CO_2混相驱多组分多相非等温数学模拟
|
摘要
将二氧化碳作为油藏提高采收率的驱油剂已研究多年,室内和现场试验都曾表明它是一种有效的驱油剂。它能够提高原油采收率的原因主要有以下几个方面。一方面是因为二氧化碳易溶于原油,这种特性可以起到如下三方面的作用。(1)使原油的体积增大,从而促使充满油的孔隙体积也增大,这为油在孔隙介质中流动提供了有利的条件。若随后地层注水,还可使油藏中的残余油量减小。(2)可使原油粘度降低,促使原油流动性提高,其结果是用少量的驱油剂就可达到一定的驱油效率。或换言之,用一定量的驱油剂就能达到较高的驱油效率。(3)能使毛细管的吸渗作用得到改善,从而使油层扫油范围扩大,使水、油的流动性保持平衡。另一方面是因为二氧化碳易溶于水,这种特性也可以起到如下三方面的作用。(1)使水的粘度有所增加;当注入粘度较高的水时,由于水的流动性降低,从而使水、油粘度比例随着油的流动性增大而变小。(2)二氧化碳水溶液能与岩石的碳酸盐成分发生反应,并使其溶解,从而提高储集层的渗透率性能,使注入井的吸收能力增强。(3)可降低油水界面的表面张力,从而提高驱油效率。更为重要的是,二氧化碳可促进原油中的轻质烃类(C2～C30)被抽提出来,从而使残余油饱和度明显降低。同时,在不同原油的成分、温度和压力条件下,二氧化碳具有无限制地与原油混相的能力,实际上可以达到很好的驱油目的。二氧化碳在油、水中的扩散系数较高,其扩散作用可使二氧化碳本身重新分配并使相系统平衡状态稳定。注入碳酸水,可大大降低残余油饱和度,因为在含水带内的碳酸水前缘,能形成和保持二氧化碳气游离带。据国外有关资料统计,用二氧化碳驱油若能达到混相状态,油田的最终采收率可达60-70%;若以非混相驱油,油田最终采收率也可达50%以上。广泛的适应性和成本低廉、成效显著、可回收重复利用的特点,使二氧化碳驱油已成为国外三次采油的主要手段。
As one kind of oil expellant in improving the recovery ratio for oil reservoir, carbon dioxide has been studied for many years. All the experiments both in laboratories and fields indicate that it is effective oil expellant. Its predominance is shown in the following aspects: First of all, CO2 is apt to be dissolved into crude oil and work in three ways: (1)Make the volume of crude oil increase and enlarge the hole filled with oil, so that feasible condition can be offered for the oil flows. Flowing with the water flooding, amount of the remnant oil would reduce. (2) Reduce the crude oil viscidity and improve its mobility, so that certain oil driving efficiency can be obtained with a small amount of oil expellant. Or in other words, higher driving oil efficiency with certain oil expellant can be got. (3)Improve the sucking function of capillary and expand the scope of oil scanning for the reservoir, so that oil and water flows can be balanced. Secondly, CO2 is apt to be dissolved into water and operate in three aspects: (1)Increase the water viscidity and the mobility of the water is reduced, so that the proportion of water and oil diminishes with the mobility increase of the oil. (2)The carbon dioxide solution can react with the carbonate in the rocks, dissolve the rocks and improve its penetrate capability, so that the absorption ability of the pouring well is strengthened. (3)Decrease the surface intension between oil and water and improve the oil driving efficiency. And carbon dioxide has a good influence on the relative penetrate curves of oil and water, can promote the releasing of light hydrocarbon (C2-C30) from crude oil and make the saturation of oil reduced. Meanwhile under different conditions of compositions, temperatures and pressures of the crude oil, CO2 possesses miscible ability with crude oil limitlessly so driving oil efficiently can be achieved. The high diffusion coefficient of CO2 in oil and water can redistribute itself and make the balanced state of the phase system steady. Pouring into carbonic water can reduce the saturation of the remained oil greatly. Relevant statistics from foreign countries show that the final recovery ratio can be up to 60-70% if CO2 can get the miscible
drive condition. Otherwise the final recovery ratio can be up to more than 50%. The extensive adaptability, low cost, and recoverability have made CO2 become the main way in the third oil extraction in foreign countries.The main part of Caoshe Oil field is netted river sediments of a middle fan. In sandstone quartz is the main composition, with the content of 60-75%; in the gravel, quartz is relatively low, generally in 25-50%, but oddment content is relatively high, the main cementation type is hole pattern, the miscellaneouscontent is 7-15%. Identification in casting slides shows that main cementation material is press connecting pattern hole pattern The main cementation type is hole pattern, and miscellaneous content is7-15%, clay mineral kaolinite is a higher. Drill core determines the hole ratio is 6.3-21.86%, and its average value is 13.21%,penerate ratio is 0.22-342.1 X 10-3nm2, and its average value is 24.77 X 10-3fim2Based on the statistical numeral of testing result, the south-middle to the south-middle faulted block are under identical pressure system, and the temperature field is consistent with a ground temperature grads equation : T=4.9116+3.36 x 10-2H.In the first section of Shutaizhou group, the depth of oil reservoir is 2760~ 3200m, its thickness is 70m, the primitive stratum pressure is 19.29Mpa, stratum temperature is 97.45-108.4℃, and the compress coefficient of the rock and hole is 1.3x10~-4 IV Mpa, its thermal capacity is 2870KJ/ m3 ℃, and heat conduction coefficient is 266 KJ / L ℃, On the up and bottom the thermal capacity and heat conduction coefficient of the rocks are2740KJ / m3 ℃ and 279 KJ / L ℃ =The oil reservoir in Taizhou Group of Caoshe oil field belongs to continent caused crude oil having high content of wax, low sulphurhigh wax and high freezing point, low sulphur, high solidifying point. The density of crude oil on the ground is 0.8310g/cm3, viscidity is about 20.11-106.38mPa.s, and the point of the first distillation is 67-246°C; The density of crude oil in stratum is 0.7534g/cm3, viscidity is 12.83mPa.s, and the determined saturation pressure of the crude oil in stratum is 5.491 Mpa. Reservoir in this area is formed in high-pressure: pressure of pickle pointis 3.94-4.89Mpa, volume coefficient is 1.1319, the scale of gas to oil is 27.96m3/t. Gases in this area are all dissolved gas, and the scale of gas to oil is 24.2m3/t. No. 8 and No 126 well are wells that could be observed with bianshui presently in Caoshe oil field and their water types are mainly composed of Na2SO4, with PH value varies from 6.24-7.99 as well as mineral solubility varies from 4.63-38.53g/cm3. We may make a conclusion that oil produced from these wells
belong to the typical black oil, after calculating composition of sample through chromatogram analysis, respectively, of 14.252% Cl, 9.411%C2~C6 and 74.277% C7+.Research on the oil reservoir of Caoshe Oil Field regards the reservoir as a thick tabular body. It is isotopic except the differences of the hole degree and penetrate ratio caused by different sediment environments. And this provides the initial mathematical condition at the same time.According to the experiment, the changing rule of the minimal miscible pressure of the oil reservoir in Taizhou group of Caoshe oil field is basically coincidence with MMP Co2-lo =6.05*10"6(1.8T-459.67) ' 06(C5+) '78 and we may make a prediction that the minimal miscible pressure of component of the crude oil according to the stratum temperature and composition of crude oil, using the formula stated above if the stratum pressure exceeds the miscible pressure.Depending on stratum volume ratio to represent the multi-phase hydro-mechanical consecutive equation and model, this article has summarized and reasoned mono-phase ^ multi-phase hydro-mechanical consecutive as well as multi-phase transfer equation, which is aimed at solving the problem concerning underground multi-phase hydro-mechanical density.According to the conservation of mass, the black oil mathematic model of "three phases flow" expressed by the volume coefficient of stratum is endued. For adopt a simpler method, the average meaning of " three phases flow " in space-time scale is provided. The entire liquid hydrocarbon and all gaseous phases that appear under the ground condition are regarded as petroleum and gas, only considering their solubility in their concomitancy substances. This make it more significant for the CO2 miscible drives in "three phases".A solid academic foundation concerning the possibility of CO2 expelling oil and simulation before exploration will be established through reasoning model of injecting carbon dioxide within the multi-composition of gas and oil as well as Tri-phase solubility within water, according to the law of energy conservation.A solid theoretical foundation will be established after we first time advancing that CO2 could be utilized in expelling oil under abnormal temperature so as to validate its feasibility.According to the experiment, an accurate standard was utilized in analysis ,dividing crude oil into several parts, respectively including 1.210% N2, 14.282% Cl, 2.292% C2, 1.817% C3, 0.910% IC4, 2.156% NC4, 0.149% IC5, 0.487% NC5, 1.600% C6, 4.597% C7, 7.021% C8, 6.075% C9,
5.881%5.881%,and 50.703% C11+. Simultaneity, based on the law of energy conservation, we first time establish a Carbon dioxide expelling oil within multi-composition of oil and gas as well as multi-phase non-isothermal model. This model will establish a firm academic foundation besides its application for the study under non-isothermal condition and play a significant role in studying the dimensional changing rule of saturation, promoting crude oil recovery and offering precise individual pressure data between a series of groups.On the base of non-linear numerical methods of " three -phases" of multi-component, a advanced convergence implicit difference scheme is adopted, also the functional expansion method with finite element method combined is used to compute non-linear model. This creates more conditions for CO2 in modeling the changing law of "great looks".Five main factors including way of carbon dioxide injection, pressure of injection, velocity of injection, total ratio of injection and injection method should be involved when designing plans. However, only the most favorable and practical factors can be selected and combined so as to achieve the goal of efficiency.Using the pouring well net as the foundation, considering the connection and heterogeneous, and because of existing of high influent areas in reservoir of Taizhou group, we must adjust and jam the high influent areas in order to prevent the carbon dioxide from fleeing.The effect of continuous gas pouring and the alternative pouring of gas and water shows that alternative pouring of gas and water can improve the recovery ratio, and when the scale of water and gas is 1:1, the oil volume increase most, so we chose the way of WAG l:lpouring. According to the compare of experience and numerical simulation of Cao3 well, the best result of injection is 0.3HCPV, so we choose it. According to the physical analogy and the analysis of Caoshe, Chujia oil reservoir, the scale should choose 1.0. The long drill core drives always pouring into rate of 0.3PV for the experiment, the best pouring into rate, if the words finishing within 6 years of always pouring into rate of 0.3PV, the pouring into rate is 370RM3/d every day, nearly shut 227t/d. Pouring into the pump is mainly controlled by stratum pressure, stratum absorbability, rubbing hindering and CO2 liquid post pressure. The normal water flooding well head pressure calculates between 23- 24.8Mpa, and the normal gas pouring well head pressure is between 20- 25MPa at present. Because the pressure wellhead can be under 35Mpa, so the normal gas pouring can be guaranteed. Adopt pouring in the way of WAG 1:1, pouring cycle is 90 days, first pouring carbon dioxide for 45 days and then pouring
As one kind of oil expellant in improving the recovery ratio for oil reservoir, carbon dioxide has been studied for many years. All the experiments both in laboratories and fields indicate that it is effective oil expellant. Its predominance is shown in the following aspects: First of all, CO2 is apt to be dissolved into crude oil and work in three ways: (1)Make the volume of crude oil increase and enlarge the hole filled with oil, so that feasible condition can be offered for the oil flows. Flowing with the water flooding, amount of the remnant oil would reduce. (2) Reduce the crude oil viscidity and improve its mobility, so that certain oil driving efficiency can be obtained with a small amount of oil expellant. Or in other words, higher driving oil efficiency with certain oil expellant can be got. (3)Improve the sucking function of capillary and expand the scope of oil scanning for the reservoir, so that oil and water flows can be balanced. Secondly, CO2 is apt to be dissolved into water and operate in three aspects: (1)Increase the water viscidity and the mobility of the water is reduced, so that the proportion of water and oil diminishes with the mobility increase of the oil. (2)The carbon dioxide solution can react with the carbonate in the rocks, dissolve the rocks and improve its penetrate capability, so that the absorption ability of the pouring well is strengthened. (3)Decrease the surface intension between oil and water and improve the oil driving efficiency. And carbon dioxide has a good influence on the relative penetrate curves of oil and water, can promote the releasing of light hydrocarbon (C2-C30) from crude oil and make the saturation of oil reduced. Meanwhile under different conditions of compositions, temperatures and pressures of the crude oil, CO2 possesses miscible ability with crude oil limitlessly so driving oil efficiently can be achieved. The high diffusion coefficient of CO2 in oil and water can redistribute itself and make the balanced state of the phase system steady. Pouring into carbonic water can reduce the saturation of the remained oil greatly. Relevant statistics from foreign countries show that the final recovery ratio can be up to 60-70% if CO2 can get the miscible
drive condition. Otherwise the final recovery ratio can be up to more than 50%. The extensive adaptability, low cost, and recoverability have made CO2 become the main way in the third oil extraction in foreign countries.The main part of Caoshe Oil field is netted river sediments of a middle fan. In sandstone quartz is the main composition, with the content of 60-75%; in the gravel, quartz is relatively low, generally in 25-50%, but oddment content is relatively high, the main cementation type is hole pattern, the miscellaneouscontent is 7-15%. Identification in casting slides shows that main cementation material is press connecting pattern hole pattern The main cementation type is hole pattern, and miscellaneous content is7-15%, clay mineral kaolinite is a higher. Drill core determines the hole ratio is 6.3-21.86%, and its average value is 13.21%,penerate ratio is 0.22-342.1 X 10-3nm2, and its average value is 24.77 X 10-3fim2Based on the statistical numeral of testing result, the south-middle to the south-middle faulted block are under identical pressure system, and the temperature field is consistent with a ground temperature grads equation : T=4.9116+3.36 x 10-2H.In the first section of Shutaizhou group, the depth of oil reservoir is 2760~ 3200m, its thickness is 70m, the primitive stratum pressure is 19.29Mpa, stratum temperature is 97.45-108.4℃, and the compress coefficient of the rock and hole is 1.3x10~-4 IV Mpa, its thermal capacity is 2870KJ/ m3 ℃, and heat conduction coefficient is 266 KJ / L ℃, On the up and bottom the thermal capacity and heat conduction coefficient of the rocks are2740KJ / m3 ℃ and 279 KJ / L ℃ =The oil reservoir in Taizhou Group of Caoshe oil field belongs to continent caused crude oil having high content of wax, low sulphurhigh wax and high freezing point, low sulphur, high solidifying point. The density of crude oil on the ground is 0.8310g/cm3, viscidity is about 20.11-106.38mPa.s, and the point of the first distillation is 67-246°C; The density of crude oil in stratum is 0.7534g/cm3, viscidity is 12.83mPa.s, and the determined saturation pressure of the crude oil in stratum is 5.491 Mpa. Reservoir in this area is formed in high-pressure: pressure of pickle pointis 3.94-4.89Mpa, volume coefficient is 1.1319, the scale of gas to oil is 27.96m3/t. Gases in this area are all dissolved gas, and the scale of gas to oil is 24.2m3/t. No. 8 and No 126 well are wells that could be observed with bianshui presently in Caoshe oil field and their water types are mainly composed of Na2SO4, with PH value varies from 6.24-7.99 as well as mineral solubility varies from 4.63-38.53g/cm3. We may make a conclusion that oil produced from these wells
belong to the typical black oil, after calculating composition of sample through chromatogram analysis, respectively, of 14.252% Cl, 9.411%C2~C6 and 74.277% C7+.Research on the oil reservoir of Caoshe Oil Field regards the reservoir as a thick tabular body. It is isotopic except the differences of the hole degree and penetrate ratio caused by different sediment environments. And this provides the initial mathematical condition at the same time.According to the experiment, the changing rule of the minimal miscible pressure of the oil reservoir in Taizhou group of Caoshe oil field is basically coincidence with MMP Co2-lo =6.05*10"6(1.8T-459.67) ' 06(C5+) '78 and we may make a prediction that the minimal miscible pressure of component of the crude oil according to the stratum temperature and composition of crude oil, using the formula stated above if the stratum pressure exceeds the miscible pressure.Depending on stratum volume ratio to represent the multi-phase hydro-mechanical consecutive equation and model, this article has summarized and reasoned mono-phase ^ multi-phase hydro-mechanical consecutive as well as multi-phase transfer equation, which is aimed at solving the problem concerning underground multi-phase hydro-mechanical density.According to the conservation of mass, the black oil mathematic model of "three phases flow" expressed by the volume coefficient of stratum is endued. For adopt a simpler method, the average meaning of " three phases flow " in space-time scale is provided. The entire liquid hydrocarbon and all gaseous phases that appear under the ground condition are regarded as petroleum and gas, only considering their solubility in their concomitancy substances. This make it more significant for the CO2 miscible drives in "three phases".A solid academic foundation concerning the possibility of CO2 expelling oil and simulation before exploration will be established through reasoning model of injecting carbon dioxide within the multi-composition of gas and oil as well as Tri-phase solubility within water, according to the law of energy conservation.A solid theoretical foundation will be established after we first time advancing that CO2 could be utilized in expelling oil under abnormal temperature so as to validate its feasibility.According to the experiment, an accurate standard was utilized in analysis ,dividing crude oil into several parts, respectively including 1.210% N2, 14.282% Cl, 2.292% C2, 1.817% C3, 0.910% IC4, 2.156% NC4, 0.149% IC5, 0.487% NC5, 1.600% C6, 4.597% C7, 7.021% C8, 6.075% C9,
5.881%5.881%,and 50.703% C11+. Simultaneity, based on the law of energy conservation, we first time establish a Carbon dioxide expelling oil within multi-composition of oil and gas as well as multi-phase non-isothermal model. This model will establish a firm academic foundation besides its application for the study under non-isothermal condition and play a significant role in studying the dimensional changing rule of saturation, promoting crude oil recovery and offering precise individual pressure data between a series of groups.On the base of non-linear numerical methods of " three -phases" of multi-component, a advanced convergence implicit difference scheme is adopted, also the functional expansion method with finite element method combined is used to compute non-linear model. This creates more conditions for CO2 in modeling the changing law of "great looks".Five main factors including way of carbon dioxide injection, pressure of injection, velocity of injection, total ratio of injection and injection method should be involved when designing plans. However, only the most favorable and practical factors can be selected and combined so as to achieve the goal of efficiency.Using the pouring well net as the foundation, considering the connection and heterogeneous, and because of existing of high influent areas in reservoir of Taizhou group, we must adjust and jam the high influent areas in order to prevent the carbon dioxide from fleeing.The effect of continuous gas pouring and the alternative pouring of gas and water shows that alternative pouring of gas and water can improve the recovery ratio, and when the scale of water and gas is 1:1, the oil volume increase most, so we chose the way of WAG l:lpouring. According to the compare of experience and numerical simulation of Cao3 well, the best result of injection is 0.3HCPV, so we choose it. According to the physical analogy and the analysis of Caoshe, Chujia oil reservoir, the scale should choose 1.0. The long drill core drives always pouring into rate of 0.3PV for the experiment, the best pouring into rate, if the words finishing within 6 years of always pouring into rate of 0.3PV, the pouring into rate is 370RM3/d every day, nearly shut 227t/d. Pouring into the pump is mainly controlled by stratum pressure, stratum absorbability, rubbing hindering and CO2 liquid post pressure. The normal water flooding well head pressure calculates between 23- 24.8Mpa, and the normal gas pouring well head pressure is between 20- 25MPa at present. Because the pressure wellhead can be under 35Mpa, so the normal gas pouring can be guaranteed. Adopt pouring in the way of WAG 1:1, pouring cycle is 90 days, first pouring carbon dioxide for 45 days and then pouring
引文
[1] 陈凡云.油井CO_2吞吐技术,河南石油,2002:06.
[2] 何家雄.刘全稳.南海北部大陆架边缘盆地CO_2成因和运聚规律的分析与预测:天然气地球科学,2004.01.
[3] 李道品,罗迪强等.低渗透油田开发技术.北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[4] 李士伦,郭平.发展注气提高采收技术.西南石油学院学报,2000,22(3):41-45.
[5] 王振峰.何家雄.张树林等.南海北部边缘盆地CO_2成因及充注驱油的石油地质意义.石油学报,2004,05.
[6] 杨承志,岳清山,沈平平.混相驱提高石油采收率[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991.3.
[7] Adewusi, V. A. (Obafemi Awolowo Univ); Ikwuka, N. A. Tertiary oil recovery potential from CO_2-miscible flooding of Agbada viscous oil reservoir. Petroleum Science and Technology, 16, (5-6), 1998, 477-501.
[8] Arnold, Charles W. Chemical challenges in the quest for enhanced oil recovery. Preprints-Division of Petroleum Chemistry, American Chemical Society, 21 (2) 1976, 225-230.
[9] Beliveau, D. (Shell Canada Ltd); Payne, D. A. Analysis of a tertiary CO_2 flood pilot in a naturally fractured reservoir, Proceedings-SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, v Sigma, Reservoir Engineering, 1991, 615-626.
[10] Bou-Mikael, Sami (Texaco E&P Inc). New analytical method to evaluate, predict, and improve CO_2 flood performance in sandstone reservoirs. Proceedings-SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1996, 177-187.
[11] Cardenas, R. L. (Texaco Inc); Alston, R. B.; Nute, A. J.; Kokolis, G. P. Laboratory design of a gravity-stable miscible CO_2 process. JPT, Joumal of Petroleum Technology, 36(1), 1984, 111-118.
[12] Christiansen, Richard L. (Marathon Oil Co); Haines, Hiemi Kim, Rapic measurement of minimum miscibility pressure with the rising-bubble apparatus. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4), 1987, 523-527.
[13] Dollens, Kimberly B.; Larson, Dana C.; Anthony, Terry L.; Howell, David A.; Jones, Tim A.; Storbeck, Wendy G. The Redevelopment of a Mature Waterflood Through the Application of Horizontal Multilateral Drilling Technology in Preparation for Tertiary CO_2 WAG Operations SPE Reprint Series, 56, 2003, 119-130.
[14] Duncan, Grant (Petro-Canada); Stemler, Phil Enhanced recovery engineering. World Oil, 216(11),1995, 64-68.
[15] Frimodig, James P. (Chevron Canada Resources Ltd); Reese, Norman A.; Williams, Craig A. Carbon Dioxide flooding evaluation of high-pour-point, paraffinic red wash reservoir oil. SPEJ., Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 23(4), 1983, 587-594.
[16] Grigg, R. B. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Gregory, M. D.; Purkaple, J. D. Effect of pressure on improved oilflood recovery from tertiary gas injection. Proceedings-SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1996, 255-264.
[17] Heller, J. P. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent, NM, USA); Taber, J. J. Influnce of reservoir depth on enhanced oil recovery by CO_2 flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, 1986, 155-161.
[18] Henry, Richard L. (Amoco Production Co); Metcalfe, Robert S. Multiple-phase generation during Carbon Dioxide flooding flooding. SPEJ, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 23(4), 1983, 595-601.
[19] Srivastava, R. K. (Saskatchewan Research Council); Huang, S. S.; Dong, M. Laboratory investigation of Weyburn CO_2 miscible flooding. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(2), 2000, 41-51.
[20] 加拿大国家能源保护委员会著,童宪章等津,气井试井理论与实践.石油工业出版社,1988.
[21] 克林斯MA.二氧化碳驱油机理及工程设计.程绍进译.北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
[22] M.A.克林斯.程绍进译.二氧化碳驱油机理及工程设计.北京:石油工业出版社,1989.6.
[23] 童景山,梁燕波.CO_2气液固三相饱和态下PVT的计算.工程热物理学报,2000.22(6).
[24] DonLyle.郑蓉.王勇.美国堪萨斯州的CO_2驱油前景,国外油田工程2000,04.
[25] 张伟林等.样条函数线法及在筒壳结构分析中的应用.安徽建筑工业学院学报,1998,6(3):1-5.
[26] [美]小斯托卡F.I.混相驱开发油田.北京:石油工业出版社,1989.
[27] Arnold, M. D. (Texas Tech Univ) Improved oil recovery processes. Proceedings of the Annual Southwestern Petroleum Short Course, 1992, 476-487.
[28] Creek, J. L(Chevron Oil Field Reseach Co); Sheffield,J.M.Phase behavior, fluid properties, and displacement characteristics of Permian basin reservoirfluid/CO_2 system.SPE Peservoir Engineering(Society of Petroleum Engineers),8(1), 1993, 36-42.
[29] Genetti, D. B.; Whitaker, C. A.; Smith, D. P.; Price, L. M. Applying Improved Recovery Processes and Effective Reservoir Management to Maximize Oil Recovery at Salt Creek Proceedings of the Middle East Oil Show, 13, 2003, 343-352.
[30] Brokmeyer, R. J. (Amoco Exploration and Production Sector); Borling, D. C.; Pierson, W. T. Lost soldier tensleep CO_2 tertiary project, performance case history; Bairoil, Wyoming. SPE Reprint Series, 51, 1999, 16-23.
[31] Bryant, D. W. (Louisiana State Univ, LA, USA); Monger, T. G. Multiple-contact phase behavior phase behavior measurement and application with mixtures of CO_2 and highly asphaltic crude. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3,(2), 1988, 701-710.
[32] Enick, Robert M. (Univ of Pittsburgh, PA, USA); Holder, Gerald D.; Mohamed, Rahoma mixing rule for asymmetric systems. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4), 1987, 687-694.
[33] 童景山,梁燕波.CO_2气、液、固三相饱和态下PVT的计算.工程热物理学报,2000.22(6)
[34] Hara, S. K. (Shell Development Co); Christman, P. G.. Investigation of a cyclic countercurrent light-oil CO_2 immiscible process. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 341-352.
[35] Iqbal, G. M. (Univ of Oklahoma); Tiab, D. Effect of dispersion on miscible flow in heterogeneous porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 3(1-2), 1989, 47-63.
[36] Islam, M. R. (South Dakota Sch of Mines and Technology); Chakma, A. Storage and utilization of CO_2 in petroleum reservoirs. A simulation study. Energy Conversion and Management, 34(9-11), 1993, 1205-1212.
[37] Jang L K and Yen T F. Biological alternative for heavy oil recovery. ProG 3rd International Conference on Heavy Crude and Sands. Lorg Beach. CA 1985, 7. 22-31.
[38] Killesreiter, H. (Inst fuer Erdoefforschung, Hannover, West Ger); Klie, K. D.; Neumann, H. J.; Severin, D.; Erdoel und Kohle, Erdgas; Combustion gas in EOR projects. Petrochemie vereinigt mit Brennstoff-Chemie, 36(2), 1983, 71-74.
[39] Lang, K. R. (ICF Resources Inc); Biglarbigi, Khosrow. Potential for additional carbon dioxide flooding projects in the Permian basin. Proceedings-SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1994, 193-201.
[40] Lee, K. H. (Conoco Inc); El-Saleh, M. M. Full-field numerical modeling study for the Ford Geraldine unit CO_2 flood. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 517-528.
[41] Liu, Ningyu (Faculty of Engineering, University of Regina); Paranjape, Raman; Asghari, Koorosh Underground ultrasound probing for monitoring carbon dioxide flooding in oil producing reservoirs. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1, 2002, 510-514.
[42] Merritt, M. B. (Fasken Oil & Ranch Interests); Groce, J. F. Case history of the Hanford San Andres miscible CO_2 project. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 541-548.
[43] Negahban, Shahin (Amoco Production Co); Shiralkar, Gautam S.; Gupta, Surendra P. Simulation of the effects of mixing in gasdrive core tests of reservoir fluids. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 5(3), 1990, 402-408.
[44] O'Brien, John (Anadarko Petroleum); Kilbride, Fiona; Lim, Frank. Time-lapse VSP reservoir monitoring. Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK), 23(11), 2004, 1178-1184.
[45] 冯庆贤.陈智宇.耐高温采油微生物的研究与应用,石油勘探与开发:2000:03.
[46] 高正龙等.文184断块二氧化碳混相驱及油藏数作模拟研究.江汉石油学院学报,2000,122(4).
[47] 郭平,孙雷,孙良田等.不同种类气体注入对原油物性的影响.西南石油学院学报,2000,22(3):57-60.
[48] 田仲强.李淑兰.王志敏等.注蒸汽加气体开采稠油技术室内研究与现场试验应用,油田化学,2002,01.
[49] 童景山,李敬.流体热物理性质的计算.北京:清华工业出版社,1988.
[50] 王艳辉.陈亚平.李少池.火烧驱油特征的实验研究,石油勘探与开发,2000:01.
[51] 谢尚贤,韩培慧,钱昱.大庆油田萨南东部过渡带注CO_2驱油先导性矿场试验研究.油气采收率技术,1997,4(4).
[52] 杨基和,祝平,周毅.江苏泰兴CO_2气源用于驱油的可行性分析,石油与天然气化工,1996,02.
[53] 张新平.降低表面活性剂在碳酸盐油藏中的吸附,国外油田工程,1995,01.
[54] 张忠智,李庆忠,王洪君等.微生物采油中监控技术进展,石油化工高等学校学报:2002,02.
[55] 朱志宏,周惠忠.吉林新立油田CO_2非混相驱模拟研究,清华大学学报(自然科学版)1996,11.
[56] Bowen R M.混合物理论.江苏科技出版社,1983.
[57] Holm, LeRoy W. (Union Oil Co of Calif, USA); Josendal, Virgil A. Effect of oil composition on miscible-type displacement by carbon dioxide. Source: SPEJ, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 22(1), 1982, 87-98.
[58] Huang, E. T. S. (Unocal Corp) Effect of oil composition and asphaltene content on CO2 displacement Source: Eighth Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1992, 267-274.
[59] Jankowski, D. J. (Argonne Natl Lab, Argonne, IL, USA); Wolsky, A. M. Value of CO2 to today's producer. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, 1986, 419-428.
[60] Ko, S. C. M. (Ultramar Oil & Gas Canada Ltd, Can); Stanton, P. M.; Stephenson, D. J. Tertiary Recovery potential of CO_2 flooding in Joffre Viking pool, Alberta. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 24(1), 1985, 36-43.
[61] Kremesec, V. J. Jr. (Amoco Production Co); Sebastian, H. M. CO_2 displacements of reservoir oils from long Berea cores: laboratory and simulation results. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 496-504.
[62] Fullbright, G. D. (Chevron USA Production Co); Hild, G. P.; Korf, T. A.; Myers, J. P.; O'Toole, F. S.; Wackowski, R. K.; Smith, M. E. Evolution of conformance improvement efforts in a major CO_2 WAG injection project. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1996, 167-175.
[63] Turek, Edward A. (Amoco Production Co); Metcalfe, Robert S.; Fishback, Robert E. Phase behavior of several CO_2 West-Texas Reservoir-oil system. Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 505-516.
[64] Wegener, D. C. (Phillips Petroleum Co); Harpole, K. J. Determination of relative permeability and trapped gas saturation for predictions of WAG performance in the South Cowden CO_2 flood. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1996, 273-285.
[65] Wilbum, D. L. (Louisiana State Univ, LA, USA); Bankston, B. A.; Monger, T. G. Experimental investigation into the effects of chemical type on CO_2 heavy-dydrocarbon phase behavior. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 711-719.
[66] Yellig, W. F. (Amoco Prod Co); Metcalfe, R. S. Determination and prediction of CO_2 minimum miscibility pressures. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 32(1), 1980, 160-168.
[67] Moring, Jane A. (Mississippi State Univ); Rogers, Rudy E. Potential Mississippi oil recovery and economic impact from CO_2 miscible flooding. Energy Sources, 13(3), 1991, 303-317.
[68] Mungan, Necmettin (Mungan Pet Consult Ltd, Calgary, Alberta). Carbon dioxide flooding EM Dash fundamentals. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 21(6), 1982, 112-117.
[69] Orr, F. M. Jr. (Stanford Univ, CA, USA); Silva, M. K. Effect of oil composition on minimum miscibility pressure-part2: correlation. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4), 1987, 479-491.
[70] Pande, K.K. (Chevron Oil Field Research Co); Orr, F.M. Jr. Analytical computation of breakthrough recovery for CO_2 floods in layered reservoirs. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990,47-58.
[71] Schneider, B. D. (Wiser Oil Co); Hogan, G. P. II; Holt, W. N. Jr. Pulsed-neutron decay-spectrum data and multi-inflatable-packer plugdown assemblies improve oil production rates. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 12(3), 1997, 169-172.
[72] Sim, S. S. K. (Petroelum Recovery Inst); Udegbunam, E. O.; Haggerty, D. J.; Baroni, J. J.; Baroni, M. Laboratory experiments and reservoir simulation studies in support of CO_2 injection project in Mattoon Field, Illinois, USA Source: Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 35(2),1996,25-32.
[73] Brebbia C A. Progress in Boundary Element Methods. London: Pentech p ress, 1983.
[74] Kuehne, D. L. (Chevron Research & Technology Co); Frazier, R.H.; Cantor, Jeremy; Horn, Willie Jr. Evaluation of surfactants for CO2 mobility control in dolomite reservoirs. Proc Eighth Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1992, 215-224.
[75] Stookey, D. J. (Monsanto Co, St. Louis, Mo, USA); Graham, T. E.; Pope, W. M. Natural gas processing with prism separators. Environmental Progress, 3(3),1984, 212-214.
[76] Dong, M. (Saskatchewan Research Council); Huang, S. S.; Srivastava, R. Laboratory study on near-miscible CO_2 injection in Steelman reservoir. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 40(2), 2001, 53-61.
[77] Fong, W.S. (Chevron Oil Field Research Co); Sheffield, J.M.; Ehrlich, R.; Emanuel, A.S. Phase behavior modeling techniques for low-temperature CO_2 applied to McElroy and North Ward Estes projects. Proc Eighth Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1992, 289-302.
[78] Johnson, J. E. (Stearns Catalytic Corp, Petroleum & Mining Div, Denver, CO, USA); Walter, F. B. Gas processing needs for EOR. Hydrocarbon Processing, 64(10), 1985, 62-66.
[79] Recht, D. L. (Eagleton Engineering Co, Houston, TX, USA).Carbon Dioxide pipeline design considerations.American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Petroleum Division (Publication) 6, 1987, 155-159.
[80] Reid, Gary W. (Envirotech Inc); Sawyer, David N. Miscibility correlation developed for recovering Mississippi oil. Petroleum Engineer International, 69(3),1996,43-45.
[81] Chang, Yih-Bor; Lim, M.T.; Pope, G.A.; Sepehrnoori, K. CO_2 flow patterns under multiphase flow: heterogeneous field-scale conditions.SPE Reservoir Series, 51, 1999,145-153.
[82] Chase, Curtis A. Jr. (Todd, Dietrich & Chase Inc, USA); Todd, Michael R.Numerical simulation of CO_2 flood perfomance. SPEJ, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24(6), 1984, 597-605.
[83] Diaz, Daniel (Louisiana State Univ); Bassiouni, Zaki; Kimbrell, William; Wolcott, Joanne Screening criteria for application of carbon dioxide miscible displacement in waterflooded reservoirs containing light oil. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1996, 287-293.
[84] Idem, Raphael O. (Process/Petroleum System Eng. Lab., Faculty of Engineering, University of Regina); Ibrahim, Hussam H. Kinetics of CO_2-induced asphaltene precipitation from various Saskatchewan crude oils during CO_2 miscible flooding Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 35(3-4), 2002, 233-246.
[85] Kadiver M. H. Sharifi H. Double mpping of isopermetric Mesh generation. C&S, 1996, 59(3): 471-477.
[86] Holm, L. W. (Unocal Corp); O'Brien, L. J. Factors to consider when designing a CO_2 flood. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, 2, 1986, 179-188.
[87] Hou, Jian (Inst. of Petroleum Eng., Petroleum Univ.) Streamline-based mathematical model for CO_2 miscible flooding . Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 25(6), 2004, 694-702.
[88] Bybee, Karen A New Method to Characterize the Size and Shape Dynamics of Asphaltene Deposition Source: JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 56, (1), 2004, 43-44.
[89] Emera, Mohammed K. (Australian School of Petroleum, University of Adelaide); Sarma, Hemanta K. Use of genetic algorithm to estimate CO_2-oil minimum miscibility pressure - A key parameter in design of CO_2 miscible flood. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 46(1-2), 2005, 37-52.
[90] Edwards, K. (Gulf Canada Resources) CO_2 in Alberta - a vision of the future. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(9), 2000,48-53.
[91] Johns, Russell T. (University of Texas at Austin); Bermudez, Leonardo; Parakh, Harshad WAG Optimization for Gas Floods above the MME. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2003, 2679-2690.
[92] Kessel, D. (Inst fuer Erdoelforschung (IFE)); Pusch, G.; Albertsen, M. Ergebnisse und Bewertung von Laboruntersuchungen zum CO_2-Fluten (Results and assessment of experimental investigations on the CO_2-flooding process). Erdoel Erdgas Kohle, 105(9), 1989,351-357.
[93] Anon. Tertiary oil recovery project makes Canadian oil history. Energy Processing/Canada, 78(1), 1985, 22-24.
[94] Bahralolom, I. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Bretz, R. E.; Orr, F. M. Jr. Experimental investigation of the interaction of phase behavior with microscopic heterogeneity in a CO_2 flood. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 662-672.
[95] Bellveau, Dennis (Shell Corp Ltd.); Payne, David A.; Mundry, Martin. Waterflood and
Co_2 flood of the fractured Midale field. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 45(9), 1993, 881-887.
[96] Bing, P. C. (Natl Energy Board, Energy Supply Branch, Ottawa, Ont, Can); Bowers, B.; Lomas, R. H. Model for forecasting the economic potential for enhanced oil recovery in Cnada. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 23,(6), 1984,44-54.
[97] Adewusi, V.A. (Obafemi Awolowo Univ). Predictive model studies of miscible gas flooding of Nigerian undersaturated crude oil reservoirs. Petroleum Science and Technology,16(9-10), 1998,903-929.
[98] Bellavance, J. F. R. (UNOCAL Corp). Dollarhide Devonian CO_2 flood: project performance review 10 years later, SPE Reprint Series, 51, 1999, 7-15.
[99] Anon. Carbon dioxide and its applications to enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum Frontiers, 2(1), 1984, 63.
[100] Anon. Review of CO_2 Process Mechanisms. SPE Monograph Series(Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME), 22, 2000,13-38.
[101] Balasch, Albert F. (Core Lab Can Ltd).Miscible floods -the role of gas processors. Energy Processing/Canada, 73(6),1981, 62-64.
[102] Bath, Peter G. H. (Shell U. K. Exploration and Production) Status report on miscible/immiscible gas flooding Source: Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2(2-3), 1989,103-117.
[103] Orr, F. M. Jr. (Society of Petroleum Engineers); Johns, R. T; Dindoruk, Birol;Development of miscibility in four-component CO_2 floods. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 8(2), 1993, 135-142.
[104] Petty, S. D. (Amoco Production Co (USA)); Ho, B. S. Pilot plant performance oftriethanolamine for bulk CO_2 separation. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 36(10), 1984, 1603-1612.
[105] Pope, Gary A. (Univ of Tex). Application of fractional flow theory to enhanced oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME Journal, 20(3),1980, 191-205.
[106] Khan, S.A.; Pope, G.A. Simulation of carbon dioxide flooding using horizontal wells AU Lim, M.T. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, v Sigma, Reservoir Engineering, 1992, 753-768.
[107] Lansangan, R.M. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Taylor, M.; Smith, J.L.; Kovarik, F. S. Improved viscosity correlation for CO_2/reservoir oil systems. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 361-369.
[108] Lim, M.T. (U. of Texas); Pope, G.A.; Sepehrnoori, Kamy Mechanistic study of carbon dioxide flooding using horizontal wells. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1994,275-286.
[109] Rivas, O.; Embid, S.; Bolivar, F. Ranking reservoirs for carbon dioxide flooding processes SPE Advanced Technology Series, 2(1),1994,95-103.
[110] Silva, M. K. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent, NM, USA); Orr, F. M. Jr. Effect of oil composition on minimum miscibility pressure-part 1: solubility of hydrocarbons in dense CO_2. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4),1987, 468-478.
[111] Simlote, Vishnu N. (Cities Serv Co); Withjack, Eric M. Estimation of tertiary by CO_2 injection EM Dash springer a sand, Northeat Purdy Unit. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33(5), 1981, 808-818.
[112] Srivastava, R. (Saskatchewan Research Council); Huang, S. Technical feasibility of CO_2 Sflooding in Weyburn reservoir - a laboratory investigation. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 36(10), 1997, 48-55.
[113] Huh, D. G. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Cochrane, T. D.; Kovarik, F. S. Effect of microscopic heterogeneity on CO_2-foam mobility. Part 1. Mechanistic study. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 41(8), 1989, 872-879.
[114] Lu, Lianhai (Jiangsu Oil Exploration Corp); Liu, Bingguan Feasibility research method and project design on CO_2 miscible flooding for a small complex fault block field. Proceedings of the International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, 2, 1998, 501-515.
[115] Raef, Abdelmoneam E. (Kansas Geological Survey); Miller, Richard D.; Byrnes, Alan P.; Harrison, William E. 4D seismic monitoring of the miscible CO_2 flood of Hall-Gurney Field, Kansas, U. S. Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK), 23(11), 2004, 1171-1176.
[116] MacIntyre, K. J. (Vikor Resources Ltd). Design considerations for carbon dioxide injection facilities. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 25, (2), 1986, 90-95.
[117] Sehbi, Baljit S.; Frailey, Scott M.; Lawal, Akanni S. Analysis of Factors Affecting Microscopic Displacement Efficiency in CO_2 Floods S. Proceedings of the Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, 2001, 153-160.
[118] Shaw, J.; Bachu, S. Screening, evaluation, and ranking of oil reservoirs suitable for CO_2-flood EOR and carbon dioxide sequestration. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 41(9), 2002, 51-61.
[119] Wehner, S. C. (Texaco Exploration and Production Inc); Prieditis, J. CO_2 Huff-n-Puff: Initial results from a waterflooded SSC reservoir. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1996, 45-54.
[120] Young, Larry C. (Reservoir Simulation Research Corp). Use of dispersion relationships. To model adverse-mobility-ratio miscible displacements. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 5(3), 1990, 309-316.
[121] Tiffin, D. L. (Amoco Production Co); Kremesec, V. J. Jr. Mechanistic study of mechanistic study of gravity-assisted CO_2 flooding. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 524-532.
[122] Ucok W R Siagian, Reid B Grigg. The extraction of hydrocarbons from crude oil by high pressure CO_2. SPE, 1998; 120. 123.
[123] Yu, John P. (West Virginia Univ); Zhuang, Ziqing; Kumar, K. Hemanth; Watts, Royal J. Simulation approach in economic assessment and risk analysis of the CO_2 miscible flooding process. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 4(4), 1990, 359-374.
[124] 德文,杨剑锋.二氧化碳增产技术在胜利油田勘探开发中的应用.低渗透油气田,1998,3(3).
[125] Hervey, J. R. (Chevron USA Inc); Iakovakis, A.C. Performance review of a miscible CO2
[2] 何家雄.刘全稳.南海北部大陆架边缘盆地CO_2成因和运聚规律的分析与预测:天然气地球科学,2004.01.
[3] 李道品,罗迪强等.低渗透油田开发技术.北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[4] 李士伦,郭平.发展注气提高采收技术.西南石油学院学报,2000,22(3):41-45.
[5] 王振峰.何家雄.张树林等.南海北部边缘盆地CO_2成因及充注驱油的石油地质意义.石油学报,2004,05.
[6] 杨承志,岳清山,沈平平.混相驱提高石油采收率[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991.3.
[7] Adewusi, V. A. (Obafemi Awolowo Univ); Ikwuka, N. A. Tertiary oil recovery potential from CO_2-miscible flooding of Agbada viscous oil reservoir. Petroleum Science and Technology, 16, (5-6), 1998, 477-501.
[8] Arnold, Charles W. Chemical challenges in the quest for enhanced oil recovery. Preprints-Division of Petroleum Chemistry, American Chemical Society, 21 (2) 1976, 225-230.
[9] Beliveau, D. (Shell Canada Ltd); Payne, D. A. Analysis of a tertiary CO_2 flood pilot in a naturally fractured reservoir, Proceedings-SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, v Sigma, Reservoir Engineering, 1991, 615-626.
[10] Bou-Mikael, Sami (Texaco E&P Inc). New analytical method to evaluate, predict, and improve CO_2 flood performance in sandstone reservoirs. Proceedings-SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1996, 177-187.
[11] Cardenas, R. L. (Texaco Inc); Alston, R. B.; Nute, A. J.; Kokolis, G. P. Laboratory design of a gravity-stable miscible CO_2 process. JPT, Joumal of Petroleum Technology, 36(1), 1984, 111-118.
[12] Christiansen, Richard L. (Marathon Oil Co); Haines, Hiemi Kim, Rapic measurement of minimum miscibility pressure with the rising-bubble apparatus. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4), 1987, 523-527.
[13] Dollens, Kimberly B.; Larson, Dana C.; Anthony, Terry L.; Howell, David A.; Jones, Tim A.; Storbeck, Wendy G. The Redevelopment of a Mature Waterflood Through the Application of Horizontal Multilateral Drilling Technology in Preparation for Tertiary CO_2 WAG Operations SPE Reprint Series, 56, 2003, 119-130.
[14] Duncan, Grant (Petro-Canada); Stemler, Phil Enhanced recovery engineering. World Oil, 216(11),1995, 64-68.
[15] Frimodig, James P. (Chevron Canada Resources Ltd); Reese, Norman A.; Williams, Craig A. Carbon Dioxide flooding evaluation of high-pour-point, paraffinic red wash reservoir oil. SPEJ., Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 23(4), 1983, 587-594.
[16] Grigg, R. B. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Gregory, M. D.; Purkaple, J. D. Effect of pressure on improved oilflood recovery from tertiary gas injection. Proceedings-SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1996, 255-264.
[17] Heller, J. P. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent, NM, USA); Taber, J. J. Influnce of reservoir depth on enhanced oil recovery by CO_2 flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, 1986, 155-161.
[18] Henry, Richard L. (Amoco Production Co); Metcalfe, Robert S. Multiple-phase generation during Carbon Dioxide flooding flooding. SPEJ, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 23(4), 1983, 595-601.
[19] Srivastava, R. K. (Saskatchewan Research Council); Huang, S. S.; Dong, M. Laboratory investigation of Weyburn CO_2 miscible flooding. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(2), 2000, 41-51.
[20] 加拿大国家能源保护委员会著,童宪章等津,气井试井理论与实践.石油工业出版社,1988.
[21] 克林斯MA.二氧化碳驱油机理及工程设计.程绍进译.北京:石油工业出版社,1993.
[22] M.A.克林斯.程绍进译.二氧化碳驱油机理及工程设计.北京:石油工业出版社,1989.6.
[23] 童景山,梁燕波.CO_2气液固三相饱和态下PVT的计算.工程热物理学报,2000.22(6).
[24] DonLyle.郑蓉.王勇.美国堪萨斯州的CO_2驱油前景,国外油田工程2000,04.
[25] 张伟林等.样条函数线法及在筒壳结构分析中的应用.安徽建筑工业学院学报,1998,6(3):1-5.
[26] [美]小斯托卡F.I.混相驱开发油田.北京:石油工业出版社,1989.
[27] Arnold, M. D. (Texas Tech Univ) Improved oil recovery processes. Proceedings of the Annual Southwestern Petroleum Short Course, 1992, 476-487.
[28] Creek, J. L(Chevron Oil Field Reseach Co); Sheffield,J.M.Phase behavior, fluid properties, and displacement characteristics of Permian basin reservoirfluid/CO_2 system.SPE Peservoir Engineering(Society of Petroleum Engineers),8(1), 1993, 36-42.
[29] Genetti, D. B.; Whitaker, C. A.; Smith, D. P.; Price, L. M. Applying Improved Recovery Processes and Effective Reservoir Management to Maximize Oil Recovery at Salt Creek Proceedings of the Middle East Oil Show, 13, 2003, 343-352.
[30] Brokmeyer, R. J. (Amoco Exploration and Production Sector); Borling, D. C.; Pierson, W. T. Lost soldier tensleep CO_2 tertiary project, performance case history; Bairoil, Wyoming. SPE Reprint Series, 51, 1999, 16-23.
[31] Bryant, D. W. (Louisiana State Univ, LA, USA); Monger, T. G. Multiple-contact phase behavior phase behavior measurement and application with mixtures of CO_2 and highly asphaltic crude. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3,(2), 1988, 701-710.
[32] Enick, Robert M. (Univ of Pittsburgh, PA, USA); Holder, Gerald D.; Mohamed, Rahoma mixing rule for asymmetric systems. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4), 1987, 687-694.
[33] 童景山,梁燕波.CO_2气、液、固三相饱和态下PVT的计算.工程热物理学报,2000.22(6)
[34] Hara, S. K. (Shell Development Co); Christman, P. G.. Investigation of a cyclic countercurrent light-oil CO_2 immiscible process. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 341-352.
[35] Iqbal, G. M. (Univ of Oklahoma); Tiab, D. Effect of dispersion on miscible flow in heterogeneous porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 3(1-2), 1989, 47-63.
[36] Islam, M. R. (South Dakota Sch of Mines and Technology); Chakma, A. Storage and utilization of CO_2 in petroleum reservoirs. A simulation study. Energy Conversion and Management, 34(9-11), 1993, 1205-1212.
[37] Jang L K and Yen T F. Biological alternative for heavy oil recovery. ProG 3rd International Conference on Heavy Crude and Sands. Lorg Beach. CA 1985, 7. 22-31.
[38] Killesreiter, H. (Inst fuer Erdoefforschung, Hannover, West Ger); Klie, K. D.; Neumann, H. J.; Severin, D.; Erdoel und Kohle, Erdgas; Combustion gas in EOR projects. Petrochemie vereinigt mit Brennstoff-Chemie, 36(2), 1983, 71-74.
[39] Lang, K. R. (ICF Resources Inc); Biglarbigi, Khosrow. Potential for additional carbon dioxide flooding projects in the Permian basin. Proceedings-SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1994, 193-201.
[40] Lee, K. H. (Conoco Inc); El-Saleh, M. M. Full-field numerical modeling study for the Ford Geraldine unit CO_2 flood. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 517-528.
[41] Liu, Ningyu (Faculty of Engineering, University of Regina); Paranjape, Raman; Asghari, Koorosh Underground ultrasound probing for monitoring carbon dioxide flooding in oil producing reservoirs. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1, 2002, 510-514.
[42] Merritt, M. B. (Fasken Oil & Ranch Interests); Groce, J. F. Case history of the Hanford San Andres miscible CO_2 project. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 541-548.
[43] Negahban, Shahin (Amoco Production Co); Shiralkar, Gautam S.; Gupta, Surendra P. Simulation of the effects of mixing in gasdrive core tests of reservoir fluids. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 5(3), 1990, 402-408.
[44] O'Brien, John (Anadarko Petroleum); Kilbride, Fiona; Lim, Frank. Time-lapse VSP reservoir monitoring. Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK), 23(11), 2004, 1178-1184.
[45] 冯庆贤.陈智宇.耐高温采油微生物的研究与应用,石油勘探与开发:2000:03.
[46] 高正龙等.文184断块二氧化碳混相驱及油藏数作模拟研究.江汉石油学院学报,2000,122(4).
[47] 郭平,孙雷,孙良田等.不同种类气体注入对原油物性的影响.西南石油学院学报,2000,22(3):57-60.
[48] 田仲强.李淑兰.王志敏等.注蒸汽加气体开采稠油技术室内研究与现场试验应用,油田化学,2002,01.
[49] 童景山,李敬.流体热物理性质的计算.北京:清华工业出版社,1988.
[50] 王艳辉.陈亚平.李少池.火烧驱油特征的实验研究,石油勘探与开发,2000:01.
[51] 谢尚贤,韩培慧,钱昱.大庆油田萨南东部过渡带注CO_2驱油先导性矿场试验研究.油气采收率技术,1997,4(4).
[52] 杨基和,祝平,周毅.江苏泰兴CO_2气源用于驱油的可行性分析,石油与天然气化工,1996,02.
[53] 张新平.降低表面活性剂在碳酸盐油藏中的吸附,国外油田工程,1995,01.
[54] 张忠智,李庆忠,王洪君等.微生物采油中监控技术进展,石油化工高等学校学报:2002,02.
[55] 朱志宏,周惠忠.吉林新立油田CO_2非混相驱模拟研究,清华大学学报(自然科学版)1996,11.
[56] Bowen R M.混合物理论.江苏科技出版社,1983.
[57] Holm, LeRoy W. (Union Oil Co of Calif, USA); Josendal, Virgil A. Effect of oil composition on miscible-type displacement by carbon dioxide. Source: SPEJ, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 22(1), 1982, 87-98.
[58] Huang, E. T. S. (Unocal Corp) Effect of oil composition and asphaltene content on CO2 displacement Source: Eighth Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1992, 267-274.
[59] Jankowski, D. J. (Argonne Natl Lab, Argonne, IL, USA); Wolsky, A. M. Value of CO2 to today's producer. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, 1986, 419-428.
[60] Ko, S. C. M. (Ultramar Oil & Gas Canada Ltd, Can); Stanton, P. M.; Stephenson, D. J. Tertiary Recovery potential of CO_2 flooding in Joffre Viking pool, Alberta. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 24(1), 1985, 36-43.
[61] Kremesec, V. J. Jr. (Amoco Production Co); Sebastian, H. M. CO_2 displacements of reservoir oils from long Berea cores: laboratory and simulation results. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 496-504.
[62] Fullbright, G. D. (Chevron USA Production Co); Hild, G. P.; Korf, T. A.; Myers, J. P.; O'Toole, F. S.; Wackowski, R. K.; Smith, M. E. Evolution of conformance improvement efforts in a major CO_2 WAG injection project. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1996, 167-175.
[63] Turek, Edward A. (Amoco Production Co); Metcalfe, Robert S.; Fishback, Robert E. Phase behavior of several CO_2 West-Texas Reservoir-oil system. Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 505-516.
[64] Wegener, D. C. (Phillips Petroleum Co); Harpole, K. J. Determination of relative permeability and trapped gas saturation for predictions of WAG performance in the South Cowden CO_2 flood. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1996, 273-285.
[65] Wilbum, D. L. (Louisiana State Univ, LA, USA); Bankston, B. A.; Monger, T. G. Experimental investigation into the effects of chemical type on CO_2 heavy-dydrocarbon phase behavior. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 711-719.
[66] Yellig, W. F. (Amoco Prod Co); Metcalfe, R. S. Determination and prediction of CO_2 minimum miscibility pressures. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 32(1), 1980, 160-168.
[67] Moring, Jane A. (Mississippi State Univ); Rogers, Rudy E. Potential Mississippi oil recovery and economic impact from CO_2 miscible flooding. Energy Sources, 13(3), 1991, 303-317.
[68] Mungan, Necmettin (Mungan Pet Consult Ltd, Calgary, Alberta). Carbon dioxide flooding EM Dash fundamentals. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 21(6), 1982, 112-117.
[69] Orr, F. M. Jr. (Stanford Univ, CA, USA); Silva, M. K. Effect of oil composition on minimum miscibility pressure-part2: correlation. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4), 1987, 479-491.
[70] Pande, K.K. (Chevron Oil Field Research Co); Orr, F.M. Jr. Analytical computation of breakthrough recovery for CO_2 floods in layered reservoirs. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990,47-58.
[71] Schneider, B. D. (Wiser Oil Co); Hogan, G. P. II; Holt, W. N. Jr. Pulsed-neutron decay-spectrum data and multi-inflatable-packer plugdown assemblies improve oil production rates. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 12(3), 1997, 169-172.
[72] Sim, S. S. K. (Petroelum Recovery Inst); Udegbunam, E. O.; Haggerty, D. J.; Baroni, J. J.; Baroni, M. Laboratory experiments and reservoir simulation studies in support of CO_2 injection project in Mattoon Field, Illinois, USA Source: Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 35(2),1996,25-32.
[73] Brebbia C A. Progress in Boundary Element Methods. London: Pentech p ress, 1983.
[74] Kuehne, D. L. (Chevron Research & Technology Co); Frazier, R.H.; Cantor, Jeremy; Horn, Willie Jr. Evaluation of surfactants for CO2 mobility control in dolomite reservoirs. Proc Eighth Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1992, 215-224.
[75] Stookey, D. J. (Monsanto Co, St. Louis, Mo, USA); Graham, T. E.; Pope, W. M. Natural gas processing with prism separators. Environmental Progress, 3(3),1984, 212-214.
[76] Dong, M. (Saskatchewan Research Council); Huang, S. S.; Srivastava, R. Laboratory study on near-miscible CO_2 injection in Steelman reservoir. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 40(2), 2001, 53-61.
[77] Fong, W.S. (Chevron Oil Field Research Co); Sheffield, J.M.; Ehrlich, R.; Emanuel, A.S. Phase behavior modeling techniques for low-temperature CO_2 applied to McElroy and North Ward Estes projects. Proc Eighth Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1992, 289-302.
[78] Johnson, J. E. (Stearns Catalytic Corp, Petroleum & Mining Div, Denver, CO, USA); Walter, F. B. Gas processing needs for EOR. Hydrocarbon Processing, 64(10), 1985, 62-66.
[79] Recht, D. L. (Eagleton Engineering Co, Houston, TX, USA).Carbon Dioxide pipeline design considerations.American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Petroleum Division (Publication) 6, 1987, 155-159.
[80] Reid, Gary W. (Envirotech Inc); Sawyer, David N. Miscibility correlation developed for recovering Mississippi oil. Petroleum Engineer International, 69(3),1996,43-45.
[81] Chang, Yih-Bor; Lim, M.T.; Pope, G.A.; Sepehrnoori, K. CO_2 flow patterns under multiphase flow: heterogeneous field-scale conditions.SPE Reservoir Series, 51, 1999,145-153.
[82] Chase, Curtis A. Jr. (Todd, Dietrich & Chase Inc, USA); Todd, Michael R.Numerical simulation of CO_2 flood perfomance. SPEJ, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24(6), 1984, 597-605.
[83] Diaz, Daniel (Louisiana State Univ); Bassiouni, Zaki; Kimbrell, William; Wolcott, Joanne Screening criteria for application of carbon dioxide miscible displacement in waterflooded reservoirs containing light oil. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1996, 287-293.
[84] Idem, Raphael O. (Process/Petroleum System Eng. Lab., Faculty of Engineering, University of Regina); Ibrahim, Hussam H. Kinetics of CO_2-induced asphaltene precipitation from various Saskatchewan crude oils during CO_2 miscible flooding Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 35(3-4), 2002, 233-246.
[85] Kadiver M. H. Sharifi H. Double mpping of isopermetric Mesh generation. C&S, 1996, 59(3): 471-477.
[86] Holm, L. W. (Unocal Corp); O'Brien, L. J. Factors to consider when designing a CO_2 flood. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, 2, 1986, 179-188.
[87] Hou, Jian (Inst. of Petroleum Eng., Petroleum Univ.) Streamline-based mathematical model for CO_2 miscible flooding . Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 25(6), 2004, 694-702.
[88] Bybee, Karen A New Method to Characterize the Size and Shape Dynamics of Asphaltene Deposition Source: JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 56, (1), 2004, 43-44.
[89] Emera, Mohammed K. (Australian School of Petroleum, University of Adelaide); Sarma, Hemanta K. Use of genetic algorithm to estimate CO_2-oil minimum miscibility pressure - A key parameter in design of CO_2 miscible flood. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 46(1-2), 2005, 37-52.
[90] Edwards, K. (Gulf Canada Resources) CO_2 in Alberta - a vision of the future. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(9), 2000,48-53.
[91] Johns, Russell T. (University of Texas at Austin); Bermudez, Leonardo; Parakh, Harshad WAG Optimization for Gas Floods above the MME. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2003, 2679-2690.
[92] Kessel, D. (Inst fuer Erdoelforschung (IFE)); Pusch, G.; Albertsen, M. Ergebnisse und Bewertung von Laboruntersuchungen zum CO_2-Fluten (Results and assessment of experimental investigations on the CO_2-flooding process). Erdoel Erdgas Kohle, 105(9), 1989,351-357.
[93] Anon. Tertiary oil recovery project makes Canadian oil history. Energy Processing/Canada, 78(1), 1985, 22-24.
[94] Bahralolom, I. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Bretz, R. E.; Orr, F. M. Jr. Experimental investigation of the interaction of phase behavior with microscopic heterogeneity in a CO_2 flood. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 662-672.
[95] Bellveau, Dennis (Shell Corp Ltd.); Payne, David A.; Mundry, Martin. Waterflood and
Co_2 flood of the fractured Midale field. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 45(9), 1993, 881-887.
[96] Bing, P. C. (Natl Energy Board, Energy Supply Branch, Ottawa, Ont, Can); Bowers, B.; Lomas, R. H. Model for forecasting the economic potential for enhanced oil recovery in Cnada. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 23,(6), 1984,44-54.
[97] Adewusi, V.A. (Obafemi Awolowo Univ). Predictive model studies of miscible gas flooding of Nigerian undersaturated crude oil reservoirs. Petroleum Science and Technology,16(9-10), 1998,903-929.
[98] Bellavance, J. F. R. (UNOCAL Corp). Dollarhide Devonian CO_2 flood: project performance review 10 years later, SPE Reprint Series, 51, 1999, 7-15.
[99] Anon. Carbon dioxide and its applications to enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum Frontiers, 2(1), 1984, 63.
[100] Anon. Review of CO_2 Process Mechanisms. SPE Monograph Series(Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME), 22, 2000,13-38.
[101] Balasch, Albert F. (Core Lab Can Ltd).Miscible floods -the role of gas processors. Energy Processing/Canada, 73(6),1981, 62-64.
[102] Bath, Peter G. H. (Shell U. K. Exploration and Production) Status report on miscible/immiscible gas flooding Source: Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2(2-3), 1989,103-117.
[103] Orr, F. M. Jr. (Society of Petroleum Engineers); Johns, R. T; Dindoruk, Birol;Development of miscibility in four-component CO_2 floods. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 8(2), 1993, 135-142.
[104] Petty, S. D. (Amoco Production Co (USA)); Ho, B. S. Pilot plant performance oftriethanolamine for bulk CO_2 separation. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 36(10), 1984, 1603-1612.
[105] Pope, Gary A. (Univ of Tex). Application of fractional flow theory to enhanced oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME Journal, 20(3),1980, 191-205.
[106] Khan, S.A.; Pope, G.A. Simulation of carbon dioxide flooding using horizontal wells AU Lim, M.T. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, v Sigma, Reservoir Engineering, 1992, 753-768.
[107] Lansangan, R.M. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Taylor, M.; Smith, J.L.; Kovarik, F. S. Improved viscosity correlation for CO_2/reservoir oil systems. Proc SPE DOE Seventh Symp Enhanced Oil Recovery, 1990, 361-369.
[108] Lim, M.T. (U. of Texas); Pope, G.A.; Sepehrnoori, Kamy Mechanistic study of carbon dioxide flooding using horizontal wells. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 2, 1994,275-286.
[109] Rivas, O.; Embid, S.; Bolivar, F. Ranking reservoirs for carbon dioxide flooding processes SPE Advanced Technology Series, 2(1),1994,95-103.
[110] Silva, M. K. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent, NM, USA); Orr, F. M. Jr. Effect of oil composition on minimum miscibility pressure-part 1: solubility of hydrocarbons in dense CO_2. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(4),1987, 468-478.
[111] Simlote, Vishnu N. (Cities Serv Co); Withjack, Eric M. Estimation of tertiary by CO_2 injection EM Dash springer a sand, Northeat Purdy Unit. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33(5), 1981, 808-818.
[112] Srivastava, R. (Saskatchewan Research Council); Huang, S. Technical feasibility of CO_2 Sflooding in Weyburn reservoir - a laboratory investigation. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 36(10), 1997, 48-55.
[113] Huh, D. G. (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Cent); Cochrane, T. D.; Kovarik, F. S. Effect of microscopic heterogeneity on CO_2-foam mobility. Part 1. Mechanistic study. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 41(8), 1989, 872-879.
[114] Lu, Lianhai (Jiangsu Oil Exploration Corp); Liu, Bingguan Feasibility research method and project design on CO_2 miscible flooding for a small complex fault block field. Proceedings of the International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, 2, 1998, 501-515.
[115] Raef, Abdelmoneam E. (Kansas Geological Survey); Miller, Richard D.; Byrnes, Alan P.; Harrison, William E. 4D seismic monitoring of the miscible CO_2 flood of Hall-Gurney Field, Kansas, U. S. Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK), 23(11), 2004, 1171-1176.
[116] MacIntyre, K. J. (Vikor Resources Ltd). Design considerations for carbon dioxide injection facilities. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 25, (2), 1986, 90-95.
[117] Sehbi, Baljit S.; Frailey, Scott M.; Lawal, Akanni S. Analysis of Factors Affecting Microscopic Displacement Efficiency in CO_2 Floods S. Proceedings of the Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, 2001, 153-160.
[118] Shaw, J.; Bachu, S. Screening, evaluation, and ranking of oil reservoirs suitable for CO_2-flood EOR and carbon dioxide sequestration. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 41(9), 2002, 51-61.
[119] Wehner, S. C. (Texaco Exploration and Production Inc); Prieditis, J. CO_2 Huff-n-Puff: Initial results from a waterflooded SSC reservoir. Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1, 1996, 45-54.
[120] Young, Larry C. (Reservoir Simulation Research Corp). Use of dispersion relationships. To model adverse-mobility-ratio miscible displacements. SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 5(3), 1990, 309-316.
[121] Tiffin, D. L. (Amoco Production Co); Kremesec, V. J. Jr. Mechanistic study of mechanistic study of gravity-assisted CO_2 flooding. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(2), 1988, 524-532.
[122] Ucok W R Siagian, Reid B Grigg. The extraction of hydrocarbons from crude oil by high pressure CO_2. SPE, 1998; 120. 123.
[123] Yu, John P. (West Virginia Univ); Zhuang, Ziqing; Kumar, K. Hemanth; Watts, Royal J. Simulation approach in economic assessment and risk analysis of the CO_2 miscible flooding process. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 4(4), 1990, 359-374.
[124] 德文,杨剑锋.二氧化碳增产技术在胜利油田勘探开发中的应用.低渗透油气田,1998,3(3).
[125] Hervey, J. R. (Chevron USA Inc); Iakovakis, A.C. Performance review of a miscible CO2