现金流视角下上市公司并购绩效评价及其影响机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
企业并购作为一种重要的资源配置方式,对推动社会生产力的进步发挥了重要作用。进入21世纪以后,我国企业并购市场获得了突飞猛进的发展,因此并购绩效如何、哪些因素导致了并购绩效的个体差异就成为企业并购理论和实证研究需要回答的基础问题。本研究以现金流分析作为并购绩效评价的基础,以上市公司2003至2005年的并购交易作为实证分析样本,同时突破以往对并购绩效研究仅局限于财务绩效的缺陷,力图系统把握上市公司并购的真实演变规律。
     论文首先研究了上市公司并购财务绩效,以现金流指标结合因子分析模型作为综合绩效评价方法,采用对照样本年度均值调整方法排除非并购因素影响,最后利用对比模型和回归截距模型识别出并购财务绩效。研究发现,并购活动对主并企业财务绩效有显著负向影响,但并购长期绩效有一定改善趋势;并购活动对目标企业财务绩效无显著影响。研究发现,以现金流为基础和以传统盈利能力指标为基础的并购财务绩效出现明显背离现象,证实了传统盈余相关指标所识别的并购财务绩效存在一定程度的失真问题。
     论文采用相同的方法考察了上市公司并购社会绩效,研究发现并购活动对主并企业总体社会绩效无显著影响,但对目标企业社会绩效却有显著的负向影响。进一步研究发现,导致目标企业社会绩效显著下降的主要原因是员工福利水平的大幅度降低,表明控制权转移过程员工权益没有得到切实维护。对并购财务绩效和并购社会绩效相关性研究发现,主并企业并购财务绩效和并购员工福利绩效有显著负相关关系,而目标企业则有不显著的负相关关系;所有样本企业并购财务绩效和并购税费贡献绩效、并购违规状况绩效均表现出正相关关系,表明三者之间有较好的协调性。
     对主并企业并购财务绩效影响机制研究发现,追求协同效应、并购相对规模、战略委员会设置、并购前ST情况以及并购发生年度对其有显著解释能力;而管理者主义、自由现金流假说、民营控股、高管持股比例也有一定的解释能力。对目标企业并购财务绩效影响机制研究发现,追求协同效应、保护壳资源、资本结构状况、财务资源状况、行业匹配性以及并购发生年度对目标企业并购财务绩效有显著解释能力;而Z指数、董事长总经理设置状况以及高管相对规模也有一定的解释能力。以并购财务绩效影响机制研究结论为依据,分别构建了主并企业和目标企业并购财务绩效预测模型,准确率分别为72.4%和74.2%。
As an indispensible measure of resource collocation, M&A plays a crucial role in social capacity development. In 21st century, M&A has developed rapidly in China. It becomes the basic problems among M&A theory and empirical study that how M&A performance goes and which factor induces the individual differences of M&A performance. Regarding cash flow analysis as the basis of M&A performance evaluation, this study selects M&A transactions of listed companies during the year from 2003 to 2005 as the samples for empirical analysis. The former studies of M&A only focus on financial performance, while this study makes up this shortage and tries to grasp the real evolving rule of M&A performance.
     Regarding cash flow indexes combined with factor analysis model as a comprehensive performance evaluation method, this article firstly studies the M&A financial performance of listed companies. Then, the approach of year’s mean adjustment between comparison samples is adopted to exclude the influence from non-M&A factors. Finally, the comparison model and intercept model are applied to identify the M&A financial performance. The research discovers that the M&A action has brought remarkable negative influence on M&A financial performance of acquiring firms, but the long-term performance of M&A has meliorative trend; on the other side, the M&A action has no remarkable influence on financial performance of target firms, which does not accord with prior research conclusions. The study finds that the M&A financial performance based on cash flow obviously deviates from the M&A financial performance based on traditional earning capacity indexes, which demonstrates that the M&A financial performance identified by traditional earning related indexes occurs distortion on some degree.
     Using the same method to evaluate the M&A social performance of listed companies, this paper reveals that the M&A action has no significant influence on social performance of acquiring firms, but has remarkable negative influence on social performance of target firms. It is found that employee’s welfare lever dropping sharply caused the social performance’s great incline of target firms in further research. Empirical study shows that employee rights and interests of target firms don’t be protected effectively during control right changing process. The study on M&A financial performance and M&A social performance observes that there is a negative significant correlation between M&A financial performance and M&A employee benefits performance among acquiring firms, but the negative correlation is not significant among target firms; meanwhile, there is a positive correlation among M&A financial performance, tax and fee contribution performance of M&A, infringing situation performance of M&A for all sample firms, which shows there exists a good compatibility among them.
     For M&A financial performance influence mechanism of acquiring firms, the research finds that the pursuit of synergy effect, relative scales of M&A, establishment of strategy committee of board, ST situation before M&A and the year when M&A happened has significant ability to explain the M&A financial performance of acquiring firms. Meanwhile, we find that managerialism, free cash flow hypothesis, the private controlling shareholder and share proportion held by management also has certain explanatory capacity. For M&A financial performance influence mechanism of target firms, we find that the pursuit of synergy effect, the protection of listing status, capital structure, financial resources, industry matching situation and the year when M&A happened has significant ability to explain the M&A financial performance of target firms. At the same time, Z indicator, establishment of board chairman and general manager, the relative size of top managers also has certain explanatory capacity. Based on the conclusions of influence mechanism research, we construct the forecast model of M&A financial performance of target acquiring firms and target firms by Logistic regression, the general accuracy of forecast model respectively achieves 72.4 percent and 74.2 percent.
引文
[1]王亚平,吴联生,白云霞.中国上市公司盈余管理的频率与幅度[J].经济研究,2005, (12):102-112.
    [2]靳明.从ROE的实证分析看上市公司的业绩操纵问题[J].中国工业经济,2000,(2):64-69.
    [3] D. Abody, J. Hughes and J. Liu. Mearing Value Relevance in a ( Possibly) Inefficient Market[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2002,40:965-986.
    [4]吴联生,薄仙慧,王亚平.现金流在多大程度上被管理了[J].金融研究,2007,(3):162-174.
    [5]万朝领等.重组之花结出什么果—沪深股票市场重组绩效实证研究[N].上海证券报, 2001-1-9.
    [6]朱学义.我国环境会计初探[J].会计研究,1999,(4):26-30.
    [7]朱学义.基于民本经济的会计改革[J].当代财经,2007,(2):102-106.
    [8] Jensen, Michael C, Ruback, Richard S. The Market for Corporate Control[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1983,11:5-50.
    [9] Gilson, Scholes, Wolfson. Taxation and the Dynamics of Corporate Control: The Uneasy Cases for Tax—Motivated Acquisitions[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,1987.
    [10] Singh, M., Mathur, Gleason and Etebari. An Empirical Examination of the Trend and Performance Implications of Business Diversification [J].Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 2001,7(2):25-51.
    [11] Khanna, N.and S. Tice. The Bright Side of Internal Capital Markets[J].Journal of Finance,2001, 56:1489-1528.
    [12] Louis T.W. Cheng and T.Y. Leung. A Comparative Analysis of the Market-based and Accounting-based Performance of Diversifying and Non-diversifying Acquisitions in Hong Kong[J]. International Business Review,2004,13:763-789.
    [13] H.P. Lang and R.M. Stultz. Tobin’s Q, Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1994,102:1248-1280.
    [14] H.G. Manne. Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1965,75:110-120.
    [15] E.F. Fama. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm[J].Journal of Political Economy,1980,88:288-307.
    [16] M.C. Jensen. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow [J].Corporate Finance,1986,76:323-329.
    [17] D.C. Mueller. A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1969, 83:643-665.
    [18] W.G.. Lewellen and B.Huntsman. Managerial Pay and Corporate Performance[J].American Economic Review,1970,60:710-720.
    [19] Roll Richard. The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeover[J].Journal of Business,1986, 59:197-216.
    [20] A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny. Value Maximization and the Acquisition Process[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,1988,2(1):7-20.
    [21] R.E. Hoskisson and M.A. Hitt. Hitt.Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of Diversification: Review and Critique of Theoretical Perspectives[J].Journal of Management,1990,16:461-509.
    [22] Andrade and Stafford. Investigating the Economic Role of Mergers[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2004,10:1-36.
    [23] La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer. Corporate Ownership around the World[J].Journal of Finance,1999,54:471-517.
    [24] Shleifer and Vishny. A Survey of Corporate Governance[J].Journal of Finance,1997, 52:737-783.
    [25] Johnson, La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer. Tunneling[J].American Economic Review, 2000,90:22-27.
    [26] Friedman, Jonson, Mitton. Propping and Tunneling[J].Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003,31:732-750.
    [27]魏江.企业并购绩效评估模型和度量[J].科研管理,2002,23(6):59-66.
    [28]张秋生,周琳.企业并购协同效应的研究与发展[J].会计研究,2003,(16):44-47.
    [29]潘杰.基于大股东控制的并购财富效应[J].中国工业经济,2006,(7):124-128.
    [30]李增泉,余谦,王晓坤.掏空支持与并购重组[J].经济研究,2005,(1):95-105.
    [31]黄兴孪,沈维涛.掏空或支持—来自我国上市公司关联并购的实证分析[J].经济管理.新管理,2006,(6):57-64.
    [32]王宏利.提高并购绩效的目标公司选择[J].管理世界,2005,(3):137-144.
    [33]李善民,朱滔等.收购公司与目标公司配对组合绩效的实证分析[J].经济研究,2004,(6):96-104.
    [34]李善民,曾昭灶等.上市公司并购绩效及其影响因素分析[J].世界经济,2004,(9):60-67.
    [35]高良谋.并购后整合管理研究[J].管理世界,2003,(12):107-114.
    [36]王晓初,俞伟峰.企业收购绩效与公司治理[J].会计研究,2007,(8):51-59.
    [37]宋耘.基于整合过程的企业并购绩效影响因素探析[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 46(5):129-134.
    [38] Robert F. Bruner. Does M&A Pay? A Survey of Evidence for the Decision-Maker[J].Journal of Applied Finance,2002,Spring/Summer:48-68.
    [39] Jarrell, G.. and A. Poulsen. The Returns to Acquiring Firms in Tender Offers. Evidence from Three Decades[J].Financial Management,1989,18:12-19.
    [40] Michael Bradley, Desai, E.Han Kim. Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Division Between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1988,21:3-40.
    [41] Scott C. Linn, Michael S. Rozeff. The Corporate Sell-Off [J].Corporate Finance Journal,1984, Summer:17-26.
    [42] Healy, Palepu,Ruback.Does Corporate Performance Improve after Merger[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1992,31:135-175.
    [43] S. Kaplan and M. Weisbach. The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures[J].Journal of Finance,1992,47:107-138.
    [44] Berkovitch and Narayanon. Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993,28:347-362.
    [45] B.E. Eckbo. Mergers and the Value of Antitrust Deterrence[J].Journal of Finance,1992, 47:1005-1030.
    [46] M. Walker. Corporate Takeovers, Strategic Objectives, and Acquiring-firm Shareholder Wealth [J].Financial Management,2000,29(1):53-66.
    [47] M.L Mitchell, E. Stafford. Managerial Decisions and Long-Term Stock Price Performance[J]. Journal of Business,2000,73:287-329.
    [48] J.H. Mulherin and A.L.Boone.Comparing Acquisitions and Divestitures[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2000,6:117-139.
    [49] P. Dodd and R. Ruback. Tender Offers and Stockholder Returns: An Empirical Analysis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1977,5(3):351-374.
    [50] P. Dodd. Merger Proposals, Management Discretion and Stockholder Wealth[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1980,8:105-138.
    [51] P. Asquith.The Gains to Bidding Firms from Merger[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1983, 11:51-83.
    [52]杨朝军,蔡明超,刘波.中国股票市场信息传递效率实证分析[J].上海交通大学学报, 2000,34(11):1553-1556.
    [53]陈信元,张田余.资产重组的市场反应—1997年沪市资产重组市场实证分析[J].经济研究,1999,(9):47-55.
    [54]万朝领等.中国并购事项研究[R].国信证券研究报告,2000.
    [55]余光,杨荣.企业购并股价效应的理论分析和实证分析[J].当代财经,2000,(7):70-74.
    [56]李善民,陈玉罡.上市公司兼并与收购的财富效应[J].经济研究,2002,(11):27-35.
    [57]张新.并购重组是否创造价值[J].经济研究,2003,(6):20-29.
    [58]李善民,朱滔.多元化并购能给股东创造价值吗?—兼论影响多元化并购长期绩效的因素[J].管理世界,2006,(3):129-137.
    [59] Ravenscraft and Scherer. Mergers, Sell-offs and Economic Efficiency[M].Washington: The Bookings Institution,1987.
    [60] E. Herman and L. Lowenstein. The Efficiency Effect of Hostile Takeovers[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,1988.
    [61] J.D. Parrino and R.S. Harris. Takeovers, Management Replacement, and Post-Acquisition Operating Performance: Some Evidence from the 1980s[J].Journal of Applied Corporate finance, 1999,11(4):88-97.
    [62] J.D. Parrino and R.S. Harris. Business Linkages and Post-merger Operating Performance. Working Paper, University of Virginia,2001.
    [63]原红旗,吴星宇.资产重组对财务业绩影响的实证研究[N].上海证券报,1998-8-26.
    [64]冯根福,吴林江.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究[J].经济研究,2001,(1):54-61.
    [65]吴育平.资产重组绩效研究[J].资本市场,2002,(7):64-66.
    [66]方芳,闫晓彤.中国上市公司并购绩效的思考[J].经济理论与经济管理,2002,(8):43-48.
    [67]李心丹等.基于DEA的上市公司并购效率研究[J].经济研究,2003,(10):15-24.
    [68]檀向球等.沪市上市公司资产重组绩效实证研究[N].中国证券报,1998-9-28.
    [69]朱宝宪,王怡凯.1998年中国上市公司并购实践的效应分析[J].经济研究,2002,(11):20-26.
    [70]吴联生,白云霞.公司价值、资产收购与公司控制权转移方式[J].管理世界,2004,(9): 123-130.
    [71] M. J. Conyon, S. Girma, S. Thompsonc and P. Wright. Do Hostile Mergers Destroy Jobs?[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2001,45:427-440.
    [72] M. J. Conyon, S. Girma, S. Thompsonc and P. Wright. The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Company Employment in the United Kingdom[J].European Economic Review,2002,46:31-49.
    [73] H. A. Krishan, D. Park, S. Thompsonc and P. Wright. The Impact of Workforce Reduction on Subsequent Performance in Major Mergers and Acquisition—An Exploratory Study[J].Journal of Business Research,2002,55:285-292.
    [74]朱滔.民营上市公司并购效果实证分析[J].证券市场导报,2007,(11):37-42.
    [75] M. Simkowitz and R.J. Monroe. A Discriminant Analysis Function for Conglomerate Targets[J]. Southern Journal of Business,1971,38:1-16.
    [76] K.G.. Palepu. Predicting Takeover Targets: A Methodology and Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,1986,8:3-35.
    [77] J. P. Barnes. Takeover Targets Using Published Historical Cost Accounting Data,Some Empirical Evidence Comparing Logit with Linear Discriminant Analysis and Raw Financial Ratios with Industry-relative Ratios[J].International Review of Financial Analysis,2000,9:147-162.
    [78] R.S. Harris, J. Stewart, D. Guilkey. Characteristics of Acquired firms: Fixed and Random Coefficients Probit Analysis[J].Southern Economic Journal,1982,7:164-184.
    [79] D. E. Sorensen. Characteristics of Merging Firms[J].Journal of Economics and Business,2000, 52:423-433.
    [80] M. L. Mitchell, J.H. Mulherin. The Impact of Industry Stocks on Takeover and Restructuring Activity[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1996,41:193-229.
    [81] S. Richard,R. Richard. What Determines Acquisition Activity within an Industry?[J].European Management Journal,1999,17:93-98.
    [82]蔡红艳,韩立研.我国上市公司资产重组的行业分析[J].经济学,2003,(4):667-677.
    [83]赵勇,朱武祥.上市公司兼并收购的可预测性[J].经济研究,2000,(4):19-25.
    [84]史先诚.股权结构与兼并行为倾向的实证分析[J].财经研究,2004,30(6):134-144.
    [85]蔡阳,马海峰.股权结构对上市公司并购倾向性影响的实证分析[J].淮海工学院学报(自然科学版),2006,15(2):80-83.
    [86]王化成,程小可,刘雪辉.中国资本市场披露现金流量信息的有用性[J].经济理论与经济管理,2003,(10):29-35.
    [87] K. Melendrez, W. Schartz, M. Trombley. How does the Market Value accrual and Cash Flow Surprises?.Working Paper, Louisiana State University and University of Arizona,2005.
    [88]方军雄.市场变迁与现金流操控—一项基于我国上市公司的实证研究[J].中国会计评论,2004,2(1):77-104.
    [89]王啸.我国上市公司现金流操纵现象分析[J].证券市场导报,2004,(5):55-60.
    [90]田华臣.警惕粉饰过的每股经营性现金净流量[J].广西会计,2004,(8):37-39.
    [91]董红星.永久性盈余、暂时性盈余与经营现金流的信息含量[J].经济问题探索,2007,(4): 166-171.
    [92]陈志斌,韩飞畴.基于价值创造的现金流管理[J].会计研究,2002,(12):45-50.
    [93]陈志斌.基于自由现金流管理视角的创值动因解析模型研究[J].会计研究,2006,(4): 58-62.
    [94]朱乾宇.我国上市公司并购绩效的多元回归分析[J].中南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2002,21(1): 83-86.
    [95]王跃堂.我国证券市场资产重组绩效之比较分析[J].财经研究,1999,(7):53-59.
    [96]李善民,王彩萍等.中国上市公司资产重组长期绩效研究[J].管理世界,2004,(9): 131-136.
    [97]张艳,李书锋.上市公司资产重组绩效的实证研究[J].石家庄经济学院学报,2004,27(6): 656-659.
    [98] E. Feroz,S. Kim,U. Levin,R. Raab. Do Mergers Improve Managerial Performance? A Data Envelopment Analysis. Working Paper,UMD Bureau of Business and Economic Research,2002.
    [99]杨安华.公司并购中长期价值效应的管辖属性分析[J].软科学,2007,21(5):140-144.
    [100]何晓群.多元统计分析[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:167-180.
    [101] D. J. Denis,T. A. Kruse. Managerial Discipline and Corporate Restructuring Following Performance Declines[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2000,55:391-424.
    [102]廖理,朱正芹.上市公司重大资产重组的业绩改善研究[J].中国工业经济,2004,(10): 97-104.
    [103] A. Ghosh. Does Operating Performance Really Improve following Corporate Acquisitions?[J].Journal of Corporate Financial,2001,7:151-178.
    [104]白云霞,吴联生.国有控制权转移、终极控制人变更与公司业绩[J].金融研究,2008,(6): 130-143.
    [105]祝红梅.上市公司并购后业绩改善的短期化现象[J].经济学动态,2004,(12):53-56.
    [106] A. B. Carroll. A Three -dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance[J]. Academy of Management Review,1979,4:497-506.
    [107]江若尘.企业利益相关者问题的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2004,(10):67-74.
    [108]陈玮.论利益相关者利益最大化财务目标—基于利益相关者理论及系统科学的视角[J].会计研究,2006,(4):63-67.
    [109]陈宏辉,贾生华.企业利益相关者三维分类的实证分析[J].经济研究,2004,(4):80-90.
    [110]白重恩,路江涌,陶志刚.国有企业改制效果的实证研究[J].经济研究,2006,(8):4-13.
    [111] R. E. Freeman, D. L. Reed. A Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance[J].California Management Review,1983,25(3):88-106.
    [112] B. Cornell and A. C. Shapiro. Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance[J].Financial Management,1987,Spring:4-14.
    [113] W. G.. Simpson, T. Kohers. The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2002,35:97-109.
    [114]阳秋林,黄珍文,曹钻.建立有中国特色的社会责任会计势在必行—关于我国现行企业实行社会责任会计情况的调查报告[J].南华大学学报(社科版),2002,3(4):16-20.
    [115]陈玉清,马丽丽.我国上市公司社会责任会计信息市场反应实证分析[J].会计研究,2005, (11):76-81.
    [116]李正.企业社会责任与企业价值的相关性研究—来自沪市上市公司的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2006,(2):77-83.
    [117]温素彬,方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究—利益相关者视角的面板数据分析[J].中国工业经济,2008,(10):150-160.
    [118]李正,向锐.中国企业社会责任信息披露的内容界定、计量方法和现状研究[J].会计研究,2007,(7):3-11.
    [119]宋献中,龚明晓.社会责任信息的质量与决策价值评价—上市公司会计年报的内容分析[J].会计研究,2007,(2):37-43.
    [120] R.P. Rumelt. Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance[M].Boston: Harvard UniversityPress,1974.
    [121] J·费雷德·费斯通等.兼并、重组与公司控制(中译本)[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1998.
    [122]李善民,朱滔.管理者动机与并购绩效关系研究[J].经济管理.新管理,2005,(4):4-12.
    [123] O. E. Williamson. Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust Implications[M].New York: New York Free Press,1975.
    [124]余鹏翼,李善民,张晓斌.上市公司股权结构、多元化经营与公司绩效问题研究[J].管理科学,2005,18(1):79-83.
    [125] S. L. Gillan, J. W. Kensinger, J. D.Martin. Value Creation and Corporate Diversification: the Case of Sears, Roebuck & Co[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2000,55:103-137.
    [126]陈信元,黄俊.政府干预、多元化经营与公司业绩[J].管理世界,2007,(1):92-97.
    [127]许陈生,尹继东,郭烨.多元化经营对公司绩效的影响—来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].经济问题探索,2006,(11):126-130.
    [128]姚俊,吕源,蓝海林.我国上市公司多元化与经济绩效关系的实证研究[J].管理世界,2004,(11):119-125,135.
    [129] J.B. Kusewitt. An Exploratory Study of Strategic Acquisition Factors Relating to Performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1985,6:151-169.
    [130] F. Modigliani, M. Miller. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment[J].American Economic Review,1958,58:261-297.
    [131]徐晓东,陈小悦.第一大股东对公司治理、企业业绩的影响分析[J].经济研究,2003, (2):64-74.
    [132]刘志强.上市公司并购绩效及其影响因素的实证研究[D].吉林:吉林大学商学院,2007.
    [133] W. P. Lloyd, Hand, H. M. John, K. Naval. The Effect of the Degree of Ownership Control on Firm Diversification, Market Value and Merger Activity[J].Journal of Business Research,1987, 15:303-312.
    [134] John M. Griffith. CEO Ownership and Firm Value[J].Managerial and Decision Economics, 1999,20(1):1-8.
    [135]魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,(3):32-39,64.
    [136]于东智.资本结构、债权治理与公司绩效[J].中国工业经济,2003,(1):87-94.
    [137]李增泉.激励机制与企业绩效—一项基于上市公司的实证研究[J].会计研究,2000, (1):24-30.
    [138]蔡吉甫,陈敏.控制权性质、管理层持股与公司治理效率[J].产业经济研究,2005, (3):16-22.
    [139] H. Demsetz, L. Kenneth. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences [J].Journal of Political Economy,1985,93:1155-1177.
    [140] E. F. Fama, M. C. Jensen. Separation of Ownership and Control[J].Journal of Law and Economics,1983,26:1-32.
    [141] J. Byrd, K. Hickman. Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers? Evidence from Tender Offers Bids[J].Journal of Financial economics,1992,32:195-222.
    [142]李善民,周木堂,余鹏翼.最终所有权性质、治理机制对企业绩效的影响研究[J].管理科学,2006,19(5):9-16.
    [143]胡朝晖,夏芸.独立董事能否为收购公司创造财富—来自中国上市公司并购的证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2007,29(4):78-84.
    [144]周建,刘小元等.董事会战略委员会与企业绩效的相关性研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2008, 30(8):62-69.
    [145]张沛沛,夏新平.控制权转移中的高层更换与公司绩效—来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].当代财经,2006,(11):66-70.
    [146]毛小元.ST公司控制权价值的决定因素研究—来自中国A股市场的证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2006,28(5):116-123.
    [147]张兆国,宋丽梦,张庆.我国上市公司资本结构影响股权代理成本的实证分析[J].会计研究,2005,(8):44-49.
    [148] J. Cotter, A. Shivdasani and M.Zenner. Do Independent Directors Enhance Target Shareholder Wealth during Tender Offers[J].Journal Financial Economics,1997,43:195-218.
    [149] S. Bhagat and B. Black. The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance[J].Business Lawyer,1999,54:921-964.
    [150]于东智,王化成.独立董事与公司治理:理论、经验与实践[J].会计研究,2003,(8):8-13.
    [151]林勇,曾晓涛.第二大股东持股的治理效应—基于上市公司的实证分析[J].财经论丛, 2007,(5):84-89.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700