防治马尾松毛虫绿僵菌的应用基础研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文主要针对绿僵菌对马尾松毛虫致病菌株的筛选及影响致病力的温湿度因子、马尾松毛虫对绿僵菌入侵的生理反应、绿僵菌培养与菌种稳定性、绿僵菌与化学杀虫剂、白僵菌混配及其增效作用和绿僵菌对林间节肢动物群落多样性的影响等方面进行了较为系统的研究,旨在揭示绿僵菌对马尾松毛虫的生物控制潜能,为有效利用绿僵菌防治马尾松毛虫提供理论依据。现将主要研究结果摘要如下:
     1.供试的9个绿僵菌菌株(M_(103)、M_(104)、M_(131)、M_(337)、M_(187)、M_(336)、M_(115)、M_(335)和M_(189))中,金龟子绿僵菌M_(104)和M_(337)菌株对马尾松毛虫有致病性,进一步对这2个菌株进行生物测定表明,M_(337)菌株的毒力高于M_(104)菌株,M_(337)菌株对马尾松毛虫有较高毒力。通过对致病菌株M_(104)和M_(337)生物学特性的研究,明确了它们生长发育所需要的营养条件、环境条件和分生孢子萌发的营养和环境条件。2个致病菌株对环境条件有较好的适应性,25~28℃、pH6.5~7.0为适宜的产孢条件;温度、湿度和pH显著影响分生孢子萌发,25~28℃,pH6.5~7.5,RH>92.5%是分生孢子的最适萌发条件。比较而言,M_(337)菌株比M_(104)菌株的产孢量大、孢子萌发快、萌发率高,对温度、湿度等环境条件的适应力更强,表现出更好的开发应用潜力。
     2.以筛选出的绿僵菌M_(337)和M_(104)菌株为研究对象,对其致病力及温湿度影响因子与白僵菌(Bb_(01)和Bb_(02)菌株)进行比较。研究结果表明,绿僵菌M_(337)菌株与白僵菌Bb_(01)、Bb_(02)菌株对马尾松毛虫的毒力相当,但绿僵菌M_(104)菌株对马尾松毛虫的毒力低于白僵菌Bb_(01)和Bb_(02)菌株。与供试的白僵菌菌株相比,绿僵菌分生孢子具有较好的耐高温和耐旱性,在高温和低湿的条件下,绿僵菌的杀虫效果优于白僵菌。林间防治结果显示,绿僵菌对第1代马尾松毛虫的防治效果显著优于白僵菌,显示了较好的应用前景。
     3.马尾松毛虫对绿僵菌入侵的生理反应试验表明,幼虫被绿僵菌感染后1~4d,血淋巴中血细胞总数和可溶性蛋白浓度均显著高于同期未感染的幼虫。利用聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳技术,分析了感染后3d、4d、6d幼虫体壁组织中可溶性蛋白和过氧化物酶,以及血淋巴中过氧化物酶的变化。结果显示,绿僵菌的侵染对寄主昆虫的蛋白质代谢产生影响,过氧化物酶活性有减弱趋势。
     4.通过对金龟子绿僵菌M_(337)菌株液固两相发酵技术的研究,优化控制发酵过程,筛选出玉米粉(2份)+麦麸(2份)+谷壳(2份)为固体发酵培养基的优化配方,液体种子发酵周期72h,初始接种量控制在25%为宜。保持培养温度25~28℃和环境湿度83~94%左右,同时选择合适的覆盖物可降低杂菌的污染。固态发酵周期11d,菌粉干燥温度控制在35℃,时间24h,可缩短生产周期。此外,研究了2种含铜化学杀菌剂(30%氧氯化铜和耐克铜)对绿僵菌生长、产孢的影响和对杂菌的抑制作用,在0.05%~0.15%浓度范围内,2种杀菌剂对金龟子绿僵菌的菌落形成没有明显影响。而耐克铜在0.05%~0.15%浓度时能显著地增加金龟子绿僵菌的产孢量,并有缩短产孢时间的作用。研究还表明2种杀菌剂对杂菌(根霉、曲霉和青霉)有较强的抑制作用,并随着浓度的增大,抑制作用迅速增强。试验结果对绿僵菌菌剂生产具有重要意义。
     5.对6个绿僵菌菌株(M_(337)、M_(103)、M_(104)、M_(115)、M_(335)和M_(336))的液体深层培养研究表明,绿僵菌M_(337)、M_(103)、M_(104)、M_(115)菌株能通过微循环产孢方式形成液生分生孢子,微循环产孢现象的发生与菌株有一定的相关性。绿僵菌在固体和液体培养中产生不同形态的分生孢子,绿僵菌M_(337)菌株在液体培养条件下产生的液生分生孢子为单孢、卵圆形到近球形,大小3.17~4.51μm×2.51~3.34μm,与气生分生孢子有明显差异。
     以M_(337)菌株为对象研究了在液体深层培养条件下绿僵菌生长和产孢的营养和环境条件。研究结果表明,绿僵菌液生分生孢子的形成与培养基成分密切相关。不同的碳、氮源对液生分生孢子形成具有显著影响。蔗糖是液体深层培养液生分生孢子的理想碳源,而花生饼粉、豆饼粉则是较理想的氮源,且液生分生孢子的产量与培养基氮源的性质有关,复杂的氮源比简单的氮源更有利于液生分生孢子的形成。在供试的8种碳源和6种氮源相互组配的培养液中,以蔗糖+花生饼粉的组合最佳,液生分生孢子产量达14.13×10~9个孢子·L~(-1)。同时,液生分生孢子的形成比率与培养液的碳氮比有关,培养液的C/N为3:1时,可使液生分生孢子的产出率最高。微量元素和维生素对促进绿僵菌液生分生孢子的形成具有重要影响。Mo为最重要的影响元素,其次是Zn,而B、Cu、Fe、Mn、Mo、Zn的协同作用将有力促进液生分生孢子的产生。在培养基中添加VB_6+VH或复合维生素B能有效促进绿僵菌液生分生孢子的形成。不同的氨基酸对绿僵菌生长及液生分生孢子形成影响很大,天门冬酰胺和L-丙氨酸有利于液生分生孢子的形成。光照对绿僵菌生长和液生分生孢子产量均无显著影响。但培养温度显著影响其生物量和液生分生孢子的产出率。25~28℃为适宜的培养温度,但28℃时液生分生孢子的产量最高。同时,培养液的pH也显著影响绿僵菌的生长和产孢,以pH6.5~6.8为宜,但pH6.8时产孢量最大。
     对3株绿僵菌(M_(337)、M_(103)和M_(115))在不同含量的吐温80培养液中进行液体深层培养研究表明,吐温80对绿僵菌液生分生孢子的形成具有显著的影响,培养基中吐温80含量在0.6~1.0%之间时,可获得最大的产孢量。
     磁化水对供试的3株金龟子绿僵菌(M_(337)、M_(103)、M_(104))和1株贵州绿僵菌(M_(115))的液生分生孢子形成影响显著,但对生物量无显著影响。适当磁化强度的磁化水能显著提高绿僵菌M_(337)和M_(103)菌株的液生分生孢子产量,但试验也显示不同菌株对磁化水的生物效应表现出明显的差异性。
     对马尾松毛虫毒力的生物测定显示,绿僵菌M_(337)菌株的液生分生孢子对马尾松毛虫具有较高的侵染力,仅比气生分生孢子的毒力略低。因此,绿僵菌液体发酵有进一步研究的价值。
     6.对金龟子绿僵菌M_(337)菌株进行继代培养,探讨了6种常见培养基、4种碳源和氮源以及6个碳氮组合培养基对菌种稳定性、产孢量、毒力的影响。结果显示,绿僵菌的变异虽然主要受控于菌株自身的遗传特性,但同时也受培养基组成性质的影响。常见的6种培养基以营养贫乏的CMA和WBA最易发生变异,PPDA较稳定。动物性氮源较植物性氮源稳定,以麦芽糖和乳糖为碳源比较稳定。在不同碳氮比试验中,供试菌株在C/N比为2:1的培养基上比较稳定。
     7.对8种化学杀虫剂(4.5%高效顺反氯氰菊酯乳油、2.5%敌杀死乳油、21%灭杀毙乳油、25%灭幼脲Ⅲ悬浮剂、20%杀灭菊酯乳油、40%氧化乐果乳油、40%辛硫磷乳油和18%杀虫双水剂)与绿僵菌M_(337)、M_(103)、M_(104)、M_(115)、M_(335)和M_(336)菌株的相容性以及菌药混配的增效作用进行研究,结果表明,供试的8种化学杀虫剂皆对绿僵菌分生孢子有程度不同的抑制作用,浓度愈高,抑制作用愈强,但次亚致死剂量对分生孢子萌发抑制作用较小。对马尾松毛虫的生物测定结果显示,M_(337)+杀灭菊酯(80000×)、M_(337)+敌杀死(60000×)、M_(337)+辛硫磷(10000×)、M_(337)+灭杀毙(25000×)、M_(337)+灭幼脲Ⅲ(15000×),其LT_(50)比单用绿僵菌M_(337)(1.9×10~(10)个孢子·L~(-1))分别缩短了9d、7d、6d、5d和3d,增效作用明显。
     8.绿僵菌和白僵菌混合使用经共毒系数分析,对马尾松毛虫幼虫的毒力增加了1.78倍。林间防治试验结果也表明,绿僵菌与白僵菌混合使用对马尾松毛虫的防治效果显著优于单独使用绿僵菌和白僵菌,增效作用明显。
     9.在施用绿僵菌菌剂前后,通过对马尾松毛虫虫口密度的T测验、节肢动物群落的垂直分布格局及马尾松林群落特征参数的分析,结果表明,绿僵菌对马尾松毛虫的种群控制作用明显,对非目标无脊椎动物不具有明显的影响,并且改善了整个马尾松林节肢动物群落的多样性和稳定性。
Nine strains of the entomopathogenic fungi belonging to Metarhizium used to efficient biocontrol of Dendrolimus punctatus were studied in this thesis.The researches focused on screening of high virulent strains and effects of temperature and humidity on their pathogenicity, host pest's physiological response,cultivation and stability,compatibility with chemical insecticides,Metarhizium anisopliae mixed with other insecticides and synergism,as well as effects of M.anisopliae on the diversity of arthropod community in Masson pine forest,and aimed to evaluate the potential of Metarhizium as a biocontrol agent for D.punctatus and to provide the theoretical basis for the applications.The main results are as follows:
     1.The pathogenicity of nine swains of Metarhizium spp.(including M_(103),M_(104),M_(131),M_(337), M_(187),M_(336),M_(115),M_(335)and M_(189))to larvae of D.punctatus were studied in the laboratory.Two strains(M_(104),M_(337))showed pathogenicity to the larvae.The bioassays for toxicity of strains M_(104) and M_(337)were tested to D.punctatus respectively and showed the virulence of M_(337)was stronger than that of M_(104),and the Strain M_(337)was significantly more effective to control D.punctatus. Nutrition and other conditions for the two swains' growth,sporulation and conidia germination were determined,and the results showed that the two strains had good adaptability to the conditions such as temperature,humidity and pH value.The suitable sporulation conditions were 25—28℃,pH 6.5—7.0.The germination of the conidia was remarkably affected by temperature, humidity and pH value.The optimum condition for germination were 25—28℃,pH 6.5—7.5, RH>92.5%,however,M_(337)germinated faster than strain M_(104)and showed more tolerance to high temperature and low humidity,and higher conidia germination and production rate.These implied that the strain M_(337)had a great potential of exploitation and application.
     2.The virulence of M_(104)and M_(337)were tested and analyzed by contrasting with the biocontrol agent Beauveria bassiana(including Bb_(01)and Bb_(02)),which showed that there were no difference of virulence to D.punctatus among M_(337),Bb_(01)and Bb_(02),however,the virulence of M_(104)was lower than those of Bb_(01)and Bb_(02).The strain M_(337)of M.anisopliae was more tolerant to high temperature and drought than strain Bb_(01)of B.bassiana.In the conditions of high temperature and low humidity,the control effects of M.anisopliae on D.punctatus were higher also.Field test indicated that M.anisopliae was great superior to control the first generation of D.punctatus.
     3.The research on the host insect physiological response to the pathogen showed that the total hemocyte counts and the concentration of hemolymph soluble protein were significantly higher in infected larvae than in non-infected ones,from 1d to 4d after infection.By means of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis technique,the physiological changes of proteins and peroxidases in hemolymph and body wall of the D.punctatus which 3d,4d and 6d post infection were analyzed.The results revealed that M anisopliae had some effect on the metabolism of the host's proteins,and the peroxidase activities showed a tendency to decline.
     4.The solid-submerge fermentation technology of strain M_(337)of M.anisopliae was studied, and the optimal control for fermentation process were determined.The optimized medium of solid state fermentation was obtained,which would be composed of corn flour(2 portion),wheat bran(2 portion)and rice hull(2 portion).The fermentation period for liquid seed was 72h and the appropriate initial inoculation amount was 25%.The culture temperature and humidity were at 25—28℃and 83—94%,respectively.Meanwhile,in order to control the contamination of mould, the suitable covering material was selected necessarily.The period of solid state fermentation was adjusted to 11d,and drying temperature was manipulated at 35℃for 24h,and then the production cycle would be shortened.
     In addition,the influence of two chemical germicides(including 30%Cuprum oxychloride and Naiketong)on growth and sporulation of strain M_(337)of M.anisopliae,and inhibitory effect on competed moulds were investigated.The results showed that the two chemical germicides,viz. 30%Cuprum oxychloride and Naiketong had no obvious effect on colony recovery of M. anisopliae at the concentration of 0.05—0.15%.Naiketong at the concentration of 0.05—0.15% had increased conidial output,while it also shortened the sporulation time of M.anisopliae.The two germicides inhibited the colony growth of competed moulds(Rhizopus sp.,Penicillium sp. Aspergillus sp.)strongly,and the inhibition became stronger when concentration increased.
     5.Six strains belonging to Metarhizium(including M_(337),M_(103),M_(104),M_(115),M_(335)and M_(336)) were cultivated in submerged culture.The results indicated that the submerged conidia could be produced by means of microcyclic sporogenesis for strains M_(337),M_(103),M_(104)and M_(115),perhaps, the occurrence of microcyclic sporogenesis depended on the nature of strains.Under solid-state and liquid-state cultivations,the entomopathogenic fungus M.anisopliae produced different types of spores.The morphologic characteristics of submerged cortidia of strain M_(337)are ovoid to subspherical,monocellular,with the size of 3.17—4.51μm×2.51—3.34μm,quite different from the aerial conidia.
     Nutrition and other conditions for the growth and sporulation of M_(337)were emphatically studied in submerged culture.The results showed that the submerged sporulation depended on a delicate equilibrium in the composition of the medium.Various carbon and nitrogen sources had significant effect on the production of submerged conidia.Sucrose was ideal carbon source for submerged sporulation.Peanut cake powder and bean cake powder were effective for sporulation of submerged conidia.The production of submerged conidia was correlated with the properties of nitrogen sources,which complex nitrogen source for sporulation of submerged conidia was more favorable to simple nitrogen source.Liquid medium containing sucrose and peanut cake powder produced large numbers of submerged conidia(14.13×10~9 spores·L~(-1)).The experiment also showed that the output of submerged conidia was relationship with carbon-to-nitrogen(C:N) ratio of medium.Highest yield of submerged conidia was obtained in medium containing C:N ratio of 3:1.Trace elements and Vitamins had remarkable impacts on submerged sporulation. Molybdenum was the most important element.Zinc was stimulatory factor.When all 6 elements (including B,Cu,Fe,Mn,Mo and Zn)were added together,highest yield of submerged conidia could be obtained.VB_6+VH and compound vitamin B were more effective for producing submerged conidia.Various amino acids had important influence on growth and sporulation of submerged conidia.Liquid medium containing L-asparagine or L-alanine produced large numbers of submerged conidia.Illumination had no effect on mycelia growth and submerged spomlation directly.The cultural temperature and pH value had significant effect on the mycelia growth and output of submerged conidia.The proper temperatures and pH values for submerged culture were 25—28℃and pH 6.5—6.8,respectively.The maximum yield of submerged conidia was obtained in the condition of temperature at 28℃and pH 6.8.
     Biomass and submerged conidia yield were measured for three strains of Metarhizium spp. (including M_(337),M_(103)and M_(115))grown in liquid media containing different concentrations of Tween 80.The data was showed that concentrations of Tween 80 had effect on sporulation of Metarhizium spp.significantly.The submerged conidia yield was highest in liquid media containing 0.6—1.0%Tween 80.
     Three strains of M.anisopliae(M_(337),M_(103),M_(104))and one strain of Metarhizium guizhouense (M_(115))were cultivated in submerged culture by magnetized water media,and the biomagnetic effect of magnetized water on submerged sporulation of Metarhizium spp.were preliminary analyzed.The results indicated that the submerged conidia yields were affected by magnetized water,but the biomass were unaffected.The outputs of submerged conidia of strains M_(337)and M_(103)were increased remarkably in proper intensity of magnetizing water.But the experiment also showed that there existed obvious difference in different strains for biological effects of magnetizing water.This results provided an experimental basis for further research on the biological effects and applications of the magnetized water.
     In addition,The virulence of submerged conidia of strain M_(337)was tested against D. punctatus in laboratory.Results showed that submerged conidia had stronger virulence to the larvae of D.punctatus.There were no apparent differences in the toxicity between submerged conidia and aerial cortidia,but the virulence of submerged conidia to larvae of D.punctatus was slightly lower.Therefore,it is of great value for further research on submerse fermentation of Metarhizium.
     6.The subcultures of M_(337)were studied in this experiment.Effects of 6 regular media,4 carbon and nitrogen sources and 6 combinations of carbon and nitrogen on strain stability,growth characters and virulence were observed.The results indicated that the variation of M.anisopliae was mainly controlled by its genetic materials,but also influenced by the composition nature of media.Among the six regular media,strain M_(337)grew most stably on PPDA,but those nutrition poor ones such as CMA and WBA would cause variation very frequently.Among nitrogen sources, those from animal were more stable than those from plant.Mean while,strain M_(337)grew most stably on media containing maltose and lactose as carbon source.The experiment results also showed that strain M_(337)grew most stably on medium containing C:N ratio of 2:1.
     7.The compatibility of 8 chemical insecticides(including 4.5%Beta-Cypermethrin EC, 2.5%Deltamethrin EC,21%Pesticide destroying EC,25%Benzoylphenal ureaⅢSC,20% Fenvalerate EC,40%Omethoate EC,40%Phoxim EC and 18%Dimehypo WA)with Metarhizium spp.(including M_(337),M_(103),M_(104),M_(115),M_(335)and M_(336))were studied in this experiment.The results showed that all chemical insecticides inhibited the conidial germination to a certain degree,and the inhibition became stronger as concentration increased.But low sublethal dose of chemical insecticide had less inhibitory effect on conidial germination.The results of bioassay showed that it was obvious of the synergism against Masson's pine caterpillars(D. punctatus),when strain M_(337)of M.anisopliae(1.9×10~(10)spores·L~(-1))mixed with Fenvalerate (80000×),Deltamethrin(60000×),Phoxim(10000×),Pesticide destroying(25000×)and Benzoylphenal ureaⅢ(15000×),and the LT_(50)of mixtures would be shortened about 9 days,7 days,6 days,5 days and 3 days respectively,comparing with that of using fungal insecticide of M. anisopliae(1.9×10~(10)spores·L~(-1))alone.
     8.According to the analysis of Co-toxicity coefficient,M.anisopliae could increase 1.78 times in its toxicity to larvae of D.punctatus when it was mixed with B.bassiana.The effect of control test in the field showed that the mixture insecticide was great superior in controlling D.punctatus to using fungal insecticide of M.anisopliae and B.bassiana alone.
     9.The density of Masson's pine caterpillars and arthropod communities in various layers of pine forest were investigated before and after spraying microbial insecticide of M.anisopliae in Shanghang county in Fujian province.T test of the density of Masson's pine caterpillars,vertical pattern of arthropod community and its parameters were discussed.The results showed that M. anisopliae had obvious biocontrol effect on Masson's pine caterpillars,but it had no impact on the non-target invertebrates apparently.The diversity and stability of arthropod community in pine stand was improved.
引文
1.A Kassa D Stephan S.Vidal,et al.Laboratory and field evaluation of different formulations of Metarhizium anisopliae var.acridum submerged spores and aerial conidia for the control of locusts and grasshoppers[J].BioControl,2004,49:63-81
    2.A J Van Winkelhoff,C W McCoy.Conidiation of Hirsutella thompsonii var.synnematosa in submerged culture[J].J.Invert.Pathol,1984,43:56-68
    3.Adamek L.Submerse cultivation of fungus Metarhizium anisopliae(Metxch.)[J].Folia Microbiol,1965,10:255-57
    4.Agudelo F,Falcon L A.Mass production,infectivity,and field application studies with the entomogenous fungus Paecilomyces farinosus[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1983(42):124-132
    5.Allard G B.Prospects for the biocontrol of the sugarcane froghopper with particular reference to Trinidad[J].Bio Contr News Inform,1987,8(2):105-115
    6.Alves R T,Bateman R P,Prior C,et al.Effects of simulated solar radiation on eonidial germination of Metarhizium anisopliae in different formulations[J].Crop Protection.1998,17(8):675-679
    7.Alves S B Pererra T M.Production of Metarhizium(Metsch.)Sorok and Beauveria bassiana(Bals.)Vuill.in plastic trays[J].Ecossistema,1989,14:188-192
    8.Amiri B,lbrahim L,Butt T M.Antifeedant properties of destruxins and their potential use with the entomogenous fungus Metarhizium anisopliae for improved control of crucifer pests[J].Biocontrol Science and Technology,1999,9(4):487-498
    9.Areas J A,Diaz B M,Lecuona R.E.Bioinsecticidal activity of conidia and dry mycelium prepartions of two isolates of Beauveria bassiana against the sugarance borer Diaatraea saccharalis[J].J.Biotechnol,1999,67:151-158
    10.Amebrant K,E Baath,B Soderstrom.Copper Tolerance of microfungi isolated from polluted forest soil[J].Mycologia.1987,79:890-895
    11.Arzumanov T,Jerkins N,and Roussos S.Effect of aeration and substrate moisture content on sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae var.acridum[J].Process Biochemistry,2005,40(3):1437-1042
    12.Baath E.Tolerance of copper by entomogenous fungi and the use of copper-amended media for isolation of entomogenous fungi from soil[J].Mycological Research.1991,95(9):1140-1152
    13.Bartlett M.C,Jaronski S T.Mass production of entomogenous fungi for biological control of insects,in:Burge,M.N.(ed)Fungi in biological control systems.Manchester,UK,Manchester University Press,1988,61-85
    14.Batema R.The development of a mycoinsecticide for the control of locusts and grasshoppers.International Institute of Biological Control(U K)[J].Outlook on Agriculture,1997,26(1):13-18
    15.Bateman R P,Carey M,Moore D.The enhanced infectivity of Metarhizium flavoviride in oil formulations to desert locusts at low relative humidities[J].Ann Appl Bio,1993,122:145-152
    16.Bosch A,Yantomo O.Microcycle conidiation in the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana bals.(vuill.)[J].Process Biochem,1999,34:707-716
    17.Bo-wen Geng,Run-jie Zhang.Pathogenicity of Metarhizium anisopliae var.acridu to the deveolpmental stages of brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Stal and Sogatella furcifera(HORVATH)[J].Entomologia Sinica,2004,11(2):89-97
    18.Burgess,H.D.Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides[M].Kluwer Academic Publishers.London,U.K.1998.412
    19.Bustamante,M.1994.Produccion masiva del bongo entomopatogenno Beauveria bassiana.Resumenes del V Congreso Intemacional de Manejo Integrdo de Plagas,San Jose,p.89.See:Grimm C..Economic feasibility of a small-scale production plant for entomopathogenic fungi in Nicaragua.Crop Prot.2001,20:623-630
    20.Campbell R K,Petting T M,Barnes G L et al.Growth and sporulation of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on media containing various amino acids[J].J.Invert.Pathol,1978,31:28-295
    21.Campbell R,et al.Growth and sporulation of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhiziura anisopliae in a basal medium containing various carbohydrates sources[J].J.lnvertebr.Pathol.1983,41:117-121
    22.Carvajal F.The production of spores in submerged cultures by some Streptomyces[J].Mycologia,1947,34:426-440
    23.Caudwell,R W and A G Gatehouse.Formulation of grasshopper and locust entomopathogens in baits using starch extrusion technology[J].Crop Protection.1996,15(1):33-37
    24.Caudwell,R.W.and A.G.Gatehouse.Laboratory and field trials of bait formulaitons of the fungal pathogen,Metarhizium flavoviride,against a tropical grasshopper and locust[J].Biocontrol Sci.Tech.1996,(6):561-567.
    25.Cerenius L,Thomqvist P O,Vey A,et al.The effect of the fungal toxin destruxin E on isolated crayfish haemocyte[J].J.Insect Physiol.,1990,36(1):785-789
    26.Charnley A K.Physiological aspects of destructive pathogenesis in insects by fungi:a speculative review.In:Anderson J M,ed.Invertebrate-microbial interactions.London:Cambridge University Press,1984,229-270
    27.Chen J W,Liu B L,Tzeng Y M.Purification and quantification of destruxins A and destruxins B from Metarhizium anisopliae[J].Journal of Chromatography A,1999,830:115-125
    28.Claude V,Kartar S,Sehgal S N.Sporulation of filamentous fungi in submerged culture[J].Mycologia,1965,57:722-736
    29.Crula S A,Woods S P,Russell Ⅱ.In:Roberts D W,Aisl J R ed.Infection probers of Fungi.Rickeleller Foundation Conference Report,1984:147-162
    30.Daoust R A,Ward M G,Roberts D W.Effect of formulation on the viability of Metarhizium anisopliae conidia[J].J Invertebr PathoL,1983,41:151-161
    31.Daoust,R.A,and D W Roberts.Studies on the prolonged storage ofMetarhizium anisopliae conidia:effect of growth substrate on conidial survival and virulence against mosquitoes[J].J.Invert.PathoL 1983,41:161-170
    32.Dillon R J,Chamley A K.Initiation of germination in conidia of the entomopathogenic fungus,Metarhizium anisopliae[J].Mycol.Res.,1990,94(3):299-304
    33.Donald W R,Raymond J S L.Metarhizium slap.,Cosmopolitan Insect-Pathogenic Fungi:Mycological Aspects[J].Advances in applied Microbiology,2004.54:1-70.
    34.Dorta B,Ertola R J,Areas J A.Characterization of growth and spomlation of Metarhizium anisopliae in solid-substrate fermentation[J].Enzyme Microb Tech.1996,19:434-439.
    35.Driver F,Milner R J,Trueman J W W.A taxonomic revision of Metarhizuim based on a phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequence data[J].Mycol.Res.,2000,104(2):134-150
    36.Dubois T,Li Z Z,Hu J F,et al.Efficacy of fiber bands impregnated with Beauveria brongniartii cultures against the Asian longhomed beetle,Anoplophora glabrippenis[J].Biological Control,2004,31:320-328
    37.Dumas C,Matha V,Quiot J M.Effects of destruxins cyclic deppsipeptide mycotoxins on calcium balance and phosphorylation of intracellular proteins in lepidopteran cell lines[J].Comp Biochem Physiol,1996,114(3):213-219.
    38.Fargues J,Goettel M S,Smits N,et al.Variability in susceptibility to simulated sunlight of conidia among isolates of entomopathogenic Hyphomycetes[J].Mycopathologia.1996,135:171-181.
    39.Fargues J.Etude des condition d' infection des larves de Doryphora,Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say,Par Beauvaria bassiana(Bals.)Vuill.[J].Entompophage,1972(17):319-337.
    40.Feng M G,Poprawski T J,Khachatourians G G.Production of formulation and application of the entomopathgenic fungus Beauveria bassiana for insect control:current status[J].Biocontrol Sci Techn,1994,4:3-34
    41.Femando E V,Mark A J,Guy M,et al.The impact of nutrition on spore yields for various fungal entomopathogens in liquid culture[J].World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology,2003,19:363-368
    42.Foster J W,L E McDaniel,H B Woodruff,et al.Microbiological aspects of Penicillium.V.Conidiospore formation in submerged cultures of Penicillium notatwn[5].J.Bacteriol,1950:365-368
    43.Fukushima Y,Furumori K,Higuchi T.Carder for insecticidal microorganisms-consists of non-woven or woven carder bearing culture medium for microorganism.1991,WPT Ace,No:1991,102066/199114
    44.Fuxa J R,Tnada Y.Epizootiology of insect diseases.A Wiley-Interscience publication.USA.1987
    45.Gams W.& Rozsypal J.Metarhizium flavoviride n.sp.isolated from insects and from soil[J].Acta Botanica Neerlandica,1973,22:518-522
    46.Gillespie A T,Claydon N C.The use of entomogenous fungi for pest control and the role of toxins in pathogenesis[J].Pesticide Science,1989,27:203-215
    47.Gillespie J P,Bumett C,Chamley A K.The immune response of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria during mycosis of the entomopahtogenic fungus,Metarhizium anisopliae var.acridum[J].Journal of Insect Physiology,2000,46:429-437
    48.Glare T R,Milner R J,Chilvers G A.The effect of environmental factors on the production,discharge and germination of primary conidia of Zoophthora phalloides Batko[J].J Irtvertebr Pathol,1986,48:275-283
    49.Glaser R W.The green muscardine disease in silkworms and its control[J].Ann.Entomol.Soc.Am.,1926,19:180-192
    50.Glinski Z,Buczek K.Response of the Apoidea to fungal infections[J].Apiacta,2003,183-189
    51.Goettel M S,Johnson D L,and Douglas lnglis D.The role of fungi in the control of grasshopper[J].Canadian Journal of botany-Journal Canadian de botanique 1995,73(1):71-75
    52.Goettel M S.Fungal agents for biocontrol.In:Biological control of locusts and grasshopper(edited by C.J.,homer and C.,Prior).CAB lntemational.Wallingford,1992,122-132
    53.Goodman D.The theory of diversity-stability relationships in ecology[J].The Quarterly Review of Biology,1975,50(3):237-266
    54.Gottwald T R.Tedders W L.Suppression of Pecan weevil(Coleoptera:Curculionidae)Population with Entomopathogenic Fungi[J].Environ.Entomol,1983,12:471-474
    55.Gotz P.Encapsulation in arthropods.In:Brehelin M,eds.Immunity in invertebrate[M],Berlin Springer Velag,1986,153-170
    56.Guillon M..Production of biopesticides:scale up and quality assurance.In:BCPC Symposium Proceedings No.68.Microbial insecticides:novelty or necessity.Farnham,UK,The British Crop Protection Council,1997,151-162
    57.Hajek A E,St.Leger R J.Interactions between fungal pathogens and insect hosts[J].Annu.Rev.Entomol.,1994,39:293-322
    58.Hallsworth,J.E.,and N.Magan.Effect of carbohydrate type and concentrationon polyhydroxy alcohol and trehalose content of conidia of three entomopathogenic fungi[J].Microbiol.1994a,140:2705-2713
    59.Hallsworth,J E.,and N Magan.Effects of KCI concentration on accumulation of acyclic sugar alchohols and trehalose in conidia of three entomopathogenic fungi[J].Lett.Appl.Microbiol.,1994b,18:8-11
    60.Hallsworth,J E,and N Magan.Manipulation of intracellular glycerol and erythritol enhances germination of conidia at low water availability[J].Microbiol.1995,141:1109-1115
    61.Hallsworth,J E,and N Magan.Culture age,temperature,and pH affect the polyol and trehalose contents of fungal propagules[J].Appl.Environ.Microbiol.1996,62:2435-2442
    62.Halvorson H O.Spores[M].Publ.No.5.American Institute of Biological Sciences,Washington,D.C.,1957
    63.Halvorson H O.Spores Ⅱ[M].Burgess Publ.Co.,Minneapolis,Minn,1961
    64.Hassan A E M,Chamley A K.Ultrastructural study of the penetration by Metarhizuim anisopliae through dimilin-affected cuticle of Manduca sexta[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1989,54:117-124
    65.Hong T D,Ellis R H,and D Moore.Development of a model to predict the effect of temperature and moisture on fungal spore longevity[J].Ann.Botany.1997,79:121-128
    66.Hong T D,Jenkins N E,Ellis R H,and D Moore.Limits to the negative logarithmic relationship between moisture content and longevity in conidia of Metarhizium flavoviride[J].Ann.Botany.1998.81:625-630
    67.Hsieh C M,Hung W K,Kao S S,et al.Production of destrucxins from a local entomopathogenic fungus,Metarhizium anisopliae var.anisopliae,by solid stage and submerged fermentation[J].Joumal of the Chinese Agricultrual Chemical Sociaty,1998,36(4):371-379
    68.Hung S Y,Boucias D G.Influence of Beauveria bassiana on the cellular defense response of the beet armyworm,Spodoptera exigua[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1992,60:152-158
    69.Hung S Y,Boucias D G,Vey A J.Effect of Beauveria bassiana and candida albicans on the cellular defense response of Spodoptera exigua[J].Journal of Invertebrate pathology,1993,61:179-187
    70.Hunt T R,Moore D,Higgins P M,et al.Effect of sunscreens,irradiance and resting periods on the germination of Metarhizium flavoviride conidia[J].Entomophaga,1994,39(3/4):313-322
    71.Hurd L E.Stability and diversity at three tropic levels in terrestrial successional ecosystems[J].Science,1971,173:1134-1136
    72.Huxham I M,Lackie A M,Mocorkindale N J.Inhibitary effects of cyclodepsipeptides destruxins from the fungus Metarrhrzium anisopliae on cellular immunity in insects[J].J Insect Physiol,1989,35:97-105
    73.Ibrahim Y B,Low W.Potential of mass-production and field efficacy of isolates of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus against Plutella xylostella[J].International Journal of Pest Management,1993,39:288-292
    74.Ignoffo C M,and C Gareia.UV-photoinaetivation of cells and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis and effects of peroxidase on inactivation[J].Environ.Entomol.1978,7(2):270-272.
    75.Ignoffo C M.Environmental factors affecting persistence of entomopathogens[J].Florida Entomol.1992,75(4):516-524
    76.Inglis G D,Goettel M S,Johnson D L.Influnce of ultraviolet light protectants on persistence of the entomopathogenic fungus,Beauveria bassiana[J].Biol Control,1995,5:581-590
    77.Inglis G D,Johnson D L,and M S Goettel.Effect of bait substrate and formulation on infection of grasshopper nymphs of Beauveria bassiana[J].Biocontrol Sci.and Technol.1996,6:35-50
    78.Inyang E N,McCartney H A,Oyejola B.Effect of formulation,application and rain on the persistence of the entomogenous fungus Metarhizium anisopliae on oilseed rape[J].Mycol Res,2000,104(6):653-661
    79.Issaly N,Chauveau H,Aglevor R,et al.Influence of nutrient,pH and dissolved oxygen on the production of Metarhizium flavoviride Mf189 blastospores in submerged batch culture[J].Process Biochemistry,2005,40(3):1425-1431
    80.Jacques F,Nathalie S,Claire V,et al.Effect of liquid culture media on morphology,growth,propagule production,and pathogenic activity of the Hyphomycete,Metarhizium flavoviride[J].Mycopathologia,2001,154:127-138
    81.Jenkins N E,Lomer C J.1994.Development of a new procedure for the mass production of conidia of Metarhizium flavoviride pp:181-184 in:Smits P H,ed.Microbial Control of Pests,4th European Meeting,IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 17(3).See:Jenkins N E and Goettel M S.Methods for mass-production of microbial control agents grasshoppers and locusts.Mem Entomol Soc Can,1997,171:37-48
    82.Jenkins N E,Heviefo G,Langewald J,et al.Development of mass production technology for aerial conidia for use as mycopesticides[J].Biocontrol News and Information,1998(19):21-31
    83.Kawakami K.Phagocytosis in muscardine-diseased larvae of the silkworm,Bombyx mori(Linnaeus)[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1965,7:203-208
    84.Kleespies R.G,Zimmermann G.Production of btastospores by three strains of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metch.)Sorok,in submerged culture[J].Biocontrol Science and Technology,1992(2):127-135
    85.Latch C C M.Metarhizium anisopliae(Metschnikff)Sorokin swains in New Zealand and their possible use for controlling pasture inhabiting insects[J].N.Zeal.Agr.Res.,1965,8:384-396.
    86.Latege J P,Moletta T.Biotechnology.In:Samson R A,Evans H,Large J P(eds.)Atlas of entomopathogenic fungi.Berlin,Springer-Verlag,1988,152-164
    87.Lewis J A,Papavizas G C.Production of chlamydospores and conidia by Trichoderma spp.in liquid and solid growth media[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1983,(15):351-357
    88.Liu S D,Grey G.Proceedings of the International Symposium on "The Use of Biological Control Agents Under Integrated Pest Management"[C].Talpei:Food and Fertilizer Technology Center for the Asian and Pacific Region,1996,154-163
    89.Liu Zuoyi,Milner R.J.The Effect of Copper on in Vitro Sporulation and Growth ofMetarhizium spp.[J].贵州农学院学报,1996,15(1):50-53
    90.Lomer C J,Thomas M B,Godonou I,et al.Control of grasshopper,particularly Hieroglyphus daganensis,in northem Benin using Metarhizium flavoviride.Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada,in press.Canada,1997,132
    91.Maheve E,Djelveh G,Larroche C,Gros J B.Sporulation of Penicillium roqueforti in solid substrate fermentation[J].Biotechnology Letters,1984,(6):97-102
    92.Manandhar J B.Effect of light,temperature,and water potential on growth and spomlation of Microdochiumoryzae[J].Mycologia,1998,90:995-1000
    93.Marschall K J,Vargo A M,Fatuesi S.Research Extension Series College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources,University of Hawaii,Cooperative Extens(USA),1991,137-140
    94.McClatchie G V,Moore D,Bateman R P,et al.Effect of temperature on the viability of the conidia Metarhizium flavoviride in oil formulations[J].Mycology Research,1994,98(3):749-756
    95.McCoy C W,Hill A J,Kanavel R F.A liquid medium for the large-scale production of Hirsutella thompsonii in submerged culture[J].J.Invert.Pathol,1972,19:370-374
    96.McCoy C W,Samson R A,Boucias D G.Entomogenous Fungi[M].In CRC Handbook of Natural Pesticide.Vol V Microbial Insecticides,Part A.In Ignoffo C M,Mandore N B,eds.Boca Raton,Florida:CRC press.Inc.1988,151-236
    97.McCoy C W.Pest control by the fungus Hirsutella thompsonii.In Microbial Control of Pests and Plant Diseases 1970-1980[M].Acad.Press,1981,499-512.
    98.Mendonca A F.Mass production,application and formulation of Metarhizium anisopliae for control of sugarcane froghopper,Mahanarvaposticata,in Brazil[M].In:Lomer C J,Prior C,et al.Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers.Wallingford,UK,CAB INTERNATIONAL,1992,239-244
    99.Miiner R J,Staples J A,Lutton G G.The effect of humidity on germination and infection of termites by the hyphomycete,Metarhizium anisopliae[J].Jouranl of Invertebrate Pathology,1997,(69):64-69
    100.Moore D,Bateman R P,Carey M.Long-term storage ofMetarhiziumflavoviride conidia in oil fornmlation for the control of locust and grasshopper[J].Bioc Sci Techn.,1995,5:193-199
    101.Moore D,Bridge P D,Higgins P M,et al.Ultra- violet radiation damage to Metarhizium flavoviride conidia and the protection given by vegetable and mineral oils and chemical sunscreens[J].Ann.Appl.Biol.1993,122,605-616
    102.Moore D,Douro O K,Jenkins N E.Effects of moisture content and temperature on storage of Metarhizium flavoviride conidia[J].Biocontrol Sci Technol,1996,6:51-61
    103.Nowierski R M,Zeng Z,Jaronski S,et al.Analgsis and modeling of time-dose-mortality of Melanoplus sanguinipes,Locusta migratoria migratorioides,and Sclzistocerca gregaria(Othoptera:Acrididae)from Beauveria,Metarhizium,and Paecilomyces isolates from Madagascar[J].J Invertebr.Pathol.,1996,67:236-252
    104.Okitsu M,Kishi Y,Takagi Y.Control of adults of Monochamus alternatus Hope(Coleptera:Cerambycidae)by application of non-woven fabric strips containing Beauveria bassiana(Deutyeromycotina:Hyphomycetes)on infested tree trunks[J].J Jap Forest Soc,2000,82(3):276-280
    105.Preisler H K,Robertson J L.Analysis of time-dose-mortality data[J].J.Econ.Entomol.,1989,83:1534-1542
    106.Price R E,Bateman R P,Brown H D,et al.Aerial spray trials against brown locust(Locustana pardalina Wallker)nymphs in South Africa using oil-based formulations of Metarhizium flavoviride[J].Crop Protection,1997,16(4):345-351
    107.Prior C,Greathead D J.Biological control of locust.the potential for the exploitation of pathogens[J].FAO Plant Protection Bullentin,1989,37:151-163
    108.Prior,C,Jollands,P,and G le Patourel.Infectivity of oil and water formulations of Beauveria bassiana (Deuteromycotina:Hyphomycetes)to the cocoa weevil pest Pantorhytes plums(Coleoptera:Curculionidae)[J].J.Invert.Pathol.,1988,52:66-72
    109.Quintela E D,Me Coy C W.Pathogenicity Enhancement of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana to First Instar of Diaprepes Abbreviatus with Sublethal Doses of Imidacloprid[J].Environ.Entomol,1997,26:1173-1182
    110.Quintela E D.Synergistic Effect of Imidaeloprid on Conidial Germination and the Pathogenicity of Two Entomopathogenic Fungi to Larvae of Diaprepes Abbreviatus(Coleoptera:Curculionidae).Ph.D.Dissertation,University of Florida,Gainesville,1996
    111.Raid R N,Cherry R H.Effect of soil parameters on pathogenicity of the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae to the sugarcran grub Ligyrus subtropicus(Coleoptera:Searabaeidae)[J].Fla Entomol,1992,75:179-184
    112.Rateliffe N A,Rowley A E.Strueture and function of blood cells of insects[J].Dev.Comp.Immuno.,1979,3:198-221
    113.Rath A C,Carr C J,Graham B R.Characterization of Metarhizium anisopliae strsins by carbohydrate utilization(AP150CH)[J].J Invert Pathol,1995,65:152-161
    114.Rath A C,Guy P L,Webb W R.Matarhizium spore surface antigens are correlated with pathogenicity[J].Mycol.Res.,1996,100:57-62
    115.Robert D W,et al.Entomopathogenic fungi.In Microbial control of Pests and Plant Diseases 1970-1980.Acad Press,1981:441-464.
    116.Robert M P,Donald W R.Dry mycelium preparations of entomopathogenic fungi,Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana[J].J Invert Pathol,1990,56:39-46
    117.Roberts D W,Humber R A.Entomogenous fungi.In Biology of Conidial Fungi.1981,1:204-227
    118.Roberts D W,Humber R A.Entomopathogenic fungi.In Infection Processes of Fungi.In:Roberts DW,Aist JR,eds.The Rockefeller Foundation,1984,1-12
    119.Robertson J L,Preisler H K.Pesticide bioassays with arthropods[M].Boca Raton:CRC Press.Inc.1992,127
    120.Rombach M C,Aguda R M,Shepard B M,et al.Entomopathogenic fungi in the control of the black bug of rice[J].Invertrbr.Pathol,1986,48:174-179
    121.Rombach M C,Humber R A,Roberts D W.Metarhizium flavoviride var.minus var.nov.,a pathogen of plant and leafhoppers on rice Philippines and Solomon Islands[J].Mycotaxon,1986,27:87-92
    122.Samsina K A,Kalalova S.The influence of a single-spore isolate and repeated subculturing on the pathogenicity of conidia of the entomophagous fungus Beauveria bassiana[J].J Invertebr Pathol,1983(42):156-161
    123.Samsinakova A,Kalalova S,Vlcek V,et al.Mass production of Beauveria bassiana for regulation of Leptinotarsa decemlineata populations[J].Journal of Inverebrate Pathology,1981,(38):169-174
    124.Samson R A,Evans H C,Latge J P.Atlas of Entomopathogenic Fungi.Springer-Verlag,Berlin,1988,1-187
    125.Samuels K D Z.& Pinnock D E.Control of Australian soldier fly and scarabaeid larvae with Metarhizium anisopliae.Abstracts of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Society for Invertebrate Pathology.University of Califomia,San Diego,1988,August 14-18,pp:32
    126.Schaerffenberg B.Biological and environmental condition for the development of mycoses caused by Beauveria and Metarhizium[J].J Insect Pathol,1964(6):8-12
    127.Silman R W,Nelson T C,Bothast R J.Comparison of culture methods for production of Colletotrichum truncatum spores for use as a mycoherbicide[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters,1991,79:69-74
    128.Sloman I S,Reynolds S E.Inhibition of ecdysteroid secretion from Manduca prothoracic glands in vitro by destruxins - byclic depsipeptide toxins from the insect pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae[J].Insect Biochem.Molec.Biol.,1993,23(1):43-46
    129.St.Leger R J,Cooper R M,Chamley A K.The effect of melanization of Manduca sexta cuticle on growth and infection by Metarhizium anisopliae[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1988,52:459-470
    130.St.Leger R J,Goettel M,Roberts D W.et al.Prepenetration events during infection of host cuticle by Metarhizium anisopliae[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1991,58(2):168-179
    131.Tanada Y & Kaya H K.Insect pathology[M].Academic Press,Inc.NewYork,1993,1-80
    132.Tedders W L.In vitro inhibition of the entomopathogenic fungi,Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae by six fungicides used in pecan culture[J].Envir.Entomol.,1981,10:345-349
    133.Thomas K C,Khachatourians G G,Ingedew W M.Production and properties of Beauveria bassiana conidia cultivated in submerged culture[J].Can.J.Microbio1,1987,33:12-20
    134.Tsutsumi T,Yamanaka M.Effects of nonwoven fabric sheet containing entomogenous fungus,Beauveria brongniartii(Sacc.)Petch GSES,on adults yellow spotted longicom beetle,Psacothea hilaris(Pascoe)(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)on fig tree[J].Jap Jappl Entomol Zool,1996,40(2):145-151
    135.Tulloch M.The genus Metarhizium[J].Transaction of the British Mycological Society,1976,66:407-411
    136.Veen K H,Ferron P.A selective medium for the isolation of Beauveria tenella and of Metarhizium anisopliae[J].J Invertebr Pathol,1966,8:268-269
    137.Veen K H.Recherches sur lamaladie,due a Metarhizium anisopliae chez le criqut pelerin[J].Mededelingen Landouwhoge school Wageningen.Nethrlands.,1968,58:1-77
    138.Vimala Devi P S.Conidia production of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi and its evaluation for control of Spodotera litura(Fab)on Ricinus communis[J].Journal of Invertebrate of Pathology,1994,(63):145-150
    139.Walstad J D,Anderson R F,Stambaugh W J.Effects of environmental conditions on two species of muscardine fungi(Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae)[J].J Invertebr Pathol.1970,16:221-226
    140.Wikardi E A.Protects for controlling coconut hispids with Metarhiziurn sp.(Plesispa reichei,and Brontispa longissima).Pemberitaan Lembbaga Tanaman Ind Bogor:Lembaga.,1982,8(44):35-38
    141.Zacharuk R Y.Fine structure of the fungus Metarrhizium anisopliae infecting three species of larval Elateridae(Coleoptera).I.Dormant and germinating conidia[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1970,15:63-80
    142.Zacharuk R Y.Fine structure of the fungus Metatrhizium anisopliae infecting three species of larval Elateddae(Coleoptera)Ⅱ.Conidial germ tubes and appressoria[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1970,15:81-91
    143.Zacharuk R Y.Fine structure of the fungus Metarrhizium anisopliae infecting three species of larval Elateridae(Coleoptera)Ⅲ.Penetration of the host Integument[J].Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,1970,15:372-396
    144.Zacharuk R Y.Fine structure of the fungus Metarrhizium anisopliae infecting three species of larval Elateridae(Coleoptera)Ⅳ.Development within the host[J].Can.J.Microbiol.,1970,17:525-529
    145.Zacharuk R Y.Ultrastructural changes in tissues of larval Elateridae infected with the fungus Metcrrrhizium anisopliae[J].Can.J.Microbiol.,1971,281-290
    146.Zimmermann G.The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae and its potential as a biocontrol agent[J].Pestic.Sci.1993,37:375-379
    147.蔡峻,叶恭银,胡萃.寄生对菜粉蝶蛹血淋巴中血细胞和可溶性蛋白组份的影响[J].植物保护学报,2000,27(2):151-156
    148.陈斌,邓裕亮,李正跃,等.绿僵菌对小云斑鳃金龟毒力及在土壤中的宿存[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,26(5):580-583
    149.陈昌洁.松毛虫综合管理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1990:227.
    150.陈长醌主编.昆虫生理生化实验[M].北京:农业出版社,1996,53-56
    151.陈华癸,樊庆笙主编.微生物学(修订第四版)[M].北京:农业出版社,1994.57
    152.陈嘉文.DCPV—Bt复合微生物杀虫剂研究初报[J].林业科学研究,1993,6:118-121
    153.陈年春.农药生物测定技术[M].北京:北京农业出版社,1991,110
    154.陈顺立,戴沿海,余培旺,等.双线盗毒蛾NPV—Bt—白僵菌复合杀虫剂初步研究[J].福建林学院学报,1998,18(1):1-4
    155.陈顺立,黄锋.蜀柏毒蛾多角体病毒林间防治试验[J].福建林学院学报,1995,15(3):241-245
    156.陈素伟,迟仁平,徐和光,等.质刑多角体病毒与BT混用防治赤松毛虫[J].山东林业科技.1999(6):31-33
    157.陈祝安,黄基荣.不同来源绿僵菌对云斑金龟蛴螬致病力评价[J].1997,24(2):81-83
    158.陈祝安,方勇军.田间施放绿僵菌防治稻水象甲效果评价[J].中国生物防治,2000,16(2):52-55
    159.陈祝安,潘玲聪.油类和糖类对绿僵菌孢子萌发的影响[J].中国生物防治,1995,11(1):10-12
    160.程惊秋.昆虫血细胞的观察和计数方法[J].昆虫知识,1987,24(5):297-299
    161.崔永三,李兰珍,周新胜,等.化学农药对白僵菌的影响及菌药合用的初步研究[J].森林病虫通讯,1997,1:6-8
    162.代鹏,宋妍,许天委,等.绿僵菌的研究进展[J].热带农业科学,2005,25(2):73-77
    163.戴华国.四种大蚜的过氧化酶同工酶的比较研究[J].东北林业大学学报,1985,13(3):62-155
    164.单乐天,冯明光.不同寄主及地理来源的16株绿僵菌对桃蚜的毒力比较[J].微生物学报,2006,46(4):602-607
    165.丁福章,张泽华,张礼生,等.绿僵菌对椰心叶甲的控制作用研究[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(3):454-456
    166.丁珊,汤坚,王成树,等.灭幼脲与白僵菌的相容性及增效作用的研究[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):366-370
    167.丁一倪,何芳陔.磁场对于微生物之生长及代谢之影响[J].(台湾)中国农业化学会志,1973,11(34):97-108
    168.杜克辉,丁定安,周明仁.BT制剂防治松毛虫试验[J].湖南林业科技.1991,(3):21-22
    169.樊美珍,郭超,燕新华.从青杨天牛分离的几种致病真菌[J].真菌学报,1987,6(2):97-102
    170.樊美珍,郭超,薛文奇.金龟子绿僵菌液体深层培养初报[C].中国虫生真菌研究与应用(第3卷).北京:中国农业科技出版社,1993.146-149
    171.樊美珍,李增智,唐晓庆.白僵菌菌种退化及控制[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):239-245.
    172.樊美珍,李增智.绿僵菌及其应用.见:陈涛主编,有害生物的微生物防治原理和技术[M].湖北:科学技术出版社,1994,245-254
    173.樊美珍,李增智.绿僵菌在土壤中的延续及控制桃小食心虫的潜力[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(1):49-55
    174.冯明光,唐启义,胡国成,等.球孢白僵菌对七种蚜虫的感染反应:时间-剂量-死亡率模型分析[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,1996,4(1):22-33
    175.冯明光.迁徙蚱蜢经口器摄入感染球孢白僵菌的时间与剂量效应[J].浙江农业大学学报,1997,23(5):491-498
    176.傅丽君.小菜蛾感染球饱白僵菌后病理反应研究(D).福建:福建农业大学,2000
    177.高宝嘉,高素红,张炬红等.不同林木类型昆虫群落结构及变化规律的研究[J].河北林果研究,2002,17(1):52-57
    178.高宝嘉,张执中,李镇宇.植物群落对昆虫群落生态效应的数学分析[J].生态学报,1993,13(2):130-134
    179.高焕森,刘作易等.绿僵菌产孢研究[J].中国生物防治,1996,12(2):62-65
    180.高松.绿僵菌防治稻水象甲的研究简报[C].2002年生物农药技术研讨及产品展示会论文摘要集.南京:江苏科技出版社,2002,116
    181.高松.绿僵茵研究的新进展[J].中国生物防治,1996,12(4);182-187
    182.高穗生,蔡勇胜.虫生病原真菌在虫害防治上应用.台湾省农业药物毒物试验所专题报道,1995,39:1-15
    183.耿博闻,张润杰.低浓度噻嗪酮与黄绿绿僵菌对褐飞虱协同作用的生物测定[J].植物保护学报,2005,32(1):53-56
    184.郭好礼,傅仓生,李振兰.绿僵菌的研究与应用[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1990.26-52
    185.郭好礼,叶柏龄,岳莹玉,等.绿僵菌属的三个新种[J].真菌学报,1986,5(3):177-184
    186.何学友,陈顺立,黄金水.感染松墨天牛的金龟子绿僵菌菌株的初步筛选[J].昆虫学报,2005,48(6):975-981
    187.何学友.金龟子绿僵菌松墨天牛优良菌株筛选及其林间宿存研究[D].福建农林大学,2007
    188.何益良DCPV—白僵菌—杀灭菊酯复合杀虫剂林间防治试验[J].福建林学院学报,1995,15(3):285-288
    189.胡加付.白僵菌的工业化生产与防治天牛技术的研究[D].安徽农业大学硕士研究生论文.合肥,2001
    190.黄邦侃.福建昆虫志[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,1999-2003,第1卷-第9卷
    191.黄勃,樊美珍,李增智.绿僵菌属系统分类的研究进展(综述)[J].安徽农业大学学报,2002,29(2):169-172
    192.黄恒献.森得保药剂防治马尾松毛虫试验[J].福建林业科技,2006,33(3):120-122
    193.黄英姿,古德祥,张文庆,等.影响马尾松毛虫虫灾发生类型因素的重要性分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(1):56-60
    194.贾春生,由士江,张少柱.利用绿僵菌与倍硫磷混用防治东北大黑鳃金龟研究[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版).2003,4(1):78-79
    195.贾嫒,马跃,王占斌.磁场处理蕃茄种子对幼苗CAT、POD酶活性的影响[J].生物技术,2000,10(2):14-17
    196.江英成.绿僵菌和白僵茵侵染马尾松毛虫试验比较[J].浙江林学院学报,2000,17(4):410-413
    197.蒋有绪.对我国生物多样性保护研究的几点看法[J].世界林业研究.1996,6(3):1-3
    198.康冀川,刘爱英,梁宗琦.KL—天然活性剂对提高绿僵菌白僵菌毒力的研究.Ⅱ KL对白僵菌绿僵菌防治害虫的增效作用[J].贵州农学院学报,1995,14(1):33-36
    199.况红玲.应用白僵菌进行马尾松毛虫生物防治试验的实例[J].西部林业科学,2005,34(4):76-80
    200.雷仲仁,问锦曾,谭正华,等.绿僵菌油剂防治东亚飞蝗田间试验[J].植物保护,2003,29(1):17-19
    201.李宝玉,张泽华,农向群,等.真菌杀虫剂产品标准化研究进展[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(增刊):32-38
    202.李保平,Roy Bateman,李国有,等.绿僵菌油剂防治新疆山地草原蝗虫的田间试验[J].中国生物防治,2000,16(4):145-147
    203.李典谟,高增祥.21世纪昆虫学面临的挑战和机遇[J].昆虫知识,2001,38(1):1-2
    204.李国栋.生物磁学的发展和应用[J].生物化学与生物物理进展,1978,4:39-44
    205.李国栋编著.生物磁学及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1983,71-136
    206.李红征,侯佩华,简国林,等.松毛虫CPV,BT林间防治第一代马尾松毛虫初报[[J].江西植保.2003,26(1):37-38
    207.李农昌,樊美珍,胡景江,等.绿僵菌干菌丝粉的制备及应用[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):418-426
    208.李去惑,张合平.飞播马尾松林与昆虫群落特征及多样性的研究[J].广西林业科学,2001,30(1):7-12
    209.李世广,林华峰.不同条件下几种虫生真菌对棉铃虫的侵染致病效应[J].华东昆虫学报,2003,12(1):29-34
    210.李天生,陈建寅,卢崇飞,等.马尾松毛虫幼虫抽样方法及个体群落面积的研究[J].森林病虫通讯,1986,(3):1-4
    211.李天生.马尾松林天敌昆虫群落对马尾松松毛虫控制作用的研究[J].生物多样性,1998,6(3):161-166
    212.李文华,张永军,王中康,虫生真菌穿透昆虫表皮相关理化因子的研究[C].昆虫与环境—中国昆虫学会2001年学术年会论文集.北京:科学技术出版杜2001,473-479
    213.李增智,程双龙,鲁绪祥,等.绿僵菌、黄僵菌对松毛虫的室内杀虫及固体生产试验初报[J].安徽农学院学报,1985,12(2):85-90
    214.李增智,杨震,汤坚.12种化学杀虫剂对3种虫生真菌孢子萌发影响的研究[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):360-365
    215.李增智等.几种表面活性剂及营养物对虫生真菌孢子萌发的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):355-359
    216.粱修山,章立新,徐光宇.林分因子和气候对松毛虫白僵菌流行的影响[J].森林病虫通讯,1999,(4):4-7
    217.梁子才,程振衡.亚洲玉米螟幼虫血淋巴的免疫反应[J].昆虫学报,1991,34(2):141-145
    218.林冠伦编著.生物防治导论[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1988.253-258
    219.林华峰,李世广,张磊.绿僵菌大孢变种的生物学特征及其对蛴螬的毒力研究[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(2):351-353
    220.林华峰,李增智,李晓平.用白僵菌防治马尾松毛虫的影响因素与用药时间[J].安徽农业大学学报,1998,25(4):342-347
    221.林爵平,刘玉茂.生物制剂大面积防治马尾松毛虫的研究[J].长沙电力学院学报,2002,17(2):89-91
    222.林立辉,付连荣.几种培养基对绿僵菌生长及产毒能力的影响[J].微生物学杂志.1987,7(1):61-62
    223.林韶湘.磁场对几种作物种子萌发的生物学效应[J].植物生理学通讯,1983,6:24-26
    224.刘炬,蒲蛰龙.毒杀蚊幼虫的绿僵菌菌株的筛选及其毒性测定[J].昆虫天敌,1982,2:41-46
    225.刘爱英,康冀川,梁宗琦.KL—天然活性剂对提高绿僵菌白僵菌毒力的研究I.KL促进白僵菌绿僵菌分生孢子萌发的研究[J].贵州农学院学报,1994,13(3):22-26
    226.刘爱英,梁宗琦,曹蕾.双型孢绿僵菌的分离鉴定研究[J].贵州农学院学报,1989,2:27-31
    227.刘彩玲,冯明光.安徽虫瘟霉对桃蚜的生物测定与时间-剂量效应分析[J].菌物系统,1998,17(4):361-366
    228.刘国城.生态系统复杂性怎样导致稳定性[J].东北林业大学学报,1991,(4):4-7
    229.刘晓建等.应用绿僵菌及其复合剂防治青海草原蝗虫试验初报[J].青海草业,2001,10(1):13-15
    230.刘玉珍,韩宝瑜.常年释放白僵菌的马尾松林虫生真菌和动物群落的结构及时空格局[J].生物数学报,1995,10(3):237-266
    231.刘志强,张吉明.聚合凝胶白僵菌杀虫剂田间应用初报[J].黑龙江农业科学,1994,5:29-31
    232.刘宗祥.绿僵菌防治草原蝗虫技术推广中存在的问题及对策[J].草业科学,2003,20(5):27-29
    233.刘作易.澳洲对绿僵菌的研究及其应用[C].中国虫生真菌研究与应用(第4卷).北京:中国农业科技出版社,1997.18-22
    234.刘作易.三种杀真菌剂对金龟子绿僵菌产孢及生长的影响[J].生物防治通报,1994,10(1):28-31
    235.卢忠燕,高松,江渝.金龟子绿僵菌固体培养条件的筛选[J].应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(2):223-225
    236.陆龙喜,时连根.家蚕血细胞对病原白僵菌的防御反应研究[J].浙江农业学报,2001,13(4):201-204
    237.陆庆光,邓春光,陈长风.应用绿僵菌防治东亚飞蝗田间试验[J].昆虫天敌,1996,18(4):147-150
    238.陆庆光,邓春生,张爱文,等.四种不同绿僵菌菌株对东亚飞蝗的毒力的初步观察[J].生物防治通报,1993,9(1):187
    239.马峻,Richard J,Milnet.小菜蛾对绿僵菌的感染反应[J].中国生物防治,2000,16(1):15-18
    240.缪文超,李延宝,陈文辉,等.白僵菌工业化生产新工艺的中试研究[C].中国虫生真菌研究与应用(第3卷),北京:中国农业科技出版社,1993:130-134
    241.南京农业大学主编.昆虫生理生化实验[M].北京:农业出版社,1993.61-67
    242.南开大学生物系昆虫教研室.金龟子绿僵菌对几种蛴螬的药效试验[J].昆虫知识,1978,15(2):40
    243.农向群,高松,邓春生,等.白僵菌绿僵菌分生孢子对高温的耐受力[J].中国生物防治,1999,15(3):111-114
    244.潘蓉英,余春仁,蔡美兰.绿僵菌对橄榄星室木虱的室内毒力测定[J].福建农业大学学报,1995,24(3):304-306
    245.庞雄飞,尤民生.昆虫群落生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996,1-9
    246.彭龙慧,曾文文,许永青,等.苏云金杆菌(Bt)与氰戊菊酯混配防治马尾松毛虫试验[J].江西植保,2005,28(3):122-124
    247.蒲蛰龙,李增智.昆虫真菌学[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1996,95-97,715
    248.蒲蛰龙.害虫生物防治的原理和方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.159
    249.蒲蛰龙.昆虫病理学[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1994,15-29,339-442
    250.蒲蛰龙主编.害虫生物防治的原理和方法(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.162-179
    251.秦玉洁,吴伟坚.虫生真菌对节瓜蓟马种群的控制作用[J].中国植保导刊,2004,7:5-7
    252.轻工部甘蔗糖业科学研究所.绿僵菌防治黑色蔗龟试验报告.1978
    253.裘维蕃.菌物学大全[M].北京:科学出版社,1998,837-999
    254.任立宗,王淑芬.马尾松林昆虫群落及时空结构的研究[J].林业科学研究,1998,1(4):397-403
    255.沙槎云,谢强江.感染苏云金杆菌后粘虫血淋巴中血细胞数量、蛋白质和酯酶的变化[J].昆虫知识,1992,29(4):215-217
    256.舒志群,徐旭士,朱志民,等.银纹夜蛾感染异源核型多角体病毒后血淋巴的病理生化分析[J].中国生物防治,1997,13(3):118-121
    257.宋漳.九株绿僵菌液体振荡培养的初步研究[J].福建林学院学报,1996,16(1):38-40
    258.宋漳,景云,蔡和谦,等.应用绿僵菌防治马尾松毛虫初探[J].福建林学院学报,1997,17(2):107-109
    259.宋漳,徐乐勤,江涛.8株绿僵菌孢子萌发条件及室内侵染马尾松毛虫试验[J].浙江林学院学报,1997,14(2):165-168
    260.宋漳.液体深层培养贵州绿僵菌分生孢子的研究[J].福建林学院学报,1997,17(3):205-208
    261.宋漳,江英成,饶如春.吐温80对绿僵菌液生分生孢子形成的影响[J].中国病毒学,2000,15(杀虫微生物专刊):201-204
    262.宋漳,江英成,饶如春.氨基酸维生素对绿僵菌液生分生孢子形成影响[J].福建林学院学报,2000,20(3):251-254
    263.宋漳,江英成.绿僵菌防治第1代马尾松毛虫的研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(6):604-608
    264.宋漳.化学杀虫剂对绿僵菌的影响及菌药混用研究[J].福建林学院学报,2001,21(4):308-311
    265.宋漳.液体深层培养绿僵菌分生孢子的研究[J].林业科学,2001,37(5):134-139
    266.宋漳,江英成.应用磁化水深层培养绿僵菌液生分生孢子初探[J].林业科学,2001,37(专刊1):177-180
    267.宋漳,黄钦周.2种杀菌剂对金龟子绿僵菌产孢的影响[J].福建林学院学报,2002,22(1):1-3
    268.宋漳.金龟子绿僵菌液体深层培养研究[J].热带作物学报,2002,23(2):72-76
    269.宋漳,陈辉,卢凤美.绿僵菌液体培养的条件及其对马尾松毛虫的毒力[J].应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(4):403-407
    270.宋漳,冯丽贞,景云.马尾松毛虫感染绿僵菌后某些生化指标的变化[J].昆虫知识,2002,39(4):297-300
    271.宋漳,江英成,叶斌,等.绿僵菌与白僵菌混合使用对马尾松毛虫的毒力[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2006,35(3):254-257
    272.宋漳,卢凤美,陈辉.金龟子绿僵菌室内侵染刚竹毒蛾试验[J].福建林学院学报,2002,22(2):120-123
    273.宋漳,卢凤美,陈辉.绿僵菌和白僵菌对刚竹毒蛾的毒力比较[J].西北林学院学报,2003,18(3):43-46
    274.孙儒泳.动物生态学原理(第二版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1987,416-426
    275.唐晓庆,樊美珍,李增智.球孢白僵菌继代培养中菌落局变现象及环境影响因素的研究[J].真菌学报,1996,15(3):188-196
    276.唐晓庆,唐燕平,李增智.球孢白僵菌菌种退化及其对马尾松毛虫防治的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):246-253
    277.万金精.微生物与害虫防治[M].河南:科学技术出版社,1985,50-54
    278.王滨,樊美珍,李增智.真菌杀虫剂剂型的研究与应用[J].安徽农业大学学报,2003,30(20):206-209
    279.王海川,尤民生.绿僵菌对昆虫的入侵机理[J].微生物学通报,1999,26(1):71-73
    280.王海川,尤民生.绿僵菌分生孢子对寄主附着机制的研究进展[J].昆虫知识,1999,36(3):189-192
    281.王清海,万平平,黄玉杰,等.虫生真菌在害虫生物防治中的应用研究[J].山东科学,2005,18(4).37-41
    282.王四宝,樊美珍,李增智,等.松褐天牛天敌微生物的研究进展[J].昆虫知识,2003,40(4):303-307
    283.王四宝,黄勇平,张心团,等.松褐天牛成虫高毒力病原菌筛选及林间感染试验[J],中国森林病虫,2004,23(6):13-16
    284.王振平,严毓骅.蝗虫天敌可利用性分析及研究进展[J].中国草地1999,6:54-58
    285.问锦曾,雷仲仁,谭正华,等.5株绿僵菌对东亚飞蝗的毒力测定[J].植物保护,2003,3(29):50-52
    286.吴千红,邵则信,苏德明,等.昆虫生态学实验[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1991.229-230
    287.吴振强,彭景龙,李运南,等.金龟子绿僵菌固态发酵环境变量优化研究[J].农药,2004,43(3):123-126
    288.吴振强,彭景龙,夏枫耿,等.金龟子绿僵菌固态培养生物变量优化研究[J].昆虫天敌,2004,26(1):1-6
    289.武觐文.从生态总体来审视害虫防治—兼论微生物防治发展的可能性[C].中国虫生真菌研究与应用(第2卷),中国农业科技出版社,1991,27-30
    290.夏成润,丁德贵,刘云鹏,等.金龟子绿僵菌无纺布菌剂与引诱剂结合使用防治短角幽天牛的试验[J].安徽农业大学学报,2005,32(4):419-422
    291.肖育贵,郭亨孝.绿僵菌对鞭角华扁叶蜂幼虫侵入途径及致病性的研究[J].中国森林病虫,2003,22(1):12-14
    292.肖育贵,郭亨孝.绿僵菌防治鞭角华扁叶蜂试验研究[J].四川林业科技,2000,21(3):10-13
    293.谢大洋.福建马尾松毛虫发生特点及主要因子分析[J].中国森林病虫,2003,22(3):12-14
    294.谢杏扬,戴自荣,黄珍友.绿僵菌感染家白蚁室内试验初报[J].昆虫知识,1984,21(5):223-224
    295.熊道雅.绿僵菌防治甘薯华叶虫[J].植物保护,1981,7:36
    296.徐红梅,陈京元,江建国,等.灭幼脉Ⅲ号与阿维菌素混剂防治马尾松毛虫试验[J].中国森林病虫,2003,22(6):35-36
    297.徐华潮,吴鸿,周云娥,等.沟金针虫生物学特性及绿僵菌毒力测定[J].浙江林学院学报2002,19(2):166-168
    298.徐庆丰,宋益良,杜长喜,等.深层培养白僵菌分生孢子的贮存期和田间防治玉米螟试验[C].中国虫生真菌研究与应用(第4卷).北京:中国农业科技出版社,1997,120-124
    299.徐庆丰,杨敏芝,宋益良温度对白僵菌生长和产孢的影响.杀虫微生物(第2卷).中国微生物学会农业委员会主编.中国农业科技出版社,1989:163-164
    300.徐庆丰.白僵菌的防虫作用及其在应用上的一些问题[J].昆虫知识.1964,8(6):293-297
    301.阳葵,王福东,冯霞等.磁化水处理菌种在甾体微生物转化过程中的效应[J].微生物学通报,1999,26(5):336-338
    302.杨海珍等.20%绿僵菌油剂防治东亚飞蝗药效试验研究[J].农药科学与管理,2003,24(2):17-18
    303.杨敏芝,谭云峰,王向群等.磁场对白僵菌菌丝生长和产孢量的影响[J].植物保护学报,1998,25(1):89-90
    304.杨明华.华北大黑金龟幼虫对注射细菌的免疫反应[J].昆虫学报,1985,28(2):160-164
    305.杨明华.金龟幼虫血细胞的防卫反应[J].昆虫学报,1981,24(4):367-370
    306.杨瑞华,谢伟忠,潘务耀,等.灭幼脲与白僵菌混合防治马尾松毛虫效果研究[J].林业科技通讯,1994,5:11-14
    307.姚道明,林庆源,林际朗,等.纱窗式机械化生产白僵菌孢子粉工艺的研究[C].中国虫生真菌研究与应用(第1卷),北京:学术期刊出版社,1988,116-118
    308.叶斌,江英成,林文清,宋漳(通讯作者).金龟子绿僵菌对马尾松林节肢动物群落多样性的影响[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2005,34(2):239-243
    309.伊可儿,李运帷,金得森,等.白僵菌微囊化的初步研究[J].微生物学通报,1992,19(3):344-345
    310.殷凤鸣,陈权才,陈亚广,等.液体深层培养白僵菌分生孢子的研究[C].中国虫生真菌研究与应用(第1卷).北京:中国农业科技出版社,1988,105-110
    311.殷凤鸣,潘务耀,李增智.白僵菌生产企业标准[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):321-325
    312.尤华明,刘银春,钱友安.灵芝的磁生物效应及其超微结构的研究[J].中国食用菌,1998,17(6):9-12
    313.尤华明.香菇磁生物效应的超微结构研究[J].中国食用菌,1997,16(6):7-9
    314.于世文,周素芬,刘燕黔.绿僵菌防治梨虎试验简报[J].贵州农业科学,1983,2:50-52
    315.余金勇,黄吉勇,吴跃开,等.白僵菌防治马尾松毛虫试验[J].贵州林业科技,2007,35(2):38-40
    316.曾大兴,梁宗琦,刘爱英.几种虫生真菌的铜耐受性及选择分离[J].贵州农学院学报,1996,15(2):42-45
    317.曾述圣,杨桂,杨中学,等.思茅松毛虫质刑多角体病毒的应用[[J].森林病虫通讯.2000,(1):28-29
    318.翟锦彬,黄秀梨,许萍.杀虫真菌—球孢白僵菌的昆虫致病机理研究近况[J].微生物学通报,1995,22(1):145-48
    319.张波,白杨,岛津光明,等.无纺布防治光肩星天牛成虫的初步研究[J].西北林学院学报,1999,14(1):68-72
    320.张吉先,俞劲炎.磁场对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,1999,1:26-28
    321.张克勤.我国杀虫真菌的研究与应用[J].植物保护,1996,22(1):43-46
    322.张礼生,张泽华,高松,等.绿僵菌生物农药的研制与应用[J].中国生物防治,2006,22(增刊)141-146
    323.张丽靖.球孢白僵菌孢子粉生产、制剂和贮存技术改进及其淀粉酶特性测定[D].杭州:浙江大学,2003
    324.张丽萍,程辉彩,王迎春,等.绿僵菌固体生产条件的研究(J].农药,2002,41(7):20-21
    325.张文勤.粉拟青霉的一种选择培养基[J].福建林学院学报,199,19(3):270-272
    326.张享能.4种农药在飞机防治马尾松毛虫上的应用[J].广东林业,2006,22(2):54-58
    327.张泽华,高松,张刚应,等.应用绿僵菌油剂防治内蒙草原蝗虫的效果[J].中国生物防治,2000,16(2):49-52
    328.张志光.白僵菌生活史的研究:异核体的形成和准性生殖的显微摄影观察[J].农业微生物通讯,1981(3):30-33
    329.张志良,吴光耀主编.植物生物化学技术和方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.114-11
    330.张志武,谢建军等.20%杀蝗绿僵菌油剂防治东亚飞蝗田间药效试验[J].天津农业科技,2004,1:4-5
    331.张宗炳.杀虫剂的毒力测定IM].北京:科学出版社,1988:359-413
    332.赵俊生,郭素萍,武慧贞,等.利用绿僵菌防治鳞翅目害虫研究[J].山西农业科学,2000,28(2):69-71
    333.赵俊生,郭素萍,武慧贞,等.应用绿僵菌防治鳞翅目蔬菜害虫及壮苗试验[J].植物保护,2001,27(5):29-30
    334.甄荣乐,黄坚城.绿僵菌复合剂防治按树幼林白蚁[J].林业实用技术,2002,8:31
    335.郑本暖,黄耀坚,蔡启运.Bt星光4号虫体连续传代及增效作用的研究[J].福建林学院学报,1993,13(1):17-23
    336.钟伟,殷幼平.美洲大蠊血细胞对金龟子绿僵菌CQMa102菌株的免疫反应[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2003,26(6):89-100
    337.朱如云.白僵菌防治马尾松毛虫效果与环境温湿度关系研究[J].浙江林业科技,2007,27(3):51-53
    338.朱少木.应用轻型飞机防治马尾松毛虫的试验Ⅱ.喷施阿维菌素防治的效果[J].昆虫天敌,2007,29(2):64-68
    339.柴一秋,陈祝安,冯惠英,等.金龟子绿僵菌对稻水象甲的致病性[J].中国生物防治,2000,16(1):22-25
    340.邹钟琳.昆虫生态学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1980
    341.G.W.考克斯.普通生态试验手册[M].北京:北京科学出版社,1979.120-122

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700