工程车辆倾翻安全性动态仿真及试验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
论文结合国家“863”项目“工程车辆安全性数字化试验平台”和国家自然科学基金项目“非公路车辆倾翻安全技术研究”项目,对工程车辆倾翻动态过程进行了计算机仿真和试验研究,提出了倾翻保护结构的动态设计方法和新型倾翻保护结构设计方案。初步实现了工程车辆倾翻安全性的动态预测。
     论文综述了工程车辆倾翻安全性和保护结构的国内外研究现状。建立了装载机动态倾翻整车模型,基于几何非线性、材料非线性和接触碰撞理论,采用显式动态有限元法,进行车辆倾翻的动态仿真,分析了刚性坡面和柔性坡面车辆倾翻过程中其保护结构的动态响应。制作了装载机物理样机模型并进行了两种坡面倾翻试验,试验结果验证了基于整车的显示动态仿真方法的正确。并以某装载机为例,对不同倾角刚性坡面车体倾翻工况进行了计算机仿真,讨论了坡面倾角和摩擦系数对车辆倾翻过程中保护结构动态响应的影响规律,根据工程车辆多个倾翻工况的保护结构响应分析,获得了ROPS动态响应的若干规律在动态仿真基础上提出了倾翻保护结构的动态设计步骤,为保护结构的动态设计提供了依据。提出了新型诱导缓冲吸能倾翻保护结构,基于正交试验方法对其进行了优化设计。
     本文对工程车辆倾翻动态仿真、动态倾翻试验测试及其动态设计方法的研究结论,为工程车辆倾翻保护结构动态试验标准的制定提供了依据,提升了工程车辆安全性设计水平。
Engineering vehicles are widely used in the field of construction, mining, transportation, farmland water conservancy and so on, which is belonging to off-road vehicle. Because of the high deadweight, the abominable working environment and the descending stability, engineering vehicles are prone to rolling over during working, which may cause personal injury even death once the accident happens. When wheel loader is rolling over, the most effective method to protect the diver is equipping engineering vehicle with roll-over protective structure (called ROPS for short). This paper based on“Digital design platform of safty for Roll-over and Falling-object of engineering vehicles”and“Roll-over safty technology for road-off vehicle”, which supported by national 863 program and national natural science foundation program respectively. According to the key problems of dynamic test method and design method of ROPS, the dynamic response and the dynamic roll-over test method and the dynamic design method was discussed detailedly in this paper.
     According to characteristics of rolling engineering vehicles, the basic theory of dynamic response method of ROPS during rolling was discussed in this paper. Firstly the theories of geometric nonlinearity, material nonlinearity and contact nonlinearity of dynamic rolling response analysis were presented. Then according to the basic equations of explicit finite element method, the calculational accuracy and efficiency of the analysis were taken into consideration, such as the method of controlling time-step of explicit integration algorithm, the main algorithm of contact surface and the symmetric penalty function based on the contact force. The shell element which adapt to the impacted simulation of ROPS and the viscous damping hourglass-control method which adapt to the rolling simulation of ROPS were selected respectively.
     The method of analyzing dynamic rolling engineering vehicle was put forward in this paper. The finite element model of whole vehicle was established. Then the analysis in boundary conditions of typical rolling-over case was performed. According to the quantitative and qualitative comparisons among the kinetic energy, the impacted force of ROPS, the total internal energy, the internal energy of ROPS, the frictional energy, the deformation mode and the plastic hinge, the analyzed results can be summarized as following: rigid slope is more dangerous than tamped slope for engineering vehicle as the others conditions are the same; when engineering vehicle rolling over at the rigid slope and the tamped slope, the deformation modes of ROPS are the same but the positions of plastic hinge are different. Basing on these conclusions, the dynamic rolling simulation method of engineering vehicle ROPS was proposed in this paper.
     There are two types of test of ROPS: rolling test on site and test in the lab. Taking the economic status into consideration, the rolling test on site is impossible, so the dynamic test in the lab was performed basing on the model of wheel loader. Through the comparison between the results of test and computer simulation, we obtained conclusions that the computer simulation can simulate the rolling impacted force response of ROPS accurately and can obtain the formation law and the energy conservation of plastic hinge. The differences of material model and frictional coefficient resulted in deviation between the test results and the simulated results. Furthermore, the weld cracked during test, which was not taken into consideration during simulation and will be discuss in further research.
     The dynamic design method was proposed in this paper. According to the international standard of static test of ROPS, a four-post ROPS for a heavy wheel loader was developed. Then the static nonlinear test and the destructive test were performed, and the results showed that the ROPS could meet the static safety requirements of international standard. The dynamic rolling-over response analysises were performed in nine rolling-over cases. The simulated results showed that the wheel loader did not roll over more than 360°but slipped down to crash on the horizontal plane, except the case of which the inclination of slope is 45°and the frictional coefficient is 0.6. The wheel loader slipped down to crash on the horizontal plane in the case of which the frictional coefficient is 0.2 while the inclination of slope is 15°, and ROPS played a role to protect the driver. ROPS did not play a role while the inclination is 30°and 45°. While the inclination of slope is invariant, with increasing frictional coefficient, the impacted force of ROPS increased and the internal energy of ROPS increased respectively. The variation of internal energy is complicated while the frictional coefficient is invariant. When the frictional coefficient was set as 0.2, the internal energy is lowest while the inclination is 45°, and the internal energy is highest while the inclination is 30°. When the frictional coefficient was set as 0.4, the internal energy is lowest while the inclination is 15°, and the internal energy is highest while the inclination is 30°. When the frictional coefficient was set as 0.6, the internal energy increased with increasing inclination. So the deformation mode and the position and number of the plastic hinge are completely different in the two simulation method above.
     The strength, the stiffness and the energy of ROPS should be taken into consideration during designing the roll-over protect structure, and the energy design is the key point. In order to maximize the absorption of energy and prolong the acting time of impacted force, a new structure of ROPS which is easy to absorb the energy was proposed. Then the dynamic analysises in several cases were performed. Basing on the orthogonal test method, the energy absorbing structure was optimized. The results are as follows. (1) The inducing liners in the post and the beam could control the position of plastic hinge; (2) The new type of ROPS with absorbing structure could prolong the acting time of impacted force by 59.52 percent and reduce the acting time of peak force, while the carrying capacity of ROPS was invariant; (3) The peak of impacted force of new ROPS decreased by 2.84kN, and the maximum internal energy of ROPS increased by 14.97 percent; (4) The deformation of new ROPS was smaller than that of original ROPS; (5) For original ROPS, the positions of plastic hinge are different at different post, which are the same at the free end of inducing liner for new ROPS. That is to say, the inducing liners play a role in inducing deformation.
     The innovative points in this paper are as follows. (1) The roll-over safety daynamic simulation of engineering vehicles was performed in this paper, which according with the results of simulation proved that the simplification of model and the selection of elements were reasonable. The dynamic deformation mode of ROPS, the plastic hinge and the changing law of impacted force and internal energy of whole vehicle were discussed in this paper. (2) Several new laws of dynamic response of ROPS have been found by the research of dynamic response of whole vehicle. The engineering applications of a typical large wheel loader were performed, and a new method to develop ROPS of engineering vehicle was proposed based on dynamic design flow of ROPS. (3) A new ROPS with inducing liners was proposed. Meanwhile, the stiffness nearby the joints of ROPS and stiffeners has been improved. The contradiction between carrying capacity and energy absorption of ROPS has been solved by the energy absorbing structure.
     The results in this paper improved the theory of designing ROPS, which can provide theoretical basis and practical method for dynamic designing and testing. This paper has a great significance on improving of national engineering vehicle.
引文
[1] ISO3449: Earth-moving machinery--Falling-object protective structures--Laboratory tests and performance requirements [S].1992
    [2] ISO3471: Earth-moving machinery--Roll-over protective structures--Laboratory tests and performance requirements [S].1994
    [3] Robert M.Clarke and Joseph Mergel.Heavy truck occupant crash protection: a plan for investigating ways to improve it.SAE Paper 821270
    [4] Hard D.L., Myers J.R.and Gerberich S.G.Traumatic injuries in agriculture.Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health[J].2002, 8(01):51~65
    [5]于英,田晋跃,吴润才等.非公路车辆倾翻安全保护技术的研究[J].中国安全科学学报.2004, 14(06):60~62
    [6]曲守平,陆丛红,侯慕英,汪萍.ISO关于工程车辆倾翻和落物保护装置的概念与要求[J].农业工程学报,2002, 18(04):193~197
    [7] Bengt Springfeldtb.Rollover of tractors: international experiences[J].Safety Science.1996, 24(02): 95~110
    [8]茅仲文.扩大出口——增强中国工程机械发展后劲[J].工程机械,2005,36(04)
    [9]李冰,李自光.工程机械的发展机遇和趋势[J].筑路机械与施工机械化.2004, 21(04):4~6
    [10] Thelin.Rollover Fatalities: Nordic Perspectives[J].Journal of Agriculture Safety And Health.1998, 4(03): 157~160
    [11] ISO3164: Earth-Moving Machinery-Laboratory Evaluation of Roll-Over And Falling-Object Protective Structures-Specifications For Deflection-Limiting Volume[S].1995
    [12] Fritz Edward A., J.I.Case and William G.Switalski.Small Agricultural Tractor ROPS-New Operator Protective Zone[J].SAE Transactions.1991,100(02): 201-218
    [13] Neil K.Cooperrider.Testing and Analysis of Vehicle Roller Behavior.SAE Paper 90-0366
    [14]陆丛红.落物和倾翻保护装置(ROPS&FOPS)有限元分析及设计方法研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古工业大学, 2001
    [15] Karlinski J., Rusińskia E.and Smolnicki T.Protective structures for construction andmining machine operators [J].Automation in Construction.2008, 17(03): 232-244
    [16] Melvin L.Myers.Continuous overturn control of compactors/rollers by rollover protective structures [J].International Journal of Vehicle Safety.2008, 3(01): 45-59
    [17] Krishna N.Pai.Modeling of Roll Over Protective Structure and Falling Object Protective Structure Tests on a Composite Cabs for Skid Steer Loader[D].India: Bangalore University, 2001
    [18] Brown Clarence E., Olson David L., Woods Terrill W.Structural Modeling of ROPS under Dynamic Loading.SAE Paper 740798
    [19] David P.Thambiratnam, Brian J.Clark, Nimal J.Perera.Dynamic Response of a Rollover Protective Structure[J].Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering.2008, 23(06): 448-464
    [20] Thambiratnam D.P., Clark B.J., Perera N.J.Performance of a rollover protective structure for a bulldozer[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics.2009, 135(01): 31-40
    [21] Busatti, R.Paoluzzi.Application of digital gauging system for ROPS test.Second International Conference on Management Information Systems Incorporating GIS & Remote Sensing.2000: 303-311
    [22] Ayers P.D., Dickson M., Warner S.Model to evaluate Roll Over Protective Structure (ROPS)Testing[J].1994, 37(06): 1763-1768
    [23] Babu B.N.Qualifying the Brittle Fracture Ressitance of ROPS and FORPS Steels.SAE Paper 1979
    [24] Adam M.Gillispie.Optimization of a Roll Over Protective Structure (ROPS) Using Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis [D].USA: Virginia University, 2000
    [25] Bengt Springfeldt.Rollover Tractors—International Experiences[J].Safety Science.1996, 24(02): 95-166
    [26] Cheryl Tevis.Adding Roll Bars Saves Lives[J].Successful Farming.2002, 100(2): 28-31
    [27] Stephen J.Reynolds,William Groves.Effectiveness of Roll-Over Protective Structures in Reducing Farm Tractor Fatalities[J].American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2000, 18(05) 63-69
    [28] Wang X.Modification and evaluation of continuous roll prediction model for front drive mowers[D].USA: The University of Tennessee, 2005
    [29] J.Mangado, J.Arana, C.Jaren, S.Arazuri, P.Arnal.Design Calculation on Roll-Over Protective Structures for Agricultural Tractors[J].Biosystems Engineering.2007, 96(02): 181-191
    [30] Wilkins J.R., Engelhardt H.L., Bean T.L., Byers M.V.& Crawford J.M.Prevalence of ROPS--equipped tractors and farm/farmer characteristics[J].Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health.2003, 9(02): 107-118
    [31] Kim T.H., Reid S.R.Multiaxial Softening Hinge Model For Tubular Vehicle Roll-Over Protective Structures[J].International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.2001, 43(9): 2147-2170
    [32] Khaled Alkhaledi.Adavanced Generation NIOSH Automatically Deploydble Rollover Protective Structure (AutoROPS) [D].USA: Virginia University, 2002
    [33] Busatti, R.Paoluzzi.Application of digital gauging system for ROPS test.Second International Conference on Management Information Systems Incorporating GIS & Remote Sensing.2000
    [34] Xinyan Wang, Paul Ayers, Robert S.Comer.Modification and Evaluation of Continuous Roll Prediction Model for Front Drive Mowers[J] . Dissertation Abstracts International.2005, 67(02): 1006
    [35] Etherton John R., Ronaghi Mahmood, Current Richard S.Development of a pultruded FRP composite material ROPS for farm tractors[J].Composite Structures.2007, 78(02): 162-169
    [36] Khaled Alkhaledi.Adavanced Generation NIOSH Automatically Deploydble Rollover Protective Structure (AUTOROPS) [D].USA, Virginia University, 2002
    [37] Srivastava A.K., Rehkugler G.E., Masemore B.J.Similitude modeling of ROPS overturn tests.ASAE Paper 1976
    [38] Rollen G.Easter.Analytical prediction of ROPS static elastic-plastic behavior.Experimental Mechanics.1977, 17(02): 77-80
    [39] Woodward J.L., Swan S.ROPS field performance-status report.SAE Paper 800679
    [40] Yeh Rudolph E.Elements of ROPS Engineering.American Society for Metals.1976,7: 76-46
    [41] Clark Brian J., Thambiratnam David P., Perera Nimal J.Analytical and experimentalinvestigation of the behaviour of a rollover protective structure[J] . The Structure Engineer.2006, 84(01): 29-34
    [42] Rikard Sv?rd.Factors Affecting the Finite Element Simulation of a ROPS Test of a Volvo Cab[D].Sweden: Linkoping University, 2007
    [43] Altamore P., Tomas J.A., Tran H., et al.Static and Dynamic Simulation of ROPS for Earth Moving Machinery.SAE Paper 961286
    [44] Altamore P., Tomas J.A., Tran H., et al.Static and Dynamic Simulation of ROPS for Earth Moving Machinery . 47th Earthmoving Industry Conference and Exposition.Peoria, Illinois, USA, 1996
    [45] http://www.sae.org/servlets/works/committeeHome.do?comtID=TC127
    [46] John Etherton, E.A.Mckenzie, Jr., Tim Lutz, Doug Cantis & Tsui-Ying Kau.An initial farmer evaluation of a NIOSH AutoROPS prototype[J].International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.2004, 34(03): 155-165
    [47] Liu J.H., Jones N.Dynamic response of a rigid plastic clamped beam struck by a mass at any point on the span[J].International journal of solids and structures.1988, 24(03): 251-270
    [48] Stephen M.Werner, Robert E.Larson.Heavy truck rollover crashworthiness: Testing methods and development of recommended practices.SAE paper 2000-01-0467
    [49] Jones N., Gomes de Oliveira J.The influence of rotatory inertia and transverse shear on the dynamic plastic behavior of beams[J].Journal of Applied Mechanics.1997, 46(02): 303-310
    [50] Stephen A.Swan.Rollover protective structure (ROPS) performance criteria for large mobile mining equipment[D].USA: Bur of Mines, 1988
    [51] Zhu Y.Y., Cescoto S.Unified and mixed formulation of the 8-node hexahedral elements by assumed strain method[J] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.1996, 129(01-02): 177-209
    [52] Franklin, RC; Stark, KL; Fragar, L.Intervention strategies for the retro-fitment of Rollover Protective Structures (ROPS) and fleet characteristic, farm tractors [J].Safety Science.2006(11) : 771-783
    [53] Li K.P., Cescotto S.An 8-node brick element with mixed formulation for largedeformation analyses[J].Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.1997, 141(01-02): 157-204
    [54] Etherton J.R., Cutlip R.G., Harris J.R., Ronaghi M., Means K.H.& Gillispie A.Static Load Test Performance of a Telescoping Structure for an Automatically Deployable ROPS.Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health.2002, 8(01): 119-126
    [55] Busatti, R.Paoluzzi.Application of digital gauging system for ROPS test.Second International Conference on Management Information Systems Incorporating GIS & Remote Sensing.2000
    [56] Franklin Richard C., Stark Kerri-Lynn, Fragar Lyn.Intervention strategies for the retro-fitment of Rollover Protective Structures(ROPS) and fleet characteristic, farm tractors, farm tractors.[J] Safety Science.2006, 44(9): 771-783
    [57] Edward A., Fritz J.I.Case, William G.Switalskl.Small Agricultural Tractor Rops New Operator Protective Zone.SAE Paper 91-1782
    [58] Fritz Edward A., Case J.I., Switalski William G.Small agricultural tractor ROPS-new Operator Protective Zone.SAE Transactions.1991, 100(2): 201-218
    [59] May, J J; Sorensen, J A; Burdick, P A, et al.Rollover protection on New York tractors and farmers' readiness for change[J].J Agric Saf Health.2006(8) : 199-213
    [60] Liu J., Wang D., Yao L.A Contact Force Model in the Dynamic Analysis of Contactable Crack[J].Acta Mechanical Solida Sinica.1993, 6(04): 49-452
    [61] Stephen M.Werner, Robert E.Larson.Heavy truck rollover crashworthiness: Testing methods and development of recommended practices[J].SAE paper 2000-01-0467
    [62] Sorensen J.A., May J., Ostby-Malling R., et al.Encouraging the installation of rollover protective structures in New York State: the design of a social marketing intervention[J].Sacndinavian Journal of public health.2008, 36(08): 859-869
    [63] Silleli H., Dayioglu M.A., Gultekin A.et al.Anchor mechanism to increase the operator clearance zone on narrow-track wheeled agricultural tractors: Stadic and field upset test results[J].Biosystems Engineering.2008, 99(2): 196-204
    [64] Jacek Karliński, Eugeniusz Rusińskia, Tadeusz Smolnicki.Protective structures for construction and mining machine operators [J].Automation in Construction: 2008, 17(3): 232-244
    [65] Mark A.Purschwitz.Roll-over protective structures: Facing the continuing challenges of retrofitting[J] . American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting.2008: 1595-1604
    [66] Mangado, J; Arana, JI; Jaren, C, et al.Design calculations on roll-over protective structures for agricultural tractors[J].Biosystems Engineering, 2007(2): 181-191
    [67] Hahn Youngwon, Hulbert Gregory M., Ma Zheng-Dong, Kikuchi Noboru.Rollover case study simulation for HMMWV military vehicle.Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC, 2007
    [68] Hu Y., Neal-Sturgess C.E., Hassan A.M.Simulation of vehicle kinematics in rollover tests with quaternions[J].Journal of Automobile Engineering.2006, 220(11): 1503-1513
    [69] Lei G., Bao C.Y., Liu X.J.Finite Element Analysis of Head-Ground Collision: International Workshop on Modelling.Hong Kong, China, 2008
    [70] Teo Ee Chon, Zhang Qing Hang, Huang Russel C.Finite element analysis of head-neck kinematics during motor vehicle accidents: Analysis in multiple planes[J].Medical Engineering and Physics.2007, 29(1): 54-60
    [71] Kleiven S.Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure.[J] International Journal of Crashworthiness.2006, 11(1): 65-79
    [72] Kimpara Hideyuki, Iwamoto Masami, Watanabe Isao, Miki Kazuo, Lee Jong B., Yang King H., King Albert I.Effect of assumed stiffness and mass density on the impact response of the human chest using a three-dimensional FE model of the human body[J].Journal of Biomechanical Engineering.2006, 128(5): 772-776
    [73] Teng Tso-Liang, Chang Kuan-Chun, Wu Chien-Hsun.Development and validation of side-impact crash and sled testing finite-element models[J] . Vehicle System Dynamics.2007, 45(10): 925-937
    [74] Majumder Santanu, Roychowdhury Amit, Pal Subrata.Three-dimensional finite element simulation of pelvic fracture during side impact with pelvis-femur-soft tissue complex.[J] International Journal of Crashworthiness.2008, 13(3): 313-329
    [75] Karlsson Ulf B., Ringsberg Jonas W., Johnson Erland, Hoseini Mohammed, UlfvarsonAnders.Experimental and numerical investigation of bulb impact with a ship side-shell structure[J].Marine Technology.2009,46(1): 16-26
    [76] Bhatti Abdul Qadir, Kishi Norimitsu, Mikami Hiroshi, Ando Tomohiro.Elasto-plastic impact response analysis of shear-failure-type RC beams with shear rebars[J].Materials and Design.2009, 30(3): 502-510
    [77] Astier V.Thollon L., Arnoux P.J., Mouret F., Brunet Pr.C.Development of a finite element model of the shoulder: Application during a side impact[J].International Journal of Crashworthiness.2008, 13(03): 301-312
    [78] Shen Weixin, Niu Yuqing, Mattrey Robert F., Fournier Adam, Corbeil Jackie, Kono Yuko, Stuhmiller James H.Development and validation of subject-specific finite element models for blunt trauma study[J].Journal of Biomechanical Engineering.2008, 130(2)
    [79] Hu Jingwen, Ma Chunsheng, Yang King H., Chou Clifford C., King Albert I., McCoy Robert W., Chen Roger J.Development of a finite element model for simulation of rollover crashes . [J] ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition.2008, 16: 423-432
    [80] Jeffrey L.Evens, Batzer Stephen A., Andrews Stanley B.and Hooker Robert M.Evaluation of heavy truck rollover crashworthiness.Transportation.2005: 91-96
    [81] Chen T., Chirwa E.C., Mao M.and Latchford J.Rollover far side roof strength test and simulation.International Journal of Crashworthiness.2007, 12(01): 29-39
    [82] GB/T 17771-1999:土方机械落物保护结构实验室试验和性能要求[S]
    [83] GB17772-1999:土方机械─保护结构实验室鉴定挠曲极限量的规定[S]
    [84] JB6030-2001:工程机械-通用安全技术要求[S]
    [85] GB/T 19930-2005:土方机械小型挖掘机倾翻保护结构的实验室试验和性能要求[S]
    [86] GB/T 19932-2005:土方机械液压挖掘机司机防护装置的实验室试验和性能要求[S]
    [87] http://www.sactc334.com/
    [88]贡凯军,诸文农,杨庆佛.倾翻保护装置性能试验和侧向加载时挠度的塑性计算方法[J].机械工程学报,1996,32(3):47-50
    [89]贡凯军.倾翻和落物保护装置(ROPS&FOPS)性能试验和非线性设计理论研究[D].长春:吉林工业大学,1995
    [90]刘伟等.轮式装载机倾翻保护结构的试验技术[J],工程机械,1992(3):16~18
    [91]曹刚.推土机、装载机、驾驶室防倾翻装置用钢的试制研究[J].鞍钢技术, 1999,(02)
    [92]陈之立,邢玉玺.工程机械倾翻保护结构塑性分析及优化设计[J].工程机械, 1990,(04)
    [93]沈玉凤,程治保.ROPS/FOPS弹塑性变形计算方法的研究[J].山东工程学院学报, 2000,(03)
    [94]沈玉凤.工程车辆ROPS/FOPS弹塑性临界状态研究[J].山东工程学院学报, 2002,(03)
    [95]陈燎.工程机械安全框架立柱的非对称弯曲强度研究[J].江苏理工大学学报, 2001,(02)
    [96]王继新,王国强,刘小光.小型装载机倾翻保护结构性能非线性仿真与试验[J].中国机械工程, 2006,(13)
    [97]王继新.工程车辆倾翻保护结构设计方法与试验研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2006
    [98]赵登峰,王国强,许纯新,李欣.工程车辆ROPS有限元分析及试验研究[J].工程机械, 2003,(06)
    [99]赵红伟,陈潇凯,林逸.农用车倾翻保护结构非线性有限元分析[J].农机化研究, 2008,(10)
    [100]冯素丽.工程车辆落物和倾翻保护结构性能计算机仿真及试验研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2007
    [101]徐惠贤,张立意,高晔.装载机倾翻和落物保护装置的有限元分析[J].矿山机械, 2004,(03)
    [102]于向军,王继新,杨永海,林建荣,蒋拓.压路机安全驾驶室ROPS非线性数值模拟与试验[J].吉林大学学报(工学版), 2008,(S2)
    [103]王继新,王国强,刘小光,林建荣.ZL80G装载机倾翻保护结构侧向加载塑性极限特性[J].吉林大学学报(工学版), 2006,(06)
    [104]葛树文,崔国华,马若丁.基于能量吸收控制的工程车辆倾翻保护结构设计方法[J].煤炭学报, 2008,(01)
    [105]江建,张文明.安全驾驶室倾翻保护结构的有限元分析[J].农业工程学报, 2008,(02)
    [106]杜文靖,王国强,冯素丽,葛树文.土方机械倾翻保护结构计算机仿真及试验[J].中国工程机械学报, 2006,(01)
    [107]刘南才.轮式装载机驾驶室司机安全保护结构试验(1)[J].工程机械, 2005,(07)
    [108]王继新,王国强,刘小光,林建荣.振动压路机安全驾驶室ROPS侧向加载特性研究[J].建筑机械, 2006,(03)
    [109]池智,王金华.轮式装载机ROPS&FOPS有限元分析研究[J].建设机械技术与管理, 2006,(12)
    [110]刘小光,王继新.装载机ROPS侧向加载计算机仿真方法[J].建筑机械, 2006,(17)
    [111]杜文靖,崔国华,李志波,杨涛.工程车辆倾翻保护结构性能试验失效机理分析[J]矿山机械, 2007,(07)
    [112]冯素丽,王国强,杜文靖,葛树文.液压挖掘机保护结构计算机仿真与实验[J]中国工程机械学报.2006,(01)
    [113]王国强,刘新岩,杨彬,林建容.液压挖掘机司机保护装置性能要求和试验方法[J]建筑机械.2004,(06)
    [114]陈龙,王锦雯,周孔亢.农林车辆安全驾驶室碰撞的数值模拟[J].农业工程学报,
    [115]师昌绪,钟群鹏,李成功.中国材料大典第一卷材料工程基础[M].北京:化学工业出版社.2005
    [116]毛坚强,丁桂彪.变形体的虚功原理及其在求解接触问题中的应用[J].西南交通大学学报, 2002, 37(3)
    [117]周长城,胡仁喜,熊文波.ANSYS11.0基础与典型范例[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2007
    [118]何涛等编.ANSYS 10.0/LS-DYNA非线性有限元分析实例指导教程[M].北京:机械工业出版社.2007
    [119]刘小苹,谢春生,秦孟兆.穿甲机理的数值研究[J].力学学报,1990,3:318-327
    [120]李德元,徐国荣,水鸿寿.二维非定常流体力学数值方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1987
    [121]冯其京,何长江,宫晓静.三维多介质欧拉流体力学数值方法中的混合网格界面处理[J].爆炸与冲击.1997,17增刊:23-32
    [122] Youngs D L , Time dependent multi-material flow with large fluid distortion[A].Morton K W, Baines M J.Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics[M],1982: 273-285
    [123]何长江,于志鲁,冯其京.高速碰撞的三维欧拉数值模拟方法[J].爆炸与冲击1999, 19(3)
    [124]陈希哲.土力学地基基础[M].北京:清华大学出版社
    [125]卢廷浩.土力学[M].南京:河海大学出版社
    [126]葛树文.轿车侧面碰撞安全性能计算机仿真及试验研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2007
    [127]同济大学.铲土运输机械[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1987
    [128]李国强,刘玉姝.钢结构框架体系整体非线性分析研究综述[J].同济大学学报,2003,2(314):138-143
    [129]魏中峰.框架结构梁中塑性铰的设置[J].建筑技术与应用,2002,4:39-40
    [130]蔡益燕.考虑塑性铰外移的钢框架梁柱连接设计[J].建筑结构,2004,2:3-5
    [131] Baaten W.Numerical Simulation of the crashworthiness of longitudinal members for different collision situations[J].Internai report.2004, 15(04)
    [132]任露泉.试验优化设计与分析(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004
    [133]《正交试验法》编写组.正交试验法[M].国防工业出版社,1976

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700