湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制研究
|
摘要
本文研究视角
本文试图从国际河流水资源合作的角度阐释构建湄公河全流域水资源国际合作法律机制的必要性和可能性,以及这一法律机制的基本功能。从国际合作是各参与国利益诉求的博弈行为及过程这一客观现实出发,从博弈论的视角对国际河流水资源的合作过程进行了分析,明确了水资源博弈的主要因子是河流各段在水利水能资源开发与河流水资源可持续利用上的损益,揭示了不同发展阶段国际水资源合作中的博弈特点和规律,在此基础上运用博弈论的基本方法构建了国际水资源合作的博弈模型,进而深入探讨了中国参与湄公河流域水资源国际合作的现状和可能的路径,就如何在博弈分析的指导下参与和构建湄公河流域的水资源国际合作法律机制,规范和推进湄公河的全流域水资源合作,发挥中国在此机制中的积极作用进行了分析,对构建湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的困难进行了分析,对构建设这一机制的前景进行了预判。本文的研究重点：
一、对湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制现状的分析。
(一)通过对水资源、国际水资源和国际河流水资源进行定义,对湄公河流域水资源的特点进行定义,确定了特点1：湄公河流域水资源的地理性质决定了上下游水资源的客观差异和不同河段水资源利用目标的冲突。特点2：湄公河水资源的整体性决定了河流水资源的可持续发展必须通过全流域的国际合作才能达成,这就在客观上造成了湄公河流域水资源利用的矛盾性及国际合作的可能性和必要性。
(二)在阐明水资源国际合作法律机制原理的基础上,对现有的湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制——湄公河委员会进行了分析,对湄公河流域水资源合作的国际法律基础和中国与湄公河委员会的法律合作现状进行分类探讨,对湄公河流域水资源合作的法律机制进行剖析,指出：并非国际法律没有参考,而是上下游国家——尤其是中国同湄公河委员会国家,在水资源国际合作方面存在严重分歧,导致湄公河流域水资源合作难以深入和扩展。由于湄公河上下游之间在流域水资源合作上的利益诉求没有一个可供博弈的平台,无法进行充分的博弈,因而在水资源利用上缺乏共识和妥协。又因国际河流水资源分属不同主权国家的固有特点,导致难以形成有效的、权威的湄公河全流域水资源合作法律机制。
二、运用博弈论的方法探讨湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的构建路径
通过对国际河流水资源合作特征的分析,确定了国际水资源合作是一种多个决策主体共同参与的非合作博弈,进而运用非合作博弈的理论方法,对中国同下游国家水资源利用的不同阶段进行博弈分析,对中国参与下游水资源合作就将会受到水资源利益损失的传统观念进行了纠偏,证明上下游国家水资源合作在一定条件下将会转化为多方得利的合作博弈,并且随着水资源利用的不断深入,无论上下游国家是否主观上对水资源合作存在抵触,均会为了自身的利益选择参与到水资源国际合作法律机制当中,并且该合作法律机制的主要合作目的必然将从水电开发协调,转移到水资源的可持续发展与环境保护上来。对博弈的结果进行抽象化得到以下结论：
(一)在河流水资源合作初期,因为水资源分布的时空不均衡,流域各段水资源利益表现不同,不同主体的博弈选择也会不同,上游国家和下游国家出于各自利益最大化考虑,均不会对构建全流域水资源国际合作的法律机制抱积极态度。上游国家甚至会顾虑到构建全流域水资源合作的法律机制会制约自己的水资源开发行为而抵制这种构建。而下游国家一般会在邀请上游国家参与得到否定答复后采取消极的合作态度,故尔上下游国家很难在河流水资源利用的初期就达成构建全流域水资源国际合作法律机制的共识。
(二)当水资源利用到达一定的水平,特别是当上游国家可开发的水利水电利益已经不足以和参与全流域合作得到的生态利益相对抗时,上游国家才会不可避免地寻求与下游国家进行全面的水资源国际合作。而下游国家在考虑到自身生态和水电利益的条件下也将选择与上游国家进行积极的水资源合作。湄公河上游水资源开发的高峰期已经随着中国段水能水电建设的基本结束而成为过去,但老挝、缅甸由于经济发展相对滞后等原因,尚未达到开发高峰,此时构建湄公河全流域水资源国际合作法律机制还存在很大的利益冲突,但是由于全流域水资源合作对中国已经成为最大最佳的利益组合,在中国积极参与下的全流域国际水资源合作将成为各国的最终选择,而构建湄公河全流域国际水资源合作法律机制的条件也趋于成熟。
(三)水资源利用进入后开发期时,全流域的生态利益合作会成为所有国家共同关注的最大利益,容易形成共同诉求和共识,成为国际合作的基础。由此可知,湄公河流域水资源国际合作的最终目标必定是全流域整体的生态利益,湄公河流域水资源及生态保护的可持续发展将成为支撑各国共同构建法律机制的共同目标。
三、从国际河流水资源合作法律机制构建过程所得到的启示
(一)依据国际水资源合作的现状,国际流域水资源合作可分为三类：1.全面有效的国际合作流域。2.已形成全流域合作机制但实施效果不明显的合作流域。3.基本没有流域合作机制的国际流域。
(二)现行国际水资源利用都是基于两个主要原则——公平合理利用原则与无害利用原则。公平合理与利用无害原则的国际实践表明：国际合作法律机制的构建应体现国际水法的基本追求,体现流域各国在利用国际水资源的过程中应承担的国际义务。构建法律合作机制的目的是实现公平和合理利用国际水资源,无害利用国际水资源,预防和解决国际水争端的基本途径。
水资源管理的两大主要理论——可持续发展理论和系统理论都明确认为,国际水资源的国际合作是不可避免的客观要求,而全流域的国际水资源合作是达到这一客观要求的唯一渠道。
(三)借鉴多瑙河流域水资源合作的经验,以欧盟水框架指令——国际水资源合作在法律机制层面上的典范为案例,认为：
1、湄公河水资源利益的实际博弈与多瑙河流域水资源合作的发展过程可以相互印证。
2、湄公河流域水资源国际合作应该也只能通过流域各国的国际法律合作而达成；
3、湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制应是一个综合的水资源国际执法机制；
4、湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制应是一个多重合作机制的复杂体；
5、湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制还将面临长期的水资源利益合作挑战。
四、对中国参与构建湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的预判与展望
通过以上分析,可对中国参与构建湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的前景加以预判和展望——即湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的构建的紧迫性、可能性。具体表现在以下几个方面：
(一)中国参与建立湄公河流域水资源国际合作机制具有迫切性
1、湄公河国际河流的水资源的共享性特点要求中国尽快加入到湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制当中；
2、在澜沧江流域开发、尤其是主干流开发进入中后期后,中国已大规模的进入湄公河下游国家进行水电开发活动,流域各国在水资源开发上的利益冲突需要有更为完善的平台来实现博弈,需要建立面对水资源主权问题争端的协商解决机制,而湄公河全流域水资源合作法律机制是解决这一类争端的唯一出路；
3、从博弈论的角度分析,中国无论现在支持与否,随着湄公河流域开发的进程,中国与下游国家终将选择共同构建全流域的水资源国际合作法律机制；
4、中国的国家责任和国家利益都要求中国参与到构建湄公河全流域国际合作法律机制当中。
(二)根据湄公河流域自然条件、各国经济发展的不平衡以及水资源国际法律合作的经验,本文认为中国参与构建的湄公河流域国际合作法律机制必将是一个不断调整的法律机制,不可能在初期就能够达成较高的水资源合作水平,是一个不断完善过程。
(三)认为中国在构建湄公河全流域水资源合作时,应当坚持——主权与公平利用原则,可持续发展与统筹协调原则,并对中国构建湄公河流域水资源合作的主要制度进行展望。
Research perspective
This article attempts to explain the necessity and possibility of construction of Mekong water resources basin-wide legal mechanisms for international cooperation, as well as the basic functions of the legal mechanisms river water resources from the perspective of international cooperation. International cooperation is the process of game behavior and interests of the participating countries of the objective demands of reality, from a game theory perspective on the process of international cooperation in the river water were analyzed, clearly the main factor of the game is the river of water in each segment profit or river water conservancy and hydropower resources development on the sustainable use of water resources, and reveals the different stages of development of international cooperation in water resources characteristics and laws of the game, using the basic method of game theory constructed on the basis of international water cooperation game model, and then discuss in depth the current situation and possible paths China to participate in international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources, water resources on how to participate and build the legal mechanism for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin Game Analysis of guidance, standards and promote the Mekong basin-wide water resources cooperation, China play a positive role in this mechanism were analyzed, the difficulties of legal mechanisms for international cooperation to build water resources of the Mekong River Basin were analyzed on prospects of construction of this mechanism were to predict.
The focus
Fristly, the analysis of water resources in international cooperation mechanisms for the Mekong River.
(a) Through the water resources, water resources and the international definition of international river water resources, water resources in the Mekong River basin characteristics define, determine the characteristics of one:geographical nature of the Mekong River Basin water resources determines the objective differences between the upstream and downstream water river water use conflicts and different goals. Feature2:determining the integrity of the Mekong water resources for sustainable development of water resources of the river must be reached through international cooperation the whole basin, which resulted in the objective contradictions and possibilities of international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water use and necessity.
(b) Clarifing the principles of water resources in the legal mechanisms for international cooperation on the basis of the existing water resources in the Mekong River Basin legal mechanism for international cooperation, the Mekong River Commission analyzed the international legal basis for cooperation on water resources in the Mekong River Basin and China and the Mekong carried Status classification of Legal Cooperation Committee, the legal mechanism of the Mekong River Basin water resources cooperation analyze, states:international law does not refer to, but on the downstream countries-particularly China and the Mekong River Commission, national, international cooperation in water resources there are serious differences, resulting in deep water cooperation in the Mekong River and difficult to expand. Since interest demands on water resources cooperation between the Mekong river basin downstream platform available without a game, the game can not be fully and thus the lack of consensus and compromise on water use. Because of the international river water resources belong to the inherent characteristics of different sovereign states, making it difficult to form an effective and authoritative legal mechanism of cooperation in the Mekong basin-wide water resources.
Secondly, using game theory to explore water resources in the Mekong River Basin legal mechanism for international cooperation to build a path
By analyzing the characteristics of the international river water cooperation, identified the international water cooperation is more than a non-cooperative game to participate in the decision-making body, and thus the use of non-cooperative game theory, the downstream countries of China with different water use stage game analysis on China's participation in the downstream water cooperation on water resources will be the loss of the traditional concept of interest were correct, proven national water upstream and downstream cooperation under certain conditions, will be transformed into multi-benefit cooperation game, and with the deepening of water use, regardless of whether the downstream countries cooperation on water resources exist subjectively conflict for their own interests will choose to participate in the legal mechanism for international cooperation among water resources, and the cooperation of the main purpose of the inevitable legal mechanisms of cooperation from hydropower development coordination, transfer to sustainable development and environmental protection of water resources up. Game results were abstracted the following conclusions:
(a) the initial cooperation in river water resources, because the spatial and temporal distribution of water resources is not balanced, the performance of the different interests of the various River Basin water resources, the game will choose different subjects in different upstream and downstream countries to maximize the benefits for their own national considerations, There will not be constructed legal mechanisms for international cooperation in the whole basin of water to take a positive attitude. Upstream countries will even take into consideration the whole basin of water cooperation to build the legal mechanism would restrict their water resources development act to resist this build. The downstream countries will normally be invited to participate in the upstream countries to get a negative answer to take a negative attitude of cooperation, it is difficult to Seoul on downstream countries in the early river water use on the construction of water resources to achieve international cooperation in basin-wide consensus on legal mechanisms.
(b) When water use reaches a certain level, especially when the water conservancy and hydropower interests of upstream countries can be developed and ecological benefits have been insufficient to get the full participation and cooperation to confront the basin, upstream countries will inevitably seek and downstream countries comprehensive international cooperation in water resources. The downstream countries, taking into account the interests of their own ecological and hydro conditions with the upstream countries will be selected for active co-operation of water resources. The peak of the upper Mekong water resources development China has basically completed with the construction of hydropower and water segment of the past, but Laos, Myanmar economic development is lagging behind other reasons, the development has not yet reached its peak at this time to build the whole Mekong River Basin Water Resources International legal mechanisms of cooperation there is a big conflict of interest, but because the whole basin of water cooperation, China has become the biggest and best combination of interests, international water cooperation in China with the active participation of the whole basin will become the ultimate choice of countries, and build conditions Mekong basin-wide cooperation in international water law mechanisms are mature.
(c) the use of water resources into the development of cooperation ecological interests of the whole basin will become the biggest common interest of all countries concerned, it is easy to form a common aspirations and consensus as the basis for international cooperation. It can be seen that the ultimate goal of international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources must be the interests of the whole watershed ecology, sustainable development and ecological protection of water resources in the Mekong River Basin will become the common goal of supporting countries to work together to build legal mechanisms.
Thirdly, the revelation process resulting from the construction of international legal mechanism river water cooperation
(a) in accordance with the status of international water resources cooperation, cooperation in international water basin can be divided into three categories:(1) a comprehensive and effective international cooperation Basin.2basin-wide cooperation mechanism has been formed but the implementation is not obvious cooperative watershed.3. Basically no international cooperation mechanism watershed basin.
(b) the existing international water use are based on two main principles-the principle of equitable and reasonable utilization and harmless use principle. Fair and reasonable and the use of sound principles of international practice shows:Building international cooperation mechanism should reflect the basic legal pursuit of international water law, reflecting the international obligations of the countries in the basin water use international process should be undertaken. The purpose is to build legal cooperation mechanisms to achieve equitable and reasonable utilization of international water resources, harmless use of international water resources, prevention and basic way to solve international water disputes.
Two main theories for water resource management-Sustainable development theory and systems theory are clear that international cooperation is inevitable international waters objective requirements, and international water basin-wide cooperation is required to achieve this objective only channels.
(C) draw on the experience of the Danube River Basin water resources cooperation, the EU Water Framework Directive-International cooperation on legal mechanisms of water-level model for the case, said:
1, the actual interests of the game and the Mekong River water resources development cooperation in the Danube River Basin water resources can confirm each other.
2, international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources should only international legal cooperation through basin countries and reach;
3, the Mekong River Basin water resources legal mechanism for international cooperation should be an integrated water resources of international enforcement mechanisms;
4, the legal mechanism for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources should be a multi-complex of cooperation mechanisms;
5, water legal mechanism for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources will face long-term challenges of the benefits of cooperation.
Fourthly, China's participation in international cooperation to build water resources of the Mekong River Basin legal mechanism to predict and Prospects
Through the above analysis, can be pre-judgment and vision for the prospects of China's participation in international cooperation in legal mechanism to build water resources of the Mekong River Basin-Construction of water that legal mechanisms for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin urgency possibilities. Specifically in the following areas:
(a) the establishment of China's participation in international cooperation mechanisms in the Mekong River Basin Water Resources urgency.
1, the characteristics of the Mekong River water sharing international rivers of water added to the requirements of China as soon as possible legal mechanisms for international cooperation among the Mekong River;
2, in the Lancang River Basin development, especially after the mid-and late into the mainstream of development, China has entered a large-scale hydropower development in the lower Mekong countries activities, national watershed conflict of interest in the development of water resources requires a more sophisticated platform to achieve game, the need to establish the sovereignty issue facing the water resource disputes resolved through consultation mechanism, and water cooperation in the Mekong basin-wide legal mechanism is the only way to resolve this type of dispute;
3, from game theory point of view, China is now whether or not to support, along with the process of developing the Mekong River Basin, China and the downstream countries will eventually choose a common legal mechanisms for international cooperation to build water resources in the basin;
4, State responsibility and China's national interests require China to participate in the construction of the Mekong basin-wide mechanisms for international cooperation among law.
(b) Based on the experience of the Mekong River Basin natural conditions unbalanced economic development of countries and international legal cooperation in water resources, this paper considers the legal mechanisms for China's participation in international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin is bound to build a legal mechanism to constantly adjust, it is impossible in the early Water will be able to reach a higher level of cooperation, is a continuous improvement process.
(c) China in the construction of water resources in the Mekong basin-wide cooperation should adhere to the main principles-the principle of sovereignty and the equitable utilization, the principles of sustainable development and coordination and co-ordinate.
and the principle of sustainable development, and China to build major projects of cooperation in the Mekong basin water resources outlook.
本文试图从国际河流水资源合作的角度阐释构建湄公河全流域水资源国际合作法律机制的必要性和可能性,以及这一法律机制的基本功能。从国际合作是各参与国利益诉求的博弈行为及过程这一客观现实出发,从博弈论的视角对国际河流水资源的合作过程进行了分析,明确了水资源博弈的主要因子是河流各段在水利水能资源开发与河流水资源可持续利用上的损益,揭示了不同发展阶段国际水资源合作中的博弈特点和规律,在此基础上运用博弈论的基本方法构建了国际水资源合作的博弈模型,进而深入探讨了中国参与湄公河流域水资源国际合作的现状和可能的路径,就如何在博弈分析的指导下参与和构建湄公河流域的水资源国际合作法律机制,规范和推进湄公河的全流域水资源合作,发挥中国在此机制中的积极作用进行了分析,对构建湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的困难进行了分析,对构建设这一机制的前景进行了预判。本文的研究重点：
一、对湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制现状的分析。
(一)通过对水资源、国际水资源和国际河流水资源进行定义,对湄公河流域水资源的特点进行定义,确定了特点1：湄公河流域水资源的地理性质决定了上下游水资源的客观差异和不同河段水资源利用目标的冲突。特点2：湄公河水资源的整体性决定了河流水资源的可持续发展必须通过全流域的国际合作才能达成,这就在客观上造成了湄公河流域水资源利用的矛盾性及国际合作的可能性和必要性。
(二)在阐明水资源国际合作法律机制原理的基础上,对现有的湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制——湄公河委员会进行了分析,对湄公河流域水资源合作的国际法律基础和中国与湄公河委员会的法律合作现状进行分类探讨,对湄公河流域水资源合作的法律机制进行剖析,指出：并非国际法律没有参考,而是上下游国家——尤其是中国同湄公河委员会国家,在水资源国际合作方面存在严重分歧,导致湄公河流域水资源合作难以深入和扩展。由于湄公河上下游之间在流域水资源合作上的利益诉求没有一个可供博弈的平台,无法进行充分的博弈,因而在水资源利用上缺乏共识和妥协。又因国际河流水资源分属不同主权国家的固有特点,导致难以形成有效的、权威的湄公河全流域水资源合作法律机制。
二、运用博弈论的方法探讨湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的构建路径
通过对国际河流水资源合作特征的分析,确定了国际水资源合作是一种多个决策主体共同参与的非合作博弈,进而运用非合作博弈的理论方法,对中国同下游国家水资源利用的不同阶段进行博弈分析,对中国参与下游水资源合作就将会受到水资源利益损失的传统观念进行了纠偏,证明上下游国家水资源合作在一定条件下将会转化为多方得利的合作博弈,并且随着水资源利用的不断深入,无论上下游国家是否主观上对水资源合作存在抵触,均会为了自身的利益选择参与到水资源国际合作法律机制当中,并且该合作法律机制的主要合作目的必然将从水电开发协调,转移到水资源的可持续发展与环境保护上来。对博弈的结果进行抽象化得到以下结论：
(一)在河流水资源合作初期,因为水资源分布的时空不均衡,流域各段水资源利益表现不同,不同主体的博弈选择也会不同,上游国家和下游国家出于各自利益最大化考虑,均不会对构建全流域水资源国际合作的法律机制抱积极态度。上游国家甚至会顾虑到构建全流域水资源合作的法律机制会制约自己的水资源开发行为而抵制这种构建。而下游国家一般会在邀请上游国家参与得到否定答复后采取消极的合作态度,故尔上下游国家很难在河流水资源利用的初期就达成构建全流域水资源国际合作法律机制的共识。
(二)当水资源利用到达一定的水平,特别是当上游国家可开发的水利水电利益已经不足以和参与全流域合作得到的生态利益相对抗时,上游国家才会不可避免地寻求与下游国家进行全面的水资源国际合作。而下游国家在考虑到自身生态和水电利益的条件下也将选择与上游国家进行积极的水资源合作。湄公河上游水资源开发的高峰期已经随着中国段水能水电建设的基本结束而成为过去,但老挝、缅甸由于经济发展相对滞后等原因,尚未达到开发高峰,此时构建湄公河全流域水资源国际合作法律机制还存在很大的利益冲突,但是由于全流域水资源合作对中国已经成为最大最佳的利益组合,在中国积极参与下的全流域国际水资源合作将成为各国的最终选择,而构建湄公河全流域国际水资源合作法律机制的条件也趋于成熟。
(三)水资源利用进入后开发期时,全流域的生态利益合作会成为所有国家共同关注的最大利益,容易形成共同诉求和共识,成为国际合作的基础。由此可知,湄公河流域水资源国际合作的最终目标必定是全流域整体的生态利益,湄公河流域水资源及生态保护的可持续发展将成为支撑各国共同构建法律机制的共同目标。
三、从国际河流水资源合作法律机制构建过程所得到的启示
(一)依据国际水资源合作的现状,国际流域水资源合作可分为三类：1.全面有效的国际合作流域。2.已形成全流域合作机制但实施效果不明显的合作流域。3.基本没有流域合作机制的国际流域。
(二)现行国际水资源利用都是基于两个主要原则——公平合理利用原则与无害利用原则。公平合理与利用无害原则的国际实践表明：国际合作法律机制的构建应体现国际水法的基本追求,体现流域各国在利用国际水资源的过程中应承担的国际义务。构建法律合作机制的目的是实现公平和合理利用国际水资源,无害利用国际水资源,预防和解决国际水争端的基本途径。
水资源管理的两大主要理论——可持续发展理论和系统理论都明确认为,国际水资源的国际合作是不可避免的客观要求,而全流域的国际水资源合作是达到这一客观要求的唯一渠道。
(三)借鉴多瑙河流域水资源合作的经验,以欧盟水框架指令——国际水资源合作在法律机制层面上的典范为案例,认为：
1、湄公河水资源利益的实际博弈与多瑙河流域水资源合作的发展过程可以相互印证。
2、湄公河流域水资源国际合作应该也只能通过流域各国的国际法律合作而达成；
3、湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制应是一个综合的水资源国际执法机制；
4、湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制应是一个多重合作机制的复杂体；
5、湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制还将面临长期的水资源利益合作挑战。
四、对中国参与构建湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的预判与展望
通过以上分析,可对中国参与构建湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的前景加以预判和展望——即湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制的构建的紧迫性、可能性。具体表现在以下几个方面：
(一)中国参与建立湄公河流域水资源国际合作机制具有迫切性
1、湄公河国际河流的水资源的共享性特点要求中国尽快加入到湄公河流域水资源国际合作法律机制当中；
2、在澜沧江流域开发、尤其是主干流开发进入中后期后,中国已大规模的进入湄公河下游国家进行水电开发活动,流域各国在水资源开发上的利益冲突需要有更为完善的平台来实现博弈,需要建立面对水资源主权问题争端的协商解决机制,而湄公河全流域水资源合作法律机制是解决这一类争端的唯一出路；
3、从博弈论的角度分析,中国无论现在支持与否,随着湄公河流域开发的进程,中国与下游国家终将选择共同构建全流域的水资源国际合作法律机制；
4、中国的国家责任和国家利益都要求中国参与到构建湄公河全流域国际合作法律机制当中。
(二)根据湄公河流域自然条件、各国经济发展的不平衡以及水资源国际法律合作的经验,本文认为中国参与构建的湄公河流域国际合作法律机制必将是一个不断调整的法律机制,不可能在初期就能够达成较高的水资源合作水平,是一个不断完善过程。
(三)认为中国在构建湄公河全流域水资源合作时,应当坚持——主权与公平利用原则,可持续发展与统筹协调原则,并对中国构建湄公河流域水资源合作的主要制度进行展望。
Research perspective
This article attempts to explain the necessity and possibility of construction of Mekong water resources basin-wide legal mechanisms for international cooperation, as well as the basic functions of the legal mechanisms river water resources from the perspective of international cooperation. International cooperation is the process of game behavior and interests of the participating countries of the objective demands of reality, from a game theory perspective on the process of international cooperation in the river water were analyzed, clearly the main factor of the game is the river of water in each segment profit or river water conservancy and hydropower resources development on the sustainable use of water resources, and reveals the different stages of development of international cooperation in water resources characteristics and laws of the game, using the basic method of game theory constructed on the basis of international water cooperation game model, and then discuss in depth the current situation and possible paths China to participate in international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources, water resources on how to participate and build the legal mechanism for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin Game Analysis of guidance, standards and promote the Mekong basin-wide water resources cooperation, China play a positive role in this mechanism were analyzed, the difficulties of legal mechanisms for international cooperation to build water resources of the Mekong River Basin were analyzed on prospects of construction of this mechanism were to predict.
The focus
Fristly, the analysis of water resources in international cooperation mechanisms for the Mekong River.
(a) Through the water resources, water resources and the international definition of international river water resources, water resources in the Mekong River basin characteristics define, determine the characteristics of one:geographical nature of the Mekong River Basin water resources determines the objective differences between the upstream and downstream water river water use conflicts and different goals. Feature2:determining the integrity of the Mekong water resources for sustainable development of water resources of the river must be reached through international cooperation the whole basin, which resulted in the objective contradictions and possibilities of international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water use and necessity.
(b) Clarifing the principles of water resources in the legal mechanisms for international cooperation on the basis of the existing water resources in the Mekong River Basin legal mechanism for international cooperation, the Mekong River Commission analyzed the international legal basis for cooperation on water resources in the Mekong River Basin and China and the Mekong carried Status classification of Legal Cooperation Committee, the legal mechanism of the Mekong River Basin water resources cooperation analyze, states:international law does not refer to, but on the downstream countries-particularly China and the Mekong River Commission, national, international cooperation in water resources there are serious differences, resulting in deep water cooperation in the Mekong River and difficult to expand. Since interest demands on water resources cooperation between the Mekong river basin downstream platform available without a game, the game can not be fully and thus the lack of consensus and compromise on water use. Because of the international river water resources belong to the inherent characteristics of different sovereign states, making it difficult to form an effective and authoritative legal mechanism of cooperation in the Mekong basin-wide water resources.
Secondly, using game theory to explore water resources in the Mekong River Basin legal mechanism for international cooperation to build a path
By analyzing the characteristics of the international river water cooperation, identified the international water cooperation is more than a non-cooperative game to participate in the decision-making body, and thus the use of non-cooperative game theory, the downstream countries of China with different water use stage game analysis on China's participation in the downstream water cooperation on water resources will be the loss of the traditional concept of interest were correct, proven national water upstream and downstream cooperation under certain conditions, will be transformed into multi-benefit cooperation game, and with the deepening of water use, regardless of whether the downstream countries cooperation on water resources exist subjectively conflict for their own interests will choose to participate in the legal mechanism for international cooperation among water resources, and the cooperation of the main purpose of the inevitable legal mechanisms of cooperation from hydropower development coordination, transfer to sustainable development and environmental protection of water resources up. Game results were abstracted the following conclusions:
(a) the initial cooperation in river water resources, because the spatial and temporal distribution of water resources is not balanced, the performance of the different interests of the various River Basin water resources, the game will choose different subjects in different upstream and downstream countries to maximize the benefits for their own national considerations, There will not be constructed legal mechanisms for international cooperation in the whole basin of water to take a positive attitude. Upstream countries will even take into consideration the whole basin of water cooperation to build the legal mechanism would restrict their water resources development act to resist this build. The downstream countries will normally be invited to participate in the upstream countries to get a negative answer to take a negative attitude of cooperation, it is difficult to Seoul on downstream countries in the early river water use on the construction of water resources to achieve international cooperation in basin-wide consensus on legal mechanisms.
(b) When water use reaches a certain level, especially when the water conservancy and hydropower interests of upstream countries can be developed and ecological benefits have been insufficient to get the full participation and cooperation to confront the basin, upstream countries will inevitably seek and downstream countries comprehensive international cooperation in water resources. The downstream countries, taking into account the interests of their own ecological and hydro conditions with the upstream countries will be selected for active co-operation of water resources. The peak of the upper Mekong water resources development China has basically completed with the construction of hydropower and water segment of the past, but Laos, Myanmar economic development is lagging behind other reasons, the development has not yet reached its peak at this time to build the whole Mekong River Basin Water Resources International legal mechanisms of cooperation there is a big conflict of interest, but because the whole basin of water cooperation, China has become the biggest and best combination of interests, international water cooperation in China with the active participation of the whole basin will become the ultimate choice of countries, and build conditions Mekong basin-wide cooperation in international water law mechanisms are mature.
(c) the use of water resources into the development of cooperation ecological interests of the whole basin will become the biggest common interest of all countries concerned, it is easy to form a common aspirations and consensus as the basis for international cooperation. It can be seen that the ultimate goal of international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources must be the interests of the whole watershed ecology, sustainable development and ecological protection of water resources in the Mekong River Basin will become the common goal of supporting countries to work together to build legal mechanisms.
Thirdly, the revelation process resulting from the construction of international legal mechanism river water cooperation
(a) in accordance with the status of international water resources cooperation, cooperation in international water basin can be divided into three categories:(1) a comprehensive and effective international cooperation Basin.2basin-wide cooperation mechanism has been formed but the implementation is not obvious cooperative watershed.3. Basically no international cooperation mechanism watershed basin.
(b) the existing international water use are based on two main principles-the principle of equitable and reasonable utilization and harmless use principle. Fair and reasonable and the use of sound principles of international practice shows:Building international cooperation mechanism should reflect the basic legal pursuit of international water law, reflecting the international obligations of the countries in the basin water use international process should be undertaken. The purpose is to build legal cooperation mechanisms to achieve equitable and reasonable utilization of international water resources, harmless use of international water resources, prevention and basic way to solve international water disputes.
Two main theories for water resource management-Sustainable development theory and systems theory are clear that international cooperation is inevitable international waters objective requirements, and international water basin-wide cooperation is required to achieve this objective only channels.
(C) draw on the experience of the Danube River Basin water resources cooperation, the EU Water Framework Directive-International cooperation on legal mechanisms of water-level model for the case, said:
1, the actual interests of the game and the Mekong River water resources development cooperation in the Danube River Basin water resources can confirm each other.
2, international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources should only international legal cooperation through basin countries and reach;
3, the Mekong River Basin water resources legal mechanism for international cooperation should be an integrated water resources of international enforcement mechanisms;
4, the legal mechanism for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources should be a multi-complex of cooperation mechanisms;
5, water legal mechanism for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin water resources will face long-term challenges of the benefits of cooperation.
Fourthly, China's participation in international cooperation to build water resources of the Mekong River Basin legal mechanism to predict and Prospects
Through the above analysis, can be pre-judgment and vision for the prospects of China's participation in international cooperation in legal mechanism to build water resources of the Mekong River Basin-Construction of water that legal mechanisms for international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin urgency possibilities. Specifically in the following areas:
(a) the establishment of China's participation in international cooperation mechanisms in the Mekong River Basin Water Resources urgency.
1, the characteristics of the Mekong River water sharing international rivers of water added to the requirements of China as soon as possible legal mechanisms for international cooperation among the Mekong River;
2, in the Lancang River Basin development, especially after the mid-and late into the mainstream of development, China has entered a large-scale hydropower development in the lower Mekong countries activities, national watershed conflict of interest in the development of water resources requires a more sophisticated platform to achieve game, the need to establish the sovereignty issue facing the water resource disputes resolved through consultation mechanism, and water cooperation in the Mekong basin-wide legal mechanism is the only way to resolve this type of dispute;
3, from game theory point of view, China is now whether or not to support, along with the process of developing the Mekong River Basin, China and the downstream countries will eventually choose a common legal mechanisms for international cooperation to build water resources in the basin;
4, State responsibility and China's national interests require China to participate in the construction of the Mekong basin-wide mechanisms for international cooperation among law.
(b) Based on the experience of the Mekong River Basin natural conditions unbalanced economic development of countries and international legal cooperation in water resources, this paper considers the legal mechanisms for China's participation in international cooperation in the Mekong River Basin is bound to build a legal mechanism to constantly adjust, it is impossible in the early Water will be able to reach a higher level of cooperation, is a continuous improvement process.
(c) China in the construction of water resources in the Mekong basin-wide cooperation should adhere to the main principles-the principle of sovereignty and the equitable utilization, the principles of sustainable development and coordination and co-ordinate.
and the principle of sustainable development, and China to build major projects of cooperation in the Mekong basin water resources outlook.
引文
1 中新网,中老电力合作加深累计送电逾4亿千瓦时http://www.cableabc.com/news/20131004000638.html,访问口期2013.12.10。
2 国务院国有资产管理委员会,南方电网公司与柬埔寨的电力合作正式启动,http://www.sasac.gov.cn/n 1180/n 1226/n2410/n314274/1437212.html,访问日期2013.12.10。
3 中国电力网,大唐集团投资建设的柬埔寨斯登沃代水电站暨金边—马德望电网工程开工,http://www.chinapower.com.cn/newsarticle/1068/new1068546.asp,访问日期2013.12.10。
4 中国电力网,中国水电在老挝建设的水电站正式投产发电,http://www.chinapower.com.cn/article/1221/art1221416.asp访问日期2013.12.10。
5 重庆晚报,旱灾引发湄公河用水争端泰国指责我国水坝截水,http://www.cqwb.com.cn/NewsFiles/201003/26/20102026102008336178.shtml,访问日期2013.12.10。
6 Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk, The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4,p184-192.
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20Volume%201-Managing%20Wate r%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pdf
7 Vandana Shiva,Water Wars:Privatization, Pollution and Profit,South End Press,2002,p77.
8 Richard Schaffer,Filiberto Agusti,Beverley Earle,international Business Law and Its Environment,SOUTH-WESTERN LEGAL STUDIES IN BUSINESS ACAMIC SERIES,2009,p66.
9 李峥,解决国际淡水资源争端的条法化综述,《国际资料信息》,2002年第10期,第13页。
10 Undala Alam a, Ousmane Dione, Paul Jeffrey, The benefit-sharing principle:Implementing sovereignty bargains on water,Political Geography,28 (2009),p 90-100.
11 2010 World Affairs Challenge Guide:Glossary:Water around the World, http://worldsavvy.org/docs/2010_WAC-Water-Glossary.pdf.
12 何艳梅,华东政法大学博士论文,第48页。
13 Dante A Caponera,Marcella Nanni, Principles of Water Law and Administration:National and International,CRC PRESS,1992,p213.
14 Kai Wegerich，Jeroen Warner,Politics of Water:A Survey,Routledge,2010,p31.
15 何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》,华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第50页。
16 Agim Popa, The Theory of "Limited Sovereignty"-A Flagrant Expression of the Imperialist Policy of the Soviet Revisionists, https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/albania/albania-14.pdf,visited 2013.1.2.
17 Dante A Caponera,Marcella,Nanni,Principles of Water Law and Administration,CRC PRESS,1992,p213.
18 Korwa G. Adar,Nicasius A. Check,Cooperative Diplomacy, Regional Stability and National Interests, African Books Collective,2011,p332-333.
19 Salah El-DinAmer,law of water-historical record, the Options Mediterraneennes,1997, p381-390.
20 Aline Baillat. nternational Trade in Water Rights:The Next Step, IWA Publishing,2010.p8-9.
21 Patrick Forest,Transferring bulk water between Canada and the United States:More than a century of transboundary inter-local water supplies, Geoforum,2011(7),pl-3.
22 Shlomi Dinar, Assessing side-payment and cost-sharing patterns in international water agreements:The geographic and economic connection, Political Geography 25 (2006),p 412-437.
23 E. Hey， International Water Law Placed in a Contemporary Environmental Context:the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Case, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B:Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, Volume 25, Issue 3,2000, P303-308.
24 Paul Jeffrey, The benefit-sharing principle:Implementing sovereignty bargains on water, Political Geography, Volume 28, Issue 2, February 2009, P90-100.
25 Libor Jansky, The Danube:a case study of sharing international waters，Global Environmental Change, Volume 14, Supplement,2004. P39-49.
26 冯彦,何大,国际河流的水权及其有效利用和保护研究,《水科学进展》,2003年第14期,第124-128页。
27 何艳梅,国际河流水资源分配的冲突及其协调,《资源与产业》,2010年第4期,第54-57页。
28 龙晴,林春,关于我国参与大渊公河次区域电力合作的战略思考,《现代电力》,2006年第3期,第89-92页。
29 徐宁,中国与大湄公河地区国家的水能开发合作,《中国水能及电气化》,2007年第4期,第4-8页。
30 张锡镇,中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路,《南洋问题研究》,2007年第3期,第1-5页。
31 陆海曙,《基于博弈论的流域水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》博士论文.江苏：河海大学,第30-40页。
32 姜国辉,《基于博弈论的跨流域调水工程水价及项目管理研究》博士论文.西安：西安理工大学,2008年。
33 肖志娟,解建仓,基于合作博弈的水权交易模型,《水科学进展》,2005年第6期,第817-821页。
34 曲格平著：《环保保护知识读本》第二章当代全球环境问题第六节,http://www.jsie.edu.cn/web/chemonnet/books/%BB%B7%BE%B3%E1%A3%BB%A4%D6%AA%CA%B6%B6 %C1%B1%BE/qgp_ml.htm,访问日期:2011年3月30日。
35 联合国.《联合国报告——国际行动十年生命之水2005—2015》,http://www.un.org/zh/waterforlifedecade/scarcity.shtml,Visited 2011.3.20
36 United Nations.Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk, The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4,p2-3,
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20Volume%201-Managing%20Wate r%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pdf. Visited 2011.3.20
37 张泽.《国际水资源安全问题研究》,北京：中共中央党校博士论文,第100页。
38 何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》,上海：华东政法大学博士论文,第l页。
39 黄锡生,李希昆著《环境与资源保护法学》,2007版,第156页。
40 蔡守秋,《环境与资源法教程》,2006版,第277页。
41 美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际河流资料,
http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html访问日期2013年8月10日。
42 王曦主编／译,《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》,法律出版社2002年版,第272页。
43 万霞著,《国际环境保护的法律理论与实践》,经济科学出版社2003年版,第162页。
44 蔡守秋、常纪文主编,《国际环境法学》,法律出版社2007年版,第164页。
45 王曦主编／译,《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》,法律出版社2002年版,第272页。
46 美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际河流资料,
http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html访问日期：2011年3月20日。
47 Juha I. Uitto,Multi-country cooperation around shared waters:role of monitoring and evaluation, Global Environmental Change, 2004, 14(S1),p5-14.
48 Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-six Session.UN Doc.A/49/10,Year Book of the International Law Commission,Vol Ⅱ,Part 2(1994),p 326.
49 F. H. Hinsley,Sovereignty, CUP Archive,p3-4.
50 中国网,各国经济权利和义务宪章,http://www.china.com.cn/law/flfg/txt/2006-08/08/content_7057219.htm,访问日期2013年12月4日。
Salah E1-DinAmer,law of water-historical record, the Options Mediterraneennes,1997,p381-390.
52 冯彦、何大明,国际水法的发展趋势与中国水法体系的对比分析研究,地理学报,1999年6月,第170页。
53 唐海行,澜沧江—湄公河流域的水资源及其开发利用现状分析,《云南地理环境研究》,1999年01期,第21页。
54 Zou Keyuan,China-Asean Relations and International Law,CHANDOS PUBLISHING,2009,p95-96.
54 参见中国水利国际合作与科技网：《世界江河数据库》,http://www.cws.net.cn/riverdata/Search.asp?CWSNewsID=17970,访问日期：2011年3月20日.。
56 以下的澜沧江段水资源能源规划及环评报告资料来于华能澜沧江电力有限公司提供的往年可公开澜沧江环评资料,为笔者自己的收集整理。
57 Vietnews:Dams signal misery for Mekong River, http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-misery-for-Mekong-River.htm访问日期2011年3月31日。
58 李希昆,关于澜沧江——湄公河次区域环境保护立法的思考[J].昆明理工大学学报,2002,(4)
59 维基百科,湄公河,http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/湄公河,访问日期2013年6月30日。
60 南方日报,下游国家指湄公河水位下降因中国建水电站外交部回应,2010年3月27日,http://china.nfdaily.cn/content/2010-03/27/content_10520096.htm,访问日期2013年6月30日。
61 秦晖,湄公河枯水之思,《经济观察报》,2010年4月10日版。
62 何艳梅,《国际水资源公平合理利用的法律理论与实践》,华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第16页。
63 M.Falkenmark,Competing Freshwater and Ecological Services in the River Basin Perspective,presentation at 9~(th) Stockholm Water Symposium,August 1999.
64 中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》,,http://.www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm
65 张锡镇,《中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路》,南洋问题研究,2007年第3期,第5-7 页。
66 陈丽晖,曾尊固.国际河流整体开发和管理及两大理论依据.《长江流域资源与环境》,2001年第10期,第309-314。
67 戴长雷,王佳慧.国际河流水权初探,《水利学术》,2004年第1期,第62页。
68 贺圣达,大湄公河次区域合作：复杂的合作机制和中国的参与,《南洋问题研究》,2005年第1期,第6-14页。
69 贾琳,国际河流开发的区域合作法律机制,《北方法学》,2008年05期,第104-110页。
70 丁桂彬等,国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探,《中国农村水利水电》, 2009年第8期,第56页。
71 丁桂彬等,国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探,《中国农村水利水电》,2009年第8期,第57页。
72 笔者认为这一论断过于重视水资源的国际共享性,而忽略了水资源作为重要的流域各国重要的矿产资源的独立性以及各国对流域水资源的依赖性：放眼世界各国,几乎没有国家对各国区域内国际河流的水资源 出现放任浪费使用和肆意污染的行为,这与公地悲剧的假设存在矛盾。参见蒋天文,樊志宏,大江大河从“公共资源”到“公地悲剧”演变的内在机理分析,《长江流域资源与环境》,2006年03期,第315-318页。
73 贾琳.《西南国际河流的流域共同开发法律机制》.《生态经济》,2010年第7期,第162-163页。
74 陈丽晖,曾尊固.《国际河流整体开发和管理及两大理论依据》.长江流域资源与环境,2001年7月第10卷第4期,第313页。
75 齐虹丽,龙悦宁.澜—湄流域淡水资源保护国际合作机制探析.《云南社会科学》,2011年05期,第68页。
76 杜元真.论个人的国际法主体地位.《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011年09期,第34页。
77 杜元真.论个人的国际法主体地位.《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011年09期, 第35页。
78 ESCAP, About ESCAP, http://www.unescap.org/about/.visited 2013.3.10
79 ESCAP.ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FORASIA AND THE PACIFIC ANNUAL REPORT. http://www.unescap.org/EDC/English/AnnualReports/1999(55).pdf.2013.3.10
80 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIAAND THE PACIFIC:REPORT OF THE MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION,2008 (64), pp.1-8.
81 Integrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strategic-Plan-2011.pdf, visited 2012.12.20.
82 Mekong River Commission:Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin, Second Reprint by MRC Secretariat (5 April 1995) [R],1999, pp.6～13.
83 MRC.lntegrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy.http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strategic-Plan-201 1.pdf. visited2012.12.20.
84 中国东盟博览会网,《泰国湄公河引水工程年内动工》http://www.caexpo.org/gb/cafta/t20080908_80840.html访问日期2011年4月1日。
85 Vietnews:Dams signal misery for Mekong River, http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-miserv-for-Mekong-River.htm访问日期2011年3月31日。
86 中国东盟自由贸易区网站公告http://www.chinaaseantrade.com/访问日期：2011年3月28日。
87 中国人民政府网,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》,中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告[R/OL],http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm.
88 中国网,大湄公河蓝皮书http://www.china. com.cn/international/txt/2012-07/05/content_25814843.htm访问日期2013年10月10日。
89 荆海虹.经济分析法学派综述.《科学之友》,2009年1月,第150-151页。
90 (美)卡普洛,(美)沙维尔著,冯玉军,涂永前译,《公平与福利》,法律出版社：第1版,第165-190页。
91 史绍忠,《运筹学在建筑工程投资与进度控制中的运用》,大连理工大学：硕士学位论文,2008年,第5-10页。
92 刘光溪,《共赢性博弈理论》,复旦大学：博士学位论文,2006年,第86-87页。
93 周炜,《基于博弈理论的普适计算信任模型的安全问题研究》,中国海洋大学博士论文,2011年,第25-26页。
94 马光文,《基于博弈理论的水电竞价策略研究》,四川大学博士论文,2006年,第16页。
95 陆海曙,《基于博弈论的河流水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》,河海大学博十学位论文,2007年,第5-8页。
96 阿维纳什·迪克西特等著,蒲勇健译：《策略博弈》,中国人民大学出版仕,2011年版,第4页。
97 合作博弈与非合作博弈是以博弈中达成的协议成是否充足的具有联合实施行动的外部强制力为依据的,国际水资源合作协议大部分为多边或双边协定组成,一般不具有外部强制力,故采用非合作博弈模型对国际水资源合作进行分析,具体参见[美]阿维纳什·迪克西特等著：《策略博弈》,蒲勇健等译,中国人民大学出版社2011年3月版。
98 中国日报,中国为保澜沧江下游生态不惜做亏本买卖,http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqgj/jryw/2012-05-25/content_6009820_2.html2013年12月12日
99 Henry P. Farnham,The Law of Waters and Water Rights, The Lawbook Exchange,Ltd.,2006,p805.
100 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union' First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2000,p4.
101 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p2..
102 刘佳奇,《莱茵河保护公约》的协调机制及其展开,《云南大学学报(法学版)》,2012年05期,第28页。
103 Erik Mostert,International co-operation on Rhine water quality 1945-2008:An example to follow?, Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283.
104 Brahma Chellaney,Water:Asia's New Battleground, Georgetown University Press,2011,p315.
105 Aysegul Kibareglu, Adele Kirschner, Sigrid Mehring, Rudiger Wolfrum:Water Law and Cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris Region, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2004,p150.
106 Katharina Hohendinger:Water politics in the Middle East:The Euphrates-Tigris-Basin,GRIN Verlag,2006, p4.
107 Asit K. Biswas:Asian international waters:from Ganges-Brahmaputra to Mekong,Oxford University Press, 1996, p1-3.
108 杨恕,沈晓晨,解决国际河流水资源分配问题的国际法基础,《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》,2009年第4期,第15页。
109 何艳梅,国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践,华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第84-85页。
110 周寄中,《国际科技与经济合作》,科学出版社1993年版,第221页。
111 叶明照,《国际环境法概论》,厦门大学出版社1996年版,第80页。
112 Stephen C.McCaffrey,the Law of International Watercourses:Non-Navigational Uses,Chapter 6,Oxford, New York:Oxford University Press,2001.p150-151.
113 胡文俊,张捷斌,国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探,《水利经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页。
114 韩健、陈立虎主,《国际环境法》,武汉大学出版社1992年版,第96页。
Judgement of 25 September1997,1997 ICJ No.92, Para.85, p102.
116 曾彩琳,国际河流公平合理利用原则：回顾、反思与消解,《世界地理研究》,2012年第2期,第56页。
117 [德]沃尔夫刚.格拉夫.魏智通主编,吴越、毛晓飞,《国际法》,法律出版社2002年版,第591页。
118 Gabriel E.Eckstein,Application of International Water Law to Transboundary Groundwater Resources, and the Slovak-Hungarian Dispute over Gabcikovo-Nagymaros,19 Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 1995, p67.
119 Richard Paisley,Adversanes into partners:International water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits,Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283.
120 韩健、陈立虎编,《国际环境法》,武汉大学出版社1992年版,第96页。
121 Dr.Patricia Wouters.The Legal Response to International Water Scarcity and Water Conflicts,Note 197,http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/waterlaw,visited on Dec.25 2013.
122 Joseph W.Dellapenna,The customary international law of transboundary fresh waters.Int.J.Global Environmental Issues,Vol.1,Nos.3/4,2001,p.278.
123 Richard Paisley.Adversaries into partners:International Water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits,Melboume Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283.
124 Green Cross International,National Sovereignty and International Watercourses,first pristributed for the occasion of the 2ndWorld Water Forum,The Hague.March 2000.p200.
125 Ludwik A. Teclaff,The river basin in history and law, Martinus Nijhoff,1967,p228.
126 McCaffrey Stephen,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses,at 399,2001.
See intemanional court of justis,case concerning the gabcikovo-nagymaros project (Hungary and Slovenia Snow), Judgement of 25 September1997,1997,p7,Para.17.
128 何艳梅,国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践,上海：华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第120页。
129 胡文俊,国际水法的发展及其对跨界水国际合作的影响,《国际瞭望》,2007年11月,第63页。
130 李斌,《现代国际法学》,北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页。
131 See Attila Tanzi,The Relationship between the 1992 UN/ECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes and the 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Non Navigational Uses of International Watercourses,Report of the UNECE Task Force on Legal and Administrative Aspects,Italy,Geneva,Feb.2000,p 18.
132 Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law, University Press of America,1996, p57.
133 Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law, University Press of America, 1996, p60.
134 Roger W. Babcock, Roger William Babcock, Raymond Walton, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008:Ahupua, ASCE Publications,p1-2.
135 陈明忠,孙烨,《多瑙河流域国际水管理简介》,《水利经济》,1991年第4期,第68页。
136 Danubebox,Water use in the Danube river basin, http://www.danubebox.org/files/dbox/download/DanubeBox_Chapter4.pdf. visited 2012.12.12.
137 Slobodan P. P. Simonovic, Managing Water Resources:Methods and Tools for a Systems Approach, UNESCO Publishing,2012,p150-154.
138 中国数字科技馆,多瑙河http://amuseum.cdstm.cn/AMuseum/shuiziyuan/water/02/w02_b04_03.html访问时间2013年10月12日。
139 WATERPUB,多瑙河,http://www. waterpub.com.cn/jhdb/DetailRiver.asp?ID=78访问时间2013年10月12日。
140 R.施塔德勒,多瑙河流域跨界管理,《水利水电快报》,2009年9月,第12页。
141 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12.
142 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12.
143 ICPDR, Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable use of the Danube River, Article 2: Objectives and principles of cooperation.
144 ICPDR, Contracting Parties, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12.
145 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions, Article 2,(3).
146 ICPDR,Contracting Parties, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12.
147 R.施塔德勒,多瑙河流域跨界管理,《水利水电快报》,2009年9月,第12页。
148 I.L. Murphy, Protecting Danube River Basin Resources:Ensuring Access to Water Quality Date and Information, Kluwer Acadimic publishers,2012, p9-10.
149 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007.p2.
150 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,'Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union' First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2000,p4.
151 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.htm,visited2013.12.13.
152 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007.p6-7.
153 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p362.
154 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p7-8.
155 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL in accordance with article 18.3 of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC on programmes for monitoring of water status,2009,p3-4.
156 Angel Borj,The European water framework directive:A challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf research, Volume 25, Issue 14, September 2005, P 1768.
157 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p6.
158 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,River Basin Management Plans 2009-2015-information on availability by country, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm,visited 2012.12.14.
159 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12.
160 P. van der Zaag and H. Savenije, A comparison between conventional and integrated water resources planning and management, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27 (2002),p831-838.
161 胡文俊,张捷斌,国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探,《水利经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页。
162 李斌,《现代国际法学》,北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页。
163 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.htm,visited2013.12.13.
4 张泽,《国际水资源安全问题研究》,中共中央党校,博士论文,2009年,第124至140页。
5 高晓露,现代国际水法的发展趋势及对中国的启示,学术交流,2009年4月,第58至59页。
166 何艳梅,从基本概念的演变看现代国际水法的特点,法治论从,2004年9月,第97页
167 Matthias Finger,Ludivine Tamiotti,Jeremy Allouche,The Multi-Governance of Water, SUNY Press,2006,p23.
168 赵建文,《国际法上的国家责任》,中国政法大学：博士论文,2004年,第3页。
169 王铁崖主编：《国际法》,法律出版社1995年版,第136页。
170. Kimberley N. Trapp,State Responsibility for International Terrorism, Oxford University Press,2011,p1.
171 维基百科,http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/各国人均国内生产总值列表_(国际汇率),访问日期2013年12月8日。
172 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions, Article 2,(3).
173 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p2.
174 McCaffrey,S,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses.at 399,2001.
5 何艳梅,华东政法大学博士论文
176 黄德春,许长新,基于整体开发管理的国际河流决策支持系统,《中国人口·资源与环境》,2006年第2期,第138页。
[1]中新网.中老电力合作加深累计送电逾4亿千瓦时[R/OL],http://www.cableabc.com/news/20131004000638.html,访问日期 2013.12.10
[2]国务院国有资产管理委员会.南方电网公司与柬埔寨的电力合作正式启动[R/OL], http://www.sasac.gov.cn/n1180/n1226/n2410/n314274/1437212.html,访问口期2013年12月10口
[3]中国电力网.大唐集团投资建设的柬埔寨斯登沃代水电站暨金边—马德望电网工程开工[R/OL],http://www.chinapower.com.cn/newsarticle/1068/new1068546.asp,访问日期2013年12月10日
[4]中国电力网.中国水电在老挝建设的水电站正式投产发电[R/OL],http://www.chinapower.com.en/article/1221/art1221416.asp,访问日期2013年12月10日
[5]重庆晚报.旱灾引发湄公河用水争端泰国指责我国水坝截水[N/OL],http://www.cqwb.com.cn/NewsFiles/201003/26/20102026102008336178.shtml,访问日期2013年12月10日
[6]Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk, The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4[R/OL],p184-192 http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20 Volume%201-Managing%20Water%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pd f, visited 2012.12.10
[7]Vandana Shiva,Water Wars:Privatization[M], Pollution and Profit,South End Press,2002,p77
[8]Richard Schaffer,Filiberto Agusti,Beverley Earle,international Business Law and Its Environment[M],SOUTH-WESTERN LEGAL STUDIES IN BUSINESS ACAMIC SERIES,2009,p66
[9]李峥.解决国际淡水资源争端的条法化综述[J].《国际资料信息》,2002年第10期,第13页
[10]Undala Alam a, Ousmane Dione, Paul Jeffrey, The benefit-sharing principle: Implementing sovereignty bargains on water[J],Political Geography,28 (2009),p 90-100
[11]2010 World Affairs Challenge Guide:Glossary:Water around the World[R], http://worldsavvy.org/docs/2010_WAC-Water-Glossary.pdf,visited 2012.12.10
[12]何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第48页
[13]Dante A Caponera,Marcella Nanni, Principles of Water Law and Administration: National and International [M],CRC PRESS,1992,p213
[14]Kai Wegerich,Jeroen Warner,Politics of Water:A Survey[J],Routledge,2010,p31.
[15]何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》[D].华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第50页
[16]Agim Popa,The Theory of "Limited Sovereignty"-A Flagrant Expression of the Imperialist Policy of the Soviet Revisionists [J], https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/albania/albania-14.pdf,visited 2013.1.2
[17]Dante A Caponera,Marcella,Nanni,Principles of Water Law and Administration [M],CRC PRESS,1992,p213
[18]Korwa G. Adar,Nicasius A. Check,Cooperative Diplomacy, Regional Stability and National Interests [M], African Books Collective,p6-8
[19]Salah El-DinAmer,law of water-historical record [J], the Options Mediterraneennes,1997, p381-390
[20]Aline Baillat, nternational Trade in Water Rights:The Next Step [M], IWA Publishing,2010,p8-9
[21]Patrick Forest, Transferring bulk water between Canada and the United States: More than a century of transboundary inter-local water supplies [J], Geoforum, 2011(7),p1-3
[22]Shlomi Dinar, Assessing side-payment and cost-sharing patterns in international water agreements:The geographic and economic connection [J], Political Geography 25 (2006),p 412-437
[23]Erasumus, International Water Law Placed in a Contemporary Environmental Context:the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Case [J],Pergamon,2008,p80
[24]Paul Jeffrey, Impediments and Innovation in International Rivers:The Waters of South Asia,Political Geography,2000,p1908-2005
[25]Libor Jansky, Development of a web-based decision support system (DSS) for managing large international rivers [J],Global Environmental Change,2004,p26-30
[26]冯彦,何大明.国际河流的水权及其有效利用和保护研究[J].《水科学进展》,2003年第14期,第124-128页
[27]何艳梅.国际河流水资源分配的冲突及其协调[J].《资源与产业》,2010年第4期,第54-57页
[28]龙晴,林春.关于我国参与大湄公河次区域电力合作的战略思考[J].《现代电力》,2006年第3期,第89-92页
[29]徐宁.中国与大湄公河地区国家的水能开发合作[J].《中国水能及电气化》,2007年第4期,第4-8页
[30]张锡镇.中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路[J].《南洋问题研究》,2007年第3期,第1-5页
[31]陆海曙,《基于博弈论的流域水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》[D].江苏：河海大学,第30-40页
[32]姜国辉,《基于博弈论的跨流域调水工程水价及项目管理研究》[D].西安：西安理工大学,2008年
[33]肖志娟,解建仓.基于合作博弈的水权交易模型[J],水科学进展,2005年第6期,第817-821页
[34]曲格平.《环保保护知识读本》[M/OL],http://www.jsie.edu.cn/web/chemonnet/books/%BB%B7%BE%B3%Bl%A3% BB%A4%D6%AA%CA%B6%B6%Cl%Bl%BE/qgp_ml.htm, 访问日期:2011 年3月30日
[35]联合国,《联合国报告——国际行动十年生命之水2005-2015》[R/OL],http://www.un.org/zh/waterforlifedecade/scarcity.shtml,访问日期2013年12月12日
[36]United nations,Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk [R/OL], The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4,p2-3, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20 Volume%201-Managing%20Water%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pd f, visited 2012.12.10
[37]张泽.《国际水资源安全问题研究》[D].北京：中共中央党校,第100页
[38]何艳梅.《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第1页
[39]黄锡生,李希昆.《环境与资源保护法学》[M].重庆：重庆大学出版社,2007年版,第156页
[40]蔡守秋,《环境与资源法教程》[M].北京：中国人民大学,2006版,第277页
[41]美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际流域报告[R/OL],http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html,访问日期2013年8月10日
[42]王曦.《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》[M].北京：法律出版社,2002年版,第272页
[43]万霞著.《国际环境保护的法律理论与实践》[M].北京：经济科学出版社2003年版,第162页
[44]蔡守秋、常纪文.《国际环境法学》[M].北京：法律出版社2007年版,第164页
[45]王曦.《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》[M].北京：法律出版社2002年版,第272页
[46]美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际流域报告[R/OL]http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html,访问日期：2011年3月20日
[47]Juha I. Uitto,Multi-country cooperation around shared waters:role of monitoring and evaluation, Global Environmental Change [J],2004,14(S1), p 5-14
[48]Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-six Session,UN Doc.A/49/10,Year Book of the International Law Commission [R],Vol Ⅱ,Part 2(1994),p 326
[49]F. H. Hinsley,Sovereignty [M], CUP Archive,p3-4
[50]中国网,各国经济权利和义务宪章[R/OL],http://www.china.com.cn/law/flfg/txt/2006-08/08/content_7057219.htm,访问日期2013年12月4日
[51]Salah El-DinAmer,law of water-historical record [J], the Options Mediterraneennes,1997,p381-390
[52]冯彦、何大明.国际水法的发展趋势与中国水法体系的对比分析研究[J],《地理学报》,1999年6月,第170页
[53]唐海行.澜沧江—湄公河流域的水资源及其开发利用现状分析[J],《云南地理环境研究》,1999年01期,第21页
[54]Zou Keyuan,China-Asean Relations and International Law,CHANDOS PUBLISHING,2009,p95-96
[55]中国水利国际合作与科技网,《世界江河数据库》[R/OL],http://www.cws.net.cn/riverdata/Search.asp?CWSNewsID=17970,访问日期：2011年3月20日
[56]以下的澜沧江段水资源能源规划及环评报告资料来于华能澜沧江电力有限公司提供的往年可公开澜沧江环评资料,为笔者自己的收集整理
[57]Vietnews,Dams signal misery for Mekong River [R], http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-misery-for-Me kong-River.htm, visited 2012.12.10
[58]李希昆.关于澜沧江——湄公河次区域环境保护立法的思考[J]. 《昆明理工大学学报》,2002,P4
[59]维基百科.湄公河[R/OL], http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/湄公河,访问日期2013年6月30日
[60]南方日报.下游国家指湄公河水位下降因中国建水电站外交部回应[N/OL],2010年3月27日,http://china.nfdaily.cn/content/2010-03/27/content_10520096.htm,访问日期2013年6月30日
[61]秦晖.湄公河枯水之思[J].经济观察报,2010年4月10日版
[62]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平合理利用的法律理论与实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第16页
[63]M.Falkenmark,Competing Freshwater and Ecological Services in the River Basin Perspective [J], presentation at 9th Stockholm Water Symposium,August 1999,p282-284
[64]中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》 [R/OL],http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm
[65]张锡镇.中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路.《南洋问题研究》,2007年第3期,第5页
[66]陈丽晖,曾尊固.国际河流整体开发和管理及西大理论依据[J].《长江流域资源与环境》,2001年第10期,第309-314
[67]戴长雷,王佳慧.国际河流水权初探[J].《水利学术》,2004年第1期,第62页
[68]贺圣达.大湄公河次区域合作：复杂的合作机制和中国的参与[J].《南洋问题研究》,2005年第1期,第6-14页
[69]贾琳.国际河流开发的区域合作法律机制[J].《北方法学》,2008年05期,第104-110页
[70]丁桂彬等.国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探[J].《中国农村水利水电》,2009年第八期,第56页
[71]丁桂彬等.国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探[J].《中国农村水利水电》,2009年第八期,第57页
[72]蒋天文,樊志宏.大江大河从“公共资源”到“公地悲剧”演变的内在机理分析[J].《长江流域资源与环境》,2006年03期,第315-318页
[73]贾琳.西南国际河流的流域共同开发法律机制[J].《生态经济》,2010年第7期,第162-163页
[74]陈丽晖,曾尊固.国际河流整体开发和管理及两大理论依据[J].《长江流域资源与环境》,2001年7月第4期,第313页
[75]齐虹丽,龙悦宁.湄公河流域淡水资源保护国际合作机制探析[J].《云南社会科学》,2011年05期,第68页
[76]杜元贞.论个人的国际法主体地位[J].《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011 年09期,第34页
[77]杜元贞.论个人的国际法主体地位[J].《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011年09期,第35页
[78]ESCAP. About ESCAP [R/OL]. http://www.unescap.org/about/. Visited 2013.3.10
[79]ESCAP.ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FORASIA AND THE PACIFIC ANNUAL REPORT [R/OL]. http://www.unescap.org/EDC/English/AnnualReports/1999(55).pdf. Visited 2013.3.10
[80]ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC: REPORT OF THE MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION [R/OL],2008 (64) pp.1-8
[81]MRC,Integrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy [R/OL], http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strate gic-Plan-2011.pdf,visited 2012.12.20
[82]Mekong River Commission:Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin [R/OL], Second Reprint by MRC Secretariat (5 April 1995) [R],1999,pp.6-13
[83]MRC,Integrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy[R/OL], http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strate gic-Plan-2011.pdf, visited 2012.12.20
[84]中国东盟博览会网.《泰国湄公河引水工程年内动工》[R/OL],http://www.caexpo.org/gb/cafta/t20080908_80840.html,访问日期2011年4月1日
[85]Vietnews, Dams signal misery for Mekong River, http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-misery-for-Me kong-River.htm,访问日期2011年3月31日
[86]中国东盟自由贸易区网,公告数据[EB/OL], http://www.chinaaseantrade.com/,访问日期：2011年3月28日
[87]中国人民政府网,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》,中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告[R/OL],http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm,访问日期：2011年3月28日
[88]中国网,大湄公河蓝皮书[R/OL],http://www.china.com.cn/international/txt/2012-07/05/content_25814843.htm,访问口期2013年10月10日
[89]荆海虹.经济分析法学派综述[J].《科学之友》,2009年1月,第150-151页
[90](美)卡普洛,(美)沙维尔著,冯玉军,涂永前译.《公平与福利》[M].法律出版社,2007年版,第165-190页
[91]史绍忠.《运筹学在建筑工程投资与进度控制中的运用》[D].大连：大连理工大学,2008年,第5-10页
[92]刘光溪.《共赢性博弈理论》[D].上海：复旦大学,2006年,第86-87页
[93]周炜.《基于博弈理论的普适计算信任模型的安全问题研究》[D].大连：中国海洋大学,2011年,第25-26页
[94]马光文.基于博弈理论的水电竞价策略研究》[D].四川：四川大学,2006年,第16页
[95]陆海曙.《基于博弈论的河流水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》[D].江苏：河海大学,2007年,第5-8页
[96]阿维纳什·迪克西特等著,蒲勇健译.《策略博弈》[M].中国人民大学出版社,2011年版,第4页
[97]阿维纳什·迪克西特等著,蒲勇健译.《策略博弈》[M].中国人民大学出版社,2011年版,第7-10页
[98]中国日报,中国为保澜沧江下游生态不惜做亏本买卖,http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqgj/jryw/2012-05-25/content_6009820_2.html,2013年12月12日
[99]Henry P. Farnham,The Law of Waters and Water Rights[M], The Lawbook Exchange,Ltd.,2006,p805
[100]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC[R/OL],2000,p4
[101]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC[R/OL],2007,p2
[102]刘佳奇.《莱茵河保护公约》的协调机制及其展开[J].《云南大学学报(法学版)》,2012年05期,第28页
[103]Erik Mostert,International co-operation on Rhine water quality 1945-2008: An example to follow? [J], Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283
[104]Brahma Chellaney,Water:Asia's New Battleground[M], Georgetown University Press,2011,p315
[105]Aysegul Kibaroglu, Adele Kirschner, Sigrid Mehring, Riidiger Wolfrum, Water Law and Cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris Region[M], Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2004,p150
[106]Katharina Hohendinger, Water politics in the Middle East:The Euphrates-Tigris-Basin[M],GRIN Verlag,2006, p4
[107]Asit K. Biswas,Asian international waters:from Ganges-Brahmaputra to Mekong[M],Oxford University Press,1996, p1-3
[108]杨恕,沈晓晨.解决国际河流水资源分配问题的国际法基础[J].《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》,2009年第4期,第15页
[109]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第84-85页
[110]周寄中.《国际科技与经济合作》[M].北京：科学出版社,1993年版,第221页
[111]叶明照.《国际环境法概论》[M].厦门：厦门大学出版社,1996年版,第80页
[112]Stephen C.McCaffrey,the Law of International Watercourses:Non-Navigational Uses,Chapter 6[M],Oxford,New York:Oxford University Press,2001.p150-151
[113]胡文俊,张捷斌.国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探[J].《水利 经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页
[114]韩健、陈立虎.《国际环境法》[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,1992年版,第96页
[115]Judgement of 25 Septemberl997,1997 ICJ No.92 [EB/OL], Para.85, p102
[116]曾彩琳.国际河流公平合理利用原则：回顾、反思与消解[J].《世界地理研究》,2012年第2期,第56页
[117][德]沃尔夫刚.格拉夫.魏智通主编,吴越、毛晓飞译.《国际法》[M].北京：法律出版社,2002年版,第591页
[118]Gabriel E.Eckstein,Application of International Water Law to Transboundary Groundwater Resources and the Slovak-Hungarian Dispute over Gabcikovo-Nagymaros [J],19 Suffolk Transnational Law Review,1995, p67
[119]Richard Paisley,Adversaries into partners:International Water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits [J],Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283
[120]韩健、陈立虎编著.《国际环境法》[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,1992年版,第96页
[121]Dr.Patricia Wouters,The Legal Response to International Water Scarcity and Water Conflicts,Note197,http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/waterlaw,visited on 2013.10.10
[122]Joseph W.Dellapenna,The customary international law of transboundary fresh waters [M],Int.J.Global Environmental Issues,Vol.1,Nos.3/4,2001,p.278
[123]Richard Paisley,Adversaries into partners:International Water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits [J],Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283
[124]Green Cross International,National Sovereignty and International Watercourses,first pristributed for the occasion of the 2ndWorld Water Forum, [M] The Hague,March 2000.p200
[125]Ludwik A. Teclaff,The river basin in history and law [M], Martinus Nijhoff, 1967,p228
[126]McCaffrey Stephen,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses [M],Wolters kluwer,2001,p399
[127]See internanional court of justis,case concerning the gabcikovo-nagymaros project (.Hungary and Slovenia Snow) [EB/OL], Judgement of 25 September1997,1997,p7,Para.17
[128]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第120页
[129]胡文俊.国际水法的发展及其对跨界水国际合作的影响.《国际瞭望》,2007年11月,第63页
[130]李斌,《现代国际法学》,北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页
[131]See Attila Tanzi,The Relationship between the 1992 UN/ECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes and the 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Non Navigational Uses of International Watercourses [J],Report of the UNECE Task Force on Legal and Administrative Aspects,Italy,Geneva,Feb.2000,p18
[132]Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law [M], University Press of America,1996, p57
[133]Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law [M], University Press of America,1996, p60
[134]Roger W. Babcock, Roger William Babcock, Raymond Walton, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008:Ahupua [M],ASCE Publications,p1-2
[135]陈明忠,孙烨.多瑙河流域国际水管理简介[J].《水利经济》,1991年第4期,第68页
[136]Danubebox,Water use in the Danube river basin [R/OL], http://www.danubebox.org/files/dbox/download/DanubeBox_Chapter4.pdf. visited 2012.12.12
[137]Slobodan P. P. Simonovic, Managing Water Resources:Methods and Tools for a Systems Approach [M], UNESCO Publishing,2012,p150-154
[138]维基百科.多瑙河[R/OL], http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/多瑙河,访问时间 2013年10月12日
[139]WATERPUB多瑙河[R/OL],http://www.waterpub.com.cn/jhdb/DetailRiver.asp?ID=78,访问时间2013年10月12日
[140]R.施塔德勒.多瑙河流域跨界管理[J],《水利水电快报》,2009年9月,第12页
[141]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12
[142]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12
[143]ICPDR, Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable use of the Danube River [EB], Article 2:Objectives and principles of cooperation
[144]ICPDR, Contracting Parties [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12
[145]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions [EB], Article 2,(3).
[146]ICPDR, Contracting Parties [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12
[147]R.施塔德勒.多瑙河流域跨界管理[J].水利水电快报,2009年9月,第12页
[148]I.L. Murphy, Protecting Danube River Basin Resources:Ensuring Access to Water Quality Date and Information [M], Kluwer Acadimic publishers,2012, p9-10
[149]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p2.
[150]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,'Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2000,p4
[151]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports [R/OL], http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.ht m,visited2013.12.13
[152]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p6-7
[153]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p362
[154]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p7-8
[155]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL in accordance with article 18.3 of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC on programmes for monitoring of water status[EB],2009,p3-4
[156]Angel Borj,The European water framework directive:A challenge for nearshore[J], coastal and continental shelf research, Volume 25, Issue 14, September 2005, P 1768
[157]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p6
[158]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,River Basin Management Plans 2009-2015-information on availability by country [R/OL], http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm,visited 2012.12.14
[159]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention[R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12
[160]P. van der Zaag and H. Savenije, A comparison between conventional and integrated water resources planning and management[J], Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27 (2002),p831-838
[161]胡文俊,张捷斌.国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探[J].《水利经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页
[162]李斌.现代国际法学[J].北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页
[163]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports[R/OL], http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.ht m,visited2013.12.13
[164]张泽.《国际水资源安全问题研究》[D].北京：中共中央党校,2009年,第124至140页
[165]高晓露.现代国际水法的发展趋势及对中国的启示[J].《学术交流》,2009年4月,第58至59页
[166]何艳梅.从基本概念的演变看现代国际水法的特点[J].法治论丛,2004年9月,第97页
[167]Matthias Finger,Ludivine Tamiotti,Jeremy Allouche,The Multi-Governance of Water[M], SUNY Press,2006,p23
[168]赵建文.《国际法上的国家责任》[D].北京：中国政法大学,2004年,第3页
[169]王铁崖.《国际法》[M].北京：法律出版社,1995年版,第136页。
[170]Kimberley N. Trapp,State Responsibility for International Terrorism[M], Oxford University Press,2011,p1
[171]维基百科.各国人均国内生产总值列表[R/OL],http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/各国人均国内生产总值列表_(国际汇率),访问日期2013年12月8日
[172]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions [EB], Article 2,(3)
[173]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p2
[174]McCaffrey Stephen,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses [M],Wolters kluwer,2001,p399
[175]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践》[D].上海：华 东政法大学,2006年,第185-186页
[176]黄德春,许长新.基于整体开发管理的国际河流决策支持系统[J].《中国人口·资源与环境》,2006年第2期,第138页
2 国务院国有资产管理委员会,南方电网公司与柬埔寨的电力合作正式启动,http://www.sasac.gov.cn/n 1180/n 1226/n2410/n314274/1437212.html,访问日期2013.12.10。
3 中国电力网,大唐集团投资建设的柬埔寨斯登沃代水电站暨金边—马德望电网工程开工,http://www.chinapower.com.cn/newsarticle/1068/new1068546.asp,访问日期2013.12.10。
4 中国电力网,中国水电在老挝建设的水电站正式投产发电,http://www.chinapower.com.cn/article/1221/art1221416.asp访问日期2013.12.10。
5 重庆晚报,旱灾引发湄公河用水争端泰国指责我国水坝截水,http://www.cqwb.com.cn/NewsFiles/201003/26/20102026102008336178.shtml,访问日期2013.12.10。
6 Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk, The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4,p184-192.
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20Volume%201-Managing%20Wate r%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pdf
7 Vandana Shiva,Water Wars:Privatization, Pollution and Profit,South End Press,2002,p77.
8 Richard Schaffer,Filiberto Agusti,Beverley Earle,international Business Law and Its Environment,SOUTH-WESTERN LEGAL STUDIES IN BUSINESS ACAMIC SERIES,2009,p66.
9 李峥,解决国际淡水资源争端的条法化综述,《国际资料信息》,2002年第10期,第13页。
10 Undala Alam a, Ousmane Dione, Paul Jeffrey, The benefit-sharing principle:Implementing sovereignty bargains on water,Political Geography,28 (2009),p 90-100.
11 2010 World Affairs Challenge Guide:Glossary:Water around the World, http://worldsavvy.org/docs/2010_WAC-Water-Glossary.pdf.
12 何艳梅,华东政法大学博士论文,第48页。
13 Dante A Caponera,Marcella Nanni, Principles of Water Law and Administration:National and International,CRC PRESS,1992,p213.
14 Kai Wegerich，Jeroen Warner,Politics of Water:A Survey,Routledge,2010,p31.
15 何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》,华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第50页。
16 Agim Popa, The Theory of "Limited Sovereignty"-A Flagrant Expression of the Imperialist Policy of the Soviet Revisionists, https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/albania/albania-14.pdf,visited 2013.1.2.
17 Dante A Caponera,Marcella,Nanni,Principles of Water Law and Administration,CRC PRESS,1992,p213.
18 Korwa G. Adar,Nicasius A. Check,Cooperative Diplomacy, Regional Stability and National Interests, African Books Collective,2011,p332-333.
19 Salah El-DinAmer,law of water-historical record, the Options Mediterraneennes,1997, p381-390.
20 Aline Baillat. nternational Trade in Water Rights:The Next Step, IWA Publishing,2010.p8-9.
21 Patrick Forest,Transferring bulk water between Canada and the United States:More than a century of transboundary inter-local water supplies, Geoforum,2011(7),pl-3.
22 Shlomi Dinar, Assessing side-payment and cost-sharing patterns in international water agreements:The geographic and economic connection, Political Geography 25 (2006),p 412-437.
23 E. Hey， International Water Law Placed in a Contemporary Environmental Context:the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Case, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B:Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, Volume 25, Issue 3,2000, P303-308.
24 Paul Jeffrey, The benefit-sharing principle:Implementing sovereignty bargains on water, Political Geography, Volume 28, Issue 2, February 2009, P90-100.
25 Libor Jansky, The Danube:a case study of sharing international waters，Global Environmental Change, Volume 14, Supplement,2004. P39-49.
26 冯彦,何大,国际河流的水权及其有效利用和保护研究,《水科学进展》,2003年第14期,第124-128页。
27 何艳梅,国际河流水资源分配的冲突及其协调,《资源与产业》,2010年第4期,第54-57页。
28 龙晴,林春,关于我国参与大渊公河次区域电力合作的战略思考,《现代电力》,2006年第3期,第89-92页。
29 徐宁,中国与大湄公河地区国家的水能开发合作,《中国水能及电气化》,2007年第4期,第4-8页。
30 张锡镇,中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路,《南洋问题研究》,2007年第3期,第1-5页。
31 陆海曙,《基于博弈论的流域水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》博士论文.江苏：河海大学,第30-40页。
32 姜国辉,《基于博弈论的跨流域调水工程水价及项目管理研究》博士论文.西安：西安理工大学,2008年。
33 肖志娟,解建仓,基于合作博弈的水权交易模型,《水科学进展》,2005年第6期,第817-821页。
34 曲格平著：《环保保护知识读本》第二章当代全球环境问题第六节,http://www.jsie.edu.cn/web/chemonnet/books/%BB%B7%BE%B3%E1%A3%BB%A4%D6%AA%CA%B6%B6 %C1%B1%BE/qgp_ml.htm,访问日期:2011年3月30日。
35 联合国.《联合国报告——国际行动十年生命之水2005—2015》,http://www.un.org/zh/waterforlifedecade/scarcity.shtml,Visited 2011.3.20
36 United Nations.Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk, The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4,p2-3,
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20Volume%201-Managing%20Wate r%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pdf. Visited 2011.3.20
37 张泽.《国际水资源安全问题研究》,北京：中共中央党校博士论文,第100页。
38 何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》,上海：华东政法大学博士论文,第l页。
39 黄锡生,李希昆著《环境与资源保护法学》,2007版,第156页。
40 蔡守秋,《环境与资源法教程》,2006版,第277页。
41 美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际河流资料,
http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html访问日期2013年8月10日。
42 王曦主编／译,《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》,法律出版社2002年版,第272页。
43 万霞著,《国际环境保护的法律理论与实践》,经济科学出版社2003年版,第162页。
44 蔡守秋、常纪文主编,《国际环境法学》,法律出版社2007年版,第164页。
45 王曦主编／译,《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》,法律出版社2002年版,第272页。
46 美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际河流资料,
http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html访问日期：2011年3月20日。
47 Juha I. Uitto,Multi-country cooperation around shared waters:role of monitoring and evaluation, Global Environmental Change, 2004, 14(S1),p5-14.
48 Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-six Session.UN Doc.A/49/10,Year Book of the International Law Commission,Vol Ⅱ,Part 2(1994),p 326.
49 F. H. Hinsley,Sovereignty, CUP Archive,p3-4.
50 中国网,各国经济权利和义务宪章,http://www.china.com.cn/law/flfg/txt/2006-08/08/content_7057219.htm,访问日期2013年12月4日。
Salah E1-DinAmer,law of water-historical record, the Options Mediterraneennes,1997,p381-390.
52 冯彦、何大明,国际水法的发展趋势与中国水法体系的对比分析研究,地理学报,1999年6月,第170页。
53 唐海行,澜沧江—湄公河流域的水资源及其开发利用现状分析,《云南地理环境研究》,1999年01期,第21页。
54 Zou Keyuan,China-Asean Relations and International Law,CHANDOS PUBLISHING,2009,p95-96.
54 参见中国水利国际合作与科技网：《世界江河数据库》,http://www.cws.net.cn/riverdata/Search.asp?CWSNewsID=17970,访问日期：2011年3月20日.。
56 以下的澜沧江段水资源能源规划及环评报告资料来于华能澜沧江电力有限公司提供的往年可公开澜沧江环评资料,为笔者自己的收集整理。
57 Vietnews:Dams signal misery for Mekong River, http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-misery-for-Mekong-River.htm访问日期2011年3月31日。
58 李希昆,关于澜沧江——湄公河次区域环境保护立法的思考[J].昆明理工大学学报,2002,(4)
59 维基百科,湄公河,http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/湄公河,访问日期2013年6月30日。
60 南方日报,下游国家指湄公河水位下降因中国建水电站外交部回应,2010年3月27日,http://china.nfdaily.cn/content/2010-03/27/content_10520096.htm,访问日期2013年6月30日。
61 秦晖,湄公河枯水之思,《经济观察报》,2010年4月10日版。
62 何艳梅,《国际水资源公平合理利用的法律理论与实践》,华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第16页。
63 M.Falkenmark,Competing Freshwater and Ecological Services in the River Basin Perspective,presentation at 9~(th) Stockholm Water Symposium,August 1999.
64 中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》,,http://.www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm
65 张锡镇,《中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路》,南洋问题研究,2007年第3期,第5-7 页。
66 陈丽晖,曾尊固.国际河流整体开发和管理及两大理论依据.《长江流域资源与环境》,2001年第10期,第309-314。
67 戴长雷,王佳慧.国际河流水权初探,《水利学术》,2004年第1期,第62页。
68 贺圣达,大湄公河次区域合作：复杂的合作机制和中国的参与,《南洋问题研究》,2005年第1期,第6-14页。
69 贾琳,国际河流开发的区域合作法律机制,《北方法学》,2008年05期,第104-110页。
70 丁桂彬等,国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探,《中国农村水利水电》, 2009年第8期,第56页。
71 丁桂彬等,国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探,《中国农村水利水电》,2009年第8期,第57页。
72 笔者认为这一论断过于重视水资源的国际共享性,而忽略了水资源作为重要的流域各国重要的矿产资源的独立性以及各国对流域水资源的依赖性：放眼世界各国,几乎没有国家对各国区域内国际河流的水资源 出现放任浪费使用和肆意污染的行为,这与公地悲剧的假设存在矛盾。参见蒋天文,樊志宏,大江大河从“公共资源”到“公地悲剧”演变的内在机理分析,《长江流域资源与环境》,2006年03期,第315-318页。
73 贾琳.《西南国际河流的流域共同开发法律机制》.《生态经济》,2010年第7期,第162-163页。
74 陈丽晖,曾尊固.《国际河流整体开发和管理及两大理论依据》.长江流域资源与环境,2001年7月第10卷第4期,第313页。
75 齐虹丽,龙悦宁.澜—湄流域淡水资源保护国际合作机制探析.《云南社会科学》,2011年05期,第68页。
76 杜元真.论个人的国际法主体地位.《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011年09期,第34页。
77 杜元真.论个人的国际法主体地位.《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011年09期, 第35页。
78 ESCAP, About ESCAP, http://www.unescap.org/about/.visited 2013.3.10
79 ESCAP.ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FORASIA AND THE PACIFIC ANNUAL REPORT. http://www.unescap.org/EDC/English/AnnualReports/1999(55).pdf.2013.3.10
80 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIAAND THE PACIFIC:REPORT OF THE MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION,2008 (64), pp.1-8.
81 Integrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strategic-Plan-2011.pdf, visited 2012.12.20.
82 Mekong River Commission:Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin, Second Reprint by MRC Secretariat (5 April 1995) [R],1999, pp.6～13.
83 MRC.lntegrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy.http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strategic-Plan-201 1.pdf. visited2012.12.20.
84 中国东盟博览会网,《泰国湄公河引水工程年内动工》http://www.caexpo.org/gb/cafta/t20080908_80840.html访问日期2011年4月1日。
85 Vietnews:Dams signal misery for Mekong River, http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-miserv-for-Mekong-River.htm访问日期2011年3月31日。
86 中国东盟自由贸易区网站公告http://www.chinaaseantrade.com/访问日期：2011年3月28日。
87 中国人民政府网,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》,中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告[R/OL],http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm.
88 中国网,大湄公河蓝皮书http://www.china. com.cn/international/txt/2012-07/05/content_25814843.htm访问日期2013年10月10日。
89 荆海虹.经济分析法学派综述.《科学之友》,2009年1月,第150-151页。
90 (美)卡普洛,(美)沙维尔著,冯玉军,涂永前译,《公平与福利》,法律出版社：第1版,第165-190页。
91 史绍忠,《运筹学在建筑工程投资与进度控制中的运用》,大连理工大学：硕士学位论文,2008年,第5-10页。
92 刘光溪,《共赢性博弈理论》,复旦大学：博士学位论文,2006年,第86-87页。
93 周炜,《基于博弈理论的普适计算信任模型的安全问题研究》,中国海洋大学博士论文,2011年,第25-26页。
94 马光文,《基于博弈理论的水电竞价策略研究》,四川大学博士论文,2006年,第16页。
95 陆海曙,《基于博弈论的河流水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》,河海大学博十学位论文,2007年,第5-8页。
96 阿维纳什·迪克西特等著,蒲勇健译：《策略博弈》,中国人民大学出版仕,2011年版,第4页。
97 合作博弈与非合作博弈是以博弈中达成的协议成是否充足的具有联合实施行动的外部强制力为依据的,国际水资源合作协议大部分为多边或双边协定组成,一般不具有外部强制力,故采用非合作博弈模型对国际水资源合作进行分析,具体参见[美]阿维纳什·迪克西特等著：《策略博弈》,蒲勇健等译,中国人民大学出版社2011年3月版。
98 中国日报,中国为保澜沧江下游生态不惜做亏本买卖,http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqgj/jryw/2012-05-25/content_6009820_2.html2013年12月12日
99 Henry P. Farnham,The Law of Waters and Water Rights, The Lawbook Exchange,Ltd.,2006,p805.
100 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union' First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2000,p4.
101 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p2..
102 刘佳奇,《莱茵河保护公约》的协调机制及其展开,《云南大学学报(法学版)》,2012年05期,第28页。
103 Erik Mostert,International co-operation on Rhine water quality 1945-2008:An example to follow?, Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283.
104 Brahma Chellaney,Water:Asia's New Battleground, Georgetown University Press,2011,p315.
105 Aysegul Kibareglu, Adele Kirschner, Sigrid Mehring, Rudiger Wolfrum:Water Law and Cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris Region, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2004,p150.
106 Katharina Hohendinger:Water politics in the Middle East:The Euphrates-Tigris-Basin,GRIN Verlag,2006, p4.
107 Asit K. Biswas:Asian international waters:from Ganges-Brahmaputra to Mekong,Oxford University Press, 1996, p1-3.
108 杨恕,沈晓晨,解决国际河流水资源分配问题的国际法基础,《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》,2009年第4期,第15页。
109 何艳梅,国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践,华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第84-85页。
110 周寄中,《国际科技与经济合作》,科学出版社1993年版,第221页。
111 叶明照,《国际环境法概论》,厦门大学出版社1996年版,第80页。
112 Stephen C.McCaffrey,the Law of International Watercourses:Non-Navigational Uses,Chapter 6,Oxford, New York:Oxford University Press,2001.p150-151.
113 胡文俊,张捷斌,国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探,《水利经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页。
114 韩健、陈立虎主,《国际环境法》,武汉大学出版社1992年版,第96页。
Judgement of 25 September1997,1997 ICJ No.92, Para.85, p102.
116 曾彩琳,国际河流公平合理利用原则：回顾、反思与消解,《世界地理研究》,2012年第2期,第56页。
117 [德]沃尔夫刚.格拉夫.魏智通主编,吴越、毛晓飞,《国际法》,法律出版社2002年版,第591页。
118 Gabriel E.Eckstein,Application of International Water Law to Transboundary Groundwater Resources, and the Slovak-Hungarian Dispute over Gabcikovo-Nagymaros,19 Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 1995, p67.
119 Richard Paisley,Adversanes into partners:International water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits,Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283.
120 韩健、陈立虎编,《国际环境法》,武汉大学出版社1992年版,第96页。
121 Dr.Patricia Wouters.The Legal Response to International Water Scarcity and Water Conflicts,Note 197,http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/waterlaw,visited on Dec.25 2013.
122 Joseph W.Dellapenna,The customary international law of transboundary fresh waters.Int.J.Global Environmental Issues,Vol.1,Nos.3/4,2001,p.278.
123 Richard Paisley.Adversaries into partners:International Water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits,Melboume Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283.
124 Green Cross International,National Sovereignty and International Watercourses,first pristributed for the occasion of the 2ndWorld Water Forum,The Hague.March 2000.p200.
125 Ludwik A. Teclaff,The river basin in history and law, Martinus Nijhoff,1967,p228.
126 McCaffrey Stephen,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses,at 399,2001.
See intemanional court of justis,case concerning the gabcikovo-nagymaros project (Hungary and Slovenia Snow), Judgement of 25 September1997,1997,p7,Para.17.
128 何艳梅,国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践,上海：华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第120页。
129 胡文俊,国际水法的发展及其对跨界水国际合作的影响,《国际瞭望》,2007年11月,第63页。
130 李斌,《现代国际法学》,北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页。
131 See Attila Tanzi,The Relationship between the 1992 UN/ECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes and the 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Non Navigational Uses of International Watercourses,Report of the UNECE Task Force on Legal and Administrative Aspects,Italy,Geneva,Feb.2000,p 18.
132 Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law, University Press of America,1996, p57.
133 Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law, University Press of America, 1996, p60.
134 Roger W. Babcock, Roger William Babcock, Raymond Walton, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008:Ahupua, ASCE Publications,p1-2.
135 陈明忠,孙烨,《多瑙河流域国际水管理简介》,《水利经济》,1991年第4期,第68页。
136 Danubebox,Water use in the Danube river basin, http://www.danubebox.org/files/dbox/download/DanubeBox_Chapter4.pdf. visited 2012.12.12.
137 Slobodan P. P. Simonovic, Managing Water Resources:Methods and Tools for a Systems Approach, UNESCO Publishing,2012,p150-154.
138 中国数字科技馆,多瑙河http://amuseum.cdstm.cn/AMuseum/shuiziyuan/water/02/w02_b04_03.html访问时间2013年10月12日。
139 WATERPUB,多瑙河,http://www. waterpub.com.cn/jhdb/DetailRiver.asp?ID=78访问时间2013年10月12日。
140 R.施塔德勒,多瑙河流域跨界管理,《水利水电快报》,2009年9月,第12页。
141 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12.
142 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12.
143 ICPDR, Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable use of the Danube River, Article 2: Objectives and principles of cooperation.
144 ICPDR, Contracting Parties, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12.
145 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions, Article 2,(3).
146 ICPDR,Contracting Parties, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12.
147 R.施塔德勒,多瑙河流域跨界管理,《水利水电快报》,2009年9月,第12页。
148 I.L. Murphy, Protecting Danube River Basin Resources:Ensuring Access to Water Quality Date and Information, Kluwer Acadimic publishers,2012, p9-10.
149 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007.p2.
150 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,'Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union' First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2000,p4.
151 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.htm,visited2013.12.13.
152 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007.p6-7.
153 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p362.
154 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p7-8.
155 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL in accordance with article 18.3 of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC on programmes for monitoring of water status,2009,p3-4.
156 Angel Borj,The European water framework directive:A challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf research, Volume 25, Issue 14, September 2005, P 1768.
157 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p6.
158 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,River Basin Management Plans 2009-2015-information on availability by country, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm,visited 2012.12.14.
159 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12.
160 P. van der Zaag and H. Savenije, A comparison between conventional and integrated water resources planning and management, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27 (2002),p831-838.
161 胡文俊,张捷斌,国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探,《水利经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页。
162 李斌,《现代国际法学》,北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页。
163 EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.htm,visited2013.12.13.
4 张泽,《国际水资源安全问题研究》,中共中央党校,博士论文,2009年,第124至140页。
5 高晓露,现代国际水法的发展趋势及对中国的启示,学术交流,2009年4月,第58至59页。
166 何艳梅,从基本概念的演变看现代国际水法的特点,法治论从,2004年9月,第97页
167 Matthias Finger,Ludivine Tamiotti,Jeremy Allouche,The Multi-Governance of Water, SUNY Press,2006,p23.
168 赵建文,《国际法上的国家责任》,中国政法大学：博士论文,2004年,第3页。
169 王铁崖主编：《国际法》,法律出版社1995年版,第136页。
170. Kimberley N. Trapp,State Responsibility for International Terrorism, Oxford University Press,2011,p1.
171 维基百科,http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/各国人均国内生产总值列表_(国际汇率),访问日期2013年12月8日。
172 ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions, Article 2,(3).
173 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC,2007,p2.
174 McCaffrey,S,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses.at 399,2001.
5 何艳梅,华东政法大学博士论文
176 黄德春,许长新,基于整体开发管理的国际河流决策支持系统,《中国人口·资源与环境》,2006年第2期,第138页。
[1]中新网.中老电力合作加深累计送电逾4亿千瓦时[R/OL],http://www.cableabc.com/news/20131004000638.html,访问日期 2013.12.10
[2]国务院国有资产管理委员会.南方电网公司与柬埔寨的电力合作正式启动[R/OL], http://www.sasac.gov.cn/n1180/n1226/n2410/n314274/1437212.html,访问口期2013年12月10口
[3]中国电力网.大唐集团投资建设的柬埔寨斯登沃代水电站暨金边—马德望电网工程开工[R/OL],http://www.chinapower.com.cn/newsarticle/1068/new1068546.asp,访问日期2013年12月10日
[4]中国电力网.中国水电在老挝建设的水电站正式投产发电[R/OL],http://www.chinapower.com.en/article/1221/art1221416.asp,访问日期2013年12月10日
[5]重庆晚报.旱灾引发湄公河用水争端泰国指责我国水坝截水[N/OL],http://www.cqwb.com.cn/NewsFiles/201003/26/20102026102008336178.shtml,访问日期2013年12月10日
[6]Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk, The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4[R/OL],p184-192 http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20 Volume%201-Managing%20Water%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pd f, visited 2012.12.10
[7]Vandana Shiva,Water Wars:Privatization[M], Pollution and Profit,South End Press,2002,p77
[8]Richard Schaffer,Filiberto Agusti,Beverley Earle,international Business Law and Its Environment[M],SOUTH-WESTERN LEGAL STUDIES IN BUSINESS ACAMIC SERIES,2009,p66
[9]李峥.解决国际淡水资源争端的条法化综述[J].《国际资料信息》,2002年第10期,第13页
[10]Undala Alam a, Ousmane Dione, Paul Jeffrey, The benefit-sharing principle: Implementing sovereignty bargains on water[J],Political Geography,28 (2009),p 90-100
[11]2010 World Affairs Challenge Guide:Glossary:Water around the World[R], http://worldsavvy.org/docs/2010_WAC-Water-Glossary.pdf,visited 2012.12.10
[12]何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第48页
[13]Dante A Caponera,Marcella Nanni, Principles of Water Law and Administration: National and International [M],CRC PRESS,1992,p213
[14]Kai Wegerich,Jeroen Warner,Politics of Water:A Survey[J],Routledge,2010,p31.
[15]何艳梅,《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》[D].华东政法大学博士论文,2006年,第50页
[16]Agim Popa,The Theory of "Limited Sovereignty"-A Flagrant Expression of the Imperialist Policy of the Soviet Revisionists [J], https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/albania/albania-14.pdf,visited 2013.1.2
[17]Dante A Caponera,Marcella,Nanni,Principles of Water Law and Administration [M],CRC PRESS,1992,p213
[18]Korwa G. Adar,Nicasius A. Check,Cooperative Diplomacy, Regional Stability and National Interests [M], African Books Collective,p6-8
[19]Salah El-DinAmer,law of water-historical record [J], the Options Mediterraneennes,1997, p381-390
[20]Aline Baillat, nternational Trade in Water Rights:The Next Step [M], IWA Publishing,2010,p8-9
[21]Patrick Forest, Transferring bulk water between Canada and the United States: More than a century of transboundary inter-local water supplies [J], Geoforum, 2011(7),p1-3
[22]Shlomi Dinar, Assessing side-payment and cost-sharing patterns in international water agreements:The geographic and economic connection [J], Political Geography 25 (2006),p 412-437
[23]Erasumus, International Water Law Placed in a Contemporary Environmental Context:the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Case [J],Pergamon,2008,p80
[24]Paul Jeffrey, Impediments and Innovation in International Rivers:The Waters of South Asia,Political Geography,2000,p1908-2005
[25]Libor Jansky, Development of a web-based decision support system (DSS) for managing large international rivers [J],Global Environmental Change,2004,p26-30
[26]冯彦,何大明.国际河流的水权及其有效利用和保护研究[J].《水科学进展》,2003年第14期,第124-128页
[27]何艳梅.国际河流水资源分配的冲突及其协调[J].《资源与产业》,2010年第4期,第54-57页
[28]龙晴,林春.关于我国参与大湄公河次区域电力合作的战略思考[J].《现代电力》,2006年第3期,第89-92页
[29]徐宁.中国与大湄公河地区国家的水能开发合作[J].《中国水能及电气化》,2007年第4期,第4-8页
[30]张锡镇.中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路[J].《南洋问题研究》,2007年第3期,第1-5页
[31]陆海曙,《基于博弈论的流域水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》[D].江苏：河海大学,第30-40页
[32]姜国辉,《基于博弈论的跨流域调水工程水价及项目管理研究》[D].西安：西安理工大学,2008年
[33]肖志娟,解建仓.基于合作博弈的水权交易模型[J],水科学进展,2005年第6期,第817-821页
[34]曲格平.《环保保护知识读本》[M/OL],http://www.jsie.edu.cn/web/chemonnet/books/%BB%B7%BE%B3%Bl%A3% BB%A4%D6%AA%CA%B6%B6%Cl%Bl%BE/qgp_ml.htm, 访问日期:2011 年3月30日
[35]联合国,《联合国报告——国际行动十年生命之水2005-2015》[R/OL],http://www.un.org/zh/waterforlifedecade/scarcity.shtml,访问日期2013年12月12日
[36]United nations,Managing Water Report under Uncertainty and Risk [R/OL], The UniTed naTions World WaTer developmenT reporT 4,p2-3, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWDR4%20 Volume%201-Managing%20Water%20under%20Uncertainty%20and%20Risk.pd f, visited 2012.12.10
[37]张泽.《国际水资源安全问题研究》[D].北京：中共中央党校,第100页
[38]何艳梅.《国际水资源合理和公平利用的法律和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第1页
[39]黄锡生,李希昆.《环境与资源保护法学》[M].重庆：重庆大学出版社,2007年版,第156页
[40]蔡守秋,《环境与资源法教程》[M].北京：中国人民大学,2006版,第277页
[41]美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际流域报告[R/OL],http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html,访问日期2013年8月10日
[42]王曦.《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》[M].北京：法律出版社,2002年版,第272页
[43]万霞著.《国际环境保护的法律理论与实践》[M].北京：经济科学出版社2003年版,第162页
[44]蔡守秋、常纪文.《国际环境法学》[M].北京：法律出版社2007年版,第164页
[45]王曦.《联合国环境规划署环境法教程》[M].北京：法律出版社2002年版,第272页
[46]美国俄勒冈州立大学国际水边界教育资料库,国际流域报告[R/OL]http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/register/tables/IRB_table_5.html,访问日期：2011年3月20日
[47]Juha I. Uitto,Multi-country cooperation around shared waters:role of monitoring and evaluation, Global Environmental Change [J],2004,14(S1), p 5-14
[48]Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-six Session,UN Doc.A/49/10,Year Book of the International Law Commission [R],Vol Ⅱ,Part 2(1994),p 326
[49]F. H. Hinsley,Sovereignty [M], CUP Archive,p3-4
[50]中国网,各国经济权利和义务宪章[R/OL],http://www.china.com.cn/law/flfg/txt/2006-08/08/content_7057219.htm,访问日期2013年12月4日
[51]Salah El-DinAmer,law of water-historical record [J], the Options Mediterraneennes,1997,p381-390
[52]冯彦、何大明.国际水法的发展趋势与中国水法体系的对比分析研究[J],《地理学报》,1999年6月,第170页
[53]唐海行.澜沧江—湄公河流域的水资源及其开发利用现状分析[J],《云南地理环境研究》,1999年01期,第21页
[54]Zou Keyuan,China-Asean Relations and International Law,CHANDOS PUBLISHING,2009,p95-96
[55]中国水利国际合作与科技网,《世界江河数据库》[R/OL],http://www.cws.net.cn/riverdata/Search.asp?CWSNewsID=17970,访问日期：2011年3月20日
[56]以下的澜沧江段水资源能源规划及环评报告资料来于华能澜沧江电力有限公司提供的往年可公开澜沧江环评资料,为笔者自己的收集整理
[57]Vietnews,Dams signal misery for Mekong River [R], http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-misery-for-Me kong-River.htm, visited 2012.12.10
[58]李希昆.关于澜沧江——湄公河次区域环境保护立法的思考[J]. 《昆明理工大学学报》,2002,P4
[59]维基百科.湄公河[R/OL], http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/湄公河,访问日期2013年6月30日
[60]南方日报.下游国家指湄公河水位下降因中国建水电站外交部回应[N/OL],2010年3月27日,http://china.nfdaily.cn/content/2010-03/27/content_10520096.htm,访问日期2013年6月30日
[61]秦晖.湄公河枯水之思[J].经济观察报,2010年4月10日版
[62]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平合理利用的法律理论与实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第16页
[63]M.Falkenmark,Competing Freshwater and Ecological Services in the River Basin Perspective [J], presentation at 9th Stockholm Water Symposium,August 1999,p282-284
[64]中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》 [R/OL],http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm
[65]张锡镇.中国参与大湄公河次区域合作的进展、障碍与出路.《南洋问题研究》,2007年第3期,第5页
[66]陈丽晖,曾尊固.国际河流整体开发和管理及西大理论依据[J].《长江流域资源与环境》,2001年第10期,第309-314
[67]戴长雷,王佳慧.国际河流水权初探[J].《水利学术》,2004年第1期,第62页
[68]贺圣达.大湄公河次区域合作：复杂的合作机制和中国的参与[J].《南洋问题研究》,2005年第1期,第6-14页
[69]贾琳.国际河流开发的区域合作法律机制[J].《北方法学》,2008年05期,第104-110页
[70]丁桂彬等.国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探[J].《中国农村水利水电》,2009年第八期,第56页
[71]丁桂彬等.国内关于国际河流管理研究进展初探[J].《中国农村水利水电》,2009年第八期,第57页
[72]蒋天文,樊志宏.大江大河从“公共资源”到“公地悲剧”演变的内在机理分析[J].《长江流域资源与环境》,2006年03期,第315-318页
[73]贾琳.西南国际河流的流域共同开发法律机制[J].《生态经济》,2010年第7期,第162-163页
[74]陈丽晖,曾尊固.国际河流整体开发和管理及两大理论依据[J].《长江流域资源与环境》,2001年7月第4期,第313页
[75]齐虹丽,龙悦宁.湄公河流域淡水资源保护国际合作机制探析[J].《云南社会科学》,2011年05期,第68页
[76]杜元贞.论个人的国际法主体地位[J].《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011 年09期,第34页
[77]杜元贞.论个人的国际法主体地位[J].《今日财富(金融发展与监管)》,2011年09期,第35页
[78]ESCAP. About ESCAP [R/OL]. http://www.unescap.org/about/. Visited 2013.3.10
[79]ESCAP.ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FORASIA AND THE PACIFIC ANNUAL REPORT [R/OL]. http://www.unescap.org/EDC/English/AnnualReports/1999(55).pdf. Visited 2013.3.10
[80]ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC: REPORT OF THE MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION [R/OL],2008 (64) pp.1-8
[81]MRC,Integrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy [R/OL], http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strate gic-Plan-2011.pdf,visited 2012.12.20
[82]Mekong River Commission:Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin [R/OL], Second Reprint by MRC Secretariat (5 April 1995) [R],1999,pp.6-13
[83]MRC,Integrated Water Resources Management-based Basin DevelopmentStrategy[R/OL], http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog/BDP-Strate gic-Plan-2011.pdf, visited 2012.12.20
[84]中国东盟博览会网.《泰国湄公河引水工程年内动工》[R/OL],http://www.caexpo.org/gb/cafta/t20080908_80840.html,访问日期2011年4月1日
[85]Vietnews, Dams signal misery for Mekong River, http://www.vietnewsonline.vn/News/Society/11892/Dams-signal-misery-for-Me kong-River.htm,访问日期2011年3月31日
[86]中国东盟自由贸易区网,公告数据[EB/OL], http://www.chinaaseantrade.com/,访问日期：2011年3月28日
[87]中国人民政府网,《大湄公河次区域合作发展报告2012》,中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站公告[R/OL],http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-12/17/content_2022602.htm,访问日期：2011年3月28日
[88]中国网,大湄公河蓝皮书[R/OL],http://www.china.com.cn/international/txt/2012-07/05/content_25814843.htm,访问口期2013年10月10日
[89]荆海虹.经济分析法学派综述[J].《科学之友》,2009年1月,第150-151页
[90](美)卡普洛,(美)沙维尔著,冯玉军,涂永前译.《公平与福利》[M].法律出版社,2007年版,第165-190页
[91]史绍忠.《运筹学在建筑工程投资与进度控制中的运用》[D].大连：大连理工大学,2008年,第5-10页
[92]刘光溪.《共赢性博弈理论》[D].上海：复旦大学,2006年,第86-87页
[93]周炜.《基于博弈理论的普适计算信任模型的安全问题研究》[D].大连：中国海洋大学,2011年,第25-26页
[94]马光文.基于博弈理论的水电竞价策略研究》[D].四川：四川大学,2006年,第16页
[95]陆海曙.《基于博弈论的河流水资源利用冲突及初始水权分配研究》[D].江苏：河海大学,2007年,第5-8页
[96]阿维纳什·迪克西特等著,蒲勇健译.《策略博弈》[M].中国人民大学出版社,2011年版,第4页
[97]阿维纳什·迪克西特等著,蒲勇健译.《策略博弈》[M].中国人民大学出版社,2011年版,第7-10页
[98]中国日报,中国为保澜沧江下游生态不惜做亏本买卖,http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqgj/jryw/2012-05-25/content_6009820_2.html,2013年12月12日
[99]Henry P. Farnham,The Law of Waters and Water Rights[M], The Lawbook Exchange,Ltd.,2006,p805
[100]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC[R/OL],2000,p4
[101]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC[R/OL],2007,p2
[102]刘佳奇.《莱茵河保护公约》的协调机制及其展开[J].《云南大学学报(法学版)》,2012年05期,第28页
[103]Erik Mostert,International co-operation on Rhine water quality 1945-2008: An example to follow? [J], Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283
[104]Brahma Chellaney,Water:Asia's New Battleground[M], Georgetown University Press,2011,p315
[105]Aysegul Kibaroglu, Adele Kirschner, Sigrid Mehring, Riidiger Wolfrum, Water Law and Cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris Region[M], Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2004,p150
[106]Katharina Hohendinger, Water politics in the Middle East:The Euphrates-Tigris-Basin[M],GRIN Verlag,2006, p4
[107]Asit K. Biswas,Asian international waters:from Ganges-Brahmaputra to Mekong[M],Oxford University Press,1996, p1-3
[108]杨恕,沈晓晨.解决国际河流水资源分配问题的国际法基础[J].《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》,2009年第4期,第15页
[109]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第84-85页
[110]周寄中.《国际科技与经济合作》[M].北京：科学出版社,1993年版,第221页
[111]叶明照.《国际环境法概论》[M].厦门：厦门大学出版社,1996年版,第80页
[112]Stephen C.McCaffrey,the Law of International Watercourses:Non-Navigational Uses,Chapter 6[M],Oxford,New York:Oxford University Press,2001.p150-151
[113]胡文俊,张捷斌.国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探[J].《水利 经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页
[114]韩健、陈立虎.《国际环境法》[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,1992年版,第96页
[115]Judgement of 25 Septemberl997,1997 ICJ No.92 [EB/OL], Para.85, p102
[116]曾彩琳.国际河流公平合理利用原则：回顾、反思与消解[J].《世界地理研究》,2012年第2期,第56页
[117][德]沃尔夫刚.格拉夫.魏智通主编,吴越、毛晓飞译.《国际法》[M].北京：法律出版社,2002年版,第591页
[118]Gabriel E.Eckstein,Application of International Water Law to Transboundary Groundwater Resources and the Slovak-Hungarian Dispute over Gabcikovo-Nagymaros [J],19 Suffolk Transnational Law Review,1995, p67
[119]Richard Paisley,Adversaries into partners:International Water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits [J],Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283
[120]韩健、陈立虎编著.《国际环境法》[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,1992年版,第96页
[121]Dr.Patricia Wouters,The Legal Response to International Water Scarcity and Water Conflicts,Note197,http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/waterlaw,visited on 2013.10.10
[122]Joseph W.Dellapenna,The customary international law of transboundary fresh waters [M],Int.J.Global Environmental Issues,Vol.1,Nos.3/4,2001,p.278
[123]Richard Paisley,Adversaries into partners:International Water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits [J],Melbourne Journal of International Law,Oct.2002,p.283
[124]Green Cross International,National Sovereignty and International Watercourses,first pristributed for the occasion of the 2ndWorld Water Forum, [M] The Hague,March 2000.p200
[125]Ludwik A. Teclaff,The river basin in history and law [M], Martinus Nijhoff, 1967,p228
[126]McCaffrey Stephen,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses [M],Wolters kluwer,2001,p399
[127]See internanional court of justis,case concerning the gabcikovo-nagymaros project (.Hungary and Slovenia Snow) [EB/OL], Judgement of 25 September1997,1997,p7,Para.17
[128]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践》[D].上海：华东政法大学,2006年,第120页
[129]胡文俊.国际水法的发展及其对跨界水国际合作的影响.《国际瞭望》,2007年11月,第63页
[130]李斌,《现代国际法学》,北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页
[131]See Attila Tanzi,The Relationship between the 1992 UN/ECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes and the 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Non Navigational Uses of International Watercourses [J],Report of the UNECE Task Force on Legal and Administrative Aspects,Italy,Geneva,Feb.2000,p18
[132]Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law [M], University Press of America,1996, p57
[133]Lynne M. Jurgielewicz, Global Environmental Change and International Law [M], University Press of America,1996, p60
[134]Roger W. Babcock, Roger William Babcock, Raymond Walton, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008:Ahupua [M],ASCE Publications,p1-2
[135]陈明忠,孙烨.多瑙河流域国际水管理简介[J].《水利经济》,1991年第4期,第68页
[136]Danubebox,Water use in the Danube river basin [R/OL], http://www.danubebox.org/files/dbox/download/DanubeBox_Chapter4.pdf. visited 2012.12.12
[137]Slobodan P. P. Simonovic, Managing Water Resources:Methods and Tools for a Systems Approach [M], UNESCO Publishing,2012,p150-154
[138]维基百科.多瑙河[R/OL], http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/多瑙河,访问时间 2013年10月12日
[139]WATERPUB多瑙河[R/OL],http://www.waterpub.com.cn/jhdb/DetailRiver.asp?ID=78,访问时间2013年10月12日
[140]R.施塔德勒.多瑙河流域跨界管理[J],《水利水电快报》,2009年9月,第12页
[141]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12
[142]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12
[143]ICPDR, Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable use of the Danube River [EB], Article 2:Objectives and principles of cooperation
[144]ICPDR, Contracting Parties [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12
[145]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions [EB], Article 2,(3).
[146]ICPDR, Contracting Parties [R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention. visited 2013.12.12
[147]R.施塔德勒.多瑙河流域跨界管理[J].水利水电快报,2009年9月,第12页
[148]I.L. Murphy, Protecting Danube River Basin Resources:Ensuring Access to Water Quality Date and Information [M], Kluwer Acadimic publishers,2012, p9-10
[149]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p2.
[150]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,'Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2000,p4
[151]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports [R/OL], http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.ht m,visited2013.12.13
[152]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p6-7
[153]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p362
[154]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p7-8
[155]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL in accordance with article 18.3 of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC on programmes for monitoring of water status[EB],2009,p3-4
[156]Angel Borj,The European water framework directive:A challenge for nearshore[J], coastal and continental shelf research, Volume 25, Issue 14, September 2005, P 1768
[157]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p6
[158]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,River Basin Management Plans 2009-2015-information on availability by country [R/OL], http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/map_mc/map.htm,visited 2012.12.14
[159]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention[R/OL], http://www.icpdr.org/main/icpdr/danube-river-protection-convention, visit 2013.12.12
[160]P. van der Zaag and H. Savenije, A comparison between conventional and integrated water resources planning and management[J], Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27 (2002),p831-838
[161]胡文俊,张捷斌.国际河流利用的基本原则和重要规则初探[J].《水利经济》,2009年第5期,第1-4页
[162]李斌.现代国际法学[J].北京：科学出版社,2004,第200-206页
[163]EUROPEAN COMMISSION,WFD Implementation Reports[R/OL], http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/implrep2007/index_en.ht m,visited2013.12.13
[164]张泽.《国际水资源安全问题研究》[D].北京：中共中央党校,2009年,第124至140页
[165]高晓露.现代国际水法的发展趋势及对中国的启示[J].《学术交流》,2009年4月,第58至59页
[166]何艳梅.从基本概念的演变看现代国际水法的特点[J].法治论丛,2004年9月,第97页
[167]Matthias Finger,Ludivine Tamiotti,Jeremy Allouche,The Multi-Governance of Water[M], SUNY Press,2006,p23
[168]赵建文.《国际法上的国家责任》[D].北京：中国政法大学,2004年,第3页
[169]王铁崖.《国际法》[M].北京：法律出版社,1995年版,第136页。
[170]Kimberley N. Trapp,State Responsibility for International Terrorism[M], Oxford University Press,2011,p1
[171]维基百科.各国人均国内生产总值列表[R/OL],http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/各国人均国内生产总值列表_(国际汇率),访问日期2013年12月8日
[172]ICPDR, Danube River Protection Convention, Part I General provisions [EB], Article 2,(3)
[173]COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC [EB],2007,p2
[174]McCaffrey Stephen,the Law of international Watercourses:Non-navigational Uses [M],Wolters kluwer,2001,p399
[175]何艳梅.《国际水资源公平和合理利用的法律理论和实践》[D].上海：华 东政法大学,2006年,第185-186页
[176]黄德春,许长新.基于整体开发管理的国际河流决策支持系统[J].《中国人口·资源与环境》,2006年第2期,第138页