针刺留针配合推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床随机对照研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
腰椎间盘突出症是指退变的间盘在外力的作用下,纤维环部分或全部破裂,间盘组织向外突出,压迫临近的窦椎神经和神经根,再加上神经根局部炎症刺激和自体免疫反应,从而引起以腰腿疼痛为主要症状,伴有下肢感觉异常以及感觉减退或过敏等感觉障碍的疾病。在非手术疗法中,推拿手法可以解除腰部肌肉痉挛,纠正腰椎小关节紊乱,改变突出物位置,减轻或解除局部的机械压迫;减少炎性细胞对疼痛感受器的刺激;提高神经根局部疼痛阈值。针刺可以改善神经周围微循环,促进内源性镇痛物质阿片肽的释放,缓解疼痛,改善神经功能。所以,将推拿和针刺结合起来治疗腰椎间盘突出症不失为一种很好的治疗选择。针灸和推拿是中医传统治疗方法的重要组成部分,有着共同的理论基础——中医基础理论,都以经络学说为指导,都能够舒经通络、行气活血;都具有疗效好、费用低、操作简单、无副作用的特点;不同点在于:手法可以缓解肌肉痉挛,调整关节以纠正解剖异常,解除对临近组织的压迫;而针刺可以调节神经功能,即时镇痛,缓解肢体远端的疼痛、麻木等神经症状。
     目的:观察两种方案(针刺留针配合推拿手法、推拿手法加牵引)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效差异,比较各个中医分型组内及组间在多个观察指标中的不同之处,探索治疗方案的适宜证型,从而为今后进一步临床研究提供参考。
     方法:
     1研究对象:选择2007年6月至2009年6月在中国中医科学院广安门医院推拿科门诊就诊的腰椎间盘突出症患者,共120例,采用SPSS13.0软件随机分为两组,各60例。
     2干预方法:治疗组采用针刺留针配合推拿手法治疗,依次进行辨证针刺、按揉松脊、捻转行针、弹拨理脊、捻转行针、纵横捏脊、起针、斜扳整脊和虚掌拍脊,整个治疗过程约需30分钟;对照组采用推拿手法加牵引治疗,参照俞大方主编的高等医药院校《推拿学》教材中推荐的腰椎间盘突出症的治疗方法,约需30-40分钟;隔日1次,10次为1个疗程。
     3观察指标:比较两组组内及组间JOA(日本矫形外科学会腰痛疾患疗效评定标准)积分变化、VAS(直观模拟量表)评分变化、腰椎活动度(用三维腰椎活动度测量仪测量)的改善程度、下肢感觉障碍的评分变化、以及夹脊穴按压反应强度(压痛)的变化。
     4疗效评定:参照国家中医药管理局中医药行业标准《中医病证诊断疗效标准》中的腰椎间盘突出症疗效评定标准拟定。
     5统计方法:运用SPSS13.0统计软件进行分析,计数资料采用卡方(X2)检验,计量资料采用t检验,等级/频数资料采用两独立样本非参数检验,有序分类变量相关性分析用Kendall’s等级相关系数分析。
     结果:
     1两组间性别、年龄、身高、体重、病程以及中医分型所占比例比较无显著差异,组间均衡,具有可比性。
     2两组JOA积分、VAS评分、腰椎活动度、下肢感觉障碍评分在治疗前均无显著差异,具有可比性。
     3两组组内治疗前后JOA积分有显著差异;两组组间治疗后JOA积分有显著差异,两组间第1次治疗后JOA积分无显著差异,第3次和第10次治疗后JOA积分有显著性差异;第3次治疗后血瘀型和肾虚型JOA积分改善程度在治疗组和对照组间无显著差异,寒湿型和湿热型JOA积分改善程度在两组间有显著差异;第10次治疗后四个中医分型JOA积分改善程度两组间均有显著差异。
     4两组组内治疗前后VAS评分有显著差异;两组组间治疗后VAS评分有显著差异;当次治疗前后VAS最大差值两组间比较,第1次治疗前后VAS差值在两组间无显著性差异,而在第3、6、10次治疗前后VAS差值在两组间有显著性差异;治疗组血瘀型、寒湿型、湿热型均在治疗第3次出现VAS差值最大,而对照组血瘀型、寒湿型以及湿热型则在治疗第6次出现VAS差值最大,肾虚型两组间差别不大。
     5两组组内治疗前后腰椎活动度改善程度有显著差异;两组腰椎活动度改善程度组间比较,左旋、右旋改善程度无显著差异,前屈、后伸、左侧屈、右侧屈改善程度有显著性差异;寒湿型的腰椎活动改善程度组间比较,前屈、后伸有显著差异;左侧屈、右侧屈、左旋、右旋组间比较无显著差异;血瘀型、湿热型、肾虚型腰椎活动改善程度组间比较,各方向活动均无显著差异。
     6两组组内治疗前后下肢感觉障碍评分有显著差异;两组组间治疗后下肢感觉障碍评分有显著差异;两组治疗后感觉障碍改善程度有显著差异;血瘀型两组间无显著差异;而肾虚型、湿热型、寒湿型均有显著性差异。
     7两组组内治疗前后夹脊穴按压反应有显著差异,两组肾虚型治疗前后夹脊穴按压反应无显著差异,而两组血瘀型、寒湿型、湿热型治疗前后夹脊穴按压反应有显著差异。两组组间治疗后夹脊穴按压反应有显著差异;治疗后两组组间血瘀型、肾虚型和湿热型无显著差异,而寒湿型有显著差异。
     8两组组间疗效比较无显著差异,寒湿型的疗效两组间比较有显著差异;两组疗效与病程、疗效与夹脊穴按压反应均显著相关。
     结论:
     1两组治疗方法都能改善腰椎间盘突出症患者的JOA积分;针刺留针配合推拿优于推拿手法加牵引治疗,尤其是寒湿型和湿热型腰椎间盘突出症患者治疗第3次后的JOA积分改善明显优于对照组,而在第10次治疗后四个分型的JOA积分改善程度都明显优于对照组。提示针刺留针配合推拿在改善JOA积分方面更适用于寒湿型和湿热型。
     2两组治疗方法都能降低腰椎间盘突出症患者的VAS评分;针刺留针配合推拿优于推拿手法加牵引的对照组,在第3次治疗后两组间就有明显区别;治疗组血瘀型、寒湿型、湿热型三型在治疗第3次时就能使疼痛明显改善,而对照组的上述三型在治疗第6次时出现疼痛改善明显,肾虚型两组差别不大。提示针刺留针配合推拿在降低VAS评分方面较适用于血瘀型、寒湿型、湿热型。
     3两组治疗方法都能改善腰椎间盘突出症患者的腰椎活动度;针刺留针配合推拿在改善患者前屈、后伸、左右侧屈活动度方面优于推拿加牵引治疗;在改善寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症患者前屈、后伸活动度方面同样优于推拿手法加牵引治疗的对照组;其他三型在改善腰椎活动度方面两组治疗方法之间无明显区别。提示针刺留针配合推拿在改善腰椎活动度方面较适用于寒湿型。
     4两组治疗方法都能改善腰椎间盘突出症患者的下肢感觉障碍;针刺留针配合推拿优于推拿手法加牵引治疗,尤其是对肾虚型、湿热型和寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症患者。提示针刺留针配合推拿在减轻腰椎间盘突出症患者下肢感觉障碍方面更适用于肾虚型、湿热型和寒湿型。
     5两组治疗方法都能降低腰椎间盘突出症患者的夹脊穴按压反应强度,但两组方法对肾虚型患者改善不明显。针刺留针配合推拿优于推拿手法加牵引治疗,尤其是对寒湿型患者的夹脊穴按压反应。提示针刺留针配合推拿在改善患者夹脊穴按压反应方面更适用于寒湿型。
     6两组方法治疗腰椎间盘突出症都能取得很好的疗效;对于寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症患者,配合针刺留针的治疗组疗效优于推拿加牵引治疗的对照组;提示针刺留针配合推拿在提高腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效方面更适用于寒湿型。两组的疗效与病程显著相关,即病程越长,疗效越差;两组的疗效与夹脊穴按压反应呈负相关,即治疗后夹脊穴按压反应越强,疗效越差。
Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Protrusion (LIDP) is a common and frequently occurred disease in the clinic and often manifests as lumbago and leg pain. Among all the non-operative therapies, manual manipulation can relieve spasm in the lumbar muscles, adjust the small joint disorders in the lumbar vertebrae, change the position of the protrusion and relieve the local mechanical compression, while acupuncture functions as improving the peripheral microcirculation of the nerves, promoting the release of endogenous opioid peptide, relieving pains and improving the nervous functions. Hence, the combination of manual manipulation and acupuncture is one of the choices for LIDP treatment.
     Objective:To compare the effects on LIDP treatment by acupuncture combining with manual manipulation versus pure manual manipulation, observe the effect difference by the two treatments among different syndromes (including types of Blood Stasis, Cold Dampness, Damp Heat and Kidney Deficiency), thus find out the proper treatment protocols for different syndromes to guide the clinical practice.
     Methods:The subjects were LIDP patients collected from June,2007 to June,2009 in the Massage Department of Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. Totally 120 cases were included and randomized into two groups with 60 cases in each group. The treatment group was applied with acupuncture with manual manipulation while the control group was with manual manipulation only, both once every other day, ten times as a course. The following items were recorded, measured and compared for the clinical effect evaluation and group comparison:JOA scores (standards for evaluating lumbago therapeutic effect by Japanese Orthopedic Association), VAS scores (Visual Analogue Scale), lumbar mobility (measured by self-made three-dimensional lumbar actometer), scores of sensory disturbance in the lower limbs and pressing response intensity in the Jiaji points (EX-B2) (measured by self-made manometer with same pressure before and after the treatment). The data was analyzed by SPSS13.0 Software. Qualitative data was tested by Chi-square test, measurement data by t-test, ranked counting data by Two-independent-samples nonparametric test, and correlation analysis for ordinal categorical variables by Kendall's rank correlation coefficient analysis.
     Results:
     1. There is no significant difference between the two groups in the gender, age, body height, weight, disease course, duration after the attack, location of the affected intervertebral disc, direction of the protrusion, and rates of different syndromes. The two groups are with homogeneity and comparable.
     2. There is no significant difference between the two groups in JOA scores, VAS scores, lumbar mobility, scores of sensory disturbance in the lower limbs and pressing response intensity in the Jiaji points (EX-B2) before the first treatment. The two groups are comparable.
     3. There is no obvious difference of the effects between the two groups but significant difference of the effects on the Cold Dampness syndrome in the two groups.
     4. There is significant difference of the JOA scores, VAS scores, lumbar mobility, scores of sensory disturbance in the lower limbs, and pressing response intensity in the Jiaji points (EX-B2) in the groups before and after the treatment, and also between the two groups after the treatment.
     5. The effects are obvious correlated with the disease course and pressing response intensity in the Jiaji points (EX-B2).
     Conclusion:
     1. Acupuncture with manual manipulation is better than pure manual manipulation in improving the JOA scores, especially after the third treatment in the Cold Dampness and Damp Heat syndromes of the LI DP patients, and in the four syndromes after ten times of treatment.
     2. Acupuncture with manual manipulation is better than pure manual manipulation in decreasing the VAS scores, especially in the Blood Stasis, Cold Dampness and Damp Heat syndromes after the third treatment.
     3. Acupuncture with manual manipulation is better than pure manual manipulation in improving the lumbar mobility of anteflexion, posterior extension and lateroflexion, and better in improving the anteflexion and posterior extension in the Cold Dampness syndrome.
     4. Acupuncture with manual manipulation is better than pure manual manipulation in improving the scores of the sensory disturbance in the lower limbs in the Kidney Deficiency, Damp Heat and Cold Dampness syndromes.
     5. Acupuncture with manual manipulation is better than pure manual manipulation in relieving the pressing response intensity in the Jiaji points (EX-B2); there are no obvious changes of the response intensity in the Kidney Deficiency syndrome before and after the treatment; the effects and the Jiaji points response intensity are with negative correlation, i.e., the stronger the response intensity after the treatment, the worse the effects.
     6. The effects in the treatment group and control group both are good; acupuncture with manual manipulation is better than pure manual manipulation in the Cold Dampness syndrome of the.LIDP patients; the effects and the disease course are obviously correlated, i.e., the longer the disease course, the worse the effects.
引文
[1]杨洪兴,杨俭,黄超美,等.斜扳法治疗腰椎间盘突出症200例临床观察.长春中医学院学报,2003,19(6):26.
    [2]王绍山.斜扳法治疗腰椎间盘突出症45例临床体会.中原医刊,2003,30(13):24.
    [3]皮开鹏.斜扳法与脊柱旋转复位法治疗腰椎间盘突出症对比观察.河南中医,2004,24(7):66-67.
    [4]王有善.斜扳法治疗腰突症的评价与机制探讨.陕西中医学院学报,2005,28(4):49.
    [5]侯筱魁,董凡,赵文成.斜扳时完整腰椎三维立体运动的研究,中医骨伤,1996,9(4):5-7.
    [6]魏景梅.腰椎旋转复位法治疗腰椎间盘突出症280例.中国民间疗法,2005,13(5):17.
    [7]马达,蒋位庄.脊柱旋转手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的实验研究.中国骨伤,1994,7(5):7-9.
    [8]冯宇,杨殊杰,高燕.手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效以及解除神经根受压的MRM分析.中国骨伤,2005,18(8):456-458.
    [9]冯金升,敬红平,刘明江,等.推拿疗法的作用机理.按摩与导引,2001,17(5):4-6.
    [10]Peter T Jandra,赵红霞,赵若谷,等.针刺结合电针治疗腰推间盘突出症疗效观察.实用中医药杂志,2008,24(11):726-727.
    [11]麻虹,王雨燕.深刺华佗夹脊穴配合电针治疗腰椎间盘突出症50例.中国民间疗法,2008,(5):18.
    [12]王升旭,李树成,老锦雄,等.电针夹脊穴治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察及机理探讨.中国针灸,2000,(3):166.
    [13]张文忠.针刺配合手法旋转复位治疗腰椎间盘突出症32例临床报告.针灸临床杂志,2003,19(3):15.
    [14]李西京.推拿结合针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察.四川中医,2007,25(11):104-105
    [15]蔡宏伟.针灸结合推拿手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究.CHKD博硕士学位论文全文数据库,2007,18-19.
    [16]蒋松鹤,黄飞虹,叶天申,等.牵引态下针刺治疗腰突症62例临床观察.针灸临床杂志,1997,13(1):17.
    [17]叶德宝,褚海林.电针、牵引配合手法分期治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察.浙江中医学院学报,2002,26(3):60-61
    [18]庞军.推拿配合电针治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察.针灸临床杂志,2006,22(4):43-45
    [19]朱海林.电针配合推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症47例临床观察.针灸临床杂志,2005,21(5):39-40
    [20]陈传江.针推结合治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察.针灸临床杂志,2006,22(11):26-27.
    [21]张庆力.温针配合手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症85例.广西中医药,2007,30(3):41-42.
    [22]于清丽.温针灸结合推拿治疗腰间盘突出症疗效观察.辽宁中医杂志,2008,35(4):594.
    [23]许付阳,冯永新.腰椎间盘突出症取穴特点与评估指标评述.实用中医内科杂志,2008,22(2):60-61.
    [24]王宁生,欧阳钢.穴位注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症.针灸临床杂志,1999,15(2):19-20.
    [25]程肖芳,姜进平,彭燕玲,等.电针加穴位注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察.上海针灸杂志,2008,127(2):22-24.
    [26]俞勤龙.针灸治疗腰椎间盘脱出症40例.江苏中医,1994,15(6):29.
    [27]李占东,俞大佩,陈斌,等.针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症481例.上海针灸杂志,1998,17(4):32.
    [28]回克义.针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症262例临床观察.福建省针灸学会康复医学第三次学术会议论文集,2008,P68-69.
    [29]李宝吉.针刺夹脊穴配合牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察.实用中医药杂志,2008,24(3):167.
    [30]罗培安,严晓春.夹脊穴温针法治疗腰椎间盘突出症33例临床观察.中医中药,2008,5(14):92-93.
    [31]王生林,宋改云.牵引下指压夹脊穴治疗腰椎间盘突出症1000例,职业与健康,2009,25(8):885-886.
    [32]汪崇淼.刺络拔罐法在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中的应用.上海针灸杂志,1998,17(2):2.
    [1]席宁,汤立.姜揖君教授针灸经验撷萃.北京中医药大学学报(中医临床版),2005,12(3):22-23.
    [2]张永臣.论留针.北京针灸骨伤学院学报,2000,7(1):50-52.
    [3]陈利国,蔡向红.留针的意义及时限探讨.中国针灸,1996,(6):40-41.
    [4]童明欧,周厚强,张世俊,等.不同留针时间对急性腰扭伤的疗效观察.中医外治杂志,2009,18(6):50-51.
    [5]汪立新.针刺治疗急慢性软组织损伤时毫针留针时间与疗效关系的探讨.针灸临床杂志,1996,12(Z2):40-41.
    [6]许云祥,陈贵珍.不同留针时间对踩关节软组织损伤的疗效观察.中国针灸,2001,21(10):607-608.
    [7]房丽,于致顺.头穴针刺不同刺激量对急性脑梗塞的肌力恢复的影响.针灸临床杂志,1995,11(5):37.
    [8]沙岩.关于针刺有效刺激量和维持一定的有效刺激时间问题的探讨.针灸临床杂志,1996,12(4):21.
    [9]任彦红.头皮针提插动留综合手法治疗缺血性中风偏瘫临床对比观察.中医杂 志,1997,38(8):47.
    [10]朱诚,童刚,龚健.足中平穴留针配合手法治疗肩关节周围炎.按摩与导引,1996,(5):18-19.
    [1]周秉文.腰背痛.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.P125-187.
    [2]李锋,冯建书,聂喜增.骨科疾病诊断标准.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2009.P116-126.
    [3]韦贵康.实用骨关节与软组织伤病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.P187-198.
    [4]肖正权.现代中医骨科学.北京:中医古籍出版社,2003.P397-409.
    [5]孙曾祺.实用中医辨证论治学.北京:中国中医药出版社,2006.P306-307.
    [6]李建仲,贺振中.通督正脊术.太原:山西科学技术出版社,2006.P50-122.
    [7]俞大方.推拿学.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005.P3-7,125-128.
    [8]蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.P118-124.
    [9]国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准.南京:南京大学出版社,1994.P201.
    [10]Robert Gunzburg, Marek Szpalski, Gunnar B.J.Andersson. Degenerative Disc Disease. USA:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2004. P90-97.
    [11]Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P, et al. Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet,1997,350:178-181.
    [12]Takahash H, Suguro T, Okazima Y, et al. Inflammatory cytokines in the herniated disc of the lumbar spine. Spine,1996,21:218-224.
    [13]Olmarker K, Larsson K. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and nucleus pulposus-induced nerve root injury. Spine,1998,23:2538-2544.
    [14]李雁林,韩明舫.推拿手法对老龄家兔腰脊神经根炎症局部IL-1β及PGE2含量的影响.中国老年学杂志,2009,29:1819-1820.
    [15]刘波,戴国钢,马建等.大强度运动和中医治疗对兔膝关节软骨IL-1、TNF、PGE2的影响.中国运动医学杂志,2004,23(3):304-306.
    [16]伊智雄.中西医结合治疗腰椎间盘突出症.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.P279-284.
    [17]戚少华.电针治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床评估及对照研究.现代康复,1999,3(4):395.
    [18]王升旭,李树成,老锦雄等.电针夹脊穴治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察及机理探讨,中国针灸,2000,(3):166.
    [19]任彦红.头皮针提插动留综合手法治疗缺血性中风偏瘫临床对比观察.中医杂志,1997,38(8):47.
    [20]朱诚,童刚,龚健.足中平穴留针配合手法治疗肩关节周围炎.按摩与导引,1996.(5):18-19.
    [21]沈雪勇.经络腧穴学.北京:中国中医药出版社,2003.P248-249.
    [22]石学敏.针灸学.北京:中国中医药出版社,2002.P66-68.
    [23]郭长青,朱江.针灸特定穴临床实用集萃.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.P387-389.
    [24]张吉.针灸镇痛机制与临床.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.P66-113.
    [25]张智龙.针灸临床穴性类编精解.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.P112-395.
    [26]熊光天,魏稼.阳陵泉初探.中医杂志,1988,(4):13-14.
    [27]杨志新.相对穴及临床应用.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.P184-189.
    [28]曹喜俊,周颖芳,李万瑶.八风穴的临床应用.蜜蜂杂志,2007,(3):29.
    [29]张永臣.论留针.北京针灸骨伤学院学报,2000,7(1):50-52.
    [30]王培清.得气、得气的应用与操作.中国针灸,2007,27(5):349-351.
    [31]陈利国,蔡向红.留针的意义及时限探讨.中国针灸,1996,(6):40-41.
    [32]童明欧,周厚强,张世俊等.不同留针时间对急性腰扭伤的疗效观察.中医外治杂志,2009,18(6):50-51.
    [33]汪立新.针刺治疗急慢性软组织损伤时毫针留针时间与疗效关系的探讨.针灸临床杂志,1996,12(Z2):40-41.
    [34]房丽,于致顺.头穴针刺不同刺激量对急性脑梗塞的肌力恢复的影响.针灸临床杂志,1995,11(5):37.
    [35]沙岩.关于针刺有效刺激量和维持一定的有效刺激时间问题的探讨.针灸临床杂志,1996,12(4):21.
    [36]陆寿康.刺法灸法学.北京:中国中医药出版社,2003.P75-76.
    [37]Tischer T, Aktas T, Milz S, et al. Detailed pathologicalchanges of human lumbar facet joints L1-L5 in elderly indi-viduals. Eur Spine,2006,15(3):308-315.
    [38]严隽陶.推拿学.北京:中国中医药出版社,2003.P96-143.
    [39]张德仁,任龙喜,宋文阁.椎间盘源性疼痛微创治疗学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.P10-17.
    [40]Bates MS, Edwards WT, Anderson KO. Ethnocultural influences on variation in chronic pain perception. Pain,1993,52:101-112.
    [41]范振华,周士枋.实用康复医学.南京:东南大学出版社,1998.P133-143.
    [42]Ronald McRae著.王延宙译.骨科临床检查图解.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2005. P149-150.
    [43]顾新,李玉明,李晶.几种腰前屈活动度评定方法的比较.中国康复医学杂志,2001,16(3): 167-169.
    [44]杜良杰,李建军.多功能躯体活动度测量仪的设计及应用.中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(4):269-270.
    [45]杨期东.神经病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.P13-19.
    [46]贾连顺,李家顺.现代腰椎外科学.上海:上海远东出版社,1995.P328-329.
    [47]李锋,冯建书,聂喜增.骨科疾病诊断标准.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2009.P116-126.
    [48]范卫民.骨科疾病诊断流程与治疗策略.北京:科学出版社,2008.P407-415.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700