青川县城桅杆梁不稳定斜坡稳定性评价及其防治措施研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
桅杆梁不稳定斜坡位于四川省广元市青川县主城区西南部,主要由3个老滑坡体和3个倾倒变形体组成。倾倒变形体表部薄板状千枚岩倾倒弯曲变形强烈,5?12汶川特大地震引起倾倒变形体拉裂变形强烈,圈弧状裂缝拉开15~20cm,最大下错量达30cm,对坡下城区居民的生命财产和坡顶古刹宝莲寺安全构成极大威胁。因此,研究其变形破裂机制及稳定性,进而提出防治措施具有重要的实践和理论意义。
     本文在桅杆梁不稳定斜坡的基本地质条件、斜坡岩体结构、变形破裂迹象等研究基础上,对斜坡的形成演化机制及变形破坏模式进行了分析,采用UDEC二维离散元软件对边坡的变形破坏机制进行了模拟;运用刚体极限平衡理论对边坡的稳定性进行了计算与评价,进而研究了不稳定斜坡的防治措施。取得了如下主要成果:
     (1)斜坡为千枚岩组成的陡倾顺向坡,其变形破裂机制为倾倒弯曲-拉裂型。不稳定斜坡由3个倾倒变形体和3个由倾倒变形发展成的老滑坡组成。结合斜坡的形成演化,分析了斜坡倾倒弯曲一拉裂变形失稳的过程。
     (2)5·12汶川特大地震造成不稳定斜坡不同程度的变形破裂,主要具有如下特征:地震对桅杆梁不稳定斜坡的作用主要表现在地震波对坡体的振荡作用,在地震波作用下坡体上的变形破裂特征主要以圈弧状地震裂缝为主。受坡体结构影响,地震裂缝多沿发生明显倾倒弯曲变形的基岩变形体边界呈圈弧状发育,而老滑坡体的边界及其内部裂缝较少发育;除此之外,地震裂缝的分布受地形条件影响较大。由于地震波震动作用及其动响应在坡肩、坡顶一带的放大作用,导致坡顶一带的1#、2#和3#变形体的地震裂缝尤为发育,而坡体中部的老滑坡体与其相比之下则地震裂缝发育较少;2#和3#变形体虽同处于坡顶一带,但由于高程差异,2#变形体变形破裂迹象尤为显著。
     (3)采用UDEC二维离散元软件对斜坡的变形过程进行数值模拟,分别从位移矢量及速度矢量分析地震状况下在不同计算步时的变形特征,研究斜坡的形成演化过程及其变形破坏模式。结果表明,在地震作用下,斜坡岩体倾倒-弯曲变形,顶部产生垂直于岩层面拉裂破坏的破坏模式。
     (4)定性分析结合刚体极限平衡法(传递系数法)稳定性计算结果表明,老滑坡体稳定系数均大于1.15,处于稳定状态。3#变形体在各工况下处于稳定或基本稳定状态,但不满足一级边坡的安全标准;1#、2#变形体稳定性天然和暴雨工况下稳定系数均大于1.05,坡体处于基本稳定状态,但在地震工况下稳定系数小于1.05,处于欠稳定状态,不满足一级边坡的安全标准。
     (5)根据不稳定体结构、变形破坏机制、破坏模式及稳定性状况等,提出了以预应力锚索格构(竖梁)为主的防治措施,并进行了支护设计。
Weiganliang unstable slopes in the southwest of Qingchuan County, Guangyuan City, Toppling the Department of sheet-like surface dumping of bending phyllite strong, 5 ? 12 Wenchuan earthquake deformation and shape deformablelandslide strong, circle arc-shaped crack opened 15 ~ 20cm, the largest on the wrong volume of 30cm, posing a serious threat the people behind the slope and to the Po Lin Temple on the top of the hill. Therefore, to study the deformation and fracture mechanism and stability, and to make prevention and control measures have important practical and theoretical significance.
     In this paper, the Weiganliang unstable slopes of the basic geological conditions, slope rock mass structure, signs of deformation and fracture of the basis of such studies on mechanism of formation and evolution of slope failure modes were analyzed using two dimensional discrete element code UDEC slope deformation and failure mechanism of the simulation; using rigid body limit equilibrium theory to calculate the slope stability and evaluation, and study the unstable slope mitigation measures. Main results obtained are as follows:
     (1) The slope is the steep dip slope,composed of phyllite. The deformation and fracture mechanisms for the dumping bent - fracturing. Unstable slopes from the three overturned deformation and three from the dumping of old landslide deformation into the composition. Combination of slope formation and evolution, analysis of the slope or bent shape of a tensile failure of the process of fission.
     (2) 5 ? 12 Wenchuan earthquake caused unstable slopes varying degrees of deformation and fracture, primarily with the following characteristics: Earthquake on the role of the Weiganliang unstable slopes mainly in seismic oscillation effect on the slope. Seismic waves in the slope of the deformation and fracture characteristics of cracks mainly to the earthquake, seismic cracks at the curved growth ring. Affected by the slope structure, circle arc-shaped crack earthquakes over the border along the development of deformed bedrock, that showed significantly deformed rock dumping deformation. The old landslide boundaries and internal cracks in less developed;In addition, the distribution of crack earthquakes influenced by the terrain conditions. As the seismic wave motions and the dynamic response of the slope of the shoulder, top of the hill in the vicinity of amplification, resulting in top of the hill in the vicinity of 1 #, 2 # and 3 # deformed crack earthquakes particular development, the central slope compared with the old landslide under the seismic fractures than less; 2 # and 3 # deformed although the same area at the top of the hill, but because of elevation differences between two # signs of deformation and fracture deformation is particularly significant.
     (3) UDEC discrete two-dimensional element software on the slope deformation process of numerical simulation, respectively, from the displacement vector and velocity vector of the earthquake conditions in the different steps when calculating the deformation characteristics of the process of its formation and evolution of the slope deformation and failure modes . The results show,Affected by the earthquake,that the slope rock mass dumping-bending at the top level generated perpendicular to the tensile failure of rock failure mode.
     (4) Qualitative analysis combined with rigid body limit equilibrium method (transfer coefficient) stability calculation results show that the old landslide stability factor greater than 1.15, is stable. 3 # deformed body in the condition in a stable or stable state, but does not meet the safety standards of a slope; 1 #, 2 # Block stability of natural and heavy rain condition stability factor greater than 1.05, slope body is in stable condition, but stable condition in the seismic coefficient is less than 1.05, is less stable, does not meet the safety standards of a slope.
     (5) According to the unstable structure, deformation and failure mechanisms, failure modes and the stability of the status, put forward a prestressed anchor rope lattice (vertical beam)-based control measures, and had support design.
引文
[1]许强.汶川大地震诱发地质灾害主要类型与特征研究[J] .地质灾害与环境保护, 2008,20(2):86-92.
    [2]陆兆臻.工程地质原理[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001.
    [3]韩贝传,王思敬.边坡倾倒变形的形成机制与影响因素分析[J] .工程地质学报,1999,7(3):213-217.
    [4]齐典涛.昌马水库倾倒变形边坡特征形成机制及发育深度[J] .西部探矿工程,2001,(6):47-49.
    [5]徐佩华,陈剑平,黄润秋等.锦屏水电站解放沟反倾高边坡变形机制的探讨[J] .工程地质学报,2004,12(3):247-252.
    [6]邹小虎,沈军辉等.雅砻江甲西滑坡成因机制及其稳定性分析[J] .地质灾害与环境保护,2006,17(4):39-42.
    [7]伍法权.云母石英片岩斜坡弯曲倾倒变形的理论分析[J] .工程地质学报,1997,5(4):306-311.
    [8]常祖峰,谢阳,梁海华.小浪底工程库区岸坡倾倒变形研究[J] .中国地质灾害与防治学报,1999,10(11):28-31,27.
    [9]李天扶.论层状岩石边坡的倾倒破坏[J] .西北水电,2006,(4):4-6.
    [10]黄昌乾,丁恩保.边坡工程常用稳定性分析方法[J] .水电站设计,1999,15(1):53-58.
    [11]夏元友,李新平.基于人工神经网络的边坡稳定性工程地质评价方法[J] .岩土力学,1996,17(3):27-33.
    [12]徐青等.改进剩余推力法及其在三板溪滑坡稳定研究中的应用[J] .安全与环境学报,2005,5(4):73-77。
    [13] Avriel,M. Nonlinear Programming [J] .Analysis and Methods,Prentice-HaII,Inc. 1976.
    [14] Fellenius W. Erdstatisch Berechnungen. Berlin W. Ernst and sohn revised Edition.
    [15]张世雄.凹陷露天矿边坡少剥离技术的时空原理[J ].中国矿业,1998,7(2):26-28.
    [16]张有天,周维垣.岩石高边坡的变形与稳定[M] .北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999.
    [17]裴觉民,数值流形方法与非连续变形分析[J] .岩石力学与工程学报,1997,16(3):279-292.
    [18]康胜,梁收运,刘高等.清水子滑坡特征分析及形成机制研究[J] ,兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2006,42(专辑):64-67.
    [19] ADHIKAPW D P, DYSKIN A V. Modelling of Progreslive an Instantaneous Failures of Foliated Rock Slopes [J] .Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2007, 40(4):349一362.
    [20]李桂荣,佘成学,陈胜宏.层状岩体边坡的弯曲变形破坏试验及有限元分析[j]岩石力学与工程学报,1997,16(4):305一311.
    [21] ADHIKARY D P, DYSKIN A V, JEWELL R J. Numerical Modeling of The Flexural Deformation of Foliated Rock Slopes[l].Rock Mechanics and Mining Science,1996,33(6):595一606.
    [22] ADHIKARY D P, MuHLHAUS H B, DYSKIN A V.Modellin of the Large Deformations in Stratified Media一Lhe Cosseral Continuum Approach[J].Mech.Cohes一Fricl.Mater, 1999,(4):195一213.
    [23]万洪,胡春林.地震荷载作用下岩质边坡稳定性分析[J] .建材世界,2009,30(3):106-109.
    [24]徐行军.浅谈喷锚网技术在高陡边坡防护中的应用[J] .华东公路,2003,3(142):38-42.
    [25]申润植.滑坡整治理论和工程实践[M] .北京:北京中国铁道出版社.1996.
    [26]殷坤龙等.国际滑坡研究的新进展[J] .水文地质工程地质,2000(5)
    [27]张倬元.滑坡防治工程的现状与发展展望[J] ..地质灾害与环境保护,2000.6
    [28]王恭先.抗滑支挡建筑物的发展动向.滑坡文集(第十三集).北京:中国铁道出版社,1998
    [29]张博.天山公路边坡破坏机制及稳定性研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2006
    [30]李智毅,杨欲云.工程地质学概论[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社.
    [31]张倬元,王士天,王兰生.工程地质分析原理[M] .北京:地质出版社,1993.
    [32]祁生文,伍法权.边坡动力响应规律研究[J] .中国科学E辑技术科学2003.33(增刊)
    [33]许强,黄润秋.5.12汶川大地震诱发大型崩滑灾害动力特征初探[J] .工程地质学报,2008.
    [34]李智毅.工程地质学基础[M].南京:中国地质大学出版社,1990.12.
    [35]Vardoulakis, I Dynamic thermo-poro-mechanical analysis of catastrophic landslides[J]. Geotechnique, 2002, 52 (3) : 157~171.
    [36]Sassa K. Special lecture: Geotechnical model for the motion of landslides[A ]. In: Proceedings of the 5 th International Symposium on Landslide, Vol.1 [ C ]. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema, 1988.37~55.
    [37]Sassa, K. Mechanism of flows in granular soils [A ] . In: Geo-Eng2000 - An International Conference on Geotechnical and Geo-logical Engineering,Vol.1:Invited Papers [C].Lancaster,Pennsylvania: Technomic Publishing Co.Inc,2000.1671~1702.
    [38]Foda, M. A. Landslides riding on basal pressure waves[ J ]. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 1994, 6: 61~79.
    [39]Kobayashi, Y. Long runout landslides riding on a basal guided wave[A] . In: Engineering Geology and the Environment [C] .Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema, 1997.761~766.
    [40]Zhang, D., Foda, M. A. An instabilitymechanism for the sliding motion of finite depth of bulk granularmaterials[ J ]. ActaM echanica, 1997.121: 1~19.
    [41]沈中超.两河口水电站庆大河泄水建筑物进口边坡稳定性评价[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [42]李勇,周荣军.青藏高原东缘大陆动力学过程与地质响应[M],北京:地质出版社,2006
    [43]中华人民共和国1:20万区域地质图广元幅,1967,4.
    [44]王海云,谢礼立.近断层强地震动的特点[J] .哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006.11,38(12)
    [45]俞言祥,高孟潭.台湾集集地震近场地震动的上盘效应[J] .地震学报,2001.11,23(6).
    [46]于海英,王栋等.汶川8.0级地震强震动特征初步分析[J] .震灾防御技术,2008.12,3(4).
    [47]黄润秋,李为乐.汶川大地震触发地质灾害的断层效应分析[J] .工程地质学报,2009.1.
    [48]马保起,张世民,田勤俭等.汶川8.0级地震地表破裂带[J].第四纪研究,2008.7,28(4).
    [49]李海波,冯海鹏,刘博.不同剪切速率下岩石节理的强度特性研究[J] .岩石力学与工程学报,2006.12,25(12).
    [50]王士天,严明,黄润秋.高边坡变形破坏机制及稳定性评价[M]成都:西南交通大学出版社,1994.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700