多层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像技术及应用研究
|
摘要
第一部分对比剂不同注射方案在64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影应用中的研究
【摘要】目的比较不同的对比剂注射方案,以选择最佳的64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影注射方案。方法将150例患者按数字表法随机分为以下5组:组1为单时相(单纯注射对比剂),组2为双时相(对比剂注射完后注射生理盐水),组3A、3B、3C为三时相(在注射对比剂和生理盐水注射时相之间加入稀释对比剂注射时相,即同时注射对比剂和生理盐水,其比例依次为3:7、5:5和7:3)。各组病例对比剂为均使用碘海醇(350mgI/ml)。分别测量右心房、右心室、左心房、左心室、升主动脉、左右冠状动脉CT值,采用单因素分析(anova)比较其差异。评估图像质量和上腔静脉伪影,采用卡方检验比较其差异。结果各组间总对比剂用量差异有统计学意义(F=27.43,P＜0.001),组3B与组1、3C差异无统计学意义(P=0.18;P=0.25),组2与组3A对比剂注射总量差异也无统计学意义(P=0.06),其余各组两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。组2对比剂用量最少,为59.9±4.9mL,其次为组3A,为62.9±3.2mL。5组病例中,冠状动脉图像质量差异有统计学意义(χ~2=18.81 P=0.016)。组1图像质量最佳,评分为4分为22例。其次为组2和组3A,图像质量评分为3分和4分之和分别为26例和24例,两组图像质量无显著性差异(χ~2=0.48,P=0.79)。各组产生的上腔静脉伪影差异有统计学意义(F=31.44,P＜0.001),产生伪影以组1最多,共21例,组2最少,仅1例。组2冠状动脉CT值较其它组明显高(F=29.41,P＜0.001),其余各组间左右冠状动脉CT值差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。在5组中,组3A显示右心系统最好。结论在64层冠状动脉造影扫描中,在减少造影剂用量和上腔静脉伪影方面,双时相和三时相注射方案优于单时相注射方案;在显示右心系统方面,三时相注射方案优于双时相注射方案。
第二部分64层螺旋CT冠状动脉支架检测的实验研究
【摘要】目的64层MSCT采用不同的扫描方式及扫描电流对不同扫描位置的支架显示的影响。方法在扫描床偏离中心位置0.0cm、2.5cm、5.0cm、7.5cm和10.0cm的情况下,分别采用回顾性心电门控螺旋扫描方法(管电流为400mA、600mA)和非心电门控轴位扫描方法(管电流为350mA)对18个冠状动脉支架模型(10个支架内设有50%的狭窄)进行成像,测量支架管腔绝对测量值、支架内CT值、支架内噪声、支架周围水的CT值和水的噪声。结果(1)扫描床偏离中心的距离与支架管腔绝对测量值、支架内模拟斑块的可视比例呈负相关,相关系数分别为—0.71、—0.78(P＜0.01)。支架内CT值、支架内噪声以及支架周围水的噪声与扫描床偏离中心距离成正相关,其相关系数分别为0.39、0.11、0.46(P＜0.01)。(2)不同的扫描方式和管电流对支架管腔绝对测量值、支架管腔相对值、支架管腔内CT值、支架管腔内噪声、支架周围水的CT值以及支架内模拟斑块的可视比例的影响差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),对支架周围水的噪声影响差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。
结论本研究显示扫描床的位置对支架管腔的显示产生影响,提示行冠状动脉扫描时,尽量将心脏置于机架中心位置。不同的扫描方式和管电流对支架管腔显示的影响较小。MSCT对评价支架内中等密度斑块受限。
第三部分不同形态冠状动脉钙化与冠状动脉狭窄的多层螺旋CT相关性研究
【摘要】目的探讨64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影图像上不同形态的冠状动脉钙化与局部管腔狭窄的关系。方法回顾性分析111例冠状动脉钙化患者的CT冠状动脉造影和传统冠状动脉造影图像。依据冠状动脉长轴和短轴方向上冠状动脉钙化形态对钙化灶进行分类。长轴方向的冠状动脉钙化灶分为:点状钙化、结节状、条状钙化、条块状钙化。短轴方向的冠状动脉钙化灶分为:点状钙化、新月形钙化、半月形钙化、满月形钙化、环形钙化。通过CTA和CAG点对点的评价,分析不同形态的冠状动脉钙化同局部管腔狭窄的关系。结果共分析了528个节段钙化灶,其中383个节段(72.5%)为点状钙化,145个节段(27.5%)为非点状钙化。所有点状钙化本身未造成局部冠状动脉狭窄。34个节段冠状动脉非点状钙化造成局部管腔重度狭窄,占非点状钙化灶的23.5%。不同形态的冠状动脉钙化斑块造成局部管腔重度狭窄的比例差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。从冠状动脉长轴方向看,造成冠状动脉局部管腔重度狭窄34个节段钙化灶中,结节状钙化、条状钙化及条块状钙化节段分别有4(11.8%)、8(23.5%)、22(64.7%)个。42.3%(22/52)的条块状钙化造成管腔重度狭窄。从冠状动脉短轴方向看,造成冠状动脉局部管腔重度狭窄的新月形、半月形、满月形及环形钙化节段分别有0(0.0%)、8(23.5%)、18(52.9%)、8(23.5%)个。66.7%(18/27)的满月形钙化和66.7%(8/12)环形钙化造成管腔重度狭窄。结论冠状动脉CTA显示的不同形态的钙化斑块造成局部管腔的狭窄程度不同。冠状动脉长轴方向上的条块状钙化和短轴方向上的满月型钙化、环形钙化是造成局部冠状动脉重度狭窄的主要原因。
第四部分双源CT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉造影:与传统冠状动脉造影对照
【摘要】目的评价双源CT(DSCT)前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉造影(CTCA)对冠状动脉病变诊断的准确性和可行性。方法选取同期行前瞻性心电门控CTCA(扫描前心率低于75次/分)和传统冠状动脉造影(CAG)的30例连续患者作为研究对象。另选取同期行回顾性心电门控CTCA和CAG的45例连续患者作为对照。两名CT医师和两名造影医师依冠状动脉狭窄程度(0:冠状动脉无狭窄;1:冠状动脉狭窄＜50%;2:冠状动脉狭窄≥50 9,6,但＜75%:3:冠状动脉狭窄≥75%;4:冠状动脉狭窄=100%)分别对CTCA和CAG图像进行诊断。两名CT医师还对CTCA的图像质量进行评估,记录辐射剂量。比较前瞻性和回顾性心电门控CTCA的诊断准确性、辐射剂量和图像质量。结果对患者冠状动脉病变的诊断,前瞻性和回顾性心电门控CTCA的差异无统计学意义,其敏感性分别为100.0%、97.4%(P=0.86),特异性分别为66.7%、100.0%(P=0.65),阳性预测值分别为96.4%、100.0%(P=0.89),阴性预测值分别为100.0%、87.5%(P=0.43),诊断准确性分别为96.7%、97.8%(P=0.66);对分支冠状动脉病变的诊断,两者的差异也无统计学意义,其敏感性分别为95.9%、91.1%(P=0.46),特异性分别为97.2%、97.0%(P=0.85),阳性预测值分别为95.9%、96.0%(P=0.66),阴性预测值分别为97.2%、93.2%(P=0.41),诊断准确性分别为96.7%、94.4%(P=0.53);对节段冠状动脉病变的诊断,两者的差异同样也没有统计学意义,其敏感性分别为90.5%、91.2%(P=0.92),特异性分别为98.4%、99.3%(P=0.35),阳性预测值分别为91.8%、96.6%(P=0.26),阴性预测值分别为98.1%、98.0%(P=0.92),诊断准确性分别为97.1%、97.7%(P=0.62)。前瞻性心电门控CTCA的图像质量同同顾性心电门控CTCA的类似(3.3±0.5与3.2±0.3:P=0.23)。同回顾性心电门控CTCA比较,前瞻性心电门控CTCA能降低71%的辐射剂量(3.1mSv±1.3与10.8 mSv±4.6,P＜0.01)。结论在心率低于75次/分,心律稳定的情况下,DSCT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉造影能获得与回顾性心电门控冠状动脉造影相同的诊断准确性,图像质量也无差别,但是辐射剂量大大降低。
第五部分北京自然人群冠状动脉钙化的调查研究
【摘要】目的了解北京地区自然人群冠状动脉钙化的发病情况,为临床采用冠状动脉钙化对冠心病危险因素分层和对冠状动脉钙化进一步研究提供基础数据。方法在北京地区随机分层抽取1800例自然人群进行64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化扫描。计算冠状动脉钙化积分的人群分布情况及不同年龄和性别人群的钙化分布。结果共1548名入选本课题的北京居民在我院行冠状动脉钙化CT平扫,年龄为53.3±7.8岁,共461名受检者(29.8%)检测出冠状动脉钙化。男性冠状动脉钙化的发病率(37.7%,270/716)较女性的高(23.0%,191/832)(p＜0.001)。男女钙化积分(77.5±252.0)明显高于女性的(37.8±178.9)(p＜0.05)。男女冠状动脉钙化积分均随年龄的增长而增加(p＜0.05)。男女的钙化积分均与年龄和糖尿病密切相关(p＜0.05),女性的冠状动脉钙化积分与高血压密切相关(p＜0.001)。结论北京地区自然人群的冠状动脉钙化发病率及程度随年龄增长而增加,男性的冠状动脉钙化发病率及程度均较同龄女性高。冠状动脉钙化的发展规律及同临床冠心病事件的关系有待进一步研究。
Part 1 Different contrast injection protocols for noninvasive 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography
Objectives To determine the optimal contrast injection protocol for 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography.Methods One hundred and fifty consecutive patients scheduled to undergo retrospectively electrocardiographically gated 64-slice computed tomography.Each 30 patients were assigned to use a different contrast protocols:group 1:uniphasic protocol(contrast injection without saline flush); group 2:biphasic protocol(contrast injection with saline flush);group 3A,3B and 3C: triphasic protocol(contrast material+different saline diluted contrast material+saline flush).Attenuation was measured in the right atrium,right ventricle,left atrium,left ventricle,ascending aorta,right coronary artery and left coronary artery was evaluated and analyzed by s one-way analysis of variance test(ANOVA).The quality of the coronary artery image was evaluated and compared using person Chi-square.Results Among the triphasic protocol groups,group 3A(30%:70%contrast material-saline mixture was used in second phase) used the least contrast material and had the least frequency of streak artifacts,but there were no significant differences in coronary artery attenuation,image quality,visualization right and left heart structures respectively.Among the uniphasic protocol group(group 1),biphasic protocol group (group 2) and triphasic protocol subgroup(group 3A),there were no significant differences in image quality scores of coronary artery(P=0.18);uniphasic protocol group had the highest frequency of streak artifacts(20 cases)(P＜0.05) and had the most amount contrast material(67.0±5.3 ml);biphasic protocol group had the least amount of contrast material(59.9±4.9 ml)(P＜0.05) and had the highest attenuation of left main coronary artery and right coronary artery(P＜0.01),but had the least amount of clear visualization right heart structure(6 cases);triphasic protocol group(group 3A) had the most amount of clear visualization right heart structures(29 cases) were the most among the three groups(P＜0.05).Conclusions Biphasic protocol are superior to the traditional uniphasic protocols for using the least total contrastmedia,having the least Streak artifacts and without image quality degradation.Triphasic protocol (30%:70%contrastmedia-saline mixture was used in second phase) are superior to for clearly visualization of both left ventricle and right ventricle cavities without contrast material volume increase and image quality degradation.
Part 2 Evaluation of Coronary Stents In Vitro With 64-slice Computed Tomography
Objectives To assess the visualization of different coronary artery stents and the delineation of in-stent stenosis using 64-slice computed tomography (MSCT) with different scan modes when it were placed at different positions.Methods A total of 18 different coronary stents(10 stents with lumen diameter stenosis of 50%) were placed in a vascular phantom and scanned with a 64-slice computed tomography at the distance of 0 mm,25mm,50mm,75mm,and 100mm from the centre of scanner to the phantom.The scan modes were retrospective ECG gating helical scan(tub current:400mA and 600mA) and non-ECG triggering axial scan(tube current:350mA). Visible lumen diameter and attenuation in the stented segments of the phantom were measured.Two readers assessed stenosis delineation.Results(1)The visible lumen diameter and percent of the visible in-stent stenosis had significantly negative correction with the distance between the center of scanner and the phantom(r=-0.71, -0.78 respectively)(all P＜0.01).The attenuation of stent lumen,the attenuation of the water around the stent and the noise of the water around the stent had significantly positive correction with the distance between the center of scanner and the phantom (r=0.39,0.11,0.46 respectively).(2) Different scan mode and different tube current had no effect on the visible lumen diameter,the attenuation of stent lumen,the percent of the visible in-stent stenosis and the attenuation of the water around the stent (P＞0.05),but had effect on the noise of the water around stent(P＜0.01)。Conclusion The distance between the center of scanner and the stents has effect on the display of the stents.The scan mode has little effect on the display of the stent.MSCT Shows limit value in detecting in-stent restenosis.
Part 3 Study of Morphological Characteristics of Calcified Plaques and Lumenal Stenosis On 64-slice Computed Tomographic Coronary Anigiography
Objective To research the morphological characters of coronary artery calcified plaque and it's relation to the degree of stenosis of local coronary artery lumen by multi-slice computed tomography.Methods One hundred and eleven patients who had received 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography(CAG) were found calcified plaques burden.The calcified plaques were classified as punctate,nodular,strip-like and nubbly in long-axis view,and were classified as crescent,semilunar,round moon and circinate in short-axis view.The morphologic characters of these calcification plaques were retrospectively analyzed.The stenosis degree of the corresponding coronary artery lumen was judged in accordance with the results of CAG.Severe stenosis was defined as stenosis of≥75%of the luminal diameter.Results Totally 528 calcified plaque segments were analyzed in coronary computed tomography angiography(CTA) in these 111 patients.Among these there were 383(72.5%) punctate calcified plaque segments and 145(23.5%) non- punctate calcified plaque segments.No obvious stenosis in coronary artery was caused by punctate calcified plaques.There were 34 non-punctate calcified plaques which caused severe stenosis.The ratio of different morphological coronary artery calcification which caused sever stenosis was significant different(all p＜0.01).There were 4 nodular calcified plaques,8 stripe-like calcified plaques and 22 nubbly calcified plaques which caused severe stenosis.42.3% (22/52) nubbly calcified plaque caused severe stenosis.At the same time,there were 0 crescent calcified plaques,8 semilunar calcified plaques,18 round moon calcified plaques and 8 circinate calcified plaques which caused severe stenosis.66.7%moon calcified plaque and circinate calcified plaques caused severe stenosis.Conclusion Different coronary artery calcified plaques generate different degree of stenosis of local coronary artery lumen.Severe stenosis are mostly caused by nubbly calcified plaque(long-axis view),moon calcified plaque(short-axis view) and circinate calcified plaque(short-axis view).
Part 4 Prospective ECG triggering for dual-source CT coronary angiography:Comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography(CTCA) using prospective ECG triggering for the assessment of coronary artery disease(CAD).Methods A tall of 30 patients with heart rate less than 75 beats per minute underwent prospective ECG triggering and conventional coronary angiography(Study group) and 45 patients underwent retrospective ECG gating and conventional coronary angiography(Control group).Two independent radiologists assessed the severity of stenosis of CT coronary angiograms,and two independent cardiologists assessed the severity of stenosis of conventional angiograms.All of them used blinging method.Effective radiation doses were calculated and image quality was valuated.Results The differences in diagnostic performance on a per-patient basis between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography were not significantly different:sensitivity was 100.0%,97.4%,respectively(P=0.86);specificity was 66.7%,100.0%,respectively (P=0.65);PPV was 96.4%,100.0%,respectively(P=0.89);NPV was 100.0%,87.5%, respectively(P=0.43);diagnostic accuracy was 96.7%,97.8%,respectively(P=0.66). Similarly,no level of significance was reached on a per-vessel analysis:sensitivity was 95.9%,91.1%,respectively(P=0.46);specificity was 97.2%,97.0%,respectively (P=0.85);PPV was 95.9%,96.0%,respectively(P=0.66);NPV was 97.2%,93.2%, respectively(P=0.41);diagnostic accuracy was 96.7%,94.4%,respectively(P=0.53). In the same way no level of significance was reached on a per-segment analysis sensitivity was 95.9%,91.1%,respectively(P=0.46);specificity was 97.2%,97.0%, respectively(P=0.85);PPV was 95.9%,96.0%,respectively(P=0.66);NPV was 97.2%,93.2%,respectively(P=0.41);diagnostic accuracy was 96.7%,94.4%, respectively(P=0.53) when comparing prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography.Consensus-determined image quality in coronary artery branches was similar between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography (3.3±0.5 vs 3.2±0.3,respectively;P=0.23).Calculated effective dose with prospective CT angiography was 71%lower than that with retrospective CT angiography(3.1mSv±1.3 vs 10.8 mSv±4.6,respectively;P＜0.01).Conclusion Prospective CT angiography can reduce radiation dose below that of retrospective CT angiography,while maintain image quality and the ability to assess luminal obstructions in patients with a stable heart rates of less than 75 beats per minute.
Part 5 Prevalence of coronary artery calcium among natural population in Beijing
Objective To investigate prevalence and amount of CAC as determined by Multi-slice computed tomography(MSCT) in Beijing community natural population.Methods A stratified random sample of 1800 community natural residents in Beijing was enrolled in the study.All subjects would undergo non-enhanced coronary scan by retrospectively ECG-Gated MSCT.Agatston scoring was used for CAC.Coronary artery calcium score(CACS) was calculated for each subject.Groups were compared with respect to age,gender.Results There were 1548 subjects(53.3±7.8 years) enrolled in our study.CAC was found in 29.8%(461/1548) of the subjects.The prevalence of CAC was significantly higher in male subjects (37.7%,270/716) than female subjects(23.0%,191/832)(p＜0.001).The CACS of male subjects and female subjects were 77.5±252.0 and 37.8±178.9,respectively.It was significantly higher in males than females(p＜0.05).The CACS increased significantly with increasing age in males and female subjects(p＜0.05).In the study, age and mellitus diabetes were significantly associated with CACS in both men and women(all p＜0.05).Additionally,hypertension showed significant associations with CACS in women only(p＜0.001).Conclusion There is an increase in the prevalence and amount of coronary artery calcification with age in Beijing community population. Males have significantly higher prevalence and amount of CAC than females.The development of CAC of Chinese and it's relation to the cardiac events should be studied further.
【摘要】目的比较不同的对比剂注射方案,以选择最佳的64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影注射方案。方法将150例患者按数字表法随机分为以下5组:组1为单时相(单纯注射对比剂),组2为双时相(对比剂注射完后注射生理盐水),组3A、3B、3C为三时相(在注射对比剂和生理盐水注射时相之间加入稀释对比剂注射时相,即同时注射对比剂和生理盐水,其比例依次为3:7、5:5和7:3)。各组病例对比剂为均使用碘海醇(350mgI/ml)。分别测量右心房、右心室、左心房、左心室、升主动脉、左右冠状动脉CT值,采用单因素分析(anova)比较其差异。评估图像质量和上腔静脉伪影,采用卡方检验比较其差异。结果各组间总对比剂用量差异有统计学意义(F=27.43,P＜0.001),组3B与组1、3C差异无统计学意义(P=0.18;P=0.25),组2与组3A对比剂注射总量差异也无统计学意义(P=0.06),其余各组两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。组2对比剂用量最少,为59.9±4.9mL,其次为组3A,为62.9±3.2mL。5组病例中,冠状动脉图像质量差异有统计学意义(χ~2=18.81 P=0.016)。组1图像质量最佳,评分为4分为22例。其次为组2和组3A,图像质量评分为3分和4分之和分别为26例和24例,两组图像质量无显著性差异(χ~2=0.48,P=0.79)。各组产生的上腔静脉伪影差异有统计学意义(F=31.44,P＜0.001),产生伪影以组1最多,共21例,组2最少,仅1例。组2冠状动脉CT值较其它组明显高(F=29.41,P＜0.001),其余各组间左右冠状动脉CT值差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。在5组中,组3A显示右心系统最好。结论在64层冠状动脉造影扫描中,在减少造影剂用量和上腔静脉伪影方面,双时相和三时相注射方案优于单时相注射方案;在显示右心系统方面,三时相注射方案优于双时相注射方案。
第二部分64层螺旋CT冠状动脉支架检测的实验研究
【摘要】目的64层MSCT采用不同的扫描方式及扫描电流对不同扫描位置的支架显示的影响。方法在扫描床偏离中心位置0.0cm、2.5cm、5.0cm、7.5cm和10.0cm的情况下,分别采用回顾性心电门控螺旋扫描方法(管电流为400mA、600mA)和非心电门控轴位扫描方法(管电流为350mA)对18个冠状动脉支架模型(10个支架内设有50%的狭窄)进行成像,测量支架管腔绝对测量值、支架内CT值、支架内噪声、支架周围水的CT值和水的噪声。结果(1)扫描床偏离中心的距离与支架管腔绝对测量值、支架内模拟斑块的可视比例呈负相关,相关系数分别为—0.71、—0.78(P＜0.01)。支架内CT值、支架内噪声以及支架周围水的噪声与扫描床偏离中心距离成正相关,其相关系数分别为0.39、0.11、0.46(P＜0.01)。(2)不同的扫描方式和管电流对支架管腔绝对测量值、支架管腔相对值、支架管腔内CT值、支架管腔内噪声、支架周围水的CT值以及支架内模拟斑块的可视比例的影响差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),对支架周围水的噪声影响差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。
结论本研究显示扫描床的位置对支架管腔的显示产生影响,提示行冠状动脉扫描时,尽量将心脏置于机架中心位置。不同的扫描方式和管电流对支架管腔显示的影响较小。MSCT对评价支架内中等密度斑块受限。
第三部分不同形态冠状动脉钙化与冠状动脉狭窄的多层螺旋CT相关性研究
【摘要】目的探讨64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影图像上不同形态的冠状动脉钙化与局部管腔狭窄的关系。方法回顾性分析111例冠状动脉钙化患者的CT冠状动脉造影和传统冠状动脉造影图像。依据冠状动脉长轴和短轴方向上冠状动脉钙化形态对钙化灶进行分类。长轴方向的冠状动脉钙化灶分为:点状钙化、结节状、条状钙化、条块状钙化。短轴方向的冠状动脉钙化灶分为:点状钙化、新月形钙化、半月形钙化、满月形钙化、环形钙化。通过CTA和CAG点对点的评价,分析不同形态的冠状动脉钙化同局部管腔狭窄的关系。结果共分析了528个节段钙化灶,其中383个节段(72.5%)为点状钙化,145个节段(27.5%)为非点状钙化。所有点状钙化本身未造成局部冠状动脉狭窄。34个节段冠状动脉非点状钙化造成局部管腔重度狭窄,占非点状钙化灶的23.5%。不同形态的冠状动脉钙化斑块造成局部管腔重度狭窄的比例差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。从冠状动脉长轴方向看,造成冠状动脉局部管腔重度狭窄34个节段钙化灶中,结节状钙化、条状钙化及条块状钙化节段分别有4(11.8%)、8(23.5%)、22(64.7%)个。42.3%(22/52)的条块状钙化造成管腔重度狭窄。从冠状动脉短轴方向看,造成冠状动脉局部管腔重度狭窄的新月形、半月形、满月形及环形钙化节段分别有0(0.0%)、8(23.5%)、18(52.9%)、8(23.5%)个。66.7%(18/27)的满月形钙化和66.7%(8/12)环形钙化造成管腔重度狭窄。结论冠状动脉CTA显示的不同形态的钙化斑块造成局部管腔的狭窄程度不同。冠状动脉长轴方向上的条块状钙化和短轴方向上的满月型钙化、环形钙化是造成局部冠状动脉重度狭窄的主要原因。
第四部分双源CT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉造影:与传统冠状动脉造影对照
【摘要】目的评价双源CT(DSCT)前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉造影(CTCA)对冠状动脉病变诊断的准确性和可行性。方法选取同期行前瞻性心电门控CTCA(扫描前心率低于75次/分)和传统冠状动脉造影(CAG)的30例连续患者作为研究对象。另选取同期行回顾性心电门控CTCA和CAG的45例连续患者作为对照。两名CT医师和两名造影医师依冠状动脉狭窄程度(0:冠状动脉无狭窄;1:冠状动脉狭窄＜50%;2:冠状动脉狭窄≥50 9,6,但＜75%:3:冠状动脉狭窄≥75%;4:冠状动脉狭窄=100%)分别对CTCA和CAG图像进行诊断。两名CT医师还对CTCA的图像质量进行评估,记录辐射剂量。比较前瞻性和回顾性心电门控CTCA的诊断准确性、辐射剂量和图像质量。结果对患者冠状动脉病变的诊断,前瞻性和回顾性心电门控CTCA的差异无统计学意义,其敏感性分别为100.0%、97.4%(P=0.86),特异性分别为66.7%、100.0%(P=0.65),阳性预测值分别为96.4%、100.0%(P=0.89),阴性预测值分别为100.0%、87.5%(P=0.43),诊断准确性分别为96.7%、97.8%(P=0.66);对分支冠状动脉病变的诊断,两者的差异也无统计学意义,其敏感性分别为95.9%、91.1%(P=0.46),特异性分别为97.2%、97.0%(P=0.85),阳性预测值分别为95.9%、96.0%(P=0.66),阴性预测值分别为97.2%、93.2%(P=0.41),诊断准确性分别为96.7%、94.4%(P=0.53);对节段冠状动脉病变的诊断,两者的差异同样也没有统计学意义,其敏感性分别为90.5%、91.2%(P=0.92),特异性分别为98.4%、99.3%(P=0.35),阳性预测值分别为91.8%、96.6%(P=0.26),阴性预测值分别为98.1%、98.0%(P=0.92),诊断准确性分别为97.1%、97.7%(P=0.62)。前瞻性心电门控CTCA的图像质量同同顾性心电门控CTCA的类似(3.3±0.5与3.2±0.3:P=0.23)。同回顾性心电门控CTCA比较,前瞻性心电门控CTCA能降低71%的辐射剂量(3.1mSv±1.3与10.8 mSv±4.6,P＜0.01)。结论在心率低于75次/分,心律稳定的情况下,DSCT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉造影能获得与回顾性心电门控冠状动脉造影相同的诊断准确性,图像质量也无差别,但是辐射剂量大大降低。
第五部分北京自然人群冠状动脉钙化的调查研究
【摘要】目的了解北京地区自然人群冠状动脉钙化的发病情况,为临床采用冠状动脉钙化对冠心病危险因素分层和对冠状动脉钙化进一步研究提供基础数据。方法在北京地区随机分层抽取1800例自然人群进行64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化扫描。计算冠状动脉钙化积分的人群分布情况及不同年龄和性别人群的钙化分布。结果共1548名入选本课题的北京居民在我院行冠状动脉钙化CT平扫,年龄为53.3±7.8岁,共461名受检者(29.8%)检测出冠状动脉钙化。男性冠状动脉钙化的发病率(37.7%,270/716)较女性的高(23.0%,191/832)(p＜0.001)。男女钙化积分(77.5±252.0)明显高于女性的(37.8±178.9)(p＜0.05)。男女冠状动脉钙化积分均随年龄的增长而增加(p＜0.05)。男女的钙化积分均与年龄和糖尿病密切相关(p＜0.05),女性的冠状动脉钙化积分与高血压密切相关(p＜0.001)。结论北京地区自然人群的冠状动脉钙化发病率及程度随年龄增长而增加,男性的冠状动脉钙化发病率及程度均较同龄女性高。冠状动脉钙化的发展规律及同临床冠心病事件的关系有待进一步研究。
Part 1 Different contrast injection protocols for noninvasive 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography
Objectives To determine the optimal contrast injection protocol for 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography.Methods One hundred and fifty consecutive patients scheduled to undergo retrospectively electrocardiographically gated 64-slice computed tomography.Each 30 patients were assigned to use a different contrast protocols:group 1:uniphasic protocol(contrast injection without saline flush); group 2:biphasic protocol(contrast injection with saline flush);group 3A,3B and 3C: triphasic protocol(contrast material+different saline diluted contrast material+saline flush).Attenuation was measured in the right atrium,right ventricle,left atrium,left ventricle,ascending aorta,right coronary artery and left coronary artery was evaluated and analyzed by s one-way analysis of variance test(ANOVA).The quality of the coronary artery image was evaluated and compared using person Chi-square.Results Among the triphasic protocol groups,group 3A(30%:70%contrast material-saline mixture was used in second phase) used the least contrast material and had the least frequency of streak artifacts,but there were no significant differences in coronary artery attenuation,image quality,visualization right and left heart structures respectively.Among the uniphasic protocol group(group 1),biphasic protocol group (group 2) and triphasic protocol subgroup(group 3A),there were no significant differences in image quality scores of coronary artery(P=0.18);uniphasic protocol group had the highest frequency of streak artifacts(20 cases)(P＜0.05) and had the most amount contrast material(67.0±5.3 ml);biphasic protocol group had the least amount of contrast material(59.9±4.9 ml)(P＜0.05) and had the highest attenuation of left main coronary artery and right coronary artery(P＜0.01),but had the least amount of clear visualization right heart structure(6 cases);triphasic protocol group(group 3A) had the most amount of clear visualization right heart structures(29 cases) were the most among the three groups(P＜0.05).Conclusions Biphasic protocol are superior to the traditional uniphasic protocols for using the least total contrastmedia,having the least Streak artifacts and without image quality degradation.Triphasic protocol (30%:70%contrastmedia-saline mixture was used in second phase) are superior to for clearly visualization of both left ventricle and right ventricle cavities without contrast material volume increase and image quality degradation.
Part 2 Evaluation of Coronary Stents In Vitro With 64-slice Computed Tomography
Objectives To assess the visualization of different coronary artery stents and the delineation of in-stent stenosis using 64-slice computed tomography (MSCT) with different scan modes when it were placed at different positions.Methods A total of 18 different coronary stents(10 stents with lumen diameter stenosis of 50%) were placed in a vascular phantom and scanned with a 64-slice computed tomography at the distance of 0 mm,25mm,50mm,75mm,and 100mm from the centre of scanner to the phantom.The scan modes were retrospective ECG gating helical scan(tub current:400mA and 600mA) and non-ECG triggering axial scan(tube current:350mA). Visible lumen diameter and attenuation in the stented segments of the phantom were measured.Two readers assessed stenosis delineation.Results(1)The visible lumen diameter and percent of the visible in-stent stenosis had significantly negative correction with the distance between the center of scanner and the phantom(r=-0.71, -0.78 respectively)(all P＜0.01).The attenuation of stent lumen,the attenuation of the water around the stent and the noise of the water around the stent had significantly positive correction with the distance between the center of scanner and the phantom (r=0.39,0.11,0.46 respectively).(2) Different scan mode and different tube current had no effect on the visible lumen diameter,the attenuation of stent lumen,the percent of the visible in-stent stenosis and the attenuation of the water around the stent (P＞0.05),but had effect on the noise of the water around stent(P＜0.01)。Conclusion The distance between the center of scanner and the stents has effect on the display of the stents.The scan mode has little effect on the display of the stent.MSCT Shows limit value in detecting in-stent restenosis.
Part 3 Study of Morphological Characteristics of Calcified Plaques and Lumenal Stenosis On 64-slice Computed Tomographic Coronary Anigiography
Objective To research the morphological characters of coronary artery calcified plaque and it's relation to the degree of stenosis of local coronary artery lumen by multi-slice computed tomography.Methods One hundred and eleven patients who had received 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography(CAG) were found calcified plaques burden.The calcified plaques were classified as punctate,nodular,strip-like and nubbly in long-axis view,and were classified as crescent,semilunar,round moon and circinate in short-axis view.The morphologic characters of these calcification plaques were retrospectively analyzed.The stenosis degree of the corresponding coronary artery lumen was judged in accordance with the results of CAG.Severe stenosis was defined as stenosis of≥75%of the luminal diameter.Results Totally 528 calcified plaque segments were analyzed in coronary computed tomography angiography(CTA) in these 111 patients.Among these there were 383(72.5%) punctate calcified plaque segments and 145(23.5%) non- punctate calcified plaque segments.No obvious stenosis in coronary artery was caused by punctate calcified plaques.There were 34 non-punctate calcified plaques which caused severe stenosis.The ratio of different morphological coronary artery calcification which caused sever stenosis was significant different(all p＜0.01).There were 4 nodular calcified plaques,8 stripe-like calcified plaques and 22 nubbly calcified plaques which caused severe stenosis.42.3% (22/52) nubbly calcified plaque caused severe stenosis.At the same time,there were 0 crescent calcified plaques,8 semilunar calcified plaques,18 round moon calcified plaques and 8 circinate calcified plaques which caused severe stenosis.66.7%moon calcified plaque and circinate calcified plaques caused severe stenosis.Conclusion Different coronary artery calcified plaques generate different degree of stenosis of local coronary artery lumen.Severe stenosis are mostly caused by nubbly calcified plaque(long-axis view),moon calcified plaque(short-axis view) and circinate calcified plaque(short-axis view).
Part 4 Prospective ECG triggering for dual-source CT coronary angiography:Comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography(CTCA) using prospective ECG triggering for the assessment of coronary artery disease(CAD).Methods A tall of 30 patients with heart rate less than 75 beats per minute underwent prospective ECG triggering and conventional coronary angiography(Study group) and 45 patients underwent retrospective ECG gating and conventional coronary angiography(Control group).Two independent radiologists assessed the severity of stenosis of CT coronary angiograms,and two independent cardiologists assessed the severity of stenosis of conventional angiograms.All of them used blinging method.Effective radiation doses were calculated and image quality was valuated.Results The differences in diagnostic performance on a per-patient basis between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography were not significantly different:sensitivity was 100.0%,97.4%,respectively(P=0.86);specificity was 66.7%,100.0%,respectively (P=0.65);PPV was 96.4%,100.0%,respectively(P=0.89);NPV was 100.0%,87.5%, respectively(P=0.43);diagnostic accuracy was 96.7%,97.8%,respectively(P=0.66). Similarly,no level of significance was reached on a per-vessel analysis:sensitivity was 95.9%,91.1%,respectively(P=0.46);specificity was 97.2%,97.0%,respectively (P=0.85);PPV was 95.9%,96.0%,respectively(P=0.66);NPV was 97.2%,93.2%, respectively(P=0.41);diagnostic accuracy was 96.7%,94.4%,respectively(P=0.53). In the same way no level of significance was reached on a per-segment analysis sensitivity was 95.9%,91.1%,respectively(P=0.46);specificity was 97.2%,97.0%, respectively(P=0.85);PPV was 95.9%,96.0%,respectively(P=0.66);NPV was 97.2%,93.2%,respectively(P=0.41);diagnostic accuracy was 96.7%,94.4%, respectively(P=0.53) when comparing prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography.Consensus-determined image quality in coronary artery branches was similar between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography (3.3±0.5 vs 3.2±0.3,respectively;P=0.23).Calculated effective dose with prospective CT angiography was 71%lower than that with retrospective CT angiography(3.1mSv±1.3 vs 10.8 mSv±4.6,respectively;P＜0.01).Conclusion Prospective CT angiography can reduce radiation dose below that of retrospective CT angiography,while maintain image quality and the ability to assess luminal obstructions in patients with a stable heart rates of less than 75 beats per minute.
Part 5 Prevalence of coronary artery calcium among natural population in Beijing
Objective To investigate prevalence and amount of CAC as determined by Multi-slice computed tomography(MSCT) in Beijing community natural population.Methods A stratified random sample of 1800 community natural residents in Beijing was enrolled in the study.All subjects would undergo non-enhanced coronary scan by retrospectively ECG-Gated MSCT.Agatston scoring was used for CAC.Coronary artery calcium score(CACS) was calculated for each subject.Groups were compared with respect to age,gender.Results There were 1548 subjects(53.3±7.8 years) enrolled in our study.CAC was found in 29.8%(461/1548) of the subjects.The prevalence of CAC was significantly higher in male subjects (37.7%,270/716) than female subjects(23.0%,191/832)(p＜0.001).The CACS of male subjects and female subjects were 77.5±252.0 and 37.8±178.9,respectively.It was significantly higher in males than females(p＜0.05).The CACS increased significantly with increasing age in males and female subjects(p＜0.05).In the study, age and mellitus diabetes were significantly associated with CACS in both men and women(all p＜0.05).Additionally,hypertension showed significant associations with CACS in women only(p＜0.001).Conclusion There is an increase in the prevalence and amount of coronary artery calcification with age in Beijing community population. Males have significantly higher prevalence and amount of CAC than females.The development of CAC of Chinese and it's relation to the cardiac events should be studied further.
引文
[1]Hara T,Yamada S,Hayashi T,et al.Accuracy of nonstenotic coronary atherosclerosis assessment by multi-detector computed tomography.Circ J,2007,71:911-914.PMID:17526989
[2]Pflederer T,Schmid M,Ropers D,et al.Interobserver variability of 64-slice computed tomography for the quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque.Rofo,2007,179:953-957.PMID:17492542
[3]Onuma Y,Tanabe K,Chihara R,et al.Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.Am Heart J,2007,154:519-526.PMID:17719300
[4]Ong K,Chin SP,Chan WL,et al.Feasibility and accuracy of 64-row MDCT coronary imaging from a centre with early experience:a review and comparison with established centres.Med J Malaysia,2005,60:629-636.PMID:16515115
[5]Fleischmann D.Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications:CT angiography.Eur Radiol,2002,12:S11-S15.PMID:12232656
[6]Setty BN,Sahani DV,Ouellete-Piazzo,et al.Comparison of enhancement,image quality,cost,and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT.Comput Assist Tomogr,2006,30:818-822.PMID:16954936
[7]李颖,杨立,刘新,等.心率对64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量的影响.中国医学影像技术,2006,22:1477-1480.
[8]Sekiguchi R,Nawano S,Satake M et al.Multislice CT of the thorax:effects of contrast material pushed with saline solution using a dual power injector on contrast material dose and perivenous artifacts.Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi,2001,61:484-490.PMID:11577433
[9]Haage P,Schmitz-Rode T,Hubner D,et al.Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax.AJR,2000,174:1049-1053.PMID:10749248
[10]Juergens KU,Grude M,Fallenberg EM,et al.Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease.AJR,2002,179:1545-1550.PMID:12438052
[11]Utsunomiya D,Awai K,Sakamoto T,et al.Cardiac 16-MDCT for anatomic and functional analysis:assessment of a biphasic contrast injection protocol.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2006,187:638-44.PMID:16928924
[12]赵辉.1997年-2006年国内造影剂肾病期刊文献计量分析.放射学实践,2007,22:629-630.
[13]Becker C.The use of contrast material in cardiac CT.Suppl Appl Radiol,2003,32:50-56.
[14]Wintersperger BJ,Nikolaus K.Basic of cardiac MDCT:techniques and contrast application.Eur Radiol,2005,15:B2-B9.PMID:15801051
[15]Yamamuro M,Tadamura E,Kanao S.J.Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser:influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation.Comput Assist Tomogr,2007,31:272-280.PMID:17414766
[16]Rist C,Nikolaou K,Kirchin MA,et al.Contrast bolus optimization for cardiac 16-slice computed tomography:comparison of contrast medium formulations containing 300 and 400milligrams of iodine per milliliter.Invest Radiol,2006 May,41:460-467.PMID:16625109
[17]Cademartiri F,de Monye C,Pugliese F,et al.High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography:iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400.Invest Radiol,2006,41:349-353.PMID:16481919
[1]Das KM,El-Menyar AA,Salam AM,et al.Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.Radiology.2007.245(2):424-32.
[2]Harish A,Khatri P,Priyadarshini H,et al.Accuracy of 64-slice coronary CT angiography in predicting percentage diameter stenosis.Indian Heart J.2008.60(4):296-301.
[3]于淑靖,李忠信,马国军.64 MSCT对冠状动脉支架通畅性评价的准确性与支架材料的关系.中国临床医学影像杂志.2007.18(10):716-718.
[4]孔令燕[1,3],金征宇[1等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像评价冠状动脉支架通畅性.中国医学科学院学报.2006.28(1):32-35.
[5]萧毅[1],弓静[1],田建明[1]等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影评价冠状动脉支架再狭 窄.介入放射学杂志.2007.16(5):312-315.
[6]王涛,王锡明,武乐斌,李振家,柳澄.64层螺旋CT在评价冠状动脉支架中的价值.中国医学影像技术.2006.22(10):1489-1491.
[7]孙新海,侯代伦,李娴等.64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉支架置入术后评估中的价值.医学影像学杂志.2007.17(1):11-13.
[8]Oncel D,Oncel G,Karaca M.Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis:determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience.Radiology.2007.242(2):403-9.
[9]Pugliese F,Weustink AC,Van Mieghem C,et al.Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis.Heart.2008.94(7):848-54.
[10]Oncel D,Oncel G,Tastan A,Tamci B.Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control.AJR Am J Roentgenol.2008.191(1):56-63.
[11]霍天龙,杜湘珂,廖静敏.定量评估64层螺旋CT血管成像与DSA显示冠状动脉狭窄的能力和可靠性.中华放射学杂志.2007.41(10):1036-1039.
[12]刘新,李颖,杨立等.64层螺旋CT评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的价值.中华放射学杂志.2006.40(8):808-811.
[13]霍天龙[1],杜湘珂[1],李剑颍[2],沈云[2],廖静敏[2].64层VCT冠状动脉成像的实验研究.临床放射学杂志.2007.26(11):1147-1151.
[14]Groen JM,Greuter MJ,van OPM,Oudkerk M.A new approach to the assessment of lumen visibility of coronary artery stent at various heart rates using 64-slice MDCT.Eur Radiol.2007.17(7):1879-84.
[15]Sheth T,Dodd JD,Hoffmann U,et al.Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2007.69(7):933-8.
[16]Lell MM,Panknin C,Saleh R,et al.Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT(DSCT).Invest Radiol.2007.42(7):536-41.
[17]Schlosser T,Scheuermann T,Ulzheimer S,et al.In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.Clin Res Cardiol.2007.96(12):883-90.
[18]Wolf F,Feuchtner GM,Homolka P,et al.In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents:are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners.Eur J Radiol.2008.68(3):465-70.
[19]Schlosser T,Scheuermann T,Ulzheimer S,et al.In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis.Acta Radiol.2008.49(1):56-64.
[20]Rist C,Nikolaou K,Flohr T,Wintersperger BJ,Reiser MF,Becker CR.High-resolution ex vivo imaging of coronary artery stents using 64-slice computed tomography-initial experience.Eur Radiol.2006.16(7):1564-9.
[21]Seifarth H,Ozgun M,Raupach R,et al.64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment:in vitro experience.Invest Radiol.2006.41(1):22-7.
[22]Maintz D,Burg MC,Seifarth H,et al.Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents:in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT.Eur Radiol.2009.19(1):42-9.
[23]Maintz D,Seifarth H,Raupach R,et al.64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography:in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.Eur Radiol.2006.16(4):818-26.
[24]朱新进,熊华峰,曾惠良,欧卫谦,梁坚豪,李佩文.16层CT与导管法造影在冠状动脉支架评价中的对照研究.医学影像学杂志.2008.(03):245-248.
[25]贾志豪,马依彤,马翔等.62例冠脉支架术后患者的64排螺旋CT与冠脉造影结果分析.中国心血管病研究.2008.(04):249-251.
[26]Seifarth H,Ozgun M,Raupach R,et al.64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment:in vitro experience.Invest Radiol.2006.41(1):22-7.
[27]Gopal A,Mao SS,Karlsberg D,et al.Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography,Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.2009.25(4):405-16.
[28]苏瑞瑛,张海军,肖文良,申艳霞,田帅.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的评价.临床荟萃.2008.(16):1168-1170.
[1]Schoenhagen P,Halliburton SS,Stillman AE,et al.Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries:current and future role of multi-detector row CT.Radiology,2004,232:7-17.
[2]马恩森,杨志刚,余建群,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化积分在冠心病诊断中的临床应用.四川大学学报(医学版),2008:492-495.
[3]马恩森,杨志刚,余建群,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化积分在冠心病诊断中的临床应用.四川大学学报:医学版,2008,39:492-495.
[4]苏瑞瑛,肖文良,申艳霞,等.64层螺旋CT量化冠状动脉钙化在冠心病中的诊断价值.临床荟萃,2006,21:1227-1233.
[5]胡秀华,章士正,黄文鑫,等.16层螺旋CT检测冠状动脉钙化斑块的狭窄程度.中国医学科学院学报,2006,28:40-43.
[6]孙国平,陈宇,徐坚民,等.冠状动脉钙化多层螺旋CT检查及与冠状动脉造影的对比研究.中国医学影像技术,2004,20:702-704.
[7]赵泽华,王康,王伟忠,等.冠状动脉钙化多层螺旋CT检查及与冠状动脉造影的对比研究.上海医学影像,2003,12:41-43.
[8]黄列军.使用对比剂做X线检查停用二甲双胍.糖尿病天地,2004:38-40.
[9]Heussel CP,Voigtlaender T,Kauczor H,et al.Detection of coronary artery calcifications predicting coronary heart disease:comparison of fluoroscopy and spiral CT.Eur Radiol,1998,8:1016-24.
[10]Lau GT,Ridley LJ,Schieb MC,et al.Coronary artery stenoses:detection with calcium scoring,CT angiography,and both methods combined.Radiology,2005,235:415-22.
[11]王诚,赵世华,戴汝平.冠状动脉钙化电子束CT研究进展.国外医学:临床放射学分册,2005,28:153-156.
[12]刘旭杰(综述),张兴华(审校).冠状动脉钙化研究进展.心血管病学进展, 2007,28:46-50.
[13]Ong TK,Chin SP,Liew CK,et al.Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients:influence of calcification.Am Heart J,2006,151:1323.e1-6.
[14]Gutstein A,Wolak A,Lee C,et al.Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography:development of selection criteria and initial experience.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2008,2:81-90.
[15]Alkadhi H,Scheffel H,Desbiolles L,et al.Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography:influence of obesity,calcium load,and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy.Eur Heart J,2008,29:766-76.
[16]Burgstahler C,Reimann A,Drosch T,et al.Cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe coronary calcifications and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2007,1:143-51.
[17]Stolzmann P,Scheffel H,Leschka S,et al.Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2008,191:1684-9.
[18]Thilo C,Nguyen S,Zwerner P,et al.Coronary Artery Calcium:Correlation of Calcification Patterns with Non-Calcified Plaque and Stenosis.RSNA,2006.
[19]刘新,赵锡海,程流泉,等.冠状动脉CT和MR血管成像诊断粥样硬化斑块和狭窄的对比研究.中华放射学杂志,2006,40:1156-1160.
[20]吕滨[1],庄囡[2],戴汝平[1],等.电子束CT冠状动脉钙化积分和血管造影诊断冠心病的价值.中华放射学杂志,2004,38:1305-1310.
[1]Feuchtner GM,Stolzmann P,Dichtl W,et al.Muitislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis:comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings.J Am Coll Cardiol,2009,53:436-44.
[2]Rist C,Johnson TR,Muller-Starck J,et al.Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.Invest Radiol,2009.
[3]Rixe J,Rolf A,Conradi G,et at.Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series:comparison with invasive angiography.Circ J,2009,73:316-22.
[4]Tsiflikas I,Brodoefel H,Reimann AJ,et al.Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients.Eur J Radiol,2009.
[5]王明亮[1],董光[2],耿海[2],等.双源CT冠状动脉成像与冠状动脉造影对照的初步研究.中国医学影像技术,2008,24:881-884.
[6]王怡宁,金征宇,孔令燕,等.双源CT冠状动脉成像:与64层螺旋CT初步比较.中国医学影像技术,2007,23:1503-1506.
[7]张竹花[1],金征宇[1],张抒扬[3],等.双源CT冠状动脉成像的初步研究.中华放射学杂志,2007,41:973-976.
[8]Dill T,Deetjen A,Ekinci O,et al.Radiation dose exposure in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol,2008,124:307-11.
[9] Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation, 2006,113:1305-10.
[10] Weigold WG, Olszewski ME, Walker MJ. Low-dose prospectively gated 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009.
[11] Tatsugami F, Husmann L, Herzog BA, et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009,192:635-8.
[12] Gutstein A, Wolak A, Lee C, et al. Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2008,2:81-90.
[13] Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol, 2009,16:15-21.
[14] Gopal A, Mao SS, Karlsberg D, et al. Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009,25:405-16.
[15] Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J, 2008,29:3037-42.
[16] Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology, 2008,248:424-30.
[17] Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology, 2008,248:431-7.
[18] 黄列军.使用对比剂做X线检查停用二甲双胍.糖尿病天地, 2004:38-40.
[19] Heussel CP, Voigtlaender T, Kauczor H, et al. Detection of coronary artery calcifications predicting coronary heart disease: comparison of fluoroscopy and spiral CT. Eur Radiol, 1998,8:1016-24.
[20] Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA, 2007,298:317-23.
[21] Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, et al. Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol, 2008,18:592-9.
[22] Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol, 2008,18:1809-17.
[23] Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J, 2008,29:191-7.
[24] Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol, 2009,16:15-21.
[25] Ketelsen D, Thomas C, Werner M, et al. Dual-source computed tomography: Estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol, 2008.
[26] Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology, 2008,248:424-30.
[27] Earls JP How to use a prospective gated technique for cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2009,3:45-51.
[28] Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Leschka S, et al. Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008,191:1684-9.
[29] Pelberg R, Mazur W. Cardiac CT Angiography Manual. Springer Verlag, 2007:51-51.
[1]Rumberger JA,Simons DB,Fitzpatrick LA,et al.Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area.A histopathologic correlative study.Circulation,1995,92:2157-62.
[2]Sangiorgi G,Rumberger JA,Severson A,et al.Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans:a histologic study of 723coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology.J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,31:126-33.
[3]Guerci AD,Spadaro LA,Popma JJ,et al.Relation of coronary calcium score by electron beam computed tomography to arteriographic findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults.Am J Cardiol,1997,79:128-33.
[4]Bielak LF,Rumberger JA,2nd SPF,et al.Probabilistic model for prediction of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease using electron beam computed tomography calcium score strata.Circulation,2000,102:380-5.
[5]Budoff MJ,Nasir K,Mao S,et al.Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis,2006,187:343-50.
[6]Bild DE,Detrano R,Peterson D,et al.Ethnic differences in coronary calcification:the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis(MESA).Circulation,2005,111:1313-20.
[7]Budoff MJ,Nasir K,Mao S,et al.Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis,2006,187:343-50.
[8]Shisen J,Leung DY,Juergens CP.Gender and age differences in the prevalence of coronary artery calcification in 953 Chinese subjects.Heart Lung Circ,2005,14:69-73.
[9]马恩森,杨志刚,余建群,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化积分在冠心病诊断中的临床应用.四川大学学报:医学版,2008,39:492-495.
[10]刘承云[1],万晶晶[1],梁波[2],等.多层螺旋CT检测老年单纯收缩期高血压患者冠状动脉钙化积分的意义.中华老年医学杂志,2007,26:270-271.
[11]苏瑞瑛,肖文良,申艳霞,等.64层螺旋CT量化冠状动脉钙化在冠心病中的诊断价值.临床荟萃,2006,21:1227-1233.
[12]Agatston AS,Janowitz WR,Hildner FJ,et al.Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990,15:827-32.
[13] Knez A, Becker C, Becker A, et al. Determination of coronary calcium with multi-slice spiral computed tomography: a comparative study with electron-beam CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002. 18(4): 295-303.
[14] Lau GT, Ridley LJ, Schieb MC, et al. Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combined. Radiology, 2005,235:415-22.
[15] Haberl R, Tittus J, Bohme E, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: an effective filter before catheter angiography. Am Heart J, 2005,149:1112-9.
[16] Leber AW, Knez A, von ZF, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,46:147-54.
[17] Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, et al. Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation, 2000,101:850-5.
[18] Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003. 228(3): 826-33.
[19] Hoff JA, Daviglus ML, Chomka EV, et al. Conventional coronary artery disease risk factors and coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 30,908 healthy individuals. Ann Epidemiol, 2003,13:163-9.
[20] Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ, et al. Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults. Am J Cardiol, 2001,87:1335-9.
[21] Dakik HA, Skouri HN, Mehio-Sibai A, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery calcium among asymptomatic men and women in a developing country: comparison with the USA data. Atherosclerosis, 2005,183:141-5.
[22] Chen LC, Ding PY, Chen JW, et al. Coronary artery calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography for predicting angiographic coronary artery disease in moderate- to high-risk Chinese patients. Cardiology, 2001,95:183-9.
[23] Wong ND, Kouwabunpat D, Vo AN, et al. Coronary calcium and atherosclerosis by ultrafast computed tomography in asymptomatic men and women: relation to age and risk factors. Am Heart J, 1994,127:422-30.
[24] Diez RAV, Detrano R, Jackson S, et al. Acculturation and socioeconomic position as predictors of coronary calcification in amultiethnic sample. Circulation, 2005,112:1557-65.
[25] Shemesh J, Koren-Morag N, Apter S, et al. Accelerated progression of coronary calcification: four-year follow-up in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Radiology, 2004,233:201-9.
[26] Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ, et al. Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults. Am J Cardiol, 2001,87:1335-9.
[27] Daniell AL, Wong ND, Friedman JD, et al. Concordance of coronary artery calcium estimates between MDCT and electron beam tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005,185:1542-5.
[28]Stanford W,Thompson BH,Burns TL,et al.Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT.Radiology,2004,230:397-402.
[29]Budoff MJ,Nasir K,Mao S,et al.Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis,2006,187:343-50.
[1]Falk E,Shah PK,Fuster V.Coronary plaque disruption.Circulation.1995.92(3):657-71.
[2]Ward MR,Pasterkamp G,Yeung AC,Borst C.Arterial remodeling.Mechanisms and clinical implications.Circulation.2000.102(10):1186-91.
[3]Escolar E,Weigold G,Fuisz A,Weissman NJ.New imaging techniques for diagnosing coronary artery disease.CMAJ.2006.174(4):487-95.
[4]Nikolaou K,Becker CR,Muders M,et al.Multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in human ex vivo coronary arteries.Atherosclerosis.2004.174(2):243-52.
[5]Becker CR,Nikolaou K,Muders M,et al.Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT.Eur Radiol.2003.13(9):2094-8.
[6]Xiao XG,Xie DX,Shen BZ,et al.[Value of multi-slice computed tomography in diagnosis of coronary plaque characterization].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi.2007.87(46):3247-50.
[7]Galonska M,Ducke F,Kertesz-Zborilova T,Meyer R,Guski H,Knollmann FD.Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in human coronary arteries with 16-slice multidetector row computed tomography by analysis of attenuation profiles.Acad Radiol.2008.15(2):222-30.
[8]Kopp AF.Angio-CT:heart and coronary arteries.Eur J Radiol.2003.45 Suppl 1:S32-6.
[9]Carrascosa PM,Capunay CM,Garcia-Merletti P,Carrascosa J,Garcia MF.Characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques by multidetector computed tomography.Am J Cardiol.2006.97(5):598-602.
[10]Pohle K,Achenbach S,Macneill B,et al.Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT:comparison to IVUS.Atherosclerosis.2007.190(1):174-80.
[11]吴文辉[1],吕滨[1],蒋世良[1]等.多层螺旋CT对冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块的显示结果及与超声结果的比较.中华放射学杂志.2007.41(10):1027-1031.
[12]Sun J,Zhang Z,Lu B,et al.Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques:a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound.A JR Am J Roentgenol. 2008. 190(3): 748-54.
[13] Leber AW, Knez A, von ZF, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. 46(1): 147-54.
[14] Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004. 109(1): 14-7.
[15] Springer I, Dewey M. Comparison of multislice computed tomography with intravascular ultrasound for detection and characterization of coronary artery plaques: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2008 .
[16] Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2005. 111(25):3481-8.
[17] Bauters C. [Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease]. Rev Prat. 2008. 58(14): 1523-6.
[18] Otsuka M, Bruining N, Van Pelt NC, et al. Quantification of coronary plaque by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison with quantitative intracoronary ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2008. 43(5): 314-21.
[19] Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004. 109(1): 14-7.
[20] Moselewski F, Ropers D, Pohle K, et al. Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 2004. 94(10): 1294-7.
[21] Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47(3): 672-7.
[22] Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008. 29(4): 531-56.
[23] Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006.47(8): 1655-62.
[24] Schuijf JD, Beck T, Burgstahler C, et al. Differences in plaque composition and distribution in stable coronary artery disease versus acute coronary syndromes; non-invasive evaluation with multi-slice computed tomography. Acute Card Care. 2007. 9(1): 48-53.
[25] Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. 50(4): 319-26.
[26] Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. 49(1): 62-70.
[27] Akosah KO, Schaper A, Cogbill C, Schoenfeld P. Preventing myocardial infarction in the young adult in the first place: how do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III guidelines perform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003. 41(9): 1475-9.
[28] Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Raggi P. Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. 46(10): 1931-6.
[29] Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008. 358(13): 1336-45.
[30] Johnson KM, Dowe DA, Brink JA. Traditional clinical risk assessment tools do not accurately predict coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden: a CT angiography study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. 192(1): 235-43.
[31] Kotani J, Nanto S, Mintz GS, et al. Plaque gruel of atheromatous coronary lesion may contribute to the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circulation. 2002. 106(13): 1672-7.
[32] Fitzgerald PJ, Ports TA, Yock PG. Contribution of localized calcium deposits to dissection after angioplasty. An observational study using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 1992. 86(1):64-70.
[33]Kinohira Y,Akutsu Y,Li HL,et al.Coronary arterial plaque characterized by multislice computed tomography predicts complications following coronary intervention.Int Heart J.2007.48(1):25-33.
[34]Nakazawa G,Tanabe K,Onuma Y,et al.Efficacy of culprit plaque assessment by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography to predict transient no-refiow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention.Am Heart J.2008.155(6):1150-7.
[35]Burgstahler C,Reimann A,Beck T,et al.Influence of a lipid-lowering therapy on calcified and noncalcified coronary plaques monitored by multislice detector computed tomography:results of the New Age Ⅱ Pilot Study.Invest Radiol.2007.42(3):189-95.
[36]Kunita E,Fujii T,Urabe Y,et al.Coronary Plaque Stabilization Followed by Color Code Plaque(TM) Analysis With 64-Slice Multidetector Row Computed Tomography.Circ J.2008.
[37]Leber AW,Becker A,Knez A,et al.Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system:a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound.J Am Coll Cardiol.2006.47(3):672-7.
[38]Lindsay AC,Choudhury RP.Form to function:current and future roles for atherosclerosis imaging in drug development.Nat Rev Drug Discov.2008.7(6):517-29.
[39]毛定飚,滑炎卿,张国帧等.多层螺旋CT评价冠状动脉内软斑块的准确性.中华放射学杂志.2006.(07):722-725.
[40]Cademartiri F,Mollet NR,Runza G,et al.Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography:observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography.Eur Radiol.2005.15(7):1426-31.
[41]Halliburton SS,Schoenhagen P,Nair A,et al.Contrast enhancement of coronary atherosclerotic plaque:a high-resolution,multidetector-row computed tomography study of pressure-perfused,human ex-vivo coronary arteries.Coron Artery Dis.2006.17(6):553-60.
[42]Barreto M,Schoenhagen P,Nair A,et al.Potential of dual-energy computed tomography to characterize atherosclerotic plaque:ex vivo assessment of human coronary arteries in comparison to histology.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr.2008.2(4):234-42.
[43]Husmann L,Valenta I,Gaemperli O,et al.Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography:first experience with prospective ECG-gating.Eur Heart J.2008.29(2):191-7.
[44]Hein PA,Romano VC,Lembcke A,May J,Rogalla P.Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT.Eur Radiol.2009.
[45]Nissen SE,Nicholls SJ,Sipahi I,et al.Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis:the ASTEROID trial.JAMA.2006.295(13):1556-65.
[46]Komatsu S,Hirayama A,Omori Y,et al.Detection of coronary plaque by computed tomography with a novel plaque analysis system,'Plaque Map',and comparison with intravascular ultrasound and angioscopy.Circ J.2005.69(1):72-7.
[47]王焱辉,张兆琪,吕飙.64层螺旋CT检测冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块的初步研究.中华放射学杂志.2007.41(11):1189-1193.
[2]Pflederer T,Schmid M,Ropers D,et al.Interobserver variability of 64-slice computed tomography for the quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque.Rofo,2007,179:953-957.PMID:17492542
[3]Onuma Y,Tanabe K,Chihara R,et al.Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.Am Heart J,2007,154:519-526.PMID:17719300
[4]Ong K,Chin SP,Chan WL,et al.Feasibility and accuracy of 64-row MDCT coronary imaging from a centre with early experience:a review and comparison with established centres.Med J Malaysia,2005,60:629-636.PMID:16515115
[5]Fleischmann D.Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications:CT angiography.Eur Radiol,2002,12:S11-S15.PMID:12232656
[6]Setty BN,Sahani DV,Ouellete-Piazzo,et al.Comparison of enhancement,image quality,cost,and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT.Comput Assist Tomogr,2006,30:818-822.PMID:16954936
[7]李颖,杨立,刘新,等.心率对64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量的影响.中国医学影像技术,2006,22:1477-1480.
[8]Sekiguchi R,Nawano S,Satake M et al.Multislice CT of the thorax:effects of contrast material pushed with saline solution using a dual power injector on contrast material dose and perivenous artifacts.Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi,2001,61:484-490.PMID:11577433
[9]Haage P,Schmitz-Rode T,Hubner D,et al.Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax.AJR,2000,174:1049-1053.PMID:10749248
[10]Juergens KU,Grude M,Fallenberg EM,et al.Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease.AJR,2002,179:1545-1550.PMID:12438052
[11]Utsunomiya D,Awai K,Sakamoto T,et al.Cardiac 16-MDCT for anatomic and functional analysis:assessment of a biphasic contrast injection protocol.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2006,187:638-44.PMID:16928924
[12]赵辉.1997年-2006年国内造影剂肾病期刊文献计量分析.放射学实践,2007,22:629-630.
[13]Becker C.The use of contrast material in cardiac CT.Suppl Appl Radiol,2003,32:50-56.
[14]Wintersperger BJ,Nikolaus K.Basic of cardiac MDCT:techniques and contrast application.Eur Radiol,2005,15:B2-B9.PMID:15801051
[15]Yamamuro M,Tadamura E,Kanao S.J.Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser:influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation.Comput Assist Tomogr,2007,31:272-280.PMID:17414766
[16]Rist C,Nikolaou K,Kirchin MA,et al.Contrast bolus optimization for cardiac 16-slice computed tomography:comparison of contrast medium formulations containing 300 and 400milligrams of iodine per milliliter.Invest Radiol,2006 May,41:460-467.PMID:16625109
[17]Cademartiri F,de Monye C,Pugliese F,et al.High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography:iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400.Invest Radiol,2006,41:349-353.PMID:16481919
[1]Das KM,El-Menyar AA,Salam AM,et al.Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.Radiology.2007.245(2):424-32.
[2]Harish A,Khatri P,Priyadarshini H,et al.Accuracy of 64-slice coronary CT angiography in predicting percentage diameter stenosis.Indian Heart J.2008.60(4):296-301.
[3]于淑靖,李忠信,马国军.64 MSCT对冠状动脉支架通畅性评价的准确性与支架材料的关系.中国临床医学影像杂志.2007.18(10):716-718.
[4]孔令燕[1,3],金征宇[1等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像评价冠状动脉支架通畅性.中国医学科学院学报.2006.28(1):32-35.
[5]萧毅[1],弓静[1],田建明[1]等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影评价冠状动脉支架再狭 窄.介入放射学杂志.2007.16(5):312-315.
[6]王涛,王锡明,武乐斌,李振家,柳澄.64层螺旋CT在评价冠状动脉支架中的价值.中国医学影像技术.2006.22(10):1489-1491.
[7]孙新海,侯代伦,李娴等.64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉支架置入术后评估中的价值.医学影像学杂志.2007.17(1):11-13.
[8]Oncel D,Oncel G,Karaca M.Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis:determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience.Radiology.2007.242(2):403-9.
[9]Pugliese F,Weustink AC,Van Mieghem C,et al.Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis.Heart.2008.94(7):848-54.
[10]Oncel D,Oncel G,Tastan A,Tamci B.Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control.AJR Am J Roentgenol.2008.191(1):56-63.
[11]霍天龙,杜湘珂,廖静敏.定量评估64层螺旋CT血管成像与DSA显示冠状动脉狭窄的能力和可靠性.中华放射学杂志.2007.41(10):1036-1039.
[12]刘新,李颖,杨立等.64层螺旋CT评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的价值.中华放射学杂志.2006.40(8):808-811.
[13]霍天龙[1],杜湘珂[1],李剑颍[2],沈云[2],廖静敏[2].64层VCT冠状动脉成像的实验研究.临床放射学杂志.2007.26(11):1147-1151.
[14]Groen JM,Greuter MJ,van OPM,Oudkerk M.A new approach to the assessment of lumen visibility of coronary artery stent at various heart rates using 64-slice MDCT.Eur Radiol.2007.17(7):1879-84.
[15]Sheth T,Dodd JD,Hoffmann U,et al.Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2007.69(7):933-8.
[16]Lell MM,Panknin C,Saleh R,et al.Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT(DSCT).Invest Radiol.2007.42(7):536-41.
[17]Schlosser T,Scheuermann T,Ulzheimer S,et al.In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.Clin Res Cardiol.2007.96(12):883-90.
[18]Wolf F,Feuchtner GM,Homolka P,et al.In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents:are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners.Eur J Radiol.2008.68(3):465-70.
[19]Schlosser T,Scheuermann T,Ulzheimer S,et al.In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis.Acta Radiol.2008.49(1):56-64.
[20]Rist C,Nikolaou K,Flohr T,Wintersperger BJ,Reiser MF,Becker CR.High-resolution ex vivo imaging of coronary artery stents using 64-slice computed tomography-initial experience.Eur Radiol.2006.16(7):1564-9.
[21]Seifarth H,Ozgun M,Raupach R,et al.64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment:in vitro experience.Invest Radiol.2006.41(1):22-7.
[22]Maintz D,Burg MC,Seifarth H,et al.Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents:in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT.Eur Radiol.2009.19(1):42-9.
[23]Maintz D,Seifarth H,Raupach R,et al.64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography:in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.Eur Radiol.2006.16(4):818-26.
[24]朱新进,熊华峰,曾惠良,欧卫谦,梁坚豪,李佩文.16层CT与导管法造影在冠状动脉支架评价中的对照研究.医学影像学杂志.2008.(03):245-248.
[25]贾志豪,马依彤,马翔等.62例冠脉支架术后患者的64排螺旋CT与冠脉造影结果分析.中国心血管病研究.2008.(04):249-251.
[26]Seifarth H,Ozgun M,Raupach R,et al.64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment:in vitro experience.Invest Radiol.2006.41(1):22-7.
[27]Gopal A,Mao SS,Karlsberg D,et al.Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography,Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.2009.25(4):405-16.
[28]苏瑞瑛,张海军,肖文良,申艳霞,田帅.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的评价.临床荟萃.2008.(16):1168-1170.
[1]Schoenhagen P,Halliburton SS,Stillman AE,et al.Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries:current and future role of multi-detector row CT.Radiology,2004,232:7-17.
[2]马恩森,杨志刚,余建群,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化积分在冠心病诊断中的临床应用.四川大学学报(医学版),2008:492-495.
[3]马恩森,杨志刚,余建群,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化积分在冠心病诊断中的临床应用.四川大学学报:医学版,2008,39:492-495.
[4]苏瑞瑛,肖文良,申艳霞,等.64层螺旋CT量化冠状动脉钙化在冠心病中的诊断价值.临床荟萃,2006,21:1227-1233.
[5]胡秀华,章士正,黄文鑫,等.16层螺旋CT检测冠状动脉钙化斑块的狭窄程度.中国医学科学院学报,2006,28:40-43.
[6]孙国平,陈宇,徐坚民,等.冠状动脉钙化多层螺旋CT检查及与冠状动脉造影的对比研究.中国医学影像技术,2004,20:702-704.
[7]赵泽华,王康,王伟忠,等.冠状动脉钙化多层螺旋CT检查及与冠状动脉造影的对比研究.上海医学影像,2003,12:41-43.
[8]黄列军.使用对比剂做X线检查停用二甲双胍.糖尿病天地,2004:38-40.
[9]Heussel CP,Voigtlaender T,Kauczor H,et al.Detection of coronary artery calcifications predicting coronary heart disease:comparison of fluoroscopy and spiral CT.Eur Radiol,1998,8:1016-24.
[10]Lau GT,Ridley LJ,Schieb MC,et al.Coronary artery stenoses:detection with calcium scoring,CT angiography,and both methods combined.Radiology,2005,235:415-22.
[11]王诚,赵世华,戴汝平.冠状动脉钙化电子束CT研究进展.国外医学:临床放射学分册,2005,28:153-156.
[12]刘旭杰(综述),张兴华(审校).冠状动脉钙化研究进展.心血管病学进展, 2007,28:46-50.
[13]Ong TK,Chin SP,Liew CK,et al.Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients:influence of calcification.Am Heart J,2006,151:1323.e1-6.
[14]Gutstein A,Wolak A,Lee C,et al.Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography:development of selection criteria and initial experience.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2008,2:81-90.
[15]Alkadhi H,Scheffel H,Desbiolles L,et al.Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography:influence of obesity,calcium load,and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy.Eur Heart J,2008,29:766-76.
[16]Burgstahler C,Reimann A,Drosch T,et al.Cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe coronary calcifications and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2007,1:143-51.
[17]Stolzmann P,Scheffel H,Leschka S,et al.Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2008,191:1684-9.
[18]Thilo C,Nguyen S,Zwerner P,et al.Coronary Artery Calcium:Correlation of Calcification Patterns with Non-Calcified Plaque and Stenosis.RSNA,2006.
[19]刘新,赵锡海,程流泉,等.冠状动脉CT和MR血管成像诊断粥样硬化斑块和狭窄的对比研究.中华放射学杂志,2006,40:1156-1160.
[20]吕滨[1],庄囡[2],戴汝平[1],等.电子束CT冠状动脉钙化积分和血管造影诊断冠心病的价值.中华放射学杂志,2004,38:1305-1310.
[1]Feuchtner GM,Stolzmann P,Dichtl W,et al.Muitislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis:comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings.J Am Coll Cardiol,2009,53:436-44.
[2]Rist C,Johnson TR,Muller-Starck J,et al.Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.Invest Radiol,2009.
[3]Rixe J,Rolf A,Conradi G,et at.Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series:comparison with invasive angiography.Circ J,2009,73:316-22.
[4]Tsiflikas I,Brodoefel H,Reimann AJ,et al.Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients.Eur J Radiol,2009.
[5]王明亮[1],董光[2],耿海[2],等.双源CT冠状动脉成像与冠状动脉造影对照的初步研究.中国医学影像技术,2008,24:881-884.
[6]王怡宁,金征宇,孔令燕,等.双源CT冠状动脉成像:与64层螺旋CT初步比较.中国医学影像技术,2007,23:1503-1506.
[7]张竹花[1],金征宇[1],张抒扬[3],等.双源CT冠状动脉成像的初步研究.中华放射学杂志,2007,41:973-976.
[8]Dill T,Deetjen A,Ekinci O,et al.Radiation dose exposure in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol,2008,124:307-11.
[9] Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation, 2006,113:1305-10.
[10] Weigold WG, Olszewski ME, Walker MJ. Low-dose prospectively gated 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009.
[11] Tatsugami F, Husmann L, Herzog BA, et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009,192:635-8.
[12] Gutstein A, Wolak A, Lee C, et al. Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2008,2:81-90.
[13] Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol, 2009,16:15-21.
[14] Gopal A, Mao SS, Karlsberg D, et al. Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009,25:405-16.
[15] Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J, 2008,29:3037-42.
[16] Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology, 2008,248:424-30.
[17] Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology, 2008,248:431-7.
[18] 黄列军.使用对比剂做X线检查停用二甲双胍.糖尿病天地, 2004:38-40.
[19] Heussel CP, Voigtlaender T, Kauczor H, et al. Detection of coronary artery calcifications predicting coronary heart disease: comparison of fluoroscopy and spiral CT. Eur Radiol, 1998,8:1016-24.
[20] Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA, 2007,298:317-23.
[21] Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, et al. Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol, 2008,18:592-9.
[22] Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol, 2008,18:1809-17.
[23] Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J, 2008,29:191-7.
[24] Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol, 2009,16:15-21.
[25] Ketelsen D, Thomas C, Werner M, et al. Dual-source computed tomography: Estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol, 2008.
[26] Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology, 2008,248:424-30.
[27] Earls JP How to use a prospective gated technique for cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2009,3:45-51.
[28] Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Leschka S, et al. Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008,191:1684-9.
[29] Pelberg R, Mazur W. Cardiac CT Angiography Manual. Springer Verlag, 2007:51-51.
[1]Rumberger JA,Simons DB,Fitzpatrick LA,et al.Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area.A histopathologic correlative study.Circulation,1995,92:2157-62.
[2]Sangiorgi G,Rumberger JA,Severson A,et al.Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans:a histologic study of 723coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology.J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,31:126-33.
[3]Guerci AD,Spadaro LA,Popma JJ,et al.Relation of coronary calcium score by electron beam computed tomography to arteriographic findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults.Am J Cardiol,1997,79:128-33.
[4]Bielak LF,Rumberger JA,2nd SPF,et al.Probabilistic model for prediction of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease using electron beam computed tomography calcium score strata.Circulation,2000,102:380-5.
[5]Budoff MJ,Nasir K,Mao S,et al.Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis,2006,187:343-50.
[6]Bild DE,Detrano R,Peterson D,et al.Ethnic differences in coronary calcification:the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis(MESA).Circulation,2005,111:1313-20.
[7]Budoff MJ,Nasir K,Mao S,et al.Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis,2006,187:343-50.
[8]Shisen J,Leung DY,Juergens CP.Gender and age differences in the prevalence of coronary artery calcification in 953 Chinese subjects.Heart Lung Circ,2005,14:69-73.
[9]马恩森,杨志刚,余建群,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化积分在冠心病诊断中的临床应用.四川大学学报:医学版,2008,39:492-495.
[10]刘承云[1],万晶晶[1],梁波[2],等.多层螺旋CT检测老年单纯收缩期高血压患者冠状动脉钙化积分的意义.中华老年医学杂志,2007,26:270-271.
[11]苏瑞瑛,肖文良,申艳霞,等.64层螺旋CT量化冠状动脉钙化在冠心病中的诊断价值.临床荟萃,2006,21:1227-1233.
[12]Agatston AS,Janowitz WR,Hildner FJ,et al.Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990,15:827-32.
[13] Knez A, Becker C, Becker A, et al. Determination of coronary calcium with multi-slice spiral computed tomography: a comparative study with electron-beam CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002. 18(4): 295-303.
[14] Lau GT, Ridley LJ, Schieb MC, et al. Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combined. Radiology, 2005,235:415-22.
[15] Haberl R, Tittus J, Bohme E, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: an effective filter before catheter angiography. Am Heart J, 2005,149:1112-9.
[16] Leber AW, Knez A, von ZF, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,46:147-54.
[17] Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, et al. Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation, 2000,101:850-5.
[18] Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003. 228(3): 826-33.
[19] Hoff JA, Daviglus ML, Chomka EV, et al. Conventional coronary artery disease risk factors and coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 30,908 healthy individuals. Ann Epidemiol, 2003,13:163-9.
[20] Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ, et al. Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults. Am J Cardiol, 2001,87:1335-9.
[21] Dakik HA, Skouri HN, Mehio-Sibai A, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery calcium among asymptomatic men and women in a developing country: comparison with the USA data. Atherosclerosis, 2005,183:141-5.
[22] Chen LC, Ding PY, Chen JW, et al. Coronary artery calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography for predicting angiographic coronary artery disease in moderate- to high-risk Chinese patients. Cardiology, 2001,95:183-9.
[23] Wong ND, Kouwabunpat D, Vo AN, et al. Coronary calcium and atherosclerosis by ultrafast computed tomography in asymptomatic men and women: relation to age and risk factors. Am Heart J, 1994,127:422-30.
[24] Diez RAV, Detrano R, Jackson S, et al. Acculturation and socioeconomic position as predictors of coronary calcification in amultiethnic sample. Circulation, 2005,112:1557-65.
[25] Shemesh J, Koren-Morag N, Apter S, et al. Accelerated progression of coronary calcification: four-year follow-up in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Radiology, 2004,233:201-9.
[26] Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ, et al. Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults. Am J Cardiol, 2001,87:1335-9.
[27] Daniell AL, Wong ND, Friedman JD, et al. Concordance of coronary artery calcium estimates between MDCT and electron beam tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005,185:1542-5.
[28]Stanford W,Thompson BH,Burns TL,et al.Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT.Radiology,2004,230:397-402.
[29]Budoff MJ,Nasir K,Mao S,et al.Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis,2006,187:343-50.
[1]Falk E,Shah PK,Fuster V.Coronary plaque disruption.Circulation.1995.92(3):657-71.
[2]Ward MR,Pasterkamp G,Yeung AC,Borst C.Arterial remodeling.Mechanisms and clinical implications.Circulation.2000.102(10):1186-91.
[3]Escolar E,Weigold G,Fuisz A,Weissman NJ.New imaging techniques for diagnosing coronary artery disease.CMAJ.2006.174(4):487-95.
[4]Nikolaou K,Becker CR,Muders M,et al.Multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in human ex vivo coronary arteries.Atherosclerosis.2004.174(2):243-52.
[5]Becker CR,Nikolaou K,Muders M,et al.Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT.Eur Radiol.2003.13(9):2094-8.
[6]Xiao XG,Xie DX,Shen BZ,et al.[Value of multi-slice computed tomography in diagnosis of coronary plaque characterization].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi.2007.87(46):3247-50.
[7]Galonska M,Ducke F,Kertesz-Zborilova T,Meyer R,Guski H,Knollmann FD.Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in human coronary arteries with 16-slice multidetector row computed tomography by analysis of attenuation profiles.Acad Radiol.2008.15(2):222-30.
[8]Kopp AF.Angio-CT:heart and coronary arteries.Eur J Radiol.2003.45 Suppl 1:S32-6.
[9]Carrascosa PM,Capunay CM,Garcia-Merletti P,Carrascosa J,Garcia MF.Characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques by multidetector computed tomography.Am J Cardiol.2006.97(5):598-602.
[10]Pohle K,Achenbach S,Macneill B,et al.Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT:comparison to IVUS.Atherosclerosis.2007.190(1):174-80.
[11]吴文辉[1],吕滨[1],蒋世良[1]等.多层螺旋CT对冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块的显示结果及与超声结果的比较.中华放射学杂志.2007.41(10):1027-1031.
[12]Sun J,Zhang Z,Lu B,et al.Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques:a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound.A JR Am J Roentgenol. 2008. 190(3): 748-54.
[13] Leber AW, Knez A, von ZF, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. 46(1): 147-54.
[14] Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004. 109(1): 14-7.
[15] Springer I, Dewey M. Comparison of multislice computed tomography with intravascular ultrasound for detection and characterization of coronary artery plaques: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2008 .
[16] Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2005. 111(25):3481-8.
[17] Bauters C. [Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease]. Rev Prat. 2008. 58(14): 1523-6.
[18] Otsuka M, Bruining N, Van Pelt NC, et al. Quantification of coronary plaque by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison with quantitative intracoronary ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2008. 43(5): 314-21.
[19] Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004. 109(1): 14-7.
[20] Moselewski F, Ropers D, Pohle K, et al. Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 2004. 94(10): 1294-7.
[21] Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47(3): 672-7.
[22] Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008. 29(4): 531-56.
[23] Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006.47(8): 1655-62.
[24] Schuijf JD, Beck T, Burgstahler C, et al. Differences in plaque composition and distribution in stable coronary artery disease versus acute coronary syndromes; non-invasive evaluation with multi-slice computed tomography. Acute Card Care. 2007. 9(1): 48-53.
[25] Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. 50(4): 319-26.
[26] Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. 49(1): 62-70.
[27] Akosah KO, Schaper A, Cogbill C, Schoenfeld P. Preventing myocardial infarction in the young adult in the first place: how do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III guidelines perform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003. 41(9): 1475-9.
[28] Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Raggi P. Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. 46(10): 1931-6.
[29] Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008. 358(13): 1336-45.
[30] Johnson KM, Dowe DA, Brink JA. Traditional clinical risk assessment tools do not accurately predict coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden: a CT angiography study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. 192(1): 235-43.
[31] Kotani J, Nanto S, Mintz GS, et al. Plaque gruel of atheromatous coronary lesion may contribute to the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circulation. 2002. 106(13): 1672-7.
[32] Fitzgerald PJ, Ports TA, Yock PG. Contribution of localized calcium deposits to dissection after angioplasty. An observational study using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 1992. 86(1):64-70.
[33]Kinohira Y,Akutsu Y,Li HL,et al.Coronary arterial plaque characterized by multislice computed tomography predicts complications following coronary intervention.Int Heart J.2007.48(1):25-33.
[34]Nakazawa G,Tanabe K,Onuma Y,et al.Efficacy of culprit plaque assessment by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography to predict transient no-refiow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention.Am Heart J.2008.155(6):1150-7.
[35]Burgstahler C,Reimann A,Beck T,et al.Influence of a lipid-lowering therapy on calcified and noncalcified coronary plaques monitored by multislice detector computed tomography:results of the New Age Ⅱ Pilot Study.Invest Radiol.2007.42(3):189-95.
[36]Kunita E,Fujii T,Urabe Y,et al.Coronary Plaque Stabilization Followed by Color Code Plaque(TM) Analysis With 64-Slice Multidetector Row Computed Tomography.Circ J.2008.
[37]Leber AW,Becker A,Knez A,et al.Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system:a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound.J Am Coll Cardiol.2006.47(3):672-7.
[38]Lindsay AC,Choudhury RP.Form to function:current and future roles for atherosclerosis imaging in drug development.Nat Rev Drug Discov.2008.7(6):517-29.
[39]毛定飚,滑炎卿,张国帧等.多层螺旋CT评价冠状动脉内软斑块的准确性.中华放射学杂志.2006.(07):722-725.
[40]Cademartiri F,Mollet NR,Runza G,et al.Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography:observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography.Eur Radiol.2005.15(7):1426-31.
[41]Halliburton SS,Schoenhagen P,Nair A,et al.Contrast enhancement of coronary atherosclerotic plaque:a high-resolution,multidetector-row computed tomography study of pressure-perfused,human ex-vivo coronary arteries.Coron Artery Dis.2006.17(6):553-60.
[42]Barreto M,Schoenhagen P,Nair A,et al.Potential of dual-energy computed tomography to characterize atherosclerotic plaque:ex vivo assessment of human coronary arteries in comparison to histology.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr.2008.2(4):234-42.
[43]Husmann L,Valenta I,Gaemperli O,et al.Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography:first experience with prospective ECG-gating.Eur Heart J.2008.29(2):191-7.
[44]Hein PA,Romano VC,Lembcke A,May J,Rogalla P.Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT.Eur Radiol.2009.
[45]Nissen SE,Nicholls SJ,Sipahi I,et al.Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis:the ASTEROID trial.JAMA.2006.295(13):1556-65.
[46]Komatsu S,Hirayama A,Omori Y,et al.Detection of coronary plaque by computed tomography with a novel plaque analysis system,'Plaque Map',and comparison with intravascular ultrasound and angioscopy.Circ J.2005.69(1):72-7.
[47]王焱辉,张兆琪,吕飙.64层螺旋CT检测冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块的初步研究.中华放射学杂志.2007.41(11):1189-1193.