黔中隆起及周缘构造演化的沉积响应
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
油气勘探在我国经济的发展中所发挥的作用越来越大,海相碳酸盐岩具有很大的勘探潜力,黔中隆起及周缘是我国南方勘探走出四川盆地的重要接替战场。前人对该区进行了一定程度的研究,但在层序地层对比、岩相古地理、构造分析和油气地质方面存在一些不足。
     本文以黔中隆起及周缘奥陶系、志留系为主要研究对象,同时涉及中晚古生代地层,进行了层序地层、沉积体系、岩相古地理、断裂构造和构造演化方面的综合研究。借助野外露头、钻测井资料进行了层序地层详细研究,在奥陶系中识别出了10个三级层序边界,划分为9个三级层序,这些界面中OsB1、OSB3、OSB4、OSB5和OsB9为Ⅰ型层序边界,其它均为Ⅱ型层序边界。在志留系中识别出了5个三级层序边界,将其划分为4个三级层序,SsB1、SsB2、SSB3、SSB4和SsB5为Ⅰ型层序边界。基于层序地层划分和地震剖面分析,对黔中隆起的形成时间进行了研究,发现黔中隆起的形成是一个反复的过程,最早为奥陶纪桐梓期的水下隆起阶段,直至湄潭期早期才第一次隆出水面,其后又被海水淹没,湄潭期晚期再次隆出水面,直至奥陶纪五峰期晚期才最终抬升成陆。
     通过对断裂带的空间展布特征、运动学特征的研究,分析了黔中隆起周缘4条边界断裂对两侧沉积、岩相的控制作用。遵义断裂燕山期才开始活动,对两侧的奥陶系、志留系沉积没有控制作用,对黔中隆起的形成演化没有影响。垭都-紫云断裂在都匀运动期间开始活动,导致了滇黔桂古陆的解体,对黔中隆起的沉积具有明显的控制作用。赫章-遵义断裂在奥陶纪对断裂带两侧的沉积岩相和古生物有一定的控制作用,志留纪对两侧的控制作用更加明显。镇远-贵阳断裂都匀运动时期对断裂两侧的沉积产生明显的控制作用,广西运动时期断裂基本上控制了黔中隆起南缘志留系的沉积边界。
     借助大量的野外露头剖面,辅以钻测井资料和地震资料,在黔中隆起及周缘识别出了滨海、陆棚、碳酸盐台地、斜坡-盆地4种沉积体系,每一种沉积体系又进行了进一步的细分。应用Dickinson三角投点图法并辅以重矿物进行了物源分析,发现黔北斜坡、武陵坳陷、黔南坳陷的物源来自研究区西侧的牛首山古陆,经黔中隆起运移而至,而黔南坳陷的物源同时受东南部的雪峰隆起的影响。选择品质较好的地震剖面对黔南坳陷的地震相进行了研究,在奥陶系中识别出了4种地震相,志留系识别出了3种地震相。在层序划分对比、沉积体系研究,沉积相连井对比、地震相研究的基础上,以露头层序地层学为指导,结合钻井、地震等资料,以三级层序体系域为时间单元,编制了黔中隆起及周缘奥陶系、志留系岩相古地理图。黔中地区在OsQ3TST时期的水体开始变浅,OSQ3HST时期初次露出水面,OSQ4HST、OSQ5HST时期黔中隆起两次露出水面,至OSQ8HST时期地理格局由北西高南东低演变为南高北低。OSQ9TST时期黔中地区已经完全隆升为陆,且与黔南连成一体,形成滇黔桂古陆。SSQ2TST时期海水侵入,导致了滇黔桂古陆的重新解体。
     黔中隆起开始于郁南运动,云开地块与黔桂-北越地块的碰撞使息烽-织金一带水体相对变浅,奥陶系桐梓组为大套白云岩沉积,为水下隆起阶段。都匀运动使研究区进一步抬升,至奥陶纪湄潭期沉积时期,黔中地区基本露出水面,成为陆上隆起,并且和由西部侵入的滇东古陆相连,晚奥陶世都匀运动进一步加强,并最终使黔中、黔南上升成陆,缺失晚奥陶世、早志留世沉积。广西运动使黔中隆起得到继承性加强,隆起范围进一步扩大,使黔中、黔南整体继续隆升,其上缺失上志留统-下泥盆统,甚至部分地区石炭系大塘组和奥陶系湄潭组直接接触。
     分析了黔中隆起及周缘的麻江古油藏、瓮安古油藏的生储盖特征、油气成藏与破坏规律和地质储量。发现烃源岩发育具有多层系性,寒武系牛蹄塘组、志留系龙马溪组为主要烃源岩,中泥盆统泥岩及泥灰岩、中石炭统泥岩、二叠系泥岩、灰岩及煤系为次要烃源岩。储层主要有下寒武统明心寺组顶部砂岩、奥陶系下统碳酸盐岩、志留系砂岩。发现黔中隆起及周缘有3套区域性盖层和2套局部盖层。3套区域盖层为下寒武统牛蹄塘组-金顶山组、金顶山组-清虚洞组和中下志留统上部,2套局部盖层分别为黔中隆起和黔北斜坡的寒武系中上统膏岩、黔南贵定-三都-黄平范围内残留的中奥陶统泥岩类。黔中隆起及周缘主要有3套生储盖组合。优选出了黔中隆起及周缘的有利油气勘探区,安顺凹陷为油气保存条件最佳区块。图233幅,表29个,参考文献148篇。
The oil and gas exploration takes an increasingly role in China's economic development, marine carbonate rocks has a great potential for exploration, the Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent areas are the important succeed battlefield that southern China exploration goes out of the Sichuan Basin. Predecessors have done certain research in this area, but there are some deficiencies in the comparison of sequence stratigraphy, lithofacies paleogeography, structural analysis, and petroleum geology.
     This paper taked Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent areas Ordovician, Silurian as the main research object, also the late Paleozoic strata was involved, and conducts a comprehensive study of the sequence stratigraphy, depositional systems, lithofacies palaeogeography, fault structure and tectonic evolution. The detailed study of sequence stratigraphy was carried out with outcrop and drill logging data,10three-order sequence boundaries were identified in the Ordovician, and divided them into9three-order sequences, of these interfaces, OSB1, OSB3,OSB4, OSB5and OSB9are type Ⅰ sequence boundary, and other sequence boundaries are type Ⅱ sequence boundary.5three-order sequence boundaries were identified in Silurian, and divided them into4three-order sequences, of which SSB1, SSB2, SSB3, SSB4and SSB5are type Ⅰ sequence boundary. Based on the sequence stratigraphic classification and analysis of seismic facies, the formation time of Central Guizhou Uplift was studied, and found that the Central Guizhou Uplift formation was not done overnight but by repeated times, the earliest time was the Ordovician Tongzi Period, it was underwater uplift stage, it first exposure of the water until the early Meitan Formation, then it was flooded by seawater, and rose out of the water again in the late Meitan Formation. The Central Guizhou Uplift was finally lifted into land until the late Wufeng Formation.
     By studying the the spatial distribution characteristics and kinematic characteristics of the fault zone, the controlling action of the four boundary faults in Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent for facies and deposition was analyzed. Zunyi Fracture had no controlling action on the deposition of both sides, and no affect on the formation, evolution and deposition of the Central Guizhou Uplift. Yadu-Ziyun Fracture started its activities during the Duyun Movement period, leading to the disintegration of the Dianqiangui Ancient Land, and played a significant controlling role in the deposition of the Central Guizhou Uplift. Hezhang-Zunyi Fracture had controlling action on the sedimentary facies and paleontology of both sides in fault zone in Ordovician, and the controlling role was more significant in Silurian. Zhenyuan-Guiyang Fracture played a significant controlling role in the deposition of both sides in fault zone during the Duyun Movement period. During the Guangxi Movement period, the fracture essentially controlled the sedimentary boundary of the Silurian in the southern edge of Central Guizhou Uplift.
     With a large number of outcrop section, drilling logging data and seismic data,4kinds of sedimentary system-coastal deposition system, shelf sedimentary system, carbonate platform sedimentary system, slope-basin sedimentary system were identified in the Central Guizhou Uplift and its Adjacent Areas, and each sedimentary system was further subdivided. Provenance analysis was conducted by Dickinson triangular cast point diagram method while supplemented by heavy minerals, it was found that the provenance of Northern Guizhou Slope, Wuling Depression, Southern Guizhou Depression was from Niushoushan Ancient Land, also the provenance of the Southern Guizhou Depression was affected by Xuefeng Uplift in the southeast. High quality seismic facies were selected to study the seismic facies of southern Guizhou depression, four kinds of seismic facies were identified in Ordovician, and three kinds of seismic facies were identified in Silurian. Based on division and correlation of the sequence, depositional systems, and sedimentary connected well correlation, seismic facies study, taking outcrop sequence stratigraphy as the guidline, combining with drilling and seismic data, and taking the three system tracts as time unit, the lithofacies paleogeographic map of Ordovician and Silurian in Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent areas was established. The Central Guizhou Region experienced the shallowing of OSQ3TST period, it was exposured of the water surface for the first time during the OSQ3HST period, during the OSQ4HST period the Central Guizhou Uplift was exposured of the water surface again, the geographical pattern evolved into the southern high northern low situation from the situation that the north west was high and south east was low during the OSQ8HST period. When it came to the OSQ9TST period, the Central Guizhou Uplift was completely uplifted into land, and it fused with Southern Guizhou and formed into Dianqiangui ancient land. During SSQ2TST period, the sea water was intrused, which led to the redisintegration of Dianqiangui ancient land.
     Yunan Movement was the start of the formation of the Central Guizhou Uplift, the collision of Yunkai Block and Qiangui-Beiyue Block caused the water of Xifeng-Zhijin was relatively shallow, the Ordovician Tongzi Period was a set of domolite deposition, it was the underwater uplift stage. Duyun Movement caused the study area to further uplift, the Central Guizhou Region was basically out of the water, becoming onshore uplift and connected the Diandong ancinet land which was the invasion by western. In the period of Late Ordovician, Duyun Movement further strengthened, and ultimately made the Central Guizhou, Qiannan rising into land, the deposition of Late Ordovician and Early Silurian was omission. The Central Guizhou Uplift was inheritance strengthened by Guangxi Movement, the scope of Central Guizhou Uplift further expanded, the Central Guizhou, Qiannan overall continued to uplift, its upper miss Upper Silurian-Lower Devonian, and even part of the Carboniferous Datang Group and the Ordovician Meitan Group directly contact.
     The characteristics of source-reservoir-cap, the reservoir forming and damage and the geological reserves of Majiang ancient reservoir, Weng'an ancient reservoir in Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent areas were analyzed. It was found that the development of hydrocarbon source rocks has a multi-storey department, the Cambrian Niutitang Formation, Silurian Longmaxi Formation were main hydrocarbon source rocks, while the Sinian Doushantuo Formation mudstone, the middle Devonian shale and marl, Carboniferous shale, Permian mudstone, limestone and coal measures were minor hydrocarbon source rocks. The reservoirs were mainly Upper Sinian Dengying Formation, the sandstone at the top of the Lower Cambrian Mingxinsi Formation, the carbonates in Lower Ordovician, the sandstone in Silurian. It was found that the Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent areas had3sets of regional seal and2sets of local seal. The3sets of regional seal were the Lower Cambrian Niutitang-Jindingshan Formation, the Jindingshan-Qingxudong Formation and the upper of the middle-lower Silurian. The2sets of local seal were Cambrian Marketing gypsum rock of Central Guizhou Uplift and Northern Guizhou Slope, the Middle Ordovician mudstone class remained in Guiding-Sandu-Huangping in southern Guizhou. The Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent areas mainly had3sets of reservoir combination. Favorable oil and gas exploration area in the Central Guizhou Uplift and its adjacent areas was selected, and the Anshun depression is the best blocks in hydrocarbon preservation conditions.
引文
[1]汤良杰,吕修祥,金之钧,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩层系油气地质特点、战略选取思考及需要解决的主要地质问题[J].地质通报,2006,25(9-10):1032-1035.
    [2]周小进.中国南方二叠纪构造-层序岩相古地理[D].长沙:中南大学,2009.
    [3]刘辰生.塔里木盆地阿克库勒地区三叠系层序地层学与沉积相研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2006.
    [4]王明艳.阿克库勒凸起古生界和三叠系碎屑岩层序地层学与储层特征研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2005.
    [5]宋传春.地震-地质综合研究方法评述[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(2):133-139.
    [6]张长俊.构造作用、海平面升降和沉积作用的地层标志[J].国外地质(成都)1993,(4):11-20.
    [7]Wheeler H E.Base level,lithosphere surface and time-stratigraphy[J].Bull Geo Soc,1964,75:599-610.
    [8]Vail P R, M itchum R M, Todd R G, et al. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level[J]. In:Payton C E, eds. Seismic stratigraphy-applications to hydrocarbon exploration.AAPG, Memoir,1977,(26):49-212.
    [10]C.K.威尔格斯.层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析)[M].北京:石油工业出版,1993:1-519.
    [11]Mtichell S F, Paul CR,Gale A S. Carbon isotopes and sequence stratigraphy. In:Howell J A, Aitken J F, eds. High resolution sequence stratigraphy: innovationsand applications. Geo logical Society Special Publication,1996, (104):11-24.
    [12]Armentrout J M. High resolution sequence bio stratigraphy:examples from the Gulf of Mexico Plio-Pleistocene. In:Howell J A, Aitken J F, eds. High resolution sequence stratigraphy:innovations and applications. Geological Society Special Publication,1996,(104):65-86.
    [13]Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequence in basin analysis 1:architecture and genesis of flooding/surface bounded depositional units[J]. AAPG Bull, 1989,73:125-142.
    [14]OLSEN T,STEEL R,HIGSETH K et al. Sequential architecture in a fluvial succession:sequence stratigraphy in the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group,Price Canyon, Utah [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1995, B65(2):265-280.
    [15]Johnson J C, Klapper C,Sandberg C A. Devonian eustatic fluctuation in Eurameria[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,1985,96:567-587.
    [16]Miall A D. Stratigraphic sequences and their chronostratigraphic correlation[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1991,61:497-505.
    [17]Shanley K W and McCabe P J.1991.Predicting facies architecture through sequence stratigraphy [J] Journal of Geology,101:279-294.
    [18]邓宏文.高分辨率层序地层学:原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002:1-253.
    [19]王东坡,刘立.大陆裂谷盆地层序地层学的研究[J].岩相古地理,1994,14(30):1-9.
    [20]李思田,林畅松,解习农,等.大型陆相盆地层序地层学研究-以鄂尔多斯中生代盆地为例[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3-4):133-148.
    [21]朱筱敏,康安,王贵文.陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨[J].沉积学报,2003,21(2):283-287.
    [22]徐怀大.层序地层学理论用于我国断陷盆地分析中的问题[J].石油与天然气地质,1991,12(1):52-57.
    [23]魏魁生.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋存关系[J].地球科学,1993,18(2):139-149.
    [24]程日辉,王东坡.陆相层序地层学进展[J].岩相古地理,1996,16(4):56-61.
    [25]解习农,李思田.陆相盆地层序地层研究特点[J].地质科技情报,1993,12(1):22-24.
    [26]解习农,李思田.伊通地堑层序地层分析及充填史研究[J].地球科学,1993,3(2):105-110.
    [27]郭建华,曾允孚,翟永红,等.新疆塔中石炭系层序地层学研究一个克拉通内坳陷盆地的层序地层格架模式[J].地质学报,1996,70(4):361-372.
    [28]朱筱敏,王贵文,谢庆宾.塔里木盆地志留系层序地层特征[J].古地理学报,2001,3(2):64-71.
    [29]高福红.沉积物源区研究的新进展[J].世界地质,1994,13(3):98-103.
    [30]汪正江,陈洪德,张锦泉.物源分析的研究与展望[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2000,20(4):104-109.
    [31]赵红格,刘池洋.物源分析方法与研究进展[J].沉积学报,2003,23(3):409-415.
    [32]闫义,林舸,王岳军,等.盆地陆源碎屑沉积物对源区构造背景的指示意义[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(1):85-90.
    [33]张翠梅.渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷构造-沉积分析[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2010.
    [34]杨剑.黔北地区下寒武统黑色岩系形成环境与地球化学研究[D].西安:长安大学,2009.
    [35]杨俊鹏.辽河口潮滩沉积物元素地球化学特征及其环境效应[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2011.
    [36]郭建华,刘生国,翟永红.塔中地区石炭系碎屑岩岩石学特征与物源分析[J].江汉石油学院学报,1995,17(3):1-7.
    [37]刘少峰,柯爱蓉,吴丽云,等.鄂尔多斯西南缘前陆盆地沉积物物源分析及其构适意义[J].沉积学报,1997,15(1):156-159.
    [38]邵磊,李文厚,袁明生.吐鲁番-哈密盆地陆源碎屑沉积环境及物源分析[J].沉积学报,1997,17(3):435-441.
    [39]Hendrix X S, Graham S A, Carroll A R, et al.Sedimentary record and climatic implications of recurrent deformation in the Tian Shan:Evidence from Mesozoic strata of the north Tarim, south Junggar,and Tupan basin, northwest China[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin.1992,104:53-79.
    [40]Shao L.Sedimentology and Evolution of the Turpan Basin(N W China)[M].Kiel University Press, Kiel,Germany.1996.34-59.
    [41]单玄龙,刘招君,滕佃波.裂变径迹方法在盆地分析中的应用[J].世界地质,1995,14(2):47-51.
    [42]Galbraith R F. The radio plot:Graphical assessment of spread in ages[J].Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas,1991,17:197-206.
    [43]Sambridge M S. Compston. W. Mixture modelling of multi-component data sets with application to iorrprobe zircon ages[J].Earth and Planetare Science Letters, 1994,128:373-390.
    [44]周祖翼,毛凤鸣,廖宗廷,等.裂变径迹年龄多成分分离技术及其在沉积盆地物源分析中的应用[J].沉积学报,2001,19(3):456-473.
    [45]徐飞.邯邢煤田石炭-二叠纪层序地层及岩相古地理研究[D].邯郸:河北工程大学,2011.
    [46]冯增昭,金振奎,杨玉卿,等.滇黔桂地区二叠纪岩相古地理[M].北京:地质出版社,1994:1-40.
    [47]周名魁,王汝植,李志明,等.中国南方奥陶-志留纪岩相古地理与成矿作用[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:1-95.
    [48]华夏,张勤勤.岩相古地理研究现状及展望[J].科教前沿,2009,33:473.
    [49]田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄.层序岩相古地理图及其编制[[J].地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(1):6-12.
    [50]冯增昭,曾允孚.岩相古地理基础和工作方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1985:1-442.
    [51]李昌全.黔中隆起及周缘老井复查评价报告[R].成都:中石化南方分公司勘探开发研究院,2004.
    [52]李明文.黔山1井试气工程[R].成都:中国石化股份有限公司南方勘探开发分公司,2007.
    [53]韩定坤.贵州安顺、织安、郎岱区块勘探早期油气地质评价[R].长沙:中南分公司油气勘探开发规划研究院,2005.
    [54]赵陵.黔中隆起及周缘地区下组合油气勘探前景评价研究[R].贵阳:中石化股份有限公司南方勘探开发分公司研究院贵阳室,2006.
    [55]杨长清.黔中隆起及南缘古生界油气保存条件与区带评价[R].长沙:中国石油化工股份有限公司中南分公司,2006.
    [56]梁狄刚.南方复杂构造区有效烃源岩评价[R].成都:中国石油化工股份有限公司南方勘探开发分公司,2007.
    [57]周明辉.论“黔中隆起”的形成与演化[J].南方油气,2005,18(2):6-9.
    [58]肖加飞,何熙琦,王尚彦,等.黔中隆起及外围南华-志留纪层序地层特征[J].贵州地质,2005,22(2):90-97.
    [59]封永泰,赵泽恒,赵培荣,等.黔中隆起及周缘基底结构、断裂特征[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(3):35-38.
    [60]陈旭,刘建波.上扬子地区奥陶-志留纪之交的黔中隆起和宜昌上升[J].科学通报,2001,46(12):1052-1056.
    [61]牛新生,冯常茂,刘进.黔中隆起的形成时间及形成机制探讨[J].海相油气地质,2007,12(2):46-50.
    [62]刘特民.再论“黔中古陆”[J].贵州工学院学报,1990,19(1):87-88.
    [63]沈志达,梅冥相,曾羽.贵州太康运动的地层学效应—兼论“黔中古陆”的形成[J].贵州地质,1990,7(2):91-97.
    [64]鞠天呤.黔中隆起之窥见[J].贵州地质,1999,16(2):180-184.
    [65]张正华.以沉积相的演变看“黔中隆起”的发展历史[J].贵州工学院学报,1992,21(1):100.
    [66]周希云.对“黔中隆起”的几点初步认识[J].贵州工学院学报,1990,19(1):78-79.
    [67]邓新,杨坤光,刘彦良,等.黔中隆起性质及其构造演化[J].地学前缘,1999,17(3):79-89.
    [68]王庆生.黔中北部于早奥陶世湄潭中晚期上升为陆[J].贵州工学院学报,1990,19(1):84-85.
    [69]梅冥相.黔中隆起及周缘下古生界层序地层与储层评价[R].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2005.
    [70]Catuneanu, V. Abreu J.P. Bhattacharya et, al. Towards the sta.nda.rdiza.tion of sequence stratigraphy [J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2009,92:1-33.
    [71]刘宝瑶,许效松.中国南方岩相古地理图集[M].北京:科学出版社,1994:59-72.
    [72]曾允孚,陈洪德,张锦泉,等.华南泥盆纪沉积盆地类型和主要特征[J].沉积学报,1992,10(3):10-19.
    [73]王立亭.中国南方二叠纪岩相古地理与成矿作用[M].北京:地质出版社,1994:1-76
    [74]廖士范.“黔中隆起”的发生发展与古风化壳铝土矿的形成问题[J].贵州工学院学报,1990,19(1):81-82.
    [75]戎嘉余.再论志留纪年代地层的统、阶层型研究[J].地层学研究,2005,29(2):160-164.
    [76]董卫平.贵州省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997:143-220.
    [77]赵自强,丁启秀.中南区区域地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1996:71-123.
    [78]殷保安.广西壮族自治区岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997:52-191.
    [79]吴浩若.广西加里东运动构造古地理问题[J].古地理学报,2000,2(1):17-23.
    [80]梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.加里东运动构造古地理及滇黔桂盆地的形成:兼论滇黔桂盆地深层油气勘探潜力[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):227-236.
    [81]沈志达,梅冥相,曾羽.太康运动与黔中古陆的形成[J].贵州工学院学报,1990,1:90-92.
    [82]戴新春,黄友庄.刍议黔中隆起及其形成过程中的均衡沉陷作用[J].贵州工业大学学报,1998,27(2):23-26.
    [83]田海芹,郭彤楼,胡东风,等.黔中隆起及其周缘地区海相下组合与油气勘探前景[J].古地理学报,2006,8(4):509-518.
    [84]冯常茂,牛新生,吴冲龙.黔中隆起及周缘地区下组合含油气流体包裹体研究[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2008,27(3):121-126.
    [85]赵泽恒,张桂权,薛秀丽.黔中隆起下组合古油藏和残余油气藏[J].天然气工业,2008,28(8):39-42.
    [86]蔡立国.黔中隆起及周缘地区油气地质条件综合研究及有利勘探目标优选[R].北京:中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所,2007.
    [87]陈明.黔中隆起及其周缘实测构造走廊大剖面报告[R].绵阳:四川地矿局西北地质队,2005.
    [88]廖宗廷.黔南及桂中坳陷构造特征研究[R].上海:同济大学,2003.
    [89]徐旭辉.中国南方海相新区含油气盆地分析与演化研究[R].无锡:中石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所,2006.
    [90]丘元禧.云开大陆及其邻区构造演化:云开大山及其邻区地质构造论文集[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:1-11.
    [91]Kiessling W, PIE, Golonka J, et al. Pattern s of Phanerozoic carbonate platform sedimentation[J]. Lethaia,2003,36(3):195-225.
    [92]楼达.黔中隆起及其周缘复杂褶皱—逆冲推覆构造及其动力学[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2008.
    [93]秦川.川中南部地区中三叠统雷口坡组储层特征[D].成都:成都理工大学,2009.
    [94]林小云,刘建,陈志良,等.中下扬子区海相烃源岩分布与生烃潜力评价[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(3):15-19.
    [95]陈红,龚洪春,杨友胜,等.下扬子区海相油气成藏特征[J].江苏地质,2003,27(3):148-151.
    [96]钟韬.黔中隆起及邻区下奥陶统礁滩相储层特征与分布研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2009.
    [97]P.B.Flemings, T.E. Jordan. A synthetic stratigraphic model of foreland basin development[J]. Jour. Geophy. Res,1989, (94):3851-3866.
    [98]R.L Gawthorpe, M.R. Leedert. Tectono-sedimentary evolution of active extensional basins[J]. Basin Research,2000,12:195-218.
    [99]John Koss, Frank G. Ethridge, S.A.Schumm. An experimental study of the effects of base-level change on fluvial, coastal plain and shelf systems [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1994,64(2):90-98.
    [100]Miall A D. Stratigraphic sequence and their chronostratigraphic correlation[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1991,61:497-505.
    [101]Shanley K. W. et. al. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata [J]. AAPG,1994,78(4):544-568.
    [102]雍自权.济阳坳陷狐岛潜山下古生界油气成藏条件和机理研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
    [103]Zhu Xiaomin, Xin Quanlin. Sedimentary characteristics and models of the beach-bar reservoirs in faulted down lacustrine basins [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1994,12(2):20-28.
    [104]Yin A and Harrison T M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen[J]. Annual Review of Earth amd Planetary Sciences,2000,28:211-280.
    [105]S. Gordon, Fraser. Sediments and sedimentary structures of a shore of lake Michigan[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1977,47(3):1187-1200.
    [106]Fralick PW, Kronberg B I. Geochemical discrimination of clastic sedimentary rock sources[J]. Sediment Geology,1997,113:111-124.
    [107]卜香萍.鲁西隆起区晚中生代盆地沉积记录研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2010.
    [108]Wolcott J. Nonfluvial contral of bimodal grain-size distributions in river-bed gravels[J] Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1988,58(6):979-984.
    [109]Gu X X, Liu J M, Zhang M H, et al. Provenance and tectonic setting of the Proterozoic turbidites in Hunan, South China:geochemical evidence[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,2002,72:393-407.
    [110]Wang J, Li Z. History of Neoproterozoic rift basins in south China:implications for Rodinia break up[J]. Precambrian Research,2003,122:141.
    [111 Li J Y. Permian geodynamic setting of Northeast China and adjacent regions:closure of the Paleo-Asian ocean and subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2006,26 (3/4):207-224.
    [112]Glcadow, Duddy, et al. Fission track lengths in the apatite annealing zone and the interpretation of mixed ages[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,1986, 78:245-254.
    [113]K. VV Shaney, P J. Me cabe. Predicting fades architecture through sequence stratigraphy-an example from the Kaiparowits Plateau, Utah[J]. Geology, 1991,19:742-745.
    [114]A. D. Heathershaw, A. G Davies. Resonant wave reflection by transverse bedforms and its relation to beaches and offshore bars[J]. Marine Geology, 1985,62(3-4):321-338.
    [115]刘震,张万选.陆相断陷盆地地震相解释专家系统[J].石油地球物理勘探,1992,27(2):261-269.
    [116]刘伟,许效松,余谦.探讨黔中古隆起形成机制及演化[J].沉积学报,2011,29(4):27-35.
    [117]吴占廷,蔡冰堰.贵阳武当奥陶系湄潭组震积岩的发现及意义[J].科技信息,2011,29:8-10.
    [118]董立,汤良杰,卢雪梅,等.麻江地区节理发育特征及对应力场转换的指示[J].石油与天然气地质,29(6):740-747.
    [119]Chen Hongde., Qin Jianxiong, Tian Jingchun. et al. Permian sedimentary bas ins and regional sedimentary models in the Sichuan-Yunnan-Grangxi-Guizhon Region[J]. Scientia Geological Sinica,1997,6(3):283-293.
    [120]牛新生.黔中隆起及其周缘地区构造-沉积演化[D].武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2007.
    [121]Ting V K. The orogenic movements in China[J]. Bulletin of Geological Society of China,1995,8(2):151-170.
    [122]Wang H Z, Mo X X. An outline of the tectonic evolution of China[J]. Episodes, 1995,18(1-2):6-16.
    [123]Goodman R E. Subaudible noise during compression of rock[J]. Geology Society of Americal Bulletin,1963,74:487-490.
    [124]梅冥相,高金汉,易定红,等.黔桂地区二叠纪层序地层格架及相对海平面变化研究[J].高校地质学报,2002,8(3):318-332.
    [125]Bohacs K M. Lake-basin type, source potential, and hydrocarbon character:an integrated sequence-stratigraphic-geochemical framework[J].AAPG Studies in Geology 46,3-33.
    [126]Daniel J. Lehrmann, Jiayong Wei, Pa.tzl Fnos. Controls on fa.cies architecture of a large triassic carbonate platform:the great bank of guizhou, nanpanjiang basin, south China [J]. Journal of sedimentary research,1998,68(2):311-326.
    [127]David A.Ferrill, Alan P.Morris, Mark A. Evans, et al. Calcite twin morphology: a low temperature deformation geothemometer[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,2004,26:1521-1569.
    [128]贵州地矿局区调队.贵州省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987:20-87.
    [129]邓新,杨坤光,刘彦良.遵义断裂带变形特点及其演化历史探讨[J].贵州地质,2010,27(3):161-167.
    [130]贵州省地质矿产局.贵州省1:20万区域调查报告桐梓幅、遵义幅,息烽幅、贵阳幅,瓮安幅[M].1973.
    [131]宁俊瑞.黔中隆起南缘重磁电震联合反演综合研究[R].北京:中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院,2009.
    [132]Nabighian M. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation[J]. Geophysics,1972,37 (2):507-512.
    [133]Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, Gary Egbert,An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data[J].Geophysics,2000,65(3):791-803.
    [134]崔敏,汤良杰,郭彤楼,等.黔南地区古生代正断层对构造特征的制约[J].现代地质,2009,23(3):409-413.
    [135]Hirth, G. Tullis, J. Dislocation creep regimes in quarts aggregates[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1992,14:145-159.
    [136]贵州地质局区调队.贵州省区域地质调查报告1:20万瓮安幅、镇远幅、贵阳幅、安顺幅[R].贵阳:贵州地质局,1970.
    [137]刘彦良.黔中镇远-贵阳断裂带构造变形特征及其区域构造活动响应[D].武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2009.
    [138]刘彦良,杨坤光,邓新.镇远-贵阳断裂带活动历时及其对黔中隆起演化的制约[J].地质科技情报,2009,28(3):41-47.
    [139]徐政语,姚根顺,郭庆新,等.黔南坳陷构造变形特征及其成因解析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2010,34(1):20-31.
    [140]王鸿帧.加里东运动后东吴运动前之中国古地理[J].地质评论,2012,16(1):1-8.
    [141]赵泽恒,周建平,张桂权.黔中隆起及周缘地区油气成藏规律探讨[J].天然气勘探与开发,2008,31(2):1-8.
    [142]赵泽恒,薛秀丽,张桂权.贵州黄平凹陷下古生界油气勘探潜力[J].海相油气地质,2007,12(3):33-43.
    [143]王津义,涂伟,曾华盛,等.黔西北地区天然气成藏地质特征[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(5):445-449.
    [144]何光玉,张卫华.盖层研究现状及发展趋势[J].世界地质,1997,16(2):28-32.
    [145]Peter J. Rose. Risk analysis and management of petroleum exploration ventures[J].AAPG.1987,71 (1):1-16.
    [146]Mello, Karner. Developrnent of sediment overpressure and ils effect on thermal maturation:application to the gulf of Mexio basin[J]. AAPG.1996, 80(9):1367-1396.
    [147]Li Z X, Zhang L H. Powell C M. South Chian in Rodinia; part of the missing link between Australia-East Antarctica and Laurentia[J]. Geology,1995, 23(5):407-410.
    [148]李双建,高波,沃玉进,等.中国南方海相油气藏破坏类型及其时空分布[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(1):43-49.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700