对价方式、溢价率与中长期业绩
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
我国控制权转移活动是随着国有经济“国退民进、抓大放小”的改革和资本市场的建设而蓬勃兴起的。虽然控制权转移之类的并购活动吸引了众多学者,但是对于交易价格这个并购活动的核心内容来说却研究不多。本文着眼于对价方式的角度,剖析其对盈余管理的影响,并力图较为正确地评价对价方式对市场绩效是否存在改进作用。
     本文的研究发现不同对价方式的盈余管理动机存在差异,有偿转让控制权的对价方式更易推动上市公司通过操控应计利润调低净资产,提高溢价率,以符合政策要求。动机的差异导致两种对价方式下上市公司的盈余管理程度并不相同。实证结果表明,在整体上无偿类样本相对于同行业公司没有明显的盈余管理,而有偿类样本则有明显通过线上项目调控应计利润的痕迹,即使控制了“洗大澡”等因素,对价方式对操控性应计利润的影响还是十分明显。
     利用每股净资产和每股价格回归得到的系数,本文估算出名义溢价率和实际溢价率等数据,不仅证实了前述盈余管理的动机,而且发现调整盈余管理后的实际溢价率与市场溢价率接近。
     本文还根据对价方式影响市场绩效两种途径将对价方式对市场绩效的影响分为前期影响和后期影响。如此明确划分对价方式的前期、后期影响,是为了防止企业将控制权转移前的业绩挪到控制权转移后,制造出业绩提高的假象。
     实证结果表明对价方式的前期影响并不显著,对价方式的后期影响在控制权转移后的18个月内的确存在,说明有偿转让方式可以提高企业的中短期市场绩效,但中长期来看,对价方式的作用并不明显。
     本文的贡献主要包括:注重对价方式样本选择的可比性;将盈余管理问题引入我国控制权转移的研究中;较为深入研究对价方式及市场绩效并估算出实际溢价率;利用较为准确的行业资料估算操控性应计利润,并采用更为严谨的自举法来检验市场绩效。
Control right transfer(CRT) has depeloped with the reform of the state economy and construction of the capital market. Althought these M&A activities have attractedmany researchers, few studies pay attention to the core issue------price. Therefore,this paper emphasizes on pricing mode, analysing its impact on earnings management and market performance.
     The paper discovers that pricing mode has impact on the motivation of earnings management. CRTs with paperment often motivate listed companies to adjust DA, so as to make companies' equity seem low and premium rate seem high. This adjustment is made to meet the regulations concerning pricing for transfering stated-owned stock. Different motivations lead different amount of DA adjusted by listed companies. Empirical results show that overrall, CRTs without payment have no significant DA while CRTs with payment have significant DA even other factors such as "big bath" have controlled.
     Utilizing the coefficients of the regression between equity per share and price per share, the paper estimates nominal premium rate and real premium rate. This procedure not only proves the existence of motivation to manage earnings, but also discovers real premium rate is quite the same as premium rate with little DA in the market.
     Considering the different way that the pricing mode of CRTs has impact on market performance, the paper divides the influence of pricing mode into prophase part and anaphase part. This division is made for distinguishing fake account that defers recognizing perfomance before CRTs until CRTs are finished.
     Empirical tests show no significance for prophase influence of the pricing mode. Meanwile, significant anaphase infuence of the pricing mode does exist during the 18 months after CRTs. That is, CRTs with payment can improve short- and medium-term market performance. However, pricing mode shows little significant influence on market performance.
     The paper contributes in following aspects: paying attention to the comparability when choosing data; considering earnings management in the research on CRTs; conducting a thorough research on pricing mode and its influence on market performance; estimating real premium rate; calculating DA with accurate industrial data; using the precise method of bootstrapping to test market performance.
引文
[1]你是否为一项并购付出得太多?《哈佛商业评论》1999年7/8月,Robert G Eccles,Kersten L.Lanes,Thomas C.Wilson。
    [1]市场化改革三十年成就,http://www.chinareform.org.cn/ad/2007-18/。
    [2]吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,序言部分,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [3]吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,1981笼子与鸟章节,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [1]概括自吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,破产的高潮--冰火两重天章节,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [1]概括自吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,1997“世界不再令人着迷”章节,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [2]吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,2002中国制造章节,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [1]概括自吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,1986一无所有的力量章节,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [2]概括自吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,1989:倒春寒章节,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [1]概括自吴晓波,《激荡三十年(上)》,1993剧烈变革的转折之年章节,中信出版社,2007.1。
    [2]我国民营经济的发展历程,摘自中国中小企业研究网,http://www.sme2000.com.cn/develop/develop_view.asp?id=113,2005.5。
    [1]徐兆铭,《企业并购理论研究与实证分析》,P74-75,中国财政经济出版社,2005.6。
    [2]长江巴黎百富勤证券有限责任公司,优化资源配置提升公司价值--谈外资并购对资本市场的影响,中国证券监督管理委员会网站投资者保护论坛,http://www.csrc.gov.cn/n575458/n4238522/n4238647/n4369453/4369755.html.2006.11。
    [1]并购相关法规主要搜索于http://www.law-lib.com、http://www.qseek.net/law网站。
    [2]高明华,《中国上市公司并购财务效应的实证研究》,厦门大学博士论文,P20。
    [1]张文魁,中国证券市场十年回眸(2)漫漫重组路,功过有几分,http://www.mergers-china.com/redianjujiao/rmhtdetail.asp?id=107,2000.12。
    [1]陈昆玉,《国有控股上市公司控制权转移对经营绩效的影响》,经济科学出版社,2006.2,P30。
    [1]张秋生主持,《企业改组、兼并与资产重组中的财务与会计问题研究--价值评估、融资、会计处理》,北京:经济科学出版社,2002。
    [1]《接管、重组与公司治理》(第二版),J.弗雷德·威斯通,S.郑光,胡安·A.苏著,李秉祥等译,东北财经大学出版社,2000,P107。
    [1]《接管、重组与公司治理》(第二版),J.弗雷德·威斯通,S.郑光,胡安·A.苏著,李秉祥等译,东北财经大学出版社,2000,P113。
    [1]盈余管理的研究分类参考了石晓军、王豪,基于动机视角的盈余管理文献综述,金融经济,2006.14。
    [1]直接根据线下项目判断盈余管理程度的做法参见Kevin和Hongqi(2004)。
    [1]巴曙松:国有股权转让按净资产定价有缺陷,上海证券报,2003.11.27,http://bjyouth.ynet.com/viewjsp?oid=2785370。
    [2]《中国并购评论》,清华大学出版社,2004.1,P22。
    [3]国外的溢价率一般是指股权转让价格相对于发出要约时的市价而言,我国溢价率按照股权转让价格相对于转让时净资产来计算,这实际上是股权分置情况下的产物。在全流通时代,参照二级市场价格转让股权
    [1]白重恩等.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005(2):81-91.
    [2]白云霞.控制权转移、资产收购与公司业绩[D].厦门大学博士论文,2004.
    [3]长江巴黎百富勤证券有限责任公司.优化资源配置、提升公司价值--谈外资并购对资本市场的影响[Z].httq://www.csrc.gov.cn/n575458/n4238522/n4238647/n4369453/4369755.html,2006.11.
    [4]陈昆玉.国有控股上市公司控制权转移对经营绩效的影响[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.
    [5]陈小林.公司控制权的频繁转移、企业业绩与投机性并购[J].南开管理评论,2005(4):103-108.
    [6]陈小悦和徐晓东.股权结构、企业绩效和投资者利益保护[J].经济研究,2001(11):3-11.
    [7]冯根福、韩冰和闫冰.中国上市公司股权集中度变动的实证分析[J].经济研究,2002(8):12-19.
    [8]费一文和蔡明超.上海股市股权收购效果分析[J]_世界经济,2003(5):64-69.
    [9]高雷和宋顺林.上市公司控制权转移与市场反应[J].财经科学,2006(3):30-37.
    [10]高明华.中国上市公司并购财务效应的实证研究[D].厦门大学博士论文,2005.
    [11]高明华和杨静.中国上市公司治理绩效的影响因素分析[J].国际金融研究,2002(11):54-58.
    [12]顾勇和吴冲锋.上市公司并购动机及股价反应的实证检验[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(2):84-89.
    [13]李善民、陈玉罡、曾昭灶、李珩和王彩萍.中国上市公司并购与重组的实证研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003.
    [14]李善民和曾昭灶.控制权转移的背景与控制权转移公司的特征研究[J].经济研究,2003(11):54-65.
    [15]李心丹、朱洪亮、张兵和罗浩,基于DEA的上市公司并购效率研究[J].经济研究,2003(10):15-25.
    [16]李增泉.国家控股与公司治理的有效性--一项基于中国证券市场的实证研究[D].上海财经大学博士论文,2002.
    [17]李增泉和杨春燕.企业绩效、控制权转移与经理人员变更--一项基于我国证券市场的实证研究[J].中国会计与财务研究,2003(4):51-108.
    [18]鲁爱雪.我国上市公司控制权转移价格研究[D].南京工业大学硕士论文,2005.
    [19]陆国庆.中国上市公司不同资产重组类型的绩效比较--对1999年度沪市的实证分析[J].财经科学,2000(6):20-24.
    [20]吕爱兵.我国企业属地化并购研究报告[J].中国并购评论,2004(2):8-28.
    [21]J.弗雷德·威斯通、S.郑光和胡安·A.苏著,李秉祥等译.接管、重组与公司治理(第二版)[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2000.
    [22]马克·L·赛罗沃(Mark L.Sirower),杨炯译.协同效应的陷阱[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1999.
    [23]宁宇新和柯大钢.控制权转移和资产重组:掏空抑或支持--来自中国资本市场的经验证据[J].中国会计评论,2006(2):277-290.
    [24]施东晖.上市公司控制权价值的实证研究[J].经济科学,2003(6):83-89.
    [25]宋大龙.企业控制权转移动因研究[J]_海南金融,2007(8):17-22.
    [26]孙永祥和黄祖辉.上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J].经济研究,1999(12):23-30.
    [27]孙铮和李增泉.股价反应、企业绩效与控制权转移--来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国会计与财务研究,2003(5):1-63.
    [28]唐宗明和蒋位.中国上市公司大股东侵害度实证分析[J].经济研究,2002(4):44-51.
    [29]童晓兰和朱宝宪.我国企业并购溢价及其影响的实证分析[J].中国并购评论,2004(1):78-97.
    [30]王会芳.中国上市公司第一大股东变更的实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2004(2):64-71.
    [31]王剑敏、孙伯灿和王晓云.控制权转移的上市公司财务绩效及其影响因素的实证研究[J].重庆大学学报,2006(5):16-23.
    [32]我国民营经济的发展历程[Z].http://www.sme2000.com.cn/develop/develop_view.asp?id =113,2005.5.
    [33]吴联生和白云霞.公司价值、资产收购与控制权转移方式[J].管理世界,2004(9):123-131.
    [34]吴晓波.激荡三十年(上)[M].北京:中信出版社,2007.
    [35]肖腾文.上市公司控制权问题研究[J].证券市场导报,2000(7):48-62.
    [36]徐莉萍、陈工孟和辛宇a.控制权转移、产权改革及公司经营绩效之改进[J].管理世界,2005(3):126-136.
    [37]徐莉萍、陈工孟和辛宇b.产权改革、控制权转移及其市场反应研究[J].审计研究,2005(5):75-80.
    [38]徐兆铭.企业并购理论研究与实证分析[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2005.
    [39]杨瑞龙和周业安.一个关于企业所有权安排的规范性分析框架及其理论含义[J].经济研究,1997(1):12-22。
    [40]杨瑞龙和周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2000.
    [41]叶康涛.公司控制权的隐性收益--来自中国非流通股转让市场的研究[J].经济科学,2003(5):61-69.
    [42]张秋生等.企业改组、兼并与资产重组中的财务与会计问题研究--价值评估、融资、会计处理[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002.
    [43]张文魁.中国证券市场十年回眸(2)漫漫重组路,功过有几分[Z].http://www.mergerschina.com/redianjujiao/rmhtdetail.asp?id=107,2000.12.
    [44]张文魁.中国国有企业产权改革与公司治理转型[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2007.
    [45]张文璋和顾慧慧.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究[J].证券市场导报,2002(9):21-26.
    [46]赵勇和朱武祥.上市公司兼并收购可预测性[J].经济研究,2000(4):19-25.
    [47]郑厚斌.收购与合并--企业产权交易及其市场组织[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998.
    [48]朱宝宪和王怡凯.1998年中国上市公司并购实践的效应分析[J].经济研究,2002(11):20-27
    [1]Agrawal A.,J.Jaffe and G N.Mandelker.The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms:A Re-examination of an Anomaly[J].Journal of Finance,1992,47:1605-1621.
    [2]Arrow,K.J.Vertical Integration and Communication,Bell Journal of Economics,1975,6:173-183.
    [3]Asquith,P.,and E.H.Kim.The Impact of Merger Bids on the Participating Firms'Securityholders[J].Journal of Finance,1982,37:1209-1228.
    [4]Asquith,P.Merger Bids,Uncertainty,and Stockholder Returns[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1983,11:51-83.
    [5]Bai,C.,Liu,Q.and Song,F.Value of Corporate Control:Evidence from China's Distressed Firms[Z].Working Paper,University of Hong Kong,2002.
    [6]Barclay,Michael J.and Clifford G.Holderness.Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1989,25:371- 395.
    [7]Bennedsen M,and Wolfenzon D.The balance of Power in Closely Held Corporations[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2000,58:113-139.
    [8]Berkovitch,E.,and M.P.Narayanan.Motives for Takeovers:An Empirical Investigation[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993,28:347-362.
    [9]Berle A.Jr,and Gardiner C.Means.The Modern Corporation and Private Property[M].New York:Mac-millan Company,1932.
    [10]Bloch F.,U.Hege.Multiple Shareholders and Control Contests[Z].Working Paper,http://www.ssm.com.2001.
    [11]Boardman,A.E.and Vining,A.R.Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1989, 32:1-33.
    [12] Boycko M., Shleifer A., and Vishny R. A Theory of Privatization[J]. Economic Journal, 1996, 106:309-319.
    [13] Bradley, M. Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate Control[J].Journal of Business, 1980, 53: 345-376.
    [14] Bradley. M., A. Desai, and E. H. Kim. The Rationale Behind Interfirm Tender Offers: Information or Synergy? [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983,11: 183-206.
    [15] Bradley. M, A. Desai, and E. H. Kim. Synergistic Gains From Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division Between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firm[J].The Rand Journal of Economics, 1988,19: 88-101.
    [16] Chatterjee, S. Types of Synergy and Economics Value: The Impact of Acquisition on Mergering and Rival Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986,7: 119-139.
    [17] Christie, A. A., and J. Zimmerman. Efficient and Opportunistic Choices of Accounting Procedures: Corporate Control Contests[J].The Accounting Review, 1994, 69: 539-566.
    [18] DeAngelo, L. E. Accounting Numbers as Market Valuation Substitutes: A Study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholders[J].The Accounting Review, 1986, 61:400-420.
    [19] DeAngelo, L. E. Managerial Competition, Information Costs, and Corporate Governance: The Use of Accounting Performance Measures in Proxy Contests[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1988,10: 3-36.
    [20] Dennis, D.K., and J. J.McConnell. Corporate Mergers and Security Returns[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, 16: 349-365.
    [21] Desai, H., and P. Jain. Firm Performance and Focus: Long-Run Stock Market Performance Following Spinoffs[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 54: 75-101.
    [22] Dodd, P. and Ruback, R. S. Tender Offers and Stockholder Return: An Empirical Analysis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1977, 5: 351-373.
    [23] Easterwood, C. Takeovers and Incentives for Earnings Management: an Empirical Analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Business Research, 1997, 14: 29-48.
    [24] Eckbo B. E. Horizontal Mergers, Collusion and Stockholder Wealth. [J] Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, 11:241-273.
    [25] Elgers, P. T, and Clark, J.J. Merger Type and Shareholder Returns: Additional Evidence, [J]. Financial Management, 1980, 9: 66-72.
    [26] Erickson, M. and S. Wang. Earnings Management by Acquiring Firms in Stock for Stock Mergers[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1999, 27: 149-176.
    [27] Eugene F. Fama and Michael C. Jensen, Organizational Forms and Investment Decisions[J] Journal of Financial Economics, 1985, 14: 101-119.
    [28] Fama, E. F. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1980,88:288-307.
    [29] Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. Separation of Ownership and Control[J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26: 301-325.
    [30] Ferris, S., and K. Park. How Different is the Long-Run Performance of Mergers in the Telecommunications Industry? [Z]. Working Paper,University of Missouri, March 2001.
    [31] Franks, J., R. Harris, and S. Titman. The Postmerger Share-Price Performance of Acquiring. Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1991, 29: 81-96.
    [32] Ghosh, A. Does Operating Performance Really Improve Following Corporate Acquisitions? [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2001, 7: 151-178.
    [33] Gomes, A., and W. Novaes. Sharing of Control as a Corporate Governance. Mechanism, [Z]. working paper, University of Pennsylvania, 2001.
    [34] Gregory A. An Examination of the Long Run Performance of UK Acquiring Firms[J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1997, 24: 971-1002.
    [35] Groff, J., and C. Wright. The Market for Corporate Control and its Implications for Accounting Policy Choice[J]. Advances in Accounting, 1989, 7: 3-21
    [36] Grossman, Sanford J., and Hart, Oliver D. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94: 691-719.
    [37] Hart O., and Moore J. Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98: 1119~1158.
    [38] Hayward, M. L. A., and Hambrick, D.C. Explaining the Premium Paid for Large Aacquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 103-127.
    [39] Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu and R.S. Ruback. Does corporate performance improve after mergers? [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1992, 31: 135-175.
    [40] Hirshleifer, D., and A. V. Thakor. Corporate control through board dismissals and takeovers[J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1998, 7: 489-520.
    [41] Inderst, Roman and Muller, H. Internal vs. External Financing: An Optimal Contracting Approach[J]. Journal of Finance , 2003, 58: 1033-1062.
    [42] Jennings R. H., and Michael A. Mazzeo. Competing Bids, Target Management Resistance, and the Structure of Takeover Bids[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1993, 6: 883-910.
    [43] Jensen, M. C, and Meckling, W. H. The Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3: 305-362.
    [44] Jensen, Michael C, and Richard S. Ruback. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, 11: 5-50.
    [45] Jensen, M. C. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1986,76: 323-329.
    [46] Jensen, M. C. The Distribution of Power among Corporate Managers,Shareholders and Directors [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20: 3-24.
    [47] John, K. and E. Ofek. Asset Sales and Increase in Focus[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 37: 105-126.
    [48] Johnson, S. R., La Porta, F.Lopez-de-Silanes and A.Shleifer. Tunneling[J]. American Economic Review, 2000, 90: 22-27.
    [49] Kim,E. H., and J. J. McConnell. Corporate Merger and the Co-Insurance of Corporate Debt[J]. Journal of Finance, 1977, 32: 349-365.
    [50] Kohers N., and T. Kohers. Takeovers of Technology Firms: Expectations vs. reality [J]. Financial. Management, 2001, 30: 5-30.
    [51] Koumanakos E, Siriopoulos C. and A. Georgopoulos. Firm Acquisitions and Earnings Management: Evidence from Greece[J]. Managerial Auditing Journal, 2005, 20: 663-678.
    [52] Kyle, A. Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading[J]. Econometrica, 1985, 53: 1315-1335.
    [53] Laeven, L., and R. Levine. Beyond the Biggest: Do Other Large Shareholders Influence Corporate Valuations[Z]. working paper, University of Minnesota, 2004.
    [54] Langetieg, T. An Application of a Three-Factor Performance Index to Measure Stockholder Gains from Mergers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1978, 6: 365-383.
    [55] Linn, S. C, and J. A. Switzer. Are Cash Acquisitions Associated With Better Postcombination Operating Performance than Stock Acquisitions? [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2001,25:1113-1138.
    [56] Loderer, C, and K. Martin. Postacquisition Performance of Acquiring Firms[J]. Financial Management, 1992, 21: 69-79.
    [57] Loughran, T., and A. M. Vijh. Do Long- termSharehoIders Benefit fromCorporate Acquisitions? [J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52: 1765-1790.
    [58] Louis, H. The Causes of Post-Merger Underperformance: Evidence from Successful and Unsuccessful Bidders[Z]. Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University, 2002.
    [59] Magenheim E. B., and Mueller D. C. Are Acquiring FirmShareholders Better-Off After an Acquisition? [A]. in J. Coffee, Jr., L. Lowenstein and S. R. Ackerman (eds. ), Knights, Raiders and Targets [C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
    [60] Malatesta P. H. The Wealth Effect of Merger Activity and the Objective Functions of Merging Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, 11: 155-181.
    [61] Mandelker, G. Risk and Return: The Case of Merging Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1974, 1:305-335.
    [62] Manne. H. Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1965,73: 110-120.
    [63] Maquieira, C, Megginson, W. and Nail, L. Wealth Creation Versus Wealth Redistributions in Pure Stock-for-Stock Mergers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, 48: 3-33.
    [64] Matsusake, J. G. Target Profits and Managerial Discipline During the Conglomerate Merger Wave[J]. Journal of Economics, 1993,24: 357-379.
    [65] Maury, B., and A. Pajuste. Multiple large shareholders and firm value[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2005, 29: 1813-1834.
    [66] McConnell, J. J., and H. Servaes. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal of Financial Economics, 1990, 27: 696-612.
    [67] McDaniel, M. W. Bondholders and Corporate Governance[J]. Business Lawyer, 1986, 41: 413-460.
    [68] Megginson, W. L., and J. M. Netter. From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39: 321-389.
    [69] Megginson, W.L., A. Morgan, and L. Nail. The Determinants of Positive Long-Term Performance in Strategic Mergers: Corporate Focus and Cash[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance 2004, 28: 523-552.
    [70] Mitchell, M. L. and J. H. Mulherin. The Impact of Industrial Shocks on Takeover and Restructuring Activity[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996,41: 193-229.
    [71] Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., and Stulz, R. M. Firm Size and the Gains from Acquisitions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, 73: 201-228.
    [72] Morck R., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny. Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acqusitions[J]. Journal of Finance, 1990, 45: 31-48.
    [73] Mueller, D. C. A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1969, 8: 643-659.
    [74] Murphy, K. J. and J. L. Zimmerman. Financial Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1993, 16: 273-315.
    [75] Myers, S. C, and N. S. Majluf. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, 13:187-221.
    [76] Nielsen, J. F., and R. W. Melicher. A Financial Analysis of Acquisition and Merger Premiums[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1973, 8: 139-162.
    [77] Parrino, R. CEO Turnover and Outside Succession: A Cross-Sectional Analysis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997,46: 165-197.
    [78] Pettit, B. The Long-Horizon Performance of Acquiring Firms: The French Evidence., [Z]. Working Paper, American Graduate School of International Management, November 2000.
    [79] Rau, P.R., and T. Vermaelen. Glamour, Value and the Post-Acquisition Performance of Acquiring Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, 48: 223-253.
    [80] Roll, R. The hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers[J].Journal of Business, 1986, 59: 197-216.
    [81] Seth, A. Value Creation in Acquisitions: A Re-Examination of Performance Issues[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1990,11: 99-115.
    [82] Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94: 481-488.
    [83] Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny. A survey of corporate governance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997,52:737-783.
    [84] Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. Stock market driven acquisitions [Z].Working paper,University of Chicago, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=278563, 2001.
    [85] Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert W. Stock Market Driven Acquisitions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, 70: 295-311.
    [86] Shirley, M., and P. Walsh. Public vs. Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate[J]. World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 2420, 2000.
    [87] Stein, Jeremy. Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52: 111-133.
    [88] Stigler, J. George. Monopoly and Oligopoly by Merger[J]. American Economic Review, 1950, 40: 23-34.
    [89] Travlos, N. G. Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment and Bidding Firms' Stock Returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 1987,42: 943-963.
    [90] Varaiya, N. P., and Ferris, K. R. Overpaying in Corporate Takeovers: The Winner's Curse[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 1987, 43: 64-70.
    [91] Wansley, J., Lane, W., and Yang, H. Abnormal Returns to Acquired Firms by Type of Acquisition and Method of Payment[J]. Financial Management, 1983,12: 16-22.
    [92] Warga, A. and Welch, I. Bondholder Losses in Leveraged Buyouts[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1993,6:959-982.
    [93] Wu, Y. W. Management Buyouts and Earnings Management [J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 1997, 12: 373-389.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700