蓝商公路李家河三号隧道渗流分析与防渗措施研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
拟建的李家河水库与李家河隧道之间存在一定的水头差,李家河水库可能对李家河隧道的渗流量产生一定的影响,从而影响到隧道运营期安全,因此李家河隧道渗流分析与工程防渗措施研究具有重要的工程应用价值。
     本文的主要工作有:
     (1)开展了专门的水文地质调查研究工作和野外地质调查,重点进行了隧道与水库之间裂隙调查与统计、断层调查、断层带地球物探、断层带地质勘探钻孔、以及压水试验渗透系数实测等工作,为渗流模型的建立提供实际参数;
     (2)进行了隧道开挖施工期间围岩渗漏部位和渗流量的观察和测量,并实测了竣工后隧道的总渗流量;
     (3)对岩体水力学裂隙渗流理论进行分析,结合李家河隧道实际的岩体特征和水文地质条件,建立了岩体渗流分析的数学模型;
     (4)根据隧道竣工期渗水量,运用渗流软件对岩体渗流进行了反演分析,得到了合理的渗透系数场,根据渗透系数场并通过计算抗水压段灌浆与不灌浆时李家河三号隧道的渗流量,对比分析隧道抗水压段横剖面拱顶外水压力和流速的分布,验证灌浆的必要性。
     (5)分别对隧道在李家河水库水位到达880m条件下、突发暴雨条件下以及李家河水库水位880m和突发暴雨共同作用条件下隧道渗流结果进行分析,提出了李家河三号隧道工程的防排水的措施为:抗水压段灌浆,减少渗流量和防止围岩渗透破坏;布置全隧道防水措施,包括土工布和防水板;建立合理的隧道纵向排水系统,通过以上措施实现隧道围岩地下水的防排结合。
     本文针对李家河三号隧道抗水压段进行了数值模拟,论证了灌浆必要性,预测了三种工况下隧道渗流量。根据预测结果分析,提出了李家河隧道具体的防排水方案。
There is difference of waterhead between the proposed Li River reservoir and the Li River tunnel., which will likely lead to Li River tunnel seepage certainly, thus affecting the operational safety of the tunnel. To carry out Li River tunnel seepage analysis and anti-seepage measures play an important value on engineering.
     Thesis main work as follows:
     (1) Do a research of a specific hydro-geological investigation, such as field geological survey, concentrating on fracture survey and statistics and fault investigation between the tunnel and reservoir, geophysical prospecting of earth fault, geological exploration drilling of fault, as well as the pressurizing water test, etc., in order to provide practical parameters for seepage mode;
     (2) Carry out rockmass seepage observations and measurements during the tunnel excavation, and measure the total seepage discharge after the completion of the tunnel;
     (3) Make a theory analysis on fracture mechanics in rock mass hydraulics, and establish a mathematical model of rock seepage analysis combined with Li River tunnel rock mass characteristics and the actual hydro-geological conditions;
     (4) According to the tunnel seepage volume in the completion period, carry out the inversion analysis of a reasonable permeability coefficient with the use of rock flow software, and verify the necessity of grouting through the comparative analysis of waterhead distribution and seepage velocity distribution between grouting and without grouting;
     (5)According to seepage analysis results of Li River tunnel when Li River reservoir water level is 880m, when sudden rainstorm comes, and under the action of Li River reservoir water level is 880m with the sudden rainstorm.Put forward anti-seepage and drainage measures for Li River 3rd tunnel project:grouting in anti-pressure section to reduce seepage and prevent the surrounding rock seepage failure, seting waterproof board and earthwork cloth in all the tunnel, making reasonable arrangements for vertical drainage system,in order to achieve the combination of anti-seepage and drainage.
     In this paper,author verifys the necessity of grouting through a numerical simulation in anti-pressure section of Li River 3rd tunnel under three working conditions, and provides an important measures for anti-seepage and drainage design.
引文
[1]黄润秋,王贤能.深埋隧道工程主要灾害地质问题分析[J].水文地质与工程地质,1998,25(4):21-24
    [2]黄润秋,王贤能,陈龙生.深埋隧道涌水过程的水力劈裂作用分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(5):573-576
    [3]李阳刚,孟维孝,何小龙,唐和青.厦门海底隧道涌水涌砂应急预案与处理施工技术.[J]现代交通技术,2008,5(1):50-64
    [4]任旭华,李同春,陈祥荣.锦屏二级水电站深埋引水隧洞衬砌及围岩结构分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,20(1):16-19
    [5]甘建军,黄润秋,王朝阳.雁门关铁路隧道涌水量预测与防护措施研究[J].四川地质学报,2009,29(4):467-473.
    [6]张学富,张耀南,梁波,黄明奎,肖盛燮.昆仑山隧道漏水灾害的链式机制及断链新措施[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(S1):2719-2729
    [7]弓俊伟,付黎龙,张灵波.大瑶山1号隧道涌水段注浆施工方案研究[J].铁道标准设计,2009(1):100-113
    [8]徐济川,黄少霞.大瑶山隧道的突泥涌水机制[J].铁道工程学报,1996(2):83-89
    [9]陈绍林,李茂竹,陈忠恕,谢晓东.四川广(安)—渝(重庆)高速公路华蓥山隧道岩溶突水的研究与整治[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(9):1344-1349
    [10]Romm.E.S..Flow Characteristics of Fractured Rocks[M].Nedra,Moscow,1966
    [11]Snow D..anisotropic permeability of fractured media.Water Resour.Res..1969.5(6):1273-1289
    [12]Louis C..Rock hydraulics Rock,Mechanics。 Edited by L。Muller Udine。 1974:299-387
    [13]杨太华,曾德顺.三峡船闸高边坡裂隙岩体的渗流损伤特征[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,中国地质灾害与防治学报,1997,8(2):13-18
    [14]田开铭.对裂隙岩石渗透性的初步研究[J].地质研究.1980,(2):137-143
    [15]张有天,刘平.降雨过程裂隙网络饱和/非饱和、非恒定渗流分析[J],岩石力学与工程学报,1997,16(2):104-111
    [16]杜延龄,许国安,黄一和.复杂岩基的三维渗流分析研究[J],水利学报.1984(3):1-9
    [17]杨天鸿,李连崇,唐春安.岩石破坏过程中渗流-损伤关系的认识——兼对唐红侠博士提问的答复[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(24):4254-4257
    [18]余天庆.损伤本构模型新进展[J].湖北工学院学报,1995,10(3):1-10
    [19]Noorishad J.etlal.A finite-element method for coupled stress and fluid flow analysis in fracture rock masses,Int J.RockMeeh.Sei&Geomeeh.Abstr,1985,22(4):251-281
    [20]Oda M.An Equivalent Model for CouPled Stress and Fluld Flow Analysis in Jointed Rock Masses, water resource.Res.,1986,22(13):1845-1856
    [21]陈平,张有天.裂隙岩体渗流与应力耦合分析[J].岩石水力学与工程学报,1994,13(4):299-308
    [22]王媛等,徐志英,速宝玉.复杂裂隙岩体渗流与应力弹塑性全耦合分析[J].岩石力学与工程报,2000,19(2):177-181
    [23]王媛等,速宝玉.单裂隙面渗流特性及等效水力隙宽[J].水科学进展,2002,13(1),63-68
    [24]朱珍德,等裂隙岩体的渗流场与损伤场耦合分析及其工程应用[J],长江科学院院报,1999,16(2):22-27
    [25]郑少河.裂隙岩体渗流场—损伤场耦合理论研究及工程应用武汉,中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所博士论文,2004,
    [26]陈卫忠,杨建平,邹喜德,周春宏.裂隙岩体宏观力学参数研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(8):1569-1575
    [27]周创兵,於三大.论岩体表征单元体积REV-岩体力学参数取值的一个基本问题[J].工程地质学报1999,7(4):332-336
    [28]周创兵,陈益峰,姜清辉.岩体表征单元体与岩体力学参数[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(8):
    [29]陈益峰,姜清何,满潮.工程岩体力学参数确定方法的研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(2):225-229.
    [30]Bibhuti B.Panda,P.H.S.W.Kulatilake,Relations between fracture tensor parameters and jointed rock hydraulics[J], Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1999,125(1):51-59.
    [31]P.H.S.W.Kulatilake, Bibhuti B.Panda,Effect of block size and joint geometry on jointed rock hydraulics and rev [J],2000,126(8):850-858
    [32]肖裕行,王泳嘉,卢世宗等.裂隙岩体水力等效连续介质中物理量的讨论[J].岩土力学,1997,18(4):13-17
    [33]肖裕行,王泳嘉,卢世宗等.裂隙岩体水力等效连续介质存在性的评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(1):75~80
    [34]Wilson C.R.,P.A.Witherspoon,J.C.S.Long,R.M.Galnreith,A.O.Dubois,and M.J.Mcpheron.Large-Scale hydraulic conductivity measurements in fractured granite,Int,j,Rock Mech.Min,Sci.&Geo mech.Abstr..1983.20(6),269-276
    [35]Maini Y.N.T..In situ hydraulic prarmeters in joint rock-their measurement and iterpretation.Ph.D.Thesis imperial coll.,London.1971
    [36]张有天.岩石水力学与工程[M],北京:中国水利水电出版社,2005.
    [37]杨会军,王梦恕.深埋长大隧道渗流数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,25(3):511-519
    [38]李定方,鄢俊,陶同康..裂隙岩体渗流新模型[J].水利水运科学研究,1996,(4):283-29
    [39]黄勇,周志芳.岩体渗流模拟的二维随机裂隙网络模型[J].河海大学学报自然科学版.2004.,32(1):91-94
    [40]柴军瑞,仵彦卿.岩体裂隙网络渗流自由面的确定方法[J].工程勘察,2000(1):20-21
    [41]柴军瑞,仵彦卿.岩体多重裂隙网络渗流模型研究[J].煤田地质与勘探.2000,,28(2):33-36
    [42]贺少辉,廖国华.裂隙岩体裂隙网络渗流模型研究[J]矿冶工程,1997,17(2):11-15
    [43]Barenblatt,Q.I.,etal.,Basic concepts in the theory of see Page of homogeneous liquidsin fissure drocks,J.Appl.Meth.Mech.,Engl.Transl.1960(5)
    [44]Barton N.,S.Bandis,K.Bakhatr,Strength,deformation and conductivity eopling of rock joints,Int.J.Rock Meck Min.Sci.&Geomeeh.Abstr.,1985,22(3):121-140
    [45]王恩志,杨成田.裂隙网络及地下水网络流数值方法[J].研究勘察科学技术,1991,04(004)
    [46]毛昶熙,陈平.裂隙岩体计算方法研究[J].岩土工程学,1991,13(6):1-10
    [47]万力,李定方,李吉庆.三维裂隙网络的多边形单元渗流模型[J].水利水运科学研究,1993(4):347-353
    [48]王洪涛,李永祥.三维随机裂隙网络非稳定渗流模型[J].水利水运科学研究,1997,(2):27-29
    [49]仵彦卿,张倬元.岩体水力学导论[M].成都:西南交通大学出版社,1995
    [50]仵彦卿,张倬元.岩土水力学[M],北京:科学出版社2009年
    [51]柴军瑞,仵彦卿.岩体多重裂隙网络渗流模型研究[J].煤田地质与勘探.2000,28(2):33-36
    [52]杨映涛,南生辉,顾敏.三轴应力状态下单裂隙突水机理的实验研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,1997,25(S1):37-41
    [53]耿克勤等.岩体裂隙渗流水力特性的实验研究.清华大学学报(自然科学版),1996,36(1):102-106
    [54]郑少河,赵阳升,段康廉.三维应力作用下天然裂隙渗流规律的实验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报1999,18(2):133-136
    [55]孙蓉琳,梁杏,靳孟贵.裂隙岩体渗透系数确定方法综述[J].水文地质工程地质,2006(6):120-123
    [55]柴军瑞,仵彦卿.单裂隙非稳定流分析.[J]水利水运科学研究.2000(2):59-61
    [57]何吉,徐青,陈胜宏.裂隙岩体渗透特性反演分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增1):2730-2735
    [58]周志芳,王锦国著.裂隙介质水动力学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2004:200-204
    [59]张宪堂,王洪立,周红敏,卢立标.FLAC-3D在海底隧道涌水量预测中的应用[J],岩土力学,2008,29(增):258-262
    [60]GB50218-94.工程岩体分级标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1994
    [61]郑鹏武,谭忠盛,吴金刚.齐岳山隧道注浆必要性的数值分析与论证[J].铁道建筑,2006,1:36-38
    [62]JTG/F60-2009.公路隧道施工技术规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700