利用GI技术对粗饲料进行科学搭配及绵羊日粮配方系统优化技术的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本试验根据卢德勋(2002)提出的粗料分级指数(GI)和优化饲养设计,采用体外(In Vitro)、体内(In Vivo)相结合的方法,研究了粗饲料分级指数GI、不同粗饲料和粗料-精料间的组合效应,并利用粗饲料分级指数进行粗饲料间的科学搭配和筛选,同时结合组合效应综合指数(MFAEI)在最佳粗料配方的基础上进行了优化精料配方的组合和筛选的研究。最后以动物的生产性能及消化代谢为检测手段对优化配方设计的有效性进行了比较研究。旨在为反刍动物的优化饲养设计及粗饲料的科学利用提供一个技术依据。
     1.几种常用粗饲料GI指数的测定
     采用Tilley和Terry(1963)两级离体消化法测定了四种粗料的代谢能值(ME)。选取16只健康状况良好,体重为20-25Kg健康良好的内蒙古半细毛羯羊,按体重随机分为四组,进行自由采食量的测定。对本试验所选四种粗饲料草成分分析可得出:沙打旺属于三级豆科草,品质处于中下水平。羊草属于中等禾本科草,而玉米秸和谷草品质属于优质秸秆粗饲料。通过实测得出四种粗饲料的GI值分别为:沙打旺:36.99;羊草:15.90;玉米秸:7.22;谷草:3.98。GI对四种粗饲料品质的分级次序为沙打旺>羊草>玉米秸>谷草。
     2.不同粗饲料间组合效应的研究
     应用体外批次培养法,研究了粗-粗以及粗-精料间的组合效应。试验结果表明,单种粗料与同一精料搭配后(7:3)发生了明显的正组合效应,尤以羊草+精料组为佳,多项组合效应指标MFAEI(multiple-factors associative effect index)为1.11,其次为沙打旺(MFAEI:0.76)和玉米秸(MFAEI:0.71),谷草的MFAEI最小为0.43。在不同粗料混合以后与同一精料(7:3)搭配同样产生了明显的正组合效应。当羊草、玉米秸、谷草分别以50%的比例替代沙打旺时,相对于100%的沙打旺来说,尤其以(玉米秸+沙打旺)+精料(35:35:30)组(MFAEI:0.51)和(谷草+沙打旺)+精料(35:35:30)组(MFAEI:0.37)这两组组合效应值较大,而(羊草+沙打旺)+精料(35:35:30)组(MFAEI:0.24)较小。同样相对于100%的羊草、玉米秸及谷草也发生了明显的正组合效应。MFAEI依大小次序排列为谷草/沙打旺(1.00)、羊草/沙打旺(0.72)、玉米秸/沙打旺(0.70)。
     3.混合粗料优化配方筛选
     应用体外批次培养法,对GI优化粗料配方进行了筛选。试验结果表明:粗料的GI值与其体外消化率存在明显的正相关,回归方程为
    
     利用G!技术对粗饲料进行科学指配及绵羊日用配方系统优化技术的研究
    Y=0.815X+15.392(R‘=0.6785,P<0.0001,n=IS)。将配方的 GI、成本、体
    外发酵指标进行综合评定,从中选出一个最佳的粗料配方,即羊草:玉米秸:
    沙打旺为 10:50:40,此配方 GI值为 20刀0,价格为 0石3元略
    4.优化混合粗料为基础的精料配方设计与应用
     应用体外批次培养法,在试验三的基础上,进一步筛选与该粗料组合最
    佳搭配的精料配方。在固定 SC/NSC比例为 1.17的基础上,在 0.49~0.80
    的范围内调整精料组成及比例。试验结果表明:UDP/RDP为0石0时的MFAEI
    最大为 0.64,为所求取的最佳粗、精组合,价格为 0.83元/kg。
    5.优化日粮配方生产性能及消化代谢的比较研究
     选用 8只健康状况良好平均体重为 40.9!上 1.13Kg的内蒙半细毛揭羊,
    随机分为2组,分别饲以所选优化粗、精组合及本试验基地青干草搭配该种
    精料吓:C,7:3人 试验结果表明氮代谢各指标,青干草组都有优于优化
    混合粗料组的趋势,而各项指标差异均不显著(P>o.05人 而优化混合粗料
    组的**二优于青干草组,但差异不显著(P>0.05)。两组日粮对绵羊的体增
    重影响不显著(P>o.05L 但优化混合粗料组有高于青干草组的趋势。优化
    混合粗料组的饲料报酬及饲养成本兼优于青干草组,每公斤增重成本降低了
    4.62元。
Based on forage grading index ( GI) and the optimum ration design putting forward by Prof.Dexun-Lu in 2002 ,the experiments were conducted (1) to determine GI ,and to evaluate the associative effects existed between different forages or between concentrate and forage; (2) to design and select the optimum mixed forage formulation by GI, and then a appropriate concentrate matching with the forage mixture in terms with the maximum of multiple-factors associative effects index (MFAEI) , both In Vitro and In Vivo.And a comparative study between the selected ration formula and medium quality hays supplemented with the selected concentrate (F:C,7:3 ) was made to determine the responses of animal performance and nitrogen retention.
    Exp 1. The determination of GI to four forages
    The ME of the four forages were determined by Tilley and Terry ( 1963) technique.Sixteen healthy Inner Mongolian semi-fine wool sheep weighting 20-25Kg were divided into 4 groups randomly and given the four forage respectively for voluntary intake determination .Through the calculation of the two experiments' data , the GI of the four forages was obtained.They are Astrgalus adsurgens (legume )( AA) :36.99(MJ);Zeym? chinensis (Trin. )Tzvel. (Gramineae ) ( LC ) :15.90(MJ);Corn straw ( CS ) :7.22(MJ);Rice straw (RS) :3.98(MJ). And the quality order of the four forages evaluated by GI is Astrgalus adsurgens > Leymus chinensis (Trin. ) Tzvel > Corn straw > Rice straw.
    Exp 2. The study of the associative effects among the feedstuffs
    Based on in vitro batch incubation, The associative effects existed between different forages or between forage and a concentrate (C) were studied. We observed the significantly positive associative effects when the each four forages incubated mixed the same concentrate in the In Vitro trail (F:C is 7:3) . Especially the LC,which MFAEI (1.11) is the highest;the next is the AA ,MFAEI is 0.76 and CS is 0.71 ;The last is the RS,which MFAEI is 0.43. The positive associative effects also found when the different forage mixtures mixed with the
    
    
    same concentrate in comparison with the single forage supplemented with the same concentrate .When the LC> CS and RS substituted the AA as 50% respectively ,the positive associative effects occurred compared with AA as 100%.Especially (CS+AA)+C as (35:35:30) (CH) has the biggest MFAEI (0.51);(RS+AA)+C (35:35:30) (RH) MFAEI was the next(0.37) and MFAEI of (LC+AA)+C (LH) was 0.24. These mixtures also appeared significantly positive associative compared with LCU CS and RS as 100%,respectively.The MFAEI of RH> LH and CH is 1.00> 0.72 and 0.70.
    Exp 3. The selection of the optimum mixed forage fomulation
    Based on in vitro batch incubation, the selection of the optimum mixed forage formulations was made.The results of the experiment showed that there was significantly correlationship between GI(M.T) (X) and it's IVDOM (%) (Y) . The regression equation obtained were showed as follows:
    Y=0.815X+15.392 (R2=0.6785,P < 0.0001,n=18) .
    According to GI, the feed cost and the In Vitro degradation indexes of the mixed forage formula comprehensively , one optimum formula was selected out .They were LC:CS:AA (10:50:40) , with GI 20.00 (MJ) and cost of 0.63 /kg.
    Exp 4. The design and selection of the most appropriate concentrate formula matched with the optimum forage mixture
    Based on the results obtained from the Exp 3, a further selection of a proper concentrate for the mixed forage formula by In Vitro was carried out.Keeping the SC/NSC as 1.17, the proportion of UDP/RDP in the range of 0.49-0.80 was regulated. The second formula was chosen ( UDP/RDP:0.60) as the most appropriate concentrate formula according to the maximum of the MFAEI (0.64).
    Exp 5. The comparative study of animal performance and nitrogen retention between the selected ration formula and the medium quality hay
    Based on the results of Exp3 and 4,eight healthy Inner Mongolian semi-fine wool sheep weighting 40.91+1.13Kg were divided into 2 groups randomly and given the optimum selected formulation and medium qual
引文
1 FAO. FAO Production Yearbook, 1995. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 1996.
    2 Coupland, R.T. (1992) Approach and generalizations. In: Coupland, R.T. (ed.) NaturalGrasslands. Introduction and Western Hemisphere. Ecosystems of the World SA, Elsevier,Amsterdam, pp. 1-6.
    3 Atta-Krah, A.N. Trees and shrubs as secondary components of pasture. In: Proceedingsof the ⅩⅦ International Grassland Congress, 8-21 February 1993, Palmerston North,New Zealand. New Zealand Grassland Association, Palmerston North, 1993.pp. 2045 - 2052.
    4 Kossila, V.L. Location and potential feed use. In: Sundstφl, F. and Owen, E. (eds).Straw and Other Fibrous By-products as Feed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.pp. 4 - 24.
    5 卢德勋.乳牛营养技术精要,华西希望集团.2001年动物营养学术研讨会论文集.2001.
    6 Fitzhugh, H.A., Hodgson, H.J., Scoville, O.J., Nguyen, T.D. and Byerly, T.C. (1978) TheRole of Ruminants in Support of Man: Winrock Report. Winrock Foundation, Morrilton,Arkansas.
    7 Allen,M.S. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber [J]. Dairy Sci. 1997,80:1447-1462.
    8 Barney Harris,Jr. The importance of fiber in feeding dairy cattle.[OL].Edis. Cooperrative Extension Service Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences University of Florida..2002. 11 Gutteridge, R.C. (ed.) Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford.1994.
    9 Swain, S. M., and L. E. Armentano. Quantitative evaluation of fiber from nonforage sources used to replace alfalfa silage. J. Dairy Sci,1998.77:2318-2331.
    10 Vaughan, K, K., S. M. Swain, S. M., and L. E. Armentano. Effectiveness of NDF from ground corn cobs and wheat middlings compared to alfalfa silage. J.Dairy Sci.74 (Suppl.1):220 (Abstr.).
    11 Clark, P. W., and L. E. Armentano. Effectiveness of neutral deter-gent fiber in whole cottonseed and dried distillers grains compaired with alfalfa haylage. J.Dairy Sci. 1993.76:2644-2650.
    12 Clark, P. W., and L. E. Armentano. Replacement of alfalfa neutral detergent fiber with a combination of nonforage fiber sources. 1997. J.Dairy Sci.80:675-680
    13 Mertens, D. R. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cow. 1997.
    
    J.Dairy Sci.80:1463-1481.
    14 Ledgard S. F.,Penno J.W. and Sprosen M. S. Nitrogen inputs and losses from clover/grass pastures grazed by dairy cow, as affected by nitrogen fertilizer, 1999. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 132:215-225.
    15 吴克谦.秸秆饲料的利用与营养评价的研究.动物营养研究进展[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1996.268-273.
    16 邢廷铣等.中国水稻秸秆饲料营养价值特性的研究畜牧兽医学报,1994.25(1):31~40.
    17 Rick Grant, Bruce Anderson and Rick Rasby Testing livestock feeds for beef cattle, dairy cattle, sheep and horses. G89-915-A. http://www.ianr.unl.edu/pubs/range/g915.htm. (Revised April 1997).
    18 Collins,M,Composition and fiber digestion in morphological components of an alfalfa-timothy sward, J. Anim. Feed. Sci.Tech. 1988, 19: 135-143.
    19 Ball,D M.,M Collins.,G D Lacefield.,N P Martin.,D A Mertens et al,Understanding forage quality 2001 American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01,Park Ridge, Ⅱ.
    20 Blaster, R., R. C. Hammes, Jr.,J. P. Fontenot, H. T. Bryant, C. E. Polan, D. D. Wolf, F. S. McClaugherty, R. G. Klein, and J. S. Moore. 1986. Forage-animal manageent systems, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Bulletin 86-7.
    21 Stone J B.,G W Trimberger,C R Henderson,J T Reid,Forage intake and efficiency of feed utilization in dairy cattle,J.Diary Sci 1960,43: 1275-1281
    22 Collins,M,Wetting and maturity effects on the yield and quality of legume hay. Agron,J, 1983,75: 523-527.
    23 Verma, L, and B.D. NELson. Changes in round bales during storge. Trans. ASAE, 1983, 26:328-332.
    24 Jung, H.G. and Allen, M.S. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science, 1995, 73:2774-2790.
    25 Offer, N.W., Percival, D.S., Dewhurst, R.J. and Thomas, C. Prediction of the voluntary intake potential of grass silage by sheep and dairy cows from laboratory silage measurements.Animal Science, 1998, 66, 357 - 367.
    26 Deaville, E.R. and Flinn, P.C. Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy: An alternative approach for the estimation of forage quality and voluntary intake. In:D.I. Givens, E. Owen, R.F.E. Axford and H.M. Omed (Editors), Forage Evaluationin Ruminant Nutrition. CAB International, Wallingford, 2000, pp. 301-320.
    27 Beever, D.E. and Mould, F.L. Forage evaluation for efficient ruminant livestock
    
    production. In: D.I. Givens, E. Owen, R.F.E. Axford and H.M.Omed (Editors), Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. CABI Publishing,Wallingford, UK, 2000, pp. 15-42.
    28 Reeves Ⅲ, J.B. Use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. In:J.P.F. D'Mello (Editors), Farm animal metabolism and nutrition. CAB International, Wallingford, 2000, pp. 185-207.
    29 Gill M, C Powell. Prediction of associative effect of mixing feed [R]. FAO: International Conference on Animal Production with Local Resources [J].1993. 393-405.
    30 Haddad S G. Associative effects of supplementing barley straw diets with alfalfa hay on rumen enviroment and nutrient intake and digestibility for ewes Animal Feed Sci Technol, 2000, 87: 163-171.
    31 Mould F L, E R φrskov, S O Mann. Associative effects of mixed feeds I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 1983, 10: 15-30.
    32 卢德勋.反刍动物营养调控理论及应用[J].内蒙古畜牧科学,1993,(特刊).
    33 Mould F L. Associative effects of feeds [A]. In: E R φrskov (ed), World Anim Sci B_4, Feed Sci Elservier [M], Amsterdam. 1988. 279-292.
    34 Huhtanen. Associative effects of feeds in ruminants [J]. Norwegian J Agric Sci, 1991 (Suppl. 5): 37-57.
    35 Uden P . Digestibity and digestra retention in dairy cows receiving hay or silage at varying concerntratelevels [J]. Animal Feed Sci Tecbnol, 1984, 11: 279-291.
    36 卢德勋.饲料的组合效应[A].见张子仪中国饲料学 [M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.289-294.
    37 Liu J X, J A Ye, H W Ye. Effects of supplementary Chinese milk-vetch silage on the growth rate of cattle and their intake of ammoniated rice straw [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 1997, 65: 79-86.
    38 Ye J A, J x Liu. The effects of ammoniated rice straw diets supplementary Chinese milk-vetch silage and rapeseed meal on the performance and microflora in sheep [J]. Livest Res for Rural Dev, 1997, 8(4): 45-52.
    39 Wu Y M, J X Liu, Z M Chen. Effects of supplementary Chinese milk-vetch silage and replace rapeseed meal on performance and rumen fermentation of lambs given ammoniated rice straw based diet. Asian-Aust [J]. J Anim Sci, 1998, 11(4): 455-461
    40 Jaakkola S & P Huhtanen. The response to cellulose treatment of silage and replacement of barley by unmolassed sugar beer pulp in the diets of growing cattle [J]. Acta Agric Scand, 1990, 40: 415-426.
    
    
    41 Thomas C & J T Rae, Concentrate supplementation of silage for diary cows [A]. In: P C Garnsworhty (ed), Nutrition and Lactation in the Diary Cow [M]. Butterworths, london, 1988. 327-354.
    42 Rooke J A, N H Lee, D G Armstrong. The effects of intralruminal infusions of urea, casein, glucose syrup and a mixture of glucose syrup and casein on nitrogen digestion in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage diets [J].Br J Nutr, 1987, 57: 89-98.
    43 φrskov E R, &N A Macleod. Dietary-induced thermogenesis and feed evaluation in ruminants [J]. Proc Nutr Soc, 1990, 49: 227-237.
    44 MacRae J C&G E Lobery, Some factors which influence thermal energy losses during the metabolism of ruminants [J]. Livest. Prod. Sci, 1982, 9: 447-456.
    45 Gill M, D E Beer, P J Buttery, et al. The effect of oestradiol-17β implantation on the response in voluntary intake, live weight gain and body composition, to fish mill supplementation of sillage offered to growing cows [J]. J Agric Sci (Camb), 1987, 108: 9-16.
    46 Madrid J, F Hernandez, M A Pulgar, et al. In vivo digestibility of treated and untreated barly straw: results of direct and by difference digestibility trials [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 1997, 65: 129-138.
    47 Mendoza G D, R A Britton, R A Stock. Rumen fermentation and in situ starch digestion with high moisture corn, dry rolled grain sorghum or a mixture of these grains [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 1998, 74: 329-335.
    48 Liu J X, Yah B, Yao J, et al. Effects of mulberry leaves to replace rapeseed meal on performance of sheep feeding on ammoniated rice straw diet [J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2001, 39(2) 131-136.
    49 Menke K H, H Steingass. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid [J]. Anim Res Dev, 1988, 28: 7-55.
    50 Getachew G, M Blümmel, H P S Makkar, et al. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 1998, 72:261-281.
    51 Prasad C S, C D Wood, K T Sampath. Use of in vitro gas production to evaluate rumen fermentation of untreated and urea treated finger millet straw supplemented with different levels of concentrate [J]. J Sci Food Agric, 1994, 65: 457-464.
    52 Wood C D, B Mnyuchi. Use of an in vitro gas production method to investigate interactions between veld hay and Napier hay or groundnut hay supplements [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 1997, 65: 265-278.
    
    
    53 Liu J X, A Susenbeth, K H Südekum. In vitro gas production measurements to evaluate interactions between untreated and chemically treated rice straws, grass hay, and mulberry leaves [J]. Animal Sci, 2002, 80: 517-524.
    54 Blümmel M, H Steingass, K Becker The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield, 15N incorporation and its imp[J]. Br. J Nutr, 1997, 77: 911-921.
    55 吴跃明,苏海涯,刘建新.反刍动物日粮中桑叶与饼粕类饲料间组合效应的研究[R].待发表.2002.
    56 Mohammed O E, LD Satter, R R Grummer, et al.Influence of dietary cottonseed and soybean on milk production and composition [J].J Dairy Sci, 1988, 71: 2677-2688.
    57 Blümmel M lications for the pridiction of voluntary feed intake of roughages I, A Sxhroder, K H Sudekum, et al. Estimating ruminal microbial efficiencies in silage-fed cattle: comparison of an in vitro method with a combination of in situ and in vivo measurements [J].J Animal Physiol Nutr, 1999, 81: 57-65.
    58 Erdman R A, R W Hemken, L S Bull. Dietary sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide for early postpartum lactating dairy cows: effects on production, acide-base metabolism, and digestion [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1988, 71(3): 754-761.
    59 England P & M Gill. The effect of fish meal and sucrose supplementation on the voluntary intake and live-weight gain by young cattle [J]. Animal Prod, 1985, 40: 259-265.
    60 Russel J B, J D O Connor, D G Fox, et al. A net carbonhydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I.Rumen Fermentation [J].J Anim Sci, 1992, 70: 3551-3561.
    61 MacRae J C, J S Smith, P J S Dewey, et al. The efficiency of metabolizable energy and apparent absorption of amino acids in sheep given spring-and autumn-harvested dried grass [J].Br J Nutr, 1985, 54: 197-209.
    62 Gordon F J, E F Unsworth, A C Peoples. Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for milk production [R]. 54th Annual Report, Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, 1981, 3-23.
    63 Tuori M L Syrjl-Qvist. The effect of rapeseed meal on the digesitybility and protein utilization of silage and hay based diet. Polish-Finish Seminar on Nutritive Value of Rapeseed Protein and Other Plant Protein in Animal Nutrition [M]. Jablonna. 1988. pp.
    64 Czerkawski J W, Metbolism of long chain fatty acides in the rumen. In: K L Blaxter, J Kielanowski & G Thorbek eds. Energy meatabolism of Farm Animals [M]. Oriel Press, Newcastle Upon Tyne. 1969, 103-108.
    65 Palmquist D L. The feeding value of fats [A]. In: E R φrskov (ed), World Anim Sci B_4,
    
    Feed Sci Elservier [M], Amsterdam. 1988. 293-311.
    66 Sliva A T, E R φrskov. The effect of five supplemenrts on the degradation of straw in sheep given untreated barely straw [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 1988, 19: 289-298.
    67 Preston T R. Associated effect and interaction among feed ingredients [J].FAO: Animal Production and Health Paper, 1989, 63: M-21.
    68 Dajajanegara, A. and Doyle, P.T., Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1989, 27:17-30.
    69 Mgheni, D.M., et al., Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1993, 44: 209-220.
    70 刘建新等,中国饲料(增刊) 1991,75-82.
    71 徐宁迎等,中国动物营养学报,1994,6(1) :10-15.
    72 刘建新等,我国南方提高秸秆饲料利用效率的模式研究.(1996)动物营养研究进展,1996,PP274—283.
    73 Oliveros, B.A.,et al., J. Anim. Sci., 1989, 67:1784-1792.
    74 Highfill, B.D., et al., J. Anim. Sci., 1987, 65:224-234.
    75 Manyuchi, B., et al., Anim. Feed Sci. and Technol, 1992, 38:293-304.
    76 Moore ,J.E. Forage quality indices: development and application. 1994. p.977-998. In: G.C. Fahey, Jr. (Ed.) Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison,WI
    77 Rohweder, D.A., R.F.Barnes, and N.Jorgensen. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality.[J].Anim. Sci. ,1978,47:747-759.
    78 Undersander, D. Does forage quality pay? In:Proc. Am .For. Grsld. Coun. Springdale, AR. AFGC, Georgetown, TX. April 22-25, 2001, p. 120-125.
    79 Kellums, R.O, and D.C. Church. Livestock Feeds & Feeding[M].Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall,NJ. 2002.
    80 Moore, J.E., and S.W. Coleman. Forage intake, digestibility, NDF and ADF: How well are they related? 2001, p.238-242. In: T. Terrill (Ed) Proc. Am. For. Grsld. Coun.,Springdale ,AR. AFGC, Georgetown, TX.
    81 Moore, J.E., and W.E. Kunkle, K.A. Bjorndal, R.S. Sand, C.G. Chambliss, and P. Mislevy. Extension forage testing program utilizing near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. 1984 ,p.41-52. In:Proc. Am. For. Grsld. Coun., Houston, TX. AFGC,Georgetown, TX.
    82 NRC,Nutrinent Requirements of beef cattle (M), 1984,Sixth Revised Edition. National Research Council, National Academy Press,Washington,DC.
    83 Johne. Moore and Daniel J.Undersander. Relative Forage Quality: An Alternative to Relative Feed Value and Quality Index (A) Proceedings 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, 2002,p 16-32.
    
    
    84 Moore , J.E., J.C Burns, and D.S. Fisher. Multiple regression equations for predicting Relative Feed Value of grass hays. 1996, p.135-139. In: M.J. Williams (Ed) Proc. Am. For. Grsld. Courn., Vancouver, BC. AFGC, Gerogetown, TX.
    85 Moore, J.E.,M.H. Brant, W.E. Kunkle, and D.I Hopkins. Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance(J)..Anim. Sci.77,1999a,(Supple. 2): 122-135.
    86 Lipple, H. and D.B. Herd. FORAGVAL: Intake and gain estimated from acid detergent fiber and crude protein of the forage diet. Tex. Agric. Expt. Sta. 1990, MP--1708.
    87 Oba, M. and M.S.Allen. Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows (J). Dairy Sci.1999, 82: 589-596.
    88 Moore, J.E., and W.E. Kunkle. Evaluation of equations for estimating voluntary intake of forages and forage-based diets(J). Animal Sci. 1999., (Suppl. 1):204.
    89 Van Soest, P.J. Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages (J). Anim. Sci. 1967, 26: 119-127.
    90 Van Soest, P.J., D.R. Mertens, and B. Deinum. Preharvest factors influencing quality of conserved forage.(J)..Anim. Sci. 1978,47:712-720.
    91 Abrams, S.M. Sources of error in predicting digestible dry matter from the acid-detergent fiber content in forages (J). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1988, 21:205-208.
    92 Moore, J.E., W.E. Kunkle, and M.B. Hall. Evaluation of equations for predicting relative Feed value of grasses.1999b,Proc. Natl. For. Testing Assoc. Workship, Topeka,KS.
    93 Beauchemin, K.A. Using ADF and NDF in dairy cattle diet formulation - a western Canadi-An perspective(J). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.. 1996,58:101-111.
    94 Rayburn, E.B.,and D.G. Fox. Variation in neutral detergent fiber intake of Holstein cows (J). Dairy Sci. 1993, 76:544-554.
    95 Sanson,D.W.,and C.J.Kercher. Validation of equations used to estimate Relative Feed Value of alfalfa hay(J).Prof. Anim.Sci. 1996,12:162-166.
    96 Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. (1963) A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage
    97 NRC, 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, Seventh Revised Edition. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
    98 Wolin, M.J., A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. J.Dairy Sci. 1960, 43:1452-1459.
    99 Beuvink, J.M.W. and Spoelstra, S.F. Interactions between substrate, fermentation end products, buffering systems and gas production upon fermentation of different carbohydrates
    
    by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1992, 37: 505-509.
    100 Blümmel,M., φrskov, E.R., Comparison of gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle.Anim. Feed Sci. Technol,1993, 40:109-119.
    101 Blümmel,M,, Bullerdick, P., The need to complement in vitro gas measurements with residue determination from in sacco degradabilities to improve the prediction of voluntary intake of hays. Anim.Sci. 1997,64:71-75.
    102 Cotta,M.A.and J.B.Russell. Effect of peptides and amino acids on efficiency of rumen bacterial protein synthesis in continuous culture. J.Dairy Sci1982..65:226-234.
    103 Broderick,G.A. and W.M.Craig. Metabolism of peptides and amino acids during in vitro protein degradation by mixed rumen organisms .J Dairy Sci, 1989, 72:2540-2548.
    104 Rca regional training workshop on In Vitro techniques for feed evaluation. E-mail:h.makkar@iaea. org. 16~27 April 2001 Jakarta, Indonesia.
    105 Blümmel,M., Makkar, H.P.S, Chisanga, G., Mtimuni,J., Becker,K., 1997b. The prediction of dry matter intake of temperate and tropical roughages from in vitro digestibility /gas production data and the dry matter intake and in vivo digestibity of African roughages in relation to ruminant liveweight gain. Anim.Feed Sci. Technol,1997, 69:131-141.
    106 Blümmel,M., Steingass, H., Becker,K., 1997a. The relationship between gas production, microbial biomass yield and ~(15)N incorporation and its implications for the pridiction of of voluntary feed intake of roughages. Br. J. Nutr. 1997, 77:911-921.
    107 Williams, B.A. Cummulative gas-production techniques for forage evaluation. In: D.I. Givens, E. Owen, R.F.E. Axford and H.M. Omed (Editors), Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. CAB International, Wallingford, 2000, pp.189-213.
    108 Schofield, P. Gas production methods. In: J.P.F. D'Mello (Editors),Farm animal metabolism and nutrition. CAB International, Wallingford, 2000, pp. 209-232.
    109 Nagadi, S. M. Herrero, N. S. Jessop The influence of diet of the donor animal on the initial bacterial concentration of ruminal fluid and in vitro gas producton degradability parameters. [J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 2000, 87: 231-239.
    110 Burbank, R. K.,A. Woolf and G. Post. Influence of pH on In Vitro digestibility of white-tailed deer foods. J. Wildl. Manage. 1979, 43:788-790.
    111 Ru, Y. J., Glatz, Z.H. Miao, K. Swanson, S. et al., Comparison of the digestibity of grain and forage by sheep, red and fallow deer. Asian-Aust. J. Anim Sci, 2002, 15(6): 800-805.
    112 Van Soest, P.J., Nutritional Ecology of ruminants, 2nd edn. CorNELI University Press, 1994,476 pp.
    
    
    113 Groot, J., Willians, B.A., Oostdam, A., Boer, H. and Tamminga, S. The use of cumulative gas and VFA production to predict in vitro fermentation kinetics of Italian ryegrass leaf cell walls and contents at various time intervals. British Journal of Nutrition, 1998, 79: 519-525.
    114 Doyle, P.T., C.Devendra, and G.R.Pearce. 1986. "Rice straw as feed for Ruminants" international Development Program of Australian Universities and Colleges Limited (IDP), Canberra.
    115 Castrillo, C., M.Fondevila, X.Alibes, and M.Joy. Chemical treatments for upgrading lignocellulosic resources and strategies for their utilization in ruminant feeding. In: G.C.Galletti(Editor), Prodution and utilization of lignocellulosics. Else vier Applied Sciences, London. 1991.PP. 339-373.
    116 Pathak, N.N., and S.K.Ranjhan. Effect of urea molasses liquid diet feed as the main source of nitr intake, growth response and utilization of nutrient in crossbred calves. Ogen and energy along with limited amount cereal forage and intact proteins on Voluntary. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 1976.46: 515-520.
    117 Mclennan, S.R., G.S.Wright, and G.W.Blight. Effectof supplements of urea, molasses and sodium sulphate on the intake and liveweight of steers fed rice straw. Austr. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husbandry. 1981.21: 367-370.
    118 Daniel, S.J., Q.Z.Hansan, and K.Nath. Urea molasses liquid diet as a Feed for calves. Indian J.Anim. Sci. 1986.56: 149-151.
    119 Gomes, M.J., F.D.DeB, X.B.Chen, E.M.Nengomasha, and D.Fikremariam. The effect of starch supplementation of straw on microbial protein supply in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1994.49: 277-286.
    120 Hershberger, T.V., D.G.Bently, J.H.Cline, and W.J.Tyznik. Formation of short-chain fatty acids from cellulose, starch and metabolism intermediates by ovine and bovine tumen microorganisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1956.4: 902.
    121 Mulholland, J.G., J.B.Coombe, and W.R.MacManus. Effect of starch In the utilization by sheep of a straw diet supplemented with urea and minerals. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 1976.27: 139-153.
    122 Mertens, D.R., and J.R.Loften. The effect of starch on forage fiber digestion kinetics in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 1980.63: 1437-1446.
    123 Huhtanen, P., and S.Jaakkola. The effects of forage preservation method and proportion of concentrate on digestion of cell wall carbohydrate and rumen digests pool size in cattle. Grass and Forage Sci. 1993. 48: 155-165.
    124 McAllan, A.B., J.D.Sutton, D.E.Beever, and D.J.Napper. Rumen fermentation
    
    characteristics and duodenal nutrient flow in lactating cows receiving two types of grass silage with two levels of concentrates. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1994. 46: 277-291.
    125 Blaxter, K.L., and R.S.Wilson. 1963. The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production. Anim. Prod. 5: 27.
    126 Cook, C.W., and L.E.Harris. Effect of supplementation on intake and digestibility of range forage. Utah Agric. Exp. Stat. Bull. 1968.PP.475.
    127 Chappel, G.L., and J.P.Fontenot. Effect of level of available carbohydrates in purified sheep rations on cellulose digestibility and nitrogen utilization. J. Anim. Sci. 1968.27: 1709.
    128 Tyrrell, H.F., P.J.Reynolds, and P.W.Mode. effect of diet on partial efficiency of acetate use for body tissue synthesis by mature cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1979. 48: 598-606.
    129 Kartchner, R.J. Effects of protein and energy supplementation of cows grazing native winter range on forage on intake and digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 1980.51: 432.
    130 Doyle, P.T., H.dove, M.Freer, F.J.Hart, R.M.Dixon, and A.R.Egan. Effects of a concentrate supplement on the intake and digestion of a low quality forage by lambs. J. Agric. Sci. 1988.111: 503-511.
    131 Colucci, P.E., L.E.Chase, and P.J.Van Soest. Feed intake, apparent diet digestibility and rate of particulate passage in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1982. 65:1445-1456.
    132 DelCurto, T., R.C.Cochram, D.L.Harmon, A.A.Beharka, K.A.Jacqucs, G.Towhe, and E.S.Vanzant. Supplementation of dormant, tallgrass-prairie forage. I. Influence of varying supplemental protein and (or) energy levels on forage utilization characteristics of beef steers in confinement. J. Anim. Sci. 1989.68: 575.
    133 φrskov E.R., and C.Frazer. The effects of processing of barley based supplements on rumen pH, rate of digestion and voluntary intake of dried grass in sheep. Brit. J. Nutr. 1975. 34: 497.
    134 Hart, S.P. Associative effects of sorghum silage and sorghum grain diets, J. Anim. Sci. 1987, 64: 1779-1789.
    135 Wernli, G.G., and R.J.Wilkins. Nutritional studies with sheep fed conserved ryegrass. 2. Silage supplemented with dried grass or barley. J. Agric. Sci. 1980.94: 219-227.
    136 Franklin, K.K., J.E.Winch, and G.K.Macleod. The effect of concentrate on the digestion of Bromegrass constituents. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1981.61: 935-944.
    137 Lamb, L.S., and J.Eadie. The effect of barley supplements on the voluntary intake and digestion of low quality roughage by sheep. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.). 1979.92: 235.
    138 Chase, C.C., and C.A.Hibberd. Utilization of low quality native grass hay by beef cows fed increasing quantities of corn grain. J. Anim. Sci. 1987.65: 557-566.
    
    
    139 φrskov, E.R. Starch digestion and utilization in ruminants, J. Anim. Sci. 1986.63: 1624-1633.
    140 Williams, P.E.V., G.M.Lnns, and P.J.Moor. Supplementation of a diet of straw with starch or fish meal: Effects on the degradability and rate of outflow of straw from the rumen. Anim. Prod. 1984. 38: 551.
    141 Highfill, B.D., D.L.Boggs, H.E.Amos, and J.G.Crickman. Effects of high fibre energy supplements on fermentation characteristics and in vivo and in situ digestibilities of low quality fescue hay. J. Anim. Sci. 1987.65: 224-234.
    142 Robbins. C. T., P. J. Van Soest, W. W. Mautz and A, N. Moen. Feed analysis and digestion with reference to white-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 1975.39: 67-79.
    143 McCullough. Y. Carbohydrate and urea influences on in vitro deer forage digestibility. J. Wildl. Manage. 1979. 43: 650-656.
    144 Strobel, H. J., and J. B. Russell. Effect of pH and energy spilling on bacterial protein synthesis by carbohydrate-limited cultures of mixed rumen bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 1986.69:294-2947.1.
    145 卜登攀.2002.绒山羊瘤胃能氮同步释放及其对微生物蛋白合成影响研究.宁夏大学硕士学位论文[D].2002.6
    146 韩正康,陈杰,反刍动物瘤胃的消化代谢.科学出版社.1988,P49
    147 Murphy,M.R.,Modelling prodction of volatile fatty acids in ruminants.In:R.L.Baldwin and A.C.Bywarter (Editors). Moelling ruminant digestion and metabolism,Proc,Second International Workshop. University of California. Davis,USA,pp59~62.
    148 Franci,O. and Acciaioli,A. Mathematical models for the innovative interpretation of the associative effect. Options Méditerranéennes,Seire B, Etudes et Recherches, 1998,17:73-78.
    149 Sohane,R.K., and Singh,M.,Effect of supplementing green forages with straws from two rice varieties on nutrient utilization in cattle. Indian J. Anim.Nutr.,2001,18(1):1-7.
    150 Sauvant, D. and Giger,S. Straw digestibility calculation and digeative interactions. In:Chenost, M.and Reiniger, P. (eds) Evaluation of straw in ruminant feeding. Elsevier Applied Science,London,pp47-61.
    151 Vogel, G.J.,Phillips, W.A.,Horn, G.W.,Ford, M.J.and McNew, R.W. Effects of supplemental silage on forage intake and utilization by steers grazing wheat pasture or bermudagrass. J. Anim Sci, 1989, 67:232-240.
    152 Butterworth, M.H. and Mosi,A.K.The intake and digesitibility by sheep of oat straw and maize stover offered with different levels of noug. Anim.Feed Sci.Technol,1986, 16:99-107.
    153 Reid, R.L., Templeton, W.C.,Jr,Ranney, T.S. and Thane,W.V. Digestibility, intake and
    
    mineral utilization of combination of grasses and legumes by lambs. J. Anim Sci, 1987, 64:1725-1734.
    154 Bawman, J.G.P. and Asplund, J.M., Evaluation of mixed Lucerne and Caucasian bluestem hay diets fed to sheep, Anim.Feed Sci.Technol,1988, 20:19-31
    155 Hunt, C.W., Paterson, J.A., Williams, J.E., Intake and digestibility of alfalfa-tall fescue combination diets feed to lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 1985.60: 301-312.
    156 Paterson, J.A., Klopfenstein, T.J., Britton, R.A., Digestibility of sodium hydroxide-treated crop residues when fed with alfalfa hay. J. Anim. Sci. 1982.54: 1056-1066.
    157 Brandit, R.T.Jr., and T.J.Klopfenstein. Evaluation of alfalfa-corn associative action. Ⅱ. Comparative test of alfalfa hay as a source of ruminal degradable protein, J. Anim. Sci. 1986a.63: 902-910.
    158 Brandit, R.T.Jr., and T.J.Klopfenstein. Evaluation of alfalfa-corn associative action. Ⅲ. The effect of mechanically separated alfalfa fractions on intake, digestibility and ruminal characteristics of ammonia-treated corn cob diets fed to sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1986b. 63: 911-922.
    159 O' Donovan, P.B., Untreated straw as a livestock feed. Nutritive Abstr. 1983. Rev. Series BS3(T): 442-455.
    160 Laidlaw A.S. and Teuber. N. 2001. Temperate forage grass-legume mixtures: advances and perspectives.
    161 Hindrichsen., I.K. Osuji. P.O. 2001. Effects of supplementation with for multipurpose trees and lablab purpureus on Rumen microbial population, Rumen fermentation, digests kinetics and microbial protein supply of sheep fed maize stover and libitum.
    162 Sinclair, L,A., Garnsworthy ,P.C., Newbold, J.R., Buttery,.P.J. Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. J. Agric . Sci., Cambr. 1993,120:251-263.
    163 Sinclair, L.A., Garnsworthy ,P.C., Newbold, J.R., Buttery,.P.J. Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release in diets with a similar carbohydrate composition on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. J. Agric Sci., Cambr. 1995, 124:463-472.
    164 Clark,J.H.,Klusmeyer,t.K.Cameron,M.r. Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows.J.Dairy Sci. 1992,75:2304-2323.
    165 Pirt. S. J., Principles of Microbe and Cell Cultivation. Blackwell science. Oxford, UK.. 1975.
    166 Henning ,P.H.,D.G.Steyn,and H.H.Meissner. The effect of energy and nitrogen supply
    
    pattern on rumen bacterial growth in virto .Anim.Prod. 1991,53:165-175.
    167 Moseley, G., and J.R.Jones. Some factors associated with the difference in nutritive value of artificially dried red clover and perennial ryegrass for sheep. Brit. J. Nutr. 1979.42: 139.
    168 Klopfenstein, T., and F.G.Owen. Value and potential use of crop residues and by-products in dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci. 1981.64:1250-1268.
    169 Preston, T.R. Nutritional limitations associated with the feeding of tropical forages. J. Anita. Sci. 1982.54: 877-884.
    170 Kellaway, R.C., and J.Leibholz. Effects of nitrogen supplements on intake and utilization of low quality roughages. World Anim. Rev. 1983. 33-37.
    171 Ndlovu, L.R. and J.G.Buchanan-smith. Utilization of poor quality roughages by sheep: Effects of alfalfa supplementation on ruminal parameters, fibre digestion and rate of passage from the tumen. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1985.65: 693-703.
    172 Ndlovu, L.R. and J.G.Buchanan-smith. Alfalfa supplementation of corncob diets for sheep: Effect of ruminal or postruminal supply of protein on intake, digestibility, digesta, passage and liveweight changes. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1987a.67: 1075.
    173 Ndlovu, L.R. and J.G.Buchanan-smith. Alfalfa supplementation of corncob diets for sheep: Comparison with higher volatile fatty acids, soybean protein and alfalfa fibre on intake, environment and digestion in the rumen and digesta passage. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1987b.67: 1083.
    174 Ash, A.J. The effect of supplementation with leaves from the leguminous tree sesbania grandiflora, Albizia chinensis and Gliricidia sepium on the intake and digestibility of guinea hay by goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1990. 38: 225-232.
    175 Howard, M.D., R.D.H.Cohen, and J.A.Kerman. Effect of ammoniation and supplementation with sweet clover hay on intake and digestibility of flax straw by sheep. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71991. 1: 599-602.
    176 Grigsby, K.N., C.W.Peters, M.S.Kerley, and J.A.Paterson. Digestibility of vegetative and native tall fescue greenchop with or without alfalfa greenchop substitution. J. Anim. Sci. 1991.19:4602-4610.
    177 McCarthy, R. D., T. H. Klusmeyer, J. L. Vicini, J. H. Clark, and D. R. NELson. Effect of source of protein and carbohydrate on ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the small intesting of lactationg cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72:2002-2016.
    178 Herrera-Saldana, R., R. Gomez-Alarcon, M. Torabi, and J. T. Huber. Influence of synchronizing protein and starch degradation in the rumen on mutrient utilization and microbial synthesis. J. Dairy SCI. 1990, 73:142-148.
    
    
    179 谭支良,绵羊日粮中不同碳水化合物和氮源比例对纤维物质消化动力学的影响及其组合效应评估模型.1998,内蒙古农业大学博士论文.
    180 王岗,绵羊小肠内寡肽吸规律的研究.2001.内蒙古农业大学博士学位论文.
    181 Ranilla, M.J Carro, M.D.S.Lopez, Newbold C.J.and Wallace. R.J. Influence of nitrogen source on the fermentation of fibre from barley straw and sugarbeet pulp by ruminal micro-organisms in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition. 2001.86: 717-724.
    182 Atasoglu C, Vald(?)s C, Newbold CJ&Wallace RJ De novo synthesis of amino acids by the ruminal bacteria, Prevotella bryantii B_14, Selenomonas ruminantium HD4, and Streptococcus bovis ES1. Applied and Enviromental Microbiology, 1998, 64:2836-2843.
    183 Antogiovanni, M. Franci, O. Acciaiolii, A. Bruni, R. Dughiese, C. Supplementation of cereal stralls with different protein feeds: In vivo studies, dipartimento di scienze Zootecniche, Universi 1994, 1995, 1996.
    184 Taniguchi,K.,G.B,Huntington,and B.P.Glenn. Net nutrient flux by visceral tissues of beef steers given abomassal and ruminal infusions of casein and starch. J.Anim.Sci. 1995. 73:236-249.
    185 Matras. J., S.J. Battle, and R. L. Preston. Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: Effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation. J.Anim. Sci. 1991.69:339.
    186 Poore, M. H., J. A. Moore, R. S. Swingle, T. P. Eck, and W. H. Brown. Response of lactating cows to diets varying in fiber source and ruminal starch degradability, J. Dairy. Sci. 1993.76:2235-2243.
    187 NRC.1985.Ruminant nitrogen usage. National Academy of Science,Washington,DC.
    188 Stern, Md.1986. Efficiency of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Proc. Of the CorNEL1 Nutrition Conf. For Feed Manufacturers, CorNEL1 Univ., Ithaca, NY.
    189 Johnson,R.R., Influence of carbohydrate solubility on noOn-protein nitrogen utilization in the ruminant.J.Anim.Sci. 1976.43,184-191.
    190 Sniffen, C. J., J. B. Russell.,And P.J. Van Soest. The influence of carbon source, nitrogen source and growth factors on tumen microbial growth. Proceedings of the CorNEL1 nutrition conference for feed manufacturers, CorNELI University, Ithaca. 1983. PP 26-33. Jthaca, NY.
    191 Nocek, J.E., and J.B. Russell. Protein and energy as an integrated system. Relationship of ruminal protein and carbohydrate availability to microbial synthesis and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 1988. 71:2070-2107.
    192 Herrera-Saldana,R.,J.T.Huber,and M.H.Poore. Dry matter, crude pritein and starch degradability of five cereal grains. J. Dairy. Sci. 1990.73:2386-2393.
    
    
    193 Stokers, S. R., W. H. Hoover, T. K. Miller, and R. Blauweikel. 1991a. Ruminal digestion and microbial utilization of diets varying in type of carbohydrate and protein. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:871-881..
    194 Cecava,M.J.,Merchen,N.R.,Berger,R.I.,Mackie,G.C.Fatey,Jr., Effects of dietary energy level and protein source on nutrient digestion and ruminal nitrogen metabolism in steers.J.Anim.Sci., 1991.69,2230-2243.
    195 Stokes, S. R., W. H. Hoover, T. K. Miller, and R. P. Manski. 1991b. Impact of carbohydrate and protein levels on bacterial metabolism in continuous culture. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:860-870.
    196 Lee, H.J., Kim, E.J., Maeng. W.J., Cockburn. J.E., scollan, N.D., Effects of dietary asynchrony on rumen function studies using tumen simulation continuous culture, Proceedings of the British sociery of Animal science Annual Meeting, 1997. 203 pp...
    197 Narayan Dutta, K. Sharma and Uma Naulia. Use of undecotticated sunflower cake as a critical protein supplement in sheep and goats fed wheat straw. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2002. Vol 15, No. 6: 834-837.
    198 Ashok Kumar, V.K.Paliwal and V.Kapoor. Effect of feeding deoiled sunflower cake on growth and nutrient utilization in crossbred calves. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 2001. 18: 217-221.
    199 Adugna Tolera, Frik Sundstφl,Supplementation of graded levels of Desmodium intortum hay to sheep feeding on maize stover harvested at three stages of maturity 2.Rumen fermentation and nitrogen metbolism, Anim. Feed Sci. and Technol. 2000.87:215-229.
    200 Bonsi, M.L.K. Osuji, P.O. Nsalahai, I.V. and Tuan, A.K. Graded level of sesbania sesban and leucaena leucocephala as supplement to teff straw given to Ethopian menz sheep. Anim. Prod. 1994. 59: 235-244.
    201 D.G.Atwell, N.R.Merchen, E.H.Jaster, G.C.Fahey, Jpl, L.L Berger, E.C.Titgemeyer, and L.D. Bourquin. Intake, digestibility, and in situ digestion kinetics of treated wheat straw and alfalfa mixtures fed to Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 1991.74: 3524-3534.
    202 Bird, S.H., Romulo, B. and Leng, R.A. Effect of Lucerne supplementation and defaunation on feed intake, digestibility, nitrogen retention and productivity of sheep fed straw based diets. Anim. Feed Sci. and Technol. 1994.45:119-129.
    203 Das, A. and Singh, G.P. Effect of berseem supplementation to straw diets on nitrogen metabolism and nutrient utilization in cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 1999.69, (4)243-247.
    204 Rahal, A., Atharuddin and Singh, M. Effect of urea treatment and diet composition on and prediction of rice straw of different cultivars. Anim. Feed Sci. and Technology. 1997.68: 165-182.
    
    
    205 Dissertation, vorgelegt von Solomon Melaku. Evaluation of selected multipurpose trees as feed supplements in tef straw based feeding of Menze sheep. Tyele verteidigt in September 2001.
    206 Wu,Y.M.,et al 1996. In:Proceeding of 8th AAAP Animal Science Congrass. Chiba, Japan.
    207 严冰,刘建新,姚军.氨化稻草日粮补饲桑叶对湖羊生长性能的影响,中国畜牧杂志,2002,38(1):36-37.
    208 方德罗等,浙江农业大学学报,1996,22(2):168-171.
    209 Menke, K.H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D., Schneider, W., The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with ruman liquor. J. Agric. Sci, 1979,93:217-222.
    210 φrskov, E.R., Hovell, F.D.D. and Mould, F. The use of the nylonbag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production, 1980, 5:195-213.
    211 卢德勋,反刍动物营养调控理论及其应用.内蒙古畜牧科学.1993.特刊.ISSN-1003-1642.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700