6311S配套恢复系选育的组合判别法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
恢复系×恢复系是目前杂交稻选育恢复系的主要途径。一般方法是根据农艺性状进行选择,待基本稳定后再进行测配;前期以表型选择为主,后期配合力选择为主,但是表型选择与配合力选择并不完全一致,有时甚至结果相反。如果前期提高表型选择标准,高配合力的材料可能早早就被淘汰;但若把表型选择标准放宽,前期选择及后期的测配工作量都很大,育种效率不高。本文借鉴杂交玉米育种中的配子选择法,设计了6311S配套恢复系选育的组合判别法研究,尝试在恢复系选育的早代进行配合力选择,提高组合早代的筛选效率。试验利用8个恢复系亲本按双列杂交法配制26个单交F_1,然后再与两用不育系6311S杂交配制三交组合。对26个单交F_1的主要性状进行分析;并分析了三交组合的农艺性状和部分品质性状,研究了三交组合和对应父本F_1之间的性状相关性;同时对8个亲本恢复系和26个单交F_1进行配合力分析,研究了它们与单交F_1的性状表现及其现实配合力之间的关系;对6311S配套恢复系的早代筛选做了初步探讨。结果表明:
     1、根据三交组合的表现,筛选出5个现实配合力好的单交组合,即玉18/绵恢725、绵恢725/9311、9311/紫66、绵恢725/紫66和测253/CDR22,从它们后代中选育出6311S配套恢复系的几率要高。
     2、恢复系间单交F_1的性状分析得到6个农艺性状表现优良的组合:9965/紫66、9311/CDR22、351/紫66、玉18/紫66、测253/CDR22、351/9311,只有测253/CDR22的现实配合力较高。
     3、紫66、351、CDR22、9311的单株产量一般配合力较好;测253/CDR22、9965/玉18、9965/紫66、351/绵恢725、绵恢725/紫66、9311/CDR22等组合的特殊配合力效应值较高。恢复系间单交F_1的主茎穗总粒数、实粒数、结实率、有效穗数和单株产量以基因的非加性效应为主,千粒重性状以基因的加性效应为主;而表型选择的6个组合中,351/紫66单株产量双亲的一般配合力起着主要作用,其它组合的单株产量组合特殊配合力起着主要作用。
     4、配合力选择的5个F_1中,4个中选F_1的双亲中至少有一个一般配合力高的亲本,但是除三交F_1的实粒数与单交组合的特殊配合力呈显著负相关,恢复系亲本的一般配合力与三交组合的千粒重达极显著正相关外,并未发现恢复系亲本的一般配合力和单交组合的特殊配合力与三交F_1单株产量在内的其它性状之间有明显的相关关系,说明亲本间杂交的配合力分析并不能替代组合判别,从而证实了组合判别法必要性。
    
    周六斤硕士学位论文:63115配套恢复系选育的组合判别法研究
    5、本研究在恢复系选育的早代进行配合力选择,单交组合淘汰率高达80%以上,
    可以把有限的人力物力集中于少数几个有希望的组合,大大降低了工作量,提高
    了组合筛选的效率,为恢复系的选育提供了一个快速、有效的方法.
The general method of breeding new restorer lines is to select from two restorer lines cross descendants by phenotypic characters in early generations and by Combining ability in late generations. The effect was not satisfying, because phenotypic selection and combining ability selection can not fit well, sometimes the results were opposite , if phenotypic selection was strict in early generation, materials with good combining ability would be lost earlier; but if the criterion of phenotypic selection was wide, the workload both in early and late generations would be very large. Combination screening method in breeding restorer lines for 6311S was studied according to gamete selection in maize breeding. 26 F1 were derived from 8 restorer lines by Griffing IV design, then 26 triple cross hybrids were obtained from 26 FI and 6311S. Important characters of single cross hybrids and triple cross hybrids.combing abilities of 8 restorer lines and 26 single cross hybrids were analyzed. Meanwhile, the correlations between combing abilities and yields of single cross hybrids and triple cross hybrids were studied. The results were as follows:
    1. 5 FI were selected from 26 FI based on important characters of triple cross hybrids. They were Yul8/MianHui725, MianHui 725/9311, 9311/Zi66, MianHui725/Zi66, Ce253/CDR22, from which the probability of breeding new restorer lines for 6311S might be high.
    2. According to phenotypic characters of single cross hybrids. 9965/ZJ66. 9311/CDR22, 351/Zi66,Yul8/Zi66,Ce253/CDR22,351/9311 were chosen. Phenotypic selection and combing ability selection got different results.
    3. 351. 9311, Zi66 and CDR22 had good GCAs; Ce253/CDR22. 9311/CDR22. 9965/Zi66, 351/Mianhui725 and 9965/Yul8 had good SCAs in yields.The non additive variation was principal for spikelets per panicle , filled spikelets per panicle, seed setting rate, and grain weight per plant of single cross hybrids: while the additive variation was greater for only 1000-grain weight. Among 6 FI selected by phenotypic selection, GCAs play more important role in the yield of 351/Z166. But SCAs play more important roles in the yields of the rest.
    4. SCAs of 5 F1 selected by combining selection were different, among the restorer lines of 4 hybrids, at least one had high GCA . but the correlations between parents' GCAs and triple cross hybrids' yields were not found.
    5. These results suggest that Combing ability selection in early generation might be a quick and effective method of breeding restorer lines.
引文
1. Boppenmaier J et al. Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds:Performance of crosses within versus between heterotic groups for grain traits. Plant Breeding, 1993,111:217~226
    2. Dimitrios A. Ntanos and Demetrios G. Roupakias. Comparative efficiency of two breeding methods for yield and quality in rice. Crop Sci,2001,41:345~350
    3. Donald, C.M. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Eu-phytica, 1968,17:385~4036
    4. Ikehashi H, et al. Varietal screening for compatibility type revealed in F1 fertility of distant cross in rice. Japan J Breed, 1984,34(3):304~313
    5. Lee M, Godshalk K, et al. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreeds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci, 1989, (29), 1067~1071
    6. Lee M. Godshalk K, et. Al. Association of restriction fragment length ploymorphisms among maize inbreeds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci, 1989, (29),1067~1071
    7. Melchinger A E, et al. Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms:Relation to estimated genetic effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci, 1990,30:1033~1040
    8.S.S.Virmani著,杨仁崔,陈顺辉译.杂种优势和杂交水稻育种.福州:福建科学技术出版社,1996
    9. Shreep. Singh Gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple traits in common bean. Crop Sci, 1994,34:352~355
    10. Stuber C W.Lincoln S E,Wolff D W, et al. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers.Genetics, 1992.132:823~839
    11. W. A. Russel ,S.A. Eberhart, et al. Recurrent selection for specific combining ability for yield in two maize populations. Crop Sci, 1973,13:257~261
    12. Xiao J, et al. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis in rice as revealed by PCR-based markers[J],Theor Appl Genet, 1996,92:637~643
    13. Xiao J.Li J,et al. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular. Genetics,1995,140:745~754
    14. Zhang Q F et al. Molecular heterozygosity and hybrid performance in indica and japonica rice. Theor Appl Genet 1996,93(8):1218~1224
    15.蔡洪法.21世纪的中国稻业.水稻遗传育种国际学术讨论文集.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999
    
    
    16.陈立云.杂交稻杂种优势利用的初步探讨.杂交水稻,1987,(4):11~13
    17.陈亮,孙传清,姜廷波等.IRRI新株型稻杂种优势利用研究.华北农学报,2000,15(11):11~14
    18.程式华,廖西元,闵绍楷.中国超级稻研究:背景、目标和有关问题的思考[J].中国稻米,1998(1):3~5
    19.程式华,闵绍楷.中国水稻品种:现状与展望,中国稻米,2000,(1):13~16
    20.程式华.杂交水稻育种材料和方法研究的现状及发展趋势.中国水稻科学,2000,14(3):165~169
    21.樊叶杨,庄杰云,李强等.水稻株高QTL分析及其产量QTL的关系.作物学报,2001,27(6):915~921
    22.范树国.水稻杂种优势利用研究.水稻遗传育种国际学术讨论文集.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999
    23.广成,杨继民,薛雁等.玉米自交系8个数量性状的配合力分析.西北农业学报,2001,10(4):45~49
    24.广西农科院水稻杂优组.水稻雄性不育细胞质对子一代主要性状的影响.中国农业科学,1982.4
    25.何丹,王秀全,刘昌明等.12个王米自交系产量性状配合力分析.杂粮作物,2001,21(4):5~7
    26.何光华,裴炎,杨光伟等.我国中籼杂交稻亲本的DNA变异性研究.作物学报.2002Vol(26)4:449~454
    27.何光华,唐梅,裴炎等.四川主要水稻恢复系的DNA多态性初步研究.杂交水稻 1999.14(6):39~40
    28.洪德林,杨开晴,潘恩飞.粳稻不同生态类型间F_1的杂种优势及其亲本的配合力分析.中国水稻科学,2002,16(3):216~220
    29.黄耀祥.水稻丛化育种.广东农业科学,1983,(1):1~57
    30.吉立柱.粳稻二元不育系和三交种应用的研究 南京农业大学硕士论文 1999.6 集.中国农业科技出版社,1999
    31.江奕君.杂交水稻高产、优质、多抗新组合选育.广东农业科学,1996,(4):12~13
    32.姜廷波,李任华,孙传清等.两系杂交水稻主要性状配合力与亲本籼粳分化关系的研究.农业生物技术学报,1999,7(3):295~301
    33.姜廷波,李荣田,崔成焕等.水稻穗型构成性状的遗传分析.黑龙江农业科学,1995,6:1~5
    34.蒋开锋,郑家荃,曾德初等.杂交水稻稳产性配合力初步研究.中国水稻科学,1998,12(3):134~138
    35.金田忠吉.应用籼粳杂交培育超高产水稻品种.JARQ,1986,19(4):235~2403
    
    
    36.雷捷成,游年顺.综述我国近三年杂交稻育种概况.福建稻麦科技,2000.18(1):1~2
    37.李成荃,刘垂芋等.粳稻数量性状遗传距离测定及其在杂种优势上的作用.安徽农业科学,1981(水稻数量遗传论文专辑),77~83
    38.李梅芳.水稻生物技术育种.北京:中国农业科技出版社,2001
    39.李文海.我国杂交水稻发展现状与存在的若干问题.生物学杂志,1996,(5):5~8
    40.李泽柄等.杂交水稻的研究与实践.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1981
    41.栗学俊,陈彩虹,禤绮琳等.杂交水稻产量构成分析与育种策略.广西农业科学,2002,6:283~285
    42.廖伏明,周坤炉,阳和华.杂交水稻亲本遗传差异与杂种优势的关系.中国水稻科学,1998,12(4):193~199
    43.廖伏明,周坤炉,阳和华等.籼型杂交水稻米质性状配合力及遗传力研究.湖南农业大学学报,2000,26(5):323~328
    44.林光涛,张先广.杂交水稻杂种优势预测方法评述.安徽农业科学,2000,28(5):520-529
    45.林世成,闵绍楷.中国水稻品种系谱.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1991
    46.刘纪磷.玉米育种学.北京:中国农业出版社,2002
    47.刘秋华.农林8号m苯达松敏感致死性的遗传分析及其基因定位.南京农业大学硕士论文,2003,8
    48.泷田正.水稻粒形特性与育种.农业技术,1990,44(6):39-42
    49.卢庆善.农作物杂种优势利用.北京:中国农业科技出版社,2001
    50.卢兴桂,袁潜华,徐宏书.我国两系法杂交水稻中试开发的实践与经验.杂交水稻,1998.13(5):1~29
    51.陆贤军,任光俊等.籼型杂交水稻恢复系选育研究进展.西南农业学报 1998,11(院庆专辑):58~63
    52.陆作楣.论水稻两系法育种.南京农业大学学报,1996,19(4):1~4
    53.陆作楣.论杂交稻育种配合力选择.中国水稻科学,1999,13(1):1~5
    54.罗利军,梅捍卫,余新桥等.水稻杂种优势表现与遗传差异.中国水稻科学,1999,13(1):6~10
    55.罗孝和,袁隆平.水稻广亲和系的选育[J].杂交水稻,1989(2):35~38.
    56.罗志祥,丁超尘,陈多璞等.几个籼型三系杂交水稻亲本的配合力及遗传力研究.安徽农业科学 1999,27(4):315~317
    57.毛昌祥.我国杂交水稻的形势与战略.杂交水稻,1994,1:1~4
    58.闵绍楷,程式华等.提高杂交水稻产量潜力的育种策略.水稻遗传育种国际学术讨论文集 北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999
    59.潘家驹.作物育种学总论.北京:农业出版社,1994
    60.祁新,赵颖君,权继斌等.玉米主要品质性状的配合力分析.玉米科学,2001,9(1):
    
    26~30
    61.石春海,朱军.籼稻稻米外观品质与其它品质性状的相关性分析.浙江农业大学学报,1994,20(6):606~610
    62.石春海,朱军等.籼型杂交稻稻米品质性状遗传分析.水稻遗传育种国际学术讨论文
    63.石明松.晚粳自然两用系选育及应用初报[J].湖北农业科学,1981,(7):1~3
    64.史开兵.多细胞质源杂交籼稻利用的可行性研究.南京农业大学硕士论文,2002,7
    65.苏京平.杂交稻恢复系选育地组合判别法研究.南京农业大学硕士论文,2002,7
    66.苏孝道等.杂交水稻三交种优势表现及其配合力.福建农学院学报,1990,19(1):7~12
    67.粟学俊,陈彩虹.几个杂交水稻亲本配合力测定分析.广西农业科学,2001(1):1~3
    68.粟学俊.三系杂交水稻优质育种.西南农业学报,14(1):106~110
    69.孙宗修.两系杂交水稻研究现状与对策.科技通报,2000,16(1):1~7
    70.孙宗修等.杂交水稻育种 从三系,两系到一系.中国农业科技出版社 1994
    71.唐甫林,胡石海,侯秀芳等.水稻株高对经济系数及产量影响的初探.上海农业科技,2000(5):9
    72.汪旭东,周开达等.常规育种技术与生物技术相结合在杂交水稻育种中的应用.水稻遗传育种国际学术讨论文集.中国农业科技出版社 1999
    73.王得元,李颖,黎振兴等.DNA分子标记在作物杂种优势研究中的应用.西北农业学报,1998,7(3):94~97
    74.王家银,张志雄等.综合育种技术在杂交水稻恢复系选育上的效果 1994,7(2):17-21
    75.王景余,都兴林.利用生物技术育成的水稻新品种组培7号,吉林农业科学,1996(1):20~23
    76.王三良.我国籼型杂交水稻育种现状、问题与对策.杂交水稻,1996(3):1~4
    77.王守海,罗彦长等.两系杂交籼稻亲本配合力研究.安徽农业大学学报,1995,22(增刊):11~17
    78.武小金,张克明.杂交水稻发展的现状与前景.农业现代化研究,1996,17(4):234~239
    79.武耀廷,张天真,朱协飞等.陆地棉遗传距离与杂种F_1、F_2产量及杂种优势的相关分析.中国农业科学,2002,35(1):22~28
    80.谢华安,罗家密,郑家团等.杂交水稻恢复系和强优组合选育进展.863计划两系杂交水稻专题研讨会暨1996年海南年会论文汇编[C].1996:221~227.
    81.谢华安,罗家密.籼型杂交水稻恢复系的选育.杂交水稻,1994(3-4):31~33
    82.徐大勇,刘洪福,杜永等.高产水稻品种主要经济性状遗传分析及其超高产育种策略的探索.江苏农业科学,2000,21(1):12~15
    83.徐静斐.水稻杂种优势与遗传距离.安徽农业科学(水稻数量遗传专辑),1981:126~129
    84.杨联松,白一松,许传万等.水稻粒形与稻米品质间相关性研究.安徽农业科学,2001,
    
    29(3):312~316
    85.杨守仁,张步龙,王进民等.水稻理想株形育种的理论和方法初论.中国农业科学,1984,(3):6~138
    86.姚立生,高恒广,顾来顺等.籼三系强优恢复系选育的有效途径——籼掺粳恢恢交低世代测鉴.中国稻米,1997(5):10~12
    87.余四斌,李建雄,徐才国等.上位性效应是水稻杂种优势的重要遗传基础.中国科学(C辑),1998,28(4):333~341
    88.袁隆平.水稻的雄性不孕性[J].科学通报.1996,17(4):185~188
    89.袁隆平.杂交水稻的育种战略设想.杂交水稻,1987,(1):1~3
    90.袁隆平.杂交水稻育种栽培学[M]长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1988
    91.袁隆平.杂交水稻超高产育种[J].杂交水稻,1997(6):1~3
    92.杂交水稻国际学术讨论会论文集.学术期刊出版社,1988
    93.曾千春,周开达.中国水稻杂种优势利用现状.中国水稻科学,2000,14(4):243~246
    94.张利华,王建军,李旭晨等.籼型三系杂交水稻主要农艺性状的配合力分析.浙江农业学报,2003,15(1):1~7
    95.张瑞祥.早籼稻育种现状及品质改良技术探讨.江西农业学报,2000,12(4):51~54
    96.张世煌.玉朱的杂种优势群和杂种优势模式.作物杂志,1998(增刊):84~85
    97.张毅,秦华,沈福成等.水稻株型性状的配合力分析.西南农业大学学报,2000,22(1):17~20
    98.赵炳然.杂交水稻分子育种研究进展.湖南农业科学,1996(2):9~10
    99.赵世绪.如何固定杂种优势[J].遗传与育种,1977(3):21~22
    100.周开达,马玉清,刘太清等.杂交水稻亚种间重穗型组合的选育——杂交水稻超高产育种的理论与实践.四川农业大学学报,1995,13(4):403~4079
    101.周开达,汪旭东.重穗型杂交水稻育种.成都:四川科技出版社,1997:1~65
    102.周开达,王旭东,李仕贵等.亚种间重穗型杂交稻研究.中国农业科学,1997,30(5):91~93
    103.周开达等.杂交水稻主要农艺性状配合力、遗传力的初步研究.作物学报,1982,8(3):145~152
    104.朱普年.我国杂交水稻研究进展概述.江西农业科技,2000(6):3~6
    105.朱旭东,陈红旗,闵绍楷.杂交稻米主要品质性状的遗传与改良.安徽农业科学,2001,29(4):426~429,436
    106.庄杰云,樊叶杨,吴建利等.水稻显性效应对水稻杂种优势的重要作用.中国科学(C辑),2001,Vol31(2):106~113
    107.庄巧生等译.植物育种学.农业出版社,1964
    108.佐藤尚雄.水稻超高产育种研究.国外农学·水稻,1984,(2):1~162

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700