大准铁路病害路段路基加固处理研究
|
摘要
大准线作为我国第二条开行万吨列车的重载铁路,自运营以来,随着运量的逐年增加,线桥设备的破坏程度日益增大,冻害、翻浆冒泥、路基下沉等病害日益突出。其中部分路段由于排水不畅,病害尤为严重,基床的强度和稳定性已很难保证列车的安全与稳定运行。而大准线承担着繁重的煤运任务,因此,寻求一种在基本不影响运营情况下的病害路段治理方案,以保证列车安全运行是十分必要的。
本文以大准线K37+400-640段路基加固为研究对象,利用土力学、复合地基理论、数值计算等理论和方法,研究了路基的受力特性,提出了路基加固方案,主要取得了以下研究成果：
首先,论文结合现场探地雷达检测报告,分析了大准线病害路段路基的状况,探讨了K37+400-640段路基病害产生原因及机理。通过分析发现,大准线路基出现病害的主要原因有：原有路基土软弱、冻融循环、排水沟失效以及循环重载。
其次,了解常用的路基病害整治方案,针对大准线病害情况对路基采用斜向灰土桩加固,并恢复排水系统。斜向灰土桩的加固方案可在列车限界外施工,不影响线路的运营,整体施工效率高。但因倾斜桩桩体自身承载、桩体与土体间相互作用关系,与竖直桩体相比要复杂的多,所构成的复合路基也难以用简单解析表达式来描述,可用数值方法来验证其加固效果。本文拟先运用复合地基理论设计出可行的竖向灰土桩加固方案,为斜向桩加固方案提供参照。
再次,采用数值方法计算,分析了斜向桩加固方案,并与竖向桩加固方案进行了对比,基于分析的路基变形和应力比较二者的加固效果,从而证明斜向桩和竖向桩都可以取得良好的加固效果,且斜向桩更优。
最后,在证明斜向桩是一种有效的加固方案的基础上,考虑实际工程运用时,保证加固效果的同时还要兼顾经济合理,论文进一步对斜向灰土桩的倾斜角度、灰土配合比和纵向桩排距对加固效果的影响进行了分析,并给出了斜向桩的优化加固方案。
Da Zhun railway is our second heavy haul railway that running trains with ten thousand tons cargo.With the increase of traffic volume year by year, the damage to line bridge equipment becomes more and more seriously since the operation, the subgrade disease such as harmful freez, mud pumping, subgrade settlement are increasingly prominent. Owing to the poor drainage system of some sections, the disease are particularly serious, leading to the strength and stability of the subgrade has been difficult to guarantee the safety and stability of the operation. And it bears the heavy coal transport task, therefore, seeking a treatment that can deal with the disease without affecting the operation is very necessary.
In this paper, the subgrade of K37+400-640section is taken as an example. The paper studies the mechanical behavior of subgrade according to the theory of soil mechanics and composite foundation, the method of numerical simulation etc., the treatment is proposed, the main results are obtained as followings:
First, through the on-site GPR detection report, learning the subgrade disease present situation of railway subgrade disease, and analyzing the cause of the disease.
Second, basing on the analysis of the common treatments to these ill roadbeds used in the existing railway line, the oblique lime-soil compaction piles treatment is introduced, But at present, the calculation theory about the oblique piles isn't perfect, it can't prove its feasibility in theory but by using numerical simulation.So, the upright piles treatment is designed through the composite foundation theory. It can provide a reference for the oblique piles treatment.
Again, the reinforcement scheme of the oblique piles and upright piles are calculated by using numerical simulation, and Analysis on their reinforcement effects from the deformation and stress.The comparison results show that the oblique piles is more better.
Finally, when used in the practical engineering, to ensure the reinforcement effect as well as economical, so this paper also optimize the angle of oblique piles, lime soil mixture ratio and the vertical distance of piles.
本文以大准线K37+400-640段路基加固为研究对象,利用土力学、复合地基理论、数值计算等理论和方法,研究了路基的受力特性,提出了路基加固方案,主要取得了以下研究成果：
首先,论文结合现场探地雷达检测报告,分析了大准线病害路段路基的状况,探讨了K37+400-640段路基病害产生原因及机理。通过分析发现,大准线路基出现病害的主要原因有：原有路基土软弱、冻融循环、排水沟失效以及循环重载。
其次,了解常用的路基病害整治方案,针对大准线病害情况对路基采用斜向灰土桩加固,并恢复排水系统。斜向灰土桩的加固方案可在列车限界外施工,不影响线路的运营,整体施工效率高。但因倾斜桩桩体自身承载、桩体与土体间相互作用关系,与竖直桩体相比要复杂的多,所构成的复合路基也难以用简单解析表达式来描述,可用数值方法来验证其加固效果。本文拟先运用复合地基理论设计出可行的竖向灰土桩加固方案,为斜向桩加固方案提供参照。
再次,采用数值方法计算,分析了斜向桩加固方案,并与竖向桩加固方案进行了对比,基于分析的路基变形和应力比较二者的加固效果,从而证明斜向桩和竖向桩都可以取得良好的加固效果,且斜向桩更优。
最后,在证明斜向桩是一种有效的加固方案的基础上,考虑实际工程运用时,保证加固效果的同时还要兼顾经济合理,论文进一步对斜向灰土桩的倾斜角度、灰土配合比和纵向桩排距对加固效果的影响进行了分析,并给出了斜向桩的优化加固方案。
Da Zhun railway is our second heavy haul railway that running trains with ten thousand tons cargo.With the increase of traffic volume year by year, the damage to line bridge equipment becomes more and more seriously since the operation, the subgrade disease such as harmful freez, mud pumping, subgrade settlement are increasingly prominent. Owing to the poor drainage system of some sections, the disease are particularly serious, leading to the strength and stability of the subgrade has been difficult to guarantee the safety and stability of the operation. And it bears the heavy coal transport task, therefore, seeking a treatment that can deal with the disease without affecting the operation is very necessary.
In this paper, the subgrade of K37+400-640section is taken as an example. The paper studies the mechanical behavior of subgrade according to the theory of soil mechanics and composite foundation, the method of numerical simulation etc., the treatment is proposed, the main results are obtained as followings:
First, through the on-site GPR detection report, learning the subgrade disease present situation of railway subgrade disease, and analyzing the cause of the disease.
Second, basing on the analysis of the common treatments to these ill roadbeds used in the existing railway line, the oblique lime-soil compaction piles treatment is introduced, But at present, the calculation theory about the oblique piles isn't perfect, it can't prove its feasibility in theory but by using numerical simulation.So, the upright piles treatment is designed through the composite foundation theory. It can provide a reference for the oblique piles treatment.
Again, the reinforcement scheme of the oblique piles and upright piles are calculated by using numerical simulation, and Analysis on their reinforcement effects from the deformation and stress.The comparison results show that the oblique piles is more better.
Finally, when used in the practical engineering, to ensure the reinforcement effect as well as economical, so this paper also optimize the angle of oblique piles, lime soil mixture ratio and the vertical distance of piles.
引文
[1]赵平平.从神华大准铁路运载现状谈煤炭重载运输[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2008(12)
[2]毕正玉.万吨重载列车对轨道动态影响及轨道管理措施分析[J].神华科技,2009(12)
[3]张洪世.京包线万吨重载列车开行对线路质量的影响及采取的对策[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2011(4)
[4]陈文海.铁路路基翻浆冒泥病害机理及整治[J].企业技术开发,2011(4)
[5]刘林昌,王金玉.土工合成材料在大秦线路基病害整治工程中的应用[J].铁道标准设计,2003(1)
[6]郑希正.开“天窗”铺设土工合成材料[J].路基工程,2000(1)
[7]盂宪洪,高文.通让线水害路基翻浆冒泥的整治[J].铁道建筑,2001.
[8]王定举.斜向旋喷桩在朔黄铁路路基病害整治工程中的应用[J].铁道建筑技术,2006(增)
[9]叶朝良,朱永全,郭京浩.既有线路基基床加固方法的讨论[J].路基工程,2006(3)
[10]刘保卫.投石压浆无砂混凝土小桩复合地基技术分析[J].华北水利水电学院学报,2002(2)
[11]祝和意.采用水泥稳定土挤密桩加固既有线基床[J].铁道建筑,2007(5)
[12]黎冬来.水泥挤密桩加固既有铁路基基床的施工技术[J].大众科技,2006(6)
[13]刘放民,薄长顺.朔黄铁路重载路基基床加固技术研究[J].铁道建筑技术,2006(增)
[14]李世奇.粉喷桩加固既有线旁软土地基技术[J].山西建筑,2007(6)
[15]李世稳.铁路路基翻浆冒泥整治方法的探讨[J].公路工程,2008(2)
[16]杨秀竹,王星华.铁路岩溶路基加固的一种新方法[J].岩土力学,2004(6)
[17]赵作林.铁路既有线路基病害整治的探讨[J].铁道标准设计,2008(1)：36-37.
[18]贾应革,刘卫东.应用水平注浆加固软土路基的试验[J].铁道建筑,2004(1)：32-34.
[19]熊学政,彭习斌.柔性钻注浆加固重载铁路基床[J].武钢技术,2011(3)：37-39.
[20]杨忠文,史册光.关于路基基床翻浆冒泥基床土强度问题的探讨[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,1992,5(1)
[21]倪铁山,丁超.注盐法整治铁路路基冻害的试验性研究[J].科技创新与应用,2012(12)
[22]徐立新,王铁儒,杨少华.柔性路堤荷载下粉喷桩复合地基的试验研究[J].科技通报,2006(3)
[23]朱云升,胡幼常.柔性基础复合地基力学性状的有限元分析[J].岩土力学,2003(6)
[24]李海芳,龚晓南.路堤下复合地基沉降影响因素有限元分析[J].工业建筑,2005,35(6)：49-52.
[25]吴慧明.不同刚度基础下复合地基性状研究[D].杭州：浙江大学,2000(11)
[26]李海芳,温晓贵,龚晓南.路堤荷载下刚性桩复合地基的现场试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2004(5)
[27]王令朝.雷达无损检测新技术在铁路行业中的应用[J].铁道技术监督,2006(9)：23-25.
[28]中华人民共和国铁道部,铁路工程物理勘探规程(TB 10013-2004)[S].
[29]刘波.高速公路路基下沉原因分析及处理[J].科技创新与应用,2012(7)：104.
[30]朱曰强.高速公路病害分析与大修处理的研究[D].山东：山东大学,2009.
[31]周猛.动荷载作用下铁路路基翻浆冒泥探讨[J].安徽建筑,2008(3)
[32]刘承良.铁路路基翻浆冒泥病害成因及处理对策[J].工程科学,2010(23)
[33]刘燕.大准线车站能力的查定分析与研究[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2009(19)：89-90.
[34]彭华,张鸿儒.铁路路基病害类型、机理及检测与整治技术[J].工程地质学报,2005(13)
[35]San, K. & Leshchinsky, D. & Matsui T. Geosynthetic reinfored slopes:Limitequilibrium and finite element analyses [J].Soils and foundations,1994,34 (2):79-85.
[36]Junjie Zheng, Sari W. Abusharara.Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element modeling of composite foundation formed by CFG-lime piles [J].Computers and Geotechnics, 2007:243-257.
[37]中华人民共和国建设部,铁路工程地基处理规程(TB10106-2010)[S].
[38]孟庆山,王吉利,汪稔.采用不同加固方案处理软土地基的对比研究[J].岩土力学,2002,23(3)：375-378.
[39]郭庆吴.既有路基加固机理与方法研究[D].石家庄：石家庄铁道学院,2006.
[40]郝瀛.铁道工程[M].北京,中国铁道出版社,2002.
[41]中华人民共和国铁道部,新建时速200-250公里客运专线铁路设计暂行规定(上下).
[42]徐庆元,李斌.高速列车作用下路基上板式无砟轨道动力系数[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2011(9)
[43]Wong H Y, Viborflotation-its effect on weak cohesive soils[J].Civil Engineering,1976, 44 (4):463-479.
[44]Chen Qiunan, Zhao Minghua. Bearing capacity and mechanical behavior of CFG pile composite foundation School of Civil Engineering[J].Hunan University of Science and Technology; 2008 (S2):45-49.
[45]SCHWEIGER H F, PANDE G N. Numerical analysis of stone column reinforced foundation[J]. Computers and Geotechnics,1986, (2):347-372.
[46]中华人民共和国交通部,公路路基设计规范(JTGD30-2004)[S].
[47]中华人民共和国铁道部,铁路路基设计规范(TB10001-2005)[S].
[48]翟婉明等.列车提速对线路的动力影响研究与对策[J].中国铁道科学,2000.21(3)：11-20.
[49]RD Mindlin. An introduction to the mathematical theory of vibrations of elastic plates[M].World Scientific.2006.
[50]Rajashekhar MR, Ellingword BR, A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis[J].Structral saftety,1993,12 (3):205-220.
[51]陈开圣,刘宇峰.分层总和法在路基沉降计算中应注意的几个问题[J].岩土工程技术,2005(1)：43-45
[52]雷东,黄欢.分层总和法在某铁路软土路基的沉降分析[J].中国水运(下半月),2008(12)
[53]Yang Ping, Hu Hesong, Xu Jianfeng.Settlement Characteristics of Pile Composite Foundation under Staged Loading[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012 (12): 1055-1062.
[54]Wang Changdan, Wang Binglong.The Differential Settlement in Rigid Pile Composite Foundation on Collapsible Loess in High Speed Railway[J]. Advanced Science Letters 2012 (12),46-51.
[55]Cao Wengui, Liu Haitao. Settlement of composite foundation with discrete material pile considering modulus change [J] Journal of Central South University of Technology,2008 (15):8-14.
[56]Yoshito MAEDA, Akio ICHIKAWA. Study on bearing capacity characteristics and practical application of composite ground pile foundation[J] Japanese Geotechnical Journal,2008 (3):37-54.
[57]Changcun Gu, Changdi Hong. Calculation method of composite foundation sedimentation of grouting pile with cover plate under embankment load[J] Journal of Central South University of Technology,2008 (15):138-146.
[58]潘卫东.灰土桩复合地基法处理湿陷性黄土地基的理论与实践[D].兰州：兰州理工大学,2004.
[59]薛继连.盐渍土、软土地区重载铁路路基修建技术[M].北京,科学出版社,2009：3-20.
[60]程莉等.灰土挤密桩在湿陷性黄土地基中的设计与应用[J].兰州铁道学院学报,2000(12).
[61]陈立涛.重载铁路路桥过渡段斜向旋喷桩加强效果研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[2]毕正玉.万吨重载列车对轨道动态影响及轨道管理措施分析[J].神华科技,2009(12)
[3]张洪世.京包线万吨重载列车开行对线路质量的影响及采取的对策[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2011(4)
[4]陈文海.铁路路基翻浆冒泥病害机理及整治[J].企业技术开发,2011(4)
[5]刘林昌,王金玉.土工合成材料在大秦线路基病害整治工程中的应用[J].铁道标准设计,2003(1)
[6]郑希正.开“天窗”铺设土工合成材料[J].路基工程,2000(1)
[7]盂宪洪,高文.通让线水害路基翻浆冒泥的整治[J].铁道建筑,2001.
[8]王定举.斜向旋喷桩在朔黄铁路路基病害整治工程中的应用[J].铁道建筑技术,2006(增)
[9]叶朝良,朱永全,郭京浩.既有线路基基床加固方法的讨论[J].路基工程,2006(3)
[10]刘保卫.投石压浆无砂混凝土小桩复合地基技术分析[J].华北水利水电学院学报,2002(2)
[11]祝和意.采用水泥稳定土挤密桩加固既有线基床[J].铁道建筑,2007(5)
[12]黎冬来.水泥挤密桩加固既有铁路基基床的施工技术[J].大众科技,2006(6)
[13]刘放民,薄长顺.朔黄铁路重载路基基床加固技术研究[J].铁道建筑技术,2006(增)
[14]李世奇.粉喷桩加固既有线旁软土地基技术[J].山西建筑,2007(6)
[15]李世稳.铁路路基翻浆冒泥整治方法的探讨[J].公路工程,2008(2)
[16]杨秀竹,王星华.铁路岩溶路基加固的一种新方法[J].岩土力学,2004(6)
[17]赵作林.铁路既有线路基病害整治的探讨[J].铁道标准设计,2008(1)：36-37.
[18]贾应革,刘卫东.应用水平注浆加固软土路基的试验[J].铁道建筑,2004(1)：32-34.
[19]熊学政,彭习斌.柔性钻注浆加固重载铁路基床[J].武钢技术,2011(3)：37-39.
[20]杨忠文,史册光.关于路基基床翻浆冒泥基床土强度问题的探讨[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,1992,5(1)
[21]倪铁山,丁超.注盐法整治铁路路基冻害的试验性研究[J].科技创新与应用,2012(12)
[22]徐立新,王铁儒,杨少华.柔性路堤荷载下粉喷桩复合地基的试验研究[J].科技通报,2006(3)
[23]朱云升,胡幼常.柔性基础复合地基力学性状的有限元分析[J].岩土力学,2003(6)
[24]李海芳,龚晓南.路堤下复合地基沉降影响因素有限元分析[J].工业建筑,2005,35(6)：49-52.
[25]吴慧明.不同刚度基础下复合地基性状研究[D].杭州：浙江大学,2000(11)
[26]李海芳,温晓贵,龚晓南.路堤荷载下刚性桩复合地基的现场试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2004(5)
[27]王令朝.雷达无损检测新技术在铁路行业中的应用[J].铁道技术监督,2006(9)：23-25.
[28]中华人民共和国铁道部,铁路工程物理勘探规程(TB 10013-2004)[S].
[29]刘波.高速公路路基下沉原因分析及处理[J].科技创新与应用,2012(7)：104.
[30]朱曰强.高速公路病害分析与大修处理的研究[D].山东：山东大学,2009.
[31]周猛.动荷载作用下铁路路基翻浆冒泥探讨[J].安徽建筑,2008(3)
[32]刘承良.铁路路基翻浆冒泥病害成因及处理对策[J].工程科学,2010(23)
[33]刘燕.大准线车站能力的查定分析与研究[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2009(19)：89-90.
[34]彭华,张鸿儒.铁路路基病害类型、机理及检测与整治技术[J].工程地质学报,2005(13)
[35]San, K. & Leshchinsky, D. & Matsui T. Geosynthetic reinfored slopes:Limitequilibrium and finite element analyses [J].Soils and foundations,1994,34 (2):79-85.
[36]Junjie Zheng, Sari W. Abusharara.Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element modeling of composite foundation formed by CFG-lime piles [J].Computers and Geotechnics, 2007:243-257.
[37]中华人民共和国建设部,铁路工程地基处理规程(TB10106-2010)[S].
[38]孟庆山,王吉利,汪稔.采用不同加固方案处理软土地基的对比研究[J].岩土力学,2002,23(3)：375-378.
[39]郭庆吴.既有路基加固机理与方法研究[D].石家庄：石家庄铁道学院,2006.
[40]郝瀛.铁道工程[M].北京,中国铁道出版社,2002.
[41]中华人民共和国铁道部,新建时速200-250公里客运专线铁路设计暂行规定(上下).
[42]徐庆元,李斌.高速列车作用下路基上板式无砟轨道动力系数[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2011(9)
[43]Wong H Y, Viborflotation-its effect on weak cohesive soils[J].Civil Engineering,1976, 44 (4):463-479.
[44]Chen Qiunan, Zhao Minghua. Bearing capacity and mechanical behavior of CFG pile composite foundation School of Civil Engineering[J].Hunan University of Science and Technology; 2008 (S2):45-49.
[45]SCHWEIGER H F, PANDE G N. Numerical analysis of stone column reinforced foundation[J]. Computers and Geotechnics,1986, (2):347-372.
[46]中华人民共和国交通部,公路路基设计规范(JTGD30-2004)[S].
[47]中华人民共和国铁道部,铁路路基设计规范(TB10001-2005)[S].
[48]翟婉明等.列车提速对线路的动力影响研究与对策[J].中国铁道科学,2000.21(3)：11-20.
[49]RD Mindlin. An introduction to the mathematical theory of vibrations of elastic plates[M].World Scientific.2006.
[50]Rajashekhar MR, Ellingword BR, A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis[J].Structral saftety,1993,12 (3):205-220.
[51]陈开圣,刘宇峰.分层总和法在路基沉降计算中应注意的几个问题[J].岩土工程技术,2005(1)：43-45
[52]雷东,黄欢.分层总和法在某铁路软土路基的沉降分析[J].中国水运(下半月),2008(12)
[53]Yang Ping, Hu Hesong, Xu Jianfeng.Settlement Characteristics of Pile Composite Foundation under Staged Loading[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012 (12): 1055-1062.
[54]Wang Changdan, Wang Binglong.The Differential Settlement in Rigid Pile Composite Foundation on Collapsible Loess in High Speed Railway[J]. Advanced Science Letters 2012 (12),46-51.
[55]Cao Wengui, Liu Haitao. Settlement of composite foundation with discrete material pile considering modulus change [J] Journal of Central South University of Technology,2008 (15):8-14.
[56]Yoshito MAEDA, Akio ICHIKAWA. Study on bearing capacity characteristics and practical application of composite ground pile foundation[J] Japanese Geotechnical Journal,2008 (3):37-54.
[57]Changcun Gu, Changdi Hong. Calculation method of composite foundation sedimentation of grouting pile with cover plate under embankment load[J] Journal of Central South University of Technology,2008 (15):138-146.
[58]潘卫东.灰土桩复合地基法处理湿陷性黄土地基的理论与实践[D].兰州：兰州理工大学,2004.
[59]薛继连.盐渍土、软土地区重载铁路路基修建技术[M].北京,科学出版社,2009：3-20.
[60]程莉等.灰土挤密桩在湿陷性黄土地基中的设计与应用[J].兰州铁道学院学报,2000(12).
[61]陈立涛.重载铁路路桥过渡段斜向旋喷桩加强效果研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.