大学计算机基础课课堂教学评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
大学计算机基础课教学评价是大学计算机基础课课堂教学重要的组成部分之一,是确保大学计算机文化基础这门重要公共基础课教学质量的关键,而目前对大学计算机文化基础课课堂教学的评价还比较少,其理论与实践还不成熟,所以开展大学计算机文化基础课课堂教学评价的研究将会提升该门课程的教学质量和效果。
     第一部分首先从五个方面介绍了美国与中国高校课堂教学评价的情况,分别为:评价研究的历史、名称和管理机构、评价量表的类型和结构、评价内容和评定标准、评价的实施。总结分析我国高校课堂教学评价存在的主要问题。
     第二部分介绍了高校课堂教学评价和用于教学评价的模糊基本理论。
     第三部分是教师课堂教学评价指标体系的确立以及评价的具体实施。立足于大学计算机基础课的教学特点,注重师生互动的角度,从教学内容、教学讲授、师风师德及上机四个方面设立评价指标。利用具有学科特点的评价指标体系在我校部分学生中开展了评价活动。然后运用模糊评价理论从综合情况和教师情况两个角度对统计数据进行处理和分析,以反映计算机基础课课堂教学的实况。
     第四部分是对学生学习计算机文化基础课学习效果的测试。大学计算机文化基础课重视实践技能的培养,我们根据教学内容的五大模块及教学大纲的要求,列举出重要的实践技能点,并对学生进行上机实践测试,测试出学生对于这五个模块知识技能的掌握情况。
     第五部分是对教师课堂教学评价以及学生教学效果测试结论的分析,并提出大学计算机文化基础的改革的必要性及改革的具体措施。
The evaluation of the classroom instruction of the college computer culture basis is one of the important component of the classroom instruction of the college computer culture basis. Being the important public basis course, the evaluation of it is the key of teaching quality of the college computer culture basis.At present, the evaluation of it is still little. So the research of the evaluation of the classroom instruction of the college computer culture basis will promote the development of it effectively.
     Part one: at first, we introduce the situation of the evaluating of the classroom instruction of the colleges in U.S.A. and China respectively in five respects: the history of evaluating of the classroom instruction of the colleges; the name and the management organization of the evaluation, the type and the structure of the evaluation scales, the content and the criteria for the evaluation, implementation of the evaluation,Then we discuss the subject problems existing at present in the classroom instruction of the college.
     Part two: we introduce the basic theories about the evaluation of the classroom instruction of the colleges, including the educational evaluation and the evaluation of the classroom instruction of the colleges and fuzzy theory.
     Part three: we set up the index system of the evaluation of the classroom instruction of the college computer culture basis and the make the implement of it. we set up the index system according to the characteristics of the college computer culture basis.Attach importance to the perspective of student– teacher interraction to set up the index system. In the course of carrying out the evaluation activities, we using the theory of fuzzy evaluation respectively from the perspectives of comprehensive conditions and conditions of the teachers,then process and analyse the statistical data, in order to reflect the realities of classroom instruction of the college computer culture basis.
     Part four: we test the learing effect of the students in studying the college computer culture basis. The course of college computer culture basis attach importance to the cultivation of practical skills.We list the key point of practical skills,according to the teaching contents and teaching program of the course of the college computer culture basis. And then we put the test into effect, and got the realities of the situation of the students in mastering the practical skills of the five modules.
     Part five: we analyse the conclusions of the evaluation of the classroom instruction of teachers and the test of the effect in student’s learning in the college computer culture basis.Then put forward the necessity of reform in the course of the college computer culture basis,and the concrete measures.
引文
[1]林卫国,刘蓓.高校教学质量保障体系初探[J].福州:福州大学学报,2002, 16(3):100一102.
    [2]詹英.计算机教学评价的设计技术[J].台州师范学报,2000,22(6):17-18.
    [3]汪芳.高校学生评教的实施状况及评析[D].2003年湖北大学硕士学位论文.
    [4]吴钢,陈露君.中美高校学生评价教师课堂教学的比较及其启示[J].大学教育科学,2005(4).
    [5]RobertSproule.The underdeter minination of instructor performance by data from the student evaluation of teaching [J].Economics of Education Review ,2002(21).
    [6]蓝江桥,冷余生,李小平.中美两国大学课程教学质量评价的比较与思考[J].高等教育研究,2003(2).
    [7]钱萌,田东平.中美大学教师教学质量评价之比较[J].高等工程教育研究,2003 (1).
    [8]陶用之.官方统计数据质量评估与控制[M].北京:新华出版社2002.
    [9]张辉华.高等学校学生评价课堂教学的研究[D].上海:上海师范大学,2003(5).
    [10]陈露君.中美高校学生评价教师课堂教学的比较研究〔D].上海:上海师范大学,2004.
    [11]Paul.M.Mason,Jeffrey.w.Steagall,Michanel.M.Fabritius.Student Evaluation of Faculty: A New Aggregate Mersures of Performance[J].Economics of Education Review,1995(4).
    [12] Anthony.C.Krautmann, William Sander. Grades and student evaluation of teachers [J]. Economics of Education Review,1999(18).
    [13]吴洪莉.对以学生为主体的大学物理课堂教学评价的研究[D].2006(5).
    [14]中央电大经济数学基础课程组.教学评价的指标体系及其系统意义[J].中国电大教育,1997(10).
    [15]胡中锋.教育评价学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:22-23.
    [16]程书肖.教育评价方法技术[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004(1):6-8.
    [17]王孝玲.教学评价的理论与技术[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1999: 12-15.
    [18]李绩才,刘燕飞.基于群AHP和Vague集的教学测评(J).湖州师范学院学报,2008(2):114-115.
    [19]冯高斌.教学质量模糊评价技术研究[D].2005(10).
    [20]朱元昌.模糊综合评判法在课堂授课质量评价中的应用[J].南京理工大学学报(自然科学社会版),2007(2):66-67.
    [21]计算机文化基础课精品课:http://jpkc.zptc.cn/jsjwh/kcms-1.asp.
    [22]陈玉馄.教育评价学[M].人民教育出版社,1998.
    [23]薛惠,何栋,马静媛.基于AHP方法构建教学评价指标的研究[J]. Computer Knowledge and Technology,2009(4), 3177-3178.
    [24]韩照祥,朱惠娟.高校教学评估的探索[J].大学教育科学,2005(4):48-49.
    [25]王若梅.近十年国内高校教师教学评价研究与实践综述[J].江苏高教,2008(3):70-73.
    [26]郑家成.高校课堂教学评价标准研究[D].南京:河海大学,2004(3).
    [27]许广.多媒体教学软件评价指标体系的理论研究[D].湖南师范大学,2002.
    [28]佟庆伟,胡迎宾.教育科研中的量化方法[M].中国科学技术出版社,1997(6).

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700