铁路突发事件应急决策若干问题研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
当前对于铁路突发事件应急决策,主要依据决策者的自身经验,然而由于决策者的知识局限性,做出的决策可能会存在一定的不足,另外,决策者的自身压力可能较大,正常的决策能力会受到影响。因此,如何高效、及时地对铁路突发事件进行有效决策,已成为迫切需要解决的问题。本文综合运用模糊数学、评估理论、多属性群决策理论及计算机技术等多学科知识,采用分析与综合相结合、理论研究与数值试验相结合的方法,针对铁路突发事件应急决策的若干问题进行了研究。本研究的具体内容如下:
     (1)研究了铁路突发事件及铁路应急决策相关理论,包括铁路突发事件定义、分类分级、特点、基本应急属性,以及铁路应急决策定义、特点、流程和方法。
     (2)提出案例推理(CBR)应用到铁路应急决策中,①针对铁路突发事件案例表示,提出采用四元组(主题域、问题域、解决方案域、及效果域)描述案例,并提出该四元组中包含的属性;②提出铁路突发事件案例以及铁路应急预案框架法表示方法;③案例属性值上考虑了数值型、有序枚举型、无序枚举型、区间数型及模糊数型五种形式属性值,提出五种形式属性值的案例相似度计算方法;④结合案例属性的特点,采用层次分析法确定铁路突发事件案例属性权重,研究了案例属性局部相似度计算方法、案例总体相似度计算方法,以及基于结构相似度算法,研究案例属性缺失条件下的案例总体相似度计算方法;⑤提出基于案例推理的铁路突发事件应急决策流程。
     (3)在铁路应急预案评估方面,考虑评估值的不确定性和模糊性以及评估者的偏好和知识不完备性,本文提出四种铁路应急预案评估方法:①改进VIKOR方法评估铁路应急预案,针对的评估指标值为语言值,指标权重的求解运用基于熵的主客观赋权法,另外对铁路预案评估指标提出改进;②针对评估指标值为混合值,提出基于二元语义的混合多属性群决策评估方法,提出模型及求解算法;③针对指标评估值为区间语言值,定义区间二元语义混合平均(IVTHA)算子及区间二元语义混合几何(IVTHG)新算子,提出基于区间二元语义混合平均(IVTHA)算子的决策评估方法,给出算法步骤;④针对评估指标具有不同优先级,评估值为语言值,提出二元语义优先加权平均(2TLPWA)算子、二元语义优先几何平均(2TLPWG)算子、二元语义优先有序加权平均(2TLPOWA)算子、二元语义优先有序加权几何(2TLPOWG)算子,提出基于二元语义优先有序平均算子(2TPOWA)算子的与预案评估方法,并给出算法步骤。
     (4)在决策支持系统的理论基础上,给出铁路突发事件应急决策系统的定义、目标,构建了铁路突发事件应急决策系统的框架,提出铁路突发事件应急决策系统的总体设计,并对功能模块做了较详细设计,另外对铁路突发事件应急决策系统“多库”系统中的知识库、模型库、方法库、基础信息库系统做出设计。
     本文的研究对改进铁路突发事件应急决策方法,提高铁路突发事件应急决策水平具有一定的现实意义,同时对案例推理人工智能技术、多属性群决策评估理论以及决策支持系统的结合研究提供一定的理论基础。
Railway emergency decision-making is mainly based on their own experience ofdecision-makers. However, due to the limitations of knowledge of the decision-makers andtheir own pressure, the decision may exist some deficiencies. Therefore, how to makeeffective decision efficiently and timely has become an urgent.
     In this thesis, some issues around the railway emergency decision-making are researchedby the method of combining analysis and synthesis, theoretical research and numericalexperiments, and using multi-disciplinary knowledges, such as fuzzy mathematics,assessment theory, multi-attribute group decision theory and computer technology. The maincontents of this reasearch are as follows:
     (1) The theories of railway emergencies and railway emergency decision are discussed.The theories include definition, classification, grading, characteristics, and basic emergencyproperty of railway emergency, as well as the definitions, characteristics, processes, methodsof railway emergency decision.
     (2) Case-based reasoning (CBR) is applied to the railway emergency decision. Fourtuples of subject domain, problem domain, solution domain, and the effect domain are used todescribe railway emergency case. Attributes of the four tuples are presented. Framework ofrailway emergency is represented. Different attribute values including numeric, orderlyenumeration type, disorderly enumeration type, type of interval numbers,and fuzzy numbersare studied. A method of five attributes value type is proposed to calculate their similarity.Attribute weights of railway emergency are determined combing with attribute characteristicsby the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. Calculation method of local similarity andglobal similarity of the current case and the source case is studied. Calculation method ofglobal similarity is studied for values of attributes missing conditions, based on structuresimilarity algorithm.
     (3) Due to uncertainty and ambiguity of assessment value and knowledge incompletenessand preferences of evaluators in the aspects of railway emergency plans evaluation, four kindsof evaluation methods for railway emergency plan evaluation are presented. Aiming atlinguistic evaluation value of attribute, VIKOR method is improved for evaluting railwayemergency plan. Weights are solved by the method of subjective and objective weight basedon entropy. In addition, evaluation indexes of railway emergency plan is improved. In view of the evaluation indexes value is hybrid, a method based on2-tuple linguistic is presented forevaluating railway emergency plan with weight information known, and algorithm are given.Aiming at evaluation value of interval linguistic form, interval-valued2-tuple linguistichybrid average (IVTHA) operator and interval-valued2-tuple linguistic hybridgeometric(IVTHG) operator are defined. The method of multi-attribute group decisionmaking based on IVTHA operator is proposed for evaluating railway emergency plan, inaddition algorithm and steps are suggested. According to the evaluation indexes with differentpriorities and evaluation value of interval linguistic form,2-tuple prioritized weightedaverage(2TLPWA) operator,2-tuple prioritized weighted geometric(2TLPWG) operator,2-tuple prioritized ordered weighted average (2TLPOWA) operator, and2-tuple prioritizedordered weighted average(2TLPOWG) operator are suggested. The method of multi-attributegroup decision making based on2TLPOWA operator is presented, and algorithm is proposed.
     (4) Based on the theory of decision support system, the definition of the railwayemergency decision-making system, and the goal of the system are proposed. The frameworkof railway emergency decision system is built. The overall design of the railway emergencydecision system is presented. The detailed design of functional modules is made. In additionto knowledge base, model base, method base, and basic information database system aredesigned for the "library" system of the railway emergency decision system.
     In short, improving railway emergency decision-making methods and the level of railwayemergency decision-making has a certain practical significance. Combination study of CBRof artificial intelligence technology, the theory of multi-attribute group decision makingassessment and the technique of decision support system provides certain theoretical basis forrailway emergency decision-making.
引文
[1]维基百科.铁路事故列表[EB/OL].(2012.3.30)[2012-04-10].http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/铁路事故列表.
    [2] Aamodt.A,Plaza.E.Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, andsystem approaches[J].AI communications.1994,7(1):39-59.
    [3]刘建炜,燕路峰.知识表示方法比较[J].计算机系统应用.2011,20(3):242-246.
    [4]陈世福.人工智能与知识工程[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1997,:64-115.
    [5]年志刚,梁式,麻芳兰.知识表示方法研究与应用[J].计算机应用研究.2007,24(5):234-236.
    [6]王万森,人工智能[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2011:39-50.
    [7]王天戌.基于案例推理的应急预案管理研究[J].现代计算机.2008(7):40-43.
    [8]李茹,任海涛,刘开瑛.基于案例推理中特征权重自动学习方法研究[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版).2004,27(3):245-248.
    [9]蒋占四,陈立平,罗年猛.最近邻实例检索相似度分析[J].计算机集成制造系统.2007,13(6):1165-1169.
    [10]贾兆红,陈华平.基于改进遗传算法的权重发现技术[J].计算机工程.2007,5(33):156-159.
    [11]王津津,田卫东.案例推理中一种组合权重的方法[J].微计算机信息.2010,26(33):254-256.
    [12] Kai Zhao,Xin Yu. A Case Based Reasoning Approach on Supplier Selection in PetroleumEnterprises[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2011,38(6):6839-6847.
    [13]黄继鸿,姚武,雷战波.基于案例推理的企业财务危机智能预警支持系统研究[J].系统工程理论与实践.2003,23(12):46-52.
    [14] Watson I, Marir F. Case-based reasoning: A review[J].Knowledge EngineeringReview.1994,9(4):327-354.
    [15]李铌,刘武成,李亮基.基于案例推理的铁路施工项目投标报价决策研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报.2008,5(4):68-73.
    [16]徐晓臻,高国安.案例推理在多准则评价智能决策支持系统中的应用研究[J].计算机集成制造系统.2001,7(1):16-18,28.
    [17]阮跃.案例推理在汽轮发电机组故障诊断中的应用[J].热能动力工程.2000,15(3):301-303.
    [18]贺晓,刘景宁,李淑霞.基于灰色关联理论的案例推理在故障智能诊断系统中的应用[J].中国机械工程.2004,15(22):2022-2026.
    [19]沈亚诚,舒忠梅.基于案例推理的病历表示与系统架构研究[J].南方医科大学学报.2007,27(7):1114-1116.
    [20]段军,戴居丰.案例修正方法研究[J].计算机工程.2006,6(32):1-3.
    [21]常春光,崔建江,汪定伟.案例推理中案例调整技术的研究[J].系统仿真学报.2004,6(16):1260-1265,1283.
    [22]董晓峰,顾煜炯,杨昆.基于模糊粗糙集的案例推理在发电设备RCM分析中的应用[J].中国电机工程学报.2009(32):30-36.
    [23]武民民,宋良图,黄伟.基于替代算法的案例推理灾害救助系统[J].计算机系统应用.2009,18(4):11-13.
    [24]张代胜,陈朝阳,张树强.基于案例推理的汽车维修专家系统[J].汽车工程.2003,25(5):506-509.
    [25]赵卫东,李旗号,盛昭翰.基于案例推理的决策问题求解研究[J].管理科学学报.2000(4):29-36.
    [26]胡衍强,刘仲英.基于案例推理的金融操作风险预警系统[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版.2008,36(9):1290-1294.
    [27]韩江洪,刘小平,杜兆芳.基于案例推理的纺纱质量预测模型研究[J].系统仿真学报.2009(5):1347-1351.
    [28]曹方,王伟,王介生.基于知识挖掘和案例推理的电渣重熔过程智能优化设定控制[J].信息与控制.2010(1):114-119,128.
    [29]曹立军,王兴贵,秦俊奇.融合案例与规则推理的故障预测专家系统[J].计算机工程.2006,32(1):208-210.
    [30]于跃海,郑瑞强.基于案例推理的ICU应急诊断方案生成系统[J].东南大学学报:自然科学版.2001,3(12):27-30.
    [31] Churchman C L.Case-based reasoning support for liver dosease diagnosis[J].Artificial Intelligencein Medicine,2011,53(1):15-23.
    [32]孟宪福,王蒴,关迎晖.基于案例推理的企业信用评估系统[J].计算机工程.2003,29(22):170-172.
    [33]于江,王征.基于案例推理的产品包装设计系统[J].计算机应用研究.2003,23(1):39-40,43.
    [34]路云,吴应宇,达庆利.基于案例推理技术的企业经营决策支持模型设计[J].中国管理科学.2005,13(2):81-87.
    [35]周凯波,魏莹,冯珊.基于案例推理的金融危机预警支持系统[J].计算机工程与应用.2001(14):18-21.
    [36]方圆,胡代平.基于案例推理的股价操纵行为判别系统研究[J].科学技术与工程.2011,11(5):1147-1151.
    [37]戢晓峰,刘澜.基于案例推理的交通拥挤管理方法[J].西南交通大学学报.2009,44(3):415-420.
    [38]吕宗平,胡欣,杨宏宇.基于案例推理的机场应急预案管理[J].中国民航大学学报.2010,28(2):1-5.
    [39]李青,史雅琴,周扬.基于案例推理方法在飞机故障诊断中的应用[J].北京航空航天大学学报.2007,33(5):622-626.
    [40]计雷.突发事件应急管理[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
    [41]罗文婷,王艳辉,贾利民.改进层次分析法在铁路应急预案评价中的应用研究[J].铁道学报.2008,30(6):24-28.
    [42]黄典剑,宁绪成.石油化工企业应急预案评价方法研究[J].石油化工安全技术.2006,22(5):17-19.
    [43]夏保成,牛帅印,张永领.我国专项应急预案完备性评估指标与方法探讨[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版).2012,31(1):19-24.
    [44]于瑛英,池宏,高敏刚.应急预案的综合评估研究[J].中国科技论坛.2009(2):88-92.
    [45]徐朱连.社区应急预案评估标准研究与实践[J].中国应急管理.2012(7):32-36.
    [46]王亚洲,方咏,王祥君.人民银行系统应急预案评估方法研究与应用[J].中国应急管理.2012(7):37-41.
    [47]刘吉夫,朱晶晶.我国自然灾害类应急预案评价方法研究(1):完备性评价[J].中国安全科学学报.2008,18(2):6-11.
    [48]邓万涛.煤矿应急预案评价方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报.2010,20(5):167-171.
    [49]王颖,郑鱼洪.综合决策模型在饮水安全应急预案评估中的应用[J].水电能源科学.2011,29(4):122-123,196.
    [50]邓晓衡,刘雪芹,陈志刚.基于模糊综合评判的人防预案评估模型[J].计算机工程.2011,39(17):252-255.
    [51]张海龙,,李雄飞,,董立岩.应急预案评估方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报.2009,19(7):143-148.
    [52]孙颖,池宏,祁明亮.基于改进的多属性群决策方法的突发事件应急预案评估[J].中国管理科学.2005,13(Z1):153-156.
    [53]郭子雪,张强.基于直觉模糊集的突发事件应急预案评估[J].数学的实践与认识.2008,38(22):64-69.
    [54]李磊,王富章.基于改进VIKOR法的铁路应急预案评估研究[J].中国安全科学学报.2012,22(8):29-36.
    [55] Atanassov K T.Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets and Systems.1986,20(1):87-96.
    [56] Atanassov K,Gargov G. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets andsystems.1989,31(3):343-349.
    [57] Gau W L, Buehrer D J.Vague sets[J].Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactionson.1993,23(2):610-614.
    [58] Bustince H, Burillo P.Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets andsystems.1996,79(3):403-405.
    [59] Shu M H,Cheng C H,Chang J R.Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printedcircuit board assembly[J].Microelectronics Reliability.2006,46(12):2139-2148.
    [60]王坚强.模糊多准则决策方法研究综述[J].控制与决策.2008,23(6):601-607.
    [61] De S K,Biswas R,Roy A. R.Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets andSystems.2000,114(3):477-484.
    [62] Bustince H.Construction of intuitionistic fuzzy relations with predetermined properties[J].FuzzySets and Systems.2000,109(3):379-403.
    [63] Xu Z. Multi-person multi-attribute decision making models under intuitionistic fuzzyenvironment[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.2007,6(3):221-236.
    [64]王坚强.信息不完全确定的多准则区间直觉模糊决策方法[J].控制与决策.2006,21(11):1253-1256,1263.
    [65]王坚强.基于直觉梯形模糊数的信息不完全确定的多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策.2009,24(2):226-230.
    [66] Li D F.Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzysets[J].Journal of computer and System Sciences.2005,70(1):73-85.
    [67] Ye J.Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient underintuitionistic fuzzy environment[J].European Journal of OperationalResearch.2010,205(1):202-204.
    [68] Ye J.Two effective measures of intuitionistic fuzzy entropy[J].Computing.2010,87(1-2):55-62.
    [69] Parkash O,Sharma P K,Mahajan R.New measures of weighted fuzzy entropy and theirapplications for the study of maximum weighted fuzzy entropy principle[J].InformationSciences.2008,178(11):2389-2395.
    [70] Ye J.Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method using entropy weights-based correlationcoefficients of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Applied MathematicalModelling.2010,34(12):3864-3870.
    [71] Park D G,Kwun Y C,Park J H.Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy setsand its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems[J].Mathematical andComputer Modelling.2009,50(9):1279-1293.
    [72] Xu Z.Models for multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzyinformation[J].International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-BasedSystems.2007,15(3):285-297.
    [73] Xu Z.A deviation-based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decisionmaking[J].Group Decision and Negotiation.2010,19(1):57-76.
    [74] Lin L,Yuan X H,Xia Z Q.Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making methods based on intuitionisticfuzzy sets[J].Journal of Computer and System Sciences.2007,73(1):84-88.
    [75] Xu Z.Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decisionmaking[J].Information Sciences.2007,177(11):2363-2379.
    [76] Wei G W.Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionisticfuzzy setting[J].Knowledge-Based Systems.2008,21(8):833-836.
    [77] Wei G W.GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight informationin intuitionistic fuzzy setting[J].Knowledge-Based Systems.2010,23(3):243-247.
    [78] Yue Z.Deriving decision maker’s weights based on distance measure for interval-valuedintuitionistic fuzzy group decision making[J].Expert Systems withApplications.2011,38(9):11665-11670.
    [79] Park J H,Park I Y,Kwun Y C.Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problemsunder interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J].Applied MathematicalModelling.2011,35(5):2544-2556.
    [80] Dymova L,Sevastjanov P.An interpretation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in terms of evidence theory:Decision making aspect[J].Knowledge-Based Systems.2010,23(8):772-782.
    [81] Chen Z,Yang W.A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzzysetting[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling.2011,35(9):4424-4437.
    [82] Xu Z.Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J].Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactionson.2007,15(6):1179-1187.
    [83] Xu Z,Yarger R R.Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzysets[J].International journal of general systems.2006,35(4):417-433.
    [84] Xu Z,Chen J.Approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgmentmatrices[J].Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice.2007,27(4):126-133.
    [85]徐泽水.区间直觉模糊信息的集成方法及其在决策中的应用[J].控制与决策.2007,22(2):215-219.
    [86] Xu Z,Chen J.On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzyinformation[C].Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery,2007. Fourth International Conferenceon. IEEE.2007(2):466-471.
    [87] Wei G,Wang X.Some geometric aggregation operators based on interval-valued intuitionisticfuzzy sets and their application to group decision making[C][J].Computational Intelligence andSecurity,2007International Conference on. IEEE.2007:495-499.
    [88] X.H.Yu,Z.S.Xu.Hierarchical aggregation methods based on weighted combinationoperators[J].Information: An International Interdisciplinary Journal.2009(12):51-64.
    [89] Xu Z.Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information[J].InformationSciences.2010,180(5):726-736.
    [90] Xu Z.Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy poweraggregation operators[J].Knowledge-Based Systems.2011,24(6):749-760.
    [91] Yu X, Xu Z.Prioritized intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J].InformationFusion.2013,14(1):108-116.
    [92] Yu D,Wu Y,Lu T.Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application ingroup decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems.2012(30):57-66.
    [93] Xu Z, Yarger R R.Intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means[J].Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B:Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on.2011,41(2):568-578.
    [94] Zhao H,Xu Z,Ni M.Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].InternationalJournal of Intelligent Systems.2010,25(1):1-30.
    [95] Xia M,Xu Z,Zhu B.Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means[J].International Journal ofIntelligent Systems.2012,27(1):23-47.
    [96] Yager R R.Induced aggregation operators[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems.2003,137(1):59-69.
    [97] Wei G.Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information andtheir application to group decision making[J].Applied Soft Computing.2010,10(2):423-431.
    [98] Su Z,Chen M.Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operator for multi-attribute groupdecision making[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2012,39(2):1902-1910.
    [99] Xu Z,Xia M.Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators[J].Knowledge-BasedSystems.2011,24(2):197-209.
    [100]Wei G.Induced intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted averaging operator and its application tomultiple attribute group decision making[M].2008,Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology.Springer Berlin Heidelberg:124-131.
    [101]Yager R R.On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteriaaggregation[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.2009,50(8):1279-1286.
    [102]M.Sun,J.Liu.Induced Generalized Weighted Bonferroni Mean Operator for Intuitionistic FuzzySets[J].Advanced Modeling and Optimization.2012,14(3):663-671.
    [103]Xu Y,Wang H.The induced generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets andtheir application in group decision making[J].Applied Soft Computing.2012,12(3):1168-1179.
    [104]Xu Z, Yager R R. Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[J].InternationalJournal of Approximate Reasoning.2008,48(1):246-262.
    [105]Park J H,Cho H J,Kwun Y C.Extension of the VIKOR method to dynamic intuitionistic fuzzymultiple attribute decision making[J].Computers&Mathematics withApplications.2013,65(4):731-744.
    [106]Su Z,Chen M,Xia G.An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute groupdecision making[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2011,38(12):15286-15295.
    [107]Tan C.A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making with Choquetintegral-based TOPSIS[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2011,38(4):3023-3033.
    [108]Park J H,Cho H J,Kwun Y C.Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making withinterval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information[J].Fuzzy Optimization and DecisionMaking.2011,10(3):233-253.
    [109]Chen S M,Tan J M.Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague settheory[J].Fuzzy sets and systems.1994,67(2):163-172.
    [110]Hong D H,Choi C H.Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague settheory[J].Fuzzy sets and systems.2000,114(1):103-113.
    [111]Liu H W,Wang G J.Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzysets[J].European Journal of Operational Research.2007,179(1):220-233.
    [112]王坚强,孟利宇,陈晓红.基于决策者风险态度的多准则决策的Vague集方法[J].系统工程与电子技术.2009,31(2):361-365.
    [113]Wang J,Li K,Zhang H.Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-makingapproach based on prospect score function[J].Knowledge-Based Systems.2012(27):119-125.
    [114]Zadeh L.A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages[J].Computers&Mathematics with Applications.1983,9(1):149-184.
    [115]Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E.Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problemsunder linguistic information[J].Fuzzy Sets and systems.2000,115(1):67-82.
    [116]Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E.A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic termsets in decision making[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems.2000,114(1):43-58.
    [117]Chen S J J,Hwang C L,Beckmann M J,Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods andapplications[M].1992,Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
    [118]Delgado M,Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E.Combining numerical and linguistic information ingroup decision making[J].Information Sciences.1998,107(1):177-194.
    [119]Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E,Verdegay J L.A linguistic decision process in group decisionmaking[J].Group Decision and Negotiation.1996,5(2):165-176.
    [120]Li D F.Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making[J].Applied SoftComputing.2007,7(3):807-817.
    [121]Chen S M,Lee L W.Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2TOPSIS method[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2010,37(4):2790-2798.
    [122]Chen S M,Lee L W. W.Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the rankingvalues and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2fuzzy sets[J].Expert Systems withapplications.2010,37(1):824-833.
    [123]Mendel J M,John R I,Liu F L.Interval type-2fuzzy logic systems made simple[J]., IEEETransactions on Fuzzy Systems.2006,14(6):808-821.
    [124]Herrera F,Martinez L.A2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing withwords[J].Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on.2000,8(6):746-752.
    [125]李洪燕,樊治平.一种基于二元语义的多指标群决策方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版).2003,24(5):495-498.
    [126]Wei G W,Wang X R.Two-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making based on thegroup ideal alternative[C].Control Conference,27th Chinese. IEEE.2008:150-154.
    [127]卫贵武.权重信息不完全的二元语义多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术.2008,30(2):273-277.
    [128]张亦驰,张园林,匡兴华.考虑权重信息的二元语义多属性群决策方法[J].武汉理工大学学报:信息与管理工程版.2008,30(6):928-931.
    [129]Wei G W.A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG andET-OWG operators with2-tuple linguistic information[J].Expert Systems withApplications.2010,37(12):7895-7900.
    [130]Wei G W.Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and theirapplication to multiple attribute group decision making[J].Computers&IndustrialEngineering.2011,61(1):32-38.
    [131]Xu Y,Wang H.Approaches based on2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multipleattribute group decision making under linguistic environment[J].Applied SoftComputing.2011,11(5):3988-3997.
    [132]徐泽水,达庆利.基于模糊语言评估的多属性决策方法[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版).2002,32(4):656-658.
    [133]Herrera F,Martinez L.A model based on linguistic2-tuples for dealing with multigranularhierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making[J].Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on.2001,31(2):227-234.
    [134]Wu Z,Chen Y.The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision makingunder linguistic environment[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems.2007,158(14):1608-1617.
    [135]Liu P.A weighted aggregation operators multi-attribute group decision-making method based oninterval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers[J].Expert Systems withApplications.2011,38(1):1053-1060.
    [136]Wang C,Peng J,Li P.Study on multi-attribute group decision making under the information oflinguistic fuzzy numbers[C][J].Intelligent Control and Automation,2008. WCICA2008.7thWorld Congress on. IEEE.2008:7496-7499.
    [137]Yager R R.On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking[J].Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on.1988,18(1):183-190.
    [138]Delgado M,Verdegay J L,Vila M. A.On aggregation operations of linguistic labels[J].Internationaljournal of intelligent systems.1993,8(3):351-370.
    [139]Xu Z.Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decisionmaking[J].Information fusion.2006,7(2):231-238.
    [140]Xu Z.A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making withlinguistic preference relations[J].Information sciences.2004,166(1):19-30.
    [141]Xu Z.Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute groupdecision making under uncertain linguistic environment[J].InformationSciences.2004,168(1):171-184.
    [142]Xu Z.An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators togroup decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations[J].Decisionsupport systems.2006,41(2):488-499.
    [143]Park J H,Gwak M G,Kwun Y C.Uncertain linguistic harmonic mean operators and theirapplications to multiple attribute group decision making[J].Computing.2011,93(1).
    [144]Xu Z.A note on linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute groupdecision making with linguistic information[J].Group Decision andNegotiation.2006,15(6):593-604.
    [145]Park J H,Gwak M G,Kwun Y C.Linguistic harmonic mean operators and their applications togroup decision making[J].The International Journal of Advanced ManufacturingTechnology.2011,57(1-4):411-419.
    [146]Wei G,Zhao X,Lin R.Uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application tomultiple attribute decision making[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling.2012,37(7):5277-5285.
    [147]Xu Z.On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operators[J].International journal of generalsystems.2006,35(1):17-28.
    [148]Merigó J M,Gil-Lafuente A M,Zhou L G.Induced and linguistic generalized aggregationoperators and their application in linguistic group decision making[J].Group Decision andNegotiation.2012,21(4):531-549.
    [149]Xu Y,Huang L.An approach to group decision making problems based on2-tuple linguisticaggregation operators[C].Computing, Communication, Control, and Management,2008.CCCM'08. ISECS International Colloquium on. IEEE.2008(3):73-77.
    [150]Yang W,Chen Z.New aggregation operators based on the Choquet integral and2-tuple linguisticinformation[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2012,39(3):2662-2668.
    [151]Chen S M,Niou S J.Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preferencerelations[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2011,38(4):3865-3872.
    [152]Wei G W.GRA-based linear-programming methodology for multiple attribute group decisionmaking with2-tuple linguistic assessment information[J].Information: An InternationalInterdisciplinary Journal.2011,14(4):1105-1110.
    [153]Xu Y,Cai Z.Standard deviation method for determining the weights of group multiple attributedecision making under uncertain linguistic environment[C].Intelligent Control and Automation,2008. WCICA2008.7th World Congress on. IEEE.2008:8311-8316.
    [154]Wei G,Lin R,Zhao X.Models for multiple attribute group decision making with2-tuple linguisticassessment information[J].International Journal of Computational IntelligenceSystems.2010,3(3):315-324.
    [155]Wei G W.Extension of TOPSIS method for2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decisionmaking with incomplete weight information[J].Knowledge and InformationSystems.2010,25(3):623-634.
    [156]Su Z X.A hybrid fuzzy approach to fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making[J].InternationalJournal of Information Technology&Decision Making.2011,10(4):695-711.
    [157]宋业.地质灾害预警系统与决策支持系统研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报.1993,4(2):84-91.
    [158]徐帮树,贾超,王育奎.城市防汛预警决策支持系统研究及应用[J].山东大学学报(工学版).2011,41(2):167-172.
    [159]徐志胜,冯凯,徐亮.基于GIS的城市公共安全应急决策支持系统的研究[J].安全与环境学报.2004,4(6):82-85.
    [160]刘士兴,张永明,袁非牛.城市公共安全应急决策支持系统研究[J].安全与环境学报.2007,7(2):140-143.
    [161]刘军,方源敏,苗芳芳.矿井火灾避灾决策支持系统的研究与设计[J].科学技术与工程.2011,11(2):429-434.
    [162]贾进章,刘剑,赵千里.金川公司二矿区矿井火灾救灾决策支持系统研究[J].中国安全科学学报.2006,16(4):131-135.
    [163]刘金城,郭德勇,和德江.煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故应急辅助决策系统设计[J].煤矿安全.2006,37(4):10-12.
    [164]张海彬,张东平.突发性环境污染事故预警系统的探讨[J].污染防治技术.2007,20(1):60-62.
    [165]张保森,肖红,田凯.构建环境应急决策支持系统的思考[J].环境科学与管理.2010,35(1):57-59.
    [166]高鹏飞,王鹏,郭亮.流域水污染应急决策支持系统中模型系统研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报.2009,41(2):92-96.
    [167]韩小明,鞠时光.突发性污染事故应急监测与处置决策支持系统[J].计算机工程与设计.2009,30(17):4108-4110.
    [168]高强飞,陈国富,张.欣.公交事件应急管理智能决策支持系统研究[J].交通与运输(学术版).2009(12):53-65.
    [169]柴干,周家铭,濮居一.高速公路紧急救援决策支持系统的设计[J].中国安全科学学报.2007,17(5):58-63.
    [170]严海,杨天军,关宏志.城市道路交通安全管理决策支持系统[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版).2008,28(2):84-88.
    [171]束恩戴,李瑞敏,马兆有.基于GIS的高速公路紧急救援辅助决策支持系统的研究与开发[J].测绘通报.2011(9):66-69.
    [172]李柯.基于数据仓库和OLAP的民航灾害预警决策支持系统[J].西南交通大学学报.2007,42(4):511-515.
    [173]迟文学,孙刚,武峥.基于GIS民航应急救援与辅助决策支持系统研究[J].交通与计算机.2005,23(6):46-48.
    [174]罗永宏.海上搜救智能辅助决策系统探究[J].中国航海2004(3):21-24,57.
    [175]于卫红.基于JADE的海上搜救智能决策支持系统[J].计算机应用与软件.2011,28(8):237-239.
    [176]王林泽,陈昭明.铁路行车事故救援智能辅助决策系统研究[J].中国安全科学学报.2004,14(1):22-24.
    [177]陈昭明,,王林泽,,马林.铁路事故救援辅助决策系统的研究[J].铁道学报.2004,26(5):8-13.
    [178]张英菊,, et al.基于案例推理的应急辅助决策方法研究[J].计算机应用研究.2009,26(4):1412-1415.
    [179]宋猛,王林泽.铁路行车事故救援决策方法研究[J].计算机仿真.2008,25(7):257-261.
    [180]孙丹,铁路突发公共事件处置研究[M].2010,济南:山东大学.
    [181]袁辉.重大突发事件及其应急决策研究[J].安全.1996,17(2):1-4.
    [182]湖北省政府.湖北省铁路交通事故应急预案[EB/OL].(2012.3.30)
    [2011.5.10].http://www.hubei.gov.cn/zwgk/rdzt/mhwzzt/hbmhzt/yjb/yjbya/201105/t20110510_138090.shtml.
    [183]中国政府门户网站.国家处置铁路行车事故应急预案[EB/OL].(2006.1.23)[2012-06-20].http://www.gov.cn/yjgl/2006-01/23/content_21263.htm.
    [184]桂维民.应急决策论[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,2008:84-85.
    [185]卡尔.帕顿,大卫.沙维奇.政策分析和规划的初步方法[M].北京:华夏出版社,2001:1-20.
    [186]薛澜,张强,钟开斌.危机管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2012:188-194.
    [187]铁道部安全监察司.2004、2005年铁路行车事故案例[M].北京:中国铁道工业出版社,2006.
    [188]王晋刚,陈昭明,马林,铁路行车事故救援方法及装备应用手册[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2002.
    [189]喻晓社,朱希文.523”沪昆线K859次旅客列车脱轨重大事故救援案例分析[J].中国应急管理.2010(12):35-38.
    [190]“4.28”胶济铁路特别重大铁路交通事故调查组.“428”胶济铁路特别重大交通事故调查报告[R].2008.
    [191]“7.23”甬温线特别重大铁路交通事故调查组.“723”甬温线特别重大铁路交通事故调查报告[R].2011.
    [192]Wong F S Y,Chuah K B,Venuvinod P K.Automated inspection process planning: Algorithmicinspection feature recognition, and inspection case representation for CBR[J].Robotics andComputer-Integrated Manufacturing.2006,22(1):56-68.
    [193]王万良.人工智能导论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011:36-40.
    [194]张荣梅.智能决策支持系统研究开发及应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2003:86.
    [195]史忠植,知识发现[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002.
    [196]柳炳祥,盛昭翰.基于案例推理的企业危机预警系统设计[J].中国软科学.2003(3):67-70.
    [197]薛松林.论铁路应急预案的完善[J].理论学习与探索.2009(6):56-57.
    [198]Opricovic S,Tzeng.G H.Multicriteria planning of post‐earthquake sustainablereconstruction[J].Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering.2002,17(3):211-220.
    [199]Opricovic S,Tzeng.G H.Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis ofVIKOR and TOPSIS[J].European Journal of Operational Research.2004,156(2):445-455.
    [200]F.Herrera L.M.n., P.J.Sánchez.Managing non-homogeneous information in group decisionmaking[J].European Journal of Operational.2005,168(1):115-132.
    [201]郭秀英,预测决策的理论与方法[M].2010,北京:化学工业出版社:174-176.
    [202]Zhang.H.The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators withinterval-valued2-tuple linguistic information[J].Mathematical and ComputerModelling.2012,56(1):27-35.
    [203]Yager.R.R.Prioritized OWA aggregation[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.2009,8(3):245-262.
    [204]Yager.R.R.Prioritized aggregation operators[J].Prioritized aggregation operators.2008.
    [205]姚国章.典型国家突发公共事件应急管理体系及其借鉴[J].南京审计学院学报.2006,3(2):5-14.
    [206]郭泳亨卢兴华,刘云.基于案例库的应急决策支持系统研究[J].2006,22(24):148-150.
    [207]刘功智,刘铁民.重大事故应急预案编制指南[J].劳动保护.2004(4):11-18.
    [208]贺正楚.论企业危机管理系统的构建[J].系统工程.2003,21(3):34-39.
    [209]邬伦,刘瑜,张晶,地理信息系统--原理、方法和应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
    [210]禹竹蕊.论应急预案的动态综合评估[J].人民论坛:中旬刊.2011(5).
    [211]张全.信息系统原理与应用[M].北京市:清华大学出版社,2011:169-190.
    [212]朱敏韬,刘永亮,李治.铁路运输信息基础数据维护系统总体设计[J].铁道信息化建设青年科技研讨会暨中国铁道学会第九届青年学术会议.2003:350-353.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700