. Plant Physiol. 106: 1583-1592.
    Kochian LV. (1995). Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants, Annu Rev Plant Physiol. Plant Mol Biol. 46: 237-260.
    Kochian LV, Hoekenga OA and Pineros MA. (2004). How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55: 459-493.
    Lazof DB, Goldsmith JG, Rufty TW and Linton RW. (1994). Rapid uptake of aluminum into cells of intact soybean root tips, A microanalytical study using secondary ion mass spectrometry. Plant Physiol. 106: 1107-1114.
    Lazof DB, Goldsmith JG, Rufty TW and Linton RW. (1996). The early entry of Al into cells of intact soybean roots. A comparison of three developmental root regions using secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging. Plant Physiol. 112:1289-300
    Le Van H, Kuraishi S and Sakurai N. (1994). Aluminum-induced rapid root inhibition and changes in cell-wall components of squash seedlings. Plant Physiol. 106:971-976.
    Marschner H. (1991). Mechanisms of adaptation of plants to acid soils. Plant Soil 134:1-20.
    Nian H, Yang ZM, Huang H, Yan XL and Matsumoto H. (2004). Citrate secretion induced by aluminum stress may not be a key mechanism responsible for differential aluminum tolerance of some soybean genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. 27:2047-2066.
    Ofei-Manu P, Wagatsuma T and Ishikawa S (2001). The significance of phenolic compounds in roots of different age on Al resistance of some common woody plants. In: Horst WJ et al (ed). Plant Nutrition -Food Security and Sustainability of Agro-Ecosystems, pp 512-513, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
    Parker DR and Bertsch PM. (1992). Formation of the "Al" tridecameric polycation under diverse synthesis conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 26: 914-921
    Rengel Z. (1996). Uptake of aluminium by plant cells. New Phytol. 134: 389-406.
    Rengle Z and Reid RJ. (1997). Uptake of Al across the plasma membrane of plant cells. Plant Soil. 192:31-35.
    Ryan PR, Ditomaso JM and Kochian LV. (1993). Aluminum toxicity in roots: An investigation of spatial sensitivity and the role of the root cap. J Exp. Bot. 44:
     437-446.
    Ryan PR, Reid RJ and Smith FA. (1997) Direct evaluation of the Ca2+-displacement hypothesis for Al toxicity. Plant Physiol. 113: 1351-1357.
    Schildknecht PHPA and Vidal BC.( 2002). A role for the cell wall in A13+ resistance and toxicity: crystallinity and availability of negative charges. Int. Arch. Biosci. 2002: 1087-1095.
    Shen RF, Ma JF, Kyo M and Iwashita T. (2002). Compartmentation of aluminium in leaves of an Al-accumulator, Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Planta 215:394-98.
    Silva IR, Smyth TJ, Moxley DF, Carter TE, Allen NS and Rufty TW. (2000). Aluminum accumulation at nuclei of cells in the root tip. Fluorescence detection using lumogallion and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Plant Physiol. 123:543-52.
    Sivaguru M and Horst WJ. (1998). The distal part of the transition zone is the most aluminum-sensitive apical root zone of maize. Plant Physiol. 116: 155-163.
    Sivaguru M, Fujiwara T, Samaj J, Baluska F, Yang ZM,Osawa H, Maeda T, Mori T, Volkmann D and Matsumoto H. (2000) . Aluminum-induced 1,3-3-D-glucan inhibits cell-to-cell trafficking of molecules through plasmodesmata: a new mechanism of Al toxicity in plants. Plant Physiol. 124: 991-1005.
    Taylor GJ. (1990).The physiology of aluminium phytotoxicity. In: Siegel H. (ed.): Metal Ions in Biological Systems, pp. 123- 163. Marcel Dekker, New York.
    Taylor GJ. (1991). Current review of the aluminum stress response: The physiological basis of tolerance. Curr. Top. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 10: 57-93.
    Tice KR, Parker DR and Demason DA. (1992). Operationally defined apoplastic and symplastic aluminum fractions in root tips of aluminum-intoxicated wheat. Plant Physiol. 100: 309-318.
    Vazquez M, Poschenrieder C, Corrales L and Barcelo J. (1999) Changes in apoplastic aluminum during the initial growth response to aluminum by roots of tolerant maize variety. Plant Physiol. 119: 435-444.
    von Uexkull H R and Mutert E (1995). Global extent, development and econonim impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171:1-15.
    Wagatsuma T, Jujo K, Ishikawa S and Nakashima T. (1995) Aluminum-tolerant
     protoplasts from roots can be collected with positively charged silica microbeads: A method based on differences in surface negativity. Plant Cell Physiol. 36:1493-1502.
    Wenzl P, Patino GM, Chaves AL, Mayer JE and Rao IM. (2001). The high level of aluminum resistance in signalgrass is not associated with known mechanisms of external aluminum detoxification in root apices. Plant Physiol. 125:1473-1484.
    Wissemeier AH, Diening A, Hergenroder A, Horst WJ and Mix-Wagner G. (1992). Callose formation as parameter for assessing genotypical plant tolerance of aluminium and managanese. Plant Soil. 146: 67-75.
    Yang JL, Zheng SJ, He YF, Tang CX and Zhou GD. (2005) Genotypic differences among plant species in response to aluminum stress. J. Plant Nutr. 28: 949-961.
    Yermiyahu U, Rytwo G, Brauer DK and Kinraide TB. (1997) Binding and electrostatic attraction of lanthanum (La3+) andaluminum (Al3+) to wheat root plasma membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 159: 239-252.
    Yamamoto Y, Kobayashi Y, Devi SR, Rikiishi S and Matsumoto H. (2003) Oxidative stress triggered by aluminum in plant roots. Plant Soil 255: 239-243.
    Zheng SJ and Yang JL. (2005). Target sits of aluminum phytotoxicty. Biol. Plant. 49:321-331.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700