警察职业倦怠的相关研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
职业倦怠是近年来的一个研究热点,在许多职业领域都有体现。有关职业倦怠的研究,起源于20世纪70年代的美国,至今已有30多年的研究历史,取得了丰硕的成果。国内有关职业倦怠的研究也取得了一些进展,但多以教师和医护人员为研究对象,对警察职业倦怠的研究还为数不多。1997年,Maslach和Leiter提出了个体-情境匹配理论,认为个体与情境越是不匹配,越有可能产生倦怠;越是匹配,工作的投入程度就越高。本研究简单回顾了国内外关于职业倦怠的研究现状,并在前人研究的基础上,从个体-情境匹配理论入手,运用文献综述、问卷调查的研究方法探讨角色压力、应对方式、集体效能等因素对警察职业倦怠的影响,实证部分的问卷调查研究对象是来自40个中队的245名警察,研究结果如下:
     1.对各因变量进行人口学变量分析发现:男性警察在人格解体和角色冲突上的得分均显著高于女性警察;未婚警察在情感耗竭上的得分显著低于已婚警察,在角色模糊上的得分显著高于已婚警察;26-35岁的警察在成就感降低、角色模糊和角色冲突上的得分均显著高于36-45岁的警察,在情感耗竭上的得分显著高于25岁以下的警察;警龄在16-25年的警察在成就感降低上的得分显著低于警龄在5年及以下的警察和警龄在6-15年的警察,警龄在5年及以下的警察在角色模糊、角色冲突上的得分均显著高于警龄在16-25年的警察;特警在情感耗竭、人格解体、成就感降低、角色模糊、角色冲突上的得分均显著高于其他警种。
     2.职业倦怠与角色模糊、角色冲突、消极应对方式呈显著正相关,与积极应对方式呈显著负相关;情感耗竭与角色模糊、角色冲突、消极应对方式呈显著正相关,人格解体与角色模糊、角色冲突、消极应对方式呈显著正相关;成就感降低与积极应对方式呈显著负相关,与消极应对方式呈显著正相关;角色模糊与积极应对方式呈显著负相关,与消极应对方式呈显著正相关;角色冲突与消极应对方式呈显著正相关。
     3.角色压力对职业倦怠既有直接作用,也有通过应对方式的间接作用。应对方式是角色压力作用于职业倦怠的部分中介变量。变量间的具体作用机制如下:
     积极应对方式在角色模糊和成就感降低之间的中介效应显著,在角色模糊与人格解体之间的中介效应不显著。消极应对方式在角色冲突与情感耗竭之间的中介效应不显著,在角色冲突与人格解体之间的中介效应不显著。
     4.以警察职业倦怠及各维度为因变量的多层分析表明:(1)在职业倦怠上,角色模糊、角色冲突、消极应对方式是显著的正向预测因子;在情感耗竭上,角色冲突、消极应对方式是显著的正向预测因子;在人格解体上,角色模糊、角色冲突、消极应对方式是显著的正向预测因子;在成就感降低上,角色模糊是一个极其显著的正向预测因子。(2)中队水平的集体效能正向预测了警察的职业倦怠和情感耗竭水平。
     通过对结论的分析,本文还提出了相应的对策来预防和干预警察的职业倦怠,提高警察的工作满意度和身心健康水平,并对可能的后续研究进行了展望。
Job burnout is a research hotspot in recent years, and has reflected in many occupational fields. Research on job burnout, originated in the 1970s in the United States, has been more than 30 years of studying history and achieved fruitful results. Research on job burnout have been achieved some results in China, but more to teachers and health care workers as the research object. Study in police occupation has also been few. In 1997, Maslach and Leiter put forward the Individual -Situation Matching theory that the more individual and situation does not match, the more likely job burnout is; more match, the higher degree of job input is. This study briefly reviews the history of job burnout, and discusses how factors such as roles pressure, coping style, collective efficacy affect the job burnout of police on the basis of previous studies, from the Individual -Situation Matching theory, using the method of literature and survey research. The part of the empirical study is a questionnaire survey from 40 Squadron 245 police, the results are as follows:
     1.Analysis to dependable variable dealt with demography variable shows that: The scores of policemen in the role conflict and depersonalization are significantly higher than those of policewomen officers; the scores of unmarried police in the emotion exhaustion are significantly lower than those of married police, role ambiguity in the scoring significantly higher than that of married police; the scores of 26-35-year-old police in the diminished personal accomplishment, role conflict and role ambiguity are significantly higher than those of 36-45-year-old police, the emotion exhaustion scores are significantly higher than those of under the age of 25 police; the scores of the 16-25 years police in reducing the achievement are significantly lower than those of below 5 years and 6-15 years police, the scores of below 5 years police in the role ambiguity, role conflict are significantly higher than those of the 16-25 years police; the scores of special police in emotion exhaustion, depersonalization, diminished personal accomplishment, role ambiguity and role conflict are significantly higher than those of other police.
     2. Job burnout is positively related to role ambiguity, role conflict, and negative coping style but negatively relate to positive coping style; emotion exhaustion is positively related to role ambiguity, role conflict and negative coping style; depersonalization is positively related to role ambiguity, role conflict and negative coping style; diminished personal accomplishment is negatively related to positive coping style but positively relate to negative coping style; role ambiguity is negatively relate to positive coping style but positively relate to negative coping style; role conflict is positively relate to negative coping style.
     3. Role pressure not only impacts on job burnout directly, but also impacts on job burnout indirectly through the medium of coping styles. Coping style works as partial medium between role pressure and job burnout. The explicit mechanism of variables is described as follows:
     Positive coping style significantly mediates between role ambiguity and diminished personal accomplishment but do not significantly mediate between role ambiguity and depersonalization. Negative coping style do not significantly mediated between role conflict and emotion exhaustion, between role conflict and depersonalization.
     4. Multilayer analysis for using police job burnout as dependable variable concluded: (1) On job burnout role conflict, role ambiguity, role conflict and negative coping style are significant positive anticipation genes; on emotion exhaustion, role conflict and negative coping style are significant positive anticipation genes; on depersonalization, role ambiguity, role conflict and negative coping style are significant positive anticipation genes; on diminished personal accomplishment, role ambiguity is a significant positive anticipation gene.(2) On lochus level, collective efficacy of the police can positively anticipate job burnout and emotion exhaustion.
     After results, the thesis put forward the corresponding countermeasures to prevent and intervene in job burnout of police, improve satisfaction with the work and the level of physical and mental health, and possible recommendations on follow-up study.
引文
[1]徐长江等.工作倦怠:一个不断扩展的研究领域[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(6):680-685.
    [2]Maslach C,Schaufeli W B,Leiter M P.Job Burnout[J].Annual Review Psychology,2001(52):397-422.
    [3]Freudenberger HJ.Staff burnout[J].Journal of Social Issues,1974,30:159-165.
    [4]Maslach C,Schaufeli W B,Leiter M P.et al.Job burnout[J].Annual Review Psychology,2001,52:397-422.
    [5]李永鑫.三种职业人群工作倦怠的比较研究_基于整合的视角[D].博士学位论文[D],华东师范大学,2005.
    [6]Schaufeli W B,Enzmann D.The burnout companion to study and practice:A critical analysis[M].London:Taylor and Francis,1998.
    [7]李永鑫,孟慧.工作倦怠结构研究进展[J].心理科学,2004,27(2):474-476.
    [8]Kalliath T J,O'driscoll M P,& Gillespie D F,et al.A test of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in three samples ofhealthcare professionals[J].Work & Stress,2000,14(1):35-50.
    [9]Boles J S,Dean D H,& Ricks J M,et al.The dimensionality of the Maslach Burnout Inventory across small business owners and educators[J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,2000,56:12-34.
    [10]Tans T W.,Schreurs J Q.,Schaufeli W B.Construct validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey:a two -sample examination of its factor structure and correlates[J].Work & Stress,1999,13(3):223-237.
    [11]Schutte N,Toppinen S,Kalimo R,et al.The factorial validity of the Mastach Burnout Inventory-General Survey(MBI-GS)across occupational groups and nations [J].Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2000,73:53-66.
    [12]Westman M,Etzion D.The impact of vacation and job stress on burnout and absenteeism[J].Psychology and Health,2001,16:595-606.
    [13]Weisberg J,Sagie A.Teachers' physical,mental,and emotional burnout:impact on intention quit[J].The Journal of Psychology,1999,133(3):333-339.
    [14]李超平,时勘.分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响[J].心理学报,2003,35(5):77-84.
    [15]李永鑫.三种职业人群工作倦怠的比较研究_基于整合的视角[D].博士学位论文[D],华东师范大学,2005.
    [16]林初悦,李永鑫,胡瑜.社会支持的调节作用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1116-1119.
    [17]Maslach Schaufeli W B,Leiter M P.Job burnout[J].Annual review of Psychology,2001,52:397-422.
    [18]蒋奖.警察工作倦怠与A型行为、压力源的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(3):207.
    [19]李超平,时勘.分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响[J].心理学报,2003 (5):677-684.
    [20]张振声,徐永红.中国警察职业倦怠解析[J].中国人民公安大学学报,2004,3(3):130-134.
    [21]蒋奖.警察工作倦怠与A型行为、压力源的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(3),207.
    [22]李岩等.监狱警察工作倦怠、心理健康及两者的关系[J].山东精神医学,2005,18(4),235-237.
    [23]张姝玥,许燕,蒋奖.Maslach倦怠量表—服务行业版在警察中的修订及应用分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(2):85-88.
    [24]王成义,刘琪,赵海.警察职业倦怠调查研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版),2006(1):55-58.
    [25]孙曼.白领工作者角色压力、工作倦怠与组织承诺的关系研究[D].硕士学位论文,同济大学,2006.
    [26]Moore J E.One mad to turnover:An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals[J].MIS Quarterly,2000(24):141-175.
    [27]Harden R M.Stress,pressure and burnout in teachers:Is the swan exhausted[J].Medical Teacher,1999,21(3):245-247.
    [28]Cordes,C.L.& Dougerthy,T.W.A review and integration of research on job burnout[J].Academy of Management Review,1993,18(4):621-659.
    [29]郭思.情绪应对、角色压力、控制感和工作倦怠的关系研究[D].硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2004.
    [30]李小光,徐娅霞.角色冲突和角色模糊对护士工作倦怠的影响[J].长江大学学报(社会科学版),2006,29(4):110-115.
    [31]闫晓静,杨继平.酒店服务人员角色压力与职业倦怠相关研究[J].山西科技,2006(2):85-87.
    [32]肖计划.应付与应付方式[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1992,6(4):181-183.
    [33]Jane L.Ireland,Rebecca Boustead,Carol A.Ireland.Coping style and psychological health among adolescent prisoners:a study of young and juvenile offenders[J].Journal of Adolescence 2005(28):411-423.
    [34]谭邵珍.个体_组织主观匹配对警察工作倦怠影响的研究[D].硕士学位论文,华南师范大学,2005.
    [35]杨扬.中基层管理者工作家庭冲突、应对方式及其与工作倦怠的关系[D].硕士学位论文,对外经济贸易大学,2007.
    [36]李永鑫.护士心理控制源、应对方式与工作倦怠的相关研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007(6):532-533.
    [37]Goddard,Roger D.Collective efficacy:A neglected construct in the study ot schools and student achievement[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2001,93(3)467-476.
    [38]Bandura,A.Self-efficacy:The exercise of control[M].New York:Freeman,1997.
    [39]Schaubroeck J,Simon S,Lam K,et al.Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control:a cross-cultural study[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(4):512-525.
    [40]Zellars K L,Hochwarter W A,Perrewe P L,et al.Beyond self-efficacy:Interactive effects of role conflict and perceived collective efficacy[J].Journal of Managerial Issues,2001,13(4):483-499.
    [41]刘红云,张雷,孟庆茂.小学教师集体效能及其对自我效能功能的调节[J].心理学报,2005,37(1):79-86.
    [42]张志强.高中阶段教师职业枯竭的多层研究[D].硕士学位论文,山东师范大学,2006.
    [43]王赛男.中学领导方式与教师工作态度的关系[D].硕士学位论文,山东师范大学,2007.
    [44]李永鑫,吴明证.工作倦怠的结构研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(2):454-457.
    [45]马剑虹、张庭文.角色认知、控制感及工作压力的关系分析[J].人类工效学,1999,5(4):15-20.
    [46]汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册·增订版·[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.
    [47]Riggs,M.L.,Babasa,B.,Betancourt,R.,Hooker,S.Development and self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related application[J].Education and Psychological Measurement,1994,58,1017-1034.
    [48]温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理科学,2005,37(2):268-274.
    [49]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理科学,2004,36(5):614-620.
    [50]于俊杰.苏州地区警察心理压力研究[D].硕士学位论文,苏州大学,2004.
    [51]韩亚华.对监狱警察心理学压力及其调适的研究[D].硕士学位论文,中国政法大学,2005.
    [52]华红琴.人生发展心理学[M].上海:上海大学出版社,2000.
    [53]Loo,R.Burnout among Canadian police managers[J].The international journal of organizational analysis,1994,2,406-417.
    [54]Cordes,C.L.,Dougyerty,T.W.A review and an integration of research on job burnout[J].Academy of Management Review,1993,18(4):621.
    [55]Schaufeli W B.,Greenglass E R.Introduction to special issue on burnout and health[J].Psychology and Health,2001,16:501-510.
    [56]王成义,刘琪,赵海.警察职业倦怠调查研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版),2006(1):55-58.
    [57]Thomas AC.,Peter L.The relationship between levels of perceived burnout and career stage among police offices[J].Police Studies,1995,18(3/4):53-60.
    [58]Von Emster,Gregory R,Harrison,Albert A.Role ambiguity,spheres of control,burnout,and work-related attitudes of teleservice[J].Professionals Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,1998,13(2):375-385.
    [59]Peiro J M.,Gonzalez-Roma V,Tordera N,et al.Does role stress predict burnout over time among health care[J].Professionals Psychology & Health,2001(16):511-525.
    [60]李冬梅,中小学教师的角色模糊、角色冲突对工作满意度及三者对职业倦怠的影响[D].硕士学位论文,华东师范大学,2002.
    [61]Cordes C,Dougherty T.A review and an integration of research on job burnout [J].Academy of Management Review,1993(18):621-656.
    [62]Gil-Monte,Pedro R.,Valcareel,Pilar,Zornoza,Alia.Role Stress:Burnout antecedent in Nursing Professionals[J].European Work& Organizational Psychologist,1993,3(3):217.
    [63]陆勇华.提炼公安精神,打造和谐警营[J].公安教育,2006(12):14-16.
    [64]陈秋凤.警务人员工作特征_社会支持与工作倦怠的关系[D].硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2006.
    [65]Maslach C,Leiter M P.The Troth about Burnout:How Organizalions Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about It[M].California:Tossev-Bass Inc,1997.
    [1]Dick,P.The social construction of the meaning of acute stressors:a qualitative study of the personal accounts of police officers using a stress counseling service[J].Work & stress,2000,4(3):226-244.
    [2]李锐,凌文铨.工业与组织心理学中的集体效能感[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(6):924-931.
    [3]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务:问卷分析与应用统计[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [4]张雷,雷雳,郭伯良.多层线性模型应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.
    [5]侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
    [6]Brown,J.,Fielding,J.& Grover,J.Distinguishing traumatic,vicarious and routine operational stressor exposure and attendant adverse consequences in a sample of police officers[J].Work & stress,1999,13(4):312-325.
    [7]王觅也.角色压力与工作倦怠关系的实证研究[D].硕士学位论文.西南交通大学,2007.
    [8]李怀玉.警察工作倦怠感研究[D].硕士学位论文,河南大学,2005.
    [9]张振声.警察心理学[M],北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2003.
    [10]李永鑫.工作倦怠及其测量[J].心理科学,2003,26(3):556-557.
    [11]卞冉,龙立荣.工作倦怠的理论研究及其进展[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2003,11(4):317-321.
    [12]Iwasaki,Y.,Mannell,R.C.,Smale,B.J.,&Butcher,J.A short-term longitudinal analysis of Leisure Coping used by police and emergency response service workers [J].Journal of Leisure Research,2002,34(3):311-339.
    [13]侯讳.法官工作倦怠及其与相关因素的关系[D].硕士学位论文,河南大学,2006.
    [14]梁荣辉,章炼,封文波.教育心理多元统计学与SPSS软件[M].北京理工大学出版社,2005.
    [15]王鹏,高峰强,隋美荣.集体效能:一种团体研究的主体性视角[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):916-931.
    [16]王晓春,甘怡群.国外关于工作倦怠研究的现状评述[J].心理学进展,2002,11(5):567-572.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700