鲁西地区中、新生界划分与对比
|
摘要
在不同时期,不同研究者对鲁西地层分区建立和使用了许多不同的岩石地层单位,使用比较混乱。该地区分布着近东西向大致平行排列的第三纪盆地群,但是一直以来对该地区地层单位的划分都存在很大的争议,这给研究工作带来了很大不便。本文对鲁西地区中、新生代的岩石地层单位进行了讨论,提出了新的划分方案。我们建议在中生代使用坊子组、三台组、蒙阴组、西洼组、固城组这一地层系统,同时建议,废除“汶南(亚)组”和“分水岭(亚)组”,并且在鲁西地层分区不使用鲁东地层分区的“杨家庄组”、“曲格庄组”、“八亩地组”等岩石地层单位。在新生代依据对沉积特征以及地层的分布特点,认为该地区的第三系应该采用官庄群一名,自下而上包括固城组、卞桥组、常路组、朱家沟组和大汶口组。通过对哺乳动物、介形类、轮藻、腹足类和孢粉等化石的研究,官庄群的时代属古新世一早渐新世,固城组的时代为晚白垩世,卞桥组为早古新世,常路组为中、晚古新世至早始新世,朱家沟组为早始新世,大汶口组为中始新世。利用露头区新的划分方案对不同时期、不同单位在覆盖区的钻井地层进行了重新划分,并对钻井及露头区的地层进行了对比,总结了鲁西地区中新生代地层分布特点。从而为鲁西中、新生代地层的发育特征研究奠定了基础。
The use of Hthostratigraphic units to the west Shandong province stratigraphic subregion is very chaotic because different researchers establishes and uses different Hthostratigraphic units in different time. Tertiary period basin group lies approximately parallel arrangement along east and west. It is difficult for studying work because Stratigraphic unit's division has the very great dispute to this area. This article discusses lithostratigraphic units of Mesozoic Era, Cainozoic era to the west Shandong province and then proposes a new division scheme. It is suggested that use Fangzi formation, Santai formation, Mengyin formation, Xiwa formation, Gucheng formation, abate "Wennan formation (sub-formation) ", "Fenshuiling formation (sub-formation) " and does not use some lithostratigraphic units in the west Shandong province, such as "Yanggezhuang formation", "Qugezhuang formation", "Bamudi formation" and so on. Guanzhuang group is suggested to be adopted in Tertiary era according to sedimentary characteristic and the distribution of strata, Cainozoic era. Guanzhuang group includes Gucheng formation, Bianqiao formation, Changlu formation, Zhujiagou formation and Dawenkou formation from bottom to top. After the research of mammal, ostracoda, chareae, gastropod, palynologic fossil and so on, Guanzhuang group pertains Paleocene epoch to early Oligocene epoch, Gucheng formation pertains late Cretaceous, Bianqiao formation pertains early Paleocene epoch, Changlu formation pertains middle-late Paleocene epoch to early Eocene epoch, Zhujiagou formation pertains early Eocene epoch, Dawenkou formation pertains middle Eocene epoch. Well strata of overlay area are redivided and the strata are contrasted of overlay area and outcrop area, using the new division scheme. Finally Mesozoic Era, Cainozoic era strata distributed characteristic is summarized to the west Shandongprovince and this research has laid the foundation.
The use of Hthostratigraphic units to the west Shandong province stratigraphic subregion is very chaotic because different researchers establishes and uses different Hthostratigraphic units in different time. Tertiary period basin group lies approximately parallel arrangement along east and west. It is difficult for studying work because Stratigraphic unit's division has the very great dispute to this area. This article discusses lithostratigraphic units of Mesozoic Era, Cainozoic era to the west Shandong province and then proposes a new division scheme. It is suggested that use Fangzi formation, Santai formation, Mengyin formation, Xiwa formation, Gucheng formation, abate "Wennan formation (sub-formation) ", "Fenshuiling formation (sub-formation) " and does not use some lithostratigraphic units in the west Shandong province, such as "Yanggezhuang formation", "Qugezhuang formation", "Bamudi formation" and so on. Guanzhuang group is suggested to be adopted in Tertiary era according to sedimentary characteristic and the distribution of strata, Cainozoic era. Guanzhuang group includes Gucheng formation, Bianqiao formation, Changlu formation, Zhujiagou formation and Dawenkou formation from bottom to top. After the research of mammal, ostracoda, chareae, gastropod, palynologic fossil and so on, Guanzhuang group pertains Paleocene epoch to early Oligocene epoch, Gucheng formation pertains late Cretaceous, Bianqiao formation pertains early Paleocene epoch, Changlu formation pertains middle-late Paleocene epoch to early Eocene epoch, Zhujiagou formation pertains early Eocene epoch, Dawenkou formation pertains middle Eocene epoch. Well strata of overlay area are redivided and the strata are contrasted of overlay area and outcrop area, using the new division scheme. Finally Mesozoic Era, Cainozoic era strata distributed characteristic is summarized to the west Shandongprovince and this research has laid the foundation.
引文
1.陈丕基,曹美珍,潘华璋等,1980,山东中生代陆相地层问题。地层学杂志,4(4):301-309
2.陈丕基,1982,山东蒙阴侏罗纪叶肢介。 古生物学报,21(1):133-138
3.卢辉楠,罗其鑫,1990,塔里木盆地轮藻化石。北京:科学技术文献出版社,1-261。
4.卢辉楠,李守军,2005,郯庐断裂对两侧盆地沉积地层的控制作用。187
5.刘明渭,栾恒彦,迟培星,徐立军,1994,山东省侏罗-白垩纪岩石地层清理意见。山东地质,10卷(增刊):53-69
6.刘明渭,张庆玉,宋万千,2003,山东省白垩纪岩石地层序列与火山岩系地层划分。地层学杂志,27(3):
7.罗群,郑德山,孙宏智,2001,地质-地震综合地层划分对比法及其应用。江汉石油学院学报,23(1):26-30
8.李守军,何文渊,1997,山东省中生代地层划分与对比.高校地质学报,3(1):87-93
9.李守军,1998,综合地层学在山东省中生代地层研究中的应用。山东地质,14(4):31-36
10.山东省地质矿产局,1991,山东省区域地质志,中华人民共和国地质矿产部地质专报,区域地质,第26号。北京:地质出版社,1-595
11.山东省区域地层表编写组,1978,山东省区域地层表。北京:地质出版社,1-130
12.胜利油田石油地质志编写组,1993,中国石油地质志。石油工业出版社,507
13.胜利油田石油管理局地质科学研究院,1999,山东油气区侏罗系划分与对比研究。1-109
14.全国地层委员会,2001,中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书。地质出版社,1-59
15.谭锡畴,山东中生代及旧第三纪地层。地质汇报.1923,5(2):55-79。
16.姚华舟,谢德凡,综合地层学的系统层次结构。地层学杂志,1994,18(4):241-247
17.张增奇,刘明渭,1996,山东省岩石地层。北京:中国地质大学出版社,1-328
18.周明镇,齐陶,山东新泰中始新世化石哺乳类材料。古脊椎动物与古人类,1982,20(4)
19.李云通,山东昌乐五图组的非海栖腹足类化石。地层古生物论文集,第12辑,北京:地质出版社,1985
20.李云通,山东平邑官庄组的非海栖软体动物化石。中国地质科学院院报,第12号,1986
21.雷春碧,山东下第三系官庄组孢粉组合、山东地层古生物论文集。北京:海洋出版社,1986,121-145
22.徐宝政,王秋,陈淑华等,山东平邑盆地古新世蒸发岩地层的发现。见:山东地层古生物论文集,北京:海洋出版社,1986
23.迟洪纪,何湘龙,王士林,山东平邑盆地下第三系的划分。地层学杂志,1986,10(2):7-12
24.钟筱春,唐文松,沈后等,哺乳动物化石在油气区地层对比中的作用。石油学报,1992,13(2)
25.关绍曾,庞其清,萧宗政,鲁西南莱芜、蒙阴、平邑早第三纪地层的划分和对比。化工矿产地质,19卷,3期,1997,1-13
26.李增学,中原油田第三系沉积相研究(研究报告)。2003,12-13
27.李守军,蔡进功,济阳坳陷沙四段与山东外围盆地同期地层沉积特征对比研究(研究报告)。2001,1-62
28.李守军,华北地区第三纪地层对比及盆地发育关系研究(研究报告)。2002,16-19
29.姚益民,梁泓德,蔡治国,关学婷等著,中国油气区第三系(Ⅳ)渤海湾盆地油气区分册。石油工业出版社,1994,1-97
30.谢庆宾,管守锐,李熙哲,山东平邑盆地官中段沉积环境和层序地层特征。沉积学报,1999,17卷1期:71-77
31.张增奇,刘明渭,1996,山东省岩石地层。北京:中国地质大学出版社,1-328
32.姜同海,胶莱盆地构造特征及演化,2005,山东科技大学。
33.李守军 谢传礼,山东莱阳盆地莱阳组时代讨论,1997,地层学杂志,20卷3期:233-238页。
34.李洪奎等,沂沭断裂带中段地质特征与金矿成矿作用,2004,地质调查与研究,27卷4期:255-260页。
35.刘明渭,山东省白垩纪岩石地层序列与火山岩系地层划分,2003年,地层学杂志,27卷3期:247-253页。
36.陆克政等,胶莱盆地的形成和演化,1994,石油大学出版社:36-46页。
37.山东省地质矿产局,山东省岩石地层,1996,中国地质大学出版社:200-242页。
38.施炜等,山东胶莱盆地构造变形及形成演化,2003,地质通报,22卷5期:325-334页。
39.肖丙建,沂沭断裂带南段莱阳群的发现及其地质特征,2001,山东地质,17卷5期:18-23页。
40.周建波等,郯庐断裂中段石场.中楼拉分盆地的确定,1999,地质学报,34卷1期:18-28页。
41.Anderson F W.1973:The Jurassic-Cretaceous transition:the nonmarine ostracod faunas.In:The Boreal Lower Cretaceous.Casey,R and Rawson,P E(Eds.).Geological Journal,Special Issue 5,Liverpool,101-110
42.Anderson F W.1985.Ostracod faunas in the Purbeck and Wealden of England.Journal of Micropalaeontology,4(2):1-68
43.Malz H.et al.1985.Biostratigraphy of the Middle Jurassic of N.W.Sardinia by means of ostracods.Senckenbergiana lethaea,66(3/5):299-345
44.ZhouJianbo,《An Early Cretaceous Pull-apart Basin in the Middle Section of the Tanlu Fault Zone》,1999,地震地质,21卷2期:185-192页。
45.WangYu,《Formation Time and Dynamic Characteristics of the Northern Part of the Tanlu Fault Zone in East China》,1997,地震地质,19卷2期:186-192页。
46.Young C C.A review of the Early Tertiary Formations.Bulletin of the Geological Society of China. Vol.10.1934.
47.Zdansky O,Die alter tiaren Saugetiere Chinas.Pal.Sin.ser.C.Vol.V1,Fasc.Ⅱ.1930.
2.陈丕基,1982,山东蒙阴侏罗纪叶肢介。 古生物学报,21(1):133-138
3.卢辉楠,罗其鑫,1990,塔里木盆地轮藻化石。北京:科学技术文献出版社,1-261。
4.卢辉楠,李守军,2005,郯庐断裂对两侧盆地沉积地层的控制作用。187
5.刘明渭,栾恒彦,迟培星,徐立军,1994,山东省侏罗-白垩纪岩石地层清理意见。山东地质,10卷(增刊):53-69
6.刘明渭,张庆玉,宋万千,2003,山东省白垩纪岩石地层序列与火山岩系地层划分。地层学杂志,27(3):
7.罗群,郑德山,孙宏智,2001,地质-地震综合地层划分对比法及其应用。江汉石油学院学报,23(1):26-30
8.李守军,何文渊,1997,山东省中生代地层划分与对比.高校地质学报,3(1):87-93
9.李守军,1998,综合地层学在山东省中生代地层研究中的应用。山东地质,14(4):31-36
10.山东省地质矿产局,1991,山东省区域地质志,中华人民共和国地质矿产部地质专报,区域地质,第26号。北京:地质出版社,1-595
11.山东省区域地层表编写组,1978,山东省区域地层表。北京:地质出版社,1-130
12.胜利油田石油地质志编写组,1993,中国石油地质志。石油工业出版社,507
13.胜利油田石油管理局地质科学研究院,1999,山东油气区侏罗系划分与对比研究。1-109
14.全国地层委员会,2001,中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书。地质出版社,1-59
15.谭锡畴,山东中生代及旧第三纪地层。地质汇报.1923,5(2):55-79。
16.姚华舟,谢德凡,综合地层学的系统层次结构。地层学杂志,1994,18(4):241-247
17.张增奇,刘明渭,1996,山东省岩石地层。北京:中国地质大学出版社,1-328
18.周明镇,齐陶,山东新泰中始新世化石哺乳类材料。古脊椎动物与古人类,1982,20(4)
19.李云通,山东昌乐五图组的非海栖腹足类化石。地层古生物论文集,第12辑,北京:地质出版社,1985
20.李云通,山东平邑官庄组的非海栖软体动物化石。中国地质科学院院报,第12号,1986
21.雷春碧,山东下第三系官庄组孢粉组合、山东地层古生物论文集。北京:海洋出版社,1986,121-145
22.徐宝政,王秋,陈淑华等,山东平邑盆地古新世蒸发岩地层的发现。见:山东地层古生物论文集,北京:海洋出版社,1986
23.迟洪纪,何湘龙,王士林,山东平邑盆地下第三系的划分。地层学杂志,1986,10(2):7-12
24.钟筱春,唐文松,沈后等,哺乳动物化石在油气区地层对比中的作用。石油学报,1992,13(2)
25.关绍曾,庞其清,萧宗政,鲁西南莱芜、蒙阴、平邑早第三纪地层的划分和对比。化工矿产地质,19卷,3期,1997,1-13
26.李增学,中原油田第三系沉积相研究(研究报告)。2003,12-13
27.李守军,蔡进功,济阳坳陷沙四段与山东外围盆地同期地层沉积特征对比研究(研究报告)。2001,1-62
28.李守军,华北地区第三纪地层对比及盆地发育关系研究(研究报告)。2002,16-19
29.姚益民,梁泓德,蔡治国,关学婷等著,中国油气区第三系(Ⅳ)渤海湾盆地油气区分册。石油工业出版社,1994,1-97
30.谢庆宾,管守锐,李熙哲,山东平邑盆地官中段沉积环境和层序地层特征。沉积学报,1999,17卷1期:71-77
31.张增奇,刘明渭,1996,山东省岩石地层。北京:中国地质大学出版社,1-328
32.姜同海,胶莱盆地构造特征及演化,2005,山东科技大学。
33.李守军 谢传礼,山东莱阳盆地莱阳组时代讨论,1997,地层学杂志,20卷3期:233-238页。
34.李洪奎等,沂沭断裂带中段地质特征与金矿成矿作用,2004,地质调查与研究,27卷4期:255-260页。
35.刘明渭,山东省白垩纪岩石地层序列与火山岩系地层划分,2003年,地层学杂志,27卷3期:247-253页。
36.陆克政等,胶莱盆地的形成和演化,1994,石油大学出版社:36-46页。
37.山东省地质矿产局,山东省岩石地层,1996,中国地质大学出版社:200-242页。
38.施炜等,山东胶莱盆地构造变形及形成演化,2003,地质通报,22卷5期:325-334页。
39.肖丙建,沂沭断裂带南段莱阳群的发现及其地质特征,2001,山东地质,17卷5期:18-23页。
40.周建波等,郯庐断裂中段石场.中楼拉分盆地的确定,1999,地质学报,34卷1期:18-28页。
41.Anderson F W.1973:The Jurassic-Cretaceous transition:the nonmarine ostracod faunas.In:The Boreal Lower Cretaceous.Casey,R and Rawson,P E(Eds.).Geological Journal,Special Issue 5,Liverpool,101-110
42.Anderson F W.1985.Ostracod faunas in the Purbeck and Wealden of England.Journal of Micropalaeontology,4(2):1-68
43.Malz H.et al.1985.Biostratigraphy of the Middle Jurassic of N.W.Sardinia by means of ostracods.Senckenbergiana lethaea,66(3/5):299-345
44.ZhouJianbo,《An Early Cretaceous Pull-apart Basin in the Middle Section of the Tanlu Fault Zone》,1999,地震地质,21卷2期:185-192页。
45.WangYu,《Formation Time and Dynamic Characteristics of the Northern Part of the Tanlu Fault Zone in East China》,1997,地震地质,19卷2期:186-192页。
46.Young C C.A review of the Early Tertiary Formations.Bulletin of the Geological Society of China. Vol.10.1934.
47.Zdansky O,Die alter tiaren Saugetiere Chinas.Pal.Sin.ser.C.Vol.V1,Fasc.Ⅱ.1930.