江南隆起北缘油气成藏带解剖及成藏规律探讨
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
江南隆起带位于扬子地块与华夏地块结合部位,研究区(江南隆起北缘)油气显示丰富,古油藏分布众多,是一个巨型的油气成藏带。对古油藏解剖和对比研究可指出巨型油气成藏带油气藏的分布规律,成藏和破坏特征,为在变质程度低保存条件好的地区找到工业油气藏提供勘探方向和思路。因此,加强古油藏的研究对于指导研究区下古油气勘探具有重要的现实意义。
     本文通过对江南隆起带北缘典型古油藏残留沥青性质和组分的分析,判断其来源和属性,运用“IES”盆地模拟软件对古油藏的埋藏史和生烃史进行了模拟,并利用储层沥青定年和有机包裹体定年等方法来确定油气成藏的时间,结合圈闭的演化史等的分析,对古油藏进行了解剖,揭示出了古油藏的的形成和破坏过程。
     麻江古油藏为单油源古油藏。油源来自下寒武统(∈_1)烃源层,充注层位为奥陶系红花园组(O_1h)碳酸盐岩古岩溶带及中下志留统翁项群(S_(1+2)wn)砂岩各类孔隙,盖层为翁项群(S_(1+2)wn)中上部泥质岩。控油构造为“加里东运动”形成的宽缓大背斜。下寒武统烃源岩于志留世末—泥盆世早期(S_3—D_1)达生烃高峰形成原始油藏;在“广西运动”时期,油藏被抬升,盖层受到剥蚀,原始油藏遭到一定程度氧化;到石炭世中期—中三叠世末(C_2—T_2)原始油藏先后裂解成天然气及残余沥青;燕山—喜山期大幅度的抬升剥蚀使气藏被破坏形成了麻江古油藏
     凯里残余油藏为多源古油藏,存在两个含油气系统。油源来自下寒武统(∈_1)和下奥陶—中下志留统两套泥岩烃源层。其储层为上震旦统灯影组(Z_2dy)白云岩溶孔、溶洞、裂缝,下寒武统九门冲组(∈_1jm)灰岩裂缝,奥陶系红花园组(O_1h)碳酸盐岩古岩溶带,及中下志留统翁项群(S_(1+2)wn)砂岩孔隙,盖层为下寒武统九门冲组和变马冲—杷榔组泥页岩,及翁项群(S_(1+2)wn)中上部泥质岩。以下寒武统为烃源岩的含油气系统成藏史和麻江古油藏相似,油藏形成于加里东期,并在海西—印支中期深埋,油藏逐渐向凝析油气藏转化,至燕山期最终裂解成现今以甲烷为主的干气和残余沥青。下奥陶—中下志留统烃源岩成熟期在中二叠世末,油藏形成于晚三叠世,至今仍属成熟阶段。燕山~喜山期凯里地区抬升剥蚀比麻江地区弱,二叠系地层还普遍存在,这为志留系及其以下储层的油气保存提供了很好的保护,使得油气得以部分残留,形成了现今的凯里残余油气藏。
     慈利南山坪古油藏为多源古油藏,油源来自下寒武统牛蹄塘组(∈_1n)和下志留统龙马溪组(S_1l),储层为上震旦统灯影组(Z_2dy)白云岩溶蚀孔,粒间孔和构造缝,盖层是下寒武统牛蹄塘组和杷榔组泥岩。控油构造为加里东期(志留纪末)形成的宽缓大背斜。牛蹄塘组生油岩在志留世中期达生油高峰,形成的油气向下运移形成灯影组原始油藏,并于晚石炭世开始向气藏演化;二叠世末,下志留统烃源岩开始生烃并向灯影组储层供油,此时灯影组原始油藏达生气高峰,印支构造运动控制的断控背斜构造圈闭混源型次生油气藏。燕山期—
Jiangnan Uplift is located between the Yangzi Plate and Huaxia plate. There are many oil and gas showing and paleo-reservoir in northern margin of Jiangnan uplift. The research of paleo-reservoir anatomization and contrast can open out the law of reservoir distribution. The study of hydrocarbon accumulation and reservoir destruction in Palaeozoic offer the exploration direction of discover reservoir in low metamorphosed and well saved place. So it is nessary and important to strengthen research of paleo-reservoir for exploration in Palaeozoic.
    This paper analyses the asphalt characteristic and its composition that paleo-reservoir remained to verdict asphalt source and attribute. "IES" basin model is used to analyze the burial history and hydrocarbon forming history of paleo-reservoir. Asphalt of reservoir and hydrocarbon enclosure is used to verify the reservoir forming time. These ways are used to anatomize and contrast paleo-reservoir in order to find out the process of paleo-reservoir forming and destruction.
    Majiang paleo-reservoir is unisource paleo-reservoir. The source rock is Lower Cambrian. Reservoir bed are karsts carbonate rock of Ordovician Honghuayuan. formation (O_1h) and sandstone of Lower Silurian Wengxiang formation (S_(1+2)wn). Cap rock is mud rock of Middle-upper Wengxiang formation. The trap is opened anticline zone formed during Caledonian. Hydrocarbon peak production of source rock is from Laster Silurian to Early Devonian, and during this period the originality reservoir formed. The originality reservoir was uplifted in Guangxi tectogenesis epoch, and the cap rock was disintegrated so the originality reservoir was oxygenated. From Middle Carboniferous to Middle Triassic the originality reservoir pyrolysised to gas pool and asphalt. From Yanshan to Himalayan epoch the crust uplifted and stratum was disintegrated, gas pool was destructed and Majiang paleo-reservoir formed.
    Kaili remainder reservoir is multiple source reservoir and has two petroleum system. Source rock are Lower Cambrian and Lower-Middle Silurian. Reservoir bed are dolostone emposieu, cave and crack of Sinian Dengying formation (Z_2dy) , limestone crack of Lower Cambrian Jiumencong formation (∈_1jm) , karst carbonate rock of Ordovician Honghuayuan formation (O_1h) and sandstone of Lower Silurian Wengxiang formation (S_(1+2)wn) . Cap rock is mud shale rock of Lower Cambrian Jiumencong, Bianmacong and Palang formation, Silurian Middle-upper Wengxiang
引文
1.许靖华,孙枢,李继亮,等.是华南造山带而不是华南地台[J].中国科学(B辑),1987,17(10):1107~1115.
    2.许靖华.中国南方大地构造的几个问题[J].地质科技情报,1987,6(2):13~27.
    3.陈旭,戎嘉余,D.B.Rowley,等.对华南早古生代板溪洋的质疑[J].地质论评,1995,41(5):389~400.
    4.赵崇贺,何科昭,周正国,等.关于华南大地构造问题的再认识[J].现代地质,1996,10(4):512~517.
    5.侯光久.江南古陆的构造属性讨论—以湖南马底驿地区板溪群为例[J].地质科技情报,1998,17(3):1~6.
    6.李曰俊,郝杰,鲁刚毅,等,论板溪群与板溪蛇绿混杂岩[J].地质论评,1994,40(2):97~105.
    7.陈旭,戎嘉余,Rowley D B,等,对华南早古生代板溪洋的质疑[J].地质论评,1995,41(5):389-400.
    8.刘鸿允,李曰俊,郝杰,论华南的板溪群及其有关的大地构造问题[J].地球学报,1994,(3—4):88-96.
    9.郭则华.试论浙西沥青煤的成因[J].石油勘探与开发,1981,3(4):7~17.
    10.马锡昭,袁望成.湖北通山碳沥青性质及成因的初步研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,1981,4(1):20~25.
    11.林等忠,王元,阎秀刚.中国南方煤化沥青成因与下古生界找油气前景[M].石油地质文集.地质出版社,1982
    12.王守德,罗瑞兰,刘建荣,等.试论中国南方下古生界碳沥青与古油藏的关系[C].南方古油藏学术会议,1987
    13.徐克定.康山“沥青脉”的成因[J].海相油气地质,1997,2(3):54~59.
    14.支家生.旧话重提“康山古油藏”质疑[J].海相油气地质,1997,2(1):42~43.
    15.吴士清,冯加良.浙西康山可燃有机岩矿脉的实质与成因[J].海相油气地质,1997,2(2):52~59.
    16.王守德,郑冰,蔡立国.中国南方古油藏与油气评价[J].海相油气地质,1997,2(1):44~50.
    17.毛世盛,黄时清,孙小东.湖北通山鲁家源煤矿气化充填成因探讨[J].湖北地矿,2001,15(1):22~25.
    18.罗璋,吴士清,徐克定等.下扬于区海相地层典型古油藏解剖[J].海相油气地质,1996,1(1):34~39.
    19.韩世庆,王守德,胡惟元.黔东麻江古油藏的发现及其地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质,1982,3(4):315~326.
    20.苏浙皖闽油气区石油地质编写组.中国石油地质志——苏浙皖闽油气区(第八卷),北京:石油工业出版社,1992:588.
    21.叶德胜,刘树辉.塔里木盆地东北地区古油藏及其石油地质意义[C].见:地矿部西北石油地质局.塔里木盆地石油地质论文集,1990.
    22.江海定.论浙江省碳沥青的成冈[J].中国煤田地质,1996,8(4):23~62.
    23.陈安定,黄金明,杨芝文等.皖南—浙西下古生界碳沥青成因及南方海相“有效烃源岩”问题探讨[J].海相油气地质,2004,9(1):77~83.
    24.武蔚文.贵州东部若干古油藏的形成和破坏[J].贵州地质,1989,6(1):9~22.
    25.马力,陈焕捌,甘克文,等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M].地质出版社,2004:109~121.
    26.刘德汉.碳酸岩中的沥青[A].见《碳酸岩有机地球化学》[M],傅家漠等著,北京:科学出版社.1989:p77~92,
    27.张景廉,朱炳泉,涂湘林,等.关于沥青成因的讨论[J].海相油气地质,1997,2(4):53~57
    28.胡见义,牛嘉玉.中国重油沥青资源的形成与分布[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(2):105~112.
    29. Curiale J A. Origin of solid bitumens, with emphasis on biological marker results. Org. Geochem., 1985, 10(3): p559~580.
    30. Van Gijzel P. Applications of the geomicophotometry of kerogen, solid hydrocarbons and crude oils to petroleum exploration. In: Brooks J, ed. Organic Maturation Studies and Fossil Fuel Exploration. London: Academic Press, 1981: 351~377
    31.邱蕴玉,徐濂.扬子准地台南缘下古生界油源研究及地化指标初探[C],有机地球化学论文集,北京,地质出版社,1987:53~70.
    32.翟光明.中国石油地质志——滇黔桂油气区(第十一卷).北京:石油工业出版社,1992
    33. Hood A, Gutjahr C.C.M, Heacock R.L.. Organic metamorphism and the generation of petroleum[J]. AAPG Bulletin. 1975, 59 (6): 986~996.
    34. Dow W G. Kerogern studies and geological interpretations[J]. Journal of Gelehemical Exploration, 1977, 7 (1): 79~99.
    35.周中毅,潘长春主编.沉积盆地古地温测定方法及其应用[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1992:13~15.
    36. Barker C. E., Pawlewica M.J. The correlation of Vitrinite reflectance with maximum temperature in humic organic matter[J]. Lecture Notes in Earth Science, 1986, 5:79~81.
    37. Baker C E, Goldstein R H. Fluid inclusion technique for determine maximum temperature in calcite and its composition to the Vitrinite reflectance gethermometer[J]. Geology, 1990, 18:1003~1006.
    38.费琪.成油体系分析与模拟[M].北京:高等教育出版,2001.
    39. Magara, L.B.&Dow, W.G., The Petroleum System——from Source to Trap[M], AAPG Memoir 60, 1994
    40.赵宗举,冯加良,陈学时,等.湖南慈利灯影组古油藏的发现及意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,22(2):114~118.
    41.戴俊生,马占荣,冀国盛,等.扬子板块中部南山坪背斜的形成与演化[J].中国地质,2003,30(4):367~371.
    42.浙江省地质矿产局.浙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1989.
    43.杨巍然.华南加里东阶段古构造特征[A].见:王鸿祯主编,华南地区古大陆边缘构造史[M],武汉:武汉地质学院出版社,1986:39~641.
    44.邓家瑞,张志平.雪峰古陆的加里东期推覆构造[J].华东地质学院学报,1996,19(3):201~210.
    45.王国平.福建印支运动基本特征探讨[J].福建地质,1983,2(2):27~36.
    46.贵州省地矿局,贵州省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
    47.张攀华.论江南地轴北西缘在湖南的边界[J].湖南地质,1984,3(2):57~58.
    48.李浩.滇黔桂地区加里东构造古地理变迁及油气勘探潜力分析[D].中国地质大学(北京),2005.5
    49.雪峰科研专题组.江南—雪峰地区的层滑作用及多期复台构造[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
    50.罗志立.中国西南地区晚古生代以来地裂运动对石油等矿产形成的影响[J].四川地质学报,1981,2(1):1~22.
    51.马文璞,丘元禧,何丰盛.江南隆起上的下古生界缺失带——华南加里东前陆褶冲带的标志[J].现代地质,1995,9(3):320~324.
    52.尹福光,许效松,万方,等.华南地区加里东期前陆盆地演化过程中的沉积响应[J].地球学报,2001,22(5):425~428.
    53.万方,尹福光,许效松,等.华南加里东运动演化过程中烃源岩的成生[J]矿物岩石,2003,23(2):82~86
    54.郭福祥.关于华南东部的印支运动[J].桂林工学院学报,1998,18(4):313~322.
    55.刘文均.海西—印支期华南板块的沉积特点[J].成都理工学院学报,1998,25(2):328~336
    56.湖南省地质矿产局.湖南省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1988.
    57.任纪舜.印支运动及其在中国大地构造演化中的意义[J].中国地质科学院院报,1984,(9):31~44.
    58.江西省地质矿产局.江西省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1988.
    59. Decelles P G, Gilest K A. Foreland basin system[J]. Basin Research, 1996, 8:105~123.
    60.汤济广,梅廉夫,沈传波,等.前陆盆地结构单元与油气成藏响应[J].新疆石油地质,2006,27(2):242~245.
    61. Creaney S, Allan J. Petroleum systems in the foreland basin of Western Canada[A]. In: Macqueen R W, Lecike D A, ed. Foreland Basin and Fold Belts[C], AAPG Memoir 55. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. 1992:279~308.
    62. Yu Ho-Shing, Chou Ying-Wei. Characteristics and development of the flexural forebulge and basal unconformity of Western Taiwan Foreland Basin[J]. Tectonophysics. 2001, 333:277~291.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700