基于意见挖掘通用框架的情感极性强度模糊性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
从认识论的角度来划分,信息分为客观性信息和主观性信息。客观性信息描述客观事实,主观性信息反映人或组织对于事物或事件的看法和态度。在过去,由于互联网普通用户只是阅读和接受信息,人们对信息的需求多表现为客观性信息,而如今随着大众参与网络信息的创造和发布,人们对主观性信息的需求更为普遍。虽然互联网包含着海量的主观性信息,但人们查找和利用这些信息的成本很高,迫切需要对主观性信息进行信息分析与处理。
     意见挖掘利用自然语言处理、信息抽取和数据挖掘等技术识别和分析主观性信息。它的出现满足了人们对于主观性信息分析的需求,已应用于网络口碑评价、舆情监控、企业竞争情报分析等众多领域。
     意见挖掘研究取得了丰富的研究成果,但也面临以下问题:①信息内容复杂,②信息形式多样化,③语言不规范,④表现出模糊性,⑤依赖于特定领域等。其中,关于情感极性强度模糊性的研究具有重要的学术意义和实践价值,它有助于全面真实地反映主观性信息。
     鉴于此,本文借助模糊数学和证据理论对情感极性强度模糊性进行处理。将情感极性强度级别看作模糊集,提出一种采用隶属度来表示情感极性强度的方法,判断情感极性属于某一强度级别的程度,运用模糊统计法来计算隶属度;将意见摘要合成看作决策问题,提出一种采用Dempster合成法则来合成意见摘要的方法。
     笔者以洗衣机为例,采用意见挖掘通用框架构建实验平台,为研究提供数据基础和对比参照。在实验平台上以算例的方式对模糊性方法处理的流程和效果进行了说明。
     本文共分为六章:
     (一)研究综述
     本章总结意见挖掘和情感极性强度的研究现状。意见挖掘研究分为两类技术路线:一类研究重点在于依据言论的情感极性来进行分类;一类研究重点在于抽取并分析有关评价特征的意见。在进行意见挖掘研究中发现,语料库标注者和语言学家之间对情感极性和情感极性强度很难达成一致,表现出模糊性。目前,对于情感极性的模糊性有一些研究成果,但关于情感极性强度模糊性的研究较少。
     (二)意见挖掘通用框架
     本章基于意见挖掘通用框架构建实验平台。笔者以20款洗衣机作为对象对框架的核心部分进行说明,主观性数据来源于京东商城,共计6006条。利用特征和情感词选择工具,提取出22个特征和229个情感词,进行情感分析的准确率达到88.47%,并根据网络口碑对洗衣机进行排序,同时将分析结果生成为意见摘要网页。
     (三)情感极性强度模糊性的问题分析
     本章旨在对情感极性强度模糊性问题进行分析。在意见挖掘研究中,情感极性表现出歧义性,而不是模糊性,它可以通过消除领域依赖的方法加以解决,而情感极性强度则表现出模糊性,难以消除。
     (四)情感极性强度模糊性的表示方法
     本章旨在提出情感极性强度模糊性的表示方法。在模糊数学思想的指导下,将情感极性强度级别看作为模糊集,采用隶属度表示情感极性强度属于强度级别的程度,运用模糊统计法计算隶属度。以算例的形式,计算得到第2章中程度副词和情感词集合的模糊性表示结果。
     (五)情感极性强度模糊性的合成方法
     本章旨在提出情感极性强度模糊性的合成方法。在证据理论思想的指导下,将意见摘要合成看作决策问题,运用Dempster合成法则进行合成。此章的算例基于第4章的程度副词和情感词的模糊性表示结果,以“松下XQB60-P620U6"洗衣机为例对合成方法进行说明。
     (六)总结
     本章对研究内容进行总结和展望。经过对比分析第5章模糊性处理后的结果与第2章未处理模糊性的结果,表明了情感极性强度模糊性处理的合理性和有效性。最后,对于下一步的研究工作进行了讨论。
From the perspective of epistemology, information can be divided into objective information and subjective information. The former describes the facts and the latter reflects viewpoints and attitudes of the individuals or organizations.In the past, ordinary Internet users usually browse and receive information, as a result, what people demanded for information is mostly objective information. With the development of the Internet, more people contribute to the creation and distribution of information on the Internet, people's needs for the subjective information becomes more popular now. The flourish of the Internet has generated massive volumes of subjective information. But the cost of finding and using the information is quite high, which causes urgent need to analyze subjective information.
     Opinion mining recognizes and analyzes subjective information by using techniques such as natural language processing, information extraction, data mining and so on. It emergence meets people's needs for subjective information analysis and it has been applied to word-of-mouth analysis, public opinions analysis, enterprise competitive intelligence and etc.
     Opinion mining has achieved abundant research results, but it still faced with the following problems:1) complexity of the information,2) various forms of information,3) lack of standard languages,4) fuzziness,5) domain dependence, etc. The fourth problem has important academic significance and practical values. If solved reasonably it will contribute to a comprehensive real response of the subjective information.
     This paper studies sentiment strength fuzziness by using fuzzy mathematics and evidence theory. It considers sentiment strength as fuzzy sets, using membership degree to express sentiment strength and using fuzzy statistical method to calculate membership degree. The opinion summarization is regarded as decision-making issues in which Dempster-Shafer's rule of combination is used to combine opinions.
     To attain these goals, the author built up an experimental platform based on a general framework for opinion mining, and took washing machines for example to provide reference basic data for research and comparison. Based on the experimental platform, the procedures and effects of the method are illustrated with examples.
     The dissertation is composed of six chapters as follows.
     (1) Overviews
     This chapter summarizes the status of the Opinion mining and sentiment strength research. The techniques of Opinion mining are divided into two categories. One type is focused on the classification, which is based on sentiment orientation of sentence; the other type tends to extract and analyze features of the viewpoints. During the research, we found it difficult to reach an agreement on sentiment orientation and sentiment strength between corpus annotators and linguists, which shows fuzziness. At present, the researches on sentiment orientation fuzziness have made some achievements, but the study on sentiment strength fuzziness is rare.
     (2) Opinion Mining General Framework
     This chapter establishes an experimental platform by Opinion mining general framework. We illustrates core parts of framework using 20 washing machines as test objects, and a total of 6006 subjective records comes from JingdongShangCheng Website. Using feature and sentiment word selection tools, extract 22 features and 229 sentiment words. Then generate analysis results in web pages. The accuracy rate is 88.47%.
     (3) Analysis of Sentiment Strength Fuzziness
     This chapter aims to analyze sentiment strength fuzziness. Both objects that people express their viewpoints towards and the languages as the means, for people to express their viewpoints exhibit fuzziness. So the analysis also tends to be fuzzy. In the opinion mining research, sentiment orientation shows ambiguity, rather than fuzziness, which can be resolved by eliminating domain-dependence, but sentiment strength cannot.
     (4) Representation of Sentiment Strength Fuzziness
     This chapter aims to introduce a representation method of sentiment strength fuzziness. Under the guidance of fuzzy set theory, this paper considers the grades of sentiment strength as fuzzy sets, using membership degrees to express how sentiment strength belonging to a certain strength grade, and makes use of fuzzy statistical method to calculate membership degrees. Take adverbs and sentiment words in Chapter 2 as example to illustrate the method.
     (5) Combination of Sentiment Strength Fuzziness
     This chapter aims to introduce combination of sentiment strength fuzziness. Under the guidance of evidence theory, the opinion summarization is regarded as decision-making issues, and Dempster-Shafer's rule of combination is used to combine opinions. Based on the results in Chapter 4, an example illustrates the combination method by taking the "Panasonic XQB60-P620U6" washing machine as test object.
     (6) Conclusion
     This chapter summarizes the research contents and prospects. Based on comparative analysis of the new results in Chapter 5 and old results in Chapter 2, this paper prove that the new method reasonable and valid. Finally, this paper discusses the further research.
引文
1 姚天,程希文,徐飞玉,汉思·乌思克尔特,王睿.文本意见挖掘综述.中文信息学报,2008,22(3):71-80.
    1 姚天,程希文,徐飞玉,汉思·乌思克尔特,王睿.文本意见挖掘综述.中文信息学报,2008,22(3):71-80.
    2 Das S. and Chen M. Yahoo! for Amazon:Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference (APFA),2001.
    3 Dave K., Lawrence S. and Pennock DM. Mining the peanut gallery:Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. Proceedings of WWW,2003,519-528.
    4 Pang B. and Lee L. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval,2008, 2(1-2):1-135.
    1 数据更新时间2009-09-15.
    2 Wiebe J., Wilson T. and Cardie C. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation,2005,1(2).
    1 Liu B. Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing,2010.
    2 Liu B. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1-2),1-135,2008. Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005, 339-346.
    1 Ding X., Liu B. and Yu P.S. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. Proceedings of the Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining (WSDM),2008,231-240.
    2 Hu M. and Liu B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the ACM, SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD),2004,168-177.
    3 Bethard S., Yu H., Thornton A., Hatzivassiloglou V., and Jurafsky D. Automatic extraction of opinion propositions and their holders.Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text,2004.
    4 Choi Y, Cardie C., Riloff E. and Patwardhan S. Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005,355-362.
    5 Kim S.M. and Hovy E. Determining the sentiment of opinions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING),2004,1367-1373.
    6 Sarawagi S.Information extraction. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval,2008,1(3):261-377.
    7 张晓艳,王挺,陈火旺.命名实体识别研究.计算机科学,2005,32(4):44-48.
    8 刘非凡,赵军,吕碧波,徐波,于浩,夏迎炬.面向商务信息抽取的产品命名实体识别研究.中文信息学报,2006,20(1):7-13.
    1 王厚峰.指代消解的基本方法和实现技术.中文信息学报,2002,16(6):9-17.
    2 Stoyanov V. and Cardie C. Partially supervised coreference resolution for opinion summarization through structured rule learning. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),2006,336-344.
    2 张强,李乃和.网络口碑研究现状及未来发展初探.江西农业学报,2008,20(4):147-149.
    1 Hearst MA. Direction-based text interpretation as an information access refinement. In Paul Jacobs, editor, Text-Based Intelligent Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1992,257-274.
    2 Wiebe JM.Identifying subjective characters in narrative. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING),1990,401-408.
    3 Wiebe JM.Tracking point of view in narrative. Computational Linguistics,1994,20(2):233-287.
    4 Wiebe JM.and Rapaport WJ.A computational theory of perspective and reference in narrative. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),1988,131-138.
    5 Wiebe J.and Bruce R. Probabilistic classifiers for tracking point of view. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation,1995,181-187.
    6 Huettner A.and Subasic P. Fuzzy typing for document management. In ACL 2000 Companion Volume:Tutorial Abstracts and Demonstration Notes,2000,26-27.
    1 Das S. and Chen M. Yahoo! for Amazon:Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference (APFA),2001.
    2 Pang B.and Lee L. and Vaithyanathan.S. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),2002,79-86.
    3 Tumey P. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),2002,417-424.
    4 Dini L. and Mazzini G. Opinion classification through information extraction. Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining Methods and Databases for Engineering, Finance and Other Fields (Data Mining),2002,299-310.
    5 Cardie C., Wiebe J., Wilson T.and Litman D. Combining low-level and summary representations of opinions for multi-perspective question answering. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on New Directions in Question Answering,2003,20-27.
    6 Dave K., Lawrence S.and Pennock DM. Mining the peanut gallery:Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. Proceedings of WWW,2003,519-528.
    1 Lin D. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. Proceedings of COLING-ACL,1998,768-774.
    2 Riloff E., Wiebe J.and Wilson T. Learning subjective nouns using extraction pattern bootstrapping. Conference on natural language learning (CoNLL), Edmonton,2003,25-32.
    3 Turney P.D. and Littman M.L. Unsupervised learning of semantic orientation from a hundred-billion-word corpus. Technical Report ERB-1094,National Research Council Canada, Institute for Information Technology,2002.
    4 Wiebe J. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In AAAI/IAAI,2000,735-740.
    5 Andreevskaia A. and Bergler S. Mining WordNet for a fuzzy sentiment:Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. In Proceedings EACL-06, Trento, Italy,2006.
    6 Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification. Proceedings of CIKM-05, the ACM SIGIR conference on information and knowledge management, Bremen, DE,2005.
    7 Gamon M. and Aue A. Automatic identification of sentiment vocabulary exploiting low association with known sentiment terms. Proceedings of the ACL workshop on feature engineering for machine learning in NLP, Ann Arbor,2005,57-64.
    1 Hatzivassiloglou V. and McKeown K. R. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of ACL,1997,174-181.
    2 Turney P.D. and Littman M. L. Unsupervised learning of semantic orientation from a hundred-billion-word corpus. Technical Report ERB-1094, National Research Council Canada, Institute for Information Technology,2002.
    3 Turney P. D. and Littman M. L. Measuring praise and criticism:Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems,2003,21(4),315-346.
    1 Kamps J., Marx M., Mokken R.J., and de Rijke M. Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of LREC-04,4th international conference on language resources and evaluation,2004, Vol(Ⅳ),1115-1118.
    2 Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification. Proceedings of CIKM-05, the ACM SIGIR conference on information and knowledge management, Bremen, DE,2005.
    3 Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. SentiWordNet:A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. Proceedings of LREC 2006,5th conference on language resources and evaluation, Genova,2006.
    4 Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. Determining term subjectivity and term orientation for opinion mining. Proceedings of EACL-06, 11th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, Trento,2006.
    1 Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification. Proceedings of CIKM-05, the ACM SIGIR conference on information and knowledge management, Bremen, DE,2005.
    2 Andreevskaia A. and Bergler S. Mining WordNet for a fuzzy sentiment:Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. Proceedings EACL-06, Trento, Italy,2006.
    3 Hatzivassiloglou V. and McKeown K.R. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of ACL,1997,174-181.
    4 Stone P.J., Dumphy D.C., Smith M.S. and Ogilvie D.M.The General Inquirer:a computer approach to content analysis. M.I.T. studies in comparative politics. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge,MA,1966.
    1 Salvetti F., Lewis S., and Reichenbach, C. Automatic opinion polarity classification of movie reviews. Colorado research in linguistics, Boulder: University of Colorado.2004,17,(1).
    2 Whitelaw C.,Garg N., and Argamon,S. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of CIKM-05,14th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, Bremen, DE,2005,625-631.
    3 Nigam K., McCallum A., and Thrun S. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning,2000,39(2/3),103-134.
    4 Lafferty J., McCallum A., and Pereira F. Conditional random fields:Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling or sequence data. In ICML'O1,2001.
    1 Turney P. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),2002,417-424.
    2 Aue A. and Gamon M. Customizing sentiment classifiers to new domains:A case study. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP),2005.
    3 Blitzer J.,Dredze M. and Pereira F. Biographies, Bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders:Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),2007.
    4 Yang H., Si L. and Callan J. Knowledge transfer and opinion detection in the TREC2006 blog 36 track. Proceedings of TREC,2006.
    5 Tan S., Wu G., Tang H., and Cheng X. A novel scheme for domain-transfer problem in the context of sentiment analysis. Proceedings of CIKM'07, Lisboa, Portugal,2007.
    6 Read J. Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification. In ACL student research workshop. Ann Arbor, MI:Association for Computational Linguistics,2005,43-48.
    1 Agarwal A. and Bhattacharyya P. Sentiment analysis:A new approach for effective use of linguistic knowledge and exploiting similarities in a set of documents to be classified. Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON),2005.
    2 Agrawal R., Rajagopalan S., Srikant Rand XuY. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. Proceedings of WWW,2003,529-535.
    3 Bansal M., Cardie C. and Lee L. The power of negative thinking:Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING),2008.
    1 Liu B. Web Data Mining:Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data. Springer,2006.
    2 Liu B.,Hu M.and Cheng J.Opinion observer:Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. Proceedings of WWW,2005.1 来自京东商城“夏普(SHARP) SH6010c GSM手机(蓝色)”的评论
    1 来自卓越网“微软舒适光学鲨1000”的评论
    2 Yi J., Nasukawa T., Bunescu R. and Niblack W. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM),2003.
    1 Hu M.and Liu B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD),2004,168-177.
    2 Hu M.and Liu B. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. Proceedings of AAAI,2004,755-760.
    3 Popescu,A.M. and Etzioni.O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews.Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005.
    4 Popescu A.M. and Etzioni O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005.
    5 Qiu G., Liu B., Bu J. and Chen C. Expanding Domain Sentiment Lexicon through Double Propagation, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-09),2009.
    1 Su Q., Xu X., Guo H., Wu X., Zhang X., Swen B. and Su Z. Hidden Sentiment Association in Chinese Web Opinion Mining. Proceedings of WWW'08,2008,959-968.
    2 Liu B., Hu M.and Cheng J. Opinion observer:Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web, Proceedings of WWW,2005.
    3 Lafferty J., McCallum A. and Pereira F. Conditional random fields:Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data, Proceedings of ICML,2001,282-289.
    4 Hu M. and Liu B. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. Proceedings of AAAI,2004,755-760.
    5 Yi J., Nasukawa T., Bunescu R. and Niblack W. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM),2003.
    6 Popescu A.M. and Etzioni O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005.
    7 Yi J., Nasukawa T., Bunescu R. and Niblack W. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM),2003.
    8 Popescu A.M. and Etzioni O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005.
    1 Fellbaum C., ed. Wordnet:An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press,1998.
    2 董振东,董强,知网简介.http://www.keenage.com/.1999.
    3 梅家驹.同义词词林.1983,上海辞书出版社.
    4 Carenini G.,Ng R.T. and Zwart E. Extracting knowledge from evaluative text. Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP),2005,11-18.
    5 Choi Y., Cardie C., Riloff E. and Patwardhan,S. Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005.
    1 Breck E., Choi Y. and Cardie C. Identifying expressions of opinion in context. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Hyderabad, India,2007.
    2 Choi Y., Breck E. and Cardie C. Joint extraction of entities and relations for opinion recognition. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),2006.
    1 Bethard S., Yu H., Thornton A., Hatzivassiloglou,V.and Jurafsky.D. Automatic extraction of opinion propositions and their holders. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text,2004.
    2 Kim SM. and Hovy E.Identifying and analyzing judgment opinions. Proceedings of the Joint Human Language Technology/North American Chapter of the ACL Conference (HLT-NAACL),2006.
    1 Ku LW., Liang YT.and Chen HH. Opinion Extraction. Summarization and Tracking in News and Blog Corpora, Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Research issues in digital libraries.2006
    2 http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/-inquirer/
    3 http://134.208.10.186/WBB/EMOTION_KEYWORD/Atx_emtwordP.htm
    4 http://bow.sinica.edu.tw/
    1 Kim SM. and Hovy E. Determining the sentiment of opinions. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics,Geneva, Switzerland.2004.
    2 Kamps J., Marx M., Mokken R. J. and de Rijke M. Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of LREC-04,4th international conference on language resources and evaluation, Lisbon, PT,2004, Vol(Ⅳ), 1115-1118.
    1 姚天昉,娄德成.汉语情感词语义倾向判别的研究.第七届中文信息处理国际会议,2007,222-225.
    2 http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/-inquirer/
    3 姚天昉,娄德成.汉语情感词语义倾向判别的研究.第七届中文信息处理国际会议,2007,222-225.
    4 Andreevskaia A. and Bergler S. Mining WordNet for a fuzzy sentiment:Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. Proceedings EACL-06, Trento, Italy,2006.
    1 姚天昉,娄德成.汉语情感词语义倾向判别的研究.第七届中文信息处理国际会议,2007,222-225.
    2 Wilson T., Wiebe J.and Hwa R. Just How Mad Are You? Finding Strong and Weak Opinion Clauses. Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence. San Jose, California,2004,761-767.
    3 Wilson T. and Wiebe J. Annotating opinions in the world press. Proceedings of the 4th ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGdial-03),2003,13-22.
    1 Ghose A.and Ipeirotis PG Designing novel review ranking systems:predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce,Minneapolis, MN, USA,2007,303-310.
    2 Ghose A., Ipeirotis PG. and Sundararajan, A. Opinion Mining using Econometrics:A Case Study on Reputation Systems. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational LinguisticsPrague, Czech Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics,June,2007,416-423.
    3 Beineke P., Hastie T., Manning,C. and Vaithyanathan,S. Exploring sentiment summarization. In Qu et al.. AAAI technical report SS-04-07.
    1 http://www.rottentomatoes.com
    2 Mao Yi. and Lebanon G Sequential models for sentiment prediction. ICML Workshop on Learning in Structured Output Spaces,2006.
    3 Pang B. and Lee L. A sentimental education:Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),2004,271-278.
    4 Cardie C., Wiebe J., Wilson.T. and Litma,D. Combining low-level and summary representations of opinions for multi-perspective question answering. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on New Directions in Question Answering,2003,20-27.
    5 Dini L. and Mazzini G Opinion classification through information extraction. Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining Methods and Databases for Engineering, Finance and Other Fields (Data Mining),2002,299-310.
    6 Cardie C., Wiebe J., Wilson T. and Litman.D. Combining low-level and summary representations of opinions for multi-perspective question answering. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on New Directions in Question Answering,2003,20-27.
    7 Chevalier JA. and Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales:Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, August,2006,43(3):345-354.
    8 Houser D. and Wooders, J. Reputation in auctions:Theory, and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,2006,15:252-369.
    9 Dewally M. Internet investment advice:Investing with a rock of salt. Financial Analysts Journal, July/August, 2003,59(4):65-77.
    10 Gamon M., Aue,A.,Corston-Oliver,S. and Ringger,E. Pulse:Mining customer opinions from free text. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (IDA), number 3646 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science,2005, 121-132.
    11 Carenini G., Ng,RT. and Pauls,A. Interactive multimedia summaries of evaluative text. Proceedings of Intelligent User
    Interfaces (IUI), ACM Press,2006,124-131.
    1 Yi J. and Niblack W. Sentiment mining in WebFountain. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE),2005.
    2 Liu B., Hu M. and Cheng J. Opinion observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. Proceedings of WWW, 2005.
    3 Gregory M L.Chinchor N., Whitney P., Carter R., Hetzler E.and Turner A. User-directed sentiment analysis:Visualizing the affective content of documents. Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, Association for
    Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia, July,2006,23-30.
    4 Andreevskaia A.and Bergler S. Mining WordNet for fuzzy sentiment:Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. Proceedings of EACL.2006.
    5 Stone P.J., Dumphy D.C., Smith M.S. and Ogilvie D.M.The General Inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis. M.I.T. studies in comparative politics. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge,MA,1966.
    6 Hatzivassiloglou V. and McKeown KB. Predicting the Semantic Orientation of Adjectives. In 35th ACL,1997,174-181.
    7 Wilson T.and Wiebe,J. Annotating opinions in the world press. Proceedings of the 4th ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGdial-03),2003,13-22.
    8 张桂宾.相对程度副词与绝对程度副词.华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,(2):92-96.
    1 蔺璜,郭妹慧.程度副词的特点范围与分类.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(2):71-74.
    2 马真.程度副词在表示程度比较的句式中的分布情况考察.1988,(2):81-86.
    3 陈颖.简论程度副词的程度等级.牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(1):59-62.
    4 Subasic Rand Huettner A. Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2001.
    5 Andreevskaia A. and Bergler S. Mining WordNet for a fuzzy sentiment:Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. Proceedings EACL-06, Trento, Italy,2006.
    1 Wilson T. and Wiebe J. Annotating opinions in the world press. Proceedings of the 4th ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGdial-03),2003,13-22.
    1 3C是计算机Computer、通讯Communication和消费电子产品Consumer Electronic三类电子产品的简称
    2 http://www.analysys.com.cn/web2007/hysj_index.php/id_6369.html
    1 http://ir.dcs.gla.ac.uk/test collections/access to data.html
    2 Ounis I., de Rijke M., Macdonald C., Mishne G. and Soboroff I. Overview of the TREC-2006 Blog Track. Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2006),2006.
    3 http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/llee/data/convote.html
    4 http://govtrack.us
    5 http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/pabo/movie-review-data/
    1 Pang B., Lee L. and Vaithyanathan S. Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),2002,79-86.
    2 http://www.cs.uic.edu/liub/FBS/CustomerReviewData.zip
    3 http://www.amazon.com/
    4 http://www.cnet.com/
    5 http://economining.stem.nyu.edu/datasets.html
    6 Ghose A., Ipeirotis PG. and Sundararajan A. Opinion Mining using Econometrics:A Case Study on Reputation Systems. Proceedings of the 45 th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational LinguisticsPrague,2007,416-423.
    7 http://www.psor.ucl.ac.be/personal/yb/Resource.html
    8 http://www.cs.pitt.edu/mpqa/databaserelease/
    1 Wilson T., Wiebe J.and Hoffmann P. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005,347-354.
    2 http://people.csail.mit.edu/bsnyder/naacl07
    3 http://www.we8there.com
    4 Snyder B. and Barzilay R. Multiple aspect ranking using the Good Grief algorithm.Proceedings Language Technology/North American Chapter of the ACL Conference (HLT-NAACL),2007,300-307. 5 http://www.amazon.com
    6 Blitzer J., Dredze M. and Pereira F. Biographies, Bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders:Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),2007.
    7 Seki Y, Evans DK., Ku LW, Sun L., Chen HH. and Kando N. Overview of Multilingual Opinion Analysis Task at NTCIR-7. Proceedings of the Seventh NTCIR Workshop Meeting, Tokyo Japan, Dec,2008,16-19.
    1 http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/llee/data/search-subj.html
    2 Li Y., Zheng Z. and Dai HK. KDD CUP-2005 report:Facing a great challenge.SIGKDD Explorations,2005,7(2):91-99.
    3 Pang B. and Lee L. Using very simple statistics for review search:An exploration. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Poster paper,2008.
    4 http://www.omining.com
    5 http://news.sina.com.cn/society/moodrank/index.shtml
    1 夏明波,王晓川,孙永强,金士尧.序列模式挖掘算法研究.计算机技术与发展,2006,16(4):4-10.
    2 李国良.数据挖掘中的关联规则和序列模式.电子科技大学,2004.
    1 Abney S. Bootstrapping. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2002,2002:360-367.
    2 Clark S., Curran J.R.and Osborne M. Bootstrapping POS taggers using unlabelled data. Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003,2003,4:49-55.
    1 Blum A.and Mitchell T. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. COLT:Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory,1998:92-100.
    1 Park SB. and Zhang BT.Text Categorization Using Co-Trained Support Vector Machines with Both Lexical and Syntactic Information. NIPS 2001 Workshop on Machine Learning Methods for Text and Images,2001.
    2 Pierce D.and Cardie C. Limitations of Co-Training for Natural Language Learning from Large Datasets, Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2001),2001.
    3 Collins M. and Singer Y. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora,1999.
    4 Muller C., Rapp S.and Strube M. Applying Co-Training to Reference Resolution, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics,2002:352-359.
    1 Allen J. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company,1995.
    1 宗成庆.统计自然语言处理.清华大学出版社.2008.
    2 宗成庆.统计自然语言处理.清华大学出版社,2008,182.
    3 宗成庆.统计自然语言处理.清华大学出版社,2008,184.
    1 Eisner J.Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing:An exploration. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96), Copenhagen, August,1996,340-345.
    2 Eisner J.An empirical comparison of probability models for dependency grammar. Computation and Language. Technical report IRCS-96-11, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, U. of Pennsylvania
    3 McDonald R., Crammer K.and Pereira F. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Ann Arbor, Michigan,2005,91-98.
    4 McDonald R., Pereira F., Ribarov K.and Hajic J. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,2005,523-530.
    5 Yamada H.and Matsumoto Y. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. Proceedings of IWPT,2003.
    6 Nivre J., Hall,J.and Nilsson J. Memory-based dependency parsing. Proceedings of CoNLL,2004.
    7 J Nivre. Incrementality in deterministic dependency parsing. Proceedings of the Workshop on Incremental Parsing: Bringing Engineering and Cognition Together. Barcelona, Spain,2004,50-57.
    8 The Stanford Parser:A statistical parser. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml
    1 刘建华,张智雄.基于Stanford Par ser的实体间关系识别.现代图书情报技术,2009,5:1-5.
    2 Levy R.and Manning C.Is it harder to parse Chinese, or the Chinese Treebank? Proceedings of the 41 st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Sapporo, Japan,2004,439-446.
    1 Hajic J., Ciaramita M., Johansson R., Kawahara D., Antonia Marti M.,Marquez L.,Meyers A.,Nivre J., Pado S., Stepanek J., Stranak P., Surdeanu., Xue N., Zhang Y. The CoNLL-2009 Shared Task:Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies in Multiple Languages. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2009): Shared Task. Boulder, Colorado,2009,1-18.
    1 南非田径选手塞门亚的性别成谜.http://sport.ldhot.com/s4/s29/200908/239928.html
    2 塞门亚世锦赛金牌仍可保留不公开其性别鉴定结果.http://sports.titan24.com/athletics/2009-11-20/53765.html
    3 苗东升.模糊学导引.中国人民大学出版社,1987,21.
    4 恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(卷三):自然辩证法.北京:人民出版,1972,535.
    1 苗东升.模糊学导引.中国人民大学出版社,1987,27.
    2 世界杯分档确定 巴阿英意西种子法葡第4档.http://sports.qq.com/a/20091202/000598.htm.
    3 世界杯分档法媒体称是赤裸裸阴谋法国队遭报复.http://sports.sohu.com/20091203/n268644438.shtml
    4 死亡阴谋.http://sports.163.com/special/000525 AC/2010chouqian06.html
    5 世界杯32强分档恐被操控 法国不当种子皆大欢喜.http://sports.sohu.com/20091204/n268666191.shtml
    1 苗东升.模糊学导引.中国人民大学出版社,1987,28.
    1 Zadeh LA. Fuzzy set. Information and control.1965.338-353.
    2 多义词.http://baike.baidu.com/view/645697.htm
    3 深.http://hanyu.iciba.com/hanzi/5492.shtml
    4 中医.http://hanyu.iciba.com/cizu/16721.shtml
    5 目标词是指需要进行词义排歧的词。
    1 可能性.http://www.hudong.com/wiki/%E5%8F%AF%E8%83%BD%E6%80%A7
    1 Andreevskaia A.and Bergler S. Mining WordNet for fuzzy sentiment:Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. Proceedings of EACL 2006.
    2 Stone P.J., Dumphy D.C., Smith M.S. and Ogilvie D.M. The General Inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis. M.I.T. studies in comparative politics. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA,1966.
    3 Hatzivassiloglou V. and McKeown KB. Predicting the Semantic Orientation of Adjectives.35th ACL,1997,174-181.
    4 Wilson T. and Wiebe J. Annotating opinions in the world press. Proceedings of the 4th ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGdial-03),2003,13-22.
    5 吕叔湘.汉语语法分析问题.商务印书馆,北京,1979.
    1 张谊生.现代汉语副词研究.学林出版社,上海,2000.
    2 韩容洙.现代汉语的程度副词.汉语学习,2000,2:12-15.
    3 蔺璜,郭姝慧.程度副词的特点范围与分类.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,2:71-74.
    4 丁声树等.现代汉语语法讲话.商务印书馆,1979,180-181.
    5 朱德熙.语法讲义.商务印书馆.2002,196-197.
    6 刘月华等.实用现代汉语语法.外语教学与研究出版社,1983,135.
    7 张谊生.现代汉语副词研究.学林出版社,上海,2000.
    8 李泉.从分布上看副词的再分类.北京语言大学出版社,2004,172-173.
    1 王力.中国现代汉语语法.北京:商务印书馆,1985.
    2 张桂宾.相对程度副词与绝对程度副词.华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,(2):92-96.
    3 蔺璜,郭姝慧.程度副词的特点范围与分类.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(2):71-74.
    4 马真.程度副词在表示程度比较的句式中的分布情况考察.1988,(2):81-86.
    5 陈颖.简论程度副词的程度等级.牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(1):59-62.
    1 Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets*. Information and control.1965,8:338-353.
    2 杨纶标,高英仪.模糊数学原理及应用.华南理工大学出版社.
    1 Shafer G. The construction of probability Arguments, Working Paper No.183,1986.
    2 Shafer G. Probability Judgment in Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Working Paper No.165, School of Business, The University of Kansas, Lawrence,1974.
    1 Shafer G.. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton,1976.
    1 Shafer G.. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton,1976.
    1 Dempster A.P. A Generalization of Bayesian Inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1968, Series B 30,205-247.
    1 高珍伟.基于证据理论的安徽省汽车企业技术创新能力评价.合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    2 刁联旺,李勇智,杨静宇.D—S证据推理的决策问题.计算机工程与应用,2003,(33):82-9.
    1 杜栋,庞庆华.现代综合评价方法与案例精选.清华大学出版社.2005.
    [1]. Abney S. Bootstrapping. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2002,2002:360-367.
    [2]. Agarwal A. and Bhattacharyya P. Sentiment analysis:A new approach for effective use of linguistic knowledge and exploiting similarities in a set of documents to be classified. Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON),2005.
    [3]. Agrawal R., Rajagopalan S., Srikant R.and XuY. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. Proceedings of WWW,2003,529-535.
    [4]. Allen J. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company,1995.
    [5]. Andreevskaia A.and Bergler S. Mining WordNet for fuzzy sentiment:Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses. Proceedings of EACL,2006.
    [6]. Aue A. and Gamon M. Customizing sentiment classifiers to new domains:A case study. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP),2005.
    [7]. Bansal M., Cardie C. and Lee L. The power of negative thinking:Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING),2008.
    [8]. Beineke P., Hastie T., Manning,C. and Vaithyanathan,S. Exploring sentiment summarization. In Qu et al.. AAAI technical report SS-04-07.
    [9]. Bethard S., Yu H., Thornton A., Hatzivassiloglou V., and Jurafsky D. Automatic extraction of opinion propositions and their holders.Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text,2004.
    [10]. Blitzer J., Dredze M. and Pereira F. Biographies, Bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders:Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),2007.
    [11]. Blum A.and Mitchell T. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. COLT: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory,1998:92-100.
    [12]. Breck E., Choi Y. and Cardie C. Identifying expressions of opinion in context. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Hyderabad, India,2007.
    [13]. Cardie C., Wiebe J., Wilson T. and Litman,D. Combining low-level and summary representations of opinions for multi-perspective question answering. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on New Directions in Question Answering,2003,20-27.
    [14]. Carenini G., Ng, RT. and Pauls,A.Interactive multimedia summaries of evaluative text. Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), ACM Press,2006,124-131.
    [15]. Carenini G., Ng R.T. and Zwart E. Extracting knowledge from evaluative text. Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP),2005,11-18.
    [16]. Chevalier JA. and Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales:Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, August,2006,43(3):345-354.
    [17]. Choi Y., Breck E. and Cardie C. Joint extraction of entities and relations for opinion recognition. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2006.
    [18]. Choi Y., Cardie C., Riloff E. and Patwardhan S. Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005,355-362.
    [19]. Clark S., Curran J.R.and Osborne M. Bootstrapping POS taggers using unlabelled data. Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003,2003, 4:49-55.
    [20]. Collins M. and Singer Y Unsupervised models for named entity classification. Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora,1999.
    [21]. Das S. and Chen M.Yahoo! for Amazon:Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference (APFA),2001.
    [22]. Dave K., Lawrence S.and Pennock DM. Mining the peanut gallery:Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. Proceedings of WWW,2003,519-528.
    [23]. Dempster A.P. A Generalization of Bayesian Inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1968, Series B 30,205-247.
    [24]. Dewally M. Internet investment advice:Investing with a rock of salt. Financial Analysts Journal, July/August,2003,59(4):65-77.
    [25]. Ding X., Liu B. and Yu P.S. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. Proceedings of the Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining (WSDM),2008,231-240.
    [26]. Dini L. and Mazzini G Opinion classification through information extraction. Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining Methods and Databases for Engineering, Finance and Other Fields (Data Mining),2002,299-310.
    [27]. Eisner J.An empirical comparison of probability models for dependency grammar. Computation and Language. Technical report IRCS-96-11, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, U. of Pennsylvania
    [28]. Eisner J.Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing:An exploration. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96), Copenhagen, August,1996,340-345.
    [29]. Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. Determining term subjectivity and term orientation for opinion mining. Proceedings of EACL-06,11th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, Trento,2006.
    [30]. Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification. Proceedings of CIKM-05, the ACM SIGIR conference on information and knowledge management, Bremen, DE,2005.
    [31]. Esuli A. and Sebastiani F. SentiWordNet:A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. Proceedings of LREC 2006,5th conference on language resources and evaluation, Genova,2006.
    [32]. Fellbaum C., ed. Wordnet:An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press,1998.
    [33]. Gamon M. and Aue A. Automatic identification of sentiment vocabulary exploiting low association with known sentiment terms. Proceedings of the ACL workshop on feature engineering for machine learning in NLP, Ann Arbor,2005,57-64.
    [34]. Gamon M., Aue,A.,Corston-Oliver,S. and Ringger,E. Pulse:Mining customer opinions from free text. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (IDA), number 3646 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science,2005,121-132.
    [35]. Ghose A.and Ipeirotis PG Designing novel review ranking systems:predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce, Minneapolis, MN, USA,2007,303-310.
    [36]. Ghose A., Ipeirotis PG and Sundararajan A. Opinion Mining using Econometrics:A Case Study on Reputation Systems. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational LinguisticsPrague,2007,416-423.
    [37]. Gregory M L., Chinchor N., Whitney P., and Carter R., Hetzler E.and Turner A. User-directed sentiment analysis:Visualizing the affective content of documents. Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia, July,2006,23-30.
    [38]. Hajic J., Ciaramita M., Johansson R., Kawahara D., Antonia Marti M.,Marquez L.,Meyers
    A.,Nivre J., Pado S., Stepanek J., Stranak P., Surdeanu., Xue N., Zhang Y. The CoNLL-2009 Shared Task:Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies in Multiple Languages. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2009):Shared Task. Boulder, Colorado,2009,1-18.
    [39]. Hatzivassiloglou V. and McKeown K. R. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of ACL,1997,174-181.
    [40]. Hearst MA. Direction-based text interpretation as an information access refinement. In Paul Jacobs, editor, Text-Based Intelligent Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1992,257-274.
    [41]. Houser D. and Wooders, J. Reputation in auctions:Theory, and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,2006,15:252-369.
    [42]. Hu M. and Liu B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the ACM, SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD),2004,168-177.
    [43]. Hu M. and Liu B. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. Proceedings of AAAI,2004, 755-760.
    [44]. Huettner A.and Subas(?) typing for document management. In ACL 2000 Companion Volume:Tutorial Abs(?)d Demonstration Notes,2000,26-27.
    [45]. J Nivre. Incrementality in deterministic dependency parsing. Proceedings of the Workshop on Incremental Parsing:Bringing Engineering and Cognition Together. Barcelona, Spain,2004, 50-57.
    [46]. Kamps J., Marx M., Mokken R. J. and de Rijke M. Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. Proceedings of LREC-04,4th international conference on language resources and evaluation, Lisbon, PT,2004, Vol (Ⅳ),1115-1118.
    [47]. Kim S.M. and Hovy E. Determining the sentiment of opinions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING),2004,1367-1373.
    [48]. Kim SM. and Hovy E.Identifying and analyzing judgment opinions. Proceedings of the Joint Human Language Technology/North American Chapter of the ACL Conference (HLT-NAACL), 2006.
    [49]. Kim SM.and Hovy E. Determining the sentiment of opinions. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics, Geneva, Switzerland.2004.
    [50]. Ku LW. Liang YT.and Chen HH. Opinion Extraction. Summarization and Tracking in News and Blog Corpora, Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Research issues in digital libraries.2006
    [51]. Lafferty J., McCallum A., and Pereira F. Conditional random fields:Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling or sequence data. In ICML'01,2001.
    [52]. Levy R.and Manning C.Is it harder to parse Chinese, or the Chinese Treebank? Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Sapporo, Japan,2004, 439-446.
    [53]. Li Y., Zheng Z. and Dai HK. KDD CUP-2005 report:Facing a great challenge.SIGKDD Explorations,2005,7(2):91-99.
    [54]. Lin D. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. Proceedings of COLING-ACL,1998, 768-774.
    [55]. Liu B. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1-2), pp.1-135,2008.
    [56]. Liu B. Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing,2010.
    [57]. Liu B. Web Data Mining:Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data. Springer,2006.
    [58]. Liu B., Hu M.and Cheng J. Opinion observer:Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. Proceedings of WWW,2005.
    [59]. Mao Yi. and Lebanon G. Sequential models for sentiment prediction. ICML Workshop on Learning in Structured Output Spaces,2006.
    [60]. McDonald R., Crammer K.and Pereira F. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Ann Arbor, Michigan,2005,91-98.
    [61]. McDonald R., Pereira F., Ribarov K.and Hajic J. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2005,523-530.
    [62]. Muller C., Rapp S.and Strube M. Applying Co-Training to Reference Resolution, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics,2002:352-359.
    [63]. Nigam K., McCallum A., and Thrun S. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning,2000,39(2/3),103-134.
    [64]. Nivre J., Hall, J.and Nilsson J. Memory-based dependency parsing. Proceedings of CoNLL, 2004.
    [65]. Ounis I., de Rijke M., Macdonald C., Mishne G. and Soboroff I. Overview of the TREC-2006 Blog Track. Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2006),2006.
    [66]. Pang B. and Lee L. A sentimental education:Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2004,271-278.
    [67]. Pang B. and Lee L. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval,2008,2(1-2):1-135.
    [68]. Pang B., Lee L. and Vaithyanathan S. Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),2002,79-86.
    [69]. Pang B.and Lee L. Using very simple statistics for review search:An exploration. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Poster paper,2008.
    [70]. Park SB. and Zhang BT. Text Categorization Using Co-Trained Support Vector Machines with Both Lexical and Syntactic Information. NIPS 2001 Workshop on Machine Learning Methods for Text and Images,2001.
    [71]. Pierce D.and Cardie C. Limitations of Co-Training for Natural Language Learning from Large Datasets, Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2001),2001.
    [72]. Popescu A.M. and Etzioni O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005,339-346.
    [73]. Qiu G, Liu B., Bu J. and Chen C. Expanding Domain Sentiment Lexicon through Double Propagation, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-09),2009.
    [74]. Read J. Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification. In ACL student research workshop. Ann Arbor, MI:Association for Computational Linguistics,2005,43-48.
    [75]. Riloff E., Wiebe Land Wilson T. Learning subjective nouns using extraction pattern bootstrapping. Conference on natural language learning (CoNLL), Edmonton,2003,25-32.
    [76]. Salvetti F., Lewis S., and Reichenbach, C. Automatic opinion polarity classification of movie reviews. Colorado research in linguistics, Boulder:University of Colorado.2004,17,(1).
    [77]. Sarawagi S.Information extraction. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval,2008,1(3): 261-377.
    [78]. Sebastiani F. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR),2002,34(1),1-47.
    [79]. Seki Y., Evans DK., Ku LW, Sun L., Chen HH. and Kando N. Overview of Multilingual Opinion Analysis Task at NTCIR-7. Proceedings of the Seventh NTCIR Workshop Meeting, Tokyo Japan, Dec,2008,16-19.
    [80]. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton,1976.
    [81]. Shafer G. Probability Judgment in Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Working Paper No.165, School of Business, The University of Kansas, Lawrence,1974.
    [82]. Shafer G The construction of probability Arguments, Working Paper No.183,1986.
    [83]. Snyder B. and Barzilay R. Multiple aspect ranking using the Good Grief algorithm.Proceedings of the Joint Human Language Technology/North American Chapter of the ACL Conference (HLT-NAACL),2007,300-307.
    [84]. Stone P.J., Dumphy D.C., Smith M.S. and Ogilvie D.M.The General Inquirer:a computer approach to content analysis. M.I.T. studies in comparative politics. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA,1966.
    [85]. Stoyanov V. and Cardie C. Partially supervised coreference resolution for opinion summarization through structured rule learning. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP),2006,336-344.
    [86]. Su Q., Xu X., Guo H., Wu X., Zhang X., Swen B. and Su Z. Hidden Sentiment Association in Chinese Web Opinion Mining. Proceedings of WWW'08,2008,959-968.
    [87]. Subasic P.and Huettner A. Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2001.
    [88]. Tan S., Wu G, Tang H., and Cheng X. A novel scheme for domain-transfer problem in the context of sentiment analysis. Proceedings of CIKM'07, Lisboa, Portugal,2007.
    [89]. The Stanford Parser:A statistical parser. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml
    [90]. Turney P. D. and Littman M. L. Measuring praise and criticism:Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems,2003,21(4),315-346.
    [91]. Turney P. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2002,417-424.
    [92]. Turney P.D. and Littman M. L. Unsupervised learning of semantic orientation from a hundred-billion-word corpus. Technical Report ERB-1094, National Research Council Canada, Institute for Information Technology,2002.
    [93]. Whitelaw C., Garg N., and Argamon, S. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of CIKM-05,14th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, Bremen, DE,2005,625-631.
    [94]. Wiebe J. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In AAAI/IAAI,2000,735-740.
    [95]. Wiebe J., Wilson T. and Cardie C. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation,2005,1(2).
    [96]. Wiebe J.and Bruce R. Probabilistic classifiers for tracking point of view. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation, 1995,181-187.
    [97]. Wiebe JM.and Rapaport WJ.A computational theory of perspective and reference in narrative. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL),1988,131-138.
    [98]. Wiebe JM.Identifying subjective characters in narrative. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING),1990,401-408.
    [99]. Wiebe JM.Tracking point of view in narrative. Computational Linguistics,1994,20(2):233-287.
    [100]. Wilson T. and Wiebe J. Annotating opinions in the world press. Proceedings of the 4th ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGdial-03),2003,13-22.
    [101]. Wilson T., Wiebe J.and Hoffmann P. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP),2005,347-354.
    [102]. Wilson T., Wiebe J.and Hwa R. Just How Mad Are You? Finding Strong and Weak Opinion Clauses. Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence. San Jose, California,2004,761-767.
    [103]. Wilson T. and Wiebe J. Annotating opinions in the world press. Proceedings of the 4th ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGdial-03),2003,13-22.
    [104]. Yamada H.and Matsumoto Y. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. Proceedings of IWPT,2003.
    [105]. Yang H., Si L. and Callan J. Knowledge transfer and opinion detection in the TREC2006 blog 36 track. Proceedings of TREC,2006.
    [106]. Yi J. and Niblack W. Sentiment mining in WebFountain. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE),2005.
    [107]. Yi J., Nasukawa T., Bunescu R. and Niblack W. Sentiment analyzer:Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM),2003.
    [108]. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy set. Information and control.1965.338-353.
    [109]. 陈颖.简论程度副词的程度等级.牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(1):59-62.
    [110]. 刁联旺,李勇智,杨静宇.D-S证据推理的决策问题.计算机工程与应用,2003,(33):82-9.
    [111]. 丁声树等.现代汉语语法讲话.商务印书馆,1979,pp.180-181.
    [112]. 董振东,董强.知网简介.http://www.keenage.com/.1999.
    [113]. 杜栋,庞庆华.现代综合评价方法与案例精选.清华大学出版社.2005.
    [114]. 段新生.证据理论与决策、人工智能.中国人民大学出版社,1993,pp.3-4.
    [115]. 多义词http://baike.baidu.com/view/645697.htm
    [116]. 恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(卷三):自然辩证法.北京:人民出版,1972,pp.535.
    [117]. 高珍伟.基于证据理论的安徽省汽车企业技术创新能力评价.合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [118]. 韩容洙.现代汉语的程度副词.汉语学习,2000,2:12-15.
    [119]. 胡建华.否定、焦点与辖域.中国语文,2007,2:99-112.
    [120]. 可能性.http://www.hudong.com/wiki/%E5%8F%AF%E8%83%BD%E6%80%A7
    [121]. 寇广增.可配置的WEB数据抽取框架(Helooo).武汉大学,2005.
    [122]. 李国良.数据挖掘中的关联规则和序列模式.电子科技大学,2004.
    [123]. 李泉.从分布上看副词的再分类.北京语言大学出版社,2004,pp.172.173.
    [124]. 李宇明.形容词否定式及其级次问题.云梦学刊,1997(1):77-81.
    [125]. 蔺璜,郭姝慧.程度副词的特点范围与分类.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(2):71-74.
    [126]. 刘非凡,赵军,吕碧波,徐波,于浩,夏迎炬.面向商务信息抽取的产品命名实体识别研究.中文信息学报,2006,20(1):7-13.
    [127]. 刘建华,张智雄.基于Stanford Par ser的实体间关系识别.现代图书情报技术,2009,5:1-5.
    [128]. 刘月华等.实用现代汉语语法.外语教学与研究出版社,1983,pp.135.
    [129]. 吕叔湘.汉语语法分析问题.商务印书馆,北京,1979.
    [130]. 马真.程度副词在表示程度比较的句式中的分布情况考察.1988,(2):81-86.
    [131]. 毛泽东.矛盾论.北京:人民出版社,1991.
    [132]. 梅家驹.同义词词林.1983,上海辞书出版社.
    [133]. 苗东升.模糊学导引.中国人民大学出版社,1987.
    [134]. 南非田径选手塞门亚的性别成谜.http://sport.ldhot.com/s4/s29/200908/239928.html.
    [135]. 塞门亚世锦赛金牌仍可保留不公开其性别鉴定结果.http://sports.titan24.com/athletics/2009-11-20/53765.html.
    [136]. 深.http://hanyu.iciba.com/hanzi/5492.shtml
    [137]. 世界杯32强分档恐被操控法国不当种子皆大欢喜.http://sports.sohu.com/20091204/n268666191.shtml.
    [138]. 世界杯分档法媒体称是赤裸裸阴谋法国队遭报复.http://sports.sohu.com/20091203/n268644438.shtml
    [139]. 世界杯分档确定巴阿英意西种子法葡第4档.http://sports.qq.com/a/20091202/000598.htm.
    [140]. 死亡阴谋.http://sports.163.com/special/000525AC/2010chouqian06.html.
    [141].2008年中国三四级家电市场白皮书.http://info.homea.hc360.com/2009/01/141151422029.shtml.
    [142]. 王厚峰.指代消解的基本方法和实现技术.中文信息学报,2002,16(6):9-17.
    [143]. 王力.中国现代汉语语法.北京:商务印书馆,1985.
    [144]. 吴振国.汉语模糊语义研究.华中师范大学出版社,2003,pp.1.
    [145]. 夏明波,王晓川,孙永强,金士尧.序列模式挖掘算法研究.计算机技术与发展,2006,16(4):4-10.
    [146]. 徐琳.网络口碑和知识困境.现代经济探讨,2007(6):76-78.
    [147]. 杨纶标,高英仪.模糊数学原理及应用.华南理工大学出版社.
    [148]. 姚天,程希文,徐飞玉,汉思·乌思克尔特,王睿.文本意见挖掘综述.中文信息学报,2008,22(3):71-80.
    [149]. 姚天防,娄德成.汉语情感词语义倾向判别的研究.第七届中文信息处理国际会议,2007,222-225.
    [150]. 张桂宾.相对程度副词与绝对程度副词.华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,(2):92-96.
    [151]. 张强,李乃和.网络口碑研究现状及未来发展初探.江西农业学报,2008,20(4):147-149.
    [152]. 张晓艳,王挺,陈火旺.命名实体识别研究.计算机科学,2005,32(4):44-48.
    [153]. 张谊生.现代汉语副词研究.学林出版社,上海,2000.
    [154]. 中医.http://hanyu.iciba.com/cizu/16721.shtml.
    [155]. 朱德熙.语法讲义.商务印书馆.2002,pp.196-197.
    [156]. 宗成庆.统计自然语言处理.清华大学出版社.2008.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700