摘要
近年来,随着信息通信技术的快速发展,电信行业的竞争日趋激烈,电信企业的发展和生存越来越依赖于其组织创新能力、对外部环境的适应与合作能力。电信行业的竞争主体已经从原来的单个企业单打独斗演变到产业链间的竞争,更升级到价值网络企业群之间的竞争。本文对电信价值网络的界定是指,以电信运营企业为核心,和内容提供商、系统提供商、设备终端提供商等各类企业所形成的一个集合体,资金、产品、信息、知识乃至人员等有形和无形资源都在这个集合体内流动与转移。电信价值网络作为特殊的、“虚拟的”、动态的网络组织形式,是以组织的存续性和利益关联为前提,以信任、学习、共享、合作与竞争结盟为内涵,并以网络化、虚拟化和动态性实时整合为标志,共同为顾客创造价值的组织形式。
毫无疑问,电信价值网路内部的企业所拥有的知识、能力各不相同。基于这一因素,电信价值网络内部拥有互补性知识的企业开始以电信运营企业为中心进行相互的合纵联合,最终形成了电信价值网络。知识转移已经成为电信价值网络形成的内在动因。因此,本文将电信价值网络内部知识转移行为及机制机理作为研究对象,并根据研究结果制定相关策略,以提升电信价值网络的整体竞争力。
本文采用实证研究的方法,在大量文献检索的基础上,构造出电信价值网络内部知识转移的行为模型,据此有针对性地对电信运营企业员工以及了解电信行业的专家和学者做了小范围的问卷调查,根据调查结果,建立了电信价值网络知识转移的评价指标体系。该指标体系细分成网络环境、转移能力、转移模式、转移环境、知识特征、成功的知识转移等7个1级变量,24个2级变量。以该指标体系为基础,采用层次分析法对我国电信行业知识转移的效果进行了科学评价,得出电信行业各参与成员已经具备良好的知识转移认知意识和知识转移能力的结论。
同时,运用博弈理论,研究了电信运营企业与价值网络内部其他企业知识转移行为的相互作用关系,得出电信运营企业主导整个电信价值网络知识转移过程的结论。电信运营企业通过创造和谐的知识转移环境,争取更多的合作伙伴加入到电信价值网络内的知识转移队伍中来,形成合作共赢的知识转移局面,进而凭借知识转移提升电信价值网络的整体竞争力。
本文将成功的知识转移界定为最终实证模型的因变量。研究结果表明,基于电信价值网络结构的视角,电信价值网络内部的主导知识转移包括电信运营企业向服务企业的知识转移以及服务企业向电信运营企业的知识转移。同时,鉴于电信价值网络的结构与特性,将价值网络知识转移的重点集中在电信运营企业接受网络内其他企业知识转移的过程模型。随后,根据所收集到的问卷调查,使用SPSS18.0统计软件对样本数据进行预处理,检验了问卷的结构效度和信度,删除不合理问卷数据,然后对变量作相关分析和多重共线性检验,进一步验证了问卷设计和数据质量。
通过对电信价值网络主导知识转移模型的回归分析,本文得出影响价值网络内部知识成功转移的主导因素依次是知识转移环境、知识转移模式、网络环境和知识转移能力。其中,电信企业价值网络内部的知识转移环境是影响知识有效转移最为显著的因素,良好的知识转移环境,将促使网络内知识的有效转移。电信价值网络内部的知识转移模式是知识有效转移的次显著因素,一般而言以编码和序列式的转移方式转移的知识更容易被接收,复杂和关系式的知识转移不易实现,必须要与所转移的知识相匹配才能够成功地实现知识转移。价值网络环境情况是知识有效转移的第三影响因素,电信价值网络的规模越大,越不利于知识的有效转移。电信价值网络内企业的知识转移能力是知识有效转移的第四个影响因子,且为正相关,也就是说,电信运营企业的知识接受能力越高、服务企业的知识传递能力越高及转移意愿越强烈,知识转移越趋于成功。
最后,本文在实证研究理论结果的基础上,结合电信价值网络的实际情况,为电信运营企业与服务企业之间的知识转移管理提供了可供参考的意见和建议,制定了促进电信价值网络内部知识转移的机制,并围绕国内3G产业价值网络的知识转移,以国内某电信运营企业的3G业务运营为案例,剖析了该电信运营企业与终端厂家、内容及应用提供商、渠道合作商之间的知识转移策略与实践效果。针对价值网络内终端、内容、软件乃至互联网企业,应坚持开放性和一体化的原则,建立对所有内容、软件和互联网等电信价值网络内部企业均能够开放使用的“聚合平台”,搭建知识数据库与知识共享平台,建设良好的知识环境。该平台将集成更多性质的应用,设计出能够有效进行知识转移的知识共享平台,并保障知识在电信价值网络内部流动的通畅,从而促进电信价值网络内部知识交流所涉及的隐形知识和显性知识之间的相互转化,促进新知识的产生,达到知识共享“1+1>2”的效果,达到提升价值网络竞争优势的最终目的。
需要说明的是,本文重点研究了电信运营企业接受服务企业的知识转移模型。考虑到电信价值网络的规模逐渐增大,加入其中的服务企业也将越来越多,虽然电信运营企业和服务企业之间的知识转移仍是知识转移的主要过程,但服务企业之间的知识转移情况也将逐渐增加,下一个重点研究方向应从服务企业角度进一步考量电信价值网络的知识转移过程。
In recent years,as information technology and other rapid development of science andtechnology,the competition in the telecommunications industry has increased. Thedevelopment and survival of telecommunications is increasingly depends on its ability toinnovate and adapt to the external environment with the ability to cooperate. The maincompetition in the telecommunications industry from the original single enterprise alone tothe competition between the industrial chain,as to more competition between networks. Inthis paper,the definition of the telecommunications industry value network refers to thecore telecom companies and content providers,system providers and equipment providersand other types of terminals formed by a collection of business,capital,products,information,knowledge and even personnel and other tangible and intangible resources inthe collection and transfer in the flow. Telecommunications value network as a special"virtual" value dynamic network form of organization is the organization's environment andthe survival benefits associated with the premise,trust,learning,sharing,cooperationand competition alliance for the content,and networking,virtualization,agile anddynamic to achieve Real-time integration as a symbol together to create value for thecustomer organization.
There is no doubt that the value of the network between enterprises has differentknowledge and capacity. The enterprises with complementary knowledge within networkbegan to joint and form the telecommunications value network. In other words,knowledgetransfer has become the internal factors within the telecommunications value network. Theresearch object of this paper is the internal knowledge transfer mechanisms oftelecommunications value network. According to the study results,we will find somereasonable development of relevant strategies to enhance the overall competitiveness of thetelecommunications value network.
The value of the telecommunications network knowledge transfer evaluation systembroken down into seven variables,such as“specific network environment”、“the transferof capacity”、“transfer mode”、“the transfer of environment”、“knowledge of characteristicsof successful knowledge transfer”. According these variables,we build thetelecommunications value network of knowledge transfer evaluation system. Then,by theapplication of AHP,the status of the telecommunications industry knowledge transfer wasanalysis. And then we come to the conclusion that the enterprises within the telecommunications network already have a good knowledge transfer of cognitive andcapacity.
At the same time,with the game theory,the paper study the value of telecomcompanies and other companies within the network's role in the process of knowledgetransfer. And the Conclusion is get,which is leading telecom companies come to value theentire telecommunications network knowledge transfer process. Telecom companies need tocreate a harmonious knowledge transfer environment and strive for more partners,to form awin-win situation,and by virtue of knowledge transfer to enhance the core competitivenessof the telecommunications value network.
This article describes the success of knowledge transfer is defined as the dependentvariable of the final empirical model. The results of research shows that the lead knowledgetransfer includes the transfer of“the telecom companies to the knowledge of the servicecompanies”and“service companies to telecommunications knowledge transfer between theoperating companies”,this conclusion is basing on the perspective of network structure ofthe telecommunications value. At the same time,considering the structure of thetelecommunications value network,we will value network of knowledge transfer focus onthe telecom companies to accept the knowledge transfer process model. Subsequently,weuse SPSS18.0 statistical software pretreatment 50 valid questionnaires collected. By the toolof the construct validity and reliability of the questionnaire,we removed sevenquestionnaires unreasonable data. Then we tested further validate the questionnaire designand data quality with correlation analysis and multiple linear.
By the method of factor analysis,we have analysis the telecommunications valuenetwork-led model of knowledge transfer,and come to the dominant factors in successfultransfer of internal knowledge of the value network,which are followed by“knowledgetransfer environment”,“knowledge transfer mode”,“network environment”and“knowledge transfer capabilities”.
Among them,the knowledge transfer environment within the telecommunicationsvalue network is the most significant factors. Good environment for knowledge transfer willpromote the effective transfer of knowledge within the telecommunications value network.Knowledge transfer’s model within the telecommunications value network is significanteffective factors of knowledge transfer. In general,knowledge transfer to the encoding andserial transfer is received easily,the complex relationship of knowledge transfer is not easyto achieve,it must match with the transfer of knowledge to successfully achieve knowledgetransfer. The value of the network environment is the third effectively impact factors ofknowledge transfer within the telecommunications value network. The size oftelecommunications value network is the more that is not conducive to the effective transferof knowledge. Knowledge transfer capacity of companies in the telecommunications value network is the fourth effectively impact factor of the positive knowledge transfer. In otherwords,if the telecom companies has the higher accept capacity of knowledge,and theservice enterprises has the higher knowledge transfer capacity and the more strongly transferwill,knowledge transfer tends to the more successful.
Finally,the paper formulate policies to promote knowledge transfer within thetelecommunications value network the mechanism,which is for telecom operators andservice companies in the telecommunications value network. Meanwhile,the paper hasdeveloped a strategy of knowledge transfer for telecommunication Coperation of China:theterminal for the network,content,software and even Internet companies,telecommunication Coperation should take the principles of openness and integration,establish a "aggregation platform" for all companies within telecommunications valuenetwork. On the platform,there are“a knowledge database”,“knowledge-sharingplatform”,and“develop a good knowledge environment”ects. The platform will beintegrated more the nature of the application,and the platform will share tacit knowledgetransfer more effectively. The platform will safeguard the patency of the internal flow ofknowledge in the telecommunications value network,so as to promote mutual conversionbetween tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge involved in the exchange of knowledgewithin the network of the telecommunications value and promote the generation of newknowledge. Then we will got the effect of knowledge sharing "1 +1>2”,and achieve theultimate goal to enhance the value network of competitive advantage.
It should be noted that the most important study is the model of knowledge transfer fromservice enterprises to telecom companies. Accounting to the telecommunications valuenetwork size is increasing,so the service enterprises which will join into the network ismore and more. The knowledge transfer between telecom operators and service enterprises isstill the main process of knowledge transfer,but knowledge transfer services betweenenterprises is also increasing. Under a key research direction is the further consideration ofthe telecommunications value network knowledge transfer process from the perspective ofservice enterprises.
引文
[1]张永艳.网站绩效模糊综合评估.华中师范大学硕士论文.2007,P21-24.
[2]王峰,刘锦高,陈亚华.基于AHP的电信客户价值评价模型研究[J].计算机系统应用,2009.1,P26-P28.
[3]李殿伟.基于价值网理论的电信企业商业模式研究[D].天津大学,2007,24-25.
[4]肇启伟,邓舟等.传统价值链研究[J].商场现代化,2008,Vol.5,187.
[5]李翠娟,宣国良.知识合作剩余:合作知识创新创造企业竞争优势的机理分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005.
[6]周建.战略联盟与企业竞争力[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2002.
[7]陈伟,刘希宋.基于价值链管理的现代企业竞争优势研究[J].工业技术经济,2002,Vol.5,82-83.
[8]迟晓英,宣国良.价值链研究发展综述[J].外国经济与管理,2000,Vol.2,25-30.
[9]董广茂,等.战略联盟、价值网络中关系形成的效用组合分析[J].中国管理科学,2004(12).
[10]尹美群,胡国柳.虚拟企业、虚拟价值链及其与价值链的逻辑关系[J].海南大学学报人文社会科学版,2005,Vol.23,137-141.
[11]魏明亮,李斌.价值网络理论在中国跨国公司物流供应链中的应用研究[J].2008,Vol.45,124-125.
[12]大卫·波维特,等.价值网:打破供应链、挖掘潜利润[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2001:9.
[13]迟晓英.价值网及节点价值链的系统研究[D].上海交通大学博士学位论文,2003.
[14]苟昂,廖飞.基于组织模块化的价值网研究[J].中国工业经济,2005.2,66-72.
[15]李垣,刘益.基于价值创造的价值网络管理(I):特点与形成[J].管理工程学报,2001(4):38-41.
[16] Bovel D,Martha J.From Supply Chain to Value Net[J].Journal of Business Strategy,2000,21(4):24-28.
[17]卜华白.基于价值网模型的企业集群模式创新研究[J].衡阳师范学院学报,2008(5):42-45.
[18]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.
[19]唐守廉,郑丽,王江磊.电信产业价值链的演变和价值网络[J].电信科学,2003(09):1-4.
[20]梅军.基于产业价值链模式的电信运营研究[J].通信世界,2003(25):31-32.
[21]钱慧,吕廷杰.3G价值网业务模式的研究[J].电信科学,2006(11):40-43.
[22]董爽,梁雄健.关于移动通信价值网的探讨[J].价值工程,2007(2):57-56.
[23]王晓明,李仕明,杜义飞.“要素-结构-功能”:企业运营模式演进研究——以移动通信运营商为例.
[24]李丹,俞竹超,樊治平.知识网络的构建过程分析[J].科学学研究,2002(12):620-623.
[25]高晶,关涛,王雅林.价值网络中企业协同竞争机制的演化博弈分析[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2007,10(28):1176 -1181.
[26]汪涛,李威.中国移动通信运营商运营模式分析.中国工业经济,2003(3):21-27.
[27]姚洪心.对Cartel联盟机制的非合作博弈分析[J].预测,2004(4).
[28]任志安.企业知识共享网络理论及其治理研究[博士学位论文].成都:西南交通大学,2001.
[29]刘信志.知识管理参考模式之研究.台北科技大学商业自动化与管理研究所硕士论文,2000.
[30]战培志,廖文和.企业知识管理中的知识共享建模技术[J].华南理工大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(7):61-66.
[31]孙伟,赵盎.基于产业集群的社会网络理论研究综述[J].工业技术经济,2006.
[32]王铮,马翠芳,王露,杨妍,朱斌.知识网络动态与政策控制(I)——模型的建立[J].科研管理,2001,22(3):126-133.
[33]冯锋,王凯.产业集群内知识转移的小世界网络模型分析[J].学学与科学技术管理,2007(7):88-91.
[34]李文博,郑文哲,刘爽.产业集群中知识网络结构的测量研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):788-792.
[35]常小兵.联通对未来的判断与应对策略.通信产业报,2008/11/24,http://www.3gcn.org/content/view/74156/207/ .
[36] [美]霍金斯等著,符国群等译.消费者行为学.机械工业出版社,2007,24-67.
[37]顾莉莉.江苏电信宽带业务发展战略研究.南京理工大学MBA论文,2004,P33-41.
[38]张志勇,刘益,陶蕾.企业网络与知识转移:跨国公司于产业聚集群的比较研究,科学管理研究,2007.
[39]邝宁华,胡奇英,杜荣.强联系与跨部门复杂知识转移困难的客服[J].研究与发展管理,2004.
[40]宋健元.企业隐性知识共享的效率分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2005(2):58-61.
[41]张军.企业内部知识有效转移障碍及其对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(1):79-82.
[42]南希.M.狄克逊,王书贵等译.共有知识:企业知识共享的方法与案例[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2002.
[43]许强,陈劲.基于网络结构的母子公司组织关系[J].外国经济与管理,2001.
[44]余光胜.企业发展的知识分析[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2000.
[45]周晓东,项保华.企业知识内部转移:模式、影响因素与机制分析[J].南开管理评论,2003.
[46]陈菲琼.企业知识联盟——理论与实际研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.
[47]德鲁克等著,杨开峰译.知识管理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[48]格兰特,贝登-富勒.知识与经济组织:公司合作分析的应用[A].科鲁夫等著,北乔译.知识创新:价值的源泉[C].北京:经济出版社,2002.
[49]李新春.企业联盟与网络[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2000.
[50]冯天学,田金信.基于企业内知识转移与共享的激励模式研究[J].预测,2005,24(5):9-13.
[51]张作风.知识共享的可能性:一个博弈分析[J].图书情报工作,2004,48(2):54-56.
[52]蒋国瑞,李蕾.隐性知识共享中合作的博弈分析[J].科技管理研究,2008(5):242-243.
[53]陶洪,戴昌钧.组织隐性知识共享的博弈分析[J].情报杂志,2006(7):74-75.
[54]张晓燕,李元旭.论内在激励对隐性知识转移的优势作用[J].研究与发展管理,2007,19(2):28-32.
[55]唐涛.企业内部隐性知识共享的博弈分析[J].情报理论与实践,2008,31(2):202-204.
[56]李梦俊,赵越岷,陈华平.关于组织成员转移知识意向影响因素的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2008(11):217-219.
[57]魏江,王铜安.个体、群组、组织间知识转移影响因素的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1):91-96.
[58]唐炎华,石金涛.我国知识型员工知识转移的动机实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(1):29-34.
[59]杨露,黄世祥.谈企业知识管理实施中存在的博弈现象[J].现代管理科学,2006(10):85-86.
[60]薛丽莉.社会资本视角下的组织内部知识转移障碍[J].经济论坛,2008(2):74-76.
[61]徐贵宝.工业和信息化部电信研究院通信标准研究所.国际主流运营商宽带战略解析,http://www.cww.net.cn/news/html/2008/11/24/200811241622253630.htm,2008.
[62]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海人民出版社,2006:182-207.
[63]卡尔·佛莱保罗.知识管理[M].北京:华夏出版社,2004,13-18.
[64]王文平等著.产业集群中的知识型企业社会网络:结构演化与复杂性分析.科学出版社,2009.
[65]肖冬平,顾新.知识网络的形成动因及多视角分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,1:84-91.
[66]赵蓉英.知识网络研究:知识网络的概念、内涵和特征[J].情报学报,2007,26(3):470-476.
[67]袁静,孔杰.知识分类与组织知识研究[J].企业经济,2007(4):48-50.
[68]王清晓,杨忠.跨国公司内部网络结点之间知识转移的影响因素分析——一个概念模型[J].科研管理2006(02):102-107.
[69]胡汉辉,刘怀德.价值转移理论的形成及其启示[J].研究与发展管理(14卷),第1期,2002.2.
[70] [美]詹姆斯·布里克利,克雷佛·史密斯,杰诺德.学与组织架构[M].人民邮电出版社,2005.4.
[71]易观国际.中国移动增值服务市场综合分析报告,2004.
[72] [美]迈克尔·波特.竞争优势[M].华夏出版社,1997.
[73]迈克尔·A·希特.战略管理[M].机械工业出版社,2005.
[74]齐安邦.价值工程[M].机械工业出版社,2004.
[75]王希苏.价值和价值管理[J].世界有色金属,2001(8).
[76] [美]菲利普·科特勒.营销管理[M].上海人民出版社,2003.10.
[77]杨蕙馨,冯文娜.中间性组织的组织形态及其相互关系研究[J].财经问题研究,2005.9.
[78]林健,李焕荣.基于核心能力的企业战略网络研究[J].科研管理,2002(5),P56-63.
[79]张斌武.网络组织的协调管理模式研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,2002.
[80]屈雪莲.如何塑造宽带品牌.通信企业管理,2003(10):P18-19.
[81]包东智.宽带网市场发展中应关注的问题.信息网络,2003(11):P13-15.
[82]雷震洲.韩国宽带接入的现状与未来.信息网络.2004(7):P17-21.
[83]唐守廉,郑丽,王江磊.电信产业价值链的演变和价值网络[J].电信科学,2003(09):1-4.
[84]叶璐,潘宏亮,刘晓农.国外知识共享影响因素研究述评.
[85]任皓,苏新宁,孔敏,周军.论企业知识资源的组织.情报学报,2003,Vol. 22,No.2,211-213.
[86]苟昂,廖飞.基于组织模块化的价值网研究[J].中国工业经济,2005.2,66-72.
[87]中国联通网站,http://www.chinaunicom.com/.
[88] C114中国第一通信门户,http://www.c114.net/.
[89]艾瑞咨询集团,http://www.iresearch.com.cn/.
[90] Warren J. Keegan. Global Marketing Management. Prentice Hall Press,2001.
[91] PeterHines,Richaed Lamming,etc.Value Stream Management[M].Prentice HallPress,Great Brita in,2000.
[92] Douglas M Lambert,Terrance L.Pohlen.Supply chain metrics[J].InternationalJournal of Logistics Management,Vol.12,Issuel,2001.
[93] Amit R & Zott C.Value creation in business[J].Strategic Management Journal,2001(22).
[94] Peter Weill & Thomas Malone et al.Do some business models perform better thanothers? A study of t he 1000 largest US firms[R].MIT,Working Paper,2004.
[95] Dyer J H,Ouchi W G.Japanese style business partner.ships:giving companies acompetitive edge[J].Sloan Management Review,1993(1).
[96] David W. Conklin,Larry Ta.The creative Web:A new model form an aginginnovation[J].Ivey Business Journal,Vol.64,Issues,May/Jun,2000.
[97] Ishii,K.,A. Stevels.Environmental Value Chain Analysis:A Tool for ProductDefinition in Eco Design[J].IEEEI SEE,San Francisco,CAUSA,2000.
[98] David Bovet,Joseph Martha.Value nets[J].CMA Management,ol.74,Issue5,Jun,2 000.
[99] Magretta. J. Why business models matter[J].Harvard Business Review,May,2002.
[100] Mowery,D C,Oxley,JE,Silverman,BS. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledgetransfer[J] . Strategic Management Journal,1996,17:77- 91.
[101] Gerchak,Y,Parlar,M. Allocating resources to research and development projects ina competitive environment[J].IIE Transactions,1999,31(9):827-834.
[102] Kogut B,Zander U. Knowledge of the firm,combinative capabilities,and thereplication of technology [J]. Organization Science,1992(3):383-397.
[103] T.H.Davenport,L.Prusak.Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage WhatThey Know[M].Botston:Harvard Business School Press.1998.16-78.
[104] VON HIPPLE E.Sticky information and the locus of problem solving imp lications forinnovation[J].Management Science,1994,40(4):429-439.
[105] Holtham,C.,Courtney,N. Developing managerial teaming styles in the context of thestrategic application of information and communications technologies [J].InternationalJournal of training & Development,2001,5(1):23-33.
[106] Nonaka,I.,Toyama,R.,and Konno,N.,ba and leadership:A unified model ofdynamic knowledge creation,Long Range Planning,Vol. 33,2000,pp.5-34.
[107] Duffy,J.,Knowledge management:to be or not to be,Information ManagementJournal,Vol. 34,No. 1,2000,pp.64-67.
[108] I kujiro Nonaka,Hirotaka Takeuchi. The Knowledge-creating Company [J] HarvardBusiness Review,1991(10-11):196-1041.
[109] G. Hamel,C. K. Prahalad. The Core Competence of the Corporation [J]. HarvardBusiness Review,1990,5.
[110] Kaplan Robert S. and David P. Norton. Strategy Maps:Converting Intangible Assetsin to Intangible Outcomes,Harvard Business School Press:Boston,MA(.2004).
[111] Weill,P.,Vitale,M.R. Place to Space:Migrating to eBusiness Models,HarvardBusiness School Press,Boston,2001.
[112] EI-Sayed Abou-Zeid. An ontology-based approach to inter-organizational knowledgetransfer [J]. Journal of Global Information Technology Management,2002,5(3):32 47.
[113] Liao,S.H.,Knowledge Management Technologies and Applications-LiteratureReview from 1995-2002,Expert System with Applications,Vol. 25,2003,pp.155-164.
[114] Grant,R.M“Prospering in Dynamically—competitiveEnvironments:OrganizationalCapabilities as KnowledgeIntegration?”,Organization Science,1996,7(4):42-50.
[115] Teeee D.J.“Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets:theRole of Firm Structurean d Industrial Context”,Long RangePlanning 2000,3(3):35-54.
[116] Kogut,B.and Zander,U.Knowledge of the Firm:Combinative Capabilities and theReplication of technology,Organization Science,1992,3(2):383-397.
[117] Argote,L.and Ingram,P.:Knowledge Transfer:A Basis for Competitive Advantagein Firms,Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,2000,82(1):150-169.
[118] Knowledge Management/Transfer Workgroup:knowledge management/transfer,November 2002(http://www.goer.state.ny.us/workforee).
[119] Nicolai J.Foss and TorbenPede~en:The MNC as a Knowledge Structure:The Rolesof Knowledge Sources and Organizational Instruments in MNC KnowledgeManagement,Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics,2003,5(6):1-33.
[120] Li Li Knowledge Transfer within Western Multinational Subsidiary Units in China and Finland,EKONOMIOCH SAMHALLE,20D4:1-60.
[121] Hedlund,Gunnar e Hypermodern MNC-A Hierarchy Human Resource Management,1986,25(1):9-35.
[122] Ram Mudambi:Knowledge management in multinational firms,Journal ofInternational Management 2002(8):1-9.
[123] Pien Wan ga,Tony W.Tongb,Chun Peng KoheAn:integrated model of knowledgetransfer from MNC parent to China subsidiary,Journal of Wodd Business,2004(39):168-182.
[124] L.Felipe Monteito,Niklas Arvidsson,Julian Birkinshaw:Knowledge Flows WithinMultinational Corporations:Why are Some Subsidiaries Isolated? Academy ofManagementBest Conference Paper,2004,IM:B1.
[125] Gupta,Anil K.and Vijay Govindarajan:“Knowledge FlowsWithin MultinationalCorporations,”Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:473-496.
[126] GSzulanski G.Exploring intemal stickiness-impediments to the transfer of bestpractice within the firm [J].Strategic Management Journal。1996(2):27-43.
[127] Albino V,Garavelli A C,Schiuma G.Knowledge transfer and inter fin relationshipsin industrial districts:the role of the leader firm[J] Technovation Journal,1998(1):53-63.
[128] Beckmann M J. Economic Models of Knowledge Network s,in Networks in Action
[M]. Berlin:Heidelberg,Springer-Verlag,1995. 159- 174.
[129] Seufert A,eta.l Towards Knowledge Network ing [J]. Journal of KnowledgeManagement,1999,3(3):180-190.
[130] Kraemer K L,DedrickJ,etal. Redefining and extending the business model withinformation technology:Dell Computer Corporation[J]. The Information Society,2000,(16):5-21.
[131] Ches brough H,Rosen bloom R S. The role of the business model in capturing valuefrom innovation:evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-offcompanies[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2002,11(3):529-555.
[132] A fuah A,Tucci C. Internet Business Models and Strategies[M]. Boston:McGrawHill. 2003.
[133] Ches brough H. Open Innovation:The New Imperative for Creating and Profitingfrom Technology[M]. Boston,Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,2003.
[134] RappaM. The utility business model and the future of computing services[J]. IBMSystems Journal,2004,43(1):32-43.
[135] Thomas R. Business Value Analysis:Coping with Unruly Uncertainty[J]. Strategy &Leadership,2001,29(2):16-24.
[136] Dubosson M,Osterwalder A,Pigneur Y. E-business model design,classification andmeasurement[J]. Thunderbird International Business Review,2002,44(1):5-23.
[137] Osterwalder A,Pigneur Y,Tucci C. Clarifing business models:origins,present,and future of the concept[J]. Communications of the Association for InformationSystems,2005,15:1-40.
[138] Porter M E.Competitive Advantage [M].New York:the Free Press,1985.11-21.
[139] HojkB,Eriksson K,Johanson J. Creating Value Through Mutual Commitment toBusiness Network Relationships[J].Strategic Management Journal,1999,20:467-486.
[140] Rayport J F,Sviokla J J,Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain[J],Harvard BusinessReview,1995,(Sep.-Dec.):75-99.
[141] Prabakar Kothan daraman and David T. Wilson,The Future of Competition:Value-Creating Networks,Industrial Marketing Management,Volume 30,Issue 4,May 2001,Pages 379-389.
[142] Timmers P. Business models for electronic markets[J]. Journal on ElectronicMarkets,1998,8(2):3-8.
[143] Castanias R P,Helfat C E. The managerial rents model:Theory and empiricalresults[J]. Journal of Management,2001,27(6):661-678.
[144] Weibu JW. E volu t ionary Gam e Theory [M]. Boston:M IT Press,1998. 32- 48.
[145] POLANYI K. The Great Transformation:The Political and Economic Origins of OurTime[M]. Boston MA:Bea-con Press,1944.
[146] GRANOVETTER M. Economic action and social structure:the problem ofembeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510.
[147] ZUKIN S,DIMAGGIO P. Structures of Capital:The Social Organization ofEconomy[M]. Cambridge,MA:Cambridge University Press,1990.
[148] BARBER B. All economies are‘embedded’:the career of a concept,and beyond[J].Social Research,1995,62(2):387-413.
[149] GRANOVETTER M. Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology[A]. Boston:Harvard. Business School Press,1992:25 -56.
[150] BURTR S . Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1992.